<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_09_1323250</id>
	<title>D-Link's New Boxee Box Runs Linux, Eyes Netflix</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260366120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>DeviceGuru writes <i>"OpenBoxeeBox.com is reporting that <a href="http://openboxeebox.com/d-link-tips-linux-based-boxee-box/">D-Link's new DM-380 Boxee Box</a>, demonstrated last night in New York at <a href="http://openboxeebox.com/boxee-beta-previewed/">Boxee's Boxee Beta</a> unveiling, runs Linux but does not yet stream Netflix video-on-demand titles. However, according to an unnamed Boxee insider, 'the goal is to have the device support Netflix.' The DM-380 features ports for HDMI, optical digital and analog audio, dual USB, and wired Ethernet, plus it has an SD card slot and built-in WiFi. Photos and screenshots are at OpenBoxeeBox, and additional <a href="http://www.dlink.com/boxeebox">details are on D-Link's website</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>DeviceGuru writes " OpenBoxeeBox.com is reporting that D-Link 's new DM-380 Boxee Box , demonstrated last night in New York at Boxee 's Boxee Beta unveiling , runs Linux but does not yet stream Netflix video-on-demand titles .
However , according to an unnamed Boxee insider , 'the goal is to have the device support Netflix .
' The DM-380 features ports for HDMI , optical digital and analog audio , dual USB , and wired Ethernet , plus it has an SD card slot and built-in WiFi .
Photos and screenshots are at OpenBoxeeBox , and additional details are on D-Link 's website .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DeviceGuru writes "OpenBoxeeBox.com is reporting that D-Link's new DM-380 Boxee Box, demonstrated last night in New York at Boxee's Boxee Beta unveiling, runs Linux but does not yet stream Netflix video-on-demand titles.
However, according to an unnamed Boxee insider, 'the goal is to have the device support Netflix.
' The DM-380 features ports for HDMI, optical digital and analog audio, dual USB, and wired Ethernet, plus it has an SD card slot and built-in WiFi.
Photos and screenshots are at OpenBoxeeBox, and additional details are on D-Link's website.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259593020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This will never sell.  It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.  It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.</p></div><p>I don't think it looks like crap, but it definitely doesn't look like it belongs in my A/V cabinet. Just make it look like a DVD player or something close and I think it would have a better chance of taking off. But, then again, the only people who will be buying this to begin with already know what Boxee is, which means this thing was never going to sell well anyways.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will never sell .
It does n't fit into the entertainment center paradigm .
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.I do n't think it looks like crap , but it definitely does n't look like it belongs in my A/V cabinet .
Just make it look like a DVD player or something close and I think it would have a better chance of taking off .
But , then again , the only people who will be buying this to begin with already know what Boxee is , which means this thing was never going to sell well anyways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will never sell.
It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.I don't think it looks like crap, but it definitely doesn't look like it belongs in my A/V cabinet.
Just make it look like a DVD player or something close and I think it would have a better chance of taking off.
But, then again, the only people who will be buying this to begin with already know what Boxee is, which means this thing was never going to sell well anyways.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377304</id>
	<title>Re:Netflix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two options, either Moonlight improves to the state where it can work with the Netflix service, or D-Link goes to Netflix and says 'we have <i>n</i> units installed and connected to TVs, we think this is a market that could make you money and we'd like to work with you to get it supported'.  The place I rent DVDs from streams using Flash, so it already works with Linux and OS X.  They originally trialled some MS solution, but a lot of people complained (it turns out that the people who ditch their TV and pay a monthly subscription to rent DVDs is a group with a large overlap with people who don't use Windows).  If Netflix is losing potential customers by using Silverlight then they may well switch to Flash or something open.  If they're going to deploy a second system to support non-Windows users, and this also works on Windows, there's no real reason for them to keep maintaining the Windows-only one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Two options , either Moonlight improves to the state where it can work with the Netflix service , or D-Link goes to Netflix and says 'we have n units installed and connected to TVs , we think this is a market that could make you money and we 'd like to work with you to get it supported' .
The place I rent DVDs from streams using Flash , so it already works with Linux and OS X. They originally trialled some MS solution , but a lot of people complained ( it turns out that the people who ditch their TV and pay a monthly subscription to rent DVDs is a group with a large overlap with people who do n't use Windows ) .
If Netflix is losing potential customers by using Silverlight then they may well switch to Flash or something open .
If they 're going to deploy a second system to support non-Windows users , and this also works on Windows , there 's no real reason for them to keep maintaining the Windows-only one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two options, either Moonlight improves to the state where it can work with the Netflix service, or D-Link goes to Netflix and says 'we have n units installed and connected to TVs, we think this is a market that could make you money and we'd like to work with you to get it supported'.
The place I rent DVDs from streams using Flash, so it already works with Linux and OS X.  They originally trialled some MS solution, but a lot of people complained (it turns out that the people who ditch their TV and pay a monthly subscription to rent DVDs is a group with a large overlap with people who don't use Windows).
If Netflix is losing potential customers by using Silverlight then they may well switch to Flash or something open.
If they're going to deploy a second system to support non-Windows users, and this also works on Windows, there's no real reason for them to keep maintaining the Windows-only one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378086</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1259603280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No kidding - it didn't take but 1 quick glance at this thing to determine "Nope, I'm not buying that.".</p><p>Then again we may see "corner addons" appear on Ebay to make the thing into an actual box shape . . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No kidding - it did n't take but 1 quick glance at this thing to determine " Nope , I 'm not buying that .
" .Then again we may see " corner addons " appear on Ebay to make the thing into an actual box shape .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kidding - it didn't take but 1 quick glance at this thing to determine "Nope, I'm not buying that.
".Then again we may see "corner addons" appear on Ebay to make the thing into an actual box shape .
. .</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376424</id>
	<title>Form over functionality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259592600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad that thing is formed to take as much as space as possible, there is no way I get a permission from the mrs. to purchase one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad that thing is formed to take as much as space as possible , there is no way I get a permission from the mrs. to purchase one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad that thing is formed to take as much as space as possible, there is no way I get a permission from the mrs. to purchase one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376400</id>
	<title>Uhh... So, Hi guys. My name is boxxy...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259592420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I aint trollin...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I aint trollin.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I aint trollin...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380306</id>
	<title>Re:Still no Blu-Ray?</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1259572680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do <i>not</i> want a consumer device with an optical drive built in, unless the drive <i>is</i> the device. It's always the first thing to fail. That's not a big deal on computers, where such drives are commodity OEM products, so replacing them is not an expensive send-it-back-to-the-factory process. But everybody I know who's bought a TV, VCR, or game console with a blu-ray built in has regretted it.</p><p>Since this box looks extremely hackable, you could probably add a blu-ray drive to it. Problem solved.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>'m waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.</p></div><p>Why does it have to be a PS3? Why not just run XBMC on a Linux box with a blu-ray drive?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do not want a consumer device with an optical drive built in , unless the drive is the device .
It 's always the first thing to fail .
That 's not a big deal on computers , where such drives are commodity OEM products , so replacing them is not an expensive send-it-back-to-the-factory process .
But everybody I know who 's bought a TV , VCR , or game console with a blu-ray built in has regretted it.Since this box looks extremely hackable , you could probably add a blu-ray drive to it .
Problem solved .
'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.Why does it have to be a PS3 ?
Why not just run XBMC on a Linux box with a blu-ray drive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do not want a consumer device with an optical drive built in, unless the drive is the device.
It's always the first thing to fail.
That's not a big deal on computers, where such drives are commodity OEM products, so replacing them is not an expensive send-it-back-to-the-factory process.
But everybody I know who's bought a TV, VCR, or game console with a blu-ray built in has regretted it.Since this box looks extremely hackable, you could probably add a blu-ray drive to it.
Problem solved.
'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.Why does it have to be a PS3?
Why not just run XBMC on a Linux box with a blu-ray drive?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378058</id>
	<title>Re:opengl to directx?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the Boxee blog:<p><div class="quote"><p>As part of the Beta we also changed the underlying graphic library <b>on Windows</b> from OpenGL to DirectX</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Boxee blog : As part of the Beta we also changed the underlying graphic library on Windows from OpenGL to DirectX</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Boxee blog:As part of the Beta we also changed the underlying graphic library on Windows from OpenGL to DirectX
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377294</id>
	<title>Re:Netflix</title>
	<author>no\_such\_user</author>
	<datestamp>1259598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tivos runs Linux.  Tivos support Netflix.  Therefore, BoxeeBox might just be able to run Netflix.</p><p>It's still ugly, though.  Maybe someone will offer a 3rd party case for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tivos runs Linux .
Tivos support Netflix .
Therefore , BoxeeBox might just be able to run Netflix.It 's still ugly , though .
Maybe someone will offer a 3rd party case for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tivos runs Linux.
Tivos support Netflix.
Therefore, BoxeeBox might just be able to run Netflix.It's still ugly, though.
Maybe someone will offer a 3rd party case for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377102</id>
	<title>Re:with DTV/PVR?</title>
	<author>dsoltesz</author>
	<datestamp>1259597460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you want this thing? Just get over it and build your own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you want this thing ?
Just get over it and build your own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you want this thing?
Just get over it and build your own.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376780</id>
	<title>Re:Form over functionality</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>oh hell, you are such an obvious lying troll: <br> <br>
1. you're on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. , you obviously haven't gotten close enough to a girl to ask one out, let alone marry one<br>
2. if we assume, for the moment,  that the first part of your premise is in fact factual, way to wear the pants in the family, letting the mrs encroach on your domain, wussemeyer...</htmltext>
<tokenext>oh hell , you are such an obvious lying troll : 1. you 're on / .
, you obviously have n't gotten close enough to a girl to ask one out , let alone marry one 2. if we assume , for the moment , that the first part of your premise is in fact factual , way to wear the pants in the family , letting the mrs encroach on your domain , wussemeyer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh hell, you are such an obvious lying troll:  
1. you're on /.
, you obviously haven't gotten close enough to a girl to ask one out, let alone marry one
2. if we assume, for the moment,  that the first part of your premise is in fact factual, way to wear the pants in the family, letting the mrs encroach on your domain, wussemeyer...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</id>
	<title>It looks like crap</title>
	<author>MistrBlank</author>
	<datestamp>1259592600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This will never sell.  It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.  It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will never sell .
It does n't fit into the entertainment center paradigm .
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will never sell.
It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377014</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1259596860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are being too kind, merely using "crap" to describe it. Start with "fugly" and go from there. It needs a copious beating with an Apple beauty stick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are being too kind , merely using " crap " to describe it .
Start with " fugly " and go from there .
It needs a copious beating with an Apple beauty stick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are being too kind, merely using "crap" to describe it.
Start with "fugly" and go from there.
It needs a copious beating with an Apple beauty stick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377588</id>
	<title>Re:with DTV/PVR?</title>
	<author>Killer Orca</author>
	<datestamp>1259600280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I recommend having a computer handle the back-end work of recording and separate devices that can accept network streams at each TV.  As for a setup that allows this, I know Dvico makes many, including this <a href="http://www.tvix.co.kr/ENG/products/PVRM6640N.aspx" title="tvix.co.kr">http://www.tvix.co.kr/ENG/products/PVRM6640N.aspx</a> [tvix.co.kr] for recording.  I can't verify their reliability though, never used one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I recommend having a computer handle the back-end work of recording and separate devices that can accept network streams at each TV .
As for a setup that allows this , I know Dvico makes many , including this http : //www.tvix.co.kr/ENG/products/PVRM6640N.aspx [ tvix.co.kr ] for recording .
I ca n't verify their reliability though , never used one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I recommend having a computer handle the back-end work of recording and separate devices that can accept network streams at each TV.
As for a setup that allows this, I know Dvico makes many, including this http://www.tvix.co.kr/ENG/products/PVRM6640N.aspx [tvix.co.kr] for recording.
I can't verify their reliability though, never used one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379468</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1259610660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This will never sell. It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm. It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.</i></p><p>I hit the page for comments, and the first 5 amount to "It'll never work, get off my lawn". I'm reminded that when Apple came out with their first iPod, comments here on slashdork were loaded with downer reviews. Here's a couple of them</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame."</p></div><p>This, btw, was in the article summary. A little further down:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.</p> </div><p>Or, next comment down:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Since when is Apple concerned about market share? They do what capitalism was born to do. Cater to a small market, and do it the right way.</p> </div><p>Sure, not everyone was downer, but being pissy because you can't stick a remote on a 4" wide box? I don't know about you, but I have 2 or three FEET behind my flat-screen TV in my entertainment center, because although my 32" TV is just 3" thick, the stereo and media center computer are still like 2' deep, with piles of ugly cords carefully hidden in the back.</p><p>Don't tell me that this "won't fit" the media center paradigm. The media center paradigm needs to get rid of piles of wires and switch to bluetooth, with lightweight devices that fit wherever they look nice. (EG: on the bookshelf or mantle piece)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will never sell .
It does n't fit into the entertainment center paradigm .
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.I hit the page for comments , and the first 5 amount to " It 'll never work , get off my lawn " .
I 'm reminded that when Apple came out with their first iPod , comments here on slashdork were loaded with downer reviews .
Here 's a couple of them " No wireless .
Less space than a nomad .
Lame. " This , btw , was in the article summary .
A little further down : Pretty slim , eh ?
I do n't see many sales in the future of iPod .
Or , next comment down : Since when is Apple concerned about market share ?
They do what capitalism was born to do .
Cater to a small market , and do it the right way .
Sure , not everyone was downer , but being pissy because you ca n't stick a remote on a 4 " wide box ?
I do n't know about you , but I have 2 or three FEET behind my flat-screen TV in my entertainment center , because although my 32 " TV is just 3 " thick , the stereo and media center computer are still like 2 ' deep , with piles of ugly cords carefully hidden in the back.Do n't tell me that this " wo n't fit " the media center paradigm .
The media center paradigm needs to get rid of piles of wires and switch to bluetooth , with lightweight devices that fit wherever they look nice .
( EG : on the bookshelf or mantle piece )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will never sell.
It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.I hit the page for comments, and the first 5 amount to "It'll never work, get off my lawn".
I'm reminded that when Apple came out with their first iPod, comments here on slashdork were loaded with downer reviews.
Here's a couple of them"No wireless.
Less space than a nomad.
Lame."This, btw, was in the article summary.
A little further down:Pretty slim, eh?
I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.
Or, next comment down:Since when is Apple concerned about market share?
They do what capitalism was born to do.
Cater to a small market, and do it the right way.
Sure, not everyone was downer, but being pissy because you can't stick a remote on a 4" wide box?
I don't know about you, but I have 2 or three FEET behind my flat-screen TV in my entertainment center, because although my 32" TV is just 3" thick, the stereo and media center computer are still like 2' deep, with piles of ugly cords carefully hidden in the back.Don't tell me that this "won't fit" the media center paradigm.
The media center paradigm needs to get rid of piles of wires and switch to bluetooth, with lightweight devices that fit wherever they look nice.
(EG: on the bookshelf or mantle piece)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376474</id>
	<title>Tongue twister?  Gosh, yes!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259592960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boxee Box Beta Linux boxen botox begorah Batman!  This could only be the work of the Riddler.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boxee Box Beta Linux boxen botox begorah Batman !
This could only be the work of the Riddler .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boxee Box Beta Linux boxen botox begorah Batman!
This could only be the work of the Riddler.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377072</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh huh.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The unusually shaped box measures 4.7-inches on a side and has a flush power button on its top. It was designed by Astro Studios, which counts among its past accomplishments Microsoft&rsquo;s stylish Xbox 360+</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh huh.The unusually shaped box measures 4.7-inches on a side and has a flush power button on its top .
It was designed by Astro Studios , which counts among its past accomplishments Microsoft    s stylish Xbox 360 +</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh huh.The unusually shaped box measures 4.7-inches on a side and has a flush power button on its top.
It was designed by Astro Studios, which counts among its past accomplishments Microsoft’s stylish Xbox 360+
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377826</id>
	<title>Re:opengl to directx?</title>
	<author>limaxray</author>
	<datestamp>1259601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Ubuntu version (and I assume the OS X version) use OpenGL solely for the menus and overlays.  VDPAU is used for decoding video on the GPU, and it works exceptionally well.</p><p>Up until now though, this meant Windows users were SOL when it came to hardware accelerated video decoding - I'm guessing DirectX gives them this functionality.</p><p>The amusing part though is that the original project (XMBC) used DirectX since it only ran on the original XBox, and the XBMC project ported to OpenGL to support other platforms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Ubuntu version ( and I assume the OS X version ) use OpenGL solely for the menus and overlays .
VDPAU is used for decoding video on the GPU , and it works exceptionally well.Up until now though , this meant Windows users were SOL when it came to hardware accelerated video decoding - I 'm guessing DirectX gives them this functionality.The amusing part though is that the original project ( XMBC ) used DirectX since it only ran on the original XBox , and the XBMC project ported to OpenGL to support other platforms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Ubuntu version (and I assume the OS X version) use OpenGL solely for the menus and overlays.
VDPAU is used for decoding video on the GPU, and it works exceptionally well.Up until now though, this meant Windows users were SOL when it came to hardware accelerated video decoding - I'm guessing DirectX gives them this functionality.The amusing part though is that the original project (XMBC) used DirectX since it only ran on the original XBox, and the XBMC project ported to OpenGL to support other platforms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377704</id>
	<title>Re:wifi, hdmi, usb...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, but does it run BSD ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , but does it run BSD ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, but does it run BSD ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376612</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259593860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If price is below 200$ as they say and it already runs linux, then perhaps hack it and use use it as a home "server"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If price is below 200 $ as they say and it already runs linux , then perhaps hack it and use use it as a home " server "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If price is below 200$ as they say and it already runs linux, then perhaps hack it and use use it as a home "server"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376904</id>
	<title>Re:HD Limitations?</title>
	<author>Junior Samples</author>
	<datestamp>1259596140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does anybody know about HD support, I know it has it but curious if it's limited to only 720p like the AppleTV or if it will display 1080i/p.</p><p>And is there anything to stop me from installing XBMC on there. (I doubt there is but I'm not a big fan of boxee)</p></div><p>I was looking for a high definition media player and ended up purchasing a Popcornhour Model C200 networked media player after ruling out Apple TV. <a href="http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/" title="popcornhour.com">http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/</a> [popcornhour.com]</p><p>The C200 accommodates 1 or 2 internal hard drives and has a 3.5" bay for a Blue Ray or DVD player as well. 1080P playback is not a problem.  There are very few file formats that won't work with this player.</p><p>Here are the C200 technical specifications: <a href="http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/index.php?pluginoption=productspec&amp;item\_id=12" title="popcornhour.com">http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/index.php?pluginoption=productspec&amp;item\_id=12</a> [popcornhour.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody know about HD support , I know it has it but curious if it 's limited to only 720p like the AppleTV or if it will display 1080i/p.And is there anything to stop me from installing XBMC on there .
( I doubt there is but I 'm not a big fan of boxee ) I was looking for a high definition media player and ended up purchasing a Popcornhour Model C200 networked media player after ruling out Apple TV .
http : //www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/ [ popcornhour.com ] The C200 accommodates 1 or 2 internal hard drives and has a 3.5 " bay for a Blue Ray or DVD player as well .
1080P playback is not a problem .
There are very few file formats that wo n't work with this player.Here are the C200 technical specifications : http : //www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/index.php ? pluginoption = productspec&amp;item \ _id = 12 [ popcornhour.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody know about HD support, I know it has it but curious if it's limited to only 720p like the AppleTV or if it will display 1080i/p.And is there anything to stop me from installing XBMC on there.
(I doubt there is but I'm not a big fan of boxee)I was looking for a high definition media player and ended up purchasing a Popcornhour Model C200 networked media player after ruling out Apple TV.
http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/ [popcornhour.com]The C200 accommodates 1 or 2 internal hard drives and has a 3.5" bay for a Blue Ray or DVD player as well.
1080P playback is not a problem.
There are very few file formats that won't work with this player.Here are the C200 technical specifications: http://www.popcornhour.com/onlinestore/index.php?pluginoption=productspec&amp;item\_id=12 [popcornhour.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378506</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>msimm</author>
	<datestamp>1259605440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It looks like an interesting experiment. I've been using their <a href="http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=547" title="dlink.com">DSM-750</a> [dlink.com] for a year or so and although it's missing some of the more advanced features of something like MythTV (no imdb lookups, no cover browsing) it's been a pretty nice way to get away from the computer and enjoy my media without burning everything to coasters.

I agree the design of this thing is terrible (for a piece of functional hardware) but if it does marginally well I'm sure we'll see other vendors take a more tasteful approach in the near-future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like an interesting experiment .
I 've been using their DSM-750 [ dlink.com ] for a year or so and although it 's missing some of the more advanced features of something like MythTV ( no imdb lookups , no cover browsing ) it 's been a pretty nice way to get away from the computer and enjoy my media without burning everything to coasters .
I agree the design of this thing is terrible ( for a piece of functional hardware ) but if it does marginally well I 'm sure we 'll see other vendors take a more tasteful approach in the near-future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like an interesting experiment.
I've been using their DSM-750 [dlink.com] for a year or so and although it's missing some of the more advanced features of something like MythTV (no imdb lookups, no cover browsing) it's been a pretty nice way to get away from the computer and enjoy my media without burning everything to coasters.
I agree the design of this thing is terrible (for a piece of functional hardware) but if it does marginally well I'm sure we'll see other vendors take a more tasteful approach in the near-future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377222</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Xoltri</author>
	<datestamp>1259598180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never understood why they still make home theater electronics so huge with gobs of empty space in them just to fit someone's idea of how they should stack together.  This isn't 1980 anymore, move on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never understood why they still make home theater electronics so huge with gobs of empty space in them just to fit someone 's idea of how they should stack together .
This is n't 1980 anymore , move on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never understood why they still make home theater electronics so huge with gobs of empty space in them just to fit someone's idea of how they should stack together.
This isn't 1980 anymore, move on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377436</id>
	<title>They called it OpenBoxeeBox...</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1259599380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854</id>
	<title>Still no Blu-Ray?</title>
	<author>Tyr\_7BE</author>
	<datestamp>1259595900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's too bad.  Otherwise this would have been a serious contender for my next media box.</p><p>It seems there's no "do-it-all" media center on the market.  Games, Blu-Ray, XBMC.  Pick any two.  I'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.  When that happens, I will have chosen my corner in this fight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's too bad .
Otherwise this would have been a serious contender for my next media box.It seems there 's no " do-it-all " media center on the market .
Games , Blu-Ray , XBMC .
Pick any two .
I 'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3 .
When that happens , I will have chosen my corner in this fight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's too bad.
Otherwise this would have been a serious contender for my next media box.It seems there's no "do-it-all" media center on the market.
Games, Blu-Ray, XBMC.
Pick any two.
I'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.
When that happens, I will have chosen my corner in this fight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376672</id>
	<title>Why not Tivo?</title>
	<author>wift</author>
	<datestamp>1259594400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First thought. Gimmicky, not stackable and this is something that Tivo should have already done.  Seems like a bunch of us had the same first impression too.  Won't bode well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First thought .
Gimmicky , not stackable and this is something that Tivo should have already done .
Seems like a bunch of us had the same first impression too .
Wo n't bode well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First thought.
Gimmicky, not stackable and this is something that Tivo should have already done.
Seems like a bunch of us had the same first impression too.
Won't bode well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380354</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>lysdexia</author>
	<datestamp>1259573040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cool, I'll hook a light sail to it and zip out to the galactic router.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool , I 'll hook a light sail to it and zip out to the galactic router .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool, I'll hook a light sail to it and zip out to the galactic router.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376686</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1259594460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reminds me of a couple of years back when we hired a designer fresh out of art school. He had plenty of artistic and creative energy, but little to no concern with what consumers actually wanted or needed. I think he lasted about 6 months. I guess he's not compromising his vision in the unemployment line now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of a couple of years back when we hired a designer fresh out of art school .
He had plenty of artistic and creative energy , but little to no concern with what consumers actually wanted or needed .
I think he lasted about 6 months .
I guess he 's not compromising his vision in the unemployment line now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of a couple of years back when we hired a designer fresh out of art school.
He had plenty of artistic and creative energy, but little to no concern with what consumers actually wanted or needed.
I think he lasted about 6 months.
I guess he's not compromising his vision in the unemployment line now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377488</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>uglyduckling</author>
	<datestamp>1259599740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is TINY.  It's not meant to fit into any 'paradigm', it's meant to live behind the TV amongst the cluster of cables, or else in the gap between the TV panel and the shelf/table it's on, if you prefer to see the unit.  Check out TFA, the device is the size of a coke can.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is TINY .
It 's not meant to fit into any 'paradigm ' , it 's meant to live behind the TV amongst the cluster of cables , or else in the gap between the TV panel and the shelf/table it 's on , if you prefer to see the unit .
Check out TFA , the device is the size of a coke can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is TINY.
It's not meant to fit into any 'paradigm', it's meant to live behind the TV amongst the cluster of cables, or else in the gap between the TV panel and the shelf/table it's on, if you prefer to see the unit.
Check out TFA, the device is the size of a coke can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380358</id>
	<title>Re:HD Limitations?</title>
	<author>dotgain</author>
	<datestamp>1259573040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Early Apple TVs supported 1080i as well as 720p (I have one).  Newer models support 1080p in addition.<p>
Maybe you got it confused with iTunes rentals, which don't seem to be available higher than 720p.  Hope this helps, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Early Apple TVs supported 1080i as well as 720p ( I have one ) .
Newer models support 1080p in addition .
Maybe you got it confused with iTunes rentals , which do n't seem to be available higher than 720p .
Hope this helps , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Early Apple TVs supported 1080i as well as 720p (I have one).
Newer models support 1080p in addition.
Maybe you got it confused with iTunes rentals, which don't seem to be available higher than 720p.
Hope this helps, anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377666</id>
	<title>Re:Netflix</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The technology Netflix uses for streaming movies on your computer (and by that, I mean "your x86 box that runs Mac OS or a modern version of Windows," unfortunately) is, in fact, Silverlight.</p><p>But Netflix is, and has been, pushing <b>hard</b> for more <b>device</b> adoption of streaming -- at this point, you can stream Netflix on Roku boxes, Samsung and LG players, some Sony TVs, PS3s, XBoxes, etc.  It's not the case -- and you should not assume -- all these systems are using Silverlight to do aforementioned streaming.</p><p>Someone below mentions the possibility of D-Link coming to Netflix and saying "we have X boxes, we'd like to have some help."  I suspect they'd find a warm reception.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The technology Netflix uses for streaming movies on your computer ( and by that , I mean " your x86 box that runs Mac OS or a modern version of Windows , " unfortunately ) is , in fact , Silverlight.But Netflix is , and has been , pushing hard for more device adoption of streaming -- at this point , you can stream Netflix on Roku boxes , Samsung and LG players , some Sony TVs , PS3s , XBoxes , etc .
It 's not the case -- and you should not assume -- all these systems are using Silverlight to do aforementioned streaming.Someone below mentions the possibility of D-Link coming to Netflix and saying " we have X boxes , we 'd like to have some help .
" I suspect they 'd find a warm reception .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The technology Netflix uses for streaming movies on your computer (and by that, I mean "your x86 box that runs Mac OS or a modern version of Windows," unfortunately) is, in fact, Silverlight.But Netflix is, and has been, pushing hard for more device adoption of streaming -- at this point, you can stream Netflix on Roku boxes, Samsung and LG players, some Sony TVs, PS3s, XBoxes, etc.
It's not the case -- and you should not assume -- all these systems are using Silverlight to do aforementioned streaming.Someone below mentions the possibility of D-Link coming to Netflix and saying "we have X boxes, we'd like to have some help.
"  I suspect they'd find a warm reception.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377278</id>
	<title>Re:Netflix</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1259598540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>moonlight is a linux implementation of silverlight. It has at least some support from microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>moonlight is a linux implementation of silverlight .
It has at least some support from microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>moonlight is a linux implementation of silverlight.
It has at least some support from microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376788</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or you could buy any of the dozens of sub-200 dollar boxes that are designed to accept a new OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or you could buy any of the dozens of sub-200 dollar boxes that are designed to accept a new OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or you could buy any of the dozens of sub-200 dollar boxes that are designed to accept a new OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376452</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1259592780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>

This will never sell. It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm. It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.
</i> <br>
<br>
I thought you were joking, then I went and looked at the pics. Here's hoping they make one that looks a bit more, uhhh, normal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will never sell .
It does n't fit into the entertainment center paradigm .
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy .
I thought you were joking , then I went and looked at the pics .
Here 's hoping they make one that looks a bit more , uhhh , normal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>

This will never sell.
It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.
It looks like a puzzle box and a toy.
I thought you were joking, then I went and looked at the pics.
Here's hoping they make one that looks a bit more, uhhh, normal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30384176</id>
	<title>No surprise - XBMC is using DirectX on win32 now</title>
	<author>itslifejimbutnotaswe</author>
	<datestamp>1259594160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given that the mother project (XBMC) also switched to DirectX on win32 this is no surprise.  It makes sense too - on Windows, you get much easier hardware acceleration of videos if you're using DirectX (i.e. you can get a DirectX surface out easier)

You also tend to get better hardware support.

It appears the Boxee gues worked with the XBMC team on this - kudos.  Let's hope the boxee box is open enough to get XBMC on there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that the mother project ( XBMC ) also switched to DirectX on win32 this is no surprise .
It makes sense too - on Windows , you get much easier hardware acceleration of videos if you 're using DirectX ( i.e .
you can get a DirectX surface out easier ) You also tend to get better hardware support .
It appears the Boxee gues worked with the XBMC team on this - kudos .
Let 's hope the boxee box is open enough to get XBMC on there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that the mother project (XBMC) also switched to DirectX on win32 this is no surprise.
It makes sense too - on Windows, you get much easier hardware acceleration of videos if you're using DirectX (i.e.
you can get a DirectX surface out easier)

You also tend to get better hardware support.
It appears the Boxee gues worked with the XBMC team on this - kudos.
Let's hope the boxee box is open enough to get XBMC on there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376406</id>
	<title>wifi, hdmi, usb...</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1259592480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What? No Lotus notes and a machine gun?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ?
No Lotus notes and a machine gun ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?
No Lotus notes and a machine gun?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377420</id>
	<title>Fugly</title>
	<author>goto11</author>
	<datestamp>1259599380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agree. Could never pass the WAF (wife acceptance factor). WTF?<br>And while I'm at it, could Apple please make a Mac Mini, AppleTV, whatever, that was the proper width for my stereo system? Or somebody make me a box I can put my Mac Mini into, and add a 3.5" SATA HD.... but I digress...</p><p>And the same fugliness applies to my friggin' silver, half-width cable box (black, please). This crap has got to go. Make it matte black and 17-1/8" (435mm) wide or it will look hideous on  my AV rack. It's not rocket science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agree .
Could never pass the WAF ( wife acceptance factor ) .
WTF ? And while I 'm at it , could Apple please make a Mac Mini , AppleTV , whatever , that was the proper width for my stereo system ?
Or somebody make me a box I can put my Mac Mini into , and add a 3.5 " SATA HD.... but I digress...And the same fugliness applies to my friggin ' silver , half-width cable box ( black , please ) .
This crap has got to go .
Make it matte black and 17-1/8 " ( 435mm ) wide or it will look hideous on my AV rack .
It 's not rocket science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agree.
Could never pass the WAF (wife acceptance factor).
WTF?And while I'm at it, could Apple please make a Mac Mini, AppleTV, whatever, that was the proper width for my stereo system?
Or somebody make me a box I can put my Mac Mini into, and add a 3.5" SATA HD.... but I digress...And the same fugliness applies to my friggin' silver, half-width cable box (black, please).
This crap has got to go.
Make it matte black and 17-1/8" (435mm) wide or it will look hideous on  my AV rack.
It's not rocket science.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376670</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259594400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just need to talk to the folks at goodvibrations.com about doing some touchup work on the design.</p><p>(What you don't use your media PC for porn marathons?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just need to talk to the folks at goodvibrations.com about doing some touchup work on the design .
( What you do n't use your media PC for porn marathons ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just need to talk to the folks at goodvibrations.com about doing some touchup work on the design.
(What you don't use your media PC for porn marathons?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30382150</id>
	<title>Looks stupid</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1259581200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take a look at the pics of that device. No, really: RTFA. That is one of the dumbest designs for consumer electronics gear I've ever seen. I looks like someone took a cube and hacked off about half of it at a completely random angle, and then laid it awkwardly on its cut side. I don't care what kind of multimedia experience this thing offers, I would not buy this thing simply for its stupid looks.</p><p>I wouldn't be caught dead with this thing in my living room and that's saying a lot since my entertainment center is a bunch of equipment stacked up on a fish tank stand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take a look at the pics of that device .
No , really : RTFA .
That is one of the dumbest designs for consumer electronics gear I 've ever seen .
I looks like someone took a cube and hacked off about half of it at a completely random angle , and then laid it awkwardly on its cut side .
I do n't care what kind of multimedia experience this thing offers , I would not buy this thing simply for its stupid looks.I would n't be caught dead with this thing in my living room and that 's saying a lot since my entertainment center is a bunch of equipment stacked up on a fish tank stand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take a look at the pics of that device.
No, really: RTFA.
That is one of the dumbest designs for consumer electronics gear I've ever seen.
I looks like someone took a cube and hacked off about half of it at a completely random angle, and then laid it awkwardly on its cut side.
I don't care what kind of multimedia experience this thing offers, I would not buy this thing simply for its stupid looks.I wouldn't be caught dead with this thing in my living room and that's saying a lot since my entertainment center is a bunch of equipment stacked up on a fish tank stand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377476</id>
	<title>Re:Netflix on linux</title>
	<author>Zinho</author>
	<datestamp>1259599620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've got it the wrong way around - once D-Link contrives a Linux solution for Netflix streaming, then we'll be able to stream Netflix to any Linux platform we like.</p><p>Yes, it's not possible now, but the Netflix streaming overlords might be more persuaded by a potential corporate partner than they are by the unwashed masses.  I wish D-Link the best of luck in this effort!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've got it the wrong way around - once D-Link contrives a Linux solution for Netflix streaming , then we 'll be able to stream Netflix to any Linux platform we like.Yes , it 's not possible now , but the Netflix streaming overlords might be more persuaded by a potential corporate partner than they are by the unwashed masses .
I wish D-Link the best of luck in this effort !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've got it the wrong way around - once D-Link contrives a Linux solution for Netflix streaming, then we'll be able to stream Netflix to any Linux platform we like.Yes, it's not possible now, but the Netflix streaming overlords might be more persuaded by a potential corporate partner than they are by the unwashed masses.
I wish D-Link the best of luck in this effort!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377654</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1259600640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.</i></p><p>FFS, it doesn't <a href="http://images.dlink.com/new/products/DSM-380/DSM-380\_white\_front.png" title="dlink.com">fit into an entertainment center, <em>period.</em> </a> [dlink.com] Nor can anything be stacked on top of it. Plus it's needlessly hard to manufacture, find components for, and assemble. <b>This is quite possibly the most horribly designed piece of consumer gear I've ever seen in my life.</b></p><p>ATTENTION LOSERS WHO WANT TO COPY APPLE: Design doesn't just mean making it <i>look</i> neat. Apple's stuff looks flashy but it actually <i>works.</i> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en-us&amp;q=apple+puck+mouse" title="google.com">(Most of the time, anyway.)</a> [google.com] And if your design only looks "neat" to 14-year-old males, you should throw it right the fuck away and never venture down that path again. Seriously, this thing looks like a prop from a bad SciFi (excuse me, SyFy) movie-of-the-week, or maybe a Roomba from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka\_(TV\_series)" title="wikipedia.org">Eureka</a> [wikipedia.org] that gains sentience and starts causing problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.FFS , it does n't fit into an entertainment center , period .
[ dlink.com ] Nor can anything be stacked on top of it .
Plus it 's needlessly hard to manufacture , find components for , and assemble .
This is quite possibly the most horribly designed piece of consumer gear I 've ever seen in my life.ATTENTION LOSERS WHO WANT TO COPY APPLE : Design does n't just mean making it look neat .
Apple 's stuff looks flashy but it actually works .
( Most of the time , anyway .
) [ google.com ] And if your design only looks " neat " to 14-year-old males , you should throw it right the fuck away and never venture down that path again .
Seriously , this thing looks like a prop from a bad SciFi ( excuse me , SyFy ) movie-of-the-week , or maybe a Roomba from Eureka [ wikipedia.org ] that gains sentience and starts causing problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't fit into the entertainment center paradigm.FFS, it doesn't fit into an entertainment center, period.
[dlink.com] Nor can anything be stacked on top of it.
Plus it's needlessly hard to manufacture, find components for, and assemble.
This is quite possibly the most horribly designed piece of consumer gear I've ever seen in my life.ATTENTION LOSERS WHO WANT TO COPY APPLE: Design doesn't just mean making it look neat.
Apple's stuff looks flashy but it actually works.
(Most of the time, anyway.
) [google.com] And if your design only looks "neat" to 14-year-old males, you should throw it right the fuck away and never venture down that path again.
Seriously, this thing looks like a prop from a bad SciFi (excuse me, SyFy) movie-of-the-week, or maybe a Roomba from Eureka [wikipedia.org] that gains sentience and starts causing problems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726</id>
	<title>with DTV/PVR?</title>
	<author>Kludge</author>
	<datestamp>1259594820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there anything out there like this that also does DTV/PVR?<br>I don't want to have multiple computers to maintain sitting around my TV set.<br>Oh, yeah, and it has to run Linux.</p><p>Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there anything out there like this that also does DTV/PVR ? I do n't want to have multiple computers to maintain sitting around my TV set.Oh , yeah , and it has to run Linux.Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there anything out there like this that also does DTV/PVR?I don't want to have multiple computers to maintain sitting around my TV set.Oh, yeah, and it has to run Linux.Thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376950</id>
	<title>Re:opengl to directx?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259596440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OpenGL should be properly hardware accelerated on both OS X and Linux. The problem is that most driver vendors (NVIDIA, ATI) don't bother with good OpenGL implementations for Windows, so the only real alternative for good performance is DirectX.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OpenGL should be properly hardware accelerated on both OS X and Linux .
The problem is that most driver vendors ( NVIDIA , ATI ) do n't bother with good OpenGL implementations for Windows , so the only real alternative for good performance is DirectX .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OpenGL should be properly hardware accelerated on both OS X and Linux.
The problem is that most driver vendors (NVIDIA, ATI) don't bother with good OpenGL implementations for Windows, so the only real alternative for good performance is DirectX.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377056</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>dsoltesz</author>
	<datestamp>1259597160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's cute as a button!!! Uhhhh, gimme the standard entertainment system form factor so I can stack the damn thing on top of the DVD player please. I got nowhere to put that crazy cute thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's cute as a button ! ! !
Uhhhh , gim me the standard entertainment system form factor so I can stack the damn thing on top of the DVD player please .
I got nowhere to put that crazy cute thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's cute as a button!!!
Uhhhh, gimme the standard entertainment system form factor so I can stack the damn thing on top of the DVD player please.
I got nowhere to put that crazy cute thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379178</id>
	<title>Re:opengl to directx?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, OpenGL is a 3D graphics API (although people may use it for other things anyway to get access to it's supported hardware).</p><p>The equivalent Khronos API for media decoding is OpenMAX, but afaik none of the major desktop OSes or hardware accelerators implement it publicly right now.  However, the working group's members include AMD, Apple, ARM, Imagination, IBM, Intel, Nokia and Nvidia, so I wouldn't be horribly surprised to see at least parts of it implemented on Mac and Linux machines with all the major GPU families eventually.</p><p>For right now there's DXVA on Windows, VA API and VDPAU and XVBA and XVMC on Linux, and really nothing publicly supported on Mac.</p><p>As I understand it Boxee uses VDPAU on Linux, so it's decoding should be hardware accelerated for recent Nvidia GPUs (but not for those of ATI who use XVBA rather than VDPAU, or Intel who use VA API).</p><p>So basically, Linux is a mess of incompatible solutions, Apple is ignoring outside developers entirely for the moment, and only Microsoft has a single API.</p><p>Anyway, that's all just the result of a bit of interested googling, I wouldn't be too surprised if it's wrong on some points...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , OpenGL is a 3D graphics API ( although people may use it for other things anyway to get access to it 's supported hardware ) .The equivalent Khronos API for media decoding is OpenMAX , but afaik none of the major desktop OSes or hardware accelerators implement it publicly right now .
However , the working group 's members include AMD , Apple , ARM , Imagination , IBM , Intel , Nokia and Nvidia , so I would n't be horribly surprised to see at least parts of it implemented on Mac and Linux machines with all the major GPU families eventually.For right now there 's DXVA on Windows , VA API and VDPAU and XVBA and XVMC on Linux , and really nothing publicly supported on Mac.As I understand it Boxee uses VDPAU on Linux , so it 's decoding should be hardware accelerated for recent Nvidia GPUs ( but not for those of ATI who use XVBA rather than VDPAU , or Intel who use VA API ) .So basically , Linux is a mess of incompatible solutions , Apple is ignoring outside developers entirely for the moment , and only Microsoft has a single API.Anyway , that 's all just the result of a bit of interested googling , I would n't be too surprised if it 's wrong on some points.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, OpenGL is a 3D graphics API (although people may use it for other things anyway to get access to it's supported hardware).The equivalent Khronos API for media decoding is OpenMAX, but afaik none of the major desktop OSes or hardware accelerators implement it publicly right now.
However, the working group's members include AMD, Apple, ARM, Imagination, IBM, Intel, Nokia and Nvidia, so I wouldn't be horribly surprised to see at least parts of it implemented on Mac and Linux machines with all the major GPU families eventually.For right now there's DXVA on Windows, VA API and VDPAU and XVBA and XVMC on Linux, and really nothing publicly supported on Mac.As I understand it Boxee uses VDPAU on Linux, so it's decoding should be hardware accelerated for recent Nvidia GPUs (but not for those of ATI who use XVBA rather than VDPAU, or Intel who use VA API).So basically, Linux is a mess of incompatible solutions, Apple is ignoring outside developers entirely for the moment, and only Microsoft has a single API.Anyway, that's all just the result of a bit of interested googling, I wouldn't be too surprised if it's wrong on some points...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377432</id>
	<title>Re:Still no Blu-Ray?</title>
	<author>crazycheetah</author>
	<datestamp>1259599380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you could find a USB blu-ray drive, you should be able to just plug it right in there. The wikipedia page on it says something about it being licensed for use in blu-ray players, so that should work, in theory. Though XBMC (or Boxee, comparing it to this box; it's built off of XBMC) on a PS3 would kick this thing's ass, easily.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you could find a USB blu-ray drive , you should be able to just plug it right in there .
The wikipedia page on it says something about it being licensed for use in blu-ray players , so that should work , in theory .
Though XBMC ( or Boxee , comparing it to this box ; it 's built off of XBMC ) on a PS3 would kick this thing 's ass , easily .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you could find a USB blu-ray drive, you should be able to just plug it right in there.
The wikipedia page on it says something about it being licensed for use in blu-ray players, so that should work, in theory.
Though XBMC (or Boxee, comparing it to this box; it's built off of XBMC) on a PS3 would kick this thing's ass, easily.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30382300</id>
	<title>Re:Netflix</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1259581980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My main multimedia machine runs Linux and is connected to a 47" TV via HDMI.  I have no problem running any program and playing back any sort of multimedia.  Now, I fix computers for a living and I know there are all levels of comfort when it comes to what people expect.  My thoughts here are just that, that it is the end-user perspective on what you think should or should not work.  We work pretty hard in the Linux community to satisfy people's demands and things get fixed pretty quick.</p><p>What we ask more than anything in the Linux community is to have you stop thinking that Linux is a clone of Windows.  Not only is it not, but we don't want it that way, for several reasons; one of which is that we don't want predicate our advances upon whether Microsoft has implemented them beforehand.</p><p>Boxee runs fine on Linux and though I do have Netflix I do not have the desire to try to get it to run under Linux (after my initial attempt), as silverlight is pretty much a Microsoft technology that really can't compete with Flash.  I'm amazed that Netflix went with them and that they are still using it.  80\% of all streamed multimedia is done with flash.  Those are hard fast numbers.  silverlight is just Microsoft attempting to get back at Adobe due to Adobe punching them out of the market on PDF.</p><p>One has to wonder just how many other services use silverlight or how many other products are based on it.  On top of that one has to wonder just how many people use Netflix streaming.  Even if it is 2 million or even 5 million that's nothing compared to how many that don't use it.  That makes it essentially a moot point as it isn't significant enough to worry about.  What incorporating Netflix into Boxee does is to give it some sense of legitimacy--that is for the product itself.  If it is seen to be partnering with legitimate companies it seemingly is perceived as a legitimate product--for the consumer as well as for their partners (e.g., D-Link).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My main multimedia machine runs Linux and is connected to a 47 " TV via HDMI .
I have no problem running any program and playing back any sort of multimedia .
Now , I fix computers for a living and I know there are all levels of comfort when it comes to what people expect .
My thoughts here are just that , that it is the end-user perspective on what you think should or should not work .
We work pretty hard in the Linux community to satisfy people 's demands and things get fixed pretty quick.What we ask more than anything in the Linux community is to have you stop thinking that Linux is a clone of Windows .
Not only is it not , but we do n't want it that way , for several reasons ; one of which is that we do n't want predicate our advances upon whether Microsoft has implemented them beforehand.Boxee runs fine on Linux and though I do have Netflix I do not have the desire to try to get it to run under Linux ( after my initial attempt ) , as silverlight is pretty much a Microsoft technology that really ca n't compete with Flash .
I 'm amazed that Netflix went with them and that they are still using it .
80 \ % of all streamed multimedia is done with flash .
Those are hard fast numbers .
silverlight is just Microsoft attempting to get back at Adobe due to Adobe punching them out of the market on PDF.One has to wonder just how many other services use silverlight or how many other products are based on it .
On top of that one has to wonder just how many people use Netflix streaming .
Even if it is 2 million or even 5 million that 's nothing compared to how many that do n't use it .
That makes it essentially a moot point as it is n't significant enough to worry about .
What incorporating Netflix into Boxee does is to give it some sense of legitimacy--that is for the product itself .
If it is seen to be partnering with legitimate companies it seemingly is perceived as a legitimate product--for the consumer as well as for their partners ( e.g. , D-Link ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My main multimedia machine runs Linux and is connected to a 47" TV via HDMI.
I have no problem running any program and playing back any sort of multimedia.
Now, I fix computers for a living and I know there are all levels of comfort when it comes to what people expect.
My thoughts here are just that, that it is the end-user perspective on what you think should or should not work.
We work pretty hard in the Linux community to satisfy people's demands and things get fixed pretty quick.What we ask more than anything in the Linux community is to have you stop thinking that Linux is a clone of Windows.
Not only is it not, but we don't want it that way, for several reasons; one of which is that we don't want predicate our advances upon whether Microsoft has implemented them beforehand.Boxee runs fine on Linux and though I do have Netflix I do not have the desire to try to get it to run under Linux (after my initial attempt), as silverlight is pretty much a Microsoft technology that really can't compete with Flash.
I'm amazed that Netflix went with them and that they are still using it.
80\% of all streamed multimedia is done with flash.
Those are hard fast numbers.
silverlight is just Microsoft attempting to get back at Adobe due to Adobe punching them out of the market on PDF.One has to wonder just how many other services use silverlight or how many other products are based on it.
On top of that one has to wonder just how many people use Netflix streaming.
Even if it is 2 million or even 5 million that's nothing compared to how many that don't use it.
That makes it essentially a moot point as it isn't significant enough to worry about.
What incorporating Netflix into Boxee does is to give it some sense of legitimacy--that is for the product itself.
If it is seen to be partnering with legitimate companies it seemingly is perceived as a legitimate product--for the consumer as well as for their partners (e.g., D-Link).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682</id>
	<title>opengl to directx?</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1259594460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting bits from the Boxee <a href="http://openboxeebox.com/boxee-beta-previewed/" title="openboxeebox.com">beta preview page.</a> [openboxeebox.com] First it lists 'Official support for OS X "Snow Leopard" and Ubuntu "Karmic"', then it goes on to say:<p><div class="quote"><p>Finally, Ronen notes that with the Beta release, Boxee's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX, allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration.</p></div><p>So the "officially supported" OS X and Ubuntu versions will be running on OpenGL, but the Windows version gets full hardware acceleration by using DirectX?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting bits from the Boxee beta preview page .
[ openboxeebox.com ] First it lists 'Official support for OS X " Snow Leopard " and Ubuntu " Karmic " ' , then it goes on to say : Finally , Ronen notes that with the Beta release , Boxee 's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX , allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration.So the " officially supported " OS X and Ubuntu versions will be running on OpenGL , but the Windows version gets full hardware acceleration by using DirectX ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting bits from the Boxee beta preview page.
[openboxeebox.com] First it lists 'Official support for OS X "Snow Leopard" and Ubuntu "Karmic"', then it goes on to say:Finally, Ronen notes that with the Beta release, Boxee's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX, allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration.So the "officially supported" OS X and Ubuntu versions will be running on OpenGL, but the Windows version gets full hardware acceleration by using DirectX?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379484</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>gknoy</author>
	<datestamp>1259610720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It looks "interesting", but also useless.  <b>I can't stack anything on top of it</b>, like my remotes, or game controllers, or a stack of DVDs.  I'm unlikely to buy one so strange shaped.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks " interesting " , but also useless .
I ca n't stack anything on top of it , like my remotes , or game controllers , or a stack of DVDs .
I 'm unlikely to buy one so strange shaped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks "interesting", but also useless.
I can't stack anything on top of it, like my remotes, or game controllers, or a stack of DVDs.
I'm unlikely to buy one so strange shaped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376936</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1259596320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If price is below 200$ as they say and it already runs linux, then perhaps hack it and use use it as a home "server"</p></div><p>
And then create a beowolf cluster of these!
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If price is below 200 $ as they say and it already runs linux , then perhaps hack it and use use it as a home " server " And then create a beowolf cluster of these !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If price is below 200$ as they say and it already runs linux, then perhaps hack it and use use it as a home "server"
And then create a beowolf cluster of these!

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379606</id>
	<title>XMBC on PS3 : Non trivial</title>
	<author>DrYak</author>
	<datestamp>1259611380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.</p></div><p>But don't hold your breath. It's technically possible, but it's going to be a lot difficult.</p><p>You see the PS3 isn't closed to homebrew development. Quite the countrary. You can even install Linux on it and develop whatever you want.<br>But there's a restriction, when running homebrew software, the hypervisor doesn't give access to the GPU.<br>You can program all the scientific number-crunching application you want, you have full access to the CELL SPU units for some crazy parallel computing. But no 3D GFX only limited to some basic 2D stuff (This is supposedly done that way by Sony, so evil pirate couldn't get to run pirated games using the homebrew mode).</p><p>So although it's greate for a lot of stuff, a PS3 can't get graphically intense homebrew software out-of-the-box.<br>And saddly, XBMC *is* a graphically intense application (requires hardware support to accelerate lots of the decoding steps).</p><p>Also, depending on where you live, the decription of blue ray's DRM might break you local stupid DMCA-like law.<br>I doubt that the PS3 Blueray official player key will be available to Homebrew developers (Sony fearing that this might make the PS3 a convenient Blue-ray ripping machine), and thus I suspect that using collections of extracted keys like BackupHD will be necessary.<br>Which should be legal in most jurisdiction which respect the fair-use exception, but not all.</p><p>So, we'll have to wait until Linux PS3 gets an OpenGL implementation which is accelerated on the CELL SPUs instead of the (restricted) GPU. Work is currently done in Gallium3D (the Next-Gen Mesa3D). Once this is finished, you'll have all the necessary acceleration, only running as custom software on the SPUs instead of shaders on the GPU.<br>Then it'll be only a matter of packaging a PS3 Linux with Gallium3D and XBMC.<br>(And maybe other software using OpenGL and VA API or VDPAU. As long as their requirement stay within what is achievable on a Cell's streaming units).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.But do n't hold your breath .
It 's technically possible , but it 's going to be a lot difficult.You see the PS3 is n't closed to homebrew development .
Quite the countrary .
You can even install Linux on it and develop whatever you want.But there 's a restriction , when running homebrew software , the hypervisor does n't give access to the GPU.You can program all the scientific number-crunching application you want , you have full access to the CELL SPU units for some crazy parallel computing .
But no 3D GFX only limited to some basic 2D stuff ( This is supposedly done that way by Sony , so evil pirate could n't get to run pirated games using the homebrew mode ) .So although it 's greate for a lot of stuff , a PS3 ca n't get graphically intense homebrew software out-of-the-box.And saddly , XBMC * is * a graphically intense application ( requires hardware support to accelerate lots of the decoding steps ) .Also , depending on where you live , the decription of blue ray 's DRM might break you local stupid DMCA-like law.I doubt that the PS3 Blueray official player key will be available to Homebrew developers ( Sony fearing that this might make the PS3 a convenient Blue-ray ripping machine ) , and thus I suspect that using collections of extracted keys like BackupHD will be necessary.Which should be legal in most jurisdiction which respect the fair-use exception , but not all.So , we 'll have to wait until Linux PS3 gets an OpenGL implementation which is accelerated on the CELL SPUs instead of the ( restricted ) GPU .
Work is currently done in Gallium3D ( the Next-Gen Mesa3D ) .
Once this is finished , you 'll have all the necessary acceleration , only running as custom software on the SPUs instead of shaders on the GPU.Then it 'll be only a matter of packaging a PS3 Linux with Gallium3D and XBMC .
( And maybe other software using OpenGL and VA API or VDPAU .
As long as their requirement stay within what is achievable on a Cell 's streaming units ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for someone to get XBMC going on a PS3.But don't hold your breath.
It's technically possible, but it's going to be a lot difficult.You see the PS3 isn't closed to homebrew development.
Quite the countrary.
You can even install Linux on it and develop whatever you want.But there's a restriction, when running homebrew software, the hypervisor doesn't give access to the GPU.You can program all the scientific number-crunching application you want, you have full access to the CELL SPU units for some crazy parallel computing.
But no 3D GFX only limited to some basic 2D stuff (This is supposedly done that way by Sony, so evil pirate couldn't get to run pirated games using the homebrew mode).So although it's greate for a lot of stuff, a PS3 can't get graphically intense homebrew software out-of-the-box.And saddly, XBMC *is* a graphically intense application (requires hardware support to accelerate lots of the decoding steps).Also, depending on where you live, the decription of blue ray's DRM might break you local stupid DMCA-like law.I doubt that the PS3 Blueray official player key will be available to Homebrew developers (Sony fearing that this might make the PS3 a convenient Blue-ray ripping machine), and thus I suspect that using collections of extracted keys like BackupHD will be necessary.Which should be legal in most jurisdiction which respect the fair-use exception, but not all.So, we'll have to wait until Linux PS3 gets an OpenGL implementation which is accelerated on the CELL SPUs instead of the (restricted) GPU.
Work is currently done in Gallium3D (the Next-Gen Mesa3D).
Once this is finished, you'll have all the necessary acceleration, only running as custom software on the SPUs instead of shaders on the GPU.Then it'll be only a matter of packaging a PS3 Linux with Gallium3D and XBMC.
(And maybe other software using OpenGL and VA API or VDPAU.
As long as their requirement stay within what is achievable on a Cell's streaming units).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377306</id>
	<title>Re:Form over functionality</title>
	<author>phozz bare</author>
	<datestamp>1259598660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing is the size of a soda can and can be placed anywhere you want, including out of sight. From <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/12/09/step-1-make-a-boxee-box-no-need-to-cut-a-hole/" title="boxee.tv">http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/12/09/step-1-make-a-boxee-box-no-need-to-cut-a-hole/</a> [boxee.tv]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:<p><div class="quote"><p>Rest assured the Boxee Box will fit into your entertainment center.  If the look doesn&rsquo;t quite fit with your decor, not to worry.  The RF remote means you can place the box out of sight and still control it.   Of course, the Boxee Box prefers being on top : )</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is the size of a soda can and can be placed anywhere you want , including out of sight .
From http : //blog.boxee.tv/2009/12/09/step-1-make-a-boxee-box-no-need-to-cut-a-hole/ [ boxee.tv ] : Rest assured the Boxee Box will fit into your entertainment center .
If the look doesn    t quite fit with your decor , not to worry .
The RF remote means you can place the box out of sight and still control it .
Of course , the Boxee Box prefers being on top : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is the size of a soda can and can be placed anywhere you want, including out of sight.
From http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/12/09/step-1-make-a-boxee-box-no-need-to-cut-a-hole/ [boxee.tv] :Rest assured the Boxee Box will fit into your entertainment center.
If the look doesn’t quite fit with your decor, not to worry.
The RF remote means you can place the box out of sight and still control it.
Of course, the Boxee Box prefers being on top : )
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377040</id>
	<title>Re:with DTV/PVR?</title>
	<author>jhol13</author>
	<datestamp>1259597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, for example TViX PVR M-6640N or DreamBox. I don't know where you live, those probably do not work in USA as they use DVB-S/C/T.</p><p>It would seem that WD TV Live Full HD might be better than the "advertised". YMMV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , for example TViX PVR M-6640N or DreamBox .
I do n't know where you live , those probably do not work in USA as they use DVB-S/C/T.It would seem that WD TV Live Full HD might be better than the " advertised " .
YMMV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, for example TViX PVR M-6640N or DreamBox.
I don't know where you live, those probably do not work in USA as they use DVB-S/C/T.It would seem that WD TV Live Full HD might be better than the "advertised".
YMMV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376532</id>
	<title>HD Limitations?</title>
	<author>soup4you2</author>
	<datestamp>1259593320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anybody know about HD support, I know it has it but curious if it's limited to only 720p like the AppleTV or if it will display 1080i/p.

And is there anything to stop me from installing XBMC on there. (I doubt there is but I'm not a big fan of boxee)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anybody know about HD support , I know it has it but curious if it 's limited to only 720p like the AppleTV or if it will display 1080i/p .
And is there anything to stop me from installing XBMC on there .
( I doubt there is but I 'm not a big fan of boxee )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anybody know about HD support, I know it has it but curious if it's limited to only 720p like the AppleTV or if it will display 1080i/p.
And is there anything to stop me from installing XBMC on there.
(I doubt there is but I'm not a big fan of boxee)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076</id>
	<title>Netflix</title>
	<author>qazwart</author>
	<datestamp>1259597280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't Netflix use SILVERLIGHT?</p><p>Let's see:</p><p>1). BoxeeBox uses Linux.<br>2). Linux doesn't run Silverlight.<br>3). You need Silverlight to run Netflix</p><p>Now fill in the missing word:</p><p>Therefore, BoxeeBox will never be able to run \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.</p><p>The truth is that I've given up on standard Linux distros when it comes to multimedia. It simply isn't as good as Windows or Mac OS X. For about a year, we tried to run Mythbuntu, then Ubuntu w/ MythTV and Boxee. It simply never worked very well. Incompatibility issues with drivers and configuration problems drove us up the wall. When Windows 7 came out, we "upgraded" to Windows 7. (Why not?, it was originally a Windows Vista box).</p><p>The problem I see with the Boxee Box is that it is competing against HDTVs that can connect with Netflix right out of the box. Plus, these HDTVs are better at displaying video than what Boxee will be able to do.</p><p>Don't get me wrong. I use Linux (Fedora Distro) at work. In fact, I installed it at work over my Windows box and am running Windows under VirtualBox on the machine. I prefer to do my development on Linux because it is faster, and it comes with all the development tools I need. Plus, it is two to three times faster running Subversion and Eclipse than Windows.</p><p>However, I have that Windows under VirtualBox instance if I have to read email (our corporation uses Exchange and Evolution is an awful Exchange client). I also use my Windows side if I have to display a video or a Flash application. If I can get Flash to work on Linux, it is splotchy at best, MP4s look awful, and don't even try to run in full screen mode. Linux based Android is much better, but that's because Google isn't shy about adding a few proprietary pieces to get things to work.</p><p>Boxee is a nice concept, but they're concentrating too much on cool and not enough on getting things to work at a consumer level.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't Netflix use SILVERLIGHT ? Let 's see : 1 ) .
BoxeeBox uses Linux.2 ) .
Linux does n't run Silverlight.3 ) .
You need Silverlight to run NetflixNow fill in the missing word : Therefore , BoxeeBox will never be able to run \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _.The truth is that I 've given up on standard Linux distros when it comes to multimedia .
It simply is n't as good as Windows or Mac OS X. For about a year , we tried to run Mythbuntu , then Ubuntu w/ MythTV and Boxee .
It simply never worked very well .
Incompatibility issues with drivers and configuration problems drove us up the wall .
When Windows 7 came out , we " upgraded " to Windows 7 .
( Why not ? , it was originally a Windows Vista box ) .The problem I see with the Boxee Box is that it is competing against HDTVs that can connect with Netflix right out of the box .
Plus , these HDTVs are better at displaying video than what Boxee will be able to do.Do n't get me wrong .
I use Linux ( Fedora Distro ) at work .
In fact , I installed it at work over my Windows box and am running Windows under VirtualBox on the machine .
I prefer to do my development on Linux because it is faster , and it comes with all the development tools I need .
Plus , it is two to three times faster running Subversion and Eclipse than Windows.However , I have that Windows under VirtualBox instance if I have to read email ( our corporation uses Exchange and Evolution is an awful Exchange client ) .
I also use my Windows side if I have to display a video or a Flash application .
If I can get Flash to work on Linux , it is splotchy at best , MP4s look awful , and do n't even try to run in full screen mode .
Linux based Android is much better , but that 's because Google is n't shy about adding a few proprietary pieces to get things to work.Boxee is a nice concept , but they 're concentrating too much on cool and not enough on getting things to work at a consumer level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't Netflix use SILVERLIGHT?Let's see:1).
BoxeeBox uses Linux.2).
Linux doesn't run Silverlight.3).
You need Silverlight to run NetflixNow fill in the missing word:Therefore, BoxeeBox will never be able to run \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.The truth is that I've given up on standard Linux distros when it comes to multimedia.
It simply isn't as good as Windows or Mac OS X. For about a year, we tried to run Mythbuntu, then Ubuntu w/ MythTV and Boxee.
It simply never worked very well.
Incompatibility issues with drivers and configuration problems drove us up the wall.
When Windows 7 came out, we "upgraded" to Windows 7.
(Why not?, it was originally a Windows Vista box).The problem I see with the Boxee Box is that it is competing against HDTVs that can connect with Netflix right out of the box.
Plus, these HDTVs are better at displaying video than what Boxee will be able to do.Don't get me wrong.
I use Linux (Fedora Distro) at work.
In fact, I installed it at work over my Windows box and am running Windows under VirtualBox on the machine.
I prefer to do my development on Linux because it is faster, and it comes with all the development tools I need.
Plus, it is two to three times faster running Subversion and Eclipse than Windows.However, I have that Windows under VirtualBox instance if I have to read email (our corporation uses Exchange and Evolution is an awful Exchange client).
I also use my Windows side if I have to display a video or a Flash application.
If I can get Flash to work on Linux, it is splotchy at best, MP4s look awful, and don't even try to run in full screen mode.
Linux based Android is much better, but that's because Google isn't shy about adding a few proprietary pieces to get things to work.Boxee is a nice concept, but they're concentrating too much on cool and not enough on getting things to work at a consumer level.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376518</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259593260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And what is so special on this? Most networking devices use Linux kernel as their OS to run all needed other features on it.<br>My 4 year old travel router (WL-520G if I remember correctly) has Linux on it. Same thing is on my 8 year old Telewell ADSL-modem.</p><p>The Linux might have a small marketshare by statics companies when it comes only to desktop use, but when it comes to real world usage statics... it has almost same market share as NT (NT 6.0/6.1 is the operating system on Windows Vista and Windows 7!).</p><p>Even my Digital TV -set has Linux in them. The DVD/VHS-recorder, 500GB DVB-T and DVB-C devices and even my cellphone has a Linux kernel working as the operating system. (And no, none of the Linux OS's rans the GNU software, so of course the RMS is angry about the fame what Linux has got because GNU did not got their own OS working).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And what is so special on this ?
Most networking devices use Linux kernel as their OS to run all needed other features on it.My 4 year old travel router ( WL-520G if I remember correctly ) has Linux on it .
Same thing is on my 8 year old Telewell ADSL-modem.The Linux might have a small marketshare by statics companies when it comes only to desktop use , but when it comes to real world usage statics... it has almost same market share as NT ( NT 6.0/6.1 is the operating system on Windows Vista and Windows 7 !
) .Even my Digital TV -set has Linux in them .
The DVD/VHS-recorder , 500GB DVB-T and DVB-C devices and even my cellphone has a Linux kernel working as the operating system .
( And no , none of the Linux OS 's rans the GNU software , so of course the RMS is angry about the fame what Linux has got because GNU did not got their own OS working ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And what is so special on this?
Most networking devices use Linux kernel as their OS to run all needed other features on it.My 4 year old travel router (WL-520G if I remember correctly) has Linux on it.
Same thing is on my 8 year old Telewell ADSL-modem.The Linux might have a small marketshare by statics companies when it comes only to desktop use, but when it comes to real world usage statics... it has almost same market share as NT (NT 6.0/6.1 is the operating system on Windows Vista and Windows 7!
).Even my Digital TV -set has Linux in them.
The DVD/VHS-recorder, 500GB DVB-T and DVB-C devices and even my cellphone has a Linux kernel working as the operating system.
(And no, none of the Linux OS's rans the GNU software, so of course the RMS is angry about the fame what Linux has got because GNU did not got their own OS working).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378756</id>
	<title>Re:It looks like crap</title>
	<author>tbuskey</author>
	<datestamp>1259606640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think it's ugl, but it ain't<br>I see lots of reboxing mods.</p><p>My TV is on the wall<br>I have a set top box, DVD player and a TiVo stacked.<br>It can replace my TiVo for playback, but I probably still want to stack it.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think it 's ugl , but it ain'tI see lots of reboxing mods.My TV is on the wallI have a set top box , DVD player and a TiVo stacked.It can replace my TiVo for playback , but I probably still want to stack it.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think it's ugl, but it ain'tI see lots of reboxing mods.My TV is on the wallI have a set top box, DVD player and a TiVo stacked.It can replace my TiVo for playback, but I probably still want to stack it.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379204</id>
	<title>Popcorn Hour</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259609100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Popcorn Hour still looks better</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Popcorn Hour still looks better</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Popcorn Hour still looks better</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376406
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30384176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30382300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_09_1323250_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30382300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377278
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376400
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376480
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376612
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376788
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30380358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376904
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_09_1323250.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30377826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30379178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30376950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30378058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_09_1323250.30384176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
