<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_30_0336221</id>
	<title>The Technology Behind Last.fm</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259606100000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>CNET's Crave has up a <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/digitalmusic/0,39029432,49304380,00.htm">detailed interview with Last.fm's Matthew Ogle</a>, the company's head of Web development. Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world. From the interview: <i>"We stream all music directly off our servers in London. We have a cluster of streaming nodes including a bunch of powerful machines with solid-state hard drives. We have a process that runs daily which finds the hottest music and pushes those tracks on to the SSDs streamers that sit in front of our regular platter-based streaming machines. That way, if someone is listening to one of our more popular stations, the chances are really good that these songs are coming off our high-speed SSD machines. They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter."</i> The interview is actually on two pages but pretends it's on three.</htmltext>
<tokenext>CNET 's Crave has up a detailed interview with Last.fm 's Matthew Ogle , the company 's head of Web development .
Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world .
From the interview : " We stream all music directly off our servers in London .
We have a cluster of streaming nodes including a bunch of powerful machines with solid-state hard drives .
We have a process that runs daily which finds the hottest music and pushes those tracks on to the SSDs streamers that sit in front of our regular platter-based streaming machines .
That way , if someone is listening to one of our more popular stations , the chances are really good that these songs are coming off our high-speed SSD machines .
They 're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow , spinning platter .
" The interview is actually on two pages but pretends it 's on three .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CNET's Crave has up a detailed interview with Last.fm's Matthew Ogle, the company's head of Web development.
Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.
From the interview: "We stream all music directly off our servers in London.
We have a cluster of streaming nodes including a bunch of powerful machines with solid-state hard drives.
We have a process that runs daily which finds the hottest music and pushes those tracks on to the SSDs streamers that sit in front of our regular platter-based streaming machines.
That way, if someone is listening to one of our more popular stations, the chances are really good that these songs are coming off our high-speed SSD machines.
They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter.
" The interview is actually on two pages but pretends it's on three.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267906</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1259573220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do use Last.fm, unfortunately they do not have a wide range of artists, at least not of my liked genre.</p><p>Every time I start a station with say the "Satriani" artist tag, I get the exact same 20 songs (in random order), before something completely unrelated start playing. I have the same results with "Kamelot", "Stratovarius" and "Dream Theater".</p><p>I liked it more when you could specify two or three artists. That would give you a bit of more breadth on the pool of music to listen.</p><p>Regarding alternatives, I have tried Musicology and it is OK, the only drawback being the "web2.0" interface which I really hate.</p><p>BTW, the LastRipper program is a good way to save Last.FM streams. I have got a lot of classical music (at 128kbps quality is good for portable players)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do use Last.fm , unfortunately they do not have a wide range of artists , at least not of my liked genre.Every time I start a station with say the " Satriani " artist tag , I get the exact same 20 songs ( in random order ) , before something completely unrelated start playing .
I have the same results with " Kamelot " , " Stratovarius " and " Dream Theater " .I liked it more when you could specify two or three artists .
That would give you a bit of more breadth on the pool of music to listen.Regarding alternatives , I have tried Musicology and it is OK , the only drawback being the " web2.0 " interface which I really hate.BTW , the LastRipper program is a good way to save Last.FM streams .
I have got a lot of classical music ( at 128kbps quality is good for portable players )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do use Last.fm, unfortunately they do not have a wide range of artists, at least not of my liked genre.Every time I start a station with say the "Satriani" artist tag, I get the exact same 20 songs (in random order), before something completely unrelated start playing.
I have the same results with "Kamelot", "Stratovarius" and "Dream Theater".I liked it more when you could specify two or three artists.
That would give you a bit of more breadth on the pool of music to listen.Regarding alternatives, I have tried Musicology and it is OK, the only drawback being the "web2.0" interface which I really hate.BTW, the LastRipper program is a good way to save Last.FM streams.
I have got a lot of classical music (at 128kbps quality is good for portable players)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267878</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1259572800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is that?  I didn't realise that ones taste in music could be such a defining characteristic.</p><p>Are you also this snobbish about peoples choice of software, clothing, transport?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is that ?
I did n't realise that ones taste in music could be such a defining characteristic.Are you also this snobbish about peoples choice of software , clothing , transport ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is that?
I didn't realise that ones taste in music could be such a defining characteristic.Are you also this snobbish about peoples choice of software, clothing, transport?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30277770</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Backward Z</author>
	<datestamp>1259588700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, I was right there with you knocking Lady GaGa, but there's really more to her than she lets on...</p><p><a href="http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=2737" title="vigilantcitizen.com">http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=2737</a> [vigilantcitizen.com]</p><p>Here she is pre-fame performing at a NYU talent show: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM51qOpwcIM" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM51qOpwcIM</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>And a Metafilter comment that expresses what I want to say very well: <a href="http://www.metafilter.com/86769/Norah-Jones-Look-Out#2827870" title="metafilter.com">http://www.metafilter.com/86769/Norah-Jones-Look-Out#2827870</a> [metafilter.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>I considered Lady Gaga a guilty pleasure until this last video came out. I think it epitomizes all of her potential as a star and artist. All of it, down to the intentionally cheesy Europop backing, is commentary. And all of it is a mask, revealing practically nothing about the person at the helm. That's a really difficult feat to pull off, because stars tend to be insecure enough to want to be liked and respected as an icon but also as a person.</p><p>Gaga is basically trying to keep up the illusion that there is no person under there, or at least not what we are used to thinking of as a person. There is something trans-human about her ambition that I think is perfectly timely. She's a smart person having a lark, taking it a million times farther than anyone in their right mind would attempt, and making other pop stars look like the fools and relics that they actually are. I'm surprised more people don't get or appreciate that.<br>posted by hermitosis at 6:41 AM on November 18 [132 favorites ]</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , I was right there with you knocking Lady GaGa , but there 's really more to her than she lets on...http : //vigilantcitizen.com/ ? p = 2737 [ vigilantcitizen.com ] Here she is pre-fame performing at a NYU talent show : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = NM51qOpwcIM [ youtube.com ] And a Metafilter comment that expresses what I want to say very well : http : //www.metafilter.com/86769/Norah-Jones-Look-Out # 2827870 [ metafilter.com ] I considered Lady Gaga a guilty pleasure until this last video came out .
I think it epitomizes all of her potential as a star and artist .
All of it , down to the intentionally cheesy Europop backing , is commentary .
And all of it is a mask , revealing practically nothing about the person at the helm .
That 's a really difficult feat to pull off , because stars tend to be insecure enough to want to be liked and respected as an icon but also as a person.Gaga is basically trying to keep up the illusion that there is no person under there , or at least not what we are used to thinking of as a person .
There is something trans-human about her ambition that I think is perfectly timely .
She 's a smart person having a lark , taking it a million times farther than anyone in their right mind would attempt , and making other pop stars look like the fools and relics that they actually are .
I 'm surprised more people do n't get or appreciate that.posted by hermitosis at 6 : 41 AM on November 18 [ 132 favorites ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, I was right there with you knocking Lady GaGa, but there's really more to her than she lets on...http://vigilantcitizen.com/?p=2737 [vigilantcitizen.com]Here she is pre-fame performing at a NYU talent show: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NM51qOpwcIM [youtube.com]And a Metafilter comment that expresses what I want to say very well: http://www.metafilter.com/86769/Norah-Jones-Look-Out#2827870 [metafilter.com] I considered Lady Gaga a guilty pleasure until this last video came out.
I think it epitomizes all of her potential as a star and artist.
All of it, down to the intentionally cheesy Europop backing, is commentary.
And all of it is a mask, revealing practically nothing about the person at the helm.
That's a really difficult feat to pull off, because stars tend to be insecure enough to want to be liked and respected as an icon but also as a person.Gaga is basically trying to keep up the illusion that there is no person under there, or at least not what we are used to thinking of as a person.
There is something trans-human about her ambition that I think is perfectly timely.
She's a smart person having a lark, taking it a million times farther than anyone in their right mind would attempt, and making other pop stars look like the fools and relics that they actually are.
I'm surprised more people don't get or appreciate that.posted by hermitosis at 6:41 AM on November 18 [132 favorites ]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267696</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259613840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.</p></div></blockquote><p>Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends. Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.</p></div><p>i love it when people are being snobbish about their music taste.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends .
Some of my acquaintances are well-read , well-dressed , well-spoken people , the sort who really seem to have it all together , but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you 've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.i love it when people are being snobbish about their music taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends.
Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.i love it when people are being snobbish about their music taste.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269824</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259595840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because the part that everybody other are sheeple and you are soooo special is just self-delusion.</p><p>There are certainly many people on Last.fm with similar music tastes to yours. But...their music library has some artists that yours doesn't, and which still likely fit. That's the data on which Last.fm builds recommendations.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the part that everybody other are sheeple and you are soooo special is just self-delusion.There are certainly many people on Last.fm with similar music tastes to yours .
But...their music library has some artists that yours does n't , and which still likely fit .
That 's the data on which Last.fm builds recommendations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the part that everybody other are sheeple and you are soooo special is just self-delusion.There are certainly many people on Last.fm with similar music tastes to yours.
But...their music library has some artists that yours doesn't, and which still likely fit.
That's the data on which Last.fm builds recommendations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267770</id>
	<title>Duck Duck GOOSE</title>
	<author>Osinoche</author>
	<datestamp>1259614500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LAST.FM = GOOSE.
Duck = You
Duck = Me
Goose &gt;= Duck</htmltext>
<tokenext>LAST.FM = GOOSE .
Duck = You Duck = Me Goose &gt; = Duck</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LAST.FM = GOOSE.
Duck = You
Duck = Me
Goose &gt;= Duck</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267396</id>
	<title>First Post FLAMENGO HEXA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259523360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>lol</htmltext>
<tokenext>lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270840</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1259602080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, but who the hell knows what scrobbling is?!<br> <br>If anyone has asked me (prior to reading the above comment) if I'd ever "scrobbled" on the internet, I'd be turning my webcam away while in front of my computer a lot more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but who the hell knows what scrobbling is ? !
If anyone has asked me ( prior to reading the above comment ) if I 'd ever " scrobbled " on the internet , I 'd be turning my webcam away while in front of my computer a lot more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but who the hell knows what scrobbling is?!
If anyone has asked me (prior to reading the above comment) if I'd ever "scrobbled" on the internet, I'd be turning my webcam away while in front of my computer a lot more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269784</id>
	<title>Re:Memory instead of platters...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd, same result.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd , same result .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd, same result.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270886</id>
	<title>Re:RTFA</title>
	<author>CaseM</author>
	<datestamp>1259602260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So now even the submitters aren't reading TFA anymore? I know, I know... its slashdot.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sigh</i></p><p>You must be new here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now even the submitters are n't reading TFA anymore ?
I know , I know... its slashdot .
/sighYou must be new here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So now even the submitters aren't reading TFA anymore?
I know, I know... its slashdot.
/sighYou must be new here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267516</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268394</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>darthflo</author>
	<datestamp>1259579700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh, the only impact being the "hottest new music" has is being served from one of their SSD hosts instead of the normal streaming cluster. This is completely transparent to the user. It doesn't limit what you can listen to or even make it more likely you'll hear "hot new" music from an SSD host. It's caching of the most popular files, plain and simple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , the only impact being the " hottest new music " has is being served from one of their SSD hosts instead of the normal streaming cluster .
This is completely transparent to the user .
It does n't limit what you can listen to or even make it more likely you 'll hear " hot new " music from an SSD host .
It 's caching of the most popular files , plain and simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, the only impact being the "hottest new music" has is being served from one of their SSD hosts instead of the normal streaming cluster.
This is completely transparent to the user.
It doesn't limit what you can listen to or even make it more likely you'll hear "hot new" music from an SSD host.
It's caching of the most popular files, plain and simple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269030</id>
	<title>Duh</title>
	<author>fph il quozientatore</author>
	<datestamp>1259589480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Duh. Sounds like they discovered caching. Definitely not a new idea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Duh .
Sounds like they discovered caching .
Definitely not a new idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Duh.
Sounds like they discovered caching.
Definitely not a new idea.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268426</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1259580300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really could not care less what "sheeple" are listening to or how "compatible" their music tastes are to mine. I *know* my musical tastes do not necessarily match up with others, especially when it concerns new popular music. So please explain why should I let others decide what is hot, for me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really could not care less what " sheeple " are listening to or how " compatible " their music tastes are to mine .
I * know * my musical tastes do not necessarily match up with others , especially when it concerns new popular music .
So please explain why should I let others decide what is hot , for me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really could not care less what "sheeple" are listening to or how "compatible" their music tastes are to mine.
I *know* my musical tastes do not necessarily match up with others, especially when it concerns new popular music.
So please explain why should I let others decide what is hot, for me?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267806</id>
	<title>NOT FREE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259571660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the bastard started charging $6/month for everyone a month or so back. only the US, UK and germany are temporarily free. before committing data to the service better check the TOS and decide.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the bastard started charging $ 6/month for everyone a month or so back .
only the US , UK and germany are temporarily free .
before committing data to the service better check the TOS and decide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the bastard started charging $6/month for everyone a month or so back.
only the US, UK and germany are temporarily free.
before committing data to the service better check the TOS and decide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502</id>
	<title>275,000 years?  Wow.</title>
	<author>zonker</author>
	<datestamp>1259611200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.</p></div><p>I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.I 'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267694</id>
	<title>MogileFS</title>
	<author>Tuqui</author>
	<datestamp>1259613780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Beyond that, our streamers are all running Linux and using MogileFS -- which is an open-source distributed file system, which is a little bit like a software RAID system.</p></div><p>OMG Files a lot of files served with MogileFS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Beyond that , our streamers are all running Linux and using MogileFS -- which is an open-source distributed file system , which is a little bit like a software RAID system.OMG Files a lot of files served with MogileFS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beyond that, our streamers are all running Linux and using MogileFS -- which is an open-source distributed file system, which is a little bit like a software RAID system.OMG Files a lot of files served with MogileFS.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270852</id>
	<title>Where does the RIAA pipe fit in?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259602080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So which part of the whole setup includes the direct pipe to the various RIAA labels so they can tell them when you're listening to songs you shouldn't be?</p><p>That's right.  I went there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So which part of the whole setup includes the direct pipe to the various RIAA labels so they can tell them when you 're listening to songs you should n't be ? That 's right .
I went there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So which part of the whole setup includes the direct pipe to the various RIAA labels so they can tell them when you're listening to songs you shouldn't be?That's right.
I went there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259612040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends. Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears .
Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends .
Some of my acquaintances are well-read , well-dressed , well-spoken people , the sort who really seem to have it all together , but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you 've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.
Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends.
Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267608</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259612640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears</p></div></blockquote><p>

<a href="http://www.last.fm/music/Britney\%2520Spears" title="www.last.fm">56,904,147 plays (1,246,583 listeners) </a> [www.last.fm]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world .
I 'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears 56,904,147 plays ( 1,246,583 listeners ) [ www.last.fm ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world.
I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears

56,904,147 plays (1,246,583 listeners)  [www.last.fm]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269016</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1259589360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends. Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;</p><p>That's because (1) a lot of the so-called "better" music that people have recommended to me is actually boring shit, and (2) I'm not looking for boredom, put-me-to-sleep music.  I'm looking for fun music.  Lady Gaga is weird but fun.  (3)  Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies.  Saying, "Those guys are crap" is only going to get you dumped</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends .
Some of my acquaintances are well-read , well-dressed , well-spoken people , the sort who really seem to have it all together , but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you 've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga. &gt; &gt; &gt; That 's because ( 1 ) a lot of the so-called " better " music that people have recommended to me is actually boring shit , and ( 2 ) I 'm not looking for boredom , put-me-to-sleep music .
I 'm looking for fun music .
Lady Gaga is weird but fun .
( 3 ) Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies .
Saying , " Those guys are crap " is only going to get you dumped</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;Last.fm is definitely a way to feel awkward with friends.
Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together, but then you can never really manage the same level of respect for them after you've seen their Last.fm profile is nothing but Justin Timberlake and Lady Gaga.&gt;&gt;&gt;That's because (1) a lot of the so-called "better" music that people have recommended to me is actually boring shit, and (2) I'm not looking for boredom, put-me-to-sleep music.
I'm looking for fun music.
Lady Gaga is weird but fun.
(3)  Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies.
Saying, "Those guys are crap" is only going to get you dumped</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268448</id>
	<title>Last.fm complements Spotify</title>
	<author>jimbob666</author>
	<datestamp>1259580840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've used last.fm for 4 years with about 19,000 scrobbles and this makes their recommended radio stations pretty damn good.

However, I'm confused at the 'destroying Spotify' bit. To me they are completely different services that complement each other.

I certainly couldn't use one without the other...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've used last.fm for 4 years with about 19,000 scrobbles and this makes their recommended radio stations pretty damn good .
However , I 'm confused at the 'destroying Spotify ' bit .
To me they are completely different services that complement each other .
I certainly could n't use one without the other.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've used last.fm for 4 years with about 19,000 scrobbles and this makes their recommended radio stations pretty damn good.
However, I'm confused at the 'destroying Spotify' bit.
To me they are completely different services that complement each other.
I certainly couldn't use one without the other...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738</id>
	<title>No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1259614260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is precisely why I rarely listen to radio, whether it's streamed or broadcast over the air. They place too much weight on "the hottest new music", and this causes otherwise good music, which may not be "today's hottest new music" to be buried in the background noise. Not to mention that "the hottest new music" then gets played over and over, 100's of times a day on popular radio stations. This get boring and monotonous really quick. While radio can be a good way to discover new bands, I rarely listen to it for long periods of time because it just repeats the same tracks over and over. It's a very lopsided system that promotes the hottest single-of-the-day at the expense of everything else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is precisely why I rarely listen to radio , whether it 's streamed or broadcast over the air .
They place too much weight on " the hottest new music " , and this causes otherwise good music , which may not be " today 's hottest new music " to be buried in the background noise .
Not to mention that " the hottest new music " then gets played over and over , 100 's of times a day on popular radio stations .
This get boring and monotonous really quick .
While radio can be a good way to discover new bands , I rarely listen to it for long periods of time because it just repeats the same tracks over and over .
It 's a very lopsided system that promotes the hottest single-of-the-day at the expense of everything else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is precisely why I rarely listen to radio, whether it's streamed or broadcast over the air.
They place too much weight on "the hottest new music", and this causes otherwise good music, which may not be "today's hottest new music" to be buried in the background noise.
Not to mention that "the hottest new music" then gets played over and over, 100's of times a day on popular radio stations.
This get boring and monotonous really quick.
While radio can be a good way to discover new bands, I rarely listen to it for long periods of time because it just repeats the same tracks over and over.
It's a very lopsided system that promotes the hottest single-of-the-day at the expense of everything else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30290516</id>
	<title>Memcached for MP3 music? I think not.</title>
	<author>imtheguru</author>
	<datestamp>1259669280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd, same result.</p></div><p>How does your suggested setup using memcache get around the problem of storing/fetching objects greater than 1MB? That is, without implementing custom interfaces for handling multiple chunks.</p><p>From the memcache wiki page:<br><a href="http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/WhyNotMemcached" title="google.com">http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/WhyNotMemcached</a> [google.com]</p><p>"Memcached is terrific! But not for every situation...</p><p>You have objects larger than 1MB.<br>Memcached is not for large media and streaming huge blobs.<br>"</p><p>Cheers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd , same result.How does your suggested setup using memcache get around the problem of storing/fetching objects greater than 1MB ?
That is , without implementing custom interfaces for handling multiple chunks.From the memcache wiki page : http : //code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/WhyNotMemcached [ google.com ] " Memcached is terrific !
But not for every situation...You have objects larger than 1MB.Memcached is not for large media and streaming huge blobs .
" Cheers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or they could have just filled each 1u server with 8-16 GB of ram and run 1-8 memcached daemons on each cheaper than ssd, same result.How does your suggested setup using memcache get around the problem of storing/fetching objects greater than 1MB?
That is, without implementing custom interfaces for handling multiple chunks.From the memcache wiki page:http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/WhyNotMemcached [google.com]"Memcached is terrific!
But not for every situation...You have objects larger than 1MB.Memcached is not for large media and streaming huge blobs.
"Cheers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270664</id>
	<title>Take heed - Last.fm can run servers</title>
	<author>Mr. DOS</author>
	<datestamp>1259601120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of all the so-called "social" sites whose services I use, Last.fm probably has the best uptime and overall availability. I think I've only seen the main Last.fm site down once or twice in over two years, and I've never seen the Scrobbling service go offline. On top of that, they can actually run a database - unlike Facebook, with its oft-inaccurate or missing data, all of my Last.fm profile is always there. Kudos to these guys for sticking to it and figuring out how to manage high loads properly instead of just whining about how inadequate the tools they have to work with are.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; --- Mr. DOS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of all the so-called " social " sites whose services I use , Last.fm probably has the best uptime and overall availability .
I think I 've only seen the main Last.fm site down once or twice in over two years , and I 've never seen the Scrobbling service go offline .
On top of that , they can actually run a database - unlike Facebook , with its oft-inaccurate or missing data , all of my Last.fm profile is always there .
Kudos to these guys for sticking to it and figuring out how to manage high loads properly instead of just whining about how inadequate the tools they have to work with are .
      --- Mr. DOS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of all the so-called "social" sites whose services I use, Last.fm probably has the best uptime and overall availability.
I think I've only seen the main Last.fm site down once or twice in over two years, and I've never seen the Scrobbling service go offline.
On top of that, they can actually run a database - unlike Facebook, with its oft-inaccurate or missing data, all of my Last.fm profile is always there.
Kudos to these guys for sticking to it and figuring out how to manage high loads properly instead of just whining about how inadequate the tools they have to work with are.
      --- Mr. DOS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269516</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259593560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, there was an easy way you could make sure if what you're writing makes sense...</p><p><a href="http://www.last.fm/charts" title="www.last.fm">http://www.last.fm/charts</a> [www.last.fm]</p><p>The most presented list, <i>Weekly artist and track charts</i>:<br>1. Muse<br>2. The Beatles<br>3. Radiohead<br>4. Coldplay<br>5. Lady GaGa<br>6. The Killers<br>7. Red Hot Chili Peppers<br>8. Metallica<br>9. Michael Jackson<br>10. Kings of Leon</p><p>Heck, even hyped artists and tracks (which simply show the increase in actual listening) seem passable...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , there was an easy way you could make sure if what you 're writing makes sense...http : //www.last.fm/charts [ www.last.fm ] The most presented list , Weekly artist and track charts : 1 .
Muse2. The Beatles3 .
Radiohead4. Coldplay5 .
Lady GaGa6 .
The Killers7 .
Red Hot Chili Peppers8 .
Metallica9. Michael Jackson10 .
Kings of LeonHeck , even hyped artists and tracks ( which simply show the increase in actual listening ) seem passable.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, there was an easy way you could make sure if what you're writing makes sense...http://www.last.fm/charts [www.last.fm]The most presented list, Weekly artist and track charts:1.
Muse2. The Beatles3.
Radiohead4. Coldplay5.
Lady GaGa6.
The Killers7.
Red Hot Chili Peppers8.
Metallica9. Michael Jackson10.
Kings of LeonHeck, even hyped artists and tracks (which simply show the increase in actual listening) seem passable...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270012</id>
	<title>Re:NOT FREE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I never use the stream, only the scrobble.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I never use the stream , only the scrobble .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never use the stream, only the scrobble.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267806</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270398</id>
	<title>Re:SCSI 4 LIFE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259599440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you're saying that SSD is going to lose to HDD just like SCSI lost to IDE?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying that SSD is going to lose to HDD just like SCSI lost to IDE ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying that SSD is going to lose to HDD just like SCSI lost to IDE?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268672</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>MrMr</author>
	<datestamp>1259584140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>choice of software...</i> <br>
You're new here?</htmltext>
<tokenext>choice of software.. . You 're new here ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>choice of software... 
You're new here?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272990</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>kannibal\_klown</author>
	<datestamp>1259612400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics, it's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment (the relationship between the bass and melody).  All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them.  That's what my music cognition friends have to say about it, anyway.</p></div><p>I wouldn't considered myself really "schooled" in music.  I played an instrument for 8 years during my pre-college days, but it was nothing special.</p><p>But I'm in the exact opposite, I listen to the music's melody and harmony and almost ignore the lyrics entirely.  I admit that I don't have the grasp of the complexity as someone truly <b>schooled</b> in music, but I don't listen to the lyrics much save for a few singers.</p><p>Heck, I used to laugh at myself because there were a few rap songs with decent music that I liked as a kid and I never even bothered knowing the words.  Yet someone else will say "but the lyrics are the whole point of a rap."</p><p>Oh well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics , it 's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment ( the relationship between the bass and melody ) .
All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them .
That 's what my music cognition friends have to say about it , anyway.I would n't considered myself really " schooled " in music .
I played an instrument for 8 years during my pre-college days , but it was nothing special.But I 'm in the exact opposite , I listen to the music 's melody and harmony and almost ignore the lyrics entirely .
I admit that I do n't have the grasp of the complexity as someone truly schooled in music , but I do n't listen to the lyrics much save for a few singers.Heck , I used to laugh at myself because there were a few rap songs with decent music that I liked as a kid and I never even bothered knowing the words .
Yet someone else will say " but the lyrics are the whole point of a rap .
" Oh well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics, it's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment (the relationship between the bass and melody).
All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them.
That's what my music cognition friends have to say about it, anyway.I wouldn't considered myself really "schooled" in music.
I played an instrument for 8 years during my pre-college days, but it was nothing special.But I'm in the exact opposite, I listen to the music's melody and harmony and almost ignore the lyrics entirely.
I admit that I don't have the grasp of the complexity as someone truly schooled in music, but I don't listen to the lyrics much save for a few singers.Heck, I used to laugh at myself because there were a few rap songs with decent music that I liked as a kid and I never even bothered knowing the words.
Yet someone else will say "but the lyrics are the whole point of a rap.
"Oh well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272054</id>
	<title>Re:Memory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He obviously means main memory you pedantic jackass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He obviously means main memory you pedantic jackass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He obviously means main memory you pedantic jackass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268666</id>
	<title>Hmmm...</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1259584080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>We give the labels a breakdown of which artists should be accruing what royalties, so they have fairly good information on what they should be paying who.</p></div><p>Given what we've heard about record labels, who wants to bet that when this "fairly good information" gets to the record label it is printed on nice soft paper, cut into individual sheets and then placed in the lavatories?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : We give the labels a breakdown of which artists should be accruing what royalties , so they have fairly good information on what they should be paying who.Given what we 've heard about record labels , who wants to bet that when this " fairly good information " gets to the record label it is printed on nice soft paper , cut into individual sheets and then placed in the lavatories ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:We give the labels a breakdown of which artists should be accruing what royalties, so they have fairly good information on what they should be paying who.Given what we've heard about record labels, who wants to bet that when this "fairly good information" gets to the record label it is printed on nice soft paper, cut into individual sheets and then placed in the lavatories?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270020</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>maevius</author>
	<datestamp>1259597100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>1) There is better music and it is actually better. You're just not used to it because it's not getting hammered by the radio 24/7.
2) It's not weird, it's pop. The same pop music that is massively produced for at least the last 20 years. You might like it, I have no problem with that, but it still is just pop music. 3) It makes you popular with ladies that listen to that music only. There are many kinds of ladies with different tastes in music... I am not trying to troll, but that's the way it is</htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) There is better music and it is actually better .
You 're just not used to it because it 's not getting hammered by the radio 24/7 .
2 ) It 's not weird , it 's pop .
The same pop music that is massively produced for at least the last 20 years .
You might like it , I have no problem with that , but it still is just pop music .
3 ) It makes you popular with ladies that listen to that music only .
There are many kinds of ladies with different tastes in music... I am not trying to troll , but that 's the way it is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) There is better music and it is actually better.
You're just not used to it because it's not getting hammered by the radio 24/7.
2) It's not weird, it's pop.
The same pop music that is massively produced for at least the last 20 years.
You might like it, I have no problem with that, but it still is just pop music.
3) It makes you popular with ladies that listen to that music only.
There are many kinds of ladies with different tastes in music... I am not trying to troll, but that's the way it is</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158</id>
	<title>Memory</title>
	<author>WGFCrafty</author>
	<datestamp>1259576340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter."</p></div><p>
Aren't the HDDs (the one's with platters) still considered memory?
<br> <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer\_memory" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer\_memory</a> [wikipedia.org] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Computer memory refers to devices that are used to store data or programs (sequences of instructions) on a temporary or permanent basis for use in an electronic digital computer.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow , spinning platter .
" Are n't the HDDs ( the one 's with platters ) still considered memory ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer \ _memory [ wikipedia.org ] Computer memory refers to devices that are used to store data or programs ( sequences of instructions ) on a temporary or permanent basis for use in an electronic digital computer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter.
"
Aren't the HDDs (the one's with platters) still considered memory?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer\_memory [wikipedia.org] Computer memory refers to devices that are used to store data or programs (sequences of instructions) on a temporary or permanent basis for use in an electronic digital computer.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268958</id>
	<title>Re:275,000years? Wow.Christmas sale, free shipping</title>
	<author>coolforsale135</author>
	<datestamp>1259588580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]  (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]  (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270872</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1259602200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dream Theater are featured heavily on Spotify. I feel lucky to have their service.<br> <br>They also have a lot of Saxon<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dream Theater are featured heavily on Spotify .
I feel lucky to have their service .
They also have a lot of Saxon : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dream Theater are featured heavily on Spotify.
I feel lucky to have their service.
They also have a lot of Saxon :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270978</id>
	<title>Re:Memory instead of platters...?</title>
	<author>Quantumstate</author>
	<datestamp>1259602680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was assuming that they really were referring to memory.  At 4mb per song you can hold 4000 songs in 16GB of ram which isn't a huge amount for a server.  With 4000 songs per server for popular servers you shouldn't need to touch the disk so having fast SSD drives seems like a waste of money.  I would put fast SSD drives for less popular songs since SSD is cheaper than ram in terms of storage capacity and then for very low popularity I would use hard disks if cost is that much of an issue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was assuming that they really were referring to memory .
At 4mb per song you can hold 4000 songs in 16GB of ram which is n't a huge amount for a server .
With 4000 songs per server for popular servers you should n't need to touch the disk so having fast SSD drives seems like a waste of money .
I would put fast SSD drives for less popular songs since SSD is cheaper than ram in terms of storage capacity and then for very low popularity I would use hard disks if cost is that much of an issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was assuming that they really were referring to memory.
At 4mb per song you can hold 4000 songs in 16GB of ram which isn't a huge amount for a server.
With 4000 songs per server for popular servers you shouldn't need to touch the disk so having fast SSD drives seems like a waste of money.
I would put fast SSD drives for less popular songs since SSD is cheaper than ram in terms of storage capacity and then for very low popularity I would use hard disks if cost is that much of an issue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267674</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272586</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Lemmy Caution</author>
	<datestamp>1259610240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think a lot of people educated in Western music over-emphasize the appreciation of the melodic line and phrase over  rhythm. Western art music only caught up with polyrhythms used in other musical traditions in the beginning of the 20th century, and even now, few really do well with microtones. I did have a background in music theory and appreciation (and performance), but it took a course in Hindustani classical music for me to start to realize what I was missing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think a lot of people educated in Western music over-emphasize the appreciation of the melodic line and phrase over rhythm .
Western art music only caught up with polyrhythms used in other musical traditions in the beginning of the 20th century , and even now , few really do well with microtones .
I did have a background in music theory and appreciation ( and performance ) , but it took a course in Hindustani classical music for me to start to realize what I was missing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think a lot of people educated in Western music over-emphasize the appreciation of the melodic line and phrase over  rhythm.
Western art music only caught up with polyrhythms used in other musical traditions in the beginning of the 20th century, and even now, few really do well with microtones.
I did have a background in music theory and appreciation (and performance), but it took a course in Hindustani classical music for me to start to realize what I was missing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269170</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1259590860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Putting in a popular artist like Satriani or Dream Theater will get popular results out (not mainstream, but still popular). I listen to the 4 artists you list (Dream Theater is most listened, Kamelot is 9th)- the bands it recommends range from 60k listens to 10's of millions. While I've found some artists from their radio, I generally use the recommendations and my neighbor list to find new music, especially for lesser-known bands. The free tracks it suggests are often from small bands, so check those out too. While some bands are obscure enough last.fm doesn't have them up to stream, they usually at least have a page for the band- using the charts for the band I can check other sites to find streamed songs.<br> <br>

That said, I do agree multiple tags/artists would help the radio work better. I usually pick a band I don't know and try to piece together a playlist on imeem using their most listened chart on last.fm.<br> <br>

My last.fm username is tmurph89- you have similar enough taste you might find a new band you like in my charts. If you want something different Apocalyptica is a heavy cello quartet (although their top 5 tracks are overly mainstream and wise to avoid).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Putting in a popular artist like Satriani or Dream Theater will get popular results out ( not mainstream , but still popular ) .
I listen to the 4 artists you list ( Dream Theater is most listened , Kamelot is 9th ) - the bands it recommends range from 60k listens to 10 's of millions .
While I 've found some artists from their radio , I generally use the recommendations and my neighbor list to find new music , especially for lesser-known bands .
The free tracks it suggests are often from small bands , so check those out too .
While some bands are obscure enough last.fm does n't have them up to stream , they usually at least have a page for the band- using the charts for the band I can check other sites to find streamed songs .
That said , I do agree multiple tags/artists would help the radio work better .
I usually pick a band I do n't know and try to piece together a playlist on imeem using their most listened chart on last.fm .
My last.fm username is tmurph89- you have similar enough taste you might find a new band you like in my charts .
If you want something different Apocalyptica is a heavy cello quartet ( although their top 5 tracks are overly mainstream and wise to avoid ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Putting in a popular artist like Satriani or Dream Theater will get popular results out (not mainstream, but still popular).
I listen to the 4 artists you list (Dream Theater is most listened, Kamelot is 9th)- the bands it recommends range from 60k listens to 10's of millions.
While I've found some artists from their radio, I generally use the recommendations and my neighbor list to find new music, especially for lesser-known bands.
The free tracks it suggests are often from small bands, so check those out too.
While some bands are obscure enough last.fm doesn't have them up to stream, they usually at least have a page for the band- using the charts for the band I can check other sites to find streamed songs.
That said, I do agree multiple tags/artists would help the radio work better.
I usually pick a band I don't know and try to piece together a playlist on imeem using their most listened chart on last.fm.
My last.fm username is tmurph89- you have similar enough taste you might find a new band you like in my charts.
If you want something different Apocalyptica is a heavy cello quartet (although their top 5 tracks are overly mainstream and wise to avoid).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267758</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>ScoLgo</author>
	<datestamp>1259614440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears."</p><p>Unfortunately, you'd probably have to measure that metric in Libraries of Congress.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears .
" Unfortunately , you 'd probably have to measure that metric in Libraries of Congress .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'd love to know how much of that was stuff like Britney Spears.
"Unfortunately, you'd probably have to measure that metric in Libraries of Congress.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267516</id>
	<title>RTFA</title>
	<author>Snowblindeye</author>
	<datestamp>1259611380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the world</p></div><p>Where did the submitter get that impression? Certainly not from the article. It mentions that they <b>scrobbled</b> 275,000 years of audio. Scrobbling is what Last.fm's client does when it takes a song you are playing from another source and uploads the meta data to them. Clearly that uses much less bandwidth than streaming a song</p><p>So now even the submitters aren't reading TFA anymore? I know, I know... its slashdot.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sigh</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the worldWhere did the submitter get that impression ?
Certainly not from the article .
It mentions that they scrobbled 275,000 years of audio .
Scrobbling is what Last.fm 's client does when it takes a song you are playing from another source and uploads the meta data to them .
Clearly that uses much less bandwidth than streaming a songSo now even the submitters are n't reading TFA anymore ?
I know , I know... its slashdot .
/sigh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reader CNETNate notes that Last.fm has streamed 275,000 years of audio around the worldWhere did the submitter get that impression?
Certainly not from the article.
It mentions that they scrobbled 275,000 years of audio.
Scrobbling is what Last.fm's client does when it takes a song you are playing from another source and uploads the meta data to them.
Clearly that uses much less bandwidth than streaming a songSo now even the submitters aren't reading TFA anymore?
I know, I know... its slashdot.
/sigh
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267846</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>EvilIdler</author>
	<datestamp>1259572320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Last.fm's definition of "hottest" is what people actually listen to. It's not a handful of artist names handed down from MusicMegaCorpCoLLC to be digested by the uninformed masses<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>I suggest looking at what Last.fm actually is. It has helped me find new music frequently. It also made me spend lots of money, which is the only real drawback. Anything you play is recorded, and musical compatibility with other members is compared to give suggestions. There might not be samples of everything on their site, but I usually find samples somewhere (Spotify is the weakest, iTunes and eMusic usually has it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Last.fm 's definition of " hottest " is what people actually listen to .
It 's not a handful of artist names handed down from MusicMegaCorpCoLLC to be digested by the uninformed masses ; ) I suggest looking at what Last.fm actually is .
It has helped me find new music frequently .
It also made me spend lots of money , which is the only real drawback .
Anything you play is recorded , and musical compatibility with other members is compared to give suggestions .
There might not be samples of everything on their site , but I usually find samples somewhere ( Spotify is the weakest , iTunes and eMusic usually has it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Last.fm's definition of "hottest" is what people actually listen to.
It's not a handful of artist names handed down from MusicMegaCorpCoLLC to be digested by the uninformed masses ;)I suggest looking at what Last.fm actually is.
It has helped me find new music frequently.
It also made me spend lots of money, which is the only real drawback.
Anything you play is recorded, and musical compatibility with other members is compared to give suggestions.
There might not be samples of everything on their site, but I usually find samples somewhere (Spotify is the weakest, iTunes and eMusic usually has it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269008</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Keeper Of Keys</author>
	<datestamp>1259589300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they can't appreciate Sonic Youth I don't want to know them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they ca n't appreciate Sonic Youth I do n't want to know them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they can't appreciate Sonic Youth I don't want to know them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269830</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259595840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't judge them too harshly.  Unless you went to school for music, or otherwise spent some quality time cultivating an appreciation for the organization of sound, you probably don't have any taste.  Music seems to be the last area where anyone bothers to develop taste nowadays.</p><p>In this age when everyone is concerned with breaking down the barriers and bucking elitism, maybe listening to pop trash makes your well-heeled friends feel folksy and good about themselves.</p><p>I did go to school for music, and did play professionally for about a decade before I went in to IT/software, and I'm pretty confident when I observe that, for most people, the words are the music.  They don't hear pitches, just lyrics.</p><p>If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics, it's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment (the relationship between the bass and melody).  All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them.  That's what my music cognition friends have to say about it, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't judge them too harshly .
Unless you went to school for music , or otherwise spent some quality time cultivating an appreciation for the organization of sound , you probably do n't have any taste .
Music seems to be the last area where anyone bothers to develop taste nowadays.In this age when everyone is concerned with breaking down the barriers and bucking elitism , maybe listening to pop trash makes your well-heeled friends feel folksy and good about themselves.I did go to school for music , and did play professionally for about a decade before I went in to IT/software , and I 'm pretty confident when I observe that , for most people , the words are the music .
They do n't hear pitches , just lyrics.If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics , it 's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment ( the relationship between the bass and melody ) .
All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them .
That 's what my music cognition friends have to say about it , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't judge them too harshly.
Unless you went to school for music, or otherwise spent some quality time cultivating an appreciation for the organization of sound, you probably don't have any taste.
Music seems to be the last area where anyone bothers to develop taste nowadays.In this age when everyone is concerned with breaking down the barriers and bucking elitism, maybe listening to pop trash makes your well-heeled friends feel folksy and good about themselves.I did go to school for music, and did play professionally for about a decade before I went in to IT/software, and I'm pretty confident when I observe that, for most people, the words are the music.
They don't hear pitches, just lyrics.If the unschooled person hears something more than the lyrics, it's usually only the highest and lowest pitches at any given moment (the relationship between the bass and melody).
All that western harmony in the middle spectrum is really lost on them.
That's what my music cognition friends have to say about it, anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268532</id>
	<title>Re:No thanks, last.fm</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1259582280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There might not be samples of everything on their site, [...].</p></div><p>That has become the main problem for me, aside from the same 30 songs they play everytime I start a station, nothing new ever comes out.</p><p>In order for it to work better, you must listen to whatever genres they cover better. I guess alternative, grunge, pop and rock-pop may be ok. But for heavy metal they do not have a lot of diversity, OR their recommendation algorithm is broken.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There might not be samples of everything on their site , [ ... ] .That has become the main problem for me , aside from the same 30 songs they play everytime I start a station , nothing new ever comes out.In order for it to work better , you must listen to whatever genres they cover better .
I guess alternative , grunge , pop and rock-pop may be ok. But for heavy metal they do not have a lot of diversity , OR their recommendation algorithm is broken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There might not be samples of everything on their site, [...].That has become the main problem for me, aside from the same 30 songs they play everytime I start a station, nothing new ever comes out.In order for it to work better, you must listen to whatever genres they cover better.
I guess alternative, grunge, pop and rock-pop may be ok. But for heavy metal they do not have a lot of diversity, OR their recommendation algorithm is broken.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269998</id>
	<title>Re:Memory - yes and no</title>
	<author>jackb\_guppy</author>
	<datestamp>1259596920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Wiki article would translate to what you said. But there is another view that needs to be thought about. That is "how it is connected?".</p><p>ROM and RAM are normally connected directly to address and data buses of CPU and thought today more as memory.  The disk are normally connected though an interface (some times another computer/controller) and thought as storage.  This all about the PHYSICAL connection.  It is also why other connections to "disks" can be created like RAM disks, iSCSI and tape-drive-disks.</p><p>I work on a machine that OS "looks" to machine via LOGICAL view.  So the disk is just one large slow virtual memory space and the RAM is just faster / closer cache of that virtual space, and cache is faster still and closer.  Makes nice to add new drives since it just one big flat model.  It even makes journals easy since you can have it stripe the journals over 100 drives with single option.  My "current" machine is 32 processors, 640GB of memory, and 900+ disks in RAID5 clusters for 35TB of storage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Wiki article would translate to what you said .
But there is another view that needs to be thought about .
That is " how it is connected ?
" .ROM and RAM are normally connected directly to address and data buses of CPU and thought today more as memory .
The disk are normally connected though an interface ( some times another computer/controller ) and thought as storage .
This all about the PHYSICAL connection .
It is also why other connections to " disks " can be created like RAM disks , iSCSI and tape-drive-disks.I work on a machine that OS " looks " to machine via LOGICAL view .
So the disk is just one large slow virtual memory space and the RAM is just faster / closer cache of that virtual space , and cache is faster still and closer .
Makes nice to add new drives since it just one big flat model .
It even makes journals easy since you can have it stripe the journals over 100 drives with single option .
My " current " machine is 32 processors , 640GB of memory , and 900 + disks in RAID5 clusters for 35TB of storage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Wiki article would translate to what you said.
But there is another view that needs to be thought about.
That is "how it is connected?
".ROM and RAM are normally connected directly to address and data buses of CPU and thought today more as memory.
The disk are normally connected though an interface (some times another computer/controller) and thought as storage.
This all about the PHYSICAL connection.
It is also why other connections to "disks" can be created like RAM disks, iSCSI and tape-drive-disks.I work on a machine that OS "looks" to machine via LOGICAL view.
So the disk is just one large slow virtual memory space and the RAM is just faster / closer cache of that virtual space, and cache is faster still and closer.
Makes nice to add new drives since it just one big flat model.
It even makes journals easy since you can have it stripe the journals over 100 drives with single option.
My "current" machine is 32 processors, 640GB of memory, and 900+ disks in RAID5 clusters for 35TB of storage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267432</id>
	<title>SCSI 4 LIFE!</title>
	<author>AmigaHeretic</author>
	<datestamp>1259523780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just replace SCSI &amp; IDE with SSD &amp; Platter and pretend we already did this fight 15 years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just replace SCSI &amp; IDE with SSD &amp; Platter and pretend we already did this fight 15 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just replace SCSI &amp; IDE with SSD &amp; Platter and pretend we already did this fight 15 years ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30271694</id>
	<title>Re:Memory</title>
	<author>kybred</author>
	<datestamp>1259606220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter."</p></div><p>
So does that mean that the songs sound like a 45 played at 78? Or that the ones from the hard drives sound like a 45 played at 33?
</p><p>
Of course, half the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers here won't know what I'm talking about.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow , spinning platter .
" So does that mean that the songs sound like a 45 played at 78 ?
Or that the ones from the hard drives sound like a 45 played at 33 ?
Of course , half the /.ers here wo n't know what I 'm talking about .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're fast because every song is sitting in memory instead of being on a slow, spinning platter.
"
So does that mean that the songs sound like a 45 played at 78?
Or that the ones from the hard drives sound like a 45 played at 33?
Of course, half the /.ers here won't know what I'm talking about.
:-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267908</id>
	<title>CNET and last.fm are both owned by CBS Interactive</title>
	<author>boot\_img</author>
	<datestamp>1259573220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... so this article is not really journalism, but rather marketing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... so this article is not really journalism , but rather marketing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... so this article is not really journalism, but rather marketing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268164</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Deanalator</author>
	<datestamp>1259576460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It still confuses me why their "psytrance radio" keeps pulling in Britney Spears.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It still confuses me why their " psytrance radio " keeps pulling in Britney Spears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It still confuses me why their "psytrance radio" keeps pulling in Britney Spears.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268088</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1259575620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together...</p></div></blockquote><p>

Many of those people did everything right, stayed out of trouble, never questioned authority, and are generally conscientious but lacking in personality and interesting life experience. <br> <br>

Shit, at least my friends wait until they're really drunk before they break out the Toby Keith.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of my acquaintances are well-read , well-dressed , well-spoken people , the sort who really seem to have it all together.. . Many of those people did everything right , stayed out of trouble , never questioned authority , and are generally conscientious but lacking in personality and interesting life experience .
Shit , at least my friends wait until they 're really drunk before they break out the Toby Keith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of my acquaintances are well-read, well-dressed, well-spoken people, the sort who really seem to have it all together...

Many of those people did everything right, stayed out of trouble, never questioned authority, and are generally conscientious but lacking in personality and interesting life experience.
Shit, at least my friends wait until they're really drunk before they break out the Toby Keith.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272834</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Omestes</author>
	<datestamp>1259611680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies. Saying, "Those guys are crap" is only going to get you dumped</i></p><p>By "ladies" you of course mean: girls under 18, or fat old women who wear Betty Boop/Disney pajamas and form Twilight fan clubs.</p><p>Me and my girlfriend spent many a night bonding over Slayer and Mike Patton, which suited me just fine. I'd actually be very frightened if she listened to Justin Timberlake (and whoever "Daughtery" is), since there is something very strange about a 30 year old listening to 2000's teeny-bopper music.  People shouldn't be frightened of growing up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies .
Saying , " Those guys are crap " is only going to get you dumpedBy " ladies " you of course mean : girls under 18 , or fat old women who wear Betty Boop/Disney pajamas and form Twilight fan clubs.Me and my girlfriend spent many a night bonding over Slayer and Mike Patton , which suited me just fine .
I 'd actually be very frightened if she listened to Justin Timberlake ( and whoever " Daughtery " is ) , since there is something very strange about a 30 year old listening to 2000 's teeny-bopper music .
People should n't be frightened of growing up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Being familiar with music from hotties like Timberlake and Daughtry makes you popular with the ladies.
Saying, "Those guys are crap" is only going to get you dumpedBy "ladies" you of course mean: girls under 18, or fat old women who wear Betty Boop/Disney pajamas and form Twilight fan clubs.Me and my girlfriend spent many a night bonding over Slayer and Mike Patton, which suited me just fine.
I'd actually be very frightened if she listened to Justin Timberlake (and whoever "Daughtery" is), since there is something very strange about a 30 year old listening to 2000's teeny-bopper music.
People shouldn't be frightened of growing up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269016</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267674</id>
	<title>Memory instead of platters...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259613480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really hope that was an attempt to dumb it down for the article. It's a pretty poor way of describing the difference between HDDs and SSDs. After all, HDDs are a form of non-volatile memory too. They just happen to have a mechanical aspect.</p><p>In fact, the only way in which they could stream music without having it all in memory first is if they were using a microphone and a live band. Sure, it might make for an entertaining data center, but it's not very scalable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hope that was an attempt to dumb it down for the article .
It 's a pretty poor way of describing the difference between HDDs and SSDs .
After all , HDDs are a form of non-volatile memory too .
They just happen to have a mechanical aspect.In fact , the only way in which they could stream music without having it all in memory first is if they were using a microphone and a live band .
Sure , it might make for an entertaining data center , but it 's not very scalable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hope that was an attempt to dumb it down for the article.
It's a pretty poor way of describing the difference between HDDs and SSDs.
After all, HDDs are a form of non-volatile memory too.
They just happen to have a mechanical aspect.In fact, the only way in which they could stream music without having it all in memory first is if they were using a microphone and a live band.
Sure, it might make for an entertaining data center, but it's not very scalable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30271902</id>
	<title>Re:Memory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259607120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously a case can be made for it if you want to be pedantic, but certainly not in regular use.  We've long since relegated use of the word "memory" to RAM, differentiating it from non-volatile types of memory.  This helps reduce a big point of confusion in communication between the tech-savvy and 'n00bs'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously a case can be made for it if you want to be pedantic , but certainly not in regular use .
We 've long since relegated use of the word " memory " to RAM , differentiating it from non-volatile types of memory .
This helps reduce a big point of confusion in communication between the tech-savvy and 'n00bs' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously a case can be made for it if you want to be pedantic, but certainly not in regular use.
We've long since relegated use of the word "memory" to RAM, differentiating it from non-volatile types of memory.
This helps reduce a big point of confusion in communication between the tech-savvy and 'n00bs'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267858</id>
	<title>Re:275,000 years? Wow.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259572500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And your playlist was composed of?...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And your playlist was composed of ? .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And your playlist was composed of?...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30277770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269830
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30290516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267674
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30271694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267516
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30271902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267806
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_30_0336221_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267846
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268426
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30290516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30271902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30271694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269830
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272586
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272990
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267878
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269016
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30272834
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30270020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30269008
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30277770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30267608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_30_0336221.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_30_0336221.30268448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
