<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_06_0356232</id>
	<title>DARPA Network Challenge Lasts All of 9 Hours</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1260105420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>stillnotelf writes <i>"<a href="https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/default.aspx">A team based at MIT has won</a> the DARPA Network Challenge.  DARPA notes: 'The Challenge has captured the imagination of people around the world, is rich with scientific intrigue, and, we hope, is part of a growing "renaissance of wonder" throughout the nation,' said DARPA's director, Dr. Regina E. Dugan. 'DARPA salutes the MIT team for successfully completing this complex task less than 9 hours after balloon launch.' <a href="https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/darpanetworkchallengewinner2009.pdf">PDF with (scant) details</a>.  Hit the first link above for a map with the locations.  How many did your team find?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>stillnotelf writes " A team based at MIT has won the DARPA Network Challenge .
DARPA notes : 'The Challenge has captured the imagination of people around the world , is rich with scientific intrigue , and , we hope , is part of a growing " renaissance of wonder " throughout the nation, ' said DARPA 's director , Dr. Regina E. Dugan. 'DARPA salutes the MIT team for successfully completing this complex task less than 9 hours after balloon launch .
' PDF with ( scant ) details .
Hit the first link above for a map with the locations .
How many did your team find ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>stillnotelf writes "A team based at MIT has won the DARPA Network Challenge.
DARPA notes: 'The Challenge has captured the imagination of people around the world, is rich with scientific intrigue, and, we hope, is part of a growing "renaissance of wonder" throughout the nation,' said DARPA's director, Dr. Regina E. Dugan. 'DARPA salutes the MIT team for successfully completing this complex task less than 9 hours after balloon launch.
' PDF with (scant) details.
Hit the first link above for a map with the locations.
How many did your team find?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342812</id>
	<title>Actually they'd spend only 5 hrs.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260110160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But one of the balloons was a real b*tch to locate... and, in the end, it was very frustrating and lost time -- it was not a balloon... just an UFO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But one of the balloons was a real b * tch to locate... and , in the end , it was very frustrating and lost time -- it was not a balloon... just an UFO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But one of the balloons was a real b*tch to locate... and, in the end, it was very frustrating and lost time -- it was not a balloon... just an UFO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Kenz0r</author>
	<datestamp>1260113160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This may come as a surprise to you, but slashdot has readers that don't live in the United States.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This may come as a surprise to you , but slashdot has readers that do n't live in the United States .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may come as a surprise to you, but slashdot has readers that don't live in the United States.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343432</id>
	<title>And apparently, hiding in the US of A</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1260117960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Daring fellow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Daring fellow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Daring fellow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342942</id>
	<title>Re:Great, but</title>
	<author>smitty777</author>
	<datestamp>1260112020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938\_105-10410064-1.html" title="cnet.com"> answer</a> [cnet.com].  I was wondering the same thing myself.  It appears that the solution was very low tech: just get a bunch of people, and when they see a balloon, send a message to the group.  Instead of splitting the 40k among the group, they donated it to charity.  Reward for MIT?  Bragging rights.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's the answer [ cnet.com ] .
I was wondering the same thing myself .
It appears that the solution was very low tech : just get a bunch of people , and when they see a balloon , send a message to the group .
Instead of splitting the 40k among the group , they donated it to charity .
Reward for MIT ?
Bragging rights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's the  answer [cnet.com].
I was wondering the same thing myself.
It appears that the solution was very low tech: just get a bunch of people, and when they see a balloon, send a message to the group.
Instead of splitting the 40k among the group, they donated it to charity.
Reward for MIT?
Bragging rights.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343030</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>pnewhook</author>
	<datestamp>1260113220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's DARPA??  What was your previous question 'what's that big round thing between me and the couch?'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's DARPA ? ?
What was your previous question 'what 's that big round thing between me and the couch ?
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's DARPA??
What was your previous question 'what's that big round thing between me and the couch?
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343508</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>convolvatron</author>
	<datestamp>1260118620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you missed the renaissance of wonder?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you missed the renaissance of wonder ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you missed the renaissance of wonder?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343212</id>
	<title>Re:99 Luftballoons</title>
	<author>finity</author>
	<datestamp>1260115500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Red balloons really piss SkyNET off.  You don't want to make SkyNET angry.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Red balloons really piss SkyNET off .
You do n't want to make SkyNET angry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Red balloons really piss SkyNET off.
You don't want to make SkyNET angry.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343052</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>benchbri</author>
	<datestamp>1260113580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're implying that the United States wants Bin Laden to be found.

If you'll excuse me, I'm off to my Two Minute Hate over 9/11.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're implying that the United States wants Bin Laden to be found .
If you 'll excuse me , I 'm off to my Two Minute Hate over 9/11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're implying that the United States wants Bin Laden to be found.
If you'll excuse me, I'm off to my Two Minute Hate over 9/11.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342844</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260110640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sure do hope there's some irony in your post I'm not caching.<br> <br>
DARPA is an acronym standing for  Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.<br>
It is an agency of the US Department of Defense it develops tech for the army.<br>
It's predecessor ARPA gave us the internet amongst other things(too condensed a statement).<br>
They like to issue challenges and geeks of all trades either like to participate in them for the sport and/or are picked from the crowd and given jobs at DARPA to develop new cutting edge technologies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure do hope there 's some irony in your post I 'm not caching .
DARPA is an acronym standing for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency .
It is an agency of the US Department of Defense it develops tech for the army .
It 's predecessor ARPA gave us the internet amongst other things ( too condensed a statement ) .
They like to issue challenges and geeks of all trades either like to participate in them for the sport and/or are picked from the crowd and given jobs at DARPA to develop new cutting edge technologies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure do hope there's some irony in your post I'm not caching.
DARPA is an acronym standing for  Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
It is an agency of the US Department of Defense it develops tech for the army.
It's predecessor ARPA gave us the internet amongst other things(too condensed a statement).
They like to issue challenges and geeks of all trades either like to participate in them for the sport and/or are picked from the crowd and given jobs at DARPA to develop new cutting edge technologies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344120</id>
	<title>NEWSFLASH: Spam pyramid schemes work!</title>
	<author>mtrachtenberg</author>
	<datestamp>1260124140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Today, MIT and the United States Department of Warxxx Defense are proud to report their joint discovery that spam email, when combined with a pyramid sales scheme, is an effective way to get people off their asses.  This works best when your name is well-known and has not yet been sufficiently exploited that your email is ignored.</p><p>Note to editors: when referring to spam in connection with MIT, correct usage is "social network."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Today , MIT and the United States Department of Warxxx Defense are proud to report their joint discovery that spam email , when combined with a pyramid sales scheme , is an effective way to get people off their asses .
This works best when your name is well-known and has not yet been sufficiently exploited that your email is ignored.Note to editors : when referring to spam in connection with MIT , correct usage is " social network .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today, MIT and the United States Department of Warxxx Defense are proud to report their joint discovery that spam email, when combined with a pyramid sales scheme, is an effective way to get people off their asses.
This works best when your name is well-known and has not yet been sufficiently exploited that your email is ignored.Note to editors: when referring to spam in connection with MIT, correct usage is "social network.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342858</id>
	<title>Re:how</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1260110880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well reading the <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/12/04/2047229" title="slashdot.org">previous article</a> [slashdot.org] about MITs solution to this challenge would be a good start.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well reading the previous article [ slashdot.org ] about MITs solution to this challenge would be a good start .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well reading the previous article [slashdot.org] about MITs solution to this challenge would be a good start.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394</id>
	<title>Why this challenge?</title>
	<author>sp3d2orbit</author>
	<datestamp>1260117600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one that sees how nefarious this experiment is? Someone in the US military saw the events in Iran a few months back and panicked. The Iranian military was able to censor official news but not social networks. DARPA is conducting this challenge to gather the real world information it needs to effectively censor social networks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that sees how nefarious this experiment is ?
Someone in the US military saw the events in Iran a few months back and panicked .
The Iranian military was able to censor official news but not social networks .
DARPA is conducting this challenge to gather the real world information it needs to effectively censor social networks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that sees how nefarious this experiment is?
Someone in the US military saw the events in Iran a few months back and panicked.
The Iranian military was able to censor official news but not social networks.
DARPA is conducting this challenge to gather the real world information it needs to effectively censor social networks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260110580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>What's DARPA?</i>
<p>
Right. Get off slashdot. Now. Thank you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's DARPA ?
Right. Get off slashdot .
Now. Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's DARPA?
Right. Get off slashdot.
Now. Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>Fzz</author>
	<datestamp>1260114720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you implying that Bin Laden is eight feet high, red, and visible from the nearest road?  Interesting intel, that.  Perhaps you should call the CIA?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you implying that Bin Laden is eight feet high , red , and visible from the nearest road ?
Interesting intel , that .
Perhaps you should call the CIA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you implying that Bin Laden is eight feet high, red, and visible from the nearest road?
Interesting intel, that.
Perhaps you should call the CIA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343894</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>deblau</author>
	<datestamp>1260122280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Missing the point.  This was not about the hunt itself, but so DARPA could study the spontaneous social networks that would spring up in response to the challenge.  They'll have some really good data on that now, and I'm sure they'll interview the MIT guys carefully.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Missing the point .
This was not about the hunt itself , but so DARPA could study the spontaneous social networks that would spring up in response to the challenge .
They 'll have some really good data on that now , and I 'm sure they 'll interview the MIT guys carefully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Missing the point.
This was not about the hunt itself, but so DARPA could study the spontaneous social networks that would spring up in response to the challenge.
They'll have some really good data on that now, and I'm sure they'll interview the MIT guys carefully.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348350</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Barryke</author>
	<datestamp>1260111900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You skilled formulated it as "one of the entities".</p><p>An other one from europe:<br><a href="http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/About/Web-en.html" title="web.cern.ch" rel="nofollow">http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/About/Web-en.html</a> [web.cern.ch]<br>Most American residents will know CERN. They payed 500 million of the 10miljard (ten billion in US english) costs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You skilled formulated it as " one of the entities " .An other one from europe : http : //public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/About/Web-en.html [ web.cern.ch ] Most American residents will know CERN .
They payed 500 million of the 10miljard ( ten billion in US english ) costs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You skilled formulated it as "one of the entities".An other one from europe:http://public.web.cern.ch/Public/en/About/Web-en.html [web.cern.ch]Most American residents will know CERN.
They payed 500 million of the 10miljard (ten billion in US english) costs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345684</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1260092580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This may come as a surprise to you, but slashdot has readers that don't live in the United States.</p></div><p>Yes, and when an American reader doesn't know something about something from outside the US, this is due to American arrogance, whereas when a non-American reader doesn't know something about something from the US, the fact that they were expected to is due to American arrogance.  No matter who doesn't know something about what, the problem is American arrogance...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This may come as a surprise to you , but slashdot has readers that do n't live in the United States.Yes , and when an American reader does n't know something about something from outside the US , this is due to American arrogance , whereas when a non-American reader does n't know something about something from the US , the fact that they were expected to is due to American arrogance .
No matter who does n't know something about what , the problem is American arrogance.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may come as a surprise to you, but slashdot has readers that don't live in the United States.Yes, and when an American reader doesn't know something about something from outside the US, this is due to American arrogance, whereas when a non-American reader doesn't know something about something from the US, the fact that they were expected to is due to American arrogance.
No matter who doesn't know something about what, the problem is American arrogance...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345262</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260132540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Plus of course slashdot is an American based web siute aimed at Americans as the primary audience.</p></div></blockquote><p>What's an American?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus of course slashdot is an American based web siute aimed at Americans as the primary audience.What 's an American ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus of course slashdot is an American based web siute aimed at Americans as the primary audience.What's an American?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343716</id>
	<title>This is a radio station promotion gimmick</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1260120780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
This is more like a radio station promotion.  It would have worked if one of those blowhards on AM talk radio had announced a similar hunt with a call-in number.  It didn't need the Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is more like a radio station promotion .
It would have worked if one of those blowhards on AM talk radio had announced a similar hunt with a call-in number .
It did n't need the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
This is more like a radio station promotion.
It would have worked if one of those blowhards on AM talk radio had announced a similar hunt with a call-in number.
It didn't need the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343210</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>areusche</author>
	<datestamp>1260115500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And if you look at the ever lovely Slashdot FAQ you will see that it is a US based company with US based news. Just google any and all acronyms that are unfamiliar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And if you look at the ever lovely Slashdot FAQ you will see that it is a US based company with US based news .
Just google any and all acronyms that are unfamiliar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if you look at the ever lovely Slashdot FAQ you will see that it is a US based company with US based news.
Just google any and all acronyms that are unfamiliar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345146</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260131580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know that it was a challenge so much as an experiment to see how quickly social networks could form or adapt to correlate geographically dispersed real world information.  I can see that this would be hugely important if you were trying, for example, to keep a lid on a protest involving the destruction of dispersed corporate or government property.  I also think that 9 hours represents brown trouser time for some stakeholders.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know that it was a challenge so much as an experiment to see how quickly social networks could form or adapt to correlate geographically dispersed real world information .
I can see that this would be hugely important if you were trying , for example , to keep a lid on a protest involving the destruction of dispersed corporate or government property .
I also think that 9 hours represents brown trouser time for some stakeholders .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know that it was a challenge so much as an experiment to see how quickly social networks could form or adapt to correlate geographically dispersed real world information.
I can see that this would be hugely important if you were trying, for example, to keep a lid on a protest involving the destruction of dispersed corporate or government property.
I also think that 9 hours represents brown trouser time for some stakeholders.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343040</id>
	<title>Go Slashdot!</title>
	<author>jesusfr3Ak</author>
	<datestamp>1260113400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is great!  Slashdot is reporting on the results, and all the news sites are getting really excited about the kickoff. Way to stay ahead of the curve.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is great !
Slashdot is reporting on the results , and all the news sites are getting really excited about the kickoff .
Way to stay ahead of the curve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is great!
Slashdot is reporting on the results, and all the news sites are getting really excited about the kickoff.
Way to stay ahead of the curve.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342914</id>
	<title>How many did your team find?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260111720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All of them, and we had just about closed the deal to sell the information on this secret DARPA project to China  when those bastards at MIT went public and ruined everything.  I'm posting anonynously for obvious reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All of them , and we had just about closed the deal to sell the information on this secret DARPA project to China when those bastards at MIT went public and ruined everything .
I 'm posting anonynously for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All of them, and we had just about closed the deal to sell the information on this secret DARPA project to China  when those bastards at MIT went public and ruined everything.
I'm posting anonynously for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344582</id>
	<title>Re:Great, but</title>
	<author>spydabyte</author>
	<datestamp>1260127560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It just so happened those "bunch" of people were the ones that launched the balloons and just all happened to be eating at Olive Garden afterwards....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It just so happened those " bunch " of people were the ones that launched the balloons and just all happened to be eating at Olive Garden afterwards.... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just so happened those "bunch" of people were the ones that launched the balloons and just all happened to be eating at Olive Garden afterwards.... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346460</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>feranick</author>
	<datestamp>1260098400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

<a href="http://www.darpa.mil/" title="darpa.mil">http://www.darpa.mil/</a> [darpa.mil]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency .
http : //www.darpa.mil/ [ darpa.mil ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
http://www.darpa.mil/ [darpa.mil]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342904</id>
	<title>99 Luftballoons</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260111540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, couldn't they have a least made it 99 red balloons? Was DARPA afraid they might accidently start a nuclear war?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , could n't they have a least made it 99 red balloons ?
Was DARPA afraid they might accidently start a nuclear war ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, couldn't they have a least made it 99 red balloons?
Was DARPA afraid they might accidently start a nuclear war?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343886</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260122160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bin Laden is estimated to be between 6'4" and 6'6" -- in other words, he'll stand out from any crowd.  He's also allegedly on dialysis, which considerably restricts the number of places he could stay for any length of time in a 3rd-world country.</p><p>(Of course, Bin Laden's harmless now.  His money's gone, and he's no longer the demagogue he once was.  If we manage to quell the insurgency and set up stable governments in Iraq and Afghanistan, the terrorism problem can be dealt with using a great deal of perseverance and patience -- very much like the way the UK successfully dealt with the IRA.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bin Laden is estimated to be between 6'4 " and 6'6 " -- in other words , he 'll stand out from any crowd .
He 's also allegedly on dialysis , which considerably restricts the number of places he could stay for any length of time in a 3rd-world country .
( Of course , Bin Laden 's harmless now .
His money 's gone , and he 's no longer the demagogue he once was .
If we manage to quell the insurgency and set up stable governments in Iraq and Afghanistan , the terrorism problem can be dealt with using a great deal of perseverance and patience -- very much like the way the UK successfully dealt with the IRA .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bin Laden is estimated to be between 6'4" and 6'6" -- in other words, he'll stand out from any crowd.
He's also allegedly on dialysis, which considerably restricts the number of places he could stay for any length of time in a 3rd-world country.
(Of course, Bin Laden's harmless now.
His money's gone, and he's no longer the demagogue he once was.
If we manage to quell the insurgency and set up stable governments in Iraq and Afghanistan, the terrorism problem can be dealt with using a great deal of perseverance and patience -- very much like the way the UK successfully dealt with the IRA.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30363958</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Herve5</author>
	<datestamp>1260280380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but some of those, like the European I am, still know Darpa<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but some of those , like the European I am , still know Darpa : -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but some of those, like the European I am, still know Darpa :-D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343684</id>
	<title>Wait a second...</title>
	<author>pongo000</author>
	<datestamp>1260120540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but wasn't this a joint DARPA/MIT project?  <i>And an MIT won the challenge?</i>  How does this apparent conflict of interest satisfy the "rich with scientific intrigue" tag?  This is a non-starter, and I'm disappointed that DARPA would even have wasted their time with this.</p><p>As a teacher, my level of concern continues to rise with what passes for "science" these days, especially from institutions that should know better.  This wasn't a science experiment.  It was an advertising gimmick.  Shame on DARPA, and shame on MIT.  (No shame on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/., because after 12 years, I've come to expect this type of editorial slackness.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but was n't this a joint DARPA/MIT project ?
And an MIT won the challenge ?
How does this apparent conflict of interest satisfy the " rich with scientific intrigue " tag ?
This is a non-starter , and I 'm disappointed that DARPA would even have wasted their time with this.As a teacher , my level of concern continues to rise with what passes for " science " these days , especially from institutions that should know better .
This was n't a science experiment .
It was an advertising gimmick .
Shame on DARPA , and shame on MIT .
( No shame on /. , because after 12 years , I 've come to expect this type of editorial slackness .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but wasn't this a joint DARPA/MIT project?
And an MIT won the challenge?
How does this apparent conflict of interest satisfy the "rich with scientific intrigue" tag?
This is a non-starter, and I'm disappointed that DARPA would even have wasted their time with this.As a teacher, my level of concern continues to rise with what passes for "science" these days, especially from institutions that should know better.
This wasn't a science experiment.
It was an advertising gimmick.
Shame on DARPA, and shame on MIT.
(No shame on /., because after 12 years, I've come to expect this type of editorial slackness.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344334</id>
	<title>Re:Why this challenge?</title>
	<author>physicsphairy</author>
	<datestamp>1260125880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I the only one that sees how nefarious this experiment is?</p></div><p>No, I'm sure plenty of other people are willing to make highly implausible leaps to support their initial assumption that anything the military does is directed at them.

</p><p>But as useful as it must be to the coming military junta to prove that people twitter each other,  I am going to go out on a limb and hypothesize that instead of thinking they are capable of overcoming the information deluge of internet and cellular communications by targetting a few nexus points in the social networks, that they may actually be interested in <em>using</em> social networks, or at least gauging their value as a strategic asset.

</p><p>You know that country in the middle east you just mentioned having a problem with social networks?  Our enemy.  Exacerbating their problems is in fact one of the central aspects of intelligence based warfare.  One of the primary reasons for setting up a democracy in Iraq is to try undermine the stability of the fundamentalist governments encircling it, and promoting the flow of information is certainly conducive to that end.

</p><p>Not to mention things like setting up impromptu intelligence networks (when an ally is invaded, such as with Russia--&gt;Georgia recently), or trying to locate a truck which was known to cross into the USA carrying biological toxins, etc.  In that respect DARPA may actually be interested in finding out how they can *augment* the capabilities of our social networks so that they're more effective in the case of such an emergency.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that sees how nefarious this experiment is ? No , I 'm sure plenty of other people are willing to make highly implausible leaps to support their initial assumption that anything the military does is directed at them .
But as useful as it must be to the coming military junta to prove that people twitter each other , I am going to go out on a limb and hypothesize that instead of thinking they are capable of overcoming the information deluge of internet and cellular communications by targetting a few nexus points in the social networks , that they may actually be interested in using social networks , or at least gauging their value as a strategic asset .
You know that country in the middle east you just mentioned having a problem with social networks ?
Our enemy .
Exacerbating their problems is in fact one of the central aspects of intelligence based warfare .
One of the primary reasons for setting up a democracy in Iraq is to try undermine the stability of the fundamentalist governments encircling it , and promoting the flow of information is certainly conducive to that end .
Not to mention things like setting up impromptu intelligence networks ( when an ally is invaded , such as with Russia-- &gt; Georgia recently ) , or trying to locate a truck which was known to cross into the USA carrying biological toxins , etc .
In that respect DARPA may actually be interested in finding out how they can * augment * the capabilities of our social networks so that they 're more effective in the case of such an emergency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that sees how nefarious this experiment is?No, I'm sure plenty of other people are willing to make highly implausible leaps to support their initial assumption that anything the military does is directed at them.
But as useful as it must be to the coming military junta to prove that people twitter each other,  I am going to go out on a limb and hypothesize that instead of thinking they are capable of overcoming the information deluge of internet and cellular communications by targetting a few nexus points in the social networks, that they may actually be interested in using social networks, or at least gauging their value as a strategic asset.
You know that country in the middle east you just mentioned having a problem with social networks?
Our enemy.
Exacerbating their problems is in fact one of the central aspects of intelligence based warfare.
One of the primary reasons for setting up a democracy in Iraq is to try undermine the stability of the fundamentalist governments encircling it, and promoting the flow of information is certainly conducive to that end.
Not to mention things like setting up impromptu intelligence networks (when an ally is invaded, such as with Russia--&gt;Georgia recently), or trying to locate a truck which was known to cross into the USA carrying biological toxins, etc.
In that respect DARPA may actually be interested in finding out how they can *augment* the capabilities of our social networks so that they're more effective in the case of such an emergency.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342902</id>
	<title>We just found one really big one</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260111540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the Good Year Blimp count?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the Good Year Blimp count ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the Good Year Blimp count?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738</id>
	<title>That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260109260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But I bet that team couldn't beat me to first post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I bet that team could n't beat me to first post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I bet that team couldn't beat me to first post.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346998</id>
	<title>No...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260102240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your comment was modded funny because the competition had ZERO affiliation with MIT.</p><p><a href="https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/FAQ.aspx" title="darpa.mil" rel="nofollow">https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/FAQ.aspx</a> [darpa.mil]<br><a href="https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/rules.aspx" title="darpa.mil" rel="nofollow">https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/rules.aspx</a> [darpa.mil]</p><p>Nowhere does it mention any MIT participation in administrating the contest.  You could have verified this yourself in ten seconds.  You are a retard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your comment was modded funny because the competition had ZERO affiliation with MIT.https : //networkchallenge.darpa.mil/FAQ.aspx [ darpa.mil ] https : //networkchallenge.darpa.mil/rules.aspx [ darpa.mil ] Nowhere does it mention any MIT participation in administrating the contest .
You could have verified this yourself in ten seconds .
You are a retard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your comment was modded funny because the competition had ZERO affiliation with MIT.https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/FAQ.aspx [darpa.mil]https://networkchallenge.darpa.mil/rules.aspx [darpa.mil]Nowhere does it mention any MIT participation in administrating the contest.
You could have verified this yourself in ten seconds.
You are a retard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343218</id>
	<title>Re:how</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1260115620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MIT used the pyramid scheme.  You don't have to find a balloon, just get 5 people under you to find 5 people and so on.</p><p>It's not MIT tactics... It's AMWAY tactics...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MIT used the pyramid scheme .
You do n't have to find a balloon , just get 5 people under you to find 5 people and so on.It 's not MIT tactics... It 's AMWAY tactics.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MIT used the pyramid scheme.
You don't have to find a balloon, just get 5 people under you to find 5 people and so on.It's not MIT tactics... It's AMWAY tactics...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343362</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1260117300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And that the person who turned him in wouldn't get a very special price involving 40,000 ounces of plastique, hand delivered?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And that the person who turned him in would n't get a very special price involving 40,000 ounces of plastique , hand delivered ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And that the person who turned him in wouldn't get a very special price involving 40,000 ounces of plastique, hand delivered?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343788</id>
	<title>Re:Why this challenge?</title>
	<author>jafiwam</author>
	<datestamp>1260121320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't Stop the Signal.</p><p>The problem with your paranoia is that information is a tool that does far far more damage to "bad" type governments (theocracies, dictatorships, oligarchies, etc.) than it does to democracies (or democratic republics or other "good" type governments).</p><p>Unlike other weapons systems, information has preferential kill for the stuff you want to kill.  Nukes, cluster bombs, bat-bombs, land mines, and AKs don't, they can be used to destroy anybody. Information, even semi-truthful information only hurts the bad guys.</p><p>So, this is one of those cases where you are getting your panties in a bunch over WHO is doing it, and not WHAT they are doing.  If this were a Facebook project or some sort of flash-mob or other garbage nobody would even bring up "nefarious purposes" because it would just be a weekend diversion for the kiddies. As it turns out, diversions for the kiddies can be used to help topple brutal dictatorships.</p><p>No you are not the only one to see "nefarious" plot in it, lots of other moon bat non thinking "liberals" thought the same thing and they are just as wrong as you are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't Stop the Signal.The problem with your paranoia is that information is a tool that does far far more damage to " bad " type governments ( theocracies , dictatorships , oligarchies , etc .
) than it does to democracies ( or democratic republics or other " good " type governments ) .Unlike other weapons systems , information has preferential kill for the stuff you want to kill .
Nukes , cluster bombs , bat-bombs , land mines , and AKs do n't , they can be used to destroy anybody .
Information , even semi-truthful information only hurts the bad guys.So , this is one of those cases where you are getting your panties in a bunch over WHO is doing it , and not WHAT they are doing .
If this were a Facebook project or some sort of flash-mob or other garbage nobody would even bring up " nefarious purposes " because it would just be a weekend diversion for the kiddies .
As it turns out , diversions for the kiddies can be used to help topple brutal dictatorships.No you are not the only one to see " nefarious " plot in it , lots of other moon bat non thinking " liberals " thought the same thing and they are just as wrong as you are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't Stop the Signal.The problem with your paranoia is that information is a tool that does far far more damage to "bad" type governments (theocracies, dictatorships, oligarchies, etc.
) than it does to democracies (or democratic republics or other "good" type governments).Unlike other weapons systems, information has preferential kill for the stuff you want to kill.
Nukes, cluster bombs, bat-bombs, land mines, and AKs don't, they can be used to destroy anybody.
Information, even semi-truthful information only hurts the bad guys.So, this is one of those cases where you are getting your panties in a bunch over WHO is doing it, and not WHAT they are doing.
If this were a Facebook project or some sort of flash-mob or other garbage nobody would even bring up "nefarious purposes" because it would just be a weekend diversion for the kiddies.
As it turns out, diversions for the kiddies can be used to help topple brutal dictatorships.No you are not the only one to see "nefarious" plot in it, lots of other moon bat non thinking "liberals" thought the same thing and they are just as wrong as you are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343614</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1260119820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would you be able to find 10 balloons scattered about the entire country at random in 9 hours with naught but a 35mm camera and faux wood-panelled station wagon?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would you be able to find 10 balloons scattered about the entire country at random in 9 hours with naught but a 35mm camera and faux wood-panelled station wagon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would you be able to find 10 balloons scattered about the entire country at random in 9 hours with naught but a 35mm camera and faux wood-panelled station wagon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342852</id>
	<title>Great, but</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260110700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How? That's really the only thing everybody cares about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How ?
That 's really the only thing everybody cares about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How?
That's really the only thing everybody cares about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345478</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1260090720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting that you have everything backwards. Your own politicians are the demagogues and by "set up stable governments" you presumably mean set up puppet governments. Also the source of most of the world's terrorism is the US, even when enacted by Israel - as it's been for the last few decades.</p><p>Yah yah, I know, it's not that everyone hates a hypocritical warmongering terrorist state but that everyone is 'jealous' of amerikkka.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting that you have everything backwards .
Your own politicians are the demagogues and by " set up stable governments " you presumably mean set up puppet governments .
Also the source of most of the world 's terrorism is the US , even when enacted by Israel - as it 's been for the last few decades.Yah yah , I know , it 's not that everyone hates a hypocritical warmongering terrorist state but that everyone is 'jealous ' of amerikkka .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting that you have everything backwards.
Your own politicians are the demagogues and by "set up stable governments" you presumably mean set up puppet governments.
Also the source of most of the world's terrorism is the US, even when enacted by Israel - as it's been for the last few decades.Yah yah, I know, it's not that everyone hates a hypocritical warmongering terrorist state but that everyone is 'jealous' of amerikkka.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346030</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260095700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we paid them to go away, just in time for the GWOT. After all we couldn't go bombing Dublin back to the Stone Age. That wouldn't do at all. They are white you see.</p><p>Funnily enough, now the GWOT is over, the IRA is getting active again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we paid them to go away , just in time for the GWOT .
After all we could n't go bombing Dublin back to the Stone Age .
That would n't do at all .
They are white you see.Funnily enough , now the GWOT is over , the IRA is getting active again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we paid them to go away, just in time for the GWOT.
After all we couldn't go bombing Dublin back to the Stone Age.
That wouldn't do at all.
They are white you see.Funnily enough, now the GWOT is over, the IRA is getting active again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343132</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>fotoguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1260114540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, the title of the article has <i>all of 9 hours</i>, and the title of the post you responded to is <i>That was pretty fast...</i> <br> <br>

So, to summarize:

<br> <br>That was pretty fast...it took all of nine hours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the title of the article has all of 9 hours , and the title of the post you responded to is That was pretty fast.. . So , to summarize : That was pretty fast...it took all of nine hours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the title of the article has all of 9 hours, and the title of the post you responded to is That was pretty fast...  

So, to summarize:

 That was pretty fast...it took all of nine hours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343290</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260116460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ummm... Yeah, 'cause I know a lot of boyscouts who can cover 3 million square miles of territory in 9 hours...  I'd say the point was to see how people would use technology  to build quick awareness of events over a large area.  Seeking out insurgents or terrorist cells might be a practical military application of this technology.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ummm... Yeah , 'cause I know a lot of boyscouts who can cover 3 million square miles of territory in 9 hours... I 'd say the point was to see how people would use technology to build quick awareness of events over a large area .
Seeking out insurgents or terrorist cells might be a practical military application of this technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ummm... Yeah, 'cause I know a lot of boyscouts who can cover 3 million square miles of territory in 9 hours...  I'd say the point was to see how people would use technology  to build quick awareness of events over a large area.
Seeking out insurgents or terrorist cells might be a practical military application of this technology.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348164</id>
	<title>Re:Wait a second...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260110340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; How does this apparent conflict of interest satisfy the "rich with scientific intrigue" tag?</p><p>That seems self evident.<br>intrigue  (ntrg, n-trg) n.<br>1.a. A secret or underhand scheme; a plot.  b. The practice of or involvement in such schemes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; How does this apparent conflict of interest satisfy the " rich with scientific intrigue " tag ? That seems self evident.intrigue ( ntrg , n-trg ) n.1.a .
A secret or underhand scheme ; a plot .
b. The practice of or involvement in such schemes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; How does this apparent conflict of interest satisfy the "rich with scientific intrigue" tag?That seems self evident.intrigue  (ntrg, n-trg) n.1.a.
A secret or underhand scheme; a plot.
b. The practice of or involvement in such schemes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343216</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>MisterSquid</author>
	<datestamp>1260115560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This may come as a surprise to you, but slashdot has readers that don't live in the United States.</p></div></blockquote><p>Is this some kind of bizarro version of the ignorance normally attributed to stupid North Americans (USians)? Stereotypically, US citizens are characterized as deeply ignorant of history and current events outside of the US. In this case people outside of the US, on a forum as technologically current as Slashdot, can claim justified ignorance of one of the entities that gave rise to the Internet?</p><p>The mind, it has to boggle.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This may come as a surprise to you , but slashdot has readers that do n't live in the United States.Is this some kind of bizarro version of the ignorance normally attributed to stupid North Americans ( USians ) ?
Stereotypically , US citizens are characterized as deeply ignorant of history and current events outside of the US .
In this case people outside of the US , on a forum as technologically current as Slashdot , can claim justified ignorance of one of the entities that gave rise to the Internet ? The mind , it has to boggle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may come as a surprise to you, but slashdot has readers that don't live in the United States.Is this some kind of bizarro version of the ignorance normally attributed to stupid North Americans (USians)?
Stereotypically, US citizens are characterized as deeply ignorant of history and current events outside of the US.
In this case people outside of the US, on a forum as technologically current as Slashdot, can claim justified ignorance of one of the entities that gave rise to the Internet?The mind, it has to boggle.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30351034</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1260185820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>He will be if you walk past him with a sign that says his mother is a buddhist.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He will be if you walk past him with a sign that says his mother is a buddhist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He will be if you walk past him with a sign that says his mother is a buddhist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342802</id>
	<title>How many did your team find?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260109980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We found them all within fifteen minutes but we sold the information about this secret DARPA project to China for $400,000.  I'm posting anonymously for obvious reasons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We found them all within fifteen minutes but we sold the information about this secret DARPA project to China for $ 400,000 .
I 'm posting anonymously for obvious reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We found them all within fifteen minutes but we sold the information about this secret DARPA project to China for $400,000.
I'm posting anonymously for obvious reasons.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344924</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260129840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why call the CIA? They let him go at least once already. He's far more useful to the PTB as an "Emmanuel Goldstein" who's always plotting in the shadows...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why call the CIA ?
They let him go at least once already .
He 's far more useful to the PTB as an " Emmanuel Goldstein " who 's always plotting in the shadows.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why call the CIA?
They let him go at least once already.
He's far more useful to the PTB as an "Emmanuel Goldstein" who's always plotting in the shadows...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343206</id>
	<title>Where's balloon boy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260115440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He would have made a great mascot for this event.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He would have made a great mascot for this event .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He would have made a great mascot for this event.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344214</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260124920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Department of Defense is great against big threats: planes, ships, large numbers of troops, etc.</p><p>9/11 really hit home the point that small threats are harder to protect against: single members or small groups of opposing forces are easier to get across borders and into places we don't want them to be.</p><p>So DARPA says to itself "In the hypothetical situation that a small number of people or bombs or whatever were known to be in the country, but their specific location was a mystery, could we mobilize citizens to find them?"</p><p>At least, that's my guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Department of Defense is great against big threats : planes , ships , large numbers of troops , etc.9/11 really hit home the point that small threats are harder to protect against : single members or small groups of opposing forces are easier to get across borders and into places we do n't want them to be.So DARPA says to itself " In the hypothetical situation that a small number of people or bombs or whatever were known to be in the country , but their specific location was a mystery , could we mobilize citizens to find them ?
" At least , that 's my guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Department of Defense is great against big threats: planes, ships, large numbers of troops, etc.9/11 really hit home the point that small threats are harder to protect against: single members or small groups of opposing forces are easier to get across borders and into places we don't want them to be.So DARPA says to itself "In the hypothetical situation that a small number of people or bombs or whatever were known to be in the country, but their specific location was a mystery, could we mobilize citizens to find them?
"At least, that's my guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046</id>
	<title>What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>bytesex</author>
	<datestamp>1260113520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how was this a technical challenge, and not just a boyscout fox hunt ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how was this a technical challenge , and not just a boyscout fox hunt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how was this a technical challenge, and not just a boyscout fox hunt ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343636</id>
	<title>Re:Why this challenge?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260120060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In that case this was a very clumsy experiment.  What they got data on was, at best, how social networks are created for a singular purpose; this will give them almost no insight into how a more organic social network communicates.  If they had structured the contest so that existing social networks were encouraged to join, you might have been onto something.  The introduction of a cash prize alone spoils any particular insight into people who are into the free exchange of ideas; they targeted a different (though perhaps overlapping) group of people from the ones you think they are spying on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In that case this was a very clumsy experiment .
What they got data on was , at best , how social networks are created for a singular purpose ; this will give them almost no insight into how a more organic social network communicates .
If they had structured the contest so that existing social networks were encouraged to join , you might have been onto something .
The introduction of a cash prize alone spoils any particular insight into people who are into the free exchange of ideas ; they targeted a different ( though perhaps overlapping ) group of people from the ones you think they are spying on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that case this was a very clumsy experiment.
What they got data on was, at best, how social networks are created for a singular purpose; this will give them almost no insight into how a more organic social network communicates.
If they had structured the contest so that existing social networks were encouraged to join, you might have been onto something.
The introduction of a cash prize alone spoils any particular insight into people who are into the free exchange of ideas; they targeted a different (though perhaps overlapping) group of people from the ones you think they are spying on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343082</id>
	<title>Uh...</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1260113940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's more of a news story that DARPA is apparently terrified of the Dakotas, or perhaps Minnesota.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's more of a news story that DARPA is apparently terrified of the Dakotas , or perhaps Minnesota .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's more of a news story that DARPA is apparently terrified of the Dakotas, or perhaps Minnesota.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344296</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>stuuf</author>
	<datestamp>1260125700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Worldwide notability of US government acronyms seems to be limited to 4 letters. When there's a story about the FBI or FCC or NASA nobody complains that it wasn't explained, but <em>DARPA</em>? how dare you assume people around the world using the internet know what that means!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worldwide notability of US government acronyms seems to be limited to 4 letters .
When there 's a story about the FBI or FCC or NASA nobody complains that it was n't explained , but DARPA ?
how dare you assume people around the world using the internet know what that means !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worldwide notability of US government acronyms seems to be limited to 4 letters.
When there's a story about the FBI or FCC or NASA nobody complains that it wasn't explained, but DARPA?
how dare you assume people around the world using the internet know what that means!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348470</id>
	<title>Re: Ignorance</title>
	<author>TaoPhoenix</author>
	<datestamp>1260112860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's a tossup between that and how people think it's faster to post "What is X" *And wait for the answer* than to use a search engine. It's that shift from how conversations used to work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's a tossup between that and how people think it 's faster to post " What is X " * And wait for the answer * than to use a search engine .
It 's that shift from how conversations used to work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's a tossup between that and how people think it's faster to post "What is X" *And wait for the answer* than to use a search engine.
It's that shift from how conversations used to work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343962</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1260122760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's DARPA for deity's sake, previously known as ARPA, previously known as DARPA, previously known as ARPA.</p><p>You know ARPANET.</p><p>Does slashdot have to expand "FTP" and "HTTP" and "SMTP" whever it mentions them too?</p><p>Plus of course slashdot is an American based web siute aimed at Americans as the primary audience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's DARPA for deity 's sake , previously known as ARPA , previously known as DARPA , previously known as ARPA.You know ARPANET.Does slashdot have to expand " FTP " and " HTTP " and " SMTP " whever it mentions them too ? Plus of course slashdot is an American based web siute aimed at Americans as the primary audience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's DARPA for deity's sake, previously known as ARPA, previously known as DARPA, previously known as ARPA.You know ARPANET.Does slashdot have to expand "FTP" and "HTTP" and "SMTP" whever it mentions them too?Plus of course slashdot is an American based web siute aimed at Americans as the primary audience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968</id>
	<title>Interesting results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260112320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny that it doesn't seem to work on Bin Laden.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny that it does n't seem to work on Bin Laden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny that it doesn't seem to work on Bin Laden.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343706</id>
	<title>Re:Why this challenge?</title>
	<author>breadstic</author>
	<datestamp>1260120660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um... WHAT?!</p><p>If the US want to censor twitter or facebook, they can just shut them down...<br>People got around this in iran by using anonymous proxies to tunnel requests to websites outside of their government's control... US citizens could do the same thing in such circumstances (using studivz or something more obscure if the conspiracy stretches that far)</p><p>And I think if we're talking about DARPA attempting to find some algorithm to silently censor certain posts about US unrest, unless they manage to completely disconnect a region from the outside world with nobody noticing, I think there would be a fairly large outcry. Tibet managed to get word out, I'm sure an american state could do the same...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um.. .
WHAT ? ! If the US want to censor twitter or facebook , they can just shut them down...People got around this in iran by using anonymous proxies to tunnel requests to websites outside of their government 's control... US citizens could do the same thing in such circumstances ( using studivz or something more obscure if the conspiracy stretches that far ) And I think if we 're talking about DARPA attempting to find some algorithm to silently censor certain posts about US unrest , unless they manage to completely disconnect a region from the outside world with nobody noticing , I think there would be a fairly large outcry .
Tibet managed to get word out , I 'm sure an american state could do the same.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um...
WHAT?!If the US want to censor twitter or facebook, they can just shut them down...People got around this in iran by using anonymous proxies to tunnel requests to websites outside of their government's control... US citizens could do the same thing in such circumstances (using studivz or something more obscure if the conspiracy stretches that far)And I think if we're talking about DARPA attempting to find some algorithm to silently censor certain posts about US unrest, unless they manage to completely disconnect a region from the outside world with nobody noticing, I think there would be a fairly large outcry.
Tibet managed to get word out, I'm sure an american state could do the same...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342768</id>
	<title>how</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260109620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how did they do this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how did they do this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how did they do this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342944</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1260112020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>MIT is a school in the US btw. Err and the US is the United States of America... it's a country.</htmltext>
<tokenext>MIT is a school in the US btw .
Err and the US is the United States of America... it 's a country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MIT is a school in the US btw.
Err and the US is the United States of America... it's a country.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343242</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>theangryfool</author>
	<datestamp>1260115860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>And obviously slashdot has readers who don't know about <a href="http://www.isoc.org/internet/history/cerf.shtml" title="isoc.org" rel="nofollow">TCP/IP</a> [isoc.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>And obviously slashdot has readers who do n't know about TCP/IP [ isoc.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And obviously slashdot has readers who don't know about TCP/IP [isoc.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344268</id>
	<title>Re:What's DARPA about it ?</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1260125400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looking at fused satellite, radar, etc. data in the most likely part of the Indian Ocean, they might find pie rats<br>by observing the routes of mother ships (not in nine hours though).<br>With effort it could be made a Zodiac Free Sea (ZFS).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at fused satellite , radar , etc .
data in the most likely part of the Indian Ocean , they might find pie ratsby observing the routes of mother ships ( not in nine hours though ) .With effort it could be made a Zodiac Free Sea ( ZFS ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at fused satellite, radar, etc.
data in the most likely part of the Indian Ocean, they might find pie ratsby observing the routes of mother ships (not in nine hours though).With effort it could be made a Zodiac Free Sea (ZFS).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796</id>
	<title>Re:That was pretty fast...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260109920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>9 hours? Is that fast?<br> <br>The Challenge has captured the imagination of people around the world, is rich with scientific intrigue, and, we hope, is part of a growing "renaissance of wonder" umm.... what challenge again? What's DARPA? (It's not in TFA and what good is a FA when you have to click through three pages to find out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>9 hours ?
Is that fast ?
The Challenge has captured the imagination of people around the world , is rich with scientific intrigue , and , we hope , is part of a growing " renaissance of wonder " umm.... what challenge again ?
What 's DARPA ?
( It 's not in TFA and what good is a FA when you have to click through three pages to find out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>9 hours?
Is that fast?
The Challenge has captured the imagination of people around the world, is rich with scientific intrigue, and, we hope, is part of a growing "renaissance of wonder" umm.... what challenge again?
What's DARPA?
(It's not in TFA and what good is a FA when you have to click through three pages to find out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345758</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1260093300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think it's more of a news story that DARPA is apparently terrified of the Dakotas, or perhaps Minnesota.</p></div><p>DARPA is no match for UFFDA.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's more of a news story that DARPA is apparently terrified of the Dakotas , or perhaps Minnesota.DARPA is no match for UFFDA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's more of a news story that DARPA is apparently terrified of the Dakotas, or perhaps Minnesota.DARPA is no match for UFFDA.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343494</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260118440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the CIA already knows where its agents are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the CIA already knows where its agents are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the CIA already knows where its agents are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30363958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30351034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_06_0356232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343160
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343432
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30351034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344924
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343886
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345478
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342796
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342834
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343018
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343962
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345262
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343216
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348350
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348470
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344296
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343242
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343210
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345684
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30363958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346460
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30348164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30346998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30342858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_06_0356232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30345146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30344214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_06_0356232.30343894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
