<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_30_1553242</id>
	<title>iPhone 3.1 Spotted In Field Testing</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1259596980000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>kai\_hiwatari writes <i>"Digitizor reports that the <a href="http://digitizor.com/2009/11/30/next-generation-iphone-caught-testing-spotted-in-app-usage-log/#more-5149">next generation of the iPhone was spotted in the analytics log</a> of an iPhone app called iBart. The device, it seems, was identified as iPhone 3.1 in the log. When iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kai \ _hiwatari writes " Digitizor reports that the next generation of the iPhone was spotted in the analytics log of an iPhone app called iBart .
The device , it seems , was identified as iPhone 3.1 in the log .
When iPhone 2.1 was spotted , it was followed by iPhone 3G .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kai\_hiwatari writes "Digitizor reports that the next generation of the iPhone was spotted in the analytics log of an iPhone app called iBart.
The device, it seems, was identified as iPhone 3.1 in the log.
When iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270952</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Normally, I'd agree with you that this is not news.  However, with Apple, this type of fanboi news is the only way to know that they're doing *anything* because they're so tight lipped.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Normally , I 'd agree with you that this is not news .
However , with Apple , this type of fanboi news is the only way to know that they 're doing * anything * because they 're so tight lipped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Normally, I'd agree with you that this is not news.
However, with Apple, this type of fanboi news is the only way to know that they're doing *anything* because they're so tight lipped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270742</id>
	<title>Slight Error in Summary, Version Number Mismatch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary says, "The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G."</p><p>But the version numbers actually are:<br>iPhone: 1,1<br>iPhone 3G: 1,2<br>iPhone 3GS: 2,1</p><p>The mistake in the summary isn't a big deal.  But it does go into the big pile of little mistakes that we see all the time around here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary says , " The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted , it was followed by iPhone 3G .
" But the version numbers actually are : iPhone : 1,1iPhone 3G : 1,2iPhone 3GS : 2,1The mistake in the summary is n't a big deal .
But it does go into the big pile of little mistakes that we see all the time around here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary says, "The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G.
"But the version numbers actually are:iPhone: 1,1iPhone 3G: 1,2iPhone 3GS: 2,1The mistake in the summary isn't a big deal.
But it does go into the big pile of little mistakes that we see all the time around here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271072</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1259603220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*double checks URL he typed in*</p><p>Yeah it says <a href="http://slashdot.org/" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/</a> [slashdot.org]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... thought maybe I'd typed macrumors</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* double checks URL he typed in * Yeah it says http : //slashdot.org/ [ slashdot.org ] ... thought maybe I 'd typed macrumors</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*double checks URL he typed in*Yeah it says http://slashdot.org/ [slashdot.org] ... thought maybe I'd typed macrumors</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270668</id>
	<title>Yay, mostly</title>
	<author>Thyamine</author>
	<datestamp>1259601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's certainly a nice little news tidbit, but there's not much more to say.  I'm an Apple fan, but really it would be more newsworthy if they announced no more phones and then something new was seen.  I think everyone knows they are going to be coming out with a new one at regular intervals.  If we had a section for 'News Headlines that are Their Own Articles' this would go there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's certainly a nice little news tidbit , but there 's not much more to say .
I 'm an Apple fan , but really it would be more newsworthy if they announced no more phones and then something new was seen .
I think everyone knows they are going to be coming out with a new one at regular intervals .
If we had a section for 'News Headlines that are Their Own Articles ' this would go there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's certainly a nice little news tidbit, but there's not much more to say.
I'm an Apple fan, but really it would be more newsworthy if they announced no more phones and then something new was seen.
I think everyone knows they are going to be coming out with a new one at regular intervals.
If we had a section for 'News Headlines that are Their Own Articles' this would go there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271988</id>
	<title>Re:interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  The tethering issue is not bait and switch, at least not from Apples end.  Non at&amp;t iPhones have tether.  It's a Carrier Limitation, not a hardware limitation.  Much like what VZW typically does to bluetooth file transfer OBEX's on many phones.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; at&amp;t Mobility never indicated that it would ever allow teathering on the iPhone before or after release.  The evade the topic simply by saying that it may at some point provide a teather plan such as they do on other devices, including giving a pricing structure to such a hypothetical plan.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; So, any bait and switch on at least this feature is based on the assumption that a feature would be enabled from the carrier.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; And no, I don't work for at&amp;t and I have a mifi-2200 from VZW for my "teather" needs since it works well with my iPhone as a backup data connection (which I need regularly due to the crappy at&amp;t coverage in my area).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The tethering issue is not bait and switch , at least not from Apples end .
Non at&amp;t iPhones have tether .
It 's a Carrier Limitation , not a hardware limitation .
Much like what VZW typically does to bluetooth file transfer OBEX 's on many phones .
    at&amp;t Mobility never indicated that it would ever allow teathering on the iPhone before or after release .
The evade the topic simply by saying that it may at some point provide a teather plan such as they do on other devices , including giving a pricing structure to such a hypothetical plan .
    So , any bait and switch on at least this feature is based on the assumption that a feature would be enabled from the carrier .
    And no , I do n't work for at&amp;t and I have a mifi-2200 from VZW for my " teather " needs since it works well with my iPhone as a backup data connection ( which I need regularly due to the crappy at&amp;t coverage in my area ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  The tethering issue is not bait and switch, at least not from Apples end.
Non at&amp;t iPhones have tether.
It's a Carrier Limitation, not a hardware limitation.
Much like what VZW typically does to bluetooth file transfer OBEX's on many phones.
    at&amp;t Mobility never indicated that it would ever allow teathering on the iPhone before or after release.
The evade the topic simply by saying that it may at some point provide a teather plan such as they do on other devices, including giving a pricing structure to such a hypothetical plan.
    So, any bait and switch on at least this feature is based on the assumption that a feature would be enabled from the carrier.
    And no, I don't work for at&amp;t and I have a mifi-2200 from VZW for my "teather" needs since it works well with my iPhone as a backup data connection (which I need regularly due to the crappy at&amp;t coverage in my area).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270610</id>
	<title>Newsflash:  Apple developing another iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Important update:  Its version number is 1 higher than the old one!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Important update : Its version number is 1 higher than the old one !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Important update:  Its version number is 1 higher than the old one!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271718</id>
	<title>Save your money!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For iPhone 3.11 for Workgroups.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For iPhone 3.11 for Workgroups .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For iPhone 3.11 for Workgroups.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270624</id>
	<title>you mean?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you mean to tell me that Apple is <i>actively</i> continuing development of one of their most popular products?!?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you mean to tell me that Apple is actively continuing development of one of their most popular products ? ! ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you mean to tell me that Apple is actively continuing development of one of their most popular products?!?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270820</id>
	<title>Re:who cares?</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1259601960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I sure as fuck don't.</p></div><p>OOOh! Technology, apathy and profanity -- all rolled into one little <i>golden nugget!</i></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure as fuck do n't.OOOh !
Technology , apathy and profanity -- all rolled into one little golden nugget !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure as fuck don't.OOOh!
Technology, apathy and profanity -- all rolled into one little golden nugget!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270850</id>
	<title>2,1 was 3GS not 3G</title>
	<author>eegad</author>
	<datestamp>1259602080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Former iPhones were labeled like this:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * Original iPhone = 1,1<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * iPhone 3G = 1,2<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; * iPhone 3GS = 2,1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Former iPhones were labeled like this :         * Original iPhone = 1,1         * iPhone 3G = 1,2         * iPhone 3GS = 2,1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Former iPhones were labeled like this:
        * Original iPhone = 1,1
        * iPhone 3G = 1,2
        * iPhone 3GS = 2,1</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275124</id>
	<title>More fanboi astroturfing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259577420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/. astorturfing for apple</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .
astorturfing for apple</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.
astorturfing for apple</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271406</id>
	<title>False user agent</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1259604780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So what are the odds that this is a falsified user agent and that someone with a jailbroken iPhone is having a good laugh at this article?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what are the odds that this is a falsified user agent and that someone with a jailbroken iPhone is having a good laugh at this article ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what are the odds that this is a falsified user agent and that someone with a jailbroken iPhone is having a good laugh at this article?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270692</id>
	<title>Dear Editors:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That should be a comma in ("iPhone \%d,\%d",majorversionnumber,minorversionnumber), not a period.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That should be a comma in ( " iPhone \ % d , \ % d " ,majorversionnumber,minorversionnumber ) , not a period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should be a comma in ("iPhone \%d,\%d",majorversionnumber,minorversionnumber), not a period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270900</id>
	<title>useragent?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So if i set my firefox useragent as iPhone/Tablet 5.0 and start visiting iPhone related sites a lot of noise will be generated?<br><br>Announcing that they are looking specially to an info so easily modified is a good recipe for unfounded hype.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So if i set my firefox useragent as iPhone/Tablet 5.0 and start visiting iPhone related sites a lot of noise will be generated ? Announcing that they are looking specially to an info so easily modified is a good recipe for unfounded hype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if i set my firefox useragent as iPhone/Tablet 5.0 and start visiting iPhone related sites a lot of noise will be generated?Announcing that they are looking specially to an info so easily modified is a good recipe for unfounded hype.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275230</id>
	<title>Daily Iphone Slashvertisement</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1259577900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed.</p><p>When they finally release a product, then it <i>may</i> be worthy of a story. And I say may - note that most released phones never get <i>any</i> stories on Slashdot, even those from well known companies with far bigger market share (Nokia, Samsung, - well just about all of them, actually). Yet when it comes to Apple, with just a few per cent market share with their previous products, it's now news because some random guy saw something <i>in his logs</i>?</p><p>The Daily Iphone Slashvertisement is getting boring.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed.When they finally release a product , then it may be worthy of a story .
And I say may - note that most released phones never get any stories on Slashdot , even those from well known companies with far bigger market share ( Nokia , Samsung , - well just about all of them , actually ) .
Yet when it comes to Apple , with just a few per cent market share with their previous products , it 's now news because some random guy saw something in his logs ? The Daily Iphone Slashvertisement is getting boring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.When they finally release a product, then it may be worthy of a story.
And I say may - note that most released phones never get any stories on Slashdot, even those from well known companies with far bigger market share (Nokia, Samsung, - well just about all of them, actually).
Yet when it comes to Apple, with just a few per cent market share with their previous products, it's now news because some random guy saw something in his logs?The Daily Iphone Slashvertisement is getting boring.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270996</id>
	<title>Re:who cares?</title>
	<author>baker\_tony</author>
	<datestamp>1259602740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I care so little, I don't even add comments to articles...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I care so little , I do n't even add comments to articles.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I care so little, I don't even add comments to articles...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272322</id>
	<title>Re:interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  I've read the rumor mills.  The one thing I'm not seeing there is the distinct possibility that 3,1 may not include a increase or change in functionallity.  With at&amp;t's exclusivity ending, 3,1 could simply be the major hardware rev to include CDMA in the product line?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've read the rumor mills .
The one thing I 'm not seeing there is the distinct possibility that 3,1 may not include a increase or change in functionallity .
With at&amp;t 's exclusivity ending , 3,1 could simply be the major hardware rev to include CDMA in the product line ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  I've read the rumor mills.
The one thing I'm not seeing there is the distinct possibility that 3,1 may not include a increase or change in functionallity.
With at&amp;t's exclusivity ending, 3,1 could simply be the major hardware rev to include CDMA in the product line?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1259602020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end, someone downloading it on something faking the "iphone 3.1" or someone at ibart playing a prank?</p></div><p>Here's a better question: why would anyone bother to do that?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end , someone downloading it on something faking the " iphone 3.1 " or someone at ibart playing a prank ? Here 's a better question : why would anyone bother to do that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end, someone downloading it on something faking the "iphone 3.1" or someone at ibart playing a prank?Here's a better question: why would anyone bother to do that?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1259601360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone enlighten me: how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end, someone downloading it on something faking the "iphone 3.1" or someone at ibart playing a prank?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone enlighten me : how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end , someone downloading it on something faking the " iphone 3.1 " or someone at ibart playing a prank ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone enlighten me: how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end, someone downloading it on something faking the "iphone 3.1" or someone at ibart playing a prank?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274190</id>
	<title>Re:useragent?</title>
	<author>kai\_hiwatari</author>
	<datestamp>1259573580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but you can't use iPhone apps using firefox<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</htmltext>
<tokenext>but you ca n't use iPhone apps using firefox : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but you can't use iPhone apps using firefox :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275414</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1259578560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot Editor #1: "Oh crap, I can't think of anything for today's Iphone story. Maybe post a story about someone doing something, where he just happens to use an Iphone? Nope <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/23/013255/After-35-Years-Another-Message-Sent-From-Arecibo?from=rss" title="slashdot.org">already done it</a> [slashdot.org]."</p><p>Slashdot Editor #2: "Maybe a story about some random website, and we can say how you can use your Iphone to access a website? Oh wait, <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/02/27/1740221" title="slashdot.org">we did that one too</a> [slashdot.org]."</p><p>Slashdot Editor #1: "Ah I know - quick, fake up an Iphone new version and put it in my server logs. Instant story!"</p><p>But I've got to say - despite the constant spam (Apple send enough unsolicited spam to my inbox), it is interesting to see how people can keep coming up with a story, for every single day. What will it be tomorrow? "Man phones person in another country - uses an Iphone"? "How to get laid, by emailing girls - On Your Iphone"? "Google Maps - which is now available on the Iphone - doesn't show your mom's basement"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot Editor # 1 : " Oh crap , I ca n't think of anything for today 's Iphone story .
Maybe post a story about someone doing something , where he just happens to use an Iphone ?
Nope already done it [ slashdot.org ] .
" Slashdot Editor # 2 : " Maybe a story about some random website , and we can say how you can use your Iphone to access a website ?
Oh wait , we did that one too [ slashdot.org ] .
" Slashdot Editor # 1 : " Ah I know - quick , fake up an Iphone new version and put it in my server logs .
Instant story !
" But I 've got to say - despite the constant spam ( Apple send enough unsolicited spam to my inbox ) , it is interesting to see how people can keep coming up with a story , for every single day .
What will it be tomorrow ?
" Man phones person in another country - uses an Iphone " ?
" How to get laid , by emailing girls - On Your Iphone " ?
" Google Maps - which is now available on the Iphone - does n't show your mom 's basement " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot Editor #1: "Oh crap, I can't think of anything for today's Iphone story.
Maybe post a story about someone doing something, where he just happens to use an Iphone?
Nope already done it [slashdot.org].
"Slashdot Editor #2: "Maybe a story about some random website, and we can say how you can use your Iphone to access a website?
Oh wait, we did that one too [slashdot.org].
"Slashdot Editor #1: "Ah I know - quick, fake up an Iphone new version and put it in my server logs.
Instant story!
"But I've got to say - despite the constant spam (Apple send enough unsolicited spam to my inbox), it is interesting to see how people can keep coming up with a story, for every single day.
What will it be tomorrow?
"Man phones person in another country - uses an Iphone"?
"How to get laid, by emailing girls - On Your Iphone"?
"Google Maps - which is now available on the Iphone - doesn't show your mom's basement"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271560</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>mi</author>
	<datestamp>1259605560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Here's a better question: why would anyone bother to do that [Alter their browser's UserAgent setting -mi]?</p></div></blockquote><p>Dunno about you... I usually have my Konqueror's setting to something like <tt>No one here but us, squirrels - 3.0 VMS 19-bit</tt>. If a particular site breaks from that, I make an exception for them (and try to avoid them, for it annoys me, when sites have browser-specific rules/content.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a better question : why would anyone bother to do that [ Alter their browser 's UserAgent setting -mi ] ? Dunno about you... I usually have my Konqueror 's setting to something like No one here but us , squirrels - 3.0 VMS 19-bit .
If a particular site breaks from that , I make an exception for them ( and try to avoid them , for it annoys me , when sites have browser-specific rules/content .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a better question: why would anyone bother to do that [Alter their browser's UserAgent setting -mi]?Dunno about you... I usually have my Konqueror's setting to something like No one here but us, squirrels - 3.0 VMS 19-bit.
If a particular site breaks from that, I make an exception for them (and try to avoid them, for it annoys me, when sites have browser-specific rules/content.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271808</id>
	<title>Re:LIKE ZOMFG!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259606700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, get with the times.  You meant Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez or a Jonas brother.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , get with the times .
You meant Miley Cyrus , Selena Gomez or a Jonas brother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, get with the times.
You meant Miley Cyrus, Selena Gomez or a Jonas brother.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272890</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>sbeckstead</author>
	<datestamp>1259611980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>why do we care?</htmltext>
<tokenext>why do we care ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why do we care?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271286</id>
	<title>Re:useragent?</title>
	<author>MachineShedFred</author>
	<datestamp>1259604120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't a user agent string.  This is a hardware model identifier.  Apple hardware has an identifier in the ROM so that you can find out what hardware you're running on in software.  Here are some examples of why you'd want to do that:</p><p>MacPro 1,1:  First generation Mac Pro (only has 16-lane PCI-e)<br>MacBookPro 1,1:  First generation MacBook Pro (Intel Core Duo, not Intel Core2 Duo with SSE4)<br>MacPro 3,1:  Third generation Mac Pro (32-lane PCI-e, quad core Nehalem Xeons)<br>iPhone 2,1:  Hardware compass, etc. etc.</p><p>Get it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't a user agent string .
This is a hardware model identifier .
Apple hardware has an identifier in the ROM so that you can find out what hardware you 're running on in software .
Here are some examples of why you 'd want to do that : MacPro 1,1 : First generation Mac Pro ( only has 16-lane PCI-e ) MacBookPro 1,1 : First generation MacBook Pro ( Intel Core Duo , not Intel Core2 Duo with SSE4 ) MacPro 3,1 : Third generation Mac Pro ( 32-lane PCI-e , quad core Nehalem Xeons ) iPhone 2,1 : Hardware compass , etc .
etc.Get it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't a user agent string.
This is a hardware model identifier.
Apple hardware has an identifier in the ROM so that you can find out what hardware you're running on in software.
Here are some examples of why you'd want to do that:MacPro 1,1:  First generation Mac Pro (only has 16-lane PCI-e)MacBookPro 1,1:  First generation MacBook Pro (Intel Core Duo, not Intel Core2 Duo with SSE4)MacPro 3,1:  Third generation Mac Pro (32-lane PCI-e, quad core Nehalem Xeons)iPhone 2,1:  Hardware compass, etc.
etc.Get it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271116</id>
	<title>thanks for telling me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that iBart is "spying" sorry "analytics" on its users by sending who-knows-what-else data<br>to a third party</p><p>if this behaviour was on Windows app it would be condemmed instantly<br>and <a href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/12/12789/" title="uneasysilence.com" rel="nofollow">users would demand they stop it</a> [uneasysilence.com]</p><p>i wonder how many other of the iPhone apps spy on its "users"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that iBart is " spying " sorry " analytics " on its users by sending who-knows-what-else datato a third partyif this behaviour was on Windows app it would be condemmed instantlyand users would demand they stop it [ uneasysilence.com ] i wonder how many other of the iPhone apps spy on its " users "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that iBart is "spying" sorry "analytics" on its users by sending who-knows-what-else datato a third partyif this behaviour was on Windows app it would be condemmed instantlyand users would demand they stop it [uneasysilence.com]i wonder how many other of the iPhone apps spy on its "users"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608</id>
	<title>News Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Company is developing follow-up product to an existing successful product!!
<br> <br>
Details at 11.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Company is developing follow-up product to an existing successful product ! !
Details at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Company is developing follow-up product to an existing successful product!!
Details at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272992</id>
	<title>sex wit4 a trolLkore</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259612460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you down. It was Reciprocating bad OUTREACH ARE Crisco or lube. the reaper BSD's 40,,00 coming goodbye...she had</htmltext>
<tokenext>you down .
It was Reciprocating bad OUTREACH ARE Crisco or lube .
the reaper BSD 's 40,,00 coming goodbye...she had</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you down.
It was Reciprocating bad OUTREACH ARE Crisco or lube.
the reaper BSD's 40,,00 coming goodbye...she had</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271592</id>
	<title>Free iBart publicity</title>
	<author>michelcolman</author>
	<datestamp>1259605740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's more interesting, is that probably thousands of rumor site addicts are now checking out iBart (I know I just did). That's the real news in this story: a lot of iPhone programmers are now going to let their app phone home with as many details about the device as possible hoping to get a scoop out with their app's name!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's more interesting , is that probably thousands of rumor site addicts are now checking out iBart ( I know I just did ) .
That 's the real news in this story : a lot of iPhone programmers are now going to let their app phone home with as many details about the device as possible hoping to get a scoop out with their app 's name !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's more interesting, is that probably thousands of rumor site addicts are now checking out iBart (I know I just did).
That's the real news in this story: a lot of iPhone programmers are now going to let their app phone home with as many details about the device as possible hoping to get a scoop out with their app's name!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271252</id>
	<title>Slashdotted</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope they're not running the site on the iPhone itself<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they 're not running the site on the iPhone itself : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they're not running the site on the iPhone itself :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270724</id>
	<title>tower</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soon I will be able to build a skyscraper with all of my iPhones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon I will be able to build a skyscraper with all of my iPhones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon I will be able to build a skyscraper with all of my iPhones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275616</id>
	<title>Re:who cares?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1259579160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but if you have to read literally <i>daily</i> stories about one of those products, no matter how trivial (in this case, a non-news item based on rumour, that even if it was true, tells us nothing other than the bleeding obvious that they are developing new products), you might get annoyed, or simply wonder why such disproportionate advertising was being given to them.</p><p>And your comparison is flawed - Firefox, Windows, Google have much bigger market share than the Iphone. The third problem with your argument is that there is virtually no coverage of any of the larger players in the phone market. A better analogy would be getting daily coverage of, I don't know, Opera, whilst never giving any coverage to IE or Firefox.</p><p>I can see it now: "New Opera user agent string spotting in field testing!" Is that news, do you think? And do you think it would make sense to have those kind of stories, whilst not having any stories even when a full version of IE or Firefox is officially actually released?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but if you have to read literally daily stories about one of those products , no matter how trivial ( in this case , a non-news item based on rumour , that even if it was true , tells us nothing other than the bleeding obvious that they are developing new products ) , you might get annoyed , or simply wonder why such disproportionate advertising was being given to them.And your comparison is flawed - Firefox , Windows , Google have much bigger market share than the Iphone .
The third problem with your argument is that there is virtually no coverage of any of the larger players in the phone market .
A better analogy would be getting daily coverage of , I do n't know , Opera , whilst never giving any coverage to IE or Firefox.I can see it now : " New Opera user agent string spotting in field testing !
" Is that news , do you think ?
And do you think it would make sense to have those kind of stories , whilst not having any stories even when a full version of IE or Firefox is officially actually released ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but if you have to read literally daily stories about one of those products, no matter how trivial (in this case, a non-news item based on rumour, that even if it was true, tells us nothing other than the bleeding obvious that they are developing new products), you might get annoyed, or simply wonder why such disproportionate advertising was being given to them.And your comparison is flawed - Firefox, Windows, Google have much bigger market share than the Iphone.
The third problem with your argument is that there is virtually no coverage of any of the larger players in the phone market.
A better analogy would be getting daily coverage of, I don't know, Opera, whilst never giving any coverage to IE or Firefox.I can see it now: "New Opera user agent string spotting in field testing!
" Is that news, do you think?
And do you think it would make sense to have those kind of stories, whilst not having any stories even when a full version of IE or Firefox is officially actually released?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271018</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30279950</id>
	<title>heh</title>
	<author>GregNorc</author>
	<datestamp>1259608740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can create a custom browser user agent <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/59" title="mozilla.org">.</a> [mozilla.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can create a custom browser user agent .
[ mozilla.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can create a custom browser user agent .
[mozilla.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30273178</id>
	<title>Slowest news day ever!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259613360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really?  This has got to be the dumbest, most pointless story (and I use the term lightly) I have ever read on here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
This has got to be the dumbest , most pointless story ( and I use the term lightly ) I have ever read on here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
This has got to be the dumbest, most pointless story (and I use the term lightly) I have ever read on here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271216</id>
	<title>Analytics?</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1259603820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It worries me a lot that random iPhone apps are allowed to phone home with this kind of data, especially after that story a while back where the user's phone number was being sent in order to spam call them.</p><p>There seems to be a lot of protection for Apple (against jailbreaking or doing anything they or the carrier does not authorise) and pretty much none for the user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It worries me a lot that random iPhone apps are allowed to phone home with this kind of data , especially after that story a while back where the user 's phone number was being sent in order to spam call them.There seems to be a lot of protection for Apple ( against jailbreaking or doing anything they or the carrier does not authorise ) and pretty much none for the user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It worries me a lot that random iPhone apps are allowed to phone home with this kind of data, especially after that story a while back where the user's phone number was being sent in order to spam call them.There seems to be a lot of protection for Apple (against jailbreaking or doing anything they or the carrier does not authorise) and pretty much none for the user.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270920</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Editors:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G."</p><p>iPhone 3G is version "1,2"<br>iPhone 3GS is version "2,1"</p><p>Not that it should matter much for the article/issue.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted , it was followed by iPhone 3G .
" iPhone 3G is version " 1,2 " iPhone 3GS is version " 2,1 " Not that it should matter much for the article/issue .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...The last time when iPhone 2.1 was spotted, it was followed by iPhone 3G.
"iPhone 3G is version "1,2"iPhone 3GS is version "2,1"Not that it should matter much for the article/issue.
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30273866</id>
	<title>All I see</title>
	<author>No. 24601</author>
	<datestamp>1259572440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All I see here is a story about a foolish developer who decided it was smarter to let slip that they are mining their usage logs looking for "interesting" stuff like this, when they should probably keep their mouths shut if they plan on misusing people's (or, for that matter, a company's) personal data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All I see here is a story about a foolish developer who decided it was smarter to let slip that they are mining their usage logs looking for " interesting " stuff like this , when they should probably keep their mouths shut if they plan on misusing people 's ( or , for that matter , a company 's ) personal data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All I see here is a story about a foolish developer who decided it was smarter to let slip that they are mining their usage logs looking for "interesting" stuff like this, when they should probably keep their mouths shut if they plan on misusing people's (or, for that matter, a company's) personal data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270766</id>
	<title>interesting</title>
	<author>ILuvRamen</author>
	<datestamp>1259601720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what could they have possibly done to improve it?  Raise the price?  Cuz I bet you're still locked into their app store, their cell provider, and their everything else.  It's still locked down and super proprietary and that's the one thing everyone hates about them.  So what could they have possibly added that would make it better?</htmltext>
<tokenext>what could they have possibly done to improve it ?
Raise the price ?
Cuz I bet you 're still locked into their app store , their cell provider , and their everything else .
It 's still locked down and super proprietary and that 's the one thing everyone hates about them .
So what could they have possibly added that would make it better ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what could they have possibly done to improve it?
Raise the price?
Cuz I bet you're still locked into their app store, their cell provider, and their everything else.
It's still locked down and super proprietary and that's the one thing everyone hates about them.
So what could they have possibly added that would make it better?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271030</id>
	<title>Re:interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>what could they have possibly done to improve it? Raise the price? Cuz I bet you're still locked into their app store, their cell provider, and their everything else.</p></div></blockquote><p>They could back key features they pulled a bait and switch on (tethering) and not only that they could open it up a bit, since power users jailbreak them anyhow, and preventing hacking is nearly impossible. Someone somewhere will crack it when they have unfettered physical access. Somehow I don't think they're going to take the steps required to prevent hacking, i.e., require iPhone owners to use their phones under supervision at Apple stores and not let customers take them outside the store.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what could they have possibly done to improve it ?
Raise the price ?
Cuz I bet you 're still locked into their app store , their cell provider , and their everything else.They could back key features they pulled a bait and switch on ( tethering ) and not only that they could open it up a bit , since power users jailbreak them anyhow , and preventing hacking is nearly impossible .
Someone somewhere will crack it when they have unfettered physical access .
Somehow I do n't think they 're going to take the steps required to prevent hacking , i.e. , require iPhone owners to use their phones under supervision at Apple stores and not let customers take them outside the store .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what could they have possibly done to improve it?
Raise the price?
Cuz I bet you're still locked into their app store, their cell provider, and their everything else.They could back key features they pulled a bait and switch on (tethering) and not only that they could open it up a bit, since power users jailbreak them anyhow, and preventing hacking is nearly impossible.
Someone somewhere will crack it when they have unfettered physical access.
Somehow I don't think they're going to take the steps required to prevent hacking, i.e., require iPhone owners to use their phones under supervision at Apple stores and not let customers take them outside the store.
;)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30273564</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1259614680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's amusing.  I quite often set my user agent to whatever the latest bit of vapourware is, or to a Commodore 16.  Every once in a while, I get a bite and some blogmaster posts something like "MOG [sic] I've been surfed by a Microsoft Surface" or whatever.  It gives me a little frisson of pleasure.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's amusing .
I quite often set my user agent to whatever the latest bit of vapourware is , or to a Commodore 16 .
Every once in a while , I get a bite and some blogmaster posts something like " MOG [ sic ] I 've been surfed by a Microsoft Surface " or whatever .
It gives me a little frisson of pleasure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's amusing.
I quite often set my user agent to whatever the latest bit of vapourware is, or to a Commodore 16.
Every once in a while, I get a bite and some blogmaster posts something like "MOG [sic] I've been surfed by a Microsoft Surface" or whatever.
It gives me a little frisson of pleasure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270634</id>
	<title>Figures...</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1259600880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With more and more providers getting the iPhone, it seems like Apple just isn't feeling exclusive enough. Time to make a new version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With more and more providers getting the iPhone , it seems like Apple just is n't feeling exclusive enough .
Time to make a new version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With more and more providers getting the iPhone, it seems like Apple just isn't feeling exclusive enough.
Time to make a new version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274290</id>
	<title>Re:interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259574000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the upgrade from 2.5G to 3G apparently only justified the bump from 1,1 to 1,2, I'd guess that just the change of the radio to CDMA should not justify a bump from 2,1 to 3,1.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the upgrade from 2.5G to 3G apparently only justified the bump from 1,1 to 1,2 , I 'd guess that just the change of the radio to CDMA should not justify a bump from 2,1 to 3,1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the upgrade from 2.5G to 3G apparently only justified the bump from 1,1 to 1,2, I'd guess that just the change of the radio to CDMA should not justify a bump from 2,1 to 3,1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270802</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Editors:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is an iphone, that should be:</p><p>[NSString stringWithFormat:@"iPhone \%d,\%d", majorversionnumber, minorversionnumber];</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is an iphone , that should be : [ NSString stringWithFormat : @ " iPhone \ % d , \ % d " , majorversionnumber , minorversionnumber ] ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is an iphone, that should be:[NSString stringWithFormat:@"iPhone \%d,\%d", majorversionnumber, minorversionnumber];</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270692</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270648</id>
	<title>Original link here...</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1259600940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...at <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/28/apple-starts-field-testing-next-generation-iphone-31/" title="macrumors.com">MacRumors</a> [macrumors.com].  Relevant quote:
</p><p> <i>References to "iPhone3,1" was first discovered in the iPhone firmware files back in August, but this seems to be the first time that it has been spotted "in the wild". Apple similarly began testing the iPhone 3GS (iPhone2,1) back in October of 2008 about 8 months ahead of its launch. At the time, the usage was similarly focused in the San Francisco Bay Area where Apple is located.</i>
</p><p>So, if history repeats itself, the actual product will be released sometime in April or May.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...at MacRumors [ macrumors.com ] .
Relevant quote : References to " iPhone3,1 " was first discovered in the iPhone firmware files back in August , but this seems to be the first time that it has been spotted " in the wild " .
Apple similarly began testing the iPhone 3GS ( iPhone2,1 ) back in October of 2008 about 8 months ahead of its launch .
At the time , the usage was similarly focused in the San Francisco Bay Area where Apple is located .
So , if history repeats itself , the actual product will be released sometime in April or May .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...at MacRumors [macrumors.com].
Relevant quote:
 References to "iPhone3,1" was first discovered in the iPhone firmware files back in August, but this seems to be the first time that it has been spotted "in the wild".
Apple similarly began testing the iPhone 3GS (iPhone2,1) back in October of 2008 about 8 months ahead of its launch.
At the time, the usage was similarly focused in the San Francisco Bay Area where Apple is located.
So, if history repeats itself, the actual product will be released sometime in April or May.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274940</id>
	<title>Re:who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259576640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, it <i>is</i> Slashdot...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , it is Slashdot.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, it is Slashdot...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270674</id>
	<title>iBart?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1259601180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lionel\_Hutz" title="wikipedia.org">Mr. Hutz</a> [wikipedia.org]? I think we might have another case for you! - Fox Networks</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Hutz [ wikipedia.org ] ?
I think we might have another case for you !
- Fox Networks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Hutz [wikipedia.org]?
I think we might have another case for you!
- Fox Networks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271246</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259603940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhone 3.1...... hopefully it'll be better than Windows 3.1 was?! Or are we to avoid version number comparison?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone 3.1...... hopefully it 'll be better than Windows 3.1 was ? !
Or are we to avoid version number comparison ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone 3.1...... hopefully it'll be better than Windows 3.1 was?!
Or are we to avoid version number comparison?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270628</id>
	<title>It'd be bigger news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...if Apple WEREN'T bringing out a new iPhone sometime next year. An annual cycle is predictable; some manufacturers would consider it TOO long between launches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if Apple WERE N'T bringing out a new iPhone sometime next year .
An annual cycle is predictable ; some manufacturers would consider it TOO long between launches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...if Apple WEREN'T bringing out a new iPhone sometime next year.
An annual cycle is predictable; some manufacturers would consider it TOO long between launches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270788</id>
	<title>Re:LIKE ZOMFG!!!!</title>
	<author>Per Wigren</author>
	<datestamp>1259601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.iphonity.com/pictures/celebrities/britney\_speaers\_iphone.jpg" title="iphonity.com">Here you are.</a> [iphonity.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here you are .
[ iphonity.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here you are.
[iphonity.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271026</id>
	<title>Napkin Please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just came so hard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just came so hard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just came so hard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270630</id>
	<title>News Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just kidding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just kidding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just kidding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272354</id>
	<title>Got tired of waiting.</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1259608980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I gave up on waiting for apple to get off the schnide and make the one change they desperatly need to make; ditch at&amp;t. Got my droid a few weeks ago and couldn't be happier.</p><p>Verizon seems to be the smartphone thunderdome, and i'd love to see apple come in and kick some windows mobile and blackberry ass, but they are apparently content to hang out in the at&amp;t sandbox. I'd be posting this from an iphone instead of a droid if apple would commit to a decent network. Maybe in 2 years they'll have gotten the hint that exclusivity hurts in the long run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I gave up on waiting for apple to get off the schnide and make the one change they desperatly need to make ; ditch at&amp;t .
Got my droid a few weeks ago and could n't be happier.Verizon seems to be the smartphone thunderdome , and i 'd love to see apple come in and kick some windows mobile and blackberry ass , but they are apparently content to hang out in the at&amp;t sandbox .
I 'd be posting this from an iphone instead of a droid if apple would commit to a decent network .
Maybe in 2 years they 'll have gotten the hint that exclusivity hurts in the long run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I gave up on waiting for apple to get off the schnide and make the one change they desperatly need to make; ditch at&amp;t.
Got my droid a few weeks ago and couldn't be happier.Verizon seems to be the smartphone thunderdome, and i'd love to see apple come in and kick some windows mobile and blackberry ass, but they are apparently content to hang out in the at&amp;t sandbox.
I'd be posting this from an iphone instead of a droid if apple would commit to a decent network.
Maybe in 2 years they'll have gotten the hint that exclusivity hurts in the long run.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656</id>
	<title>who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259601000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I sure as fuck don't.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I sure as fuck do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I sure as fuck don't.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30278146</id>
	<title>Re:Figures...</title>
	<author>RedK</author>
	<datestamp>1259591460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, this timeframe is very normal.  They always have the next iPhone model ready 6 months in advane for a June-July release, so it can go through FCC approval, and they can announce before it does.  Same reason the original iPhone was introduced and functionnal late 2006 but only shipped June 2007.</p><p>This is just the normal product cycle for the iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , this timeframe is very normal .
They always have the next iPhone model ready 6 months in advane for a June-July release , so it can go through FCC approval , and they can announce before it does .
Same reason the original iPhone was introduced and functionnal late 2006 but only shipped June 2007.This is just the normal product cycle for the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, this timeframe is very normal.
They always have the next iPhone model ready 6 months in advane for a June-July release, so it can go through FCC approval, and they can announce before it does.
Same reason the original iPhone was introduced and functionnal late 2006 but only shipped June 2007.This is just the normal product cycle for the iPhone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271018</id>
	<title>Re:who cares?</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1259602860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>who cares?<br>I sure as fuck don't.</p></div><p>Oh, boo hoo.  It's Slashdot's fault you couldn't scroll past the story instead of spending 20 seconds plus CAPTCHA to say you don't care.  I don't like FireFox, Windows 7, or Google, so I'm going to go into their threads and post that I don't care and get modded up for it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>who cares ? I sure as fuck do n't.Oh , boo hoo .
It 's Slashdot 's fault you could n't scroll past the story instead of spending 20 seconds plus CAPTCHA to say you do n't care .
I do n't like FireFox , Windows 7 , or Google , so I 'm going to go into their threads and post that I do n't care and get modded up for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>who cares?I sure as fuck don't.Oh, boo hoo.
It's Slashdot's fault you couldn't scroll past the story instead of spending 20 seconds plus CAPTCHA to say you don't care.
I don't like FireFox, Windows 7, or Google, so I'm going to go into their threads and post that I don't care and get modded up for it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271500</id>
	<title>next version?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259605260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when do we see an iPhone 3.11 for workgroups?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when do we see an iPhone 3.11 for workgroups ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when do we see an iPhone 3.11 for workgroups?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275966</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1259580420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm waiting for the story tomorrow, when iphone 6,9 is discovered in the wild.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the story tomorrow , when iphone 6,9 is discovered in the wild .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the story tomorrow, when iphone 6,9 is discovered in the wild.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270646</id>
	<title>LIKE ZOMFG!!!!</title>
	<author>Rogerborg</author>
	<datestamp>1259600940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only thing that could make this, like, even more awesome is if it were being used by Britney Spears!!!!!!11!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only thing that could make this , like , even more awesome is if it were being used by Britney Spears ! ! ! ! !
! 11 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only thing that could make this, like, even more awesome is if it were being used by Britney Spears!!!!!
!11!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270626</id>
	<title>Big deal...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New phones are in the works from RIM, Nokia, HTC, and lots of other companies all the time.</p><p>STFU fanbois...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New phones are in the works from RIM , Nokia , HTC , and lots of other companies all the time.STFU fanbois.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New phones are in the works from RIM, Nokia, HTC, and lots of other companies all the time.STFU fanbois...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270662</id>
	<title>Another iPhone? Inconceivable!</title>
	<author>toygeek</author>
	<datestamp>1259601060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple producing another generation of their overpriced gadgets that soccer moms and execs alike *MUST HAVE* for christmas, right before christmas, making older generations obsolete and the last version pass&#233;, right before christmas?</p><p>Will this one come with an ear wax proof screen that you won't have to clean after every skin oil soaking usage? Will it alert the authorities if you try to break out of jail?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple producing another generation of their overpriced gadgets that soccer moms and execs alike * MUST HAVE * for christmas , right before christmas , making older generations obsolete and the last version pass   , right before christmas ? Will this one come with an ear wax proof screen that you wo n't have to clean after every skin oil soaking usage ?
Will it alert the authorities if you try to break out of jail ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple producing another generation of their overpriced gadgets that soccer moms and execs alike *MUST HAVE* for christmas, right before christmas, making older generations obsolete and the last version passé, right before christmas?Will this one come with an ear wax proof screen that you won't have to clean after every skin oil soaking usage?
Will it alert the authorities if you try to break out of jail?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270776</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1259601780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Someone enlighten me: how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end, someone downloading it on something faking the "iphone 3.1" or someone at ibart playing a prank?</p></div><p>Well, you see, the iPhone has a lockout system that prevents people from doing anything with the device apart from buying programs on the app store...  This lockout system is guaranteed unsinkable, so it is entirely impossible that anyone could cause their iPhone to report false information...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Well, there was a "pretend to be iPhone 3.1" app released, but it was rejected from the app store...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone enlighten me : how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end , someone downloading it on something faking the " iphone 3.1 " or someone at ibart playing a prank ? Well , you see , the iPhone has a lockout system that prevents people from doing anything with the device apart from buying programs on the app store... This lockout system is guaranteed unsinkable , so it is entirely impossible that anyone could cause their iPhone to report false information... ...Well , there was a " pretend to be iPhone 3.1 " app released , but it was rejected from the app store.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone enlighten me: how hard would it be for someone to fake this on either end, someone downloading it on something faking the "iphone 3.1" or someone at ibart playing a prank?Well, you see, the iPhone has a lockout system that prevents people from doing anything with the device apart from buying programs on the app store...  This lockout system is guaranteed unsinkable, so it is entirely impossible that anyone could cause their iPhone to report false information... ...Well, there was a "pretend to be iPhone 3.1" app released, but it was rejected from the app store...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30278146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270634
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30273564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_1553242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270692
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271018
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30278146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270610
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270692
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271030
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30273178
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271500
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270776
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30272890
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270838
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30273564
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271560
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275966
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30275230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30270900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30274190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_1553242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_1553242.30271116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
