<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_27_1545259</id>
	<title>Life and Work On the LHC At CERN</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259342040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader sends in a CNet Crave <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/0,39029552,49304408,00.htm">interview with a working physicist at CERN</a>. The interview is full of detail about what it's like to work in this geek paradise (if a bit dumbed-down for an audience assumed not very technical). Dr. Paul Jackson, a particle physicist working on the LHC's Atlas experiment, says there's no chance of <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/09/11/13/0650229/Micro-Black-Holes-Make-Poor-Planet-Killers">black holes wiping us out</a>, and that the <a href="//science.slashdot.org/story/09/10/13/1826206/The-LHC-the-Higgs-Boson-and-Fate">time travel speculation</a> is bunkum. He is 100\% convinced that they will find the Higgs boson. The scientists there favor Macs, while computers in the control room are Linux-based. <i>"What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam? You would die. It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it. ... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader sends in a CNet Crave interview with a working physicist at CERN .
The interview is full of detail about what it 's like to work in this geek paradise ( if a bit dumbed-down for an audience assumed not very technical ) .
Dr. Paul Jackson , a particle physicist working on the LHC 's Atlas experiment , says there 's no chance of black holes wiping us out , and that the time travel speculation is bunkum .
He is 100 \ % convinced that they will find the Higgs boson .
The scientists there favor Macs , while computers in the control room are Linux-based .
" What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam ?
You would die .
It would be a pretty spectacular death , and you would n't know a lot about it .
... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader sends in a CNet Crave interview with a working physicist at CERN.
The interview is full of detail about what it's like to work in this geek paradise (if a bit dumbed-down for an audience assumed not very technical).
Dr. Paul Jackson, a particle physicist working on the LHC's Atlas experiment, says there's no chance of black holes wiping us out, and that the time travel speculation is bunkum.
He is 100\% convinced that they will find the Higgs boson.
The scientists there favor Macs, while computers in the control room are Linux-based.
"What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam?
You would die.
It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it.
... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249500</id>
	<title>Re:Real scientist ?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259319360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I forgot to put this in the other post, my bad.</p><p>Here is the actual quote:<br>""I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent. "</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I forgot to put this in the other post , my bad.Here is the actual quote : " " I 'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I forgot to put this in the other post, my bad.Here is the actual quote:""I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247378</id>
	<title>Re:mythbusters have to test the 87kg of TNT part n</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1259350200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, the beams have the energy equivalent of 87 KG of TNT.  Your statement implies that standing in front of the beam would cause you to explode, which I very much doubt.</p><p>I am curious as to what actually WOULD happen.  The beams themselves are very narrow (on the order of a millimeter according to <a href="http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/beam.htm" title="web.cern.ch">http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/beam.htm</a> [web.cern.ch] ).  With such a tiny size I might guess the beam would quickly cut a hole straight through you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , the beams have the energy equivalent of 87 KG of TNT .
Your statement implies that standing in front of the beam would cause you to explode , which I very much doubt.I am curious as to what actually WOULD happen .
The beams themselves are very narrow ( on the order of a millimeter according to http : //lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/beam.htm [ web.cern.ch ] ) .
With such a tiny size I might guess the beam would quickly cut a hole straight through you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, the beams have the energy equivalent of 87 KG of TNT.
Your statement implies that standing in front of the beam would cause you to explode, which I very much doubt.I am curious as to what actually WOULD happen.
The beams themselves are very narrow (on the order of a millimeter according to http://lhc-machine-outreach.web.cern.ch/lhc-machine-outreach/beam.htm [web.cern.ch] ).
With such a tiny size I might guess the beam would quickly cut a hole straight through you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246782</id>
	<title>Working physicist</title>
	<author>Pezbian</author>
	<datestamp>1259346060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, kids!  A real life working physicist.  He's got a job that doesn't involve waiting for an internship to open up at a University.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , kids !
A real life working physicist .
He 's got a job that does n't involve waiting for an internship to open up at a University .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, kids!
A real life working physicist.
He's got a job that doesn't involve waiting for an internship to open up at a University.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247562</id>
	<title>Re:Working physicist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259351160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think LHC is a pretty cool guy. eh kills hardons and doesn't afraid of anything...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think LHC is a pretty cool guy .
eh kills hardons and does n't afraid of anything.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think LHC is a pretty cool guy.
eh kills hardons and doesn't afraid of anything...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249424</id>
	<title>Re:Real scientist ?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1259319000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>proof has been presented. Lots of it. This is confirmation. I will be surprised if they don't find it. If thye don't it will be an interesting few years of trying to figure what else all our facts and evidence points to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>proof has been presented .
Lots of it .
This is confirmation .
I will be surprised if they do n't find it .
If thye do n't it will be an interesting few years of trying to figure what else all our facts and evidence points to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>proof has been presented.
Lots of it.
This is confirmation.
I will be surprised if they don't find it.
If thye don't it will be an interesting few years of trying to figure what else all our facts and evidence points to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248174</id>
	<title>Re:Anatoli Bugorski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259355060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.index.hr/images2/anatoli-bugorski\_W.jpg" title="index.hr" rel="nofollow">http://www.index.hr/images2/anatoli-bugorski\_W.jpg</a> [index.hr]<br><a href="http://www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/anatoli.jpg" title="cynical-c.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/anatoli.jpg</a> [cynical-c.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.index.hr/images2/anatoli-bugorski \ _W.jpg [ index.hr ] http : //www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/anatoli.jpg [ cynical-c.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.index.hr/images2/anatoli-bugorski\_W.jpg [index.hr]http://www.cynical-c.com/archives/bloggraphics/anatoli.jpg [cynical-c.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249154</id>
	<title>Re:Real scientist ?</title>
	<author>Smurf</author>
	<datestamp>1259317560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, like a true Slashdotter you didn't RTFA, congratulations. Dr. Jackson didn't use the exact words mentioned in the summary (except, of course, the direct quote RE: 87kg of TNT).</p><p>In reference to the black holes, he gives a short but complete explanation of why they would not destroy the planet.</p><p>And about the Higgs boson, he said "I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent."</p><p>The summary is not misleading, but the scientist didn't really use the emphasis you frown upon.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , like a true Slashdotter you did n't RTFA , congratulations .
Dr. Jackson did n't use the exact words mentioned in the summary ( except , of course , the direct quote RE : 87kg of TNT ) .In reference to the black holes , he gives a short but complete explanation of why they would not destroy the planet.And about the Higgs boson , he said " I 'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent .
" The summary is not misleading , but the scientist did n't really use the emphasis you frown upon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, like a true Slashdotter you didn't RTFA, congratulations.
Dr. Jackson didn't use the exact words mentioned in the summary (except, of course, the direct quote RE: 87kg of TNT).In reference to the black holes, he gives a short but complete explanation of why they would not destroy the planet.And about the Higgs boson, he said "I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent.
"The summary is not misleading, but the scientist didn't really use the emphasis you frown upon.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246840</id>
	<title>Re:mythbusters have to test the 87kg of TNT part n</title>
	<author>zygotic mitosis</author>
	<datestamp>1259346480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm curious about this point because under a previous LHC article, someone commented that "11 trillion electron volts sounds impressive, but when I flick something with my finger, far more energy is transferred." (paraphrase, obviously) <p>Could someone more versed in physics tell a layman how this scales up?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious about this point because under a previous LHC article , someone commented that " 11 trillion electron volts sounds impressive , but when I flick something with my finger , far more energy is transferred .
" ( paraphrase , obviously ) Could someone more versed in physics tell a layman how this scales up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious about this point because under a previous LHC article, someone commented that "11 trillion electron volts sounds impressive, but when I flick something with my finger, far more energy is transferred.
" (paraphrase, obviously) Could someone more versed in physics tell a layman how this scales up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246780</id>
	<title>Higgs boson</title>
	<author>al0ha</author>
	<datestamp>1259346060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I personally hope they don't find the Higgs boson as Dr. Hawking has predicted, as that will be far more interesting than if they do in my opinion.
<br>
<br>
"I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent. From a physicist's standpoint, if you don't find that it's almost more interesting, because it means we got it wrong and there is other stuff going on we don't understand." - Paul Jackson</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally hope they do n't find the Higgs boson as Dr. Hawking has predicted , as that will be far more interesting than if they do in my opinion .
" I 'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent .
From a physicist 's standpoint , if you do n't find that it 's almost more interesting , because it means we got it wrong and there is other stuff going on we do n't understand .
" - Paul Jackson</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally hope they don't find the Higgs boson as Dr. Hawking has predicted, as that will be far more interesting than if they do in my opinion.
"I'd put the chance we will find the Higgs boson or something similar to it at pretty close to 100 per cent.
From a physicist's standpoint, if you don't find that it's almost more interesting, because it means we got it wrong and there is other stuff going on we don't understand.
" - Paul Jackson</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248304</id>
	<title>Sort of like ....</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259312820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.</p></div><p>.... Mexican food.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body..... Mexican food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body..... Mexican food.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110</id>
	<title>Real scientist ?</title>
	<author>Zoxed</author>
	<datestamp>1259354520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Dr. Paul Jackson, a particle physicist working on the LHC's Atlas experiment, says there's no chance of black holes wiping us out, and that the time travel speculation is bunkum. He is 100\% convinced that they will find the Higgs boson.</p><p>Maybe it is me, but when I hear someone say "no chance of..." or "100\% convinced that they will find..." they sound more like a politician than a scientist. I thought the latter should have an open mind until proof was presented ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Dr. Paul Jackson , a particle physicist working on the LHC 's Atlas experiment , says there 's no chance of black holes wiping us out , and that the time travel speculation is bunkum .
He is 100 \ % convinced that they will find the Higgs boson.Maybe it is me , but when I hear someone say " no chance of... " or " 100 \ % convinced that they will find... " they sound more like a politician than a scientist .
I thought the latter should have an open mind until proof was presented ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Dr. Paul Jackson, a particle physicist working on the LHC's Atlas experiment, says there's no chance of black holes wiping us out, and that the time travel speculation is bunkum.
He is 100\% convinced that they will find the Higgs boson.Maybe it is me, but when I hear someone say "no chance of..." or "100\% convinced that they will find..." they sound more like a politician than a scientist.
I thought the latter should have an open mind until proof was presented ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246770</id>
	<title>A Modest Proposal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259346000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam? You would die. It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.</p></div><p>So you're saying it'd be pretty painless?  You <i>could</i> revolutionize <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-krinsky16-2009nov16,0,2399620.story" title="latimes.com">flawed processes we have in the United States</a> [latimes.com] by providing an alternative that may have a more expensive start up cost but would solve budget problems by providing needed services for both our prison system and science research at the same time.  I mean if we ignore the ethical problems with televised executions, the costs of an LHC could be mitigated by commercial segments<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam ?
You would die .
It would be a pretty spectacular death , and you would n't know a lot about it .
... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.So you 're saying it 'd be pretty painless ?
You could revolutionize flawed processes we have in the United States [ latimes.com ] by providing an alternative that may have a more expensive start up cost but would solve budget problems by providing needed services for both our prison system and science research at the same time .
I mean if we ignore the ethical problems with televised executions , the costs of an LHC could be mitigated by commercial segments .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam?
You would die.
It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it.
... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.So you're saying it'd be pretty painless?
You could revolutionize flawed processes we have in the United States [latimes.com] by providing an alternative that may have a more expensive start up cost but would solve budget problems by providing needed services for both our prison system and science research at the same time.
I mean if we ignore the ethical problems with televised executions, the costs of an LHC could be mitigated by commercial segments ...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247790</id>
	<title>Re:Wait What??</title>
	<author>Again</author>
	<datestamp>1259352600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Scientists using MAC's and the place controlled by Linux...</p></div><p>Yes, I'm guessing that if their computers are networked then they are using MAC addresses.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientists using MAC 's and the place controlled by Linux...Yes , I 'm guessing that if their computers are networked then they are using MAC addresses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientists using MAC's and the place controlled by Linux...Yes, I'm guessing that if their computers are networked then they are using MAC addresses.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247500</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs boson</title>
	<author>jpmorgan</author>
	<datestamp>1259350920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Personally, I hope for destructive interference from the future preventing the test from ever happening. But mostly because I want to see a progression of less and less probable occurrences delaying the event, until at the last moment when the lead scientist reaches over to press the 'on' button, he spontaneously turns into a giant codfish, as all the particles in his body tunnel into a different configuration.</p><p>Because that would be AWESOME!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I hope for destructive interference from the future preventing the test from ever happening .
But mostly because I want to see a progression of less and less probable occurrences delaying the event , until at the last moment when the lead scientist reaches over to press the 'on ' button , he spontaneously turns into a giant codfish , as all the particles in his body tunnel into a different configuration.Because that would be AWESOME !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I hope for destructive interference from the future preventing the test from ever happening.
But mostly because I want to see a progression of less and less probable occurrences delaying the event, until at the last moment when the lead scientist reaches over to press the 'on' button, he spontaneously turns into a giant codfish, as all the particles in his body tunnel into a different configuration.Because that would be AWESOME!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247912</id>
	<title>Re:mythbusters have to test the 87kg of TNT part n</title>
	<author>A Friendly Troll</author>
	<datestamp>1259353260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Your statement implies that standing in front of the beam would cause you to explode, which I very much doubt.<br>I am curious as to what actually WOULD happen.</p></div><p>This is the closest thing I could find:</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli\_Bugorski" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli\_Bugorski</a> [wikipedia.org]<br><a href="http://forgetomori.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/anatolibugorski3.jpg" title="forgetomori.com">http://forgetomori.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/anatolibugorski3.jpg</a> [forgetomori.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Your statement implies that standing in front of the beam would cause you to explode , which I very much doubt.I am curious as to what actually WOULD happen.This is the closest thing I could find : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli \ _Bugorski [ wikipedia.org ] http : //forgetomori.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/anatolibugorski3.jpg [ forgetomori.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your statement implies that standing in front of the beam would cause you to explode, which I very much doubt.I am curious as to what actually WOULD happen.This is the closest thing I could find:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli\_Bugorski [wikipedia.org]http://forgetomori.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/anatolibugorski3.jpg [forgetomori.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247378</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249576</id>
	<title>Re:Wait What??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259319660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stability is what you get when your hardware and associated hardware drivers do not suck.  It has had very little to do with ones choice of operating system for several years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stability is what you get when your hardware and associated hardware drivers do not suck .
It has had very little to do with ones choice of operating system for several years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stability is what you get when your hardware and associated hardware drivers do not suck.
It has had very little to do with ones choice of operating system for several years now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246816</id>
	<title>Stupid Scientists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259346360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone that prefers a MAC has intelligence issues..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone that prefers a MAC has intelligence issues. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone that prefers a MAC has intelligence issues..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247196</id>
	<title>Re:Working physicist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259349000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Look, kids! A real life working physicist. He's got a job that doesn't^W used to involve waiting for an internship to open up at a University."<br> <br>Fixed that for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Look , kids !
A real life working physicist .
He 's got a job that does n't ^ W used to involve waiting for an internship to open up at a University .
" Fixed that for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Look, kids!
A real life working physicist.
He's got a job that doesn't^W used to involve waiting for an internship to open up at a University.
" Fixed that for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246878</id>
	<title>DEATH BY STUPIDITY</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259346780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Einstein said '2 things i deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man'. He also explained us what mass is: a hurricane-like vortex of spacetime which according to his principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, attracts more the faster it turns. Nobel prize wilczek and myself in my work on fractal Universes showed we can find the mass of all particles by considering the frequency of those vortices. But quantum physicists wouldnt accept Einstein nd when he died tried to promote absurd theories like the 'higgs' particle which nobody knows how can give 'mass' to every other particle of the Universe if it is invisible, if particles colliding repel... But Einstein was a lonely genius and quantum physicists were doing Nuclear Bombs and Atomic cannons (LHC is aquark cannon but in orwelian neolanugage now this industry has been privatized after the cold war nd). Plainly speaking we do not need this Damocles machine, a 13 billion $ hoax who prevents the expansion of true science, denies Einstein's work and will produce black holes and Einstein's quark condensates responsible for nova explosions. But a marketing campaing has convinced mankind with the hype of replicating the big-bang of the Earth and find the absurd Higgs particle that Nobel Prizeweinberg called the toilet particle to be flush in a vortex of mass of Doctor Einstein as the Earth will be this christmas. We will indeed die of infinite stupidity, because a extinct species nows nothing=0 and Knowledge/0=Infinite stupidity. Einstein also said 'those who pretend to impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Einstein said '2 things i deem infinite , the Universe and the stupidity of man' .
He also explained us what mass is : a hurricane-like vortex of spacetime which according to his principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration , attracts more the faster it turns .
Nobel prize wilczek and myself in my work on fractal Universes showed we can find the mass of all particles by considering the frequency of those vortices .
But quantum physicists wouldnt accept Einstein nd when he died tried to promote absurd theories like the 'higgs ' particle which nobody knows how can give 'mass ' to every other particle of the Universe if it is invisible , if particles colliding repel... But Einstein was a lonely genius and quantum physicists were doing Nuclear Bombs and Atomic cannons ( LHC is aquark cannon but in orwelian neolanugage now this industry has been privatized after the cold war nd ) .
Plainly speaking we do not need this Damocles machine , a 13 billion $ hoax who prevents the expansion of true science , denies Einstein 's work and will produce black holes and Einstein 's quark condensates responsible for nova explosions .
But a marketing campaing has convinced mankind with the hype of replicating the big-bang of the Earth and find the absurd Higgs particle that Nobel Prizeweinberg called the toilet particle to be flush in a vortex of mass of Doctor Einstein as the Earth will be this christmas .
We will indeed die of infinite stupidity , because a extinct species nows nothing = 0 and Knowledge/0 = Infinite stupidity .
Einstein also said 'those who pretend to impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Einstein said '2 things i deem infinite, the Universe and the stupidity of man'.
He also explained us what mass is: a hurricane-like vortex of spacetime which according to his principle of equivalence between mass and acceleration, attracts more the faster it turns.
Nobel prize wilczek and myself in my work on fractal Universes showed we can find the mass of all particles by considering the frequency of those vortices.
But quantum physicists wouldnt accept Einstein nd when he died tried to promote absurd theories like the 'higgs' particle which nobody knows how can give 'mass' to every other particle of the Universe if it is invisible, if particles colliding repel... But Einstein was a lonely genius and quantum physicists were doing Nuclear Bombs and Atomic cannons (LHC is aquark cannon but in orwelian neolanugage now this industry has been privatized after the cold war nd).
Plainly speaking we do not need this Damocles machine, a 13 billion $ hoax who prevents the expansion of true science, denies Einstein's work and will produce black holes and Einstein's quark condensates responsible for nova explosions.
But a marketing campaing has convinced mankind with the hype of replicating the big-bang of the Earth and find the absurd Higgs particle that Nobel Prizeweinberg called the toilet particle to be flush in a vortex of mass of Doctor Einstein as the Earth will be this christmas.
We will indeed die of infinite stupidity, because a extinct species nows nothing=0 and Knowledge/0=Infinite stupidity.
Einstein also said 'those who pretend to impose truth with power will be the laugh of the gods'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756</id>
	<title>mythbusters have to test the 87kg of TNT part now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259345940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body." jamie wants big boom</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body .
" jamie wants big boom</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.
" jamie wants big boom</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246890</id>
	<title>visions in my head</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1259346900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam? You would die. It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body."</i></p><p>Am I the only one that <i>IMMEDIATELY</i> pulled up the vision of the green beams combining inside the deathstar?</p><p>(<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxMd93aCvd0" title="youtube.com">deathsar firing</a> [youtube.com] at 30 sec)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam ?
You would die .
It would be a pretty spectacular death , and you would n't know a lot about it .
... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body .
" Am I the only one that IMMEDIATELY pulled up the vision of the green beams combining inside the deathstar ?
( deathsar firing [ youtube.com ] at 30 sec )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam?
You would die.
It would be a pretty spectacular death, and you wouldn't know a lot about it.
... It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.
"Am I the only one that IMMEDIATELY pulled up the vision of the green beams combining inside the deathstar?
(deathsar firing [youtube.com] at 30 sec)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249846</id>
	<title>dumbed it down more plz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259321100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So it would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body</p></div><p>I guess dump=ignite.</p><p>I wonder what is the energy efficiency of these electromagnetic accelerators: i.e. (beam power)/(operating power); I assume LHC will not qualify for any government green rebates by a long shot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So it would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your bodyI guess dump = ignite.I wonder what is the energy efficiency of these electromagnetic accelerators : i.e .
( beam power ) / ( operating power ) ; I assume LHC will not qualify for any government green rebates by a long shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So it would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your bodyI guess dump=ignite.I wonder what is the energy efficiency of these electromagnetic accelerators: i.e.
(beam power)/(operating power); I assume LHC will not qualify for any government green rebates by a long shot.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142</id>
	<title>Anatoli Bugorski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259348640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>source : <a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/science.html" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/science.html</a> [wired.com]</p><p>====== snip======<br>So it was in 1978 that when the proton beam entered Anatoli Bugorski's skull it measured about 200,000 rads, and when it exited, having collided with the inside of his head, it weighed in at about 300,000 rads. Bugorski, a 36-year-old researcher at the Institute for High Energy Physics in Protvino, was checking a piece of accelerator equipment that had malfunctioned - as had, apparently, the several safety mechanisms. Leaning over the piece of equipment, Bugorski stuck his head in the space through which the beam passes on its way from one part of the accelerator tube to the next and saw a flash brighter than a thousand suns. He felt no pain.</p><p>From what we know about radiation, about 500 to 600 rads is enough to kill a person (though we don't know of anyone else who has been exposed to radiation in the form of a proton beam moving at about the speed of sound). The left side of his face swollen beyond recognition, Bugorski was taken to a clinic in Moscow so that doctors could observe his death over the following two to three weeks.</p><p>Over the next few days, skin on the back of his head and on his face just next to his left nostril peeled away to reveal the path the beam had burned through the skin, the skull, and the brain tissue. The inside of his head continued to burn away: all the nerves on the left were gone in two years, paralyzing that side of his face. Still, not only did Bugorski not die, but he remained a normally functioning human being, capable even of continuing in science. For the first dozen years, the only real evidence that something had gone neurologically awry were occasional petit mal seizures; over the last few years Bugorski has also had six grand mals. The dividing line of his life goes down the middle of his face: the right side has aged, while the left froze 19 years ago. When he concentrates, he wrinkles only half his forehead.<br>====== snip======</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>source : http : //www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/science.html [ wired.com ] = = = = = = snip = = = = = = So it was in 1978 that when the proton beam entered Anatoli Bugorski 's skull it measured about 200,000 rads , and when it exited , having collided with the inside of his head , it weighed in at about 300,000 rads .
Bugorski , a 36-year-old researcher at the Institute for High Energy Physics in Protvino , was checking a piece of accelerator equipment that had malfunctioned - as had , apparently , the several safety mechanisms .
Leaning over the piece of equipment , Bugorski stuck his head in the space through which the beam passes on its way from one part of the accelerator tube to the next and saw a flash brighter than a thousand suns .
He felt no pain.From what we know about radiation , about 500 to 600 rads is enough to kill a person ( though we do n't know of anyone else who has been exposed to radiation in the form of a proton beam moving at about the speed of sound ) .
The left side of his face swollen beyond recognition , Bugorski was taken to a clinic in Moscow so that doctors could observe his death over the following two to three weeks.Over the next few days , skin on the back of his head and on his face just next to his left nostril peeled away to reveal the path the beam had burned through the skin , the skull , and the brain tissue .
The inside of his head continued to burn away : all the nerves on the left were gone in two years , paralyzing that side of his face .
Still , not only did Bugorski not die , but he remained a normally functioning human being , capable even of continuing in science .
For the first dozen years , the only real evidence that something had gone neurologically awry were occasional petit mal seizures ; over the last few years Bugorski has also had six grand mals .
The dividing line of his life goes down the middle of his face : the right side has aged , while the left froze 19 years ago .
When he concentrates , he wrinkles only half his forehead. = = = = = = snip = = = = = =</tokentext>
<sentencetext>source : http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.12/science.html [wired.com]====== snip======So it was in 1978 that when the proton beam entered Anatoli Bugorski's skull it measured about 200,000 rads, and when it exited, having collided with the inside of his head, it weighed in at about 300,000 rads.
Bugorski, a 36-year-old researcher at the Institute for High Energy Physics in Protvino, was checking a piece of accelerator equipment that had malfunctioned - as had, apparently, the several safety mechanisms.
Leaning over the piece of equipment, Bugorski stuck his head in the space through which the beam passes on its way from one part of the accelerator tube to the next and saw a flash brighter than a thousand suns.
He felt no pain.From what we know about radiation, about 500 to 600 rads is enough to kill a person (though we don't know of anyone else who has been exposed to radiation in the form of a proton beam moving at about the speed of sound).
The left side of his face swollen beyond recognition, Bugorski was taken to a clinic in Moscow so that doctors could observe his death over the following two to three weeks.Over the next few days, skin on the back of his head and on his face just next to his left nostril peeled away to reveal the path the beam had burned through the skin, the skull, and the brain tissue.
The inside of his head continued to burn away: all the nerves on the left were gone in two years, paralyzing that side of his face.
Still, not only did Bugorski not die, but he remained a normally functioning human being, capable even of continuing in science.
For the first dozen years, the only real evidence that something had gone neurologically awry were occasional petit mal seizures; over the last few years Bugorski has also had six grand mals.
The dividing line of his life goes down the middle of his face: the right side has aged, while the left froze 19 years ago.
When he concentrates, he wrinkles only half his forehead.====== snip======</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247044</id>
	<title>Dumped through where?</title>
	<author>Moraelin</author>
	<datestamp>1259347920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now I'm thinking that depending on which opening you drop those 87 kg of TNT into someone's body, this may finally be a thread where the goatse link isn't off-topic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now I 'm thinking that depending on which opening you drop those 87 kg of TNT into someone 's body , this may finally be a thread where the goatse link is n't off-topic ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now I'm thinking that depending on which opening you drop those 87 kg of TNT into someone's body, this may finally be a thread where the goatse link isn't off-topic ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248346</id>
	<title>Alternative to death</title>
	<author>Anonymous Matt</author>
	<datestamp>1259313060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam? You would die."</p></div><p>Or through a fluke of physics you'd become a super hero. The Higgs is called the "God particle" for a reason. Of course, nobody would stand in front of the beam for a while, because of all the safety precautions. But a few years from now maybe in 2012 when everybody's relaxed and used to working on it, it could happen. Probably around the holidays when people are distracted most. Probably around Christmas, since that's a big, stressful holiday and everybody's thinking about everything but work. It wouldn't happen on Christmas day itself but most likely a few days before that like around December 21 maybe. As a physicist the interviewee should expect strange things like that to happen. Where's the imagination? This is what happens when they interview Dr. Paul Jackson instead of Dr. Daniel Jackson.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam ?
You would die .
" Or through a fluke of physics you 'd become a super hero .
The Higgs is called the " God particle " for a reason .
Of course , nobody would stand in front of the beam for a while , because of all the safety precautions .
But a few years from now maybe in 2012 when everybody 's relaxed and used to working on it , it could happen .
Probably around the holidays when people are distracted most .
Probably around Christmas , since that 's a big , stressful holiday and everybody 's thinking about everything but work .
It would n't happen on Christmas day itself but most likely a few days before that like around December 21 maybe .
As a physicist the interviewee should expect strange things like that to happen .
Where 's the imagination ?
This is what happens when they interview Dr. Paul Jackson instead of Dr. Daniel Jackson .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What would happen if you were standing in front of the beam?
You would die.
"Or through a fluke of physics you'd become a super hero.
The Higgs is called the "God particle" for a reason.
Of course, nobody would stand in front of the beam for a while, because of all the safety precautions.
But a few years from now maybe in 2012 when everybody's relaxed and used to working on it, it could happen.
Probably around the holidays when people are distracted most.
Probably around Christmas, since that's a big, stressful holiday and everybody's thinking about everything but work.
It wouldn't happen on Christmas day itself but most likely a few days before that like around December 21 maybe.
As a physicist the interviewee should expect strange things like that to happen.
Where's the imagination?
This is what happens when they interview Dr. Paul Jackson instead of Dr. Daniel Jackson.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248092</id>
	<title>Re:You wouldn't feel a thing</title>
	<author>careysub</author>
	<datestamp>1259354340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p> and you wouldn't know a lot about it.</p></div><p>...not after being cooled down to -271 C and exposed to vacuum (if you were very lucky, in that order)...</p></div><p>You don't need to get all frigid to have a meet and greet with the beam. They extract it and fire it down a 600 m tunnel, where it hits a 5 ton graphite cylinder know as the beam dump, to shut down the accelerator. Stand anywhere in the tunnel and all you'll need is some bottled oxygen or a bubble  (the tunnel is flooded with pure nitrogen since the beam dump would catch fire in an oxygen containing environment)./P</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and you would n't know a lot about it....not after being cooled down to -271 C and exposed to vacuum ( if you were very lucky , in that order ) ...You do n't need to get all frigid to have a meet and greet with the beam .
They extract it and fire it down a 600 m tunnel , where it hits a 5 ton graphite cylinder know as the beam dump , to shut down the accelerator .
Stand anywhere in the tunnel and all you 'll need is some bottled oxygen or a bubble ( the tunnel is flooded with pure nitrogen since the beam dump would catch fire in an oxygen containing environment ) ./P</tokentext>
<sentencetext> and you wouldn't know a lot about it....not after being cooled down to -271 C and exposed to vacuum (if you were very lucky, in that order)...You don't need to get all frigid to have a meet and greet with the beam.
They extract it and fire it down a 600 m tunnel, where it hits a 5 ton graphite cylinder know as the beam dump, to shut down the accelerator.
Stand anywhere in the tunnel and all you'll need is some bottled oxygen or a bubble  (the tunnel is flooded with pure nitrogen since the beam dump would catch fire in an oxygen containing environment)./P
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246832</id>
	<title>Re:mythbusters have to test the 87kg of TNT part n</title>
	<author>spammeister</author>
	<datestamp>1259346480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And then when THAT ultimately doesn't work, they put in 10 times the amount and do it again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And then when THAT ultimately does n't work , they put in 10 times the amount and do it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then when THAT ultimately doesn't work, they put in 10 times the amount and do it again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246786</id>
	<title>87 Kg TNT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259346120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sould probably leave a bit of a mess...   Albeit in little tiny pieces!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sould probably leave a bit of a mess... Albeit in little tiny pieces !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sould probably leave a bit of a mess...   Albeit in little tiny pieces!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30250658</id>
	<title>Re:Anatoli Bugorski</title>
	<author>toxygen01</author>
	<datestamp>1259325540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>proton beam moving at about the speed of sound</p></div><p>just to fix that, speed of <b>light</b>
<br>
otherwise perfect info, thanks for sharing!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>proton beam moving at about the speed of soundjust to fix that , speed of light otherwise perfect info , thanks for sharing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>proton beam moving at about the speed of soundjust to fix that, speed of light

otherwise perfect info, thanks for sharing!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248284</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid Scientists</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259312700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Anyone that prefers a MAC has intelligence issues.</p></div><p>Yes. They prefer to apply it to something other than keeping their computing system up and running.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone that prefers a MAC has intelligence issues.Yes .
They prefer to apply it to something other than keeping their computing system up and running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone that prefers a MAC has intelligence issues.Yes.
They prefer to apply it to something other than keeping their computing system up and running.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30253990</id>
	<title>Re:A Modest Proposal</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1259416560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>So you're saying it'd be pretty painless?</i></p><p>Executions are small potatoes. Think suicide machines! Die painlessly now! Mind you this is the most expensive suicide booth I've ever heard of!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying it 'd be pretty painless ? Executions are small potatoes .
Think suicide machines !
Die painlessly now !
Mind you this is the most expensive suicide booth I 've ever heard of !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying it'd be pretty painless?Executions are small potatoes.
Think suicide machines!
Die painlessly now!
Mind you this is the most expensive suicide booth I've ever heard of!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249086</id>
	<title>Best quotes of the interview</title>
	<author>wickerprints</author>
	<datestamp>1259317140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Q:  Have you tried to introduce the Kit Kat?</p><p>A:  "Yes, the Brits have tried and it's in one of the vending machines, but it's not going down so well with the Swiss."</p><p>Q:  It must be a fairly geeky place to work. What does it smell like?</p><p>A:  "It smells probably much like you'd expect -- a bit 'games-heavy'. The experimentalists and the theoretical physicists have a different odour. The excessive amount of soft cheese in the area doesn't add to the spring-time freshness of the site."</p></div></blockquote><p>LMAO.  Well worth the read.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : Have you tried to introduce the Kit Kat ? A : " Yes , the Brits have tried and it 's in one of the vending machines , but it 's not going down so well with the Swiss .
" Q : It must be a fairly geeky place to work .
What does it smell like ? A : " It smells probably much like you 'd expect -- a bit 'games-heavy' .
The experimentalists and the theoretical physicists have a different odour .
The excessive amount of soft cheese in the area does n't add to the spring-time freshness of the site. " LMAO .
Well worth the read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q:  Have you tried to introduce the Kit Kat?A:  "Yes, the Brits have tried and it's in one of the vending machines, but it's not going down so well with the Swiss.
"Q:  It must be a fairly geeky place to work.
What does it smell like?A:  "It smells probably much like you'd expect -- a bit 'games-heavy'.
The experimentalists and the theoretical physicists have a different odour.
The excessive amount of soft cheese in the area doesn't add to the spring-time freshness of the site."LMAO.
Well worth the read.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30250358</id>
	<title>Holy strange analogy, Batman!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259323800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.</p></div><p>The assumption being that the TNT is exploded once it's in your body? Or are we talking about a stream of TNT that's exploding as it's entering the body?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.The assumption being that the TNT is exploded once it 's in your body ?
Or are we talking about a stream of TNT that 's exploding as it 's entering the body ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be the equivalent of having 87kg of TNT dumped into your body.The assumption being that the TNT is exploded once it's in your body?
Or are we talking about a stream of TNT that's exploding as it's entering the body?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247084</id>
	<title>Re:A Modest Proposal</title>
	<author>gmueckl</author>
	<datestamp>1259348220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is, if you figure out how to clean up the mess - or what's left of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is , if you figure out how to clean up the mess - or what 's left of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is, if you figure out how to clean up the mess - or what's left of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247006</id>
	<title>Re:mythbusters have to test the 87kg of TNT part n</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1259347560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IANAP*, but I do play one on TV.</p><p>You see Volts deal with Electrons, and Electrons are really tiny. Fingers aren't very big either, but they are bigger than electrons [citation needed]. Some scientist somewhere took 11 trillion electrons with 1 volt each and sent them towards a single finger, in flicking motion. The battle raged for just over a year, and in the end, the finger was the victor.</p><p>*or a lawyer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAP * , but I do play one on TV.You see Volts deal with Electrons , and Electrons are really tiny .
Fingers are n't very big either , but they are bigger than electrons [ citation needed ] .
Some scientist somewhere took 11 trillion electrons with 1 volt each and sent them towards a single finger , in flicking motion .
The battle raged for just over a year , and in the end , the finger was the victor .
* or a lawyer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAP*, but I do play one on TV.You see Volts deal with Electrons, and Electrons are really tiny.
Fingers aren't very big either, but they are bigger than electrons [citation needed].
Some scientist somewhere took 11 trillion electrons with 1 volt each and sent them towards a single finger, in flicking motion.
The battle raged for just over a year, and in the end, the finger was the victor.
*or a lawyer</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249210</id>
	<title>Re:Anatoli Bugorski</title>
	<author>Smurf</author>
	<datestamp>1259317980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fascinating. Thanks for the info.</p><p>But do take into account that Bugorski was using an accelerator from 1978, and for all we know it may not have been one of the top of the line even at that time. The LHC is the most powerful accelerator built till now, and 30 years have passed. Chances are that the beams Dr. Jackson refers to are orders of magnitude more energetic than the one that hit Bugorski.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fascinating .
Thanks for the info.But do take into account that Bugorski was using an accelerator from 1978 , and for all we know it may not have been one of the top of the line even at that time .
The LHC is the most powerful accelerator built till now , and 30 years have passed .
Chances are that the beams Dr. Jackson refers to are orders of magnitude more energetic than the one that hit Bugorski .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fascinating.
Thanks for the info.But do take into account that Bugorski was using an accelerator from 1978, and for all we know it may not have been one of the top of the line even at that time.
The LHC is the most powerful accelerator built till now, and 30 years have passed.
Chances are that the beams Dr. Jackson refers to are orders of magnitude more energetic than the one that hit Bugorski.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247028</id>
	<title>Re:Higgs boson</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1259347740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope they do find it. Simply because it has public interest. On<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. everyone gets that if it isn't found that would be GOOD science. The general populace will be like BOOO science sucks, it never gives any answers, I love jeeebus. Scientists wrong again. And honestly? I'd much rather have something called the GOD-particle proven true just to have another 'Science, it works bitches' moment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope they do find it .
Simply because it has public interest .
On / .
everyone gets that if it is n't found that would be GOOD science .
The general populace will be like BOOO science sucks , it never gives any answers , I love jeeebus .
Scientists wrong again .
And honestly ?
I 'd much rather have something called the GOD-particle proven true just to have another 'Science , it works bitches ' moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope they do find it.
Simply because it has public interest.
On /.
everyone gets that if it isn't found that would be GOOD science.
The general populace will be like BOOO science sucks, it never gives any answers, I love jeeebus.
Scientists wrong again.
And honestly?
I'd much rather have something called the GOD-particle proven true just to have another 'Science, it works bitches' moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246798</id>
	<title>Wait What??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259346180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientists using MAC's and the place controlled by Linux...</p><p>This flies in the face of all the Microsoft Advertising!  You mean reality and what I see in print and TV are not the same?!?!!?!</p><p>I'm just happy to use this as a new item to throw in front of the MSFT fanbois at work..  Hmm, Microsoft is not stable enough to run this important facility, Why do we trust it here?</p><p>It will make them squirm...  I love making them squirm...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientists using MAC 's and the place controlled by Linux...This flies in the face of all the Microsoft Advertising !
You mean reality and what I see in print and TV are not the same ? ! ? ! ! ?
! I 'm just happy to use this as a new item to throw in front of the MSFT fanbois at work.. Hmm , Microsoft is not stable enough to run this important facility , Why do we trust it here ? It will make them squirm... I love making them squirm.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientists using MAC's and the place controlled by Linux...This flies in the face of all the Microsoft Advertising!
You mean reality and what I see in print and TV are not the same?!?!!?
!I'm just happy to use this as a new item to throw in front of the MSFT fanbois at work..  Hmm, Microsoft is not stable enough to run this important facility, Why do we trust it here?It will make them squirm...  I love making them squirm...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248282</id>
	<title>Re:Anatoli Bugorski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259312640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From what we know about radiation, about 500 to 600 rads is enough to kill a person (though we don't know of anyone else who has been exposed to radiation in the form of a proton beam moving at about the speed of sound).</p></div><p>Sound propagates at the speed of light in your area?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From what we know about radiation , about 500 to 600 rads is enough to kill a person ( though we do n't know of anyone else who has been exposed to radiation in the form of a proton beam moving at about the speed of sound ) .Sound propagates at the speed of light in your area ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what we know about radiation, about 500 to 600 rads is enough to kill a person (though we don't know of anyone else who has been exposed to radiation in the form of a proton beam moving at about the speed of sound).Sound propagates at the speed of light in your area?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247112</id>
	<title>You wouldn't feel a thing</title>
	<author>itsdapead</author>
	<datestamp>1259348460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> and you wouldn't know a lot about it.</p></div><p>...not after being cooled down to -271 C and exposed to vacuum (if you were very lucky, in that order)...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and you would n't know a lot about it....not after being cooled down to -271 C and exposed to vacuum ( if you were very lucky , in that order ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> and you wouldn't know a lot about it....not after being cooled down to -271 C and exposed to vacuum (if you were very lucky, in that order)...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247248</id>
	<title>Euro Scientists</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1259349240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
"The scientists there favor Macs"
</p><p>
Even the physicists turn pansy in Europe.  A disgrace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The scientists there favor Macs " Even the physicists turn pansy in Europe .
A disgrace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
"The scientists there favor Macs"

Even the physicists turn pansy in Europe.
A disgrace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30253990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246770
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_27_1545259_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30250658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246890
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30253990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246878
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30246816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_27_1545259.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30247142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30248282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30250658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_27_1545259.30249210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
