<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_05_0526211</id>
	<title>What Drugs Do Astronauts Take?</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1260007860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>astroengine writes <i>"Science fiction is stuffed full of examples of pill-popping space explorers and aliens enjoying psychedelic highs. After all, space is big; it can get boring/scary/crazy up there. It's little wonder, then, that our current space explorers <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/what-drugs-are-our-astronauts-on.html">consume a cocktail of uppers, downers, tranquilizers and alcohol</a> to get the job done. Robert Lamb on <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,254138,00.html">tranquilizers in the space station</a>: 'Sure, it hardly makes for a civilized evening aboard ISS, but it beats someone blowing the hatch because they think they saw something crawling on one of the solar panels.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>astroengine writes " Science fiction is stuffed full of examples of pill-popping space explorers and aliens enjoying psychedelic highs .
After all , space is big ; it can get boring/scary/crazy up there .
It 's little wonder , then , that our current space explorers consume a cocktail of uppers , downers , tranquilizers and alcohol to get the job done .
Robert Lamb on tranquilizers in the space station : 'Sure , it hardly makes for a civilized evening aboard ISS , but it beats someone blowing the hatch because they think they saw something crawling on one of the solar panels .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>astroengine writes "Science fiction is stuffed full of examples of pill-popping space explorers and aliens enjoying psychedelic highs.
After all, space is big; it can get boring/scary/crazy up there.
It's little wonder, then, that our current space explorers consume a cocktail of uppers, downers, tranquilizers and alcohol to get the job done.
Robert Lamb on tranquilizers in the space station: 'Sure, it hardly makes for a civilized evening aboard ISS, but it beats someone blowing the hatch because they think they saw something crawling on one of the solar panels.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</id>
	<title>ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260011880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That ever useful tool.  However would we have gone to the stars without it?
</p><p> <i>Yes, according to a 2007 report from the Associated Press, astronauts keep a few tranqs on hand in case anyone goes all suicidal or psychotic in space. NASA recommends binding the individual's wrists and ankles with duct tape (ever the space traveler's friend!), strapping them down with a bungee cord and, if necessary, sticking them with a tranquilizer.</i>
</p><p>Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That ever useful tool .
However would we have gone to the stars without it ?
Yes , according to a 2007 report from the Associated Press , astronauts keep a few tranqs on hand in case anyone goes all suicidal or psychotic in space .
NASA recommends binding the individual 's wrists and ankles with duct tape ( ever the space traveler 's friend !
) , strapping them down with a bungee cord and , if necessary , sticking them with a tranquilizer .
Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That ever useful tool.
However would we have gone to the stars without it?
Yes, according to a 2007 report from the Associated Press, astronauts keep a few tranqs on hand in case anyone goes all suicidal or psychotic in space.
NASA recommends binding the individual's wrists and ankles with duct tape (ever the space traveler's friend!
), strapping them down with a bungee cord and, if necessary, sticking them with a tranquilizer.
Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334360</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>gaderael</author>
	<datestamp>1260021480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whatever they use, it sure as hell gets them High!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever they use , it sure as hell gets them High !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever they use, it sure as hell gets them High!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335000</id>
	<title>Re:New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1260029280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>High school kids fabricate bongs out of the oddest bits and pieces, often from what's available wherever they happen to be. I would hope our astronauts are at least as talented and resourceful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>High school kids fabricate bongs out of the oddest bits and pieces , often from what 's available wherever they happen to be .
I would hope our astronauts are at least as talented and resourceful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>High school kids fabricate bongs out of the oddest bits and pieces, often from what's available wherever they happen to be.
I would hope our astronauts are at least as talented and resourceful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334164</id>
	<title>Fox News ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260017460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF is slashdot doing linking to an article from Fox News?<br>It's bad enough linking to UK stories from the Daily Mail, but Faux News is taking the piss.</p><p>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF is slashdot doing linking to an article from Fox News ? It 's bad enough linking to UK stories from the Daily Mail , but Faux News is taking the piss. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF is slashdot doing linking to an article from Fox News?It's bad enough linking to UK stories from the Daily Mail, but Faux News is taking the piss..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333918</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>camperslo</author>
	<datestamp>1260013080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape?</i></p><p>The Disney movie Skyrunners (DVD 2009) has a small/friendly spacecraft that gets repaired with duct tape</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape ? The Disney movie Skyrunners ( DVD 2009 ) has a small/friendly spacecraft that gets repaired with duct tape</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape?The Disney movie Skyrunners (DVD 2009) has a small/friendly spacecraft that gets repaired with duct tape</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334104</id>
	<title>What did they see crawling?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260016320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly did they see crawling out there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly did they see crawling out there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly did they see crawling out there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30341502</id>
	<title>Re:New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>funkspiel</author>
	<datestamp>1260040800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> . . . the bong is busted.  First the bog, and now the bong . . . hopefully the crack pipe will keep going . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div><p>Next time, bring Roor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
the bong is busted .
First the bog , and now the bong .
. .
hopefully the crack pipe will keep going .
. .Next time , bring Roor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> .
. .
the bong is busted.
First the bog, and now the bong .
. .
hopefully the crack pipe will keep going .
. .Next time, bring Roor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333980</id>
	<title>Please untie all of this duct tape!</title>
	<author>WGFCrafty</author>
	<datestamp>1260014040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.
<br> <br>
Please do try a diazepam or alprazolam Dave, they will surely calm you down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry Dave , I ca n't do that .
Please do try a diazepam or alprazolam Dave , they will surely calm you down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry Dave, I can't do that.
Please do try a diazepam or alprazolam Dave, they will surely calm you down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334734</id>
	<title>Re:Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>Jeff DeMaagd</author>
	<datestamp>1260027240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Besides, exactly what available drugs can enhance your ability to operate heavy machinery?  I'm pretty sure anything with alcohol is out, and narcotics too.  I can't think of anything stronger than what's in an energy drink, even those can be trouble if you're not careful.</p><p>Just in case someone has a snit, I'm not saying anything here against the use of recreational drugs, but space is a special circumstance, first, they're probably on the job, second, you're dealing with living an few inches away from the fatal vacuum of space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , exactly what available drugs can enhance your ability to operate heavy machinery ?
I 'm pretty sure anything with alcohol is out , and narcotics too .
I ca n't think of anything stronger than what 's in an energy drink , even those can be trouble if you 're not careful.Just in case someone has a snit , I 'm not saying anything here against the use of recreational drugs , but space is a special circumstance , first , they 're probably on the job , second , you 're dealing with living an few inches away from the fatal vacuum of space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, exactly what available drugs can enhance your ability to operate heavy machinery?
I'm pretty sure anything with alcohol is out, and narcotics too.
I can't think of anything stronger than what's in an energy drink, even those can be trouble if you're not careful.Just in case someone has a snit, I'm not saying anything here against the use of recreational drugs, but space is a special circumstance, first, they're probably on the job, second, you're dealing with living an few inches away from the fatal vacuum of space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335412</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260032640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ripley duct taped a flamethrower to an assault rifle in Aliens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ripley duct taped a flamethrower to an assault rifle in Aliens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ripley duct taped a flamethrower to an assault rifle in Aliens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335252</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>SvnLyrBrto</author>
	<datestamp>1260031140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape?</p><p>Apollo 13 featured duct tape prominently as part of the repair job for the LM's CO2 scrubber.  Of course, that actually happened.  So I don't know that it properly counts as sci-fi.  But I've always assumed that at least *part* of that movie was played up beyond actual events for cinematic drama.</p><p>Which episode of Firefly mentions duct tape?  It's been a while since I've seen the show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape ? Apollo 13 featured duct tape prominently as part of the repair job for the LM 's CO2 scrubber .
Of course , that actually happened .
So I do n't know that it properly counts as sci-fi .
But I 've always assumed that at least * part * of that movie was played up beyond actual events for cinematic drama.Which episode of Firefly mentions duct tape ?
It 's been a while since I 've seen the show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Has any sci-fi show other than Firefly ever mentioned duct tape?Apollo 13 featured duct tape prominently as part of the repair job for the LM's CO2 scrubber.
Of course, that actually happened.
So I don't know that it properly counts as sci-fi.
But I've always assumed that at least *part* of that movie was played up beyond actual events for cinematic drama.Which episode of Firefly mentions duct tape?
It's been a while since I've seen the show.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333868</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260012360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I for one welcome our cybernetic overlords!</p><p>and....</p><p>In Soviet Russia, hand's thoughts control you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I for one welcome our cybernetic overlords ! and....In Soviet Russia , hand 's thoughts control you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I for one welcome our cybernetic overlords!and....In Soviet Russia, hand's thoughts control you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334108</id>
	<title>nothing to see here</title>
	<author>byteframe</author>
	<datestamp>1260016440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I take drugs in space all the time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I take drugs in space all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take drugs in space all the time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334212</id>
	<title>One drug is certain</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1260018300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Antiemetics (that is, anti-throw-up / anti-motion-sickness)</p><p>Not having gravity to "set things straight" can mess things up royally (in several ways)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Antiemetics ( that is , anti-throw-up / anti-motion-sickness ) Not having gravity to " set things straight " can mess things up royally ( in several ways )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Antiemetics (that is, anti-throw-up / anti-motion-sickness)Not having gravity to "set things straight" can mess things up royally (in several ways)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339436</id>
	<title>Re:Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260016680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The CIA has tried all sorts of drugs in the hope of finding a truth serum. And there are all sorts of medications that can fuck you up in many ways that you can get over the counter. Scopolamine can do it's job just fine providing you stay within the right dosage. If you take too much it can have other effects (like most drugs). The reason it's still OTC is because those effects are generally considered to be unpleasant and therefore abuse is low (you think it's about safety?). The only drug the article said was mixed with Scopolamine is Dexedrine -- nothing strange or job-preventing about that combo at the right dosage and the article doesn't imply otherwise.</p><p>If you're going to ramble on about a crap article on Slashdot, at least get your facts straight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The CIA has tried all sorts of drugs in the hope of finding a truth serum .
And there are all sorts of medications that can fuck you up in many ways that you can get over the counter .
Scopolamine can do it 's job just fine providing you stay within the right dosage .
If you take too much it can have other effects ( like most drugs ) .
The reason it 's still OTC is because those effects are generally considered to be unpleasant and therefore abuse is low ( you think it 's about safety ? ) .
The only drug the article said was mixed with Scopolamine is Dexedrine -- nothing strange or job-preventing about that combo at the right dosage and the article does n't imply otherwise.If you 're going to ramble on about a crap article on Slashdot , at least get your facts straight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The CIA has tried all sorts of drugs in the hope of finding a truth serum.
And there are all sorts of medications that can fuck you up in many ways that you can get over the counter.
Scopolamine can do it's job just fine providing you stay within the right dosage.
If you take too much it can have other effects (like most drugs).
The reason it's still OTC is because those effects are generally considered to be unpleasant and therefore abuse is low (you think it's about safety?).
The only drug the article said was mixed with Scopolamine is Dexedrine -- nothing strange or job-preventing about that combo at the right dosage and the article doesn't imply otherwise.If you're going to ramble on about a crap article on Slashdot, at least get your facts straight.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334198</id>
	<title>They use marijuana syringes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260018060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this 'coz once, my grandfather, who built space ships with us in our sofa when we were kids, found a marijuana syringe on the moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this 'coz once , my grandfather , who built space ships with us in our sofa when we were kids , found a marijuana syringe on the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this 'coz once, my grandfather, who built space ships with us in our sofa when we were kids, found a marijuana syringe on the moon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334048</id>
	<title>Blood of Christ?</title>
	<author>maggotbrain\_777</author>
	<datestamp>1260015000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Aldrin took communion on the moon? I had never heard that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Aldrin took communion on the moon ?
I had never heard that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aldrin took communion on the moon?
I had never heard that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334674</id>
	<title>Should be main one</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1260026700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Caffeine?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Caffeine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caffeine?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333820</id>
	<title>Let's see how...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260011820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>many seconds until someone makes a Twilight reference to the last line of the summary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>many seconds until someone makes a Twilight reference to the last line of the summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>many seconds until someone makes a Twilight reference to the last line of the summary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335678</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1260034560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WD-40 is good stuff but for really stuck/rusty machinery, Zepreserve is better. No connection to Zep, Inc., I just work at a place that harvests and processes salt and so have to deal with a whole lot of rusty machinery.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WD-40 is good stuff but for really stuck/rusty machinery , Zepreserve is better .
No connection to Zep , Inc. , I just work at a place that harvests and processes salt and so have to deal with a whole lot of rusty machinery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WD-40 is good stuff but for really stuck/rusty machinery, Zepreserve is better.
No connection to Zep, Inc., I just work at a place that harvests and processes salt and so have to deal with a whole lot of rusty machinery.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335158</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1260030360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FWIW, when I was in the [USN] Submarine Service, we were prepared to do the same thing if a crew member went off the rails.  (Though the doc had a couple of sets of soft restraints we'd use instead of tape.)<br>
&nbsp; <br>That being said, we did use 'EB Green' (a tape that makes the useless crap falsely sold to John Q public as 'duct tape' look like tissue paper) for a wide variety of things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FWIW , when I was in the [ USN ] Submarine Service , we were prepared to do the same thing if a crew member went off the rails .
( Though the doc had a couple of sets of soft restraints we 'd use instead of tape .
)   That being said , we did use 'EB Green ' ( a tape that makes the useless crap falsely sold to John Q public as 'duct tape ' look like tissue paper ) for a wide variety of things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FWIW, when I was in the [USN] Submarine Service, we were prepared to do the same thing if a crew member went off the rails.
(Though the doc had a couple of sets of soft restraints we'd use instead of tape.
)
  That being said, we did use 'EB Green' (a tape that makes the useless crap falsely sold to John Q public as 'duct tape' look like tissue paper) for a wide variety of things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30343356</id>
	<title>Re:Is SF REALLY stuffed full of examples?</title>
	<author>conureman</author>
	<datestamp>1260117240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think there's a market for Can-D.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think there 's a market for Can-D .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think there's a market for Can-D.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335080</id>
	<title>Dr. Thaddeus Venture</title>
	<author>scire9</author>
	<datestamp>1260029880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Notable characteristics: self-proclaimed "super-genius", endless amount of cynicism, amphetamine addiction.</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor\_Thaddeus\_Venture" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor\_Thaddeus\_Venture</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Notable characteristics : self-proclaimed " super-genius " , endless amount of cynicism , amphetamine addiction .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor \ _Thaddeus \ _Venture [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Notable characteristics: self-proclaimed "super-genius", endless amount of cynicism, amphetamine addiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor\_Thaddeus\_Venture [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334920</id>
	<title>Re:They use marijuana syringes.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260028740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All right now, which bright moron modded parent "Informative", and exactly what cocktail are you getting high on, and why aren't you sharing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>All right now , which bright moron modded parent " Informative " , and exactly what cocktail are you getting high on , and why are n't you sharing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All right now, which bright moron modded parent "Informative", and exactly what cocktail are you getting high on, and why aren't you sharing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30338930</id>
	<title>Re:One drug is certain</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1260013080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd probably never do well in space. I have <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benign\_paroxysmal\_positional\_vertigo" title="wikipedia.org"> and thus zero-g, even with medication, would likely utterly destroy my sense of balance, because the inner ear balance weights are dislodged. I would probably be able to propel myself around the station from the force of my puke.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd probably never do well in space .
I have and thus zero-g , even with medication , would likely utterly destroy my sense of balance , because the inner ear balance weights are dislodged .
I would probably be able to propel myself around the station from the force of my puke .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd probably never do well in space.
I have  and thus zero-g, even with medication, would likely utterly destroy my sense of balance, because the inner ear balance weights are dislodged.
I would probably be able to propel myself around the station from the force of my puke.
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334084</id>
	<title>Didn't you see the afterschool special?</title>
	<author>antifoidulus</author>
	<datestamp>1260015900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are high on life of course!  I would never question something that my government put together!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are high on life of course !
I would never question something that my government put together !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are high on life of course!
I would never question something that my government put together!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333992</id>
	<title>Don't worry</title>
	<author>lastgoodnickname</author>
	<datestamp>1260014160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If there's one thing I can do, man, is fly when I'm stoned</htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's one thing I can do , man , is fly when I 'm stoned</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's one thing I can do, man, is fly when I'm stoned</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336328</id>
	<title>Is SF REALLY stuffed full of examples?</title>
	<author>Larry Lightbulb</author>
	<datestamp>1260038340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't think of that many, not enough to back up this claim.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't think of that many , not enough to back up this claim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't think of that many, not enough to back up this claim.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334210</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>Hamsterdan</author>
	<datestamp>1260018180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dunno, but in Farscape Chrichton used WD-40 (another universal tool) on one of the DRDs</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dunno , but in Farscape Chrichton used WD-40 ( another universal tool ) on one of the DRDs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dunno, but in Farscape Chrichton used WD-40 (another universal tool) on one of the DRDs</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334512</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260024180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So I'm assuming that the belief that "the right stuff" is a mixture of courage, determination, and good old all-american grit, rather than a delightful assortment of "better living through chemistry" options is just one of those lies we tell to children...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So I 'm assuming that the belief that " the right stuff " is a mixture of courage , determination , and good old all-american grit , rather than a delightful assortment of " better living through chemistry " options is just one of those lies we tell to children.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I'm assuming that the belief that "the right stuff" is a mixture of courage, determination, and good old all-american grit, rather than a delightful assortment of "better living through chemistry" options is just one of those lies we tell to children...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334312</id>
	<title>Who knew</title>
	<author>UbuntuniX</author>
	<datestamp>1260020160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Astronauts really know how to party, man.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Astronauts really know how to party , man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Astronauts really know how to party, man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334574</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>hydrolyzer</author>
	<datestamp>1260025140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the sci-fi game 'EVE online' the spaceships belonging to the minmatar race are often jokingly referred to as being held together with duct tape</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the sci-fi game 'EVE online ' the spaceships belonging to the minmatar race are often jokingly referred to as being held together with duct tape</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the sci-fi game 'EVE online' the spaceships belonging to the minmatar race are often jokingly referred to as being held together with duct tape</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30340464</id>
	<title>The anti moon dust pill</title>
	<author>kilodelta</author>
	<datestamp>1260026160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This would also be good for people who live in cities and near highways. Diesel, even the low sulfur varieties spews a lot of particulates. Not to mention the tiny bits of rubber tire you inhale regulary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This would also be good for people who live in cities and near highways .
Diesel , even the low sulfur varieties spews a lot of particulates .
Not to mention the tiny bits of rubber tire you inhale regulary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This would also be good for people who live in cities and near highways.
Diesel, even the low sulfur varieties spews a lot of particulates.
Not to mention the tiny bits of rubber tire you inhale regulary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333898</id>
	<title>Dude....</title>
	<author>Paxtez</author>
	<datestamp>1260012900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure what they take, but whatever they are, they are out of this world...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure what they take , but whatever they are , they are out of this world.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure what they take, but whatever they are, they are out of this world...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30341758</id>
	<title>Yeah, man</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1260132480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No one gets higher than astronauts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No one gets higher than astronauts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No one gets higher than astronauts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30342736</id>
	<title>Space Station Drugs?</title>
	<author>Phoghat</author>
	<datestamp>1260109260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One word
<p> Shrooms!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One word Shrooms !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One word
 Shrooms!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30343322</id>
	<title>Re:Blood of Christ?</title>
	<author>conureman</author>
	<datestamp>1260116940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I liked when Shepard went golfing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked when Shepard went golfing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked when Shepard went golfing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888</id>
	<title>New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260012660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> . . . the bong is busted.  First the bog, and now the bong . . . hopefully the crack pipe will keep going . . .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
the bong is busted .
First the bog , and now the bong .
. .
hopefully the crack pipe will keep going .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> .
. .
the bong is busted.
First the bog, and now the bong .
. .
hopefully the crack pipe will keep going .
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334008</id>
	<title>Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260014520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember reading this article nearly 3 years ago when it was first released.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading this article nearly 3 years ago when it was first released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading this article nearly 3 years ago when it was first released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337534</id>
	<title>Re:Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260045960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>If so, maybe we ought to look into having editors that actually know something about the area they cover and approve articles based on content rather than side effects.</p></div></blockquote><p>

What do you mean by "we" in this context? Who exactly are going to "look into having editors that..." and how are they (you?) going to accomplish that? Are you proposing to take over slashdot.org, or perhaps develop your own alternative site? Or are a silent partner in the <a href="http://geek.net/" title="geek.net" rel="nofollow">Geeknet</a> [geek.net] management, finally getting ready to take some action?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If so , maybe we ought to look into having editors that actually know something about the area they cover and approve articles based on content rather than side effects .
What do you mean by " we " in this context ?
Who exactly are going to " look into having editors that... " and how are they ( you ?
) going to accomplish that ?
Are you proposing to take over slashdot.org , or perhaps develop your own alternative site ?
Or are a silent partner in the Geeknet [ geek.net ] management , finally getting ready to take some action ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If so, maybe we ought to look into having editors that actually know something about the area they cover and approve articles based on content rather than side effects.
What do you mean by "we" in this context?
Who exactly are going to "look into having editors that..." and how are they (you?
) going to accomplish that?
Are you proposing to take over slashdot.org, or perhaps develop your own alternative site?
Or are a silent partner in the Geeknet [geek.net] management, finally getting ready to take some action?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336952</id>
	<title>Re:New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>mikeroySoft</author>
	<datestamp>1260041880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>omg... bong water in all the equipment!  Imagine the stink!
<br>
We'll need to train tiny ants to get in there with little cleaning utensils.</htmltext>
<tokenext>omg... bong water in all the equipment !
Imagine the stink !
We 'll need to train tiny ants to get in there with little cleaning utensils .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>omg... bong water in all the equipment!
Imagine the stink!
We'll need to train tiny ants to get in there with little cleaning utensils.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335164</id>
	<title>Re:Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>CaptDeuce</author>
	<datestamp>1260030420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Our fine Slashdot poster says,<p><div class="quote"><p>This article should be in "Entertainment".</p></div><p>
  It is a light hearted article to be sure so let's not be "hasty" about making "claims" suggesting that is has no "reason" to be in a popular science "web site."  </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Or why NASA is having them take a "cocktail" to "get the job done" which would, if the description is accurate, prevent the job from getting done if not kill them (alcohol + uppers + downers + tranqs? Anyone remember Karen Ann Quinlan?)</p></div><p>
More "sensationalism" in response to a light hearted "article".  So let's be serious for a "momen..." er, moment.</p><p>As noted by our fine poster, DynaSor (hey, I like that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-20\_Dyna-Soar" title="wikipedia.org">name</a> [wikipedia.org]) must know, NASA prefers that astronauts refrain from using <em>any</em> drugs <em>especially</em> while performing critical activities such as launch, reentry, and EVA.  If they needed medications on a regular basis that would not be acceptable in medically certified pilot, they would not be astronauts since there is certainly no shortage of qualified candidates. That noted, it would be irresponsible for NASA to jeopardize a mission or well being of crew members <em>not</em> to make drugs available on high profile multi-million dollar missions that are part of a multi-billion dollar program.</p><p>Alas, the simple mention of the the word "drug" triggers bizarre and irrational reactions from many, many people who are conditioned by propaganda and misinformation thrown at them from many groups (religions, politicians, pharmaceutical corporations, etc.) each with their own agenda.  Ignorance and rationalization run rampant.  It's not at all difficult to imagine listening to a patron sitting at a bar pontificate about how drug use is leading society to Hell in a hand-basket while gulping down cups of black coffee that he hopes will sober him up enough (it won't) so that he can drive home without fear of getting pulled over and get charged with a DWI. (For the uninformed, alcohol and caffeine are, indeed, drugs.)</p><p>However, I was prompted to reply when reading this in TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Modafinil: You may know it as Provigil, Alertec, Vigicer or Modalert, but astronauts know it as the upper they take when sleep isn't an option.</p></div><p>Modafinil is not an "upper" in the generally recognized sense.  Wikipedia says this about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modafinil" title="wikipedia.org">Modafinil</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...like other stimulants, [it] increases the release of monoamines... . However, modafinil also elevates hypothalamic histamine levels, leading some researchers to consider Modafinil a "wakefulness promoting agent" rather than a classic amphetamine-like stimulant.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Despite modafinil's histaminergic action, it still partially shares the actions of amphetamine-class stimulants due to its effects on norepinephrine and dopamine.</p></div><p>One can be administered Modafinil and fall asleep without undue problems.  Suffice it to say that it is misleading to simply lump Modafinil with stimulants such as amphetamines and Ritalin that are routinely put to recreational use.</p><p>Therefore, I would say the major shortcoming of TFA is that it plays on the fears and misconceptions of readers to garner undeserved attention to a subject that could otherwise be more interesting <em>and</em> informative.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Our fine Slashdot poster says,This article should be in " Entertainment " .
It is a light hearted article to be sure so let 's not be " hasty " about making " claims " suggesting that is has no " reason " to be in a popular science " web site .
" Or why NASA is having them take a " cocktail " to " get the job done " which would , if the description is accurate , prevent the job from getting done if not kill them ( alcohol + uppers + downers + tranqs ?
Anyone remember Karen Ann Quinlan ?
) More " sensationalism " in response to a light hearted " article " .
So let 's be serious for a " momen... " er , moment.As noted by our fine poster , DynaSor ( hey , I like that name [ wikipedia.org ] ) must know , NASA prefers that astronauts refrain from using any drugs especially while performing critical activities such as launch , reentry , and EVA .
If they needed medications on a regular basis that would not be acceptable in medically certified pilot , they would not be astronauts since there is certainly no shortage of qualified candidates .
That noted , it would be irresponsible for NASA to jeopardize a mission or well being of crew members not to make drugs available on high profile multi-million dollar missions that are part of a multi-billion dollar program.Alas , the simple mention of the the word " drug " triggers bizarre and irrational reactions from many , many people who are conditioned by propaganda and misinformation thrown at them from many groups ( religions , politicians , pharmaceutical corporations , etc .
) each with their own agenda .
Ignorance and rationalization run rampant .
It 's not at all difficult to imagine listening to a patron sitting at a bar pontificate about how drug use is leading society to Hell in a hand-basket while gulping down cups of black coffee that he hopes will sober him up enough ( it wo n't ) so that he can drive home without fear of getting pulled over and get charged with a DWI .
( For the uninformed , alcohol and caffeine are , indeed , drugs .
) However , I was prompted to reply when reading this in TFA : Modafinil : You may know it as Provigil , Alertec , Vigicer or Modalert , but astronauts know it as the upper they take when sleep is n't an option.Modafinil is not an " upper " in the generally recognized sense .
Wikipedia says this about Modafinil [ wikipedia.org ] : ...like other stimulants , [ it ] increases the release of monoamines... . However , modafinil also elevates hypothalamic histamine levels , leading some researchers to consider Modafinil a " wakefulness promoting agent " rather than a classic amphetamine-like stimulant .
... Despite modafinil 's histaminergic action , it still partially shares the actions of amphetamine-class stimulants due to its effects on norepinephrine and dopamine.One can be administered Modafinil and fall asleep without undue problems .
Suffice it to say that it is misleading to simply lump Modafinil with stimulants such as amphetamines and Ritalin that are routinely put to recreational use.Therefore , I would say the major shortcoming of TFA is that it plays on the fears and misconceptions of readers to garner undeserved attention to a subject that could otherwise be more interesting and informative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our fine Slashdot poster says,This article should be in "Entertainment".
It is a light hearted article to be sure so let's not be "hasty" about making "claims" suggesting that is has no "reason" to be in a popular science "web site.
"  Or why NASA is having them take a "cocktail" to "get the job done" which would, if the description is accurate, prevent the job from getting done if not kill them (alcohol + uppers + downers + tranqs?
Anyone remember Karen Ann Quinlan?
)
More "sensationalism" in response to a light hearted "article".
So let's be serious for a "momen..." er, moment.As noted by our fine poster, DynaSor (hey, I like that name [wikipedia.org]) must know, NASA prefers that astronauts refrain from using any drugs especially while performing critical activities such as launch, reentry, and EVA.
If they needed medications on a regular basis that would not be acceptable in medically certified pilot, they would not be astronauts since there is certainly no shortage of qualified candidates.
That noted, it would be irresponsible for NASA to jeopardize a mission or well being of crew members not to make drugs available on high profile multi-million dollar missions that are part of a multi-billion dollar program.Alas, the simple mention of the the word "drug" triggers bizarre and irrational reactions from many, many people who are conditioned by propaganda and misinformation thrown at them from many groups (religions, politicians, pharmaceutical corporations, etc.
) each with their own agenda.
Ignorance and rationalization run rampant.
It's not at all difficult to imagine listening to a patron sitting at a bar pontificate about how drug use is leading society to Hell in a hand-basket while gulping down cups of black coffee that he hopes will sober him up enough (it won't) so that he can drive home without fear of getting pulled over and get charged with a DWI.
(For the uninformed, alcohol and caffeine are, indeed, drugs.
)However, I was prompted to reply when reading this in TFA:Modafinil: You may know it as Provigil, Alertec, Vigicer or Modalert, but astronauts know it as the upper they take when sleep isn't an option.Modafinil is not an "upper" in the generally recognized sense.
Wikipedia says this about Modafinil [wikipedia.org]: ...like other stimulants, [it] increases the release of monoamines... . However, modafinil also elevates hypothalamic histamine levels, leading some researchers to consider Modafinil a "wakefulness promoting agent" rather than a classic amphetamine-like stimulant.
... Despite modafinil's histaminergic action, it still partially shares the actions of amphetamine-class stimulants due to its effects on norepinephrine and dopamine.One can be administered Modafinil and fall asleep without undue problems.
Suffice it to say that it is misleading to simply lump Modafinil with stimulants such as amphetamines and Ritalin that are routinely put to recreational use.Therefore, I would say the major shortcoming of TFA is that it plays on the fears and misconceptions of readers to garner undeserved attention to a subject that could otherwise be more interesting and informative.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339412</id>
	<title>Re:Psilocybin Mushrooms</title>
	<author>istartedi</author>
	<datestamp>1260016380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, you weren't shrooming.  That's the actual movie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you were n't shrooming .
That 's the actual movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you weren't shrooming.
That's the actual movie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333962</id>
	<title>Insult:</title>
	<author>djauto23</author>
	<datestamp>1260013740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Your mother's an astronaut.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your mother 's an astronaut .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your mother's an astronaut.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337940</id>
	<title>So now I got a question</title>
	<author>exsequor</author>
	<datestamp>1260005220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now I'm wondering how weed burns in a shuttle with no gravity and whether or not I can milk my roor like I can on earth...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I 'm wondering how weed burns in a shuttle with no gravity and whether or not I can milk my roor like I can on earth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I'm wondering how weed burns in a shuttle with no gravity and whether or not I can milk my roor like I can on earth...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30340592</id>
	<title>Re:They use marijuana syringes.</title>
	<author>dontbgay</author>
	<datestamp>1260027540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where's the -1 WTF? when you need it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where 's the -1 WTF ?
when you need it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where's the -1 WTF?
when you need it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334892</id>
	<title>Anti-moon dust pills??</title>
	<author>calixaren</author>
	<datestamp>1260028500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wtf?? Was the author on "a cocktail of uppers, downers, tranquilizers and alcohol" to get the article done<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-O?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wtf ? ?
Was the author on " a cocktail of uppers , downers , tranquilizers and alcohol " to get the article done : -O ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wtf??
Was the author on "a cocktail of uppers, downers, tranquilizers and alcohol" to get the article done :-O?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333938</id>
	<title>Oh wait, I know this one....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260013440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Space cakes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Space cakes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Space cakes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334154</id>
	<title>Every comment is a Joke !</title>
	<author>ami.one</author>
	<datestamp>1260017280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, so every single comment is a joke. Congratulations. Not that I can add anything of substance to such a Mooney topic. Just wondering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , so every single comment is a joke .
Congratulations. Not that I can add anything of substance to such a Mooney topic .
Just wondering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, so every single comment is a joke.
Congratulations. Not that I can add anything of substance to such a Mooney topic.
Just wondering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334032</id>
	<title>Don't forget the viagra</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1260014820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...for all the secret space sex experiments the NASA conspiracy nuts think are going on, and because they need to keep their bat servicable when they casually let it slip that they're an astronaut in all the bars around KSC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...for all the secret space sex experiments the NASA conspiracy nuts think are going on , and because they need to keep their bat servicable when they casually let it slip that they 're an astronaut in all the bars around KSC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for all the secret space sex experiments the NASA conspiracy nuts think are going on, and because they need to keep their bat servicable when they casually let it slip that they're an astronaut in all the bars around KSC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30338186</id>
	<title>Re:New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>Stephen Samuel</author>
	<datestamp>1260006960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The only problem I can foresee with bongs in space: no gravity!</p></div><p>All that does is make the problem as difficult for the astronauts, now, as it was when they were in high school,</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only problem I can foresee with bongs in space : no gravity ! All that does is make the problem as difficult for the astronauts , now , as it was when they were in high school ,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only problem I can foresee with bongs in space: no gravity!All that does is make the problem as difficult for the astronauts, now, as it was when they were in high school,
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339274</id>
	<title>Re:New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260015420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They need a centrifuge bong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need a centrifuge bong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need a centrifuge bong.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334056</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1260015360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Do they smoke grass out in space, Bowie? Or do they smoke astroturf?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Do they smoke grass out in space , Bowie ?
Or do they smoke astroturf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Do they smoke grass out in space, Bowie?
Or do they smoke astroturf?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337772</id>
	<title>Re:Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>TempeTerra</author>
	<datestamp>1260004140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Besides, exactly what available drugs can enhance your ability to operate heavy machinery?</p></div></blockquote><p>No need to worry about that, once they're in orbit it's all weightless (although still massive).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , exactly what available drugs can enhance your ability to operate heavy machinery ? No need to worry about that , once they 're in orbit it 's all weightless ( although still massive ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, exactly what available drugs can enhance your ability to operate heavy machinery?No need to worry about that, once they're in orbit it's all weightless (although still massive).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336382</id>
	<title>Re:New technical problems on the ISS . . .</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260038700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only problem I can foresee with bongs in space: no gravity!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only problem I can foresee with bongs in space : no gravity !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only problem I can foresee with bongs in space: no gravity!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333860</id>
	<title>You ever...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260012240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You ever watch C beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate... on weed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ever watch C beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate... on weed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You ever watch C beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate... on weed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334040</id>
	<title>They snort Tang</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260014880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Orange flavor</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Orange flavor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Orange flavor</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333912</id>
	<title>Psilocybin Mushrooms</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260013080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh wait, I just watched 2001 a few hours ago. And it was me that was on 'shrooms. What was the question again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh wait , I just watched 2001 a few hours ago .
And it was me that was on 'shrooms .
What was the question again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh wait, I just watched 2001 a few hours ago.
And it was me that was on 'shrooms.
What was the question again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334592</id>
	<title>Re:ah duct tape....</title>
	<author>herojig</author>
	<datestamp>1260025440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like they use a lot of it in the making of the Tilt-O-Whirl shuttle craft in Explorers (1985 by Joe Dante).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like they use a lot of it in the making of the Tilt-O-Whirl shuttle craft in Explorers ( 1985 by Joe Dante ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like they use a lot of it in the making of the Tilt-O-Whirl shuttle craft in Explorers (1985 by Joe Dante).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336148</id>
	<title>Re:Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1260037080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=28600" title="spaceref.com">Astronauts overwhelmingly have military backgrounds</a> [spaceref.com]. The US Military has been using drugs well beyond the specifications allowed for "the rest of us" since forever. I guess what we need is a video game titled WWII Pilots: BENZEDRINE VS. METHEDRINE to really bring the point home to the pixels-and-keyboards crowd. The drug cocktail should surprise no one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Astronauts overwhelmingly have military backgrounds [ spaceref.com ] .
The US Military has been using drugs well beyond the specifications allowed for " the rest of us " since forever .
I guess what we need is a video game titled WWII Pilots : BENZEDRINE VS. METHEDRINE to really bring the point home to the pixels-and-keyboards crowd .
The drug cocktail should surprise no one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Astronauts overwhelmingly have military backgrounds [spaceref.com].
The US Military has been using drugs well beyond the specifications allowed for "the rest of us" since forever.
I guess what we need is a video game titled WWII Pilots: BENZEDRINE VS. METHEDRINE to really bring the point home to the pixels-and-keyboards crowd.
The drug cocktail should surprise no one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336184</id>
	<title>Man</title>
	<author>lazylocomotives</author>
	<datestamp>1260037380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not some spice?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not some spice ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not some spice?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334400</id>
	<title>I know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260022080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spacecoke</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spacecoke</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spacecoke</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333832</id>
	<title>fox news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260012000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yuck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yuck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296</id>
	<title>Lies, Damn Lies and "Science" Articles</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1260019980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it's my limited understanding of the word "do" at fault. I can only think of it in the present tense, rather than the future conditionals attached to such as "might". This leads me to have all kinds of misunderstandings, like wondering why they're taking pills to counteract a dust (!) that nobody's been closer than 230,000 miles to in the last 40 years. Or why the articles blathers on about zombies and CIA truth serum when talking about a sleeping/motion sickness pill that's been OTC for longer than NASA has been chartered. Or why NASA is having them take a "cocktail" to "get the job done" which would, if the description is accurate, prevent the job from getting done if not kill them (alcohol + uppers + downers + tranqs? Anyone remember Karen Ann Quinlan?). Quoting details from the equally unqualified and/or wrong doesn't dilute the article's idiocy. The content could have made a perfectly good article. Too bad the writer felt unequal to the job of writing a real article as you'd expect in a science magazine.</p><p>This article should be in "Entertainment". Or, if we're to keep such trash under science, we should have some subclasses that apply, like 'bullshit', 'lies', and 'science? what's that?'. Or maybe we just need to change the "news for nerds, stuff that matters" to "stuff that might fit into the popular subjects here, and might be real, or not; we're not sure, we don't read it".</p><p>Is this the result of voting on suitability of submissions? If so, maybe we ought to look into having editors that actually know something about the area they cover and approve articles based on content rather than side effects. It appears that ironically 'games' is getting more serious treatment than 'science'. Part of the problem is the 'science' articles being written, such as TFA. But the fix for that is the same fix for including decent science articles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it 's my limited understanding of the word " do " at fault .
I can only think of it in the present tense , rather than the future conditionals attached to such as " might " .
This leads me to have all kinds of misunderstandings , like wondering why they 're taking pills to counteract a dust ( !
) that nobody 's been closer than 230,000 miles to in the last 40 years .
Or why the articles blathers on about zombies and CIA truth serum when talking about a sleeping/motion sickness pill that 's been OTC for longer than NASA has been chartered .
Or why NASA is having them take a " cocktail " to " get the job done " which would , if the description is accurate , prevent the job from getting done if not kill them ( alcohol + uppers + downers + tranqs ?
Anyone remember Karen Ann Quinlan ? ) .
Quoting details from the equally unqualified and/or wrong does n't dilute the article 's idiocy .
The content could have made a perfectly good article .
Too bad the writer felt unequal to the job of writing a real article as you 'd expect in a science magazine.This article should be in " Entertainment " .
Or , if we 're to keep such trash under science , we should have some subclasses that apply , like 'bullshit ' , 'lies ' , and 'science ?
what 's that ? ' .
Or maybe we just need to change the " news for nerds , stuff that matters " to " stuff that might fit into the popular subjects here , and might be real , or not ; we 're not sure , we do n't read it " .Is this the result of voting on suitability of submissions ?
If so , maybe we ought to look into having editors that actually know something about the area they cover and approve articles based on content rather than side effects .
It appears that ironically 'games ' is getting more serious treatment than 'science' .
Part of the problem is the 'science ' articles being written , such as TFA .
But the fix for that is the same fix for including decent science articles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it's my limited understanding of the word "do" at fault.
I can only think of it in the present tense, rather than the future conditionals attached to such as "might".
This leads me to have all kinds of misunderstandings, like wondering why they're taking pills to counteract a dust (!
) that nobody's been closer than 230,000 miles to in the last 40 years.
Or why the articles blathers on about zombies and CIA truth serum when talking about a sleeping/motion sickness pill that's been OTC for longer than NASA has been chartered.
Or why NASA is having them take a "cocktail" to "get the job done" which would, if the description is accurate, prevent the job from getting done if not kill them (alcohol + uppers + downers + tranqs?
Anyone remember Karen Ann Quinlan?).
Quoting details from the equally unqualified and/or wrong doesn't dilute the article's idiocy.
The content could have made a perfectly good article.
Too bad the writer felt unequal to the job of writing a real article as you'd expect in a science magazine.This article should be in "Entertainment".
Or, if we're to keep such trash under science, we should have some subclasses that apply, like 'bullshit', 'lies', and 'science?
what's that?'.
Or maybe we just need to change the "news for nerds, stuff that matters" to "stuff that might fit into the popular subjects here, and might be real, or not; we're not sure, we don't read it".Is this the result of voting on suitability of submissions?
If so, maybe we ought to look into having editors that actually know something about the area they cover and approve articles based on content rather than side effects.
It appears that ironically 'games' is getting more serious treatment than 'science'.
Part of the problem is the 'science' articles being written, such as TFA.
But the fix for that is the same fix for including decent science articles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30341502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30338186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30340592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30338930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30343322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30343356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336328
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_05_0526211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30341502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336382
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30338186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30340592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333820
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30343322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30337772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30336328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30343356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30335252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30338930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30339412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30333868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_05_0526211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_05_0526211.30334512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
