<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_26_1941244</id>
	<title>Apple Newton vs. Apple iPhone</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259224140000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"CNET UK has written a head-to-head piece entitled <a href="http://crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/0,39029552,49304363-1,00.htm">Apple Newton vs Apple iPhone</a>. Despite the Newton being released some 10 years ago, and despite the iPhone being a phone, not a tablet, the site's editors believe the Newton is the more innovative of the two Apple products. The two devices were tied over four rounds, but in the 'Special Powers' element, where the iPhone was praised for its iPod capability, the Newton countered with its ability to play MP3s, connect to iTunes and 'its ability to work as a phone' because 'Blam! Not even the iPhone can do that.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " CNET UK has written a head-to-head piece entitled Apple Newton vs Apple iPhone .
Despite the Newton being released some 10 years ago , and despite the iPhone being a phone , not a tablet , the site 's editors believe the Newton is the more innovative of the two Apple products .
The two devices were tied over four rounds , but in the 'Special Powers ' element , where the iPhone was praised for its iPod capability , the Newton countered with its ability to play MP3s , connect to iTunes and 'its ability to work as a phone ' because 'Blam !
Not even the iPhone can do that .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "CNET UK has written a head-to-head piece entitled Apple Newton vs Apple iPhone.
Despite the Newton being released some 10 years ago, and despite the iPhone being a phone, not a tablet, the site's editors believe the Newton is the more innovative of the two Apple products.
The two devices were tied over four rounds, but in the 'Special Powers' element, where the iPhone was praised for its iPod capability, the Newton countered with its ability to play MP3s, connect to iTunes and 'its ability to work as a phone' because 'Blam!
Not even the iPhone can do that.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239560</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259229120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I have an iphone and love it. Amazing phone. But like just about everything else Apple has done, it's not really "innovative."</i></p><p>Of course the iphone is innovative. Who else but apple would think it's a good idea to blindly execute whatever program it receives by SMS?</p><p><a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/1210222/iPhone-Vulnerability-Yields-Root-Access-Via-SMS?from=rss" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/1210222/iPhone-Vulnerability-Yields-Root-Access-Via-SMS?from=rss</a> [slashdot.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iphone and love it .
Amazing phone .
But like just about everything else Apple has done , it 's not really " innovative .
" Of course the iphone is innovative .
Who else but apple would think it 's a good idea to blindly execute whatever program it receives by SMS ? http : //it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/1210222/iPhone-Vulnerability-Yields-Root-Access-Via-SMS ? from = rss [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iphone and love it.
Amazing phone.
But like just about everything else Apple has done, it's not really "innovative.
"Of course the iphone is innovative.
Who else but apple would think it's a good idea to blindly execute whatever program it receives by SMS?http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/07/03/1210222/iPhone-Vulnerability-Yields-Root-Access-Via-SMS?from=rss [slashdot.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239916</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1259232660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>history and every industry that exists today would beg to differ.</p><p>Not everyone is successful with innovation, but innovation (and invention) are what can enable success.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>history and every industry that exists today would beg to differ.Not everyone is successful with innovation , but innovation ( and invention ) are what can enable success .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>history and every industry that exists today would beg to differ.Not everyone is successful with innovation, but innovation (and invention) are what can enable success.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239662</id>
	<title>Sometimes packaging is the innovation</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1259230020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Um what?  If the iPhone was nothing new, when it was released and even now, you wouldn't have competitors scrambling to catch up.  If there was no innovation, there wouldn't be anything to catch up to.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Um what ?
If the iPhone was nothing new , when it was released and even now , you would n't have competitors scrambling to catch up .
If there was no innovation , there would n't be anything to catch up to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Um what?
If the iPhone was nothing new, when it was released and even now, you wouldn't have competitors scrambling to catch up.
If there was no innovation, there wouldn't be anything to catch up to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30248362</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259313180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the funniest things I ever read was The Irish Times Technology Editor writing that Apple invented Midi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the funniest things I ever read was The Irish Times Technology Editor writing that Apple invented Midi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the funniest things I ever read was The Irish Times Technology Editor writing that Apple invented Midi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239590</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>drdrgivemethenews</author>
	<datestamp>1259229360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have an iphone (3Gs) and hate it. Terrible phone.  Nice toy though.  Even though I hate the keyboard, I have to say that the large screen was the innovation that sold me: I can actually read a slashdot story on this device. But so many things are broken, it's just too much. Some of it is ATT, yes.<br> <br>

I'm going to Verizon Real Soon Now, for real phone service, and getting a real GPS, so my locator service will actually work when I need it, not just 1/3 of the time. Those are the two things I really wanted out of a phone, and I'm not getting either of them now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iphone ( 3Gs ) and hate it .
Terrible phone .
Nice toy though .
Even though I hate the keyboard , I have to say that the large screen was the innovation that sold me : I can actually read a slashdot story on this device .
But so many things are broken , it 's just too much .
Some of it is ATT , yes .
I 'm going to Verizon Real Soon Now , for real phone service , and getting a real GPS , so my locator service will actually work when I need it , not just 1/3 of the time .
Those are the two things I really wanted out of a phone , and I 'm not getting either of them now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iphone (3Gs) and hate it.
Terrible phone.
Nice toy though.
Even though I hate the keyboard, I have to say that the large screen was the innovation that sold me: I can actually read a slashdot story on this device.
But so many things are broken, it's just too much.
Some of it is ATT, yes.
I'm going to Verizon Real Soon Now, for real phone service, and getting a real GPS, so my locator service will actually work when I need it, not just 1/3 of the time.
Those are the two things I really wanted out of a phone, and I'm not getting either of them now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241798</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>drerwk</author>
	<datestamp>1259248200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple II ? <br>
Hypercard ?<br>
Quicktime ?<br>
Finalcut ? <br>
Desktop publishing ?<br>
All seem pretty innovative to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple II ?
Hypercard ?
Quicktime ?
Finalcut ?
Desktop publishing ?
All seem pretty innovative to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple II ?
Hypercard ?
Quicktime ?
Finalcut ?
Desktop publishing ?
All seem pretty innovative to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239684</id>
	<title>Re:Innovative?</title>
	<author>Evets</author>
	<datestamp>1259230260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even that touch wheel wasn't really something they thought of.  They won the race to the patent office, but not by much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even that touch wheel was n't really something they thought of .
They won the race to the patent office , but not by much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even that touch wheel wasn't really something they thought of.
They won the race to the patent office, but not by much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240084</id>
	<title>iPhone do two things "uniquely"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259233980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not because of any special engineering ability, but because they've simply made it an important design must for the iPhone.</p><p>They have a BIG ASS SCREEN in a slim package. Yes there are other phones with BIG ASS SCREENS, but they have these slide out keyboards that make the case thicker than J.Lo's booty. And the one HTC phone that has a BIG ASS SCREEN in a slender case, it's super EXPENSIVE AS SHIT.</p><p>The key to a beating the iPhone will be a BIG ASS SCREEN in a SLIM CASE, at a lower cost. Then will the tyranny of Steve Jobs end.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not because of any special engineering ability , but because they 've simply made it an important design must for the iPhone.They have a BIG ASS SCREEN in a slim package .
Yes there are other phones with BIG ASS SCREENS , but they have these slide out keyboards that make the case thicker than J.Lo 's booty .
And the one HTC phone that has a BIG ASS SCREEN in a slender case , it 's super EXPENSIVE AS SHIT.The key to a beating the iPhone will be a BIG ASS SCREEN in a SLIM CASE , at a lower cost .
Then will the tyranny of Steve Jobs end .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not because of any special engineering ability, but because they've simply made it an important design must for the iPhone.They have a BIG ASS SCREEN in a slim package.
Yes there are other phones with BIG ASS SCREENS, but they have these slide out keyboards that make the case thicker than J.Lo's booty.
And the one HTC phone that has a BIG ASS SCREEN in a slender case, it's super EXPENSIVE AS SHIT.The key to a beating the iPhone will be a BIG ASS SCREEN in a SLIM CASE, at a lower cost.
Then will the tyranny of Steve Jobs end.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240178</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259234820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not innovative? I'm not sure what does that means, but I don't remember to have seen a (multi-)touch Phone before the iPhone. Now the market is full of them, after the iP</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not innovative ?
I 'm not sure what does that means , but I do n't remember to have seen a ( multi- ) touch Phone before the iPhone .
Now the market is full of them , after the iP</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not innovative?
I'm not sure what does that means, but I don't remember to have seen a (multi-)touch Phone before the iPhone.
Now the market is full of them, after the iP</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30250596</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Mista2</author>
	<datestamp>1259325180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And all-in-one computers, and miniturised desktops like the mini, and display port, and mini display port, colour matched screens, laptops with 7 hours battery life. Apple tends to have innovated very well. However iPods were nothing new, they were just the best marketed and most successful portable digital music player.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And all-in-one computers , and miniturised desktops like the mini , and display port , and mini display port , colour matched screens , laptops with 7 hours battery life .
Apple tends to have innovated very well .
However iPods were nothing new , they were just the best marketed and most successful portable digital music player .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And all-in-one computers, and miniturised desktops like the mini, and display port, and mini display port, colour matched screens, laptops with 7 hours battery life.
Apple tends to have innovated very well.
However iPods were nothing new, they were just the best marketed and most successful portable digital music player.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30247172</id>
	<title>OCR</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259348820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they overdid the dissing of handwritten character recognition.  The iphone would be great if they ported calligrapher to it.  (From the same guys who did the OCR for the Newton, and they were still in business several years ago when I last checked and had released OCR software for wince(...and I do), and a couple other devices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they overdid the dissing of handwritten character recognition .
The iphone would be great if they ported calligrapher to it .
( From the same guys who did the OCR for the Newton , and they were still in business several years ago when I last checked and had released OCR software for wince ( ...and I do ) , and a couple other devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they overdid the dissing of handwritten character recognition.
The iphone would be great if they ported calligrapher to it.
(From the same guys who did the OCR for the Newton, and they were still in business several years ago when I last checked and had released OCR software for wince(...and I do), and a couple other devices.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239430</id>
	<title>2nd!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2nd!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2nd ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2nd!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241456</id>
	<title>Re:okChristmas sale, free shipping shoes,handbags.</title>
	<author>coolforsale128</author>
	<datestamp>1259245020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244566</id>
	<title>Interesting point</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1259327520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or that's my $0.02</p></div><p>(Pardon the pun) you are right on the money!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or that 's my $ 0.02 ( Pardon the pun ) you are right on the money !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or that's my $0.02(Pardon the pun) you are right on the money!
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244996</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1259333460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who still goes on about the "Year of Linux on the Desktop"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who still goes on about the " Year of Linux on the Desktop " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who still goes on about the "Year of Linux on the Desktop"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244018</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1259318820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Same.  And yes, apple do not do anything much new.  However what they DO do, is take an existing technology (or multiple) and integrate them tightly into devices that "just work".  My iphone is used as a GPS, mail reader, map, telephone directory, notepad, web browser and for various other small applications.  And unlike my previous phones, it does all of those tasks pretty damn well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Same .
And yes , apple do not do anything much new .
However what they DO do , is take an existing technology ( or multiple ) and integrate them tightly into devices that " just work " .
My iphone is used as a GPS , mail reader , map , telephone directory , notepad , web browser and for various other small applications .
And unlike my previous phones , it does all of those tasks pretty damn well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same.
And yes, apple do not do anything much new.
However what they DO do, is take an existing technology (or multiple) and integrate them tightly into devices that "just work".
My iphone is used as a GPS, mail reader, map, telephone directory, notepad, web browser and for various other small applications.
And unlike my previous phones, it does all of those tasks pretty damn well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30250542</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Mista2</author>
	<datestamp>1259324880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of the other competitors are also racing to make the cheapest phone, so you get crappy batteries, overheating chargers, plasic screens and creaky flexible cases. I stuck with nokia for a long time on my phone simply because all of their chargers and accessories worked well with every model. Now with iPhone, I can charge it on my PC, in it's dock on my stereo, and in my car, and now OS3 gave it stereo bluetooth, I can get audio out on many devices too. It also has a standard 3mm earphone jack, I can play on any stereo on the planet with a simple RCA adapter cable.</p><p>That aside the glass screen has remained scratch free and is easy to clean, the solid case means nothing has broken or fallen off, and the reall metal trim has not worn out and faded so it looks as good now as it did when I bought it 2 yeas ago, unlike the palm it replaced which alshouth a good handset, looked like it had been through the wringer after only 6 months inmy pocket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the other competitors are also racing to make the cheapest phone , so you get crappy batteries , overheating chargers , plasic screens and creaky flexible cases .
I stuck with nokia for a long time on my phone simply because all of their chargers and accessories worked well with every model .
Now with iPhone , I can charge it on my PC , in it 's dock on my stereo , and in my car , and now OS3 gave it stereo bluetooth , I can get audio out on many devices too .
It also has a standard 3mm earphone jack , I can play on any stereo on the planet with a simple RCA adapter cable.That aside the glass screen has remained scratch free and is easy to clean , the solid case means nothing has broken or fallen off , and the reall metal trim has not worn out and faded so it looks as good now as it did when I bought it 2 yeas ago , unlike the palm it replaced which alshouth a good handset , looked like it had been through the wringer after only 6 months inmy pocket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the other competitors are also racing to make the cheapest phone, so you get crappy batteries, overheating chargers, plasic screens and creaky flexible cases.
I stuck with nokia for a long time on my phone simply because all of their chargers and accessories worked well with every model.
Now with iPhone, I can charge it on my PC, in it's dock on my stereo, and in my car, and now OS3 gave it stereo bluetooth, I can get audio out on many devices too.
It also has a standard 3mm earphone jack, I can play on any stereo on the planet with a simple RCA adapter cable.That aside the glass screen has remained scratch free and is easy to clean, the solid case means nothing has broken or fallen off, and the reall metal trim has not worn out and faded so it looks as good now as it did when I bought it 2 yeas ago, unlike the palm it replaced which alshouth a good handset, looked like it had been through the wringer after only 6 months inmy pocket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240166</id>
	<title>Innovation is not necessarily invention</title>
	<author>StreetStealth</author>
	<datestamp>1259234760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See, that's the thing that Apple does so well. They don't invent things. They make other inventions <i>actually work.</i></p><p>Through exhaustive design iteration and engineering, they develop ideas that are "nice on paper but useless in practice" into things that actually deliver on the invention's promise. From desktop UNIX to high-capacity music players to the mobile web browser, Apple invented none of these, yet they all sucked until Apple treated each one not as a feature problem but as a design and usability problem.</p><p>That's not invention. But if it isn't innovation, I don't know what is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See , that 's the thing that Apple does so well .
They do n't invent things .
They make other inventions actually work.Through exhaustive design iteration and engineering , they develop ideas that are " nice on paper but useless in practice " into things that actually deliver on the invention 's promise .
From desktop UNIX to high-capacity music players to the mobile web browser , Apple invented none of these , yet they all sucked until Apple treated each one not as a feature problem but as a design and usability problem.That 's not invention .
But if it is n't innovation , I do n't know what is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, that's the thing that Apple does so well.
They don't invent things.
They make other inventions actually work.Through exhaustive design iteration and engineering, they develop ideas that are "nice on paper but useless in practice" into things that actually deliver on the invention's promise.
From desktop UNIX to high-capacity music players to the mobile web browser, Apple invented none of these, yet they all sucked until Apple treated each one not as a feature problem but as a design and usability problem.That's not invention.
But if it isn't innovation, I don't know what is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30248972</id>
	<title>Meta: Anonymous?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259316660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If CNET Nate forgets to sign in, does that make him anonymous?</p><p>Or does this just mean Slashdot got tired of someone gaming article submissions for pageviews on low quality articles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If CNET Nate forgets to sign in , does that make him anonymous ? Or does this just mean Slashdot got tired of someone gaming article submissions for pageviews on low quality articles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If CNET Nate forgets to sign in, does that make him anonymous?Or does this just mean Slashdot got tired of someone gaming article submissions for pageviews on low quality articles?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241852</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>SailorSpork</author>
	<datestamp>1259248800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Iknow we're comparing Apples to Apples, but are we really comparing apples to apples?  I mean... you know what I mean...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iknow we 're comparing Apples to Apples , but are we really comparing apples to apples ?
I mean... you know what I mean.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iknow we're comparing Apples to Apples, but are we really comparing apples to apples?
I mean... you know what I mean...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239438</id>
	<title>Jewton vs. KikePhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no contest. The KikePhone wins because it's color screen is better for pornography.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no contest .
The KikePhone wins because it 's color screen is better for pornography .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no contest.
The KikePhone wins because it's color screen is better for pornography.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244052</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1259319240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you get used to the keyboard, you just need to trust the auto correct and/or realise that you can move your finger to the correct letter before you release the tap (if you miss).  I agree with the screen comment though - it really is the first mobile I ever saw that was actually usable for reading email and browsing the web.  I had a demo of a couple of crack-berries, and really do not want....</htmltext>
<tokenext>you get used to the keyboard , you just need to trust the auto correct and/or realise that you can move your finger to the correct letter before you release the tap ( if you miss ) .
I agree with the screen comment though - it really is the first mobile I ever saw that was actually usable for reading email and browsing the web .
I had a demo of a couple of crack-berries , and really do not want... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you get used to the keyboard, you just need to trust the auto correct and/or realise that you can move your finger to the correct letter before you release the tap (if you miss).
I agree with the screen comment though - it really is the first mobile I ever saw that was actually usable for reading email and browsing the web.
I had a demo of a couple of crack-berries, and really do not want....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>speedingant</author>
	<datestamp>1259229120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Problem is, innovation doesn't sell and make large profits in the world of technology. Apple now plays it safe, copies ideas and makes them better and generally useable. Then they sell for a neat profit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem is , innovation does n't sell and make large profits in the world of technology .
Apple now plays it safe , copies ideas and makes them better and generally useable .
Then they sell for a neat profit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem is, innovation doesn't sell and make large profits in the world of technology.
Apple now plays it safe, copies ideas and makes them better and generally useable.
Then they sell for a neat profit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241608</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>moosesocks</author>
	<datestamp>1259246340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would GPS service be better on Verizon's network?</p><p>I won't contest that Verizon offers better coverage in many parts of the country, but the GPS network is mostly separate from the cell network.  I honestly haven't heard this listed as a common complaint among iPhone users.</p><p>Also be warned that Verizon's customer support is among the worst on the planet, that Android's app ecosystem frankly sucks (and the platform isn't particularly pleasant to develop for), and that Verizon have continued their time-honored tradition of crippling their phones with the Droid (app storage limited to 256mb).</p><p>I'm not a huge fan of Apple or the iPhone.  I just happen to really, really despise the effects that Verizon's business practices have on me as a consumer -- I've been with them for 4 years, and will switch the moment that another provider can provide both a good smartphone, and decent coverage around my house.  The Droid is certainly a legitimate competitor to the iPhone, although it does have a few very notable shortcomings that have to be considered.</p><p>The Palm Pre also comes tantalizingly close to hitting the mark, although I fear that the Pre's hardware issues, and the tremendous (and possibly unjustified) hype surrounding Android may doom WebOS as a platform.  There's simply not room for 3 competing mobile platforms.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would GPS service be better on Verizon 's network ? I wo n't contest that Verizon offers better coverage in many parts of the country , but the GPS network is mostly separate from the cell network .
I honestly have n't heard this listed as a common complaint among iPhone users.Also be warned that Verizon 's customer support is among the worst on the planet , that Android 's app ecosystem frankly sucks ( and the platform is n't particularly pleasant to develop for ) , and that Verizon have continued their time-honored tradition of crippling their phones with the Droid ( app storage limited to 256mb ) .I 'm not a huge fan of Apple or the iPhone .
I just happen to really , really despise the effects that Verizon 's business practices have on me as a consumer -- I 've been with them for 4 years , and will switch the moment that another provider can provide both a good smartphone , and decent coverage around my house .
The Droid is certainly a legitimate competitor to the iPhone , although it does have a few very notable shortcomings that have to be considered.The Palm Pre also comes tantalizingly close to hitting the mark , although I fear that the Pre 's hardware issues , and the tremendous ( and possibly unjustified ) hype surrounding Android may doom WebOS as a platform .
There 's simply not room for 3 competing mobile platforms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would GPS service be better on Verizon's network?I won't contest that Verizon offers better coverage in many parts of the country, but the GPS network is mostly separate from the cell network.
I honestly haven't heard this listed as a common complaint among iPhone users.Also be warned that Verizon's customer support is among the worst on the planet, that Android's app ecosystem frankly sucks (and the platform isn't particularly pleasant to develop for), and that Verizon have continued their time-honored tradition of crippling their phones with the Droid (app storage limited to 256mb).I'm not a huge fan of Apple or the iPhone.
I just happen to really, really despise the effects that Verizon's business practices have on me as a consumer -- I've been with them for 4 years, and will switch the moment that another provider can provide both a good smartphone, and decent coverage around my house.
The Droid is certainly a legitimate competitor to the iPhone, although it does have a few very notable shortcomings that have to be considered.The Palm Pre also comes tantalizingly close to hitting the mark, although I fear that the Pre's hardware issues, and the tremendous (and possibly unjustified) hype surrounding Android may doom WebOS as a platform.
There's simply not room for 3 competing mobile platforms.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239590</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240584</id>
	<title>Re:Innovative?</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1259238000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess if you don't think usability can be innovative.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess if you do n't think usability can be innovative .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess if you don't think usability can be innovative.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240632</id>
	<title>Re:Innovation is not necessarily invention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259238360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to agree but your right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to agree but your right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to agree but your right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240166</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468</id>
	<title>Innovative?</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1259228280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd have to say that neither is truly "innovative" because that would imply something new was present in either of them, rather than a remix of existing technologies and/or incremental improvements on them (such as minaturization). The only really innovative thing I've seen out of Apple in awhile has been the touch wheel on the iPods; Which was quite a departure from existing human interface designs at the time. The word "innovative" has been quite overused in this field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd have to say that neither is truly " innovative " because that would imply something new was present in either of them , rather than a remix of existing technologies and/or incremental improvements on them ( such as minaturization ) .
The only really innovative thing I 've seen out of Apple in awhile has been the touch wheel on the iPods ; Which was quite a departure from existing human interface designs at the time .
The word " innovative " has been quite overused in this field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd have to say that neither is truly "innovative" because that would imply something new was present in either of them, rather than a remix of existing technologies and/or incremental improvements on them (such as minaturization).
The only really innovative thing I've seen out of Apple in awhile has been the touch wheel on the iPods; Which was quite a departure from existing human interface designs at the time.
The word "innovative" has been quite overused in this field.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259237400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The bigger issue here is the narrow definition of "innovation"* so often used at<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. and other tech-centric places, in which innovation only means innovation in a strictly technological/programming/hardware sense of the word. Behind this conceit lies the assumption that the only innovation which matters is purely technological innovation, and all of the other aspects, including making these innovations easy to use and accessible for  wide range of people, are looked up on as somehow less than.</p><p>Hence the constantly renewing Year of Linux on the Desktop, which ignores the fact even the best-packaged Linux distros are at best a mixed bag when it comes to usability. Hence the constant claims that the iPhone/iPod will soon fall from its perch because its focus is ease of use and accessibility and not "innovation". Hence the boiling down of the wide variety of things which must go into a successful product as "cool" or "marketing", etc.</p><p>Apple's particular current genius lies in its ability to take technology and package it for use by a wide variety of people who don't care about the technology per se, and a big part of this is the iPod Touch/iPhone's UI, which makes it so easy even your grandmother can tweet away to her heart's content. And I think the reason Apple catches so much flack here, and elsewhere, is that by giving the "sheep" access to the technology, it take away from the n3rd world the special acclaim they have given themselves for having access to that technology.</p><p>That thought aside, the fact that so very few tech companies are able to do what Apple does should tell you how incredibly difficult it is to do, and why it is as innovative as any other tech achievement.
Microsoft has, quite literally, money to burn and the best they can do is constantly bandage over the larger usability nightmares in Windows and Windows Mobile. Palm had to almost die before they came up with WebOS. Gnome and KDE have a (relatively) large installed base and access to talented people and the best they can come up with is a model which, sometimes, is easier to use than Windows. YOur average cel phone UI is a nightmare of menus, submenus, confusing icons and deeply-buried features. And on and on.</p><p>Making technology easy to use is incredibly difficult and every bit as innovative as writing a new OS or designing a new chip. And, while Apple has made, and will continue, to make stupid decisions, when it comes to what they do, they do do it so very well.</p><p>*There is a further conceit here, as to the true nature of innovation. There seems to be the idea that "true" innovators are the geniuses who come up with a wholly original idea, develop that idea, get it to market and retire to sleep on a bed of money. Look at this history of technology and you will see that almost never happens. Almost every innovation you can think of is either an improvement on an earlier idea or a new combination of previously established technology and ideas. Henry Ford, to pick one at random, didn't invent a damn thing. He took the idea of assembly lines and interchangeable parts from weapons manufacture, combined it with a newly available urban workforce and clever marketing (any color you want as long as its black) which was actually based on sound logistical planning, and created the modern car industry. It's the same with the computer industry. Progress is the story of incremental improvement and assembly of ideas and not sudden advances out of nowhere.</p><p>Or that's my $0.02</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The bigger issue here is the narrow definition of " innovation " * so often used at / .
and other tech-centric places , in which innovation only means innovation in a strictly technological/programming/hardware sense of the word .
Behind this conceit lies the assumption that the only innovation which matters is purely technological innovation , and all of the other aspects , including making these innovations easy to use and accessible for wide range of people , are looked up on as somehow less than.Hence the constantly renewing Year of Linux on the Desktop , which ignores the fact even the best-packaged Linux distros are at best a mixed bag when it comes to usability .
Hence the constant claims that the iPhone/iPod will soon fall from its perch because its focus is ease of use and accessibility and not " innovation " .
Hence the boiling down of the wide variety of things which must go into a successful product as " cool " or " marketing " , etc.Apple 's particular current genius lies in its ability to take technology and package it for use by a wide variety of people who do n't care about the technology per se , and a big part of this is the iPod Touch/iPhone 's UI , which makes it so easy even your grandmother can tweet away to her heart 's content .
And I think the reason Apple catches so much flack here , and elsewhere , is that by giving the " sheep " access to the technology , it take away from the n3rd world the special acclaim they have given themselves for having access to that technology.That thought aside , the fact that so very few tech companies are able to do what Apple does should tell you how incredibly difficult it is to do , and why it is as innovative as any other tech achievement .
Microsoft has , quite literally , money to burn and the best they can do is constantly bandage over the larger usability nightmares in Windows and Windows Mobile .
Palm had to almost die before they came up with WebOS .
Gnome and KDE have a ( relatively ) large installed base and access to talented people and the best they can come up with is a model which , sometimes , is easier to use than Windows .
YOur average cel phone UI is a nightmare of menus , submenus , confusing icons and deeply-buried features .
And on and on.Making technology easy to use is incredibly difficult and every bit as innovative as writing a new OS or designing a new chip .
And , while Apple has made , and will continue , to make stupid decisions , when it comes to what they do , they do do it so very well .
* There is a further conceit here , as to the true nature of innovation .
There seems to be the idea that " true " innovators are the geniuses who come up with a wholly original idea , develop that idea , get it to market and retire to sleep on a bed of money .
Look at this history of technology and you will see that almost never happens .
Almost every innovation you can think of is either an improvement on an earlier idea or a new combination of previously established technology and ideas .
Henry Ford , to pick one at random , did n't invent a damn thing .
He took the idea of assembly lines and interchangeable parts from weapons manufacture , combined it with a newly available urban workforce and clever marketing ( any color you want as long as its black ) which was actually based on sound logistical planning , and created the modern car industry .
It 's the same with the computer industry .
Progress is the story of incremental improvement and assembly of ideas and not sudden advances out of nowhere.Or that 's my $ 0.02</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The bigger issue here is the narrow definition of "innovation"* so often used at /.
and other tech-centric places, in which innovation only means innovation in a strictly technological/programming/hardware sense of the word.
Behind this conceit lies the assumption that the only innovation which matters is purely technological innovation, and all of the other aspects, including making these innovations easy to use and accessible for  wide range of people, are looked up on as somehow less than.Hence the constantly renewing Year of Linux on the Desktop, which ignores the fact even the best-packaged Linux distros are at best a mixed bag when it comes to usability.
Hence the constant claims that the iPhone/iPod will soon fall from its perch because its focus is ease of use and accessibility and not "innovation".
Hence the boiling down of the wide variety of things which must go into a successful product as "cool" or "marketing", etc.Apple's particular current genius lies in its ability to take technology and package it for use by a wide variety of people who don't care about the technology per se, and a big part of this is the iPod Touch/iPhone's UI, which makes it so easy even your grandmother can tweet away to her heart's content.
And I think the reason Apple catches so much flack here, and elsewhere, is that by giving the "sheep" access to the technology, it take away from the n3rd world the special acclaim they have given themselves for having access to that technology.That thought aside, the fact that so very few tech companies are able to do what Apple does should tell you how incredibly difficult it is to do, and why it is as innovative as any other tech achievement.
Microsoft has, quite literally, money to burn and the best they can do is constantly bandage over the larger usability nightmares in Windows and Windows Mobile.
Palm had to almost die before they came up with WebOS.
Gnome and KDE have a (relatively) large installed base and access to talented people and the best they can come up with is a model which, sometimes, is easier to use than Windows.
YOur average cel phone UI is a nightmare of menus, submenus, confusing icons and deeply-buried features.
And on and on.Making technology easy to use is incredibly difficult and every bit as innovative as writing a new OS or designing a new chip.
And, while Apple has made, and will continue, to make stupid decisions, when it comes to what they do, they do do it so very well.
*There is a further conceit here, as to the true nature of innovation.
There seems to be the idea that "true" innovators are the geniuses who come up with a wholly original idea, develop that idea, get it to market and retire to sleep on a bed of money.
Look at this history of technology and you will see that almost never happens.
Almost every innovation you can think of is either an improvement on an earlier idea or a new combination of previously established technology and ideas.
Henry Ford, to pick one at random, didn't invent a damn thing.
He took the idea of assembly lines and interchangeable parts from weapons manufacture, combined it with a newly available urban workforce and clever marketing (any color you want as long as its black) which was actually based on sound logistical planning, and created the modern car industry.
It's the same with the computer industry.
Progress is the story of incremental improvement and assembly of ideas and not sudden advances out of nowhere.Or that's my $0.02</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241488</id>
	<title>Re:ok</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1259245260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>And SCSI. And FireWire.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And SCSI .
And FireWire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And SCSI.
And FireWire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440</id>
	<title>ok</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1259227980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have an iphone and love it.  Amazing phone.  But like just about everything else Apple has done, it's not really "innovative."  They package well, but they never really come out with anything new.  The closest thing they probably came to innovating on WAS the Newton.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iphone and love it .
Amazing phone .
But like just about everything else Apple has done , it 's not really " innovative .
" They package well , but they never really come out with anything new .
The closest thing they probably came to innovating on WAS the Newton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iphone and love it.
Amazing phone.
But like just about everything else Apple has done, it's not really "innovative.
"  They package well, but they never really come out with anything new.
The closest thing they probably came to innovating on WAS the Newton.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30250596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30248362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30250542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1941244_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1941244.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1941244.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1941244.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30247172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1941244.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30248362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30250596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240494
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244996
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30250542
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244566
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30239590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241608
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30244052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30241456
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1941244.30240084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
