<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_30_0359216</id>
	<title>Augmented Reality and Privacy</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259586240000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader recommends a piece up at Augmented Planet that makes a couple of points about <a href="http://www.augmentedplanet.com/2009/11/do-you-care-about-privacy/">privacy in the realm of geotagging and augmented reality</a> that haven't been discussed much. First, once you geotag and upload, say, a photo to the Net you can lose ownership over the data and especially its metadata. Second, data on the Net is long-lived and might be put together in ways you wouldn't like, long after it was created. <i>"If you geotag a picture with your new 50" plasma TV in the background and upload it to the Web, congratulations you have just told everyone where you live and what you have of value. The web has a long memory &mdash; geotag something today and in six months it is still on the Web. When you tweet from the beach in Barbados telling your friends you are away for 2 weeks, that picture of your 50" plasma will still be out there along with its location. It's easy to track down someone's home address if you have their real name."</i> The submitter adds, "I never really cared about my online privacy too much. This article made me think seriously about privacy for the first time. No mean feat."</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader recommends a piece up at Augmented Planet that makes a couple of points about privacy in the realm of geotagging and augmented reality that have n't been discussed much .
First , once you geotag and upload , say , a photo to the Net you can lose ownership over the data and especially its metadata .
Second , data on the Net is long-lived and might be put together in ways you would n't like , long after it was created .
" If you geotag a picture with your new 50 " plasma TV in the background and upload it to the Web , congratulations you have just told everyone where you live and what you have of value .
The web has a long memory    geotag something today and in six months it is still on the Web .
When you tweet from the beach in Barbados telling your friends you are away for 2 weeks , that picture of your 50 " plasma will still be out there along with its location .
It 's easy to track down someone 's home address if you have their real name .
" The submitter adds , " I never really cared about my online privacy too much .
This article made me think seriously about privacy for the first time .
No mean feat .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader recommends a piece up at Augmented Planet that makes a couple of points about privacy in the realm of geotagging and augmented reality that haven't been discussed much.
First, once you geotag and upload, say, a photo to the Net you can lose ownership over the data and especially its metadata.
Second, data on the Net is long-lived and might be put together in ways you wouldn't like, long after it was created.
"If you geotag a picture with your new 50" plasma TV in the background and upload it to the Web, congratulations you have just told everyone where you live and what you have of value.
The web has a long memory — geotag something today and in six months it is still on the Web.
When you tweet from the beach in Barbados telling your friends you are away for 2 weeks, that picture of your 50" plasma will still be out there along with its location.
It's easy to track down someone's home address if you have their real name.
" The submitter adds, "I never really cared about my online privacy too much.
This article made me think seriously about privacy for the first time.
No mean feat.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269292</id>
	<title>Re:New business opportunity</title>
	<author>That\_Dan\_Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1259591940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Exactly what s happening to celebrities today. Out here in LA there were was a gang of teenage girls that followed al the celeb mags, watched the TV shows where the celebs showed off their houses etc. Then they got on Twitter and face book to see when these celebs left town. BAMN! they robbed the house. Took the police a year to find them!</p><p>They had millions of dollars worth of crap they hadn't figured out how to fence!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Exactly what s happening to celebrities today .
Out here in LA there were was a gang of teenage girls that followed al the celeb mags , watched the TV shows where the celebs showed off their houses etc .
Then they got on Twitter and face book to see when these celebs left town .
BAMN ! they robbed the house .
Took the police a year to find them ! They had millions of dollars worth of crap they had n't figured out how to fence !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Exactly what s happening to celebrities today.
Out here in LA there were was a gang of teenage girls that followed al the celeb mags, watched the TV shows where the celebs showed off their houses etc.
Then they got on Twitter and face book to see when these celebs left town.
BAMN! they robbed the house.
Took the police a year to find them!They had millions of dollars worth of crap they hadn't figured out how to fence!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272592</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259610240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>BOTH happened when I was at home and there was clear activity. One in the morning, busy getting ready and suddenly someone was in the kitchen who ran out.
</p><p>
Other time 3 people tried to climb on the balcony while 4 people were in the house.
</p><p>
The fast majority of crime in holland<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Not in the USA. Breaking in while someone is home is likely to get you shot. Even the druggies know this and make some attempt to verify a house is empty before entering.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>BOTH happened when I was at home and there was clear activity .
One in the morning , busy getting ready and suddenly someone was in the kitchen who ran out .
Other time 3 people tried to climb on the balcony while 4 people were in the house .
The fast majority of crime in holland ...Not in the USA .
Breaking in while someone is home is likely to get you shot .
Even the druggies know this and make some attempt to verify a house is empty before entering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BOTH happened when I was at home and there was clear activity.
One in the morning, busy getting ready and suddenly someone was in the kitchen who ran out.
Other time 3 people tried to climb on the balcony while 4 people were in the house.
The fast majority of crime in holland ...Not in the USA.
Breaking in while someone is home is likely to get you shot.
Even the druggies know this and make some attempt to verify a house is empty before entering.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269370</id>
	<title>One nit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259592480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to pick: if you geotag the picture of your 50'' plasma, nobody has to look up your home address by name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to pick : if you geotag the picture of your 50' ' plasma , nobody has to look up your home address by name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to pick: if you geotag the picture of your 50'' plasma, nobody has to look up your home address by name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271962</id>
	<title>I'm good.</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1259607300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't have any nice things anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't have any nice things anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't have any nice things anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269712</id>
	<title>Don't want strangers doing things to your photos?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't post them on the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't post them on the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't post them on the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272062</id>
	<title>Re:New business opportunity</title>
	<author>SleazyRidr</author>
	<datestamp>1259607780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>I've often thought about how that was possible, given the extent of personal information 'everyone' seems to know about celebs. I won't say that I'm glad to hear it happened, but it's certainly interesting...</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've often thought about how that was possible , given the extent of personal information 'everyone ' seems to know about celebs .
I wo n't say that I 'm glad to hear it happened , but it 's certainly interesting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've often thought about how that was possible, given the extent of personal information 'everyone' seems to know about celebs.
I won't say that I'm glad to hear it happened, but it's certainly interesting...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269952</id>
	<title>In six months...</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1259596680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"If you geotag a picture with your new 50" plasma TV in the background and upload it to the Web, congratulations you have just told everyone where you live and what you have of value. The web has a long memory -- geotag something today and in six months"</i> nobody will care about your antiquated plasma TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If you geotag a picture with your new 50 " plasma TV in the background and upload it to the Web , congratulations you have just told everyone where you live and what you have of value .
The web has a long memory -- geotag something today and in six months " nobody will care about your antiquated plasma TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If you geotag a picture with your new 50" plasma TV in the background and upload it to the Web, congratulations you have just told everyone where you live and what you have of value.
The web has a long memory -- geotag something today and in six months" nobody will care about your antiquated plasma TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269906</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259596440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really think that burglars would drive around and look into houses and apartments if they could simply google?</p><p>Imagine if you could google: "on vacation", with search term added in the last two weeks, in social network pages by users from your regional area.</p><p>Google doesn't quite do that yet. When it does, burglars might run into one another at those unfortunate people's houses. They don't need to know about any plasma TVs or whatnot. Everyone has something worth stealing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think that burglars would drive around and look into houses and apartments if they could simply google ? Imagine if you could google : " on vacation " , with search term added in the last two weeks , in social network pages by users from your regional area.Google does n't quite do that yet .
When it does , burglars might run into one another at those unfortunate people 's houses .
They do n't need to know about any plasma TVs or whatnot .
Everyone has something worth stealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think that burglars would drive around and look into houses and apartments if they could simply google?Imagine if you could google: "on vacation", with search term added in the last two weeks, in social network pages by users from your regional area.Google doesn't quite do that yet.
When it does, burglars might run into one another at those unfortunate people's houses.
They don't need to know about any plasma TVs or whatnot.
Everyone has something worth stealing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269096</id>
	<title>Common sense isn't it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hate to say it, but "Duh!"!</p><p>If I am uploading pictures or info, the one question that always goes through my mind, "Can anyone work out where I am and take advantage of it to do me harm, my family harm or steal anything from us?".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to say it , but " Duh !
" ! If I am uploading pictures or info , the one question that always goes through my mind , " Can anyone work out where I am and take advantage of it to do me harm , my family harm or steal anything from us ?
" .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to say it, but "Duh!
"!If I am uploading pictures or info, the one question that always goes through my mind, "Can anyone work out where I am and take advantage of it to do me harm, my family harm or steal anything from us?
".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270606</id>
	<title>The solution is social networks</title>
	<author>ukyoCE</author>
	<datestamp>1259600700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The answer to all of this is social networks.  Whether it's posting pictures+blogs+"tweets" on Facebook that are only shared with your friends, or using Android's geolocation and only sharing it with your contact list.</p><p>What we really need is a social network that isn't closed up in a single company's app.  I'd love to use my Facebook social network for sharing pictures and "private" blog entries about vacations.  The problem is that it requires uploading all my data where it's locked up in Facebook.</p><p>Maybe in a few years we'll have an open cross-application social network.  Anyone know of any platform like this out there now?  Google Wave is the closest thing I can think of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The answer to all of this is social networks .
Whether it 's posting pictures + blogs + " tweets " on Facebook that are only shared with your friends , or using Android 's geolocation and only sharing it with your contact list.What we really need is a social network that is n't closed up in a single company 's app .
I 'd love to use my Facebook social network for sharing pictures and " private " blog entries about vacations .
The problem is that it requires uploading all my data where it 's locked up in Facebook.Maybe in a few years we 'll have an open cross-application social network .
Anyone know of any platform like this out there now ?
Google Wave is the closest thing I can think of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The answer to all of this is social networks.
Whether it's posting pictures+blogs+"tweets" on Facebook that are only shared with your friends, or using Android's geolocation and only sharing it with your contact list.What we really need is a social network that isn't closed up in a single company's app.
I'd love to use my Facebook social network for sharing pictures and "private" blog entries about vacations.
The problem is that it requires uploading all my data where it's locked up in Facebook.Maybe in a few years we'll have an open cross-application social network.
Anyone know of any platform like this out there now?
Google Wave is the closest thing I can think of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269456</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>Afty0r</author>
	<datestamp>1259593020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>handy for opening new credit cards in your name</p></div></blockquote><p>Hardly my problem if a credit card company decides to give a credit card to someone masquerading as me... well I spose it depends on the laws of the country you live in, but where I live (the UK) this is the Credit Card companies' fault... and responsibility, not mine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>handy for opening new credit cards in your nameHardly my problem if a credit card company decides to give a credit card to someone masquerading as me... well I spose it depends on the laws of the country you live in , but where I live ( the UK ) this is the Credit Card companies ' fault... and responsibility , not mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>handy for opening new credit cards in your nameHardly my problem if a credit card company decides to give a credit card to someone masquerading as me... well I spose it depends on the laws of the country you live in, but where I live (the UK) this is the Credit Card companies' fault... and responsibility, not mine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</id>
	<title>I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1259592420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BOTH happened when I was at home and there was clear activity. One in the morning, busy getting ready and suddenly someone was in the kitchen who ran out.
</p><p>Other time 3 people tried to climb on the balcony while 4 people were in the house.
</p><p>The fast majority of crime in holland is committed by imigrants (don't bother telling me otherwise, all attempts were made by dark-skinned people) who have the combined IQ of a raisin.
</p><p>/. nerds come up with all kinds of clever tricks to steal things, that is not how criminals do it. Brutality and a surety that the legal system has been gutted makes them attempt break ins where there is no point because they want cash now. Planning... that just doesn't feature. It is opportunity crime, when you are home, you got doors and windows unlocked, when you are away, you double bolt everything.
</p><p>Mythbusters had a few of those Mission Impossible style break in attempts, meanwhile the biggest diamond heist that really happened, just involved driving up, loading the bags and driving away. No complex stuff, no sci-fi. Just the arrogance to think you can get away with it, and you often can. And when you don't, the law has so little change to catch you, it is worth the risk (conviction rate in Holland is less then 10\% of REPORTED crimes, only a fraction of crimes are known to be reported, so do the math).
</p><p>Do you really think a criminal who is going to sell your new plasma for at most a 100 dollars (think about it, even if you buy blackmarket, you want a box, you steal TV's from the warehous factory, not somebodies house) is going to bother keeping track of potential photo's that might show a plasma you had then and corrolate that with when you CLAIM to be away?
</p><p>Real burglars just walk past and LOOK. And they are a hell of lot more interested in a place that is dark where they can get inside very quickly and away very quickly. And even then, what are they going to do with a 50inch plasma screen? Takes ages to unplug, get off the wall, into a car and then you got what? A 2nd hand tv. Oh yeah, fences pay big bucks for that.
</p><p>I swear slashdot is the nerds fox news. You know those jokes:
</p><p>amount of pedophiles in the entire world: -
</p><p>amount of pedophiles on myspace according to Fox: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA broken up because of crap filter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
</p><p>Slashdot is like that with privacy
</p><p>Real world criminals tracking you: -
</p><p>Criminals tracking you according to the privacy crazies on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA broken up because of crap filter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
</p><p> <i>It is like the crappy filter<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. uses: Real spam stopped 0. Jokes and valid points ruined: zillion.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BOTH happened when I was at home and there was clear activity .
One in the morning , busy getting ready and suddenly someone was in the kitchen who ran out .
Other time 3 people tried to climb on the balcony while 4 people were in the house .
The fast majority of crime in holland is committed by imigrants ( do n't bother telling me otherwise , all attempts were made by dark-skinned people ) who have the combined IQ of a raisin .
/. nerds come up with all kinds of clever tricks to steal things , that is not how criminals do it .
Brutality and a surety that the legal system has been gutted makes them attempt break ins where there is no point because they want cash now .
Planning... that just does n't feature .
It is opportunity crime , when you are home , you got doors and windows unlocked , when you are away , you double bolt everything .
Mythbusters had a few of those Mission Impossible style break in attempts , meanwhile the biggest diamond heist that really happened , just involved driving up , loading the bags and driving away .
No complex stuff , no sci-fi .
Just the arrogance to think you can get away with it , and you often can .
And when you do n't , the law has so little change to catch you , it is worth the risk ( conviction rate in Holland is less then 10 \ % of REPORTED crimes , only a fraction of crimes are known to be reported , so do the math ) .
Do you really think a criminal who is going to sell your new plasma for at most a 100 dollars ( think about it , even if you buy blackmarket , you want a box , you steal TV 's from the warehous factory , not somebodies house ) is going to bother keeping track of potential photo 's that might show a plasma you had then and corrolate that with when you CLAIM to be away ?
Real burglars just walk past and LOOK .
And they are a hell of lot more interested in a place that is dark where they can get inside very quickly and away very quickly .
And even then , what are they going to do with a 50inch plasma screen ?
Takes ages to unplug , get off the wall , into a car and then you got what ?
A 2nd hand tv .
Oh yeah , fences pay big bucks for that .
I swear slashdot is the nerds fox news .
You know those jokes : amount of pedophiles in the entire world : - amount of pedophiles on myspace according to Fox : AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA broken up because of crap filter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Slashdot is like that with privacy Real world criminals tracking you : - Criminals tracking you according to the privacy crazies on / .
: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA broken up because of crap filter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA It is like the crappy filter / .
uses : Real spam stopped 0 .
Jokes and valid points ruined : zillion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BOTH happened when I was at home and there was clear activity.
One in the morning, busy getting ready and suddenly someone was in the kitchen who ran out.
Other time 3 people tried to climb on the balcony while 4 people were in the house.
The fast majority of crime in holland is committed by imigrants (don't bother telling me otherwise, all attempts were made by dark-skinned people) who have the combined IQ of a raisin.
/. nerds come up with all kinds of clever tricks to steal things, that is not how criminals do it.
Brutality and a surety that the legal system has been gutted makes them attempt break ins where there is no point because they want cash now.
Planning... that just doesn't feature.
It is opportunity crime, when you are home, you got doors and windows unlocked, when you are away, you double bolt everything.
Mythbusters had a few of those Mission Impossible style break in attempts, meanwhile the biggest diamond heist that really happened, just involved driving up, loading the bags and driving away.
No complex stuff, no sci-fi.
Just the arrogance to think you can get away with it, and you often can.
And when you don't, the law has so little change to catch you, it is worth the risk (conviction rate in Holland is less then 10\% of REPORTED crimes, only a fraction of crimes are known to be reported, so do the math).
Do you really think a criminal who is going to sell your new plasma for at most a 100 dollars (think about it, even if you buy blackmarket, you want a box, you steal TV's from the warehous factory, not somebodies house) is going to bother keeping track of potential photo's that might show a plasma you had then and corrolate that with when you CLAIM to be away?
Real burglars just walk past and LOOK.
And they are a hell of lot more interested in a place that is dark where they can get inside very quickly and away very quickly.
And even then, what are they going to do with a 50inch plasma screen?
Takes ages to unplug, get off the wall, into a car and then you got what?
A 2nd hand tv.
Oh yeah, fences pay big bucks for that.
I swear slashdot is the nerds fox news.
You know those jokes:
amount of pedophiles in the entire world: -
amount of pedophiles on myspace according to Fox: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA broken up because of crap filter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Slashdot is like that with privacy
Real world criminals tracking you: -
Criminals tracking you according to the privacy crazies on /.
: AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA broken up because of crap filter AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
 It is like the crappy filter /.
uses: Real spam stopped 0.
Jokes and valid points ruined: zillion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30276988</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259584380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting, but just using your slashdot name, I can work out that you're about 60 years old; have a macbook pro, purchased early 2008 (and a G4 before that); live in Canada with your wife (Sympatico was your ISP as recently as 2008), um... and you've compiled a SVN version of emacs 23. This is, of course, assuming that most of what you've said elsewhere is correct.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting , but just using your slashdot name , I can work out that you 're about 60 years old ; have a macbook pro , purchased early 2008 ( and a G4 before that ) ; live in Canada with your wife ( Sympatico was your ISP as recently as 2008 ) , um... and you 've compiled a SVN version of emacs 23 .
This is , of course , assuming that most of what you 've said elsewhere is correct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting, but just using your slashdot name, I can work out that you're about 60 years old; have a macbook pro, purchased early 2008 (and a G4 before that); live in Canada with your wife (Sympatico was your ISP as recently as 2008), um... and you've compiled a SVN version of emacs 23.
This is, of course, assuming that most of what you've said elsewhere is correct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269154</id>
	<title>Christmas sale, free shipping discounts...</title>
	<author>coolforsale135</author>
	<datestamp>1259590740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]
Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the  there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products . Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!  Welcome  to come  next   time ! Thank you!     <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]
Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the  there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products .
Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!
Welcome  to come  next   time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086</id>
	<title>1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2. keep all online family pictures private, behind a password</p><p>it always amazes me to find online profiles with birthdays and family member's photos: there's your mother's maiden name and your birthday on full display or a few clicks away, handy for opening new credit cards in your name</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2. keep all online family pictures private , behind a passwordit always amazes me to find online profiles with birthdays and family member 's photos : there 's your mother 's maiden name and your birthday on full display or a few clicks away , handy for opening new credit cards in your name</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2. keep all online family pictures private, behind a passwordit always amazes me to find online profiles with birthdays and family member's photos: there's your mother's maiden name and your birthday on full display or a few clicks away, handy for opening new credit cards in your name</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269646</id>
	<title>Since when does Geotagging = Augmented Reality?</title>
	<author>GrubLord</author>
	<datestamp>1259594580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Forgive me if I missed something, since the GP's link won't open for me, but isn't this unrelated to Augmented Reality?</p><p>Augmented Reality refers to systems that are able to extract or generate metadata by interpreting a live image of one's surroundings, hence 'augmenting' that reality with additional information in the manner of a futuristic heads-up display.</p><p>Unless your phone, or whatever is doing the augmenting of your reality, is transmitting that data to a social networking service or somesuch, there is no actual disclosure going on: usually, the system is just reacting to glyphs or other visual elements within its field of view.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Forgive me if I missed something , since the GP 's link wo n't open for me , but is n't this unrelated to Augmented Reality ? Augmented Reality refers to systems that are able to extract or generate metadata by interpreting a live image of one 's surroundings , hence 'augmenting ' that reality with additional information in the manner of a futuristic heads-up display.Unless your phone , or whatever is doing the augmenting of your reality , is transmitting that data to a social networking service or somesuch , there is no actual disclosure going on : usually , the system is just reacting to glyphs or other visual elements within its field of view .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Forgive me if I missed something, since the GP's link won't open for me, but isn't this unrelated to Augmented Reality?Augmented Reality refers to systems that are able to extract or generate metadata by interpreting a live image of one's surroundings, hence 'augmenting' that reality with additional information in the manner of a futuristic heads-up display.Unless your phone, or whatever is doing the augmenting of your reality, is transmitting that data to a social networking service or somesuch, there is no actual disclosure going on: usually, the system is just reacting to glyphs or other visual elements within its field of view.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272258</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>severoon</author>
	<datestamp>1259608620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad that people worry about this kind of stuff, but this problem specifically...not a problem. It's not as if people have no way to know who has nice things, and there's enough people in the world that don't even bother stopping their morning paper when they vacation that criminals never have a hard time finding easy targets.</p><p>The real trick here is to try not to be an easy target, and to accept that if someone really wants to target you, they're going to get you. There's not much you can do about it, but it's not worth worrying about because that's not how crime works.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad that people worry about this kind of stuff , but this problem specifically...not a problem .
It 's not as if people have no way to know who has nice things , and there 's enough people in the world that do n't even bother stopping their morning paper when they vacation that criminals never have a hard time finding easy targets.The real trick here is to try not to be an easy target , and to accept that if someone really wants to target you , they 're going to get you .
There 's not much you can do about it , but it 's not worth worrying about because that 's not how crime works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad that people worry about this kind of stuff, but this problem specifically...not a problem.
It's not as if people have no way to know who has nice things, and there's enough people in the world that don't even bother stopping their morning paper when they vacation that criminals never have a hard time finding easy targets.The real trick here is to try not to be an easy target, and to accept that if someone really wants to target you, they're going to get you.
There's not much you can do about it, but it's not worth worrying about because that's not how crime works.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270520</id>
	<title>Sorry, but no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259600160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you buy a 50" Plasma and bring it home, anyone driving by while you take it inside now knows you own a 50" Plasma and where you live. Where does it stop?</p><p>While theoretically, it is possible to figure something like this out for a robbery or something like that, the chances are incredibly slim, and nothing you do with the exception of completely unplugging and never leaving you home is going to make you completely secure. This is just fear mongering, you are at no higher risk with internet than you are with normal conversation (you tell friend 1 you just got a tv, they tell their friend that a friend of theirs just got that new TV, later on you leave on a trip and tell your friend, whose friend happens to be around/friend 1 tells, and now he can go steal your TV.) It is the nature of socializing, you are gonna give information that is innocuous by itself but when pieced together information can be used for bad deeds.</p><p>Ok, go ahead and mod flaimbait or troll now</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you buy a 50 " Plasma and bring it home , anyone driving by while you take it inside now knows you own a 50 " Plasma and where you live .
Where does it stop ? While theoretically , it is possible to figure something like this out for a robbery or something like that , the chances are incredibly slim , and nothing you do with the exception of completely unplugging and never leaving you home is going to make you completely secure .
This is just fear mongering , you are at no higher risk with internet than you are with normal conversation ( you tell friend 1 you just got a tv , they tell their friend that a friend of theirs just got that new TV , later on you leave on a trip and tell your friend , whose friend happens to be around/friend 1 tells , and now he can go steal your TV .
) It is the nature of socializing , you are gon na give information that is innocuous by itself but when pieced together information can be used for bad deeds.Ok , go ahead and mod flaimbait or troll now</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you buy a 50" Plasma and bring it home, anyone driving by while you take it inside now knows you own a 50" Plasma and where you live.
Where does it stop?While theoretically, it is possible to figure something like this out for a robbery or something like that, the chances are incredibly slim, and nothing you do with the exception of completely unplugging and never leaving you home is going to make you completely secure.
This is just fear mongering, you are at no higher risk with internet than you are with normal conversation (you tell friend 1 you just got a tv, they tell their friend that a friend of theirs just got that new TV, later on you leave on a trip and tell your friend, whose friend happens to be around/friend 1 tells, and now he can go steal your TV.
) It is the nature of socializing, you are gonna give information that is innocuous by itself but when pieced together information can be used for bad deeds.Ok, go ahead and mod flaimbait or troll now</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271284</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>eth1</author>
	<datestamp>1259604120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're talking about small time criminals that are operating opportunistically. Any mistakes and they might walk in on me when I'm home (and  they'll very likely have to be carried out with a few newly installed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.4in or 5.56mm holes).</p><p>This information allows burglars to do their casing safely and anonymously from home, and they can operate in a much larger area. Who cares if they have to drive 70mi, if they know with a high degree of confidence that a certain house will be unoccupied for a few hours, and they know there's $XX,000 of easily stealable stuff.</p><p>Get a box truck, paint it up like a yard service (hell, have one guy mowing the front lawn while you're at it; it'll cover the breaking glass), and you'll be invisible in plain sight in any nice neighborhood.</p><p>It will, however, be quite funny when more than one gang of competing burglars start showing up at the same time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're talking about small time criminals that are operating opportunistically .
Any mistakes and they might walk in on me when I 'm home ( and they 'll very likely have to be carried out with a few newly installed .4in or 5.56mm holes ) .This information allows burglars to do their casing safely and anonymously from home , and they can operate in a much larger area .
Who cares if they have to drive 70mi , if they know with a high degree of confidence that a certain house will be unoccupied for a few hours , and they know there 's $ XX,000 of easily stealable stuff.Get a box truck , paint it up like a yard service ( hell , have one guy mowing the front lawn while you 're at it ; it 'll cover the breaking glass ) , and you 'll be invisible in plain sight in any nice neighborhood.It will , however , be quite funny when more than one gang of competing burglars start showing up at the same time : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're talking about small time criminals that are operating opportunistically.
Any mistakes and they might walk in on me when I'm home (and  they'll very likely have to be carried out with a few newly installed .4in or 5.56mm holes).This information allows burglars to do their casing safely and anonymously from home, and they can operate in a much larger area.
Who cares if they have to drive 70mi, if they know with a high degree of confidence that a certain house will be unoccupied for a few hours, and they know there's $XX,000 of easily stealable stuff.Get a box truck, paint it up like a yard service (hell, have one guy mowing the front lawn while you're at it; it'll cover the breaking glass), and you'll be invisible in plain sight in any nice neighborhood.It will, however, be quite funny when more than one gang of competing burglars start showing up at the same time :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269202</id>
	<title>"...and especially its metadata."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259591280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What on earth does this mean? "Lose ownership of the metadata inside a photo"? Does the author even know what he/she is talking about?</p><p>I don't exactly fear "losing the rights" to the metadata contained in the jpegs I spread around the web:  shutter speed/focal length info, the camera source info, eventual embedded ICC profile, width/height info etc.</p><p>My god, the idiocy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What on earth does this mean ?
" Lose ownership of the metadata inside a photo " ?
Does the author even know what he/she is talking about ? I do n't exactly fear " losing the rights " to the metadata contained in the jpegs I spread around the web : shutter speed/focal length info , the camera source info , eventual embedded ICC profile , width/height info etc.My god , the idiocy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What on earth does this mean?
"Lose ownership of the metadata inside a photo"?
Does the author even know what he/she is talking about?I don't exactly fear "losing the rights" to the metadata contained in the jpegs I spread around the web:  shutter speed/focal length info, the camera source info, eventual embedded ICC profile, width/height info etc.My god, the idiocy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272688</id>
	<title>It's about the internet, stupid!?</title>
	<author>recharged95</author>
	<datestamp>1259610960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's funny that everyone talk about the internet and "information wants to be free", but in the end it basically breaks down all hierarchies--bring fairness to everyone and empowers everyone equally: and that includes criminals, the homeless, the predator, and the politician. I rather think of it as <i>information wants to be discovered...and exploited</i>.
<br>
<br>
<br>
I can't wait until F/OSS gets exploited by the internet--Granted F/OSS is benefitting the world more-so-ever, but so far it's a blind love fest.We all talk about freedom and the internet in the same words, and well.... you're going to get what you ask for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny that everyone talk about the internet and " information wants to be free " , but in the end it basically breaks down all hierarchies--bring fairness to everyone and empowers everyone equally : and that includes criminals , the homeless , the predator , and the politician .
I rather think of it as information wants to be discovered...and exploited .
I ca n't wait until F/OSS gets exploited by the internet--Granted F/OSS is benefitting the world more-so-ever , but so far it 's a blind love fest.We all talk about freedom and the internet in the same words , and well.... you 're going to get what you ask for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny that everyone talk about the internet and "information wants to be free", but in the end it basically breaks down all hierarchies--bring fairness to everyone and empowers everyone equally: and that includes criminals, the homeless, the predator, and the politician.
I rather think of it as information wants to be discovered...and exploited.
I can't wait until F/OSS gets exploited by the internet--Granted F/OSS is benefitting the world more-so-ever, but so far it's a blind love fest.We all talk about freedom and the internet in the same words, and well.... you're going to get what you ask for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274498</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>FrozenGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1259574720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gotta agree.
<br>
I've never used facebook (never even seen it), but I know that there is information about me on it because it's been put there by friends and family, who did it without asking (without considering).
<br>
You have limited control (probably very limited) over what personal information gets on the web.  Your best bet is knowing as much about the web as possible and using it to your advantage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Got ta agree .
I 've never used facebook ( never even seen it ) , but I know that there is information about me on it because it 's been put there by friends and family , who did it without asking ( without considering ) .
You have limited control ( probably very limited ) over what personal information gets on the web .
Your best bet is knowing as much about the web as possible and using it to your advantage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gotta agree.
I've never used facebook (never even seen it), but I know that there is information about me on it because it's been put there by friends and family, who did it without asking (without considering).
You have limited control (probably very limited) over what personal information gets on the web.
Your best bet is knowing as much about the web as possible and using it to your advantage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271238</id>
	<title>Your thieves are locals...</title>
	<author>MindPrison</author>
	<datestamp>1259603880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because no one in their right mind would travel 100's of miles to steal a 50" inch plasma tv that you can get for the price of a mediocre tv set just a few years ago anyway, there's more to it than that.</p><p>The thieves you'll most likely get (if any) is your locals. These have the time to check you out, to make sure you don't have guards - or security service...you can't find out that on facebook. And besides, they want much more from you than a mere plasma tv, if you have valuable silverware, artwork etc. now we're talking international thieves, thats something worth driving around after. The computer &amp; your plasma &amp; your playstation is only of interest to the local thieves.</p><p>There are also other key factors to if you get burglarized or not, for example - if you live in a tall building, on top...or besides a lot of neighbors - your average thief is NOT going to want to carry down 5-20 stairs past 10-20 neighbors your 50 inch huge weighty plasma tv, moving service 2'o clock in the night? Yeah right...</p><p>And for augmented reality, heh...if the burglars KNOW you have a LIVE WEBCAM - they'll be either using masks - or be sure to keep AWAY from your apartment - as there are plenty of other "non-surveillance" apartments around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because no one in their right mind would travel 100 's of miles to steal a 50 " inch plasma tv that you can get for the price of a mediocre tv set just a few years ago anyway , there 's more to it than that.The thieves you 'll most likely get ( if any ) is your locals .
These have the time to check you out , to make sure you do n't have guards - or security service...you ca n't find out that on facebook .
And besides , they want much more from you than a mere plasma tv , if you have valuable silverware , artwork etc .
now we 're talking international thieves , thats something worth driving around after .
The computer &amp; your plasma &amp; your playstation is only of interest to the local thieves.There are also other key factors to if you get burglarized or not , for example - if you live in a tall building , on top...or besides a lot of neighbors - your average thief is NOT going to want to carry down 5-20 stairs past 10-20 neighbors your 50 inch huge weighty plasma tv , moving service 2'o clock in the night ?
Yeah right...And for augmented reality , heh...if the burglars KNOW you have a LIVE WEBCAM - they 'll be either using masks - or be sure to keep AWAY from your apartment - as there are plenty of other " non-surveillance " apartments around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because no one in their right mind would travel 100's of miles to steal a 50" inch plasma tv that you can get for the price of a mediocre tv set just a few years ago anyway, there's more to it than that.The thieves you'll most likely get (if any) is your locals.
These have the time to check you out, to make sure you don't have guards - or security service...you can't find out that on facebook.
And besides, they want much more from you than a mere plasma tv, if you have valuable silverware, artwork etc.
now we're talking international thieves, thats something worth driving around after.
The computer &amp; your plasma &amp; your playstation is only of interest to the local thieves.There are also other key factors to if you get burglarized or not, for example - if you live in a tall building, on top...or besides a lot of neighbors - your average thief is NOT going to want to carry down 5-20 stairs past 10-20 neighbors your 50 inch huge weighty plasma tv, moving service 2'o clock in the night?
Yeah right...And for augmented reality, heh...if the burglars KNOW you have a LIVE WEBCAM - they'll be either using masks - or be sure to keep AWAY from your apartment - as there are plenty of other "non-surveillance" apartments around.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269314</id>
	<title>Re:New business opportunity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259592060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does the pirate bay have a patent?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the pirate bay have a patent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the pirate bay have a patent?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269094</id>
	<title>eat my shorts slashdot !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eat my shorts slashdot !!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eat my shorts slashdot !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eat my shorts slashdot !
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269630</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>Schiphol</author>
	<datestamp>1259594460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, this is a joke and the moderators are metajoking, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , this is a joke and the moderators are metajoking , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, this is a joke and the moderators are metajoking, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30278436</id>
	<title>Re:Since when does Geotagging = Augmented Reality?</title>
	<author>NiteMair</author>
	<datestamp>1259594580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No no no, you have it all wrong.</p><p>Augmented Reality is what the *theives* are gonna be using - as they walk around, they see geo-tagged pictures of 50" TVs pop into view, and next to them, the twitter feed stating the owner is away on vacation...</p><p>The guy on vacation is just using "Distorted Reality" believing that all that info he posted on the internet was a good idea, and he has thousands of internet friends looking at it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No no no , you have it all wrong.Augmented Reality is what the * theives * are gon na be using - as they walk around , they see geo-tagged pictures of 50 " TVs pop into view , and next to them , the twitter feed stating the owner is away on vacation...The guy on vacation is just using " Distorted Reality " believing that all that info he posted on the internet was a good idea , and he has thousands of internet friends looking at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No no no, you have it all wrong.Augmented Reality is what the *theives* are gonna be using - as they walk around, they see geo-tagged pictures of 50" TVs pop into view, and next to them, the twitter feed stating the owner is away on vacation...The guy on vacation is just using "Distorted Reality" believing that all that info he posted on the internet was a good idea, and he has thousands of internet friends looking at it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269646</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271380</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259604660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> I'll throw a hypothetical scenario out there - say you enabled a service at the supermarket that automatically emails you a copy of your receipt whenever you make a purchase. If your identity thief makes a purchase at one of these supermarkets, you have an incriminating email containing unrecognizable foodstuffs and a credit account you never opened, which can be used to spearhead an investigation pulling CCTV footage from that supermarket to compare to a facial recognition database, resulting in the identification and arrest of the identity thief.</i></p><p><i>Given this scenario, I think that rather than rebel against the erosion of our privacy, we need to accept that privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again, and instead work towards ensuring that no single group of people is allowed to exempt themselves or abuse this new information.</i> </p><p>Good idea: using technology to protect yourself.<br>Bad idea: throwing in the towel on privacy.</p><p>Accepting your point of view ("privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again") accomplishes nothing and is likely incorrect in all but the most pedantic sense.  Things change constantly - duh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll throw a hypothetical scenario out there - say you enabled a service at the supermarket that automatically emails you a copy of your receipt whenever you make a purchase .
If your identity thief makes a purchase at one of these supermarkets , you have an incriminating email containing unrecognizable foodstuffs and a credit account you never opened , which can be used to spearhead an investigation pulling CCTV footage from that supermarket to compare to a facial recognition database , resulting in the identification and arrest of the identity thief.Given this scenario , I think that rather than rebel against the erosion of our privacy , we need to accept that privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again , and instead work towards ensuring that no single group of people is allowed to exempt themselves or abuse this new information .
Good idea : using technology to protect yourself.Bad idea : throwing in the towel on privacy.Accepting your point of view ( " privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again " ) accomplishes nothing and is likely incorrect in all but the most pedantic sense .
Things change constantly - duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'll throw a hypothetical scenario out there - say you enabled a service at the supermarket that automatically emails you a copy of your receipt whenever you make a purchase.
If your identity thief makes a purchase at one of these supermarkets, you have an incriminating email containing unrecognizable foodstuffs and a credit account you never opened, which can be used to spearhead an investigation pulling CCTV footage from that supermarket to compare to a facial recognition database, resulting in the identification and arrest of the identity thief.Given this scenario, I think that rather than rebel against the erosion of our privacy, we need to accept that privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again, and instead work towards ensuring that no single group of people is allowed to exempt themselves or abuse this new information.
Good idea: using technology to protect yourself.Bad idea: throwing in the towel on privacy.Accepting your point of view ("privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again") accomplishes nothing and is likely incorrect in all but the most pedantic sense.
Things change constantly - duh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272112</id>
	<title>Life is hard</title>
	<author>pyrosim</author>
	<datestamp>1259608020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sure, somebody might keep track of you on the internet for six months and steal your TV. Somebody could also drive by your house every so often and do the same thing. Is it worth it to censor your entire life to cower from burglers?  Life is hard, take some risks and have some fun. Social networking is fun. You can buy a new TV, you can't buy back having wasted your life hiding.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , somebody might keep track of you on the internet for six months and steal your TV .
Somebody could also drive by your house every so often and do the same thing .
Is it worth it to censor your entire life to cower from burglers ?
Life is hard , take some risks and have some fun .
Social networking is fun .
You can buy a new TV , you ca n't buy back having wasted your life hiding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, somebody might keep track of you on the internet for six months and steal your TV.
Somebody could also drive by your house every so often and do the same thing.
Is it worth it to censor your entire life to cower from burglers?
Life is hard, take some risks and have some fun.
Social networking is fun.
You can buy a new TV, you can't buy back having wasted your life hiding.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272158</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259608200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not the fact that they are dark skinned that makes them more likely to steal. You're probably right and the majority are black but this is perhaps because the majority of black immigrants in Holland are poor/uneducated and need to steal. It's not the black skin though! racist!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the fact that they are dark skinned that makes them more likely to steal .
You 're probably right and the majority are black but this is perhaps because the majority of black immigrants in Holland are poor/uneducated and need to steal .
It 's not the black skin though !
racist !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the fact that they are dark skinned that makes them more likely to steal.
You're probably right and the majority are black but this is perhaps because the majority of black immigrants in Holland are poor/uneducated and need to steal.
It's not the black skin though!
racist!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30294088</id>
	<title>Re:The solution is social networks</title>
	<author>osssmkatz</author>
	<datestamp>1259694000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what about google's opensocial? That allows you to port apps and data between social networks.</p><p>--Sam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what about google 's opensocial ?
That allows you to port apps and data between social networks.--Sam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what about google's opensocial?
That allows you to port apps and data between social networks.--Sam</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274410</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1259574480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if you believe that's the lengths an investigation will go, you're sadly mistaken.  No one will bother with the CCTV footage, if its still even there by the time you find out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if you believe that 's the lengths an investigation will go , you 're sadly mistaken .
No one will bother with the CCTV footage , if its still even there by the time you find out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if you believe that's the lengths an investigation will go, you're sadly mistaken.
No one will bother with the CCTV footage, if its still even there by the time you find out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270250</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar</title>
	<author>izomiac</author>
	<datestamp>1259598480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting, I was under the impression that using false names with banks, on line merchants, and government services wasn't legal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting , I was under the impression that using false names with banks , on line merchants , and government services was n't legal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting, I was under the impression that using false names with banks, on line merchants, and government services wasn't legal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270032</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I'm supporting his statement.</p><p>I've had one burglary.  He was black and I didn't lock the apartment door when I went to do laundry.  He stole a checkbook, wrote checks, ended up in jail.</p><p>The point being is that using geotagging and picture research is a lot of work when someone can just drive down the street and see 4-5 houses with big-screen TVs from the street.</p><p>The core problem is saying "I'm not home" online, regardless of what you have in the home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 'm supporting his statement.I 've had one burglary .
He was black and I did n't lock the apartment door when I went to do laundry .
He stole a checkbook , wrote checks , ended up in jail.The point being is that using geotagging and picture research is a lot of work when someone can just drive down the street and see 4-5 houses with big-screen TVs from the street.The core problem is saying " I 'm not home " online , regardless of what you have in the home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I'm supporting his statement.I've had one burglary.
He was black and I didn't lock the apartment door when I went to do laundry.
He stole a checkbook, wrote checks, ended up in jail.The point being is that using geotagging and picture research is a lot of work when someone can just drive down the street and see 4-5 houses with big-screen TVs from the street.The core problem is saying "I'm not home" online, regardless of what you have in the home.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30282678</id>
	<title>Re:We're from the internet</title>
	<author>DiEx-15</author>
	<datestamp>1259680320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read this and thought: "BREAK OUT THE TINFOIL HATS!!" <br> <br>
C'mon... I am for paranoia and all, but this is ridiculous!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read this and thought : " BREAK OUT THE TINFOIL HATS ! !
" C'mon... I am for paranoia and all , but this is ridiculous !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read this and thought: "BREAK OUT THE TINFOIL HATS!!
"  
C'mon... I am for paranoia and all, but this is ridiculous!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138</id>
	<title>Avatar</title>
	<author>warren.oates</author>
	<datestamp>1259590620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I haven't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270162</id>
	<title>Wrong approach</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1259597940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would lie saying that i have a big plasma tv, a lot of gadgets and money hidden in my house, and stay hidden till the buglar with that wonderful augmented reality device come to take it.<br><br>The real problem there is not so much augmented reality as is making public things that you dont want everyone know. Once you go that road, probably augmented reality and/or geotagged photos aren't necessary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would lie saying that i have a big plasma tv , a lot of gadgets and money hidden in my house , and stay hidden till the buglar with that wonderful augmented reality device come to take it.The real problem there is not so much augmented reality as is making public things that you dont want everyone know .
Once you go that road , probably augmented reality and/or geotagged photos are n't necessary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would lie saying that i have a big plasma tv, a lot of gadgets and money hidden in my house, and stay hidden till the buglar with that wonderful augmented reality device come to take it.The real problem there is not so much augmented reality as is making public things that you dont want everyone know.
Once you go that road, probably augmented reality and/or geotagged photos aren't necessary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274082</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar</title>
	<author>No. 24601</author>
	<datestamp>1259573160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I haven't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.</p></div><p>So does that mean you never use online banking or government services ?</p><p>Ever applied for a job online ?</p><p>Pretty powerful statement.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.So does that mean you never use online banking or government services ? Ever applied for a job online ? Pretty powerful statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.So does that mean you never use online banking or government services ?Ever applied for a job online ?Pretty powerful statement.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269970</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259596800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The fast majority of crime in holland is committed by imigrants (don't bother telling me otherwise, all attempts were made by dark-skinned people)</p></div></blockquote><p>One, and only one, of the following is true:</p><ul><li>All Holland natives are white, a sample size of two is valid for drawing conclusions against a population of millions, and the plural form of "anecdote" is "data".</li><li>You're a moron.</li></ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fast majority of crime in holland is committed by imigrants ( do n't bother telling me otherwise , all attempts were made by dark-skinned people ) One , and only one , of the following is true : All Holland natives are white , a sample size of two is valid for drawing conclusions against a population of millions , and the plural form of " anecdote " is " data " .You 're a moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fast majority of crime in holland is committed by imigrants (don't bother telling me otherwise, all attempts were made by dark-skinned people)One, and only one, of the following is true:All Holland natives are white, a sample size of two is valid for drawing conclusions against a population of millions, and the plural form of "anecdote" is "data".You're a moron.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269652</id>
	<title>It's a Trap</title>
	<author>b4upoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259594700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>         Next time I go on vacation I'll put it online complete with photos of a great new plasma TV. That is right after I wire it up to a 220 outlet so that when someone lays hands on it they are fried.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Or, more moderately, anything that appears to be a breach in security can also be one heck of a set up to trap bad guys. Although I will say that I live in an exceptionally safe environment. In my location thieves are almost always quickly caught and our local courts do tend to issue very long sentences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Next time I go on vacation I 'll put it online complete with photos of a great new plasma TV .
That is right after I wire it up to a 220 outlet so that when someone lays hands on it they are fried .
                  Or , more moderately , anything that appears to be a breach in security can also be one heck of a set up to trap bad guys .
Although I will say that I live in an exceptionally safe environment .
In my location thieves are almost always quickly caught and our local courts do tend to issue very long sentences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>         Next time I go on vacation I'll put it online complete with photos of a great new plasma TV.
That is right after I wire it up to a 220 outlet so that when someone lays hands on it they are fried.
                  Or, more moderately, anything that appears to be a breach in security can also be one heck of a set up to trap bad guys.
Although I will say that I live in an exceptionally safe environment.
In my location thieves are almost always quickly caught and our local courts do tend to issue very long sentences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269308</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>thefirelane</author>
	<datestamp>1259592000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You realize, there is a reason that they don't immediately release the names of disaster victims right?  It's so the surviving family members can secure their property as criminals will find their address and break in.  I imagine this also would be exploited.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You realize , there is a reason that they do n't immediately release the names of disaster victims right ?
It 's so the surviving family members can secure their property as criminals will find their address and break in .
I imagine this also would be exploited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You realize, there is a reason that they don't immediately release the names of disaster victims right?
It's so the surviving family members can secure their property as criminals will find their address and break in.
I imagine this also would be exploited.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269180</id>
	<title>Think seriously about privacy?</title>
	<author>ComputerGeek01</author>
	<datestamp>1259591040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe you should think seriously about the quality of your 'friends'. Unless you're one of those dupes who need to believe that the 600+ people that have sent you facebook friend requests acctually care about you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you should think seriously about the quality of your 'friends' .
Unless you 're one of those dupes who need to believe that the 600 + people that have sent you facebook friend requests acctually care about you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you should think seriously about the quality of your 'friends'.
Unless you're one of those dupes who need to believe that the 600+ people that have sent you facebook friend requests acctually care about you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230</id>
	<title>Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1259591460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody reads your twitter, nobody follows your flicker account and no 2bit criminal is going to do both when i can just drive round the block and see your curtains haven't changed states in the last 3 days. There are reasons to care about your privacy, future blackmail, employer searching for you, etc, but nobody reading you (mirco)blog is going to steal your TV.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody reads your twitter , nobody follows your flicker account and no 2bit criminal is going to do both when i can just drive round the block and see your curtains have n't changed states in the last 3 days .
There are reasons to care about your privacy , future blackmail , employer searching for you , etc , but nobody reading you ( mirco ) blog is going to steal your TV .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody reads your twitter, nobody follows your flicker account and no 2bit criminal is going to do both when i can just drive round the block and see your curtains haven't changed states in the last 3 days.
There are reasons to care about your privacy, future blackmail, employer searching for you, etc, but nobody reading you (mirco)blog is going to steal your TV.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270590</id>
	<title>Common sense isn't enough yet</title>
	<author>Sloppy</author>
	<datestamp>1259600580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When you tweet from the beach in Barbados telling your friends you are away for 2 weeks..</p></div></blockquote><p>People think of tweeting as a public broadcast, but for some totally irrational and unrealistic "reason", they don't think of unencrypted email as a public broadcast, so they're still happy to leak all sorts of private data which can be used against them.  And while we all laugh at the Tweeter who does that, most people (i.e. the benchmark for defining "common" sense) <em>don't</em> laugh at the crypto-avoiders who <em>effectively</em>, if not deliberately, do the same thing.  <em>Common</em> sense has a lot of catching up to do with <em>real</em> sense.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When you tweet from the beach in Barbados telling your friends you are away for 2 weeks..People think of tweeting as a public broadcast , but for some totally irrational and unrealistic " reason " , they do n't think of unencrypted email as a public broadcast , so they 're still happy to leak all sorts of private data which can be used against them .
And while we all laugh at the Tweeter who does that , most people ( i.e .
the benchmark for defining " common " sense ) do n't laugh at the crypto-avoiders who effectively , if not deliberately , do the same thing .
Common sense has a lot of catching up to do with real sense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you tweet from the beach in Barbados telling your friends you are away for 2 weeks..People think of tweeting as a public broadcast, but for some totally irrational and unrealistic "reason", they don't think of unencrypted email as a public broadcast, so they're still happy to leak all sorts of private data which can be used against them.
And while we all laugh at the Tweeter who does that, most people (i.e.
the benchmark for defining "common" sense) don't laugh at the crypto-avoiders who effectively, if not deliberately, do the same thing.
Common sense has a lot of catching up to do with real sense.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270272</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>jsvendsen</author>
	<datestamp>1259598600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoa, big fat [citation needed] right there!</p><p>For one thing, if someone called and told you a plane fell down with your brother inside, would your first impulse <i>really</i> be to run down to his place and "secure" his flatscreen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoa , big fat [ citation needed ] right there ! For one thing , if someone called and told you a plane fell down with your brother inside , would your first impulse really be to run down to his place and " secure " his flatscreen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoa, big fat [citation needed] right there!For one thing, if someone called and told you a plane fell down with your brother inside, would your first impulse really be to run down to his place and "secure" his flatscreen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269826</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>ultral0rd</author>
	<datestamp>1259595840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Strangely enough I've heard and experience the complete opposite.
I've been burglarized twice in my life, and both were done by highly organised crime gangs.

Sure your small time druggies are just looking for something to grab so that they can get another hit, but organised gangs will thrive on information like this, to see who is afk and who isn't.
And in the end, it will be these guys who will drive away with your flat screen's and suitcases full of everything else thanks to AR.

Or maybe the burglar's in South Africa are just smarter than those in Holldand</htmltext>
<tokenext>Strangely enough I 've heard and experience the complete opposite .
I 've been burglarized twice in my life , and both were done by highly organised crime gangs .
Sure your small time druggies are just looking for something to grab so that they can get another hit , but organised gangs will thrive on information like this , to see who is afk and who is n't .
And in the end , it will be these guys who will drive away with your flat screen 's and suitcases full of everything else thanks to AR .
Or maybe the burglar 's in South Africa are just smarter than those in Holldand</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strangely enough I've heard and experience the complete opposite.
I've been burglarized twice in my life, and both were done by highly organised crime gangs.
Sure your small time druggies are just looking for something to grab so that they can get another hit, but organised gangs will thrive on information like this, to see who is afk and who isn't.
And in the end, it will be these guys who will drive away with your flat screen's and suitcases full of everything else thanks to AR.
Or maybe the burglar's in South Africa are just smarter than those in Holldand</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270432</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>izomiac</author>
	<datestamp>1259599680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Grossly speaking there are three types of criminals: smart and dumb.  Dumb criminals won't do the sophisticated attacks.  Smart criminals are unlikely to do something as risky/low reward as burglary of some Average Joe's house.  <br> <br>
Vanity causes people to post every little detail of their lives with the delusion that someone cares.  This form of paranoia is another manifestation of the same... it's the delusion that someone cares enough to carefully examine your digital life because your stuff is somehow worth the trouble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Grossly speaking there are three types of criminals : smart and dumb .
Dumb criminals wo n't do the sophisticated attacks .
Smart criminals are unlikely to do something as risky/low reward as burglary of some Average Joe 's house .
Vanity causes people to post every little detail of their lives with the delusion that someone cares .
This form of paranoia is another manifestation of the same... it 's the delusion that someone cares enough to carefully examine your digital life because your stuff is somehow worth the trouble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Grossly speaking there are three types of criminals: smart and dumb.
Dumb criminals won't do the sophisticated attacks.
Smart criminals are unlikely to do something as risky/low reward as burglary of some Average Joe's house.
Vanity causes people to post every little detail of their lives with the delusion that someone cares.
This form of paranoia is another manifestation of the same... it's the delusion that someone cares enough to carefully examine your digital life because your stuff is somehow worth the trouble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269146</id>
	<title>New business opportunity</title>
	<author>Toy G</author>
	<datestamp>1259590680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A search engine for burglars!</p><p>Quick, let's file a patent...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A search engine for burglars ! Quick , let 's file a patent.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A search engine for burglars!Quick, let's file a patent...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269122</id>
	<title>We're from the internet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>And we know what you did last summer...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And we know what you did last summer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And we know what you did last summer...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269464</id>
	<title>Re:Avatar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259593080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I haven't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.</p></div><p>It seems that you have been living two lives. In one life, you are Warren Oates, program writer for a respectable software company.
<br> <br>
The other life is lived in computers where you go by the hacker alias Neo, and are guilty of virtually every computer crime we have a law for, including the unauthorized use of the D.M.V. system for the removal of automobile boots.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.It seems that you have been living two lives .
In one life , you are Warren Oates , program writer for a respectable software company .
The other life is lived in computers where you go by the hacker alias Neo , and are guilty of virtually every computer crime we have a law for , including the unauthorized use of the D.M.V .
system for the removal of automobile boots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't used my real name anywhere on the Internet in about ten years.It seems that you have been living two lives.
In one life, you are Warren Oates, program writer for a respectable software company.
The other life is lived in computers where you go by the hacker alias Neo, and are guilty of virtually every computer crime we have a law for, including the unauthorized use of the D.M.V.
system for the removal of automobile boots.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272086</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>SleazyRidr</author>
	<datestamp>1259607840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>No, it wouldn't be your first impulse, but after you got over the initial shock it'd be one of the things you'd have to do to 'clean up.'</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it would n't be your first impulse , but after you got over the initial shock it 'd be one of the things you 'd have to do to 'clean up .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it wouldn't be your first impulse, but after you got over the initial shock it'd be one of the things you'd have to do to 'clean up.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269908</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>pinkushun</author>
	<datestamp>1259596440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well said Sir. Also to those who "never really cared about online privacy", expect bad things to come your way (read: <a href="http://facebookfails.com/" title="facebookfails.com" rel="nofollow">FB Fails</a> [facebookfails.com])</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well said Sir .
Also to those who " never really cared about online privacy " , expect bad things to come your way ( read : FB Fails [ facebookfails.com ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well said Sir.
Also to those who "never really cared about online privacy", expect bad things to come your way (read: FB Fails [facebookfails.com])</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272828</id>
	<title>Re:I had TWO attemped burglaries in my life</title>
	<author>NiteShaed</author>
	<datestamp>1259611680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>all attempts were made by dark-skinned people</p></div></blockquote><p>You're Dutch.  Pretty much everyone from anywhere is dark-skinned compared to you.  You actually manage to make the British look positively swarthy.  The people on your balcony were probably just tourists from Nebraska looking for a good place to take windmill pictures.....</p><p>By the way, you don't happen to live in Haarlem, do you?  Just wonderin'.....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>all attempts were made by dark-skinned peopleYou 're Dutch .
Pretty much everyone from anywhere is dark-skinned compared to you .
You actually manage to make the British look positively swarthy .
The people on your balcony were probably just tourists from Nebraska looking for a good place to take windmill pictures.....By the way , you do n't happen to live in Haarlem , do you ?
Just wonderin'.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>all attempts were made by dark-skinned peopleYou're Dutch.
Pretty much everyone from anywhere is dark-skinned compared to you.
You actually manage to make the British look positively swarthy.
The people on your balcony were probably just tourists from Nebraska looking for a good place to take windmill pictures.....By the way, you don't happen to live in Haarlem, do you?
Just wonderin'.....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269682</id>
	<title>What Augmented Reality doing here?</title>
	<author>S3D</author>
	<datestamp>1259594820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geotagging" title="wikipedia.org">Geotagging</a> [wikipedia.org] and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented\_reality" title="wikipedia.org">Augmented Reality</a> [wikipedia.org] are not the same. Surely AR application can do geotagging, but not necessary, no more than it can produce sound for example. AR also can use publicly geotagged objects, with client not publicly geotagged. AR have no relation whatsoever to problem in question.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geotagging [ wikipedia.org ] and Augmented Reality [ wikipedia.org ] are not the same .
Surely AR application can do geotagging , but not necessary , no more than it can produce sound for example .
AR also can use publicly geotagged objects , with client not publicly geotagged .
AR have no relation whatsoever to problem in question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geotagging [wikipedia.org] and Augmented Reality [wikipedia.org] are not the same.
Surely AR application can do geotagging, but not necessary, no more than it can produce sound for example.
AR also can use publicly geotagged objects, with client not publicly geotagged.
AR have no relation whatsoever to problem in question.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269284</id>
	<title>Why worry?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259591880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have a decent alarm system and insurance why would you even worry about advertising what you may or may not own?  If you really believe this is a problem you better start burning your trash in the backyard behind a 10' fence.  You never know when the google van will street-view your empty LCD boxes for all to see.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have a decent alarm system and insurance why would you even worry about advertising what you may or may not own ?
If you really believe this is a problem you better start burning your trash in the backyard behind a 10 ' fence .
You never know when the google van will street-view your empty LCD boxes for all to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have a decent alarm system and insurance why would you even worry about advertising what you may or may not own?
If you really believe this is a problem you better start burning your trash in the backyard behind a 10' fence.
You never know when the google van will street-view your empty LCD boxes for all to see.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269110</id>
	<title>but it's cool and hip</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259590200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to always broadcast your location and everything about me to everyone on the internet? we are all friends, right? everyone on the internets cares about what i do everyday, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to always broadcast your location and everything about me to everyone on the internet ?
we are all friends , right ?
everyone on the internets cares about what i do everyday , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to always broadcast your location and everything about me to everyone on the internet?
we are all friends, right?
everyone on the internets cares about what i do everyday, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269328</id>
	<title>Steal this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259592240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anybody who hasn't figured this out by now isn't going to. Computers have been around for over twenty years and the WWW a lot longer. I'm OK because the economic policies of the last three Presidents have left me with nothing to steal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anybody who has n't figured this out by now is n't going to .
Computers have been around for over twenty years and the WWW a lot longer .
I 'm OK because the economic policies of the last three Presidents have left me with nothing to steal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anybody who hasn't figured this out by now isn't going to.
Computers have been around for over twenty years and the WWW a lot longer.
I'm OK because the economic policies of the last three Presidents have left me with nothing to steal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270574</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody gives a shit about you</title>
	<author>Halotron1</author>
	<datestamp>1259600520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'd be surprised.</p><p>I used to figure nobody would give a crap about the contents of our family website, so why secure it?  We're just normal people among hundreds of millions.<br>Then when I was checking Google to see who linked to our site I found out that a picture of my one year old daughter was posted on a porn forum b/c someone thought she was cute.</p><p>Since then I've removed the image, blocked Google from crawling it, and secured the site behind a login.<br>Plus I have to go through all the photos from my iPhone and remove the geotagging info from them.</p><p>Pain in the butt, but it's better to take privacy precautions now than assume no one is looking and deal with the consequences later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd be surprised.I used to figure nobody would give a crap about the contents of our family website , so why secure it ?
We 're just normal people among hundreds of millions.Then when I was checking Google to see who linked to our site I found out that a picture of my one year old daughter was posted on a porn forum b/c someone thought she was cute.Since then I 've removed the image , blocked Google from crawling it , and secured the site behind a login.Plus I have to go through all the photos from my iPhone and remove the geotagging info from them.Pain in the butt , but it 's better to take privacy precautions now than assume no one is looking and deal with the consequences later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd be surprised.I used to figure nobody would give a crap about the contents of our family website, so why secure it?
We're just normal people among hundreds of millions.Then when I was checking Google to see who linked to our site I found out that a picture of my one year old daughter was posted on a porn forum b/c someone thought she was cute.Since then I've removed the image, blocked Google from crawling it, and secured the site behind a login.Plus I have to go through all the photos from my iPhone and remove the geotagging info from them.Pain in the butt, but it's better to take privacy precautions now than assume no one is looking and deal with the consequences later.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271950</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>e2d2</author>
	<datestamp>1259607240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wish you would. Maybe get those bill collectors onto a new blood scent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish you would .
Maybe get those bill collectors onto a new blood scent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish you would.
Maybe get those bill collectors onto a new blood scent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269318</id>
	<title>Who would want a plasma TV !?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1259592120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come back when you have an OLED ! *g*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come back when you have an OLED !
* g *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come back when you have an OLED !
*g*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272040</id>
	<title>online privacy</title>
	<author>memnock</author>
	<datestamp>1259607660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's overrated apparently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's overrated apparently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's overrated apparently.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518</id>
	<title>Re:1. memorize a fake birthday</title>
	<author>dintlu</author>
	<datestamp>1259593560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This does not indemnify you against information uploaded by unwitting friends, relatives, acquaintances, or colleagues.  The more people come to rely on the internet as a venue for socializing, the less control any individual will have over their personal information or their privacy.  As information collecting becomes more automated, AR will become more useful and hence more commonplace, possibly bringing some of the issues raised by the article to the fore.</p><p>I think it's important to recognize that even though AR introduces additional risks to *your* security and privacy, it has the exact same effect on a *criminal's* security and privacy.  I'll throw a hypothetical scenario out there - say you enabled a service at the supermarket that automatically emails you a copy of your receipt whenever you make a purchase.  If your identity thief makes a purchase at one of these supermarkets, you have an incriminating email containing unrecognizable foodstuffs and a credit account you never opened, which can be used to spearhead an investigation pulling CCTV footage from that supermarket to compare to a facial recognition database, resulting in the identification and arrest of the identity thief.</p><p>Given this scenario, I think that rather than rebel against the erosion of our privacy, we need to accept that privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again, and instead work towards ensuring that no single group of people is allowed to exempt themselves or abuse this new information.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This does not indemnify you against information uploaded by unwitting friends , relatives , acquaintances , or colleagues .
The more people come to rely on the internet as a venue for socializing , the less control any individual will have over their personal information or their privacy .
As information collecting becomes more automated , AR will become more useful and hence more commonplace , possibly bringing some of the issues raised by the article to the fore.I think it 's important to recognize that even though AR introduces additional risks to * your * security and privacy , it has the exact same effect on a * criminal 's * security and privacy .
I 'll throw a hypothetical scenario out there - say you enabled a service at the supermarket that automatically emails you a copy of your receipt whenever you make a purchase .
If your identity thief makes a purchase at one of these supermarkets , you have an incriminating email containing unrecognizable foodstuffs and a credit account you never opened , which can be used to spearhead an investigation pulling CCTV footage from that supermarket to compare to a facial recognition database , resulting in the identification and arrest of the identity thief.Given this scenario , I think that rather than rebel against the erosion of our privacy , we need to accept that privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again , and instead work towards ensuring that no single group of people is allowed to exempt themselves or abuse this new information .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This does not indemnify you against information uploaded by unwitting friends, relatives, acquaintances, or colleagues.
The more people come to rely on the internet as a venue for socializing, the less control any individual will have over their personal information or their privacy.
As information collecting becomes more automated, AR will become more useful and hence more commonplace, possibly bringing some of the issues raised by the article to the fore.I think it's important to recognize that even though AR introduces additional risks to *your* security and privacy, it has the exact same effect on a *criminal's* security and privacy.
I'll throw a hypothetical scenario out there - say you enabled a service at the supermarket that automatically emails you a copy of your receipt whenever you make a purchase.
If your identity thief makes a purchase at one of these supermarkets, you have an incriminating email containing unrecognizable foodstuffs and a credit account you never opened, which can be used to spearhead an investigation pulling CCTV footage from that supermarket to compare to a facial recognition database, resulting in the identification and arrest of the identity thief.Given this scenario, I think that rather than rebel against the erosion of our privacy, we need to accept that privacy in its current incarnation will never exist again, and instead work towards ensuring that no single group of people is allowed to exempt themselves or abuse this new information.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30278436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269646
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30282678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30276988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30294088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269146
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0359216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270590
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30271284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270272
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269630
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30282678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30294088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30278436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30270250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30274082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30276988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30269328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0359216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0359216.30272112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
