<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_28_2146203</id>
	<title>STS-129 Ascent Video Highlights</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259423880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader sends in this link to a video of <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/7852885">12-1/2 minutes of Space Shuttle pr0n</a>. The people at the Johnson Space Center put together this video of the ascent of STS-129 using multiple imagery assets &mdash; ground, air, booster, and the shuttle itself. The booster's-eye view of splashdown and immersion is something you don't see every day. As a bonus, another anonymous reader shared a beautiful photo of the <a href="http://chamorrobible.org/images/photos/gpw-200911-NASA-ISS021-E-032919-planet-Earth-rugged-terrain-Space-Shuttle-Atlantis-STS-129-20091125-large.jpg">shuttle flying over rugged terrain</a> after it separated from the ISS last week.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader sends in this link to a video of 12-1/2 minutes of Space Shuttle pr0n .
The people at the Johnson Space Center put together this video of the ascent of STS-129 using multiple imagery assets    ground , air , booster , and the shuttle itself .
The booster 's-eye view of splashdown and immersion is something you do n't see every day .
As a bonus , another anonymous reader shared a beautiful photo of the shuttle flying over rugged terrain after it separated from the ISS last week .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader sends in this link to a video of 12-1/2 minutes of Space Shuttle pr0n.
The people at the Johnson Space Center put together this video of the ascent of STS-129 using multiple imagery assets — ground, air, booster, and the shuttle itself.
The booster's-eye view of splashdown and immersion is something you don't see every day.
As a bonus, another anonymous reader shared a beautiful photo of the shuttle flying over rugged terrain after it separated from the ISS last week.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258938</id>
	<title>Cue...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259427780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the anti-NASA posts...  3, 2, 1...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the anti-NASA posts... 3 , 2 , 1.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the anti-NASA posts...  3, 2, 1...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261454</id>
	<title>Re:Ahh, shuttle</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1259510820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I always preferred <a href="http://sts9.com/" title="sts9.com">STS-9</a> [sts9.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I always preferred STS-9 [ sts9.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always preferred STS-9 [sts9.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259756</id>
	<title>How to find the location of the background?</title>
	<author>kanweg</author>
	<datestamp>1259528340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm always curious what part of earth is in a shot from space. Suppose this picture is the only info you've got. How to go about and find the spot on earth visible in the picture? Is it doable with stuff accessible to anyone? I see roads (fields at the bottom) and ice/salt plane at the left. Now what?</p><p>Bert</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm always curious what part of earth is in a shot from space .
Suppose this picture is the only info you 've got .
How to go about and find the spot on earth visible in the picture ?
Is it doable with stuff accessible to anyone ?
I see roads ( fields at the bottom ) and ice/salt plane at the left .
Now what ? Bert</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm always curious what part of earth is in a shot from space.
Suppose this picture is the only info you've got.
How to go about and find the spot on earth visible in the picture?
Is it doable with stuff accessible to anyone?
I see roads (fields at the bottom) and ice/salt plane at the left.
Now what?Bert</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260068</id>
	<title>What happens to the external tank?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259493360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know, it burns up. But I would kinda like to see that process. It seems that they have imagery from the ground of the thing in space even after it has separated. How long does it take to come down and what does that look like? That is what I found myself wondering at the end of the video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , it burns up .
But I would kinda like to see that process .
It seems that they have imagery from the ground of the thing in space even after it has separated .
How long does it take to come down and what does that look like ?
That is what I found myself wondering at the end of the video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, it burns up.
But I would kinda like to see that process.
It seems that they have imagery from the ground of the thing in space even after it has separated.
How long does it take to come down and what does that look like?
That is what I found myself wondering at the end of the video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260012</id>
	<title>Re:Huge photo of "shuttle flying over rugged terra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259492220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this linked from a bible site? Are you trying to save NASA's bandwidth costs?</p><p>Original here:</p><p><a href="http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-129/html/iss021e032919.html" title="nasa.gov">http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-129/html/iss021e032919.html</a> [nasa.gov]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this linked from a bible site ?
Are you trying to save NASA 's bandwidth costs ? Original here : http : //spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-129/html/iss021e032919.html [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this linked from a bible site?
Are you trying to save NASA's bandwidth costs?Original here:http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-129/html/iss021e032919.html [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263478</id>
	<title>Beautiful!</title>
	<author>cyberzephyr</author>
	<datestamp>1259485920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure there may be comparable videos out there but i was very impressed by what i saw.  It was worth watching and i intend to show it to friends.  I have always been impressed by the Shuttle program and look forward to the new program when it come out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure there may be comparable videos out there but i was very impressed by what i saw .
It was worth watching and i intend to show it to friends .
I have always been impressed by the Shuttle program and look forward to the new program when it come out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure there may be comparable videos out there but i was very impressed by what i saw.
It was worth watching and i intend to show it to friends.
I have always been impressed by the Shuttle program and look forward to the new program when it come out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258940</id>
	<title>HEIL HITLER</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259427840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SIEG HEIL! Long hail myg0t!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SIEG HEIL !
Long hail myg0t !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SIEG HEIL!
Long hail myg0t!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259512</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig SW quote.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259436780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find the lack of rule 34 disturbing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find the lack of rule 34 disturbing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find the lack of rule 34 disturbing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258998</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259110</id>
	<title>Nice</title>
	<author>Cobra Spaz</author>
	<datestamp>1259429940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is my favorite type of pr0n. Good video... those guys did a great job with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is my favorite type of pr0n .
Good video... those guys did a great job with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is my favorite type of pr0n.
Good video... those guys did a great job with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274</id>
	<title>C'mon, fix it please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259432280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The people at the Johnson Space Center put together this video of the assent of STS-129"</p><p>So what exactly did STS129 agree to?<br>I won't grammar nazi the comments, but seeing a front page mistake like that is annoying. Especially when it's spelled right in the title.</p><p>s/assent/ascent</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The people at the Johnson Space Center put together this video of the assent of STS-129 " So what exactly did STS129 agree to ? I wo n't grammar nazi the comments , but seeing a front page mistake like that is annoying .
Especially when it 's spelled right in the title.s/assent/ascent</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The people at the Johnson Space Center put together this video of the assent of STS-129"So what exactly did STS129 agree to?I won't grammar nazi the comments, but seeing a front page mistake like that is annoying.
Especially when it's spelled right in the title.s/assent/ascent</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258962</id>
	<title>alternative shuttle pr0n</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1259428140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/</a> [imdb.com]
<p>
I have absolutely no idea what's in that movie, but could some p3rv3rt slashdotter possibly summarize it for the rest of us prude5?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/ [ imdb.com ] I have absolutely no idea what 's in that movie , but could some p3rv3rt slashdotter possibly summarize it for the rest of us prude5 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0310288/ [imdb.com]

I have absolutely no idea what's in that movie, but could some p3rv3rt slashdotter possibly summarize it for the rest of us prude5?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259300</id>
	<title>Re:Shadows?</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1259432580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That diffuse light source on the left is the Earth.  The nose has bright spots where you'd expect reflections of the earthlight.  The port engine is most bright where reflection off the open door concentrates light from the Earth's limb off to the left -- probably mostly clouds reflecting light back toward the Sun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That diffuse light source on the left is the Earth .
The nose has bright spots where you 'd expect reflections of the earthlight .
The port engine is most bright where reflection off the open door concentrates light from the Earth 's limb off to the left -- probably mostly clouds reflecting light back toward the Sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That diffuse light source on the left is the Earth.
The nose has bright spots where you'd expect reflections of the earthlight.
The port engine is most bright where reflection off the open door concentrates light from the Earth's limb off to the left -- probably mostly clouds reflecting light back toward the Sun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259950</id>
	<title>Re:Ahh, shuttle</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259490420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You'll miss the old girl when she's gone.</p></div></blockquote><p>My tax wallet certainly wont. It's a cool-looking bird, but an expensive bird.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll miss the old girl when she 's gone.My tax wallet certainly wont .
It 's a cool-looking bird , but an expensive bird .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll miss the old girl when she's gone.My tax wallet certainly wont.
It's a cool-looking bird, but an expensive bird.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259082</id>
	<title>Camera info</title>
	<author>Lord Byron II</author>
	<datestamp>1259429400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone is interested, the camera they used for that shot was a Nikon D2Xs, a two-year old, 12.4MP, $5900 MSRP camera when new.</p><p>For some reason, I'm surprised NASA is using regular off-the-shelf cameras. I almost expected it to be a custom "space-camera".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone is interested , the camera they used for that shot was a Nikon D2Xs , a two-year old , 12.4MP , $ 5900 MSRP camera when new.For some reason , I 'm surprised NASA is using regular off-the-shelf cameras .
I almost expected it to be a custom " space-camera " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone is interested, the camera they used for that shot was a Nikon D2Xs, a two-year old, 12.4MP, $5900 MSRP camera when new.For some reason, I'm surprised NASA is using regular off-the-shelf cameras.
I almost expected it to be a custom "space-camera".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259018</id>
	<title>Rule 34</title>
	<author>Anubis IV</author>
	<datestamp>1259428620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was about to ask if anyone had already done it, but then I remembered the rule.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was about to ask if anyone had already done it , but then I remembered the rule .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was about to ask if anyone had already done it, but then I remembered the rule.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261662</id>
	<title>Original HD footage</title>
	<author>e-Flex</author>
	<datestamp>1259513100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why on earth does this look like it has gone through a VHS conversion?<br> <br>

And also many here does not seem to know that all NASAs imagery is free and available on the net: <a href="http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/index.html" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/index.html</a> [nasa.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why on earth does this look like it has gone through a VHS conversion ?
And also many here does not seem to know that all NASAs imagery is free and available on the net : http : //spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/index.html [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why on earth does this look like it has gone through a VHS conversion?
And also many here does not seem to know that all NASAs imagery is free and available on the net: http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/index.html [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260848</id>
	<title>Re:What happens to the external tank?</title>
	<author>the-bobcat</author>
	<datestamp>1259504520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're not too keen on showing it, seeing as it always lands in the same village in Zimbabwe, and they're starting to get annoyed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're not too keen on showing it , seeing as it always lands in the same village in Zimbabwe , and they 're starting to get annoyed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're not too keen on showing it, seeing as it always lands in the same village in Zimbabwe, and they're starting to get annoyed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261906</id>
	<title>Sell this to me, yesssss</title>
	<author>John Pfeiffer</author>
	<datestamp>1259515500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, those crazy camera tracking rigs they have...  Those initial tracking shots of the ascent are so stable and 'solid' they almost look like CG.  Wow that was awesome.  Kill those graphics and replace them with something that doesn't scream 'My other job is making powerpoint slideshows' and put it out on Blu-ray.  I'll buy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , those crazy camera tracking rigs they have... Those initial tracking shots of the ascent are so stable and 'solid ' they almost look like CG .
Wow that was awesome .
Kill those graphics and replace them with something that does n't scream 'My other job is making powerpoint slideshows ' and put it out on Blu-ray .
I 'll buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, those crazy camera tracking rigs they have...  Those initial tracking shots of the ascent are so stable and 'solid' they almost look like CG.
Wow that was awesome.
Kill those graphics and replace them with something that doesn't scream 'My other job is making powerpoint slideshows' and put it out on Blu-ray.
I'll buy it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142</id>
	<title>Shadows?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259430420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>re: the shuttle flying over rugged terrain - I am surprised that the shadows aren't deeper and sharper. What is the diffuse source that is lighting the port engine nacelle and the portion of the nose that are in shadow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>re : the shuttle flying over rugged terrain - I am surprised that the shadows are n't deeper and sharper .
What is the diffuse source that is lighting the port engine nacelle and the portion of the nose that are in shadow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>re: the shuttle flying over rugged terrain - I am surprised that the shadows aren't deeper and sharper.
What is the diffuse source that is lighting the port engine nacelle and the portion of the nose that are in shadow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the old "Pad Rat" posts on Usenet</title>
	<author>TopSpin</author>
	<datestamp>1259437860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I once caught a HD shuttle launch video at NASA's site right after the launch took place, apparently before it had been so carefully edited.  The sounds were incredible; you could hear the turbo pumps wind up several seconds before the liquid rockets were lit.  Those are large and very high speed pumps that operate at the limit of what materials science can provide; the sound they make is simply chilling.  I watched it over and over because I could not f**king believe it.</p><p>Later versions of the same launch video had that audio removed.  Can't let anyone witness any of that.  Must appear as though the launch is a peaceful, happy moment that doesn't involve any sort of drama.  Oh ponies!</p><p>NASA hurts itself by letting the cowardly nature of its bureaucracy dominate the editing process.  If you handed the same raw material to a Hollywood film maker with a mandate to sell tickets you would get a balls out, violent, bare knuckle collection of aerospace machinery burning, shaking and raging its way into orbit and every god damn taxpaying mope that watched it would know exactly what sort of miracle those 100+ successful missions represent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I once caught a HD shuttle launch video at NASA 's site right after the launch took place , apparently before it had been so carefully edited .
The sounds were incredible ; you could hear the turbo pumps wind up several seconds before the liquid rockets were lit .
Those are large and very high speed pumps that operate at the limit of what materials science can provide ; the sound they make is simply chilling .
I watched it over and over because I could not f * * king believe it.Later versions of the same launch video had that audio removed .
Ca n't let anyone witness any of that .
Must appear as though the launch is a peaceful , happy moment that does n't involve any sort of drama .
Oh ponies ! NASA hurts itself by letting the cowardly nature of its bureaucracy dominate the editing process .
If you handed the same raw material to a Hollywood film maker with a mandate to sell tickets you would get a balls out , violent , bare knuckle collection of aerospace machinery burning , shaking and raging its way into orbit and every god damn taxpaying mope that watched it would know exactly what sort of miracle those 100 + successful missions represent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I once caught a HD shuttle launch video at NASA's site right after the launch took place, apparently before it had been so carefully edited.
The sounds were incredible; you could hear the turbo pumps wind up several seconds before the liquid rockets were lit.
Those are large and very high speed pumps that operate at the limit of what materials science can provide; the sound they make is simply chilling.
I watched it over and over because I could not f**king believe it.Later versions of the same launch video had that audio removed.
Can't let anyone witness any of that.
Must appear as though the launch is a peaceful, happy moment that doesn't involve any sort of drama.
Oh ponies!NASA hurts itself by letting the cowardly nature of its bureaucracy dominate the editing process.
If you handed the same raw material to a Hollywood film maker with a mandate to sell tickets you would get a balls out, violent, bare knuckle collection of aerospace machinery burning, shaking and raging its way into orbit and every god damn taxpaying mope that watched it would know exactly what sort of miracle those 100+ successful missions represent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260672</id>
	<title>Google is your friend.  Sorta.</title>
	<author>dtmos</author>
	<datestamp>1259502060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://standards.nasa.gov/training/nasa-std-5002/swfs/5002\_400.swf" title="nasa.gov">177,000 feet [flash]</a> [nasa.gov] (about 54 km).  However, <a href="http://www.spacedu.com/nasa\%20online\%20lessons/Space\_Shuttle\_Discovery.pdf" title="spacedu.com">this NASA site</a> [spacedu.com] says 50 km (about 164,000 feet), while <a href="http://space.about.com/od/spacemissions/ig/STS-1---First-Space-Shuttle/Selected-frames-of-the-SRB-sep.htm" title="about.com">this source</a> [about.com] says 24 nautical miles (about 146,000 feet, or 44 km).  My guess is that the differences are due to variations in mass and trajectory of the shuttle for various missions, and in improvements in the design (less weight, more thrust) over the years.</p><p>Apogee of the SRBs is at <a href="http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/technology/sts-newsref/srb.html" title="nasa.gov">approximately 220,000 feet</a> [nasa.gov] (about 67 km).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>177,000 feet [ flash ] [ nasa.gov ] ( about 54 km ) .
However , this NASA site [ spacedu.com ] says 50 km ( about 164,000 feet ) , while this source [ about.com ] says 24 nautical miles ( about 146,000 feet , or 44 km ) .
My guess is that the differences are due to variations in mass and trajectory of the shuttle for various missions , and in improvements in the design ( less weight , more thrust ) over the years.Apogee of the SRBs is at approximately 220,000 feet [ nasa.gov ] ( about 67 km ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>177,000 feet [flash] [nasa.gov] (about 54 km).
However, this NASA site [spacedu.com] says 50 km (about 164,000 feet), while this source [about.com] says 24 nautical miles (about 146,000 feet, or 44 km).
My guess is that the differences are due to variations in mass and trajectory of the shuttle for various missions, and in improvements in the design (less weight, more thrust) over the years.Apogee of the SRBs is at approximately 220,000 feet [nasa.gov] (about 67 km).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259382</id>
	<title>Space Shuttle what?</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1259434200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>C'mon, none of this imagery is in the least bit commercial, let alone exploitative...why set off all the work filters for such a worthwhile topic???</htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon , none of this imagery is in the least bit commercial , let alone exploitative...why set off all the work filters for such a worthwhile topic ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon, none of this imagery is in the least bit commercial, let alone exploitative...why set off all the work filters for such a worthwhile topic??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259496</id>
	<title>Re:C'mon, fix it please</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259436480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So what exactly did STS129 agree to?</p></div></blockquote><p>They gave their assent to ascent in order to affect effects for our affection. Okay, now I'm confused again.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what exactly did STS129 agree to ? They gave their assent to ascent in order to affect effects for our affection .
Okay , now I 'm confused again .
     </tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what exactly did STS129 agree to?They gave their assent to ascent in order to affect effects for our affection.
Okay, now I'm confused again.
     
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260758</id>
	<title>Re:SRB separation</title>
	<author>huge</author>
	<datestamp>1259503200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does anyone know the altitude that SRB separation occurs?</p></div><p>Around 150000ft (<a href="http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/technology/sts-newsref/srb.html" title="nasa.gov">source</a> [nasa.gov])</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know the altitude that SRB separation occurs ? Around 150000ft ( source [ nasa.gov ] )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know the altitude that SRB separation occurs?Around 150000ft (source [nasa.gov])
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262164</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the old "Pad Rat" posts on Usenet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259517540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've always found the sound of those large rockets fascinating.</p><p>One interesting thing is that I always assumed the somewhat crackly sound of the rockets was from the microphones or preamps overloading. However, it actually sounds like that in real life! The sheer sound pressure makes air go into non linear compression, and you are hearing a series of little sonic booms as the air tries to go faster than itself. (If that makes any sense<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've always found the sound of those large rockets fascinating.One interesting thing is that I always assumed the somewhat crackly sound of the rockets was from the microphones or preamps overloading .
However , it actually sounds like that in real life !
The sheer sound pressure makes air go into non linear compression , and you are hearing a series of little sonic booms as the air tries to go faster than itself .
( If that makes any sense : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've always found the sound of those large rockets fascinating.One interesting thing is that I always assumed the somewhat crackly sound of the rockets was from the microphones or preamps overloading.
However, it actually sounds like that in real life!
The sheer sound pressure makes air go into non linear compression, and you are hearing a series of little sonic booms as the air tries to go faster than itself.
(If that makes any sense :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259726</id>
	<title>My pics</title>
	<author>Leebert</author>
	<datestamp>1259526900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My pics of the ascent:</p><p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2003087&amp;id=183100363&amp;l=f3b4259571" title="facebook.com">http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2003087&amp;id=183100363&amp;l=f3b4259571</a> [facebook.com]</p><p>The last one was pretty cool (that's the main reason I'm posting here...) I caught it just as it was passing through a cloud layer.  I'd like to pretend that was good photography, but honestly it was just luck.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My pics of the ascent : http : //www.facebook.com/album.php ? aid = 2003087&amp;id = 183100363&amp;l = f3b4259571 [ facebook.com ] The last one was pretty cool ( that 's the main reason I 'm posting here... ) I caught it just as it was passing through a cloud layer .
I 'd like to pretend that was good photography , but honestly it was just luck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My pics of the ascent:http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2003087&amp;id=183100363&amp;l=f3b4259571 [facebook.com]The last one was pretty cool (that's the main reason I'm posting here...) I caught it just as it was passing through a cloud layer.
I'd like to pretend that was good photography, but honestly it was just luck.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259398</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>quacking duck</author>
	<datestamp>1259434440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agree, absolutely incredible. Over the years there were lots of angles I'd wanted to see during a launch, this covered almost all of them (the remaining video would be of the tank actually burning up in the atmosphere).</p><p>I found it odd though that the now-regular footage from the camera mounted on the fuel tank was of much lower resolution than that from other cameras. I realize the tank-cam is live stream while other footage (e.g. on the SRBs) is retrieved later, but the tank-cam looks great on TV...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agree , absolutely incredible .
Over the years there were lots of angles I 'd wanted to see during a launch , this covered almost all of them ( the remaining video would be of the tank actually burning up in the atmosphere ) .I found it odd though that the now-regular footage from the camera mounted on the fuel tank was of much lower resolution than that from other cameras .
I realize the tank-cam is live stream while other footage ( e.g .
on the SRBs ) is retrieved later , but the tank-cam looks great on TV.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agree, absolutely incredible.
Over the years there were lots of angles I'd wanted to see during a launch, this covered almost all of them (the remaining video would be of the tank actually burning up in the atmosphere).I found it odd though that the now-regular footage from the camera mounted on the fuel tank was of much lower resolution than that from other cameras.
I realize the tank-cam is live stream while other footage (e.g.
on the SRBs) is retrieved later, but the tank-cam looks great on TV...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30264840</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the old "Pad Rat" posts on Usenet</title>
	<author>GreyFish</author>
	<datestamp>1259499240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's worth seeing the Spacestation 3d IMAX film - it has a IMAX sequence of a Soyuz taking off with the camera at ground level very close to the launch pad, it practically takes your head off<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's worth seeing the Spacestation 3d IMAX film - it has a IMAX sequence of a Soyuz taking off with the camera at ground level very close to the launch pad , it practically takes your head off : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's worth seeing the Spacestation 3d IMAX film - it has a IMAX sequence of a Soyuz taking off with the camera at ground level very close to the launch pad, it practically takes your head off :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30277806</id>
	<title>Look forward to the Ares V</title>
	<author>amightywind</author>
	<datestamp>1259588940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quite frankly, America rocks! I only hope the leftists in power will proceed forward with the Ares V which will be even more monstrous!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite frankly , America rocks !
I only hope the leftists in power will proceed forward with the Ares V which will be even more monstrous !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite frankly, America rocks!
I only hope the leftists in power will proceed forward with the Ares V which will be even more monstrous!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263310</id>
	<title>Wonderful! Also recommended</title>
	<author>StarfishOne</author>
	<datestamp>1259527680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome video material, no doubt about that! It's great to see this amazing machine from these perspectives. Especially after the SRB's were disconnected with their jets still flaming while falling away.. jaw dropping!</p><p>Also I'd like to recommend to the Space Shuttle fans the videos you can find online with a launch from an airliner.</p><p>E.g.:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv5J5cBwwFc" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv5J5cBwwFc</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome video material , no doubt about that !
It 's great to see this amazing machine from these perspectives .
Especially after the SRB 's were disconnected with their jets still flaming while falling away.. jaw dropping ! Also I 'd like to recommend to the Space Shuttle fans the videos you can find online with a launch from an airliner.E.g .
: http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Xv5J5cBwwFc [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome video material, no doubt about that!
It's great to see this amazing machine from these perspectives.
Especially after the SRB's were disconnected with their jets still flaming while falling away.. jaw dropping!Also I'd like to recommend to the Space Shuttle fans the videos you can find online with a launch from an airliner.E.g.
:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xv5J5cBwwFc [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259560</id>
	<title>HD link??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259437620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> Anyone??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Anyone?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259088</id>
	<title>12-/12</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259429520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lol</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lol</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259856</id>
	<title>Video Schmideo.</title>
	<author>lewko</author>
	<datestamp>1259487240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260536</id>
	<title>Re:What happens to the external tank?</title>
	<author>david.given</author>
	<datestamp>1259500620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know, it burns up. But I would kinda like to see that process. It seems that they have imagery from the ground of the thing in space even after it has separated. How long does it take to come down and what does that look like? That is what I found myself wondering at the end of the video.</p></div><p>What probably happens is that it goes over the horizon and is out of range for both telescopes and the rocketcam receivers. At that point the shuttle's done most of the boost into orbit and all that is left to do is circularisation (the shuttle's tiny internal tanks don't store much delta-vee). So the tank is going to go a <i>long</i> way before reentering.

</p><p>But you're right --- I'd love to see its final moments. Surely, given how much money they're spending, they could station some observation stations downrange?

</p><p>There does seem to be a bit of a phobia in the space industry about showing things going wrong, though. Remember the SpaceX Falcon 1 test flights that didn't make it? They would shut off the rocketcam footage at the first sign of trouble. I'm sure they've <i>got</i> footage of the vehicle tumbling/disintegrating, but they're not going to make it public. Perhaps NASA have decided that rocketcam footage of the external tank burning up is not something sufficiently reassuring to be shown.

</p><p>Space shuttle factoid: the pipe which pumps propellant from the external tank to the shuttle is 43cm wide.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know , it burns up .
But I would kinda like to see that process .
It seems that they have imagery from the ground of the thing in space even after it has separated .
How long does it take to come down and what does that look like ?
That is what I found myself wondering at the end of the video.What probably happens is that it goes over the horizon and is out of range for both telescopes and the rocketcam receivers .
At that point the shuttle 's done most of the boost into orbit and all that is left to do is circularisation ( the shuttle 's tiny internal tanks do n't store much delta-vee ) .
So the tank is going to go a long way before reentering .
But you 're right --- I 'd love to see its final moments .
Surely , given how much money they 're spending , they could station some observation stations downrange ?
There does seem to be a bit of a phobia in the space industry about showing things going wrong , though .
Remember the SpaceX Falcon 1 test flights that did n't make it ?
They would shut off the rocketcam footage at the first sign of trouble .
I 'm sure they 've got footage of the vehicle tumbling/disintegrating , but they 're not going to make it public .
Perhaps NASA have decided that rocketcam footage of the external tank burning up is not something sufficiently reassuring to be shown .
Space shuttle factoid : the pipe which pumps propellant from the external tank to the shuttle is 43cm wide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know, it burns up.
But I would kinda like to see that process.
It seems that they have imagery from the ground of the thing in space even after it has separated.
How long does it take to come down and what does that look like?
That is what I found myself wondering at the end of the video.What probably happens is that it goes over the horizon and is out of range for both telescopes and the rocketcam receivers.
At that point the shuttle's done most of the boost into orbit and all that is left to do is circularisation (the shuttle's tiny internal tanks don't store much delta-vee).
So the tank is going to go a long way before reentering.
But you're right --- I'd love to see its final moments.
Surely, given how much money they're spending, they could station some observation stations downrange?
There does seem to be a bit of a phobia in the space industry about showing things going wrong, though.
Remember the SpaceX Falcon 1 test flights that didn't make it?
They would shut off the rocketcam footage at the first sign of trouble.
I'm sure they've got footage of the vehicle tumbling/disintegrating, but they're not going to make it public.
Perhaps NASA have decided that rocketcam footage of the external tank burning up is not something sufficiently reassuring to be shown.
Space shuttle factoid: the pipe which pumps propellant from the external tank to the shuttle is 43cm wide.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261110</id>
	<title>Can I keep it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259507520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does anyone have a link to download this? It is this kind of video I am always afraid of losing. You either lose the link or it is not posted anymore, just at the time you want to show a friend this video you have been talking about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone have a link to download this ?
It is this kind of video I am always afraid of losing .
You either lose the link or it is not posted anymore , just at the time you want to show a friend this video you have been talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone have a link to download this?
It is this kind of video I am always afraid of losing.
You either lose the link or it is not posted anymore, just at the time you want to show a friend this video you have been talking about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259258</id>
	<title>Re:Camera info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259432100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Except for changes in lubrication oil to meet NASA specifications and the adoption of a specialized firmware, the D2XS cameras used aboard the Space Shuttle and in the ISS were basically the same as commercial models. The D2XS, released in June 2006, is a high-end Nikon digital SLR camera.</p></div></blockquote><p>(<a href="http://www.nikon.com/about/news/2008/0711\_nasa\_01.htm" title="nikon.com">Source</a> [nikon.com])<br> <br>
Almost completely stock....  They are brutes of a camera (I have one).  You could use it to pound nails in a pinch.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except for changes in lubrication oil to meet NASA specifications and the adoption of a specialized firmware , the D2XS cameras used aboard the Space Shuttle and in the ISS were basically the same as commercial models .
The D2XS , released in June 2006 , is a high-end Nikon digital SLR camera .
( Source [ nikon.com ] ) Almost completely stock.... They are brutes of a camera ( I have one ) .
You could use it to pound nails in a pinch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except for changes in lubrication oil to meet NASA specifications and the adoption of a specialized firmware, the D2XS cameras used aboard the Space Shuttle and in the ISS were basically the same as commercial models.
The D2XS, released in June 2006, is a high-end Nikon digital SLR camera.
(Source [nikon.com]) 
Almost completely stock....  They are brutes of a camera (I have one).
You could use it to pound nails in a pinch.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260684</id>
	<title>Re:Shadows?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259502240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, the dark areas were too contrasty, so the Area 51 engineers put a few extra spotlights on the ceiling.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the dark areas were too contrasty , so the Area 51 engineers put a few extra spotlights on the ceiling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the dark areas were too contrasty, so the Area 51 engineers put a few extra spotlights on the ceiling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260302</id>
	<title>SRB separation</title>
	<author>blixel</author>
	<datestamp>1259497080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in Central Florida so I've watched at least a dozen launches in the last 10 years. In watching this video, it appears as though the solid rocket booster separation happens after the shuttle has reached "black sky"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... in watching from the ground, I always assumed SRB separation was happening when the shuttle was still in blue skies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or at least dark blue skies. 100,000 feet or something like that. Does anyone know the altitude that SRB separation occurs?</p><p>Awesome video.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Central Florida so I 've watched at least a dozen launches in the last 10 years .
In watching this video , it appears as though the solid rocket booster separation happens after the shuttle has reached " black sky " ... in watching from the ground , I always assumed SRB separation was happening when the shuttle was still in blue skies ... or at least dark blue skies .
100,000 feet or something like that .
Does anyone know the altitude that SRB separation occurs ? Awesome video .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Central Florida so I've watched at least a dozen launches in the last 10 years.
In watching this video, it appears as though the solid rocket booster separation happens after the shuttle has reached "black sky" ... in watching from the ground, I always assumed SRB separation was happening when the shuttle was still in blue skies ... or at least dark blue skies.
100,000 feet or something like that.
Does anyone know the altitude that SRB separation occurs?Awesome video.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259580</id>
	<title>Wow...</title>
	<author>mingle</author>
	<datestamp>1259437920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Absolutely stunning stuff!

Everyone with even the slightest interest in the Shuttle should watch this...

Amazing...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Absolutely stunning stuff !
Everyone with even the slightest interest in the Shuttle should watch this.. . Amazing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Absolutely stunning stuff!
Everyone with even the slightest interest in the Shuttle should watch this...

Amazing...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260938</id>
	<title>Doctored picture???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259505480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it just me or is the "beautiful photo of the shuttle flying over rugged terrain" doctored?
<p>
The shadows on the ground and on the shuttle just don't match...
</p><p>
Looks like the sun is on the top-right side for the shuttle, and bottom left side for the ground...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me or is the " beautiful photo of the shuttle flying over rugged terrain " doctored ?
The shadows on the ground and on the shuttle just do n't match.. . Looks like the sun is on the top-right side for the shuttle , and bottom left side for the ground.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me or is the "beautiful photo of the shuttle flying over rugged terrain" doctored?
The shadows on the ground and on the shuttle just don't match...

Looks like the sun is on the top-right side for the shuttle, and bottom left side for the ground...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262484</id>
	<title>10G</title>
	<author>Shatrat</author>
	<datestamp>1259519820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'd have been better off just launching an STS-192 and being done with it.<br>  That's enough bandwidth to have half the moon covered in cell towers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'd have been better off just launching an STS-192 and being done with it .
That 's enough bandwidth to have half the moon covered in cell towers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'd have been better off just launching an STS-192 and being done with it.
That's enough bandwidth to have half the moon covered in cell towers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263150</id>
	<title>Re:Camera info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259526000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG, Shuttle pr0n and camera pr0n...best Sunday ever!</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG , Shuttle pr0n and camera pr0n...best Sunday ever !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG, Shuttle pr0n and camera pr0n...best Sunday ever!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126</id>
	<title>Reminds me of the old "Pad Rat" posts on Usenet</title>
	<author>rah1420</author>
	<datestamp>1259430240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There was a guy who once had a web site where he posted shots that nobody else would see of things like the mating in the VAB, the hardware itself (I remember seeing things like the charges that lit the explosive bolts that held the SRBs to the pad), etc., etc.)</p><p>Unfortunately USA (United Space Alliance) got wind of this and fired him because the photos weren't cleared through NASA PAO (the Public Affairs Office) and the site came down.  A shame.  I've never seen images of what the pad looks like after the shuttle launches except from here.</p><p>Now THAT was shuttle pr0n - but this was a respectable 2nd attempt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There was a guy who once had a web site where he posted shots that nobody else would see of things like the mating in the VAB , the hardware itself ( I remember seeing things like the charges that lit the explosive bolts that held the SRBs to the pad ) , etc. , etc .
) Unfortunately USA ( United Space Alliance ) got wind of this and fired him because the photos were n't cleared through NASA PAO ( the Public Affairs Office ) and the site came down .
A shame .
I 've never seen images of what the pad looks like after the shuttle launches except from here.Now THAT was shuttle pr0n - but this was a respectable 2nd attempt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There was a guy who once had a web site where he posted shots that nobody else would see of things like the mating in the VAB, the hardware itself (I remember seeing things like the charges that lit the explosive bolts that held the SRBs to the pad), etc., etc.
)Unfortunately USA (United Space Alliance) got wind of this and fired him because the photos weren't cleared through NASA PAO (the Public Affairs Office) and the site came down.
A shame.
I've never seen images of what the pad looks like after the shuttle launches except from here.Now THAT was shuttle pr0n - but this was a respectable 2nd attempt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30267852</id>
	<title>Don't throw stones...</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1259572440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>s/assent/ascent</p></div><p> <tt>syntax error: line 1, column 16: missing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/</tt></p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>s/assent/ascent syntax error : line 1 , column 16 : missing /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>s/assent/ascent syntax error: line 1, column 16: missing /
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259504</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the old "Pad Rat" posts on Usenet</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1259436600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure somebody kept a copy. This is the web, after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure somebody kept a copy .
This is the web , after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure somebody kept a copy.
This is the web, after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261752</id>
	<title>ISS and Shuttle on Thanksgiving</title>
	<author>NotWallaceStevens</author>
	<datestamp>1259514060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We watched the ISS with the shuttle chasing behind as they passed overhead on the evening of Thanksgiving. I looked up and thought, this is the best thing we've ever done, and it may be the best thing we ever do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We watched the ISS with the shuttle chasing behind as they passed overhead on the evening of Thanksgiving .
I looked up and thought , this is the best thing we 've ever done , and it may be the best thing we ever do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We watched the ISS with the shuttle chasing behind as they passed overhead on the evening of Thanksgiving.
I looked up and thought, this is the best thing we've ever done, and it may be the best thing we ever do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042</id>
	<title>Ahh, shuttle</title>
	<author>QuantumG</author>
	<datestamp>1259428860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll miss the old girl when she's gone.</p><p>The two months between STS-128 and STS-129 felt so long after the mere 28 days between STS-127 and STS-128.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll miss the old girl when she 's gone.The two months between STS-128 and STS-129 felt so long after the mere 28 days between STS-127 and STS-128 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll miss the old girl when she's gone.The two months between STS-128 and STS-129 felt so long after the mere 28 days between STS-127 and STS-128.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261130</id>
	<title>Fox News FTW</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259507760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you have access to an apparatus called a "TV" connected to a wiggly thing called "Cable", you could have watched the launch live. Same cameras, same amazing coverage, just one week earlier in higher def. Yup, it was on Fox News. Pretty amazing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you have access to an apparatus called a " TV " connected to a wiggly thing called " Cable " , you could have watched the launch live .
Same cameras , same amazing coverage , just one week earlier in higher def .
Yup , it was on Fox News .
Pretty amazing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you have access to an apparatus called a "TV" connected to a wiggly thing called "Cable", you could have watched the launch live.
Same cameras, same amazing coverage, just one week earlier in higher def.
Yup, it was on Fox News.
Pretty amazing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259648</id>
	<title>Hey, NASA!   Hey, Google!</title>
	<author>Aggrav8d</author>
	<datestamp>1259525580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know the relative position of every camera.  Why can't you build a real time 3D model of the launch, vehicle, pad, their positions relative to each other, and then broadcast the whole show in 3D in Google Earth - with simulated sound effects?  I'd love to, say, tether my viewpoint to the outside of the ship, watch the launch, then get "pulled along" up to space.  Even show the cockpit so we can sit with the astronauts during the trip.  It could be a great way to visualize launch data, and generate more interest in launches.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know the relative position of every camera .
Why ca n't you build a real time 3D model of the launch , vehicle , pad , their positions relative to each other , and then broadcast the whole show in 3D in Google Earth - with simulated sound effects ?
I 'd love to , say , tether my viewpoint to the outside of the ship , watch the launch , then get " pulled along " up to space .
Even show the cockpit so we can sit with the astronauts during the trip .
It could be a great way to visualize launch data , and generate more interest in launches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know the relative position of every camera.
Why can't you build a real time 3D model of the launch, vehicle, pad, their positions relative to each other, and then broadcast the whole show in 3D in Google Earth - with simulated sound effects?
I'd love to, say, tether my viewpoint to the outside of the ship, watch the launch, then get "pulled along" up to space.
Even show the cockpit so we can sit with the astronauts during the trip.
It could be a great way to visualize launch data, and generate more interest in launches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259246</id>
	<title>rofl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259431980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>assent?</p><p><i>ass</i>ent?</p><p>someone's got a case of 'porn finger'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:\</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>assent ? assent ? someone 's got a case of 'porn finger ' : \</tokentext>
<sentencetext>assent?assent?someone's got a case of 'porn finger' :\</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261522</id>
	<title>Re:Reminds me of the old "Pad Rat" posts on Usenet</title>
	<author>florescent\_beige</author>
	<datestamp>1259511540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Those are large and very high speed pumps that operate at the limit of what materials science can provide</p></div><p>The fuel pump puts out <a href="http://www.pw.utc.com/Products/Pratt+\%26+Whitney+Rocketdyne/SSME" title="utc.com">69,000 horsepower at 37,000 rpm</a> [utc.com] while being roughly the size of a car engine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those are large and very high speed pumps that operate at the limit of what materials science can provideThe fuel pump puts out 69,000 horsepower at 37,000 rpm [ utc.com ] while being roughly the size of a car engine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those are large and very high speed pumps that operate at the limit of what materials science can provideThe fuel pump puts out 69,000 horsepower at 37,000 rpm [utc.com] while being roughly the size of a car engine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260362</id>
	<title>Re:Huge photo of "shuttle flying over rugged terra</title>
	<author>adnonsense</author>
	<datestamp>1259498460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That "rough terrain" is clearly the surface of Mars.</p><p>If you look closely enough you can even see the canals!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That " rough terrain " is clearly the surface of Mars.If you look closely enough you can even see the canals !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That "rough terrain" is clearly the surface of Mars.If you look closely enough you can even see the canals!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259260</id>
	<title>They are nice to watch</title>
	<author>johngaunt</author>
	<datestamp>1259432100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While the Space Shuttles have had their share of problems, and have cost lives, they are beautiful to watch launch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While the Space Shuttles have had their share of problems , and have cost lives , they are beautiful to watch launch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While the Space Shuttles have had their share of problems, and have cost lives, they are beautiful to watch launch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259096</id>
	<title>Huge photo of "shuttle flying over rugged terrain"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259429700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NASA's Space Shuttle Atlantis (STS-129) "flying over rugged terrain" in <a href="http://chamorrobible.org/images/photos/gpw-200911-NASA-ISS021-E-032919-planet-Earth-rugged-terrain-Space-Shuttle-Atlantis-STS-129-20091125-huge.jpg" title="chamorrobible.org" rel="nofollow">4288 x 2846 pixels</a> [chamorrobible.org] via the excellent photo gallery at <a href="http://chamorrobible.org/gpw/gpw-200911.htm" title="chamorrobible.org" rel="nofollow">http://chamorrobible.org/gpw/gpw-200911.htm</a> [chamorrobible.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA 's Space Shuttle Atlantis ( STS-129 ) " flying over rugged terrain " in 4288 x 2846 pixels [ chamorrobible.org ] via the excellent photo gallery at http : //chamorrobible.org/gpw/gpw-200911.htm [ chamorrobible.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA's Space Shuttle Atlantis (STS-129) "flying over rugged terrain" in 4288 x 2846 pixels [chamorrobible.org] via the excellent photo gallery at http://chamorrobible.org/gpw/gpw-200911.htm [chamorrobible.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30275924</id>
	<title>Re:C'mon, fix it please</title>
	<author>Painted</author>
	<datestamp>1259580240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ugh the intarwebs are ruining my reading comprehension- I could have sworn you wrote "Especially when it's spelled rite in the title."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sigh</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh the intarwebs are ruining my reading comprehension- I could have sworn you wrote " Especially when it 's spelled rite in the title .
" /sigh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh the intarwebs are ruining my reading comprehension- I could have sworn you wrote "Especially when it's spelled rite in the title.
" /sigh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259062</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>MBCook</author>
	<datestamp>1259429040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of that was rather amazing. The shot near the start from the external fuel tank of the shuttle separating was great. I've never seen a shot of that before.
</p><p>The two shots from the solid rocket boosters as they separate from the external fuel tank were the most incredible. They were so clean (probably since they were out of the atmosphere, and the scale) that they looked like effect shots. If you showed that to me without the rest of the context, I'd think it was a CGI simulation of what it would look like. On the other hand, the shot from the shuttle when the external fuel tank drops off looks like high-quality film from the 60s or 70s, with lots of film grain.
</p><p>Very very cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of that was rather amazing .
The shot near the start from the external fuel tank of the shuttle separating was great .
I 've never seen a shot of that before .
The two shots from the solid rocket boosters as they separate from the external fuel tank were the most incredible .
They were so clean ( probably since they were out of the atmosphere , and the scale ) that they looked like effect shots .
If you showed that to me without the rest of the context , I 'd think it was a CGI simulation of what it would look like .
On the other hand , the shot from the shuttle when the external fuel tank drops off looks like high-quality film from the 60s or 70s , with lots of film grain .
Very very cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of that was rather amazing.
The shot near the start from the external fuel tank of the shuttle separating was great.
I've never seen a shot of that before.
The two shots from the solid rocket boosters as they separate from the external fuel tank were the most incredible.
They were so clean (probably since they were out of the atmosphere, and the scale) that they looked like effect shots.
If you showed that to me without the rest of the context, I'd think it was a CGI simulation of what it would look like.
On the other hand, the shot from the shuttle when the external fuel tank drops off looks like high-quality film from the 60s or 70s, with lots of film grain.
Very very cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263158</id>
	<title>Re:Wow</title>
	<author>Tisha\_AH</author>
	<datestamp>1259526120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ingrain those images and sounds in your brain, they represent the pinnacle of our civilization. As a whole, we have given up on dreams of things bigger than we are, of goals that take decades to come to fruition. Of making the impossible happen.</p><p>Having lived my life through the glory days of the space program. Watching the Apollo landings on the moon, the tragic losses of Apollo 1 the Challenger and the Columbia. The creation of a space station and our exploration of our planetary neighbors. The days when anything was possible, the childhood dreams that inspired many of us into the sciences and engineering.</p><p>We will no longer have scientific legacies that define our generation. Everything has been reduced to what fits within the agenda of the most recently elected representatives or for cuddly, cutesy feel-good quasi-science programs.</p><p>Maybe some civilization will colonize the moon and set foot upon the other planets but it will not be ours, we have fallen into the trap of decadence and slow decay. Once the final space shuttle mission flies we will be reduced to observer status as other, more aggressive and visionary cultures step into the forefront of exploration.</p><p>Rome faced a similar inward turning and decline. At one time they ruled most of western civilization from Britannia to Egypt. When they lost their vision of who they were as a people they contacted into the areas immediately around Rome, eventually they could not even hold onto that. Even until the times when the barbarians were beating on the gates of Rome they were comfortable in their belief that their civilization was the center of the world.</p><p>Read the Book "Titan" by Steven Baxter for a more sobering piece of fiction on where we may be heading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ingrain those images and sounds in your brain , they represent the pinnacle of our civilization .
As a whole , we have given up on dreams of things bigger than we are , of goals that take decades to come to fruition .
Of making the impossible happen.Having lived my life through the glory days of the space program .
Watching the Apollo landings on the moon , the tragic losses of Apollo 1 the Challenger and the Columbia .
The creation of a space station and our exploration of our planetary neighbors .
The days when anything was possible , the childhood dreams that inspired many of us into the sciences and engineering.We will no longer have scientific legacies that define our generation .
Everything has been reduced to what fits within the agenda of the most recently elected representatives or for cuddly , cutesy feel-good quasi-science programs.Maybe some civilization will colonize the moon and set foot upon the other planets but it will not be ours , we have fallen into the trap of decadence and slow decay .
Once the final space shuttle mission flies we will be reduced to observer status as other , more aggressive and visionary cultures step into the forefront of exploration.Rome faced a similar inward turning and decline .
At one time they ruled most of western civilization from Britannia to Egypt .
When they lost their vision of who they were as a people they contacted into the areas immediately around Rome , eventually they could not even hold onto that .
Even until the times when the barbarians were beating on the gates of Rome they were comfortable in their belief that their civilization was the center of the world.Read the Book " Titan " by Steven Baxter for a more sobering piece of fiction on where we may be heading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ingrain those images and sounds in your brain, they represent the pinnacle of our civilization.
As a whole, we have given up on dreams of things bigger than we are, of goals that take decades to come to fruition.
Of making the impossible happen.Having lived my life through the glory days of the space program.
Watching the Apollo landings on the moon, the tragic losses of Apollo 1 the Challenger and the Columbia.
The creation of a space station and our exploration of our planetary neighbors.
The days when anything was possible, the childhood dreams that inspired many of us into the sciences and engineering.We will no longer have scientific legacies that define our generation.
Everything has been reduced to what fits within the agenda of the most recently elected representatives or for cuddly, cutesy feel-good quasi-science programs.Maybe some civilization will colonize the moon and set foot upon the other planets but it will not be ours, we have fallen into the trap of decadence and slow decay.
Once the final space shuttle mission flies we will be reduced to observer status as other, more aggressive and visionary cultures step into the forefront of exploration.Rome faced a similar inward turning and decline.
At one time they ruled most of western civilization from Britannia to Egypt.
When they lost their vision of who they were as a people they contacted into the areas immediately around Rome, eventually they could not even hold onto that.
Even until the times when the barbarians were beating on the gates of Rome they were comfortable in their belief that their civilization was the center of the world.Read the Book "Titan" by Steven Baxter for a more sobering piece of fiction on where we may be heading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259062</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260312</id>
	<title>Re:C'mon, fix it please</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1259497200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some of the video is a little..uh.."creative", what with the large logo spinning around etc.  I'd be very interested to just see each of the videos, on its own, with no crap all over it, rather than that patchwork affair.  It's very good footage, ruined by what looks like someones first attempt at using video editing software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some of the video is a little..uh.. " creative " , what with the large logo spinning around etc .
I 'd be very interested to just see each of the videos , on its own , with no crap all over it , rather than that patchwork affair .
It 's very good footage , ruined by what looks like someones first attempt at using video editing software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some of the video is a little..uh.."creative", what with the large logo spinning around etc.
I'd be very interested to just see each of the videos, on its own, with no crap all over it, rather than that patchwork affair.
It's very good footage, ruined by what looks like someones first attempt at using video editing software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259234</id>
	<title>Re:Shadows?</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259431800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...</p><p>Earth</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Earth</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Earth</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263052</id>
	<title>Re:Ahh, shuttle</title>
	<author>Reality Master 101</author>
	<datestamp>1259524980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You know what's sad about rockets and space... all that fire and fury, and the capacity of the shuttle (24.4K Kg) is lifting about one standard 20 foot shipping container (24K Kg). To LEO, mind you, not GEO. And not a "heavy" container, a standard container.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You know what 's sad about rockets and space... all that fire and fury , and the capacity of the shuttle ( 24.4K Kg ) is lifting about one standard 20 foot shipping container ( 24K Kg ) .
To LEO , mind you , not GEO .
And not a " heavy " container , a standard container .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know what's sad about rockets and space... all that fire and fury, and the capacity of the shuttle (24.4K Kg) is lifting about one standard 20 foot shipping container (24K Kg).
To LEO, mind you, not GEO.
And not a "heavy" container, a standard container.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258998</id>
	<title>Oblig SW quote.</title>
	<author>munehiro</author>
	<datestamp>1259428440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not pr0n, that's a space station</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not pr0n , that 's a space station</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not pr0n, that's a space station</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262402</id>
	<title>NASA TV</title>
	<author>phme</author>
	<datestamp>1259519400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Amazing indeed. I just wish NASA TV showed a bit more of this kind of footage -- advocate for NASA to hire a couple of good video editors?
<br> <br>
For those who don't know it, a good source of NASA video archives (besides Youtube) is <a href="http://www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/" title="eu.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/</a> [eu.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Amazing indeed .
I just wish NASA TV showed a bit more of this kind of footage -- advocate for NASA to hire a couple of good video editors ?
For those who do n't know it , a good source of NASA video archives ( besides Youtube ) is http : //www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/ [ eu.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amazing indeed.
I just wish NASA TV showed a bit more of this kind of footage -- advocate for NASA to hire a couple of good video editors?
For those who don't know it, a good source of NASA video archives (besides Youtube) is http://www.space-multimedia.nl.eu.org/ [eu.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30267358</id>
	<title>Re:Doctored picture???</title>
	<author>shmlco</author>
	<datestamp>1259522940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look at the sunlight on the left wingtip. See the shadow from the tail and engine nozzle? Sun is fairly high to the immediate right. Now look at the ridge lines on the ground, top of the frame: shadows cast left, sun high to the right. It matches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look at the sunlight on the left wingtip .
See the shadow from the tail and engine nozzle ?
Sun is fairly high to the immediate right .
Now look at the ridge lines on the ground , top of the frame : shadows cast left , sun high to the right .
It matches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look at the sunlight on the left wingtip.
See the shadow from the tail and engine nozzle?
Sun is fairly high to the immediate right.
Now look at the ridge lines on the ground, top of the frame: shadows cast left, sun high to the right.
It matches.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262110</id>
	<title>Re:Oblig SW quote.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259516940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I find the lack of rule 34 disturbing.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Anonymous <a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/34/67341231\_ac83ae38f8.jpg" title="flickr.com" rel="nofollow">Delivers</a> [flickr.com]!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find the lack of rule 34 disturbing .
Anonymous Delivers [ flickr.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find the lack of rule 34 disturbing.
Anonymous Delivers [flickr.com]!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259686</id>
	<title>Help me out here...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259526060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one who had to choke back tears watching this?  Porn doesn't usually do that for me.  Though I was thinking "Oh my god! I want to do that!"  Which also happens when I... nevermind.  This is awesome stuff!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who had to choke back tears watching this ?
Porn does n't usually do that for me .
Though I was thinking " Oh my god !
I want to do that !
" Which also happens when I... nevermind. This is awesome stuff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who had to choke back tears watching this?
Porn doesn't usually do that for me.
Though I was thinking "Oh my god!
I want to do that!
"  Which also happens when I... nevermind.  This is awesome stuff!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30264840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30275924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30267358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30267852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258998
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259062
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260068
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_2146203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30267358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260012
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30263052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30260312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30267852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30275924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30258998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259512
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_2146203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259126
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30259576
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30262164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30261522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_2146203.30264840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
