<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_08_1354245</id>
	<title>Sharp Rise In Jailing of Online Journalists; Iran May Just Kill Them</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260282000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>bckspc writes <i>"The Committee to Protect Journalists has published their <a href="http://cpj.org/reports/2009/12/freelance-journalists-in-prison-cpj-2009-census.php">annual census</a> of <a href="http://cpj.org/imprisoned/2009.php">journalists in prison</a>. Of the 136 reporters in prison around the world on December 1, 'At least 68 bloggers, Web-based reporters, and online editors are imprisoned, constituting half of all journalists now in jail.' Print was next with 51 cases. Also, 'Freelancers now make up nearly 45 percent of all journalists jailed worldwide, a dramatic recent increase that reflects the evolution of the global news business.' China, Iran, Cuba, Eritrea, and Burma were the top 5 jailers of journalists."</i>

rmdstudio writes, too, with word that after the last few days' protest there, largely organized online,  the government of Iran is <a href="http://iranvideonews.com/iran-considers-death-penalty-for-bloggers-and-webmasters/">considering the death penalty for bloggers and webmasters</a> whose reports offend it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>bckspc writes " The Committee to Protect Journalists has published their annual census of journalists in prison .
Of the 136 reporters in prison around the world on December 1 , 'At least 68 bloggers , Web-based reporters , and online editors are imprisoned , constituting half of all journalists now in jail .
' Print was next with 51 cases .
Also , 'Freelancers now make up nearly 45 percent of all journalists jailed worldwide , a dramatic recent increase that reflects the evolution of the global news business .
' China , Iran , Cuba , Eritrea , and Burma were the top 5 jailers of journalists .
" rmdstudio writes , too , with word that after the last few days ' protest there , largely organized online , the government of Iran is considering the death penalty for bloggers and webmasters whose reports offend it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bckspc writes "The Committee to Protect Journalists has published their annual census of journalists in prison.
Of the 136 reporters in prison around the world on December 1, 'At least 68 bloggers, Web-based reporters, and online editors are imprisoned, constituting half of all journalists now in jail.
' Print was next with 51 cases.
Also, 'Freelancers now make up nearly 45 percent of all journalists jailed worldwide, a dramatic recent increase that reflects the evolution of the global news business.
' China, Iran, Cuba, Eritrea, and Burma were the top 5 jailers of journalists.
"

rmdstudio writes, too, with word that after the last few days' protest there, largely organized online,  the government of Iran is considering the death penalty for bloggers and webmasters whose reports offend it.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368568</id>
	<title>Re:We just need 300 well-trained Spartans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260301800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, and I could see how mainstream media would bill it, too. Front page, above the fold: "300 dead as Senate support for military action wavers". Below the fold: "Adulterous revelation stuns nation".<br>
<br>
Actually, switch those two. Sex sells.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , and I could see how mainstream media would bill it , too .
Front page , above the fold : " 300 dead as Senate support for military action wavers " .
Below the fold : " Adulterous revelation stuns nation " .
Actually , switch those two .
Sex sells .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, and I could see how mainstream media would bill it, too.
Front page, above the fold: "300 dead as Senate support for military action wavers".
Below the fold: "Adulterous revelation stuns nation".
Actually, switch those two.
Sex sells.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30374322</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>DNS-and-BIND</author>
	<datestamp>1260296520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Darfur is an Islamic jihad against Christians.  Such has been going on for centuries in that part of the world.  No wonder it doesn't get much press, it's an inconvenient truth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darfur is an Islamic jihad against Christians .
Such has been going on for centuries in that part of the world .
No wonder it does n't get much press , it 's an inconvenient truth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darfur is an Islamic jihad against Christians.
Such has been going on for centuries in that part of the world.
No wonder it doesn't get much press, it's an inconvenient truth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366568</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260293220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Technically - poor choice of words.</p><p>Go read up on the Boxer Rebellion.  Imperial China had no regard for this foolish Western custom.  Things got ugly fast.</p><p>World War 2 - because ties were cut between Japan and the Allies, Japan had a difficult time negotiating.</p><p>Sometimes keeping a communication channel open is more important.</p><p>Expel a diplomat - OK.  Incarcerate him - no.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Technically - poor choice of words.Go read up on the Boxer Rebellion .
Imperial China had no regard for this foolish Western custom .
Things got ugly fast.World War 2 - because ties were cut between Japan and the Allies , Japan had a difficult time negotiating.Sometimes keeping a communication channel open is more important.Expel a diplomat - OK. Incarcerate him - no .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Technically - poor choice of words.Go read up on the Boxer Rebellion.
Imperial China had no regard for this foolish Western custom.
Things got ugly fast.World War 2 - because ties were cut between Japan and the Allies, Japan had a difficult time negotiating.Sometimes keeping a communication channel open is more important.Expel a diplomat - OK.  Incarcerate him - no.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367036</id>
	<title>Then how do you buy there oil?</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1260295500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quick question: what is the mileage on your car? Or on your mom's car as she drives you the 1 mile to school?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quick question : what is the mileage on your car ?
Or on your mom 's car as she drives you the 1 mile to school ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quick question: what is the mileage on your car?
Or on your mom's car as she drives you the 1 mile to school?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366862</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260294660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. Because I didn't ACTUALLY do that, as that was clearly not a joke, but I seriously think they are doing such a good job arresting reporters that it is difficult to know anything about said country because there is no one to report anything about it.</p><p>idiot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
Because I did n't ACTUALLY do that , as that was clearly not a joke , but I seriously think they are doing such a good job arresting reporters that it is difficult to know anything about said country because there is no one to report anything about it.idiot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
Because I didn't ACTUALLY do that, as that was clearly not a joke, but I seriously think they are doing such a good job arresting reporters that it is difficult to know anything about said country because there is no one to report anything about it.idiot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366148</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1260291720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.</p></div><p> <b>All</b> Iranian diplomats huh?  Since there aren't any in the US (except occasionally at the UN, and I don't think the UN would approve), should we fly over to Switzerland and kidnap the diplomats working there?  Where else should we kidnap people from?  Surely this will get our point across.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed .
All Iranian diplomats huh ?
Since there are n't any in the US ( except occasionally at the UN , and I do n't think the UN would approve ) , should we fly over to Switzerland and kidnap the diplomats working there ?
Where else should we kidnap people from ?
Surely this will get our point across .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.
All Iranian diplomats huh?
Since there aren't any in the US (except occasionally at the UN, and I don't think the UN would approve), should we fly over to Switzerland and kidnap the diplomats working there?
Where else should we kidnap people from?
Surely this will get our point across.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365372</id>
	<title>in a previous iran discussion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1468788&amp;cid=30347904" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1468788&amp;cid=30347904</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>i doubted the suggestion, modded insightful, that media control in iran is just like in the usa. a further insightful reply to my trollmodded comment started discussing the idea of "manufacturing consent." which i actually don't have a problem with as a description of a real negative issue with the media in the usa. however: as if such a concept is remotely like anything what they do with the media in iran</p><p>why do people not understand that no matter how much you dislike the usa or big media in the west, or how many real and genuine problems you can find with the media and civil rights enforcement in the west, that what iran is doing is far, far more vile, according to the widest range of subjective and objective measurements, and not even remotely comparable?</p><p>what iran does to its citizens and how it handles rights internally can't possibly compare to the status quo in the west if you claim the slightest amount of intellectual honesty. iran is off the charts. there is no equivalency, period</p><p>no matter how much you hate the usa or how large your grievance is with the FOREIGN policies of western governments, when you try to equate what happens in the west DOMESTICALLY with what iran does with its citizens, you only cheapen and disqualify the moral and logical basis for your opposition to the west. you make a fool of yourself, because you do not appear to be someone who is truly speaking from moral principles, you only appear to be geopolitically posturing. you're not concerned with making the world a better place. you're concerned with vendettas. you do not demonstrate a mental ability to appreciate concepts like scale, perspective, and context when formulate an equivalence between domestic rights and media manipulation in the west and iran. do you really understand what iran freely engages in in the suppression of its citizens? do you honestly want to compare that to anything the west does to its citizens?</p><p>you need to demonstrate an actual well-defined set of moral principles. if you do that, you will find a need on your own part to criticize iran for what it does to its citizens. or at the very least, if criticism of the west is your only concern, you need to stop trying to steer a discussion of the horrid crimes iran commits internally into a discussion of the far smaller set of domestic crimes committed in the west. the west is NOT innocent. however, the crimes the west commits domestically isn't even remotely as vile as what iran commits domestically. really</p><p>in regard to the subject matter of abuse of citizens and media manipulation, if in your mind you cannot help but to confuse iran and the usa's domestic policies, you only demonstrate an irrational bias on your part, not any real moral principles or logical backbone</p><p>please, by all means, be my guest, continue to criticize the west. as someone who truly and genuinely holds free expression of opinion as a bedrock principle, i support your right to speak your mind, even if i disagree with it. but one wonders how you handle the cognitive dissonance of pointing out anthills while the mountain looms in the discussion</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1468788&amp;cid = 30347904 [ slashdot.org ] i doubted the suggestion , modded insightful , that media control in iran is just like in the usa .
a further insightful reply to my trollmodded comment started discussing the idea of " manufacturing consent .
" which i actually do n't have a problem with as a description of a real negative issue with the media in the usa .
however : as if such a concept is remotely like anything what they do with the media in iranwhy do people not understand that no matter how much you dislike the usa or big media in the west , or how many real and genuine problems you can find with the media and civil rights enforcement in the west , that what iran is doing is far , far more vile , according to the widest range of subjective and objective measurements , and not even remotely comparable ? what iran does to its citizens and how it handles rights internally ca n't possibly compare to the status quo in the west if you claim the slightest amount of intellectual honesty .
iran is off the charts .
there is no equivalency , periodno matter how much you hate the usa or how large your grievance is with the FOREIGN policies of western governments , when you try to equate what happens in the west DOMESTICALLY with what iran does with its citizens , you only cheapen and disqualify the moral and logical basis for your opposition to the west .
you make a fool of yourself , because you do not appear to be someone who is truly speaking from moral principles , you only appear to be geopolitically posturing .
you 're not concerned with making the world a better place .
you 're concerned with vendettas .
you do not demonstrate a mental ability to appreciate concepts like scale , perspective , and context when formulate an equivalence between domestic rights and media manipulation in the west and iran .
do you really understand what iran freely engages in in the suppression of its citizens ?
do you honestly want to compare that to anything the west does to its citizens ? you need to demonstrate an actual well-defined set of moral principles .
if you do that , you will find a need on your own part to criticize iran for what it does to its citizens .
or at the very least , if criticism of the west is your only concern , you need to stop trying to steer a discussion of the horrid crimes iran commits internally into a discussion of the far smaller set of domestic crimes committed in the west .
the west is NOT innocent .
however , the crimes the west commits domestically is n't even remotely as vile as what iran commits domestically .
reallyin regard to the subject matter of abuse of citizens and media manipulation , if in your mind you can not help but to confuse iran and the usa 's domestic policies , you only demonstrate an irrational bias on your part , not any real moral principles or logical backboneplease , by all means , be my guest , continue to criticize the west .
as someone who truly and genuinely holds free expression of opinion as a bedrock principle , i support your right to speak your mind , even if i disagree with it .
but one wonders how you handle the cognitive dissonance of pointing out anthills while the mountain looms in the discussion</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1468788&amp;cid=30347904 [slashdot.org]i doubted the suggestion, modded insightful, that media control in iran is just like in the usa.
a further insightful reply to my trollmodded comment started discussing the idea of "manufacturing consent.
" which i actually don't have a problem with as a description of a real negative issue with the media in the usa.
however: as if such a concept is remotely like anything what they do with the media in iranwhy do people not understand that no matter how much you dislike the usa or big media in the west, or how many real and genuine problems you can find with the media and civil rights enforcement in the west, that what iran is doing is far, far more vile, according to the widest range of subjective and objective measurements, and not even remotely comparable?what iran does to its citizens and how it handles rights internally can't possibly compare to the status quo in the west if you claim the slightest amount of intellectual honesty.
iran is off the charts.
there is no equivalency, periodno matter how much you hate the usa or how large your grievance is with the FOREIGN policies of western governments, when you try to equate what happens in the west DOMESTICALLY with what iran does with its citizens, you only cheapen and disqualify the moral and logical basis for your opposition to the west.
you make a fool of yourself, because you do not appear to be someone who is truly speaking from moral principles, you only appear to be geopolitically posturing.
you're not concerned with making the world a better place.
you're concerned with vendettas.
you do not demonstrate a mental ability to appreciate concepts like scale, perspective, and context when formulate an equivalence between domestic rights and media manipulation in the west and iran.
do you really understand what iran freely engages in in the suppression of its citizens?
do you honestly want to compare that to anything the west does to its citizens?you need to demonstrate an actual well-defined set of moral principles.
if you do that, you will find a need on your own part to criticize iran for what it does to its citizens.
or at the very least, if criticism of the west is your only concern, you need to stop trying to steer a discussion of the horrid crimes iran commits internally into a discussion of the far smaller set of domestic crimes committed in the west.
the west is NOT innocent.
however, the crimes the west commits domestically isn't even remotely as vile as what iran commits domestically.
reallyin regard to the subject matter of abuse of citizens and media manipulation, if in your mind you cannot help but to confuse iran and the usa's domestic policies, you only demonstrate an irrational bias on your part, not any real moral principles or logical backboneplease, by all means, be my guest, continue to criticize the west.
as someone who truly and genuinely holds free expression of opinion as a bedrock principle, i support your right to speak your mind, even if i disagree with it.
but one wonders how you handle the cognitive dissonance of pointing out anthills while the mountain looms in the discussion</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365630</id>
	<title>maybe because eritrea is a new country</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1260289440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>like east timor</p><p>both countries are recent breakway provinces. eritrea used to be in ethiopia until 1993. east timor used to be in indonesia until 2000. eritrea was a largely muslim area in a largely christian ethiopia. east timor was a largely catholic region in a largely muslim indonesia</p><p>its a shame that religious strife holds the basis for so much grief and fragmentation in this world</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>like east timorboth countries are recent breakway provinces .
eritrea used to be in ethiopia until 1993. east timor used to be in indonesia until 2000. eritrea was a largely muslim area in a largely christian ethiopia .
east timor was a largely catholic region in a largely muslim indonesiaits a shame that religious strife holds the basis for so much grief and fragmentation in this world</tokentext>
<sentencetext>like east timorboth countries are recent breakway provinces.
eritrea used to be in ethiopia until 1993. east timor used to be in indonesia until 2000. eritrea was a largely muslim area in a largely christian ethiopia.
east timor was a largely catholic region in a largely muslim indonesiaits a shame that religious strife holds the basis for so much grief and fragmentation in this world</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367980</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1260299640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This wouldn't be such an issue if they were torturing and imprisioning the <i>right </i>online journalists.<br> <br>
<tt>
Dear Tehran,<br> <br>

Please find attached my list of bloggers I don't like, their IP addresses, home address and a sample of their inain trite drivel<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would n't be such an issue if they were torturing and imprisioning the right online journalists .
Dear Tehran , Please find attached my list of bloggers I do n't like , their IP addresses , home address and a sample of their inain trite drivel .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This wouldn't be such an issue if they were torturing and imprisioning the right online journalists.
Dear Tehran, 

Please find attached my list of bloggers I don't like, their IP addresses, home address and a sample of their inain trite drivel ...
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372836</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1260280740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One good step towards making imprisonment and mistreatment of journalists a big international no-no would be for all the major countries to openly ban their intelligence agencies (the CIA, MI6, etc.) from using operatives posing as journalists, or hiring journalists for intelligence gathering purposes.</p></div><p>If you want to neuter your intelligence agencies maybe, but not if you want them to actually be useful. The world outside of your comfortable first world community is a nasty place, get used to it.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>It would be nice if we could at least have the CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community "We don't do this, under any circumstances" the next time some petty tyrant claims that the journalists he's caught are working for the CIA</p></div><p>Please tell us that you aren't that na&#239;ve. What would that gain the CIA? Nobody would believe them anyway.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>As it is, anyone wandering into a foreign country and asking questions, journalist or not, is going to be wearing a big target on their chest that says "Possible intelligence operative."</p></div><p>A good reason not to do that wouldn't you say? If you want to risk your neck that is your own business, but I don't need independent journalists to tell me that Iran, North Korea, Burma, and the like have unsavory regimes.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>the world community to go to bat for more journalists if they had some sort of assurance that the sanctions they were imposing were on behalf of actual legitimate journalists, not James Bond wannabes with fake press credentials.</p></div><p>The pariah countries, like Iran, don't care about world opinion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One good step towards making imprisonment and mistreatment of journalists a big international no-no would be for all the major countries to openly ban their intelligence agencies ( the CIA , MI6 , etc .
) from using operatives posing as journalists , or hiring journalists for intelligence gathering purposes.If you want to neuter your intelligence agencies maybe , but not if you want them to actually be useful .
The world outside of your comfortable first world community is a nasty place , get used to it.It would be nice if we could at least have the CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community " We do n't do this , under any circumstances " the next time some petty tyrant claims that the journalists he 's caught are working for the CIAPlease tell us that you are n't that na   ve .
What would that gain the CIA ?
Nobody would believe them anyway.As it is , anyone wandering into a foreign country and asking questions , journalist or not , is going to be wearing a big target on their chest that says " Possible intelligence operative .
" A good reason not to do that would n't you say ?
If you want to risk your neck that is your own business , but I do n't need independent journalists to tell me that Iran , North Korea , Burma , and the like have unsavory regimes.the world community to go to bat for more journalists if they had some sort of assurance that the sanctions they were imposing were on behalf of actual legitimate journalists , not James Bond wannabes with fake press credentials.The pariah countries , like Iran , do n't care about world opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One good step towards making imprisonment and mistreatment of journalists a big international no-no would be for all the major countries to openly ban their intelligence agencies (the CIA, MI6, etc.
) from using operatives posing as journalists, or hiring journalists for intelligence gathering purposes.If you want to neuter your intelligence agencies maybe, but not if you want them to actually be useful.
The world outside of your comfortable first world community is a nasty place, get used to it.It would be nice if we could at least have the CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community "We don't do this, under any circumstances" the next time some petty tyrant claims that the journalists he's caught are working for the CIAPlease tell us that you aren't that naïve.
What would that gain the CIA?
Nobody would believe them anyway.As it is, anyone wandering into a foreign country and asking questions, journalist or not, is going to be wearing a big target on their chest that says "Possible intelligence operative.
"A good reason not to do that wouldn't you say?
If you want to risk your neck that is your own business, but I don't need independent journalists to tell me that Iran, North Korea, Burma, and the like have unsavory regimes.the world community to go to bat for more journalists if they had some sort of assurance that the sanctions they were imposing were on behalf of actual legitimate journalists, not James Bond wannabes with fake press credentials.The pariah countries, like Iran, don't care about world opinion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365532</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1260289080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The difference is that the journalists are breaking local laws.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is that the journalists are breaking local laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is that the journalists are breaking local laws.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30374912</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259613300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community "We don't do this, under any circumstances"</p><p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh shit youre actually serious HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh shit thats funnyshitt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community " We do n't do this , under any circumstances " HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh shit youre actually serious HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh shit thats funnyshitt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community "We don't do this, under any circumstances"HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh shit youre actually serious HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh shit thats funnyshitt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370424</id>
	<title>Re:Good thing that the US would never ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260267180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You've obviously never been a soldier in Iraq. "Due Process" doesn't apply in combat zones. If soldiers perceive hostile intent or hostile action, they can act.</p><p>You sit there making sad "think of the x" arguments because you know it doesn't affect you in the least. You'll never have to deal with combat...it's infra dig as far as you are concerned.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've obviously never been a soldier in Iraq .
" Due Process " does n't apply in combat zones .
If soldiers perceive hostile intent or hostile action , they can act.You sit there making sad " think of the x " arguments because you know it does n't affect you in the least .
You 'll never have to deal with combat...it 's infra dig as far as you are concerned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've obviously never been a soldier in Iraq.
"Due Process" doesn't apply in combat zones.
If soldiers perceive hostile intent or hostile action, they can act.You sit there making sad "think of the x" arguments because you know it doesn't affect you in the least.
You'll never have to deal with combat...it's infra dig as far as you are concerned.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1260288900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's probably because you don't pay much attention to the world. If you had, you may have heard of this African country called Sudan, and a particularly a region in it called Darfur, a place where mass genocide has been going on- in fact, where as many as half a million civilians may have been slaughtered so far. Eritrea is one of the nations that has been accused of supporting the Darfur rebels fighting against the Sudanese government, but has since moved into a mediating position over the crisis.</p><p>To be fair though, part the reason you probably hadn't heard about it is because the world's media was mostly too busy covering middle east stuff like Israel's war with Lebanon. Apparently Israel killing 1000 odd Lebanese, many of which were Hezbollah militans and Hezbollah killing 130 Israelis, many of which were soldiers is somehow so much bigger a tragedy than the 10s of thousands of African civilians that were brutally raped, mutilated and murdered around the same time. For some reason, the tragedy in Darfur and the hundreds of thousands of dead, the hundreds of thousands raped and mutilated and the millions displaced just don't get the attention of the media like a good old fashioned suicide bombing in downtown Baghdad or a verbal spat between the US and Iran.</p><p>So yeah, Eritrea is an African nation with some quite close ties to the Darfur conflict. In it's short existence as a sovereign nation (since 1993 iirc) it's also managed to get itself in fights with Ethiopia, Yemen and possibly even Somalia I believe. It's relatively pro-Western, but not blindly so as there was some fuss about them allowing some militant in that the US claimed had Al Qaeda ties. It borders the red sea towards the North Eastern end of Africa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's probably because you do n't pay much attention to the world .
If you had , you may have heard of this African country called Sudan , and a particularly a region in it called Darfur , a place where mass genocide has been going on- in fact , where as many as half a million civilians may have been slaughtered so far .
Eritrea is one of the nations that has been accused of supporting the Darfur rebels fighting against the Sudanese government , but has since moved into a mediating position over the crisis.To be fair though , part the reason you probably had n't heard about it is because the world 's media was mostly too busy covering middle east stuff like Israel 's war with Lebanon .
Apparently Israel killing 1000 odd Lebanese , many of which were Hezbollah militans and Hezbollah killing 130 Israelis , many of which were soldiers is somehow so much bigger a tragedy than the 10s of thousands of African civilians that were brutally raped , mutilated and murdered around the same time .
For some reason , the tragedy in Darfur and the hundreds of thousands of dead , the hundreds of thousands raped and mutilated and the millions displaced just do n't get the attention of the media like a good old fashioned suicide bombing in downtown Baghdad or a verbal spat between the US and Iran.So yeah , Eritrea is an African nation with some quite close ties to the Darfur conflict .
In it 's short existence as a sovereign nation ( since 1993 iirc ) it 's also managed to get itself in fights with Ethiopia , Yemen and possibly even Somalia I believe .
It 's relatively pro-Western , but not blindly so as there was some fuss about them allowing some militant in that the US claimed had Al Qaeda ties .
It borders the red sea towards the North Eastern end of Africa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's probably because you don't pay much attention to the world.
If you had, you may have heard of this African country called Sudan, and a particularly a region in it called Darfur, a place where mass genocide has been going on- in fact, where as many as half a million civilians may have been slaughtered so far.
Eritrea is one of the nations that has been accused of supporting the Darfur rebels fighting against the Sudanese government, but has since moved into a mediating position over the crisis.To be fair though, part the reason you probably hadn't heard about it is because the world's media was mostly too busy covering middle east stuff like Israel's war with Lebanon.
Apparently Israel killing 1000 odd Lebanese, many of which were Hezbollah militans and Hezbollah killing 130 Israelis, many of which were soldiers is somehow so much bigger a tragedy than the 10s of thousands of African civilians that were brutally raped, mutilated and murdered around the same time.
For some reason, the tragedy in Darfur and the hundreds of thousands of dead, the hundreds of thousands raped and mutilated and the millions displaced just don't get the attention of the media like a good old fashioned suicide bombing in downtown Baghdad or a verbal spat between the US and Iran.So yeah, Eritrea is an African nation with some quite close ties to the Darfur conflict.
In it's short existence as a sovereign nation (since 1993 iirc) it's also managed to get itself in fights with Ethiopia, Yemen and possibly even Somalia I believe.
It's relatively pro-Western, but not blindly so as there was some fuss about them allowing some militant in that the US claimed had Al Qaeda ties.
It borders the red sea towards the North Eastern end of Africa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368184</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>cthulu\_mt</author>
	<datestamp>1260300480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's some suggested reading:
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purloined\_Letter" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purloined\_Letter</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's some suggested reading : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purloined \ _Letter [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's some suggested reading:
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purloined\_Letter [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365082</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260287100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We&rsquo;ll do that just as soon as Muslim terrorists stop hiding in hospitals and mosques.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We    ll do that just as soon as Muslim terrorists stop hiding in hospitals and mosques .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We’ll do that just as soon as Muslim terrorists stop hiding in hospitals and mosques.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367658</id>
	<title>USA still in the lead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dont' worry, even if they kill them, USA is still in the lead when it comes to killing journalists.<br>Check out Iraq statistics.<br>http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12360.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont ' worry , even if they kill them , USA is still in the lead when it comes to killing journalists.Check out Iraq statistics.http : //www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12360.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont' worry, even if they kill them, USA is still in the lead when it comes to killing journalists.Check out Iraq statistics.http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12360.htm</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372288</id>
	<title>Re:We just need 300 well-trained Spartans</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1260277080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, we don't. They'd just expand their cult of victimhood.</p><p>Iranians need to rise in violent revolt. They are too cozy, so most of them won't.</p><p>Twitter isn't shit. Fighting like the Jihadists who oppose them shows the will to power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , we do n't .
They 'd just expand their cult of victimhood.Iranians need to rise in violent revolt .
They are too cozy , so most of them wo n't.Twitter is n't shit .
Fighting like the Jihadists who oppose them shows the will to power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, we don't.
They'd just expand their cult of victimhood.Iranians need to rise in violent revolt.
They are too cozy, so most of them won't.Twitter isn't shit.
Fighting like the Jihadists who oppose them shows the will to power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972</id>
	<title>Iran can't take much more of this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260286620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's going to be a large, violent revolution soon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's going to be a large , violent revolution soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's going to be a large, violent revolution soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365394</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1260288480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only would they not believe it; but, by some definitions (taking a dictatorial point of view) anyone who makes public information (read as publishes stories) or provides information to foreign governments (read as publishes stories in foreign country), contrary to the official line, or which makes available information which has been suppressed for "security" reasons, is committing espionage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only would they not believe it ; but , by some definitions ( taking a dictatorial point of view ) anyone who makes public information ( read as publishes stories ) or provides information to foreign governments ( read as publishes stories in foreign country ) , contrary to the official line , or which makes available information which has been suppressed for " security " reasons , is committing espionage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only would they not believe it; but, by some definitions (taking a dictatorial point of view) anyone who makes public information (read as publishes stories) or provides information to foreign governments (read as publishes stories in foreign country), contrary to the official line, or which makes available information which has been suppressed for "security" reasons, is committing espionage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366010</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Dr. Evil</author>
	<datestamp>1260291060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, jail the diplomats.

</p><p>Then we need to get in contact with Tehran.  Hmmm... How to do that?

</p><p>You know, what we should do is ask Tehran to send people over who speak our language and understand our culture.  It'd be such a nice gesture that we should probably give them a place to stay.  Maybe they can be put up in the former Iranian embassy.  They have lots of tea and a mosque there.  Heaps of Persian literature and discount phones to Tehran too.

</p><p>We can negotiate with the people in this embassy for the release of the dipolmats.  They can call Tehran and set up meetings and stuff.

</p><p>Perfect solution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , jail the diplomats .
Then we need to get in contact with Tehran .
Hmmm... How to do that ?
You know , what we should do is ask Tehran to send people over who speak our language and understand our culture .
It 'd be such a nice gesture that we should probably give them a place to stay .
Maybe they can be put up in the former Iranian embassy .
They have lots of tea and a mosque there .
Heaps of Persian literature and discount phones to Tehran too .
We can negotiate with the people in this embassy for the release of the dipolmats .
They can call Tehran and set up meetings and stuff .
Perfect solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, jail the diplomats.
Then we need to get in contact with Tehran.
Hmmm... How to do that?
You know, what we should do is ask Tehran to send people over who speak our language and understand our culture.
It'd be such a nice gesture that we should probably give them a place to stay.
Maybe they can be put up in the former Iranian embassy.
They have lots of tea and a mosque there.
Heaps of Persian literature and discount phones to Tehran too.
We can negotiate with the people in this embassy for the release of the dipolmats.
They can call Tehran and set up meetings and stuff.
Perfect solution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156</id>
	<title>We just need 300 well-trained Spartans</title>
	<author>AmericanGladiator</author>
	<datestamp>1260296040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to kick their Persian behinds one more time...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to kick their Persian behinds one more time.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to kick their Persian behinds one more time...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367184</id>
	<title>Not as long as "Blame the USA" resonates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260296220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it's amazing how many people^H^H^H^H^H^Huseful idiots in the USA that resonates with.</p><p>Thank you all so much for being simplistic tools of despots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 's amazing how many people ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Huseful idiots in the USA that resonates with.Thank you all so much for being simplistic tools of despots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it's amazing how many people^H^H^H^H^H^Huseful idiots in the USA that resonates with.Thank you all so much for being simplistic tools of despots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368178</id>
	<title>Re:Dont start a post by being a dick.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260300480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I've been glued to world news for most of the last five years and I had to look up Eritrea."</p><p>Pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 've been glued to world news for most of the last five years and I had to look up Eritrea .
" Pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I've been glued to world news for most of the last five years and I had to look up Eritrea.
"Pathetic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365324</id>
	<title>wow all that capiatlism is really freeing China up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh wait... looks like they are just  giant dictatorship that oppresses workers, a fact that we capitalists love to take advantage of.</p><p>think of it! no unions, no free press, no environmental regulation! we could take things back to the good old days, like they were in the 1850s!</p><p>fuck 'modern progress'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh wait... looks like they are just giant dictatorship that oppresses workers , a fact that we capitalists love to take advantage of.think of it !
no unions , no free press , no environmental regulation !
we could take things back to the good old days , like they were in the 1850s ! fuck 'modern progress' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh wait... looks like they are just  giant dictatorship that oppresses workers, a fact that we capitalists love to take advantage of.think of it!
no unions, no free press, no environmental regulation!
we could take things back to the good old days, like they were in the 1850s!fuck 'modern progress'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30369182</id>
	<title>Wait and See</title>
	<author>MarkvW</author>
	<datestamp>1260304440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No point in agitating Iran.  The US might be able to trigger something, but it couldn't control it.  There is no way that the US can CREATE a friendly client-state in IRAN.  Only people who get paid to think of ways to create client states think that.  The revolution, if it comes, will take its own course.</p><p>It is very important to remember that the theocratic Iranian government has a huge base of support.  Students and the intelligentsia have to shift that before they can do anything.</p><p>Iran's got a big problem.  It needs technology to oppress its people, but the locals who furnish the technology are the people that the government wants to oppress.  Unfortunately, the government has oil money and oil money will finance the purchase of oppression-aiding technology from the "free" countries of the world.</p><p>When the oil runs out, the theocracy will die because it can't afford the oppression.  The sadness is that all that oil money could be used to build infrastructure for the people for the future.  But it won't.  'Tis a pity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No point in agitating Iran .
The US might be able to trigger something , but it could n't control it .
There is no way that the US can CREATE a friendly client-state in IRAN .
Only people who get paid to think of ways to create client states think that .
The revolution , if it comes , will take its own course.It is very important to remember that the theocratic Iranian government has a huge base of support .
Students and the intelligentsia have to shift that before they can do anything.Iran 's got a big problem .
It needs technology to oppress its people , but the locals who furnish the technology are the people that the government wants to oppress .
Unfortunately , the government has oil money and oil money will finance the purchase of oppression-aiding technology from the " free " countries of the world.When the oil runs out , the theocracy will die because it ca n't afford the oppression .
The sadness is that all that oil money could be used to build infrastructure for the people for the future .
But it wo n't .
'T is a pity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No point in agitating Iran.
The US might be able to trigger something, but it couldn't control it.
There is no way that the US can CREATE a friendly client-state in IRAN.
Only people who get paid to think of ways to create client states think that.
The revolution, if it comes, will take its own course.It is very important to remember that the theocratic Iranian government has a huge base of support.
Students and the intelligentsia have to shift that before they can do anything.Iran's got a big problem.
It needs technology to oppress its people, but the locals who furnish the technology are the people that the government wants to oppress.
Unfortunately, the government has oil money and oil money will finance the purchase of oppression-aiding technology from the "free" countries of the world.When the oil runs out, the theocracy will die because it can't afford the oppression.
The sadness is that all that oil money could be used to build infrastructure for the people for the future.
But it won't.
'Tis a pity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365478</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1260288840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>And in at least some cases, they probably actually ARE spies (particularly with freelancers and bloggers with no connection to reputable news organizations).</i></p><p>Spies are supposed to be inconspicuous and do their best not to draw attention to themselves.  If your job is to rile up the public against the government, you might risk being a blogger.  If your job is to, well, <i>spy</i>, you'd stay as far away from publicity as you can.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And in at least some cases , they probably actually ARE spies ( particularly with freelancers and bloggers with no connection to reputable news organizations ) .Spies are supposed to be inconspicuous and do their best not to draw attention to themselves .
If your job is to rile up the public against the government , you might risk being a blogger .
If your job is to , well , spy , you 'd stay as far away from publicity as you can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And in at least some cases, they probably actually ARE spies (particularly with freelancers and bloggers with no connection to reputable news organizations).Spies are supposed to be inconspicuous and do their best not to draw attention to themselves.
If your job is to rile up the public against the government, you might risk being a blogger.
If your job is to, well, spy, you'd stay as far away from publicity as you can.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365534</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Ma8thew</author>
	<datestamp>1260289080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jailing diplomats is especially not allowed. It would be a profoundly stupid thing to do, and would basically stop any kind of diplomatic contact between the two countries for decades,</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jailing diplomats is especially not allowed .
It would be a profoundly stupid thing to do , and would basically stop any kind of diplomatic contact between the two countries for decades,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jailing diplomats is especially not allowed.
It would be a profoundly stupid thing to do, and would basically stop any kind of diplomatic contact between the two countries for decades,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364980</id>
	<title>Cuba is good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260286680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But boycotting is bad. But Israel is bad. Boycotting is good! Boycotting hurts people. People are good! Boycotting is bad. Israel is bad. People are bad. Cuba is good! People are good!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But boycotting is bad .
But Israel is bad .
Boycotting is good !
Boycotting hurts people .
People are good !
Boycotting is bad .
Israel is bad .
People are bad .
Cuba is good !
People are good !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But boycotting is bad.
But Israel is bad.
Boycotting is good!
Boycotting hurts people.
People are good!
Boycotting is bad.
Israel is bad.
People are bad.
Cuba is good!
People are good!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</id>
	<title>Eritrea?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260286920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK I get the others, but who the hell are "Eritrea"? They must do a REALLY good job of arresting reporters as I have never heard of this country before!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK I get the others , but who the hell are " Eritrea " ?
They must do a REALLY good job of arresting reporters as I have never heard of this country before !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK I get the others, but who the hell are "Eritrea"?
They must do a REALLY good job of arresting reporters as I have never heard of this country before!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365180</id>
	<title>Good thing that the US would never ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260287520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Iraq (in U.S. custody): 1<br>Ibrahim Jassam, freelance</p><p>Imprisoned: September 2, 2008</p><p>Jassam, a freelance photographer working for Reuters, was detained by U.S. and Iraqi forces during a raid on his home in Mahmoodiya, south of Baghdad, Reuters reported. At the time of the arrest, a U.S. military spokesman told CPJ that the journalist was deemed &ldquo;a threat to the security of Iraq and coalition forces.&rdquo;</p><p>In November 2008, the Iraqi Central Criminal Court ruled that there was no evidence to hold Jassam and ordered the U.S. military to release him, Reuters reported. U.S. military authorities rejected the court order, saying that he &ldquo;continued to pose a serious threat to the security and stability of Iraq.&rdquo;</p><p>The military has disclosed no evidence against Jassam, and he has never been charged with a crime.</p><p>U.S. troops have detained dozens of journalists&mdash;mostly Iraqis&mdash;since the war in Iraq began in March 2003, CPJ research found. In at least 12 cases, journalists were held for prolonged periods without charge or due process. In all other cases, the journalists were freed without charges ever being substantiated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iraq ( in U.S. custody ) : 1Ibrahim Jassam , freelanceImprisoned : September 2 , 2008Jassam , a freelance photographer working for Reuters , was detained by U.S. and Iraqi forces during a raid on his home in Mahmoodiya , south of Baghdad , Reuters reported .
At the time of the arrest , a U.S. military spokesman told CPJ that the journalist was deemed    a threat to the security of Iraq and coalition forces.    In November 2008 , the Iraqi Central Criminal Court ruled that there was no evidence to hold Jassam and ordered the U.S. military to release him , Reuters reported .
U.S. military authorities rejected the court order , saying that he    continued to pose a serious threat to the security and stability of Iraq.    The military has disclosed no evidence against Jassam , and he has never been charged with a crime.U.S .
troops have detained dozens of journalists    mostly Iraqis    since the war in Iraq began in March 2003 , CPJ research found .
In at least 12 cases , journalists were held for prolonged periods without charge or due process .
In all other cases , the journalists were freed without charges ever being substantiated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iraq (in U.S. custody): 1Ibrahim Jassam, freelanceImprisoned: September 2, 2008Jassam, a freelance photographer working for Reuters, was detained by U.S. and Iraqi forces during a raid on his home in Mahmoodiya, south of Baghdad, Reuters reported.
At the time of the arrest, a U.S. military spokesman told CPJ that the journalist was deemed “a threat to the security of Iraq and coalition forces.”In November 2008, the Iraqi Central Criminal Court ruled that there was no evidence to hold Jassam and ordered the U.S. military to release him, Reuters reported.
U.S. military authorities rejected the court order, saying that he “continued to pose a serious threat to the security and stability of Iraq.”The military has disclosed no evidence against Jassam, and he has never been charged with a crime.U.S.
troops have detained dozens of journalists—mostly Iraqis—since the war in Iraq began in March 2003, CPJ research found.
In at least 12 cases, journalists were held for prolonged periods without charge or due process.
In all other cases, the journalists were freed without charges ever being substantiated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365500</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1260288960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Eritrea" title="lmgtfy.com" rel="nofollow">Eritrea</a> [lmgtfy.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eritrea [ lmgtfy.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eritrea [lmgtfy.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30373238</id>
	<title>Re:Iran can't take much more of this</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1260284040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"There's going to be a large, violent revolution soon."</p><p>Supporting evidence please?</p><p>Students whining and protesting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/= cutting down Basij and Revolutionary Guards with IEDs or frying them with fougasse (petrol thickened with<br>styrofoam or other expedient) bombs. The Pahlevi government was a pushover, secular and weak.</p><p>When they realize the outside world can't help them, they'll have to either give up or fight with the toughness of the Jihadists who oppose them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" There 's going to be a large , violent revolution soon .
" Supporting evidence please ? Students whining and protesting / = cutting down Basij and Revolutionary Guards with IEDs or frying them with fougasse ( petrol thickened withstyrofoam or other expedient ) bombs .
The Pahlevi government was a pushover , secular and weak.When they realize the outside world ca n't help them , they 'll have to either give up or fight with the toughness of the Jihadists who oppose them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There's going to be a large, violent revolution soon.
"Supporting evidence please?Students whining and protesting /= cutting down Basij and Revolutionary Guards with IEDs or frying them with fougasse (petrol thickened withstyrofoam or other expedient) bombs.
The Pahlevi government was a pushover, secular and weak.When they realize the outside world can't help them, they'll have to either give up or fight with the toughness of the Jihadists who oppose them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365300</id>
	<title>Big deal</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1260288060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a crusty conservative faction in Iran that would like to punish lots of things with the death penalty - blogging against the man, looking askance at the man, sticking out the tongue at the man without a permit, and parking meter violations. This is nothing new.</p><p>They actually have a lot in common with certain conservative religious groups here in the US. Bob forbid those retards ever get their hands on the levers of power. We'd have bloggers on death row within the year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a crusty conservative faction in Iran that would like to punish lots of things with the death penalty - blogging against the man , looking askance at the man , sticking out the tongue at the man without a permit , and parking meter violations .
This is nothing new.They actually have a lot in common with certain conservative religious groups here in the US .
Bob forbid those retards ever get their hands on the levers of power .
We 'd have bloggers on death row within the year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a crusty conservative faction in Iran that would like to punish lots of things with the death penalty - blogging against the man, looking askance at the man, sticking out the tongue at the man without a permit, and parking meter violations.
This is nothing new.They actually have a lot in common with certain conservative religious groups here in the US.
Bob forbid those retards ever get their hands on the levers of power.
We'd have bloggers on death row within the year.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30369348</id>
	<title>Re:Sorry, but they have been successful for many</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1260305280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Bush didn't create the bad guys by labeling them, they were bad, he just gave us a sign.</i>
<br>
<br>
In the late 90s/early 2000s, the opposition in Iran grew stronger.  After 9/11, there was a demonstration in Tehran AGAINST terrorism.<br>
<br>
After labeling Iran an axis of evil, the theocrats and revolutionary guard were able to more easily crush dissent and foment anti-Americanism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bush did n't create the bad guys by labeling them , they were bad , he just gave us a sign .
In the late 90s/early 2000s , the opposition in Iran grew stronger .
After 9/11 , there was a demonstration in Tehran AGAINST terrorism .
After labeling Iran an axis of evil , the theocrats and revolutionary guard were able to more easily crush dissent and foment anti-Americanism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bush didn't create the bad guys by labeling them, they were bad, he just gave us a sign.
In the late 90s/early 2000s, the opposition in Iran grew stronger.
After 9/11, there was a demonstration in Tehran AGAINST terrorism.
After labeling Iran an axis of evil, the theocrats and revolutionary guard were able to more easily crush dissent and foment anti-Americanism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366044</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>wtbname</author>
	<datestamp>1260291240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the international community wanted to get tough on Iran and China for jailing "journalists", they would. They wouldn't need some flimsy 3 hoop excuse relating or not relating these journalists to intelligence agencies. The connection, real or not, is of no meaning to international politics. </p><p>The international community is not as tough as some people may want about jailing these journalists because they don't care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the international community wanted to get tough on Iran and China for jailing " journalists " , they would .
They would n't need some flimsy 3 hoop excuse relating or not relating these journalists to intelligence agencies .
The connection , real or not , is of no meaning to international politics .
The international community is not as tough as some people may want about jailing these journalists because they do n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the international community wanted to get tough on Iran and China for jailing "journalists", they would.
They wouldn't need some flimsy 3 hoop excuse relating or not relating these journalists to intelligence agencies.
The connection, real or not, is of no meaning to international politics.
The international community is not as tough as some people may want about jailing these journalists because they don't care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364818</id>
	<title>Per Capita?</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1260286080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who does the most journalist jailing in proportion to the total population? Or to the total number of journalists in the country?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who does the most journalist jailing in proportion to the total population ?
Or to the total number of journalists in the country ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who does the most journalist jailing in proportion to the total population?
Or to the total number of journalists in the country?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365552</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260289140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.</p></div><p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician's\_syllogism" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">politician's syllogism!</a> [wikipedia.org]  "Something must be done!  This is something!  Therefore, this must be done!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.The politician 's syllogism !
[ wikipedia.org ] " Something must be done !
This is something !
Therefore , this must be done !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.The politician's syllogism!
[wikipedia.org]  "Something must be done!
This is something!
Therefore, this must be done!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366810</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>DarthVain</author>
	<datestamp>1260294360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have heard all about Darfur and how it is being ignored, and continues to be. That this one of many tiny African countries involved I was not aware.</p><p>Also I know it is getting gray and murky, but weren't the rebels the "good" guys, and the government was the one accused of sponsoring militias that have been going around slaughtering everyone?</p><p>Yes I think you are right, because I don't know this obscure tiny African country that may or may not be involved in supporting rebels, in a conflict that is half way around the world, which by your very admission isn't getting great media coverage, I clearly don't pay any attention to the world at all. I think that is obvious to anyone who can think critically. Furthermore I would go on to say that since I don't pay any attention to the world, I also don't care about anyone but myself, which makes a horrible horrible person, that should be reviled and shunned by others. Probably spit on also. SO if you see me, feel free to spit on me, as I clearly deserve it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have heard all about Darfur and how it is being ignored , and continues to be .
That this one of many tiny African countries involved I was not aware.Also I know it is getting gray and murky , but were n't the rebels the " good " guys , and the government was the one accused of sponsoring militias that have been going around slaughtering everyone ? Yes I think you are right , because I do n't know this obscure tiny African country that may or may not be involved in supporting rebels , in a conflict that is half way around the world , which by your very admission is n't getting great media coverage , I clearly do n't pay any attention to the world at all .
I think that is obvious to anyone who can think critically .
Furthermore I would go on to say that since I do n't pay any attention to the world , I also do n't care about anyone but myself , which makes a horrible horrible person , that should be reviled and shunned by others .
Probably spit on also .
SO if you see me , feel free to spit on me , as I clearly deserve it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have heard all about Darfur and how it is being ignored, and continues to be.
That this one of many tiny African countries involved I was not aware.Also I know it is getting gray and murky, but weren't the rebels the "good" guys, and the government was the one accused of sponsoring militias that have been going around slaughtering everyone?Yes I think you are right, because I don't know this obscure tiny African country that may or may not be involved in supporting rebels, in a conflict that is half way around the world, which by your very admission isn't getting great media coverage, I clearly don't pay any attention to the world at all.
I think that is obvious to anyone who can think critically.
Furthermore I would go on to say that since I don't pay any attention to the world, I also don't care about anyone but myself, which makes a horrible horrible person, that should be reviled and shunned by others.
Probably spit on also.
SO if you see me, feel free to spit on me, as I clearly deserve it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367216</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260296340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We don't do this, under any circumstances"</p><p>Oh, you mean like torture?<br><a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view\_all&amp;address=389x7156753" title="democratic...ground.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view\_all&amp;address=389x7156753</a> [democratic...ground.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We do n't do this , under any circumstances " Oh , you mean like torture ? http : //www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php ? az = view \ _all&amp;address = 389x7156753 [ democratic...ground.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We don't do this, under any circumstances"Oh, you mean like torture?http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view\_all&amp;address=389x7156753 [democratic...ground.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365984</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>njfuzzy</author>
	<datestamp>1260290940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I just call myself a Journalist, and print up some business cards, and then murder someone-- Will I add to this statistic? If so, it's meaningless, and only demonstrates that in 2009 it's easier to call yourself a journalist without actually being one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I just call myself a Journalist , and print up some business cards , and then murder someone-- Will I add to this statistic ?
If so , it 's meaningless , and only demonstrates that in 2009 it 's easier to call yourself a journalist without actually being one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I just call myself a Journalist, and print up some business cards, and then murder someone-- Will I add to this statistic?
If so, it's meaningless, and only demonstrates that in 2009 it's easier to call yourself a journalist without actually being one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368036</id>
	<title>Yeah, let's bury it</title>
	<author>linumax</author>
	<datestamp>1260299940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean why bother reporting news. When we can have important stories like how "Country X is working on the next generation of product Y"</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean why bother reporting news .
When we can have important stories like how " Country X is working on the next generation of product Y "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean why bother reporting news.
When we can have important stories like how "Country X is working on the next generation of product Y"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364820</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1260286080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We don't do this, under any circumstances"</p><p>And we would believe them</p><p>Because they said the same thing about spying on Americans.<br>Or torture.<br>Shall we go on?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We do n't do this , under any circumstances " And we would believe themBecause they said the same thing about spying on Americans.Or torture.Shall we go on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We don't do this, under any circumstances"And we would believe themBecause they said the same thing about spying on Americans.Or torture.Shall we go on?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365546</id>
	<title>Bad Idea: Don't do it, even if the others do</title>
	<author>DrYak</author>
	<datestamp>1260289080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(Lybia has playing such a game against Switzerland, BTW)</p><p>Ok, if you start the "<i>let's do it too in retaliation</i>" game, then what differences will be between you and the "eeevil bad guys" your are fighting against ? I mean appart some basic schoolyard excuse as "<i>They started first ?</i>".<br>If you lower your standards, you aren't distinguishable any more from the guys you're fighting against. If one day you win, it'll be simply a case of "<i>meet the new boss, same as the old boss</i>".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( Lybia has playing such a game against Switzerland , BTW ) Ok , if you start the " let 's do it too in retaliation " game , then what differences will be between you and the " eeevil bad guys " your are fighting against ?
I mean appart some basic schoolyard excuse as " They started first ?
" .If you lower your standards , you are n't distinguishable any more from the guys you 're fighting against .
If one day you win , it 'll be simply a case of " meet the new boss , same as the old boss " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Lybia has playing such a game against Switzerland, BTW)Ok, if you start the "let's do it too in retaliation" game, then what differences will be between you and the "eeevil bad guys" your are fighting against ?
I mean appart some basic schoolyard excuse as "They started first ?
".If you lower your standards, you aren't distinguishable any more from the guys you're fighting against.
If one day you win, it'll be simply a case of "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368562</id>
	<title>Re:We just need 300 well-trained Spartans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260301800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That tactic requires Persia to conquer all the way west to Greece. Something I'm sure modern day Iran would gladly do (and then decline to actually show up to lose in Greece).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That tactic requires Persia to conquer all the way west to Greece .
Something I 'm sure modern day Iran would gladly do ( and then decline to actually show up to lose in Greece ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That tactic requires Persia to conquer all the way west to Greece.
Something I'm sure modern day Iran would gladly do (and then decline to actually show up to lose in Greece).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365354</id>
	<title>Journalists, or Bloggers?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I'm an Iranian and I make $0.30 a month from Google AdSense on my blog which reviews the latest Xbox games, and I use the release of Assassin's Creed II to launch into a bourbon and chocolate ice cream-fueled rant against everything Persian, and I'm arrested, am I an unjustly incarcerated journalist, or another idiot with too much time on his hands who doesn't know when to keep his mouth shut?</p><p>It's one of those fine points, I'm just asking...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm an Iranian and I make $ 0.30 a month from Google AdSense on my blog which reviews the latest Xbox games , and I use the release of Assassin 's Creed II to launch into a bourbon and chocolate ice cream-fueled rant against everything Persian , and I 'm arrested , am I an unjustly incarcerated journalist , or another idiot with too much time on his hands who does n't know when to keep his mouth shut ? It 's one of those fine points , I 'm just asking.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm an Iranian and I make $0.30 a month from Google AdSense on my blog which reviews the latest Xbox games, and I use the release of Assassin's Creed II to launch into a bourbon and chocolate ice cream-fueled rant against everything Persian, and I'm arrested, am I an unjustly incarcerated journalist, or another idiot with too much time on his hands who doesn't know when to keep his mouth shut?It's one of those fine points, I'm just asking...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365770</id>
	<title>Edited out of the report at the last minute...</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1260290040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"But regardless of the results, the US is still the world's worst place to be for freedom of the press.  Or for anything, really."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" But regardless of the results , the US is still the world 's worst place to be for freedom of the press .
Or for anything , really .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But regardless of the results, the US is still the world's worst place to be for freedom of the press.
Or for anything, really.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366106</id>
	<title>Dont start a post by being a dick.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260291480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"That's probably because you don't pay much attention to the world. If you had, you may have heard of this African country called Sudan, and a particularly a region in it called Darfur..."</i> <br> <br>

I've been glued to world news for most of the last five years and I had to look up Eritrea. I've also never heard of it before.<br> <br>

You might have made an excellent point after this phrase, or provided some details, but when I read the first line I thought to myself, "Condescending dick." So I never read the rest of your post.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's probably because you do n't pay much attention to the world .
If you had , you may have heard of this African country called Sudan , and a particularly a region in it called Darfur... " I 've been glued to world news for most of the last five years and I had to look up Eritrea .
I 've also never heard of it before .
You might have made an excellent point after this phrase , or provided some details , but when I read the first line I thought to myself , " Condescending dick .
" So I never read the rest of your post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's probably because you don't pay much attention to the world.
If you had, you may have heard of this African country called Sudan, and a particularly a region in it called Darfur..."  

I've been glued to world news for most of the last five years and I had to look up Eritrea.
I've also never heard of it before.
You might have made an excellent point after this phrase, or provided some details, but when I read the first line I thought to myself, "Condescending dick.
" So I never read the rest of your post.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370540</id>
	<title>Support Iranian Progress</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260267900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just don't understand why those hoping for a promising future for Iran are against their nuclear progress.<br>It seems clear that nuclear is the best way forward (for Iran or any country) and those who oppose it are asking for Iran to be left behind economically.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just do n't understand why those hoping for a promising future for Iran are against their nuclear progress.It seems clear that nuclear is the best way forward ( for Iran or any country ) and those who oppose it are asking for Iran to be left behind economically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just don't understand why those hoping for a promising future for Iran are against their nuclear progress.It seems clear that nuclear is the best way forward (for Iran or any country) and those who oppose it are asking for Iran to be left behind economically.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372204</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1260276600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only way to help the victims of Darfur is to arm and train them to kill their enemies because no visiting force can defend every one of them in detail. The answer to Janjaweed is more Kalashnikovs.</p><p>That's not PC, so it won't happen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only way to help the victims of Darfur is to arm and train them to kill their enemies because no visiting force can defend every one of them in detail .
The answer to Janjaweed is more Kalashnikovs.That 's not PC , so it wo n't happen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only way to help the victims of Darfur is to arm and train them to kill their enemies because no visiting force can defend every one of them in detail.
The answer to Janjaweed is more Kalashnikovs.That's not PC, so it won't happen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364852</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>MRe\_nl</author>
	<datestamp>1260286200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and ditto for (doctors and nurses working for) the Red Cross and M&#233;decins Sans Fronti&#232;res perhaps?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and ditto for ( doctors and nurses working for ) the Red Cross and M   decins Sans Fronti   res perhaps ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and ditto for (doctors and nurses working for) the Red Cross and Médecins Sans Frontières perhaps?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365070</id>
	<title>but  but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260287040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I remember reading a story here just a few days ago where nearly everyone was going on about how great the world would be without journalists. Why the sudden change of heart?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I remember reading a story here just a few days ago where nearly everyone was going on about how great the world would be without journalists .
Why the sudden change of heart ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I remember reading a story here just a few days ago where nearly everyone was going on about how great the world would be without journalists.
Why the sudden change of heart?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365614</id>
	<title>A parallel sharp rise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260289380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see a sharp rise in "country X is evil" stories.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see a sharp rise in " country X is evil " stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see a sharp rise in "country X is evil" stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366682</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>dkf</author>
	<datestamp>1260293700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>[Eritrea is] relatively pro-Western</p></div><p>Maybe so, but it does depend on what your baseline is. They've got a bunch of fascists in charge who hate their (much larger) neighbors more than they hate us. They have no oil to speak of though, nor a navy worth the name to cause trouble in the Red Sea, so we ignore them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Eritrea is ] relatively pro-WesternMaybe so , but it does depend on what your baseline is .
They 've got a bunch of fascists in charge who hate their ( much larger ) neighbors more than they hate us .
They have no oil to speak of though , nor a navy worth the name to cause trouble in the Red Sea , so we ignore them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Eritrea is] relatively pro-WesternMaybe so, but it does depend on what your baseline is.
They've got a bunch of fascists in charge who hate their (much larger) neighbors more than they hate us.
They have no oil to speak of though, nor a navy worth the name to cause trouble in the Red Sea, so we ignore them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368034</id>
	<title>Any nation that executes journalists</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1260299940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>should have their U.N. member status revoked.  Of course, U.N. membership is already somewhat of a farce, the U.N. essentially now being a forum for cronyism, but it would at least take away another venue for people like Ahmadinejad to get up on a podium and spout hatred.  Too bad we didn't keep Mossadegh around, huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>should have their U.N. member status revoked .
Of course , U.N. membership is already somewhat of a farce , the U.N. essentially now being a forum for cronyism , but it would at least take away another venue for people like Ahmadinejad to get up on a podium and spout hatred .
Too bad we did n't keep Mossadegh around , huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>should have their U.N. member status revoked.
Of course, U.N. membership is already somewhat of a farce, the U.N. essentially now being a forum for cronyism, but it would at least take away another venue for people like Ahmadinejad to get up on a podium and spout hatred.
Too bad we didn't keep Mossadegh around, huh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30371656</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>das\_schmitt</author>
	<datestamp>1260273300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>OK I get the others, but who the hell are "Eritrea"? They must do a REALLY good job of arresting reporters as I have never heard of this country before!</i>

Or your parents and teachers might have done a REALLY good job of failing you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OK I get the others , but who the hell are " Eritrea " ?
They must do a REALLY good job of arresting reporters as I have never heard of this country before !
Or your parents and teachers might have done a REALLY good job of failing you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK I get the others, but who the hell are "Eritrea"?
They must do a REALLY good job of arresting reporters as I have never heard of this country before!
Or your parents and teachers might have done a REALLY good job of failing you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365508</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is essentially an act of war.  So, if your aim is to start one, this might do it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is essentially an act of war .
So , if your aim is to start one , this might do it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is essentially an act of war.
So, if your aim is to start one, this might do it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365218</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>bazorg</author>
	<datestamp>1260287700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They have nice food though. <p>
www.london-eating.co.uk/2904.htm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They have nice food though .
www.london-eating.co.uk/2904.htm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They have nice food though.
www.london-eating.co.uk/2904.htm</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365624</id>
	<title>Cuba?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260289440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But they have FREE health care!</p><p>Those jailed "journalists" must be enemies of the Revolution and are attempting to take away the FREE health care from all the little brown peoples!</p><p>I wish we could put Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck in jail, but NO, some stupid Constitution keeps getting in our way!</p><p>Signed,</p><p>A "Progressive" Democrat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But they have FREE health care ! Those jailed " journalists " must be enemies of the Revolution and are attempting to take away the FREE health care from all the little brown peoples ! I wish we could put Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck in jail , but NO , some stupid Constitution keeps getting in our way ! Signed,A " Progressive " Democrat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they have FREE health care!Those jailed "journalists" must be enemies of the Revolution and are attempting to take away the FREE health care from all the little brown peoples!I wish we could put Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck in jail, but NO, some stupid Constitution keeps getting in our way!Signed,A "Progressive" Democrat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30376308</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>drsquare</author>
	<datestamp>1259591640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're assuming that the CIA didn't know very well that Iraq had no WMDs, and that they don't know where Osama is. The CIA's presence in Iran includes inciting those riots last year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're assuming that the CIA did n't know very well that Iraq had no WMDs , and that they do n't know where Osama is .
The CIA 's presence in Iran includes inciting those riots last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're assuming that the CIA didn't know very well that Iraq had no WMDs, and that they don't know where Osama is.
The CIA's presence in Iran includes inciting those riots last year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366176</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>Grygus</author>
	<datestamp>1260291780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The CIA has shown pretty conclusively over the last ten years or so that their intelligence presence on the ground in the Middle East is virtually nil.  The facts that we didn't know conclusively about the WMDs in Iraq, don't know anything conclusive about a WMD program in Iran, haven't killed Osama bin Ladin, and most of the time have only a vague idea where he is all comes together to paint a pretty bleak picture from the CIA's point of view.  Not only do they apparently not have journalists posing as spies, they don't appear to have spies at all.  This hasn't stopped Iran worrying about it, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CIA has shown pretty conclusively over the last ten years or so that their intelligence presence on the ground in the Middle East is virtually nil .
The facts that we did n't know conclusively about the WMDs in Iraq , do n't know anything conclusive about a WMD program in Iran , have n't killed Osama bin Ladin , and most of the time have only a vague idea where he is all comes together to paint a pretty bleak picture from the CIA 's point of view .
Not only do they apparently not have journalists posing as spies , they do n't appear to have spies at all .
This has n't stopped Iran worrying about it , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CIA has shown pretty conclusively over the last ten years or so that their intelligence presence on the ground in the Middle East is virtually nil.
The facts that we didn't know conclusively about the WMDs in Iraq, don't know anything conclusive about a WMD program in Iran, haven't killed Osama bin Ladin, and most of the time have only a vague idea where he is all comes together to paint a pretty bleak picture from the CIA's point of view.
Not only do they apparently not have journalists posing as spies, they don't appear to have spies at all.
This hasn't stopped Iran worrying about it, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364986</id>
	<title>Allah U Akhbar !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260286680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our Allah is great !</p><p>And we will kill all those who oppose us, including those anti-Allah journalists !!</p><p>Allah U Akhbar !!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our Allah is great ! And we will kill all those who oppose us , including those anti-Allah journalists !
! Allah U Akhbar !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our Allah is great !And we will kill all those who oppose us, including those anti-Allah journalists !
!Allah U Akhbar !
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</id>
	<title>Here's a thought</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1260285720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>One good step towards making imprisonment and mistreatment of journalists a big international no-no would be for all the major countries to openly ban their intelligence agencies (the CIA, MI6, etc.) from using operatives posing as journalists, or hiring journalists for intelligence gathering purposes. One of the arguments a lot of these oppressive governments use when they imprison journalists is that these journalists are actually spies. And in at least some cases, they probably actually ARE spies (particularly with freelancers and bloggers with no connection to reputable news organizations).

It would be nice if we could at least have the CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community "We don't do this, under any circumstances" the next time some petty tyrant claims that the journalists he's caught are working for the CIA. As it is, anyone wandering into a foreign country and asking questions, journalist or not, is going to be wearing a big target on their chest that says "Possible intelligence operative." The tyrant wouldn't care if we denied it, but it would do a lot to encourage the world community to go to bat for more journalists if they had some sort of assurance that the sanctions they were imposing were on behalf of actual legitimate journalists, not James Bond wannabes with fake press credentials.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One good step towards making imprisonment and mistreatment of journalists a big international no-no would be for all the major countries to openly ban their intelligence agencies ( the CIA , MI6 , etc .
) from using operatives posing as journalists , or hiring journalists for intelligence gathering purposes .
One of the arguments a lot of these oppressive governments use when they imprison journalists is that these journalists are actually spies .
And in at least some cases , they probably actually ARE spies ( particularly with freelancers and bloggers with no connection to reputable news organizations ) .
It would be nice if we could at least have the CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community " We do n't do this , under any circumstances " the next time some petty tyrant claims that the journalists he 's caught are working for the CIA .
As it is , anyone wandering into a foreign country and asking questions , journalist or not , is going to be wearing a big target on their chest that says " Possible intelligence operative .
" The tyrant would n't care if we denied it , but it would do a lot to encourage the world community to go to bat for more journalists if they had some sort of assurance that the sanctions they were imposing were on behalf of actual legitimate journalists , not James Bond wannabes with fake press credentials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One good step towards making imprisonment and mistreatment of journalists a big international no-no would be for all the major countries to openly ban their intelligence agencies (the CIA, MI6, etc.
) from using operatives posing as journalists, or hiring journalists for intelligence gathering purposes.
One of the arguments a lot of these oppressive governments use when they imprison journalists is that these journalists are actually spies.
And in at least some cases, they probably actually ARE spies (particularly with freelancers and bloggers with no connection to reputable news organizations).
It would be nice if we could at least have the CIA come out openly and bluntly and say to the world community "We don't do this, under any circumstances" the next time some petty tyrant claims that the journalists he's caught are working for the CIA.
As it is, anyone wandering into a foreign country and asking questions, journalist or not, is going to be wearing a big target on their chest that says "Possible intelligence operative.
" The tyrant wouldn't care if we denied it, but it would do a lot to encourage the world community to go to bat for more journalists if they had some sort of assurance that the sanctions they were imposing were on behalf of actual legitimate journalists, not James Bond wannabes with fake press credentials.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30373134</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1260283200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nice idea but it wont work.<br> <br>

Even if a mandate was passed to all NATO states that journalists were not to be contracted as spies this still wont stop non NATO nations from executing journalists for the crime of spying. They basically require no evidence and do not need anything more then the accusation that NATO nations are not abiding by the mandate regardless of whether it was true.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice idea but it wont work .
Even if a mandate was passed to all NATO states that journalists were not to be contracted as spies this still wont stop non NATO nations from executing journalists for the crime of spying .
They basically require no evidence and do not need anything more then the accusation that NATO nations are not abiding by the mandate regardless of whether it was true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice idea but it wont work.
Even if a mandate was passed to all NATO states that journalists were not to be contracted as spies this still wont stop non NATO nations from executing journalists for the crime of spying.
They basically require no evidence and do not need anything more then the accusation that NATO nations are not abiding by the mandate regardless of whether it was true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372688</id>
	<title>Re:A parallel sharp rise</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260279480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent up. Its amazing how Americans are quick to point their own finger but forget that they are currently doing a lot of evil stuff themselves. You have 2 occupations of countries that just happen to be in the most energy rich region on earth where the local people don't want you there, NO they don't. Over million people died in a Iraq due to the occupation, no I don't believe the officially sanctioned figures. Not to mention supporting the Israeli occupation of Palestine with money and hi tech weopons.</p><p>As for Iran, you do know that they have agreed in principle to a nuclear free middle east which was proposed by Elbaradei ? You know who apposed it ? US and Israel. Where do you guys get off demonising your victims ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up .
Its amazing how Americans are quick to point their own finger but forget that they are currently doing a lot of evil stuff themselves .
You have 2 occupations of countries that just happen to be in the most energy rich region on earth where the local people do n't want you there , NO they do n't .
Over million people died in a Iraq due to the occupation , no I do n't believe the officially sanctioned figures .
Not to mention supporting the Israeli occupation of Palestine with money and hi tech weopons.As for Iran , you do know that they have agreed in principle to a nuclear free middle east which was proposed by Elbaradei ?
You know who apposed it ?
US and Israel .
Where do you guys get off demonising your victims ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up.
Its amazing how Americans are quick to point their own finger but forget that they are currently doing a lot of evil stuff themselves.
You have 2 occupations of countries that just happen to be in the most energy rich region on earth where the local people don't want you there, NO they don't.
Over million people died in a Iraq due to the occupation, no I don't believe the officially sanctioned figures.
Not to mention supporting the Israeli occupation of Palestine with money and hi tech weopons.As for Iran, you do know that they have agreed in principle to a nuclear free middle east which was proposed by Elbaradei ?
You know who apposed it ?
US and Israel.
Where do you guys get off demonising your victims ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364926</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>dnwq</author>
	<datestamp>1260286500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can ban it, but who would believe you? There's no way for the CIA to show that it <i>isn't</i> spying even if it really wasn't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can ban it , but who would believe you ?
There 's no way for the CIA to show that it is n't spying even if it really was n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can ban it, but who would believe you?
There's no way for the CIA to show that it isn't spying even if it really wasn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366248</id>
	<title>Re:Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260292020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How exactly did you come to the assumption that they are innocent ? Because the country they are accussed to SPY FOR said that ? Really ?</p><p>So, now, lets do a mental experiment. Lets say the country is US and the spies are accused to spy for Russia. Russia and China both say the people are innocent journalist oppressed because of defending their worldview (lets say communism).</p><p>Do you propose that the rightfull response from China and Russia would be to jail US citizens on sight ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How exactly did you come to the assumption that they are innocent ?
Because the country they are accussed to SPY FOR said that ?
Really ? So , now , lets do a mental experiment .
Lets say the country is US and the spies are accused to spy for Russia .
Russia and China both say the people are innocent journalist oppressed because of defending their worldview ( lets say communism ) .Do you propose that the rightfull response from China and Russia would be to jail US citizens on sight ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How exactly did you come to the assumption that they are innocent ?
Because the country they are accussed to SPY FOR said that ?
Really ?So, now, lets do a mental experiment.
Lets say the country is US and the spies are accused to spy for Russia.
Russia and China both say the people are innocent journalist oppressed because of defending their worldview (lets say communism).Do you propose that the rightfull response from China and Russia would be to jail US citizens on sight ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364804</id>
	<title>Would be shame...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260285960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Got that, slashdot "editors"?  It would be shame for yous to get tangled up with the laws, capiche?  Just saying.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Got that , slashdot " editors " ?
It would be shame for yous to get tangled up with the laws , capiche ?
Just saying .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Got that, slashdot "editors"?
It would be shame for yous to get tangled up with the laws, capiche?
Just saying.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370726</id>
	<title>Re:Dont start a post by being a dick.</title>
	<author>saforrest</author>
	<datestamp>1260268740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You make a good point about not being a jerk.  Honestly, I have found that once one displays a marginal degree of deep knowledge about some subject but makes a mistake, there are no shortage of "experts" willing to jump in and humiliate the poor bastard.  It's as though they're delighted to find an opponent worthy enough to fight but weak enough to defeat.</p><p>All that said, Eritrea was in the news a lot in the 80s and 90s owing to its independence war against Ethiopia.  That war has a lot to do with the state of politics in the Horn of Africa ever since, and is sort of the model for the attempted secession of Somaliland from neighboring Somalia.  I think the fact that the name of Eritrea is not well known is a travesty on the part of the media, and I think that anyone who regards themselves as well-informed on current events should feel embarrassment at not knowing the name of every current nation-state.  There are a lot of them, sure, but knowing them is the price you pay for the title "well-informed".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You make a good point about not being a jerk .
Honestly , I have found that once one displays a marginal degree of deep knowledge about some subject but makes a mistake , there are no shortage of " experts " willing to jump in and humiliate the poor bastard .
It 's as though they 're delighted to find an opponent worthy enough to fight but weak enough to defeat.All that said , Eritrea was in the news a lot in the 80s and 90s owing to its independence war against Ethiopia .
That war has a lot to do with the state of politics in the Horn of Africa ever since , and is sort of the model for the attempted secession of Somaliland from neighboring Somalia .
I think the fact that the name of Eritrea is not well known is a travesty on the part of the media , and I think that anyone who regards themselves as well-informed on current events should feel embarrassment at not knowing the name of every current nation-state .
There are a lot of them , sure , but knowing them is the price you pay for the title " well-informed " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make a good point about not being a jerk.
Honestly, I have found that once one displays a marginal degree of deep knowledge about some subject but makes a mistake, there are no shortage of "experts" willing to jump in and humiliate the poor bastard.
It's as though they're delighted to find an opponent worthy enough to fight but weak enough to defeat.All that said, Eritrea was in the news a lot in the 80s and 90s owing to its independence war against Ethiopia.
That war has a lot to do with the state of politics in the Horn of Africa ever since, and is sort of the model for the attempted secession of Somaliland from neighboring Somalia.
I think the fact that the name of Eritrea is not well known is a travesty on the part of the media, and I think that anyone who regards themselves as well-informed on current events should feel embarrassment at not knowing the name of every current nation-state.
There are a lot of them, sure, but knowing them is the price you pay for the title "well-informed".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372132</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>bensch128</author>
	<datestamp>1260276060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>To be fair though, part the reason you probably hadn't heard about it is because the world's media was mostly too busy covering middle east stuff like Israel's war with Lebanon.</i> <br>
<br>
I think the reason for this is that its a lot less fun to be a reporter in Darfur then it is to be a reporter in Tel Aviv. If you are a reporter in Israel, it's only a 3 hour trip from Tel Aviv to the Gaza strip or to the north, you get your news story about the horrors of conflict between the Israelis or Palestinians or Lebanese, and then you drive back to Tel Aviv, send off your report, and then go partying in Tel Aviv all night. Rinse and repeat.<br>
<br>
What the heck type of fun is there in Darfur?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Ben</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be fair though , part the reason you probably had n't heard about it is because the world 's media was mostly too busy covering middle east stuff like Israel 's war with Lebanon .
I think the reason for this is that its a lot less fun to be a reporter in Darfur then it is to be a reporter in Tel Aviv .
If you are a reporter in Israel , it 's only a 3 hour trip from Tel Aviv to the Gaza strip or to the north , you get your news story about the horrors of conflict between the Israelis or Palestinians or Lebanese , and then you drive back to Tel Aviv , send off your report , and then go partying in Tel Aviv all night .
Rinse and repeat .
What the heck type of fun is there in Darfur ?
Cheers Ben</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be fair though, part the reason you probably hadn't heard about it is because the world's media was mostly too busy covering middle east stuff like Israel's war with Lebanon.
I think the reason for this is that its a lot less fun to be a reporter in Darfur then it is to be a reporter in Tel Aviv.
If you are a reporter in Israel, it's only a 3 hour trip from Tel Aviv to the Gaza strip or to the north, you get your news story about the horrors of conflict between the Israelis or Palestinians or Lebanese, and then you drive back to Tel Aviv, send off your report, and then go partying in Tel Aviv all night.
Rinse and repeat.
What the heck type of fun is there in Darfur?
Cheers
Ben</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198</id>
	<title>Here's an idea</title>
	<author>WormholeFiend</author>
	<datestamp>1260287580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.</p><p>I know that technically this is not allowed, but then again, jailing innocent people is not a generally accepted practice either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.I know that technically this is not allowed , but then again , jailing innocent people is not a generally accepted practice either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about detaining all Iranian diplomats until all jounalists are freed.I know that technically this is not allowed, but then again, jailing innocent people is not a generally accepted practice either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367596</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well duh the media doesn't cover it. There's no oil in Eritrea or Darfur. The US doesn't care about civil rights, only money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well duh the media does n't cover it .
There 's no oil in Eritrea or Darfur .
The US does n't care about civil rights , only money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well duh the media doesn't cover it.
There's no oil in Eritrea or Darfur.
The US doesn't care about civil rights, only money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365828</id>
	<title>An indicator of human foolishness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260290280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Number of journalists arrested in Iran: less than 5
Number of anti-Iran stories in US media: more than 100</htmltext>
<tokenext>Number of journalists arrested in Iran : less than 5 Number of anti-Iran stories in US media : more than 100</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Number of journalists arrested in Iran: less than 5
Number of anti-Iran stories in US media: more than 100</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365864</id>
	<title>Re:Here's a thought</title>
	<author>Nidi62</author>
	<datestamp>1260290400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The CIA cannot legally use as a cover that of an American journalist.  Oh, and you think an operative is just gonna walk into a country and start asking questions?  Most CIA operatives work in Official Cover positions, primarily embassy staff.  That assistant press attache that couldnt even hold down a job in a 1-horse town newspaper?  Yeah, he works for the CIA.  Now, there are of course Non-official cover operatives, and at this point, most of them either work with the military, or doing other missions such as black arms purchases for study and evaluation.  Most espionage activities are undertaken by OC operatives and their recruited agents within their country of station.

Not to mention the fact that most "CIA operatives/agents" that these tyrants always claim to have, they're just doing that for propaganda.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The CIA can not legally use as a cover that of an American journalist .
Oh , and you think an operative is just gon na walk into a country and start asking questions ?
Most CIA operatives work in Official Cover positions , primarily embassy staff .
That assistant press attache that couldnt even hold down a job in a 1-horse town newspaper ?
Yeah , he works for the CIA .
Now , there are of course Non-official cover operatives , and at this point , most of them either work with the military , or doing other missions such as black arms purchases for study and evaluation .
Most espionage activities are undertaken by OC operatives and their recruited agents within their country of station .
Not to mention the fact that most " CIA operatives/agents " that these tyrants always claim to have , they 're just doing that for propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CIA cannot legally use as a cover that of an American journalist.
Oh, and you think an operative is just gonna walk into a country and start asking questions?
Most CIA operatives work in Official Cover positions, primarily embassy staff.
That assistant press attache that couldnt even hold down a job in a 1-horse town newspaper?
Yeah, he works for the CIA.
Now, there are of course Non-official cover operatives, and at this point, most of them either work with the military, or doing other missions such as black arms purchases for study and evaluation.
Most espionage activities are undertaken by OC operatives and their recruited agents within their country of station.
Not to mention the fact that most "CIA operatives/agents" that these tyrants always claim to have, they're just doing that for propaganda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365436</id>
	<title>Re:Iran can't take much more of this</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1260288660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I predict something large and violent, but I don't think it will be a revolution.  Maybe an Iran style Tiananmen Square.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I predict something large and violent , but I do n't think it will be a revolution .
Maybe an Iran style Tiananmen Square .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I predict something large and violent, but I don't think it will be a revolution.
Maybe an Iran style Tiananmen Square.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368770</id>
	<title>Here's another thought</title>
	<author>tuxgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1260302640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I seriously doubt journalists can be considered as spies<br>
The real cover that the CIA uses for spies is that of business men traveling overseas</p><p>
Some examples:
<br>1. George HW Bush was a covert CIA operative for many years. His cover was an oil developer.
<br>2. Valerie Plame: Also a covert operative spying on terror networks until Cheney/Novac outed her for political reprisal against her husband</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously doubt journalists can be considered as spies The real cover that the CIA uses for spies is that of business men traveling overseas Some examples : 1 .
George HW Bush was a covert CIA operative for many years .
His cover was an oil developer .
2. Valerie Plame : Also a covert operative spying on terror networks until Cheney/Novac outed her for political reprisal against her husband</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously doubt journalists can be considered as spies
The real cover that the CIA uses for spies is that of business men traveling overseas
Some examples:
1.
George HW Bush was a covert CIA operative for many years.
His cover was an oil developer.
2. Valerie Plame: Also a covert operative spying on terror networks until Cheney/Novac outed her for political reprisal against her husband</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365340</id>
	<title>Sounds like a Fox noise story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260288240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No facts, just opinion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No facts , just opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No facts, just opinion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367102</id>
	<title>Journos in Iran face execution...?</title>
	<author>Zooperman</author>
	<datestamp>1260295800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And people thought the Republicans were bad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And people thought the Republicans were bad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And people thought the Republicans were bad...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365248</id>
	<title>Sorry, but they have been successful for many</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260287760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>years at this.  I doubt all the angst here in the states or Europe amount to a hill of beans.  I see that our current Administrations new stance was accepted with glee by the leaders of Iran who more than likely feel they can now act with impunity since we have a real wimp in the White House.</p><p>Note to the current Administration, Bush didn't create the bad guys by labeling them, they were bad, he just gave us a sign.</p><p>Any successful revolution in that country is not going to come off without outside assistance.  Considering that no one wants to do anything to stop them from creating a bomb who in the hell do you think is going to help their people?  What?  A bunch of geeks insuring their message gets out?    WOW, ask me how well that helped the Chinese concerning that little incident with tanks in a certain square, ask me how well that works now when we have a new Administration that told the Chinese that human rights were not their pressing concern.  We have an Administration in the US which indirectly encourages these dictatorships.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>years at this .
I doubt all the angst here in the states or Europe amount to a hill of beans .
I see that our current Administrations new stance was accepted with glee by the leaders of Iran who more than likely feel they can now act with impunity since we have a real wimp in the White House.Note to the current Administration , Bush did n't create the bad guys by labeling them , they were bad , he just gave us a sign.Any successful revolution in that country is not going to come off without outside assistance .
Considering that no one wants to do anything to stop them from creating a bomb who in the hell do you think is going to help their people ?
What ? A bunch of geeks insuring their message gets out ?
WOW , ask me how well that helped the Chinese concerning that little incident with tanks in a certain square , ask me how well that works now when we have a new Administration that told the Chinese that human rights were not their pressing concern .
We have an Administration in the US which indirectly encourages these dictatorships .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>years at this.
I doubt all the angst here in the states or Europe amount to a hill of beans.
I see that our current Administrations new stance was accepted with glee by the leaders of Iran who more than likely feel they can now act with impunity since we have a real wimp in the White House.Note to the current Administration, Bush didn't create the bad guys by labeling them, they were bad, he just gave us a sign.Any successful revolution in that country is not going to come off without outside assistance.
Considering that no one wants to do anything to stop them from creating a bomb who in the hell do you think is going to help their people?
What?  A bunch of geeks insuring their message gets out?
WOW, ask me how well that helped the Chinese concerning that little incident with tanks in a certain square, ask me how well that works now when we have a new Administration that told the Chinese that human rights were not their pressing concern.
We have an Administration in the US which indirectly encourages these dictatorships.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364802</id>
	<title>Pile it on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260285960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we being prepared for an American invasion of Iran? Last time I saw this much propoganda was just prior to the invasion of Iraq.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we being prepared for an American invasion of Iran ?
Last time I saw this much propoganda was just prior to the invasion of Iraq .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we being prepared for an American invasion of Iran?
Last time I saw this much propoganda was just prior to the invasion of Iraq.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365224</id>
	<title>Re:Eritrea?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260287700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a country on the northeastern edge of Africa, bordering the Red Sea.  It gained independence from Ethiopia in the 1990s.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a country on the northeastern edge of Africa , bordering the Red Sea .
It gained independence from Ethiopia in the 1990s .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a country on the northeastern edge of Africa, bordering the Red Sea.
It gained independence from Ethiopia in the 1990s.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30376308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30369348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30373134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30371656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30374912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30374322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30373238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_08_1354245_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30373238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30369348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370424
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30371656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30374322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366106
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30370726
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365324
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365478
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30373134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30374912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30372836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30367980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30366176
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30376308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30364820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30365372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_08_1354245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_08_1354245.30368034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
