<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_03_0121206</id>
	<title>Cameroon the New Hotbed of Malware</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1259857080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>garg0yle writes <i>"According to McAfee, more than a third of Cameroon domains (TLD of .cm) are <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/02/mal\_hosting\_survey/">infested with viruses</a> or other not-so-fun party treats.  Given that it's very easy to mis-type .com as .cm, this puts the computers of a lot of fat-fingered typists in peril.  Second place on the most-infested domains list goes to China (.cn), while Hong Kong (last year's 'winner') is now comfortably middle-of-the-pack."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>garg0yle writes " According to McAfee , more than a third of Cameroon domains ( TLD of .cm ) are infested with viruses or other not-so-fun party treats .
Given that it 's very easy to mis-type .com as .cm , this puts the computers of a lot of fat-fingered typists in peril .
Second place on the most-infested domains list goes to China ( .cn ) , while Hong Kong ( last year 's 'winner ' ) is now comfortably middle-of-the-pack .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>garg0yle writes "According to McAfee, more than a third of Cameroon domains (TLD of .cm) are infested with viruses or other not-so-fun party treats.
Given that it's very easy to mis-type .com as .cm, this puts the computers of a lot of fat-fingered typists in peril.
Second place on the most-infested domains list goes to China (.cn), while Hong Kong (last year's 'winner') is now comfortably middle-of-the-pack.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309550</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1259851680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...second most risky TLD in the world:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Are you sure? Can you provide a link?</p><blockquote><div><p>And while we're at it, how about a link to the actual report? <b>[mcafee.com]</b> (warning: <b>PDF</b>)</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Mcafee and a PDF. Two pieces of malware from one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com site. Excellent evidence, sir.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...second most risky TLD in the world : .com .
Are you sure ?
Can you provide a link ? And while we 're at it , how about a link to the actual report ?
[ mcafee.com ] ( warning : PDF ) Mcafee and a PDF .
Two pieces of malware from one .com site .
Excellent evidence , sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...second most risky TLD in the world: .com.
Are you sure?
Can you provide a link?And while we're at it, how about a link to the actual report?
[mcafee.com] (warning: PDF)
Mcafee and a PDF.
Two pieces of malware from one .com site.
Excellent evidence, sir.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307724</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311462</id>
	<title>Rip off alert</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259860860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's just lame, I've never seen anyone (including me) misspell com for cm or cn. I think someone at godaddy or another registrar is trying make a quick buck here, as in "Guys! Go register<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cn for all your domains".</p><p>Buyer beware</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's just lame , I 've never seen anyone ( including me ) misspell com for cm or cn .
I think someone at godaddy or another registrar is trying make a quick buck here , as in " Guys !
Go register .cm and .cn for all your domains " .Buyer beware</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's just lame, I've never seen anyone (including me) misspell com for cm or cn.
I think someone at godaddy or another registrar is trying make a quick buck here, as in "Guys!
Go register .cm and .cn for all your domains".Buyer beware</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30315346</id>
	<title>Re:OpenDNS has an option to fix this</title>
	<author>forerunner403</author>
	<datestamp>1259831400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, this option is definitely a life saver.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , this option is definitely a life saver .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, this option is definitely a life saver.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308122</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>icannotthinkofaname</author>
	<datestamp>1259870880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a bit of a stretch for me to believe that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm is a typo of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com.  When I mistype<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com, it's usually<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cmo.  But I never just forget the o like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a bit of a stretch for me to believe that .cm is a typo of .com .
When I mistype .com , it 's usually .co or .cmo .
But I never just forget the o like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a bit of a stretch for me to believe that .cm is a typo of .com.
When I mistype .com, it's usually .co or .cmo.
But I never just forget the o like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309512</id>
	<title>Always one rotten apple</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1259851320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There will always be a worst and best in this category, as in anything you do in life. The problem is when it is deliberately set to that which happens to be<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm (which could be a mistype for many people)...if you think of whether this was intentional on the hackers part, you better believe it.</p><p>It could be any of the countries that have domains, and have no real talent for programming websites, but in the end,<br>you have to wonder, most are hosted on regular ISPs that offer the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm extension, so should they not be partially responsible too, for at least quick testing the sites vulnerability with a tool or something....and if they find anything, the website owners are responsible to fix it, or get their vulnerable or compromised websites taken down.</p><p>That's just my 2 cents though</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There will always be a worst and best in this category , as in anything you do in life .
The problem is when it is deliberately set to that which happens to be .cm ( which could be a mistype for many people ) ...if you think of whether this was intentional on the hackers part , you better believe it.It could be any of the countries that have domains , and have no real talent for programming websites , but in the end,you have to wonder , most are hosted on regular ISPs that offer the .cm extension , so should they not be partially responsible too , for at least quick testing the sites vulnerability with a tool or something....and if they find anything , the website owners are responsible to fix it , or get their vulnerable or compromised websites taken down.That 's just my 2 cents though</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will always be a worst and best in this category, as in anything you do in life.
The problem is when it is deliberately set to that which happens to be .cm (which could be a mistype for many people)...if you think of whether this was intentional on the hackers part, you better believe it.It could be any of the countries that have domains, and have no real talent for programming websites, but in the end,you have to wonder, most are hosted on regular ISPs that offer the .cm extension, so should they not be partially responsible too, for at least quick testing the sites vulnerability with a tool or something....and if they find anything, the website owners are responsible to fix it, or get their vulnerable or compromised websites taken down.That's just my 2 cents though</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308496</id>
	<title>It's not all so bad...</title>
	<author>billsayswow</author>
	<datestamp>1259834760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cameroon is probably just happy to be in the news. Any publicity is better than no publicity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cameroon is probably just happy to be in the news .
Any publicity is better than no publicity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cameroon is probably just happy to be in the news.
Any publicity is better than no publicity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754</id>
	<title>OpenDNS has an option to fix this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opendns has an option to automatically 'correct'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm requests to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com, which I always turn on. If Cameroon does not want people doing this, then it would have to police it's domain closely, instead of using it as a cash cow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opendns has an option to automatically 'correct ' .cm requests to .com , which I always turn on .
If Cameroon does not want people doing this , then it would have to police it 's domain closely , instead of using it as a cash cow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opendns has an option to automatically 'correct' .cm requests to .com, which I always turn on.
If Cameroon does not want people doing this, then it would have to police it's domain closely, instead of using it as a cash cow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311828</id>
	<title>Re:OpenDNS has an option to fix this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259861880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OpenDNS is one of the worst DNS services out there. (re: NXDOMAINS)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OpenDNS is one of the worst DNS services out there .
( re : NXDOMAINS )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OpenDNS is one of the worst DNS services out there.
(re: NXDOMAINS)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308374</id>
	<title>Re:OpenDNS has an option to fix this</title>
	<author>KazW</author>
	<datestamp>1259832540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OpenDNS breaks the DNS standard, as it returns a search  page for non-existent domains, there was actually a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article about sites doing this not too long ago. Lastly, not to mention, you're letting a 3rd party track almost 100\% of your net activity.<br> <br>
In closing, "smart" DNS is a dumb decision, even for dumb people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OpenDNS breaks the DNS standard , as it returns a search page for non-existent domains , there was actually a / .
article about sites doing this not too long ago .
Lastly , not to mention , you 're letting a 3rd party track almost 100 \ % of your net activity .
In closing , " smart " DNS is a dumb decision , even for dumb people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OpenDNS breaks the DNS standard, as it returns a search  page for non-existent domains, there was actually a /.
article about sites doing this not too long ago.
Lastly, not to mention, you're letting a 3rd party track almost 100\% of your net activity.
In closing, "smart" DNS is a dumb decision, even for dumb people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308154</id>
	<title>Don't take any of this seriously</title>
	<author>Theovon</author>
	<datestamp>1259871540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you want the truth about this, I strongly suggest you watch this video:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLsJryWc5XE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLsJryWc5XE</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want the truth about this , I strongly suggest you watch this video : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = XLsJryWc5XE [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want the truth about this, I strongly suggest you watch this video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLsJryWc5XE [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307580</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i always mistype it as<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cum XD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i always mistype it as .cum XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i always mistype it as .cum XD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307944</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>what about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om?</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co is Colombia,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om is Oman, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con doesn't exist.</p><p>Well, on my name server,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con tld is an alias to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.ng.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what about .co , .con , .om ?
.co is Colombia , .om is Oman , but .con does n't exist.Well , on my name server , .con tld is an alias to .ng .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about .co, .con, .om?
.co is Colombia, .om is Oman, but .con doesn't exist.Well, on my name server, .con tld is an alias to .ng.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307716</id>
	<title>.hk TLD Was Up There Due to Bone Headed Registrar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fact is that last year in an effort to sell more domains, the registrar responsible for the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.hk TLD (HKIRC http://hkirc.hk/) were willing to sell to anyone as long as you could put down a credit card online. As a result the amount of spam and malware web sites using<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.hk sky rocketed. The<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.hk domain was frequently top of the Spamcop charts.</p><p>Eventually enough pressure was put on HKIRC to change their registration procedure to make it harder to register domains and this is the reason why<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.hk has fallen in the rankings. My guess is that the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm registrar just cares about getting money and less about where their domains go.</p><p>Bo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fact is that last year in an effort to sell more domains , the registrar responsible for the .hk TLD ( HKIRC http : //hkirc.hk/ ) were willing to sell to anyone as long as you could put down a credit card online .
As a result the amount of spam and malware web sites using .hk sky rocketed .
The .hk domain was frequently top of the Spamcop charts.Eventually enough pressure was put on HKIRC to change their registration procedure to make it harder to register domains and this is the reason why .hk has fallen in the rankings .
My guess is that the .cm registrar just cares about getting money and less about where their domains go.Bo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fact is that last year in an effort to sell more domains, the registrar responsible for the .hk TLD (HKIRC http://hkirc.hk/) were willing to sell to anyone as long as you could put down a credit card online.
As a result the amount of spam and malware web sites using .hk sky rocketed.
The .hk domain was frequently top of the Spamcop charts.Eventually enough pressure was put on HKIRC to change their registration procedure to make it harder to register domains and this is the reason why .hk has fallen in the rankings.
My guess is that the .cm registrar just cares about getting money and less about where their domains go.Bo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>what about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om?</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co is Colombia,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om is Oman, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con doesn't exist.</p><blockquote><div><p>They don't seem to be high risk websites.</p></div></blockquote><p>What is "they" in that sentence, or did you mean "TLDs" instead of "websites"?</p><blockquote><div><p>I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses.</p></div></blockquote><p>.og doesn't exist. You might want to consult a list of TLDs before you ask a bunch of "what about" questions. Or install a robust browser and try to load the url instead of just wondering about it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what about .co , .con , .om ?
.co is Colombia , .om is Oman , but .con does n't exist.They do n't seem to be high risk websites.What is " they " in that sentence , or did you mean " TLDs " instead of " websites " ? I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses..og does n't exist .
You might want to consult a list of TLDs before you ask a bunch of " what about " questions .
Or install a robust browser and try to load the url instead of just wondering about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about .co, .con, .om?
.co is Colombia, .om is Oman, but .con doesn't exist.They don't seem to be high risk websites.What is "they" in that sentence, or did you mean "TLDs" instead of "websites"?I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses..og doesn't exist.
You might want to consult a list of TLDs before you ask a bunch of "what about" questions.
Or install a robust browser and try to load the url instead of just wondering about it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307650</id>
	<title>stuck key</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1259604540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>typing *.cm instead of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com is as simple as having an o key that gets stuck occasionally and not noticing the typo.  All it takes is a keyboard that needs a good cleaning and a user that isn't paying enough attention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>typing * .cm instead of .com is as simple as having an o key that gets stuck occasionally and not noticing the typo .
All it takes is a keyboard that needs a good cleaning and a user that is n't paying enough attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>typing *.cm instead of .com is as simple as having an o key that gets stuck occasionally and not noticing the typo.
All it takes is a keyboard that needs a good cleaning and a user that isn't paying enough attention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308754</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>jez9999</author>
	<datestamp>1259839080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>.co is Colombia,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om is Oman, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con doesn't exist.</i></p><p>That's a shame, coz then we could have all the malware and phishing websites under one roof like porn is with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.xxx.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.co is Colombia , .om is Oman , but .con does n't exist.That 's a shame , coz then we could have all the malware and phishing websites under one roof like porn is with .xxx .
: - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.co is Colombia, .om is Oman, but .con doesn't exist.That's a shame, coz then we could have all the malware and phishing websites under one roof like porn is with .xxx.
:-(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630</id>
	<title>Auto-Correcting Domains</title>
	<author>cshbell</author>
	<datestamp>1259604180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's water under the bridge, but in hindsight, it would have been better to not create the alternate TLDs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co. While I'm at it, tell me there's a good reason we have augmented reality iPhones and 60 MPG cars but not web browsers that autocorrect non-existent TLDs.</p><p>Seriously, why doesn't every browser have a "I don't live in Cameroon or Colombia; auto-correct<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com, don't warn me when doing it, and don't bother me about this again" option? (I know, I know,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.hosts and/or Firefox extensions. Still.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's water under the bridge , but in hindsight , it would have been better to not create the alternate TLDs .cm , .co .
While I 'm at it , tell me there 's a good reason we have augmented reality iPhones and 60 MPG cars but not web browsers that autocorrect non-existent TLDs.Seriously , why does n't every browser have a " I do n't live in Cameroon or Colombia ; auto-correct .cm and .co to .com , do n't warn me when doing it , and do n't bother me about this again " option ?
( I know , I know , .hosts and/or Firefox extensions .
Still. )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's water under the bridge, but in hindsight, it would have been better to not create the alternate TLDs .cm, .co.
While I'm at it, tell me there's a good reason we have augmented reality iPhones and 60 MPG cars but not web browsers that autocorrect non-existent TLDs.Seriously, why doesn't every browser have a "I don't live in Cameroon or Colombia; auto-correct .cm and .co to .com, don't warn me when doing it, and don't bother me about this again" option?
(I know, I know, .hosts and/or Firefox extensions.
Still.)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307476</id>
	<title>Missing keys?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I rarely miss the 'o' key altogether, more commonly I press a different one accidentally, like 'cpm' or 'con'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I rarely miss the 'o ' key altogether , more commonly I press a different one accidentally , like 'cpm ' or 'con' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rarely miss the 'o' key altogether, more commonly I press a different one accidentally, like 'cpm' or 'con'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307652</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>jrumney</author>
	<datestamp>1259604540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It depends on the policies of the registrar for those top level domains. Some countries allow free for all registration of domain names, others restrict registration to local companies and citizens only. Also many country tlds require specific sub-domains such as<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com.co, which reduce the usefulness of those domains for typo-squatters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on the policies of the registrar for those top level domains .
Some countries allow free for all registration of domain names , others restrict registration to local companies and citizens only .
Also many country tlds require specific sub-domains such as .com.co , which reduce the usefulness of those domains for typo-squatters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on the policies of the registrar for those top level domains.
Some countries allow free for all registration of domain names, others restrict registration to local companies and citizens only.
Also many country tlds require specific sub-domains such as .com.co, which reduce the usefulness of those domains for typo-squatters.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</id>
	<title>Mistype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I can believe that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm is a mistype for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com, what about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om? They don't seem to be high risk websites. I also bet that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con is a more common mistype than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm

I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I can believe that .cm is a mistype for .com , what about .co , .con , .om ?
They do n't seem to be high risk websites .
I also bet that .con is a more common mistype than .cm I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I can believe that .cm is a mistype for .com, what about .co, .con, .om?
They don't seem to be high risk websites.
I also bet that .con is a more common mistype than .cm

I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307724</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>grcumb</author>
	<datestamp>1259605500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>While I can believe that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm is a mistype for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com, what about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om? They don't seem to be high risk websites. I also bet that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con is a more common mistype than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm</p></div><p>It hardly matters. What many of the press reports (including El Reg) seem to ignore is the <em>second</em> most risky TLD in the world:<nobr> <wbr></nobr><strong>.com</strong>.</p><p>I'll bet you dollars to donuts that, because of the size and popularity of the TLD,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com is significantly more of a threat to the average Internet user than<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm.</p><p>And while we're at it, how about a link to <a href="http://us.mcafee.com/en-us/local/docs/Mapping\_Mal\_Web.pdf" title="mcafee.com">the actual report</a> [mcafee.com]? <strong>(warning: PDF)</strong> </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I can believe that .cm is a mistype for .com , what about .co , .con , .om ?
They do n't seem to be high risk websites .
I also bet that .con is a more common mistype than .cmIt hardly matters .
What many of the press reports ( including El Reg ) seem to ignore is the second most risky TLD in the world : .com.I 'll bet you dollars to donuts that , because of the size and popularity of the TLD , .com is significantly more of a threat to the average Internet user than .cm.And while we 're at it , how about a link to the actual report [ mcafee.com ] ?
( warning : PDF )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I can believe that .cm is a mistype for .com, what about .co, .con, .om?
They don't seem to be high risk websites.
I also bet that .con is a more common mistype than .cmIt hardly matters.
What many of the press reports (including El Reg) seem to ignore is the second most risky TLD in the world: .com.I'll bet you dollars to donuts that, because of the size and popularity of the TLD, .com is significantly more of a threat to the average Internet user than .cm.And while we're at it, how about a link to the actual report [mcafee.com]?
(warning: PDF) 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307504</id>
	<title>Wouldn't it be safer to...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to just block the whole Net? That way, you can't visit any website, thus avoid all websites hosting malware. Either that or have a patched, updated browser, and use smart surfing habits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to just block the whole Net ?
That way , you ca n't visit any website , thus avoid all websites hosting malware .
Either that or have a patched , updated browser , and use smart surfing habits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to just block the whole Net?
That way, you can't visit any website, thus avoid all websites hosting malware.
Either that or have a patched, updated browser, and use smart surfing habits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30310362</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1259856720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>what about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om?</i><br>assigned to colombia and oman respectively but don't allow registrations directly under the tld so not useful for cybersquatters.<nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>.con</i><br>doesn't exist.</p><p><i>I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses.</i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.og doesn't exist either</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what about .co , .om ? assigned to colombia and oman respectively but do n't allow registrations directly under the tld so not useful for cybersquatters .
.condoes n't exist.I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses .
.og does n't exist either</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about .co, .om?assigned to colombia and oman respectively but don't allow registrations directly under the tld so not useful for cybersquatters.
.condoesn't exist.I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses.
.og doesn't exist either</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311294</id>
	<title>Re:Wouldn't it be safer to...</title>
	<author>water-and-sewer</author>
	<datestamp>1259860260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, do away with it and go back to gopherspace.  No viruses there, probably.  The WWW is overrated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , do away with it and go back to gopherspace .
No viruses there , probably .
The WWW is overrated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, do away with it and go back to gopherspace.
No viruses there, probably.
The WWW is overrated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307486</id>
	<title>POLL:  have you ever mistyped .cm for .com?</title>
	<author>theNAM666</author>
	<datestamp>1259602320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really?  I've never done it.  Never.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/me goes to point<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm to 127.0.0.1 .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
I 've never done it .
Never. /me goes to point .cm to 127.0.0.1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
I've never done it.
Never. /me goes to point .cm to 127.0.0.1 .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308412</id>
	<title>Re:Wouldn't it be safer to...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259833140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if your web browser had buns of steel, all it would take is for one add-on to be able to run malformed code, and you are compromised.  Browsers are pretty secure, its just getting add-on makers to actually trouble themselves in actually considering end users more than just parasites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if your web browser had buns of steel , all it would take is for one add-on to be able to run malformed code , and you are compromised .
Browsers are pretty secure , its just getting add-on makers to actually trouble themselves in actually considering end users more than just parasites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if your web browser had buns of steel, all it would take is for one add-on to be able to run malformed code, and you are compromised.
Browsers are pretty secure, its just getting add-on makers to actually trouble themselves in actually considering end users more than just parasites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311410</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Spazztastic</author>
	<datestamp>1259860740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wasn't aware that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con wasn't a valid TLD (It should be valid for the scammers).</p></div><p>Really? We should dedicate a whole TLD just for scammers? Was that supposed to be a joke?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>And<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.og was meant to be a joke.</p></div><p>Ok, I guess you <em>did</em> mean it as a joke if you thought that one would fly too. It went over like a lead balloon, though.</p><p>Here's a tip from an internet professional: Do research before you make posts on a site that you can't delete or edit your comments on. If you make a mistake, reply to yourself and correct it. Otherwise people who have karma to burn will correct you, much like myself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't aware that .con was n't a valid TLD ( It should be valid for the scammers ) .Really ?
We should dedicate a whole TLD just for scammers ?
Was that supposed to be a joke ? And .og was meant to be a joke.Ok , I guess you did mean it as a joke if you thought that one would fly too .
It went over like a lead balloon , though.Here 's a tip from an internet professional : Do research before you make posts on a site that you ca n't delete or edit your comments on .
If you make a mistake , reply to yourself and correct it .
Otherwise people who have karma to burn will correct you , much like myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't aware that .con wasn't a valid TLD (It should be valid for the scammers).Really?
We should dedicate a whole TLD just for scammers?
Was that supposed to be a joke?And .og was meant to be a joke.Ok, I guess you did mean it as a joke if you thought that one would fly too.
It went over like a lead balloon, though.Here's a tip from an internet professional: Do research before you make posts on a site that you can't delete or edit your comments on.
If you make a mistake, reply to yourself and correct it.
Otherwise people who have karma to burn will correct you, much like myself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30315516</id>
	<title>Re:No, I don't think it is</title>
	<author>BetterSense</author>
	<datestamp>1259832180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always seem to type c.om, but maybe it's because I type dvorak. My mistakes are different.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always seem to type c.om , but maybe it 's because I type dvorak .
My mistakes are different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always seem to type c.om, but maybe it's because I type dvorak.
My mistakes are different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307886</id>
	<title>To that I'll add</title>
	<author>Sycraft-fu</author>
	<datestamp>1259607840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That different nations treat their TLDs differently. Some sell them to anyone who wants one. You can register them as long as you are willing to pay whatever fee it is they ask. The<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.tv domain is one such domain. Others make the domains available, but only to people or organizations that meet certain requirements like citizenship. Canada (.ca) would be one like that. Any Canadian can have a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.ca domain if they are willing to pay for it, but non-Canadians can't buy one. Still others only use their domain for government or internal functions. The<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.us domain was like that at one time. You could get it only as an entity like a county government or a high school or something (it is now open for registration). Finally some countries simply don't do anything with their TLD, it just isn't used at all and there's no way to get it.</p><p>So just because a TLD exists, doesn't mean it can be used for any given purposes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That different nations treat their TLDs differently .
Some sell them to anyone who wants one .
You can register them as long as you are willing to pay whatever fee it is they ask .
The .tv domain is one such domain .
Others make the domains available , but only to people or organizations that meet certain requirements like citizenship .
Canada ( .ca ) would be one like that .
Any Canadian can have a .ca domain if they are willing to pay for it , but non-Canadians ca n't buy one .
Still others only use their domain for government or internal functions .
The .us domain was like that at one time .
You could get it only as an entity like a county government or a high school or something ( it is now open for registration ) .
Finally some countries simply do n't do anything with their TLD , it just is n't used at all and there 's no way to get it.So just because a TLD exists , does n't mean it can be used for any given purposes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That different nations treat their TLDs differently.
Some sell them to anyone who wants one.
You can register them as long as you are willing to pay whatever fee it is they ask.
The .tv domain is one such domain.
Others make the domains available, but only to people or organizations that meet certain requirements like citizenship.
Canada (.ca) would be one like that.
Any Canadian can have a .ca domain if they are willing to pay for it, but non-Canadians can't buy one.
Still others only use their domain for government or internal functions.
The .us domain was like that at one time.
You could get it only as an entity like a county government or a high school or something (it is now open for registration).
Finally some countries simply don't do anything with their TLD, it just isn't used at all and there's no way to get it.So just because a TLD exists, doesn't mean it can be used for any given purposes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30310792</id>
	<title>Is there an easy way......?</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1259858520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To block any top level domain?   I mean like an entry in the hosts file, etc.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To block any top level domain ?
I mean like an entry in the hosts file , etc.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To block any top level domain?
I mean like an entry in the hosts file, etc.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307662</id>
	<title>white man's fault</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>somehow i just KNOW this is the fault of the white man.</htmltext>
<tokenext>somehow i just KNOW this is the fault of the white man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>somehow i just KNOW this is the fault of the white man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307674</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just went there, and BUY CHEAP VIAGRA yes, it is WILL MAKE YOU 9 INCHES LARGER full of viruses. SO BIG YOU COULD PUT IT ON A BUN AND EAT IT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just went there , and BUY CHEAP VIAGRA yes , it is WILL MAKE YOU 9 INCHES LARGER full of viruses .
SO BIG YOU COULD PUT IT ON A BUN AND EAT IT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just went there, and BUY CHEAP VIAGRA yes, it is WILL MAKE YOU 9 INCHES LARGER full of viruses.
SO BIG YOU COULD PUT IT ON A BUN AND EAT IT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307816</id>
	<title>Re:Auto-Correcting Domains</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's water under the bridge, but in hindsight, it would have been better to not create the alternate TLDs<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co. While I'm at it, tell me there's a good reason we have augmented reality iPhones and 60 MPG cars but not web browsers that autocorrect non-existent TLDs.</p><p>Seriously, why doesn't every browser have a "I don't live in Cameroon or Colombia; auto-correct<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com, don't warn me when doing it, and don't bother me about this again" option? (I know, I know,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.hosts and/or Firefox extensions. Still.)</p></div><p>...or you could just learn to type</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's water under the bridge , but in hindsight , it would have been better to not create the alternate TLDs .cm , .co .
While I 'm at it , tell me there 's a good reason we have augmented reality iPhones and 60 MPG cars but not web browsers that autocorrect non-existent TLDs.Seriously , why does n't every browser have a " I do n't live in Cameroon or Colombia ; auto-correct .cm and .co to .com , do n't warn me when doing it , and do n't bother me about this again " option ?
( I know , I know , .hosts and/or Firefox extensions .
Still. ) ...or you could just learn to type</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's water under the bridge, but in hindsight, it would have been better to not create the alternate TLDs .cm, .co.
While I'm at it, tell me there's a good reason we have augmented reality iPhones and 60 MPG cars but not web browsers that autocorrect non-existent TLDs.Seriously, why doesn't every browser have a "I don't live in Cameroon or Colombia; auto-correct .cm and .co to .com, don't warn me when doing it, and don't bother me about this again" option?
(I know, I know, .hosts and/or Firefox extensions.
Still.)...or you could just learn to type
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308664</id>
	<title>All malware comes from Redmond</title>
	<author>BESTouff</author>
	<datestamp>1259837280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. there's the all-time-highest Hotbed of Malware !</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. there 's the all-time-highest Hotbed of Malware !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. there's the all-time-highest Hotbed of Malware !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307892</id>
	<title>I HATE YOU!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HELLO WORLD HOW ARE YOU?!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HELLO WORLD HOW ARE YOU ? !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HELLO WORLD HOW ARE YOU?!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308644</id>
	<title>Re:No, I don't think it is</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1259836980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So missing the m key, or not pressing it hard enough is logical but missing out the o is just crazy talk?</p><p>I guess that makes sense...if you have a particularly weak index finger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So missing the m key , or not pressing it hard enough is logical but missing out the o is just crazy talk ? I guess that makes sense...if you have a particularly weak index finger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So missing the m key, or not pressing it hard enough is logical but missing out the o is just crazy talk?I guess that makes sense...if you have a particularly weak index finger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307530</id>
	<title>com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never type it, ctrl+enter works in every browser I used to fill in the www and com.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never type it , ctrl + enter works in every browser I used to fill in the www and com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never type it, ctrl+enter works in every browser I used to fill in the www and com.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307712</id>
	<title>No, it comes from....</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1259605320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.pron links</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.pron links</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.pron links</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308860</id>
	<title>Re:No, I don't think it is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259840760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suppose it was something like <a href="http://www.ee/" title="www.ee" rel="nofollow">this</a> [www.ee]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose it was something like this [ www.ee ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose it was something like this [www.ee]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309266</id>
	<title>Re:Missing keys?</title>
	<author>Spad</author>
	<datestamp>1259847720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My usual typo is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.copm</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My usual typo is .copm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My usual typo is .copm</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307470</id>
	<title>first post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FRIST PSOT!</htmltext>
<tokenext>FRIST PSOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FRIST PSOT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30319826</id>
	<title>Re:OpenDNS has an option to fix this</title>
	<author>RocketRabbit</author>
	<datestamp>1259851980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You and the four other people using OpenDNS must really be sitting pretty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You and the four other people using OpenDNS must really be sitting pretty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You and the four other people using OpenDNS must really be sitting pretty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307782</id>
	<title>Cameroon is in Africa!</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1259606160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hereby <strong>denounce</strong> this article &mdash; and the pseudo-statistics in it &mdash; as racist!

</p><p>Gebyy zl nff!..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hereby denounce this article    and the pseudo-statistics in it    as racist !
Gebyy zl nff ! . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hereby denounce this article — and the pseudo-statistics in it — as racist!
Gebyy zl nff!..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30312654</id>
	<title>logical fail: you miss the point entirely</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259864340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet again, someone has a logical disconnect between chair and keyboard. Common occurrences such as these should not surprise me, but I'm always surprised by a lack of common sense. It's amazing how many people think "caveat emptor" is an hors d'oeuvre that should be served on crackers.</p><p>It's not the fucked up websites hosting malware that put computers at risk. It's the fucked up pile of shit Windows that puts computers at risk. If Windows didn't suck donkey dicks, the malware wouldn't even exist.</p><p>I want to grow up to be like Bill Gates: write shitty fucked up code then write code to exploit the holes in my shitty fucked up code, then charge the users for more shitty fucked up code that claims to fix the holes but doesn't, and repeat that cycle until I'm a billionaire too.</p><p>How long will it take for Macroturd to lobby for hate-crime legislation to outlaw Windows bashing?</p><p>Windows, the poster child for the "How To Fuck Up A Computer Foundation".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet again , someone has a logical disconnect between chair and keyboard .
Common occurrences such as these should not surprise me , but I 'm always surprised by a lack of common sense .
It 's amazing how many people think " caveat emptor " is an hors d'oeuvre that should be served on crackers.It 's not the fucked up websites hosting malware that put computers at risk .
It 's the fucked up pile of shit Windows that puts computers at risk .
If Windows did n't suck donkey dicks , the malware would n't even exist.I want to grow up to be like Bill Gates : write shitty fucked up code then write code to exploit the holes in my shitty fucked up code , then charge the users for more shitty fucked up code that claims to fix the holes but does n't , and repeat that cycle until I 'm a billionaire too.How long will it take for Macroturd to lobby for hate-crime legislation to outlaw Windows bashing ? Windows , the poster child for the " How To Fuck Up A Computer Foundation " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet again, someone has a logical disconnect between chair and keyboard.
Common occurrences such as these should not surprise me, but I'm always surprised by a lack of common sense.
It's amazing how many people think "caveat emptor" is an hors d'oeuvre that should be served on crackers.It's not the fucked up websites hosting malware that put computers at risk.
It's the fucked up pile of shit Windows that puts computers at risk.
If Windows didn't suck donkey dicks, the malware wouldn't even exist.I want to grow up to be like Bill Gates: write shitty fucked up code then write code to exploit the holes in my shitty fucked up code, then charge the users for more shitty fucked up code that claims to fix the holes but doesn't, and repeat that cycle until I'm a billionaire too.How long will it take for Macroturd to lobby for hate-crime legislation to outlaw Windows bashing?Windows, the poster child for the "How To Fuck Up A Computer Foundation".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307514</id>
	<title>I am Naga Eboko, exchange student from Cameroon.</title>
	<author>fucket</author>
	<datestamp>1259602620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Beef jerky time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beef jerky time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beef jerky time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309120</id>
	<title>ultimate acai max</title>
	<author>brandyy</author>
	<datestamp>1259845440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Disabling the messenger service will get rid of ONE of Microsoft's Security holes, but there are plenty more which attract 114,000 virii. So, to get RID of malware, just get rid of Microsoft and install a good open source software such as www.kubuntu.org instead.

<a href="http://www.goarticles.com/cgi-bin/showa.cgi?C=2290126" title="goarticles.com" rel="nofollow">ultimate acai max</a> [goarticles.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Disabling the messenger service will get rid of ONE of Microsoft 's Security holes , but there are plenty more which attract 114,000 virii .
So , to get RID of malware , just get rid of Microsoft and install a good open source software such as www.kubuntu.org instead .
ultimate acai max [ goarticles.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disabling the messenger service will get rid of ONE of Microsoft's Security holes, but there are plenty more which attract 114,000 virii.
So, to get RID of malware, just get rid of Microsoft and install a good open source software such as www.kubuntu.org instead.
ultimate acai max [goarticles.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307562</id>
	<title>Yes, but...</title>
	<author>InspectorxGadget</author>
	<datestamp>1259603220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...they make those delightful coconut cookies.  I think we can forgive them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...they make those delightful coconut cookies .
I think we can forgive them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...they make those delightful coconut cookies.
I think we can forgive them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308948</id>
	<title>Re:Auto-Correcting Domains</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259842080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You should try KDE, I think you'd like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You should try KDE , I think you 'd like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should try KDE, I think you'd like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307710</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Lunoria</author>
	<datestamp>1259605320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>what about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om?</p></div></blockquote><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co is Colombia,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.om is Oman, but<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con doesn't exist.</p><blockquote><div><p>They don't seem to be high risk websites.</p></div></blockquote><p>What is "they" in that sentence, or did you mean "TLDs" instead of "websites"?</p><blockquote><div><p>I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses.</p></div></blockquote><p>.og doesn't exist. You might want to consult a list of TLDs before you ask a bunch of "what about" questions. Or install a robust browser and try to load the url instead of just wondering about it.</p></div><p>Yes, I meant TLD's not webistes. I wasn't aware that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.con wasn't a valid TLD (It should be valid for the scammers). And<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.og was meant to be a joke.

I'm not an internet expert, just someone who surfs the web with Firefox and Noscript.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what about .co , .con , .om ?
.co is Colombia , .om is Oman , but .con does n't exist.They do n't seem to be high risk websites.What is " they " in that sentence , or did you mean " TLDs " instead of " websites " ? I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses..og does n't exist .
You might want to consult a list of TLDs before you ask a bunch of " what about " questions .
Or install a robust browser and try to load the url instead of just wondering about it.Yes , I meant TLD 's not webistes .
I was n't aware that .con was n't a valid TLD ( It should be valid for the scammers ) .
And .og was meant to be a joke .
I 'm not an internet expert , just someone who surfs the web with Firefox and Noscript .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about .co, .con, .om?
.co is Colombia, .om is Oman, but .con doesn't exist.They don't seem to be high risk websites.What is "they" in that sentence, or did you mean "TLDs" instead of "websites"?I also wonder whether slashdot.og is infested with viruses..og doesn't exist.
You might want to consult a list of TLDs before you ask a bunch of "what about" questions.
Or install a robust browser and try to load the url instead of just wondering about it.Yes, I meant TLD's not webistes.
I wasn't aware that .con wasn't a valid TLD (It should be valid for the scammers).
And .og was meant to be a joke.
I'm not an internet expert, just someone who surfs the web with Firefox and Noscript.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307802</id>
	<title>Is omitting a letter really a problem?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1259606640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If so, change keyboards.</p><p>I see the real threat in letters getting mixed up (which probably does not matter so much in 3 letter TLDs, since I don't know of a cmo or ogr TLD) or a typo (.con,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.prg), which also usually don't really result in anything damaging.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm being mistyped as<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cn might be a problem, though. But then again, it's like missing the flood to reach the drought, so...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If so , change keyboards.I see the real threat in letters getting mixed up ( which probably does not matter so much in 3 letter TLDs , since I do n't know of a cmo or ogr TLD ) or a typo ( .con , .prg ) , which also usually do n't really result in anything damaging .
.cm being mistyped as .cn might be a problem , though .
But then again , it 's like missing the flood to reach the drought , so.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If so, change keyboards.I see the real threat in letters getting mixed up (which probably does not matter so much in 3 letter TLDs, since I don't know of a cmo or ogr TLD) or a typo (.con, .prg), which also usually don't really result in anything damaging.
.cm being mistyped as .cn might be a problem, though.
But then again, it's like missing the flood to reach the drought, so...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308632</id>
	<title>Re:Auto-Correcting Domains</title>
	<author>Tynin</author>
	<datestamp>1259836740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe because it is a world wide web, and some people who live in the US may not have as limited of interests as you?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe because it is a world wide web , and some people who live in the US may not have as limited of interests as you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe because it is a world wide web, and some people who live in the US may not have as limited of interests as you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307658</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Potor</author>
	<datestamp>1259604660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't remember the last time I typed "com". </p><p>Seriously - with ctrl+enter, who needs to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't remember the last time I typed " com " .
Seriously - with ctrl + enter , who needs to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't remember the last time I typed "com".
Seriously - with ctrl+enter, who needs to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536</id>
	<title>No, I don't think it is</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1259602860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Given that it's very easy to mis-type<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com as<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cm,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>I can safely say I've never done this. I've made other errors - such as ending up in Estonia's (.ee) web space on occasion, since I work in an electrical engineering department. But I can't believe leaving out the "o" from ".com" is particularly easy or at all common.</p><p>Now if you wanted to talk about Colombia (.co) being a frequent typo for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com domains, then I might find it more believable. I have done that on rare occasions.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that it 's very easy to mis-type .com as .cm , ...I can safely say I 've never done this .
I 've made other errors - such as ending up in Estonia 's ( .ee ) web space on occasion , since I work in an electrical engineering department .
But I ca n't believe leaving out the " o " from " .com " is particularly easy or at all common.Now if you wanted to talk about Colombia ( .co ) being a frequent typo for .com domains , then I might find it more believable .
I have done that on rare occasions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Given that it's very easy to mis-type .com as .cm, ...I can safely say I've never done this.
I've made other errors - such as ending up in Estonia's (.ee) web space on occasion, since I work in an electrical engineering department.
But I can't believe leaving out the "o" from ".com" is particularly easy or at all common.Now if you wanted to talk about Colombia (.co) being a frequent typo for .com domains, then I might find it more believable.
I have done that on rare occasions.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307512</id>
	<title>.com default</title>
	<author>feedayeen</author>
	<datestamp>1259602620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most modern browsers insert<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com automatically if no top level domain exist in the URL.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most modern browsers insert .com automatically if no top level domain exist in the URL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most modern browsers insert .com automatically if no top level domain exist in the URL.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311932</id>
	<title>Wow, another reference to Cameroon!</title>
	<author>motherpusbucket</author>
	<datestamp>1259862180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have not heard that country mentioned since Eddie Murphy disguised himself as an exchange student from Cameroon in 'Trading Places' back in the 80's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have not heard that country mentioned since Eddie Murphy disguised himself as an exchange student from Cameroon in 'Trading Places ' back in the 80 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have not heard that country mentioned since Eddie Murphy disguised himself as an exchange student from Cameroon in 'Trading Places' back in the 80's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307826</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.CONNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.CONNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ! ! ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.CONNNNNNNNNNNNNNN!!!!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309416</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1259850240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should be grateful you're not here where we have<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.co.uk addresses.  You wouldn't believe the number of times I've typed in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.cock and got something unexpected popping up on my monitor...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should be grateful you 're not here where we have .co.uk addresses .
You would n't believe the number of times I 've typed in .cock and got something unexpected popping up on my monitor.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should be grateful you're not here where we have .co.uk addresses.
You wouldn't believe the number of times I've typed in .cock and got something unexpected popping up on my monitor...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308152</id>
	<title>Re:Mistype</title>
	<author>Antiocheian</author>
	<datestamp>1259871480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'But wheah's the necessity? It seems an uncommonly woundabout and hopelessly wigmawolish method of getting anywheahs. Look heah now, I've got the wuhks of the mastahs -- the gweat ahchaeologists of the past. I wigh them against each othah -- balance of the disagweements -- analyze the conflicting statements -- decide which is pwobably cowwect- and come to a conclusion. That is the scientific method. At least' -- patronizingly -- 'as I see it. How insuffewably cwude it would be to go to Ahctuwus, oah to Sol, foah instance, and blundah about, when the old mastahs have covahed the gwound so much moah effectually than we could possibly hope to.'</p></div><p>-- Isaac Asimov, <i>Foundation</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'But wheah 's the necessity ?
It seems an uncommonly woundabout and hopelessly wigmawolish method of getting anywheahs .
Look heah now , I 've got the wuhks of the mastahs -- the gweat ahchaeologists of the past .
I wigh them against each othah -- balance of the disagweements -- analyze the conflicting statements -- decide which is pwobably cowwect- and come to a conclusion .
That is the scientific method .
At least ' -- patronizingly -- 'as I see it .
How insuffewably cwude it would be to go to Ahctuwus , oah to Sol , foah instance , and blundah about , when the old mastahs have covahed the gwound so much moah effectually than we could possibly hope to .
'-- Isaac Asimov , Foundation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'But wheah's the necessity?
It seems an uncommonly woundabout and hopelessly wigmawolish method of getting anywheahs.
Look heah now, I've got the wuhks of the mastahs -- the gweat ahchaeologists of the past.
I wigh them against each othah -- balance of the disagweements -- analyze the conflicting statements -- decide which is pwobably cowwect- and come to a conclusion.
That is the scientific method.
At least' -- patronizingly -- 'as I see it.
How insuffewably cwude it would be to go to Ahctuwus, oah to Sol, foah instance, and blundah about, when the old mastahs have covahed the gwound so much moah effectually than we could possibly hope to.
'-- Isaac Asimov, Foundation
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309826</id>
	<title>Re:POLL: have you ever mistyped .cm for .com?</title>
	<author>Nimey</author>
	<datestamp>1259853840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once just recently - I was holding my infant daughter so had to type one-handed.</p><p>OpenDNS caught the error and warned me away from a malware site.  Don't remember where I was going at the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once just recently - I was holding my infant daughter so had to type one-handed.OpenDNS caught the error and warned me away from a malware site .
Do n't remember where I was going at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once just recently - I was holding my infant daughter so had to type one-handed.OpenDNS caught the error and warned me away from a malware site.
Don't remember where I was going at the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309112</id>
	<title>The world is infected! Buy our stuff!</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1259845320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's get real and understand that the real purpose of providing this "information" is marketing. It is there to reinforce the message that the world is hopelessly infected with computer viruses and you absolutely MUST have the offerings of McAffee and other anti-virus software vendors.  I'm not even sure why anyone would believe it is true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's get real and understand that the real purpose of providing this " information " is marketing .
It is there to reinforce the message that the world is hopelessly infected with computer viruses and you absolutely MUST have the offerings of McAffee and other anti-virus software vendors .
I 'm not even sure why anyone would believe it is true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's get real and understand that the real purpose of providing this "information" is marketing.
It is there to reinforce the message that the world is hopelessly infected with computer viruses and you absolutely MUST have the offerings of McAffee and other anti-virus software vendors.
I'm not even sure why anyone would believe it is true.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30315346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30315516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30310362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30319826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_03_0121206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30319826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30315346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30315516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30310362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307588
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308152
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307826
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307944
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307710
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311410
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307724
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30310792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30309266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_03_0121206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30307504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30311294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_03_0121206.30308412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
