<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_07_1722247</id>
	<title>eBay vs. Craigslist Courtroom Fisticuffs Start Today</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1260175560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>davekleiman writes with news that former eBay chief exec Meg Whitman took the stand today to kick off the battle that has been <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/meg-whitman-testifies-as-ebay-and-craigslist-square-off-in-court/">brewing between Craigslist and eBay</a>.  The waters are further clouded by Whitman's upcoming bid for governor of California.  "eBay wants to shed light on the 'coercive plan' that it has said Newmark hatched with Craigslist Chief Executive Jim Buckmaster to dilute eBay's ownership stake, ultimately stripping eBay of its seat on the Craigslist board. Craigslist has hit back that eBay used its board seat to glean information to launch its own classified site, Kijiji. Craigslist also claims that eBay used deceptive tactics to direct traffic away from its site."</htmltext>
<tokenext>davekleiman writes with news that former eBay chief exec Meg Whitman took the stand today to kick off the battle that has been brewing between Craigslist and eBay .
The waters are further clouded by Whitman 's upcoming bid for governor of California .
" eBay wants to shed light on the 'coercive plan ' that it has said Newmark hatched with Craigslist Chief Executive Jim Buckmaster to dilute eBay 's ownership stake , ultimately stripping eBay of its seat on the Craigslist board .
Craigslist has hit back that eBay used its board seat to glean information to launch its own classified site , Kijiji .
Craigslist also claims that eBay used deceptive tactics to direct traffic away from its site .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>davekleiman writes with news that former eBay chief exec Meg Whitman took the stand today to kick off the battle that has been brewing between Craigslist and eBay.
The waters are further clouded by Whitman's upcoming bid for governor of California.
"eBay wants to shed light on the 'coercive plan' that it has said Newmark hatched with Craigslist Chief Executive Jim Buckmaster to dilute eBay's ownership stake, ultimately stripping eBay of its seat on the Craigslist board.
Craigslist has hit back that eBay used its board seat to glean information to launch its own classified site, Kijiji.
Craigslist also claims that eBay used deceptive tactics to direct traffic away from its site.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358258</id>
	<title>Re:Governor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ass hole you are mixing her up with Carla Fiorina. Who's the bitch now? (Wow, I manage to use more derogatory terms than you)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ass hole you are mixing her up with Carla Fiorina .
Who 's the bitch now ?
( Wow , I manage to use more derogatory terms than you )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ass hole you are mixing her up with Carla Fiorina.
Who's the bitch now?
(Wow, I manage to use more derogatory terms than you)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360600</id>
	<title>Re:Just one question</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1260198120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"Ow, man! You kicked me right in the kijiji!"</p></div><p>"right in the cijines"?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Ow , man !
You kicked me right in the kijiji !
" " right in the cijines " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Ow, man!
You kicked me right in the kijiji!
""right in the cijines"?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359660</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260190980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, let me tell you those eBay prostitutes are well-hidden!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , let me tell you those eBay prostitutes are well-hidden !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, let me tell you those eBay prostitutes are well-hidden!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358292</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.</p><p>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.  Or Google at Microsoft.  It just doesn't happen.</p><p>What made eBay and Craigslist different?  Or think they were different?</p></div><p>How else are they supposed to get away with collusion and evade anti-trust laws?</p><p>check out www.theyrule.net and see just how interconnected various companies really are. (and then implicitly the impact on free markets and fair business practice)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple .
Or Google at Microsoft .
It just does n't happen.What made eBay and Craigslist different ?
Or think they were different ? How else are they supposed to get away with collusion and evade anti-trust laws ? check out www.theyrule.net and see just how interconnected various companies really are .
( and then implicitly the impact on free markets and fair business practice )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.
Or Google at Microsoft.
It just doesn't happen.What made eBay and Craigslist different?
Or think they were different?How else are they supposed to get away with collusion and evade anti-trust laws?check out www.theyrule.net and see just how interconnected various companies really are.
(and then implicitly the impact on free markets and fair business practice)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014</id>
	<title>Just one question</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1260181920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>WTF is a "Kijiji"?!? It looks like a name attempt at a logo by someone with an obsession with dotted letters.<br> <br>
"Ow, man! You kicked me right in the kijiji!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is a " Kijiji " ? ! ?
It looks like a name attempt at a logo by someone with an obsession with dotted letters .
" Ow , man !
You kicked me right in the kijiji !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is a "Kijiji"?!?
It looks like a name attempt at a logo by someone with an obsession with dotted letters.
"Ow, man!
You kicked me right in the kijiji!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357618</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Stradenko</author>
	<datestamp>1260179640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google at apple?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... oh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google at apple ?
... oh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google at apple?
... oh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357646</id>
	<title>Governor?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260179820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meg won't be governor, that bitch that drove HP into the ground has a better chance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meg wo n't be governor , that bitch that drove HP into the ground has a better chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meg won't be governor, that bitch that drove HP into the ground has a better chance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1260179640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What made eBay and Craigslist different? Or think they were different?</p></div></blockquote><p>It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What made eBay and Craigslist different ?
Or think they were different ? It 's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What made eBay and Craigslist different?
Or think they were different?It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360096</id>
	<title>Re:Just one question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260194160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the eternal struggle to find the catchiest nonsensical word that can be used as a verb to name your company.</p><p>Look for the launch soon of my new company and website, Kubabbel! If you're looking for something special, just "Kubabbel" it!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the eternal struggle to find the catchiest nonsensical word that can be used as a verb to name your company.Look for the launch soon of my new company and website , Kubabbel !
If you 're looking for something special , just " Kubabbel " it ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the eternal struggle to find the catchiest nonsensical word that can be used as a verb to name your company.Look for the launch soon of my new company and website, Kubabbel!
If you're looking for something special, just "Kubabbel" it!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361778</id>
	<title>Re:watching rich people fight</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1260208080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Honest question: Is Craig actually rich?  From what I can tell, the staff at CL actually take steps to <i>minimize</i> their revenues -- to make just enough to cover costs and pay their (few) employees a good salary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Honest question : Is Craig actually rich ?
From what I can tell , the staff at CL actually take steps to minimize their revenues -- to make just enough to cover costs and pay their ( few ) employees a good salary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Honest question: Is Craig actually rich?
From what I can tell, the staff at CL actually take steps to minimize their revenues -- to make just enough to cover costs and pay their (few) employees a good salary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358144</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>hemp</author>
	<datestamp>1260182700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>eBay owns 25\% of Craigslist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>eBay owns 25 \ % of Craigslist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eBay owns 25\% of Craigslist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357698</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260180000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Richard M. Stallman,  Eric S. Raymond,  Linus Torvalds,  and Bruce Schneier  on  Microsoft's  board.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Richard M. Stallman , Eric S. Raymond , Linus Torvalds , and Bruce Schneier on Microsoft 's board .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Richard M. Stallman,  Eric S. Raymond,  Linus Torvalds,  and Bruce Schneier  on  Microsoft's  board.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</id>
	<title>Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260179400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.<br> <br>

It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.  Or Google at Microsoft.  It just doesn't happen.<br> <br>

What made eBay and Craigslist different?  Or think they were different?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board .
It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple .
Or Google at Microsoft .
It just does n't happen .
What made eBay and Craigslist different ?
Or think they were different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.
It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.
Or Google at Microsoft.
It just doesn't happen.
What made eBay and Craigslist different?
Or think they were different?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358256</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>voodoowizard</author>
	<datestamp>1260183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, in my town of around 30,000 and the surrounding town where the sites actually point to(Total pop just over 100,000). There is nothing on kijiji. Craigslist dominates here for sure. When the site was launched I heard about it but soon forgot.
Heck there is even an auction site based out of my town and I can't find anything on it, worse than kijiji here as far as users.
Just my experiences, ya know, not scientific.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , in my town of around 30,000 and the surrounding town where the sites actually point to ( Total pop just over 100,000 ) .
There is nothing on kijiji .
Craigslist dominates here for sure .
When the site was launched I heard about it but soon forgot .
Heck there is even an auction site based out of my town and I ca n't find anything on it , worse than kijiji here as far as users .
Just my experiences , ya know , not scientific .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, in my town of around 30,000 and the surrounding town where the sites actually point to(Total pop just over 100,000).
There is nothing on kijiji.
Craigslist dominates here for sure.
When the site was launched I heard about it but soon forgot.
Heck there is even an auction site based out of my town and I can't find anything on it, worse than kijiji here as far as users.
Just my experiences, ya know, not scientific.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358882</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1260186660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.</p></div> </blockquote><p>
Microsoft did have a seat at Apple. It had to. If Apple had faltered, the Feds would have broken up Microsoft. Believe it or not, Microsoft tried really hard to keep Apple alive (during its non-Steve Jobs days). </p><p>Same goes with VISA and Mastercard, except there the threat was explicitly stated (in the case of Microsoft, the threat was implicit), the Feds ordered that both boards of VISA and MasterCard share board members (forcing its larger member banks to have membership in both), which in hindsight was a bad idea, now instead of having one monopoly called VISA International, now VISA and Mastercard are two monopolies that pretty much march in sync with each other (that the Feds don't really want to complain about, since it was basically their miscalculation that made the mess even bigger).
</p><blockquote><div><p>What made eBay and Craigslist different? Or think they were different?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Craigslist has large private investors. It's not a publicly traded company. If Microsoft tries going after Google. Microsoft would have to notify Google as soon as it accumulates 5\% of the company. Plus, also the Feds would almost certainly block any attempt from Microsoft to get any board seat on Google. </p><p>And in the case of Google and Apple, the Google board member actually resigned from Apple's board citing conflicts of interests. Initially, the Google guy would just seat out the parts of the discussion on the board that involved the competing business units. Personally, I doubt Ebay gave the same courtesy to Craigslist, since Craigslist has essentially only one business unit and only twelve employees. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple .
Microsoft did have a seat at Apple .
It had to .
If Apple had faltered , the Feds would have broken up Microsoft .
Believe it or not , Microsoft tried really hard to keep Apple alive ( during its non-Steve Jobs days ) .
Same goes with VISA and Mastercard , except there the threat was explicitly stated ( in the case of Microsoft , the threat was implicit ) , the Feds ordered that both boards of VISA and MasterCard share board members ( forcing its larger member banks to have membership in both ) , which in hindsight was a bad idea , now instead of having one monopoly called VISA International , now VISA and Mastercard are two monopolies that pretty much march in sync with each other ( that the Feds do n't really want to complain about , since it was basically their miscalculation that made the mess even bigger ) .
What made eBay and Craigslist different ?
Or think they were different ?
Craigslist has large private investors .
It 's not a publicly traded company .
If Microsoft tries going after Google .
Microsoft would have to notify Google as soon as it accumulates 5 \ % of the company .
Plus , also the Feds would almost certainly block any attempt from Microsoft to get any board seat on Google .
And in the case of Google and Apple , the Google board member actually resigned from Apple 's board citing conflicts of interests .
Initially , the Google guy would just seat out the parts of the discussion on the board that involved the competing business units .
Personally , I doubt Ebay gave the same courtesy to Craigslist , since Craigslist has essentially only one business unit and only twelve employees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.
Microsoft did have a seat at Apple.
It had to.
If Apple had faltered, the Feds would have broken up Microsoft.
Believe it or not, Microsoft tried really hard to keep Apple alive (during its non-Steve Jobs days).
Same goes with VISA and Mastercard, except there the threat was explicitly stated (in the case of Microsoft, the threat was implicit), the Feds ordered that both boards of VISA and MasterCard share board members (forcing its larger member banks to have membership in both), which in hindsight was a bad idea, now instead of having one monopoly called VISA International, now VISA and Mastercard are two monopolies that pretty much march in sync with each other (that the Feds don't really want to complain about, since it was basically their miscalculation that made the mess even bigger).
What made eBay and Craigslist different?
Or think they were different?
Craigslist has large private investors.
It's not a publicly traded company.
If Microsoft tries going after Google.
Microsoft would have to notify Google as soon as it accumulates 5\% of the company.
Plus, also the Feds would almost certainly block any attempt from Microsoft to get any board seat on Google.
And in the case of Google and Apple, the Google board member actually resigned from Apple's board citing conflicts of interests.
Initially, the Google guy would just seat out the parts of the discussion on the board that involved the competing business units.
Personally, I doubt Ebay gave the same courtesy to Craigslist, since Craigslist has essentially only one business unit and only twelve employees. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357738</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1260180240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It does happen in some industries, and the law on it is pretty complex and murky (and varies by country). When it's below a certain threshold, so the minority stake doesn't exercise control over the company, and has representation basically only to ensure its rights as a minority shareholder are respected, it's considered a "passive investment" and not subject to the usual antitrust scrutiny that would ensue if, say, eBay actually tried to buy Craigslist (or buy a stake considered controlling). A lot of economists are a bit skeptical of just how passive such passive investments are, though. The keywords <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=\%22passive+investment\%22+competitors" title="google.com">+"passive investment" +competitors</a> [google.com] bring up a whole pile of writing on the subject...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does happen in some industries , and the law on it is pretty complex and murky ( and varies by country ) .
When it 's below a certain threshold , so the minority stake does n't exercise control over the company , and has representation basically only to ensure its rights as a minority shareholder are respected , it 's considered a " passive investment " and not subject to the usual antitrust scrutiny that would ensue if , say , eBay actually tried to buy Craigslist ( or buy a stake considered controlling ) .
A lot of economists are a bit skeptical of just how passive such passive investments are , though .
The keywords + " passive investment " + competitors [ google.com ] bring up a whole pile of writing on the subject.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It does happen in some industries, and the law on it is pretty complex and murky (and varies by country).
When it's below a certain threshold, so the minority stake doesn't exercise control over the company, and has representation basically only to ensure its rights as a minority shareholder are respected, it's considered a "passive investment" and not subject to the usual antitrust scrutiny that would ensue if, say, eBay actually tried to buy Craigslist (or buy a stake considered controlling).
A lot of economists are a bit skeptical of just how passive such passive investments are, though.
The keywords +"passive investment" +competitors [google.com] bring up a whole pile of writing on the subject...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357714</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>brian0918</author>
	<datestamp>1260180120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More importantly, why should it matter? If they want to do something dumb like have a competitor on their board, they should be free to make that dumb mistake. How does it become a legal matter, unless fraud or a breach of contract occurred?</htmltext>
<tokenext>More importantly , why should it matter ?
If they want to do something dumb like have a competitor on their board , they should be free to make that dumb mistake .
How does it become a legal matter , unless fraud or a breach of contract occurred ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More importantly, why should it matter?
If they want to do something dumb like have a competitor on their board, they should be free to make that dumb mistake.
How does it become a legal matter, unless fraud or a breach of contract occurred?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359982</id>
	<title>Different animals, and Meg being stupid</title>
	<author>Roblimo</author>
	<datestamp>1260193320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I want to advertise my *local* video production services, I use Craigslist: <a href="http://sarasota.craigslist.org/muc/1498727387.html" title="craigslist.org">http://sarasota.craigslist.org/muc/1498727387.html</a> [craigslist.org]</p><p>When I need someone *local* to fix a problem in my living room laminate flooring, Craiglist.</p><p>If I want to buy or sell high-end commercial video gear, eBay.</p><p>Craigslist is local, eBay is national.</p><p>eBay is about "things," while Craiglist is more about services and events.</p><p>George W. Bush's VP -- nasty chickenhawk draft-dodger, don't remember his name right now -- talked up eBay but probably never heard of (or cared about) Craigslist.</p><p>eBay is about money and commerce, Craigslist is a community resource that happens to make a few bucks.</p><p>Pierre Omidyar has done many good things, including kicking in $400,000 when SourceForge nearly went down under one of the many inept exec teams Slashdot's constantly-renamed corporate masters have suffered from over the years. Craig Newmark has made an entirely new kind of online business possible. He is a hero to many small entrepreneurs. He's a nice guy, too.</p><p>Pierre's also a good person, but he's apparently a lot more into money than Craig.</p><p>I might invite Pierre over for supper. Craig is welcome to stay on one of our fold-out futons any old time. And he's welcome to hop on our unsecured-on-purpose wireless network (really, Craig. I mean it) if we're not home when he gets here.  I'd let him borrow my Jeep, too.</p><p>Pierre probably wouldn't want to be seen in a dented, faded 1994 Cherokee. I doubt Craig would care. (It runs well.)</p><p>Meg Whitman? Um, no. A little hoity for people like us who live in a one-bedroom mobile home.</p><p>CLINCHER:</p><p>Craig &amp; Jim (Buckmeister) aren't trying to screw up eBay. Meg and her crew are trying to screw up Craigslist.</p><p>HEY, PIERRE - could you please stop messing with Craigslist and get Meg involved with Republican politics or something else smelly, instead?</p><p>Oh- just remembered the Bush VP's name: Dickhead Cheney. Couldn't he and Meg go shoot lawyers together or something? We have at least a million surplus lawyers, enough to keep Meg too busy to screw up Craigslist for many years to come, and more than enough to keep Cheney out of politics for at least a century or two.</p><p>Thanks,</p><p>- Robin</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I want to advertise my * local * video production services , I use Craigslist : http : //sarasota.craigslist.org/muc/1498727387.html [ craigslist.org ] When I need someone * local * to fix a problem in my living room laminate flooring , Craiglist.If I want to buy or sell high-end commercial video gear , eBay.Craigslist is local , eBay is national.eBay is about " things , " while Craiglist is more about services and events.George W. Bush 's VP -- nasty chickenhawk draft-dodger , do n't remember his name right now -- talked up eBay but probably never heard of ( or cared about ) Craigslist.eBay is about money and commerce , Craigslist is a community resource that happens to make a few bucks.Pierre Omidyar has done many good things , including kicking in $ 400,000 when SourceForge nearly went down under one of the many inept exec teams Slashdot 's constantly-renamed corporate masters have suffered from over the years .
Craig Newmark has made an entirely new kind of online business possible .
He is a hero to many small entrepreneurs .
He 's a nice guy , too.Pierre 's also a good person , but he 's apparently a lot more into money than Craig.I might invite Pierre over for supper .
Craig is welcome to stay on one of our fold-out futons any old time .
And he 's welcome to hop on our unsecured-on-purpose wireless network ( really , Craig .
I mean it ) if we 're not home when he gets here .
I 'd let him borrow my Jeep , too.Pierre probably would n't want to be seen in a dented , faded 1994 Cherokee .
I doubt Craig would care .
( It runs well .
) Meg Whitman ?
Um , no .
A little hoity for people like us who live in a one-bedroom mobile home.CLINCHER : Craig &amp; Jim ( Buckmeister ) are n't trying to screw up eBay .
Meg and her crew are trying to screw up Craigslist.HEY , PIERRE - could you please stop messing with Craigslist and get Meg involved with Republican politics or something else smelly , instead ? Oh- just remembered the Bush VP 's name : Dickhead Cheney .
Could n't he and Meg go shoot lawyers together or something ?
We have at least a million surplus lawyers , enough to keep Meg too busy to screw up Craigslist for many years to come , and more than enough to keep Cheney out of politics for at least a century or two.Thanks,- Robin  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I want to advertise my *local* video production services, I use Craigslist: http://sarasota.craigslist.org/muc/1498727387.html [craigslist.org]When I need someone *local* to fix a problem in my living room laminate flooring, Craiglist.If I want to buy or sell high-end commercial video gear, eBay.Craigslist is local, eBay is national.eBay is about "things," while Craiglist is more about services and events.George W. Bush's VP -- nasty chickenhawk draft-dodger, don't remember his name right now -- talked up eBay but probably never heard of (or cared about) Craigslist.eBay is about money and commerce, Craigslist is a community resource that happens to make a few bucks.Pierre Omidyar has done many good things, including kicking in $400,000 when SourceForge nearly went down under one of the many inept exec teams Slashdot's constantly-renamed corporate masters have suffered from over the years.
Craig Newmark has made an entirely new kind of online business possible.
He is a hero to many small entrepreneurs.
He's a nice guy, too.Pierre's also a good person, but he's apparently a lot more into money than Craig.I might invite Pierre over for supper.
Craig is welcome to stay on one of our fold-out futons any old time.
And he's welcome to hop on our unsecured-on-purpose wireless network (really, Craig.
I mean it) if we're not home when he gets here.
I'd let him borrow my Jeep, too.Pierre probably wouldn't want to be seen in a dented, faded 1994 Cherokee.
I doubt Craig would care.
(It runs well.
)Meg Whitman?
Um, no.
A little hoity for people like us who live in a one-bedroom mobile home.CLINCHER:Craig &amp; Jim (Buckmeister) aren't trying to screw up eBay.
Meg and her crew are trying to screw up Craigslist.HEY, PIERRE - could you please stop messing with Craigslist and get Meg involved with Republican politics or something else smelly, instead?Oh- just remembered the Bush VP's name: Dickhead Cheney.
Couldn't he and Meg go shoot lawyers together or something?
We have at least a million surplus lawyers, enough to keep Meg too busy to screw up Craigslist for many years to come, and more than enough to keep Cheney out of politics for at least a century or two.Thanks,- Robin
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358826</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>GodfatherofSoul</author>
	<datestamp>1260186360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it's the stupid name they picked.  That looks like a wheat field there are so many dots and stalks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's the stupid name they picked .
That looks like a wheat field there are so many dots and stalks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's the stupid name they picked.
That looks like a wheat field there are so many dots and stalks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359022</id>
	<title>and in other news</title>
	<author>KingPin27</author>
	<datestamp>1260187440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.......Meg Whitman was seen out on the playground kicking Jim Buckmaster in the shins and shouting "nyah nyah nyah"!</htmltext>
<tokenext>.......Meg Whitman was seen out on the playground kicking Jim Buckmaster in the shins and shouting " nyah nyah nyah " !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.......Meg Whitman was seen out on the playground kicking Jim Buckmaster in the shins and shouting "nyah nyah nyah"!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358372</id>
	<title>post office thieves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ebay should be warning its customers that items sent through customs are routinely stolen by the post office and never reach their intended recipient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ebay should be warning its customers that items sent through customs are routinely stolen by the post office and never reach their intended recipient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ebay should be warning its customers that items sent through customs are routinely stolen by the post office and never reach their intended recipient.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357770</id>
	<title>Apples and oranges</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260180360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>eBay - Money hoarding greedy Jews making money hand over fist in every aspect of use and involvement PLUS advertising.</p><p>CraigsList - Free.</p><p>This should be thrown right out of court and the Jews sentenced to finally have a real holocaust happen. They never should have let the Jews anywhere near their project. History has shown time and again not only can a Jew never be trusted, and should be dead anyway, but they will only screw you over at the first opportunity they can and as hard as they can. By the time the majority pulls their tongues out of a Jew ass they been kissing and licking clean it will be too late and you will be filled up with too much Jew shit. Idiots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>eBay - Money hoarding greedy Jews making money hand over fist in every aspect of use and involvement PLUS advertising.CraigsList - Free.This should be thrown right out of court and the Jews sentenced to finally have a real holocaust happen .
They never should have let the Jews anywhere near their project .
History has shown time and again not only can a Jew never be trusted , and should be dead anyway , but they will only screw you over at the first opportunity they can and as hard as they can .
By the time the majority pulls their tongues out of a Jew ass they been kissing and licking clean it will be too late and you will be filled up with too much Jew shit .
Idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eBay - Money hoarding greedy Jews making money hand over fist in every aspect of use and involvement PLUS advertising.CraigsList - Free.This should be thrown right out of court and the Jews sentenced to finally have a real holocaust happen.
They never should have let the Jews anywhere near their project.
History has shown time and again not only can a Jew never be trusted, and should be dead anyway, but they will only screw you over at the first opportunity they can and as hard as they can.
By the time the majority pulls their tongues out of a Jew ass they been kissing and licking clean it will be too late and you will be filled up with too much Jew shit.
Idiots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357696</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>KraftDinner</author>
	<datestamp>1260180000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kijiji is far from a huge failure. Many people who are power posters on Craigslist also post on Kijiji because Kijiji's user base is quite large.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kijiji is far from a huge failure .
Many people who are power posters on Craigslist also post on Kijiji because Kijiji 's user base is quite large .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kijiji is far from a huge failure.
Many people who are power posters on Craigslist also post on Kijiji because Kijiji's user base is quite large.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359378</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1260189240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't use "epic" in vain.  It's a case of abject failure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't use " epic " in vain .
It 's a case of abject failure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't use "epic" in vain.
It's a case of abject failure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358940</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates(By Lying)</title>
	<author>lePooch</author>
	<datestamp>1260186900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did anyone else realize that Craigslist separates by city whereas Kijiji separates by state for small markets?

Im in a small/medium city(Lincoln, NE), and Kijiji has some listings, but barring one, they're all NOT in Lincoln. Maybe that might explain why the small markets on Kijiji look "busier" than on Craigslist - Kijiji aggregates results from a hundred miles or so around town.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else realize that Craigslist separates by city whereas Kijiji separates by state for small markets ?
Im in a small/medium city ( Lincoln , NE ) , and Kijiji has some listings , but barring one , they 're all NOT in Lincoln .
Maybe that might explain why the small markets on Kijiji look " busier " than on Craigslist - Kijiji aggregates results from a hundred miles or so around town .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else realize that Craigslist separates by city whereas Kijiji separates by state for small markets?
Im in a small/medium city(Lincoln, NE), and Kijiji has some listings, but barring one, they're all NOT in Lincoln.
Maybe that might explain why the small markets on Kijiji look "busier" than on Craigslist - Kijiji aggregates results from a hundred miles or so around town.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357712</id>
	<title>Microsoft?</title>
	<author>KraftDinner</author>
	<datestamp>1260180120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always thought Kijiji was owned by Microsoft.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought Kijiji was owned by Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought Kijiji was owned by Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361580</id>
	<title>Re:Just one question</title>
	<author>Intron</author>
	<datestamp>1260205920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm pretty sure that it is Esparanto for "My hovercraft is full of eels".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that it is Esparanto for " My hovercraft is full of eels " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that it is Esparanto for "My hovercraft is full of eels".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358352</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359560</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1260190380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.</p></div><p>But its easier to find pimps on ebay</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.But its easier to find pimps on ebay</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.But its easier to find pimps on ebay
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358010</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>LaminatorX</author>
	<datestamp>1260181920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's the place to go for all your Zune, HD-DVD, and New Coke needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the place to go for all your Zune , HD-DVD , and New Coke needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the place to go for all your Zune, HD-DVD, and New Coke needs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359896</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1260192600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>I think Kijiji is bigger in Canada, but I have no stats to back up my claim. Just speaking with friends and family. Even my non-technical family have heard of Kijiji and not Craigslist.</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Kijiji is bigger in Canada , but I have no stats to back up my claim .
Just speaking with friends and family .
Even my non-technical family have heard of Kijiji and not Craigslist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Kijiji is bigger in Canada, but I have no stats to back up my claim.
Just speaking with friends and family.
Even my non-technical family have heard of Kijiji and not Craigslist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358866</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260186540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.<br>
&nbsp; It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.  Or Google at Microsoft.  It just doesn't happen.<br>
&nbsp; What made eBay and Craigslist different?  Or think they were different?</p></div><p>Actually it happens all the time, in many corporations.<br>Just do a search : "xxx board of directors" replace the "xxx" with any company, Apple, Microsoft, Google, eBay, etc...<br>You will start seeing familiar names on them, some directors sit on the boards of 10-15 companies or more.<br>The CEO of Google just resigned from Apples board in September.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board .
  It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple .
Or Google at Microsoft .
It just does n't happen .
  What made eBay and Craigslist different ?
Or think they were different ? Actually it happens all the time , in many corporations.Just do a search : " xxx board of directors " replace the " xxx " with any company , Apple , Microsoft , Google , eBay , etc...You will start seeing familiar names on them , some directors sit on the boards of 10-15 companies or more.The CEO of Google just resigned from Apples board in September .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.
  It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.
Or Google at Microsoft.
It just doesn't happen.
  What made eBay and Craigslist different?
Or think they were different?Actually it happens all the time, in many corporations.Just do a search : "xxx board of directors" replace the "xxx" with any company, Apple, Microsoft, Google, eBay, etc...You will start seeing familiar names on them, some directors sit on the boards of 10-15 companies or more.The CEO of Google just resigned from Apples board in September.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358206</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>Xoltri</author>
	<datestamp>1260183120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kijiji is picking up steam here in Edmonton, I know of lots of people that use it over Craigslist.  Craigslist refuses to update their site, and as a result I am not surprised that they have been overtaken in some markets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kijiji is picking up steam here in Edmonton , I know of lots of people that use it over Craigslist .
Craigslist refuses to update their site , and as a result I am not surprised that they have been overtaken in some markets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kijiji is picking up steam here in Edmonton, I know of lots of people that use it over Craigslist.
Craigslist refuses to update their site, and as a result I am not surprised that they have been overtaken in some markets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360508</id>
	<title>JooJoo</title>
	<author>KraftDinner</author>
	<datestamp>1260197400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So how exactly do you pronounce JooJoo? Is it like....... JewJew or something?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So how exactly do you pronounce JooJoo ?
Is it like....... JewJew or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how exactly do you pronounce JooJoo?
Is it like....... JewJew or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30364204</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260282600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple. Or Google at Microsoft. It just doesn't happen.</p></div><p>how about Google seat at Apple?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple .
Or Google at Microsoft .
It just does n't happen.how about Google seat at Apple ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple.
Or Google at Microsoft.
It just doesn't happen.how about Google seat at Apple?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358136</id>
	<title>Sweet Headline...</title>
	<author>Purist</author>
	<datestamp>1260182700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"In today's news, auction house and penny saver owners brawl...story at 11."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" In today 's news , auction house and penny saver owners brawl...story at 11 .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In today's news, auction house and penny saver owners brawl...story at 11.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</id>
	<title>Kijiji?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260179700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, I use Ebay a lot, and Craigslist even more, and this is the first time I've ever heard of Kijiji.</p><p>Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji) says it's been up since 2007 in the US.</p><p>Sounds like an epic failure to me.  I wonder if it carries any Zune ads?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , I use Ebay a lot , and Craigslist even more , and this is the first time I 've ever heard of Kijiji.Wikipedia ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji ) says it 's been up since 2007 in the US.Sounds like an epic failure to me .
I wonder if it carries any Zune ads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, I use Ebay a lot, and Craigslist even more, and this is the first time I've ever heard of Kijiji.Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji) says it's been up since 2007 in the US.Sounds like an epic failure to me.
I wonder if it carries any Zune ads?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359796</id>
	<title>Re: It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1260191880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>....and yet its easier to get screwed on eBay!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>....and yet its easier to get screwed on eBay !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....and yet its easier to get screwed on eBay!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832</id>
	<title>Seems like a small pond, but eBay is right</title>
	<author>maczealot</author>
	<datestamp>1260180780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Disclaimer:IANAL
<br> <br>
I think I have to side with eBay on this one... as they bought a 25\% stake in Craigslist for $25 million, how that doesn't mean they should get a say in how the company is run I couldn't fathom.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disclaimer : IANAL I think I have to side with eBay on this one... as they bought a 25 \ % stake in Craigslist for $ 25 million , how that does n't mean they should get a say in how the company is run I could n't fathom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disclaimer:IANAL
 
I think I have to side with eBay on this one... as they bought a 25\% stake in Craigslist for $25 million, how that doesn't mean they should get a say in how the company is run I couldn't fathom.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358312</id>
	<title>Re:Depends where you are</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1260183540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rooms for rent in my area yields 1 in-town location on Kijiji. Posted October 7. It provides two other offerings (also from October) that are 80 and 140 miles away.<br>
Craigslist has 5 in-town hits and 6 more within plausible commuting distance posted since yesterday.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rooms for rent in my area yields 1 in-town location on Kijiji .
Posted October 7 .
It provides two other offerings ( also from October ) that are 80 and 140 miles away .
Craigslist has 5 in-town hits and 6 more within plausible commuting distance posted since yesterday .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rooms for rent in my area yields 1 in-town location on Kijiji.
Posted October 7.
It provides two other offerings (also from October) that are 80 and 140 miles away.
Craigslist has 5 in-town hits and 6 more within plausible commuting distance posted since yesterday.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359294</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Ironsides</author>
	<datestamp>1260188640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ebay owns about 25\% of Craiglist.  That's what's different.  Actually, Microsoft owned about 18 million shares of Apple at one point.  That would be equal to 72 million shares today due to splits or about 8\% of Apples outstanding stock.  If Microsoft hadn't made sure it was non-voting stock, it probably would have allowed them to have a member on Apples board as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ebay owns about 25 \ % of Craiglist .
That 's what 's different .
Actually , Microsoft owned about 18 million shares of Apple at one point .
That would be equal to 72 million shares today due to splits or about 8 \ % of Apples outstanding stock .
If Microsoft had n't made sure it was non-voting stock , it probably would have allowed them to have a member on Apples board as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ebay owns about 25\% of Craiglist.
That's what's different.
Actually, Microsoft owned about 18 million shares of Apple at one point.
That would be equal to 72 million shares today due to splits or about 8\% of Apples outstanding stock.
If Microsoft hadn't made sure it was non-voting stock, it probably would have allowed them to have a member on Apples board as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30374548</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260299580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean like how a Google guy was on the board of directors for Apple?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like how a Google guy was on the board of directors for Apple ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like how a Google guy was on the board of directors for Apple?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359062</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Atomm</author>
	<datestamp>1260187680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you really want to understand how this happened, read this wired story. It will make a lot more sense.</p><p><a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/craigslist-vs-ebay/" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/craigslist-vs-ebay/</a> [wired.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you really want to understand how this happened , read this wired story .
It will make a lot more sense.http : //www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/craigslist-vs-ebay/ [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you really want to understand how this happened, read this wired story.
It will make a lot more sense.http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/08/craigslist-vs-ebay/ [wired.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361850</id>
	<title>Re:Just one question</title>
	<author>meyekul</author>
	<datestamp>1260209040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think either they were fed up with every good domain name being taken and mashed some random characters with a fist of rage, or their cat stepped on the keyboard.  Either way, they compiled it in Perl and it output a classified site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think either they were fed up with every good domain name being taken and mashed some random characters with a fist of rage , or their cat stepped on the keyboard .
Either way , they compiled it in Perl and it output a classified site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think either they were fed up with every good domain name being taken and mashed some random characters with a fist of rage, or their cat stepped on the keyboard.
Either way, they compiled it in Perl and it output a classified site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357962</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>BeardedChimp</author>
	<datestamp>1260181620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or even weirder, say having MPs on the board of private companies whose modus operandi directly conflicts with protecting the public... oh wait that does happen. Patricia Hewitt et al.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or even weirder , say having MPs on the board of private companies whose modus operandi directly conflicts with protecting the public... oh wait that does happen .
Patricia Hewitt et al .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or even weirder, say having MPs on the board of private companies whose modus operandi directly conflicts with protecting the public... oh wait that does happen.
Patricia Hewitt et al.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</id>
	<title>In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>brunes69</author>
	<datestamp>1260180300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Craigslist is big in large markets, but in small markets, no one uses it. Kijiji rules the roost in small markets.</p><p>IE in my homedown, of about 100,000 people, there are less than 200 posts right now in craigslist ForSale section.</p><p>Kijiji has over 24,000.</p><p>It is because of the classic dillema that keeps users on Craigslist (despite it being a steamping pile of crap), and keeps people on eBay (despite them charging a fortune). People searching need a critical mass of people selling, and people selling need a critical mass of people searching. It is a self-renforcing monopoloy that is a tough nut to crack.</p><p>Craigslist has always been unpopular in small markets, that is where Kijiji got its foothold.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Craigslist is big in large markets , but in small markets , no one uses it .
Kijiji rules the roost in small markets.IE in my homedown , of about 100,000 people , there are less than 200 posts right now in craigslist ForSale section.Kijiji has over 24,000.It is because of the classic dillema that keeps users on Craigslist ( despite it being a steamping pile of crap ) , and keeps people on eBay ( despite them charging a fortune ) .
People searching need a critical mass of people selling , and people selling need a critical mass of people searching .
It is a self-renforcing monopoloy that is a tough nut to crack.Craigslist has always been unpopular in small markets , that is where Kijiji got its foothold .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Craigslist is big in large markets, but in small markets, no one uses it.
Kijiji rules the roost in small markets.IE in my homedown, of about 100,000 people, there are less than 200 posts right now in craigslist ForSale section.Kijiji has over 24,000.It is because of the classic dillema that keeps users on Craigslist (despite it being a steamping pile of crap), and keeps people on eBay (despite them charging a fortune).
People searching need a critical mass of people selling, and people selling need a critical mass of people searching.
It is a self-renforcing monopoloy that is a tough nut to crack.Craigslist has always been unpopular in small markets, that is where Kijiji got its foothold.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30366744</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>jnowlan</author>
	<datestamp>1260294000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or people can spell Kijiji in the markets it dominates.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or people can spell Kijiji in the markets it dominates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or people can spell Kijiji in the markets it dominates.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358460</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rules the roost?  I live in northern New Jersey, where it's one small town (suburb) touching the next one.  Each is relatively small at tens of thousands of residents, but overall this is a densely populated area.  The NNJ CL site *jumps* with postings.  Ebay's kjj version offers just two cities, Atlantic City and Newark, which is pathetic.  Maybe CL has been active here for longer, or something, but whatever advantage it first got, that advantage has proved to be decisive.  Better living thru Craigslist, that's my motto<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rules the roost ?
I live in northern New Jersey , where it 's one small town ( suburb ) touching the next one .
Each is relatively small at tens of thousands of residents , but overall this is a densely populated area .
The NNJ CL site * jumps * with postings .
Ebay 's kjj version offers just two cities , Atlantic City and Newark , which is pathetic .
Maybe CL has been active here for longer , or something , but whatever advantage it first got , that advantage has proved to be decisive .
Better living thru Craigslist , that 's my motto : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rules the roost?
I live in northern New Jersey, where it's one small town (suburb) touching the next one.
Each is relatively small at tens of thousands of residents, but overall this is a densely populated area.
The NNJ CL site *jumps* with postings.
Ebay's kjj version offers just two cities, Atlantic City and Newark, which is pathetic.
Maybe CL has been active here for longer, or something, but whatever advantage it first got, that advantage has proved to be decisive.
Better living thru Craigslist, that's my motto :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30363052</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1260267240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't even excist outside of North America, apparently. I suppose they just counted Canada as one more state<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-p</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't even excist outside of North America , apparently .
I suppose they just counted Canada as one more state : -p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't even excist outside of North America, apparently.
I suppose they just counted Canada as one more state :-p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357952</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a small pond, but eBay is right</title>
	<author>ducomputergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1260181560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends on the type of shares they purchased.  If they were preferred shares, you get first dibs on dividends, but no votes.  If they were Common Shares, then eBay would have a say in the vote of board of directors, etc..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on the type of shares they purchased .
If they were preferred shares , you get first dibs on dividends , but no votes .
If they were Common Shares , then eBay would have a say in the vote of board of directors , etc. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on the type of shares they purchased.
If they were preferred shares, you get first dibs on dividends, but no votes.
If they were Common Shares, then eBay would have a say in the vote of board of directors, etc..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358788</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260186180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am like everyone else. Didn't hear of it until now. Looked at the auto ads. Crappy site with a terrible name</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am like everyone else .
Did n't hear of it until now .
Looked at the auto ads .
Crappy site with a terrible name</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am like everyone else.
Didn't hear of it until now.
Looked at the auto ads.
Crappy site with a terrible name</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30366620</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1260293400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I live in Phoenix.Doing a quick and unscientific test, the Phoenix Kijiji site has 37 for-sale listings posted for Saturday, Sunday, and Today.The Phoenix Craigslist site has 1200 for-sale listings in the last 45 MINUTES.At least for my location, I think Kijiji qualifies as an "Epic failure".</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Phoenix.Doing a quick and unscientific test , the Phoenix Kijiji site has 37 for-sale listings posted for Saturday , Sunday , and Today.The Phoenix Craigslist site has 1200 for-sale listings in the last 45 MINUTES.At least for my location , I think Kijiji qualifies as an " Epic failure " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Phoenix.Doing a quick and unscientific test, the Phoenix Kijiji site has 37 for-sale listings posted for Saturday, Sunday, and Today.The Phoenix Craigslist site has 1200 for-sale listings in the last 45 MINUTES.At least for my location, I think Kijiji qualifies as an "Epic failure".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358354</id>
	<title>Too shy shy. hush hush.eye to eye</title>
	<author>maggotbrain\_777</author>
	<datestamp>1260183720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>KijijiJooJoo back together again like it was 1983.</htmltext>
<tokenext>KijijiJooJoo back together again like it was 1983 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>KijijiJooJoo back together again like it was 1983.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360154</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a small pond, but eBay is right</title>
	<author>AK Marc</author>
	<datestamp>1260194760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they are making decisions to purposefully harm other stockholders (and their own interest, but hoping to make it up in increased eBay traffic), then there would be issues.  If you were part owned by you largest competitor, would you trust them to make the best decisions for the company?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they are making decisions to purposefully harm other stockholders ( and their own interest , but hoping to make it up in increased eBay traffic ) , then there would be issues .
If you were part owned by you largest competitor , would you trust them to make the best decisions for the company ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they are making decisions to purposefully harm other stockholders (and their own interest, but hoping to make it up in increased eBay traffic), then there would be issues.
If you were part owned by you largest competitor, would you trust them to make the best decisions for the company?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358052</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a small pond, but eBay is right</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1260182220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I was one of the owners of the other 75\% of craigslist, I wouldn't be to happy with someone who has a vested interest in craigslist failing getting "a say in how the company is run". Nevertheless, as long as it is a minority stake, anything the eBay proxy advocates should be automatically voted against by the rest of the board anyway. The real issue here is whether you should be able to buy yourself a seat on your direct competitor's board in order to be privy to their trade secrets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I was one of the owners of the other 75 \ % of craigslist , I would n't be to happy with someone who has a vested interest in craigslist failing getting " a say in how the company is run " .
Nevertheless , as long as it is a minority stake , anything the eBay proxy advocates should be automatically voted against by the rest of the board anyway .
The real issue here is whether you should be able to buy yourself a seat on your direct competitor 's board in order to be privy to their trade secrets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I was one of the owners of the other 75\% of craigslist, I wouldn't be to happy with someone who has a vested interest in craigslist failing getting "a say in how the company is run".
Nevertheless, as long as it is a minority stake, anything the eBay proxy advocates should be automatically voted against by the rest of the board anyway.
The real issue here is whether you should be able to buy yourself a seat on your direct competitor's board in order to be privy to their trade secrets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359084</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>Snufu</author>
	<datestamp>1260187740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>  It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.</p></div><p>

Insert power seller, feedback, bid retraction, or pimppal joke here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist .
Insert power seller , feedback , bid retraction , or pimppal joke here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  It's easier to find prostitutes on Craigslist.
Insert power seller, feedback, bid retraction, or pimppal joke here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357844</id>
	<title>Dirty Pool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260180840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This sounds like dirty pool all the way around.</p><p>1). Decided to Create competing site<br>2). Buy shares from a shareholder to gain a seat on the board<br>3). (possibly) use information gleaned from meetings of the board towards own good<br>4). (possibly) use seat on board to negatively influence decisions</p><p>As others have mentioned there is certainly a conflict of interest here and while Ebay has every right to own shares, sitting on the board is just unethical and its surprising that the other shareholders would stand for it....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This sounds like dirty pool all the way around.1 ) .
Decided to Create competing site2 ) .
Buy shares from a shareholder to gain a seat on the board3 ) .
( possibly ) use information gleaned from meetings of the board towards own good4 ) .
( possibly ) use seat on board to negatively influence decisionsAs others have mentioned there is certainly a conflict of interest here and while Ebay has every right to own shares , sitting on the board is just unethical and its surprising that the other shareholders would stand for it... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This sounds like dirty pool all the way around.1).
Decided to Create competing site2).
Buy shares from a shareholder to gain a seat on the board3).
(possibly) use information gleaned from meetings of the board towards own good4).
(possibly) use seat on board to negatively influence decisionsAs others have mentioned there is certainly a conflict of interest here and while Ebay has every right to own shares, sitting on the board is just unethical and its surprising that the other shareholders would stand for it....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357994</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260181800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in Phoenix.</p><p>Doing a quick and unscientific test, the Phoenix Kijiji site has 37 for-sale listings posted for Saturday, Sunday, and Today.</p><p>The Phoenix Craigslist site has 1200 for-sale listings in the last 45 MINUTES.</p><p>At least for my location, I think Kijiji qualifies as an "Epic failure".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Phoenix.Doing a quick and unscientific test , the Phoenix Kijiji site has 37 for-sale listings posted for Saturday , Sunday , and Today.The Phoenix Craigslist site has 1200 for-sale listings in the last 45 MINUTES.At least for my location , I think Kijiji qualifies as an " Epic failure " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Phoenix.Doing a quick and unscientific test, the Phoenix Kijiji site has 37 for-sale listings posted for Saturday, Sunday, and Today.The Phoenix Craigslist site has 1200 for-sale listings in the last 45 MINUTES.At least for my location, I think Kijiji qualifies as an "Epic failure".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357542</id>
	<title>Wooh</title>
	<author>rmushkatblat</author>
	<datestamp>1260179280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Go eBay! (lower my fees, pl0x)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Go eBay !
( lower my fees , pl0x )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go eBay!
(lower my fees, pl0x)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360202</id>
	<title>Kijiji</title>
	<author>Dideamon</author>
	<datestamp>1260195240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kijiji sucks anyways who cares</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kijiji sucks anyways who cares</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kijiji sucks anyways who cares</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361424</id>
	<title>Re:Cross Ownership</title>
	<author>camperslo</author>
	<datestamp>1260204780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.</i></p><p>Here's some background on the Ebay stake in Craigslist.</p><p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newswar/interviews/newmark.html" title="pbs.org">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newswar/interviews/newmark.html</a> [pbs.org]<br><a href="http://www.craigslist.org/about/press/ebay.stake" title="craigslist.org">http://www.craigslist.org/about/press/ebay.stake</a> [craigslist.org]</p><p>Interesting clip from 2nd link:<br>When he originally gave a stake in Craigslist to the executive that sold his shares to eBay, Mr. Newmark said, he never expected them to be worth anything. "I made a gift of some equity in craigslist to a guy who was working with me at the time," Mr. Newmark wrote on his Internet blog (www.cnewmark.com). "I figured it didn't matter, since everyone agreed that the equity had only symbolic value, not dollar value."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.Here 's some background on the Ebay stake in Craigslist.http : //www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newswar/interviews/newmark.html [ pbs.org ] http : //www.craigslist.org/about/press/ebay.stake [ craigslist.org ] Interesting clip from 2nd link : When he originally gave a stake in Craigslist to the executive that sold his shares to eBay , Mr. Newmark said , he never expected them to be worth anything .
" I made a gift of some equity in craigslist to a guy who was working with me at the time , " Mr. Newmark wrote on his Internet blog ( www.cnewmark.com ) .
" I figured it did n't matter , since everyone agreed that the equity had only symbolic value , not dollar value .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.Here's some background on the Ebay stake in Craigslist.http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newswar/interviews/newmark.html [pbs.org]http://www.craigslist.org/about/press/ebay.stake [craigslist.org]Interesting clip from 2nd link:When he originally gave a stake in Craigslist to the executive that sold his shares to eBay, Mr. Newmark said, he never expected them to be worth anything.
"I made a gift of some equity in craigslist to a guy who was working with me at the time," Mr. Newmark wrote on his Internet blog (www.cnewmark.com).
"I figured it didn't matter, since everyone agreed that the equity had only symbolic value, not dollar value.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358182</id>
	<title>Re:Kijiji?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260182940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's popular in Canada, or at least where I live (Winnipeg). No one uses Craigslist around here; they either use Kijiji or one of the locally-created sites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's popular in Canada , or at least where I live ( Winnipeg ) .
No one uses Craigslist around here ; they either use Kijiji or one of the locally-created sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's popular in Canada, or at least where I live (Winnipeg).
No one uses Craigslist around here; they either use Kijiji or one of the locally-created sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30367058</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260295560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>where the dickens do you live ?</p><p>And certainly beauty is in the eye of the beholder<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>To me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.Craigslist is beautiful<br>I can find anything I want with ease.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where the dickens do you live ? And certainly beauty is in the eye of the beholder ...To me .. .Craigslist is beautifulI can find anything I want with ease .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where the dickens do you live ?And certainly beauty is in the eye of the beholder ...To me .. .Craigslist is beautifulI can find anything I want with ease.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357668</id>
	<title>watching rich people fight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260179880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>is like watching NASCAR: people with nothing better to do with their time or money than to go around in circles for hours over something only they care about, all the while taking money from poor people who are too dumb to not want to pay for vicarious participation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>is like watching NASCAR : people with nothing better to do with their time or money than to go around in circles for hours over something only they care about , all the while taking money from poor people who are too dumb to not want to pay for vicarious participation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is like watching NASCAR: people with nothing better to do with their time or money than to go around in circles for hours over something only they care about, all the while taking money from poor people who are too dumb to not want to pay for vicarious participation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358708</id>
	<title>FUCK EBAY!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260185760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>THATS ALL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THATS ALL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THATS ALL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357816</id>
	<title>ebay is now just evil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260180660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Craigslist was not selling ownership and ebay bought it from a former Craigslist Employee through a suspicious deal.  After how ebay has made numerous decisions at the expense of their users it is hard to believe that they would complain when someone tries to correct something they should not have done in the first place.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Craigslist was not selling ownership and ebay bought it from a former Craigslist Employee through a suspicious deal .
After how ebay has made numerous decisions at the expense of their users it is hard to believe that they would complain when someone tries to correct something they should not have done in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Craigslist was not selling ownership and ebay bought it from a former Craigslist Employee through a suspicious deal.
After how ebay has made numerous decisions at the expense of their users it is hard to believe that they would complain when someone tries to correct something they should not have done in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358352</id>
	<title>Re:Just one question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Kijiji (pronounced key-jee-jee) is Swahili for village." -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Kijiji ( pronounced key-jee-jee ) is Swahili for village .
" -http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Kijiji (pronounced key-jee-jee) is Swahili for village.
" -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357798</id>
	<title>Depends where you are</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1260180540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where I live, and what I buy/sell, Kijiji has *way* more users.</p><p>Compare:<br><a href="http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/f-buy-and-sell-cameras-camcorders-W0QQCatIdZ103" title="kijiji.ca">http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/f-buy-and-sell-cameras-camcorders-W0QQCatIdZ103</a> [kijiji.ca]<br><a href="http://edmonton.en.craigslist.ca/pho/" title="craigslist.ca">http://edmonton.en.craigslist.ca/pho/</a> [craigslist.ca]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where I live , and what I buy/sell , Kijiji has * way * more users.Compare : http : //edmonton.kijiji.ca/f-buy-and-sell-cameras-camcorders-W0QQCatIdZ103 [ kijiji.ca ] http : //edmonton.en.craigslist.ca/pho/ [ craigslist.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where I live, and what I buy/sell, Kijiji has *way* more users.Compare:http://edmonton.kijiji.ca/f-buy-and-sell-cameras-camcorders-W0QQCatIdZ103 [kijiji.ca]http://edmonton.en.craigslist.ca/pho/ [craigslist.ca]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358664</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>BobMcD</author>
	<datestamp>1260185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if we have more Craigslist than Kijiji we get to call ourselves a big city?  Woot!</p><p>As of now the December 7th tallies in all of 'for sale' are roughly -</p><p>Craigslist - 2100</p><p>Kijiji - 4 (yes, four)</p><p>Population - Roughly 450,000 for the entire multi-county area</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if we have more Craigslist than Kijiji we get to call ourselves a big city ?
Woot ! As of now the December 7th tallies in all of 'for sale ' are roughly -Craigslist - 2100Kijiji - 4 ( yes , four ) Population - Roughly 450,000 for the entire multi-county area</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if we have more Craigslist than Kijiji we get to call ourselves a big city?
Woot!As of now the December 7th tallies in all of 'for sale' are roughly -Craigslist - 2100Kijiji - 4 (yes, four)Population - Roughly 450,000 for the entire multi-county area</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358122</id>
	<title>Re:In Smaller Markets, Kijiji Dominates</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1260182580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in Anchorage Alaska there is nothing up on Kijiji (14 sales). Same went for where I used to live, a small market (Skagit county Washington).</p><p>For all of South Dakota there are 29 things for sale on Kijiji and hundreds of sales on Craigslist for today alone.</p><p>So I'm not sold on Kijiji "ruling the roost" in small markets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in Anchorage Alaska there is nothing up on Kijiji ( 14 sales ) .
Same went for where I used to live , a small market ( Skagit county Washington ) .For all of South Dakota there are 29 things for sale on Kijiji and hundreds of sales on Craigslist for today alone.So I 'm not sold on Kijiji " ruling the roost " in small markets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in Anchorage Alaska there is nothing up on Kijiji (14 sales).
Same went for where I used to live, a small market (Skagit county Washington).For all of South Dakota there are 29 things for sale on Kijiji and hundreds of sales on Craigslist for today alone.So I'm not sold on Kijiji "ruling the roost" in small markets.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30367058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30363052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30374548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30364204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1722247_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30366744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357622
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359660
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30374548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30364204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358258
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30360600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30363052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30366744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30367058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357994
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30359378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357798
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30358312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30361778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1722247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1722247.30357816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
