<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_07_146228</id>
	<title>Facebook ID Probe Shows Things Getting Worse</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1260197040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"According to Sophos, <a href="http://www.sophos.com/blogs/duck/g/2009/12/06/facebook-id-probe-2009/">Facebook users are getting sloppier</a> with their personal info, not better. Revisiting a 2007 survey in which a plastic frog got 87 hits out of 200 friend requests, this time a rubber duck and a cat got 87 out of 200 friend requests, plus a bonus 8 friends who decided to trust them anyway. The research also suggests that older Facebook users are sloppier than the young, being keener to build their list of friends. (The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.)"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " According to Sophos , Facebook users are getting sloppier with their personal info , not better .
Revisiting a 2007 survey in which a plastic frog got 87 hits out of 200 friend requests , this time a rubber duck and a cat got 87 out of 200 friend requests , plus a bonus 8 friends who decided to trust them anyway .
The research also suggests that older Facebook users are sloppier than the young , being keener to build their list of friends .
( The older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young .
) "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "According to Sophos, Facebook users are getting sloppier with their personal info, not better.
Revisiting a 2007 survey in which a plastic frog got 87 hits out of 200 friend requests, this time a rubber duck and a cat got 87 out of 200 friend requests, plus a bonus 8 friends who decided to trust them anyway.
The research also suggests that older Facebook users are sloppier than the young, being keener to build their list of friends.
(The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.
)"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353184</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1260202380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In principle, the information is only visible to a pre-defined list of other users, your "friends". The point of the article is that that list is often composed with only its social function in mind, with a disregard for its security function.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In principle , the information is only visible to a pre-defined list of other users , your " friends " .
The point of the article is that that list is often composed with only its social function in mind , with a disregard for its security function .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In principle, the information is only visible to a pre-defined list of other users, your "friends".
The point of the article is that that list is often composed with only its social function in mind, with a disregard for its security function.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353576</id>
	<title>Re:Self correcting problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260204060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haha.</p><p>You may as well admit you're a virgin, we've all already guessed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Haha.You may as well admit you 're a virgin , we 've all already guessed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haha.You may as well admit you're a virgin, we've all already guessed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357818</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly because...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260180660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  Facebook has been a good way to re-connect with friends from college, high school, and even elementary school, who I had otherwise long ago lost track of.  Meanwhile a kid in high school isn't going to have as many different real-life networks to pull people from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Facebook has been a good way to re-connect with friends from college , high school , and even elementary school , who I had otherwise long ago lost track of .
Meanwhile a kid in high school is n't going to have as many different real-life networks to pull people from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Facebook has been a good way to re-connect with friends from college, high school, and even elementary school, who I had otherwise long ago lost track of.
Meanwhile a kid in high school isn't going to have as many different real-life networks to pull people from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30364808</id>
	<title>Ask Tyler.</title>
	<author>Scott Scott</author>
	<datestamp>1260285960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You decide your own level of involvement, amirite?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You decide your own level of involvement , amirite ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You decide your own level of involvement, amirite?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357184</id>
	<title>Re:Purging my friend's list</title>
	<author>RealGrouchy</author>
	<datestamp>1260177240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I must be in the minority.</p> </div><p>According to the 'study', 41-46\% of people accepted blindly, so you'd be in the majority.</p><p>- RG&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be in the minority .
According to the 'study ' , 41-46 \ % of people accepted blindly , so you 'd be in the majority.- RG &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be in the minority.
According to the 'study', 41-46\% of people accepted blindly, so you'd be in the majority.- RG&gt;
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354716</id>
	<title>I resent the implications of this study!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260208740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of my best friends are rubber ducks and cats!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of my best friends are rubber ducks and cats !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of my best friends are rubber ducks and cats!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353122</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly because...</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1260202140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes and clearly Facebook isn't about "who do you know now", its about "who have you known through your whole life who can come back to haunt you".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes and clearly Facebook is n't about " who do you know now " , its about " who have you known through your whole life who can come back to haunt you " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes and clearly Facebook isn't about "who do you know now", its about "who have you known through your whole life who can come back to haunt you".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356308</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>bkpark</author>
	<datestamp>1260216240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why on earth would I post my DOB, address, phone number there for example??</p></div><p>To throw your pursuers off the trail. My Facebook profile is littered with false information and misleading data.</p><p>If you meant putting your <em>real</em> DOB, address, or phone number, I whole-heartedly agree. Anyone who needs to know them can ask me directly, <em>in person</em>. Anyone who can't do that doesn't need to know them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth would I post my DOB , address , phone number there for example ?
? To throw your pursuers off the trail .
My Facebook profile is littered with false information and misleading data.If you meant putting your real DOB , address , or phone number , I whole-heartedly agree .
Anyone who needs to know them can ask me directly , in person .
Anyone who ca n't do that does n't need to know them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth would I post my DOB, address, phone number there for example?
?To throw your pursuers off the trail.
My Facebook profile is littered with false information and misleading data.If you meant putting your real DOB, address, or phone number, I whole-heartedly agree.
Anyone who needs to know them can ask me directly, in person.
Anyone who can't do that doesn't need to know them.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352994</id>
	<title>Useless results</title>
	<author>kdcttg</author>
	<datestamp>1260201420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This proves nothing of any use, since the first probe was done in the UK, and the more recent one in Australia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This proves nothing of any use , since the first probe was done in the UK , and the more recent one in Australia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This proves nothing of any use, since the first probe was done in the UK, and the more recent one in Australia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904</id>
	<title>Olders users know more people?</title>
	<author>TheSeventh</author>
	<datestamp>1260201000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.</p></div><p>
It's like older users know more people than younger users, and that's just not possible.  Kids know everything, just ask them.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young .
It 's like older users know more people than younger users , and that 's just not possible .
Kids know everything , just ask them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.
It's like older users know more people than younger users, and that's just not possible.
Kids know everything, just ask them.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355996</id>
	<title>Keep off you birthday too!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260214800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most people list their birthday, but that is identifying information, so I leave it off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most people list their birthday , but that is identifying information , so I leave it off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most people list their birthday, but that is identifying information, so I leave it off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363502</id>
	<title>web of trust</title>
	<author>Harald Paulsen</author>
	<datestamp>1260274320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When posting things to facebook I usually limit pictures etc to "friends of friends". I like to think my friends are just as selective on who they add as friends as I am. The whole web-of-trust-thing.</p><p>By adding everyone you shred that web. Imagine someone stalking a friend of you. Instead of stalking him/her directly, they try to add friends from her friendlist to get close to him/her.</p><p>Adding people you don't know is stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When posting things to facebook I usually limit pictures etc to " friends of friends " .
I like to think my friends are just as selective on who they add as friends as I am .
The whole web-of-trust-thing.By adding everyone you shred that web .
Imagine someone stalking a friend of you .
Instead of stalking him/her directly , they try to add friends from her friendlist to get close to him/her.Adding people you do n't know is stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When posting things to facebook I usually limit pictures etc to "friends of friends".
I like to think my friends are just as selective on who they add as friends as I am.
The whole web-of-trust-thing.By adding everyone you shred that web.
Imagine someone stalking a friend of you.
Instead of stalking him/her directly, they try to add friends from her friendlist to get close to him/her.Adding people you don't know is stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30362738</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly because...</title>
	<author>st0nes</author>
	<datestamp>1260262800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My dog <a href="http://www.facebook.com/dufus.widdicombe/" title="facebook.com">http://www.facebook.com/dufus.widdicombe/</a> [facebook.com] has more friends than I do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My dog http : //www.facebook.com/dufus.widdicombe/ [ facebook.com ] has more friends than I do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My dog http://www.facebook.com/dufus.widdicombe/ [facebook.com] has more friends than I do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353470</id>
	<title>Skewed results...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260203520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was running a similar experiment. And my pet cat Heisenberg befriended the Rubber Duck, a Nigerian prince, a Ukrainian boyband, and various sundry inanimate objects from other similar experiments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was running a similar experiment .
And my pet cat Heisenberg befriended the Rubber Duck , a Nigerian prince , a Ukrainian boyband , and various sundry inanimate objects from other similar experiments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was running a similar experiment.
And my pet cat Heisenberg befriended the Rubber Duck, a Nigerian prince, a Ukrainian boyband, and various sundry inanimate objects from other similar experiments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358386</id>
	<title>Get off my lawn</title>
	<author>electrosoccertux</author>
	<datestamp>1260183900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>nothing to see here, move along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>nothing to see here , move along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nothing to see here, move along.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352992</id>
	<title>Manage a Mosaics Craft Forum</title>
	<author>Bigbutt</author>
	<datestamp>1260201420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Facebook to let members of the <a href="http://www.mosaicandstainedglass.org/" title="mosaicands...dglass.org">forum</a> [mosaicands...dglass.org] know if there's a server problem. Most of my 50 or so friends are from the forum with my Facebook Forum page at something over 100 fans. I set up a filter so I can filter out the forum members and get updates from friends and the sites I'm a fan of.</p><p>[John]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Facebook to let members of the forum [ mosaicands...dglass.org ] know if there 's a server problem .
Most of my 50 or so friends are from the forum with my Facebook Forum page at something over 100 fans .
I set up a filter so I can filter out the forum members and get updates from friends and the sites I 'm a fan of .
[ John ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Facebook to let members of the forum [mosaicands...dglass.org] know if there's a server problem.
Most of my 50 or so friends are from the forum with my Facebook Forum page at something over 100 fans.
I set up a filter so I can filter out the forum members and get updates from friends and the sites I'm a fan of.
[John]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353560</id>
	<title>I'm friends with a Turkey, but it's restricted</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1260204000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA is full of shit- their rubber ducky was probably friended, but put on a restrictive friend list.</p><p>I'm friends with a famous turkey (long story), but said turkey is on a restricted friend list that can see barely more than my public info.  I guarantee you every kid has a restricted list of one sort or another.</p><p>Also, did they bother to track how many people friended it just enough to check it out, and then unfriended it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA is full of shit- their rubber ducky was probably friended , but put on a restrictive friend list.I 'm friends with a famous turkey ( long story ) , but said turkey is on a restricted friend list that can see barely more than my public info .
I guarantee you every kid has a restricted list of one sort or another.Also , did they bother to track how many people friended it just enough to check it out , and then unfriended it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA is full of shit- their rubber ducky was probably friended, but put on a restrictive friend list.I'm friends with a famous turkey (long story), but said turkey is on a restricted friend list that can see barely more than my public info.
I guarantee you every kid has a restricted list of one sort or another.Also, did they bother to track how many people friended it just enough to check it out, and then unfriended it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353838</id>
	<title>Re:Self correcting problem</title>
	<author>ShatteredArm</author>
	<datestamp>1260205200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except you couldn't reconnect with old friends whom you haven't seen for years using personal home pages.  And you couldn't share events with your friends and have it automatically send them an email message using personal home pages.  And you couldn't have a quick chat with an old friend in another state using personal home pages.<br> <br>

Get off my lawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except you could n't reconnect with old friends whom you have n't seen for years using personal home pages .
And you could n't share events with your friends and have it automatically send them an email message using personal home pages .
And you could n't have a quick chat with an old friend in another state using personal home pages .
Get off my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except you couldn't reconnect with old friends whom you haven't seen for years using personal home pages.
And you couldn't share events with your friends and have it automatically send them an email message using personal home pages.
And you couldn't have a quick chat with an old friend in another state using personal home pages.
Get off my lawn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353386</id>
	<title>Privacy Settings</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260203220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just set up a group for "limited" access, so if someone friend requests me and I don't feel that I trust them I add them to the limited group right away (upon accepting them) and then they can only see a handful of things.  If they turn out to be real people and I become friends with them outside of facebook, at a later point I could always remove them from the limited access group and they'll see what my normal friends see.</p><p>So yea, maybe I accepted more friend requests than the average kid (I consider myself an older user btw) but I did so in a safe manner.  Practice safe friending!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just set up a group for " limited " access , so if someone friend requests me and I do n't feel that I trust them I add them to the limited group right away ( upon accepting them ) and then they can only see a handful of things .
If they turn out to be real people and I become friends with them outside of facebook , at a later point I could always remove them from the limited access group and they 'll see what my normal friends see.So yea , maybe I accepted more friend requests than the average kid ( I consider myself an older user btw ) but I did so in a safe manner .
Practice safe friending !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just set up a group for "limited" access, so if someone friend requests me and I don't feel that I trust them I add them to the limited group right away (upon accepting them) and then they can only see a handful of things.
If they turn out to be real people and I become friends with them outside of facebook, at a later point I could always remove them from the limited access group and they'll see what my normal friends see.So yea, maybe I accepted more friend requests than the average kid (I consider myself an older user btw) but I did so in a safe manner.
Practice safe friending!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30367604</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly because...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260298200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Absolutely. I've got "older" people in my friends list who are the same age as my parents. They're either my friends or they're "family" friends". Well, guess what? They've two more generations to pick from people to "friend" than I've had, and that's reflective in their Facebook lists.</p><p>Likewise, my relatively conservative friend list is still larger than my very-socially-active 16-year-old brother-in-law.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely .
I 've got " older " people in my friends list who are the same age as my parents .
They 're either my friends or they 're " family " friends " .
Well , guess what ?
They 've two more generations to pick from people to " friend " than I 've had , and that 's reflective in their Facebook lists.Likewise , my relatively conservative friend list is still larger than my very-socially-active 16-year-old brother-in-law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely.
I've got "older" people in my friends list who are the same age as my parents.
They're either my friends or they're "family" friends".
Well, guess what?
They've two more generations to pick from people to "friend" than I've had, and that's reflective in their Facebook lists.Likewise, my relatively conservative friend list is still larger than my very-socially-active 16-year-old brother-in-law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354894</id>
	<title>Re:Unfair Tests</title>
	<author>electricbern</author>
	<datestamp>1260209400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is also unlikely the rubber ducky will steal your personal data or use your private information with any evil intentions. The cat on the other hand, likely.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is also unlikely the rubber ducky will steal your personal data or use your private information with any evil intentions .
The cat on the other hand , likely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is also unlikely the rubber ducky will steal your personal data or use your private information with any evil intentions.
The cat on the other hand, likely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30360402</id>
	<title>Blame Al Gore</title>
	<author>StickANeedleInMyEye</author>
	<datestamp>1260196740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>For inventing the Internet !!</htmltext>
<tokenext>For inventing the Internet !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For inventing the Internet !
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354566</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1260208140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tried putting up fake datas, but Facebook kicked me off.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tried putting up fake datas , but Facebook kicked me off .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tried putting up fake datas, but Facebook kicked me off.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354430</id>
	<title>Re:Are they being friended to REAL accounts?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260207600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your fake profile apparently gets more friend requests than my real one. I got a friend request a couple of days ago, and I really don&rsquo;t remember the last time I got one before that.</p><p>Or are you confusing the group/fan/application requests with friend requests? They aren&rsquo;t the same.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your fake profile apparently gets more friend requests than my real one .
I got a friend request a couple of days ago , and I really don    t remember the last time I got one before that.Or are you confusing the group/fan/application requests with friend requests ?
They aren    t the same .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your fake profile apparently gets more friend requests than my real one.
I got a friend request a couple of days ago, and I really don’t remember the last time I got one before that.Or are you confusing the group/fan/application requests with friend requests?
They aren’t the same.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30361096</id>
	<title>O rly?</title>
	<author>denmarkw00t</author>
	<datestamp>1260202080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.</p></div></blockquote><p>And in other news, older cars have more mileage than newer cars - update at 11!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young.And in other news , older cars have more mileage than newer cars - update at 11 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.And in other news, older cars have more mileage than newer cars - update at 11!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30361354</id>
	<title>older people</title>
	<author>JumpSocial</author>
	<datestamp>1260204240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Younger people are looking out for their parents.

Older people aren't.

Also older people have more friends. They've had more time to accumulate.

Further, old people are less biased about who they connect to.

If you approached somebody at a dinner party, do you think an older person or a younger person would be more open?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Younger people are looking out for their parents .
Older people are n't .
Also older people have more friends .
They 've had more time to accumulate .
Further , old people are less biased about who they connect to .
If you approached somebody at a dinner party , do you think an older person or a younger person would be more open ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Younger people are looking out for their parents.
Older people aren't.
Also older people have more friends.
They've had more time to accumulate.
Further, old people are less biased about who they connect to.
If you approached somebody at a dinner party, do you think an older person or a younger person would be more open?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353844</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260205200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Friends, family/roommates of friends, app maintainers, Facebook employees, Facebook's outsourced storage provider's employees, kazaa users that can see your friend's accidentally shared "My Pictures" directory, Friend's "Computer guy/Geeksquad," etc...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Friends , family/roommates of friends , app maintainers , Facebook employees , Facebook 's outsourced storage provider 's employees , kazaa users that can see your friend 's accidentally shared " My Pictures " directory , Friend 's " Computer guy/Geeksquad , " etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Friends, family/roommates of friends, app maintainers, Facebook employees, Facebook's outsourced storage provider's employees, kazaa users that can see your friend's accidentally shared "My Pictures" directory, Friend's "Computer guy/Geeksquad," etc...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363976</id>
	<title>Older people know more people...duh</title>
	<author>wendyg</author>
	<datestamp>1260280560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is, there are all sorts of reasons why someone might admit someone they don't know - even a frog - to their circle of "friends" and it's also fairly obvious why older people have more "friends".</p><p>To take the second first: older people have been alive longer. They've met more people: at work, in clubs, etc. People from various layers of their pasts find them. There are people in my Facebook friends list who probably never will be sufficiently interested to speak to me again - but who are nonetheless curious what's become of me (or I of them) in the 30 years since we last met. The cliques 'n' crap from high school eventually give way to a sort of neutral curiosity.</p><p>To the first point: admitting a frog to your friends list doesn't necessarily mean you're being trusting. It may mean you don't post stuff to Facebook that you wouldn't want to be public. It may mean that rather than vet people closely you're using Facebook more like LinkedIn - as a way to build a network of contacts. Or it may mean that the only reason you use FB is so that people won't bug you about why you're not using FB and you don't GAF because you never post anything anyway.</p><p>wg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , there are all sorts of reasons why someone might admit someone they do n't know - even a frog - to their circle of " friends " and it 's also fairly obvious why older people have more " friends " .To take the second first : older people have been alive longer .
They 've met more people : at work , in clubs , etc .
People from various layers of their pasts find them .
There are people in my Facebook friends list who probably never will be sufficiently interested to speak to me again - but who are nonetheless curious what 's become of me ( or I of them ) in the 30 years since we last met .
The cliques 'n ' crap from high school eventually give way to a sort of neutral curiosity.To the first point : admitting a frog to your friends list does n't necessarily mean you 're being trusting .
It may mean you do n't post stuff to Facebook that you would n't want to be public .
It may mean that rather than vet people closely you 're using Facebook more like LinkedIn - as a way to build a network of contacts .
Or it may mean that the only reason you use FB is so that people wo n't bug you about why you 're not using FB and you do n't GAF because you never post anything anyway.wg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, there are all sorts of reasons why someone might admit someone they don't know - even a frog - to their circle of "friends" and it's also fairly obvious why older people have more "friends".To take the second first: older people have been alive longer.
They've met more people: at work, in clubs, etc.
People from various layers of their pasts find them.
There are people in my Facebook friends list who probably never will be sufficiently interested to speak to me again - but who are nonetheless curious what's become of me (or I of them) in the 30 years since we last met.
The cliques 'n' crap from high school eventually give way to a sort of neutral curiosity.To the first point: admitting a frog to your friends list doesn't necessarily mean you're being trusting.
It may mean you don't post stuff to Facebook that you wouldn't want to be public.
It may mean that rather than vet people closely you're using Facebook more like LinkedIn - as a way to build a network of contacts.
Or it may mean that the only reason you use FB is so that people won't bug you about why you're not using FB and you don't GAF because you never post anything anyway.wg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358488</id>
	<title>As a Slashdot reader</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260184560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... I ain't got no friends, you insensitive clod!</p><p>Not even on Facebook...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... I ai n't got no friends , you insensitive clod ! Not even on Facebook.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... I ain't got no friends, you insensitive clod!Not even on Facebook...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353820</id>
	<title>Re:Unfair Tests</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260205140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the rubber ducky HAS probably seen you naked more than anyone in high school.</p><p>I always wondered why it kept floating upside down....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the rubber ducky HAS probably seen you naked more than anyone in high school.I always wondered why it kept floating upside down... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the rubber ducky HAS probably seen you naked more than anyone in high school.I always wondered why it kept floating upside down....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363102</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>TheTurtlesMoves</author>
	<datestamp>1260267900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I do break the ToS by giving a fake DOB when i Joined FB a while back. I just randomly clicked month and day, and made sure i was older than 18. Unfortunately i picked the same day as my daughter.
<br> <br>
But thats all history now, i deleted my account properly. Now i get emails from programmer friends wanting me to join these "professional networks" type sites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I do break the ToS by giving a fake DOB when i Joined FB a while back .
I just randomly clicked month and day , and made sure i was older than 18 .
Unfortunately i picked the same day as my daughter .
But thats all history now , i deleted my account properly .
Now i get emails from programmer friends wanting me to join these " professional networks " type sites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I do break the ToS by giving a fake DOB when i Joined FB a while back.
I just randomly clicked month and day, and made sure i was older than 18.
Unfortunately i picked the same day as my daughter.
But thats all history now, i deleted my account properly.
Now i get emails from programmer friends wanting me to join these "professional networks" type sites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355844</id>
	<title>maximum security</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260214020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only do I not even belong to facebook, but I'm posting anonymously to brag about it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only do I not even belong to facebook , but I 'm posting anonymously to brag about it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only do I not even belong to facebook, but I'm posting anonymously to brag about it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355466</id>
	<title>Re:Olders users know more people?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260212100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty much.  I mean, the Internet is serious business, no?  Goastse?  Yeah, stupid old people NOT taking the Internet thing seriously!  ITS MY LIFE!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty much .
I mean , the Internet is serious business , no ?
Goastse ? Yeah , stupid old people NOT taking the Internet thing seriously !
ITS MY LIFE !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty much.
I mean, the Internet is serious business, no?
Goastse?  Yeah, stupid old people NOT taking the Internet thing seriously!
ITS MY LIFE!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353580</id>
	<title>not for nothing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260204120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>not for nothing...but you're doing a study of 200 people on a network of 350 million...kind of small study...</htmltext>
<tokenext>not for nothing...but you 're doing a study of 200 people on a network of 350 million...kind of small study.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not for nothing...but you're doing a study of 200 people on a network of 350 million...kind of small study...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353166</id>
	<title>Public Privacy</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1260202320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If this trend is true, it points towards our "habituation" with the notion of the lack of privacy in our society.  I think that along with the flood of information in our society comes the feeling that "all information should be freely available".  People in general are becoming de-sensitized to this trend more and more, and expect more information about themselves to be available publicly.  Not even just online - take a popular show like CSI.  I think it's just sort of  assumed that everyone is leaving this massive digital fingerprint behind them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this trend is true , it points towards our " habituation " with the notion of the lack of privacy in our society .
I think that along with the flood of information in our society comes the feeling that " all information should be freely available " .
People in general are becoming de-sensitized to this trend more and more , and expect more information about themselves to be available publicly .
Not even just online - take a popular show like CSI .
I think it 's just sort of assumed that everyone is leaving this massive digital fingerprint behind them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this trend is true, it points towards our "habituation" with the notion of the lack of privacy in our society.
I think that along with the flood of information in our society comes the feeling that "all information should be freely available".
People in general are becoming de-sensitized to this trend more and more, and expect more information about themselves to be available publicly.
Not even just online - take a popular show like CSI.
I think it's just sort of  assumed that everyone is leaving this massive digital fingerprint behind them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358296</id>
	<title>Re:Olders users know more people?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260183480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That reminds me of something a 5 year old told me the other day:
<br> <br>
"Do you know what dish washer means?"<br>
I said yeah, but do you know what it means?<br>
"Yes, it's a man who washes dishes."<br>
I said That is partly correct. Anyone can be a dish washer, man or woman, boy or girl. But there are also machines that wash dishes. Those are called "dish washers."<br>
"No, a dish washer is a man who washes the dishes."<br> <br>
I think he ended up going with the "you remind me of Hitler" debate tactic and ended the conversation!</htmltext>
<tokenext>That reminds me of something a 5 year old told me the other day : " Do you know what dish washer means ?
" I said yeah , but do you know what it means ?
" Yes , it 's a man who washes dishes .
" I said That is partly correct .
Anyone can be a dish washer , man or woman , boy or girl .
But there are also machines that wash dishes .
Those are called " dish washers .
" " No , a dish washer is a man who washes the dishes .
" I think he ended up going with the " you remind me of Hitler " debate tactic and ended the conversation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That reminds me of something a 5 year old told me the other day:
 
"Do you know what dish washer means?
"
I said yeah, but do you know what it means?
"Yes, it's a man who washes dishes.
"
I said That is partly correct.
Anyone can be a dish washer, man or woman, boy or girl.
But there are also machines that wash dishes.
Those are called "dish washers.
"
"No, a dish washer is a man who washes the dishes.
" 
I think he ended up going with the "you remind me of Hitler" debate tactic and ended the conversation!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353964</id>
	<title>"Fake" accounts?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1260205680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does he know that all that "personal info" is real?  I don't do "social networking" but it seems to me some might find it amusing to create an account with plausible but fake "personal info" and then "friend" away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does he know that all that " personal info " is real ?
I do n't do " social networking " but it seems to me some might find it amusing to create an account with plausible but fake " personal info " and then " friend " away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does he know that all that "personal info" is real?
I don't do "social networking" but it seems to me some might find it amusing to create an account with plausible but fake "personal info" and then "friend" away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353642</id>
	<title>Random Friends</title>
	<author>Aladrin</author>
	<datestamp>1260204420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have tons of random friends.  Why?  Because I use Facebook as a gaming site, rather than a friends site.  The more 'friends' I have, the more powerful I am in the games.  (Which is stupid, but that's the way they are written.)  So I've got like 1000 'friends' on facebook about 10 in real life, plus family.  Most of my 'friends' on facebook are the same way.</p><p>I don't post things on there that I don't want random strangers to see anyhow, so it's no big deal.</p><p>So if they didn't eliminate people like me from their survey, it's badly skewed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have tons of random friends .
Why ? Because I use Facebook as a gaming site , rather than a friends site .
The more 'friends ' I have , the more powerful I am in the games .
( Which is stupid , but that 's the way they are written .
) So I 've got like 1000 'friends ' on facebook about 10 in real life , plus family .
Most of my 'friends ' on facebook are the same way.I do n't post things on there that I do n't want random strangers to see anyhow , so it 's no big deal.So if they did n't eliminate people like me from their survey , it 's badly skewed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have tons of random friends.
Why?  Because I use Facebook as a gaming site, rather than a friends site.
The more 'friends' I have, the more powerful I am in the games.
(Which is stupid, but that's the way they are written.
)  So I've got like 1000 'friends' on facebook about 10 in real life, plus family.
Most of my 'friends' on facebook are the same way.I don't post things on there that I don't want random strangers to see anyhow, so it's no big deal.So if they didn't eliminate people like me from their survey, it's badly skewed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355830</id>
	<title>Stop giving them the information</title>
	<author>Stregano</author>
	<datestamp>1260213960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really, if you are worried about people having your information, why give it to them?

It is a valid question.

It would be like me changing my<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. account name to JohnSmith241995 or something like that.

It is the internet.  Give the information you want to, and if you give too much, then, uh, I guess maybe you might not want to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , if you are worried about people having your information , why give it to them ?
It is a valid question .
It would be like me changing my / .
account name to JohnSmith241995 or something like that .
It is the internet .
Give the information you want to , and if you give too much , then , uh , I guess maybe you might not want to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, if you are worried about people having your information, why give it to them?
It is a valid question.
It would be like me changing my /.
account name to JohnSmith241995 or something like that.
It is the internet.
Give the information you want to, and if you give too much, then, uh, I guess maybe you might not want to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356262</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>Cro Magnon</author>
	<datestamp>1260216000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I trust some of my friends with my phone and even my address, but not all, at least on FB.  And I DON'T trust FB themnselves with my info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I trust some of my friends with my phone and even my address , but not all , at least on FB .
And I DO N'T trust FB themnselves with my info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I trust some of my friends with my phone and even my address, but not all, at least on FB.
And I DON'T trust FB themnselves with my info.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354174</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357300</id>
	<title>Re:not for nothing...</title>
	<author>postglock</author>
	<datestamp>1260177960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unintuitively, the accuracy of the estimate of a proportion has little to do with the size of the population. The accuracy relies more on the size of the sample. I'm sure there are more sophisticated ways to do this, but from my first year statistics course, the standard error is ((p(1-p))/n), where p (estimated proportion) = 87/200 and n (sample size) = 200. Hence, the standard error = 0.035 and the 95\% confidence interval is 0.435 &#177; 0.069.<p>
i.e. we are 95\% confidence that the true proportion lies between 36.7\% and 50.4\%. That's still quite high.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unintuitively , the accuracy of the estimate of a proportion has little to do with the size of the population .
The accuracy relies more on the size of the sample .
I 'm sure there are more sophisticated ways to do this , but from my first year statistics course , the standard error is ( ( p ( 1-p ) ) /n ) , where p ( estimated proportion ) = 87/200 and n ( sample size ) = 200 .
Hence , the standard error = 0.035 and the 95 \ % confidence interval is 0.435   0.069 . i.e. we are 95 \ % confidence that the true proportion lies between 36.7 \ % and 50.4 \ % .
That 's still quite high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unintuitively, the accuracy of the estimate of a proportion has little to do with the size of the population.
The accuracy relies more on the size of the sample.
I'm sure there are more sophisticated ways to do this, but from my first year statistics course, the standard error is ((p(1-p))/n), where p (estimated proportion) = 87/200 and n (sample size) = 200.
Hence, the standard error = 0.035 and the 95\% confidence interval is 0.435 ± 0.069.
i.e. we are 95\% confidence that the true proportion lies between 36.7\% and 50.4\%.
That's still quite high.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355516</id>
	<title>You can do that to your friend's list?</title>
	<author>ThrowAwaySociety</author>
	<datestamp>1260212340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Heck I've gone through my friend's list and purged out people I don't talk to or in other instances strongly dislike from way back in high school.</p></div><p>Personally, I think its irresponsible of your friend to have given you the kind of access necessary to remove people from his or her list.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Heck I 've gone through my friend 's list and purged out people I do n't talk to or in other instances strongly dislike from way back in high school.Personally , I think its irresponsible of your friend to have given you the kind of access necessary to remove people from his or her list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heck I've gone through my friend's list and purged out people I don't talk to or in other instances strongly dislike from way back in high school.Personally, I think its irresponsible of your friend to have given you the kind of access necessary to remove people from his or her list.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890</id>
	<title>Self correcting problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260200940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good.  Let Facebook go the way of the dodo.  It's the equivalent of those "personal home pages" people put up when they first discovered the Web.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good .
Let Facebook go the way of the dodo .
It 's the equivalent of those " personal home pages " people put up when they first discovered the Web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good.
Let Facebook go the way of the dodo.
It's the equivalent of those "personal home pages" people put up when they first discovered the Web.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353086</id>
	<title>They got me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260201960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was sure I knew that duck! Now that little bastard know all about me...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was sure I knew that duck !
Now that little bastard know all about me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was sure I knew that duck!
Now that little bastard know all about me...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30360782</id>
	<title>Re:Self correcting problem</title>
	<author>Gothmolly</author>
	<datestamp>1260199380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could do all those things, if you were actually still friends with those people.  Telephones, postcards and email existed BEFORE Facebook.  How is it valuable that every masturbatory comment gets immediately broadcast to all your so-called friends?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could do all those things , if you were actually still friends with those people .
Telephones , postcards and email existed BEFORE Facebook .
How is it valuable that every masturbatory comment gets immediately broadcast to all your so-called friends ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could do all those things, if you were actually still friends with those people.
Telephones, postcards and email existed BEFORE Facebook.
How is it valuable that every masturbatory comment gets immediately broadcast to all your so-called friends?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356056</id>
	<title>A duck is rather harmless...</title>
	<author>npoczynek</author>
	<datestamp>1260215040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>My friends and I conducted a sort of experiment a while back. We created an online Facebook identity that was completely over the top - the goal was for him to be a stereotypical college burn-out. <p>

None of the photos we tag of him reveal his face - we find pictures of normal college activities (parties, football games, etc.) and tag a guy who's turned the wrong way, standing in the distance, or whatever. There are about 100 of these photos and none of them are of the same person. </p><p>

I think he currently has more Facebook friends than I do. Girls will constantly accept his friend requests, especially if they have at least one friend in common. Each time we chat with someone we use his created persona and 99\% of the people never call us out on not being a real person. I can't count the number of times a girl has accepted an invitation such as the following: </p><p>

"heeay gurl u comin 2 ma paaartay?" </p><p>

We've acquired dozens of numbers (never used, obviously) and made vague promises to meet up with these girls. </p><p>

It's scary, really. Imagine how easy it would be for a predator to create an online persona that is NORMAL? When this guy, who's status is regularly updated with lines such as "ayyy yo cause when i git crunk i like to toke...yaa digg??/? ahhaahaahh", is able to have even one successful conversation. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My friends and I conducted a sort of experiment a while back .
We created an online Facebook identity that was completely over the top - the goal was for him to be a stereotypical college burn-out .
None of the photos we tag of him reveal his face - we find pictures of normal college activities ( parties , football games , etc .
) and tag a guy who 's turned the wrong way , standing in the distance , or whatever .
There are about 100 of these photos and none of them are of the same person .
I think he currently has more Facebook friends than I do .
Girls will constantly accept his friend requests , especially if they have at least one friend in common .
Each time we chat with someone we use his created persona and 99 \ % of the people never call us out on not being a real person .
I ca n't count the number of times a girl has accepted an invitation such as the following : " heeay gurl u comin 2 ma paaartay ?
" We 've acquired dozens of numbers ( never used , obviously ) and made vague promises to meet up with these girls .
It 's scary , really .
Imagine how easy it would be for a predator to create an online persona that is NORMAL ?
When this guy , who 's status is regularly updated with lines such as " ayyy yo cause when i git crunk i like to toke...yaa digg ? ? / ?
ahhaahaahh " , is able to have even one successful conversation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My friends and I conducted a sort of experiment a while back.
We created an online Facebook identity that was completely over the top - the goal was for him to be a stereotypical college burn-out.
None of the photos we tag of him reveal his face - we find pictures of normal college activities (parties, football games, etc.
) and tag a guy who's turned the wrong way, standing in the distance, or whatever.
There are about 100 of these photos and none of them are of the same person.
I think he currently has more Facebook friends than I do.
Girls will constantly accept his friend requests, especially if they have at least one friend in common.
Each time we chat with someone we use his created persona and 99\% of the people never call us out on not being a real person.
I can't count the number of times a girl has accepted an invitation such as the following: 

"heeay gurl u comin 2 ma paaartay?
" 

We've acquired dozens of numbers (never used, obviously) and made vague promises to meet up with these girls.
It's scary, really.
Imagine how easy it would be for a predator to create an online persona that is NORMAL?
When this guy, who's status is regularly updated with lines such as "ayyy yo cause when i git crunk i like to toke...yaa digg??/?
ahhaahaahh", is able to have even one successful conversation. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062</id>
	<title>Are they being friended to REAL accounts?</title>
	<author>djrosen</author>
	<datestamp>1260201840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I personally have 2 accounts. I use one strictly for games where I will accept any and all takers. I post to lists to increase my numbers and can see from 20 to hundreds of requests per day. That account has no real data.</p><p>My other REAL account only has REAL friends and Family. I scrutinize every request and all personal settings are very tight as to only allow friends to see the data. I'd consider myself an 'older' user @ +40. From what I have seen, this is not uncommon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally have 2 accounts .
I use one strictly for games where I will accept any and all takers .
I post to lists to increase my numbers and can see from 20 to hundreds of requests per day .
That account has no real data.My other REAL account only has REAL friends and Family .
I scrutinize every request and all personal settings are very tight as to only allow friends to see the data .
I 'd consider myself an 'older ' user @ + 40 .
From what I have seen , this is not uncommon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally have 2 accounts.
I use one strictly for games where I will accept any and all takers.
I post to lists to increase my numbers and can see from 20 to hundreds of requests per day.
That account has no real data.My other REAL account only has REAL friends and Family.
I scrutinize every request and all personal settings are very tight as to only allow friends to see the data.
I'd consider myself an 'older' user @ +40.
From what I have seen, this is not uncommon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353346</id>
	<title>Not in my experience</title>
	<author>Darth Sdlavrot</author>
	<datestamp>1260203040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FWIW.</p><p>Most of the "young" that I see on FB, e.g. my children, their friends, etc., have 200+ "friends."</p><p>Some of the !young that I see have 100+. I call them "friend collectors."</p><p>I personally only have about 50 (sucks to be me I guess). I don't send friend requests. I only accept friend requests from people I actually know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FWIW.Most of the " young " that I see on FB , e.g .
my children , their friends , etc. , have 200 + " friends .
" Some of the ! young that I see have 100 + .
I call them " friend collectors .
" I personally only have about 50 ( sucks to be me I guess ) .
I do n't send friend requests .
I only accept friend requests from people I actually know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FWIW.Most of the "young" that I see on FB, e.g.
my children, their friends, etc., have 200+ "friends.
"Some of the !young that I see have 100+.
I call them "friend collectors.
"I personally only have about 50 (sucks to be me I guess).
I don't send friend requests.
I only accept friend requests from people I actually know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30364606</id>
	<title>Elementary statistics tools are your friends</title>
	<author>Scott Scott</author>
	<datestamp>1260284940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kind of small as in "holy crap, it's amazing how you can analyze the patterns of a few to determine the patterns of the many," you mean. Anyone with a rudimentary grasp of statistics should know that 200 is more than enough to suggest a high degree of confidence. You ought to take note when the number drops below thirty, because that's when your sample size really begins to affect the usability of the data.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kind of small as in " holy crap , it 's amazing how you can analyze the patterns of a few to determine the patterns of the many , " you mean .
Anyone with a rudimentary grasp of statistics should know that 200 is more than enough to suggest a high degree of confidence .
You ought to take note when the number drops below thirty , because that 's when your sample size really begins to affect the usability of the data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kind of small as in "holy crap, it's amazing how you can analyze the patterns of a few to determine the patterns of the many," you mean.
Anyone with a rudimentary grasp of statistics should know that 200 is more than enough to suggest a high degree of confidence.
You ought to take note when the number drops below thirty, because that's when your sample size really begins to affect the usability of the data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353580</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357208</id>
	<title>Re:Olders users know more people?</title>
	<author>ajs</author>
	<datestamp>1260177360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.</p></div><p>It's like older users know more people than younger users, and that's just not possible.  Kids know everything, just ask them.</p></div><p>More to the point, I don't see why this is an issue. I don't store anything on Facebook that's private and I don't trust any links that anyone that I don't know personally shares with me (not to mention my use of noscript's XSS-busting features). So what do I have to lose in accepting a friend request from a plastic frog, exactly?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young.It 's like older users know more people than younger users , and that 's just not possible .
Kids know everything , just ask them.More to the point , I do n't see why this is an issue .
I do n't store anything on Facebook that 's private and I do n't trust any links that anyone that I do n't know personally shares with me ( not to mention my use of noscript 's XSS-busting features ) .
So what do I have to lose in accepting a friend request from a plastic frog , exactly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.It's like older users know more people than younger users, and that's just not possible.
Kids know everything, just ask them.More to the point, I don't see why this is an issue.
I don't store anything on Facebook that's private and I don't trust any links that anyone that I don't know personally shares with me (not to mention my use of noscript's XSS-busting features).
So what do I have to lose in accepting a friend request from a plastic frog, exactly?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354526</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>sg7jimr</author>
	<datestamp>1260207960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the whole "you must use your real name" policy of Facebook is at the heart of this free distribution of personal information.  The service is telling people it's both safe and desirable for random people to know who you really are.  Then people are shocked by stories of people getting robbed while on vacation after posting an "on vacation" Facebook status.  Anonymity is the safest for any public forum.  Yes I get that they want to sell this idea of your old friends finding you.  But they should allow people to obfuscate their identity if that's not what they are on Facebook for.  It's not difficult to find a friend using an alias if that friend wants to be found.  Instead they will terminate your account if they believe you are not who you say you are, and will only allow you to restore that account if you can prove your online identity is a real one.  The fact that Facebook is often used as a game platform and most online games allow you to choose any name you wish just reinforces the appearance that Facebook is out of touch with Internet/web realities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the whole " you must use your real name " policy of Facebook is at the heart of this free distribution of personal information .
The service is telling people it 's both safe and desirable for random people to know who you really are .
Then people are shocked by stories of people getting robbed while on vacation after posting an " on vacation " Facebook status .
Anonymity is the safest for any public forum .
Yes I get that they want to sell this idea of your old friends finding you .
But they should allow people to obfuscate their identity if that 's not what they are on Facebook for .
It 's not difficult to find a friend using an alias if that friend wants to be found .
Instead they will terminate your account if they believe you are not who you say you are , and will only allow you to restore that account if you can prove your online identity is a real one .
The fact that Facebook is often used as a game platform and most online games allow you to choose any name you wish just reinforces the appearance that Facebook is out of touch with Internet/web realities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the whole "you must use your real name" policy of Facebook is at the heart of this free distribution of personal information.
The service is telling people it's both safe and desirable for random people to know who you really are.
Then people are shocked by stories of people getting robbed while on vacation after posting an "on vacation" Facebook status.
Anonymity is the safest for any public forum.
Yes I get that they want to sell this idea of your old friends finding you.
But they should allow people to obfuscate their identity if that's not what they are on Facebook for.
It's not difficult to find a friend using an alias if that friend wants to be found.
Instead they will terminate your account if they believe you are not who you say you are, and will only allow you to restore that account if you can prove your online identity is a real one.
The fact that Facebook is often used as a game platform and most online games allow you to choose any name you wish just reinforces the appearance that Facebook is out of touch with Internet/web realities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042</id>
	<title>Unfair Tests</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260201720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who doesn't want to be friends with a rubber ducky. Anyone raised on that nefarious propaganda brain-washing show, 'Sesame Street' knows to sing "Rubber ducky! You're the one! You make bathtime so much fun! Rubber ducky, you're the only one for me!"  I mean who wouldn't want to be friends with a rubber ducky? It's much more meaningful a relationship than anyone you knew from High School.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who does n't want to be friends with a rubber ducky .
Anyone raised on that nefarious propaganda brain-washing show , 'Sesame Street ' knows to sing " Rubber ducky !
You 're the one !
You make bathtime so much fun !
Rubber ducky , you 're the only one for me !
" I mean who would n't want to be friends with a rubber ducky ?
It 's much more meaningful a relationship than anyone you knew from High School .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who doesn't want to be friends with a rubber ducky.
Anyone raised on that nefarious propaganda brain-washing show, 'Sesame Street' knows to sing "Rubber ducky!
You're the one!
You make bathtime so much fun!
Rubber ducky, you're the only one for me!
"  I mean who wouldn't want to be friends with a rubber ducky?
It's much more meaningful a relationship than anyone you knew from High School.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358332</id>
	<title>Re:That, or we don't give a shit.</title>
	<author>margaret</author>
	<datestamp>1260183660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What are these people going to find out... my hometown? My college? My favorite tv shows? Who cares?</p></div><p>Sounds like those questions the bank website asks me to prove I'm me...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are these people going to find out... my hometown ?
My college ?
My favorite tv shows ?
Who cares ? Sounds like those questions the bank website asks me to prove I 'm me.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are these people going to find out... my hometown?
My college?
My favorite tv shows?
Who cares?Sounds like those questions the bank website asks me to prove I'm me...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355720</id>
	<title>Re:Unfair Tests</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260213480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You got the lyrics wrong. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8IfCSnYPYo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You got the lyrics wrong .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = B8IfCSnYPYo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You got the lyrics wrong.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8IfCSnYPYo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354368</id>
	<title>What planet are you sending this article from?</title>
	<author>xmousex</author>
	<datestamp>1260207360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article seems lost entirely in its own little world and clueless whats going on.  Facebook IS farmville, vampire wars, pet society, arena, etc.  People join those groups, spam them for invites, and get invites in return to build up their game networks.  I know one actual person in my list that doesnt do this, shes in high school and actually uses facebook to talk to her friends and complain about homework.  Weirdo.</p><p>Now to discuss that people who play facebook shouldn't put too much personal information on their profile is a decent topic.  But dont come at it so naive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article seems lost entirely in its own little world and clueless whats going on .
Facebook IS farmville , vampire wars , pet society , arena , etc .
People join those groups , spam them for invites , and get invites in return to build up their game networks .
I know one actual person in my list that doesnt do this , shes in high school and actually uses facebook to talk to her friends and complain about homework .
Weirdo.Now to discuss that people who play facebook should n't put too much personal information on their profile is a decent topic .
But dont come at it so naive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article seems lost entirely in its own little world and clueless whats going on.
Facebook IS farmville, vampire wars, pet society, arena, etc.
People join those groups, spam them for invites, and get invites in return to build up their game networks.
I know one actual person in my list that doesnt do this, shes in high school and actually uses facebook to talk to her friends and complain about homework.
Weirdo.Now to discuss that people who play facebook shouldn't put too much personal information on their profile is a decent topic.
But dont come at it so naive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126</id>
	<title>That, or we don't give a shit.</title>
	<author>A. B3ttik</author>
	<datestamp>1260202140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd probably accept anyone who cares enough to "friend" me, whether I know them or not. Mark me in the 43.5\%, a guy who once accepted a friend request from "Some Pencils" and a random girl in Arizona (thousands of miles from me) just because she was a girl. What are these people going to find out... my hometown? My college? My favorite tv shows? Who cares? I don't think I'm really stalker material, and iIf my favorite movies are that important to some guy writing a corporate spambot, whatever, he can have it. He can't even find my address or my phone number on facebook, two things I consider more personal, and \_those\_ you can already find in any phonebook site.
<br> <br>
Hell, maybe we're \_more\_ careful about our personal info since facebook doesn't really have anything on it that we value.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd probably accept anyone who cares enough to " friend " me , whether I know them or not .
Mark me in the 43.5 \ % , a guy who once accepted a friend request from " Some Pencils " and a random girl in Arizona ( thousands of miles from me ) just because she was a girl .
What are these people going to find out... my hometown ?
My college ?
My favorite tv shows ?
Who cares ?
I do n't think I 'm really stalker material , and iIf my favorite movies are that important to some guy writing a corporate spambot , whatever , he can have it .
He ca n't even find my address or my phone number on facebook , two things I consider more personal , and \ _those \ _ you can already find in any phonebook site .
Hell , maybe we 're \ _more \ _ careful about our personal info since facebook does n't really have anything on it that we value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd probably accept anyone who cares enough to "friend" me, whether I know them or not.
Mark me in the 43.5\%, a guy who once accepted a friend request from "Some Pencils" and a random girl in Arizona (thousands of miles from me) just because she was a girl.
What are these people going to find out... my hometown?
My college?
My favorite tv shows?
Who cares?
I don't think I'm really stalker material, and iIf my favorite movies are that important to some guy writing a corporate spambot, whatever, he can have it.
He can't even find my address or my phone number on facebook, two things I consider more personal, and \_those\_ you can already find in any phonebook site.
Hell, maybe we're \_more\_ careful about our personal info since facebook doesn't really have anything on it that we value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353986</id>
	<title>Purging my friend's list</title>
	<author>areusche</author>
	<datestamp>1260205800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I must be in the minority. If I don't know a person I won't add them as a friend. Heck I've gone through my friend's list and purged out people I don't talk to or in other instances strongly dislike from way back in high school. I also don't play Mobwars or Farmville which is just a needless waste of time. I avoid them because I would become engrossed in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I must be in the minority .
If I do n't know a person I wo n't add them as a friend .
Heck I 've gone through my friend 's list and purged out people I do n't talk to or in other instances strongly dislike from way back in high school .
I also do n't play Mobwars or Farmville which is just a needless waste of time .
I avoid them because I would become engrossed in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must be in the minority.
If I don't know a person I won't add them as a friend.
Heck I've gone through my friend's list and purged out people I don't talk to or in other instances strongly dislike from way back in high school.
I also don't play Mobwars or Farmville which is just a needless waste of time.
I avoid them because I would become engrossed in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353962</id>
	<title>Bloody Hell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260205680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When are we going to see real, site-agnostic social graph?  How about encryption-based login?  Any plans for a bank to let me use a third-party tool to view my finances using OFX or another similar protocol, but based on the third-party asking for permission and me granting it on the bank website?  What about data portability: when can I have local databases for all this data that will sync securely and automatically with cloud-based databases (and allowing for merges where both the site and I have write permission)?</p><p>It seems like most of the Web 2.0 innovation has focused on making Web 1.0 fast and pretty.  Where the bloody hell are the data-driven innovations that actually level the playing field and make the web more democratic?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When are we going to see real , site-agnostic social graph ?
How about encryption-based login ?
Any plans for a bank to let me use a third-party tool to view my finances using OFX or another similar protocol , but based on the third-party asking for permission and me granting it on the bank website ?
What about data portability : when can I have local databases for all this data that will sync securely and automatically with cloud-based databases ( and allowing for merges where both the site and I have write permission ) ? It seems like most of the Web 2.0 innovation has focused on making Web 1.0 fast and pretty .
Where the bloody hell are the data-driven innovations that actually level the playing field and make the web more democratic ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When are we going to see real, site-agnostic social graph?
How about encryption-based login?
Any plans for a bank to let me use a third-party tool to view my finances using OFX or another similar protocol, but based on the third-party asking for permission and me granting it on the bank website?
What about data portability: when can I have local databases for all this data that will sync securely and automatically with cloud-based databases (and allowing for merges where both the site and I have write permission)?It seems like most of the Web 2.0 innovation has focused on making Web 1.0 fast and pretty.
Where the bloody hell are the data-driven innovations that actually level the playing field and make the web more democratic?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354034</id>
	<title>Moar pals plz</title>
	<author>CapnStank</author>
	<datestamp>1260206040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young."<br> <br>
Breaking news, those who have lived longer have created more social connections than those who have not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young .
" Breaking news , those who have lived longer have created more social connections than those who have not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.
" 
Breaking news, those who have lived longer have created more social connections than those who have not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353566</id>
	<title>Mobster</title>
	<author>PerfectionLost</author>
	<datestamp>1260204060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will the rubber ducky help me with my mob?  Or farm?  Or ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the rubber ducky help me with my mob ?
Or farm ?
Or ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the rubber ducky help me with my mob?
Or farm?
Or ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358484</id>
	<title>Who cares about Facebook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260184500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, it's just a breach of privacy anyway. Who cares about digg, twitter and all those things from the serious people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , it 's just a breach of privacy anyway .
Who cares about digg , twitter and all those things from the serious people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, it's just a breach of privacy anyway.
Who cares about digg, twitter and all those things from the serious people?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30369590</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly because...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1260263160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly!<br>I mean how many people do you know when you are in kindergarten vs.<br>how many people you know when you are clubbing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly ! I mean how many people do you know when you are in kindergarten vs.how many people you know when you are clubbing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly!I mean how many people do you know when you are in kindergarten vs.how many people you know when you are clubbing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354124</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1260206460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's what I don't get... though I'm pretty open with my DOB and phone number, my address not nearly as much.  Then again, I have a *VERY* common name, with a couple other people that match the same name and DOB.  My online persona is pretty open actually.  Personally, I just ignore/disallow pretty much all apps on facebook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's what I do n't get... though I 'm pretty open with my DOB and phone number , my address not nearly as much .
Then again , I have a * VERY * common name , with a couple other people that match the same name and DOB .
My online persona is pretty open actually .
Personally , I just ignore/disallow pretty much all apps on facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's what I don't get... though I'm pretty open with my DOB and phone number, my address not nearly as much.
Then again, I have a *VERY* common name, with a couple other people that match the same name and DOB.
My online persona is pretty open actually.
Personally, I just ignore/disallow pretty much all apps on facebook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353542</id>
	<title>Re:Olders users know more people?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260203940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, this is based on a completely unscientific poll of my brain cells, but it seems older users would be more likely to, at least initially, treat sites like Facebook as something new to just try out, a fun toy more than a serious part of their lives, and thus less likely to care that much about how they expose themselves on such a site.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , this is based on a completely unscientific poll of my brain cells , but it seems older users would be more likely to , at least initially , treat sites like Facebook as something new to just try out , a fun toy more than a serious part of their lives , and thus less likely to care that much about how they expose themselves on such a site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, this is based on a completely unscientific poll of my brain cells, but it seems older users would be more likely to, at least initially, treat sites like Facebook as something new to just try out, a fun toy more than a serious part of their lives, and thus less likely to care that much about how they expose themselves on such a site.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353232</id>
	<title>Spammers?</title>
	<author>pz</author>
	<datestamp>1260202560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could it be that these befriendings are from people who don't care about privacy, or, put a better way, want to use Facebook to send spam messages, and so will befriend EVERYONE?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could it be that these befriendings are from people who do n't care about privacy , or , put a better way , want to use Facebook to send spam messages , and so will befriend EVERYONE ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could it be that these befriendings are from people who don't care about privacy, or, put a better way, want to use Facebook to send spam messages, and so will befriend EVERYONE?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357284</id>
	<title>Re:Are they being friended to REAL accounts?</title>
	<author>AA Wulf</author>
	<datestamp>1260177840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Though not uncommon, it is technically a violation of the Facebook TOS to have multiple accounts, fictitious accounts that don't use your real name, and so on.  Facebook really needs to update their TOS in addition to their privacy settings.  If you can manage to use the service with a fictitious name, you shouldn't have to worry that some d-bag is going to come and suspend you for it down the road.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though not uncommon , it is technically a violation of the Facebook TOS to have multiple accounts , fictitious accounts that do n't use your real name , and so on .
Facebook really needs to update their TOS in addition to their privacy settings .
If you can manage to use the service with a fictitious name , you should n't have to worry that some d-bag is going to come and suspend you for it down the road .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though not uncommon, it is technically a violation of the Facebook TOS to have multiple accounts, fictitious accounts that don't use your real name, and so on.
Facebook really needs to update their TOS in addition to their privacy settings.
If you can manage to use the service with a fictitious name, you shouldn't have to worry that some d-bag is going to come and suspend you for it down the road.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353014</id>
	<title>Re:Self correcting problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260201540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Good.  Let Facebook go the way of the dodo.  It's the equivalent of those "personal home pages" people put up when they first discovered the Web.</p></div><p>Really? Pretty sure I never slept with anyone after flirting with them on my personal home page. Oh wait... I did. But guestbooks weren't quite as intuitive as Facebook.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good .
Let Facebook go the way of the dodo .
It 's the equivalent of those " personal home pages " people put up when they first discovered the Web.Really ?
Pretty sure I never slept with anyone after flirting with them on my personal home page .
Oh wait... I did .
But guestbooks were n't quite as intuitive as Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good.
Let Facebook go the way of the dodo.
It's the equivalent of those "personal home pages" people put up when they first discovered the Web.Really?
Pretty sure I never slept with anyone after flirting with them on my personal home page.
Oh wait... I did.
But guestbooks weren't quite as intuitive as Facebook.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353882</id>
	<title>Re:Are they being friended to REAL accounts?</title>
	<author>LatencyKills</author>
	<datestamp>1260205380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll go you one better - I have a single facebook account with no real information in it at all.  I made this account because people were constantly sending me facebook links, and you can't look at them without having an account.  More perplexing still is that account, essentially completely inactive from a facebook perspective without posts, pictures, or any meaningful personal data (it lists, for example, the age as 109 because at one time the default birthday was 1/1/1900 and I didn't change it), still gets friend requests, lots and lots of them.  Who are these people?  Or are they programs that simply send out friend requests in bulk like spam?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll go you one better - I have a single facebook account with no real information in it at all .
I made this account because people were constantly sending me facebook links , and you ca n't look at them without having an account .
More perplexing still is that account , essentially completely inactive from a facebook perspective without posts , pictures , or any meaningful personal data ( it lists , for example , the age as 109 because at one time the default birthday was 1/1/1900 and I did n't change it ) , still gets friend requests , lots and lots of them .
Who are these people ?
Or are they programs that simply send out friend requests in bulk like spam ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll go you one better - I have a single facebook account with no real information in it at all.
I made this account because people were constantly sending me facebook links, and you can't look at them without having an account.
More perplexing still is that account, essentially completely inactive from a facebook perspective without posts, pictures, or any meaningful personal data (it lists, for example, the age as 109 because at one time the default birthday was 1/1/1900 and I didn't change it), still gets friend requests, lots and lots of them.
Who are these people?
Or are they programs that simply send out friend requests in bulk like spam?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353028</id>
	<title>Uhh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260201660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFS: "The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young."</p><p>They've also had a lifetime of real life social networking (not the online kind) to boost the level of friends and acquaintances they would like to keep in contact with.</p><p>Young people are very cliquey with their behaviour in regards to friends. When I was in school, I could've counted my true friends on my fingers. When I went out into the world and bounced jobs for a couple years, I met many more interesting people that I remained friends with after the jobs had come and gone.</p><p>Also, do we really need another article to tell us that the older people in society are less hip to the social network scams?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFS : " The older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young .
" They 've also had a lifetime of real life social networking ( not the online kind ) to boost the level of friends and acquaintances they would like to keep in contact with.Young people are very cliquey with their behaviour in regards to friends .
When I was in school , I could 've counted my true friends on my fingers .
When I went out into the world and bounced jobs for a couple years , I met many more interesting people that I remained friends with after the jobs had come and gone.Also , do we really need another article to tell us that the older people in society are less hip to the social network scams ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFS: "The older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young.
"They've also had a lifetime of real life social networking (not the online kind) to boost the level of friends and acquaintances they would like to keep in contact with.Young people are very cliquey with their behaviour in regards to friends.
When I was in school, I could've counted my true friends on my fingers.
When I went out into the world and bounced jobs for a couple years, I met many more interesting people that I remained friends with after the jobs had come and gone.Also, do we really need another article to tell us that the older people in society are less hip to the social network scams?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353672</id>
	<title>Re:Unfair Tests</title>
	<author>Hidyman</author>
	<datestamp>1260204600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39n4wow8fWE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">duck</a> [youtube.com] in question?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this the duck [ youtube.com ] in question ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this the duck [youtube.com] in question?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357350</id>
	<title>Re:A duck is rather harmless...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1260178260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>especially if they have at least one friend in common.</p></div><p>Hmm... I wonder if there&rsquo;s a way to calculate the optimum approach vector, based on which of someone&rsquo;s friends are likely to add you as a friend off-the-bat, which of them are likely to add you once you have a few friends in common, and how many friends in common you&rsquo;ll need to have before you have a reasonable expectation of success when you attempt to friend the target?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>especially if they have at least one friend in common.Hmm... I wonder if there    s a way to calculate the optimum approach vector , based on which of someone    s friends are likely to add you as a friend off-the-bat , which of them are likely to add you once you have a few friends in common , and how many friends in common you    ll need to have before you have a reasonable expectation of success when you attempt to friend the target ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>especially if they have at least one friend in common.Hmm... I wonder if there’s a way to calculate the optimum approach vector, based on which of someone’s friends are likely to add you as a friend off-the-bat, which of them are likely to add you once you have a few friends in common, and how many friends in common you’ll need to have before you have a reasonable expectation of success when you attempt to friend the target?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</id>
	<title>Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>nizo</author>
	<datestamp>1260201840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about not putting stuff up on social media sites that you wouldn't want posted on a bulletin board at the local laundromat? Why on earth would I post my DOB, address, phone number there for example??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about not putting stuff up on social media sites that you would n't want posted on a bulletin board at the local laundromat ?
Why on earth would I post my DOB , address , phone number there for example ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about not putting stuff up on social media sites that you wouldn't want posted on a bulletin board at the local laundromat?
Why on earth would I post my DOB, address, phone number there for example?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355060</id>
	<title>Re:Possibly because...</title>
	<author>chacha08</author>
	<datestamp>1260210120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can't agree more. Time could change everything. There is no rush.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't agree more .
Time could change everything .
There is no rush .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't agree more.
Time could change everything.
There is no rush.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353334</id>
	<title>Re:Self correcting problem</title>
	<author>Fozzyuw</author>
	<datestamp>1260203040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Good. Let Facebook go the way of the dodo. It's the equivalent of those "personal home pages" people put up when they first discovered the Web.</p></div><p>I wouldn't say it's equivalent but they do share a little bit of similarity.  Facebook, unlike personal home pages, is far more intuitive now than "p.h.p."'s where back in the day.  Perhaps it's wider exposure to all things web, or perhaps it's better web technologies and tech. adoption (CSS + JS frameworks + "AJAX").</p><p>And the biggest difference, I'd say as both a web developer, a Facebook member, and someone who doesn't really like Facebook, I certainly do appreciate it for the easy as which I found I was able to reconnect with old high school friends (and perhaps ones I really wasn't interested in connecting too).</p><p>Then again, I put very little info out there.  Of course, that doesn't stop my friends from putting stuff out there and tagged to my account.  But I am looking it over to try and manage it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good .
Let Facebook go the way of the dodo .
It 's the equivalent of those " personal home pages " people put up when they first discovered the Web.I would n't say it 's equivalent but they do share a little bit of similarity .
Facebook , unlike personal home pages , is far more intuitive now than " p.h.p .
" 's where back in the day .
Perhaps it 's wider exposure to all things web , or perhaps it 's better web technologies and tech .
adoption ( CSS + JS frameworks + " AJAX " ) .And the biggest difference , I 'd say as both a web developer , a Facebook member , and someone who does n't really like Facebook , I certainly do appreciate it for the easy as which I found I was able to reconnect with old high school friends ( and perhaps ones I really was n't interested in connecting too ) .Then again , I put very little info out there .
Of course , that does n't stop my friends from putting stuff out there and tagged to my account .
But I am looking it over to try and manage it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good.
Let Facebook go the way of the dodo.
It's the equivalent of those "personal home pages" people put up when they first discovered the Web.I wouldn't say it's equivalent but they do share a little bit of similarity.
Facebook, unlike personal home pages, is far more intuitive now than "p.h.p.
"'s where back in the day.
Perhaps it's wider exposure to all things web, or perhaps it's better web technologies and tech.
adoption (CSS + JS frameworks + "AJAX").And the biggest difference, I'd say as both a web developer, a Facebook member, and someone who doesn't really like Facebook, I certainly do appreciate it for the easy as which I found I was able to reconnect with old high school friends (and perhaps ones I really wasn't interested in connecting too).Then again, I put very little info out there.
Of course, that doesn't stop my friends from putting stuff out there and tagged to my account.
But I am looking it over to try and manage it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354174</id>
	<title>Re:Here is a crazy idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260206640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why wouldn't you want to make those details handily available to those friends you trust with them? Especially if it means that if you need to change your phone number, many friends will have the new number synched to their phone automatically before you even get around to telling them that the old one is dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would n't you want to make those details handily available to those friends you trust with them ?
Especially if it means that if you need to change your phone number , many friends will have the new number synched to their phone automatically before you even get around to telling them that the old one is dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why wouldn't you want to make those details handily available to those friends you trust with them?
Especially if it means that if you need to change your phone number, many friends will have the new number synched to their phone automatically before you even get around to telling them that the old one is dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884</id>
	<title>Possibly because...</title>
	<author>wirah</author>
	<datestamp>1260200880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...the younger members just need more time to make friends!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...the younger members just need more time to make friends !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...the younger members just need more time to make friends!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354664</id>
	<title>Re:Are they being friended to REAL accounts?</title>
	<author>sarahbau</author>
	<datestamp>1260208500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been on Facebook for 9 months now, and haven't gotten a single spam friend request. The only request I've gotten from someone I didn't know was from someone whose blog post I had responded to, and he assumed I was someone he knew since only his friends and family knew about his blog (I found it through a google search). I can only assume that you are using some game or other application that is sharing your info or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been on Facebook for 9 months now , and have n't gotten a single spam friend request .
The only request I 've gotten from someone I did n't know was from someone whose blog post I had responded to , and he assumed I was someone he knew since only his friends and family knew about his blog ( I found it through a google search ) .
I can only assume that you are using some game or other application that is sharing your info or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been on Facebook for 9 months now, and haven't gotten a single spam friend request.
The only request I've gotten from someone I didn't know was from someone whose blog post I had responded to, and he assumed I was someone he knew since only his friends and family knew about his blog (I found it through a google search).
I can only assume that you are using some game or other application that is sharing your info or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30362850</id>
	<title>Re:Public Privacy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260264480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as opposed to the NON-digital fingerprint we used to leave behind instead? I'm confused - I thought my fingerprints were all on my digits all the time,,,,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as opposed to the NON-digital fingerprint we used to leave behind instead ?
I 'm confused - I thought my fingerprints were all on my digits all the time,,,,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as opposed to the NON-digital fingerprint we used to leave behind instead?
I'm confused - I thought my fingerprints were all on my digits all the time,,,,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353152</id>
	<title>Promoters</title>
	<author>boxxa</author>
	<datestamp>1260202260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am also seeing that more and more people are calling them promoters and advertisers by adding 1,000 friends on there and don't realize the information they are disclosing.

The biggest example is the Palin email account hacking that most of the answers to security questions was found in her Facebook.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am also seeing that more and more people are calling them promoters and advertisers by adding 1,000 friends on there and do n't realize the information they are disclosing .
The biggest example is the Palin email account hacking that most of the answers to security questions was found in her Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am also seeing that more and more people are calling them promoters and advertisers by adding 1,000 friends on there and don't realize the information they are disclosing.
The biggest example is the Palin email account hacking that most of the answers to security questions was found in her Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353310</id>
	<title>schemes</title>
	<author>ZenDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1260202920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Plastic Frog? Rubber Duck!? Cat?!?! What is this world coming to??? Humanity is doomed!<p>

Im going to have to side with B3ttik on this one... most people dont give a shit. This the nature of social networking, and to be frank I think Facebook wants it that way. The more information that is exposed to the masses the more they can use for their massive data mining schemes. Its just one huge advertising machine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plastic Frog ?
Rubber Duck ! ?
Cat ? ! ? ! What is this world coming to ? ? ?
Humanity is doomed !
Im going to have to side with B3ttik on this one... most people dont give a shit .
This the nature of social networking , and to be frank I think Facebook wants it that way .
The more information that is exposed to the masses the more they can use for their massive data mining schemes .
Its just one huge advertising machine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plastic Frog?
Rubber Duck!?
Cat?!?! What is this world coming to???
Humanity is doomed!
Im going to have to side with B3ttik on this one... most people dont give a shit.
This the nature of social networking, and to be frank I think Facebook wants it that way.
The more information that is exposed to the masses the more they can use for their massive data mining schemes.
Its just one huge advertising machine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354032</id>
	<title>once again the real issue is being overlooked</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260205980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why doesn't facebook offer https to sign in with? Why do we sign in over a insecure web connection?<br>Everyone is worried about the "privacy" and the most blatant privacy guard is not even implemented.<br>all smoke and mirrors to cover the real issues..<br>Facebook sucks and I do not understand why they get such great raves..<br>Sure I can talk to someone in norway big deal..<br>My friends don't give a shit what type of toilet paper I wiped with and I don't care what they wiped with.<br>really it seems like another form of attention whoreism to me</p><p>ps: my captcha was construe how ironic..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does n't facebook offer https to sign in with ?
Why do we sign in over a insecure web connection ? Everyone is worried about the " privacy " and the most blatant privacy guard is not even implemented.all smoke and mirrors to cover the real issues..Facebook sucks and I do not understand why they get such great raves..Sure I can talk to someone in norway big deal..My friends do n't give a shit what type of toilet paper I wiped with and I do n't care what they wiped with.really it seems like another form of attention whoreism to meps : my captcha was construe how ironic. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why doesn't facebook offer https to sign in with?
Why do we sign in over a insecure web connection?Everyone is worried about the "privacy" and the most blatant privacy guard is not even implemented.all smoke and mirrors to cover the real issues..Facebook sucks and I do not understand why they get such great raves..Sure I can talk to someone in norway big deal..My friends don't give a shit what type of toilet paper I wiped with and I don't care what they wiped with.really it seems like another form of attention whoreism to meps: my captcha was construe how ironic..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356576</id>
	<title>Re:Are they being friended to REAL accounts?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260217620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My other REAL account only has REAL friends and Family. I scrutinize every request and all personal settings are very tight as to only allow friends to see the data.</p></div><p>Nobody cares about your stupid facebook account. Oh, good job, you scrutinize every friend request. You've got delusions of grandeur. No one wants to be your friend that badly.</p><p>The problem is not *other people* on facebook, the problem is that you've given control of your private identity to a large, profit driven corporation. This is just dumb on the face of it. Other situations in which profit driven corporations have access to your private information- ie banks and credit agencies- are subject to government regulation and will never sell your data. Facebook on the other hand, has no such regulation. How long do you think we have until the calendar, "Hottest Facebook Chicks" comes out? I think it'll happen before we get to the year 2020.</p><p>What happens if facebook goes bankrupt? Their assets (your private information) will be sold at liquidation to the highest bidder.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My other REAL account only has REAL friends and Family .
I scrutinize every request and all personal settings are very tight as to only allow friends to see the data.Nobody cares about your stupid facebook account .
Oh , good job , you scrutinize every friend request .
You 've got delusions of grandeur .
No one wants to be your friend that badly.The problem is not * other people * on facebook , the problem is that you 've given control of your private identity to a large , profit driven corporation .
This is just dumb on the face of it .
Other situations in which profit driven corporations have access to your private information- ie banks and credit agencies- are subject to government regulation and will never sell your data .
Facebook on the other hand , has no such regulation .
How long do you think we have until the calendar , " Hottest Facebook Chicks " comes out ?
I think it 'll happen before we get to the year 2020.What happens if facebook goes bankrupt ?
Their assets ( your private information ) will be sold at liquidation to the highest bidder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My other REAL account only has REAL friends and Family.
I scrutinize every request and all personal settings are very tight as to only allow friends to see the data.Nobody cares about your stupid facebook account.
Oh, good job, you scrutinize every friend request.
You've got delusions of grandeur.
No one wants to be your friend that badly.The problem is not *other people* on facebook, the problem is that you've given control of your private identity to a large, profit driven corporation.
This is just dumb on the face of it.
Other situations in which profit driven corporations have access to your private information- ie banks and credit agencies- are subject to government regulation and will never sell your data.
Facebook on the other hand, has no such regulation.
How long do you think we have until the calendar, "Hottest Facebook Chicks" comes out?
I think it'll happen before we get to the year 2020.What happens if facebook goes bankrupt?
Their assets (your private information) will be sold at liquidation to the highest bidder.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353464</id>
	<title>Re:That, or we don't give a shit.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260203520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I kinda agree. Although, I still don&rsquo;t generally accept friend requests from random people who I don&rsquo;t know.</p><p>But the guy with the same last name as mine who requested to friend me the other day? Sure, why not. I have no idea who he is, but ok. His profile had enough info that it obviously wasn&rsquo;t somebody creating a new account just to steal info from people with my last name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I kinda agree .
Although , I still don    t generally accept friend requests from random people who I don    t know.But the guy with the same last name as mine who requested to friend me the other day ?
Sure , why not .
I have no idea who he is , but ok. His profile had enough info that it obviously wasn    t somebody creating a new account just to steal info from people with my last name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I kinda agree.
Although, I still don’t generally accept friend requests from random people who I don’t know.But the guy with the same last name as mine who requested to friend me the other day?
Sure, why not.
I have no idea who he is, but ok. His profile had enough info that it obviously wasn’t somebody creating a new account just to steal info from people with my last name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353218</id>
	<title>Re:Uhh...</title>
	<author>\_Shad0w\_</author>
	<datestamp>1260202500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You saved me the bother of stating the same thing.  All of my friends on Facebook are people I actually know; some I see regularly, others less so.  I suspect I still haven't added everyone I used to know and would want to keep up with; I only joined recently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You saved me the bother of stating the same thing .
All of my friends on Facebook are people I actually know ; some I see regularly , others less so .
I suspect I still have n't added everyone I used to know and would want to keep up with ; I only joined recently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You saved me the bother of stating the same thing.
All of my friends on Facebook are people I actually know; some I see regularly, others less so.
I suspect I still haven't added everyone I used to know and would want to keep up with; I only joined recently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357238</id>
	<title>Older users have more family...</title>
	<author>n5yat</author>
	<datestamp>1260177540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young" - true that for some, it may be eagerness to build up the friends list, but for many of us, just having family members makes for a lot of 'friends'. I have my wife, two children, my brother and sister and their kids, my Uncle and his kids and some of his grandkids, I have my other uncle and his kids... so, as you get older, the family tree keeps expanding, and the friends list grows... you have to worry when the list shrinks due to attrition!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" older users had more than 4x the friends each , on average , than the young " - true that for some , it may be eagerness to build up the friends list , but for many of us , just having family members makes for a lot of 'friends' .
I have my wife , two children , my brother and sister and their kids , my Uncle and his kids and some of his grandkids , I have my other uncle and his kids... so , as you get older , the family tree keeps expanding , and the friends list grows... you have to worry when the list shrinks due to attrition ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"older users had more than 4x the friends each, on average, than the young" - true that for some, it may be eagerness to build up the friends list, but for many of us, just having family members makes for a lot of 'friends'.
I have my wife, two children, my brother and sister and their kids, my Uncle and his kids and some of his grandkids, I have my other uncle and his kids... so, as you get older, the family tree keeps expanding, and the friends list grows... you have to worry when the list shrinks due to attrition!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30369590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30360782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30362850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353166
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353028
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30362738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30364808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30367604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30364606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_07_146228_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353580
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30364808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353838
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30360782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30362850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353542
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353882
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354430
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30354664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30356576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30364606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30358332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30363502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30369590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30353122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30362738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30367604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30357818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30355060
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_07_146228.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_07_146228.30352994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
