<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_07_2046242</id>
	<title>CrunchPad Being Re-branded As JooJoo</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1260178140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>adeelarshad82 writes to tell us that Fusion Garage seems to be ignoring the drama surrounding the "CrunchPad" and is planning to <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2356749,00.asp">launch their "JooJoo" tablet</a> this <a href="https://thejoojoo.com/">Friday at midnight</a>.  Unfortunately, the device will be a long way from the imagined $200 price point, weighing in at a hefty $499.  <i>"The JooJoo comes in black and has a capacitive touch screen, enough graphic power to deliver full high-definition video, offline capabilities, and a 4GB solid-state drive, though 'most of the storage is done in the cloud,' Rathakrishnan said. He promised 5 hours of battery life.  In a demo during the webcast, the device powered on in about 10 seconds, and showed icons for web-based services like Twitter, Hulu, CNN, and Gmail, though the JooJoo will not come pre-loaded with any apps, Rathakrishnan said. Scroll through them with your finger as you would on the iPhone.  In terms of <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/11/30/1731239/Arringtons-CrunchPad-Dies">the ownership drama</a>, Rathakrishnan said that TechCrunch editor Arrington has created an 'incomplete and distorted story.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>adeelarshad82 writes to tell us that Fusion Garage seems to be ignoring the drama surrounding the " CrunchPad " and is planning to launch their " JooJoo " tablet this Friday at midnight .
Unfortunately , the device will be a long way from the imagined $ 200 price point , weighing in at a hefty $ 499 .
" The JooJoo comes in black and has a capacitive touch screen , enough graphic power to deliver full high-definition video , offline capabilities , and a 4GB solid-state drive , though 'most of the storage is done in the cloud, ' Rathakrishnan said .
He promised 5 hours of battery life .
In a demo during the webcast , the device powered on in about 10 seconds , and showed icons for web-based services like Twitter , Hulu , CNN , and Gmail , though the JooJoo will not come pre-loaded with any apps , Rathakrishnan said .
Scroll through them with your finger as you would on the iPhone .
In terms of the ownership drama , Rathakrishnan said that TechCrunch editor Arrington has created an 'incomplete and distorted story .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>adeelarshad82 writes to tell us that Fusion Garage seems to be ignoring the drama surrounding the "CrunchPad" and is planning to launch their "JooJoo" tablet this Friday at midnight.
Unfortunately, the device will be a long way from the imagined $200 price point, weighing in at a hefty $499.
"The JooJoo comes in black and has a capacitive touch screen, enough graphic power to deliver full high-definition video, offline capabilities, and a 4GB solid-state drive, though 'most of the storage is done in the cloud,' Rathakrishnan said.
He promised 5 hours of battery life.
In a demo during the webcast, the device powered on in about 10 seconds, and showed icons for web-based services like Twitter, Hulu, CNN, and Gmail, though the JooJoo will not come pre-loaded with any apps, Rathakrishnan said.
Scroll through them with your finger as you would on the iPhone.
In terms of the ownership drama, Rathakrishnan said that TechCrunch editor Arrington has created an 'incomplete and distorted story.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358316</id>
	<title>JooJoo!</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1260183540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oy vey</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oy vey</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oy vey</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358198</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>qortra</author>
	<datestamp>1260183060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The technology would have to be extra special</p></div><p>It is special - didn't you notice, there's no keyboard!<br> <br>
I once took the steering wheel off my car and tried to sell it for twice the price.  Nobody bought it, but I think that's just because I screwed over a blogger right before I put it up for sale.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The technology would have to be extra specialIt is special - did n't you notice , there 's no keyboard !
I once took the steering wheel off my car and tried to sell it for twice the price .
Nobody bought it , but I think that 's just because I screwed over a blogger right before I put it up for sale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The technology would have to be extra specialIt is special - didn't you notice, there's no keyboard!
I once took the steering wheel off my car and tried to sell it for twice the price.
Nobody bought it, but I think that's just because I screwed over a blogger right before I put it up for sale.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362332</id>
	<title>Re:Conspiracy!</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1260214140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait, so your plan is...<br>
1) Market device with awesome features at super low price<br>
2) right before launch, assure everyone it wont be $500.<br>
3) Announce the device is canceled right before the biggest sales day of the year<br>
4) Have the manufacturerer release 3 weeks later after everyone has done their shopping, at $500<br>
5) ???<br>
6) Profit!<br>
<br>
Good luck with that</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , so your plan is.. . 1 ) Market device with awesome features at super low price 2 ) right before launch , assure everyone it wont be $ 500 .
3 ) Announce the device is canceled right before the biggest sales day of the year 4 ) Have the manufacturerer release 3 weeks later after everyone has done their shopping , at $ 500 5 ) ? ? ?
6 ) Profit !
Good luck with that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, so your plan is...
1) Market device with awesome features at super low price
2) right before launch, assure everyone it wont be $500.
3) Announce the device is canceled right before the biggest sales day of the year
4) Have the manufacturerer release 3 weeks later after everyone has done their shopping, at $500
5) ???
6) Profit!
Good luck with that</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358300</id>
	<title>Re:How many CPUs (cores) does this thing have?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's an Atom, so it's probably a single core.  The dual-core Atoms look to be targetted at desktops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's an Atom , so it 's probably a single core .
The dual-core Atoms look to be targetted at desktops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's an Atom, so it's probably a single core.
The dual-core Atoms look to be targetted at desktops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30376764</id>
	<title>PIty, I am fresh outta modpoints</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1259595060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But at least I can still tell you to go fuck yourself by using the magic reply button. Ideally, you would use something large &amp; pointy; ramming it up yourself at least a few meters.</p><p>Oh, and I don't need to hide behind the AC veil to say this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But at least I can still tell you to go fuck yourself by using the magic reply button .
Ideally , you would use something large &amp; pointy ; ramming it up yourself at least a few meters.Oh , and I do n't need to hide behind the AC veil to say this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But at least I can still tell you to go fuck yourself by using the magic reply button.
Ideally, you would use something large &amp; pointy; ramming it up yourself at least a few meters.Oh, and I don't need to hide behind the AC veil to say this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358606</id>
	<title>Cautious</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1260185160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do like the Fusion Garage explanation of the situation.  I look forward to Arrington's response.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do like the Fusion Garage explanation of the situation .
I look forward to Arrington 's response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do like the Fusion Garage explanation of the situation.
I look forward to Arrington's response.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360228</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>SlothDead</author>
	<datestamp>1260195480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know how you count down on new year's eve? You reach the cheering end of the countdown at 0:00, which is the next year, not  the last second of the old year. Also, the international standard is that a day starts at 0:00 and ends at 23:59 (or 24:00 when they add a leap second); since the United States of America are allergic to international standards I assume that "December 11th, midnight PST" means "0:00-12.12.2009".<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>But what does it matter anyway? You are going to order it by mail, so who knows when it will arrive?</p><p>(No, this comment ISN'T "flamebate", it's "+1 sarcastic")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know how you count down on new year 's eve ?
You reach the cheering end of the countdown at 0 : 00 , which is the next year , not the last second of the old year .
Also , the international standard is that a day starts at 0 : 00 and ends at 23 : 59 ( or 24 : 00 when they add a leap second ) ; since the United States of America are allergic to international standards I assume that " December 11th , midnight PST " means " 0 : 00-12.12.2009 " .
; - ) But what does it matter anyway ?
You are going to order it by mail , so who knows when it will arrive ?
( No , this comment IS N'T " flamebate " , it 's " + 1 sarcastic " )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know how you count down on new year's eve?
You reach the cheering end of the countdown at 0:00, which is the next year, not  the last second of the old year.
Also, the international standard is that a day starts at 0:00 and ends at 23:59 (or 24:00 when they add a leap second); since the United States of America are allergic to international standards I assume that "December 11th, midnight PST" means "0:00-12.12.2009".
;-)But what does it matter anyway?
You are going to order it by mail, so who knows when it will arrive?
(No, this comment ISN'T "flamebate", it's "+1 sarcastic")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362312</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1260213840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple tends to have a higher build quality, and an OS that isnt free.  They also tend to not go around screwing prominent bloggers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple tends to have a higher build quality , and an OS that isnt free .
They also tend to not go around screwing prominent bloggers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple tends to have a higher build quality, and an OS that isnt free.
They also tend to not go around screwing prominent bloggers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358380</id>
	<title>At least it's not...</title>
	<author>thelonious</author>
	<datestamp>1260183900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Jarjar.
Meesa wanna reada book!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Jarjar .
Meesa wan na reada book !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jarjar.
Meesa wanna reada book!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358786</id>
	<title>Yes</title>
	<author>hallucinogen</author>
	<datestamp>1260186180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Joo = yes in Finnish

yesyes

Well, at least they didn't name it "ei ei"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>Joo = yes in Finnish yesyes Well , at least they did n't name it " ei ei " : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Joo = yes in Finnish

yesyes

Well, at least they didn't name it "ei ei" :p</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358394</id>
	<title>Would have bought a Crunchpad, not buying this...</title>
	<author>Mage66</author>
	<datestamp>1260183960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A Crunchpad at $299 would have been a no-brainer. A JuJu at $499 is too expensive.

I'll wait for Nohrtec to come out with the Touchpad version of the Gecko laptop instead.

It seems that the people behind the Juju missed the point of the Crunchpad. It was supposed to be COST REDUCED because it had no internal storage, and used the cloud for all the apps. Not, a premium cost product.

Maybe Arrington will get with Nohrtec and get something like that produced.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Crunchpad at $ 299 would have been a no-brainer .
A JuJu at $ 499 is too expensive .
I 'll wait for Nohrtec to come out with the Touchpad version of the Gecko laptop instead .
It seems that the people behind the Juju missed the point of the Crunchpad .
It was supposed to be COST REDUCED because it had no internal storage , and used the cloud for all the apps .
Not , a premium cost product .
Maybe Arrington will get with Nohrtec and get something like that produced .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Crunchpad at $299 would have been a no-brainer.
A JuJu at $499 is too expensive.
I'll wait for Nohrtec to come out with the Touchpad version of the Gecko laptop instead.
It seems that the people behind the Juju missed the point of the Crunchpad.
It was supposed to be COST REDUCED because it had no internal storage, and used the cloud for all the apps.
Not, a premium cost product.
Maybe Arrington will get with Nohrtec and get something like that produced.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363026</id>
	<title>The DioBrando would be..</title>
	<author>WarwickRyan</author>
	<datestamp>1260266760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..a far more fitting enemy for a JoJo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..a far more fitting enemy for a JoJo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..a far more fitting enemy for a JoJo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359732</id>
	<title>Re:How many CPUs (cores) does this thing have?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1260191520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF kind of person sees an article about a $200 (supposedly) super-light tablet and immediately asks how many cores it has? How is that even slightly relevant for a machine of this class?</p><p>It obviously has 256 cores and can beat Deep Blue at chess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF kind of person sees an article about a $ 200 ( supposedly ) super-light tablet and immediately asks how many cores it has ?
How is that even slightly relevant for a machine of this class ? It obviously has 256 cores and can beat Deep Blue at chess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF kind of person sees an article about a $200 (supposedly) super-light tablet and immediately asks how many cores it has?
How is that even slightly relevant for a machine of this class?It obviously has 256 cores and can beat Deep Blue at chess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358420</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1260184140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like Digital Picture Frames last year.  You could buy a 7-9 inch portable DVD player with remote for less than $100, or you could buy a 5 inch picture frame for the same price</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like Digital Picture Frames last year .
You could buy a 7-9 inch portable DVD player with remote for less than $ 100 , or you could buy a 5 inch picture frame for the same price</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like Digital Picture Frames last year.
You could buy a 7-9 inch portable DVD player with remote for less than $100, or you could buy a 5 inch picture frame for the same price</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358474</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1260184500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No one would have thought that laptops would overtake the desktop market, but here we are.  The reason for this is not just smaller size, but often dramatically reduced costs over desktops.  Sure you can't upgrade, but the laptop can be a very inexpensive machine.
<p>
This is what i think will happen to the tablet.  We are talking about a solid state machine, no movable parts.  This increases reliability, and decreases costs.  As long as the machine can do what people want, there would be no reason to pay more.
</p><p>
I am looking at a time in the not too distance future when tablets are $200.  Not running Mac OS, because Apple is going to build a pretty tablet, and not running MS Windows, because the license to windows will be too costly, but custom *nix varients, or even android.  Of course at some point MS will move in and subsidize to gain market share, but unless MS Windoes runs on non x86 kit, this might even be a challenge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one would have thought that laptops would overtake the desktop market , but here we are .
The reason for this is not just smaller size , but often dramatically reduced costs over desktops .
Sure you ca n't upgrade , but the laptop can be a very inexpensive machine .
This is what i think will happen to the tablet .
We are talking about a solid state machine , no movable parts .
This increases reliability , and decreases costs .
As long as the machine can do what people want , there would be no reason to pay more .
I am looking at a time in the not too distance future when tablets are $ 200 .
Not running Mac OS , because Apple is going to build a pretty tablet , and not running MS Windows , because the license to windows will be too costly , but custom * nix varients , or even android .
Of course at some point MS will move in and subsidize to gain market share , but unless MS Windoes runs on non x86 kit , this might even be a challenge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one would have thought that laptops would overtake the desktop market, but here we are.
The reason for this is not just smaller size, but often dramatically reduced costs over desktops.
Sure you can't upgrade, but the laptop can be a very inexpensive machine.
This is what i think will happen to the tablet.
We are talking about a solid state machine, no movable parts.
This increases reliability, and decreases costs.
As long as the machine can do what people want, there would be no reason to pay more.
I am looking at a time in the not too distance future when tablets are $200.
Not running Mac OS, because Apple is going to build a pretty tablet, and not running MS Windows, because the license to windows will be too costly, but custom *nix varients, or even android.
Of course at some point MS will move in and subsidize to gain market share, but unless MS Windoes runs on non x86 kit, this might even be a challenge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360644</id>
	<title>Re:There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>Petrushka</author>
	<datestamp>1260198420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The HitlerHitler</p></div><p>Well, it's better than Vista.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The HitlerHitlerWell , it 's better than Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The HitlerHitlerWell, it's better than Vista.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That&rsquo;s basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That    s basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That’s basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30364072</id>
	<title>Re:As much as I hate Apple</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1260281760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;After Apple abandoned me and tens of thousands of other Apple ][ and ][+ owners almost thirty years ago</p><p>What the hell was Apple supposed to do?  Keep building obsolete 8-bit machines?  Their transition from the 8-bit Apple line to the 32-bit Macintosh line was no different than what other manufacturers were doing at that time.  Atari transitioned from 8 bit 400/800s to the 32-bit ST, and Commodore transitioned from the 64/128 to the Amiga.  Nintendo/Sega transitioned from NES/SMS to SNES/Genesis.</p><p>Your complaint is unreasonable IMHO, given the market of the late 80s.  Every company was making this "jump" from the old 8-bit tech to the newer technologies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; After Apple abandoned me and tens of thousands of other Apple ] [ and ] [ + owners almost thirty years agoWhat the hell was Apple supposed to do ?
Keep building obsolete 8-bit machines ?
Their transition from the 8-bit Apple line to the 32-bit Macintosh line was no different than what other manufacturers were doing at that time .
Atari transitioned from 8 bit 400/800s to the 32-bit ST , and Commodore transitioned from the 64/128 to the Amiga .
Nintendo/Sega transitioned from NES/SMS to SNES/Genesis.Your complaint is unreasonable IMHO , given the market of the late 80s .
Every company was making this " jump " from the old 8-bit tech to the newer technologies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;After Apple abandoned me and tens of thousands of other Apple ][ and ][+ owners almost thirty years agoWhat the hell was Apple supposed to do?
Keep building obsolete 8-bit machines?
Their transition from the 8-bit Apple line to the 32-bit Macintosh line was no different than what other manufacturers were doing at that time.
Atari transitioned from 8 bit 400/800s to the 32-bit ST, and Commodore transitioned from the 64/128 to the Amiga.
Nintendo/Sega transitioned from NES/SMS to SNES/Genesis.Your complaint is unreasonable IMHO, given the market of the late 80s.
Every company was making this "jump" from the old 8-bit tech to the newer technologies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360348</id>
	<title>Re:There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260196320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>People like you should be put in camps and systematically slaughtered.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People like you should be put in camps and systematically slaughtered .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People like you should be put in camps and systematically slaughtered.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362368</id>
	<title>Re:Cautious</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1260214500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really dont get what his response has to do with the legal issues.  If ownership was shared as Arrington already stated, it doesnt matter if he couldnt deliver AFAIK-- you cant just oust a co-owner like that and claim 100\% ownership.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really dont get what his response has to do with the legal issues .
If ownership was shared as Arrington already stated , it doesnt matter if he couldnt deliver AFAIK-- you cant just oust a co-owner like that and claim 100 \ % ownership .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really dont get what his response has to do with the legal issues.
If ownership was shared as Arrington already stated, it doesnt matter if he couldnt deliver AFAIK-- you cant just oust a co-owner like that and claim 100\% ownership.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359008</id>
	<title>Re:There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260187380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surely the joke should be:</p><p>There's two Joos, that's why it costs twice as much!</p><p>PS I am Jewish and can therefore make this joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely the joke should be : There 's two Joos , that 's why it costs twice as much ! PS I am Jewish and can therefore make this joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surely the joke should be:There's two Joos, that's why it costs twice as much!PS I am Jewish and can therefore make this joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361146</id>
	<title>Re:Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260202500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>bad joojoo associated with this product..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>bad joojoo associated with this product. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bad joojoo associated with this product..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</id>
	<title>Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1260182040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The technology would have to be extra special to make up for the price point and name. JooJoo? What were they thinking?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The technology would have to be extra special to make up for the price point and name .
JooJoo ? What were they thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The technology would have to be extra special to make up for the price point and name.
JooJoo? What were they thinking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362002</id>
	<title>Re:Cautious</title>
	<author>atamido</author>
	<datestamp>1260210480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ooh, just found this in the <a href="http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:P\_-Nbt67tloJ:www.fusiongarage.com/blog/+http://www.fusiongarage.com/blog&amp;cd=1&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;gl=us" title="74.125.155.132">Google Cache of Fusiongarage's blog</a> [74.125.155.132] (blog is now removed).</p><p>From January 19th, 2009</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There is an air of excitement permeating through Fusion Garage at the moment. Michael Arrington of Techcrunch just wrote an update on the Techcrunch Tablet Prototype B.</p><p>It&rsquo;s our software that is running on the tablet as demonstrated in the videos embedded in the article. We continue to work with Louis Monier on the feature set and the user experience. We are thrilled with this progress and would like to take the opportunity to thank Michael and Louis for giving us the opportunity to work with them on the Techcrunch Tablet.</p><p>Its early days yet but we are big believers of the Browser As An Operating System and the Techcrunch Tablet Initiative.</p><p>A nice way to begin 2009 here at FusionGarage !</p></div><p>  And then February 4th, 2009 </p><p><div class="quote"><p>The collaboration with the Crunchpad project happened as a result of meetings we had with Mike Arrington and co, subsequent to TC50. We worked closely with Louis Monier in getting the software in shape for the hardware prototype B. We continue to work with them in getting the software in shape to make crunchpad a easy to use device. This is where we stand as of prototype-B: (Details over at TechCrunch&rsquo;s update )</p></div><p>  Then from the PCMag piece today, </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Simply put, however, Arrington was unable to deliver, Rathakrishnan said. As a result, Fusion Garage completed the development of the OS, hired the necessary expertise to complete the hardware side of the equation, solved remaining technology issues, and worked on arrangements with OEMs.</p><p>Fusion Garage secured funding from its shareholders, which now totals $3 million, he said.</p><p>Rathakrishnan acknowledged that "many conversations" did take place with Arrington and that Arrington set up CrunchPad Inc., which would have been a vehicle for distribution of the device, but "ultimately nothing came out" of that. No contracts of any kind were ever signed, he said.</p><p>"TechCrunch didn't contribute a single line of code," Rathakrishnan said. "It was Fusion Garage that brought the device from the dead."</p></div><p> That doesn't sound very consistent with the blog posts.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ooh , just found this in the Google Cache of Fusiongarage 's blog [ 74.125.155.132 ] ( blog is now removed ) .From January 19th , 2009There is an air of excitement permeating through Fusion Garage at the moment .
Michael Arrington of Techcrunch just wrote an update on the Techcrunch Tablet Prototype B.It    s our software that is running on the tablet as demonstrated in the videos embedded in the article .
We continue to work with Louis Monier on the feature set and the user experience .
We are thrilled with this progress and would like to take the opportunity to thank Michael and Louis for giving us the opportunity to work with them on the Techcrunch Tablet.Its early days yet but we are big believers of the Browser As An Operating System and the Techcrunch Tablet Initiative.A nice way to begin 2009 here at FusionGarage !
And then February 4th , 2009 The collaboration with the Crunchpad project happened as a result of meetings we had with Mike Arrington and co , subsequent to TC50 .
We worked closely with Louis Monier in getting the software in shape for the hardware prototype B. We continue to work with them in getting the software in shape to make crunchpad a easy to use device .
This is where we stand as of prototype-B : ( Details over at TechCrunch    s update ) Then from the PCMag piece today , Simply put , however , Arrington was unable to deliver , Rathakrishnan said .
As a result , Fusion Garage completed the development of the OS , hired the necessary expertise to complete the hardware side of the equation , solved remaining technology issues , and worked on arrangements with OEMs.Fusion Garage secured funding from its shareholders , which now totals $ 3 million , he said.Rathakrishnan acknowledged that " many conversations " did take place with Arrington and that Arrington set up CrunchPad Inc. , which would have been a vehicle for distribution of the device , but " ultimately nothing came out " of that .
No contracts of any kind were ever signed , he said .
" TechCrunch did n't contribute a single line of code , " Rathakrishnan said .
" It was Fusion Garage that brought the device from the dead .
" That does n't sound very consistent with the blog posts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ooh, just found this in the Google Cache of Fusiongarage's blog [74.125.155.132] (blog is now removed).From January 19th, 2009There is an air of excitement permeating through Fusion Garage at the moment.
Michael Arrington of Techcrunch just wrote an update on the Techcrunch Tablet Prototype B.It’s our software that is running on the tablet as demonstrated in the videos embedded in the article.
We continue to work with Louis Monier on the feature set and the user experience.
We are thrilled with this progress and would like to take the opportunity to thank Michael and Louis for giving us the opportunity to work with them on the Techcrunch Tablet.Its early days yet but we are big believers of the Browser As An Operating System and the Techcrunch Tablet Initiative.A nice way to begin 2009 here at FusionGarage !
And then February 4th, 2009 The collaboration with the Crunchpad project happened as a result of meetings we had with Mike Arrington and co, subsequent to TC50.
We worked closely with Louis Monier in getting the software in shape for the hardware prototype B. We continue to work with them in getting the software in shape to make crunchpad a easy to use device.
This is where we stand as of prototype-B: (Details over at TechCrunch’s update )  Then from the PCMag piece today, Simply put, however, Arrington was unable to deliver, Rathakrishnan said.
As a result, Fusion Garage completed the development of the OS, hired the necessary expertise to complete the hardware side of the equation, solved remaining technology issues, and worked on arrangements with OEMs.Fusion Garage secured funding from its shareholders, which now totals $3 million, he said.Rathakrishnan acknowledged that "many conversations" did take place with Arrington and that Arrington set up CrunchPad Inc., which would have been a vehicle for distribution of the device, but "ultimately nothing came out" of that.
No contracts of any kind were ever signed, he said.
"TechCrunch didn't contribute a single line of code," Rathakrishnan said.
"It was Fusion Garage that brought the device from the dead.
" That doesn't sound very consistent with the blog posts.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276</id>
	<title>Price alone shows "crunchpad" was vapor idea...</title>
	<author>nweaver</author>
	<datestamp>1260183420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The CrunchPad model only made sense at the low price: something inexpensive and universal.</p><p>But the low price never made sense.  Apple doesn't make much money on the iPod touch, and they have all the huge economies of scale, and its still costs $200 for the 8 GB model.  Add in a MUCH larger screen and bigger battery and of course the price will balloon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The CrunchPad model only made sense at the low price : something inexpensive and universal.But the low price never made sense .
Apple does n't make much money on the iPod touch , and they have all the huge economies of scale , and its still costs $ 200 for the 8 GB model .
Add in a MUCH larger screen and bigger battery and of course the price will balloon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CrunchPad model only made sense at the low price: something inexpensive and universal.But the low price never made sense.
Apple doesn't make much money on the iPod touch, and they have all the huge economies of scale, and its still costs $200 for the 8 GB model.
Add in a MUCH larger screen and bigger battery and of course the price will balloon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359162</id>
	<title>Re:Embarrassing parallel</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1260188100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well I'm not going to be doing any video encoding.  I suppose having a "spare" core is handy but otherwise 3 or more is not needed for the average web surfer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well I 'm not going to be doing any video encoding .
I suppose having a " spare " core is handy but otherwise 3 or more is not needed for the average web surfer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well I'm not going to be doing any video encoding.
I suppose having a "spare" core is handy but otherwise 3 or more is not needed for the average web surfer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358932</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358686</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>brillow</author>
	<datestamp>1260185580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the iPhone came out, it cost $500.  It was a fraction the size and had a fraction of the (computational) capability.

People went NUTS over it.

They should have apps though, if the iPhone taught us anything, its that "web apps" are not enough.

I am sure though that if this device ends up sticking around it will have apps.

I'm also pretty sure that someone will have it running windows 7 or ubuntu or android within two weeks of it coming out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the iPhone came out , it cost $ 500 .
It was a fraction the size and had a fraction of the ( computational ) capability .
People went NUTS over it .
They should have apps though , if the iPhone taught us anything , its that " web apps " are not enough .
I am sure though that if this device ends up sticking around it will have apps .
I 'm also pretty sure that someone will have it running windows 7 or ubuntu or android within two weeks of it coming out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the iPhone came out, it cost $500.
It was a fraction the size and had a fraction of the (computational) capability.
People went NUTS over it.
They should have apps though, if the iPhone taught us anything, its that "web apps" are not enough.
I am sure though that if this device ends up sticking around it will have apps.
I'm also pretty sure that someone will have it running windows 7 or ubuntu or android within two weeks of it coming out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260187020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; December 11th, midnight PST</p><p>I am the only non native English speaker that finds this date completely ambiguous ? Is it 2009-12-11 00:00 or 2009-12-12 00:00 ?</p><p>I don't know about power plugs, but their date/time format is definitely one thing the US didn't get right...<br>I'll skip the obviously weird mm/dd/yyyy pattern, and just ask who in his right mind thought that having 12pm precede 1pm, 2pm etc... would make sense ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; December 11th , midnight PSTI am the only non native English speaker that finds this date completely ambiguous ?
Is it 2009-12-11 00 : 00 or 2009-12-12 00 : 00 ? I do n't know about power plugs , but their date/time format is definitely one thing the US did n't get right...I 'll skip the obviously weird mm/dd/yyyy pattern , and just ask who in his right mind thought that having 12pm precede 1pm , 2pm etc... would make sense ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; December 11th, midnight PSTI am the only non native English speaker that finds this date completely ambiguous ?
Is it 2009-12-11 00:00 or 2009-12-12 00:00 ?I don't know about power plugs, but their date/time format is definitely one thing the US didn't get right...I'll skip the obviously weird mm/dd/yyyy pattern, and just ask who in his right mind thought that having 12pm precede 1pm, 2pm etc... would make sense ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358496</id>
	<title>Thank goodness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260184560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they'd never have been taken seriously with a name like CrunchPad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they 'd never have been taken seriously with a name like CrunchPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they'd never have been taken seriously with a name like CrunchPad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358224</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1260183180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but e-book readers are apparently the hot item for the Holidays this year. If you can sell a device with a slow-refreshing screen that only does 16 levels of grayscale and supports no applications except a document viewer and (maybe) a stripped-down Web browser for $260, why wouldn't people be willing to buy a more fully-featured device for a similar price? I've been in the market for some kind of tablet as a secondary computing device for a long time, and I'm sure I'm not alone.</p><p>Note I said "similar price," though. At $500 this thing is definitely too expensive to succeed. Spending more than a few hundred dollars on a device that will never be more than a satellite client seems more than a little prodigal -- but something like a Nokia n810 with an 8" screen would be welcome if the price was right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but e-book readers are apparently the hot item for the Holidays this year .
If you can sell a device with a slow-refreshing screen that only does 16 levels of grayscale and supports no applications except a document viewer and ( maybe ) a stripped-down Web browser for $ 260 , why would n't people be willing to buy a more fully-featured device for a similar price ?
I 've been in the market for some kind of tablet as a secondary computing device for a long time , and I 'm sure I 'm not alone.Note I said " similar price , " though .
At $ 500 this thing is definitely too expensive to succeed .
Spending more than a few hundred dollars on a device that will never be more than a satellite client seems more than a little prodigal -- but something like a Nokia n810 with an 8 " screen would be welcome if the price was right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but e-book readers are apparently the hot item for the Holidays this year.
If you can sell a device with a slow-refreshing screen that only does 16 levels of grayscale and supports no applications except a document viewer and (maybe) a stripped-down Web browser for $260, why wouldn't people be willing to buy a more fully-featured device for a similar price?
I've been in the market for some kind of tablet as a secondary computing device for a long time, and I'm sure I'm not alone.Note I said "similar price," though.
At $500 this thing is definitely too expensive to succeed.
Spending more than a few hundred dollars on a device that will never be more than a satellite client seems more than a little prodigal -- but something like a Nokia n810 with an 8" screen would be welcome if the price was right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358472</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>the\_wesman</author>
	<datestamp>1260184500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>jar jar was taken</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>jar jar was taken</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jar jar was taken</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358504</id>
	<title>Re:Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1260184620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as "the cloud" can mean a server I control, that's fine.</p><p>Of course, for $500, I could get a pretty kick-ass laptop, or a matching pair of netbooks, or a Kindle/Nook and a netbook.</p><p>Still, it's probably a nifty neato early adopters toy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as " the cloud " can mean a server I control , that 's fine.Of course , for $ 500 , I could get a pretty kick-ass laptop , or a matching pair of netbooks , or a Kindle/Nook and a netbook.Still , it 's probably a nifty neato early adopters toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as "the cloud" can mean a server I control, that's fine.Of course, for $500, I could get a pretty kick-ass laptop, or a matching pair of netbooks, or a Kindle/Nook and a netbook.Still, it's probably a nifty neato early adopters toy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359816</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1260192000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>That's basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.</i> </p><p>Nintendo has brand-name recognition.</p><p>The first choice in casual, social, family-oriented gaming.</p><p> The console was attractively priced and had an innovative new controller.</p><p> Wii Fit was a brilliant way of attracting the ever-elusive female customer to the console gaming market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii .
Nintendo has brand-name recognition.The first choice in casual , social , family-oriented gaming .
The console was attractively priced and had an innovative new controller .
Wii Fit was a brilliant way of attracting the ever-elusive female customer to the console gaming market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.
Nintendo has brand-name recognition.The first choice in casual, social, family-oriented gaming.
The console was attractively priced and had an innovative new controller.
Wii Fit was a brilliant way of attracting the ever-elusive female customer to the console gaming market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360136</id>
	<title>Tablets will make the market the ultimate, period.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260194460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many incarnations have we seen?</p><p>- Windows for Pen - Win 3.11<br>- Windows 95-ME - various tablet-targetted stuffs..<br>- Windows XP Tablet Edition<br>- MacBook/Powerbook conversions<br>- Fujitsu Stylistic, etc..<br>- Vadem Clio<br>- iPod/Phone<br>- Newton<br>- Palm, and all subsequent handhelds of similar form factor and utility<br>- Nokia nSeries<br>- WinCE</p><p>They all strive for the same thing;  the liberation of Mankind from the mechanical keyboard.</p><p>They persist for some reason, and that reason may likely be construed as justification for hardware makers to continue with the 'keyboardless PC' paradigm until the ultimate combination of human/display interaction is achieved.</p><p>With all the positive spin, I can't help but act as an advocate of Beelzebub in saying that "we won't hit bottom, and thus success, until the thing displays wireless, non-cancer-inducing video on the back side of a contact lens, with a human interface which is accessible as a neural implant.</p><p>Wake me in 2020.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many incarnations have we seen ? - Windows for Pen - Win 3.11- Windows 95-ME - various tablet-targetted stuffs..- Windows XP Tablet Edition- MacBook/Powerbook conversions- Fujitsu Stylistic , etc..- Vadem Clio- iPod/Phone- Newton- Palm , and all subsequent handhelds of similar form factor and utility- Nokia nSeries- WinCEThey all strive for the same thing ; the liberation of Mankind from the mechanical keyboard.They persist for some reason , and that reason may likely be construed as justification for hardware makers to continue with the 'keyboardless PC ' paradigm until the ultimate combination of human/display interaction is achieved.With all the positive spin , I ca n't help but act as an advocate of Beelzebub in saying that " we wo n't hit bottom , and thus success , until the thing displays wireless , non-cancer-inducing video on the back side of a contact lens , with a human interface which is accessible as a neural implant.Wake me in 2020 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many incarnations have we seen?- Windows for Pen - Win 3.11- Windows 95-ME - various tablet-targetted stuffs..- Windows XP Tablet Edition- MacBook/Powerbook conversions- Fujitsu Stylistic, etc..- Vadem Clio- iPod/Phone- Newton- Palm, and all subsequent handhelds of similar form factor and utility- Nokia nSeries- WinCEThey all strive for the same thing;  the liberation of Mankind from the mechanical keyboard.They persist for some reason, and that reason may likely be construed as justification for hardware makers to continue with the 'keyboardless PC' paradigm until the ultimate combination of human/display interaction is achieved.With all the positive spin, I can't help but act as an advocate of Beelzebub in saying that "we won't hit bottom, and thus success, until the thing displays wireless, non-cancer-inducing video on the back side of a contact lens, with a human interface which is accessible as a neural implant.Wake me in 2020.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358116</id>
	<title>Conspiracy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The entire marketing drama behind all this was all a ploy. Call me crazy, but think about it: Market a new device that does some amazing stuff at a ridiculously low price. So low that you could never make a profit. Wait til all the news sites pick it up. Then stage a coup. During that coup have a takeover, and re-release the device at a sensible price under a different name. Free marketing.<br> <br>
Brb gotta go make a tin foil hat now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire marketing drama behind all this was all a ploy .
Call me crazy , but think about it : Market a new device that does some amazing stuff at a ridiculously low price .
So low that you could never make a profit .
Wait til all the news sites pick it up .
Then stage a coup .
During that coup have a takeover , and re-release the device at a sensible price under a different name .
Free marketing .
Brb got ta go make a tin foil hat now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The entire marketing drama behind all this was all a ploy.
Call me crazy, but think about it: Market a new device that does some amazing stuff at a ridiculously low price.
So low that you could never make a profit.
Wait til all the news sites pick it up.
Then stage a coup.
During that coup have a takeover, and re-release the device at a sensible price under a different name.
Free marketing.
Brb gotta go make a tin foil hat now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358530</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>mysidia</author>
	<datestamp>1260184800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
The price-point seems like highway robbery for what it does.
</p><p>
Pure greed, as further evidenced by ownership drama mentioned in article.
</p><p>
I have no doubt someone started seeing dollar signs, got drunk with greed and started making some really crappy decisions.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The price-point seems like highway robbery for what it does .
Pure greed , as further evidenced by ownership drama mentioned in article .
I have no doubt someone started seeing dollar signs , got drunk with greed and started making some really crappy decisions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
The price-point seems like highway robbery for what it does.
Pure greed, as further evidenced by ownership drama mentioned in article.
I have no doubt someone started seeing dollar signs, got drunk with greed and started making some really crappy decisions.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358466</id>
	<title>JooJoo is the Cantonese pronounciation of...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A penis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A penis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A penis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</id>
	<title>Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1260182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see the pure tablet play working, not from JooJoo, not even from apple - it's always going to be a niche, and a small one.</p><p>The one way I can perhaps see it working is if you either build in a collapsible keyboard, or let them work with bluetooth keyboards and have some way to attach it making a kind of temporary laptop.  There are just too many uses of a computer where the ability to type for long periods is needed, to get away without a real keyboard in a larger form factor.  There are already netbooks with touch screens and that just seems way more practical.</p><p>JooJoo has issues outside the name though, the price point does not seem great for what it does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the pure tablet play working , not from JooJoo , not even from apple - it 's always going to be a niche , and a small one.The one way I can perhaps see it working is if you either build in a collapsible keyboard , or let them work with bluetooth keyboards and have some way to attach it making a kind of temporary laptop .
There are just too many uses of a computer where the ability to type for long periods is needed , to get away without a real keyboard in a larger form factor .
There are already netbooks with touch screens and that just seems way more practical.JooJoo has issues outside the name though , the price point does not seem great for what it does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the pure tablet play working, not from JooJoo, not even from apple - it's always going to be a niche, and a small one.The one way I can perhaps see it working is if you either build in a collapsible keyboard, or let them work with bluetooth keyboards and have some way to attach it making a kind of temporary laptop.
There are just too many uses of a computer where the ability to type for long periods is needed, to get away without a real keyboard in a larger form factor.
There are already netbooks with touch screens and that just seems way more practical.JooJoo has issues outside the name though, the price point does not seem great for what it does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358364</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>Julie188</author>
	<datestamp>1260183780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. Hard to see the average person buying a tablet for $500, when you can add a digital pen/tablet input device, like from Wacom, for about $99. I guess there is the lug-it-around factor<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... if you need to do a lot of drawing out in the field. But that's a niche.

I'm a keyboard kind-a-girl myself.

--
Julie</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
Hard to see the average person buying a tablet for $ 500 , when you can add a digital pen/tablet input device , like from Wacom , for about $ 99 .
I guess there is the lug-it-around factor ... if you need to do a lot of drawing out in the field .
But that 's a niche .
I 'm a keyboard kind-a-girl myself .
-- Julie</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
Hard to see the average person buying a tablet for $500, when you can add a digital pen/tablet input device, like from Wacom, for about $99.
I guess there is the lug-it-around factor ... if you need to do a lot of drawing out in the field.
But that's a niche.
I'm a keyboard kind-a-girl myself.
--
Julie</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363316</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1260271860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you're short-sighted. Many people use a computer for hours and only need to type in the odd word, URL, or send a short message. Most people don't need a hardware keyboard for that. Surely the iPhone has proven this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you 're short-sighted .
Many people use a computer for hours and only need to type in the odd word , URL , or send a short message .
Most people do n't need a hardware keyboard for that .
Surely the iPhone has proven this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you're short-sighted.
Many people use a computer for hours and only need to type in the odd word, URL, or send a short message.
Most people don't need a hardware keyboard for that.
Surely the iPhone has proven this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362018</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260210600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't see the pure tablet play working, not from JooJoo, not even from apple - it's always going to be a niche, and a small one.</p></div><p>I distinctly remember PDAs to be on a dying bed before the iPhone showed up. Now everyone's in a hurry to make PDAs -- err, smart phones -- again. Don't underestimate the power of the reality distortion field: it's real.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the pure tablet play working , not from JooJoo , not even from apple - it 's always going to be a niche , and a small one.I distinctly remember PDAs to be on a dying bed before the iPhone showed up .
Now everyone 's in a hurry to make PDAs -- err , smart phones -- again .
Do n't underestimate the power of the reality distortion field : it 's real .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the pure tablet play working, not from JooJoo, not even from apple - it's always going to be a niche, and a small one.I distinctly remember PDAs to be on a dying bed before the iPhone showed up.
Now everyone's in a hurry to make PDAs -- err, smart phones -- again.
Don't underestimate the power of the reality distortion field: it's real.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360552</id>
	<title>Re:Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>BillX</author>
	<datestamp>1260197820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Woohoo, free backups!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Woohoo , free backups !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Woohoo, free backups!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358368</id>
	<title>Re:JooJoo?</title>
	<author>Knara</author>
	<datestamp>1260183840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or MojoJojo?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or MojoJojo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or MojoJojo?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362266</id>
	<title>Re:As much as I hate Apple</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1260213360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"At the $250 price level, the larger screen would have been worth it; at $500, no way."</i>
<br> <br>
Let's not forget there's a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/04/crunchpad-litigation/" title="techcrunch.com">huge legal battle going on too</a> [techcrunch.com], and these companies aren't exactly dell, they don't have billions to fight off in court, if they go under and something breaks on your $500 JooJoo how do you get your money back from a defunct company in Taiwan?  And how does this Taiwan company think they own it?  If I went to some guy and said "hey i want you to build this for me, here's the design and schematic", and he said screw off, built it himself and sold a million copies, I think I'd have some legal recourse.
<br> <br>
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.  Runs proprietary code so who knows what you can really do with it.  It's like a large iPod Touch at double the price with no developers and made in Taiwan, what good is it really?  How come I can <a href="http://www.dhgate.com/wholesale+ipod+touch.html?utm\_source=adwords&amp;utm\_medium=paid\_search&amp;utm\_term=ipod\%20touch\%20cheap&amp;utm\_content=3482877358&amp;utm\_campaign=26\%20Apple\%20iPod\%20touch\%20Buy\%20PS\%20AW&amp;f=txd\%7Cpaid\_search\%7Cadwords\%7Cipod\%20touch\%20cheap\%7C3482877358\%7C26\%20Apple\%20iPod\%20touch\%20Buy\%20PS\%20AW\%7CPBC1M1\%7CWLY\%7CDY" title="dhgate.com">buy a fake iPod touch for $50</a> [dhgate.com] but this thing is $500 and really just a larger iPod Touch?  Something doesn't add up.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" At the $ 250 price level , the larger screen would have been worth it ; at $ 500 , no way .
" Let 's not forget there 's a huge legal battle going on too [ techcrunch.com ] , and these companies are n't exactly dell , they do n't have billions to fight off in court , if they go under and something breaks on your $ 500 JooJoo how do you get your money back from a defunct company in Taiwan ?
And how does this Taiwan company think they own it ?
If I went to some guy and said " hey i want you to build this for me , here 's the design and schematic " , and he said screw off , built it himself and sold a million copies , I think I 'd have some legal recourse .
This whole thing stinks to high heaven .
Runs proprietary code so who knows what you can really do with it .
It 's like a large iPod Touch at double the price with no developers and made in Taiwan , what good is it really ?
How come I can buy a fake iPod touch for $ 50 [ dhgate.com ] but this thing is $ 500 and really just a larger iPod Touch ?
Something does n't add up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"At the $250 price level, the larger screen would have been worth it; at $500, no way.
"
 
Let's not forget there's a huge legal battle going on too [techcrunch.com], and these companies aren't exactly dell, they don't have billions to fight off in court, if they go under and something breaks on your $500 JooJoo how do you get your money back from a defunct company in Taiwan?
And how does this Taiwan company think they own it?
If I went to some guy and said "hey i want you to build this for me, here's the design and schematic", and he said screw off, built it himself and sold a million copies, I think I'd have some legal recourse.
This whole thing stinks to high heaven.
Runs proprietary code so who knows what you can really do with it.
It's like a large iPod Touch at double the price with no developers and made in Taiwan, what good is it really?
How come I can buy a fake iPod touch for $50 [dhgate.com] but this thing is $500 and really just a larger iPod Touch?
Something doesn't add up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358344</id>
	<title>Re:Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1260183660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No doubt so the Elders of Zion (who live in the clouds) can read your data.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No doubt so the Elders of Zion ( who live in the clouds ) can read your data .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No doubt so the Elders of Zion (who live in the clouds) can read your data.
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358494</id>
	<title>Re:How many CPUs (cores) does this thing have?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260184560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, there's a benefit to more than 2 cores.  Why would you suggest there's not?  I ran a video encode yesterday that happily used 100\% of all four cores, and encoded at faster-than-realtime.  It would have taken twice as long with only two cores.  It would have taken half as long with 8, assuming it can take advantage of that many.  If not, then I could have used the computer with no performance hit while it was going.  Still a win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , there 's a benefit to more than 2 cores .
Why would you suggest there 's not ?
I ran a video encode yesterday that happily used 100 \ % of all four cores , and encoded at faster-than-realtime .
It would have taken twice as long with only two cores .
It would have taken half as long with 8 , assuming it can take advantage of that many .
If not , then I could have used the computer with no performance hit while it was going .
Still a win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, there's a benefit to more than 2 cores.
Why would you suggest there's not?
I ran a video encode yesterday that happily used 100\% of all four cores, and encoded at faster-than-realtime.
It would have taken twice as long with only two cores.
It would have taken half as long with 8, assuming it can take advantage of that many.
If not, then I could have used the computer with no performance hit while it was going.
Still a win.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360588</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1260198060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't see the pure tablet play working, not from JooJoo, not even from apple</p></div></blockquote><p>Apple already has a tablet, it's called the iPhone. The only thing that distinguishes it from what people normally imagine when they think of "tablet computer" is the size. It would be a tablet PC all the way, if only it had some decent software.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the pure tablet play working , not from JooJoo , not even from appleApple already has a tablet , it 's called the iPhone .
The only thing that distinguishes it from what people normally imagine when they think of " tablet computer " is the size .
It would be a tablet PC all the way , if only it had some decent software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the pure tablet play working, not from JooJoo, not even from appleApple already has a tablet, it's called the iPhone.
The only thing that distinguishes it from what people normally imagine when they think of "tablet computer" is the size.
It would be a tablet PC all the way, if only it had some decent software.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358470</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Katatsumuri</author>
	<datestamp>1260184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They were probably thinking,
<br>
<br>"I am the eggman,
<br>They are the eggmen,
<br>I am the walrus!
<br>Goo-goo-goojoob!"
<br>
<br>At least I hope so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were probably thinking , " I am the eggman , They are the eggmen , I am the walrus !
Goo-goo-goojoob ! " At least I hope so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were probably thinking,

"I am the eggman,
They are the eggmen,
I am the walrus!
Goo-goo-goojoob!"

At least I hope so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358562</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>BasilBrush</author>
	<datestamp>1260184980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Apple makes one it'll do more than web browsing. It'll do at least as much as the iPod Touch. Amongst other things that means innumerable applications a couple of clicks away in an app store.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Apple makes one it 'll do more than web browsing .
It 'll do at least as much as the iPod Touch .
Amongst other things that means innumerable applications a couple of clicks away in an app store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Apple makes one it'll do more than web browsing.
It'll do at least as much as the iPod Touch.
Amongst other things that means innumerable applications a couple of clicks away in an app store.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30369990</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>metamatic</author>
	<datestamp>1260265200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The reason for this is not just smaller size, but often dramatically reduced costs over desktops.</p></div></blockquote><p>Laptops cheaper than comparable desktops? Please tell us where you buy your laptops!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason for this is not just smaller size , but often dramatically reduced costs over desktops.Laptops cheaper than comparable desktops ?
Please tell us where you buy your laptops !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason for this is not just smaller size, but often dramatically reduced costs over desktops.Laptops cheaper than comparable desktops?
Please tell us where you buy your laptops!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358310</id>
	<title>Boycott?</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1260183540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming Arrington really has a legitimate stake in the thing, I suggest we boycott it until Rathakrishnan cries uncle.  If he has no market for it, then his 'theft' gains him nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming Arrington really has a legitimate stake in the thing , I suggest we boycott it until Rathakrishnan cries uncle .
If he has no market for it , then his 'theft ' gains him nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming Arrington really has a legitimate stake in the thing, I suggest we boycott it until Rathakrishnan cries uncle.
If he has no market for it, then his 'theft' gains him nothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363428</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Genda</author>
	<datestamp>1260273420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hhmmmmm, the "I-Joo", Ya think we could have Safari in Yiddish??? Oyyy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hhmmmmm , the " I-Joo " , Ya think we could have Safari in Yiddish ? ? ?
Oyyy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hhmmmmm, the "I-Joo", Ya think we could have Safari in Yiddish???
Oyyy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359238</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260188400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not at all ambiguous.  Midnight December 11th is 2009-12-11 00:00.  This is clear because Midday December 11th is 2009-12-11 12:00.  "Half past midnight" December 11th is 2009-12-11 00:30.  There's no ambiguity at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not at all ambiguous .
Midnight December 11th is 2009-12-11 00 : 00 .
This is clear because Midday December 11th is 2009-12-11 12 : 00 .
" Half past midnight " December 11th is 2009-12-11 00 : 30 .
There 's no ambiguity at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not at all ambiguous.
Midnight December 11th is 2009-12-11 00:00.
This is clear because Midday December 11th is 2009-12-11 12:00.
"Half past midnight" December 11th is 2009-12-11 00:30.
There's no ambiguity at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30369934</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260264840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is perfectly clear. Midnight belongs to the day it precedes, not the day it followed. It is 2009-12-11 00:00. Anyone who is confused by this just doesn&rsquo;t understand how dates work.</p><p>The time goes:<br>2009-12-10 23:59:59<br><strong>2009-12-11 00:00:00</strong><br>2009-12-11 00:00:01<br>etc.<br>2009-12-11 23:59:59<br>2009-12-12 00:00:00<br>2009-12-12 00:00:01</p><p>Only one of those dates is midnight of 11 Dec. 2009. (Hint: I put it in bold to help you.)</p><p>As to the 12-hour time system, I have no idea why it was done the way it was done. Perhaps you could look it up and report back with what you find.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is perfectly clear .
Midnight belongs to the day it precedes , not the day it followed .
It is 2009-12-11 00 : 00 .
Anyone who is confused by this just doesn    t understand how dates work.The time goes : 2009-12-10 23 : 59 : 592009-12-11 00 : 00 : 002009-12-11 00 : 00 : 01etc.2009-12-11 23 : 59 : 592009-12-12 00 : 00 : 002009-12-12 00 : 00 : 01Only one of those dates is midnight of 11 Dec. 2009. ( Hint : I put it in bold to help you .
) As to the 12-hour time system , I have no idea why it was done the way it was done .
Perhaps you could look it up and report back with what you find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is perfectly clear.
Midnight belongs to the day it precedes, not the day it followed.
It is 2009-12-11 00:00.
Anyone who is confused by this just doesn’t understand how dates work.The time goes:2009-12-10 23:59:592009-12-11 00:00:002009-12-11 00:00:01etc.2009-12-11 23:59:592009-12-12 00:00:002009-12-12 00:00:01Only one of those dates is midnight of 11 Dec. 2009. (Hint: I put it in bold to help you.
)As to the 12-hour time system, I have no idea why it was done the way it was done.
Perhaps you could look it up and report back with what you find.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359328</id>
	<title>Re:Conspiracy!</title>
	<author>timster</author>
	<datestamp>1260188820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Call you crazy?  Not at all, I'm going to call you Obvious Man.  I'm not surprised that the gadget blogs all fell for this, since they essentially live off the hype machine, but the rest of us ought to know better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Call you crazy ?
Not at all , I 'm going to call you Obvious Man .
I 'm not surprised that the gadget blogs all fell for this , since they essentially live off the hype machine , but the rest of us ought to know better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Call you crazy?
Not at all, I'm going to call you Obvious Man.
I'm not surprised that the gadget blogs all fell for this, since they essentially live off the hype machine, but the rest of us ought to know better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362340</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260214200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.</p></div><p>You mean that they both sound like something a 3 year old calls their penis?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.You mean that they both sound like something a 3 year old calls their penis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's basically the same thing I said about the Nintendo Wii.You mean that they both sound like something a 3 year old calls their penis?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359336</id>
	<title>Re:Price alone shows "crunchpad" was vapor idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260188880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where do you get the idea that the touch is low profit?</p><p>http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2007/12/ipod-touch-breakdown-reveals-sky-high-margins-once-again.ars</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where do you get the idea that the touch is low profit ? http : //arstechnica.com/apple/news/2007/12/ipod-touch-breakdown-reveals-sky-high-margins-once-again.ars</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where do you get the idea that the touch is low profit?http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2007/12/ipod-touch-breakdown-reveals-sky-high-margins-once-again.ars</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358436</id>
	<title>Bad Juju</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1260184200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel bad things for this company's future.  Bad Juju, bad Mojo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel bad things for this company 's future .
Bad Juju , bad Mojo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel bad things for this company's future.
Bad Juju, bad Mojo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361786</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Caetel</author>
	<datestamp>1260208200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With Apple, I imagine the price would more likely be $700-$800.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With Apple , I imagine the price would more likely be $ 700- $ 800 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Apple, I imagine the price would more likely be $700-$800.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358722</id>
	<title>It's a TRAP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260185820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The <i>"Cloud"</i> is a <b>Losers Game</b>, stay away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Cloud " is a Losers Game , stay away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Cloud" is a Losers Game, stay away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358286</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1260183420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Yeah, but e-book readers are apparently the hot item for the Holidays this year. If you can sell a device with a slow-refreshing screen that only does 16 levels of grayscale and supports no applications except a document viewer and (maybe) a stripped-down Web browser for $260, why wouldn't people be willing to buy a more fully-featured device for a similar price?</i></p><p>Unless said "more fully-featured device" has an eink display, I think the answer to that is obvious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but e-book readers are apparently the hot item for the Holidays this year .
If you can sell a device with a slow-refreshing screen that only does 16 levels of grayscale and supports no applications except a document viewer and ( maybe ) a stripped-down Web browser for $ 260 , why would n't people be willing to buy a more fully-featured device for a similar price ? Unless said " more fully-featured device " has an eink display , I think the answer to that is obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but e-book readers are apparently the hot item for the Holidays this year.
If you can sell a device with a slow-refreshing screen that only does 16 levels of grayscale and supports no applications except a document viewer and (maybe) a stripped-down Web browser for $260, why wouldn't people be willing to buy a more fully-featured device for a similar price?Unless said "more fully-featured device" has an eink display, I think the answer to that is obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358082</id>
	<title>Price point???? ARRRGHGGGH!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People who use the phrase "price point" instead of "price" need to be shot in the head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People who use the phrase " price point " instead of " price " need to be shot in the head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People who use the phrase "price point" instead of "price" need to be shot in the head.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358586</id>
	<title>This small niche is critical for some</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260185100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I and others who develop software for people with disabilities have been looking forward to this device ever since it was announced.  We need very inexpensive tools that don't require computer skills (yes, I mean any computer skills in the conventional sense).  Video, text-to-speech, and animated "touch here if you want X" functionality can open up a lot of doors for some people.  Yes this can be done now with an uber-cheap Linux box and a small touch screen, but many social services are, for good reason, provided in the community, on the go, wherever the person in need happens to be.  This thing is a joke at $500.  The only people (other than novelty buyers) who would prefer it to a netbook at that price are people who, due to a disability, can't use a netbook, and those people don't fit into business models, and they are ignored.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I and others who develop software for people with disabilities have been looking forward to this device ever since it was announced .
We need very inexpensive tools that do n't require computer skills ( yes , I mean any computer skills in the conventional sense ) .
Video , text-to-speech , and animated " touch here if you want X " functionality can open up a lot of doors for some people .
Yes this can be done now with an uber-cheap Linux box and a small touch screen , but many social services are , for good reason , provided in the community , on the go , wherever the person in need happens to be .
This thing is a joke at $ 500 .
The only people ( other than novelty buyers ) who would prefer it to a netbook at that price are people who , due to a disability , ca n't use a netbook , and those people do n't fit into business models , and they are ignored .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I and others who develop software for people with disabilities have been looking forward to this device ever since it was announced.
We need very inexpensive tools that don't require computer skills (yes, I mean any computer skills in the conventional sense).
Video, text-to-speech, and animated "touch here if you want X" functionality can open up a lot of doors for some people.
Yes this can be done now with an uber-cheap Linux box and a small touch screen, but many social services are, for good reason, provided in the community, on the go, wherever the person in need happens to be.
This thing is a joke at $500.
The only people (other than novelty buyers) who would prefer it to a netbook at that price are people who, due to a disability, can't use a netbook, and those people don't fit into business models, and they are ignored.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358682</id>
	<title>Re:Price alone shows "crunchpad" was vapor idea...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A large part of Apple's costs came from miniaturizing the technology.  By making it larger, CrunchPad could use more parts not specifically developed for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A large part of Apple 's costs came from miniaturizing the technology .
By making it larger , CrunchPad could use more parts not specifically developed for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A large part of Apple's costs came from miniaturizing the technology.
By making it larger, CrunchPad could use more parts not specifically developed for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358366</id>
	<title>Re:Price point???? ARRRGHGGGH!!!</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1260183840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, buzzwords are always a lose-lose proposition.  Time for a paradigm shift!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , buzzwords are always a lose-lose proposition .
Time for a paradigm shift !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, buzzwords are always a lose-lose proposition.
Time for a paradigm shift!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358076</id>
	<title>Re:There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The HitlerHitler</p></div><p>No, see you got modded "Flamebait".</p><p>Here, let me give you some tips of where you could've gone with it:</p><ol> <li>That's some serious joo-joo going on there!</li><li>Well, I hope that company has got the Mojo for the joo joo!</li><li>Joo-joo, isn't that a martial art?</li><li>Does it come with Windows? No? Oh that's good Joo-joo!</li><li>Is it FOSS? If not that's bad Joo-joo</li></ol><p>See?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The HitlerHitlerNo , see you got modded " Flamebait " .Here , let me give you some tips of where you could 've gone with it : That 's some serious joo-joo going on there ! Well , I hope that company has got the Mojo for the joo joo ! Joo-joo , is n't that a martial art ? Does it come with Windows ?
No ? Oh that 's good Joo-joo ! Is it FOSS ?
If not that 's bad Joo-jooSee ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The HitlerHitlerNo, see you got modded "Flamebait".Here, let me give you some tips of where you could've gone with it: That's some serious joo-joo going on there!Well, I hope that company has got the Mojo for the joo joo!Joo-joo, isn't that a martial art?Does it come with Windows?
No? Oh that's good Joo-joo!Is it FOSS?
If not that's bad Joo-jooSee?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>rho</author>
	<datestamp>1260184020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless Apple makes one, then a lot of folks will think $500 is <i>just right</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless Apple makes one , then a lot of folks will think $ 500 is just right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless Apple makes one, then a lot of folks will think $500 is just right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358816</id>
	<title>Re:Price alone shows "crunchpad" was vapor idea...</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1260186300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple doesn't make <b>anything</b> that doesn't get them at least 30\% margins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple does n't make anything that does n't get them at least 30 \ % margins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple doesn't make anything that doesn't get them at least 30\% margins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358956</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260187020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that the Wii was CHEAP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that the Wii was CHEAP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that the Wii was CHEAP.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361828</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260208800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be just right.  They don't have a portable computing device at that price point, something that sits between the iPhone/iTouch and the MacBook.  Just like they're missing a headless desktop between the MacMini and Mac Pro.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be just right .
They do n't have a portable computing device at that price point , something that sits between the iPhone/iTouch and the MacBook .
Just like they 're missing a headless desktop between the MacMini and Mac Pro .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be just right.
They don't have a portable computing device at that price point, something that sits between the iPhone/iTouch and the MacBook.
Just like they're missing a headless desktop between the MacMini and Mac Pro.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358932</id>
	<title>Embarrassing parallel</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1260186900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I ran a video encode yesterday that happily used 100\% of all four cores</p></div><p>Video encoding is embarrassingly parallel: each run of frames between keyframes can be given to a separate core. But a lot of workloads, like the pagination that happens whenever the user views a web page, aren't necessarily so parallel unless the user is tab-browsing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ran a video encode yesterday that happily used 100 \ % of all four coresVideo encoding is embarrassingly parallel : each run of frames between keyframes can be given to a separate core .
But a lot of workloads , like the pagination that happens whenever the user views a web page , are n't necessarily so parallel unless the user is tab-browsing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ran a video encode yesterday that happily used 100\% of all four coresVideo encoding is embarrassingly parallel: each run of frames between keyframes can be given to a separate core.
But a lot of workloads, like the pagination that happens whenever the user views a web page, aren't necessarily so parallel unless the user is tab-browsing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360288</id>
	<title>Re:Retarded Name</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1260195900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&gt; December 11th, midnight PST</p><p>I am the only non native English speaker that finds this date completely ambiguous ? Is it 2009-12-11 00:00 or 2009-12-12 00:00 ?</p></div><p>Well, shit dude. I don't know how it could get much clearer than that. Start by finding the one which contains the date listed, 2009-12-11.....</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll skip the obviously weird mm/dd/yyyy pattern, and just ask who in his right mind thought that having 12pm precede 1pm, 2pm etc... would make sense ?</p></div><p>Agree with the retardedness there. The am/pm notation should probably go. 0-23 hour clock is much clearer and less ambiguous. For an extended period of time I set all of my clocks to 24-hour mode instead of the default 12-hour mode so it has become second nature for me to convert between the two. The sooner we make that switch the better.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; December 11th , midnight PSTI am the only non native English speaker that finds this date completely ambiguous ?
Is it 2009-12-11 00 : 00 or 2009-12-12 00 : 00 ? Well , shit dude .
I do n't know how it could get much clearer than that .
Start by finding the one which contains the date listed , 2009-12-11.....I 'll skip the obviously weird mm/dd/yyyy pattern , and just ask who in his right mind thought that having 12pm precede 1pm , 2pm etc... would make sense ? Agree with the retardedness there .
The am/pm notation should probably go .
0-23 hour clock is much clearer and less ambiguous .
For an extended period of time I set all of my clocks to 24-hour mode instead of the default 12-hour mode so it has become second nature for me to convert between the two .
The sooner we make that switch the better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; December 11th, midnight PSTI am the only non native English speaker that finds this date completely ambiguous ?
Is it 2009-12-11 00:00 or 2009-12-12 00:00 ?Well, shit dude.
I don't know how it could get much clearer than that.
Start by finding the one which contains the date listed, 2009-12-11.....I'll skip the obviously weird mm/dd/yyyy pattern, and just ask who in his right mind thought that having 12pm precede 1pm, 2pm etc... would make sense ?Agree with the retardedness there.
The am/pm notation should probably go.
0-23 hour clock is much clearer and less ambiguous.
For an extended period of time I set all of my clocks to 24-hour mode instead of the default 12-hour mode so it has become second nature for me to convert between the two.
The sooner we make that switch the better.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358094</id>
	<title>JOOJOO DIDDID WTCWTC</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1260182460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>They were thinking about a <a href="http://www.zhuzhupets.com/" title="zhuzhupets.com">motorized stuffed hamster</a> [zhuzhupets.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>They were thinking about a motorized stuffed hamster [ zhuzhupets.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They were thinking about a motorized stuffed hamster [zhuzhupets.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358384</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>bill\_kress</author>
	<datestamp>1260183900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't see a pure tablet working?  Check out the iPod touch...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't see a pure tablet working ?
Check out the iPod touch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't see a pure tablet working?
Check out the iPod touch...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361680</id>
	<title>Re:Boycott?</title>
	<author>atamido</author>
	<datestamp>1260206940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Besides, why do you feel any need at all to defend Michael Arrington?  You owe him nothing.  If he'd succeeded as he planned, he'd have made millions off of you and others.  Your job as a consumer is to look out for yourself.</p></div><p>To play devil's advocate, Arrington did put the idea out there and get it a lot of press.  Without the press, it's very likely Fusion Garage would not have gotten the venture capital or contacts with large companies for decently cheap mass production techniques.  And on announcement, it may very well have been relegated to a blip on some tech blog somewhere, instead of being noted by the millions of people already following the CrunchPad.  And if this helps to bring more small touch tablets to the market at a cheaper price that I can afford, then I do owe Arrington at least that thanks.</p><p>But yeah, it'll probably be 2015 before we have any idea who own the IP, and by that time Fusion Garage and Tech Crunch will likely have been bled dry by the lawyers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , why do you feel any need at all to defend Michael Arrington ?
You owe him nothing .
If he 'd succeeded as he planned , he 'd have made millions off of you and others .
Your job as a consumer is to look out for yourself.To play devil 's advocate , Arrington did put the idea out there and get it a lot of press .
Without the press , it 's very likely Fusion Garage would not have gotten the venture capital or contacts with large companies for decently cheap mass production techniques .
And on announcement , it may very well have been relegated to a blip on some tech blog somewhere , instead of being noted by the millions of people already following the CrunchPad .
And if this helps to bring more small touch tablets to the market at a cheaper price that I can afford , then I do owe Arrington at least that thanks.But yeah , it 'll probably be 2015 before we have any idea who own the IP , and by that time Fusion Garage and Tech Crunch will likely have been bled dry by the lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, why do you feel any need at all to defend Michael Arrington?
You owe him nothing.
If he'd succeeded as he planned, he'd have made millions off of you and others.
Your job as a consumer is to look out for yourself.To play devil's advocate, Arrington did put the idea out there and get it a lot of press.
Without the press, it's very likely Fusion Garage would not have gotten the venture capital or contacts with large companies for decently cheap mass production techniques.
And on announcement, it may very well have been relegated to a blip on some tech blog somewhere, instead of being noted by the millions of people already following the CrunchPad.
And if this helps to bring more small touch tablets to the market at a cheaper price that I can afford, then I do owe Arrington at least that thanks.But yeah, it'll probably be 2015 before we have any idea who own the IP, and by that time Fusion Garage and Tech Crunch will likely have been bled dry by the lawyers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358668</id>
	<title>As much as I hate Apple</title>
	<author>alanbcohen</author>
	<datestamp>1260185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>After Apple abandoned me and tens of thousands of other Apple ][ and ][+ owners almost thirty years ago, I have no love for those crooks.  But I could get an Ipod Touch with twice as much memory at half the price and several times the battery life.  At the $250 price level, the larger screen would have been worth it; at $500, no way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After Apple abandoned me and tens of thousands of other Apple ] [ and ] [ + owners almost thirty years ago , I have no love for those crooks .
But I could get an Ipod Touch with twice as much memory at half the price and several times the battery life .
At the $ 250 price level , the larger screen would have been worth it ; at $ 500 , no way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After Apple abandoned me and tens of thousands of other Apple ][ and ][+ owners almost thirty years ago, I have no love for those crooks.
But I could get an Ipod Touch with twice as much memory at half the price and several times the battery life.
At the $250 price level, the larger screen would have been worth it; at $500, no way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358216</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree 100\%.</p><p>The TC1000/1100 from HP totally did it right:</p><p><a href="http://rgbizot.com/shop/images/Tablet\_PC-HP-TC1100.jpg" title="rgbizot.com" rel="nofollow">TC1100 with keyboard behind tablet</a> [rgbizot.com]<br><a href="http://www.jksalesinc.com/catalog/images/hp\_tc1100.jpg" title="jksalesinc.com" rel="nofollow">TC1100 with keyboard under tablet</a> [jksalesinc.com]</p><p>It was such a great configuration. And to add bonus points, the keyboard was completely detachable!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree 100 \ % .The TC1000/1100 from HP totally did it right : TC1100 with keyboard behind tablet [ rgbizot.com ] TC1100 with keyboard under tablet [ jksalesinc.com ] It was such a great configuration .
And to add bonus points , the keyboard was completely detachable !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree 100\%.The TC1000/1100 from HP totally did it right:TC1100 with keyboard behind tablet [rgbizot.com]TC1100 with keyboard under tablet [jksalesinc.com]It was such a great configuration.
And to add bonus points, the keyboard was completely detachable!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358398</id>
	<title>Re:Tablet market seems like the ultimate niche</title>
	<author>Knara</author>
	<datestamp>1260183960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's terribly useful in those niches, however, *if its done correctly*.
</p><p>My interest in the niche is the art/drawing tablet + laptop aspect.  Basically a Wacom tablet slapped on top of a CPU.
</p><p>This product already exists, of course, though the implementation quality varies widely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's terribly useful in those niches , however , * if its done correctly * .
My interest in the niche is the art/drawing tablet + laptop aspect .
Basically a Wacom tablet slapped on top of a CPU .
This product already exists , of course , though the implementation quality varies widely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's terribly useful in those niches, however, *if its done correctly*.
My interest in the niche is the art/drawing tablet + laptop aspect.
Basically a Wacom tablet slapped on top of a CPU.
This product already exists, of course, though the implementation quality varies widely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359518</id>
	<title>Re:Boycott?</title>
	<author>jjohnson</author>
	<datestamp>1260190020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a big assumption, and almost certain to be wrong in detail.  IP battles in court go on for years and delve into exhaustive detail, and may turn on minutiae.  The only thing you can be certain about is that "I own half the IP!" "No you don't!" is a useless oversimplification of the real situation, which sounds like a loose verbal agreement that let each party believe what it wants to believe.</p><p>Besides, why do you feel any need at all to defend Michael Arrington?  You owe him nothing.  If he'd succeeded as he planned, he'd have made millions off of you and others.  Your job as a consumer is to look out for yourself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a big assumption , and almost certain to be wrong in detail .
IP battles in court go on for years and delve into exhaustive detail , and may turn on minutiae .
The only thing you can be certain about is that " I own half the IP !
" " No you do n't !
" is a useless oversimplification of the real situation , which sounds like a loose verbal agreement that let each party believe what it wants to believe.Besides , why do you feel any need at all to defend Michael Arrington ?
You owe him nothing .
If he 'd succeeded as he planned , he 'd have made millions off of you and others .
Your job as a consumer is to look out for yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a big assumption, and almost certain to be wrong in detail.
IP battles in court go on for years and delve into exhaustive detail, and may turn on minutiae.
The only thing you can be certain about is that "I own half the IP!
" "No you don't!
" is a useless oversimplification of the real situation, which sounds like a loose verbal agreement that let each party believe what it wants to believe.Besides, why do you feel any need at all to defend Michael Arrington?
You owe him nothing.
If he'd succeeded as he planned, he'd have made millions off of you and others.
Your job as a consumer is to look out for yourself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358374</id>
	<title>Joojoo is Finnish..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>About localization: In some contexts "Joojoo" can be translated from Finnish as "yeah, right..".</p><p>A coincidence?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>About localization : In some contexts " Joojoo " can be translated from Finnish as " yeah , right.. " .A coincidence ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About localization: In some contexts "Joojoo" can be translated from Finnish as "yeah, right..".A coincidence?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361888</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260209220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Unless Apple makes one, then a lot of folks will think $500 is just right.</p></div></blockquote><p>You mean $800.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless Apple makes one , then a lot of folks will think $ 500 is just right.You mean $ 800 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless Apple makes one, then a lot of folks will think $500 is just right.You mean $800.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362628</id>
	<title>Re:Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260304380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're so paranoid.  This sounds like a great idea to me.<br>Very efficient.  Let me make a note in my SideKick to<br>look into this product real soon!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're so paranoid .
This sounds like a great idea to me.Very efficient .
Let me make a note in my SideKick tolook into this product real soon !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're so paranoid.
This sounds like a great idea to me.Very efficient.
Let me make a note in my SideKick tolook into this product real soon!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358038</id>
	<title>JooJoo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we're going to go with silly names, then I think they should've chosen the MoJo. That way you can "get your MoJo" or "get your MoJo working" with relative ease. It's got way more marketing potential than JooJoo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we 're going to go with silly names , then I think they should 've chosen the MoJo .
That way you can " get your MoJo " or " get your MoJo working " with relative ease .
It 's got way more marketing potential than JooJoo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we're going to go with silly names, then I think they should've chosen the MoJo.
That way you can "get your MoJo" or "get your MoJo working" with relative ease.
It's got way more marketing potential than JooJoo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358792</id>
	<title>Re:There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>PaulMeigh</author>
	<datestamp>1260186180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey! My mother's a joo, which in turn makes me a joo you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey !
My mother 's a joo , which in turn makes me a joo you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey!
My mother's a joo, which in turn makes me a joo you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30364330</id>
	<title>Re:There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>Jimmy\_Slimmy</author>
	<datestamp>1260283260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The HitlerHitler is equivalent to Hitler taken Hitler times, or Hitler * Hitler.</p><p>But far more powerful is the HITLER**HITLER, which is about as much as Hitler taken Hitler times, the result taken a Hitler number of times.</p><p>But, even Hitler can beat that.  This was just a demonstration of a full proof, which this entry is too small to contain, having to do with</p><p>HITLER**HITLER**...**HITLER</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The HitlerHitler is equivalent to Hitler taken Hitler times , or Hitler * Hitler.But far more powerful is the HITLER * * HITLER , which is about as much as Hitler taken Hitler times , the result taken a Hitler number of times.But , even Hitler can beat that .
This was just a demonstration of a full proof , which this entry is too small to contain , having to do withHITLER * * HITLER * * ... * * HITLER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The HitlerHitler is equivalent to Hitler taken Hitler times, or Hitler * Hitler.But far more powerful is the HITLER**HITLER, which is about as much as Hitler taken Hitler times, the result taken a Hitler number of times.But, even Hitler can beat that.
This was just a demonstration of a full proof, which this entry is too small to contain, having to do withHITLER**HITLER**...**HITLER</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358814</id>
	<title>Re:Price</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1260186300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I snagged a Lenovo X41T a while ago for $120.  Had to buy a replacement pen for $45 and got a dock for $23.  And I sprung for restore discs that cost me $56, so I'm into it for about $250 all said and done.  Meh.</p><p>It does need a pen.  It is otherwise terrific until the HD breaks, and then I probably will get a CF replacement instead of paying for the special sideways drive...</p><p>Just beware, the drives are terribly expensive.  Otherwise, these notebooks are pretty tough, and adequate unless you need HD video, which is why you got a flat screen for Christmas, right?</p><p>No JooJoo for me. Too $$$</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I snagged a Lenovo X41T a while ago for $ 120 .
Had to buy a replacement pen for $ 45 and got a dock for $ 23 .
And I sprung for restore discs that cost me $ 56 , so I 'm into it for about $ 250 all said and done .
Meh.It does need a pen .
It is otherwise terrific until the HD breaks , and then I probably will get a CF replacement instead of paying for the special sideways drive...Just beware , the drives are terribly expensive .
Otherwise , these notebooks are pretty tough , and adequate unless you need HD video , which is why you got a flat screen for Christmas , right ? No JooJoo for me .
Too $ $ $</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I snagged a Lenovo X41T a while ago for $120.
Had to buy a replacement pen for $45 and got a dock for $23.
And I sprung for restore discs that cost me $56, so I'm into it for about $250 all said and done.
Meh.It does need a pen.
It is otherwise terrific until the HD breaks, and then I probably will get a CF replacement instead of paying for the special sideways drive...Just beware, the drives are terribly expensive.
Otherwise, these notebooks are pretty tough, and adequate unless you need HD video, which is why you got a flat screen for Christmas, right?No JooJoo for me.
Too $$$</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050</id>
	<title>Price</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>At $200 I would be all over this (even though it sounds like it was bred from a bit of dirty business dealing).  For $499, I would rather buy a laptop and have the keyboard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At $ 200 I would be all over this ( even though it sounds like it was bred from a bit of dirty business dealing ) .
For $ 499 , I would rather buy a laptop and have the keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At $200 I would be all over this (even though it sounds like it was bred from a bit of dirty business dealing).
For $499, I would rather buy a laptop and have the keyboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064</id>
	<title>How many CPUs (cores) does this thing have?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I glanced at the article but didn't spot it.  2?  3?  4?   Also is there really any benefit to having more than 2 cores inside a machine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I glanced at the article but did n't spot it .
2 ? 3 ?
4 ? Also is there really any benefit to having more than 2 cores inside a machine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I glanced at the article but didn't spot it.
2?  3?
4?   Also is there really any benefit to having more than 2 cores inside a machine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018</id>
	<title>Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>Frosty Piss</author>
	<datestamp>1260181980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...though 'most of the storage is done in the cloud...</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...though 'most of the storage is done in the cloud.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...though 'most of the storage is done in the cloud...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358238</id>
	<title>Re:Where I stopped reading...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly what I thought... 'sure, they'll steal a whole product without a moment's hesitation, but I'm sure my data will be perfectly private and safe with them."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly what I thought... 'sure , they 'll steal a whole product without a moment 's hesitation , but I 'm sure my data will be perfectly private and safe with them .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly what I thought... 'sure, they'll steal a whole product without a moment's hesitation, but I'm sure my data will be perfectly private and safe with them.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998</id>
	<title>There's a device that's going to annihilate it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260181860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The HitlerHitler</htmltext>
<tokenext>The HitlerHitler</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The HitlerHitler</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358260</id>
	<title>the thieves of concept will be selling a JooJoo.</title>
	<author>swschrad</author>
	<datestamp>1260183360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not going to touch this with a ten foot pole... and not touching the device, either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not going to touch this with a ten foot pole... and not touching the device , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not going to touch this with a ten foot pole... and not touching the device, either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358326</id>
	<title>Re:JooJoo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_Inspector" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">JuJu</a> [wikipedia.org]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>JuJu [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JuJu [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358508</id>
	<title>Re:Price point???? ARRRGHGGGH!!!</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1260184620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a correct usage.  When a specific price is a goal.  Now if they're above their goal then they have no need to use the word price point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a correct usage .
When a specific price is a goal .
Now if they 're above their goal then they have no need to use the word price point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a correct usage.
When a specific price is a goal.
Now if they're above their goal then they have no need to use the word price point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358082</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30364072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30376764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358310
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358038
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30364330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30369934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30369990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_2046242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358038
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30357998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360348
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30376764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30364330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360552
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358668
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30364072
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361888
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362312
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30361828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30369990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30363316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358932
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_2046242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359238
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30360288
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30369934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30362340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30359816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_2046242.30358472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
