<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_07_1643259</id>
	<title>Google Visual Search Coming Soon to Android</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1260208080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Several sources have shared the news that "Google Goggles," publicly known as <a href="http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Search-Engines/Google-Visual-Search-Coming-For-Android-Phones-129311/">Google Visual Search</a>, will be "coming soon" to an Android phone near you.  Rather than typing in the search term, you will be able to just take a picture with your phone and search results will be returned.  The new search was <a href="http://androidandme.com/2009/12/news/demo-of-google-goggles-aka-google-visual-search/">recently featured</a> on CNBC's "Inside the Mind of Google."  Unfortunately Goggles didn't pass muster with a recent focus group, so it could be a while before Google decides this is ready to hit the streets.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Several sources have shared the news that " Google Goggles , " publicly known as Google Visual Search , will be " coming soon " to an Android phone near you .
Rather than typing in the search term , you will be able to just take a picture with your phone and search results will be returned .
The new search was recently featured on CNBC 's " Inside the Mind of Google .
" Unfortunately Goggles did n't pass muster with a recent focus group , so it could be a while before Google decides this is ready to hit the streets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Several sources have shared the news that "Google Goggles," publicly known as Google Visual Search, will be "coming soon" to an Android phone near you.
Rather than typing in the search term, you will be able to just take a picture with your phone and search results will be returned.
The new search was recently featured on CNBC's "Inside the Mind of Google.
"  Unfortunately Goggles didn't pass muster with a recent focus group, so it could be a while before Google decides this is ready to hit the streets.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355424</id>
	<title>Now they'll know what you've seen.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260211920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now Google will not only know all of your searches and all of the emails you've sent out, but in addition to the GPS tracking of most modern mobile phones they'll even know what you've seen.</p><p>Just wait until you take a picture of your girlfriend's asshole with your mobile, and soon you'll be finding out all of the filthy porn she did several years back in college. You'll be seeing her arse penetrated by all sorts of objects and random foreign men.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now Google will not only know all of your searches and all of the emails you 've sent out , but in addition to the GPS tracking of most modern mobile phones they 'll even know what you 've seen.Just wait until you take a picture of your girlfriend 's asshole with your mobile , and soon you 'll be finding out all of the filthy porn she did several years back in college .
You 'll be seeing her arse penetrated by all sorts of objects and random foreign men .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now Google will not only know all of your searches and all of the emails you've sent out, but in addition to the GPS tracking of most modern mobile phones they'll even know what you've seen.Just wait until you take a picture of your girlfriend's asshole with your mobile, and soon you'll be finding out all of the filthy porn she did several years back in college.
You'll be seeing her arse penetrated by all sorts of objects and random foreign men.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30360354</id>
	<title>Whats bugging me is...</title>
	<author>dbuttric</author>
	<datestamp>1260196320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have this software running on my phone, and it does work.<br>What stuns me is that while this thing is in 'beta' and returning poor search results, they have the opportunity to 'train up' the AI, while also keeping hold of a bevy of images that they collect from a few thousand (or hundred thousand) phones that geeks like us were willing to install it on...</p><p>I bet that the corpus of images they collect during the next 4 years - the beta period - will be pretty impressive, and kind of scary. I bet that they claim rights on all of them. I guess we need to start watermarking the photos from our phonecams.</p><p>Just my thoughts...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have this software running on my phone , and it does work.What stuns me is that while this thing is in 'beta ' and returning poor search results , they have the opportunity to 'train up ' the AI , while also keeping hold of a bevy of images that they collect from a few thousand ( or hundred thousand ) phones that geeks like us were willing to install it on...I bet that the corpus of images they collect during the next 4 years - the beta period - will be pretty impressive , and kind of scary .
I bet that they claim rights on all of them .
I guess we need to start watermarking the photos from our phonecams.Just my thoughts.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have this software running on my phone, and it does work.What stuns me is that while this thing is in 'beta' and returning poor search results, they have the opportunity to 'train up' the AI, while also keeping hold of a bevy of images that they collect from a few thousand (or hundred thousand) phones that geeks like us were willing to install it on...I bet that the corpus of images they collect during the next 4 years - the beta period - will be pretty impressive, and kind of scary.
I bet that they claim rights on all of them.
I guess we need to start watermarking the photos from our phonecams.Just my thoughts...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30360168</id>
	<title>Nokia has already done it.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260194880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here. You can test it right now:<br><a href="http://betalabs.nokia.com/betas/view/nokia-point-and-find" title="nokia.com">http://betalabs.nokia.com/betas/view/nokia-point-and-find</a> [nokia.com]</p><p>It&rsquo;s sad, how often Slashdot is full of hype about Google or Apple doing things, that others did for a loong time.<br>Must be sad to live the 3rd world of the mobile phone industry.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p><p>It&rsquo;s really hard not to do a  &ldquo;shameless plug&rdquo; for Nokia phones yet again...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here .
You can test it right now : http : //betalabs.nokia.com/betas/view/nokia-point-and-find [ nokia.com ] It    s sad , how often Slashdot is full of hype about Google or Apple doing things , that others did for a loong time.Must be sad to live the 3rd world of the mobile phone industry .
: /It    s really hard not to do a    shameless plug    for Nokia phones yet again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here.
You can test it right now:http://betalabs.nokia.com/betas/view/nokia-point-and-find [nokia.com]It’s sad, how often Slashdot is full of hype about Google or Apple doing things, that others did for a loong time.Must be sad to live the 3rd world of the mobile phone industry.
:/It’s really hard not to do a  “shameless plug” for Nokia phones yet again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356990</id>
	<title>Its available in the Marketplace right now.</title>
	<author>jrwilk01</author>
	<datestamp>1260219540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Goggles is available for install from the Android Market place right now.</p><p>It works great for logos, and can even OCR business cards. Though, it seems to be a tad crashy on the Droid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Goggles is available for install from the Android Market place right now.It works great for logos , and can even OCR business cards .
Though , it seems to be a tad crashy on the Droid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Goggles is available for install from the Android Market place right now.It works great for logos, and can even OCR business cards.
Though, it seems to be a tad crashy on the Droid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357016</id>
	<title>Brilliant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260176460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I want to search for information about horses, I could walk outside, take a picture of one, upload it to my PC, and hope that Google recognise it as a horse!</p><p>Which is much more fun than typing in H-O-R-S-E !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I want to search for information about horses , I could walk outside , take a picture of one , upload it to my PC , and hope that Google recognise it as a horse ! Which is much more fun than typing in H-O-R-S-E !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I want to search for information about horses, I could walk outside, take a picture of one, upload it to my PC, and hope that Google recognise it as a horse!Which is much more fun than typing in H-O-R-S-E !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355704</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>insnprsn</author>
	<datestamp>1260213360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dont you mean googles the mind?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dont you mean googles the mind ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dont you mean googles the mind?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358464</id>
	<title>Re:Amazon photo search</title>
	<author>eamonman</author>
	<datestamp>1260184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually when I bought the Droid I assumed Google had some app that did that, but oh well.  The amazon app is more funny than actually useful (last week I took a picture of a random ice cream sign, and it comes back with a weight loss book).  In general it works pretty well with common objects from picturesque views.</p><p>Time to go download google goggles and test that google real time search thing too...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually when I bought the Droid I assumed Google had some app that did that , but oh well .
The amazon app is more funny than actually useful ( last week I took a picture of a random ice cream sign , and it comes back with a weight loss book ) .
In general it works pretty well with common objects from picturesque views.Time to go download google goggles and test that google real time search thing too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually when I bought the Droid I assumed Google had some app that did that, but oh well.
The amazon app is more funny than actually useful (last week I took a picture of a random ice cream sign, and it comes back with a weight loss book).
In general it works pretty well with common objects from picturesque views.Time to go download google goggles and test that google real time search thing too...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357380</id>
	<title>Re:The goggles</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1260178440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, brings back memories:</p><p><a href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3331/3504658289\_fd30e3b5a0.jpg" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3331/3504658289\_fd30e3b5a0.jpg</a> [flickr.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , brings back memories : http : //farm4.static.flickr.com/3331/3504658289 \ _fd30e3b5a0.jpg [ flickr.com ]    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, brings back memories:http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3331/3504658289\_fd30e3b5a0.jpg [flickr.com]
   </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412</id>
	<title>Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1260211860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The possibilities here are so boundless that it simply boggles the mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The possibilities here are so boundless that it simply boggles the mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The possibilities here are so boundless that it simply boggles the mind.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30361676</id>
	<title>I've tried this out a couple of times today...</title>
	<author>SyntaxTerror82</author>
	<datestamp>1260206880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've installed Google Goggles and gave it a test run.

It works brilliantly.  I haven't tried any landmarks yet, but I took a picture of a textbook sitting on my desk and it recognised it and took me to book reviews, and I could preview the book on Google Books.  The picture had major glare issues and it still worked fine.

Thinking it was a fluke, I took a picture of a second textbook and sure enough it worked perfectly again.  2 from 2 aint bad.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've installed Google Goggles and gave it a test run .
It works brilliantly .
I have n't tried any landmarks yet , but I took a picture of a textbook sitting on my desk and it recognised it and took me to book reviews , and I could preview the book on Google Books .
The picture had major glare issues and it still worked fine .
Thinking it was a fluke , I took a picture of a second textbook and sure enough it worked perfectly again .
2 from 2 aint bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've installed Google Goggles and gave it a test run.
It works brilliantly.
I haven't tried any landmarks yet, but I took a picture of a textbook sitting on my desk and it recognised it and took me to book reviews, and I could preview the book on Google Books.
The picture had major glare issues and it still worked fine.
Thinking it was a fluke, I took a picture of a second textbook and sure enough it worked perfectly again.
2 from 2 aint bad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355636</id>
	<title>Sixth sense here we come</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My first thought was this TED video: <a href="http://blog.ted.com/2009/03/sixth\_sense\_demo.php" title="ted.com">http://blog.ted.com/2009/03/sixth\_sense\_demo.php</a> [ted.com]. It would be interesting to have a heavyweight like Google developing tools to bring such a product to consumers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My first thought was this TED video : http : //blog.ted.com/2009/03/sixth \ _sense \ _demo.php [ ted.com ] .
It would be interesting to have a heavyweight like Google developing tools to bring such a product to consumers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first thought was this TED video: http://blog.ted.com/2009/03/sixth\_sense\_demo.php [ted.com].
It would be interesting to have a heavyweight like Google developing tools to bring such a product to consumers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357000</id>
	<title>I think I found a problem with this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260219540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great... now we will have a search function that only works in 24.5 days intervals</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great... now we will have a search function that only works in 24.5 days intervals</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great... now we will have a search function that only works in 24.5 days intervals</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355570</id>
	<title>The goggles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Unfortunately Goggles didn't pass muster with a recent focus group, so it could be a while before Google decides this is ready to hit the streets.</p></div></blockquote><p>So, the Goggles... they do nothing?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately Goggles did n't pass muster with a recent focus group , so it could be a while before Google decides this is ready to hit the streets.So , the Goggles... they do nothing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately Goggles didn't pass muster with a recent focus group, so it could be a while before Google decides this is ready to hit the streets.So, the Goggles... they do nothing?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356818</id>
	<title>Re:Searching for porn will be no fun.</title>
	<author>martas</author>
	<datestamp>1260218760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>take a picture of your ass, with nipples drawn on it (yep, south park reference).<br> <br>

or, just search using the famous XP "green buttocks and blue skies" wallpaper.</htmltext>
<tokenext>take a picture of your ass , with nipples drawn on it ( yep , south park reference ) .
or , just search using the famous XP " green buttocks and blue skies " wallpaper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>take a picture of your ass, with nipples drawn on it (yep, south park reference).
or, just search using the famous XP "green buttocks and blue skies" wallpaper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366638</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>MoeDrippins</author>
	<datestamp>1260293400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Secondly how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones?</p><p>In what way?  I don't have an iphone so I have no basis for comparison, but the Motorola Droid's Google maps is supersplendiforous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Secondly how come Google 's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones ? In what way ?
I do n't have an iphone so I have no basis for comparison , but the Motorola Droid 's Google maps is supersplendiforous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Secondly how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones?In what way?
I don't have an iphone so I have no basis for comparison, but the Motorola Droid's Google maps is supersplendiforous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357734</id>
	<title>Re:Great Idea, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260180240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come to think of it - what the fuck is this for? Don't we have GPS in phones nowadays? Why do I have to take pictures of the Washington Memorial when the phone knows that's the thing I'm standing next to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come to think of it - what the fuck is this for ?
Do n't we have GPS in phones nowadays ?
Why do I have to take pictures of the Washington Memorial when the phone knows that 's the thing I 'm standing next to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come to think of it - what the fuck is this for?
Don't we have GPS in phones nowadays?
Why do I have to take pictures of the Washington Memorial when the phone knows that's the thing I'm standing next to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355478</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The trouble is, you'd need a source image to start with!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The trouble is , you 'd need a source image to start with !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The trouble is, you'd need a source image to start with!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30377246</id>
	<title>Droid overload</title>
	<author>hofo</author>
	<datestamp>1259598360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great, now searches for "human" will return everyone with a picture on the net.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great , now searches for " human " will return everyone with a picture on the net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great, now searches for "human" will return everyone with a picture on the net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366576</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>MoeDrippins</author>
	<datestamp>1260293220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He WAS the father of the country...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He WAS the father of the country.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He WAS the father of the country...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356160</id>
	<title>Amazon photo search</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1260215520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Amazon app for Android offers the ability to search for an item by either barcode or photo. According to the Amazon blurb, there are <i>real people</i> behind the requests that actually look for the items pictured and send results. I have used it twice and both times they found what I needed, but the results took about 10-15 minutes to get to me. I wonder if Google will just have 10,000 wage slaves working the results queue?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Amazon app for Android offers the ability to search for an item by either barcode or photo .
According to the Amazon blurb , there are real people behind the requests that actually look for the items pictured and send results .
I have used it twice and both times they found what I needed , but the results took about 10-15 minutes to get to me .
I wonder if Google will just have 10,000 wage slaves working the results queue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Amazon app for Android offers the ability to search for an item by either barcode or photo.
According to the Amazon blurb, there are real people behind the requests that actually look for the items pictured and send results.
I have used it twice and both times they found what I needed, but the results took about 10-15 minutes to get to me.
I wonder if Google will just have 10,000 wage slaves working the results queue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</id>
	<title>Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1260213240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder why folks at Android (read Google) do not focus on web functionalities that matter in today's age.</p><p>Heck, we need Flash and PDF capabilities by default. Yes...by default. I know there are apps for these but "default" is the key word here. Now what's wrong with that?</p><p>Secondly how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones? It should be the other way round...after all it's their product.</p><p>Come on Google do something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder why folks at Android ( read Google ) do not focus on web functionalities that matter in today 's age.Heck , we need Flash and PDF capabilities by default .
Yes...by default .
I know there are apps for these but " default " is the key word here .
Now what 's wrong with that ? Secondly how come Google 's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones ?
It should be the other way round...after all it 's their product.Come on Google do something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder why folks at Android (read Google) do not focus on web functionalities that matter in today's age.Heck, we need Flash and PDF capabilities by default.
Yes...by default.
I know there are apps for these but "default" is the key word here.
Now what's wrong with that?Secondly how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones?
It should be the other way round...after all it's their product.Come on Google do something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355916</id>
	<title>First step...</title>
	<author>CSHARP123</author>
	<datestamp>1260214320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the First step. Next as soon as we see an item, our brain will be bombarded with price list from different web stores and we will know where to buy it cheap. Think of a Java code, it will be in your brain along with some not so disruptive ads. <br>
Thanks it is Google who are working on it. If it were MS, Ballmer would have squirted a lot more than necessary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the First step .
Next as soon as we see an item , our brain will be bombarded with price list from different web stores and we will know where to buy it cheap .
Think of a Java code , it will be in your brain along with some not so disruptive ads .
Thanks it is Google who are working on it .
If it were MS , Ballmer would have squirted a lot more than necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the First step.
Next as soon as we see an item, our brain will be bombarded with price list from different web stores and we will know where to buy it cheap.
Think of a Java code, it will be in your brain along with some not so disruptive ads.
Thanks it is Google who are working on it.
If it were MS, Ballmer would have squirted a lot more than necessary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355944</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1260214500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe because your comment has nothing to do with visual search (it's offtopic), and you don't want *flash* capability at all? Google is going HTML5, which removes the need for flash in it's entirety. If you want PDF capability just use <a href="http://www.cyanogenmod.com/" title="cyanogenmod.com">cyanogenmod</a> [cyanogenmod.com] and quit acting like it's google's fault.</p><p>cyanogenmod = significantly faster performance, more applications available with more functionality (1 click gps/wifi/bluetooth/etc), PDF by default, exchange support, and all OS versions including cyanogen = navigation support.</p><p>Google's map does not work at all as well on the iphone as on android. ever seen google nav on the iphone?</p><p>Your fault is your lack of understanding, none of these issue's are google's fault. I'm not saying google is great, they do a lot of bad shit too, but it helps to go to google.com and look up some of the crap you want to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe because your comment has nothing to do with visual search ( it 's offtopic ) , and you do n't want * flash * capability at all ?
Google is going HTML5 , which removes the need for flash in it 's entirety .
If you want PDF capability just use cyanogenmod [ cyanogenmod.com ] and quit acting like it 's google 's fault.cyanogenmod = significantly faster performance , more applications available with more functionality ( 1 click gps/wifi/bluetooth/etc ) , PDF by default , exchange support , and all OS versions including cyanogen = navigation support.Google 's map does not work at all as well on the iphone as on android .
ever seen google nav on the iphone ? Your fault is your lack of understanding , none of these issue 's are google 's fault .
I 'm not saying google is great , they do a lot of bad shit too , but it helps to go to google.com and look up some of the crap you want to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe because your comment has nothing to do with visual search (it's offtopic), and you don't want *flash* capability at all?
Google is going HTML5, which removes the need for flash in it's entirety.
If you want PDF capability just use cyanogenmod [cyanogenmod.com] and quit acting like it's google's fault.cyanogenmod = significantly faster performance, more applications available with more functionality (1 click gps/wifi/bluetooth/etc), PDF by default, exchange support, and all OS versions including cyanogen = navigation support.Google's map does not work at all as well on the iphone as on android.
ever seen google nav on the iphone?Your fault is your lack of understanding, none of these issue's are google's fault.
I'm not saying google is great, they do a lot of bad shit too, but it helps to go to google.com and look up some of the crap you want to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356414</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1260216840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their PDF-&gt;HTML thing could really use some work. Many PDFs look totally different.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their PDF- &gt; HTML thing could really use some work .
Many PDFs look totally different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their PDF-&gt;HTML thing could really use some work.
Many PDFs look totally different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357278</id>
	<title>Integrated with Facebook..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260177780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Snap a picture of a douchebag that just cut you off in some line and see who he is , where he lives... doesn't sound too far-fetched really.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Snap a picture of a douchebag that just cut you off in some line and see who he is , where he lives... does n't sound too far-fetched really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Snap a picture of a douchebag that just cut you off in some line and see who he is , where he lives... doesn't sound too far-fetched really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355788</id>
	<title>Re:Great Idea, but...</title>
	<author>Simon (S2)</author>
	<datestamp>1260213720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Image searching combined with the fantastically bad cameras on all smart phones.</p></div><p>The camera on my phone (a Nokia 6600 slide) takes quite good pictures. I don't know how you define "bad", but the camera is perfectly able to take pictures in which the grass is green and the sky blue, and where you recognise the faces of who you took the picture from.<br><a href="http://s2.diffuse.it/pictures/t/1142.jpg" title="diffuse.it">Here</a> [diffuse.it] <a href="http://s2.diffuse.it/pictures/show/1146.jpg" title="diffuse.it">are</a> [diffuse.it] <a href="http://s2.diffuse.it/pictures/t/1150.jpg" title="diffuse.it">some</a> [diffuse.it] <a href="http://s2.diffuse.it/pictures/t/1153.jpg" title="diffuse.it">pictures</a> [diffuse.it], <a href="http://s2.diffuse.it/pictures/t/1154.jpg" title="diffuse.it">just</a> [diffuse.it] so that you get the idea (and those are resized).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Image searching combined with the fantastically bad cameras on all smart phones.The camera on my phone ( a Nokia 6600 slide ) takes quite good pictures .
I do n't know how you define " bad " , but the camera is perfectly able to take pictures in which the grass is green and the sky blue , and where you recognise the faces of who you took the picture from.Here [ diffuse.it ] are [ diffuse.it ] some [ diffuse.it ] pictures [ diffuse.it ] , just [ diffuse.it ] so that you get the idea ( and those are resized ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Image searching combined with the fantastically bad cameras on all smart phones.The camera on my phone (a Nokia 6600 slide) takes quite good pictures.
I don't know how you define "bad", but the camera is perfectly able to take pictures in which the grass is green and the sky blue, and where you recognise the faces of who you took the picture from.Here [diffuse.it] are [diffuse.it] some [diffuse.it] pictures [diffuse.it], just [diffuse.it] so that you get the idea (and those are resized).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355778</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1260213660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With HTML 5 (which Google is helping push for) you won't need Flash so much anymore.</p><p>I don't need a PDF reader anymore given that Google will take a PDF on the web, and rerender it as HTML for me automatically.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With HTML 5 ( which Google is helping push for ) you wo n't need Flash so much anymore.I do n't need a PDF reader anymore given that Google will take a PDF on the web , and rerender it as HTML for me automatically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With HTML 5 (which Google is helping push for) you won't need Flash so much anymore.I don't need a PDF reader anymore given that Google will take a PDF on the web, and rerender it as HTML for me automatically.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355568</id>
	<title>Perennial Beta</title>
	<author>Fdisk81</author>
	<datestamp>1260212640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure they'll have plenty of time to work out the kinks during Beta.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure they 'll have plenty of time to work out the kinks during Beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure they'll have plenty of time to work out the kinks during Beta.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355530</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google thought you wanted a penis the size of the washington monument and directed you to appropriate results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google thought you wanted a penis the size of the washington monument and directed you to appropriate results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google thought you wanted a penis the size of the washington monument and directed you to appropriate results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355460</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356112</id>
	<title>Re:Now they'll know what you've seen.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260215340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>from the my-donut-shop-returned-goatse dept.</p></div><p>If they are watching you I would purposefully look at things like this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>from the my-donut-shop-returned-goatse dept.If they are watching you I would purposefully look at things like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from the my-donut-shop-returned-goatse dept.If they are watching you I would purposefully look at things like this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30361298</id>
	<title>barcodes and other numbers</title>
	<author>JumpSocial</author>
	<datestamp>1260203760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>bar codes are your friend.

as are product codes and other text that may be scanned.</htmltext>
<tokenext>bar codes are your friend .
as are product codes and other text that may be scanned .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>bar codes are your friend.
as are product codes and other text that may be scanned.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357010</id>
	<title>Google wants "to know more about you than you do"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260176400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google has stated publicly in the past, that their goal is to "know more about you than you do." Cell phone camera search, is one more tool in their toolbox for achieving that end, and it's one more service of theirs I won't be useing.</p><p>This would essentially, turn the entire cell phone camera crazed searching public, into a giant information gathering army, to further googles purposes. No matter how much they say its about you, its not about you, its about them. Thats why its a "free service".</p><p>Go ahead, take snapshots of everyone and everything you own. Let google organize it into the worlds largest database of information. Pictures of your kids, your wife, face scanned, body dimension analyzed, cataloged, available upon request ( for a fee ) by law enforcement agencies, corrupt governments, power hungry dictators, and any other 'quasi-legitamite investigative body' worldwide.</p><p>Google is big brother.</p><p>As for me, i'm using Ecosia. They destroy their records in 48 hours, and are buying up rainforest before googles corporate customers destroy it all.</p><p>ps. No, I'm not an anti-technology "omg John Kennedy Jr. orchestrated 9/11 from the dead" conspiracy nut. I am a computer programmer who is aware of multiple algorithms that are probably in use, that google doesnt speak about.</p><p>Android enabled "smart" phone<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... $200.</p><p>Cell phone service<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... $50 per month</p><p>Giving every minute detail about your entire life, the GPS location of your wife smoking weed at the Christmas party, the co-ordinates of the shiny new car you just waxed, and images of your kids to a "for profit" entity that serves its own purposes ( and any government that exercises any influence over them ) voluntarily<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... priceless</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has stated publicly in the past , that their goal is to " know more about you than you do .
" Cell phone camera search , is one more tool in their toolbox for achieving that end , and it 's one more service of theirs I wo n't be useing.This would essentially , turn the entire cell phone camera crazed searching public , into a giant information gathering army , to further googles purposes .
No matter how much they say its about you , its not about you , its about them .
Thats why its a " free service " .Go ahead , take snapshots of everyone and everything you own .
Let google organize it into the worlds largest database of information .
Pictures of your kids , your wife , face scanned , body dimension analyzed , cataloged , available upon request ( for a fee ) by law enforcement agencies , corrupt governments , power hungry dictators , and any other 'quasi-legitamite investigative body ' worldwide.Google is big brother.As for me , i 'm using Ecosia .
They destroy their records in 48 hours , and are buying up rainforest before googles corporate customers destroy it all.ps .
No , I 'm not an anti-technology " omg John Kennedy Jr. orchestrated 9/11 from the dead " conspiracy nut .
I am a computer programmer who is aware of multiple algorithms that are probably in use , that google doesnt speak about.Android enabled " smart " phone ... $ 200.Cell phone service ... $ 50 per monthGiving every minute detail about your entire life , the GPS location of your wife smoking weed at the Christmas party , the co-ordinates of the shiny new car you just waxed , and images of your kids to a " for profit " entity that serves its own purposes ( and any government that exercises any influence over them ) voluntarily .... priceless</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has stated publicly in the past, that their goal is to "know more about you than you do.
" Cell phone camera search, is one more tool in their toolbox for achieving that end, and it's one more service of theirs I won't be useing.This would essentially, turn the entire cell phone camera crazed searching public, into a giant information gathering army, to further googles purposes.
No matter how much they say its about you, its not about you, its about them.
Thats why its a "free service".Go ahead, take snapshots of everyone and everything you own.
Let google organize it into the worlds largest database of information.
Pictures of your kids, your wife, face scanned, body dimension analyzed, cataloged, available upon request ( for a fee ) by law enforcement agencies, corrupt governments, power hungry dictators, and any other 'quasi-legitamite investigative body' worldwide.Google is big brother.As for me, i'm using Ecosia.
They destroy their records in 48 hours, and are buying up rainforest before googles corporate customers destroy it all.ps.
No, I'm not an anti-technology "omg John Kennedy Jr. orchestrated 9/11 from the dead" conspiracy nut.
I am a computer programmer who is aware of multiple algorithms that are probably in use, that google doesnt speak about.Android enabled "smart" phone ... $200.Cell phone service ... $50 per monthGiving every minute detail about your entire life, the GPS location of your wife smoking weed at the Christmas party, the co-ordinates of the shiny new car you just waxed, and images of your kids to a "for profit" entity that serves its own purposes ( and any government that exercises any influence over them ) voluntarily .... priceless</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355684</id>
	<title>Re:Great Idea, but...</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1260213240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Similar Images is offered, and works quite well, for images of a poorer resolution than even the crappiest phone cams on sale today. Besides, Android handsets have your location and view direction already, which cuts the problem down enormously. I suspect they could do it without any image recognition at all and get remarkably good results.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Similar Images is offered , and works quite well , for images of a poorer resolution than even the crappiest phone cams on sale today .
Besides , Android handsets have your location and view direction already , which cuts the problem down enormously .
I suspect they could do it without any image recognition at all and get remarkably good results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Similar Images is offered, and works quite well, for images of a poorer resolution than even the crappiest phone cams on sale today.
Besides, Android handsets have your location and view direction already, which cuts the problem down enormously.
I suspect they could do it without any image recognition at all and get remarkably good results.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355460</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that why I took a picture of the Washington Monument and got a wide range of results on specific "medications"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that why I took a picture of the Washington Monument and got a wide range of results on specific " medications " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that why I took a picture of the Washington Monument and got a wide range of results on specific "medications"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30359016</id>
	<title>Re:Sixth sense here we come</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260187380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My first thought was Photo2Search announced back in 2006 by Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My first thought was Photo2Search announced back in 2006 by Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My first thought was Photo2Search announced back in 2006 by Microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355750</id>
	<title>On my next date...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260213600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On my next date, she whips out her cell phone camera, snaps a quick shot, shoots it off to Google, and gets results on me.</p><p>"Honey, that chicken is a filthy liar! She so wanted it at the time!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On my next date , she whips out her cell phone camera , snaps a quick shot , shoots it off to Google , and gets results on me .
" Honey , that chicken is a filthy liar !
She so wanted it at the time !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On my next date, she whips out her cell phone camera, snaps a quick shot, shoots it off to Google, and gets results on me.
"Honey, that chicken is a filthy liar!
She so wanted it at the time!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357398</id>
	<title>Re:Searching for porn will be no fun.</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1260178560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time to buy stock in realistic blow-up dolls.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time to buy stock in realistic blow-up dolls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time to buy stock in realistic blow-up dolls.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357548</id>
	<title>It's out!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260179280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Goggles is available on Android as of yesterday. See the official Google video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hhgfz0zPmH4</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Goggles is available on Android as of yesterday .
See the official Google video here : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Hhgfz0zPmH4</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Goggles is available on Android as of yesterday.
See the official Google video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hhgfz0zPmH4</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357556</id>
	<title>just tried it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260179340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
It's not coming soon, it's already there. I downloaded and installed the app, it's an OCR that can also read logos and barcodes. If you take a photo of a product with text, logos or barcodes it will know what that product is.
</p><p>
I took a photo of a tape dispenser with nothing but the table in background, it wasn't able to figure out it is a photo of a tape dispenser, it gave me a list of similar photos which had nothing at all to do with tape dispenser, there was even a photo of a swan.
</p><p>
I took a photo of a memory stick, it wasn't able to figure out what this is. Once again I got the "similar pictures" one of them was a photo of bees, nothing even close to memory stick.
</p><p>
I took a photo of the hand sanitizer, it recognized the Purell logo and read the text on the bottle. Taking a photo of the back of the bottle didn't result in any meaningful matches. Taking a photo of the bar code identified the product, but that's something I can already do with the barcode reader application.
</p><p>
It can read QR barcodes too. Nothing special, the barcode reader app already does that.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not coming soon , it 's already there .
I downloaded and installed the app , it 's an OCR that can also read logos and barcodes .
If you take a photo of a product with text , logos or barcodes it will know what that product is .
I took a photo of a tape dispenser with nothing but the table in background , it was n't able to figure out it is a photo of a tape dispenser , it gave me a list of similar photos which had nothing at all to do with tape dispenser , there was even a photo of a swan .
I took a photo of a memory stick , it was n't able to figure out what this is .
Once again I got the " similar pictures " one of them was a photo of bees , nothing even close to memory stick .
I took a photo of the hand sanitizer , it recognized the Purell logo and read the text on the bottle .
Taking a photo of the back of the bottle did n't result in any meaningful matches .
Taking a photo of the bar code identified the product , but that 's something I can already do with the barcode reader application .
It can read QR barcodes too .
Nothing special , the barcode reader app already does that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It's not coming soon, it's already there.
I downloaded and installed the app, it's an OCR that can also read logos and barcodes.
If you take a photo of a product with text, logos or barcodes it will know what that product is.
I took a photo of a tape dispenser with nothing but the table in background, it wasn't able to figure out it is a photo of a tape dispenser, it gave me a list of similar photos which had nothing at all to do with tape dispenser, there was even a photo of a swan.
I took a photo of a memory stick, it wasn't able to figure out what this is.
Once again I got the "similar pictures" one of them was a photo of bees, nothing even close to memory stick.
I took a photo of the hand sanitizer, it recognized the Purell logo and read the text on the bottle.
Taking a photo of the back of the bottle didn't result in any meaningful matches.
Taking a photo of the bar code identified the product, but that's something I can already do with the barcode reader application.
It can read QR barcodes too.
Nothing special, the barcode reader app already does that.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355744</id>
	<title>Re:Now they'll know what you've seen.</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1260213540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of people are being pretty pessimistic regarding how accurate the results will be.</p><p>You are being incredibly optimistic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of people are being pretty pessimistic regarding how accurate the results will be.You are being incredibly optimistic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of people are being pretty pessimistic regarding how accurate the results will be.You are being incredibly optimistic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366684</id>
	<title>Re:just tried it...</title>
	<author>MoeDrippins</author>
	<datestamp>1260293700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It misses a lot of stuff to be sure, but it got the GoodYear logo of my son's toy truck, correctly identified an Audobon print in my living room, the Stevens Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment book (from the spine, and rotated about 30*-45*, no barcode to be seen), and even correctly identified my guitar as a Fender Jazz Bass.   How it figured out it was a *bass* at all I fail to comprehend; 5 string tuners instead of 6?  And a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/jazz/ bass?    Maybe it guessed and got lucky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It misses a lot of stuff to be sure , but it got the GoodYear logo of my son 's toy truck , correctly identified an Audobon print in my living room , the Stevens Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment book ( from the spine , and rotated about 30 * -45 * , no barcode to be seen ) , and even correctly identified my guitar as a Fender Jazz Bass .
How it figured out it was a * bass * at all I fail to comprehend ; 5 string tuners instead of 6 ?
And a /jazz/ bass ?
Maybe it guessed and got lucky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It misses a lot of stuff to be sure, but it got the GoodYear logo of my son's toy truck, correctly identified an Audobon print in my living room, the Stevens Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment book (from the spine, and rotated about 30*-45*, no barcode to be seen), and even correctly identified my guitar as a Fender Jazz Bass.
How it figured out it was a *bass* at all I fail to comprehend; 5 string tuners instead of 6?
And a /jazz/ bass?
Maybe it guessed and got lucky.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355870</id>
	<title>Searching for porn will be no fun.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260214140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First you need a naked woman to see more naked woman.</p><p>And if you take a picture of your cock, you will get pictures of more cocks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First you need a naked woman to see more naked woman.And if you take a picture of your cock , you will get pictures of more cocks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First you need a naked woman to see more naked woman.And if you take a picture of your cock, you will get pictures of more cocks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30359010</id>
	<title>Re:Great Idea, but...</title>
	<author>sootman</author>
	<datestamp>1260187380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when is 3MP "fantastically bad"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when is 3MP " fantastically bad " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when is 3MP "fantastically bad"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358906</id>
	<title>Tineye</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260186720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.tineye.com/" title="tineye.com" rel="nofollow">Well, I guess Google is kinda late...</a> [tineye.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I guess Google is kinda late... [ tineye.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I guess Google is kinda late... [tineye.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356434</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1260216960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"HTML5, which removes the need for flash in it's entirety."<br> <br>Errr..... It might remove a lot of flash videos on streaming sites. I don't think it will impact flash games... And people with flash sites are unlikely to do differently.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" HTML5 , which removes the need for flash in it 's entirety .
" Errr..... It might remove a lot of flash videos on streaming sites .
I do n't think it will impact flash games... And people with flash sites are unlikely to do differently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"HTML5, which removes the need for flash in it's entirety.
" Errr..... It might remove a lot of flash videos on streaming sites.
I don't think it will impact flash games... And people with flash sites are unlikely to do differently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357882</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>ChinggisK</author>
	<datestamp>1260181080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Secondly how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones? It should be the other way round...after all it's their product.</p></div><p>
Probably the same reason I can click the back button in Gmail and have it work in Firefox but not in Chrome. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Secondly how come Google 's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones ?
It should be the other way round...after all it 's their product .
Probably the same reason I can click the back button in Gmail and have it work in Firefox but not in Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Secondly how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones?
It should be the other way round...after all it's their product.
Probably the same reason I can click the back button in Gmail and have it work in Firefox but not in Chrome. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355992</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260214740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please refer to <a href="http://www.tineye.com/" title="tineye.com">http://www.tineye.com</a> [tineye.com].</p><p>This Google visual search seems more targeted at recognising locations, tourist attractions, and billboards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please refer to http : //www.tineye.com [ tineye.com ] .This Google visual search seems more targeted at recognising locations , tourist attractions , and billboards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please refer to http://www.tineye.com [tineye.com].This Google visual search seems more targeted at recognising locations, tourist attractions, and billboards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452</id>
	<title>Great Idea, but...</title>
	<author>Reason58</author>
	<datestamp>1260212040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Image searching combined with the fantastically bad cameras on all smart phones. Sounds like a good idea in theory, but not so great in practice. For now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Image searching combined with the fantastically bad cameras on all smart phones .
Sounds like a good idea in theory , but not so great in practice .
For now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Image searching combined with the fantastically bad cameras on all smart phones.
Sounds like a good idea in theory, but not so great in practice.
For now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358396</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1260183960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones?</p></div><p>Because Apple developed the iPhone Maps app, not Google. I read somewhere that Google's engineers were pretty impressed when the first saw it, although I can't find the article at the moment.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how come Google 's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones ? Because Apple developed the iPhone Maps app , not Google .
I read somewhere that Google 's engineers were pretty impressed when the first saw it , although I ca n't find the article at the moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how come Google's own Google Maps works better on the iPhone than Android phones?Because Apple developed the iPhone Maps app, not Google.
I read somewhere that Google's engineers were pretty impressed when the first saw it, although I can't find the article at the moment.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356060</id>
	<title>Re:Just one word for you, son--"porn"</title>
	<author>vodevil</author>
	<datestamp>1260215040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The possibilities here are so boundless that it simply boggles the mind.</p></div><p>I fear for some people's self esteem...they're going to take a picture of their own dick, and google will return the results... "Did you mean to search for penis?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The possibilities here are so boundless that it simply boggles the mind.I fear for some people 's self esteem...they 're going to take a picture of their own dick , and google will return the results... " Did you mean to search for penis ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The possibilities here are so boundless that it simply boggles the mind.I fear for some people's self esteem...they're going to take a picture of their own dick, and google will return the results... "Did you mean to search for penis?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357568</id>
	<title>Re:Why don't they focus on things that matter?</title>
	<author>FlyingBishop</author>
	<datestamp>1260179400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flash and pdf are client-side issues, and the hardware isn't really up to the task. Image search is a server-side issue, so the two really have nothing to do with each other. Image search, if it works on a phone, would work just as well on the net. The issue is that it won't work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Flash and pdf are client-side issues , and the hardware is n't really up to the task .
Image search is a server-side issue , so the two really have nothing to do with each other .
Image search , if it works on a phone , would work just as well on the net .
The issue is that it wo n't work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flash and pdf are client-side issues, and the hardware isn't really up to the task.
Image search is a server-side issue, so the two really have nothing to do with each other.
Image search, if it works on a phone, would work just as well on the net.
The issue is that it won't work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30359016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30359010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_1643259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357380
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30359016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30358396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355778
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30359010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30357734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355530
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30366576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30356112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30355744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_1643259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_1643259.30361676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
