<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_28_032242</id>
	<title>Flexible, Color OLED Screens For E-Readers</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1259435520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>nadiskafadi writes <i>"Taiwanese researchers have <a href="http://www.arnnet.com.au/article/327840/taiwanese\_researchers\_show\_several\_flexible\_e-reader\_screens">shown off several flexible display technologies</a> in an endeavor to promote e-readers and e-paper. One of the newest technologies from the Industrial Technology Research Institute was a flexible 4.1-inch color OLED (organic light emitting diode) display, which it claims is for the next era of portable devices."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>nadiskafadi writes " Taiwanese researchers have shown off several flexible display technologies in an endeavor to promote e-readers and e-paper .
One of the newest technologies from the Industrial Technology Research Institute was a flexible 4.1-inch color OLED ( organic light emitting diode ) display , which it claims is for the next era of portable devices .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>nadiskafadi writes "Taiwanese researchers have shown off several flexible display technologies in an endeavor to promote e-readers and e-paper.
One of the newest technologies from the Industrial Technology Research Institute was a flexible 4.1-inch color OLED (organic light emitting diode) display, which it claims is for the next era of portable devices.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256356</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1259398980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the most part only fiction paper-backs are as small as the average e-reader display.  Hard-cover books use a format slightly smaller than letter size, and almost all technical books use 8.5x11 or A3 format.  The big books are much, much easier to read, and for technical books they can hold graphs and figures that are readable.</p><p>Squeezing all that into a paper-back sized e-reader, frankly, sucks.  Graphs become hard to read, if it's a software book you have to scroll several pages for each code block which would ordinarily fit on one page, etc.  I am very much looking forward to paper-sized readers like Plastic Logic (which was supposed to be out by now, damnit).</p><p>In other words, yeah, it's a silly question.  It's the same reason most books aren't small paper-backs - only cheap novels are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the most part only fiction paper-backs are as small as the average e-reader display .
Hard-cover books use a format slightly smaller than letter size , and almost all technical books use 8.5x11 or A3 format .
The big books are much , much easier to read , and for technical books they can hold graphs and figures that are readable.Squeezing all that into a paper-back sized e-reader , frankly , sucks .
Graphs become hard to read , if it 's a software book you have to scroll several pages for each code block which would ordinarily fit on one page , etc .
I am very much looking forward to paper-sized readers like Plastic Logic ( which was supposed to be out by now , damnit ) .In other words , yeah , it 's a silly question .
It 's the same reason most books are n't small paper-backs - only cheap novels are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the most part only fiction paper-backs are as small as the average e-reader display.
Hard-cover books use a format slightly smaller than letter size, and almost all technical books use 8.5x11 or A3 format.
The big books are much, much easier to read, and for technical books they can hold graphs and figures that are readable.Squeezing all that into a paper-back sized e-reader, frankly, sucks.
Graphs become hard to read, if it's a software book you have to scroll several pages for each code block which would ordinarily fit on one page, etc.
I am very much looking forward to paper-sized readers like Plastic Logic (which was supposed to be out by now, damnit).In other words, yeah, it's a silly question.
It's the same reason most books aren't small paper-backs - only cheap novels are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253692</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1259410560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd like both, so that I can read in bright sunlight AND in bed with the room light off.</p><p>Additional, I take it OLED can do video and full color, e-ink can't.</p><p>If on top of that the reader is foldable (but still sturdy), count me in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like both , so that I can read in bright sunlight AND in bed with the room light off.Additional , I take it OLED can do video and full color , e-ink ca n't.If on top of that the reader is foldable ( but still sturdy ) , count me in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like both, so that I can read in bright sunlight AND in bed with the room light off.Additional, I take it OLED can do video and full color, e-ink can't.If on top of that the reader is foldable (but still sturdy), count me in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255300</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>MobileTatsu-NJG</author>
	<datestamp>1259431920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Silly question:  Why letter size?  Are current books not big enough for you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Silly question : Why letter size ?
Are current books not big enough for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silly question:  Why letter size?
Are current books not big enough for you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30257226</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>scienceprogrammer</author>
	<datestamp>1259409180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article talks about a OLED display that isn't backlit. The OLED displays are easier on the eyes than the current LEDs anyway and the much better refresh rate and the fact you can use current controllers make it a viable option.
 <p>
That's the most common complaint about the visaplex, the black wash and 200ms refresh. Also the greyness takes awhile to get used to. As a kindle owner I'd switch to a non backlight technology if it gives me color and options for watching video. The kindle app on the iphone is pretty popular, I couldn't do it, my eyes would get too tired after looking at a laptop all day.</p><p>
FTA...
"We think OLED will work better than other technologies. There's no need for a backlight or a polarizer nor stacks of optical film,"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article talks about a OLED display that is n't backlit .
The OLED displays are easier on the eyes than the current LEDs anyway and the much better refresh rate and the fact you can use current controllers make it a viable option .
That 's the most common complaint about the visaplex , the black wash and 200ms refresh .
Also the greyness takes awhile to get used to .
As a kindle owner I 'd switch to a non backlight technology if it gives me color and options for watching video .
The kindle app on the iphone is pretty popular , I could n't do it , my eyes would get too tired after looking at a laptop all day .
FTA.. . " We think OLED will work better than other technologies .
There 's no need for a backlight or a polarizer nor stacks of optical film , "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article talks about a OLED display that isn't backlit.
The OLED displays are easier on the eyes than the current LEDs anyway and the much better refresh rate and the fact you can use current controllers make it a viable option.
That's the most common complaint about the visaplex, the black wash and 200ms refresh.
Also the greyness takes awhile to get used to.
As a kindle owner I'd switch to a non backlight technology if it gives me color and options for watching video.
The kindle app on the iphone is pretty popular, I couldn't do it, my eyes would get too tired after looking at a laptop all day.
FTA...
"We think OLED will work better than other technologies.
There's no need for a backlight or a polarizer nor stacks of optical film,"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253130</id>
	<title>When I was a kid, looking at the crappy. . .</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1259441400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I was a kid in drafting class at my old highschool I thought to myself. . , "One day in the F*U*T*U*R*E this big drafting board will be digital!  Won't that be cool?  Where you can have a digital air brush and a digital pencil, etc.  That'll be cool!  I REALLY want to see that.  Everything feels a little wrong with that not being in existence."</p><p>Well, we're getting closer to that reality.  Some of the Wacom technology these days is getting pretty impressive, if still clunky.</p><p>Anyway, I half-really believe that the world is one big dream sequence.  --And I don't know about the rest of everybody out there, but whenever I dream, dream content usually takes the form of a problem.  As a for instance, only a few hours ago I was dreaming a D&amp;D game involving this totally hot friend of mine.  She's about as far from 'geek' and D&amp;D as one can get, so it was a pretty ridiculous dream.  Anyway, there we were, me, one other geek friend whose face I can't remember for the life of me, and this super-hot yoga-teacher friend of mine.  And she's like, "I want to try D&amp;D.  Can you set up a game?"  And I'm all, "Well, I haven't played in a few years, but I could probably arrange something."  And because it's a dream, there we were, walking around in actual Middle Earth, dressed up in our D&amp;D personaes (I'm wearing this idiotic bear skin and carrying a club in one hand and a player's manual in the other.  She's done up in a wizard's outfit and having a frustrating time working out how the spells work.  WOTC apparently can't even get it right in a dream.  Ha ha!)</p><p>Anyway, the game is advancing, but there's this problem in the back of my mind.  "She's not supposed to be here.  This is just not who she is."  And it's bothering me; I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop.  That's the problem, and because it's a dream, I actually care.  So anyway, we wander into a town on our third evening of gaming.  The NPC's living there tell us of a dragon in the mountains yonder which needs slaying, and my hot yoga friend finally sighs heavily and says, "You know, I just want to hang out here and bake pies and sell them at the local market.  You two go on ahead and fight the monsters.  I don't think I'm really into D&amp;D, but thanks for letting me try."</p><p>And just as I was saying, "Yeah, well it was good to try this out, but no prob-" and I woke up.</p><p>That's a pretty basic example, and that's how it always goes.  Right when things resolve, whether trying to pass an exam in dream school, or climb a dream mountain, or working out how to dream fly or whatever, right when everything that <i>should</i> be balances with what actually is, that's when I wake up.</p><p>And here's how all this equates to thin-screens. . .</p><p>When digital table-tops finally become a common reality, when you can pick up a virtual pen and draw picture and use your fingers to pull around virtual documents. . , when the digital drafting board is a common reality, that's when my own personal dream of life will have resolved.  That's the lynch pin.  And we're getting pretty close.</p><p>I wonder what happens when I wake up.  I hope the rest of you don't pop out of existence.</p><p>(Take that Gordon Moore.)</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was a kid in drafting class at my old highschool I thought to myself .
. , " One day in the F * U * T * U * R * E this big drafting board will be digital !
Wo n't that be cool ?
Where you can have a digital air brush and a digital pencil , etc .
That 'll be cool !
I REALLY want to see that .
Everything feels a little wrong with that not being in existence .
" Well , we 're getting closer to that reality .
Some of the Wacom technology these days is getting pretty impressive , if still clunky.Anyway , I half-really believe that the world is one big dream sequence .
--And I do n't know about the rest of everybody out there , but whenever I dream , dream content usually takes the form of a problem .
As a for instance , only a few hours ago I was dreaming a D&amp;D game involving this totally hot friend of mine .
She 's about as far from 'geek ' and D&amp;D as one can get , so it was a pretty ridiculous dream .
Anyway , there we were , me , one other geek friend whose face I ca n't remember for the life of me , and this super-hot yoga-teacher friend of mine .
And she 's like , " I want to try D&amp;D .
Can you set up a game ?
" And I 'm all , " Well , I have n't played in a few years , but I could probably arrange something .
" And because it 's a dream , there we were , walking around in actual Middle Earth , dressed up in our D&amp;D personaes ( I 'm wearing this idiotic bear skin and carrying a club in one hand and a player 's manual in the other .
She 's done up in a wizard 's outfit and having a frustrating time working out how the spells work .
WOTC apparently ca n't even get it right in a dream .
Ha ha !
) Anyway , the game is advancing , but there 's this problem in the back of my mind .
" She 's not supposed to be here .
This is just not who she is .
" And it 's bothering me ; I 'm waiting for the other shoe to drop .
That 's the problem , and because it 's a dream , I actually care .
So anyway , we wander into a town on our third evening of gaming .
The NPC 's living there tell us of a dragon in the mountains yonder which needs slaying , and my hot yoga friend finally sighs heavily and says , " You know , I just want to hang out here and bake pies and sell them at the local market .
You two go on ahead and fight the monsters .
I do n't think I 'm really into D&amp;D , but thanks for letting me try .
" And just as I was saying , " Yeah , well it was good to try this out , but no prob- " and I woke up.That 's a pretty basic example , and that 's how it always goes .
Right when things resolve , whether trying to pass an exam in dream school , or climb a dream mountain , or working out how to dream fly or whatever , right when everything that should be balances with what actually is , that 's when I wake up.And here 's how all this equates to thin-screens .
. .When digital table-tops finally become a common reality , when you can pick up a virtual pen and draw picture and use your fingers to pull around virtual documents .
. , when the digital drafting board is a common reality , that 's when my own personal dream of life will have resolved .
That 's the lynch pin .
And we 're getting pretty close.I wonder what happens when I wake up .
I hope the rest of you do n't pop out of existence .
( Take that Gordon Moore .
) -FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was a kid in drafting class at my old highschool I thought to myself.
. , "One day in the F*U*T*U*R*E this big drafting board will be digital!
Won't that be cool?
Where you can have a digital air brush and a digital pencil, etc.
That'll be cool!
I REALLY want to see that.
Everything feels a little wrong with that not being in existence.
"Well, we're getting closer to that reality.
Some of the Wacom technology these days is getting pretty impressive, if still clunky.Anyway, I half-really believe that the world is one big dream sequence.
--And I don't know about the rest of everybody out there, but whenever I dream, dream content usually takes the form of a problem.
As a for instance, only a few hours ago I was dreaming a D&amp;D game involving this totally hot friend of mine.
She's about as far from 'geek' and D&amp;D as one can get, so it was a pretty ridiculous dream.
Anyway, there we were, me, one other geek friend whose face I can't remember for the life of me, and this super-hot yoga-teacher friend of mine.
And she's like, "I want to try D&amp;D.
Can you set up a game?
"  And I'm all, "Well, I haven't played in a few years, but I could probably arrange something.
"  And because it's a dream, there we were, walking around in actual Middle Earth, dressed up in our D&amp;D personaes (I'm wearing this idiotic bear skin and carrying a club in one hand and a player's manual in the other.
She's done up in a wizard's outfit and having a frustrating time working out how the spells work.
WOTC apparently can't even get it right in a dream.
Ha ha!
)Anyway, the game is advancing, but there's this problem in the back of my mind.
"She's not supposed to be here.
This is just not who she is.
"  And it's bothering me; I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop.
That's the problem, and because it's a dream, I actually care.
So anyway, we wander into a town on our third evening of gaming.
The NPC's living there tell us of a dragon in the mountains yonder which needs slaying, and my hot yoga friend finally sighs heavily and says, "You know, I just want to hang out here and bake pies and sell them at the local market.
You two go on ahead and fight the monsters.
I don't think I'm really into D&amp;D, but thanks for letting me try.
"And just as I was saying, "Yeah, well it was good to try this out, but no prob-" and I woke up.That's a pretty basic example, and that's how it always goes.
Right when things resolve, whether trying to pass an exam in dream school, or climb a dream mountain, or working out how to dream fly or whatever, right when everything that should be balances with what actually is, that's when I wake up.And here's how all this equates to thin-screens.
. .When digital table-tops finally become a common reality, when you can pick up a virtual pen and draw picture and use your fingers to pull around virtual documents.
. , when the digital drafting board is a common reality, that's when my own personal dream of life will have resolved.
That's the lynch pin.
And we're getting pretty close.I wonder what happens when I wake up.
I hope the rest of you don't pop out of existence.
(Take that Gordon Moore.
)-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253898</id>
	<title>Re:When I was a kid, looking at the crappy. . .</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1259415060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was a draftsman too, for several summers when I was in high school.  Back a few years ago when we were hearing all the hype about Go PenPoint and other "pen-based computing", I concluded that I couldn't get excited about pen based computing on a display that was smaller than a "D" sheet (17"x22").</p><p>Besides the displays though, we really need some improvements in UI for CAD systems.  Autocad is wretched.  Google SketchUp is moving in the right direction, but it's still got quite a ways to go before I'd prefer it over a drafting table.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was a draftsman too , for several summers when I was in high school .
Back a few years ago when we were hearing all the hype about Go PenPoint and other " pen-based computing " , I concluded that I could n't get excited about pen based computing on a display that was smaller than a " D " sheet ( 17 " x22 " ) .Besides the displays though , we really need some improvements in UI for CAD systems .
Autocad is wretched .
Google SketchUp is moving in the right direction , but it 's still got quite a ways to go before I 'd prefer it over a drafting table.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was a draftsman too, for several summers when I was in high school.
Back a few years ago when we were hearing all the hype about Go PenPoint and other "pen-based computing", I concluded that I couldn't get excited about pen based computing on a display that was smaller than a "D" sheet (17"x22").Besides the displays though, we really need some improvements in UI for CAD systems.
Autocad is wretched.
Google SketchUp is moving in the right direction, but it's still got quite a ways to go before I'd prefer it over a drafting table.-jcr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255832</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1259437500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Show the text overlain, then black, then white, then just the new text?</p></div><p>Is that really the reason you don't have one? Or do you secretly want one and are just making excuses?  Because that little flash is about as annoying as... turning a page.</p><p>God it's horrible, the text goes sideways, then disappears and you can see a page ahead for a fraction of a second, then it's sideways again and you can finally read it.  Plus there's that annoying "Shhhh..." sound it makes.  UGH! Turning pages is so disgusting!</p><p>Seriously man, I'll take my much, much clearer screen and much, much better battery life over instant page turns any day.  Unless you're reading a thousand plus words per minute, the quarter second it takes to refresh the page is not annoying at all.  Grey-scale LCDs are very low contrast, unlike e-Ink which is virtually the same as paper and ink.  That makes them much easier to read on.  And if you're reading over a thousand words per minute you probably aren't reading for pleasure anyway, so why are you bothering with the small display of ANY e-reader?</p><p>If you DO read that fast, well then, yeah, the page refresh would get pretty damn annoying, but like I said, why would you bother with an e-reader at that point anyway?</p><p>There is a reason LCD ebook readers never really took off, even though they are much less expensive than e-Ink readers.  If you haven't figured it out, maybe you should try actually reading on one for once.  My local Best-Buy has them on display, I'm sure an electronics store near you does as well.  Note that I do NOT recommend actually buying a reader from Best-Buy, just to look in person before getting one elsewhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Show the text overlain , then black , then white , then just the new text ? Is that really the reason you do n't have one ?
Or do you secretly want one and are just making excuses ?
Because that little flash is about as annoying as... turning a page.God it 's horrible , the text goes sideways , then disappears and you can see a page ahead for a fraction of a second , then it 's sideways again and you can finally read it .
Plus there 's that annoying " Shhhh... " sound it makes .
UGH ! Turning pages is so disgusting ! Seriously man , I 'll take my much , much clearer screen and much , much better battery life over instant page turns any day .
Unless you 're reading a thousand plus words per minute , the quarter second it takes to refresh the page is not annoying at all .
Grey-scale LCDs are very low contrast , unlike e-Ink which is virtually the same as paper and ink .
That makes them much easier to read on .
And if you 're reading over a thousand words per minute you probably are n't reading for pleasure anyway , so why are you bothering with the small display of ANY e-reader ? If you DO read that fast , well then , yeah , the page refresh would get pretty damn annoying , but like I said , why would you bother with an e-reader at that point anyway ? There is a reason LCD ebook readers never really took off , even though they are much less expensive than e-Ink readers .
If you have n't figured it out , maybe you should try actually reading on one for once .
My local Best-Buy has them on display , I 'm sure an electronics store near you does as well .
Note that I do NOT recommend actually buying a reader from Best-Buy , just to look in person before getting one elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Show the text overlain, then black, then white, then just the new text?Is that really the reason you don't have one?
Or do you secretly want one and are just making excuses?
Because that little flash is about as annoying as... turning a page.God it's horrible, the text goes sideways, then disappears and you can see a page ahead for a fraction of a second, then it's sideways again and you can finally read it.
Plus there's that annoying "Shhhh..." sound it makes.
UGH! Turning pages is so disgusting!Seriously man, I'll take my much, much clearer screen and much, much better battery life over instant page turns any day.
Unless you're reading a thousand plus words per minute, the quarter second it takes to refresh the page is not annoying at all.
Grey-scale LCDs are very low contrast, unlike e-Ink which is virtually the same as paper and ink.
That makes them much easier to read on.
And if you're reading over a thousand words per minute you probably aren't reading for pleasure anyway, so why are you bothering with the small display of ANY e-reader?If you DO read that fast, well then, yeah, the page refresh would get pretty damn annoying, but like I said, why would you bother with an e-reader at that point anyway?There is a reason LCD ebook readers never really took off, even though they are much less expensive than e-Ink readers.
If you haven't figured it out, maybe you should try actually reading on one for once.
My local Best-Buy has them on display, I'm sure an electronics store near you does as well.
Note that I do NOT recommend actually buying a reader from Best-Buy, just to look in person before getting one elsewhere.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253064</id>
	<title>Call me when they make OLED toilet paper</title>
	<author>BigDXLT</author>
	<datestamp>1259440260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then, I could give every single frame of each Uwe Boll movie the respect it deserves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then , I could give every single frame of each Uwe Boll movie the respect it deserves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then, I could give every single frame of each Uwe Boll movie the respect it deserves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255398</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259433120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Mental Floss issues are rather larger than my trade paperbacks, for one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Mental Floss issues are rather larger than my trade paperbacks , for one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Mental Floss issues are rather larger than my trade paperbacks, for one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253458</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1259406180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like light emitting displays. I do most of my recreational reading in the dark on a small laptop. It's nice to not have to depend on external light sources.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like light emitting displays .
I do most of my recreational reading in the dark on a small laptop .
It 's nice to not have to depend on external light sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like light emitting displays.
I do most of my recreational reading in the dark on a small laptop.
It's nice to not have to depend on external light sources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255060</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>The Salamander</author>
	<datestamp>1259429700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, one reason I haven't bought a kindle is because it does not contain a built-in light.  (The other reasons would be cost and DRM)</p><p>I like to read in bed before I go to sleep, and having to use a desk lamp or a book light is rather annoying.  I currently read some ebooks on my iPhone which works pretty well on its lowest brightness setting.</p><p>I would prefer a bigger / better resolution display, though, which is why I have atleast considered some ebook readers.  But having to turn a light on just to read?  Not really an option for me.</p><p>Now, during the day an eInk display would be wonderful!  But it needs to work in the dark as well, atleast for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , one reason I have n't bought a kindle is because it does not contain a built-in light .
( The other reasons would be cost and DRM ) I like to read in bed before I go to sleep , and having to use a desk lamp or a book light is rather annoying .
I currently read some ebooks on my iPhone which works pretty well on its lowest brightness setting.I would prefer a bigger / better resolution display , though , which is why I have atleast considered some ebook readers .
But having to turn a light on just to read ?
Not really an option for me.Now , during the day an eInk display would be wonderful !
But it needs to work in the dark as well , atleast for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, one reason I haven't bought a kindle is because it does not contain a built-in light.
(The other reasons would be cost and DRM)I like to read in bed before I go to sleep, and having to use a desk lamp or a book light is rather annoying.
I currently read some ebooks on my iPhone which works pretty well on its lowest brightness setting.I would prefer a bigger / better resolution display, though, which is why I have atleast considered some ebook readers.
But having to turn a light on just to read?
Not really an option for me.Now, during the day an eInk display would be wonderful!
But it needs to work in the dark as well, atleast for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254714</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1259425920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Gratuitous Wiki Copypasta.</p><p>Since the 1960s the International System of Units ("Syst&#232;me International d'Unit&#233;s" in French, hence "SI") has been the internationally recognised standard metric system.</p><p>Yet you still want an e-book that is 11 inches x 8 1/2 inches ?</p><p>Only three nations have not officially adopted the International System of Units as their primary or sole system of measurement: Burma, Liberia, and the United States.</p><p>Ah, that explains it.</p><p>How does it feel to be one of the 3 nations of the world who just *have* to be fucking awkward ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Gratuitous Wiki Copypasta.Since the 1960s the International System of Units ( " Syst   me International d'Unit   s " in French , hence " SI " ) has been the internationally recognised standard metric system.Yet you still want an e-book that is 11 inches x 8 1/2 inches ? Only three nations have not officially adopted the International System of Units as their primary or sole system of measurement : Burma , Liberia , and the United States.Ah , that explains it.How does it feel to be one of the 3 nations of the world who just * have * to be fucking awkward ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gratuitous Wiki Copypasta.Since the 1960s the International System of Units ("Système International d'Unités" in French, hence "SI") has been the internationally recognised standard metric system.Yet you still want an e-book that is 11 inches x 8 1/2 inches ?Only three nations have not officially adopted the International System of Units as their primary or sole system of measurement: Burma, Liberia, and the United States.Ah, that explains it.How does it feel to be one of the 3 nations of the world who just *have* to be fucking awkward ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254058</id>
	<title>Maybe I'm just missing something</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1259417580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does no one seem to want to combine these two technologies? It seems like the ultimate display would consist of a layer of e-Paper, followed by an OLED layer, and finally the touch layer. We keep seeing these video demos of transparent, flexible OLED screens which would be ideal for this purpose, but few actual products of ANY sort, let alone something transformative like this would be. Just set the page all black via e-Ink, then you can play the video over the top with OLED. All the benefits, the only drawbacks in price and complexity and I'm quite certain I'm not the only one who would pay the price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does no one seem to want to combine these two technologies ?
It seems like the ultimate display would consist of a layer of e-Paper , followed by an OLED layer , and finally the touch layer .
We keep seeing these video demos of transparent , flexible OLED screens which would be ideal for this purpose , but few actual products of ANY sort , let alone something transformative like this would be .
Just set the page all black via e-Ink , then you can play the video over the top with OLED .
All the benefits , the only drawbacks in price and complexity and I 'm quite certain I 'm not the only one who would pay the price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does no one seem to want to combine these two technologies?
It seems like the ultimate display would consist of a layer of e-Paper, followed by an OLED layer, and finally the touch layer.
We keep seeing these video demos of transparent, flexible OLED screens which would be ideal for this purpose, but few actual products of ANY sort, let alone something transformative like this would be.
Just set the page all black via e-Ink, then you can play the video over the top with OLED.
All the benefits, the only drawbacks in price and complexity and I'm quite certain I'm not the only one who would pay the price.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253282</id>
	<title>Have fun then...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259401740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Reading and watching video in the dark.</p><p>If you want, for a small fee, I will come to your house and rip out the cables out of all of your earphones, speakers, phones and other devices that blare the sound into your ears.<br>I'll break your TVs and monitors for free, but ripping out LEDs and light-bulbs will cost you extra.<br>You know... for that complete passive experience you are obviously aiming for.</p><p>Can't do much about the smells, touch and taste without removing your tongue, nose and skin though.<br>But for a price, I know a guy who does that too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Reading and watching video in the dark.If you want , for a small fee , I will come to your house and rip out the cables out of all of your earphones , speakers , phones and other devices that blare the sound into your ears.I 'll break your TVs and monitors for free , but ripping out LEDs and light-bulbs will cost you extra.You know... for that complete passive experience you are obviously aiming for.Ca n't do much about the smells , touch and taste without removing your tongue , nose and skin though.But for a price , I know a guy who does that too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Reading and watching video in the dark.If you want, for a small fee, I will come to your house and rip out the cables out of all of your earphones, speakers, phones and other devices that blare the sound into your ears.I'll break your TVs and monitors for free, but ripping out LEDs and light-bulbs will cost you extra.You know... for that complete passive experience you are obviously aiming for.Can't do much about the smells, touch and taste without removing your tongue, nose and skin though.But for a price, I know a guy who does that too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30263104</id>
	<title>e-paper is always  "just around the corner"</title>
	<author>vaporland</author>
	<datestamp>1259525520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is one of those technologies that is always "just around the corner" - "coming out next year"<br> <br>a colleague and I noted a story in the media three years ago that said a new technology for e-paper and e-ink was coming out "next year" - but it never surfaced.<br> <br>guess for now I'll keep driving my flying car to the 7-11 to pick up my Daily Post...</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is one of those technologies that is always " just around the corner " - " coming out next year " a colleague and I noted a story in the media three years ago that said a new technology for e-paper and e-ink was coming out " next year " - but it never surfaced .
guess for now I 'll keep driving my flying car to the 7-11 to pick up my Daily Post.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is one of those technologies that is always "just around the corner" - "coming out next year" a colleague and I noted a story in the media three years ago that said a new technology for e-paper and e-ink was coming out "next year" - but it never surfaced.
guess for now I'll keep driving my flying car to the 7-11 to pick up my Daily Post...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</id>
	<title>The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259439480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh for goodness sake!</p><p>The last thing you want in an e-reader is for it to be light emitting. There's a reason we're putting so much effort into developing better eInk displays.</p><p>The only people who don't seem to understand this are the ones who don't read much or haven't read much on an eInk screen. It's a huge improvement over anything that works by shining light directly into your eyes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh for goodness sake ! The last thing you want in an e-reader is for it to be light emitting .
There 's a reason we 're putting so much effort into developing better eInk displays.The only people who do n't seem to understand this are the ones who do n't read much or have n't read much on an eInk screen .
It 's a huge improvement over anything that works by shining light directly into your eyes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh for goodness sake!The last thing you want in an e-reader is for it to be light emitting.
There's a reason we're putting so much effort into developing better eInk displays.The only people who don't seem to understand this are the ones who don't read much or haven't read much on an eInk screen.
It's a huge improvement over anything that works by shining light directly into your eyes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253856</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>jcr</author>
	<datestamp>1259414280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> It's a huge improvement over anything that works by shining light directly into your eyes.</i></p><p>Anything you can see shines light directly into your eyes.</p><p>-jcr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a huge improvement over anything that works by shining light directly into your eyes.Anything you can see shines light directly into your eyes.-jcr</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It's a huge improvement over anything that works by shining light directly into your eyes.Anything you can see shines light directly into your eyes.-jcr</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253456</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259406180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</p></div></blockquote><p>So you'd prefer an OLD-radr?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.So you 'd prefer an OLD-radr ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.So you'd prefer an OLD-radr?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256280</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1259441400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>How does it feel to be one of the 3 nations of the world who just *have* to be fucking awkward ?</p></div><p>Generally superior, actually, because we know that for the time being all the rest of you losers have to deal with it.</p><p>Suckers.</p><p>Though, we're working on destroying our economy one obscenely huge bill at a time, and once we're relegated to the sidelines I'm sure there will actually be an advantage to switching, so just be patient my poor, interchangeable European friend.  Your time will come again, and you can rub it in our faces when it does.</p><p>- Your Smug American Neighbor</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it feel to be one of the 3 nations of the world who just * have * to be fucking awkward ? Generally superior , actually , because we know that for the time being all the rest of you losers have to deal with it.Suckers.Though , we 're working on destroying our economy one obscenely huge bill at a time , and once we 're relegated to the sidelines I 'm sure there will actually be an advantage to switching , so just be patient my poor , interchangeable European friend .
Your time will come again , and you can rub it in our faces when it does.- Your Smug American Neighbor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it feel to be one of the 3 nations of the world who just *have* to be fucking awkward ?Generally superior, actually, because we know that for the time being all the rest of you losers have to deal with it.Suckers.Though, we're working on destroying our economy one obscenely huge bill at a time, and once we're relegated to the sidelines I'm sure there will actually be an advantage to switching, so just be patient my poor, interchangeable European friend.
Your time will come again, and you can rub it in our faces when it does.- Your Smug American Neighbor
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253236</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>Fallen Seraph</author>
	<datestamp>1259400480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Had you actually read the article you might've noticed that the eReader display tech was NOT the OLED tech. The article talks about two different technologies for different devices. The eReader display tech in the article is Ch-LCD, not OLED. The OLED tech they describe is intended for future cell phones and the like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Had you actually read the article you might 've noticed that the eReader display tech was NOT the OLED tech .
The article talks about two different technologies for different devices .
The eReader display tech in the article is Ch-LCD , not OLED .
The OLED tech they describe is intended for future cell phones and the like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Had you actually read the article you might've noticed that the eReader display tech was NOT the OLED tech.
The article talks about two different technologies for different devices.
The eReader display tech in the article is Ch-LCD, not OLED.
The OLED tech they describe is intended for future cell phones and the like.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253406</id>
	<title>finally</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259404980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>no more cracked lcds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no more cracked lcds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no more cracked lcds.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253578</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>eugene259</author>
	<datestamp>1259408340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Being reflective or emitting has nothing to do with use of e-ink in e-readers. Main advantage of e-ink displays is that they only draw power when the display is updated, they don't consume any power to maintain the image unlike LCD or OLED displays which makes them a lot more power-efficient. However with every e-ink display having a mechanical component (little ink particles are moved around by electric fields) their refresh rate is relatively slow in comparison to an LCD or OLED which makes them unsuitable as a general purpose computer display. Since e-reader display mostly static content (text, no animation) an e-ink display is perfect for that purpose, offering much lower power consumption.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Being reflective or emitting has nothing to do with use of e-ink in e-readers .
Main advantage of e-ink displays is that they only draw power when the display is updated , they do n't consume any power to maintain the image unlike LCD or OLED displays which makes them a lot more power-efficient .
However with every e-ink display having a mechanical component ( little ink particles are moved around by electric fields ) their refresh rate is relatively slow in comparison to an LCD or OLED which makes them unsuitable as a general purpose computer display .
Since e-reader display mostly static content ( text , no animation ) an e-ink display is perfect for that purpose , offering much lower power consumption .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being reflective or emitting has nothing to do with use of e-ink in e-readers.
Main advantage of e-ink displays is that they only draw power when the display is updated, they don't consume any power to maintain the image unlike LCD or OLED displays which makes them a lot more power-efficient.
However with every e-ink display having a mechanical component (little ink particles are moved around by electric fields) their refresh rate is relatively slow in comparison to an LCD or OLED which makes them unsuitable as a general purpose computer display.
Since e-reader display mostly static content (text, no animation) an e-ink display is perfect for that purpose, offering much lower power consumption.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253324</id>
	<title>Ah yes...</title>
	<author>denzacar</author>
	<datestamp>1259402700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "I am the center of the Universe and all should conform to my unimaginative desires" approach.<br>Damn! I wish I came up with that philosophy first.</p><p>Gee.. Who would ever want a thin flexible display that could be bent or rolled up? Madness! Madness I say!<br>Naah... let's just make displays that are big enough and cheap enough for YOUR needs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " I am the center of the Universe and all should conform to my unimaginative desires " approach.Damn !
I wish I came up with that philosophy first.Gee.. Who would ever want a thin flexible display that could be bent or rolled up ?
Madness ! Madness I say ! Naah... let 's just make displays that are big enough and cheap enough for YOUR needs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "I am the center of the Universe and all should conform to my unimaginative desires" approach.Damn!
I wish I came up with that philosophy first.Gee.. Who would ever want a thin flexible display that could be bent or rolled up?
Madness! Madness I say!Naah... let's just make displays that are big enough and cheap enough for YOUR needs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253772</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259412600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To cater to the "gadget" mentality. Sheeple want colorz to watch their Survivor and America's Got Talent on. Nevermind practical workaday displays for e.g. process control, reading, display, info-data, etc. only morons buy electronics you know, so lets makem pretty colors!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To cater to the " gadget " mentality .
Sheeple want colorz to watch their Survivor and America 's Got Talent on .
Nevermind practical workaday displays for e.g .
process control , reading , display , info-data , etc .
only morons buy electronics you know , so lets makem pretty colors !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To cater to the "gadget" mentality.
Sheeple want colorz to watch their Survivor and America's Got Talent on.
Nevermind practical workaday displays for e.g.
process control, reading, display, info-data, etc.
only morons buy electronics you know, so lets makem pretty colors!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253804</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>The Evil Couch</author>
	<datestamp>1259413380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why is it they have to step forwards to color already? What I want is much larger greyscale displays with better contrast for cheaper. Seriously, give me a U.S. Letter size display with better contrast for under $100 and I will jump on the e-reader bandwagon.</p></div></blockquote><p>Because that's a false dichotomy? They're going to need to go color eventually and there's no reason that research into both cheaper, bigger monochrome displays and color displays can't be done simultaneously.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it they have to step forwards to color already ?
What I want is much larger greyscale displays with better contrast for cheaper .
Seriously , give me a U.S. Letter size display with better contrast for under $ 100 and I will jump on the e-reader bandwagon.Because that 's a false dichotomy ?
They 're going to need to go color eventually and there 's no reason that research into both cheaper , bigger monochrome displays and color displays ca n't be done simultaneously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it they have to step forwards to color already?
What I want is much larger greyscale displays with better contrast for cheaper.
Seriously, give me a U.S. Letter size display with better contrast for under $100 and I will jump on the e-reader bandwagon.Because that's a false dichotomy?
They're going to need to go color eventually and there's no reason that research into both cheaper, bigger monochrome displays and color displays can't be done simultaneously.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30262438</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>cfc-12</author>
	<datestamp>1259519580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</p></div><p>You can't get rid of the E. An OLD reader would never sell.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Re : The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.You ca n't get rid of the E. An OLD reader would never sell .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.You can't get rid of the E. An OLD reader would never sell.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30268106</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>beelsebob</author>
	<datestamp>1259575800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not only that but the emission part says it's constantly using batteries... Half the point of eInk is that it will remain displaying the same thing, even with no charge applied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only that but the emission part says it 's constantly using batteries... Half the point of eInk is that it will remain displaying the same thing , even with no charge applied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only that but the emission part says it's constantly using batteries... Half the point of eInk is that it will remain displaying the same thing, even with no charge applied.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256210</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>jimfrost</author>
	<datestamp>1259440620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The problem with current e-ink is the horrible flashing when you change pages. Show the text overlain, then black, then white, then just the new text? Ugh.</i> <p>

I was seriously concerned about this when I bought my first Kindle.  You know what?  Within 10 minutes you just don't see it anymore, pretty much the same way you blank out the page flip on a paper book.  Perhaps this is because it really isn't a "flash".</p><p>

It'd be ok with me if it went away, but it's not a problem or even a distraction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with current e-ink is the horrible flashing when you change pages .
Show the text overlain , then black , then white , then just the new text ?
Ugh . I was seriously concerned about this when I bought my first Kindle .
You know what ?
Within 10 minutes you just do n't see it anymore , pretty much the same way you blank out the page flip on a paper book .
Perhaps this is because it really is n't a " flash " .
It 'd be ok with me if it went away , but it 's not a problem or even a distraction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with current e-ink is the horrible flashing when you change pages.
Show the text overlain, then black, then white, then just the new text?
Ugh. 

I was seriously concerned about this when I bought my first Kindle.
You know what?
Within 10 minutes you just don't see it anymore, pretty much the same way you blank out the page flip on a paper book.
Perhaps this is because it really isn't a "flash".
It'd be ok with me if it went away, but it's not a problem or even a distraction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255340</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</id>
	<title>No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259400900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is it they have to step forwards to color already? What I want is much larger greyscale displays with better contrast for cheaper. Seriously, give me a U.S. Letter size display with better contrast for under $100 and I will jump on the e-reader bandwagon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is it they have to step forwards to color already ?
What I want is much larger greyscale displays with better contrast for cheaper .
Seriously , give me a U.S. Letter size display with better contrast for under $ 100 and I will jump on the e-reader bandwagon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is it they have to step forwards to color already?
What I want is much larger greyscale displays with better contrast for cheaper.
Seriously, give me a U.S. Letter size display with better contrast for under $100 and I will jump on the e-reader bandwagon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253162</id>
	<title>3.5 by 4.5 inches -- 40 second image reload</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259398920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So it will take at least as long to flip a page as it will to read it.</p><p>This is setting aside the issue of display resolution, which is not specified in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So it will take at least as long to flip a page as it will to read it.This is setting aside the issue of display resolution , which is not specified in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it will take at least as long to flip a page as it will to read it.This is setting aside the issue of display resolution, which is not specified in TFA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253036</id>
	<title>Does anyone know...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259439780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did they ever solve the problem that older, flexible, OLED displays had that caused visual distortion as the OLED display was bent or is this still an issue?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did they ever solve the problem that older , flexible , OLED displays had that caused visual distortion as the OLED display was bent or is this still an issue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did they ever solve the problem that older, flexible, OLED displays had that caused visual distortion as the OLED display was bent or is this still an issue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255340</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>russotto</author>
	<datestamp>1259432340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've read a lot on a non-eInk eBook (the REB-1100, successor to the Rocket Book).  It's fine, whether used with the backlight or in reflective mode.</p><p>The problem with current e-ink is the horrible flashing when you change pages.  Show the text overlain, then black, then white, then just the new text?  Ugh.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've read a lot on a non-eInk eBook ( the REB-1100 , successor to the Rocket Book ) .
It 's fine , whether used with the backlight or in reflective mode.The problem with current e-ink is the horrible flashing when you change pages .
Show the text overlain , then black , then white , then just the new text ?
Ugh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've read a lot on a non-eInk eBook (the REB-1100, successor to the Rocket Book).
It's fine, whether used with the backlight or in reflective mode.The problem with current e-ink is the horrible flashing when you change pages.
Show the text overlain, then black, then white, then just the new text?
Ugh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253486</id>
	<title>Re:No! Larger please.</title>
	<author>RiotingPacifist</author>
	<datestamp>1259406960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>isn't e-ink for e-readers and OLED for replacing LCD displays?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is n't e-ink for e-readers and OLED for replacing LCD displays ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>isn't e-ink for e-readers and OLED for replacing LCD displays?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253170</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>Globally Mobile</author>
	<datestamp>1259399040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, there is also the need for light in some places hungering for the lumen of even a few candlepower...  Better overhaul then expecting them to continue adding to the emissions through other forms of more deadly illumination...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. .     Some people use their screens to look @for keys n/ such.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>

<br>--**/WCHTBHTU||[[\]] <br>/.<br>
'The mind cannot forsee it's own advance' +GWGADGET(YES/NO[POLL][TRUE/FALSE]{AND/OR)
&gt;.

HOW TO IN<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. ?

[xtra+][[quiz:quote by?]]

9876543210
roll 6d6 7d7 0duNF</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , there is also the need for light in some places hungering for the lumen of even a few candlepower... Better overhaul then expecting them to continue adding to the emissions through other forms of more deadly illumination... .. .
Some people use their screens to look @ for keys n/ such .
.. .. . -- * * /WCHTBHTU | | [ [ \ ] ] / .
'The mind can not forsee it 's own advance ' + GWGADGET ( YES/NO [ POLL ] [ TRUE/FALSE ] { AND/OR ) &gt; .
HOW TO IN / .
? [ xtra + ] [ [ quiz : quote by ?
] ] 9876543210 roll 6d6 7d7 0duNF</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, there is also the need for light in some places hungering for the lumen of even a few candlepower...  Better overhaul then expecting them to continue adding to the emissions through other forms of more deadly illumination... .. .
Some people use their screens to look @for keys n/ such.
.. ...

--**/WCHTBHTU||[[\]] /.
'The mind cannot forsee it's own advance' +GWGADGET(YES/NO[POLL][TRUE/FALSE]{AND/OR)
&gt;.
HOW TO IN /.
?

[xtra+][[quiz:quote by?
]]

9876543210
roll 6d6 7d7 0duNF
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255046</id>
	<title>Re:When I was a kid, looking at the crappy. . .</title>
	<author>ahoehn</author>
	<datestamp>1259429460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, specifically, are you smoking?  And where can I get some?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , specifically , are you smoking ?
And where can I get some ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, specifically, are you smoking?
And where can I get some?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254252</id>
	<title>OLED != e-reader</title>
	<author>thijsh</author>
	<datestamp>1259420580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No exactly, this is not suitable for comfortable e-readers... but the article confuses two technology's: Ch-LCD and OLED. They also mention smartphone use for the OLED.<br> <br>

This low power, flexible, soft (but hopefully fairly tough) will be very much beneficial for other portable next generation solutions.<br>
I would love a wrist-wearable phone that folds open straight to hold and talk and you roll around your wrist to take along...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No exactly , this is not suitable for comfortable e-readers... but the article confuses two technology 's : Ch-LCD and OLED .
They also mention smartphone use for the OLED .
This low power , flexible , soft ( but hopefully fairly tough ) will be very much beneficial for other portable next generation solutions .
I would love a wrist-wearable phone that folds open straight to hold and talk and you roll around your wrist to take along.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No exactly, this is not suitable for comfortable e-readers... but the article confuses two technology's: Ch-LCD and OLED.
They also mention smartphone use for the OLED.
This low power, flexible, soft (but hopefully fairly tough) will be very much beneficial for other portable next generation solutions.
I would love a wrist-wearable phone that folds open straight to hold and talk and you roll around your wrist to take along...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30268136</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>beelsebob</author>
	<datestamp>1259576160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but people don't buy iPhones to read books on, they buy iPhones to browse the internet, play games, (gasp) make phone calls, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but people do n't buy iPhones to read books on , they buy iPhones to browse the internet , play games , ( gasp ) make phone calls , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but people don't buy iPhones to read books on, they buy iPhones to browse the internet, play games, (gasp) make phone calls, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253320</id>
	<title>Re:The problem with an OLED e-reader is the E.</title>
	<author>MrMista\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1259402700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I dunno, iPhone's seem to be pretty popular.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I dunno , iPhone 's seem to be pretty popular .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dunno, iPhone's seem to be pretty popular.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253988</id>
	<title>Good, we need to push current prices down</title>
	<author>Provocateur</author>
	<datestamp>1259416500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am hoping that current prices should come down a bit; they're currently priced as if they had some sort of "Enterprise Class Premium Edition" of an OS or something, but I feel like you're buying what essentially is the LCD part of a netbook, and an e-reader part of a distro.</p><p>The current ones *do have nice displays and elegant cases, but I feel I should be getting a Newton or something, at that price, or at least a beefed-up mp3 player built in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am hoping that current prices should come down a bit ; they 're currently priced as if they had some sort of " Enterprise Class Premium Edition " of an OS or something , but I feel like you 're buying what essentially is the LCD part of a netbook , and an e-reader part of a distro.The current ones * do have nice displays and elegant cases , but I feel I should be getting a Newton or something , at that price , or at least a beefed-up mp3 player built in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am hoping that current prices should come down a bit; they're currently priced as if they had some sort of "Enterprise Class Premium Edition" of an OS or something, but I feel like you're buying what essentially is the LCD part of a netbook, and an e-reader part of a distro.The current ones *do have nice displays and elegant cases, but I feel I should be getting a Newton or something, at that price, or at least a beefed-up mp3 player built in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253978</id>
	<title>re:Christmas sale, free shipping discounts...</title>
	<author>Johnson1985</author>
	<datestamp>1259416380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]   Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]   Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30262438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30257226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30268106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30268136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_28_032242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253988
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255398
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30262438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253236
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30254252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30257226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30268136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255340
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30256210
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30255832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30268106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_28_032242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_28_032242.30253064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
