<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_04_2122218</id>
	<title>Nokia Offers Glimpse of Symbian Facelift</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1259925600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Barence writes to mention that Nokia is giving users a first glimpse at what promises to be a <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/353869/nokia-offers-sneak-peek-at-symbian-facelift">completely overhauled Symbian user experience</a> this coming year.  Nokia's chief exec blamed the user interface &mdash; as opposed to the OS itself &mdash; as the root problem. <i>"The company will roll out a completely re-engineered user interface in 2010, aimed at addressing many of the criticisms associated with the OS. 'We will reduce the clutter and improve the input methods including multi-touch and single tap,' Kallasvuo told delegates.  'It should be just two taps to get to your favorite music or videos, rather than eight. We'll improve browser experience so that it's a quicker, flash improved, media experience with pinch-to-zoom and so on.' And, Kallasvuo wasn't stopping there. Aside from completely redesigning the interface, he also suggested that future Symbian OSes would be much faster."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barence writes to mention that Nokia is giving users a first glimpse at what promises to be a completely overhauled Symbian user experience this coming year .
Nokia 's chief exec blamed the user interface    as opposed to the OS itself    as the root problem .
" The company will roll out a completely re-engineered user interface in 2010 , aimed at addressing many of the criticisms associated with the OS .
'We will reduce the clutter and improve the input methods including multi-touch and single tap, ' Kallasvuo told delegates .
'It should be just two taps to get to your favorite music or videos , rather than eight .
We 'll improve browser experience so that it 's a quicker , flash improved , media experience with pinch-to-zoom and so on .
' And , Kallasvuo was n't stopping there .
Aside from completely redesigning the interface , he also suggested that future Symbian OSes would be much faster .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barence writes to mention that Nokia is giving users a first glimpse at what promises to be a completely overhauled Symbian user experience this coming year.
Nokia's chief exec blamed the user interface — as opposed to the OS itself — as the root problem.
"The company will roll out a completely re-engineered user interface in 2010, aimed at addressing many of the criticisms associated with the OS.
'We will reduce the clutter and improve the input methods including multi-touch and single tap,' Kallasvuo told delegates.
'It should be just two taps to get to your favorite music or videos, rather than eight.
We'll improve browser experience so that it's a quicker, flash improved, media experience with pinch-to-zoom and so on.
' And, Kallasvuo wasn't stopping there.
Aside from completely redesigning the interface, he also suggested that future Symbian OSes would be much faster.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330904</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia...</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1259931060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but Nokia has invested too much money and time in Symbian for them to abandon it now while Maemo was quickly thrown together, to Nokia they see Symbian as being carefully researched and Maemo to them is just Debian for phones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but Nokia has invested too much money and time in Symbian for them to abandon it now while Maemo was quickly thrown together , to Nokia they see Symbian as being carefully researched and Maemo to them is just Debian for phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but Nokia has invested too much money and time in Symbian for them to abandon it now while Maemo was quickly thrown together, to Nokia they see Symbian as being carefully researched and Maemo to them is just Debian for phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331438</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Tellarin</author>
	<datestamp>1259934900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple QuickTime.</p><p>On the other hand, if you mean Qt. It's a GUI (and much else) toolkit developed by Trolltech, which was acquired by Nokia some time ago.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P<br>Also, now Qt is LGPL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple QuickTime.On the other hand , if you mean Qt .
It 's a GUI ( and much else ) toolkit developed by Trolltech , which was acquired by Nokia some time ago .
: -PAlso , now Qt is LGPL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple QuickTime.On the other hand, if you mean Qt.
It's a GUI (and much else) toolkit developed by Trolltech, which was acquired by Nokia some time ago.
:-PAlso, now Qt is LGPL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331942</id>
	<title>Not necessarily...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259939100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nokia had Maemo before Apple had iPhone OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia had Maemo before Apple had iPhone OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia had Maemo before Apple had iPhone OS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332988</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259952900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're going up to the N900, why don't you just get a REAL Mobile Internet Device?</p><p>http://www.dynamism.com/#Product=viliv</p><p>I have a 32gb SSD Viliv s5, got it for $550 off Newegg a month ago (the special free upgrade I bought has since ended). Works amazingly, runs whatever you want to install (Windows, Moblin, straight Linux, etc), has GPS, 3G, WiFi, Bluetooth, and pretty good battery life (I usually get 4-6 hours with full usage).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going up to the N900 , why do n't you just get a REAL Mobile Internet Device ? http : //www.dynamism.com/ # Product = vilivI have a 32gb SSD Viliv s5 , got it for $ 550 off Newegg a month ago ( the special free upgrade I bought has since ended ) .
Works amazingly , runs whatever you want to install ( Windows , Moblin , straight Linux , etc ) , has GPS , 3G , WiFi , Bluetooth , and pretty good battery life ( I usually get 4-6 hours with full usage ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going up to the N900, why don't you just get a REAL Mobile Internet Device?http://www.dynamism.com/#Product=vilivI have a 32gb SSD Viliv s5, got it for $550 off Newegg a month ago (the special free upgrade I bought has since ended).
Works amazingly, runs whatever you want to install (Windows, Moblin, straight Linux, etc), has GPS, 3G, WiFi, Bluetooth, and pretty good battery life (I usually get 4-6 hours with full usage).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332348</id>
	<title>For non-touch phones?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259944560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this facelift includes non-touchscreen Symbian phones?  Like S60-3rd type devices (E63, E71, etc).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this facelift includes non-touchscreen Symbian phones ?
Like S60-3rd type devices ( E63 , E71 , etc ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this facelift includes non-touchscreen Symbian phones?
Like S60-3rd type devices (E63, E71, etc).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330946</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Martz</author>
	<datestamp>1259931360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can completely agree about both the N95 and the N97.</p><p>For me the N95 broke new ground and really was an impressive device when it was released. The fixes did a lot to help usability and stability.</p><p>The N97 is the Nokia device which has pissed me off so much - that I've become stuborn and vowed to never, ever again own another Nokia Symbian device. It's a complete disaster, even with the much anticipated v20 firmware.</p><p>I get a free company phone of my choosing, and I could've taken the iPhone at various times but I stood my ground on the principle of it being a "more free" device in terms of application choice. Now I'd be happy to give all of that up just to have a device which has a slick UI, does the basic functions perfectly and isn't so frustrating that I want to smash the device into the floor or throw it out of the car window.</p><p>Nokia really have to improve - they have no other choice - otherwise I believe they will lose the smartphone market.</p><p>As good as the N900 is or promises to be - I refuse to believe the hype or to be an early adopter. I'd have to see the phone in action in Real Life first before even considering another Nokia product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can completely agree about both the N95 and the N97.For me the N95 broke new ground and really was an impressive device when it was released .
The fixes did a lot to help usability and stability.The N97 is the Nokia device which has pissed me off so much - that I 've become stuborn and vowed to never , ever again own another Nokia Symbian device .
It 's a complete disaster , even with the much anticipated v20 firmware.I get a free company phone of my choosing , and I could 've taken the iPhone at various times but I stood my ground on the principle of it being a " more free " device in terms of application choice .
Now I 'd be happy to give all of that up just to have a device which has a slick UI , does the basic functions perfectly and is n't so frustrating that I want to smash the device into the floor or throw it out of the car window.Nokia really have to improve - they have no other choice - otherwise I believe they will lose the smartphone market.As good as the N900 is or promises to be - I refuse to believe the hype or to be an early adopter .
I 'd have to see the phone in action in Real Life first before even considering another Nokia product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can completely agree about both the N95 and the N97.For me the N95 broke new ground and really was an impressive device when it was released.
The fixes did a lot to help usability and stability.The N97 is the Nokia device which has pissed me off so much - that I've become stuborn and vowed to never, ever again own another Nokia Symbian device.
It's a complete disaster, even with the much anticipated v20 firmware.I get a free company phone of my choosing, and I could've taken the iPhone at various times but I stood my ground on the principle of it being a "more free" device in terms of application choice.
Now I'd be happy to give all of that up just to have a device which has a slick UI, does the basic functions perfectly and isn't so frustrating that I want to smash the device into the floor or throw it out of the car window.Nokia really have to improve - they have no other choice - otherwise I believe they will lose the smartphone market.As good as the N900 is or promises to be - I refuse to believe the hype or to be an early adopter.
I'd have to see the phone in action in Real Life first before even considering another Nokia product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330674</id>
	<title>I Like It!!</title>
	<author>SlowCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1259929680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks nice and should be most usable!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks nice and should be most usable !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks nice and should be most usable!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333144</id>
	<title>Re:I love the iPhone</title>
	<author>sien</author>
	<datestamp>1259955480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The iphone is a fine device. But your statement wildly overstates impact and improvements of the iphone over other phones.</p><p>In 1997 a reasonable phone looked like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia\_3110" title="wikipedia.org">1997 Nokia 3110</a> [wikipedia.org]. By 2007 Nokia had the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia\_N95" title="wikipedia.org">N95</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>In the 10 years till 2007 mobile phones, before the iphone had the following improvements:</p><ul><li> The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry" title="wikipedia.org"> 1999 and further Blackberries</a> [wikipedia.org] that changed mobile devices massively, possibly more than the iphone by giving people good mobile communications. Barack Obama was not addicted to updating facebook on his iphone, it was Blackberry. </li><li>mp3 players</li><li>net browsers, albeit not as good as the iphone's  </li><li>gigabyte flash storage</li><li>mulit-megapixel cameras.</li></ul><p>But yeah, other than that, there hadn't been that much improvement....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The iphone is a fine device .
But your statement wildly overstates impact and improvements of the iphone over other phones.In 1997 a reasonable phone looked like the 1997 Nokia 3110 [ wikipedia.org ] .
By 2007 Nokia had the N95 [ wikipedia.org ] In the 10 years till 2007 mobile phones , before the iphone had the following improvements : The 1999 and further Blackberries [ wikipedia.org ] that changed mobile devices massively , possibly more than the iphone by giving people good mobile communications .
Barack Obama was not addicted to updating facebook on his iphone , it was Blackberry .
mp3 playersnet browsers , albeit not as good as the iphone 's gigabyte flash storagemulit-megapixel cameras.But yeah , other than that , there had n't been that much improvement... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iphone is a fine device.
But your statement wildly overstates impact and improvements of the iphone over other phones.In 1997 a reasonable phone looked like the 1997 Nokia 3110 [wikipedia.org].
By 2007 Nokia had the N95 [wikipedia.org]In the 10 years till 2007 mobile phones, before the iphone had the following improvements: The  1999 and further Blackberries [wikipedia.org] that changed mobile devices massively, possibly more than the iphone by giving people good mobile communications.
Barack Obama was not addicted to updating facebook on his iphone, it was Blackberry.
mp3 playersnet browsers, albeit not as good as the iphone's  gigabyte flash storagemulit-megapixel cameras.But yeah, other than that, there hadn't been that much improvement....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331218</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259933280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I liked the N97. It had tons of problems when I first got it though. v20 helped some, but it was still just a phone with a decent camera and a decent browser.</p><p>I just got my N900 2 days ago. And it is everything that I ever wanted my phone to be. It's what I wished phone were 4 years ago. If you have the money, get one. It won't hurt to "wait and see" and get the next maemo phone.  Let me also mention that the N900 is more tablet linux than a phone. The "phone features" are minimal. The Phone part is merely one program amongst others. Took me 2 minutes to make a call the first time without reading the manual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked the N97 .
It had tons of problems when I first got it though .
v20 helped some , but it was still just a phone with a decent camera and a decent browser.I just got my N900 2 days ago .
And it is everything that I ever wanted my phone to be .
It 's what I wished phone were 4 years ago .
If you have the money , get one .
It wo n't hurt to " wait and see " and get the next maemo phone .
Let me also mention that the N900 is more tablet linux than a phone .
The " phone features " are minimal .
The Phone part is merely one program amongst others .
Took me 2 minutes to make a call the first time without reading the manual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked the N97.
It had tons of problems when I first got it though.
v20 helped some, but it was still just a phone with a decent camera and a decent browser.I just got my N900 2 days ago.
And it is everything that I ever wanted my phone to be.
It's what I wished phone were 4 years ago.
If you have the money, get one.
It won't hurt to "wait and see" and get the next maemo phone.
Let me also mention that the N900 is more tablet linux than a phone.
The "phone features" are minimal.
The Phone part is merely one program amongst others.
Took me 2 minutes to make a call the first time without reading the manual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333926</id>
	<title>Re:My Question Is</title>
	<author>the ReviveR</author>
	<datestamp>1260013320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple came to the phone market doing what they do best, interface &amp; usability. Sure others have some catching up to do in this segment.<br> <br>

However Apple is standing on the shoulders of giants with iPhone. If you look at GSM standards for example, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/29/nokia-vs-apple-the-in-depth-analysis" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">Nokia owns 67 of the 158 patents considered "essential" for GSM</a> [engadget.com]. Apple owns 0. And that is just a tiny part of the tech that goes into a modern phone.<br> <br>

People give Apple way too much credit for the shiny package. When it comes to actual tech, Apple is simply using the inventions of other manufacturers and I highly doubt that will change.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple came to the phone market doing what they do best , interface &amp; usability .
Sure others have some catching up to do in this segment .
However Apple is standing on the shoulders of giants with iPhone .
If you look at GSM standards for example , Nokia owns 67 of the 158 patents considered " essential " for GSM [ engadget.com ] .
Apple owns 0 .
And that is just a tiny part of the tech that goes into a modern phone .
People give Apple way too much credit for the shiny package .
When it comes to actual tech , Apple is simply using the inventions of other manufacturers and I highly doubt that will change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple came to the phone market doing what they do best, interface &amp; usability.
Sure others have some catching up to do in this segment.
However Apple is standing on the shoulders of giants with iPhone.
If you look at GSM standards for example, Nokia owns 67 of the 158 patents considered "essential" for GSM [engadget.com].
Apple owns 0.
And that is just a tiny part of the tech that goes into a modern phone.
People give Apple way too much credit for the shiny package.
When it comes to actual tech, Apple is simply using the inventions of other manufacturers and I highly doubt that will change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331530</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Jazzbunny</author>
	<datestamp>1259935560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Back in the days Symbian wasn't a pig, I had Nokia 7650, the first Symbian phone released, and it was everything nerd could hope for. For example I had universal TV control program there, so I could change the channels at my local sports bar at my will and cause mayhem if I wanted to. Later Symbian were locked up more tightly, but currently Maemo looks something I had back in the days + more. I will be using my tax refunds to get N900 and I think I wont regret it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Back in the days Symbian was n't a pig , I had Nokia 7650 , the first Symbian phone released , and it was everything nerd could hope for .
For example I had universal TV control program there , so I could change the channels at my local sports bar at my will and cause mayhem if I wanted to .
Later Symbian were locked up more tightly , but currently Maemo looks something I had back in the days + more .
I will be using my tax refunds to get N900 and I think I wont regret it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Back in the days Symbian wasn't a pig, I had Nokia 7650, the first Symbian phone released, and it was everything nerd could hope for.
For example I had universal TV control program there, so I could change the channels at my local sports bar at my will and cause mayhem if I wanted to.
Later Symbian were locked up more tightly, but currently Maemo looks something I had back in the days + more.
I will be using my tax refunds to get N900 and I think I wont regret it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330710</id>
	<title>Nokia...</title>
	<author>faragon</author>
	<datestamp>1259929860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>... please, let Symbian die. <a href="http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/" title="nokia.com">The N900 is so much better than any Symbian aberration...</a> [nokia.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>... please , let Symbian die .
The N900 is so much better than any Symbian aberration... [ nokia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... please, let Symbian die.
The N900 is so much better than any Symbian aberration... [nokia.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331332</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>cenc</author>
	<datestamp>1259934180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So is their future technology commitment going to be maemo linux or symbian?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So is their future technology commitment going to be maemo linux or symbian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So is their future technology commitment going to be maemo linux or symbian?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330682</id>
	<title>Re:My Question Is</title>
	<author>IceFox</author>
	<datestamp>1259929680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps the new UI is built on Qt and the new kinetics framework?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps the new UI is built on Qt and the new kinetics framework ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps the new UI is built on Qt and the new kinetics framework?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330696</id>
	<title>The way I've always understood it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259929800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The major problem with Symbian is that it's difficult to develop compared to the operating systems it competes with, or so 'm told by a developer friend.</p><p>So, what's being done about that?  If the answer isn't"something significant" then I find it difficult to believe that essentially copying features that other OS's already have will be sufficient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The major problem with Symbian is that it 's difficult to develop compared to the operating systems it competes with , or so 'm told by a developer friend.So , what 's being done about that ?
If the answer is n't " something significant " then I find it difficult to believe that essentially copying features that other OS 's already have will be sufficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The major problem with Symbian is that it's difficult to develop compared to the operating systems it competes with, or so 'm told by a developer friend.So, what's being done about that?
If the answer isn't"something significant" then I find it difficult to believe that essentially copying features that other OS's already have will be sufficient.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331682</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Z34107</author>
	<datestamp>1259936700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Too bad I have no idea wth QT means.</i> </p><p>It refers to someone attractive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad I have no idea wth QT means .
It refers to someone attractive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Too bad I have no idea wth QT means.
It refers to someone attractive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330944</id>
	<title>Symbian vs Maemo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259931360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe they will make developing for Symbian easier with a) Qt b) PIPS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P.I.P.S.\_Is\_POSIX\_on\_Symbian<br>They will also do the same for Maemo 6. UI will be written in Qt and the main things separating Maemo 6 from Symbian^4 are:<br>- Kernel (Linux vs EPAv2)<br>- Package management (.sis vs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.deb)<br>I wouldn't be surprised if the two platform would converge some time in future, since Symbian's upcoming Qt-based Direct UI should be possible to run on Maemo 6 with minor changes and vice versa.<br>Also both platforms are pushing Python as a choice for rapid development (S60 Python and PyQt/PySide and PyMaemo)</p><p>Qt software blog posts might give some insight:<br>http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/<br>Also Symbian foundation has public roadmaps:<br>http://www.symbian.org/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe they will make developing for Symbian easier with a ) Qt b ) PIPS http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P.I.P.S. \ _Is \ _POSIX \ _on \ _SymbianThey will also do the same for Maemo 6 .
UI will be written in Qt and the main things separating Maemo 6 from Symbian ^ 4 are : - Kernel ( Linux vs EPAv2 ) - Package management ( .sis vs .deb ) I would n't be surprised if the two platform would converge some time in future , since Symbian 's upcoming Qt-based Direct UI should be possible to run on Maemo 6 with minor changes and vice versa.Also both platforms are pushing Python as a choice for rapid development ( S60 Python and PyQt/PySide and PyMaemo ) Qt software blog posts might give some insight : http : //labs.trolltech.com/blogs/Also Symbian foundation has public roadmaps : http : //www.symbian.org/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe they will make developing for Symbian easier with a) Qt b) PIPS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P.I.P.S.\_Is\_POSIX\_on\_SymbianThey will also do the same for Maemo 6.
UI will be written in Qt and the main things separating Maemo 6 from Symbian^4 are:- Kernel (Linux vs EPAv2)- Package management (.sis vs .deb)I wouldn't be surprised if the two platform would converge some time in future, since Symbian's upcoming Qt-based Direct UI should be possible to run on Maemo 6 with minor changes and vice versa.Also both platforms are pushing Python as a choice for rapid development (S60 Python and PyQt/PySide and PyMaemo)Qt software blog posts might give some insight:http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/Also Symbian foundation has public roadmaps:http://www.symbian.org/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333880</id>
	<title>No thank you Nokia</title>
	<author>badzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1260012540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Owners of expensive Nokia Symbian S60 phones should be happy that they can upgrade their existing hardware to a shiny new version of the OS. But what is really going to happen is they are forced to throw away their old phone and pay all over again for a new hardware/OS bundle.</p><p>Nokia has no incentive to produce a truly great phone - whenever they came close to this in the past it depressed new sales because people did not want to give up their old one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Owners of expensive Nokia Symbian S60 phones should be happy that they can upgrade their existing hardware to a shiny new version of the OS .
But what is really going to happen is they are forced to throw away their old phone and pay all over again for a new hardware/OS bundle.Nokia has no incentive to produce a truly great phone - whenever they came close to this in the past it depressed new sales because people did not want to give up their old one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Owners of expensive Nokia Symbian S60 phones should be happy that they can upgrade their existing hardware to a shiny new version of the OS.
But what is really going to happen is they are forced to throw away their old phone and pay all over again for a new hardware/OS bundle.Nokia has no incentive to produce a truly great phone - whenever they came close to this in the past it depressed new sales because people did not want to give up their old one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330658</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>tool462</author>
	<datestamp>1259929560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if I care for the fonts.  A little too tall and skinny.  I'm an American.  I like things to be a little more...squat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if I care for the fonts .
A little too tall and skinny .
I 'm an American .
I like things to be a little more...squat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if I care for the fonts.
A little too tall and skinny.
I'm an American.
I like things to be a little more...squat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331710</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia...</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1259936880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They mention 'OVI maps pre-installed'. Is this the demo trial version? in other words will it include turn-by-turn talking directions? or live traffic updates for the US market??? (The last I checked, live traffic information was only available for Europe.)</p><p>I guess we can already get these things for free with Google Latitude running in the foreground -- with amAzeGPS running the background, but it would be nice if Nokia could give us all these things consolidated into one. Also, since Nokia owns the maps now, I'm guessing that it will be able to pre-load a lot of the mapping information (all their vector-based maps at least) without any cross-licensing issues, this would effectively turn Nokia phones into GPS navigators that don't always need to have cell reception -- a nice side-effect in my opinion (one that Google Android would have difficulties replicating since Google doesn't own its own maps -- it just licenses them). </p><p>Also, there is talk of better User Interface design, but as far as I'm aware, (and please, someone correct me if I'm wrong here) Nokia third party developers haven't been notified about any kind of recommended style sheet guides that they should be following (even if just voluntarily). So if the Nokia User Interface re-design hasn't been including third party developers into the mix (as of yet), I really doubt that the final design and user experience will feel as unified and as cohesive as the one offered by Apple.

</p><p>Again, please someone correct me if I'm wrong on that last point. I actually wish I was wrong, or at the very least if it turns out I'm not wrong, I'd like to have Nokia take some quick corrective action on that. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They mention 'OVI maps pre-installed' .
Is this the demo trial version ?
in other words will it include turn-by-turn talking directions ?
or live traffic updates for the US market ? ? ?
( The last I checked , live traffic information was only available for Europe .
) I guess we can already get these things for free with Google Latitude running in the foreground -- with amAzeGPS running the background , but it would be nice if Nokia could give us all these things consolidated into one .
Also , since Nokia owns the maps now , I 'm guessing that it will be able to pre-load a lot of the mapping information ( all their vector-based maps at least ) without any cross-licensing issues , this would effectively turn Nokia phones into GPS navigators that do n't always need to have cell reception -- a nice side-effect in my opinion ( one that Google Android would have difficulties replicating since Google does n't own its own maps -- it just licenses them ) .
Also , there is talk of better User Interface design , but as far as I 'm aware , ( and please , someone correct me if I 'm wrong here ) Nokia third party developers have n't been notified about any kind of recommended style sheet guides that they should be following ( even if just voluntarily ) .
So if the Nokia User Interface re-design has n't been including third party developers into the mix ( as of yet ) , I really doubt that the final design and user experience will feel as unified and as cohesive as the one offered by Apple .
Again , please someone correct me if I 'm wrong on that last point .
I actually wish I was wrong , or at the very least if it turns out I 'm not wrong , I 'd like to have Nokia take some quick corrective action on that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They mention 'OVI maps pre-installed'.
Is this the demo trial version?
in other words will it include turn-by-turn talking directions?
or live traffic updates for the US market???
(The last I checked, live traffic information was only available for Europe.
)I guess we can already get these things for free with Google Latitude running in the foreground -- with amAzeGPS running the background, but it would be nice if Nokia could give us all these things consolidated into one.
Also, since Nokia owns the maps now, I'm guessing that it will be able to pre-load a lot of the mapping information (all their vector-based maps at least) without any cross-licensing issues, this would effectively turn Nokia phones into GPS navigators that don't always need to have cell reception -- a nice side-effect in my opinion (one that Google Android would have difficulties replicating since Google doesn't own its own maps -- it just licenses them).
Also, there is talk of better User Interface design, but as far as I'm aware, (and please, someone correct me if I'm wrong here) Nokia third party developers haven't been notified about any kind of recommended style sheet guides that they should be following (even if just voluntarily).
So if the Nokia User Interface re-design hasn't been including third party developers into the mix (as of yet), I really doubt that the final design and user experience will feel as unified and as cohesive as the one offered by Apple.
Again, please someone correct me if I'm wrong on that last point.
I actually wish I was wrong, or at the very least if it turns out I'm not wrong, I'd like to have Nokia take some quick corrective action on that. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333914</id>
	<title>Never buying another Nokia!</title>
	<author>badzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1260013080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've owned a dozen or so phones nearly all of which have been from Nokia. Never again - the 6220c I currently own is ludicrously locked down and restricted. It works, kind of, but not the way I want it to work. I do mean locked down by Nokia not by a GSM operator. Do Nokia think I am stupid I paid 200 quid for this phone and expect to have root on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've owned a dozen or so phones nearly all of which have been from Nokia .
Never again - the 6220c I currently own is ludicrously locked down and restricted .
It works , kind of , but not the way I want it to work .
I do mean locked down by Nokia not by a GSM operator .
Do Nokia think I am stupid I paid 200 quid for this phone and expect to have root on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've owned a dozen or so phones nearly all of which have been from Nokia.
Never again - the 6220c I currently own is ludicrously locked down and restricted.
It works, kind of, but not the way I want it to work.
I do mean locked down by Nokia not by a GSM operator.
Do Nokia think I am stupid I paid 200 quid for this phone and expect to have root on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30338750</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1260011580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice, how you backed that &ldquo;argument&rdquo; up with facts... oh wait, you didn&rsquo;t.</p><p>I could say &ldquo;that&rsquo;s your opinion&rdquo; if you had any backing up. I could even agree if you had good argument.<br>But since you came to the table with *nothing*, I&rsquo;ll stay with my 10 years of experience with Symbian devices.</p><p>And I must say from a user perspective, they are freakin&rsquo; great! Symbian did always beat any other phone OS I knew.<br>Now finally, there are others who catch up. But this does not mean that Symbian is bad. Far from it. I have a 5800, and really like it.<br>Despite me really hating touchscreen-only devices.</p><p>And what does Nokia do? Raise the bar by a another whole league, by adding full-root-access-with-a-nice-gui Linux out-of-the-box!!<br>That&rsquo;s exactly what MacOS X won with. The best of Linux/Unix/BSD, with a good UI.<br>So I agree on the &ldquo;so far away from any othe the other phone OS's, that there just will be no contest&rdquo;.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>In my eyes, there was no &ldquo;pile of shit&rdquo; time anywhere between 1st gen S60 and Maemo Linux.<br>Maybe the contrast was too high for you, so still be able to see S60v5 as something good.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>P.S.: Yes, I went a bit &ldquo;fanboy&rdquo; here. Go ahead. Out-fanboy me, iPhone users. I don&rsquo;t care for locked-in worlds. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice , how you backed that    argument    up with facts... oh wait , you didn    t.I could say    that    s your opinion    if you had any backing up .
I could even agree if you had good argument.But since you came to the table with * nothing * , I    ll stay with my 10 years of experience with Symbian devices.And I must say from a user perspective , they are freakin    great !
Symbian did always beat any other phone OS I knew.Now finally , there are others who catch up .
But this does not mean that Symbian is bad .
Far from it .
I have a 5800 , and really like it.Despite me really hating touchscreen-only devices.And what does Nokia do ?
Raise the bar by a another whole league , by adding full-root-access-with-a-nice-gui Linux out-of-the-box !
! That    s exactly what MacOS X won with .
The best of Linux/Unix/BSD , with a good UI.So I agree on the    so far away from any othe the other phone OS 's , that there just will be no contest    .
: ) In my eyes , there was no    pile of shit    time anywhere between 1st gen S60 and Maemo Linux.Maybe the contrast was too high for you , so still be able to see S60v5 as something good .
; ) P.S. : Yes , I went a bit    fanboy    here .
Go ahead .
Out-fanboy me , iPhone users .
I don    t care for locked-in worlds .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice, how you backed that “argument” up with facts... oh wait, you didn’t.I could say “that’s your opinion” if you had any backing up.
I could even agree if you had good argument.But since you came to the table with *nothing*, I’ll stay with my 10 years of experience with Symbian devices.And I must say from a user perspective, they are freakin’ great!
Symbian did always beat any other phone OS I knew.Now finally, there are others who catch up.
But this does not mean that Symbian is bad.
Far from it.
I have a 5800, and really like it.Despite me really hating touchscreen-only devices.And what does Nokia do?
Raise the bar by a another whole league, by adding full-root-access-with-a-nice-gui Linux out-of-the-box!
!That’s exactly what MacOS X won with.
The best of Linux/Unix/BSD, with a good UI.So I agree on the “so far away from any othe the other phone OS's, that there just will be no contest”.
:)In my eyes, there was no “pile of shit” time anywhere between 1st gen S60 and Maemo Linux.Maybe the contrast was too high for you, so still be able to see S60v5 as something good.
;)P.S.: Yes, I went a bit “fanboy” here.
Go ahead.
Out-fanboy me, iPhone users.
I don’t care for locked-in worlds.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333628</id>
	<title>Bye-bye Nokia</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1260008160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nokia is pretty much over. After release of their N97 junk, they won't survive another 3 years. Nokia sales drop everywhere, especially in US and APAC. Blackberry, iPhone is what people want - not Nokia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia is pretty much over .
After release of their N97 junk , they wo n't survive another 3 years .
Nokia sales drop everywhere , especially in US and APAC .
Blackberry , iPhone is what people want - not Nokia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia is pretty much over.
After release of their N97 junk, they won't survive another 3 years.
Nokia sales drop everywhere, especially in US and APAC.
Blackberry, iPhone is what people want - not Nokia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330886</id>
	<title>Re:My Question Is</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1259930880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and my question is, where are the "graspingatstraws", "lipstickonapig" or "toolate" tags?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and my question is , where are the " graspingatstraws " , " lipstickonapig " or " toolate " tags ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and my question is, where are the "graspingatstraws", "lipstickonapig" or "toolate" tags?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</id>
	<title>I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>kurt555gs</author>
	<datestamp>1259930400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Symbian is a pig. QT on Symbian is lipstick on a pig. There is no other good way to say this. I had an N95 8GB, and Symbian 3 was actually fine on that, buttons and all. Symbian 5, ala N97 is just pushing Symbians limits to far. The best technical terms I can use to describe Symbian 5 (N97) is it's a "steaming pile of shit".</p><p>The N900 on the other hand is just phuquing unbelievable. Once they put QT on top of Maemo Linux, it will be so far away from any othe the other phone OS's, that there just will be no contest. (I say phone, but the N900 is really more of a mobile computer with cell capabilities than a phone).</p><p>The N900 rox!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Symbian is a pig .
QT on Symbian is lipstick on a pig .
There is no other good way to say this .
I had an N95 8GB , and Symbian 3 was actually fine on that , buttons and all .
Symbian 5 , ala N97 is just pushing Symbians limits to far .
The best technical terms I can use to describe Symbian 5 ( N97 ) is it 's a " steaming pile of shit " .The N900 on the other hand is just phuquing unbelievable .
Once they put QT on top of Maemo Linux , it will be so far away from any othe the other phone OS 's , that there just will be no contest .
( I say phone , but the N900 is really more of a mobile computer with cell capabilities than a phone ) .The N900 rox !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Symbian is a pig.
QT on Symbian is lipstick on a pig.
There is no other good way to say this.
I had an N95 8GB, and Symbian 3 was actually fine on that, buttons and all.
Symbian 5, ala N97 is just pushing Symbians limits to far.
The best technical terms I can use to describe Symbian 5 (N97) is it's a "steaming pile of shit".The N900 on the other hand is just phuquing unbelievable.
Once they put QT on top of Maemo Linux, it will be so far away from any othe the other phone OS's, that there just will be no contest.
(I say phone, but the N900 is really more of a mobile computer with cell capabilities than a phone).The N900 rox!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331010</id>
	<title>Yeah, lets have loads more cellphone platforms</title>
	<author>phonewebcam</author>
	<datestamp>1259931720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its all about consumer choice see, and a zillion incompatible ones sure gives the user that all right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its all about consumer choice see , and a zillion incompatible ones sure gives the user that all right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its all about consumer choice see, and a zillion incompatible ones sure gives the user that all right.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330640</id>
	<title>Neat</title>
	<author>masshuu</author>
	<datestamp>1259929440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks better than my first Nokia, which has a 200x80 or so black and whatever it is screen that just had the number and whatever else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks better than my first Nokia , which has a 200x80 or so black and whatever it is screen that just had the number and whatever else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks better than my first Nokia, which has a 200x80 or so black and whatever it is screen that just had the number and whatever else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331022</id>
	<title>Re:My Question Is</title>
	<author>Reaperducer</author>
	<datestamp>1259931720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are so right.  I hope the anti-Apple trolls don't mod you down.  When Apple released the iPhone, it was a game changer, and now everyone is playing catch-up.</p><p>
&nbsp; Whether you like the iPhone or hate the iPhone, any objective thought on the matter leads to the conclusion that the iPhone was good for the whole mobile phone industry and its consumers.</p><p>Before, software and usability were afterthoughts at best.  Now, it's job #2 or 3 at most mobile phone companies.  That's a major improvement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are so right .
I hope the anti-Apple trolls do n't mod you down .
When Apple released the iPhone , it was a game changer , and now everyone is playing catch-up .
  Whether you like the iPhone or hate the iPhone , any objective thought on the matter leads to the conclusion that the iPhone was good for the whole mobile phone industry and its consumers.Before , software and usability were afterthoughts at best .
Now , it 's job # 2 or 3 at most mobile phone companies .
That 's a major improvement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are so right.
I hope the anti-Apple trolls don't mod you down.
When Apple released the iPhone, it was a game changer, and now everyone is playing catch-up.
  Whether you like the iPhone or hate the iPhone, any objective thought on the matter leads to the conclusion that the iPhone was good for the whole mobile phone industry and its consumers.Before, software and usability were afterthoughts at best.
Now, it's job #2 or 3 at most mobile phone companies.
That's a major improvement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30341590</id>
	<title>Re:Nokia...</title>
	<author>marchmallow</author>
	<datestamp>1260042420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a N97, you can download full world maps on the N97 - I have maps of all European countries/towns/... on my N97 - turn by turn navigation does require to pay some additional money for license though, just got a 2 months trial. Maps are good but the Ovi map application sometimes may get stuck and not being able to get GPS signal for half an hour..need to reboot the phone and hope for being lucky</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a N97 , you can download full world maps on the N97 - I have maps of all European countries/towns/... on my N97 - turn by turn navigation does require to pay some additional money for license though , just got a 2 months trial .
Maps are good but the Ovi map application sometimes may get stuck and not being able to get GPS signal for half an hour..need to reboot the phone and hope for being lucky</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a N97, you can download full world maps on the N97 - I have maps of all European countries/towns/... on my N97 - turn by turn navigation does require to pay some additional money for license though, just got a 2 months trial.
Maps are good but the Ovi map application sometimes may get stuck and not being able to get GPS signal for half an hour..need to reboot the phone and hope for being lucky</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330766</id>
	<title>Good...</title>
	<author>Lord Lode</author>
	<datestamp>1259930280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good to see that something else than the closed iPhone can be flashy and cool!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good to see that something else than the closed iPhone can be flashy and cool !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good to see that something else than the closed iPhone can be flashy and cool!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330936</id>
	<title>uuuh pinch and zoom on a phone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259931240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets all welcome Nokia to 2007.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets all welcome Nokia to 2007 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets all welcome Nokia to 2007.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330912</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259931120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad I have no idea wth QT means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad I have no idea wth QT means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad I have no idea wth QT means.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330678</id>
	<title>... The Symbian?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259929680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... so will the new symbian be better for all adult film stars now?</p><p>Maybe the symbian I know is not the symbian being discussed here...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... so will the new symbian be better for all adult film stars now ? Maybe the symbian I know is not the symbian being discussed here.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... so will the new symbian be better for all adult film stars now?Maybe the symbian I know is not the symbian being discussed here...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330994</id>
	<title>Frost p1st</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259931600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>to avoid so as to BUWLA,B or BSD</htmltext>
<tokenext>to avoid so as to BUWLA,B or BSD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to avoid so as to BUWLA,B or BSD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331430</id>
	<title>Re:I have an N97 and an N900</title>
	<author>unix1</author>
	<datestamp>1259934780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The N900 on the other hand is just phuquing unbelievable. Once they put QT on top of Maemo Linux, it will be so far away from any othe the other phone OS's, that there just will be no contest.</p></div><p>They should have done that years ago, then they would have been ahead by a mile right now. But no, they had no balls. Trolltech was always there, they were always doing their thing - remember Qtopia and the Greenphone? They always had the software and the technology that can and should be taken to the next step.</p><p>Now they may go the way of Windows Mobile, with the promises of things that are year(s) away to be introduced to the market, and still beating the near dead horse that is Symbian. Maybe in the next 2 years at best they'll slow their market share slide, at worst they'll fill a niche.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The N900 on the other hand is just phuquing unbelievable .
Once they put QT on top of Maemo Linux , it will be so far away from any othe the other phone OS 's , that there just will be no contest.They should have done that years ago , then they would have been ahead by a mile right now .
But no , they had no balls .
Trolltech was always there , they were always doing their thing - remember Qtopia and the Greenphone ?
They always had the software and the technology that can and should be taken to the next step.Now they may go the way of Windows Mobile , with the promises of things that are year ( s ) away to be introduced to the market , and still beating the near dead horse that is Symbian .
Maybe in the next 2 years at best they 'll slow their market share slide , at worst they 'll fill a niche .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The N900 on the other hand is just phuquing unbelievable.
Once they put QT on top of Maemo Linux, it will be so far away from any othe the other phone OS's, that there just will be no contest.They should have done that years ago, then they would have been ahead by a mile right now.
But no, they had no balls.
Trolltech was always there, they were always doing their thing - remember Qtopia and the Greenphone?
They always had the software and the technology that can and should be taken to the next step.Now they may go the way of Windows Mobile, with the promises of things that are year(s) away to be introduced to the market, and still beating the near dead horse that is Symbian.
Maybe in the next 2 years at best they'll slow their market share slide, at worst they'll fill a niche.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962</id>
	<title>Re:My Question Is</title>
	<author>ZackSchil</author>
	<datestamp>1259931420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because they didn't have an example interface from Apple to crib off of at that point.</p><p>No, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because they did n't have an example interface from Apple to crib off of at that point.No , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because they didn't have an example interface from Apple to crib off of at that point.No, really.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330706</id>
	<title>I love the iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259929860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only because of what it does, but because of the competition it's created in an industry that hadn't really moved in a decade. Free markets do work, sometimes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only because of what it does , but because of the competition it 's created in an industry that had n't really moved in a decade .
Free markets do work , sometimes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only because of what it does, but because of the competition it's created in an industry that hadn't really moved in a decade.
Free markets do work, sometimes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332084</id>
	<title>Re:I love the iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259940900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nokia shipped its billionth phone in 2005. It contributed greatly to the fact that, while a year ago 3 billion people had cellphones, it is <b>4.6 billion people</b> now, more than half of the planet. And Nokia's most affordable phone isn't even very cheap, at 20 Euro without contract... (supposedly they wish to be able to launch 5 Euro one in a few years)</p><p>Nokia has really took to heart its corporate motto, "Connecting people". It has the potential to greatly benefit our world; make it a bit better place. It's perfectly safe to say, IMHO, that Nokia is doing far more for humanity than Apple. The latter is almost irrelevant on such scale, limited to concepts of pleasure and profit. Nokia is perhaps even doing more towards fulfillment of their corporate motto than any other entity that existed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nokia shipped its billionth phone in 2005 .
It contributed greatly to the fact that , while a year ago 3 billion people had cellphones , it is 4.6 billion people now , more than half of the planet .
And Nokia 's most affordable phone is n't even very cheap , at 20 Euro without contract... ( supposedly they wish to be able to launch 5 Euro one in a few years ) Nokia has really took to heart its corporate motto , " Connecting people " .
It has the potential to greatly benefit our world ; make it a bit better place .
It 's perfectly safe to say , IMHO , that Nokia is doing far more for humanity than Apple .
The latter is almost irrelevant on such scale , limited to concepts of pleasure and profit .
Nokia is perhaps even doing more towards fulfillment of their corporate motto than any other entity that existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nokia shipped its billionth phone in 2005.
It contributed greatly to the fact that, while a year ago 3 billion people had cellphones, it is 4.6 billion people now, more than half of the planet.
And Nokia's most affordable phone isn't even very cheap, at 20 Euro without contract... (supposedly they wish to be able to launch 5 Euro one in a few years)Nokia has really took to heart its corporate motto, "Connecting people".
It has the potential to greatly benefit our world; make it a bit better place.
It's perfectly safe to say, IMHO, that Nokia is doing far more for humanity than Apple.
The latter is almost irrelevant on such scale, limited to concepts of pleasure and profit.
Nokia is perhaps even doing more towards fulfillment of their corporate motto than any other entity that existed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331506</id>
	<title>I gave up after the N95</title>
	<author>toomanyairmiles</author>
	<datestamp>1259935320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A day late and a dollar short for my money. Their interface was creaking as much as their design language five years back. I looked at an X6 today and it's basically an I phone clone, just a cheaper plasticky one. Come on nokia you need to genuinely innovate not just throw out new keypad layouts on the same old candy bar phones.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A day late and a dollar short for my money .
Their interface was creaking as much as their design language five years back .
I looked at an X6 today and it 's basically an I phone clone , just a cheaper plasticky one .
Come on nokia you need to genuinely innovate not just throw out new keypad layouts on the same old candy bar phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A day late and a dollar short for my money.
Their interface was creaking as much as their design language five years back.
I looked at an X6 today and it's basically an I phone clone, just a cheaper plasticky one.
Come on nokia you need to genuinely innovate not just throw out new keypad layouts on the same old candy bar phones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331920</id>
	<title>Re:My Question Is</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259938920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why didn't they do this years ago?</p></div><p>Because they <i>launched</i> years ago.</p><p>In time when hardware was much slower, screens were much smaller, users were used to "classic" (S30, just launched S40) phone UIs (and because of screen &amp; cpu you didn't have much choice anyway). When smartphone was a very niche product only because of its price, mostly an experiment with the underlying OS, initially. They they built on it for a long time.</p><p>Once something takes off it is a bit hard to introduce major UI paradigm changes, I imagine.</p><p>And BTW, Maemo is quite old at this point, so it's not like they didn't do anything.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't they do this years ago ? Because they launched years ago.In time when hardware was much slower , screens were much smaller , users were used to " classic " ( S30 , just launched S40 ) phone UIs ( and because of screen &amp; cpu you did n't have much choice anyway ) .
When smartphone was a very niche product only because of its price , mostly an experiment with the underlying OS , initially .
They they built on it for a long time.Once something takes off it is a bit hard to introduce major UI paradigm changes , I imagine.And BTW , Maemo is quite old at this point , so it 's not like they did n't do anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't they do this years ago?Because they launched years ago.In time when hardware was much slower, screens were much smaller, users were used to "classic" (S30, just launched S40) phone UIs (and because of screen &amp; cpu you didn't have much choice anyway).
When smartphone was a very niche product only because of its price, mostly an experiment with the underlying OS, initially.
They they built on it for a long time.Once something takes off it is a bit hard to introduce major UI paradigm changes, I imagine.And BTW, Maemo is quite old at this point, so it's not like they didn't do anything.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648</id>
	<title>My Question Is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259929500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why didn't they do this years ago?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't they do this years ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't they do this years ago?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330910</id>
	<title>but since their OS does not have the features to</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259931120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do a proper user interface then it really IS the OS now isn't it? Try asking someone who really knows about the state of the Symbian OS.</p><p>Nokia has really dropped the ball on that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do a proper user interface then it really IS the OS now is n't it ?
Try asking someone who really knows about the state of the Symbian OS.Nokia has really dropped the ball on that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do a proper user interface then it really IS the OS now isn't it?
Try asking someone who really knows about the state of the Symbian OS.Nokia has really dropped the ball on that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30341590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30338750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_04_2122218_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331710
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30341590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330912
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30338750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30332988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_04_2122218.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330962
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30331022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30333926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_04_2122218.30330682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
