<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_11_0410258</id>
	<title>Russia Confirms Failed Missile Launch Caused Norway's Light Show</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260549000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Ch\_Omega writes <i>"According to this article over at BarentsObserver, the <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/09/12/09/1939214/Gigantic-Spiral-of-Light-Observed-Over-Norway-Rocket-To-Blame">giant spiral seen on the sky over Norway</a> Wednesday morning local time has been confirmed to be the <a href="http://www.barentsobserver.com/russia-confirms-failed-missile-launch.4663955-116320.html">result of a failed Russian missile launch</a>. Russia now confirms that '...the missile was launched from submerged position in the White Sea by the nuclear submarine <em>Dmitri Donskoy</em>. Studies of the telemetric data from the launch show that the two first stages of the missile functioned as they should, and that a technical malfunctioning occurred during the third stage.' There is also an <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1234773/The-answer-mystery-Norways-spiral-light-display-Was-failed-Russian-Bulava-missile-test.html">article on this at <em>The Daily Mail</em></a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ch \ _Omega writes " According to this article over at BarentsObserver , the giant spiral seen on the sky over Norway Wednesday morning local time has been confirmed to be the result of a failed Russian missile launch .
Russia now confirms that '...the missile was launched from submerged position in the White Sea by the nuclear submarine Dmitri Donskoy .
Studies of the telemetric data from the launch show that the two first stages of the missile functioned as they should , and that a technical malfunctioning occurred during the third stage .
' There is also an article on this at The Daily Mail .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ch\_Omega writes "According to this article over at BarentsObserver, the giant spiral seen on the sky over Norway Wednesday morning local time has been confirmed to be the result of a failed Russian missile launch.
Russia now confirms that '...the missile was launched from submerged position in the White Sea by the nuclear submarine Dmitri Donskoy.
Studies of the telemetric data from the launch show that the two first stages of the missile functioned as they should, and that a technical malfunctioning occurred during the third stage.
' There is also an article on this at The Daily Mail.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398570</id>
	<title>If they can repeat the behavior on a smaller scale</title>
	<author>Maxo-Texas</author>
	<datestamp>1260468900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is a really cool new kind of fireworks.  I've never seen one do this before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a really cool new kind of fireworks .
I 've never seen one do this before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a really cool new kind of fireworks.
I've never seen one do this before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399594</id>
	<title>Re:Conspiracy theory!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260528600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a successful fake failed missile launch designed to convince the world that the missile is not yet functional.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a successful fake failed missile launch designed to convince the world that the missile is not yet functional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a successful fake failed missile launch designed to convince the world that the missile is not yet functional.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401294</id>
	<title>More Valuable As Fireworks Display Than as Weapon</title>
	<author>littlewink</author>
	<datestamp>1260544860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Russians have produced the most stunning fireworks display I've seen in 20 years. If they can  reproduce it and commercialize it they may be able to compete with the Chinese. Forget about ICBMs: the money's in fireworks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Russians have produced the most stunning fireworks display I 've seen in 20 years .
If they can reproduce it and commercialize it they may be able to compete with the Chinese .
Forget about ICBMs : the money 's in fireworks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Russians have produced the most stunning fireworks display I've seen in 20 years.
If they can  reproduce it and commercialize it they may be able to compete with the Chinese.
Forget about ICBMs: the money's in fireworks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402002</id>
	<title>Failure my ass, it worked as intended</title>
	<author>cpu\_fusion</author>
	<datestamp>1260548220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given how it blanketed the sky, I'd expect it is some sort of anti-missile/anti-aircraft defense component.  Possibly related to stealth technology detection.  Keep in mind the Russians have been making a nice chunk of change from helping Iran build nuclear plants and defend them. This would be the ideal time for the Russians to point out to the West, through a highly visible demonstration like this, that there may be some surprises in store for an attack on Iran.</p><p>My 2 cents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given how it blanketed the sky , I 'd expect it is some sort of anti-missile/anti-aircraft defense component .
Possibly related to stealth technology detection .
Keep in mind the Russians have been making a nice chunk of change from helping Iran build nuclear plants and defend them .
This would be the ideal time for the Russians to point out to the West , through a highly visible demonstration like this , that there may be some surprises in store for an attack on Iran.My 2 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given how it blanketed the sky, I'd expect it is some sort of anti-missile/anti-aircraft defense component.
Possibly related to stealth technology detection.
Keep in mind the Russians have been making a nice chunk of change from helping Iran build nuclear plants and defend them.
This would be the ideal time for the Russians to point out to the West, through a highly visible demonstration like this, that there may be some surprises in store for an attack on Iran.My 2 cents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396</id>
	<title>Back in the day...</title>
	<author>GrahamCox</author>
	<datestamp>1260466500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum. How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum .
How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum.
How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30405638</id>
	<title>Re:Life, money and energy</title>
	<author>gurps\_npc</author>
	<datestamp>1260562980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably less lives, energy and money that these weapons saved us from.

Fear of Nuclear war prevented the US from going to war directly with Russia.  The USA-Russia cold war may in fact be the first time that the two most powerful national enemies NEVER fought a war.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably less lives , energy and money that these weapons saved us from .
Fear of Nuclear war prevented the US from going to war directly with Russia .
The USA-Russia cold war may in fact be the first time that the two most powerful national enemies NEVER fought a war .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably less lives, energy and money that these weapons saved us from.
Fear of Nuclear war prevented the US from going to war directly with Russia.
The USA-Russia cold war may in fact be the first time that the two most powerful national enemies NEVER fought a war.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398536</id>
	<title>bloody nonsense.</title>
	<author>Cr0vv</author>
	<datestamp>1260468480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>That was no danged failed launch of a missile.  Has anyone seen the images?  This reply by the Russians is a coverup.  This event was far, far bigger in scope and influence.  This event was viewed by people, there was no mention of a rocket or a missile, besides how could a device like a missile scribe a path in the sky like that, and then break off with a blue spiral?  Ugh.  These people must think we are so stupid.
This is a spiritual event, not a rocket event.
blackcrow.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That was no danged failed launch of a missile .
Has anyone seen the images ?
This reply by the Russians is a coverup .
This event was far , far bigger in scope and influence .
This event was viewed by people , there was no mention of a rocket or a missile , besides how could a device like a missile scribe a path in the sky like that , and then break off with a blue spiral ?
Ugh. These people must think we are so stupid .
This is a spiritual event , not a rocket event .
blackcrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was no danged failed launch of a missile.
Has anyone seen the images?
This reply by the Russians is a coverup.
This event was far, far bigger in scope and influence.
This event was viewed by people, there was no mention of a rocket or a missile, besides how could a device like a missile scribe a path in the sky like that, and then break off with a blue spiral?
Ugh.  These people must think we are so stupid.
This is a spiritual event, not a rocket event.
blackcrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398732</id>
	<title>Re:Placement</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1260471720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Russia's coastline isn't that open when you look at it.</p><p>1. North - Covered with ice during most of the year, including now, so testing here is not an option.<br>2. East - Would take forever to get there from the sub bases on the west coast (You'd either have to go north and stay under the ice for weeks, or go south down the Atlantic, around Africa, and through the Indian ocean), so also not an option.<br>3. West - This is the coast of the Baltic sea (And it shares coasts with Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and maybe Norway (I forget where the Baltic ends and the Atlantic beings)), from which you can get to the Atlantic, which puts you right at the south-western coast of Norway, and just a bit northeast of the UK.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Russia 's coastline is n't that open when you look at it.1 .
North - Covered with ice during most of the year , including now , so testing here is not an option.2 .
East - Would take forever to get there from the sub bases on the west coast ( You 'd either have to go north and stay under the ice for weeks , or go south down the Atlantic , around Africa , and through the Indian ocean ) , so also not an option.3 .
West - This is the coast of the Baltic sea ( And it shares coasts with Sweden , Denmark , Finland , and maybe Norway ( I forget where the Baltic ends and the Atlantic beings ) ) , from which you can get to the Atlantic , which puts you right at the south-western coast of Norway , and just a bit northeast of the UK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Russia's coastline isn't that open when you look at it.1.
North - Covered with ice during most of the year, including now, so testing here is not an option.2.
East - Would take forever to get there from the sub bases on the west coast (You'd either have to go north and stay under the ice for weeks, or go south down the Atlantic, around Africa, and through the Indian ocean), so also not an option.3.
West - This is the coast of the Baltic sea (And it shares coasts with Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and maybe Norway (I forget where the Baltic ends and the Atlantic beings)), from which you can get to the Atlantic, which puts you right at the south-western coast of Norway, and just a bit northeast of the UK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398512</id>
	<title>Conspiracy theory!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The failed missile launch is just a cover story. I mean, if we're going to believe extraterrestrials are behind it, why should we let silly things like facts spoil the fun?<br>
<br>
But at least it's a more entertaining story than "It was a weather balloon."</htmltext>
<tokenext>The failed missile launch is just a cover story .
I mean , if we 're going to believe extraterrestrials are behind it , why should we let silly things like facts spoil the fun ?
But at least it 's a more entertaining story than " It was a weather balloon .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The failed missile launch is just a cover story.
I mean, if we're going to believe extraterrestrials are behind it, why should we let silly things like facts spoil the fun?
But at least it's a more entertaining story than "It was a weather balloon.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402906</id>
	<title>Re:At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260552120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be the Ukrainian SSR...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be the Ukrainian SSR.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be the Ukrainian SSR...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398448</id>
	<title>Nuclear Armageddon or Computer Glich?</title>
	<author>Oxford\_Comma\_Lover</author>
	<datestamp>1260467100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So happy not to be living in the cold war.  Today, I like to think it's harder for fictional missiles to start WW3.  Fewer false positives.  Of course, here the missile was actually launched...</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav\_Petrov" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav\_Petrov</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So happy not to be living in the cold war .
Today , I like to think it 's harder for fictional missiles to start WW3 .
Fewer false positives .
Of course , here the missile was actually launched...http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav \ _Petrov [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So happy not to be living in the cold war.
Today, I like to think it's harder for fictional missiles to start WW3.
Fewer false positives.
Of course, here the missile was actually launched...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav\_Petrov [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399280</id>
	<title>Re:No Fool</title>
	<author>Stuart Gibson</author>
	<datestamp>1260523980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But this story is in the Daily Mail. Since I don't believe anything they say maybe Russia *hasn't* denied it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But this story is in the Daily Mail .
Since I do n't believe anything they say maybe Russia * has n't * denied it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But this story is in the Daily Mail.
Since I don't believe anything they say maybe Russia *hasn't* denied it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398470</id>
	<title>Martian invasion has begun; propoganda for masses</title>
	<author>fregare</author>
	<datestamp>1260467400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This stuff about Russian missiles is propaganda for the masses i.e people who drive SUVs and watch reality shows and are no taking their Prosac against their drs advice.
Pretty soon the Martians will have taken over enough human bodies so they will effectively control the world.
Besides starting wars and voting money for pork, our gobernment leaders don't really do that much.

"Power to the Martians!!!"
I welcome our Martian overlords.  Their women are hot.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This stuff about Russian missiles is propaganda for the masses i.e people who drive SUVs and watch reality shows and are no taking their Prosac against their drs advice .
Pretty soon the Martians will have taken over enough human bodies so they will effectively control the world .
Besides starting wars and voting money for pork , our gobernment leaders do n't really do that much .
" Power to the Martians ! ! !
" I welcome our Martian overlords .
Their women are hot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This stuff about Russian missiles is propaganda for the masses i.e people who drive SUVs and watch reality shows and are no taking their Prosac against their drs advice.
Pretty soon the Martians will have taken over enough human bodies so they will effectively control the world.
Besides starting wars and voting money for pork, our gobernment leaders don't really do that much.
"Power to the Martians!!!
"
I welcome our Martian overlords.
Their women are hot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399402</id>
	<title>Re:Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>buttle2000</author>
	<datestamp>1260525780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correction. It's now called 'Climate change'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correction .
It 's now called 'Climate change' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correction.
It's now called 'Climate change'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399126</id>
	<title>Underwater launches</title>
	<author>jamax</author>
	<datestamp>1260565080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on \_new\_ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position (this is slashdot, we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never, ever see unless its on youtube) and replies of ppl putting the record straight I just want to add this little nugget of information here:</p><p>In 199something (don't remember, but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news, the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession (as in several seconds between missiles) from submerged position - quite a feat of technology as well as personel training, since when launching more than one ICBM in quick succession one must take into account subs' weight change after the first missile leaves (it begins to surface), uneven wight distribution as pumps begin to fill ballast tanks with water to compensate just when the second missile fires, actual RECOIL begins to matter too - it's not much of a problem when you fire just once, but it becomes one if the sub's being shaken just as another missile is attmepting its launch..</p><p>So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.</p><p>Cheers</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on \ _new \ _ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position ( this is slashdot , we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never , ever see unless its on youtube ) and replies of ppl putting the record straight I just want to add this little nugget of information here : In 199something ( do n't remember , but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news , the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think ) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession ( as in several seconds between missiles ) from submerged position - quite a feat of technology as well as personel training , since when launching more than one ICBM in quick succession one must take into account subs ' weight change after the first missile leaves ( it begins to surface ) , uneven wight distribution as pumps begin to fill ballast tanks with water to compensate just when the second missile fires , actual RECOIL begins to matter too - it 's not much of a problem when you fire just once , but it becomes one if the sub 's being shaken just as another missile is attmepting its launch..So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.Cheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on \_new\_ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position (this is slashdot, we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never, ever see unless its on youtube) and replies of ppl putting the record straight I just want to add this little nugget of information here:In 199something (don't remember, but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news, the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession (as in several seconds between missiles) from submerged position - quite a feat of technology as well as personel training, since when launching more than one ICBM in quick succession one must take into account subs' weight change after the first missile leaves (it begins to surface), uneven wight distribution as pumps begin to fill ballast tanks with water to compensate just when the second missile fires, actual RECOIL begins to matter too - it's not much of a problem when you fire just once, but it becomes one if the sub's being shaken just as another missile is attmepting its launch..So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.Cheers</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400916</id>
	<title>UFO for sure</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1260542940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I looked at the pattern of the circular design made by the stray so called missile, and don't buy it for a second.<br>The spiral pattern is to perfect (more like a trace lining of light sent out from something....) as a stray missile would have<br>deviance in its pattern, and there was none in the pattern we saw in the sky, it was way to perfect for it to be a stray missile.</p><p>I vote on UFO, or maybe a flashlight behind a cloud shining through a design of a circular nature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I looked at the pattern of the circular design made by the stray so called missile , and do n't buy it for a second.The spiral pattern is to perfect ( more like a trace lining of light sent out from something.... ) as a stray missile would havedeviance in its pattern , and there was none in the pattern we saw in the sky , it was way to perfect for it to be a stray missile.I vote on UFO , or maybe a flashlight behind a cloud shining through a design of a circular nature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I looked at the pattern of the circular design made by the stray so called missile, and don't buy it for a second.The spiral pattern is to perfect (more like a trace lining of light sent out from something....) as a stray missile would havedeviance in its pattern, and there was none in the pattern we saw in the sky, it was way to perfect for it to be a stray missile.I vote on UFO, or maybe a flashlight behind a cloud shining through a design of a circular nature.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398632</id>
	<title>Re:Nuclear Armageddon or Computer Glich?</title>
	<author>kestasjk</author>
	<datestamp>1260470100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure nuclear armed nations are made aware of missile tests like these well in advance, either by surveillance or being informed directly</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure nuclear armed nations are made aware of missile tests like these well in advance , either by surveillance or being informed directly</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure nuclear armed nations are made aware of missile tests like these well in advance, either by surveillance or being informed directly</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400420</id>
	<title>Hatemail?</title>
	<author>zygotic mitosis</author>
	<datestamp>1260539580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why did this story get tagged 'hatemail'?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did this story get tagged 'hatemail ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did this story get tagged 'hatemail'?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398534</id>
	<title>This was no test!</title>
	<author>upto0013</author>
	<datestamp>1260468480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cthulhu is coming!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cthulhu is coming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cthulhu is coming!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398412</id>
	<title>Forth Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260466680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Forth Post!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Forth Post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forth Post!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400664</id>
	<title>bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260541500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you believe that then you you probably deserve what's coming</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you believe that then you you probably deserve what 's coming</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you believe that then you you probably deserve what's coming</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398744</id>
	<title>Re:Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1260471900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So where was the missile supposed to go?<br>Just a test run and then crash into the sea?</p></div><p>Yes. At this point, they would be quite happy if it would at least do that properly. So far, there were 13 (known) tests, and 6 of them failed. Most importantly, the 2 tests preceding this one were failures. This for a weapon that was supposed to be in service 3 years ago originally, and at the beginning of this year was claimed to be fully operational by the end of it.</p><p>Since this is supposed to be the next-gen uber missile to replace the venerable Topol-M, is supposed to be able to penetrate "any defense" (it's MIRV with EM shielding, and ability to maneuver and fire decoys in flight if it's shot at), and since it's the first weapon of that kind developed entirely in modern post-Soviet Russia (not a design developed in USSR, and not a project inherited from USSR), its success was supposed to prove that Russia is "up off its knees", and ready to take on the big boys if needed, as in the good old times... And since it's been such an abject failure so far, needless to say that it serves as a good target for related jokes these days.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So where was the missile supposed to go ? Just a test run and then crash into the sea ? Yes .
At this point , they would be quite happy if it would at least do that properly .
So far , there were 13 ( known ) tests , and 6 of them failed .
Most importantly , the 2 tests preceding this one were failures .
This for a weapon that was supposed to be in service 3 years ago originally , and at the beginning of this year was claimed to be fully operational by the end of it.Since this is supposed to be the next-gen uber missile to replace the venerable Topol-M , is supposed to be able to penetrate " any defense " ( it 's MIRV with EM shielding , and ability to maneuver and fire decoys in flight if it 's shot at ) , and since it 's the first weapon of that kind developed entirely in modern post-Soviet Russia ( not a design developed in USSR , and not a project inherited from USSR ) , its success was supposed to prove that Russia is " up off its knees " , and ready to take on the big boys if needed , as in the good old times... And since it 's been such an abject failure so far , needless to say that it serves as a good target for related jokes these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So where was the missile supposed to go?Just a test run and then crash into the sea?Yes.
At this point, they would be quite happy if it would at least do that properly.
So far, there were 13 (known) tests, and 6 of them failed.
Most importantly, the 2 tests preceding this one were failures.
This for a weapon that was supposed to be in service 3 years ago originally, and at the beginning of this year was claimed to be fully operational by the end of it.Since this is supposed to be the next-gen uber missile to replace the venerable Topol-M, is supposed to be able to penetrate "any defense" (it's MIRV with EM shielding, and ability to maneuver and fire decoys in flight if it's shot at), and since it's the first weapon of that kind developed entirely in modern post-Soviet Russia (not a design developed in USSR, and not a project inherited from USSR), its success was supposed to prove that Russia is "up off its knees", and ready to take on the big boys if needed, as in the good old times... And since it's been such an abject failure so far, needless to say that it serves as a good target for related jokes these days.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400604</id>
	<title>Re:Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260541080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>54\% success rate is not too shabby. Remember that just two 10 kton nuclear bombs have been enough to end a war in the past.</p><p>If there was a nuclear war happening tomorrow you can bet that anything with a success rate above 5-10\% would be considered operational, since you're not going to get a chance to use it later anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>54 \ % success rate is not too shabby .
Remember that just two 10 kton nuclear bombs have been enough to end a war in the past.If there was a nuclear war happening tomorrow you can bet that anything with a success rate above 5-10 \ % would be considered operational , since you 're not going to get a chance to use it later anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>54\% success rate is not too shabby.
Remember that just two 10 kton nuclear bombs have been enough to end a war in the past.If there was a nuclear war happening tomorrow you can bet that anything with a success rate above 5-10\% would be considered operational, since you're not going to get a chance to use it later anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30405116</id>
	<title>Spiral Image Too Perfect</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260560580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nonsense, there has never been a "natural" occurance even similar to this PERFECT SPIRAL IMAGE that seems to be projected into the atmosphere.  Is it possible that it is the result of multiple lasers (Weaponry Test) that originated from the ground?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nonsense , there has never been a " natural " occurance even similar to this PERFECT SPIRAL IMAGE that seems to be projected into the atmosphere .
Is it possible that it is the result of multiple lasers ( Weaponry Test ) that originated from the ground ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nonsense, there has never been a "natural" occurance even similar to this PERFECT SPIRAL IMAGE that seems to be projected into the atmosphere.
Is it possible that it is the result of multiple lasers (Weaponry Test) that originated from the ground?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401714</id>
	<title>What About the Light Beam?</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1260546900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The spiral started off with a green ray of light, then the spiral around where the ray pointed in the sky. There's also a very big beam of white light pointing from the ground/water up into the spiral for the duration. How does the missile explain these light beams?</p><p>And how doe every photo of the formation, from all kinds of different angles, all see the same spiral that the 3D twisting project into to the observer? Someone watching on-axis would see that perfect spiral, but not all the observers at all the angles.</p><p>Until those other pieces of actual evidence seen by many people and appearing in many photos and videos are explained, I don't believe it's a missile. And since the Russians have said it's a missile, compromising a secret military test to do so, what happened that also explains the Russians saying that, especially if it's not a missile?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The spiral started off with a green ray of light , then the spiral around where the ray pointed in the sky .
There 's also a very big beam of white light pointing from the ground/water up into the spiral for the duration .
How does the missile explain these light beams ? And how doe every photo of the formation , from all kinds of different angles , all see the same spiral that the 3D twisting project into to the observer ?
Someone watching on-axis would see that perfect spiral , but not all the observers at all the angles.Until those other pieces of actual evidence seen by many people and appearing in many photos and videos are explained , I do n't believe it 's a missile .
And since the Russians have said it 's a missile , compromising a secret military test to do so , what happened that also explains the Russians saying that , especially if it 's not a missile ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The spiral started off with a green ray of light, then the spiral around where the ray pointed in the sky.
There's also a very big beam of white light pointing from the ground/water up into the spiral for the duration.
How does the missile explain these light beams?And how doe every photo of the formation, from all kinds of different angles, all see the same spiral that the 3D twisting project into to the observer?
Someone watching on-axis would see that perfect spiral, but not all the observers at all the angles.Until those other pieces of actual evidence seen by many people and appearing in many photos and videos are explained, I don't believe it's a missile.
And since the Russians have said it's a missile, compromising a secret military test to do so, what happened that also explains the Russians saying that, especially if it's not a missile?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398446</id>
	<title>No Fool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260467100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At first Russia denied it, and then I knew it was true. But now that they've confirmed it, maybe there's more going on here than meets the eye...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At first Russia denied it , and then I knew it was true .
But now that they 've confirmed it , maybe there 's more going on here than meets the eye.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first Russia denied it, and then I knew it was true.
But now that they've confirmed it, maybe there's more going on here than meets the eye...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402612</id>
	<title>insert obligatory Soviet era joke here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260550920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, Missile Launches YOU!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , Missile Launches YOU !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, Missile Launches YOU!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30404258</id>
	<title>Re:Back in the day...</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1260556920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum.</p></div></blockquote><p>The time Russia would simply have remained quiet ended long before the Soviet Union did.  IIRC it was in the 60's that everyone agreed to notify the world of their launches in advance in order to prevent a test or training (or spacebound) launch from being mistaken for the opening salvo of WWIII.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War?</p></div></blockquote><p>Probably plenty, but just because John (or Ivan) Q. Public was unaware of the launch does not mean the appropriate authorities were.  Indeed, that's the case here - the appropriate notifications were filed and the appropriate announcements made, but the general population were unaware of them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum.The time Russia would simply have remained quiet ended long before the Soviet Union did .
IIRC it was in the 60 's that everyone agreed to notify the world of their launches in advance in order to prevent a test or training ( or spacebound ) launch from being mistaken for the opening salvo of WWIII .
  How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War ? Probably plenty , but just because John ( or Ivan ) Q. Public was unaware of the launch does not mean the appropriate authorities were .
Indeed , that 's the case here - the appropriate notifications were filed and the appropriate announcements made , but the general population were unaware of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was once a time that Russia would have just kept schtum.The time Russia would simply have remained quiet ended long before the Soviet Union did.
IIRC it was in the 60's that everyone agreed to notify the world of their launches in advance in order to prevent a test or training (or spacebound) launch from being mistaken for the opening salvo of WWIII.
  How many UFO reports are due to similar failed firings prior to the end of the Cold War?Probably plenty, but just because John (or Ivan) Q. Public was unaware of the launch does not mean the appropriate authorities were.
Indeed, that's the case here - the appropriate notifications were filed and the appropriate announcements made, but the general population were unaware of them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398914</id>
	<title>Anti-ICBM Laser</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260562020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being that its public knowledge that Russia and the US have active missile defense programs, when I saw the videos, the only explanation I could come up with is its an argon (blue-green) laser.</p><p>A few extra insights: I came up with this idea because at that altitude, the spiral is spinning very fast -- the outlying arms must be going a few mach, which is too fast to be an atmospheric anomaly. I was guessing the blue/green cone and the spiral were an effect caused by a spread pattern of this supposed laser. That makes sense because a spread pattern would be needed to combat MRVs, or Multiple Reentry Vehicles -- basically "cluster-nukes" -- which is what all modern ICBMs are. -- This laser would scan an area of the sky to destroy all of the separate reentry vehicles from an ICBM.</p><p>I think this is a much more plausible explanation, mainly because of the speed of that rotation. It would also make sense that Russia would be hush hush about missile defense, because defense against ICBMs brings even more power than ICBMs in themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being that its public knowledge that Russia and the US have active missile defense programs , when I saw the videos , the only explanation I could come up with is its an argon ( blue-green ) laser.A few extra insights : I came up with this idea because at that altitude , the spiral is spinning very fast -- the outlying arms must be going a few mach , which is too fast to be an atmospheric anomaly .
I was guessing the blue/green cone and the spiral were an effect caused by a spread pattern of this supposed laser .
That makes sense because a spread pattern would be needed to combat MRVs , or Multiple Reentry Vehicles -- basically " cluster-nukes " -- which is what all modern ICBMs are .
-- This laser would scan an area of the sky to destroy all of the separate reentry vehicles from an ICBM.I think this is a much more plausible explanation , mainly because of the speed of that rotation .
It would also make sense that Russia would be hush hush about missile defense , because defense against ICBMs brings even more power than ICBMs in themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being that its public knowledge that Russia and the US have active missile defense programs, when I saw the videos, the only explanation I could come up with is its an argon (blue-green) laser.A few extra insights: I came up with this idea because at that altitude, the spiral is spinning very fast -- the outlying arms must be going a few mach, which is too fast to be an atmospheric anomaly.
I was guessing the blue/green cone and the spiral were an effect caused by a spread pattern of this supposed laser.
That makes sense because a spread pattern would be needed to combat MRVs, or Multiple Reentry Vehicles -- basically "cluster-nukes" -- which is what all modern ICBMs are.
-- This laser would scan an area of the sky to destroy all of the separate reentry vehicles from an ICBM.I think this is a much more plausible explanation, mainly because of the speed of that rotation.
It would also make sense that Russia would be hush hush about missile defense, because defense against ICBMs brings even more power than ICBMs in themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401826</id>
	<title>Coincidence?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260547320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cold War ends, Global Warming Starts?</p><p>Don't worry, its just the Russians in the fight to stop Global Warm...erm Climate Change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cold War ends , Global Warming Starts ? Do n't worry , its just the Russians in the fight to stop Global Warm...erm Climate Change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cold War ends, Global Warming Starts?Don't worry, its just the Russians in the fight to stop Global Warm...erm Climate Change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402570</id>
	<title>In Russia...</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1260550740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Russia we no longer conquer our neighbors, we have new rocket program to hypnotize them into submission.<br>Just watch the pretty lights, you are getting sleepy comrade, verry sleepy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,yet you retain a lucid state.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Russia we no longer conquer our neighbors , we have new rocket program to hypnotize them into submission.Just watch the pretty lights , you are getting sleepy comrade , verry sleepy ,yet you retain a lucid state .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Russia we no longer conquer our neighbors, we have new rocket program to hypnotize them into submission.Just watch the pretty lights, you are getting sleepy comrade, verry sleepy ,yet you retain a lucid state.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30407890</id>
	<title>Obama</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260531180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find it interesting that this happened at the same time the President visited Norway to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. Was there some sort of terrorist (or other) attach? Some new Secret Service toy used to thwart it?</p><p>I have yet to hear how a Russian missile could possibly produce the effects in that video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find it interesting that this happened at the same time the President visited Norway to accept the Nobel Peace Prize .
Was there some sort of terrorist ( or other ) attach ?
Some new Secret Service toy used to thwart it ? I have yet to hear how a Russian missile could possibly produce the effects in that video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find it interesting that this happened at the same time the President visited Norway to accept the Nobel Peace Prize.
Was there some sort of terrorist (or other) attach?
Some new Secret Service toy used to thwart it?I have yet to hear how a Russian missile could possibly produce the effects in that video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399144</id>
	<title>What happened to Russia?</title>
	<author>damburger</author>
	<datestamp>1260522060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wheres the beloved monolithic wall of paranoid state security? The day after the event and they're all "sorry guys, we screwed up one of our missile tests. Here are the details."</p><p>Unless its all a cunning Russkie ruse...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wheres the beloved monolithic wall of paranoid state security ?
The day after the event and they 're all " sorry guys , we screwed up one of our missile tests .
Here are the details .
" Unless its all a cunning Russkie ruse.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wheres the beloved monolithic wall of paranoid state security?
The day after the event and they're all "sorry guys, we screwed up one of our missile tests.
Here are the details.
"Unless its all a cunning Russkie ruse...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580</id>
	<title>At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up...</title>
	<author>thaddeusthudpucker</author>
	<datestamp>1260469140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Like in 1986 when it took radiation alarms going off in fucking SWEDEN before they admitted that they had literally nuked a city or two...</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Like in 1986 when it took radiation alarms going off in fucking SWEDEN before they admitted that they had literally nuked a city or two.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Like in 1986 when it took radiation alarms going off in fucking SWEDEN before they admitted that they had literally nuked a city or two...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399512</id>
	<title>Re:Back in the day...</title>
	<author>IrquiM</author>
	<datestamp>1260527580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>None - because we didn't have slashdot back then</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>None - because we did n't have slashdot back then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>None - because we didn't have slashdot back then</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398708</id>
	<title>Russia? I doubt it.</title>
	<author>Bottoms</author>
	<datestamp>1260471360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Russia? I doubt it. I bet Elon Musk was just trying to launch another bottle rocket again. Keep pumping air Elon! You'll eventually get enough pressure into that coke bottle!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Russia ?
I doubt it .
I bet Elon Musk was just trying to launch another bottle rocket again .
Keep pumping air Elon !
You 'll eventually get enough pressure into that coke bottle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Russia?
I doubt it.
I bet Elon Musk was just trying to launch another bottle rocket again.
Keep pumping air Elon!
You'll eventually get enough pressure into that coke bottle!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398488</id>
	<title>Re:Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260467700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most likely into Okhotsk Sea near Kamchatka like in previous tests.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most likely into Okhotsk Sea near Kamchatka like in previous tests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most likely into Okhotsk Sea near Kamchatka like in previous tests.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399950</id>
	<title>Re:A missile that hypnotizes you</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260533940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wouldn&rsquo;t a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7As\_q6PSKSM" title="youtube.com">Hypnotoad hailstorm</a> [youtube.com] be more effective?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wouldn    t a Hypnotoad hailstorm [ youtube.com ] be more effective ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn’t a Hypnotoad hailstorm [youtube.com] be more effective?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398410</id>
	<title>Placement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260466680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems odd to me that Russia has so much open coastline to test something like this, yet they choose to do it at the very edge by another country. Is there a logistical reason for this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems odd to me that Russia has so much open coastline to test something like this , yet they choose to do it at the very edge by another country .
Is there a logistical reason for this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems odd to me that Russia has so much open coastline to test something like this, yet they choose to do it at the very edge by another country.
Is there a logistical reason for this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399450</id>
	<title>Obvious when you think about it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260526440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's quite obvious when given some thought. Consider the following:
<br>
<br>
You are at a party relaxing and enjoying yourself. At some point you lose track of your surroundings and time. When you come to, you remember being junk-kicked in your man business some 180 times. You're pretty sure in was someone you met at the party by the name of Ivan Jnkkckr. After a bit of investigative work you track down Ivan's number from another guest that attended the party. Ivan denies junk-kicking you in your man business.
<br>
<br>
After further investigation and conversations with other party attendees, you come into possession of some cellphone video. The videos show quite Ivan's foot spinning in a spiral pattern while junk-kicking you in your man business some 180 times. You confront Ivan Jnkkckr with multiple videos showing from multiple angles the relentless assault on your now decimated nuts. Ivan then promply admits that he spiral junk-kicked your nuts.
<br>
<br>
Obviously Ivan knew he had junk-kicked your man business; he just needed the video evidence to compel him to come clean.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's quite obvious when given some thought .
Consider the following : You are at a party relaxing and enjoying yourself .
At some point you lose track of your surroundings and time .
When you come to , you remember being junk-kicked in your man business some 180 times .
You 're pretty sure in was someone you met at the party by the name of Ivan Jnkkckr .
After a bit of investigative work you track down Ivan 's number from another guest that attended the party .
Ivan denies junk-kicking you in your man business .
After further investigation and conversations with other party attendees , you come into possession of some cellphone video .
The videos show quite Ivan 's foot spinning in a spiral pattern while junk-kicking you in your man business some 180 times .
You confront Ivan Jnkkckr with multiple videos showing from multiple angles the relentless assault on your now decimated nuts .
Ivan then promply admits that he spiral junk-kicked your nuts .
Obviously Ivan knew he had junk-kicked your man business ; he just needed the video evidence to compel him to come clean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's quite obvious when given some thought.
Consider the following:


You are at a party relaxing and enjoying yourself.
At some point you lose track of your surroundings and time.
When you come to, you remember being junk-kicked in your man business some 180 times.
You're pretty sure in was someone you met at the party by the name of Ivan Jnkkckr.
After a bit of investigative work you track down Ivan's number from another guest that attended the party.
Ivan denies junk-kicking you in your man business.
After further investigation and conversations with other party attendees, you come into possession of some cellphone video.
The videos show quite Ivan's foot spinning in a spiral pattern while junk-kicking you in your man business some 180 times.
You confront Ivan Jnkkckr with multiple videos showing from multiple angles the relentless assault on your now decimated nuts.
Ivan then promply admits that he spiral junk-kicked your nuts.
Obviously Ivan knew he had junk-kicked your man business; he just needed the video evidence to compel him to come clean.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30410782</id>
	<title>Re:Well paint me surprised:</title>
	<author>camperslo</author>
	<datestamp>1260551220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's to celebrate Mission Impossible Season 07 being on DVD (or the torrent sites???)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's to celebrate Mission Impossible Season 07 being on DVD ( or the torrent sites ? ? ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's to celebrate Mission Impossible Season 07 being on DVD (or the torrent sites???
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398838</id>
	<title>Re:Well paint me surprised:</title>
	<author>tbischel</author>
	<datestamp>1260473760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I want to know is can we hire them for the 4th of july?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I want to know is can we hire them for the 4th of july ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I want to know is can we hire them for the 4th of july?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400504</id>
	<title>Re:At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up...</title>
	<author>DrKnark</author>
	<datestamp>1260540480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nuking a city would in my mind imply an explosion created by nuclear reactions. The explosion in Chernobyl was created by good old chemical reactions (hydrogren gas).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuking a city would in my mind imply an explosion created by nuclear reactions .
The explosion in Chernobyl was created by good old chemical reactions ( hydrogren gas ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuking a city would in my mind imply an explosion created by nuclear reactions.
The explosion in Chernobyl was created by good old chemical reactions (hydrogren gas).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398738</id>
	<title>Total Freak Out</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1260471900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imagine though how freaked out one would be walking outside and suddenly seeing a giant spinning spiral with a sci-fi-ish blue trail passing through the middle. Based on the youtube vids I saw, one could actually perceive the spinning motion.</p><p>And double freaked out if walking out of a movie theater after seeing a scary movie. That's just one goddam weird pattern.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine though how freaked out one would be walking outside and suddenly seeing a giant spinning spiral with a sci-fi-ish blue trail passing through the middle .
Based on the youtube vids I saw , one could actually perceive the spinning motion.And double freaked out if walking out of a movie theater after seeing a scary movie .
That 's just one goddam weird pattern .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine though how freaked out one would be walking outside and suddenly seeing a giant spinning spiral with a sci-fi-ish blue trail passing through the middle.
Based on the youtube vids I saw, one could actually perceive the spinning motion.And double freaked out if walking out of a movie theater after seeing a scary movie.
That's just one goddam weird pattern.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398706</id>
	<title>A missile that hypnotizes you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260471360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they want to create a weapon that hypnotizes you. And once you are hypnotized they recruit you hahaha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they want to create a weapon that hypnotizes you .
And once you are hypnotized they recruit you hahaha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they want to create a weapon that hypnotizes you.
And once you are hypnotized they recruit you hahaha</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398540</id>
	<title>Related to CERN?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because this happen just after CERN announced the reactivation of a massive energy "accelerator", which I think can be used as particle beam weapon. Russia needs to counter the threat of old Europe, so they try to launch this missile as a counter-protest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because this happen just after CERN announced the reactivation of a massive energy " accelerator " , which I think can be used as particle beam weapon .
Russia needs to counter the threat of old Europe , so they try to launch this missile as a counter-protest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because this happen just after CERN announced the reactivation of a massive energy "accelerator", which I think can be used as particle beam weapon.
Russia needs to counter the threat of old Europe, so they try to launch this missile as a counter-protest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401234</id>
	<title>Re:Life, money and energy</title>
	<author>base3</author>
	<datestamp>1260544560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how much developing them so that the enemy wasn't the only one that had them has saved us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how much developing them so that the enemy was n't the only one that had them has saved us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how much developing them so that the enemy wasn't the only one that had them has saved us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399726</id>
	<title>Re:At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up...</title>
	<author>huge</author>
	<datestamp>1260530820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So true. Here is a <a href="http://www.kiddofspeed.com/chapter1.html" title="kiddofspeed.com">site</a> [kiddofspeed.com] that I always find relevant when discussion veers into this specific incident.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So true .
Here is a site [ kiddofspeed.com ] that I always find relevant when discussion veers into this specific incident .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So true.
Here is a site [kiddofspeed.com] that I always find relevant when discussion veers into this specific incident.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30404508</id>
	<title>Re:Underwater launches</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1260558060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on \_new\_ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position (this is slashdot, we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never, ever see unless its on youtube)</p></div></blockquote><p>That's the stereotype.  But some of us have actually been there, done that, as well as being serious amateur historians and students of the weapons and technology involved.<br>
&nbsp; <br>Disclaimer:  I am one such.  I was a Ballistic Missile Fire Control tech for the USN, and have studied SLBM technology and operations for decades.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>In 199something (don't remember, but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news, the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession (as in several seconds between missiles) from submerged position - quite a feat of technology</p></div></blockquote><p>Hardly.  Both the US and Russia have been able to do so since the early 60's.<br>
&nbsp; <br>Missile submarines are *designed* to be able to salvo their weapons within a short time frame.  It's just that nobody regularly salvos a full load of test missiles because missiles are expensive and the maintenance required on the tubes afterward is time consuming.<br>
&nbsp; <br>US/UK (and I presume French and Russian) submarines are built with automatic systems to manage the ballast functions.  It's not a particularly complex algorithm or overall problem.  (The transistor based analog system US SSBN's started using in the early 70's, replacing an earlier system, fit in a box not much larger than a shoebox.)  It's not even particularly difficult to do manually, anyone with average coordination can do so with a few days of intensive training.  (I suspect a modern gamer would require even less.)<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.</p></div></blockquote><p>Very, <i>very</i> old news.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on \ _new \ _ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position ( this is slashdot , we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never , ever see unless its on youtube ) That 's the stereotype .
But some of us have actually been there , done that , as well as being serious amateur historians and students of the weapons and technology involved .
  Disclaimer : I am one such .
I was a Ballistic Missile Fire Control tech for the USN , and have studied SLBM technology and operations for decades .
  In 199something ( do n't remember , but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news , the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think ) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession ( as in several seconds between missiles ) from submerged position - quite a feat of technologyHardly .
Both the US and Russia have been able to do so since the early 60 's .
  Missile submarines are * designed * to be able to salvo their weapons within a short time frame .
It 's just that nobody regularly salvos a full load of test missiles because missiles are expensive and the maintenance required on the tubes afterward is time consuming .
  US/UK ( and I presume French and Russian ) submarines are built with automatic systems to manage the ballast functions .
It 's not a particularly complex algorithm or overall problem .
( The transistor based analog system US SSBN 's started using in the early 70 's , replacing an earlier system , fit in a box not much larger than a shoebox .
) It 's not even particularly difficult to do manually , anyone with average coordination can do so with a few days of intensive training .
( I suspect a modern gamer would require even less .
)   So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.Very , very old news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While reading through suprisingly ignorant comments on \_new\_ tech of launching an ICMB from submerged position (this is slashdot, we are all supposed to be armchair warriors with underdeveloped muscle tissue and oversized brains filled with data on weaponry we would never, ever see unless its on youtube)That's the stereotype.
But some of us have actually been there, done that, as well as being serious amateur historians and students of the weapons and technology involved.
  Disclaimer:  I am one such.
I was a Ballistic Missile Fire Control tech for the USN, and have studied SLBM technology and operations for decades.
  In 199something (don't remember, but it was a crappy year in Russia - lost of bad news, the story got lost and resurfaced only in 2002 I think) Russian submarine has successfully launched ITS ENTIRE PAYLOAD in quick succession (as in several seconds between missiles) from submerged position - quite a feat of technologyHardly.
Both the US and Russia have been able to do so since the early 60's.
  Missile submarines are *designed* to be able to salvo their weapons within a short time frame.
It's just that nobody regularly salvos a full load of test missiles because missiles are expensive and the maintenance required on the tubes afterward is time consuming.
  US/UK (and I presume French and Russian) submarines are built with automatic systems to manage the ballast functions.
It's not a particularly complex algorithm or overall problem.
(The transistor based analog system US SSBN's started using in the early 70's, replacing an earlier system, fit in a box not much larger than a shoebox.
)  It's not even particularly difficult to do manually, anyone with average coordination can do so with a few days of intensive training.
(I suspect a modern gamer would require even less.
)
  So all in all - ICBMS from under water = old news.Very, very old news.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399694</id>
	<title>Re:Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>osee</author>
	<datestamp>1260530160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Topol M is a land based missile. Bulava is submarine based. It never was intended to replace Topol but instead it's supposed to be based on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Topol M is a land based missile .
Bulava is submarine based .
It never was intended to replace Topol but instead it 's supposed to be based on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Topol M is a land based missile.
Bulava is submarine based.
It never was intended to replace Topol but instead it's supposed to be based on it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399562</id>
	<title>Re:bloody nonsense.</title>
	<author>IrquiM</author>
	<datestamp>1260528180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's been modded funny - he must be!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's been modded funny - he must be !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's been modded funny - he must be!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30403910</id>
	<title>Sigh...</title>
	<author>Majestix</author>
	<datestamp>1260555720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and here i was hoping that we'd come across something truly unknown to us.  Oh well, back to the dreaming board.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and here i was hoping that we 'd come across something truly unknown to us .
Oh well , back to the dreaming board .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and here i was hoping that we'd come across something truly unknown to us.
Oh well, back to the dreaming board.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402286</id>
	<title>Re:Well paint me surprised:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260549360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Imran Zakhaev must be proud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Imran Zakhaev must be proud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imran Zakhaev must be proud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398870</id>
	<title>I'm shocked!</title>
	<author>cyberzephyr</author>
	<datestamp>1260474960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone could have seen it was a rocket or missile spiralling out of control.  I knew it the minute i saw the first picture.  It was a very nice pic of an out of control missile.  Rockets typically blow up in flight if they are really flawed hopefully.</p><p>I rather have peace anyway.  Rather a missile blow up in production than a successful one work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone could have seen it was a rocket or missile spiralling out of control .
I knew it the minute i saw the first picture .
It was a very nice pic of an out of control missile .
Rockets typically blow up in flight if they are really flawed hopefully.I rather have peace anyway .
Rather a missile blow up in production than a successful one work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone could have seen it was a rocket or missile spiralling out of control.
I knew it the minute i saw the first picture.
It was a very nice pic of an out of control missile.
Rockets typically blow up in flight if they are really flawed hopefully.I rather have peace anyway.
Rather a missile blow up in production than a successful one work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399990</id>
	<title>Re:Bad fuel mix</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1260534540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Look at the pictures again. There was <i>nothing</i> to suggest uncontrolled action when creating those spirals. My best guess it they're the result of rotation during flight, to prevent the US <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing\_YAL-1" title="wikipedia.org">ABL</a> [wikipedia.org] aircraft from shooting them down. Third stage looks shoddy (4th or 5th picture shows the contrail all over the place vanishing into the distance.)<br> <br>Damn pretty effect, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the pictures again .
There was nothing to suggest uncontrolled action when creating those spirals .
My best guess it they 're the result of rotation during flight , to prevent the US ABL [ wikipedia.org ] aircraft from shooting them down .
Third stage looks shoddy ( 4th or 5th picture shows the contrail all over the place vanishing into the distance .
) Damn pretty effect , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the pictures again.
There was nothing to suggest uncontrolled action when creating those spirals.
My best guess it they're the result of rotation during flight, to prevent the US ABL [wikipedia.org] aircraft from shooting them down.
Third stage looks shoddy (4th or 5th picture shows the contrail all over the place vanishing into the distance.
) Damn pretty effect, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398714</id>
	<title>CGI?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260471540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Request the Russians screw up more missile launches cause those pictures are stonking amazing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Request the Russians screw up more missile launches cause those pictures are stonking amazing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Request the Russians screw up more missile launches cause those pictures are stonking amazing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398554</id>
	<title>Bad fuel mix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given the out of control spiral pattern maybe Vodka wasn't the best choice for rocket fuel even if it was greener.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the out of control spiral pattern maybe Vodka was n't the best choice for rocket fuel even if it was greener .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the out of control spiral pattern maybe Vodka wasn't the best choice for rocket fuel even if it was greener.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404</id>
	<title>Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260466620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So where was the missile supposed to go?<br>Just a test run and then crash into the sea?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So where was the missile supposed to go ? Just a test run and then crash into the sea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So where was the missile supposed to go?Just a test run and then crash into the sea?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399390</id>
	<title>thanks russia ... saved a lot of UFO hunters time.</title>
	<author>cheap.computer</author>
	<datestamp>1260525540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With this Mia culpa Russia has saved a lot of time for all the UFO hunters &amp; conspirators. Lets all return to the regular scheduled programming of US Health Care reform debate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With this Mia culpa Russia has saved a lot of time for all the UFO hunters &amp; conspirators .
Lets all return to the regular scheduled programming of US Health Care reform debate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With this Mia culpa Russia has saved a lot of time for all the UFO hunters &amp; conspirators.
Lets all return to the regular scheduled programming of US Health Care reform debate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400340</id>
	<title>Dang...</title>
	<author>Capt James McCarthy</author>
	<datestamp>1260538800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought The Final Countdown movie was going to be real life!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought The Final Countdown movie was going to be real life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought The Final Countdown movie was going to be real life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398772</id>
	<title>Re:bloody nonsense.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260472440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You <i>are</i> kidding, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are kidding , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are kidding, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401288</id>
	<title>Re:bloody nonsense.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260544800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am not really convinced either way yet.  That video did not resemble anything I could imagine a rocket doing, but I don't know much about rockets.  Does anyone know why the rocket would make a repeating spiral pattern like that and what the protruding light was?  So far none of the sites reporting that it is a rocket explain how a rocket makes that pattern.  I'm open to suggestions but until I here an explanation I have to side with this guy.  That didn't look like a rocket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am not really convinced either way yet .
That video did not resemble anything I could imagine a rocket doing , but I do n't know much about rockets .
Does anyone know why the rocket would make a repeating spiral pattern like that and what the protruding light was ?
So far none of the sites reporting that it is a rocket explain how a rocket makes that pattern .
I 'm open to suggestions but until I here an explanation I have to side with this guy .
That did n't look like a rocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am not really convinced either way yet.
That video did not resemble anything I could imagine a rocket doing, but I don't know much about rockets.
Does anyone know why the rocket would make a repeating spiral pattern like that and what the protruding light was?
So far none of the sites reporting that it is a rocket explain how a rocket makes that pattern.
I'm open to suggestions but until I here an explanation I have to side with this guy.
That didn't look like a rocket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398704</id>
	<title>ep#!??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260471300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>around return it Baby take my you aal is to let</htmltext>
<tokenext>around return it Baby take my you aal is to let</tokentext>
<sentencetext>around return it Baby take my you aal is to let</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398516</id>
	<title>Re:Testing missiles?</title>
	<author>hwyhobo</author>
	<datestamp>1260468240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was supposed to detonate over the polar cap and melt it to shut up the global warming deniers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was supposed to detonate over the polar cap and melt it to shut up the global warming deniers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was supposed to detonate over the polar cap and melt it to shut up the global warming deniers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398484</id>
	<title>Re:Placement</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260467640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was happening at quite high altitude, visible from vast distance, so it wasn't really at the doorstep of Norway, probably.</p><p>Plus Russia doesn't have exactly that much of a coastline as the first glance at many typical maps would suggest - the northern regions are quite close to the north pole, so they end up heavily "distorted" in certain map projections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was happening at quite high altitude , visible from vast distance , so it was n't really at the doorstep of Norway , probably.Plus Russia does n't have exactly that much of a coastline as the first glance at many typical maps would suggest - the northern regions are quite close to the north pole , so they end up heavily " distorted " in certain map projections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was happening at quite high altitude, visible from vast distance, so it wasn't really at the doorstep of Norway, probably.Plus Russia doesn't have exactly that much of a coastline as the first glance at many typical maps would suggest - the northern regions are quite close to the north pole, so they end up heavily "distorted" in certain map projections.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399700</id>
	<title>None</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260530220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There were actually no reports of UFOs, but rather of "strange lighting show all over northern norway".</p><p>Only the die-hard UFO-believers would believe this was a UFO. It was either too strange, or someone guessed its a rocket of some kind.</p><p>When someone sees one or more saucers fly over the sky, go in strange patterns and then zip faster than you can see. THEN you'll get UFO reports..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There were actually no reports of UFOs , but rather of " strange lighting show all over northern norway " .Only the die-hard UFO-believers would believe this was a UFO .
It was either too strange , or someone guessed its a rocket of some kind.When someone sees one or more saucers fly over the sky , go in strange patterns and then zip faster than you can see .
THEN you 'll get UFO reports. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There were actually no reports of UFOs, but rather of "strange lighting show all over northern norway".Only the die-hard UFO-believers would believe this was a UFO.
It was either too strange, or someone guessed its a rocket of some kind.When someone sees one or more saucers fly over the sky, go in strange patterns and then zip faster than you can see.
THEN you'll get UFO reports..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398810</id>
	<title>ITS OKAY, FOLKS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260473460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Russia's just launching missiles from nuclear subs, that's all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Russia 's just launching missiles from nuclear subs , that 's all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Russia's just launching missiles from nuclear subs, that's all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400694</id>
	<title>Missile my ass.  It was a marketing ploy</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1260541680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0800369/" title="imdb.com">this</a> [imdb.com].  Why didja think they did it over Scandinavia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for this [ imdb.com ] .
Why didja think they did it over Scandinavia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for this [imdb.com].
Why didja think they did it over Scandinavia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398790</id>
	<title>Aliens from outer space</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1260472920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
"Missile launch" is just a coverup.
</p><p>
Norway's version of "It was just a weather balloon".
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Missile launch " is just a coverup .
Norway 's version of " It was just a weather balloon " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
"Missile launch" is just a coverup.
Norway's version of "It was just a weather balloon".
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400312</id>
	<title>Life, money and energy</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1260538500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder how much lives, energy and money these weapons that we should never use has cost us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how much lives , energy and money these weapons that we should never use has cost us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how much lives, energy and money these weapons that we should never use has cost us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398622</id>
	<title>Re:Forth Post!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260469980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>: X DUP 1+ . . ;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>: X DUP 1 + .
. ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>: X DUP 1+ .
. ;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398636</id>
	<title>In Soviet Russia....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260470100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>signs of super advanced civilization usually turn out to be a mirage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>signs of super advanced civilization usually turn out to be a mirage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>signs of super advanced civilization usually turn out to be a mirage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402178</id>
	<title>Celebration?</title>
	<author>OhHellWithIt</author>
	<datestamp>1260548940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was the missile launch Russia's celebration of the Nobel Awards going on this week?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was the missile launch Russia 's celebration of the Nobel Awards going on this week ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was the missile launch Russia's celebration of the Nobel Awards going on this week?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399208</id>
	<title>Russians launched a Photoshop missile</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260523020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't you guys see the PIXELS?! The missile went into the sky and spewed PIXELS!! It's Photoshopped!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't you guys see the PIXELS ? !
The missile went into the sky and spewed PIXELS ! !
It 's Photoshopped !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't you guys see the PIXELS?!
The missile went into the sky and spewed PIXELS!!
It's Photoshopped!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398566</id>
	<title>Re:Well paint me surprised:</title>
	<author>zkp</author>
	<datestamp>1260468900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They gave their software engineers vodka while they were working on the code for the missile.  Apparently they significantly overshot the Ballmer peak.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They gave their software engineers vodka while they were working on the code for the missile .
Apparently they significantly overshot the Ballmer peak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They gave their software engineers vodka while they were working on the code for the missile.
Apparently they significantly overshot the Ballmer peak.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399352</id>
	<title>Nukular winter...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260525000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...will cancel out global warming.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...will cancel out global warming .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...will cancel out global warming.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388</id>
	<title>Well paint me surprised:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260466380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>And all this time I seriously thought that it was some unimaginably interesting plot all about a russian missile program, underwater subs and secrecy beyond everyone's wildest imagination. Wait... what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And all this time I seriously thought that it was some unimaginably interesting plot all about a russian missile program , underwater subs and secrecy beyond everyone 's wildest imagination .
Wait... what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And all this time I seriously thought that it was some unimaginably interesting plot all about a russian missile program, underwater subs and secrecy beyond everyone's wildest imagination.
Wait... what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400228</id>
	<title>Re:If they can repeat the behavior on a smaller sc</title>
	<author>Animaether</author>
	<datestamp>1260537420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This doesn't work so easily on a smaller scale.</p><p>The reason it works for the rocket in question is because it's rather big, has lots of propellant, which it ejects at a fairly high velocity relative to its rate of rotation (spinning), which coupled with the fact that it's rather high up allows for a large vapor trail.</p><p>If you compare that to existing consumer glass fireworks which -does- have spinners.. and I'll link to a little home-made thing (don't try this at home, etc.)... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7WSEmXA6s4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7WSEmXA6s4</a> [youtube.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...then you'll see that the effect extinguishes very quickly and you never really see much of a spiral.<br>You would essentially have to 1. replace the little fountain with a smoke bomb instead and 2. get that smoke to be ejected quickly (perhaps through a nozzle).</p><p>Unfortunately, that doesn't get rid of the scale of turbulence in air and - if performed outside - wind etc. which will affect these small scale effects much more than that of the rocket.</p><p>In short... I don't think it can be done at a small scale while keeping the effect.  You *might* be able to get it reasonably going with non-consumer class fireworks.  But I'll leave that for the chaps at freakpyromaniacs.com and such to figure out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does n't work so easily on a smaller scale.The reason it works for the rocket in question is because it 's rather big , has lots of propellant , which it ejects at a fairly high velocity relative to its rate of rotation ( spinning ) , which coupled with the fact that it 's rather high up allows for a large vapor trail.If you compare that to existing consumer glass fireworks which -does- have spinners.. and I 'll link to a little home-made thing ( do n't try this at home , etc. ) .. .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = N7WSEmXA6s4 [ youtube.com ] ...then you 'll see that the effect extinguishes very quickly and you never really see much of a spiral.You would essentially have to 1. replace the little fountain with a smoke bomb instead and 2. get that smoke to be ejected quickly ( perhaps through a nozzle ) .Unfortunately , that does n't get rid of the scale of turbulence in air and - if performed outside - wind etc .
which will affect these small scale effects much more than that of the rocket.In short... I do n't think it can be done at a small scale while keeping the effect .
You * might * be able to get it reasonably going with non-consumer class fireworks .
But I 'll leave that for the chaps at freakpyromaniacs.com and such to figure out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This doesn't work so easily on a smaller scale.The reason it works for the rocket in question is because it's rather big, has lots of propellant, which it ejects at a fairly high velocity relative to its rate of rotation (spinning), which coupled with the fact that it's rather high up allows for a large vapor trail.If you compare that to existing consumer glass fireworks which -does- have spinners.. and I'll link to a little home-made thing (don't try this at home, etc.)...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7WSEmXA6s4 [youtube.com] ...then you'll see that the effect extinguishes very quickly and you never really see much of a spiral.You would essentially have to 1. replace the little fountain with a smoke bomb instead and 2. get that smoke to be ejected quickly (perhaps through a nozzle).Unfortunately, that doesn't get rid of the scale of turbulence in air and - if performed outside - wind etc.
which will affect these small scale effects much more than that of the rocket.In short... I don't think it can be done at a small scale while keeping the effect.
You *might* be able to get it reasonably going with non-consumer class fireworks.
But I'll leave that for the chaps at freakpyromaniacs.com and such to figure out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398528</id>
	<title>Don't wary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Norway: Russia, it looks like there is a UFO above our sky. We are very concerned.<br>Russia: Oh,  no. You do not have any reason to wary. It is not a UFO. It just one of our nuclear bomb loaded missile flew away,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Norway : Russia , it looks like there is a UFO above our sky .
We are very concerned.Russia : Oh , no .
You do not have any reason to wary .
It is not a UFO .
It just one of our nuclear bomb loaded missile flew away,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Norway: Russia, it looks like there is a UFO above our sky.
We are very concerned.Russia: Oh,  no.
You do not have any reason to wary.
It is not a UFO.
It just one of our nuclear bomb loaded missile flew away,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402522</id>
	<title>I think we all kinow what this means...</title>
	<author>Microsift</author>
	<datestamp>1260550560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The aliens have taken over the Kreml</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The aliens have taken over the Kreml</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The aliens have taken over the Kreml</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400396</id>
	<title>Re:At least it wasnt a nuke plant going up...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260539280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was not radiation detectors that went off. It was spotted on a sattelite photo that one of the basins for cooling water was emptied.<br>This was proof that the reactor was offline, and not operational (like the Russians said up until that point).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was not radiation detectors that went off .
It was spotted on a sattelite photo that one of the basins for cooling water was emptied.This was proof that the reactor was offline , and not operational ( like the Russians said up until that point ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was not radiation detectors that went off.
It was spotted on a sattelite photo that one of the basins for cooling water was emptied.This was proof that the reactor was offline, and not operational (like the Russians said up until that point).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398472</id>
	<title>Re:Back in the day...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1260467400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Soviet Russia, UFO reports you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Soviet Russia , UFO reports you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Soviet Russia, UFO reports you!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30404258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30405638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398554
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398512
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30410782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30404508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_11_0410258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30405638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30404258
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30404508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30402286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30410782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30401714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30399694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_11_0410258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30398570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_11_0410258.30400228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
