<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_28_1830214</id>
	<title>A Dual-Screen 10.1" Laptop In Time For the Holidays</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259399640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>JoshuaInNippon writes <i>"Japanese computer manufacture Kohjinsha has announced that it will begin selling a <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-16352-Japan-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m11d27-Dual-screen-laptop-to-go-on-sale-in-Japan-in-December">10.1" dual-screen laptop</a> on Dec. 11 &mdash; in Japan only. While it is not the first dual-screen laptop, a title claimed by the monstrous 17" <a href="//hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/02/28/223238/Testing-Lenovos-ThinkPad-W700ds-Dual-Screen-Notebook">Lenovo Thinkpad W700ds</a> series, the Kohjinsha sure looks much more portable and stylish. The Thinkpad's extra screen pulls out slightly from one side for about a 40\% increase on its display, whereas on the Kohjinsha's two full separate screens spread out symmetrically from the center. While specs are admittedly lower than the Thinkpad, the DZ series certainly wins on cost. The starting price will be &yen;79,800, about $900, in Japan (exporters will likely mark that price up slightly), compared with the Thinkpad at well over $2,000. Kohjinsha says the laptop is great for working on 'large business documents' (e.g. excessively wide spreadsheets), or watching videos while surfing the Web, which is likely what most users will be doing with it. The timing and the price certainly make the Kohjinsha DZ series a tempting toy idea for holiday giving &mdash; perhaps to oneself."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>JoshuaInNippon writes " Japanese computer manufacture Kohjinsha has announced that it will begin selling a 10.1 " dual-screen laptop on Dec. 11    in Japan only .
While it is not the first dual-screen laptop , a title claimed by the monstrous 17 " Lenovo Thinkpad W700ds series , the Kohjinsha sure looks much more portable and stylish .
The Thinkpad 's extra screen pulls out slightly from one side for about a 40 \ % increase on its display , whereas on the Kohjinsha 's two full separate screens spread out symmetrically from the center .
While specs are admittedly lower than the Thinkpad , the DZ series certainly wins on cost .
The starting price will be   79,800 , about $ 900 , in Japan ( exporters will likely mark that price up slightly ) , compared with the Thinkpad at well over $ 2,000 .
Kohjinsha says the laptop is great for working on 'large business documents ' ( e.g .
excessively wide spreadsheets ) , or watching videos while surfing the Web , which is likely what most users will be doing with it .
The timing and the price certainly make the Kohjinsha DZ series a tempting toy idea for holiday giving    perhaps to oneself .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>JoshuaInNippon writes "Japanese computer manufacture Kohjinsha has announced that it will begin selling a 10.1" dual-screen laptop on Dec. 11 — in Japan only.
While it is not the first dual-screen laptop, a title claimed by the monstrous 17" Lenovo Thinkpad W700ds series, the Kohjinsha sure looks much more portable and stylish.
The Thinkpad's extra screen pulls out slightly from one side for about a 40\% increase on its display, whereas on the Kohjinsha's two full separate screens spread out symmetrically from the center.
While specs are admittedly lower than the Thinkpad, the DZ series certainly wins on cost.
The starting price will be ¥79,800, about $900, in Japan (exporters will likely mark that price up slightly), compared with the Thinkpad at well over $2,000.
Kohjinsha says the laptop is great for working on 'large business documents' (e.g.
excessively wide spreadsheets), or watching videos while surfing the Web, which is likely what most users will be doing with it.
The timing and the price certainly make the Kohjinsha DZ series a tempting toy idea for holiday giving — perhaps to oneself.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257486</id>
	<title>just try using that on a plane</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1259412000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You thought you had trouble finding room for your elbows, now imagine trying to encroach half a foot to the left and right.</p><p>I'd say a 17" laptop is almost too big in those cases.  15" seems to be about the right compromise unless you absolutely need maximum space.</p><p>I know I'd have a problem with someone hanging half their display over my lap when I'm trying to read a magazine or my Kindle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You thought you had trouble finding room for your elbows , now imagine trying to encroach half a foot to the left and right.I 'd say a 17 " laptop is almost too big in those cases .
15 " seems to be about the right compromise unless you absolutely need maximum space.I know I 'd have a problem with someone hanging half their display over my lap when I 'm trying to read a magazine or my Kindle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You thought you had trouble finding room for your elbows, now imagine trying to encroach half a foot to the left and right.I'd say a 17" laptop is almost too big in those cases.
15" seems to be about the right compromise unless you absolutely need maximum space.I know I'd have a problem with someone hanging half their display over my lap when I'm trying to read a magazine or my Kindle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257664</id>
	<title>Two notes:</title>
	<author>TheSHAD0W</author>
	<datestamp>1259413800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1.  Why did they have to use 15:9 displays?  I think 4:3 displays would be better for this sort of use.</p><p>2.  I'd rather they start selling portable LCD monitors, with stands that fold flat so the monitor will fit in your laptop bag.  I could set up the second monitor in a hotel room, but not have to deal with it when I'm going portable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Why did they have to use 15 : 9 displays ?
I think 4 : 3 displays would be better for this sort of use.2 .
I 'd rather they start selling portable LCD monitors , with stands that fold flat so the monitor will fit in your laptop bag .
I could set up the second monitor in a hotel room , but not have to deal with it when I 'm going portable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Why did they have to use 15:9 displays?
I think 4:3 displays would be better for this sort of use.2.
I'd rather they start selling portable LCD monitors, with stands that fold flat so the monitor will fit in your laptop bag.
I could set up the second monitor in a hotel room, but not have to deal with it when I'm going portable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257608</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Acer Aspire One with 2 screens</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1259413260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1- the Atom really is much, much MUCH less powerful than any other CPU currently on the market, bar VIA's.<br>2- you're not paying for CPU power, you're paying for screens and design. Not only in money, but in battery life too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1- the Atom really is much , much MUCH less powerful than any other CPU currently on the market , bar VIA 's.2- you 're not paying for CPU power , you 're paying for screens and design .
Not only in money , but in battery life too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1- the Atom really is much, much MUCH less powerful than any other CPU currently on the market, bar VIA's.2- you're not paying for CPU power, you're paying for screens and design.
Not only in money, but in battery life too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257140</id>
	<title>Get it a Butterfly Keyboard FOR THE WIN!</title>
	<author>wernst</author>
	<datestamp>1259408340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember the Thinkpad 701 with the folding, "Butterfly Keyboard?"

Combine that screen with this keyboard and you'd have quite the portable "transformer."

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj-5OI2tPlY" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj-5OI2tPlY</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the Thinkpad 701 with the folding , " Butterfly Keyboard ?
" Combine that screen with this keyboard and you 'd have quite the portable " transformer .
" http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = Dj-5OI2tPlY [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the Thinkpad 701 with the folding, "Butterfly Keyboard?
"

Combine that screen with this keyboard and you'd have quite the portable "transformer.
"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj-5OI2tPlY [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257420</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>White Flame</author>
	<datestamp>1259411400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd buy a device that is only 600 pixels tall only if it were handheld and a good price.  For a laptop, no way.  That's not a usable screen height.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd buy a device that is only 600 pixels tall only if it were handheld and a good price .
For a laptop , no way .
That 's not a usable screen height .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd buy a device that is only 600 pixels tall only if it were handheld and a good price.
For a laptop, no way.
That's not a usable screen height.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257452</id>
	<title>Re:Made in Japan: Cheaper Alternative?</title>
	<author>icegreentea</author>
	<datestamp>1259411640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only similar features between the W700ds and this is that they're both laptops and both have two screens. The W700 easily has more than 4 times the performance that this laptop has.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only similar features between the W700ds and this is that they 're both laptops and both have two screens .
The W700 easily has more than 4 times the performance that this laptop has .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only similar features between the W700ds and this is that they're both laptops and both have two screens.
The W700 easily has more than 4 times the performance that this laptop has.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852</id>
	<title>More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259404140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I obviously understand not every product is tailored to my needs, I can't really see much of a need for this. The netbook level tech specs likely mean doing more than one thing at once would be painful. Plus, if you actually need a lot of screen real estate, you could likely get a larger laptop with more pixels (and more power under the hood) for around the same money.

</p><p>Anyone around here think they would want one? Actually curious to hear about the appeal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I obviously understand not every product is tailored to my needs , I ca n't really see much of a need for this .
The netbook level tech specs likely mean doing more than one thing at once would be painful .
Plus , if you actually need a lot of screen real estate , you could likely get a larger laptop with more pixels ( and more power under the hood ) for around the same money .
Anyone around here think they would want one ?
Actually curious to hear about the appeal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I obviously understand not every product is tailored to my needs, I can't really see much of a need for this.
The netbook level tech specs likely mean doing more than one thing at once would be painful.
Plus, if you actually need a lot of screen real estate, you could likely get a larger laptop with more pixels (and more power under the hood) for around the same money.
Anyone around here think they would want one?
Actually curious to hear about the appeal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257392</id>
	<title>Missing the Point</title>
	<author>Nemyst</author>
	<datestamp>1259411160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Obviously it was meant as a workaround to Microsoft's limitation on screen size for Windows 7 and above!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously it was meant as a workaround to Microsoft 's limitation on screen size for Windows 7 and above !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously it was meant as a workaround to Microsoft's limitation on screen size for Windows 7 and above!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256906</id>
	<title>looks good on paper</title>
	<author>Councilor Hart</author>
	<datestamp>1259405040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah, another slashvertisement. <br>
It might look good on paper, but maybe not in actual usage. There is probable a depth difference between the two screens due to screen thickness, unless one folds back and/or the other one forward. I can't tell from the picture.  Another more obviously issue is the black edge right in the middle of your view. Am I supposed to use my perifial vision or turn my head constantly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , another slashvertisement .
It might look good on paper , but maybe not in actual usage .
There is probable a depth difference between the two screens due to screen thickness , unless one folds back and/or the other one forward .
I ca n't tell from the picture .
Another more obviously issue is the black edge right in the middle of your view .
Am I supposed to use my perifial vision or turn my head constantly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, another slashvertisement.
It might look good on paper, but maybe not in actual usage.
There is probable a depth difference between the two screens due to screen thickness, unless one folds back and/or the other one forward.
I can't tell from the picture.
Another more obviously issue is the black edge right in the middle of your view.
Am I supposed to use my perifial vision or turn my head constantly?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30263282</id>
	<title>Re:Butterfly Keyboard</title>
	<author>PingPongBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1259527260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The time has come for a dual screen tablet PC.</p><p>Both the pen and the keyboard are very good input devices now, and touch screens are very good too. So let's have tablet PCs with no keyboard and two touchscreen tablet screens instead. Bingo - you have double the screen area if you want as well as tablet and keyboard interfaces even in the standard laptop look and feel of a horizontal and upright screen.</p><p>The price of a tablet screen is really affordable now - maybe around $600 now (6 months ago the price was around $700).</p><p>The difficulty may be in letting people use the machine regardless of which side is horizontal. It would have to be balanced with half the components on one side and half on the other. A one-screen tablet feels cool because the hot processor is under the screen, but in the summer with the processor really cranking even the screen feels hot. Mind you, the plastic keyboard also feels hot, but when you rest your hand on the screen and you are writing, heat isn't fun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The time has come for a dual screen tablet PC.Both the pen and the keyboard are very good input devices now , and touch screens are very good too .
So let 's have tablet PCs with no keyboard and two touchscreen tablet screens instead .
Bingo - you have double the screen area if you want as well as tablet and keyboard interfaces even in the standard laptop look and feel of a horizontal and upright screen.The price of a tablet screen is really affordable now - maybe around $ 600 now ( 6 months ago the price was around $ 700 ) .The difficulty may be in letting people use the machine regardless of which side is horizontal .
It would have to be balanced with half the components on one side and half on the other .
A one-screen tablet feels cool because the hot processor is under the screen , but in the summer with the processor really cranking even the screen feels hot .
Mind you , the plastic keyboard also feels hot , but when you rest your hand on the screen and you are writing , heat is n't fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The time has come for a dual screen tablet PC.Both the pen and the keyboard are very good input devices now, and touch screens are very good too.
So let's have tablet PCs with no keyboard and two touchscreen tablet screens instead.
Bingo - you have double the screen area if you want as well as tablet and keyboard interfaces even in the standard laptop look and feel of a horizontal and upright screen.The price of a tablet screen is really affordable now - maybe around $600 now (6 months ago the price was around $700).The difficulty may be in letting people use the machine regardless of which side is horizontal.
It would have to be balanced with half the components on one side and half on the other.
A one-screen tablet feels cool because the hot processor is under the screen, but in the summer with the processor really cranking even the screen feels hot.
Mind you, the plastic keyboard also feels hot, but when you rest your hand on the screen and you are writing, heat isn't fun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258876</id>
	<title>Re:that lenovo looks like a beast</title>
	<author>piltdownman84</author>
	<datestamp>1259426940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a HP Elitebook that is roughly in the same class as the Thinkpad only without the second monitor. After I installed Windows XP 64, and replaced the graphics card drivers with the CUDA drivers I get a whopping 32 minutes battery life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a HP Elitebook that is roughly in the same class as the Thinkpad only without the second monitor .
After I installed Windows XP 64 , and replaced the graphics card drivers with the CUDA drivers I get a whopping 32 minutes battery life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a HP Elitebook that is roughly in the same class as the Thinkpad only without the second monitor.
After I installed Windows XP 64, and replaced the graphics card drivers with the CUDA drivers I get a whopping 32 minutes battery life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259416</id>
	<title>this is just stupid</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1259434920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you need use two screens on a laptop, wait until you get back to your desk and plug in an external screen. Hell - I've got three external screens connected to my MBP 15" and it works great.<br> <br>This is just engineering out of control - if they sell 10,000 of these I'll be shocked.<br> <br>Someone call the pointy-haired boss and have Dilbert-san clean out his desk. . .</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you need use two screens on a laptop , wait until you get back to your desk and plug in an external screen .
Hell - I 've got three external screens connected to my MBP 15 " and it works great .
This is just engineering out of control - if they sell 10,000 of these I 'll be shocked .
Someone call the pointy-haired boss and have Dilbert-san clean out his desk .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you need use two screens on a laptop, wait until you get back to your desk and plug in an external screen.
Hell - I've got three external screens connected to my MBP 15" and it works great.
This is just engineering out of control - if they sell 10,000 of these I'll be shocked.
Someone call the pointy-haired boss and have Dilbert-san clean out his desk.
. .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257334</id>
	<title>Ingenious</title>
	<author>gooneybird</author>
	<datestamp>1259410440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess the LCD manufacturers have finally figured out how to dump all of the outdated crap 10.1" LCD screens that manufacturers have warehouses full of and still get people to pay top dollar for them - and sell 2 at a time.
<br> <br>
Dumb public, they'll buy anything.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess the LCD manufacturers have finally figured out how to dump all of the outdated crap 10.1 " LCD screens that manufacturers have warehouses full of and still get people to pay top dollar for them - and sell 2 at a time .
Dumb public , they 'll buy anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess the LCD manufacturers have finally figured out how to dump all of the outdated crap 10.1" LCD screens that manufacturers have warehouses full of and still get people to pay top dollar for them - and sell 2 at a time.
Dumb public, they'll buy anything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186</id>
	<title>Made in Japan:  Cheaper Alternative?</title>
	<author>reporter</author>
	<datestamp>1259408760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The price for the laptop made by Kohjinsha (based in Japan) is $900.  The price for a laptop having similar features and made by Lenovo (based in China) is $2000.  This pricing is quite surprising.
<p>
All Lenovo laptops are made in China, and the Kohjinsha laptop is made in Japan.  How can a Japanese product be cheaper than a Chinese product, given that the cost of labor in Japan is much higher than the cost of labor in China?
</p><p>
The Kohjinsha product is the 2nd instance of such unusual pricing.
</p><p>
In 2008, a quick scan at Frys (the local electronics store) shows that all Fujitsu laptops are made in Japan.  Most Sony laptops are made in China.  (Only Sony laptops costing more than $2200 are made in Japan).  What is interesting is that the made-in-Japan Fujitsu laptops have prices and features that are similar to the prices and the features of the made-in-China Sony laptops.
</p><p>
What is happening here?  How can certain Japanese manufacturers (like Kohjinsha and Fujitsu) possibly price their products so low, keep their high-value manufacturing in Japan, yet still be profitable?  What is the secret formula?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The price for the laptop made by Kohjinsha ( based in Japan ) is $ 900 .
The price for a laptop having similar features and made by Lenovo ( based in China ) is $ 2000 .
This pricing is quite surprising .
All Lenovo laptops are made in China , and the Kohjinsha laptop is made in Japan .
How can a Japanese product be cheaper than a Chinese product , given that the cost of labor in Japan is much higher than the cost of labor in China ?
The Kohjinsha product is the 2nd instance of such unusual pricing .
In 2008 , a quick scan at Frys ( the local electronics store ) shows that all Fujitsu laptops are made in Japan .
Most Sony laptops are made in China .
( Only Sony laptops costing more than $ 2200 are made in Japan ) .
What is interesting is that the made-in-Japan Fujitsu laptops have prices and features that are similar to the prices and the features of the made-in-China Sony laptops .
What is happening here ?
How can certain Japanese manufacturers ( like Kohjinsha and Fujitsu ) possibly price their products so low , keep their high-value manufacturing in Japan , yet still be profitable ?
What is the secret formula ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price for the laptop made by Kohjinsha (based in Japan) is $900.
The price for a laptop having similar features and made by Lenovo (based in China) is $2000.
This pricing is quite surprising.
All Lenovo laptops are made in China, and the Kohjinsha laptop is made in Japan.
How can a Japanese product be cheaper than a Chinese product, given that the cost of labor in Japan is much higher than the cost of labor in China?
The Kohjinsha product is the 2nd instance of such unusual pricing.
In 2008, a quick scan at Frys (the local electronics store) shows that all Fujitsu laptops are made in Japan.
Most Sony laptops are made in China.
(Only Sony laptops costing more than $2200 are made in Japan).
What is interesting is that the made-in-Japan Fujitsu laptops have prices and features that are similar to the prices and the features of the made-in-China Sony laptops.
What is happening here?
How can certain Japanese manufacturers (like Kohjinsha and Fujitsu) possibly price their products so low, keep their high-value manufacturing in Japan, yet still be profitable?
What is the secret formula?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257872</id>
	<title>I actually like this idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259416080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do like the idea of having a dual display netbook like that. Importing one from Japan would cost though, and I already have a perfectly good netbook. I guess I'll just have to hope the idea catches on with other manufacturers who offer products here by the time I'm due for a replacement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do like the idea of having a dual display netbook like that .
Importing one from Japan would cost though , and I already have a perfectly good netbook .
I guess I 'll just have to hope the idea catches on with other manufacturers who offer products here by the time I 'm due for a replacement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do like the idea of having a dual display netbook like that.
Importing one from Japan would cost though, and I already have a perfectly good netbook.
I guess I'll just have to hope the idea catches on with other manufacturers who offer products here by the time I'm due for a replacement.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258908</id>
	<title>Re:Made in Japan: Cheaper Alternative?</title>
	<author>ikea5</author>
	<datestamp>1259427300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kohjinsha is actually a subsidiary of Inventec based out of Taiwan. Inventec designs and manufactures Kohjinsha products.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kohjinsha is actually a subsidiary of Inventec based out of Taiwan .
Inventec designs and manufactures Kohjinsha products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kohjinsha is actually a subsidiary of Inventec based out of Taiwan.
Inventec designs and manufactures Kohjinsha products.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256904</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259404920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm running Mint Linux on a 10'', 1GB Ram, 160GB HD Acer Aspire 1 here, and I can definitely do multiple things at once on it without everything grinding to a halt<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well I would if I had the screen real estate. As it is, I'm bound to switch between workspaces, so a second screen would come nicely, especially if I don't have to lose the low form factor which was, at least for me, the main attraction about the AA1 (I had a 8.9'' previously, but the SSD died and all I could get my hands on afterward was a 10''<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... in pink. I'd have gladly bought a small one if I had had the opportunity).
Sure, a 21'' ~notebook~ offers a lot of screen space, but a 10'' netbook is the way to go in terms of  mobile computing (unless you only want to watch youtube clips, then go get a smartphone).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm running Mint Linux on a 10' ' , 1GB Ram , 160GB HD Acer Aspire 1 here , and I can definitely do multiple things at once on it without everything grinding to a halt ... well I would if I had the screen real estate .
As it is , I 'm bound to switch between workspaces , so a second screen would come nicely , especially if I do n't have to lose the low form factor which was , at least for me , the main attraction about the AA1 ( I had a 8.9' ' previously , but the SSD died and all I could get my hands on afterward was a 10' ' ... in pink .
I 'd have gladly bought a small one if I had had the opportunity ) .
Sure , a 21' ' ~ notebook ~ offers a lot of screen space , but a 10' ' netbook is the way to go in terms of mobile computing ( unless you only want to watch youtube clips , then go get a smartphone ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm running Mint Linux on a 10'', 1GB Ram, 160GB HD Acer Aspire 1 here, and I can definitely do multiple things at once on it without everything grinding to a halt ... well I would if I had the screen real estate.
As it is, I'm bound to switch between workspaces, so a second screen would come nicely, especially if I don't have to lose the low form factor which was, at least for me, the main attraction about the AA1 (I had a 8.9'' previously, but the SSD died and all I could get my hands on afterward was a 10'' ... in pink.
I'd have gladly bought a small one if I had had the opportunity).
Sure, a 21'' ~notebook~ offers a lot of screen space, but a 10'' netbook is the way to go in terms of  mobile computing (unless you only want to watch youtube clips, then go get a smartphone).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256978</id>
	<title>Re:looks good on paper</title>
	<author>icegreentea</author>
	<datestamp>1259406060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You get use to such things. I've been using multiple monitors for a long time now, and for most programs (where a window stays on a single monitor), those don't matter too much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You get use to such things .
I 've been using multiple monitors for a long time now , and for most programs ( where a window stays on a single monitor ) , those do n't matter too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You get use to such things.
I've been using multiple monitors for a long time now, and for most programs (where a window stays on a single monitor), those don't matter too much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257708</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Acer Aspire One with 2 screens</title>
	<author>coolforsale1321</author>
	<datestamp>1259414340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]   Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]   Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257072</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Acer Aspire One with 2 screens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259407320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, you'd honestly be better off doing some simple "enhancement modding" of a netbook with a second screen, even touchscreen if you wanted to.*<br>Velcro strips and a plastic container with some wheels to slide it out would do well.  Stick it in the USB port and bham, dual screen.<br>This is an obviously over-simplistic description, but you get the picture.</p><p>* I saw a decent little 7.1" touchscreen earlier today powered and streamed over USB (~800x480 admittedly)... wish i remembered the site now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , you 'd honestly be better off doing some simple " enhancement modding " of a netbook with a second screen , even touchscreen if you wanted to .
* Velcro strips and a plastic container with some wheels to slide it out would do well .
Stick it in the USB port and bham , dual screen.This is an obviously over-simplistic description , but you get the picture .
* I saw a decent little 7.1 " touchscreen earlier today powered and streamed over USB ( ~ 800x480 admittedly ) ... wish i remembered the site now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, you'd honestly be better off doing some simple "enhancement modding" of a netbook with a second screen, even touchscreen if you wanted to.
*Velcro strips and a plastic container with some wheels to slide it out would do well.
Stick it in the USB port and bham, dual screen.This is an obviously over-simplistic description, but you get the picture.
* I saw a decent little 7.1" touchscreen earlier today powered and streamed over USB (~800x480 admittedly)... wish i remembered the site now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814</id>
	<title>It's a Acer Aspire One with 2 screens</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259403600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Specs are 1.6ghz AMD, 1gb ram, 160gb hd, ATI 3200, so it's barely more than a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acer\_Aspire\_One" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Acer Aspire One with a second 10" screen</a> [wikipedia.org], so <a href="http://www.google.com/products/catalog?q=acer+aspire+one&amp;hl=en&amp;cid=11428603430675802515&amp;sa=title#p" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">why the $700 price difference</a> [google.com]?  I imagine we'll see these going for ~$300 to $400 by spring.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Specs are 1.6ghz AMD , 1gb ram , 160gb hd , ATI 3200 , so it 's barely more than a Acer Aspire One with a second 10 " screen [ wikipedia.org ] , so why the $ 700 price difference [ google.com ] ?
I imagine we 'll see these going for ~ $ 300 to $ 400 by spring .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Specs are 1.6ghz AMD, 1gb ram, 160gb hd, ATI 3200, so it's barely more than a Acer Aspire One with a second 10" screen [wikipedia.org], so why the $700 price difference [google.com]?
I imagine we'll see these going for ~$300 to $400 by spring.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257996</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>blackest\_k</author>
	<datestamp>1259417160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Funny thing I was looking for something similar, ideally a vga input or usb powered screen (with linux drivers please) and ideally a touch screen or discrete buttons around the same size as my netbook screen possibly smaller.</p><p>I saw a few products which almost suit.<br>one was a lcd display small enough to fit in a couple of 5.25 drive bays which could be cute in a tower based server. Unfortunately the price was over $200 (and not even a touch screen) at a lower price point it would get interesting.</p><p>Ideally i'm looking for something thing that perhaps could clip or sucker to the back of my netbook screen to work as a tablet add on for my netbook. Actually it could work in a few positions as a tablet for input. as a 2nd screen side by side with the internal or clipped on the back for tablet style ebook reader or for film use on the back of the car seats. Or as a fairly minimal screen for that server again.</p><p>It should be possible to get a lowish cost product to do this.</p><p>I also started looking at digital picture frames and these are getting more and more capable many can play mp3's and video's and some samsung models can work as a second screen connected via usb but only with windows or mac drivers. I'd love to find a reasonably priced frame with better than average connectivity.</p><p>Along with my ebook reader screen thoughts, there are some picture frames which support some text output alternatively its a possibility to convert a pdf file to a series of jpg files and load that onto a digital frame. With some of them battery backed it might be possible to make a low cost ebook reader.</p><p>One things for sure a small secondary display with touch screen capability could easily become a great add on for laptops and netbooks.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny thing I was looking for something similar , ideally a vga input or usb powered screen ( with linux drivers please ) and ideally a touch screen or discrete buttons around the same size as my netbook screen possibly smaller.I saw a few products which almost suit.one was a lcd display small enough to fit in a couple of 5.25 drive bays which could be cute in a tower based server .
Unfortunately the price was over $ 200 ( and not even a touch screen ) at a lower price point it would get interesting.Ideally i 'm looking for something thing that perhaps could clip or sucker to the back of my netbook screen to work as a tablet add on for my netbook .
Actually it could work in a few positions as a tablet for input .
as a 2nd screen side by side with the internal or clipped on the back for tablet style ebook reader or for film use on the back of the car seats .
Or as a fairly minimal screen for that server again.It should be possible to get a lowish cost product to do this.I also started looking at digital picture frames and these are getting more and more capable many can play mp3 's and video 's and some samsung models can work as a second screen connected via usb but only with windows or mac drivers .
I 'd love to find a reasonably priced frame with better than average connectivity.Along with my ebook reader screen thoughts , there are some picture frames which support some text output alternatively its a possibility to convert a pdf file to a series of jpg files and load that onto a digital frame .
With some of them battery backed it might be possible to make a low cost ebook reader.One things for sure a small secondary display with touch screen capability could easily become a great add on for laptops and netbooks .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny thing I was looking for something similar, ideally a vga input or usb powered screen (with linux drivers please) and ideally a touch screen or discrete buttons around the same size as my netbook screen possibly smaller.I saw a few products which almost suit.one was a lcd display small enough to fit in a couple of 5.25 drive bays which could be cute in a tower based server.
Unfortunately the price was over $200 (and not even a touch screen) at a lower price point it would get interesting.Ideally i'm looking for something thing that perhaps could clip or sucker to the back of my netbook screen to work as a tablet add on for my netbook.
Actually it could work in a few positions as a tablet for input.
as a 2nd screen side by side with the internal or clipped on the back for tablet style ebook reader or for film use on the back of the car seats.
Or as a fairly minimal screen for that server again.It should be possible to get a lowish cost product to do this.I also started looking at digital picture frames and these are getting more and more capable many can play mp3's and video's and some samsung models can work as a second screen connected via usb but only with windows or mac drivers.
I'd love to find a reasonably priced frame with better than average connectivity.Along with my ebook reader screen thoughts, there are some picture frames which support some text output alternatively its a possibility to convert a pdf file to a series of jpg files and load that onto a digital frame.
With some of them battery backed it might be possible to make a low cost ebook reader.One things for sure a small secondary display with touch screen capability could easily become a great add on for laptops and netbooks.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256896</id>
	<title>that lenovo looks like a beast</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259404740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry for the mildly off-topic post, but wow!  I wonder what kind of battery life that beast gets?  Does it have a portable nuclear reactor on board or is the battery reduced to being useful only for trips across the room to switch outlets?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry for the mildly off-topic post , but wow !
I wonder what kind of battery life that beast gets ?
Does it have a portable nuclear reactor on board or is the battery reduced to being useful only for trips across the room to switch outlets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry for the mildly off-topic post, but wow!
I wonder what kind of battery life that beast gets?
Does it have a portable nuclear reactor on board or is the battery reduced to being useful only for trips across the room to switch outlets?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257374</id>
	<title>Re:Made in Japan: Cheaper Alternative?</title>
	<author>E IS mC(Square)</author>
	<datestamp>1259410920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt;&gt; The price for the laptop made by Kohjinsha (based in Japan) is $900. The price for a laptop having similar features and made by Lenovo (based in China) is $2000. This pricing is quite surprising.
<br> <br>Similar features? Where?
<br> <br>
Kohjinsha:
<br>==========
<br>two thin 10.1 inch widescreen LCD screens with 1024x600 (WSVGA) display
<br>AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 ( 1.6GHz ) processor
1GB of memory (with a max of 4GB)
<br>a 160GB 2.5 inch SATA hard drive
<br>an ATI Radeon HD 3200 internal graphics accelerator
<br>a wireless LAN + Bluetooth
<br>a 1.3 megapixel webcam
<br>Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit.
<br> <br>
Lenovo (basic, with nothing extra) <br>
============
<br>Intel Core 2 Duo processor T9600 (2.8GHz 1066MHz 6MBL2)
<br>Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64
<br>17" WUXGA 400NIT TFT + 10.6"WXGA+ TFT
<br>NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 48-core CUDA parallel computing processor 512MB (dedicated)
<br>2 GB PC3-8500 DDR3 SDRAM 1067MHz SODIMM Memory (1 DIMM)
<br>Ultranav + Fingerprint Reader
<br>Non-RAID HDD, 160 GB Hard Disk Drive, 7200rpm
<br>Integrated Bluetooth PAN
<br>Intel WiFi Link 5300 (AGN) with My WiFi Technology</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; The price for the laptop made by Kohjinsha ( based in Japan ) is $ 900 .
The price for a laptop having similar features and made by Lenovo ( based in China ) is $ 2000 .
This pricing is quite surprising .
Similar features ?
Where ? Kohjinsha : = = = = = = = = = = two thin 10.1 inch widescreen LCD screens with 1024x600 ( WSVGA ) display AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 ( 1.6GHz ) processor 1GB of memory ( with a max of 4GB ) a 160GB 2.5 inch SATA hard drive an ATI Radeon HD 3200 internal graphics accelerator a wireless LAN + Bluetooth a 1.3 megapixel webcam Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit .
Lenovo ( basic , with nothing extra ) = = = = = = = = = = = = Intel Core 2 Duo processor T9600 ( 2.8GHz 1066MHz 6MBL2 ) Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64 17 " WUXGA 400NIT TFT + 10.6 " WXGA + TFT NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 48-core CUDA parallel computing processor 512MB ( dedicated ) 2 GB PC3-8500 DDR3 SDRAM 1067MHz SODIMM Memory ( 1 DIMM ) Ultranav + Fingerprint Reader Non-RAID HDD , 160 GB Hard Disk Drive , 7200rpm Integrated Bluetooth PAN Intel WiFi Link 5300 ( AGN ) with My WiFi Technology</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt; The price for the laptop made by Kohjinsha (based in Japan) is $900.
The price for a laptop having similar features and made by Lenovo (based in China) is $2000.
This pricing is quite surprising.
Similar features?
Where?
 
Kohjinsha:
==========
two thin 10.1 inch widescreen LCD screens with 1024x600 (WSVGA) display
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40 ( 1.6GHz ) processor
1GB of memory (with a max of 4GB)
a 160GB 2.5 inch SATA hard drive
an ATI Radeon HD 3200 internal graphics accelerator
a wireless LAN + Bluetooth
a 1.3 megapixel webcam
Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit.
Lenovo (basic, with nothing extra) 
============
Intel Core 2 Duo processor T9600 (2.8GHz 1066MHz 6MBL2)
Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64
17" WUXGA 400NIT TFT + 10.6"WXGA+ TFT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 48-core CUDA parallel computing processor 512MB (dedicated)
2 GB PC3-8500 DDR3 SDRAM 1067MHz SODIMM Memory (1 DIMM)
Ultranav + Fingerprint Reader
Non-RAID HDD, 160 GB Hard Disk Drive, 7200rpm
Integrated Bluetooth PAN
Intel WiFi Link 5300 (AGN) with My WiFi Technology</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259626</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1259525340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Meh. LCDs are pretty thin these days. I want 4 slide out screens. 2048x1200 would be pretty cool for a laptop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Meh .
LCDs are pretty thin these days .
I want 4 slide out screens .
2048x1200 would be pretty cool for a laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meh.
LCDs are pretty thin these days.
I want 4 slide out screens.
2048x1200 would be pretty cool for a laptop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256878</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257056</id>
	<title>Pays itself back in productivity</title>
	<author>cerberusss</author>
	<datestamp>1259407140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No comment has yet cited <a href="http://dubroy.com/blog/multiple-monitor-productivity-fact-or-fiction/" title="dubroy.com">this blog post citing several sources</a> [dubroy.com]. Basically you can assume that an extra display pays itself back in productivity.</p><p>The mentioned uses in the article of the summary ("very wide spreadsheets" and "watching video while surfing the web") are laughable though. That's pretty narrow. Think about ANY copy/paste routine, keeping documentation open, keeping an e-mail app open etc, THESE are the productivity increases.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No comment has yet cited this blog post citing several sources [ dubroy.com ] .
Basically you can assume that an extra display pays itself back in productivity.The mentioned uses in the article of the summary ( " very wide spreadsheets " and " watching video while surfing the web " ) are laughable though .
That 's pretty narrow .
Think about ANY copy/paste routine , keeping documentation open , keeping an e-mail app open etc , THESE are the productivity increases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No comment has yet cited this blog post citing several sources [dubroy.com].
Basically you can assume that an extra display pays itself back in productivity.The mentioned uses in the article of the summary ("very wide spreadsheets" and "watching video while surfing the web") are laughable though.
That's pretty narrow.
Think about ANY copy/paste routine, keeping documentation open, keeping an e-mail app open etc, THESE are the productivity increases.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259256</id>
	<title>Re:Butterfly Keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259432100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dual keyboards would be very useful. This would allow your friend to play too. How about adding a second touch pad for your other hand?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dual keyboards would be very useful .
This would allow your friend to play too .
How about adding a second touch pad for your other hand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dual keyboards would be very useful.
This would allow your friend to play too.
How about adding a second touch pad for your other hand?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256868</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257222</id>
	<title>Pong!</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1259409060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy crap! Imagine playing Pong on this thing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy crap !
Imagine playing Pong on this thing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy crap!
Imagine playing Pong on this thing!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30266082</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>mqduck</author>
	<datestamp>1259511600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd love something like that just to have documentation on one screen while I code on the other. Or to have email/IRC/whatever open on one screen while I browse on the other.</p></div><p>Modern computer operating systems have these things called "windows". You can resize them and have two (or more!) showing at the same time! With this amazing technology, a larger screen can be used like two screens *or* one big screen!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love something like that just to have documentation on one screen while I code on the other .
Or to have email/IRC/whatever open on one screen while I browse on the other.Modern computer operating systems have these things called " windows " .
You can resize them and have two ( or more !
) showing at the same time !
With this amazing technology , a larger screen can be used like two screens * or * one big screen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love something like that just to have documentation on one screen while I code on the other.
Or to have email/IRC/whatever open on one screen while I browse on the other.Modern computer operating systems have these things called "windows".
You can resize them and have two (or more!
) showing at the same time!
With this amazing technology, a larger screen can be used like two screens *or* one big screen!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256972</id>
	<title>Do it in the 11.6" factor and I'll buy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259405940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The screens are still limited to 600 pixels vertically. Use the ones from the 11.6" version, at 1366x768 each, and I'll be buying one.</p><p>I stopped carrying around a 14" notebook because it was just too much to carry around everywhere. A 9" netbook fits the need much better. After playing with someone else's 11.6", I was struck by how much more useful the 1366x768 screen is over a 1024x600 screen (the full-size keyboard doesn't hurt either). If I could have two such screens, which fold up for convenient carrying, I would be all over this.</p><p>I have to imagine this will be thicker than a typical netbook, but I could deal with that if the other dimensions do not change.</p><p>Mal-2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The screens are still limited to 600 pixels vertically .
Use the ones from the 11.6 " version , at 1366x768 each , and I 'll be buying one.I stopped carrying around a 14 " notebook because it was just too much to carry around everywhere .
A 9 " netbook fits the need much better .
After playing with someone else 's 11.6 " , I was struck by how much more useful the 1366x768 screen is over a 1024x600 screen ( the full-size keyboard does n't hurt either ) .
If I could have two such screens , which fold up for convenient carrying , I would be all over this.I have to imagine this will be thicker than a typical netbook , but I could deal with that if the other dimensions do not change.Mal-2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The screens are still limited to 600 pixels vertically.
Use the ones from the 11.6" version, at 1366x768 each, and I'll be buying one.I stopped carrying around a 14" notebook because it was just too much to carry around everywhere.
A 9" netbook fits the need much better.
After playing with someone else's 11.6", I was struck by how much more useful the 1366x768 screen is over a 1024x600 screen (the full-size keyboard doesn't hurt either).
If I could have two such screens, which fold up for convenient carrying, I would be all over this.I have to imagine this will be thicker than a typical netbook, but I could deal with that if the other dimensions do not change.Mal-2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256980</id>
	<title>Great!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259406120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>With one of these you can watch p0rn while watching more p0rn!</htmltext>
<tokenext>With one of these you can watch p0rn while watching more p0rn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With one of these you can watch p0rn while watching more p0rn!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257328</id>
	<title>split in the middle of the screen</title>
	<author>vosester</author>
	<datestamp>1259410380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would so get one, if only there wasn't a massive bevel between the screens.<br>Having two screens if useful, but having two that can combine into one, would be brilliant.<br>How hard is to make the split not stand out so much.<br>All then need to do is make the inside edges of the screen bevel really thin and then have the two halves lock in to place with some latch at the back of the screens. If you get them lined up enough, It would make the split a lot less noticeable.<br>They could even go all the way and have no bevel on the inside.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would so get one , if only there was n't a massive bevel between the screens.Having two screens if useful , but having two that can combine into one , would be brilliant.How hard is to make the split not stand out so much.All then need to do is make the inside edges of the screen bevel really thin and then have the two halves lock in to place with some latch at the back of the screens .
If you get them lined up enough , It would make the split a lot less noticeable.They could even go all the way and have no bevel on the inside .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would so get one, if only there wasn't a massive bevel between the screens.Having two screens if useful, but having two that can combine into one, would be brilliant.How hard is to make the split not stand out so much.All then need to do is make the inside edges of the screen bevel really thin and then have the two halves lock in to place with some latch at the back of the screens.
If you get them lined up enough, It would make the split a lot less noticeable.They could even go all the way and have no bevel on the inside.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256832</id>
	<title>back2back</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259403780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want the dual screens to be back to back. So someone on the other side of me can see what I'm doing, except in reverse!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want the dual screens to be back to back .
So someone on the other side of me can see what I 'm doing , except in reverse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want the dual screens to be back to back.
So someone on the other side of me can see what I'm doing, except in reverse!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256878</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>RobVB</author>
	<datestamp>1259404500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Dude, it's a frickin' dual screen laptop! I want one and I want it now. Who cares what it's good for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , it 's a frickin ' dual screen laptop !
I want one and I want it now .
Who cares what it 's good for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, it's a frickin' dual screen laptop!
I want one and I want it now.
Who cares what it's good for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257444</id>
	<title>Narrow slit screens</title>
	<author>White Flame</author>
	<datestamp>1259411580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's next, 8000x50 pixel desktop displays?  Give me some height already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's next , 8000x50 pixel desktop displays ?
Give me some height already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's next, 8000x50 pixel desktop displays?
Give me some height already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258434</id>
	<title>It's not a dual screen notebook, it's a netbook</title>
	<author>Kagetsuki</author>
	<datestamp>1259422620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kojinsha labels the unit as a netbook, it is small and smaller numbers (1GB RAM) also reflect that. They are not trying to compete with Lenovo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kojinsha labels the unit as a netbook , it is small and smaller numbers ( 1GB RAM ) also reflect that .
They are not trying to compete with Lenovo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kojinsha labels the unit as a netbook, it is small and smaller numbers (1GB RAM) also reflect that.
They are not trying to compete with Lenovo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256868</id>
	<title>Butterfly Keyboard</title>
	<author>lobiusmoop</author>
	<datestamp>1259404380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can remember when IBM first tried this trick, but with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM\_ThinkPad\_Butterfly\_keyboard" title="wikipedia.org">the keyboard instead of the screen</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can remember when IBM first tried this trick , but with the keyboard instead of the screen [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can remember when IBM first tried this trick, but with the keyboard instead of the screen [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257090</id>
	<title>Once you dispense with the simplicity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259407560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>of the basic notebook design, why connect the screen to the keyboard with a hinge at all?  It's not a very good ergonomic design.</p><p>Why not have three pieces connected by cables like a desktop, but each part designed to pack for travel?  You'd have the CPU and battery in a brick, a keyboard/pointing device, and a separate monitor (or monitors) with its own stand.  Then you could leave behind one of the monitors if you wanted to save weight; your could face them in different directions to do demos.  You could upgrade each piece independently.</p><p>It'd have to be easier and cheaper to do it that way than to build a mechanically elaborate chassis like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>of the basic notebook design , why connect the screen to the keyboard with a hinge at all ?
It 's not a very good ergonomic design.Why not have three pieces connected by cables like a desktop , but each part designed to pack for travel ?
You 'd have the CPU and battery in a brick , a keyboard/pointing device , and a separate monitor ( or monitors ) with its own stand .
Then you could leave behind one of the monitors if you wanted to save weight ; your could face them in different directions to do demos .
You could upgrade each piece independently.It 'd have to be easier and cheaper to do it that way than to build a mechanically elaborate chassis like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of the basic notebook design, why connect the screen to the keyboard with a hinge at all?
It's not a very good ergonomic design.Why not have three pieces connected by cables like a desktop, but each part designed to pack for travel?
You'd have the CPU and battery in a brick, a keyboard/pointing device, and a separate monitor (or monitors) with its own stand.
Then you could leave behind one of the monitors if you wanted to save weight; your could face them in different directions to do demos.
You could upgrade each piece independently.It'd have to be easier and cheaper to do it that way than to build a mechanically elaborate chassis like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257944</id>
	<title>Better design</title>
	<author>klui</author>
	<datestamp>1259416800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Much better than the Thinkpad in terms of design and way better than the Intel prototype "dual" monitor laptop.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Much better than the Thinkpad in terms of design and way better than the Intel prototype " dual " monitor laptop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much better than the Thinkpad in terms of design and way better than the Intel prototype "dual" monitor laptop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256880</id>
	<title>Re:More than a gimmick?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259404560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good lord... 1.6Ghz CPU and a gig of RAM will make "doing more than one thing at once<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... painful"??  You must have a very low threshold for pain.</p><p>I'd love something like that just to have documentation on one screen while I code on the other.  Or to have email/IRC/whatever open on one screen while I browse on the other.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good lord... 1.6Ghz CPU and a gig of RAM will make " doing more than one thing at once .. .
painful " ? ? You must have a very low threshold for pain.I 'd love something like that just to have documentation on one screen while I code on the other .
Or to have email/IRC/whatever open on one screen while I browse on the other .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good lord... 1.6Ghz CPU and a gig of RAM will make "doing more than one thing at once ...
painful"??  You must have a very low threshold for pain.I'd love something like that just to have documentation on one screen while I code on the other.
Or to have email/IRC/whatever open on one screen while I browse on the other.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259646</id>
	<title>Re:It's a Acer Aspire One with 2 screens</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1259525580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because of the engineering required for a second screen to slide out and fold and such?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because of the engineering required for a second screen to slide out and fold and such ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because of the engineering required for a second screen to slide out and fold and such?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256910</id>
	<title>Ya I fail to see the point</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259405040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I only find that dual screens are useful in two situations:</p><p>1) When you have an app that needs a whole screen to work. A video editor would be an example. They often wish to use a dedicated screen as a preview screen. As such you want a second monitor to dedicate to that, regardless of size of your first one.</p><p>2) When you need more screen real estate than you can get in a single monitor, or for a cheaper price than large single monitors. This is by far the most common. You want more room, but a 30" screen is too much money so you get 2 22" or 24" screens instead. The whole reason is more room.</p><p>Ya well, in this case a larger laptop, or external screen (or both) would seem to be the way to go. I'm not seeing the second monitor as useful.</p><p>There's also the fact that the divide is right down the center. In dual monitor setups I've encountered (including mine at work) one monitor is directly in front of the user and is the primary screen, the other is off to the side and contains the less important stuff. I've never seen one where both monitors were in front and the split was centered. That would be very noticeable and very annoying.</p><p>To me, this looks like nothing more than a gimmick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I only find that dual screens are useful in two situations : 1 ) When you have an app that needs a whole screen to work .
A video editor would be an example .
They often wish to use a dedicated screen as a preview screen .
As such you want a second monitor to dedicate to that , regardless of size of your first one.2 ) When you need more screen real estate than you can get in a single monitor , or for a cheaper price than large single monitors .
This is by far the most common .
You want more room , but a 30 " screen is too much money so you get 2 22 " or 24 " screens instead .
The whole reason is more room.Ya well , in this case a larger laptop , or external screen ( or both ) would seem to be the way to go .
I 'm not seeing the second monitor as useful.There 's also the fact that the divide is right down the center .
In dual monitor setups I 've encountered ( including mine at work ) one monitor is directly in front of the user and is the primary screen , the other is off to the side and contains the less important stuff .
I 've never seen one where both monitors were in front and the split was centered .
That would be very noticeable and very annoying.To me , this looks like nothing more than a gimmick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only find that dual screens are useful in two situations:1) When you have an app that needs a whole screen to work.
A video editor would be an example.
They often wish to use a dedicated screen as a preview screen.
As such you want a second monitor to dedicate to that, regardless of size of your first one.2) When you need more screen real estate than you can get in a single monitor, or for a cheaper price than large single monitors.
This is by far the most common.
You want more room, but a 30" screen is too much money so you get 2 22" or 24" screens instead.
The whole reason is more room.Ya well, in this case a larger laptop, or external screen (or both) would seem to be the way to go.
I'm not seeing the second monitor as useful.There's also the fact that the divide is right down the center.
In dual monitor setups I've encountered (including mine at work) one monitor is directly in front of the user and is the primary screen, the other is off to the side and contains the less important stuff.
I've never seen one where both monitors were in front and the split was centered.
That would be very noticeable and very annoying.To me, this looks like nothing more than a gimmick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30263282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256868
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30266082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256906
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_1830214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256978
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257186
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257374
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30263282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30258876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30259626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256880
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30266082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30256980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_1830214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_1830214.30257486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
