<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_08_2042253</id>
	<title>US No Longer Leading the World In Spam</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1260267600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>darthcamaro writes <i>"<a href="http://www.esecurityplanet.com/features/article.phpr/3851931/Cisco-US-No-Longer-the-Spam-Leader.htm">America is no longer the spam king</a>. According to Cisco, US-originated spam dropped by over two trillion messages &mdash; American-based IP addresses sent about 6.2 trillion spam messages. The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages. 'I'm not completely surprised to see US falling to number two in the spam stats, but I didn't expect it to happen yet,' said Cisco Fellow Patrick Peterson. 'I was really gratified to see the actual spam volume decrease, not just ranking, but we [also] decreased the amount of spam that is pouring out of the United States.'"</i> The drop in US spam might have had something to do with the <a href="//it.slashdot.org/story/08/11/26/1930226/Massive-Botnet-Returns-From-the-Dead-To-Spam-On">temporary</a> <a href="//it.slashdot.org/story/08/11/12/1253230/Washington-Post-Blog-Shuts-Down-75-of-Online-Spam">shutdown</a> of the McColo spam ISP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>darthcamaro writes " America is no longer the spam king .
According to Cisco , US-originated spam dropped by over two trillion messages    American-based IP addresses sent about 6.2 trillion spam messages .
The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages .
'I 'm not completely surprised to see US falling to number two in the spam stats , but I did n't expect it to happen yet, ' said Cisco Fellow Patrick Peterson .
'I was really gratified to see the actual spam volume decrease , not just ranking , but we [ also ] decreased the amount of spam that is pouring out of the United States .
' " The drop in US spam might have had something to do with the temporary shutdown of the McColo spam ISP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>darthcamaro writes "America is no longer the spam king.
According to Cisco, US-originated spam dropped by over two trillion messages — American-based IP addresses sent about 6.2 trillion spam messages.
The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages.
'I'm not completely surprised to see US falling to number two in the spam stats, but I didn't expect it to happen yet,' said Cisco Fellow Patrick Peterson.
'I was really gratified to see the actual spam volume decrease, not just ranking, but we [also] decreased the amount of spam that is pouring out of the United States.
'" The drop in US spam might have had something to do with the temporary shutdown of the McColo spam ISP.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371324</id>
	<title>I beg to differ ...</title>
	<author>neonprimetime</author>
	<datestamp>1260271500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to <a href="http://www.hormelfoods.com/brands/spam/" title="hormelfoods.com">Hormel</a> [hormelfoods.com] <br> <br> <i>More than 122 million cans of the SPAM&#174; family of products are sold worldwide each year, 90 million in the U.S. alone.</i>
<br> <br>
Sounds to me like the US is still the leader!</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to Hormel [ hormelfoods.com ] More than 122 million cans of the SPAM   family of products are sold worldwide each year , 90 million in the U.S. alone . Sounds to me like the US is still the leader !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to Hormel [hormelfoods.com]   More than 122 million cans of the SPAM® family of products are sold worldwide each year, 90 million in the U.S. alone.
 
Sounds to me like the US is still the leader!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373226</id>
	<title>Congratulations</title>
	<author>horza</author>
	<datestamp>1260283980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well done. Now if you can do the same for your CO2, welcome to those making the world a better place.</p><p>Phillip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well done .
Now if you can do the same for your CO2 , welcome to those making the world a better place.Phillip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well done.
Now if you can do the same for your CO2, welcome to those making the world a better place.Phillip.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371876</id>
	<title>Re:Offtopic- Are we getting more mod points?</title>
	<author>CorporateSuit</author>
	<datestamp>1260274560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always figure when I get 15 mod points, it's slashdot's way of telling me to stop posting and start reading.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always figure when I get 15 mod points , it 's slashdot 's way of telling me to stop posting and start reading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always figure when I get 15 mod points, it's slashdot's way of telling me to stop posting and start reading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30376832</id>
	<title>Don't be sad!</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1259595660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are still world leader in CO2 pollution!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are still world leader in CO2 pollution !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are still world leader in CO2 pollution!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371754</id>
	<title>US dollar</title>
	<author>jonsmirl</author>
	<datestamp>1260273840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this make the US dollar spam? We print about five trillion a year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this make the US dollar spam ?
We print about five trillion a year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this make the US dollar spam?
We print about five trillion a year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371558</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260272760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally we are leading something other than the eventual World Cup. It has been a good year, first we beat Argentine at "deaths from Swine Flu" competition, now we have beaten the US on Spam. Nothing can stop us now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally we are leading something other than the eventual World Cup .
It has been a good year , first we beat Argentine at " deaths from Swine Flu " competition , now we have beaten the US on Spam .
Nothing can stop us now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally we are leading something other than the eventual World Cup.
It has been a good year, first we beat Argentine at "deaths from Swine Flu" competition, now we have beaten the US on Spam.
Nothing can stop us now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375304</id>
	<title>Re:A Brazilian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We use the metric system, could we round it to 10 trillion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We use the metric system , could we round it to 10 trillion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We use the metric system, could we round it to 10 trillion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375260</id>
	<title>Humanity shooting itself in the foot</title>
	<author>yourtallness</author>
	<datestamp>1259576160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>7.7 trillion...</p><p>What a waste, the immenseness of counter-productivity is mind boggling. So much annoyance and so much overhead for a problem entirely maintained by human idiocy.</p><p>When will they wise up and stop doing stupid shit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>7.7 trillion...What a waste , the immenseness of counter-productivity is mind boggling .
So much annoyance and so much overhead for a problem entirely maintained by human idiocy.When will they wise up and stop doing stupid shit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7.7 trillion...What a waste, the immenseness of counter-productivity is mind boggling.
So much annoyance and so much overhead for a problem entirely maintained by human idiocy.When will they wise up and stop doing stupid shit?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371542</id>
	<title>A little trick I like to call "math"...</title>
	<author>mea37</author>
	<datestamp>1260272640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"The drop in US spam might have had something to do with the temporary shutdown of the McColo spam ISP"</i></p><p>Oh, really?</p><p>According to the very links kdawson uses to back this idea up, the botnet was off line for what, maybe 2 weeks... out of a 52 week year.  So if they accoutned for <i>all</i> of the US spam, that outage would result in a drop of 4\%.</p><p>But looking at the other numbers in TFS, it looks like there was in fact a drop of something like 25\%.</p><p>So yes, it may have had something to do with it.  In the same sense that the increase in temperature in my house may have had something to do with letting the dog back in (but probably had more to do with having the furnace repaired).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The drop in US spam might have had something to do with the temporary shutdown of the McColo spam ISP " Oh , really ? According to the very links kdawson uses to back this idea up , the botnet was off line for what , maybe 2 weeks... out of a 52 week year .
So if they accoutned for all of the US spam , that outage would result in a drop of 4 \ % .But looking at the other numbers in TFS , it looks like there was in fact a drop of something like 25 \ % .So yes , it may have had something to do with it .
In the same sense that the increase in temperature in my house may have had something to do with letting the dog back in ( but probably had more to do with having the furnace repaired ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The drop in US spam might have had something to do with the temporary shutdown of the McColo spam ISP"Oh, really?According to the very links kdawson uses to back this idea up, the botnet was off line for what, maybe 2 weeks... out of a 52 week year.
So if they accoutned for all of the US spam, that outage would result in a drop of 4\%.But looking at the other numbers in TFS, it looks like there was in fact a drop of something like 25\%.So yes, it may have had something to do with it.
In the same sense that the increase in temperature in my house may have had something to do with letting the dog back in (but probably had more to do with having the furnace repaired).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371840</id>
	<title>Re:Offtopic- Are we getting more mod points?</title>
	<author>mobby\_6kl</author>
	<datestamp>1260274380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy shit, the FAQ's been actually updated withing the last 10 years!</p><p>Although I had no idea it was possible to get 10 mod points now, I notice that I was getting them much more frequently than I used to, even though I barely ever moderate. There's nothing about that in the FAQ as far as I can see though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy shit , the FAQ 's been actually updated withing the last 10 years ! Although I had no idea it was possible to get 10 mod points now , I notice that I was getting them much more frequently than I used to , even though I barely ever moderate .
There 's nothing about that in the FAQ as far as I can see though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy shit, the FAQ's been actually updated withing the last 10 years!Although I had no idea it was possible to get 10 mod points now, I notice that I was getting them much more frequently than I used to, even though I barely ever moderate.
There's nothing about that in the FAQ as far as I can see though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373386</id>
	<title>fuckeR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260285240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">erosion of u5er</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>erosion of u5er [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>erosion of u5er [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371390</id>
	<title>U. S. continues to fall behind</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260271800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was bad enough when the U. S. was falling behind the rest of the world in health care and science education. Now we've fallen behind in spam generation as well?!?! Come on people! This is a wake-up call if ever I heard one!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was bad enough when the U. S. was falling behind the rest of the world in health care and science education .
Now we 've fallen behind in spam generation as well ? ! ? !
Come on people !
This is a wake-up call if ever I heard one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was bad enough when the U. S. was falling behind the rest of the world in health care and science education.
Now we've fallen behind in spam generation as well?!?!
Come on people!
This is a wake-up call if ever I heard one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375110</id>
	<title>Better title for post?</title>
	<author>The Apocalyptic Lawn</author>
	<datestamp>1259573520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't the title be, US loses leadship position in internet technology and marketing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't the title be , US loses leadship position in internet technology and marketing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't the title be, US loses leadship position in internet technology and marketing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373106</id>
	<title>Anyone ever wondered if spam might be used by NSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260283020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't "they" send TCP packets to target servers under the guise of having been sent from spambots?</p><p>Lots of alleged NSA affiliated IPs seem to be associated with ad/spam delivery:</p><p><a href="http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htm" title="cryptome.org" rel="nofollow">http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htm</a> [cryptome.org]</p><p><a href="http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htm" title="cryptome.org" rel="nofollow">http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htm</a> [cryptome.org]</p><p>Just askin'....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't " they " send TCP packets to target servers under the guise of having been sent from spambots ? Lots of alleged NSA affiliated IPs seem to be associated with ad/spam delivery : http : //cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htm [ cryptome.org ] http : //cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htm [ cryptome.org ] Just askin'... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't "they" send TCP packets to target servers under the guise of having been sent from spambots?Lots of alleged NSA affiliated IPs seem to be associated with ad/spam delivery:http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htm [cryptome.org]http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htm [cryptome.org]Just askin'....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372212</id>
	<title>Re:Also, supply and demand</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1260276600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure a bunch of it is aimed at Americans, but I also get some Russian targeted ads (apartments for sale by Moscow, you're invited to some conference in Novosibirsk, etc etc)<br> <br>
But it does seem that the vast majority of spam is indeed english, ime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure a bunch of it is aimed at Americans , but I also get some Russian targeted ads ( apartments for sale by Moscow , you 're invited to some conference in Novosibirsk , etc etc ) But it does seem that the vast majority of spam is indeed english , ime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure a bunch of it is aimed at Americans, but I also get some Russian targeted ads (apartments for sale by Moscow, you're invited to some conference in Novosibirsk, etc etc) 
But it does seem that the vast majority of spam is indeed english, ime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372094</id>
	<title>That sucks!</title>
	<author>cowdung</author>
	<datestamp>1260275820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We used to be the best at everything.</p><p>Then we lost our position in the world as upholders of human rights.</p><p>Followed by our economy going down the drain.</p><p>Then the dollar lost its place as best currency.</p><p>Now we're losing our position as Spam leaders?!</p><p>There's nothing left.. I'm jumping out of the sinking ship!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We used to be the best at everything.Then we lost our position in the world as upholders of human rights.Followed by our economy going down the drain.Then the dollar lost its place as best currency.Now we 're losing our position as Spam leaders ?
! There 's nothing left.. I 'm jumping out of the sinking ship !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We used to be the best at everything.Then we lost our position in the world as upholders of human rights.Followed by our economy going down the drain.Then the dollar lost its place as best currency.Now we're losing our position as Spam leaders?
!There's nothing left.. I'm jumping out of the sinking ship!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375180</id>
	<title>Koy4goff</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought this title belonged to a small Eastern-European nation http://www.theonion.com/content/video/spam\_crackdown\_threatens</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought this title belonged to a small Eastern-European nation http : //www.theonion.com/content/video/spam \ _crackdown \ _threatens</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought this title belonged to a small Eastern-European nation http://www.theonion.com/content/video/spam\_crackdown\_threatens</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372408</id>
	<title>Re:Congratulations are in order ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260277800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Except that of course it is well known that most spam is pumped out of botnets.  And the botnets are usually spread out all over the world.  Really, this just tells us that less spamming botnet activity is coming from the US than Brazil in that particular observed time frame.  This could be attributed to any of a number of factors.</p></div><p>I'd like to see statistics on the use of other operating systems than Windows in a country and how it correlates to spam from that country. Maybe there is a negative correlation even though I guess that, sadly, the market share of other operating systems is so small everywhere that it's insignificant.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that of course it is well known that most spam is pumped out of botnets .
And the botnets are usually spread out all over the world .
Really , this just tells us that less spamming botnet activity is coming from the US than Brazil in that particular observed time frame .
This could be attributed to any of a number of factors.I 'd like to see statistics on the use of other operating systems than Windows in a country and how it correlates to spam from that country .
Maybe there is a negative correlation even though I guess that , sadly , the market share of other operating systems is so small everywhere that it 's insignificant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that of course it is well known that most spam is pumped out of botnets.
And the botnets are usually spread out all over the world.
Really, this just tells us that less spamming botnet activity is coming from the US than Brazil in that particular observed time frame.
This could be attributed to any of a number of factors.I'd like to see statistics on the use of other operating systems than Windows in a country and how it correlates to spam from that country.
Maybe there is a negative correlation even though I guess that, sadly, the market share of other operating systems is so small everywhere that it's insignificant.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371812</id>
	<title>Also, supply and demand</title>
	<author>vuo</author>
	<datestamp>1260274200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What I'd like to see is statistics on where the spam-producing criminals are, and where are their "customers", rather than counting where the botnet is. I bet Brazilians, Russians or Chinese aren't doing that much good business in selling Viagra (may contain plaster) or Genuine Quartz Rolexes, or more importantly, buying them. IMHO: if you eliminated the spam that either comes from American criminals or which is targeted at Americans, there'd be no spam.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I 'd like to see is statistics on where the spam-producing criminals are , and where are their " customers " , rather than counting where the botnet is .
I bet Brazilians , Russians or Chinese are n't doing that much good business in selling Viagra ( may contain plaster ) or Genuine Quartz Rolexes , or more importantly , buying them .
IMHO : if you eliminated the spam that either comes from American criminals or which is targeted at Americans , there 'd be no spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I'd like to see is statistics on where the spam-producing criminals are, and where are their "customers", rather than counting where the botnet is.
I bet Brazilians, Russians or Chinese aren't doing that much good business in selling Viagra (may contain plaster) or Genuine Quartz Rolexes, or more importantly, buying them.
IMHO: if you eliminated the spam that either comes from American criminals or which is targeted at Americans, there'd be no spam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371362</id>
	<title>USA Numba One!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260271620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes but we never give up. We will strive to be on top of this list no matter what it takes. Come rain, sleet or snow we will be leveraging our synergies, overcoming any obstacle to our dominance in the market of bullshit. Make no mistake..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. We will not rest until that great land of bullshit has a US flag planted firmly in it's bung hole with some weasel counting the beans coming out of the "back end"!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes but we never give up .
We will strive to be on top of this list no matter what it takes .
Come rain , sleet or snow we will be leveraging our synergies , overcoming any obstacle to our dominance in the market of bullshit .
Make no mistake.. .. We will not rest until that great land of bullshit has a US flag planted firmly in it 's bung hole with some weasel counting the beans coming out of the " back end " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes but we never give up.
We will strive to be on top of this list no matter what it takes.
Come rain, sleet or snow we will be leveraging our synergies, overcoming any obstacle to our dominance in the market of bullshit.
Make no mistake.. .. We will not rest until that great land of bullshit has a US flag planted firmly in it's bung hole with some weasel counting the beans coming out of the "back end"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371518</id>
	<title>Re:Poopoo!</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1260272460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh huh.  You said <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=number+two" title="urbandictionary.com" rel="nofollow"> <i>number two</i> </a> [urbandictionary.com].  Heh heh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh huh .
You said number two [ urbandictionary.com ] .
Heh heh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh huh.
You said  number two  [urbandictionary.com].
Heh heh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371942</id>
	<title>The reason why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260274980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's because there's only so much spam that can be sent on a slow third-world rate internet infrastructure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's because there 's only so much spam that can be sent on a slow third-world rate internet infrastructure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's because there's only so much spam that can be sent on a slow third-world rate internet infrastructure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30377934</id>
	<title>Re:Brazil, Columbia and Italy</title>
	<author>Meneguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1259602260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you mean the country <b>Colombia</b>, the district of <b>Columbia</b> or the poetic name for America?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you mean the country Colombia , the district of Columbia or the poetic name for America ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you mean the country Colombia, the district of Columbia or the poetic name for America?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373752</id>
	<title>Re:Brazil, Columbia and Italy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260289020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm... maybe that's why you took a new job<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) Instead of letting spamd chew up all the resources, and using up all the DNS lookups, there ARE other ways to block those you know..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm... maybe that 's why you took a new job ; ) Instead of letting spamd chew up all the resources , and using up all the DNS lookups , there ARE other ways to block those you know. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm... maybe that's why you took a new job ;) Instead of letting spamd chew up all the resources, and using up all the DNS lookups, there ARE other ways to block those you know..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371614</id>
	<title>Re:Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260273000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except this <i>power outage</i> ha ha ha ha</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except this power outage ha ha ha ha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except this power outage ha ha ha ha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372850</id>
	<title>Re:Offtopic- Are we getting more mod points?</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1260280920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod points? What are those? I haven't seen any in literally 7 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod points ?
What are those ?
I have n't seen any in literally 7 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod points?
What are those?
I haven't seen any in literally 7 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373094</id>
	<title>Anyone ever wondered if spam might be used by NSA?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260282840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't "they" send TCP packets to target servers under the guise of having been sent from spambots?</p><p>Lots of alleged NSA affiliated IPs seem to be associated with ad/spam delivery:</p><p>http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htm</p><p>http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htm</p><p>Just askin'....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't " they " send TCP packets to target servers under the guise of having been sent from spambots ? Lots of alleged NSA affiliated IPs seem to be associated with ad/spam delivery : http : //cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htmhttp : //cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htmJust askin'... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't "they" send TCP packets to target servers under the guise of having been sent from spambots?Lots of alleged NSA affiliated IPs seem to be associated with ad/spam delivery:http://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-ip-update14.htmhttp://cryptome.org/0001/nsa-l3-peers.htmJust askin'....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371580</id>
	<title>little blue pills!</title>
	<author>digitalslave</author>
	<datestamp>1260272880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>now where am i going to buy my viagra?! doomed to be a geeky placid virgin for life!</htmltext>
<tokenext>now where am i going to buy my viagra ? !
doomed to be a geeky placid virgin for life !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>now where am i going to buy my viagra?!
doomed to be a geeky placid virgin for life!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371526</id>
	<title>Learn something new every day</title>
	<author>hwyhobo</author>
	<datestamp>1260272580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had no idea Brazil used Cyrillic character set.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had no idea Brazil used Cyrillic character set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had no idea Brazil used Cyrillic character set.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206</id>
	<title>Brazil, Columbia and Italy</title>
	<author>bsDaemon</author>
	<datestamp>1260276600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was self-appointed anti-spam czar at my last job, as I was absolutely convinced that nearly all our CPU criticals in Nagios were i/o bound, and that they were largely caused by spam.  One time, I took a server (a dell 2950) down from a load of 15 to a load of 3, just by blocking one IP address I found connected to SMTP 6 times, and causing spamd to churn, according to the Exim logs.  The majority of the spam that I saw would come from Brazil, Columbia and Italy.  One time, we hit a flood so bad of Brazilian spam, that it maxed out SMTP connections on half our west coast shared hosting servers, and caused one of our caching nameservers to crash from all the rbl look-ups.<br><br>I can't really say I'm surprised by this at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was self-appointed anti-spam czar at my last job , as I was absolutely convinced that nearly all our CPU criticals in Nagios were i/o bound , and that they were largely caused by spam .
One time , I took a server ( a dell 2950 ) down from a load of 15 to a load of 3 , just by blocking one IP address I found connected to SMTP 6 times , and causing spamd to churn , according to the Exim logs .
The majority of the spam that I saw would come from Brazil , Columbia and Italy .
One time , we hit a flood so bad of Brazilian spam , that it maxed out SMTP connections on half our west coast shared hosting servers , and caused one of our caching nameservers to crash from all the rbl look-ups.I ca n't really say I 'm surprised by this at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was self-appointed anti-spam czar at my last job, as I was absolutely convinced that nearly all our CPU criticals in Nagios were i/o bound, and that they were largely caused by spam.
One time, I took a server (a dell 2950) down from a load of 15 to a load of 3, just by blocking one IP address I found connected to SMTP 6 times, and causing spamd to churn, according to the Exim logs.
The majority of the spam that I saw would come from Brazil, Columbia and Italy.
One time, we hit a flood so bad of Brazilian spam, that it maxed out SMTP connections on half our west coast shared hosting servers, and caused one of our caching nameservers to crash from all the rbl look-ups.I can't really say I'm surprised by this at all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371638</id>
	<title>Woo Hoo! I RBL'ed .br</title>
	<author>cmholm</author>
	<datestamp>1260273120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Geez, I dropped the known<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.br IP blocks into a blackhole years ago. This may explain why my just-for-spam address receipts have been dropping.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Geez , I dropped the known .br IP blocks into a blackhole years ago .
This may explain why my just-for-spam address receipts have been dropping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geez, I dropped the known .br IP blocks into a blackhole years ago.
This may explain why my just-for-spam address receipts have been dropping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328</id>
	<title>Congratulations are in order ?</title>
	<author>damn\_registrars</author>
	<datestamp>1260271500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly, this shows that the oft-suggested tactic of countering spam with fines, kidnapping, prison, and murder, is working extremely well.  Just look at how we are no longer the top country for spam to originate from!<br> <br>
Except that of course it is well known that most spam is pumped out of botnets.  And the botnets are usually spread out all over the world.  Really, this just tells us that less spamming botnet activity is coming from the US than Brazil in that particular observed time frame.  This could be attributed to any of a number of factors.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , this shows that the oft-suggested tactic of countering spam with fines , kidnapping , prison , and murder , is working extremely well .
Just look at how we are no longer the top country for spam to originate from !
Except that of course it is well known that most spam is pumped out of botnets .
And the botnets are usually spread out all over the world .
Really , this just tells us that less spamming botnet activity is coming from the US than Brazil in that particular observed time frame .
This could be attributed to any of a number of factors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, this shows that the oft-suggested tactic of countering spam with fines, kidnapping, prison, and murder, is working extremely well.
Just look at how we are no longer the top country for spam to originate from!
Except that of course it is well known that most spam is pumped out of botnets.
And the botnets are usually spread out all over the world.
Really, this just tells us that less spamming botnet activity is coming from the US than Brazil in that particular observed time frame.
This could be attributed to any of a number of factors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372116</id>
	<title>A Brazilian</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1260275880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages.</p></div><p>From now on, 7.7 trillion will be known as one Brazilian.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages.From now on , 7.7 trillion will be known as one Brazilian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages.From now on, 7.7 trillion will be known as one Brazilian.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373888</id>
	<title>Re:Brazil, Columbia and Italy</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1260290700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>One time, I took a server (a dell 2950) down from a load of 15 to a load of 3, just by blocking one IP address I found connected to SMTP 6 times,</p></div></blockquote><p>

Your anti-spam software was not automatically doing this based on statistics?<br> <br>

I used Trend Micro IMSS at my last job and although most spam was blocked by RBL's (if you're on an RBL you don't get an SMTP connection) I'd still get one or two addresses a week temporarily blocked simply because they crossed the spam threshold.<br> <br>

Trend was blocking 85\% of spam on RBL's alone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One time , I took a server ( a dell 2950 ) down from a load of 15 to a load of 3 , just by blocking one IP address I found connected to SMTP 6 times , Your anti-spam software was not automatically doing this based on statistics ?
I used Trend Micro IMSS at my last job and although most spam was blocked by RBL 's ( if you 're on an RBL you do n't get an SMTP connection ) I 'd still get one or two addresses a week temporarily blocked simply because they crossed the spam threshold .
Trend was blocking 85 \ % of spam on RBL 's alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One time, I took a server (a dell 2950) down from a load of 15 to a load of 3, just by blocking one IP address I found connected to SMTP 6 times,

Your anti-spam software was not automatically doing this based on statistics?
I used Trend Micro IMSS at my last job and although most spam was blocked by RBL's (if you're on an RBL you don't get an SMTP connection) I'd still get one or two addresses a week temporarily blocked simply because they crossed the spam threshold.
Trend was blocking 85\% of spam on RBL's alone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371794</id>
	<title>Re:Congratulations are in order ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260274080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But in the end, it's just stats. I don't care where the SPAM originates from, I only care to get the least amount of SPAM in my Inbox. Whether it dropped in the US but increased in Brazil, I couldn't care less. I only care about how's SPAM doing worldwide; and if the amounts globally increased, the rest is just useless statistics. So no point being happy or sad, any SPAM sent to your e-mail address will get to your e-mail address, regardless whether it's from US, Nigeria or Romania.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But in the end , it 's just stats .
I do n't care where the SPAM originates from , I only care to get the least amount of SPAM in my Inbox .
Whether it dropped in the US but increased in Brazil , I could n't care less .
I only care about how 's SPAM doing worldwide ; and if the amounts globally increased , the rest is just useless statistics .
So no point being happy or sad , any SPAM sent to your e-mail address will get to your e-mail address , regardless whether it 's from US , Nigeria or Romania .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But in the end, it's just stats.
I don't care where the SPAM originates from, I only care to get the least amount of SPAM in my Inbox.
Whether it dropped in the US but increased in Brazil, I couldn't care less.
I only care about how's SPAM doing worldwide; and if the amounts globally increased, the rest is just useless statistics.
So no point being happy or sad, any SPAM sent to your e-mail address will get to your e-mail address, regardless whether it's from US, Nigeria or Romania.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382</id>
	<title>Offtopic- Are we getting more mod points?</title>
	<author>Tynin</author>
	<datestamp>1260271740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Recently I started getting 15 mod points every time they get allotted, whereas I used to only get 5. I've also noticed a lot more of the comments seem to be getting moderation, so I'm assuming 15 is the new norm. Just curious and wanted to confirm this. Thanks</htmltext>
<tokenext>Recently I started getting 15 mod points every time they get allotted , whereas I used to only get 5 .
I 've also noticed a lot more of the comments seem to be getting moderation , so I 'm assuming 15 is the new norm .
Just curious and wanted to confirm this .
Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recently I started getting 15 mod points every time they get allotted, whereas I used to only get 5.
I've also noticed a lot more of the comments seem to be getting moderation, so I'm assuming 15 is the new norm.
Just curious and wanted to confirm this.
Thanks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373642</id>
	<title>What time frame?</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1260287820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>America is no longer the spam king. According to Cisco, US-originated spam dropped by over two trillion messages -- American-based IP addresses sent about 6.2 trillion spam messages. The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages.</i> <br> <br>
These figures are over what span of time, a year? Calendar year 2008? Last week? One weekend? An acquaintance used to send most of his over weekends, when fewer senior admins were around to notice and more people were at home and likely to actually read mail and respond to sales offers, rather than just trashing messages like they do when they are in a hurry during the work week (not sure if this strategy worked). I got about 1.5 million just yesterday. No time to RTFA, after buying 7 Faulex watches, 3 mini helicopters, some stocks that will make me rich, and a pile pf penis pills.</htmltext>
<tokenext>America is no longer the spam king .
According to Cisco , US-originated spam dropped by over two trillion messages -- American-based IP addresses sent about 6.2 trillion spam messages .
The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages .
These figures are over what span of time , a year ?
Calendar year 2008 ?
Last week ?
One weekend ?
An acquaintance used to send most of his over weekends , when fewer senior admins were around to notice and more people were at home and likely to actually read mail and respond to sales offers , rather than just trashing messages like they do when they are in a hurry during the work week ( not sure if this strategy worked ) .
I got about 1.5 million just yesterday .
No time to RTFA , after buying 7 Faulex watches , 3 mini helicopters , some stocks that will make me rich , and a pile pf penis pills .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America is no longer the spam king.
According to Cisco, US-originated spam dropped by over two trillion messages -- American-based IP addresses sent about 6.2 trillion spam messages.
The new world leader is Brazil at 7.7 trillion messages.
These figures are over what span of time, a year?
Calendar year 2008?
Last week?
One weekend?
An acquaintance used to send most of his over weekends, when fewer senior admins were around to notice and more people were at home and likely to actually read mail and respond to sales offers, rather than just trashing messages like they do when they are in a hurry during the work week (not sure if this strategy worked).
I got about 1.5 million just yesterday.
No time to RTFA, after buying 7 Faulex watches, 3 mini helicopters, some stocks that will make me rich, and a pile pf penis pills.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371304</id>
	<title>Woohoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260271380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We're #2!  We're #2!  We're #2!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're # 2 !
We 're # 2 !
We 're # 2 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're #2!
We're #2!
We're #2!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371372</id>
	<title>In related news:</title>
	<author>el3mentary</author>
	<datestamp>1260271680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.meganfox.net/" title="meganfox.net" rel="nofollow">Click here for Penis enlargement</a> [meganfox.net].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Click here for Penis enlargement [ meganfox.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Click here for Penis enlargement [meganfox.net].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372062</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1260275640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we world leaders in anything anymore? Sheesh!</p><p>C'mon, team USA! Get out there and spam one for the Gipper!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we world leaders in anything anymore ?
Sheesh ! C'mon , team USA !
Get out there and spam one for the Gipper !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we world leaders in anything anymore?
Sheesh!C'mon, team USA!
Get out there and spam one for the Gipper!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371498</id>
	<title>Re:Offtopic- Are we getting more mod points?</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1260272340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm1260" title="slashdot.org">It's in FAQ</a> [slashdot.org] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Why do I have 10 moderator points instead of the usual 5?</p><p>Congratulations! You are in the top 1\% of moderators and have been given the gift of 10 points for your good work. It looks like your mom was wrong when she said all those hours on Slashdot wouldn't get you anything.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's in FAQ [ slashdot.org ] Why do I have 10 moderator points instead of the usual 5 ? Congratulations !
You are in the top 1 \ % of moderators and have been given the gift of 10 points for your good work .
It looks like your mom was wrong when she said all those hours on Slashdot would n't get you anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's in FAQ [slashdot.org] Why do I have 10 moderator points instead of the usual 5?Congratulations!
You are in the top 1\% of moderators and have been given the gift of 10 points for your good work.
It looks like your mom was wrong when she said all those hours on Slashdot wouldn't get you anything.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371302</id>
	<title>First Post</title>
	<author>el3mentary</author>
	<datestamp>1260271380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spam'd</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spam 'd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spam'd</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371348</id>
	<title>Still 23 more spammimg days in 2009</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260271560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How did they manage to get the 2009 results out so early?</p><p>I demand a recount!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How did they manage to get the 2009 results out so early ? I demand a recount !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did they manage to get the 2009 results out so early?I demand a recount!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371634</id>
	<title>Not our fault; it's the economy</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1260273120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can't blame bad US management of SPAM distribution. I think it's the economic situation. Give us a few years and we'll be on top again. As an American, I take pride that we are the top at everything, and have no doubt we'll return there once this bad economic weather blows over.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't blame bad US management of SPAM distribution .
I think it 's the economic situation .
Give us a few years and we 'll be on top again .
As an American , I take pride that we are the top at everything , and have no doubt we 'll return there once this bad economic weather blows over .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't blame bad US management of SPAM distribution.
I think it's the economic situation.
Give us a few years and we'll be on top again.
As an American, I take pride that we are the top at everything, and have no doubt we'll return there once this bad economic weather blows over.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371998</id>
	<title>HAEUHAEHUAHAEUHAEUHAEU</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260275220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>GIB MONEY PLZ OR I SPAM U</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>GIB MONEY PLZ OR I SPAM U</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GIB MONEY PLZ OR I SPAM U</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30377934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371304
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_2042253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371302
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371812
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371614
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30377934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30373106
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30375260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30372062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_2042253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_2042253.30371390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
