<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_12_01_1459234</id>
	<title>MacBook Mod Gives Base Station Chassis New Purpose</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259681400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>odysseus31173 writes <i>"A little over a year ago, I began developing for the iPhone and needed a working mac (not a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackintosh">Hackintosh</a>), so I decided to purchase a MacBook logic board to save on cost. I <a href="http://www.phantomdev.com/macbook\_mod\_2/">modded a Linksys case to accept the logic board</a> (along with all of the other hardware) and made it function again. The Mac currently runs Leopard and has a working iSight and mic along with fully functional WiFi and bluetooth. The RAM is the standard 1 gig, but the hard drive has been upgraded to 160 gigs. The iSight/mic holes in the front panel are hard to see and this could be used as a nanny cam of sorts."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>odysseus31173 writes " A little over a year ago , I began developing for the iPhone and needed a working mac ( not a Hackintosh ) , so I decided to purchase a MacBook logic board to save on cost .
I modded a Linksys case to accept the logic board ( along with all of the other hardware ) and made it function again .
The Mac currently runs Leopard and has a working iSight and mic along with fully functional WiFi and bluetooth .
The RAM is the standard 1 gig , but the hard drive has been upgraded to 160 gigs .
The iSight/mic holes in the front panel are hard to see and this could be used as a nanny cam of sorts .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>odysseus31173 writes "A little over a year ago, I began developing for the iPhone and needed a working mac (not a Hackintosh), so I decided to purchase a MacBook logic board to save on cost.
I modded a Linksys case to accept the logic board (along with all of the other hardware) and made it function again.
The Mac currently runs Leopard and has a working iSight and mic along with fully functional WiFi and bluetooth.
The RAM is the standard 1 gig, but the hard drive has been upgraded to 160 gigs.
The iSight/mic holes in the front panel are hard to see and this could be used as a nanny cam of sorts.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284382</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1259688120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's exactly how my hackintosh works.  I've been installing updates with no problems at all.  The world's changed a lot in the last year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's exactly how my hackintosh works .
I 've been installing updates with no problems at all .
The world 's changed a lot in the last year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's exactly how my hackintosh works.
I've been installing updates with no problems at all.
The world's changed a lot in the last year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30315892</id>
	<title>Re:No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>XLR8DST8</author>
	<datestamp>1259833740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>you could put your weed in there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you could put your weed in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you could put your weed in there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284118</id>
	<title>Another guy did this on a Xbox Dev Kit</title>
	<author>netchaos</author>
	<datestamp>1259686980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>He wanted an ultimate home made machine running OSX to do his video editing in Final Cut Pro.
Cool Worklog <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TggHtINGIyc" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">video </a> [youtube.com]and his <a href="http://www.willudesign.com/osxboxproTop.html" title="willudesign.com" rel="nofollow">project page </a> [willudesign.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>He wanted an ultimate home made machine running OSX to do his video editing in Final Cut Pro .
Cool Worklog video [ youtube.com ] and his project page [ willudesign.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He wanted an ultimate home made machine running OSX to do his video editing in Final Cut Pro.
Cool Worklog video  [youtube.com]and his project page  [willudesign.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285216</id>
	<title>It all evens out</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1259691780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He just used a logic board? Well, I just ordered a new case for my 13-inch MacBook. The universe is in harmony again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He just used a logic board ?
Well , I just ordered a new case for my 13-inch MacBook .
The universe is in harmony again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He just used a logic board?
Well, I just ordered a new case for my 13-inch MacBook.
The universe is in harmony again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285656</id>
	<title>Re:No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>SydShamino</author>
	<datestamp>1259693580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HDD array!  Use the thing as a server.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HDD array !
Use the thing as a server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HDD array!
Use the thing as a server.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292498</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>odysseus31173</author>
	<datestamp>1259680020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah, it is a real mac. The logic board at one time came from a working macbook</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , it is a real mac .
The logic board at one time came from a working macbook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, it is a real mac.
The logic board at one time came from a working macbook</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292524</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>odysseus31173</author>
	<datestamp>1259680200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doing this was about the mod. I already had/have a working mac mini. My time is my time. If you think it has no value, skim the pretty pictures like a 5 year old and go about your trolling</htmltext>
<tokenext>Doing this was about the mod .
I already had/have a working mac mini .
My time is my time .
If you think it has no value , skim the pretty pictures like a 5 year old and go about your trolling</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doing this was about the mod.
I already had/have a working mac mini.
My time is my time.
If you think it has no value, skim the pretty pictures like a 5 year old and go about your trolling</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284564</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259688840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the kind of story I only have to see when I read Slashdot via RSS.  Because when I actually surf to the site, I'm logged in and have stories posted by Timothy blocked. It's funny how consistently he picks stuff that's totally irrelevant or outdated or common-knowledge or in some other way completely un-"nerdy".</p><p>And even funnier how after nearly ten years of sifting through the newsbin he hasn't improved one bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the kind of story I only have to see when I read Slashdot via RSS .
Because when I actually surf to the site , I 'm logged in and have stories posted by Timothy blocked .
It 's funny how consistently he picks stuff that 's totally irrelevant or outdated or common-knowledge or in some other way completely un- " nerdy " .And even funnier how after nearly ten years of sifting through the newsbin he has n't improved one bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the kind of story I only have to see when I read Slashdot via RSS.
Because when I actually surf to the site, I'm logged in and have stories posted by Timothy blocked.
It's funny how consistently he picks stuff that's totally irrelevant or outdated or common-knowledge or in some other way completely un-"nerdy".And even funnier how after nearly ten years of sifting through the newsbin he hasn't improved one bit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30288064</id>
	<title>The first comment on the linked article:</title>
	<author>mr\_lizard13</author>
	<datestamp>1259658720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"You should post this on a modding website &ndash; you would get a bunch of traffic I bet!"
<br>
<br>
I'm sure that now this is on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. he's getting a bunch of traffic just fine without needing to post it on a modding website.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" You should post this on a modding website    you would get a bunch of traffic I bet !
" I 'm sure that now this is on / .
he 's getting a bunch of traffic just fine without needing to post it on a modding website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You should post this on a modding website – you would get a bunch of traffic I bet!
"


I'm sure that now this is on /.
he's getting a bunch of traffic just fine without needing to post it on a modding website.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1259686440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to mention it's another "my time is of no value" story. Why not buy a used Mac and start developing?</p><p>Well, I need some breakfast. Excuse me while I go raise a pig and a chicken and sow some wheat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention it 's another " my time is of no value " story .
Why not buy a used Mac and start developing ? Well , I need some breakfast .
Excuse me while I go raise a pig and a chicken and sow some wheat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention it's another "my time is of no value" story.
Why not buy a used Mac and start developing?Well, I need some breakfast.
Excuse me while I go raise a pig and a chicken and sow some wheat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291240</id>
	<title>Re:iSight?</title>
	<author>rantingkitten</author>
	<datestamp>1259672580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think part of the difference is that most people just say "webcam" for all the other products.  Anyone who constantly said "Lifecam" instead would get weird looks.  But because it's an <b>APPLE</b> product people actually refer to it as "iSight" and take that seriously.  It's bizarre. <br>
<br>
Other examples of this mentality:  <br>
<br>
If talking about a Dell, HP, IBM, Acer, or any other type of laptop, most people just say "laptop".  "Hey, grab your laptop and get over here," or "I hear Jane got a new laptop."  <br>
<br>
But not with Apple.  Oh no.  Then it <b>must</b> be called a Macbook.  "Woah, nice Macbook."  "Hey, how come Joe got a Macbook from IT?" <br>
<br>
There are a thousand different mp3 players out there and most people just say "mp3 player" or "music player".  Unless it's an Apple product.  Then it's an <b>iPod!</b>  Woo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think part of the difference is that most people just say " webcam " for all the other products .
Anyone who constantly said " Lifecam " instead would get weird looks .
But because it 's an APPLE product people actually refer to it as " iSight " and take that seriously .
It 's bizarre .
Other examples of this mentality : If talking about a Dell , HP , IBM , Acer , or any other type of laptop , most people just say " laptop " .
" Hey , grab your laptop and get over here , " or " I hear Jane got a new laptop .
" But not with Apple .
Oh no .
Then it must be called a Macbook .
" Woah , nice Macbook .
" " Hey , how come Joe got a Macbook from IT ?
" There are a thousand different mp3 players out there and most people just say " mp3 player " or " music player " .
Unless it 's an Apple product .
Then it 's an iPod !
Woo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think part of the difference is that most people just say "webcam" for all the other products.
Anyone who constantly said "Lifecam" instead would get weird looks.
But because it's an APPLE product people actually refer to it as "iSight" and take that seriously.
It's bizarre.
Other examples of this mentality:  

If talking about a Dell, HP, IBM, Acer, or any other type of laptop, most people just say "laptop".
"Hey, grab your laptop and get over here," or "I hear Jane got a new laptop.
"  

But not with Apple.
Oh no.
Then it must be called a Macbook.
"Woah, nice Macbook.
"  "Hey, how come Joe got a Macbook from IT?
" 

There are a thousand different mp3 players out there and most people just say "mp3 player" or "music player".
Unless it's an Apple product.
Then it's an iPod!
Woo!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285920</id>
	<title>Prior art: iBox</title>
	<author>illogic</author>
	<datestamp>1259694420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was a big thing a few years back, when everyone seemed to want a small Mac desktop in a "pizza box" form factor.  I guess this was pre-Mac Mini.  You would get a PowerMac G4 logic board and power supply, and add your own case and accessories.  Someone even came up with a concept for a ready made kit called the iBox which was a bring-your-own-logic-board PowerMac system.  Not sure if that ever really saw the light of day.  I really wanted one.</p><p><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2003/04/58310" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2003/04/58310</a> [wired.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This was a big thing a few years back , when everyone seemed to want a small Mac desktop in a " pizza box " form factor .
I guess this was pre-Mac Mini .
You would get a PowerMac G4 logic board and power supply , and add your own case and accessories .
Someone even came up with a concept for a ready made kit called the iBox which was a bring-your-own-logic-board PowerMac system .
Not sure if that ever really saw the light of day .
I really wanted one.http : //www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2003/04/58310 [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was a big thing a few years back, when everyone seemed to want a small Mac desktop in a "pizza box" form factor.
I guess this was pre-Mac Mini.
You would get a PowerMac G4 logic board and power supply, and add your own case and accessories.
Someone even came up with a concept for a ready made kit called the iBox which was a bring-your-own-logic-board PowerMac system.
Not sure if that ever really saw the light of day.
I really wanted one.http://www.wired.com/gadgets/mac/news/2003/04/58310 [wired.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30294562</id>
	<title>I've thought about doing something similar</title>
	<author>johnkzin</author>
	<datestamp>1259612640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Macbook Air motherboard might lend itself quite well to the innards of a eviGroup tablet, or something along those lines (I also happen to have a Samsung Q1 Ultra I'm barely using).  It wont be a pretty, nor cheap, Apple Tablet, but if Apple doesn't pull their heads out, it might be the only way to get one that's legal.</p><p>Though, with the economy the way it is lately, I don't have that kind of throw-away money right now.  But the idea keeps sitting there in the back of my mind...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Macbook Air motherboard might lend itself quite well to the innards of a eviGroup tablet , or something along those lines ( I also happen to have a Samsung Q1 Ultra I 'm barely using ) .
It wont be a pretty , nor cheap , Apple Tablet , but if Apple does n't pull their heads out , it might be the only way to get one that 's legal.Though , with the economy the way it is lately , I do n't have that kind of throw-away money right now .
But the idea keeps sitting there in the back of my mind.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Macbook Air motherboard might lend itself quite well to the innards of a eviGroup tablet, or something along those lines (I also happen to have a Samsung Q1 Ultra I'm barely using).
It wont be a pretty, nor cheap, Apple Tablet, but if Apple doesn't pull their heads out, it might be the only way to get one that's legal.Though, with the economy the way it is lately, I don't have that kind of throw-away money right now.
But the idea keeps sitting there in the back of my mind...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285456</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Sandbags</author>
	<datestamp>1259692800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if he did it for less than the cost of buying the same model Mac (used, and out of waranty), then it's a win.  If a used/refurb Mac of the same or better model WITH a waranty costs less, then it;s a big lose...  In fact, I'd say, to be a viable system and worth the effort, it would have to cost 70\% or less than a used Mac with a waranty, including all the parts needed to make this what it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if he did it for less than the cost of buying the same model Mac ( used , and out of waranty ) , then it 's a win .
If a used/refurb Mac of the same or better model WITH a waranty costs less , then it ; s a big lose... In fact , I 'd say , to be a viable system and worth the effort , it would have to cost 70 \ % or less than a used Mac with a waranty , including all the parts needed to make this what it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if he did it for less than the cost of buying the same model Mac (used, and out of waranty), then it's a win.
If a used/refurb Mac of the same or better model WITH a waranty costs less, then it;s a big lose...  In fact, I'd say, to be a viable system and worth the effort, it would have to cost 70\% or less than a used Mac with a waranty, including all the parts needed to make this what it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284810</id>
	<title>Re:iSight?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259689920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, what were they thinking?  No one ever names their products!  Apple's iSight, Microsoft's LifeCam, and Logitech's QuickCam should all just be renamed "camera"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , what were they thinking ?
No one ever names their products !
Apple 's iSight , Microsoft 's LifeCam , and Logitech 's QuickCam should all just be renamed " camera "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, what were they thinking?
No one ever names their products!
Apple's iSight, Microsoft's LifeCam, and Logitech's QuickCam should all just be renamed "camera"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764</id>
	<title>Looks like a Hackintosh to Me</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1259685420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, I know it isn't OSX installed on a PC but, when you've done that much work to make a computer that runs OSX, I think it qualifies as a Hackintosh.<br> <br>
And that's not a bad thing - I use a Mac every day and recently got myself an MSI Wind and set it up to dual boot Ubuntu and OSX so I'm all for a little Hackintosh love so don't take my above comment as a knock. If anything, I respect the work you did. But, let's call it what it is - you've hacked together some hardware to get a computer running OSX. It be a Hackintosh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , I know it is n't OSX installed on a PC but , when you 've done that much work to make a computer that runs OSX , I think it qualifies as a Hackintosh .
And that 's not a bad thing - I use a Mac every day and recently got myself an MSI Wind and set it up to dual boot Ubuntu and OSX so I 'm all for a little Hackintosh love so do n't take my above comment as a knock .
If anything , I respect the work you did .
But , let 's call it what it is - you 've hacked together some hardware to get a computer running OSX .
It be a Hackintosh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, I know it isn't OSX installed on a PC but, when you've done that much work to make a computer that runs OSX, I think it qualifies as a Hackintosh.
And that's not a bad thing - I use a Mac every day and recently got myself an MSI Wind and set it up to dual boot Ubuntu and OSX so I'm all for a little Hackintosh love so don't take my above comment as a knock.
If anything, I respect the work you did.
But, let's call it what it is - you've hacked together some hardware to get a computer running OSX.
It be a Hackintosh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285100</id>
	<title>Re:No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>omnichad</author>
	<datestamp>1259691180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What would you do with all the rest of the empty space inside?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What would you do with all the rest of the empty space inside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would you do with all the rest of the empty space inside?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283862</id>
	<title>I deem this f'ing stupid</title>
	<author>TyroneShoe</author>
	<datestamp>1259685780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>nuff said</htmltext>
<tokenext>nuff said</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nuff said</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30287416</id>
	<title>Misleading title</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1259699520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Was I the only one expecting a lava lamp?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Was I the only one expecting a lava lamp ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Was I the only one expecting a lava lamp?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285030</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And how are you going to get your grilled mushrooms &amp; tomatoes, baked beans, and fried potatos out of that lot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And how are you going to get your grilled mushrooms &amp; tomatoes , baked beans , and fried potatos out of that lot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how are you going to get your grilled mushrooms &amp; tomatoes, baked beans, and fried potatos out of that lot?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291566</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>kklein</author>
	<datestamp>1259674380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not to mention it's another "my time is of no value" story. Why not buy a used Mac and start developing?</p></div><p>Yes. This is actually part of how I ended up on the Mac. I used them until 1998, but then was drawn to Windows because it was better at the time, and because I was lured in by how cheaply you could buy parts and build your own machine. This made a lot of sense to a poor college student. However, as the years went on, and as I told everyone this was no problem and anyone could do it, I started really hating losing tons of time. Then Vista came out. And handing a company a wad of cash and getting a machine that worked right away in return started looking like a much better value.

</p><p>I get the whole DIY mentality, but projects like this are just ridiculous. He has spent a huge amount of time and created something that retains no value (who will buy it when he wants to get rid of it?), probably will crap out at some point, and which--let's be honest--is ugly as sin. I think he just didn't want to be accused of having a decent-looking computer in his basement, and had a lot of time to sink into finding parts and building a case from discarded other cases...

</p><p>Preposterous.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention it 's another " my time is of no value " story .
Why not buy a used Mac and start developing ? Yes .
This is actually part of how I ended up on the Mac .
I used them until 1998 , but then was drawn to Windows because it was better at the time , and because I was lured in by how cheaply you could buy parts and build your own machine .
This made a lot of sense to a poor college student .
However , as the years went on , and as I told everyone this was no problem and anyone could do it , I started really hating losing tons of time .
Then Vista came out .
And handing a company a wad of cash and getting a machine that worked right away in return started looking like a much better value .
I get the whole DIY mentality , but projects like this are just ridiculous .
He has spent a huge amount of time and created something that retains no value ( who will buy it when he wants to get rid of it ?
) , probably will crap out at some point , and which--let 's be honest--is ugly as sin .
I think he just did n't want to be accused of having a decent-looking computer in his basement , and had a lot of time to sink into finding parts and building a case from discarded other cases.. . Preposterous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention it's another "my time is of no value" story.
Why not buy a used Mac and start developing?Yes.
This is actually part of how I ended up on the Mac.
I used them until 1998, but then was drawn to Windows because it was better at the time, and because I was lured in by how cheaply you could buy parts and build your own machine.
This made a lot of sense to a poor college student.
However, as the years went on, and as I told everyone this was no problem and anyone could do it, I started really hating losing tons of time.
Then Vista came out.
And handing a company a wad of cash and getting a machine that worked right away in return started looking like a much better value.
I get the whole DIY mentality, but projects like this are just ridiculous.
He has spent a huge amount of time and created something that retains no value (who will buy it when he wants to get rid of it?
), probably will crap out at some point, and which--let's be honest--is ugly as sin.
I think he just didn't want to be accused of having a decent-looking computer in his basement, and had a lot of time to sink into finding parts and building a case from discarded other cases...

Preposterous.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283716</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259685240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congrats on having the ugliest mac ever.  Clever though.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats on having the ugliest mac ever .
Clever though .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats on having the ugliest mac ever.
Clever though.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285158</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1259691480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure.  But you have no guarantee it will continue to work.  As the Atom hackintosh owners found out.</p><p>It might be a small risk, but it's a risk nevertheless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure .
But you have no guarantee it will continue to work .
As the Atom hackintosh owners found out.It might be a small risk , but it 's a risk nevertheless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure.
But you have no guarantee it will continue to work.
As the Atom hackintosh owners found out.It might be a small risk, but it's a risk nevertheless.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30290688</id>
	<title>Re:iSight?</title>
	<author>Drenaran</author>
	<datestamp>1259670120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand your point, but the other two examples at least have "cam" somewhere in there.  That way you can go "oh, they mean a camera".  iSight?  I thought at first it was some sort of special addon for blind people.  That's the only reason I griped, and my bad for coming off as a Troll.</p><p>The name still sucks though. (iCam would of made more sense)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand your point , but the other two examples at least have " cam " somewhere in there .
That way you can go " oh , they mean a camera " .
iSight ? I thought at first it was some sort of special addon for blind people .
That 's the only reason I griped , and my bad for coming off as a Troll.The name still sucks though .
( iCam would of made more sense )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand your point, but the other two examples at least have "cam" somewhere in there.
That way you can go "oh, they mean a camera".
iSight?  I thought at first it was some sort of special addon for blind people.
That's the only reason I griped, and my bad for coming off as a Troll.The name still sucks though.
(iCam would of made more sense)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283924</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1259686080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... and put it in a case.</p><p>And it worked.</p></div><p>Worked, past tense.</p><p>He hosted TFArticle on the abomination, and it apparently decided to put itself out of its misery.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and put it in a case.And it worked.Worked , past tense.He hosted TFArticle on the abomination , and it apparently decided to put itself out of its misery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and put it in a case.And it worked.Worked, past tense.He hosted TFArticle on the abomination, and it apparently decided to put itself out of its misery.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284478</id>
	<title>iSight?</title>
	<author>Drenaran</author>
	<datestamp>1259688540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... Really?  iSight?  They really came up with a special Apple-only name for a camera?</p><p>Okay, I give up, excuse me while I find a truck to stand in front of (... knowing my luck it will be an iTruck).</p><p>Sincerely,<br>iSuck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... Really ? iSight ?
They really came up with a special Apple-only name for a camera ? Okay , I give up , excuse me while I find a truck to stand in front of ( ... knowing my luck it will be an iTruck ) .Sincerely,iSuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... Really?  iSight?
They really came up with a special Apple-only name for a camera?Okay, I give up, excuse me while I find a truck to stand in front of (... knowing my luck it will be an iTruck).Sincerely,iSuck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30296192</id>
	<title>Re:No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>SpooForBrains</author>
	<datestamp>1259589600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.destruc.tv/minitosh/" title="destruc.tv">This guy has done one</a> [destruc.tv], although it's not a step-by-step, most of the important details of how he did it are missing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy has done one [ destruc.tv ] , although it 's not a step-by-step , most of the important details of how he did it are missing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy has done one [destruc.tv], although it's not a step-by-step, most of the important details of how he did it are missing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285026</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259690880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because we all know a pretty box adds around 42\% in performance, the same all pop stars are better "artist" because they are pretty... Dumbass</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because we all know a pretty box adds around 42 \ % in performance , the same all pop stars are better " artist " because they are pretty... Dumbass</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because we all know a pretty box adds around 42\% in performance, the same all pop stars are better "artist" because they are pretty... Dumbass</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284168</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259687160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>no shit. hey, i bought a PC with a beige case and painted it orange. do i get my own slashdot story now too? we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints, glossy versus flat, and other really fascinating pieces of technicality! it'll be great<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... for a slow news day</p></div><p>Don't be absurd, that's not news at all.
<br> <br>
Now if you were to make a stencil of the Apple logo and paint it on the side of your machine, you could write a howto on that and make the front page of Slashdot for sure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>no shit .
hey , i bought a PC with a beige case and painted it orange .
do i get my own slashdot story now too ?
we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints , glossy versus flat , and other really fascinating pieces of technicality !
it 'll be great ... for a slow news dayDo n't be absurd , that 's not news at all .
Now if you were to make a stencil of the Apple logo and paint it on the side of your machine , you could write a howto on that and make the front page of Slashdot for sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no shit.
hey, i bought a PC with a beige case and painted it orange.
do i get my own slashdot story now too?
we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints, glossy versus flat, and other really fascinating pieces of technicality!
it'll be great ... for a slow news dayDon't be absurd, that's not news at all.
Now if you were to make a stencil of the Apple logo and paint it on the side of your machine, you could write a howto on that and make the front page of Slashdot for sure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283884</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259685900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>no shit.  hey, i bought a PC with a beige case and painted it orange.  do i get my own slashdot story now too?  we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints, glossy versus flat, and other really fascinating pieces of technicality!  it'll be great<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... for a slow news day</htmltext>
<tokenext>no shit .
hey , i bought a PC with a beige case and painted it orange .
do i get my own slashdot story now too ?
we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints , glossy versus flat , and other really fascinating pieces of technicality !
it 'll be great ... for a slow news day</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no shit.
hey, i bought a PC with a beige case and painted it orange.
do i get my own slashdot story now too?
we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints, glossy versus flat, and other really fascinating pieces of technicality!
it'll be great ... for a slow news day</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</id>
	<title>So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Viol8</author>
	<datestamp>1259685300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and put it in a case.</p><p>And it worked.</p><p>Umm yeah , and?</p><p>Must be a REALLY slow news day today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and put it in a case.And it worked.Umm yeah , and ? Must be a REALLY slow news day today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and put it in a case.And it worked.Umm yeah , and?Must be a REALLY slow news day today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283728</id>
	<title>Down already?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259685240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdotted already?!? Damn you people!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotted already ? ! ?
Damn you people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotted already?!?
Damn you people!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283790</id>
	<title>Not a bad little hack</title>
	<author>scubamage</author>
	<datestamp>1259685600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not the greatest mod ever, but he probably saved a ton of cash by buying the logic board and doing it this way. Gives me some ideas actually. Using the linksys box is kind of an interesting choice, but hey, whatever works. Kinda amazed he was able to get the isight thinger working too. I wonder how airflow will be? May wanna mount in a fan or two for exhaust and intake...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the greatest mod ever , but he probably saved a ton of cash by buying the logic board and doing it this way .
Gives me some ideas actually .
Using the linksys box is kind of an interesting choice , but hey , whatever works .
Kinda amazed he was able to get the isight thinger working too .
I wonder how airflow will be ?
May wan na mount in a fan or two for exhaust and intake.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the greatest mod ever, but he probably saved a ton of cash by buying the logic board and doing it this way.
Gives me some ideas actually.
Using the linksys box is kind of an interesting choice, but hey, whatever works.
Kinda amazed he was able to get the isight thinger working too.
I wonder how airflow will be?
May wanna mount in a fan or two for exhaust and intake...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30441870</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>bryan1945</author>
	<datestamp>1260872880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when someone puts together a standard PC into a strange case, it is awesome, yet when it is a Mac it gets a yawn?</p><p>I personally think it's neat.  Just wish I had enough time to screw around with stuff like this (I spend enough time raking up the dang leaves in my yard.  Well using the leaf blower, but you get the point).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when someone puts together a standard PC into a strange case , it is awesome , yet when it is a Mac it gets a yawn ? I personally think it 's neat .
Just wish I had enough time to screw around with stuff like this ( I spend enough time raking up the dang leaves in my yard .
Well using the leaf blower , but you get the point ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when someone puts together a standard PC into a strange case, it is awesome, yet when it is a Mac it gets a yawn?I personally think it's neat.
Just wish I had enough time to screw around with stuff like this (I spend enough time raking up the dang leaves in my yard.
Well using the leaf blower, but you get the point).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285562</id>
	<title>Clever, but -</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1259693220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Installing OSX on a Linksys router, now <i>that'd</i> be impressive.<br> <br> (You can already install Linux, of course - <a href="http://lifehacker.com/178132/hack-attack-turn-your-60-router-into-a-600-router" title="lifehacker.com">http://lifehacker.com/178132/hack-attack-turn-your-60-router-into-a-600-router</a> [lifehacker.com])</htmltext>
<tokenext>Installing OSX on a Linksys router , now that 'd be impressive .
( You can already install Linux , of course - http : //lifehacker.com/178132/hack-attack-turn-your-60-router-into-a-600-router [ lifehacker.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Installing OSX on a Linksys router, now that'd be impressive.
(You can already install Linux, of course - http://lifehacker.com/178132/hack-attack-turn-your-60-router-into-a-600-router [lifehacker.com])</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285084</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>jim\_v2000</author>
	<datestamp>1259691120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What do you mean "non-mac hardware"?  The mainboard is the only "mac" hardware in the machine.  The rest is Intel, Nvidia, ATI, and Western Digitital, LG, etc.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean " non-mac hardware " ?
The mainboard is the only " mac " hardware in the machine .
The rest is Intel , Nvidia , ATI , and Western Digitital , LG , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean "non-mac hardware"?
The mainboard is the only "mac" hardware in the machine.
The rest is Intel, Nvidia, ATI, and Western Digitital, LG, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283780</id>
	<title>Ooh, you installed OS X on a non-Apple-branded...</title>
	<author>jeffb (2.718)</author>
	<datestamp>1259685540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...er, box.  I'm tellin' Apple!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...er , box .
I 'm tellin ' Apple !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...er, box.
I'm tellin' Apple!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285430</id>
	<title>Or...</title>
	<author>jours</author>
	<datestamp>1259692680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh.  I see the top case with the keyboard in one of your pictures.  So for less than $200 shipped (and a lot less work) you could've bought the <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/MacBook-White-Bottom-Case-Version-2-NEW-Grade-A\_W0QQitemZ220515535032QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH\_DefaultDomain\_0?hash=item3357c008b8" title="ebay.com">bottom case</a> [ebay.com] and a <a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/Apple-Macbook-White-Replacement-13-Glossy-Screen\_W0QQitemZ150393601331QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH\_DefaultDomain\_0?hash=item2304283d33" title="ebay.com">replacement screen</a> [ebay.com] and built a laptop.</p><p>Of course then you wouldn't be on slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh .
I see the top case with the keyboard in one of your pictures .
So for less than $ 200 shipped ( and a lot less work ) you could 've bought the bottom case [ ebay.com ] and a replacement screen [ ebay.com ] and built a laptop.Of course then you would n't be on slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh.
I see the top case with the keyboard in one of your pictures.
So for less than $200 shipped (and a lot less work) you could've bought the bottom case [ebay.com] and a replacement screen [ebay.com] and built a laptop.Of course then you wouldn't be on slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284052</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1259686620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With the important distinction that as far as the OS cares it's a real Mac.  Thus OS updates work with no problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With the important distinction that as far as the OS cares it 's a real Mac .
Thus OS updates work with no problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the important distinction that as far as the OS cares it's a real Mac.
Thus OS updates work with no problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283806</id>
	<title>Link already dead</title>
	<author>Zontar\_Thing\_From\_Ve</author>
	<datestamp>1259685600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The link to the article on the mod is already dead and showing a "database error".</htmltext>
<tokenext>The link to the article on the mod is already dead and showing a " database error " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The link to the article on the mod is already dead and showing a "database error".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292538</id>
	<title>Re:No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>odysseus31173</author>
	<datestamp>1259680320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had an old 512k that I was thinking about using. Maybe if I do another one in the future.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I had an old 512k that I was thinking about using .
Maybe if I do another one in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had an old 512k that I was thinking about using.
Maybe if I do another one in the future.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284844</id>
	<title>Re:No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>Predius</author>
	<datestamp>1259690040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never could find an appropriate LCD for this, but that was pre netbook era so maybe things have improved.  My hang up was wanting better than 800x600 in that size.  I almost went with a CRT instead as you can still find old high res VGA displays from sales terminals in 8" but never pulled the trigger.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never could find an appropriate LCD for this , but that was pre netbook era so maybe things have improved .
My hang up was wanting better than 800x600 in that size .
I almost went with a CRT instead as you can still find old high res VGA displays from sales terminals in 8 " but never pulled the trigger .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never could find an appropriate LCD for this, but that was pre netbook era so maybe things have improved.
My hang up was wanting better than 800x600 in that size.
I almost went with a CRT instead as you can still find old high res VGA displays from sales terminals in 8" but never pulled the trigger.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283918</id>
	<title>Re:Link already dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259686080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>heres a link to the google cache<br>http://tinyurl.com/ykht44h</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>heres a link to the google cachehttp : //tinyurl.com/ykht44h</tokentext>
<sentencetext>heres a link to the google cachehttp://tinyurl.com/ykht44h</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284866</id>
	<title>Fugly</title>
	<author>gregthebunny</author>
	<datestamp>1259690100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That double-wide Linksys case looks stupid. I'm just sayin'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That double-wide Linksys case looks stupid .
I 'm just sayin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That double-wide Linksys case looks stupid.
I'm just sayin'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283760</id>
	<title>Who the hell cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259685420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've built plenty of computers in my day, and never submitted a story about it.

Now get the hell off of my lawn.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've built plenty of computers in my day , and never submitted a story about it .
Now get the hell off of my lawn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've built plenty of computers in my day, and never submitted a story about it.
Now get the hell off of my lawn.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736</id>
	<title>Um</title>
	<author>somersault</author>
	<datestamp>1259685300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think hacking together your own "Mac" out of a mac logic board and non-mac hardware still counts as being a "Hackintosh".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think hacking together your own " Mac " out of a mac logic board and non-mac hardware still counts as being a " Hackintosh " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think hacking together your own "Mac" out of a mac logic board and non-mac hardware still counts as being a "Hackintosh".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292566</id>
	<title>Re:Ooh, you installed OS X on a non-Apple-branded.</title>
	<author>odysseus31173</author>
	<datestamp>1259680500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The logic board wasn't that bad in terms of cost. I think it was 150, I stalked ebay and google. So the total price to complete this was like 250 or so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The logic board was n't that bad in terms of cost .
I think it was 150 , I stalked ebay and google .
So the total price to complete this was like 250 or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The logic board wasn't that bad in terms of cost.
I think it was 150, I stalked ebay and google.
So the total price to complete this was like 250 or so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285144</id>
	<title>More of Case Mod...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259691420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is more of a "case mod" type hack than a hardware or software hack. Style points gained for actually putting it together. No points awarded for doing anything new.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is more of a " case mod " type hack than a hardware or software hack .
Style points gained for actually putting it together .
No points awarded for doing anything new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is more of a "case mod" type hack than a hardware or software hack.
Style points gained for actually putting it together.
No points awarded for doing anything new.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283698</id>
	<title>Nanny cam of sorts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259685180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The iSight/mic holes in the front panel are hard to see and this could be used as a nanny cam of sorts."</p><p>Make sure you load it with porn that "happens" to appear when you touch any button at all, and send me the tapes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The iSight/mic holes in the front panel are hard to see and this could be used as a nanny cam of sorts .
" Make sure you load it with porn that " happens " to appear when you touch any button at all , and send me the tapes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The iSight/mic holes in the front panel are hard to see and this could be used as a nanny cam of sorts.
"Make sure you load it with porn that "happens" to appear when you touch any button at all, and send me the tapes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30287708</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259700660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a somewhat unusual case mod.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. gets the occasional case mod story and this one is no different.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a somewhat unusual case mod .
/. gets the occasional case mod story and this one is no different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a somewhat unusual case mod.
/. gets the occasional case mod story and this one is no different.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284128</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1259687040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So you bolted together a Mac from parts and put it in a case.

</p><p>And it worked.

</p><p>Umm yeah , and?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>And now it's a nice puddle of Slashdottedness.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So you bolted together a Mac from parts and put it in a case .
And it worked .
Umm yeah , and ?
And now it 's a nice puddle of Slashdottedness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you bolted together a Mac from parts and put it in a case.
And it worked.
Umm yeah , and?
And now it's a nice puddle of Slashdottedness.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291114</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259672040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paints</p></div><p>So, which would you use to restore an old NeXTcube?</p><p>Or should I just burn it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paintsSo , which would you use to restore an old NeXTcube ? Or should I just burn it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we can talk about the technical differences between latex and enamel paintsSo, which would you use to restore an old NeXTcube?Or should I just burn it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30289766</id>
	<title>Re:Um</title>
	<author>MrCrassic</author>
	<datestamp>1259665920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just in case anyone thinks building a Hackintosh is clearly bad...</p><p>Installing OS X can be an easy process IF the hardware which it's being installed on plays nice with it. I believe a lot of people, myself included, got turned off to getting OS X working on their machines because of the *MANY* issues people faced while trying to get Tiger to work. Now that the entire OS is written for the x86 platform, many machines with Core 2 Duo processors or higher can at least install OS X Leopard or Snow Leopard using the <b>retail disc</b>, which was never possible previously. The only thing that's needed to get the disc to boot is a bootloader that can recognize it.</p><p>Choosing the right hardware makes a huge difference in getting OS X running just right. Lots of people run into issues with sound, graphics and wireless, but they also fail to consider that these fail because OS X lacks the native support to make them work. Furthermore, many of those experiencing growing pains fail to look at the HUGE wiki of compatible devices that have been tried and proven working.</p><p>I was able to get OS X Snow Leopard installed on my Dell Latitude E-series laptop with minimal pitfalls. The only trip-ups are in areas that don't bother me, but might bother others. I can't sleep the machine if I want to keep my webcam and USB 2.0 at the moment, and everyone's having problems shutting down and restarting their machines using ACPI. Considering the minimal amount of time I needed to get it up and urnning, I consider these side effects negligible. The fact that I can use OS X in my daily workflow and virtualize Windows 7 within it is more than enough to keep me happy.</p><p>In the end, though, I wouldn't recommend that people build rigs expressly for getting OS X installed on it unless it differs significantly from Apple's offerings and is significantly less expensive. Their prices are coming down quite nicely, so I don't think they are as unreasonable as they used to be. Plus, their Mac Pro is pretty nice...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just in case anyone thinks building a Hackintosh is clearly bad...Installing OS X can be an easy process IF the hardware which it 's being installed on plays nice with it .
I believe a lot of people , myself included , got turned off to getting OS X working on their machines because of the * MANY * issues people faced while trying to get Tiger to work .
Now that the entire OS is written for the x86 platform , many machines with Core 2 Duo processors or higher can at least install OS X Leopard or Snow Leopard using the retail disc , which was never possible previously .
The only thing that 's needed to get the disc to boot is a bootloader that can recognize it.Choosing the right hardware makes a huge difference in getting OS X running just right .
Lots of people run into issues with sound , graphics and wireless , but they also fail to consider that these fail because OS X lacks the native support to make them work .
Furthermore , many of those experiencing growing pains fail to look at the HUGE wiki of compatible devices that have been tried and proven working.I was able to get OS X Snow Leopard installed on my Dell Latitude E-series laptop with minimal pitfalls .
The only trip-ups are in areas that do n't bother me , but might bother others .
I ca n't sleep the machine if I want to keep my webcam and USB 2.0 at the moment , and everyone 's having problems shutting down and restarting their machines using ACPI .
Considering the minimal amount of time I needed to get it up and urnning , I consider these side effects negligible .
The fact that I can use OS X in my daily workflow and virtualize Windows 7 within it is more than enough to keep me happy.In the end , though , I would n't recommend that people build rigs expressly for getting OS X installed on it unless it differs significantly from Apple 's offerings and is significantly less expensive .
Their prices are coming down quite nicely , so I do n't think they are as unreasonable as they used to be .
Plus , their Mac Pro is pretty nice.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just in case anyone thinks building a Hackintosh is clearly bad...Installing OS X can be an easy process IF the hardware which it's being installed on plays nice with it.
I believe a lot of people, myself included, got turned off to getting OS X working on their machines because of the *MANY* issues people faced while trying to get Tiger to work.
Now that the entire OS is written for the x86 platform, many machines with Core 2 Duo processors or higher can at least install OS X Leopard or Snow Leopard using the retail disc, which was never possible previously.
The only thing that's needed to get the disc to boot is a bootloader that can recognize it.Choosing the right hardware makes a huge difference in getting OS X running just right.
Lots of people run into issues with sound, graphics and wireless, but they also fail to consider that these fail because OS X lacks the native support to make them work.
Furthermore, many of those experiencing growing pains fail to look at the HUGE wiki of compatible devices that have been tried and proven working.I was able to get OS X Snow Leopard installed on my Dell Latitude E-series laptop with minimal pitfalls.
The only trip-ups are in areas that don't bother me, but might bother others.
I can't sleep the machine if I want to keep my webcam and USB 2.0 at the moment, and everyone's having problems shutting down and restarting their machines using ACPI.
Considering the minimal amount of time I needed to get it up and urnning, I consider these side effects negligible.
The fact that I can use OS X in my daily workflow and virtualize Windows 7 within it is more than enough to keep me happy.In the end, though, I wouldn't recommend that people build rigs expressly for getting OS X installed on it unless it differs significantly from Apple's offerings and is significantly less expensive.
Their prices are coming down quite nicely, so I don't think they are as unreasonable as they used to be.
Plus, their Mac Pro is pretty nice...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30300158</id>
	<title>Re:So you bolted together a Mac from parts ...</title>
	<author>oh\_my\_080980980</author>
	<datestamp>1259609700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did you read the article.  The guy took a Macbook motherboard, components, and  mounted them inside a Linksys router case and it worked!
<br> <br>
That's some real skills.  Something you obviously lack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you read the article .
The guy took a Macbook motherboard , components , and mounted them inside a Linksys router case and it worked !
That 's some real skills .
Something you obviously lack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you read the article.
The guy took a Macbook motherboard, components, and  mounted them inside a Linksys router case and it worked!
That's some real skills.
Something you obviously lack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284074</id>
	<title>Mandatory mirroring for all fing articles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259686740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, feed the articles one time through coral so slashdot borks less of the internet, or at least more than the first 400 people that click on a link can see the fing article.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , feed the articles one time through coral so slashdot borks less of the internet , or at least more than the first 400 people that click on a link can see the fing article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, feed the articles one time through coral so slashdot borks less of the internet, or at least more than the first 400 people that click on a link can see the fing article.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283974</id>
	<title>Re:Link already dead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259686320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RSS feed on feedburner still works http://feeds.feedburner.com/phantomdev/lHhb</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RSS feed on feedburner still works http : //feeds.feedburner.com/phantomdev/lHhb</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RSS feed on feedburner still works http://feeds.feedburner.com/phantomdev/lHhb</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438</id>
	<title>No, it's a Mac case mod.</title>
	<author>MsGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1259688360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hackintosh = bog standard PC running Mac OS X.<br>Case mod = hardware stuffed into a case that is wildly different or decorative or super-functional.<br>Mac case mod = Mac logic board stuffed into a case that is wildly different from standard Macs.</p><p>I still want to do a Classic Mac modded with a Mac mini inside and an LCD replacing the old CRT.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hackintosh = bog standard PC running Mac OS X.Case mod = hardware stuffed into a case that is wildly different or decorative or super-functional.Mac case mod = Mac logic board stuffed into a case that is wildly different from standard Macs.I still want to do a Classic Mac modded with a Mac mini inside and an LCD replacing the old CRT .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hackintosh = bog standard PC running Mac OS X.Case mod = hardware stuffed into a case that is wildly different or decorative or super-functional.Mac case mod = Mac logic board stuffed into a case that is wildly different from standard Macs.I still want to do a Classic Mac modded with a Mac mini inside and an LCD replacing the old CRT.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30300158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30289766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30315892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30287708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30441870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30296192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_12_01_1459234_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30290688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284382
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285158
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30289766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30287708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291566
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30441870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30300158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284168
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284438
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285100
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30315892
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285656
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292538
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30296192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283760
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30285216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30292566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284810
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30290688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30291240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30284118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_12_01_1459234.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_12_01_1459234.30283728
</commentlist>
</conversation>
