<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_08_1728239</id>
	<title>The Ultimate Geek Christmas Card</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1260299640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"CNET reports on <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/mobiles/0,39029453,49304481,00.htm">the world's most geeky Christmas card</a>, and also the most expensive. The card is made out of a 1st gen iPhone, hacked into a Christmas card using cardboard, paper and glue. The card includes a <a href="http://www.atomicantelope.com/bauble/">virtual 'bauble'</a> which uses the iPhone's accelerometer to recreate Christmas decorations that bounce and move with the card. The makers of the card say that because of the iPhone's battery life 'you probably don't want to post it anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arrive.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " CNET reports on the world 's most geeky Christmas card , and also the most expensive .
The card is made out of a 1st gen iPhone , hacked into a Christmas card using cardboard , paper and glue .
The card includes a virtual 'bauble ' which uses the iPhone 's accelerometer to recreate Christmas decorations that bounce and move with the card .
The makers of the card say that because of the iPhone 's battery life 'you probably do n't want to post it anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arrive .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "CNET reports on the world's most geeky Christmas card, and also the most expensive.
The card is made out of a 1st gen iPhone, hacked into a Christmas card using cardboard, paper and glue.
The card includes a virtual 'bauble' which uses the iPhone's accelerometer to recreate Christmas decorations that bounce and move with the card.
The makers of the card say that because of the iPhone's battery life 'you probably don't want to post it anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arrive.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369414</id>
	<title>Re:Seems more like an advert</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Might well be an advert but I can imagine a few people sending their significant other a card like this. I'm developing iPhone apps at the moment and the biggest single issue is getting noticed, the app looks great so<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well done the developers for doing something different to get attention!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Might well be an advert but I can imagine a few people sending their significant other a card like this .
I 'm developing iPhone apps at the moment and the biggest single issue is getting noticed , the app looks great so ... well done the developers for doing something different to get attention !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might well be an advert but I can imagine a few people sending their significant other a card like this.
I'm developing iPhone apps at the moment and the biggest single issue is getting noticed, the app looks great so ... well done the developers for doing something different to get attention!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372080</id>
	<title>Why an iPHONE?</title>
	<author>hudsucker</author>
	<datestamp>1260275760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't taking advantage of using an iPhone; it could just as well used an iPod Touch.
<br> <br>
A real geek card using an iPhone would have modulated the GSM carrier so that the nearest speaker would buzz to the tune of a Christmas carol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't taking advantage of using an iPhone ; it could just as well used an iPod Touch .
A real geek card using an iPhone would have modulated the GSM carrier so that the nearest speaker would buzz to the tune of a Christmas carol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't taking advantage of using an iPhone; it could just as well used an iPod Touch.
A real geek card using an iPhone would have modulated the GSM carrier so that the nearest speaker would buzz to the tune of a Christmas carol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368980</id>
	<title>Slow News Day?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of all the things to post about, and we get stories on how to waste technology? Insert joke about the phone having a 'paperweight mode' here...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of all the things to post about , and we get stories on how to waste technology ?
Insert joke about the phone having a 'paperweight mode ' here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of all the things to post about, and we get stories on how to waste technology?
Insert joke about the phone having a 'paperweight mode' here...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369106</id>
	<title>Deprecation of the word "geeky"</title>
	<author>fliptout</author>
	<datestamp>1260304200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, anything remotely involving technology is considered geeky these days.  I'm sure lots of people would be tickled to receive an iphone Christmas card, but the only hack involved is creating the actual paper card part.</p><p>In the past, I've made birthday "cards" with PICs and monochrome LCDs. Now that is geeky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , anything remotely involving technology is considered geeky these days .
I 'm sure lots of people would be tickled to receive an iphone Christmas card , but the only hack involved is creating the actual paper card part.In the past , I 've made birthday " cards " with PICs and monochrome LCDs .
Now that is geeky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, anything remotely involving technology is considered geeky these days.
I'm sure lots of people would be tickled to receive an iphone Christmas card, but the only hack involved is creating the actual paper card part.In the past, I've made birthday "cards" with PICs and monochrome LCDs.
Now that is geeky.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373110</id>
	<title>I have a better more expensive card!</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1260283020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went to the local newsagency and bought a whole SHEET of cardboard, then cut out the middle and drew christmas trees and smiley faces, and stuck it around my computer monitor. Then I navigated to a web site with christmas imagery and video and stuff. I brought my wife in and said MERRY CHRISTMAS from your geeky husband. It didn't impress her. I didn't get any. In fact she wants me to see a nice doctor tomorrow, who's going to give me a free special white jacket. I don't understand! No one appreciates geeks!</p><p>(By the way I used a NOVILLIUM Entel i7, a DemVidia 240GX video card, a Pell monitor, and cardboard by the Cardboardmen. You should buy them because they're much cooler than an iPhone. This advert was sponsored by the letter F and the number 2)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to the local newsagency and bought a whole SHEET of cardboard , then cut out the middle and drew christmas trees and smiley faces , and stuck it around my computer monitor .
Then I navigated to a web site with christmas imagery and video and stuff .
I brought my wife in and said MERRY CHRISTMAS from your geeky husband .
It did n't impress her .
I did n't get any .
In fact she wants me to see a nice doctor tomorrow , who 's going to give me a free special white jacket .
I do n't understand !
No one appreciates geeks !
( By the way I used a NOVILLIUM Entel i7 , a DemVidia 240GX video card , a Pell monitor , and cardboard by the Cardboardmen .
You should buy them because they 're much cooler than an iPhone .
This advert was sponsored by the letter F and the number 2 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to the local newsagency and bought a whole SHEET of cardboard, then cut out the middle and drew christmas trees and smiley faces, and stuck it around my computer monitor.
Then I navigated to a web site with christmas imagery and video and stuff.
I brought my wife in and said MERRY CHRISTMAS from your geeky husband.
It didn't impress her.
I didn't get any.
In fact she wants me to see a nice doctor tomorrow, who's going to give me a free special white jacket.
I don't understand!
No one appreciates geeks!
(By the way I used a NOVILLIUM Entel i7, a DemVidia 240GX video card, a Pell monitor, and cardboard by the Cardboardmen.
You should buy them because they're much cooler than an iPhone.
This advert was sponsored by the letter F and the number 2)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369150</id>
	<title>Re:why a phone, why not an ipod touch?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the "reuse" factor of this is that you'd actually have an old Gen 1 iPhone sitting around doing nothing.</p><p>I suppose if you happen to have an iPhone gen 1 lying around not being used, it could still be useful to the recipient once Christmas is over.  After all, it still holds music, and you could probably get a prepaid SIM for it and have a pretty awesome prepaid phone, though of course it couldn't do data, etc.  Can you still use an old iPhone to access WiFi and do everything like an iPod Touch could if you don't have it hooked up to cell phone service?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the " reuse " factor of this is that you 'd actually have an old Gen 1 iPhone sitting around doing nothing.I suppose if you happen to have an iPhone gen 1 lying around not being used , it could still be useful to the recipient once Christmas is over .
After all , it still holds music , and you could probably get a prepaid SIM for it and have a pretty awesome prepaid phone , though of course it could n't do data , etc .
Can you still use an old iPhone to access WiFi and do everything like an iPod Touch could if you do n't have it hooked up to cell phone service ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the "reuse" factor of this is that you'd actually have an old Gen 1 iPhone sitting around doing nothing.I suppose if you happen to have an iPhone gen 1 lying around not being used, it could still be useful to the recipient once Christmas is over.
After all, it still holds music, and you could probably get a prepaid SIM for it and have a pretty awesome prepaid phone, though of course it couldn't do data, etc.
Can you still use an old iPhone to access WiFi and do everything like an iPod Touch could if you don't have it hooked up to cell phone service?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372070</id>
	<title>Re:Deprecation of the word "geeky"</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1260275700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>In the past, I've made birthday "cards" with PICs and monochrome LCDs. Now that is geeky.</i></p><p>Bah!  Neither of you are true geeks, since you have friends/loved ones to send cards <i>to</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the past , I 've made birthday " cards " with PICs and monochrome LCDs .
Now that is geeky.Bah !
Neither of you are true geeks , since you have friends/loved ones to send cards to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the past, I've made birthday "cards" with PICs and monochrome LCDs.
Now that is geeky.Bah!
Neither of you are true geeks, since you have friends/loved ones to send cards to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369692</id>
	<title>Re:Iphones are not very geeky</title>
	<author>jbeaupre</author>
	<datestamp>1260263640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Next time to uuencoded his christmas message.  Maybe with a picture of a 20 sided dice and quote from Star Wars.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time to uuencoded his christmas message .
Maybe with a picture of a 20 sided dice and quote from Star Wars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Next time to uuencoded his christmas message.
Maybe with a picture of a 20 sided dice and quote from Star Wars.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369474</id>
	<title>Seriously</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm getting a bit sick of this site being one big rolling advert for a certain fruity multinational company and occasional OS developer.</p><p>It'd be absolutely fantastic to have a day, no in fact maake it a WEEK where it gets not one mention.</p><p>IANBG (work it out)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm getting a bit sick of this site being one big rolling advert for a certain fruity multinational company and occasional OS developer.It 'd be absolutely fantastic to have a day , no in fact maake it a WEEK where it gets not one mention.IANBG ( work it out )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm getting a bit sick of this site being one big rolling advert for a certain fruity multinational company and occasional OS developer.It'd be absolutely fantastic to have a day, no in fact maake it a WEEK where it gets not one mention.IANBG (work it out)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372196</id>
	<title>Re:Deprecation of the word "geeky"</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1260276480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Geeks by definition (or at least what used to be the definition...) were socially inept but good at some narrow technical or artistic field. For some reason, there came a sort of "geek" identity which (maybe due some movies?) became "cool". And then suddenly people who have nothing to do with the group of people described above call themselves "geek". And that's how you get this...</p></div></blockquote><p>By what <i>used</i> to be the definition when the word first entered the English language, "geek" seems to have meant "fool", so the use in the article makes sense -- its just come full circle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geeks by definition ( or at least what used to be the definition... ) were socially inept but good at some narrow technical or artistic field .
For some reason , there came a sort of " geek " identity which ( maybe due some movies ?
) became " cool " .
And then suddenly people who have nothing to do with the group of people described above call themselves " geek " .
And that 's how you get this...By what used to be the definition when the word first entered the English language , " geek " seems to have meant " fool " , so the use in the article makes sense -- its just come full circle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geeks by definition (or at least what used to be the definition...) were socially inept but good at some narrow technical or artistic field.
For some reason, there came a sort of "geek" identity which (maybe due some movies?
) became "cool".
And then suddenly people who have nothing to do with the group of people described above call themselves "geek".
And that's how you get this...By what used to be the definition when the word first entered the English language, "geek" seems to have meant "fool", so the use in the article makes sense -- its just come full circle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369364</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369276</id>
	<title>Re:Seems more like an advert</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... an advert to be sung to the tune of "I'm dreaming of a douchebag Christmas, with every iPhone card I send<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>... an advert to be sung to the tune of " I 'm dreaming of a douchebag Christmas , with every iPhone card I send ... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... an advert to be sung to the tune of "I'm dreaming of a douchebag Christmas, with every iPhone card I send ..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369370</id>
	<title>A real geek christmas card</title>
	<author>bl8n8r</author>
	<datestamp>1260305340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would have:<br>- matrix screensaver on the the front<br>- 20-project electronics kit on the left inside flap<br>- "happy holidays" would start with: 48h 41h 50h 50h 59h<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>- picture of the original star trek cast (with Redshirts)<br>- it would have a blue led on it that works as a flashlite<br>-<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..and when you open it, it would play the screeching noise you<br>get out of your pc speaker when you accidentally dump core<br>to 0xA000</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would have : - matrix screensaver on the the front- 20-project electronics kit on the left inside flap- " happy holidays " would start with : 48h 41h 50h 50h 59h ...- picture of the original star trek cast ( with Redshirts ) - it would have a blue led on it that works as a flashlite- ..and when you open it , it would play the screeching noise youget out of your pc speaker when you accidentally dump coreto 0xA000</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would have:- matrix screensaver on the the front- 20-project electronics kit on the left inside flap- "happy holidays" would start with: 48h 41h 50h 50h 59h ...- picture of the original star trek cast (with Redshirts)- it would have a blue led on it that works as a flashlite- ..and when you open it, it would play the screeching noise youget out of your pc speaker when you accidentally dump coreto 0xA000</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369310</id>
	<title>ohnoitssamzenpus</title>
	<author>Chad Birch</author>
	<datestamp>1260305100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there an "ohnoitssamzenpus" tag yet? There should be, every story he posts is awful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there an " ohnoitssamzenpus " tag yet ?
There should be , every story he posts is awful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there an "ohnoitssamzenpus" tag yet?
There should be, every story he posts is awful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369446</id>
	<title>Re:Hint to slashdot editors</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1260305700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently glueing some paper around an iPhone is frontpage material these days<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently glueing some paper around an iPhone is frontpage material these days : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently glueing some paper around an iPhone is frontpage material these days :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369542</id>
	<title>Re:There are cheaper ways</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1260262920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Send one to that nice Nigerian who is trying to send you that big pile of money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Send one to that nice Nigerian who is trying to send you that big pile of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Send one to that nice Nigerian who is trying to send you that big pile of money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369482</id>
	<title>The best part is...Commo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm part of the development team for this innovative device.  The next stage in our progress will be to implement a new operating system, and we have chosen Commo! Linux, as it is the only distribution that is small and robust enough for the task.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm part of the development team for this innovative device .
The next stage in our progress will be to implement a new operating system , and we have chosen Commo !
Linux , as it is the only distribution that is small and robust enough for the task .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm part of the development team for this innovative device.
The next stage in our progress will be to implement a new operating system, and we have chosen Commo!
Linux, as it is the only distribution that is small and robust enough for the task.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370860</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, you have an iPhone</title>
	<author>Midnight Thunder</author>
	<datestamp>1260269400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Dude, you used an iPhone, that is definitely such a geek thing to do. Because there is nothing else on the planet that could possibly make you a geek more than an iPhone; geeks are cool. </i></p><p>Its now cool to be a geek. We are just too geeky to be allowed to be called geek anymore, those bastards. I am sticking with the 1337 title.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , you used an iPhone , that is definitely such a geek thing to do .
Because there is nothing else on the planet that could possibly make you a geek more than an iPhone ; geeks are cool .
Its now cool to be a geek .
We are just too geeky to be allowed to be called geek anymore , those bastards .
I am sticking with the 1337 title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, you used an iPhone, that is definitely such a geek thing to do.
Because there is nothing else on the planet that could possibly make you a geek more than an iPhone; geeks are cool.
Its now cool to be a geek.
We are just too geeky to be allowed to be called geek anymore, those bastards.
I am sticking with the 1337 title.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30374790</id>
	<title>Re:Cool Idea</title>
	<author>adolf</author>
	<datestamp>1259611320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if this app is dramatically different, but:</p><p>On my iPod Touch, which I only use these days to run SplashID for password management, the thing will run for weeks between charges with the app loaded.</p><p>To resume, I just press power, slide a finger, and (no great surprise) the app is just sort of <i>right there</i>.</p><p>Am I missing something?  I'm sure that the craft-project Christmas card app is smart enough to know that it's supposed to, you know, <i>stop doing stuff</i> when the device is sleeping...isn't it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if this app is dramatically different , but : On my iPod Touch , which I only use these days to run SplashID for password management , the thing will run for weeks between charges with the app loaded.To resume , I just press power , slide a finger , and ( no great surprise ) the app is just sort of right there.Am I missing something ?
I 'm sure that the craft-project Christmas card app is smart enough to know that it 's supposed to , you know , stop doing stuff when the device is sleeping...is n't it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if this app is dramatically different, but:On my iPod Touch, which I only use these days to run SplashID for password management, the thing will run for weeks between charges with the app loaded.To resume, I just press power, slide a finger, and (no great surprise) the app is just sort of right there.Am I missing something?
I'm sure that the craft-project Christmas card app is smart enough to know that it's supposed to, you know, stop doing stuff when the device is sleeping...isn't it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369094</id>
	<title>Ha, hint to my wife</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1260304140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure beats the hell out of those damn annoying cards that just play music.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure beats the hell out of those damn annoying cards that just play music .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure beats the hell out of those damn annoying cards that just play music.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369408</id>
	<title>Re:Hint to slashdot editors</title>
	<author>countSudoku()</author>
	<datestamp>1260305460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed!  And it sounds like it's just duct taped onto the back of the card.  Some hack.  I'm so inspired I'm gonna "hack" the bottom of a movie theater popcorn container and then when the mood is just right... I'll offer some to my date.  Damn, I'm smooth!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed !
And it sounds like it 's just duct taped onto the back of the card .
Some hack .
I 'm so inspired I 'm gon na " hack " the bottom of a movie theater popcorn container and then when the mood is just right... I 'll offer some to my date .
Damn , I 'm smooth !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed!
And it sounds like it's just duct taped onto the back of the card.
Some hack.
I'm so inspired I'm gonna "hack" the bottom of a movie theater popcorn container and then when the mood is just right... I'll offer some to my date.
Damn, I'm smooth!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373326</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, you have an iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260284700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same reason buying a Mac and some of those square glasses makes you geeky. Which is to say, it doesn't. At all. It makes you a poseur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same reason buying a Mac and some of those square glasses makes you geeky .
Which is to say , it does n't .
At all .
It makes you a poseur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same reason buying a Mac and some of those square glasses makes you geeky.
Which is to say, it doesn't.
At all.
It makes you a poseur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370900</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, you have an iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260269580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Okay, since when is iPhone a geek item?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay , since when is iPhone a geek item ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay, since when is iPhone a geek item?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368922</id>
	<title>A goatse card</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.goatse.fr/" title="goatse.fr" rel="nofollow">here</a> [goatse.fr]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>here [ goatse.fr ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here [goatse.fr]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369538</id>
	<title>ugg</title>
	<author>Dyinobal</author>
	<datestamp>1260262920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why isn't this in idle, he loaded an app onto an iphone and tapped it to some cardboard drawn on with crayons, I don't think it counts as Hardware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is n't this in idle , he loaded an app onto an iphone and tapped it to some cardboard drawn on with crayons , I do n't think it counts as Hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why isn't this in idle, he loaded an app onto an iphone and tapped it to some cardboard drawn on with crayons, I don't think it counts as Hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369040</id>
	<title>I like it</title>
	<author>Drasham</author>
	<datestamp>1260303900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting and innovative!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting and innovative !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting and innovative!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369018</id>
	<title>Good idea</title>
	<author>Kenoli</author>
	<datestamp>1260303840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, just pop it right into the mailbox.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , just pop it right into the mailbox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, just pop it right into the mailbox.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369564</id>
	<title>Re:Seems more like an advert</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1260263040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New here much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New here much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New here much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369030</id>
	<title>why a phone, why not an ipod touch?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, I didn't RTFA, so flame away.  But wouldn't a 1st gen touch be cheaper, and do the job?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , I did n't RTFA , so flame away .
But would n't a 1st gen touch be cheaper , and do the job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, I didn't RTFA, so flame away.
But wouldn't a 1st gen touch be cheaper, and do the job?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369102</id>
	<title>iPhone geeky?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since when is the iPhone "geeky"? It's mainstream AND against any software developer who needs an open environment to create and run applications. So it's an anti-geek christmas card.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when is the iPhone " geeky " ?
It 's mainstream AND against any software developer who needs an open environment to create and run applications .
So it 's an anti-geek christmas card .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when is the iPhone "geeky"?
It's mainstream AND against any software developer who needs an open environment to create and run applications.
So it's an anti-geek christmas card.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368908</id>
	<title>Assuming that...</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1260303240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;  you probably don't want to post it anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arrive</p><p>Assuming that it makes through the postal system and that it is not flagged as some kind of potentially explosive devise !<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; you probably do n't want to post it anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arriveAssuming that it makes through the postal system and that it is not flagged as some kind of potentially explosive devise !
; - ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;  you probably don't want to post it anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arriveAssuming that it makes through the postal system and that it is not flagged as some kind of potentially explosive devise !
;-))</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369200</id>
	<title>Re:Cool Idea</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1260304500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Plus since you'll have already charged it up it's ready to go right away.</p></div><p>As long as you charge it up the night before, just before you wrap it.  Leaving an app like this running on it would discharge the battery pretty quickly, and turning it off would mean that this app isn't running and you'd have to grab it from them and fire up the app as soon as they unwrapped it.</p><p>And, trust me, you don't want to get between a geek and their new shiny thing.  Keep arms and legs clear of the machinery, folks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus since you 'll have already charged it up it 's ready to go right away.As long as you charge it up the night before , just before you wrap it .
Leaving an app like this running on it would discharge the battery pretty quickly , and turning it off would mean that this app is n't running and you 'd have to grab it from them and fire up the app as soon as they unwrapped it.And , trust me , you do n't want to get between a geek and their new shiny thing .
Keep arms and legs clear of the machinery , folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Plus since you'll have already charged it up it's ready to go right away.As long as you charge it up the night before, just before you wrap it.
Leaving an app like this running on it would discharge the battery pretty quickly, and turning it off would mean that this app isn't running and you'd have to grab it from them and fire up the app as soon as they unwrapped it.And, trust me, you don't want to get between a geek and their new shiny thing.
Keep arms and legs clear of the machinery, folks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30371476</id>
	<title>Re:Next week on some 'news' site...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260272220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sadly use of steve jobs image is punishable by gigawatt electrocution from his EYES</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sadly use of steve jobs image is punishable by gigawatt electrocution from his EYES</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sadly use of steve jobs image is punishable by gigawatt electrocution from his EYES</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369250</id>
	<title>Re:Iphones are not very geeky</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>since when are "arts and crafts" geeky?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>since when are " arts and crafts " geeky ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>since when are "arts and crafts" geeky?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369354</id>
	<title>Christmas Card?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's an app for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an app for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an app for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369894</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, you have an iPhone</title>
	<author>rocket97</author>
	<datestamp>1260264600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have always wondered why having an iPhone makes you geeky?  I know plenty of people who own them that can't even operate a standard desktop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have always wondered why having an iPhone makes you geeky ?
I know plenty of people who own them that ca n't even operate a standard desktop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have always wondered why having an iPhone makes you geeky?
I know plenty of people who own them that can't even operate a standard desktop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369002</id>
	<title>Anywhere it will take more than 3 days to arrive</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think the battery life sucks, wait till you get to the roaming charges.</p><p>Bah humbug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think the battery life sucks , wait till you get to the roaming charges.Bah humbug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think the battery life sucks, wait till you get to the roaming charges.Bah humbug.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373350</id>
	<title>Re:Slow News Day?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1260284880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But, but, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it's an Iphone! It's on the Iphone! It's some trivial activity, but it was done with an Iphone, so it's front page news!</p><p>You see, it's not a slow news day, it's just that they couldn't find anything else for today's Daily Iphone Slashvertisement.</p><p>Anyhow, I approve - best use I've seen for an Iphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But , but , but ... it 's an Iphone !
It 's on the Iphone !
It 's some trivial activity , but it was done with an Iphone , so it 's front page news ! You see , it 's not a slow news day , it 's just that they could n't find anything else for today 's Daily Iphone Slashvertisement.Anyhow , I approve - best use I 've seen for an Iphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, but, but ... it's an Iphone!
It's on the Iphone!
It's some trivial activity, but it was done with an Iphone, so it's front page news!You see, it's not a slow news day, it's just that they couldn't find anything else for today's Daily Iphone Slashvertisement.Anyhow, I approve - best use I've seen for an Iphone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369512</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone geeky?</title>
	<author>gblfxt</author>
	<datestamp>1260305940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>apparently its based on BSD, so falls into the geek category? got nothing.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>apparently its based on BSD , so falls into the geek category ?
got nothing.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>apparently its based on BSD, so falls into the geek category?
got nothing.....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996</id>
	<title>Iphones are not very geeky</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember a friend of mine signing a birthday card with a handwritten gnupgp signature<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... thats geeky those fancy fanboy phones are not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember a friend of mine signing a birthday card with a handwritten gnupgp signature ... thats geeky those fancy fanboy phones are not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember a friend of mine signing a birthday card with a handwritten gnupgp signature ... thats geeky those fancy fanboy phones are not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369456</id>
	<title>Next week on some 'news' site...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Some bloke has made another tedious iPhone app: iWank.<br>
Using the iPhones cool features such as the unique touchscreen and accelerometer, you can literally wank Steve Jobs to orgasm. Simply make the appropriate motion with the iPhone, and see a naked Jobs on the screen. His expression changes according to the speed and rhythm of the motion. To finish the job, simply rub the on screen impression of Jobs' tumescent empurpled member and watch him ejaculate.<br>
There have been rumours of a 'cheat mode', where Jobs can ejaculate in seconds after the user inputs a URL leading to another iPhone PR stunt on some news site. Apple has refused to comment.<br>
SPONSORED LINK: Get your amazing super-hip iPhone HERE"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Some bloke has made another tedious iPhone app : iWank .
Using the iPhones cool features such as the unique touchscreen and accelerometer , you can literally wank Steve Jobs to orgasm .
Simply make the appropriate motion with the iPhone , and see a naked Jobs on the screen .
His expression changes according to the speed and rhythm of the motion .
To finish the job , simply rub the on screen impression of Jobs ' tumescent empurpled member and watch him ejaculate .
There have been rumours of a 'cheat mode ' , where Jobs can ejaculate in seconds after the user inputs a URL leading to another iPhone PR stunt on some news site .
Apple has refused to comment .
SPONSORED LINK : Get your amazing super-hip iPhone HERE "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Some bloke has made another tedious iPhone app: iWank.
Using the iPhones cool features such as the unique touchscreen and accelerometer, you can literally wank Steve Jobs to orgasm.
Simply make the appropriate motion with the iPhone, and see a naked Jobs on the screen.
His expression changes according to the speed and rhythm of the motion.
To finish the job, simply rub the on screen impression of Jobs' tumescent empurpled member and watch him ejaculate.
There have been rumours of a 'cheat mode', where Jobs can ejaculate in seconds after the user inputs a URL leading to another iPhone PR stunt on some news site.
Apple has refused to comment.
SPONSORED LINK: Get your amazing super-hip iPhone HERE"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368966</id>
	<title>Have an Android Christmas!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In b4 Google makes an Android Christmas card</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In b4 Google makes an Android Christmas card</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In b4 Google makes an Android Christmas card</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369146</id>
	<title>Oblig</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1260304320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The inside writing?</p><p>"Imaging a Beowulf cluster of these"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The inside writing ?
" Imaging a Beowulf cluster of these "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The inside writing?
"Imaging a Beowulf cluster of these"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368942</id>
	<title>Does the hack</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>break the iPhone warranty?</p><p>Yours In Petrograd,<br>Kilgore Trout</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>break the iPhone warranty ? Yours In Petrograd,Kilgore Trout</tokentext>
<sentencetext>break the iPhone warranty?Yours In Petrograd,Kilgore Trout</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369280</id>
	<title>Re:Assuming that...</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1260304980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i'd be worried about it becoming a present for a postal worker's kid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'd be worried about it becoming a present for a postal worker 's kid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'd be worried about it becoming a present for a postal worker's kid!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373368</id>
	<title>Send a Jesus Phone for Christmas</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1260285120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Be fair though, everyone knows that before Apple came along with this Iphone card, no one was able to send Christmas cards to each other. Sure, Christmas cards existed, but but - well Apple did it better, in a way that I can't actually explain, so therefore it is Apple who invented and popularised the Christmas card.</p><p>In fact, even Christmas as we know it wouldn't exist without the Jesus phone.</p><p>Therefore it's as newsworthy as every other Daily Iphone story we get here on Iphonedot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Be fair though , everyone knows that before Apple came along with this Iphone card , no one was able to send Christmas cards to each other .
Sure , Christmas cards existed , but but - well Apple did it better , in a way that I ca n't actually explain , so therefore it is Apple who invented and popularised the Christmas card.In fact , even Christmas as we know it would n't exist without the Jesus phone.Therefore it 's as newsworthy as every other Daily Iphone story we get here on Iphonedot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be fair though, everyone knows that before Apple came along with this Iphone card, no one was able to send Christmas cards to each other.
Sure, Christmas cards existed, but but - well Apple did it better, in a way that I can't actually explain, so therefore it is Apple who invented and popularised the Christmas card.In fact, even Christmas as we know it wouldn't exist without the Jesus phone.Therefore it's as newsworthy as every other Daily Iphone story we get here on Iphonedot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369294</id>
	<title>Re:Seems more like an advert</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1260304980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed.  There's no real skill involved in the making of this "geek card" either.  Looking at the title you'd expect to see a story about some geek building the thing from scratch and programming it to do whatever task was required.  Instead we get two links about some random app with the Iphone glued to a piece of cardboard.  The thing looks like a crafts project for the local elementary school.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
There 's no real skill involved in the making of this " geek card " either .
Looking at the title you 'd expect to see a story about some geek building the thing from scratch and programming it to do whatever task was required .
Instead we get two links about some random app with the Iphone glued to a piece of cardboard .
The thing looks like a crafts project for the local elementary school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
There's no real skill involved in the making of this "geek card" either.
Looking at the title you'd expect to see a story about some geek building the thing from scratch and programming it to do whatever task was required.
Instead we get two links about some random app with the Iphone glued to a piece of cardboard.
The thing looks like a crafts project for the local elementary school.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038</id>
	<title>Wow, you have an iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, you used an iPhone, that is definitely such a geek thing to do.  Because there is nothing else on the planet that could possibly make you a geek more than an iPhone; geeks are cool.
<br> <br>
(Fuckwits)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , you used an iPhone , that is definitely such a geek thing to do .
Because there is nothing else on the planet that could possibly make you a geek more than an iPhone ; geeks are cool .
( Fuckwits )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, you used an iPhone, that is definitely such a geek thing to do.
Because there is nothing else on the planet that could possibly make you a geek more than an iPhone; geeks are cool.
(Fuckwits)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370994</id>
	<title>Re:Next week on some 'news' site...</title>
	<author>TerranFury</author>
	<datestamp>1260269940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Tumescent empurpled member."  Nice.  It's like something from a mutated and disturbed supermarket paperback.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Tumescent empurpled member .
" Nice .
It 's like something from a mutated and disturbed supermarket paperback .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Tumescent empurpled member.
"  Nice.
It's like something from a mutated and disturbed supermarket paperback.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369456</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369964</id>
	<title>HA! HA! HA!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260265020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About all ANY iPhone is good for!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About all ANY iPhone is good for ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About all ANY iPhone is good for!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369050</id>
	<title>Cool Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This actually seems like a great way to give someone an iphone or touch for Christmas - way cooler than just leaving it in the standard box. Plus since you'll have already charged it up it's ready to go right away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This actually seems like a great way to give someone an iphone or touch for Christmas - way cooler than just leaving it in the standard box .
Plus since you 'll have already charged it up it 's ready to go right away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This actually seems like a great way to give someone an iphone or touch for Christmas - way cooler than just leaving it in the standard box.
Plus since you'll have already charged it up it's ready to go right away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369464</id>
	<title>wut</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260305760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does Slashdot keep posting these dumb CNET UK stories?</p><p>Anyone want to help me start up a "cnetispants" tag?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does Slashdot keep posting these dumb CNET UK stories ? Anyone want to help me start up a " cnetispants " tag ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does Slashdot keep posting these dumb CNET UK stories?Anyone want to help me start up a "cnetispants" tag?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369244</id>
	<title>Guinness Book disagrees about this</title>
	<author>qazwer00</author>
	<datestamp>1260304740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most Valuable Christmas Card
The most valuable Christmas card was sold at an auction in Devizes, Wiltshire, UK in 2001 for $20,000. The card was hand-colored by illustrator John Calcott Horsley. The card was originally sent by Sir Henry Cole of Bath to his grandmother in 1843.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most Valuable Christmas Card The most valuable Christmas card was sold at an auction in Devizes , Wiltshire , UK in 2001 for $ 20,000 .
The card was hand-colored by illustrator John Calcott Horsley .
The card was originally sent by Sir Henry Cole of Bath to his grandmother in 1843 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most Valuable Christmas Card
The most valuable Christmas card was sold at an auction in Devizes, Wiltshire, UK in 2001 for $20,000.
The card was hand-colored by illustrator John Calcott Horsley.
The card was originally sent by Sir Henry Cole of Bath to his grandmother in 1843.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368964</id>
	<title>There are cheaper ways</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260303540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are cheaper ways of saying "Merry Christmas" to the postman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are cheaper ways of saying " Merry Christmas " to the postman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are cheaper ways of saying "Merry Christmas" to the postman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372460</id>
	<title>Who Else?</title>
	<author>Techman83</author>
	<datestamp>1260278040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wanted to beat that bloke senseless by the end of that. I know I was bored, but I figured a "geeky" card might have been interesting. Thoroughly dissappointed (should I have expected anything different, I don't really consider having an iPhone in the least bit geeky)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wanted to beat that bloke senseless by the end of that .
I know I was bored , but I figured a " geeky " card might have been interesting .
Thoroughly dissappointed ( should I have expected anything different , I do n't really consider having an iPhone in the least bit geeky )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wanted to beat that bloke senseless by the end of that.
I know I was bored, but I figured a "geeky" card might have been interesting.
Thoroughly dissappointed (should I have expected anything different, I don't really consider having an iPhone in the least bit geeky)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022</id>
	<title>Seems more like an advert</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1260303840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>This article (and the cnet one to be fair) seems more like an advert for for a boring little iPhone app.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This article ( and the cnet one to be fair ) seems more like an advert for for a boring little iPhone app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This article (and the cnet one to be fair) seems more like an advert for for a boring little iPhone app.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369364</id>
	<title>Re:Deprecation of the word "geeky"</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1260305340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geeks by definition (or at least what used to be the definition...) were socially inept but good at some narrow technical or artistic field. For some reason, there came a sort of "geek" identity which (maybe due some movies?) became "cool". And then suddenly people who have nothing to do with the group of people described above call themselves "geek". And that's how you get this...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geeks by definition ( or at least what used to be the definition... ) were socially inept but good at some narrow technical or artistic field .
For some reason , there came a sort of " geek " identity which ( maybe due some movies ?
) became " cool " .
And then suddenly people who have nothing to do with the group of people described above call themselves " geek " .
And that 's how you get this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geeks by definition (or at least what used to be the definition...) were socially inept but good at some narrow technical or artistic field.
For some reason, there came a sort of "geek" identity which (maybe due some movies?
) became "cool".
And then suddenly people who have nothing to do with the group of people described above call themselves "geek".
And that's how you get this...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30385778</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, you have an iPhone</title>
	<author>roko4326</author>
	<datestamp>1260436200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I would be able to mail chritmas greetings from my iPhone itself.............Go geek!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I would be able to mail chritmas greetings from my iPhone itself.............Go geek ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I would be able to mail chritmas greetings from my iPhone itself.............Go geek!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369644</id>
	<title>Tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260263340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone tag this "slashvertisement" because that is all it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone tag this " slashvertisement " because that is all it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone tag this "slashvertisement" because that is all it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369108</id>
	<title>Hint to slashdot editors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if the hack doesn't actually involve fabricating or soldering, then it's not really a hack worthy of the front page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if the hack does n't actually involve fabricating or soldering , then it 's not really a hack worthy of the front page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if the hack doesn't actually involve fabricating or soldering, then it's not really a hack worthy of the front page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370128</id>
	<title>Oh, it's a CNET story.</title>
	<author>Minwee</author>
	<datestamp>1260265980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because there's a battery powered object in it doesn't mean it's geeky.  Hardware hacking involves a little bit more than just cardboard, paper and glue.  The whole 'hack' here is "Cut a hole in the card, put your iPhone in the card, make her open the card".
</p><p>A true hardware geek would be ashamed to own up to this kind of cheap hack.  Leaving the whole thing running on battery power non-stop while it's in the mail is just painful.  To do the job right you would have to remove the case, fit the LCD panel properly into the card frame, add a switch to keep the whole thing powered off until you pull it out of the envelope, and probably do a little firmware hacking to ensure that the display is up and running the moment it powers up.  For bonus marks, source your hardware somewhere other than the Apple store and save yourself about a hundred bucks.
</p><p>But then again it's a CNET article.  You can't expect too much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because there 's a battery powered object in it does n't mean it 's geeky .
Hardware hacking involves a little bit more than just cardboard , paper and glue .
The whole 'hack ' here is " Cut a hole in the card , put your iPhone in the card , make her open the card " .
A true hardware geek would be ashamed to own up to this kind of cheap hack .
Leaving the whole thing running on battery power non-stop while it 's in the mail is just painful .
To do the job right you would have to remove the case , fit the LCD panel properly into the card frame , add a switch to keep the whole thing powered off until you pull it out of the envelope , and probably do a little firmware hacking to ensure that the display is up and running the moment it powers up .
For bonus marks , source your hardware somewhere other than the Apple store and save yourself about a hundred bucks .
But then again it 's a CNET article .
You ca n't expect too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because there's a battery powered object in it doesn't mean it's geeky.
Hardware hacking involves a little bit more than just cardboard, paper and glue.
The whole 'hack' here is "Cut a hole in the card, put your iPhone in the card, make her open the card".
A true hardware geek would be ashamed to own up to this kind of cheap hack.
Leaving the whole thing running on battery power non-stop while it's in the mail is just painful.
To do the job right you would have to remove the case, fit the LCD panel properly into the card frame, add a switch to keep the whole thing powered off until you pull it out of the envelope, and probably do a little firmware hacking to ensure that the display is up and running the moment it powers up.
For bonus marks, source your hardware somewhere other than the Apple store and save yourself about a hundred bucks.
But then again it's a CNET article.
You can't expect too much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30376312</id>
	<title>Re:Iphones are not very geeky</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259591640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fanboi</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fanboi</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fanboi</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369264</id>
	<title>Hrmmmm, time to revoke</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1260304920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>samzenpus's geek card, if you ask me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>samzenpus 's geek card , if you ask me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>samzenpus's geek card, if you ask me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30374790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368908
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30385778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30376312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30371476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369456
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1728239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30371476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30376312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370128
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30372070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369538
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369370
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30374790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30370860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30385778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30373110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1728239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30368964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1728239.30369542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
