<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_08_177232</id>
	<title>Google Upgrades Chrome To Beta For OS X, Linux</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260293400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>wkurzius writes with this nugget from Mac Rumors: <i>"As anticipated, Google has finally released an <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/12/03/google-releases-chrome-for-mac-beta/">official beta version of its Chrome browser for Mac</a>.  The initial beta version, termed Build 4.0.249.30, requires Mac OS X Leopard or Snow Leopard, and is only compatible with Intel-based Macs."</i>

And hierofalcon writes with word that Chrome has also <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/w00t.html">been made available as an official Linux Beta</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>wkurzius writes with this nugget from Mac Rumors : " As anticipated , Google has finally released an official beta version of its Chrome browser for Mac .
The initial beta version , termed Build 4.0.249.30 , requires Mac OS X Leopard or Snow Leopard , and is only compatible with Intel-based Macs .
" And hierofalcon writes with word that Chrome has also been made available as an official Linux Beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wkurzius writes with this nugget from Mac Rumors: "As anticipated, Google has finally released an official beta version of its Chrome browser for Mac.
The initial beta version, termed Build 4.0.249.30, requires Mac OS X Leopard or Snow Leopard, and is only compatible with Intel-based Macs.
"

And hierofalcon writes with word that Chrome has also been made available as an official Linux Beta.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30372708</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>macshit</author>
	<datestamp>1260279660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another reason I like recent FF better is that it apparently respects the settings in ~/.fonts.conf, whereas google chrome (currently) seems to just ignore them. Since I can get much better rendering for some fonts (typically CJK fonts) by such tweaking, chrome looks uglier in comparison.
</p><p>
Also, chrome seems to steal keystrokes it shouldn't -- in particular in text-boxes, if you have gtk's "emacs bindings" mode on, ^N should just move to the next line; in FF it does, but google steals that for its global "new window" binding.
</p><p>
Hmm, I should really report these as bugs I guess...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another reason I like recent FF better is that it apparently respects the settings in ~ /.fonts.conf , whereas google chrome ( currently ) seems to just ignore them .
Since I can get much better rendering for some fonts ( typically CJK fonts ) by such tweaking , chrome looks uglier in comparison .
Also , chrome seems to steal keystrokes it should n't -- in particular in text-boxes , if you have gtk 's " emacs bindings " mode on , ^ N should just move to the next line ; in FF it does , but google steals that for its global " new window " binding .
Hmm , I should really report these as bugs I guess.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another reason I like recent FF better is that it apparently respects the settings in ~/.fonts.conf, whereas google chrome (currently) seems to just ignore them.
Since I can get much better rendering for some fonts (typically CJK fonts) by such tweaking, chrome looks uglier in comparison.
Also, chrome seems to steal keystrokes it shouldn't -- in particular in text-boxes, if you have gtk's "emacs bindings" mode on, ^N should just move to the next line; in FF it does, but google steals that for its global "new window" binding.
Hmm, I should really report these as bugs I guess...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371596</id>
	<title>Re:Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1260272940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They are developing apps in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.net (which doesn't make any sense considering where google is standing right now, specially towards microsoft).</p></div><p>Given the present anti-trust climate for Microsoft, I'm certain Google is safe from any encroachment on this side. They just have to shout "vendor lock-in! monopoly abuse!" if something threatening ever happens, and MS knows it.</p><p>By the way, what Google applications are written in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are developing apps in .net ( which does n't make any sense considering where google is standing right now , specially towards microsoft ) .Given the present anti-trust climate for Microsoft , I 'm certain Google is safe from any encroachment on this side .
They just have to shout " vendor lock-in !
monopoly abuse !
" if something threatening ever happens , and MS knows it.By the way , what Google applications are written in .NET ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are developing apps in .net (which doesn't make any sense considering where google is standing right now, specially towards microsoft).Given the present anti-trust climate for Microsoft, I'm certain Google is safe from any encroachment on this side.
They just have to shout "vendor lock-in!
monopoly abuse!
" if something threatening ever happens, and MS knows it.By the way, what Google applications are written in .NET?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367816</id>
	<title>Won't work on RHEL5/CENTOS5</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>./chrome:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX\_3.4.9' not found (required by<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./chrome)</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libnss3.so.1d =&gt; not found<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libnssutil3.so.1d =&gt; not found<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libsmime3.so.1d =&gt; not found<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libssl3.so.1d =&gt; not found<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libplds4.so.0d =&gt; not found<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libplc4.so.0d =&gt; not found<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; libnspr4.so.0d =&gt; not found</p><p>even if I symlink the existing libraries to the names it wants above it'll still bomb on the GLIBCXX\_3.4.9 error. <a href="http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13425" title="google.com">http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13425</a> [google.com] . No big deal though. Without support for firefox plugins Chrome is pretty much worthless for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>./chrome : /usr/lib/libstdc + + .so.6 : version ` GLIBCXX \ _3.4.9 ' not found ( required by ./chrome )                 libnss3.so.1d = &gt; not found                 libnssutil3.so.1d = &gt; not found                 libsmime3.so.1d = &gt; not found                 libssl3.so.1d = &gt; not found                 libplds4.so.0d = &gt; not found                 libplc4.so.0d = &gt; not found                 libnspr4.so.0d = &gt; not foundeven if I symlink the existing libraries to the names it wants above it 'll still bomb on the GLIBCXX \ _3.4.9 error .
http : //code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail ? id = 13425 [ google.com ] .
No big deal though .
Without support for firefox plugins Chrome is pretty much worthless for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>./chrome: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX\_3.4.9' not found (required by ./chrome)
                libnss3.so.1d =&gt; not found
                libnssutil3.so.1d =&gt; not found
                libsmime3.so.1d =&gt; not found
                libssl3.so.1d =&gt; not found
                libplds4.so.0d =&gt; not found
                libplc4.so.0d =&gt; not found
                libnspr4.so.0d =&gt; not foundeven if I symlink the existing libraries to the names it wants above it'll still bomb on the GLIBCXX\_3.4.9 error.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=13425 [google.com] .
No big deal though.
Without support for firefox plugins Chrome is pretty much worthless for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369646</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>icannotthinkofaname</author>
	<datestamp>1260263340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean <a href="http://www.chromeextensions.org/appearance-functioning/adblock/" title="chromeextensions.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [chromeextensions.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean this [ chromeextensions.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean this [chromeextensions.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367496</id>
	<title>Works Great on Leopard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260297660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been running one of the Chrome nightly builds on Leopard for several weeks and I am extremely impressed with its speed and stability.  I have never had a single tab crash on me.  I'm sure that people will complain about the lack of support for extensions compared to Firefox, and rightly so.  But if you don't need many extensions, I highly recommend trying out Chrome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been running one of the Chrome nightly builds on Leopard for several weeks and I am extremely impressed with its speed and stability .
I have never had a single tab crash on me .
I 'm sure that people will complain about the lack of support for extensions compared to Firefox , and rightly so .
But if you do n't need many extensions , I highly recommend trying out Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been running one of the Chrome nightly builds on Leopard for several weeks and I am extremely impressed with its speed and stability.
I have never had a single tab crash on me.
I'm sure that people will complain about the lack of support for extensions compared to Firefox, and rightly so.
But if you don't need many extensions, I highly recommend trying out Chrome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367668</id>
	<title>The evil empire can kiss my *ss.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I no longer trust Google with anything.  So no, I will not use any version of Chrome on any of my machines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I no longer trust Google with anything .
So no , I will not use any version of Chrome on any of my machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I no longer trust Google with anything.
So no, I will not use any version of Chrome on any of my machines.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369270</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>TheQuantumShift</author>
	<datestamp>1260304920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like being up to date, but I do not like unchecking "Automatically check for updates" during the install and still having an updater app run at boot time. Why can't the apps (chrome, picasa) just check themselves when they run like firefox? Why do I need yest another process always running to do it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like being up to date , but I do not like unchecking " Automatically check for updates " during the install and still having an updater app run at boot time .
Why ca n't the apps ( chrome , picasa ) just check themselves when they run like firefox ?
Why do I need yest another process always running to do it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like being up to date, but I do not like unchecking "Automatically check for updates" during the install and still having an updater app run at boot time.
Why can't the apps (chrome, picasa) just check themselves when they run like firefox?
Why do I need yest another process always running to do it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367690</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While Microsoft may not be developing at a very fast pace or even keeping up with standards, they are still the de facto choice for a vast majority of people. Especially those who are still tied to IE6 for certain things. I hate to think of that, but the quicker IE6 can die the better off the rest of us are. I'm also glad we have some healthy competition based on features and speed with Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Opera all being reasonably good choices.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While Microsoft may not be developing at a very fast pace or even keeping up with standards , they are still the de facto choice for a vast majority of people .
Especially those who are still tied to IE6 for certain things .
I hate to think of that , but the quicker IE6 can die the better off the rest of us are .
I 'm also glad we have some healthy competition based on features and speed with Firefox , Chrome , Safari , and Opera all being reasonably good choices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While Microsoft may not be developing at a very fast pace or even keeping up with standards, they are still the de facto choice for a vast majority of people.
Especially those who are still tied to IE6 for certain things.
I hate to think of that, but the quicker IE6 can die the better off the rest of us are.
I'm also glad we have some healthy competition based on features and speed with Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Opera all being reasonably good choices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369172</id>
	<title>Re:Won't work on RHEL5/CENTOS5</title>
	<author>Mad Merlin</author>
	<datestamp>1260304380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get with the times. RHEL 5 (even 5.4) is dreadfully ancient. Trying to use it with anything that isn't already explicitly packaged for it is asking for pain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get with the times .
RHEL 5 ( even 5.4 ) is dreadfully ancient .
Trying to use it with anything that is n't already explicitly packaged for it is asking for pain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get with the times.
RHEL 5 (even 5.4) is dreadfully ancient.
Trying to use it with anything that isn't already explicitly packaged for it is asking for pain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370054</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260265500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i'm sorry but even if it's google, no company is allowed to install software on my system that is not explicitly disclosed, and no fine print does not count.  nor are they allowed to not give me the option to opt out or turn it off.<br>if i end up with chrome on my linux box it will be without keystone, even if just to spite them and yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'm sorry but even if it 's google , no company is allowed to install software on my system that is not explicitly disclosed , and no fine print does not count .
nor are they allowed to not give me the option to opt out or turn it off.if i end up with chrome on my linux box it will be without keystone , even if just to spite them and yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'm sorry but even if it's google, no company is allowed to install software on my system that is not explicitly disclosed, and no fine print does not count.
nor are they allowed to not give me the option to opt out or turn it off.if i end up with chrome on my linux box it will be without keystone, even if just to spite them and yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30374838</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Devil's Avocado</author>
	<datestamp>1259612040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The biggest difference that I've noticed btw. Chrome and Safari is about 1GB free memory when using Chrome.  No exaggeration.  Safari has gotten INSANELY bloated.  I've been using a Chromium nightly for about two weeks and it's like night and day.  Safari is beach-balls galore, while Chromium (and now Chrome) is just speedy and compact.</p><p>I quit a Safari session I was running this morning with TWO TABS and it freed 750MB.  That is so wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The biggest difference that I 've noticed btw .
Chrome and Safari is about 1GB free memory when using Chrome .
No exaggeration .
Safari has gotten INSANELY bloated .
I 've been using a Chromium nightly for about two weeks and it 's like night and day .
Safari is beach-balls galore , while Chromium ( and now Chrome ) is just speedy and compact.I quit a Safari session I was running this morning with TWO TABS and it freed 750MB .
That is so wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The biggest difference that I've noticed btw.
Chrome and Safari is about 1GB free memory when using Chrome.
No exaggeration.
Safari has gotten INSANELY bloated.
I've been using a Chromium nightly for about two weeks and it's like night and day.
Safari is beach-balls galore, while Chromium (and now Chrome) is just speedy and compact.I quit a Safari session I was running this morning with TWO TABS and it freed 750MB.
That is so wrong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368042</id>
	<title>Re:Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260300000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that Google's non-web app development record is spotty.  But in fairness Google didn't write most of the apps that you're complaining about.  They came from other companies as the result of purchases.  Some apps, like Google Earth, were already written in Qt and thus ported easily.  Other apps not so easy to port.  Google only offered Picasa on Wine because there was some demand for a linux version (not enough to warrant a native port by the original company, obviously) and that was the best way to get it to linux users without having to spend a lot of money, which would have been a complete waste for Google to do.  Had google written Picasa themselves, they likely would have used Qt.</p><p>Google Chrome is the one exception to all this.  Google wrote it, and they really did screw up by not writing it in Qt to begin with.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that Google 's non-web app development record is spotty .
But in fairness Google did n't write most of the apps that you 're complaining about .
They came from other companies as the result of purchases .
Some apps , like Google Earth , were already written in Qt and thus ported easily .
Other apps not so easy to port .
Google only offered Picasa on Wine because there was some demand for a linux version ( not enough to warrant a native port by the original company , obviously ) and that was the best way to get it to linux users without having to spend a lot of money , which would have been a complete waste for Google to do .
Had google written Picasa themselves , they likely would have used Qt.Google Chrome is the one exception to all this .
Google wrote it , and they really did screw up by not writing it in Qt to begin with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that Google's non-web app development record is spotty.
But in fairness Google didn't write most of the apps that you're complaining about.
They came from other companies as the result of purchases.
Some apps, like Google Earth, were already written in Qt and thus ported easily.
Other apps not so easy to port.
Google only offered Picasa on Wine because there was some demand for a linux version (not enough to warrant a native port by the original company, obviously) and that was the best way to get it to linux users without having to spend a lot of money, which would have been a complete waste for Google to do.
Had google written Picasa themselves, they likely would have used Qt.Google Chrome is the one exception to all this.
Google wrote it, and they really did screw up by not writing it in Qt to begin with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370228</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Sancho</author>
	<datestamp>1260266460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window) and the integrated search / location bar (which seems to be able to read my mind...).</p></div><p>Firefox does both of those quite nicely, does it not?</p></div><p>I didn't know that you could reattach tabs to Firefox.  I always seemed to have trouble with it on OS X, but I did finally manage to do it.</p><p>The tab management is kind of weak on Firefox, anyway.  With Safari, you can pull off the tab without e.g. restarting a Flash video.  Not so with Firefox.  Furthermore, Firefox always seems to create the new window in the "new window" position, rather than wherever I've dragged the mouse pointer.  It's a minor annoyance, but it's there.</p><p>Really, the only extension I use on Firefox is Noscript, but it's important enough to me that I don't dally with other browsers often.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system ( much better than Safari since you can \ _reattach \ _ tabs back into the main window ) and the integrated search / location bar ( which seems to be able to read my mind... ) .Firefox does both of those quite nicely , does it not ? I did n't know that you could reattach tabs to Firefox .
I always seemed to have trouble with it on OS X , but I did finally manage to do it.The tab management is kind of weak on Firefox , anyway .
With Safari , you can pull off the tab without e.g .
restarting a Flash video .
Not so with Firefox .
Furthermore , Firefox always seems to create the new window in the " new window " position , rather than wherever I 've dragged the mouse pointer .
It 's a minor annoyance , but it 's there.Really , the only extension I use on Firefox is Noscript , but it 's important enough to me that I do n't dally with other browsers often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window) and the integrated search / location bar (which seems to be able to read my mind...).Firefox does both of those quite nicely, does it not?I didn't know that you could reattach tabs to Firefox.
I always seemed to have trouble with it on OS X, but I did finally manage to do it.The tab management is kind of weak on Firefox, anyway.
With Safari, you can pull off the tab without e.g.
restarting a Flash video.
Not so with Firefox.
Furthermore, Firefox always seems to create the new window in the "new window" position, rather than wherever I've dragged the mouse pointer.
It's a minor annoyance, but it's there.Really, the only extension I use on Firefox is Noscript, but it's important enough to me that I don't dally with other browsers often.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367708</id>
	<title>Re:Works Great on Leopard</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1260298560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just adding that bookmark sync is already implemented and other extensions are on the way</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just adding that bookmark sync is already implemented and other extensions are on the way</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just adding that bookmark sync is already implemented and other extensions are on the way</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368728</id>
	<title>Use a proxy that blocks advertisements</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260302400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Use a proxy that blocks advertisements, like privoxy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Use a proxy that blocks advertisements , like privoxy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Use a proxy that blocks advertisements, like privoxy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368084</id>
	<title>Features missing</title>
	<author>bonch</author>
	<datestamp>1260300180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No bookmark manager (!), many other features missing.  What reason is there to compel a Mac user to use this over Safari, which uses the same rendering engine and its own slightly faster JavaScript engine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No bookmark manager ( !
) , many other features missing .
What reason is there to compel a Mac user to use this over Safari , which uses the same rendering engine and its own slightly faster JavaScript engine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No bookmark manager (!
), many other features missing.
What reason is there to compel a Mac user to use this over Safari, which uses the same rendering engine and its own slightly faster JavaScript engine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368514</id>
	<title>news at 10</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260301620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>who needs an "official" release? would you mess around with apt's keyring? i use this for about three months. it's fast and mostly stable on Debian lenny and squeeze. the v8 java script engine is a magnitude more powerful and faster than iceweasel's. put it in ~/bin or something. it's worth trying:</p><p><a href="http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/LATEST" title="chromium.org" rel="nofollow">http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/LATEST</a> [chromium.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>who needs an " official " release ?
would you mess around with apt 's keyring ?
i use this for about three months .
it 's fast and mostly stable on Debian lenny and squeeze .
the v8 java script engine is a magnitude more powerful and faster than iceweasel 's .
put it in ~ /bin or something .
it 's worth trying : http : //build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/LATEST [ chromium.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who needs an "official" release?
would you mess around with apt's keyring?
i use this for about three months.
it's fast and mostly stable on Debian lenny and squeeze.
the v8 java script engine is a magnitude more powerful and faster than iceweasel's.
put it in ~/bin or something.
it's worth trying:http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/LATEST [chromium.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367642</id>
	<title>I am the originator of Ninnle!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Users 'Ninnle Linux (1460113)' and 'Ninnle Labs, LLC (1486095)' are nothing but poseurs, and no nothing about the true nature of Ninnle!<br><br>It's all about BATMAN!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Users 'Ninnle Linux ( 1460113 ) ' and 'Ninnle Labs , LLC ( 1486095 ) ' are nothing but poseurs , and no nothing about the true nature of Ninnle ! It 's all about BATMAN !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Users 'Ninnle Linux (1460113)' and 'Ninnle Labs, LLC (1486095)' are nothing but poseurs, and no nothing about the true nature of Ninnle!It's all about BATMAN!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30403942</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>kanazir</author>
	<datestamp>1260555840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>https : //chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368818</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260302820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Scrolling smoothness</i></p><p>Scrolling down through this thread, using Chrome on OSX for my first time, I was JUST thinking the same thing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scrolling smoothnessScrolling down through this thread , using Chrome on OSX for my first time , I was JUST thinking the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scrolling smoothnessScrolling down through this thread, using Chrome on OSX for my first time, I was JUST thinking the same thing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368976</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1260303600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this on every OS?
<br>
<br>
I couldn't see anything running under Activity Monitor.  Might be using a different name though.
<br>
<br>
Cheers for the advice btw, probably my own fault for not reading that 'eula' thing carefully enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this on every OS ?
I could n't see anything running under Activity Monitor .
Might be using a different name though .
Cheers for the advice btw , probably my own fault for not reading that 'eula ' thing carefully enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this on every OS?
I couldn't see anything running under Activity Monitor.
Might be using a different name though.
Cheers for the advice btw, probably my own fault for not reading that 'eula' thing carefully enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</id>
	<title>Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>friedmud</author>
	<datestamp>1260298080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my limited testing with it this morning... I think it is very promising... but I won't quite be switching from Safari on Snow Leopard just yet.</p><p>My main gripe?  Scrolling smoothness.  It's a small thing... but the jarring scrolling of Chrome is enough to keep me on Safari.</p><p>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window) and the integrated search / location bar (which seems to be able to read my mind...).</p><p>Other than that they are very similar... can anyone spot big differences somewhere?  I mean, these days, most browsers are the same.  I used to use Firefox for the plugins... but now Firefox, Safari and Chrome all pretty much include the stuff I was using plugins for... so I go with Safari for how well integrated it is with OS X.</p><p>I am glad Google is building a good browser... it will keep everyone on their toes (especially since Microsoft has pretty much bowed out of the next-gen browser market with their unwillingness to implement standards in a timely fashion).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my limited testing with it this morning... I think it is very promising... but I wo n't quite be switching from Safari on Snow Leopard just yet.My main gripe ?
Scrolling smoothness .
It 's a small thing... but the jarring scrolling of Chrome is enough to keep me on Safari.Other than that I really like the tab tear off system ( much better than Safari since you can \ _reattach \ _ tabs back into the main window ) and the integrated search / location bar ( which seems to be able to read my mind... ) .Other than that they are very similar... can anyone spot big differences somewhere ?
I mean , these days , most browsers are the same .
I used to use Firefox for the plugins... but now Firefox , Safari and Chrome all pretty much include the stuff I was using plugins for... so I go with Safari for how well integrated it is with OS X.I am glad Google is building a good browser... it will keep everyone on their toes ( especially since Microsoft has pretty much bowed out of the next-gen browser market with their unwillingness to implement standards in a timely fashion ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my limited testing with it this morning... I think it is very promising... but I won't quite be switching from Safari on Snow Leopard just yet.My main gripe?
Scrolling smoothness.
It's a small thing... but the jarring scrolling of Chrome is enough to keep me on Safari.Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window) and the integrated search / location bar (which seems to be able to read my mind...).Other than that they are very similar... can anyone spot big differences somewhere?
I mean, these days, most browsers are the same.
I used to use Firefox for the plugins... but now Firefox, Safari and Chrome all pretty much include the stuff I was using plugins for... so I go with Safari for how well integrated it is with OS X.I am glad Google is building a good browser... it will keep everyone on their toes (especially since Microsoft has pretty much bowed out of the next-gen browser market with their unwillingness to implement standards in a timely fashion).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367828</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll switch to Chrome once it get vimperator and adblock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll switch to Chrome once it get vimperator and adblock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll switch to Chrome once it get vimperator and adblock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660</id>
	<title>Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beware that the first time you run Chrome, it will install their Keystone auto-update facility, with which Google feels free to update whatever they want, whenever they want and however they want. Even when you're not running the browser, as the Keystone agent will launch itself automatically at system boot.</p><p>You have been warned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beware that the first time you run Chrome , it will install their Keystone auto-update facility , with which Google feels free to update whatever they want , whenever they want and however they want .
Even when you 're not running the browser , as the Keystone agent will launch itself automatically at system boot.You have been warned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beware that the first time you run Chrome, it will install their Keystone auto-update facility, with which Google feels free to update whatever they want, whenever they want and however they want.
Even when you're not running the browser, as the Keystone agent will launch itself automatically at system boot.You have been warned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368224</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>g0at</author>
	<datestamp>1260300600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window</p></div><p>Unless I am misunderstanding you, this is possible in Safari (though potentially inelegant).  Tabs can be dragged to, from and between any two tabbed windows.  If you have only a single document window, though (i.e. one or no tabs showing, depending on your prefs setting), you must first induce the display of a new tab before being able to drag the principal document.</p><p>-b</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>much better than Safari since you can \ _reattach \ _ tabs back into the main windowUnless I am misunderstanding you , this is possible in Safari ( though potentially inelegant ) .
Tabs can be dragged to , from and between any two tabbed windows .
If you have only a single document window , though ( i.e .
one or no tabs showing , depending on your prefs setting ) , you must first induce the display of a new tab before being able to drag the principal document.-b</tokentext>
<sentencetext>much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main windowUnless I am misunderstanding you, this is possible in Safari (though potentially inelegant).
Tabs can be dragged to, from and between any two tabbed windows.
If you have only a single document window, though (i.e.
one or no tabs showing, depending on your prefs setting), you must first induce the display of a new tab before being able to drag the principal document.-b
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371604</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260272940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Replying now on Chrome Beta. And I concur the scrolling lag is a big turnoff</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replying now on Chrome Beta .
And I concur the scrolling lag is a big turnoff</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Replying now on Chrome Beta.
And I concur the scrolling lag is a big turnoff</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369208</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does that mean that once an update is installed that new tabs open with the new version?  Or that next time you launch Chrome it gets updated?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that mean that once an update is installed that new tabs open with the new version ?
Or that next time you launch Chrome it gets updated ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that mean that once an update is installed that new tabs open with the new version?
Or that next time you launch Chrome it gets updated?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370294</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>Thinboy00</author>
	<datestamp>1260266760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let me know when it gets adblock</p></div><p> <a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cfhdojbkjhnklbpkdaibdccddilifddb" title="google.com">Not exactly</a> [google.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when it gets adblock Not exactly [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when it gets adblock Not exactly [google.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367394</id>
	<title>Been using it for a while</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1260297300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Set up the PPA on my Ubuntu box in sources.list back in Sept/Oct</p><p><a href="https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa" title="launchpad.net">https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa</a> [launchpad.net]</p><p>Current version shows 4.0.266.0 (Ubuntu build 33943)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Set up the PPA on my Ubuntu box in sources.list back in Sept/Octhttps : //launchpad.net/ ~ chromium-daily/ + archive/ppa [ launchpad.net ] Current version shows 4.0.266.0 ( Ubuntu build 33943 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Set up the PPA on my Ubuntu box in sources.list back in Sept/Octhttps://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa [launchpad.net]Current version shows 4.0.266.0 (Ubuntu build 33943)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730</id>
	<title>Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1260298620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The main big issue, is how the company doesn't have an official policy towards local app development.</p><p>When it comes to Google's web apps, you can expect AJAX, DHTML, clean and simple look, etc. OTOH, they local apps all look developed by different companies. They are developing apps in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.net (which doesn't make any sense considering where google is standing right now, specially towards microsoft). Their so called "ports" are pathetic. All they do is recompile their apps with the WINE libs. Picasa is an example. And they didn't even test it before releasing, or at least disable the functions that don't work in wine. For example, on Picasa for GNU/Linux, when you click on "make movie" it throws the error "function not available on Windows 2000". They didn't even bother to disable it. If I wanted to run Picasa on Wine, I would just do so. If you provide a port, provide an actual port.</p><p>What really doesn't make sense to me is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... why write applications in non-portable languages/frameworks, and then port them? Why not just go GTK or QT and port it everywhere?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The main big issue , is how the company does n't have an official policy towards local app development.When it comes to Google 's web apps , you can expect AJAX , DHTML , clean and simple look , etc .
OTOH , they local apps all look developed by different companies .
They are developing apps in .net ( which does n't make any sense considering where google is standing right now , specially towards microsoft ) .
Their so called " ports " are pathetic .
All they do is recompile their apps with the WINE libs .
Picasa is an example .
And they did n't even test it before releasing , or at least disable the functions that do n't work in wine .
For example , on Picasa for GNU/Linux , when you click on " make movie " it throws the error " function not available on Windows 2000 " .
They did n't even bother to disable it .
If I wanted to run Picasa on Wine , I would just do so .
If you provide a port , provide an actual port.What really does n't make sense to me is ... why write applications in non-portable languages/frameworks , and then port them ?
Why not just go GTK or QT and port it everywhere ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The main big issue, is how the company doesn't have an official policy towards local app development.When it comes to Google's web apps, you can expect AJAX, DHTML, clean and simple look, etc.
OTOH, they local apps all look developed by different companies.
They are developing apps in .net (which doesn't make any sense considering where google is standing right now, specially towards microsoft).
Their so called "ports" are pathetic.
All they do is recompile their apps with the WINE libs.
Picasa is an example.
And they didn't even test it before releasing, or at least disable the functions that don't work in wine.
For example, on Picasa for GNU/Linux, when you click on "make movie" it throws the error "function not available on Windows 2000".
They didn't even bother to disable it.
If I wanted to run Picasa on Wine, I would just do so.
If you provide a port, provide an actual port.What really doesn't make sense to me is ... why write applications in non-portable languages/frameworks, and then port them?
Why not just go GTK or QT and port it everywhere?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368816</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260302760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrome's Task Manager -&gt; kill the Adobe Flash plugin.</p><p>Gets rid of the worst ones.  Anything else is ignorable.  YMMV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome 's Task Manager - &gt; kill the Adobe Flash plugin.Gets rid of the worst ones .
Anything else is ignorable .
YMMV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome's Task Manager -&gt; kill the Adobe Flash plugin.Gets rid of the worst ones.
Anything else is ignorable.
YMMV.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368394</id>
	<title>Re:Works Great on Leopard</title>
	<author>Xerfas</author>
	<datestamp>1260301200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have also tried it for a while and it works great in Leopard. Has never crashed for me, but firefox on the other hand has crashed a lot.
Pages updates are a bit faster, sites like Facebook works better for some odd reason. They load a bit faster for me.
I also recomment trying out Chrome if you use a Mac or Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have also tried it for a while and it works great in Leopard .
Has never crashed for me , but firefox on the other hand has crashed a lot .
Pages updates are a bit faster , sites like Facebook works better for some odd reason .
They load a bit faster for me .
I also recomment trying out Chrome if you use a Mac or Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have also tried it for a while and it works great in Leopard.
Has never crashed for me, but firefox on the other hand has crashed a lot.
Pages updates are a bit faster, sites like Facebook works better for some odd reason.
They load a bit faster for me.
I also recomment trying out Chrome if you use a Mac or Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30376806</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1259595420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I take it you have not used Debian before? And the Linux Kernel does not count, though I heard rumours about reboot-less patch-sets..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I take it you have not used Debian before ?
And the Linux Kernel does not count , though I heard rumours about reboot-less patch-sets. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I take it you have not used Debian before?
And the Linux Kernel does not count, though I heard rumours about reboot-less patch-sets..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367384</id>
	<title>Frosty Piss?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260297240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Way</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Way</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Way</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368592</id>
	<title>I've been using it for months</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1260301920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrome for Linux (no idea about OSX, I don't use it) has been release quality for a long, long time now. I'm quite surprised that only now it's in Beta.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome for Linux ( no idea about OSX , I do n't use it ) has been release quality for a long , long time now .
I 'm quite surprised that only now it 's in Beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome for Linux (no idea about OSX, I don't use it) has been release quality for a long, long time now.
I'm quite surprised that only now it's in Beta.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368124</id>
	<title>SRware Iron for Linux has been in beta since Nov</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260300300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(<a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/25/1440225" title="slashdot.org">Remember</a> [slashdot.org], Iron is the no-phone-home, no-spyware, privacy-assured derivative of Chrome.)

</p><p>Despite that, I hope to see a version of Iron based on the upstream's beta soon.  When it comes out, it would be announced on the <a href="http://www.srware.net/forum/viewforum.php?f=18&amp;sid=71c072b25303ed35dbfccbcb6a6a0709" title="srware.net">SRware forums</a> [srware.net].

</p><p>Also interesting:  The <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome?hl=en&amp;platform=linux&amp;brand=CHFK" title="google.com">Google Chrome download page</a> [google.com] requires javascript!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>You need a JavaScript-capable browser to download this software. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Remember [ slashdot.org ] , Iron is the no-phone-home , no-spyware , privacy-assured derivative of Chrome .
) Despite that , I hope to see a version of Iron based on the upstream 's beta soon .
When it comes out , it would be announced on the SRware forums [ srware.net ] .
Also interesting : The Google Chrome download page [ google.com ] requires javascript ! You need a JavaScript-capable browser to download this software .
Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Remember [slashdot.org], Iron is the no-phone-home, no-spyware, privacy-assured derivative of Chrome.
)

Despite that, I hope to see a version of Iron based on the upstream's beta soon.
When it comes out, it would be announced on the SRware forums [srware.net].
Also interesting:  The Google Chrome download page [google.com] requires javascript!You need a JavaScript-capable browser to download this software.
Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368998</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1260303720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My main gripe? Scrolling smoothness. It's a small thing... but the jarring scrolling of Chrome is enough to keep me on Safari.</p></div><p>I'm trying out Chrome OS X right now and I've noticed the same problem. In Safari, I tend to read as I scroll but I can't do that with Chrome--it would give me a headache. Otherwise, it seems okay.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My main gripe ?
Scrolling smoothness .
It 's a small thing... but the jarring scrolling of Chrome is enough to keep me on Safari.I 'm trying out Chrome OS X right now and I 've noticed the same problem .
In Safari , I tend to read as I scroll but I ca n't do that with Chrome--it would give me a headache .
Otherwise , it seems okay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My main gripe?
Scrolling smoothness.
It's a small thing... but the jarring scrolling of Chrome is enough to keep me on Safari.I'm trying out Chrome OS X right now and I've noticed the same problem.
In Safari, I tend to read as I scroll but I can't do that with Chrome--it would give me a headache.
Otherwise, it seems okay.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368424</id>
	<title>LSB = 3.2 dependency</title>
	<author>jDeepbeep</author>
	<datestamp>1260301320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux RPMs were built targeting LSB 3.2<br> <tt>lsb &gt;= 3.2 is needed by google-chrome-beta-4.0.249.30-33928.i386</tt> <br>
I'll just add this to the list of reasons to upgrade this FC8 install.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux RPMs were built targeting LSB 3.2 lsb &gt; = 3.2 is needed by google-chrome-beta-4.0.249.30-33928.i386 I 'll just add this to the list of reasons to upgrade this FC8 install .
: p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux RPMs were built targeting LSB 3.2 lsb &gt;= 3.2 is needed by google-chrome-beta-4.0.249.30-33928.i386 
I'll just add this to the list of reasons to upgrade this FC8 install.
:p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367720</id>
	<title>Iron.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you don't want to be spied by google every second, download the Iron browser. It's based on Chrome code base, but has spying disabled.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't want to be spied by google every second , download the Iron browser .
It 's based on Chrome code base , but has spying disabled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't want to be spied by google every second, download the Iron browser.
It's based on Chrome code base, but has spying disabled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368078</id>
	<title>Funny of Google...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260300180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its almost like they don't care, I mean I get OSX to a degree, but whats up with no Linux support? Is that going to "surprisingly" happen once ChromeOS comes out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its almost like they do n't care , I mean I get OSX to a degree , but whats up with no Linux support ?
Is that going to " surprisingly " happen once ChromeOS comes out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its almost like they don't care, I mean I get OSX to a degree, but whats up with no Linux support?
Is that going to "surprisingly" happen once ChromeOS comes out?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368222</id>
	<title>What happened to me?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260300600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Excuse me, but I think I reported this story first, yet it's not on the home page.. Very said indeed...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:'(
See <a href="http://slashdot.org/~Ratscallion" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/~Ratscallion</a> [slashdot.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Excuse me , but I think I reported this story first , yet it 's not on the home page.. Very said indeed... : ' ( See http : //slashdot.org/ ~ Ratscallion [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Excuse me, but I think I reported this story first, yet it's not on the home page.. Very said indeed... :'(
See http://slashdot.org/~Ratscallion [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30373286</id>
	<title>Re:Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>phoenix\_rizzen</author>
	<datestamp>1260284340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of Google's local/native apps were not developed in house, and are the result of company acquisitions.  For example, Picassa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of Google 's local/native apps were not developed in house , and are the result of company acquisitions .
For example , Picassa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of Google's local/native apps were not developed in house, and are the result of company acquisitions.
For example, Picassa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371854</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>skzo</author>
	<datestamp>1260274440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Adblock is <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/12/08/194229/Google-Chrome-Extensions-Are-Now-Available?from=rss&amp;utm\_source=feedburner&amp;utm\_medium=feed&amp;utm\_campaign=Feed\%3A+Slashdot\%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot)" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">already available</a> [slashdot.org] for both google chrome and chromium in linux, for at least a couple of months.
<br>
I've been using the chrome build in paralel with firefox, and I'm quite happy, chrome is *really* fast.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Adblock is already available [ slashdot.org ] for both google chrome and chromium in linux , for at least a couple of months .
I 've been using the chrome build in paralel with firefox , and I 'm quite happy , chrome is * really * fast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Adblock is already available [slashdot.org] for both google chrome and chromium in linux, for at least a couple of months.
I've been using the chrome build in paralel with firefox, and I'm quite happy, chrome is *really* fast.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368738</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>vitaflo</author>
	<datestamp>1260302460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're running on OS X, you don't need adblock for any browser.  <a href="http://glimmerblocker.org/" title="glimmerblocker.org">GlimmerBlocker</a> [glimmerblocker.org] will do the same thing and is usable by any browser you want since it's just a proxy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're running on OS X , you do n't need adblock for any browser .
GlimmerBlocker [ glimmerblocker.org ] will do the same thing and is usable by any browser you want since it 's just a proxy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're running on OS X, you don't need adblock for any browser.
GlimmerBlocker [glimmerblocker.org] will do the same thing and is usable by any browser you want since it's just a proxy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367516</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it for a while</title>
	<author>endx7</author>
	<datestamp>1260297780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used the PPA for a while, but it tracks HEAD a bit too closely for my liking.  The last couple of builds have had some graphical corruption that make going back to a previous version necessary for me.

The official unstable version doesn't track HEAD nearly as closely, and contains the google branding (which, I don't really care about).  I expect the beta version will be even more stable.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used the PPA for a while , but it tracks HEAD a bit too closely for my liking .
The last couple of builds have had some graphical corruption that make going back to a previous version necessary for me .
The official unstable version does n't track HEAD nearly as closely , and contains the google branding ( which , I do n't really care about ) .
I expect the beta version will be even more stable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used the PPA for a while, but it tracks HEAD a bit too closely for my liking.
The last couple of builds have had some graphical corruption that make going back to a previous version necessary for me.
The official unstable version doesn't track HEAD nearly as closely, and contains the google branding (which, I don't really care about).
I expect the beta version will be even more stable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368814</id>
	<title>It has AdSweep.</title>
	<author>neiras</author>
	<datestamp>1260302760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See <a href="http://adsweep.org/" title="adsweep.org">http://adsweep.org/</a> [adsweep.org] - not nearly as flexible as AdBlock but does the job for the most part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See http : //adsweep.org/ [ adsweep.org ] - not nearly as flexible as AdBlock but does the job for the most part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See http://adsweep.org/ [adsweep.org] - not nearly as flexible as AdBlock but does the job for the most part.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368192</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260300480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window</p></div><p>that is actually possible in safari<br><a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20070613125314741" title="macosxhints.com" rel="nofollow">your welcome</a> [macosxhints.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>much better than Safari since you can \ _reattach \ _ tabs back into the main windowthat is actually possible in safariyour welcome [ macosxhints.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main windowthat is actually possible in safariyour welcome [macosxhints.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370574</id>
	<title>Internet Explorer is dying... FAST!</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1260268080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I am glad Google is building a good browser... it will keep everyone on their toes (especially since Microsoft has pretty much bowed out of the next-gen browser market with their unwillingness to implement standards in a timely fashion).</i></p><p>What I find interesting is just how rapidly this is happening! For our intranet-style application, we've pretty much dropped support for IE altogether, telling our customers to use Firefox, Safari, or Chrome - pretty much "anything but IE". We just write standards-compliant code and almost never bother with IE weirds anymore, we just tell our users to "upgrade to Firefox or Chrome", and they do.</p><p>IE8 was Microsoft's big chance, and they blew it. It's *still* not actually standards compliant, at a time when standards compliance is what the marketplace actually wants. Now, they've dumped lots of money and mindshare into a product that still manages to underwhelm.</p><p>Microsoft tried to hijack the web development environment with their "dot net" framework, a proprietary application stack with its associated vendor lockin, and an incompatible browser with loads of marketshare.</p><p>The only thing they really had to sell was marketshare, <a href="http://www.itworldcanada.com/news/ie8-cant-stop-microsofts-declining-market-share/139539" title="itworldcanada.com">and they are losing that as fast as the marketplace can move!</a> [itworldcanada.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am glad Google is building a good browser... it will keep everyone on their toes ( especially since Microsoft has pretty much bowed out of the next-gen browser market with their unwillingness to implement standards in a timely fashion ) .What I find interesting is just how rapidly this is happening !
For our intranet-style application , we 've pretty much dropped support for IE altogether , telling our customers to use Firefox , Safari , or Chrome - pretty much " anything but IE " .
We just write standards-compliant code and almost never bother with IE weirds anymore , we just tell our users to " upgrade to Firefox or Chrome " , and they do.IE8 was Microsoft 's big chance , and they blew it .
It 's * still * not actually standards compliant , at a time when standards compliance is what the marketplace actually wants .
Now , they 've dumped lots of money and mindshare into a product that still manages to underwhelm.Microsoft tried to hijack the web development environment with their " dot net " framework , a proprietary application stack with its associated vendor lockin , and an incompatible browser with loads of marketshare.The only thing they really had to sell was marketshare , and they are losing that as fast as the marketplace can move !
[ itworldcanada.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am glad Google is building a good browser... it will keep everyone on their toes (especially since Microsoft has pretty much bowed out of the next-gen browser market with their unwillingness to implement standards in a timely fashion).What I find interesting is just how rapidly this is happening!
For our intranet-style application, we've pretty much dropped support for IE altogether, telling our customers to use Firefox, Safari, or Chrome - pretty much "anything but IE".
We just write standards-compliant code and almost never bother with IE weirds anymore, we just tell our users to "upgrade to Firefox or Chrome", and they do.IE8 was Microsoft's big chance, and they blew it.
It's *still* not actually standards compliant, at a time when standards compliance is what the marketplace actually wants.
Now, they've dumped lots of money and mindshare into a product that still manages to underwhelm.Microsoft tried to hijack the web development environment with their "dot net" framework, a proprietary application stack with its associated vendor lockin, and an incompatible browser with loads of marketshare.The only thing they really had to sell was marketshare, and they are losing that as fast as the marketplace can move!
[itworldcanada.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368860</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>ukiah</author>
	<datestamp>1260303000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let me know when it gets adblock</p></div><p>I couldn't agree more.  It's not possible for me to go back to using a browser without some sort of ad blocking capability.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when it gets adblockI could n't agree more .
It 's not possible for me to go back to using a browser without some sort of ad blocking capability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when it gets adblockI couldn't agree more.
It's not possible for me to go back to using a browser without some sort of ad blocking capability.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368604</id>
	<title>Re:Been using it for a while</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1260301980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People who don't want to hand-edit anything can also use <a href="http://ubuntu-tweak.com/" title="ubuntu-tweak.com">Ubuntu Tweak</a> [ubuntu-tweak.com], which has a nice little checkbox you can click for Chrome, in addition to many other nice applications like the <a href="http://www.openshotvideo.com/" title="openshotvideo.com">OpenShot</a> [openshotvideo.com] video editor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People who do n't want to hand-edit anything can also use Ubuntu Tweak [ ubuntu-tweak.com ] , which has a nice little checkbox you can click for Chrome , in addition to many other nice applications like the OpenShot [ openshotvideo.com ] video editor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People who don't want to hand-edit anything can also use Ubuntu Tweak [ubuntu-tweak.com], which has a nice little checkbox you can click for Chrome, in addition to many other nice applications like the OpenShot [openshotvideo.com] video editor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368762</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>Z34107</author>
	<datestamp>1260302580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try <a href="http://adsweep.org/" title="adsweep.org">AdSweep.</a> [adsweep.org]  Don't know if it works on the Mac/Linux versions, but it works on version 4 of the Windows build.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try AdSweep .
[ adsweep.org ] Do n't know if it works on the Mac/Linux versions , but it works on version 4 of the Windows build .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try AdSweep.
[adsweep.org]  Don't know if it works on the Mac/Linux versions, but it works on version 4 of the Windows build.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367736</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260298620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window) and the integrated search / location bar (which seems to be able to read my mind...).</p></div><p>Firefox does both of those quite nicely, does it not?</p><p>I use Firefox for the extensions, no doubt. But I also like its speed and stability (version 3 was the one that made the biggest difference, IIRC).</p><p>Some of the Firefox extensions I use are really handy to have. As I&rsquo;m sure you&rsquo;d expect, I use AdBlock Plus and couldn&rsquo;t live without it. However, Download Statusbar, Video DownloadHelper, FireFTP, RefControl, Screengrab, Tab Mix Plus, and User Agent Switcher are some more extensions that I have installed and find very useful.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system ( much better than Safari since you can \ _reattach \ _ tabs back into the main window ) and the integrated search / location bar ( which seems to be able to read my mind... ) .Firefox does both of those quite nicely , does it not ? I use Firefox for the extensions , no doubt .
But I also like its speed and stability ( version 3 was the one that made the biggest difference , IIRC ) .Some of the Firefox extensions I use are really handy to have .
As I    m sure you    d expect , I use AdBlock Plus and couldn    t live without it .
However , Download Statusbar , Video DownloadHelper , FireFTP , RefControl , Screengrab , Tab Mix Plus , and User Agent Switcher are some more extensions that I have installed and find very useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window) and the integrated search / location bar (which seems to be able to read my mind...).Firefox does both of those quite nicely, does it not?I use Firefox for the extensions, no doubt.
But I also like its speed and stability (version 3 was the one that made the biggest difference, IIRC).Some of the Firefox extensions I use are really handy to have.
As I’m sure you’d expect, I use AdBlock Plus and couldn’t live without it.
However, Download Statusbar, Video DownloadHelper, FireFTP, RefControl, Screengrab, Tab Mix Plus, and User Agent Switcher are some more extensions that I have installed and find very useful.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368606</id>
	<title>Google</title>
	<author>diego.viola</author>
	<datestamp>1260301980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Please add a tar.gz/bz2 with a static build for 32 and 64 bits archs.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Diego</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please add a tar.gz/bz2 with a static build for 32 and 64 bits archs.Thanks,Diego</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please add a tar.gz/bz2 with a static build for 32 and 64 bits archs.Thanks,Diego</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367544</id>
	<title>where's zip/tar package for Linux???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260297900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, no version for MY Linux. I am on CentOS, but I need a zip/tar file that I can install into $HOME. Not ever installing random shit as RPMs, duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , no version for MY Linux .
I am on CentOS , but I need a zip/tar file that I can install into $ HOME .
Not ever installing random shit as RPMs , duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, no version for MY Linux.
I am on CentOS, but I need a zip/tar file that I can install into $HOME.
Not ever installing random shit as RPMs, duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30372598</id>
	<title>Re:Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>RiffRafff</author>
	<datestamp>1260278820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, add another Linux user to the demand for a native port of Picasa.  Picasa under WINE sucks, especially with its brain-dead directory system.</p><p>Guess I don't have to worry about Chrome...not only does it <i>not</i> install automagically after download as advertised, but attempting to run it manually results in:</p><p><b>Syntax error: newline unexpected</b></p><p>Oh, well...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , add another Linux user to the demand for a native port of Picasa .
Picasa under WINE sucks , especially with its brain-dead directory system.Guess I do n't have to worry about Chrome...not only does it not install automagically after download as advertised , but attempting to run it manually results in : Syntax error : newline unexpectedOh , well.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, add another Linux user to the demand for a native port of Picasa.
Picasa under WINE sucks, especially with its brain-dead directory system.Guess I don't have to worry about Chrome...not only does it not install automagically after download as advertised, but attempting to run it manually results in:Syntax error: newline unexpectedOh, well...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368356</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>ArsonSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1260301020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're not willing to update, what are you trying to hide?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're not willing to update , what are you trying to hide ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're not willing to update, what are you trying to hide?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368636</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>Good Grief</author>
	<datestamp>1260302100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/cfhdojbkjhnklbpkdaibdccddilifddb" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">AdThwart</a> [google.com] is close enough for me. Even uses EasyList.</htmltext>
<tokenext>AdThwart [ google.com ] is close enough for me .
Even uses EasyList .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AdThwart [google.com] is close enough for me.
Even uses EasyList.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368440</id>
	<title>Re:Adblock</title>
	<author>Temporal</author>
	<datestamp>1260301380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are <a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=chrome+ad-block+extension" title="lmgtfy.com">multiple ad-blocking extensions</a> [lmgtfy.com] available for Chrome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are multiple ad-blocking extensions [ lmgtfy.com ] available for Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are multiple ad-blocking extensions [lmgtfy.com] available for Chrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368800</id>
	<title>FINALLY!</title>
	<author>valRoadie</author>
	<datestamp>1260302700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they will have some time to focus on the windows version now....im still waiting google...still waiting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they will have some time to focus on the windows version now....im still waiting google...still waiting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they will have some time to focus on the windows version now....im still waiting google...still waiting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367674</id>
	<title>Sweet. Iron?</title>
	<author>signingis</author>
	<datestamp>1260298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now it's time for the <a href="http://www.srware.net/en/software\_srware\_iron.php" title="srware.net" rel="nofollow">Iron</a> [srware.net] devs to get cracking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now it 's time for the Iron [ srware.net ] devs to get cracking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now it's time for the Iron [srware.net] devs to get cracking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380</id>
	<title>Adblock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260297240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let me know when it gets adblock</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me know when it gets adblock</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let me know when it gets adblock</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368552</id>
	<title>Re:Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>Temporal</author>
	<datestamp>1260301800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrome on Linux does not use WINE.  Have you tried it?  None of the things you complain about are true of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome on Linux does not use WINE .
Have you tried it ?
None of the things you complain about are true of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome on Linux does not use WINE.
Have you tried it?
None of the things you complain about are true of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912</id>
	<title>Re:Beware Google's penchant for auto-updates...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You make it sound evil.  Most people don't want to be nagged with constant update reminders.  In fact, most people will ignore those reminders, leaving them vulnerable to security exploits.  Hence, Google has built an updater which can automatically install updates in the background.  Remarkably, it manages to do this without ever asking you to reboot or even to restart the program being updated, which cannot be said of any other software updater I've ever seen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You make it sound evil .
Most people do n't want to be nagged with constant update reminders .
In fact , most people will ignore those reminders , leaving them vulnerable to security exploits .
Hence , Google has built an updater which can automatically install updates in the background .
Remarkably , it manages to do this without ever asking you to reboot or even to restart the program being updated , which can not be said of any other software updater I 've ever seen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make it sound evil.
Most people don't want to be nagged with constant update reminders.
In fact, most people will ignore those reminders, leaving them vulnerable to security exploits.
Hence, Google has built an updater which can automatically install updates in the background.
Remarkably, it manages to do this without ever asking you to reboot or even to restart the program being updated, which cannot be said of any other software updater I've ever seen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367820</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>samkass</author>
	<datestamp>1260298920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window)</p></div></blockquote><p>You can do this in Safari, too.  Just have the tabs always visible and drag the tab (not the title bar) back into the main window.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system ( much better than Safari since you can \ _reattach \ _ tabs back into the main window ) You can do this in Safari , too .
Just have the tabs always visible and drag the tab ( not the title bar ) back into the main window .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Other than that I really like the tab tear off system (much better than Safari since you can \_reattach\_ tabs back into the main window)You can do this in Safari, too.
Just have the tabs always visible and drag the tab (not the title bar) back into the main window.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369282</id>
	<title>Re:Google rocks, but their apps suck</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1260304980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apart from buying apps together with small companies, mentioned by other posters, perhaps it's an effect of "20\% time on personal project" policy at Google?</p><p>If large proportion of their apps start that way, they might be stuck with independent decisions of initial dev who treated it like toy project.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apart from buying apps together with small companies , mentioned by other posters , perhaps it 's an effect of " 20 \ % time on personal project " policy at Google ? If large proportion of their apps start that way , they might be stuck with independent decisions of initial dev who treated it like toy project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apart from buying apps together with small companies, mentioned by other posters, perhaps it's an effect of "20\% time on personal project" policy at Google?If large proportion of their apps start that way, they might be stuck with independent decisions of initial dev who treated it like toy project.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367406</id>
	<title>The delay is caused by Open Source</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260297300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On Windows &amp; OS X, it was fairly easy to find the API calls that turn on your system's cameras and microphones, but on Linux, those devices are all over the place so it took Google longer to figure out how to turn them on when you're running their browser.  Don't worry, all video and audio is stored securely on Google's private servers and accessible only via the website called "YouTube"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On Windows &amp; OS X , it was fairly easy to find the API calls that turn on your system 's cameras and microphones , but on Linux , those devices are all over the place so it took Google longer to figure out how to turn them on when you 're running their browser .
Do n't worry , all video and audio is stored securely on Google 's private servers and accessible only via the website called " YouTube "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On Windows &amp; OS X, it was fairly easy to find the API calls that turn on your system's cameras and microphones, but on Linux, those devices are all over the place so it took Google longer to figure out how to turn them on when you're running their browser.
Don't worry, all video and audio is stored securely on Google's private servers and accessible only via the website called "YouTube"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30375630</id>
	<title>Re:Won't Switch From Safari Yet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259582160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>but the quicker IE6 can die the better off the rest of us are.</i></p><p>Don't hold your breath. In the corporate world there's still going to be loads of people stuck on IE6 until Windows XP (last version of Windows to support IE6) gets very near to end of life (2014).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but the quicker IE6 can die the better off the rest of us are.Do n't hold your breath .
In the corporate world there 's still going to be loads of people stuck on IE6 until Windows XP ( last version of Windows to support IE6 ) gets very near to end of life ( 2014 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but the quicker IE6 can die the better off the rest of us are.Don't hold your breath.
In the corporate world there's still going to be loads of people stuck on IE6 until Windows XP (last version of Windows to support IE6) gets very near to end of life (2014).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367690</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30372598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30375630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30373286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30372708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30376806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30374838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30403942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_177232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30373286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368042
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30372598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368592
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30403942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367668
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30374838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367736
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30372708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30371604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30375630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_177232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30367660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30369208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30370054
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30376806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_177232.30368356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
