<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_10_1626244</id>
	<title>Robot Can Read Human Body Language</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260462900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"European researchers have developed a <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-12/10/popeye,-the-robot-with-brains-not-brawn.aspx">new approach to artificial intelligence</a> that could allow computers to respond to behavior as well as commands, reacting intelligently to the subtle nuances of human communication. It's no trivial feat &ndash; many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " European researchers have developed a new approach to artificial intelligence that could allow computers to respond to behavior as well as commands , reacting intelligently to the subtle nuances of human communication .
It 's no trivial feat    many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "European researchers have developed a new approach to artificial intelligence that could allow computers to respond to behavior as well as commands, reacting intelligently to the subtle nuances of human communication.
It's no trivial feat – many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389938</id>
	<title>Politics</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1260467640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's see how good can this robot read a politician.<br><br>If it is any good it will get banned in seconds.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see how good can this robot read a politician.If it is any good it will get banned in seconds .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see how good can this robot read a politician.If it is any good it will get banned in seconds.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389592</id>
	<title>Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260466680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>When this is eventually better developed and more accurate, this could be a boon for parents/caregivers of the autistic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When this is eventually better developed and more accurate , this could be a boon for parents/caregivers of the autistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this is eventually better developed and more accurate, this could be a boon for parents/caregivers of the autistic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546</id>
	<title>Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260466560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure this bot will pick up more chicks than your average slashdotter!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure this bot will pick up more chicks than your average slashdotter !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure this bot will pick up more chicks than your average slashdotter!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390016</id>
	<title>I'm not mad!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260467820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Robot: "I won't do the dishes until you calm down."<br>Me: "I *am* calm."<br>Robot: "That is not what your body is telling me."<br>Me: !!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Robot : " I wo n't do the dishes until you calm down .
" Me : " I * am * calm .
" Robot : " That is not what your body is telling me .
" Me : ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Robot: "I won't do the dishes until you calm down.
"Me: "I *am* calm.
"Robot: "That is not what your body is telling me.
"Me: !!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260469260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't you read the summary? It can understand body language. This robot is obviously female.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't you read the summary ?
It can understand body language .
This robot is obviously female .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't you read the summary?
It can understand body language.
This robot is obviously female.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30398508</id>
	<title>GPS</title>
	<author>Whiteox</author>
	<datestamp>1260468180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah. The lady on my GPS told me that I'm a dickhead!<br>What gives?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah .
The lady on my GPS told me that I 'm a dickhead ! What gives ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah.
The lady on my GPS told me that I'm a dickhead!What gives?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393000</id>
	<title>Finally, we can kill the autistics.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260478320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have no need for em now for those repetitive tasks. And the Asberger chic geeks too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have no need for em now for those repetitive tasks .
And the Asberger chic geeks too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have no need for em now for those repetitive tasks.
And the Asberger chic geeks too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30398350</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1260465840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban" title="wikipedia.org">Like this?</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this ?
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this?
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</id>
	<title>the problem is not humans struggling to respond...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260467040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to body language, the problem is humans using such an ambiguous form of communication when they could make the effort to be explicit with words.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to body language , the problem is humans using such an ambiguous form of communication when they could make the effort to be explicit with words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to body language, the problem is humans using such an ambiguous form of communication when they could make the effort to be explicit with words.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393512</id>
	<title>Re:Politics</title>
	<author>flabordec</author>
	<datestamp>1260436980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Want a politician reading program?</p><p>
<tt>
while (true) {
    printf("lying\n");
}
</tt>

</p><p>There you go</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Want a politician reading program ?
while ( true ) { printf ( " lying \ n " ) ; } There you go</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want a politician reading program?
while (true) {
    printf("lying\n");
}


There you go</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390200</id>
	<title>What</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So basement dwelling scientists developed what body language is considered interpretable? Great, a whole legion of robots that interpret licking the Cheetos crust off your fingers before your code compiles as the universal signature of an Alpha male.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So basement dwelling scientists developed what body language is considered interpretable ?
Great , a whole legion of robots that interpret licking the Cheetos crust off your fingers before your code compiles as the universal signature of an Alpha male .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So basement dwelling scientists developed what body language is considered interpretable?
Great, a whole legion of robots that interpret licking the Cheetos crust off your fingers before your code compiles as the universal signature of an Alpha male.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392386</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>jimbolauski</author>
	<datestamp>1260475680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The real problem is that at the begining of the robot war they will know when we are going to strike.  There is one hope Botox! By injecting our selves with it the robots will not be able decifer our plans and we will be able to strike first.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real problem is that at the begining of the robot war they will know when we are going to strike .
There is one hope Botox !
By injecting our selves with it the robots will not be able decifer our plans and we will be able to strike first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real problem is that at the begining of the robot war they will know when we are going to strike.
There is one hope Botox!
By injecting our selves with it the robots will not be able decifer our plans and we will be able to strike first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392046</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1260474480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You may have noticed me use the word "firewall" to describe the situation<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You may have noticed me use the word " firewall " to describe the situation ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may have noticed me use the word "firewall" to describe the situation ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390634</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1260469800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Spoken like a true socially impaired outsider... don't you ever use jargon that is only understood by your small clique of people, and not understood by anyone else? Every programmer and engineer I know of does (including myself). Human beings are social animals and are extremely socially competitive, especially the females.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Spoken like a true socially impaired outsider... do n't you ever use jargon that is only understood by your small clique of people , and not understood by anyone else ?
Every programmer and engineer I know of does ( including myself ) .
Human beings are social animals and are extremely socially competitive , especially the females .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spoken like a true socially impaired outsider... don't you ever use jargon that is only understood by your small clique of people, and not understood by anyone else?
Every programmer and engineer I know of does (including myself).
Human beings are social animals and are extremely socially competitive, especially the females.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389970</id>
	<title>I think they meant..</title>
	<author>genghisjahn</author>
	<datestamp>1260467760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"It's no trivial feat &ndash; many on Slashdot struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" It 's no trivial feat    many on Slashdot struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It's no trivial feat – many on Slashdot struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389820</id>
	<title>I can already see it in use on computers</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1260467340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>-Would you like to clean up your desktop icons now?
-NO!
-Are you sure you want to change the extension of this file?
-YES!
-Your body language shows you're getting nervous. Would you like to play some Patience now?
-NO! AAAAARGH!</htmltext>
<tokenext>-Would you like to clean up your desktop icons now ?
-NO ! -Are you sure you want to change the extension of this file ?
-YES ! -Your body language shows you 're getting nervous .
Would you like to play some Patience now ?
-NO ! AAAAARGH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-Would you like to clean up your desktop icons now?
-NO!
-Are you sure you want to change the extension of this file?
-YES!
-Your body language shows you're getting nervous.
Would you like to play some Patience now?
-NO! AAAAARGH!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30394714</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260441720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe the original statement still stands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the original statement still stands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the original statement still stands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389698</id>
	<title>Robots</title>
	<author>qoncept</author>
	<datestamp>1260466980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis</p></div><p>I bet one or two of them are reading this right now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basisI bet one or two of them are reading this right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basisI bet one or two of them are reading this right now.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392766</id>
	<title>I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet</title>
	<author>rehtonAesoohC</author>
	<datestamp>1260477360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Project Natal tech demo for <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDvHlwNvXaM" title="youtube.com">Milo</a> [youtube.com] demonstrates a robot that can read human emotion. As far as I can tell, this is a real demo where the Milo AI thing reacts to the emotions on the girl's face and responds accordingly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Project Natal tech demo for Milo [ youtube.com ] demonstrates a robot that can read human emotion .
As far as I can tell , this is a real demo where the Milo AI thing reacts to the emotions on the girl 's face and responds accordingly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Project Natal tech demo for Milo [youtube.com] demonstrates a robot that can read human emotion.
As far as I can tell, this is a real demo where the Milo AI thing reacts to the emotions on the girl's face and responds accordingly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390068</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>liquiddark</author>
	<datestamp>1260468000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And by "humans" you mean "ladies"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And by " humans " you mean " ladies " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And by "humans" you mean "ladies"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392410</id>
	<title>Good, put them in schools now!</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1260475800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they put these in elementary and high schools now, use them to teach a new generation of Asperger nerds how to do it, so we can further infect the gene pool and avoid the need for any more Revenge of the Nerds movies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they put these in elementary and high schools now , use them to teach a new generation of Asperger nerds how to do it , so we can further infect the gene pool and avoid the need for any more Revenge of the Nerds movies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they put these in elementary and high schools now, use them to teach a new generation of Asperger nerds how to do it, so we can further infect the gene pool and avoid the need for any more Revenge of the Nerds movies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393460</id>
	<title>HOSTILE!</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260436800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>00 HOSTILE!<br>01 KILL!<br>02 GOTO 00</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>00 HOSTILE ! 01 KILL ! 02 GOTO 00</tokentext>
<sentencetext>00 HOSTILE!01 KILL!02 GOTO 00</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389880</id>
	<title>Re:Idea</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1260467520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or we could replace the autistic kids with socially aware robots<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or we could replace the autistic kids with socially aware robots : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or we could replace the autistic kids with socially aware robots :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389802</id>
	<title>Hello</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1260467220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am Robotron Y76P-X12, your new protocol robot. I am capable of detecting your very needs before you even verbally express them. I can tell by your shy appearance and baggy pants that your reproductive organs make you feel insecure. Would you like a free trial of Vimax?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am Robotron Y76P-X12 , your new protocol robot .
I am capable of detecting your very needs before you even verbally express them .
I can tell by your shy appearance and baggy pants that your reproductive organs make you feel insecure .
Would you like a free trial of Vimax ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am Robotron Y76P-X12, your new protocol robot.
I am capable of detecting your very needs before you even verbally express them.
I can tell by your shy appearance and baggy pants that your reproductive organs make you feel insecure.
Would you like a free trial of Vimax?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390440</id>
	<title>computers taking my jerbs!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260469140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"European researchers have developed a new approach to artificial intelligence that could let computers to respond to behaviour as well as commands, reacting intelligently to the subtle nuances of human communication. It's no trivial feat - many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis"</p></div><p>Computers can do math better than me, read body language better than me, and the bots can play games better than me. Looks like my only remaining advantage is a greater efficiency at turning fluid grains into pee.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" European researchers have developed a new approach to artificial intelligence that could let computers to respond to behaviour as well as commands , reacting intelligently to the subtle nuances of human communication .
It 's no trivial feat - many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis " Computers can do math better than me , read body language better than me , and the bots can play games better than me .
Looks like my only remaining advantage is a greater efficiency at turning fluid grains into pee .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"European researchers have developed a new approach to artificial intelligence that could let computers to respond to behaviour as well as commands, reacting intelligently to the subtle nuances of human communication.
It's no trivial feat - many humans struggle with the challenge on a day-to-day basis"Computers can do math better than me, read body language better than me, and the bots can play games better than me.
Looks like my only remaining advantage is a greater efficiency at turning fluid grains into pee.
:(
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392406</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1260475800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dont realize. Some body language have physiological roots, so should be common across cultures. But others are more imitation, things that you learn since child, and that is cultural, and in fact you can find "normal" body language in some cultures that could be pretty offensive in others.

Anyway, current globalization are "normalizing" aspects of culture, including body language, and probably more than spoken languages.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont realize .
Some body language have physiological roots , so should be common across cultures .
But others are more imitation , things that you learn since child , and that is cultural , and in fact you can find " normal " body language in some cultures that could be pretty offensive in others .
Anyway , current globalization are " normalizing " aspects of culture , including body language , and probably more than spoken languages .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont realize.
Some body language have physiological roots, so should be common across cultures.
But others are more imitation, things that you learn since child, and that is cultural, and in fact you can find "normal" body language in some cultures that could be pretty offensive in others.
Anyway, current globalization are "normalizing" aspects of culture, including body language, and probably more than spoken languages.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390304</id>
	<title>Bad Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The robot's achievement is being able to pick out who's talking in a noisy room (combining input from two senses), not reading emotions.
<p>
I guess slashdot submitters aren't that good at reading "article language".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The robot 's achievement is being able to pick out who 's talking in a noisy room ( combining input from two senses ) , not reading emotions .
I guess slashdot submitters are n't that good at reading " article language " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The robot's achievement is being able to pick out who's talking in a noisy room (combining input from two senses), not reading emotions.
I guess slashdot submitters aren't that good at reading "article language".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390254</id>
	<title>Re:Politics</title>
	<author>Mikkeles</author>
	<datestamp>1260468600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't think that politicians could write!</p><p>On an other note, I wonder how this robot would interpret it if I farted in its general direction?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't think that politicians could write ! On an other note , I wonder how this robot would interpret it if I farted in its general direction ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't think that politicians could write!On an other note, I wonder how this robot would interpret it if I farted in its general direction?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390072</id>
	<title>Another excuse for robots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260468000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I swear, I was just trying to read your body language!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I swear , I was just trying to read your body language !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I swear, I was just trying to read your body language!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390708</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1260470100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...to body language, the problem is humans using such an ambiguous form of communication when they could make the effort to be explicit with words.</p></div><p>I don't understand what you mean.  Could you turn on your webcam?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to body language , the problem is humans using such an ambiguous form of communication when they could make the effort to be explicit with words.I do n't understand what you mean .
Could you turn on your webcam ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...to body language, the problem is humans using such an ambiguous form of communication when they could make the effort to be explicit with words.I don't understand what you mean.
Could you turn on your webcam?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390120</id>
	<title>How about interpretive dance?</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1260468240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or humans doing <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S\_i2tziV\_U" title="youtube.com">"The Robot"</a> [youtube.com]? Just sayin'....</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or humans doing " The Robot " [ youtube.com ] ?
Just sayin'... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or humans doing "The Robot" [youtube.com]?
Just sayin'....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30391606</id>
	<title>This is never going to work because...</title>
	<author>lien\_meat</author>
	<datestamp>1260472920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You just CANNOT have geeky programmer types figure out human body language well enough to create a set of working rules to program into a robot!  Why?  Well let's see, most geeky programmer types (myself included) already have a certain social awkwardness and trouble recognizing/reacting to human social quirks as it is, for the main reason that they generally don't associate as often with non-geeky people.  Now, I'm not saying this is always true of course, but I think it's at least generally the case, and probably more so with people who mess around with robots all day.  I think before we see robots that act and seem human, will be the day that normal cheerleaders and soccermoms can work on robot's AIs without realizing what they are doing(which I'm guessing is going to be a long while, unless you count the furby...).</htmltext>
<tokenext>You just CAN NOT have geeky programmer types figure out human body language well enough to create a set of working rules to program into a robot !
Why ? Well let 's see , most geeky programmer types ( myself included ) already have a certain social awkwardness and trouble recognizing/reacting to human social quirks as it is , for the main reason that they generally do n't associate as often with non-geeky people .
Now , I 'm not saying this is always true of course , but I think it 's at least generally the case , and probably more so with people who mess around with robots all day .
I think before we see robots that act and seem human , will be the day that normal cheerleaders and soccermoms can work on robot 's AIs without realizing what they are doing ( which I 'm guessing is going to be a long while , unless you count the furby... ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You just CANNOT have geeky programmer types figure out human body language well enough to create a set of working rules to program into a robot!
Why?  Well let's see, most geeky programmer types (myself included) already have a certain social awkwardness and trouble recognizing/reacting to human social quirks as it is, for the main reason that they generally don't associate as often with non-geeky people.
Now, I'm not saying this is always true of course, but I think it's at least generally the case, and probably more so with people who mess around with robots all day.
I think before we see robots that act and seem human, will be the day that normal cheerleaders and soccermoms can work on robot's AIs without realizing what they are doing(which I'm guessing is going to be a long while, unless you count the furby...).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390178</id>
	<title>Region 1 only?</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1260468420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would not the AI need to be hard-coded with said 'nuances'? Body language is not exactly universal. For example, in the USA, looking in the eyes of the person your are speaking with carries a message of honesty and sincerity. But in the some countries, that same body language carries a message of defiance and disrespect. Most humans can pick up on the difference right away based on autonomic sampling of their surroundings. But I doubt the AI will be able to do that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would not the AI need to be hard-coded with said 'nuances ' ?
Body language is not exactly universal .
For example , in the USA , looking in the eyes of the person your are speaking with carries a message of honesty and sincerity .
But in the some countries , that same body language carries a message of defiance and disrespect .
Most humans can pick up on the difference right away based on autonomic sampling of their surroundings .
But I doubt the AI will be able to do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would not the AI need to be hard-coded with said 'nuances'?
Body language is not exactly universal.
For example, in the USA, looking in the eyes of the person your are speaking with carries a message of honesty and sincerity.
But in the some countries, that same body language carries a message of defiance and disrespect.
Most humans can pick up on the difference right away based on autonomic sampling of their surroundings.
But I doubt the AI will be able to do that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389812</id>
	<title>I...</title>
	<author>oranGoo</author>
	<datestamp>1260467280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>for one, welco... oh, crap</htmltext>
<tokenext>for one , welco... oh , crap</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for one, welco... oh, crap</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30391658</id>
	<title>AI "smarter" than Human Intelligence?</title>
	<author>wall0645</author>
	<datestamp>1260473100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My question is, would it be a good idea to let an AI understand more about us than we do? Assuming it can even be done, given our lack of understanding about ourselves. What if we squint our eyes, move our eyebrows, or make a hand gesture without knowing it, and without understanding fully what our subconscious means by it? Should an AI be allowed to know exactly what were are feeling and thinking, and then act upon it?<br> <br>While this could be very useful, for example a personal AI telling us that we should take a break, or provide us with sound assurances or advice, I can also see it being taken advantage of. If you had a high understanding of body language, and the needs of a certain person or group, you could influence people almost subconsciously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My question is , would it be a good idea to let an AI understand more about us than we do ?
Assuming it can even be done , given our lack of understanding about ourselves .
What if we squint our eyes , move our eyebrows , or make a hand gesture without knowing it , and without understanding fully what our subconscious means by it ?
Should an AI be allowed to know exactly what were are feeling and thinking , and then act upon it ?
While this could be very useful , for example a personal AI telling us that we should take a break , or provide us with sound assurances or advice , I can also see it being taken advantage of .
If you had a high understanding of body language , and the needs of a certain person or group , you could influence people almost subconsciously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My question is, would it be a good idea to let an AI understand more about us than we do?
Assuming it can even be done, given our lack of understanding about ourselves.
What if we squint our eyes, move our eyebrows, or make a hand gesture without knowing it, and without understanding fully what our subconscious means by it?
Should an AI be allowed to know exactly what were are feeling and thinking, and then act upon it?
While this could be very useful, for example a personal AI telling us that we should take a break, or provide us with sound assurances or advice, I can also see it being taken advantage of.
If you had a high understanding of body language, and the needs of a certain person or group, you could influence people almost subconsciously.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389824</id>
	<title>Hmm..</title>
	<author>Kc\_spot</author>
	<datestamp>1260467340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What I'm getting with this is George Orwell's 1984... 'cept with computers spotting the revolutionists</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I 'm getting with this is George Orwell 's 1984... 'cept with computers spotting the revolutionists</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I'm getting with this is George Orwell's 1984... 'cept with computers spotting the revolutionists</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30399626</id>
	<title>Clippy</title>
	<author>cerealito</author>
	<datestamp>1260528900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How is this news?
Clippy recognized ALL my gestures back in 1998.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this news ?
Clippy recognized ALL my gestures back in 1998 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this news?
Clippy recognized ALL my gestures back in 1998.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392404</id>
	<title>oblig xkcd</title>
	<author>elFisico</author>
	<datestamp>1260475800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://xkcd.com/632/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/632/</a> [xkcd.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xkcd.com/632/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xkcd.com/632/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392696</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260477060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That just makes it worse...</p><p><em>Lesbian</em> robots pick up more chicks than your average slashdotter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That just makes it worse...Lesbian robots pick up more chicks than your average slashdotter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That just makes it worse...Lesbian robots pick up more chicks than your average slashdotter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390164</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1260468360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also think it serves as a bit of a social firewall to keep the "ins" and the "outs" just the way they are.</p><p>I suspect that lots of people are subtle on purpose so that only the select few they want in on the message actually understand it, deliberately leaving the socially impaired outsiders clueless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also think it serves as a bit of a social firewall to keep the " ins " and the " outs " just the way they are.I suspect that lots of people are subtle on purpose so that only the select few they want in on the message actually understand it , deliberately leaving the socially impaired outsiders clueless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also think it serves as a bit of a social firewall to keep the "ins" and the "outs" just the way they are.I suspect that lots of people are subtle on purpose so that only the select few they want in on the message actually understand it, deliberately leaving the socially impaired outsiders clueless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390166</id>
	<title>noisy inputs</title>
	<author>bigmaddog</author>
	<datestamp>1260468360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This kind of system, along with things that react to facial expressions, eye movement or brain activity are cool and everything, but what kind of usability gains are we going to get here? Is it really an advantage to have your computer know you're pissed, for example, or sad? Oh yeah, we can get a google-ads type response to your mood; "Looks like you're crying - click here to FedEx Kleenex," or maybe alert security that you've become enraged in your cubicle and are an imminent threat to your coworkers and company property - great. Conversely, if this does do something useful, you'd doubtlessly end up in situations where you're second-guessing the algorithms to accomplish something with twitches and contortions you could otherwise do with a few clicks or not bother with at all.</p><p>I'd be much much happier if we got some software out there that can tell that I should have used "first" instead of "firs" in a sentence that currently passes as correct in grammar/spell checking, instead of criticizing me for using passive tense, but that's all less cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This kind of system , along with things that react to facial expressions , eye movement or brain activity are cool and everything , but what kind of usability gains are we going to get here ?
Is it really an advantage to have your computer know you 're pissed , for example , or sad ?
Oh yeah , we can get a google-ads type response to your mood ; " Looks like you 're crying - click here to FedEx Kleenex , " or maybe alert security that you 've become enraged in your cubicle and are an imminent threat to your coworkers and company property - great .
Conversely , if this does do something useful , you 'd doubtlessly end up in situations where you 're second-guessing the algorithms to accomplish something with twitches and contortions you could otherwise do with a few clicks or not bother with at all.I 'd be much much happier if we got some software out there that can tell that I should have used " first " instead of " firs " in a sentence that currently passes as correct in grammar/spell checking , instead of criticizing me for using passive tense , but that 's all less cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This kind of system, along with things that react to facial expressions, eye movement or brain activity are cool and everything, but what kind of usability gains are we going to get here?
Is it really an advantage to have your computer know you're pissed, for example, or sad?
Oh yeah, we can get a google-ads type response to your mood; "Looks like you're crying - click here to FedEx Kleenex," or maybe alert security that you've become enraged in your cubicle and are an imminent threat to your coworkers and company property - great.
Conversely, if this does do something useful, you'd doubtlessly end up in situations where you're second-guessing the algorithms to accomplish something with twitches and contortions you could otherwise do with a few clicks or not bother with at all.I'd be much much happier if we got some software out there that can tell that I should have used "first" instead of "firs" in a sentence that currently passes as correct in grammar/spell checking, instead of criticizing me for using passive tense, but that's all less cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30395558</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260444720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be fair they at least read the first two paragraphs of the article...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair they at least read the first two paragraphs of the article.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair they at least read the first two paragraphs of the article...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30399024</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>Money for Nothin'</author>
	<datestamp>1260563640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wrong; cultural distinctions exist.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V\_sign#V\_sign\_as\_an\_insult" title="wikipedia.org">The "V sign" is a common symbol of "peace" in the U.S., and formerly of "victory" during the World Wars.  But in Australia?  It's offensive, as George Bush Sr. found the hard way in 1992.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong ; cultural distinctions exist .
The " V sign " is a common symbol of " peace " in the U.S. , and formerly of " victory " during the World Wars .
But in Australia ?
It 's offensive , as George Bush Sr. found the hard way in 1992 .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong; cultural distinctions exist.
The "V sign" is a common symbol of "peace" in the U.S., and formerly of "victory" during the World Wars.
But in Australia?
It's offensive, as George Bush Sr. found the hard way in 1992.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392430</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260475860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. Did the submitter not read the article, did the article change, or is this some kind of experiment to see if anybody ever reads the articles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
Did the submitter not read the article , did the article change , or is this some kind of experiment to see if anybody ever reads the articles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
Did the submitter not read the article, did the article change, or is this some kind of experiment to see if anybody ever reads the articles?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30391422</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>divisionbyzero</author>
	<datestamp>1260472260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Paranoid much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Paranoid much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paranoid much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389548</id>
	<title>I knew it!</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1260466560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always suspected Tim Roth was a robot, but now I have proof!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always suspected Tim Roth was a robot , but now I have proof !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always suspected Tim Roth was a robot, but now I have proof!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389732</id>
	<title>Hey robots: READ THIS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260467100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*middle finger*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,,|,,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* middle finger * , , | ,,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*middle finger* ,,|,,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390162</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1260468360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um, you do realize that body language is a universal language that cuts across cultures, ethnicities, and time, don't you? There's an old Chinese proverb that says "We all smile in the same language." And that's as true today as it was thousands of years ago when the first person (who may not have been anywhere near China) said it.</p><p>Body language is subtle and can be ambiguous, but that does not detract from its importance in human communication. In short, the problem isn't with the rest of the world using, it's with you for not making the effort to understand it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um , you do realize that body language is a universal language that cuts across cultures , ethnicities , and time , do n't you ?
There 's an old Chinese proverb that says " We all smile in the same language .
" And that 's as true today as it was thousands of years ago when the first person ( who may not have been anywhere near China ) said it.Body language is subtle and can be ambiguous , but that does not detract from its importance in human communication .
In short , the problem is n't with the rest of the world using , it 's with you for not making the effort to understand it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um, you do realize that body language is a universal language that cuts across cultures, ethnicities, and time, don't you?
There's an old Chinese proverb that says "We all smile in the same language.
" And that's as true today as it was thousands of years ago when the first person (who may not have been anywhere near China) said it.Body language is subtle and can be ambiguous, but that does not detract from its importance in human communication.
In short, the problem isn't with the rest of the world using, it's with you for not making the effort to understand it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392616</id>
	<title>Re:Cool</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260476700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I&rsquo;d hit that!</p><p>What? It&rsquo;s better than reading Slashdot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I    d hit that ! What ?
It    s better than reading Slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I’d hit that!What?
It’s better than reading Slashdot!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389940</id>
	<title>Re:the problem is not humans struggling to respond</title>
	<author>djupedal</author>
	<datestamp>1260467640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless of course they speak different languages...
<br>
<br>
In which case the problem at hand is narrow-mindedness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless of course they speak different languages.. . In which case the problem at hand is narrow-mindedness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless of course they speak different languages...


In which case the problem at hand is narrow-mindedness.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390436</id>
	<title>Can they open-source the algorithm</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1260469140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so that I can follow it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>so that I can follow it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so that I can follow it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30398350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30395558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30394714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30391422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_10_1626244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30399024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392616
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30394714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30393512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390254
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30398350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390634
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392046
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30391422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30399024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30392430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30395558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389880
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30391606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30389802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_10_1626244.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_10_1626244.30390072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
