<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_26_1326216</id>
	<title>Italian Prosecutors Seek Prison Sentences For Google Execs</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1259246340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"Milan prosecutors <a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/327717">have sought prison sentences</a> ranging from six months to one year for four Google executives <a href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/08/11/07/1925218/Four-Google-Officials-Facing-Charges-In-Italy-For-Errant-Video">accused of violating Italy's privacy laws</a> over the posting of a video showing the bullying of a handicapped teenage boy. The prosecutor's request was backed up by a request by lawyers representing the Milan city council for &euro;300,000 (US$452,000) in moral and material damages. The case concerns the posting on Google Video of a three-minute mobile-phone video showing a handicapped boy being tormented by his classmates in a Turin school."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " Milan prosecutors have sought prison sentences ranging from six months to one year for four Google executives accused of violating Italy 's privacy laws over the posting of a video showing the bullying of a handicapped teenage boy .
The prosecutor 's request was backed up by a request by lawyers representing the Milan city council for    300,000 ( US $ 452,000 ) in moral and material damages .
The case concerns the posting on Google Video of a three-minute mobile-phone video showing a handicapped boy being tormented by his classmates in a Turin school .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "Milan prosecutors have sought prison sentences ranging from six months to one year for four Google executives accused of violating Italy's privacy laws over the posting of a video showing the bullying of a handicapped teenage boy.
The prosecutor's request was backed up by a request by lawyers representing the Milan city council for €300,000 (US$452,000) in moral and material damages.
The case concerns the posting on Google Video of a three-minute mobile-phone video showing a handicapped boy being tormented by his classmates in a Turin school.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237460</id>
	<title>Reputation</title>
	<author>mseeger</author>
	<datestamp>1259254560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only reason for prosecuting the Google Execs is: It gives more kudos (not within the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. community and only if they win) and press coverage for the prosecutors. So they take the gamble, since most judges are so incompetent about everything concerning the internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason for prosecuting the Google Execs is : It gives more kudos ( not within the / .
community and only if they win ) and press coverage for the prosecutors .
So they take the gamble , since most judges are so incompetent about everything concerning the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason for prosecuting the Google Execs is: It gives more kudos (not within the /.
community and only if they win) and press coverage for the prosecutors.
So they take the gamble, since most judges are so incompetent about everything concerning the internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240628</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>mjwalshe</author>
	<datestamp>1259238360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>well ime sure that Berlusconi  would like to have most of comedians and cartoonists extridtite dto Italy for making fun of him then</htmltext>
<tokenext>well ime sure that Berlusconi would like to have most of comedians and cartoonists extridtite dto Italy for making fun of him then</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well ime sure that Berlusconi  would like to have most of comedians and cartoonists extridtite dto Italy for making fun of him then</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237348</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237428</id>
	<title>Interesting...</title>
	<author>redbeardcanada</author>
	<datestamp>1259254200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I clicked on your Strike 1 link, read that article then clicked on the link that showed the Google Image search results to see the actual image.<br> <br>
The doctored image of Michelle Obama rightfully generated a lot of negative reaction; however about 8 pictures in to the search results was one showing the similarities between George Bush and a monkey. There seems to be no outrage to this one... <br> <br>
Maybe the difference is an attack specific to an individual vs. an attack that is seen to be against a group of people?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I clicked on your Strike 1 link , read that article then clicked on the link that showed the Google Image search results to see the actual image .
The doctored image of Michelle Obama rightfully generated a lot of negative reaction ; however about 8 pictures in to the search results was one showing the similarities between George Bush and a monkey .
There seems to be no outrage to this one.. . Maybe the difference is an attack specific to an individual vs. an attack that is seen to be against a group of people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I clicked on your Strike 1 link, read that article then clicked on the link that showed the Google Image search results to see the actual image.
The doctored image of Michelle Obama rightfully generated a lot of negative reaction; however about 8 pictures in to the search results was one showing the similarities between George Bush and a monkey.
There seems to be no outrage to this one...  
Maybe the difference is an attack specific to an individual vs. an attack that is seen to be against a group of people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237190</id>
	<title>Take your place in line</title>
	<author>starfishsystems</author>
	<datestamp>1259252640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google executives will have to take their place in line.
<br> <br>
I plan to launch a similar action against these Italian politicians.  After all, it was their country in which the crime took place.  They stood by and permitted it to happen, didn't they?
<br> <br>
To make matters worse, they haven't even responded to my letter demanding an apology.  That's right.  I sent it to Gino's Italian Deli in Montreal.  It says "Italian Politicians" right on the envelope, so I know that it was addressed properly.  If there was any doubt, it could have been forwarded to the Italian postal service.
<br> <br>
There is no excuse.  These people are criminals.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google executives will have to take their place in line .
I plan to launch a similar action against these Italian politicians .
After all , it was their country in which the crime took place .
They stood by and permitted it to happen , did n't they ?
To make matters worse , they have n't even responded to my letter demanding an apology .
That 's right .
I sent it to Gino 's Italian Deli in Montreal .
It says " Italian Politicians " right on the envelope , so I know that it was addressed properly .
If there was any doubt , it could have been forwarded to the Italian postal service .
There is no excuse .
These people are criminals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google executives will have to take their place in line.
I plan to launch a similar action against these Italian politicians.
After all, it was their country in which the crime took place.
They stood by and permitted it to happen, didn't they?
To make matters worse, they haven't even responded to my letter demanding an apology.
That's right.
I sent it to Gino's Italian Deli in Montreal.
It says "Italian Politicians" right on the envelope, so I know that it was addressed properly.
If there was any doubt, it could have been forwarded to the Italian postal service.
There is no excuse.
These people are criminals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237506</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Philip K Dickhead</author>
	<datestamp>1259254980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They killed babies for being <i>genetically</i> inferior?</p><p>Well, if they discovered gene theory, in the centuries before Christ, I say more power to 'em!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They killed babies for being genetically inferior ? Well , if they discovered gene theory , in the centuries before Christ , I say more power to 'em !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They killed babies for being genetically inferior?Well, if they discovered gene theory, in the centuries before Christ, I say more power to 'em!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237348</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259253660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In recent news, leaders of the BBC were jailed for showing footage of a warzone during a news report. Obviously, they must be entirely responsible for this war.</p><p>Also, it has just been discovered that if you hide a problem, it goes away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In recent news , leaders of the BBC were jailed for showing footage of a warzone during a news report .
Obviously , they must be entirely responsible for this war.Also , it has just been discovered that if you hide a problem , it goes away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In recent news, leaders of the BBC were jailed for showing footage of a warzone during a news report.
Obviously, they must be entirely responsible for this war.Also, it has just been discovered that if you hide a problem, it goes away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236990</id>
	<title>Strike 2</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/11/25/google.michelle.obama.controversy-2/" title="cnn.com">Strike 1</a> [cnn.com]</p><p>That's strike 2, Google. If you put one more foot wrong I'm changing my homepage over to Bing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strike 1 [ cnn.com ] That 's strike 2 , Google .
If you put one more foot wrong I 'm changing my homepage over to Bing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strike 1 [cnn.com]That's strike 2, Google.
If you put one more foot wrong I'm changing my homepage over to Bing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30244562</id>
	<title>Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies.</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1259327400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I find that offensive to bastards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi I find that offensive to bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi

I find that offensive to bastards.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238572</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>orzetto</author>
	<datestamp>1259263440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.That is completely false. Torino comes from the celtic word Tau, which means mountain (meaning the Alps, definitely not small). It was later adapted by the Latins into Augusta Taurinorum. Your story is completely false, especially since Turin never had a particular civilisation to boast of in ancient times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.That is completely false .
Torino comes from the celtic word Tau , which means mountain ( meaning the Alps , definitely not small ) .
It was later adapted by the Latins into Augusta Taurinorum .
Your story is completely false , especially since Turin never had a particular civilisation to boast of in ancient times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.That is completely false.
Torino comes from the celtic word Tau, which means mountain (meaning the Alps, definitely not small).
It was later adapted by the Latins into Augusta Taurinorum.
Your story is completely false, especially since Turin never had a particular civilisation to boast of in ancient times.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237032</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1259251440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, but why? It's the opposite! Teach the sniveling snitches that snitching about of our brave boys who treat the degenerate scum as it deserves is not welcome here.</p><p>Next time you will think twice if you want to cry foul about someone "having some fun" with a genetically inferior!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , but why ?
It 's the opposite !
Teach the sniveling snitches that snitching about of our brave boys who treat the degenerate scum as it deserves is not welcome here.Next time you will think twice if you want to cry foul about someone " having some fun " with a genetically inferior !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, but why?
It's the opposite!
Teach the sniveling snitches that snitching about of our brave boys who treat the degenerate scum as it deserves is not welcome here.Next time you will think twice if you want to cry foul about someone "having some fun" with a genetically inferior!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236882</id>
	<title>Non-news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259250300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:</p><blockquote><div><p>There is no chance of the Google executives actually going to prison, however, according to Google lawyer Giuliano Pisapia. For a first offender receiving a prison sentence of less than three years, the penalty is automatically suspended, he said.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Move along, citizens. Nothing to see here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : There is no chance of the Google executives actually going to prison , however , according to Google lawyer Giuliano Pisapia .
For a first offender receiving a prison sentence of less than three years , the penalty is automatically suspended , he said .
Move along , citizens .
Nothing to see here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:There is no chance of the Google executives actually going to prison, however, according to Google lawyer Giuliano Pisapia.
For a first offender receiving a prison sentence of less than three years, the penalty is automatically suspended, he said.
Move along, citizens.
Nothing to see here.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237482</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259254740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I disagree. Please point out how the directive's definition of hosting would not include YouTube.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I disagree .
Please point out how the directive 's definition of hosting would not include YouTube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I disagree.
Please point out how the directive's definition of hosting would not include YouTube.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237226</id>
	<title>What is the deal here?</title>
	<author>DJRumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1259252820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless these execs posted the videos personally, why are they trying to hold Google responsible? What kind of mob law does Italy follow? What was done to the boy was reprehensible, and by all means, punish the people who did this to him. I seriously doubt these execs even knew this video existed until someone told them they had been charged. Allowing public anger to dictate who can be charged as a criminal when they have done nothing wrong is just stupid not to put too fine a point on it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless these execs posted the videos personally , why are they trying to hold Google responsible ?
What kind of mob law does Italy follow ?
What was done to the boy was reprehensible , and by all means , punish the people who did this to him .
I seriously doubt these execs even knew this video existed until someone told them they had been charged .
Allowing public anger to dictate who can be charged as a criminal when they have done nothing wrong is just stupid not to put too fine a point on it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless these execs posted the videos personally, why are they trying to hold Google responsible?
What kind of mob law does Italy follow?
What was done to the boy was reprehensible, and by all means, punish the people who did this to him.
I seriously doubt these execs even knew this video existed until someone told them they had been charged.
Allowing public anger to dictate who can be charged as a criminal when they have done nothing wrong is just stupid not to put too fine a point on it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237494</id>
	<title>Re:Non-news</title>
	<author>kheldan</author>
	<datestamp>1259254860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A word: "Grandstanding".</htmltext>
<tokenext>A word : " Grandstanding " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A word: "Grandstanding".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</id>
	<title>Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259250360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Latin word Torino (the proper spelling of 'Turin') means "small crag" or "small cliff". Similar to Greek Sparta, this citystate was notorious for performing infanticide of small, weak, and handicapped children. These kids would be thrown off the cliffs to their deaths for no other crime than being genetically inferior.</p><p>Nowadays we are a bit more conscientious about how we treat the weakest among us, but to see Torinos standing up for weak kids is kind of ironic considering the city's bloody history.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Latin word Torino ( the proper spelling of 'Turin ' ) means " small crag " or " small cliff " .
Similar to Greek Sparta , this citystate was notorious for performing infanticide of small , weak , and handicapped children .
These kids would be thrown off the cliffs to their deaths for no other crime than being genetically inferior.Nowadays we are a bit more conscientious about how we treat the weakest among us , but to see Torinos standing up for weak kids is kind of ironic considering the city 's bloody history .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Latin word Torino (the proper spelling of 'Turin') means "small crag" or "small cliff".
Similar to Greek Sparta, this citystate was notorious for performing infanticide of small, weak, and handicapped children.
These kids would be thrown off the cliffs to their deaths for no other crime than being genetically inferior.Nowadays we are a bit more conscientious about how we treat the weakest among us, but to see Torinos standing up for weak kids is kind of ironic considering the city's bloody history.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237368</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259253780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since B.A.Buy is a Scientologist you should allow him a bit of poetic license; He has a special view of reality.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since B.A.Buy is a Scientologist you should allow him a bit of poetic license ; He has a special view of reality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since B.A.Buy is a Scientologist you should allow him a bit of poetic license; He has a special view of reality.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236928</id>
	<title>Peter Fleischer's blog on this...</title>
	<author>bahbar</author>
	<datestamp>1259250660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>He's been commenting on the case itself a little bit here:
<br>
<a href="http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/ciao-italia.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/ciao-italia.html</a> [blogspot.com]
<br>
<a href="http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/today-in-milan.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/today-in-milan.html</a> [blogspot.com]
<br>
<a href="http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/european-law-on-hosting-platforms.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/european-law-on-hosting-platforms.html</a> [blogspot.com]
<br>
This last one actually has law information in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's been commenting on the case itself a little bit here : http : //peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/ciao-italia.html [ blogspot.com ] http : //peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/today-in-milan.html [ blogspot.com ] http : //peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/european-law-on-hosting-platforms.html [ blogspot.com ] This last one actually has law information in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's been commenting on the case itself a little bit here:

http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/ciao-italia.html [blogspot.com]

http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/today-in-milan.html [blogspot.com]

http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2009/11/european-law-on-hosting-platforms.html [blogspot.com]

This last one actually has law information in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237170</id>
	<title>Simple solution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259252520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google should just shut off access from Italy.</p><p>Have fun guys!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should just shut off access from Italy.Have fun guys !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should just shut off access from Italy.Have fun guys!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237420</id>
	<title>Oh sure....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259254140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I shall create the create nation of "Petertopia" and by Edict all Foreigners individuals and companies with a greater income or wealth of $1,000,000 shall be summarily shoved into the basement and bricked up.  Alternatively they can pay a yearly fine of $10,000 each.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I shall create the create nation of " Petertopia " and by Edict all Foreigners individuals and companies with a greater income or wealth of $ 1,000,000 shall be summarily shoved into the basement and bricked up .
Alternatively they can pay a yearly fine of $ 10,000 each .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I shall create the create nation of "Petertopia" and by Edict all Foreigners individuals and companies with a greater income or wealth of $1,000,000 shall be summarily shoved into the basement and bricked up.
Alternatively they can pay a yearly fine of $10,000 each.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237148</id>
	<title>It's a good thing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259252340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a good thing Italy isn't a fascist country like America and doesn't recognize common carrier exceptions.</p><p>Seriously, though, do they expect those four Google executives to sit and watch every video posted on YouTube and Google Video? No human being can possibly consume that much pr0n.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a good thing Italy is n't a fascist country like America and does n't recognize common carrier exceptions.Seriously , though , do they expect those four Google executives to sit and watch every video posted on YouTube and Google Video ?
No human being can possibly consume that much pr0n .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a good thing Italy isn't a fascist country like America and doesn't recognize common carrier exceptions.Seriously, though, do they expect those four Google executives to sit and watch every video posted on YouTube and Google Video?
No human being can possibly consume that much pr0n.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239022</id>
	<title>Re:A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>gdshaw</author>
	<datestamp>1259266980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you may be confusing good citizens with obedient citizens.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you may be confusing good citizens with obedient citizens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you may be confusing good citizens with obedient citizens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237088</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic,Christmas gift is here,shoes,handbags.</title>
	<author>coolforsale1215</author>
	<datestamp>1259251740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]
Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the  there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products . Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!  Welcome  to come  next   time ! Thank you!     <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]
Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the  there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products .
Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!
Welcome  to come  next   time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w)
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30244050</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259319180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Directives are indeed not self-implementing. However, they do have direct effect, in particular when they confer a benefit to an EU citizen over a member state. The rationale for this particular direct benefit is that it takes away a reason for member states to delay implementation. Hence, in criminal cases (where the state prosecutes), the defendant can claim protection under EU directives.</p><p>Normally, between two non-state parties, unimpemented directives indeed have no direct effect, because neither party can delay their implementation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Directives are indeed not self-implementing .
However , they do have direct effect , in particular when they confer a benefit to an EU citizen over a member state .
The rationale for this particular direct benefit is that it takes away a reason for member states to delay implementation .
Hence , in criminal cases ( where the state prosecutes ) , the defendant can claim protection under EU directives.Normally , between two non-state parties , unimpemented directives indeed have no direct effect , because neither party can delay their implementation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Directives are indeed not self-implementing.
However, they do have direct effect, in particular when they confer a benefit to an EU citizen over a member state.
The rationale for this particular direct benefit is that it takes away a reason for member states to delay implementation.
Hence, in criminal cases (where the state prosecutes), the defendant can claim protection under EU directives.Normally, between two non-state parties, unimpemented directives indeed have no direct effect, because neither party can delay their implementation.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238404</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259262120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea, well Google refuses to take this kind of crap down (unless you are the first lady) all the time citing first amendment rights.  It is disgusting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , well Google refuses to take this kind of crap down ( unless you are the first lady ) all the time citing first amendment rights .
It is disgusting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, well Google refuses to take this kind of crap down (unless you are the first lady) all the time citing first amendment rights.
It is disgusting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237124</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>error\_frey</author>
	<datestamp>1259252100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>where did you get this info? Never heard of Torino as a city-state (or) with sparta-like traditions.</p><p>by the way, "Torino" is a current italian name, not a latin one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>where did you get this info ?
Never heard of Torino as a city-state ( or ) with sparta-like traditions.by the way , " Torino " is a current italian name , not a latin one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>where did you get this info?
Never heard of Torino as a city-state (or) with sparta-like traditions.by the way, "Torino" is a current italian name, not a latin one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237470</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>Shin-LaC</author>
	<datestamp>1259254680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>As stated in comments on the previous Slashdot post on the case, the perpetrators were already prosecuted in 2006.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As stated in comments on the previous Slashdot post on the case , the perpetrators were already prosecuted in 2006 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As stated in comments on the previous Slashdot post on the case, the perpetrators were already prosecuted in 2006.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238374</id>
	<title>Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259261820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SwefaweTawefOP FAEawefRfGBfwefERJaefwefVNR&#246;oawrjgv</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SwefaweTawefOP FAEawefRfGBfwefERJaefwefVNR   oawrjgv</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SwefaweTawefOP FAEawefRfGBfwefERJaefwefVNRöoawrjgv</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239242</id>
	<title>Re:Lesson for Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259226000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well of course. It was, after all, only sheer luck that this time it wasn't their president getting caught on tape committing criminal activities...google had better learn how to behave quick!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well of course .
It was , after all , only sheer luck that this time it was n't their president getting caught on tape committing criminal activities...google had better learn how to behave quick !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well of course.
It was, after all, only sheer luck that this time it wasn't their president getting caught on tape committing criminal activities...google had better learn how to behave quick!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237002</id>
	<title>Lesson for Google</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1259251140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone posts video of someone performing some illegal activity, delete it ASAP, don't tell anyone and sweep everything under the rug. The video was never there, you never saw anything and I'm sorry, Officer that I can't help you, am I free to go now?</p><p>At least that's what the court is trying to teach them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone posts video of someone performing some illegal activity , delete it ASAP , do n't tell anyone and sweep everything under the rug .
The video was never there , you never saw anything and I 'm sorry , Officer that I ca n't help you , am I free to go now ? At least that 's what the court is trying to teach them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone posts video of someone performing some illegal activity, delete it ASAP, don't tell anyone and sweep everything under the rug.
The video was never there, you never saw anything and I'm sorry, Officer that I can't help you, am I free to go now?At least that's what the court is trying to teach them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237344</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259253600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.</p></div><p>They are going after the company that embarrassed the city publicly. BTW, everybody understands the problem here except for a few Americans.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little , misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.They are going after the company that embarrassed the city publicly .
BTW , everybody understands the problem here except for a few Americans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.They are going after the company that embarrassed the city publicly.
BTW, everybody understands the problem here except for a few Americans.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239396</id>
	<title>Re:What is the deal here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The kind that has pretty much a single media, mafia like killings for generating human interest stories, bribes for officers to look the other way to dispose barrels of nuclear material in the oceans and over the fields.<br>Fairly standard stuff.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The kind that has pretty much a single media , mafia like killings for generating human interest stories , bribes for officers to look the other way to dispose barrels of nuclear material in the oceans and over the fields.Fairly standard stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The kind that has pretty much a single media, mafia like killings for generating human interest stories, bribes for officers to look the other way to dispose barrels of nuclear material in the oceans and over the fields.Fairly standard stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238700</id>
	<title>The question is why</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259264400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is obviously a stupid prosecution.  Does the Italian government or the president hate Google for some reason?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is obviously a stupid prosecution .
Does the Italian government or the president hate Google for some reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is obviously a stupid prosecution.
Does the Italian government or the president hate Google for some reason?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240230</id>
	<title>Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259235300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you operate inside the Italian territory, you'll answer Italian justice..</p><p>If "Google Italia" has offices in Italy then they're gonna answer Italian Laws not American's no need for fancy "extradition" science fiction..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you operate inside the Italian territory , you 'll answer Italian justice..If " Google Italia " has offices in Italy then they 're gon na answer Italian Laws not American 's no need for fancy " extradition " science fiction. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you operate inside the Italian territory, you'll answer Italian justice..If "Google Italia" has offices in Italy then they're gonna answer Italian Laws not American's no need for fancy "extradition" science fiction..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237184</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Afforess</author>
	<datestamp>1259252580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also Ironic, that they haven't actually done anything about the incident, to make sure the kid is okay; instead, they just go after a corporation. <br> <br> "Think of The Children" really is an excuse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also Ironic , that they have n't actually done anything about the incident , to make sure the kid is okay ; instead , they just go after a corporation .
" Think of The Children " really is an excuse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also Ironic, that they haven't actually done anything about the incident, to make sure the kid is okay; instead, they just go after a corporation.
"Think of The Children" really is an excuse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237642</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>Neil Strickland</author>
	<datestamp>1259256300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is worth noting, however, that directives like this are not self-implementing (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive\_(European\_Union))" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive\_(European\_Union))</a> [wikipedia.org].  The Italian government is required by EU treaties to pass laws implementing the directive, but in an Italian court you cannot appeal directly to the directive itself.  So the key question here is the wording of the relevant Italian law.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is worth noting , however , that directives like this are not self-implementing ( see http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive \ _ ( European \ _Union ) ) [ wikipedia.org ] .
The Italian government is required by EU treaties to pass laws implementing the directive , but in an Italian court you can not appeal directly to the directive itself .
So the key question here is the wording of the relevant Italian law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is worth noting, however, that directives like this are not self-implementing (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directive\_(European\_Union)) [wikipedia.org].
The Italian government is required by EU treaties to pass laws implementing the directive, but in an Italian court you cannot appeal directly to the directive itself.
So the key question here is the wording of the relevant Italian law.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236902</id>
	<title>Yo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259250420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There don't seem to be any posts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There do n't seem to be any posts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There don't seem to be any posts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237842</id>
	<title>Re:A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>Stan92057</author>
	<datestamp>1259257620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Too bad money is more Important. Googles first priority is to there stock holders,which are all over the planet,not just in the USA</htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad money is more Important .
Googles first priority is to there stock holders,which are all over the planet,not just in the USA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad money is more Important.
Googles first priority is to there stock holders,which are all over the planet,not just in the USA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238000</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259258880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the movie is not complete fiction. Greatly exaggerated, but not complete fiction. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle\_of\_Thermopylae" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle\_of\_Thermopylae</a> [wikipedia.org] is pretty interesting reading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the movie is not complete fiction .
Greatly exaggerated , but not complete fiction .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle \ _of \ _Thermopylae [ wikipedia.org ] is pretty interesting reading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the movie is not complete fiction.
Greatly exaggerated, but not complete fiction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle\_of\_Thermopylae [wikipedia.org] is pretty interesting reading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237070</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916</id>
	<title>I hope that the primary focus of the prosecution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259250600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>was to punish the bullies (appropriately scaled to the age of the guilty parties)! The case against Google seems absurd in any case. It hinges on the fact that Google didn't remove the video after it was requested to. The reason was that the request was sent to the wrong address. Google may seem to be omniscient but if they didn't get the notice there is no rational case against them. In any case I doubt they're answerable to Italian law unless the prosecutors could prove to an American court that extradition is warranted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>was to punish the bullies ( appropriately scaled to the age of the guilty parties ) !
The case against Google seems absurd in any case .
It hinges on the fact that Google did n't remove the video after it was requested to .
The reason was that the request was sent to the wrong address .
Google may seem to be omniscient but if they did n't get the notice there is no rational case against them .
In any case I doubt they 're answerable to Italian law unless the prosecutors could prove to an American court that extradition is warranted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>was to punish the bullies (appropriately scaled to the age of the guilty parties)!
The case against Google seems absurd in any case.
It hinges on the fact that Google didn't remove the video after it was requested to.
The reason was that the request was sent to the wrong address.
Google may seem to be omniscient but if they didn't get the notice there is no rational case against them.
In any case I doubt they're answerable to Italian law unless the prosecutors could prove to an American court that extradition is warranted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30242800</id>
	<title>Re:Strike 2</title>
	<author>Monkier</author>
	<datestamp>1259259360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two more strikes and Google gets their internet connection cut?  Oh, no!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two more strikes and Google gets their internet connection cut ?
Oh , no !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two more strikes and Google gets their internet connection cut?
Oh, no!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238874</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259265780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that EU directives imply just the fact that a national law must be in accordance with them. Italy has a massive number of violations with regards to EU directives (100+), even more important than this one. And we (italian citizens) pay an absurd amount of money every new year to the EU for this reason. All of this... just because our inept politicians aren't able to do their job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that EU directives imply just the fact that a national law must be in accordance with them .
Italy has a massive number of violations with regards to EU directives ( 100 + ) , even more important than this one .
And we ( italian citizens ) pay an absurd amount of money every new year to the EU for this reason .
All of this... just because our inept politicians are n't able to do their job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that EU directives imply just the fact that a national law must be in accordance with them.
Italy has a massive number of violations with regards to EU directives (100+), even more important than this one.
And we (italian citizens) pay an absurd amount of money every new year to the EU for this reason.
All of this... just because our inept politicians aren't able to do their job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237052</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1259251500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the only time in Italy - media empire of Berlusconi  pointing fingers at external factors, the deal with crosses being obviously the fault of Strasburg and not a case of not following your own damn laws, season immigrants from new EU memberstates being put effectively into slavery because of their own fault of not being able to prevent it...it's always easier to look for blame abroad.</p><p>And when you do you actually get to win the popularity contest...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the only time in Italy - media empire of Berlusconi pointing fingers at external factors , the deal with crosses being obviously the fault of Strasburg and not a case of not following your own damn laws , season immigrants from new EU memberstates being put effectively into slavery because of their own fault of not being able to prevent it...it 's always easier to look for blame abroad.And when you do you actually get to win the popularity contest.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the only time in Italy - media empire of Berlusconi  pointing fingers at external factors, the deal with crosses being obviously the fault of Strasburg and not a case of not following your own damn laws, season immigrants from new EU memberstates being put effectively into slavery because of their own fault of not being able to prevent it...it's always easier to look for blame abroad.And when you do you actually get to win the popularity contest...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236948</id>
	<title>Italy...</title>
	<author>Nautical Insanity</author>
	<datestamp>1259250780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>STFU</p><p>Google executives weren't the ones shooting the video or uploading it to the website.</p><p>Fortunately, according to the article it seems that the prosecutors are just making noise and won't be able to actually throw Google employees in jail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>STFUGoogle executives were n't the ones shooting the video or uploading it to the website.Fortunately , according to the article it seems that the prosecutors are just making noise and wo n't be able to actually throw Google employees in jail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>STFUGoogle executives weren't the ones shooting the video or uploading it to the website.Fortunately, according to the article it seems that the prosecutors are just making noise and won't be able to actually throw Google employees in jail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237014</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know where you found this info, and I never heard anything about it (and I actually have born and live in Torino). Also there are no "cliffs" around Torino, and Torino has nevere been a citystate in ancient times: in fact it was born as a Roman military camp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know where you found this info , and I never heard anything about it ( and I actually have born and live in Torino ) .
Also there are no " cliffs " around Torino , and Torino has nevere been a citystate in ancient times : in fact it was born as a Roman military camp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know where you found this info, and I never heard anything about it (and I actually have born and live in Torino).
Also there are no "cliffs" around Torino, and Torino has nevere been a citystate in ancient times: in fact it was born as a Roman military camp.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236924</id>
	<title>Morons</title>
	<author>multisync</author>
	<datestamp>1259250600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Punish the kids who were doing the harassing. Google removed the video within a day, once someone actually bothered to contact them about it, and Google cooperated with Italian police:</p><blockquote><div><p>The prosecutors had also failed to acknowledge Google's cooperation with the Italian police, Pisapia said. The bullying of the handicapped boy, which had been going on for two years, came to an end after Google identified the person responsible for posting the video and enabled the police to identify the boy's tormentors, he said.</p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Punish the kids who were doing the harassing .
Google removed the video within a day , once someone actually bothered to contact them about it , and Google cooperated with Italian police : The prosecutors had also failed to acknowledge Google 's cooperation with the Italian police , Pisapia said .
The bullying of the handicapped boy , which had been going on for two years , came to an end after Google identified the person responsible for posting the video and enabled the police to identify the boy 's tormentors , he said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Punish the kids who were doing the harassing.
Google removed the video within a day, once someone actually bothered to contact them about it, and Google cooperated with Italian police:The prosecutors had also failed to acknowledge Google's cooperation with the Italian police, Pisapia said.
The bullying of the handicapped boy, which had been going on for two years, came to an end after Google identified the person responsible for posting the video and enabled the police to identify the boy's tormentors, he said. 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238680</id>
	<title>Re:What is the deal here?</title>
	<author>turtleshadow</author>
	<datestamp>1259264280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many non US governments hold top executives as the responsible party for their corporation. Thus when a lawsuit comes there s not just a bunch of lawyers representing a corporate name but someone is actually hauled in front of the judge. Many Western Executives are unable to travel to certain countries because they have been indicted, tried (sometimes in absentia) and personally found guilty of allowing graft, corruption, carelessness, criminal activities of others (often the locals) in their employment in the Global company. I believe Union Carbide in 84 and IBM Korea in 04 tried to get such testimony.</p><p>As an executive with the duty of oversight they were supposed to ensure such acts never happened in the lower ranks.<br>Probably the Italians think that Google has a local presence that should have caught the video and reported it under local laws.<br>This is chilling if some foreign government lawyer ever wants to extradite me because I did or didn't click on the inappropriate content button.</p><p>But I kind of have to meep Meep at<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.IT as they as a nation can not even successfully oust Silvio Berlusconi after so much that has happened.<br>The thought that Lodo Alphoso act for executive immunity could be worked, seems like the guy has a Caesar/Napoleon Complex</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many non US governments hold top executives as the responsible party for their corporation .
Thus when a lawsuit comes there s not just a bunch of lawyers representing a corporate name but someone is actually hauled in front of the judge .
Many Western Executives are unable to travel to certain countries because they have been indicted , tried ( sometimes in absentia ) and personally found guilty of allowing graft , corruption , carelessness , criminal activities of others ( often the locals ) in their employment in the Global company .
I believe Union Carbide in 84 and IBM Korea in 04 tried to get such testimony.As an executive with the duty of oversight they were supposed to ensure such acts never happened in the lower ranks.Probably the Italians think that Google has a local presence that should have caught the video and reported it under local laws.This is chilling if some foreign government lawyer ever wants to extradite me because I did or did n't click on the inappropriate content button.But I kind of have to meep Meep at .IT as they as a nation can not even successfully oust Silvio Berlusconi after so much that has happened.The thought that Lodo Alphoso act for executive immunity could be worked , seems like the guy has a Caesar/Napoleon Complex</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many non US governments hold top executives as the responsible party for their corporation.
Thus when a lawsuit comes there s not just a bunch of lawyers representing a corporate name but someone is actually hauled in front of the judge.
Many Western Executives are unable to travel to certain countries because they have been indicted, tried (sometimes in absentia) and personally found guilty of allowing graft, corruption, carelessness, criminal activities of others (often the locals) in their employment in the Global company.
I believe Union Carbide in 84 and IBM Korea in 04 tried to get such testimony.As an executive with the duty of oversight they were supposed to ensure such acts never happened in the lower ranks.Probably the Italians think that Google has a local presence that should have caught the video and reported it under local laws.This is chilling if some foreign government lawyer ever wants to extradite me because I did or didn't click on the inappropriate content button.But I kind of have to meep Meep at .IT as they as a nation can not even successfully oust Silvio Berlusconi after so much that has happened.The thought that Lodo Alphoso act for executive immunity could be worked, seems like the guy has a Caesar/Napoleon Complex</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238204</id>
	<title>Re:A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1259260440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>I think it shows how Google lives the 'don't do evil' slogan. They try to be a good citizen everywhere.<br></i><br>Exactly!  And in Soviet Russia "being a good citizen" means turning in dissidents.  In North Korea it means never ever saying anything bad about the Government.  In eastern Congo it means tolerating rape and violence against women.  In Nazi Germany....  Yup, it's all just a days work in "don't be evil".</p><p>This kind of moral relativism run amok is not "don't be evil".  I'm not willing to start saying Google has lost any moral fiber, but the extreme you're proposing is simply wrong.  I think you've really missed the central issue here though.  Google is a red herring in this whole story.</p><p>I don't think the video really has much of anything to do with Google being right or wrong.  Google is merely reflecting the moral character of the society, and some people don't seem to like looking in the mirror.  This kind of thing isn't going away, and it certainly isn't going to be stopped by turning to a centralized source like Google to attempt to control an inherently de-centralized Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it shows how Google lives the 'do n't do evil ' slogan .
They try to be a good citizen everywhere.Exactly !
And in Soviet Russia " being a good citizen " means turning in dissidents .
In North Korea it means never ever saying anything bad about the Government .
In eastern Congo it means tolerating rape and violence against women .
In Nazi Germany.... Yup , it 's all just a days work in " do n't be evil " .This kind of moral relativism run amok is not " do n't be evil " .
I 'm not willing to start saying Google has lost any moral fiber , but the extreme you 're proposing is simply wrong .
I think you 've really missed the central issue here though .
Google is a red herring in this whole story.I do n't think the video really has much of anything to do with Google being right or wrong .
Google is merely reflecting the moral character of the society , and some people do n't seem to like looking in the mirror .
This kind of thing is n't going away , and it certainly is n't going to be stopped by turning to a centralized source like Google to attempt to control an inherently de-centralized Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it shows how Google lives the 'don't do evil' slogan.
They try to be a good citizen everywhere.Exactly!
And in Soviet Russia "being a good citizen" means turning in dissidents.
In North Korea it means never ever saying anything bad about the Government.
In eastern Congo it means tolerating rape and violence against women.
In Nazi Germany....  Yup, it's all just a days work in "don't be evil".This kind of moral relativism run amok is not "don't be evil".
I'm not willing to start saying Google has lost any moral fiber, but the extreme you're proposing is simply wrong.
I think you've really missed the central issue here though.
Google is a red herring in this whole story.I don't think the video really has much of anything to do with Google being right or wrong.
Google is merely reflecting the moral character of the society, and some people don't seem to like looking in the mirror.
This kind of thing isn't going away, and it certainly isn't going to be stopped by turning to a centralized source like Google to attempt to control an inherently de-centralized Internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240396</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259236680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You evidently don't know much of Law not to mention Italian law but as many people love to give your 2cents for the sake of that...</p><p>A. If you allow a criminal act being done or render it possible somehow, you might likely be part of the crime itself as "involved" part. Of course who commits the act is -often- "more" responsible and when tried -accordingly- gets a more severe sentence, but by letting the crime being done you are guilty as well with various degrees of responsibility. It's not difficult to demonstrate that if you let ppl post videos on your website but you don't watch the content and someone posts copyrighted films, pedophile stuff or anything else infringing the law you're OBVIOUSLY responsible for that too.</p><p>B. This populist assertion of "get the real culprit" is funny every time I hear it. Get ALL of them should be the right statement in a right system. Maybe even a less-than-brilliant individual understands it's going to be more difficult to get a single individual that might have uploaded his vid from an internet cafe than high-rank employees of the ITALIAN business that didn't watch the stuff being posted while making a profit with it.</p><p>C. Google Italia IS and ITALIAN company, the ITALIAN branch of a wider business but this is irrelevant. As long as they operate in the Italian territory they'll respond to Italian Laws, no extradition or other fancy bs is required. Ever wondered why Guantanamo IS in Cuba, dude? Do you have any idea of what International Right is?</p><p>I'm glad someone starts paying for copyright infringement on youtube or any other vehicle to distribute stuff that might be illegal. Of course I'd be really glad to see the authors of these videos behind the bars but this doesn't mean these businesses that often operate in murky waters shouldn't be tried and found guilty as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You evidently do n't know much of Law not to mention Italian law but as many people love to give your 2cents for the sake of that...A. If you allow a criminal act being done or render it possible somehow , you might likely be part of the crime itself as " involved " part .
Of course who commits the act is -often- " more " responsible and when tried -accordingly- gets a more severe sentence , but by letting the crime being done you are guilty as well with various degrees of responsibility .
It 's not difficult to demonstrate that if you let ppl post videos on your website but you do n't watch the content and someone posts copyrighted films , pedophile stuff or anything else infringing the law you 're OBVIOUSLY responsible for that too.B .
This populist assertion of " get the real culprit " is funny every time I hear it .
Get ALL of them should be the right statement in a right system .
Maybe even a less-than-brilliant individual understands it 's going to be more difficult to get a single individual that might have uploaded his vid from an internet cafe than high-rank employees of the ITALIAN business that did n't watch the stuff being posted while making a profit with it.C .
Google Italia IS and ITALIAN company , the ITALIAN branch of a wider business but this is irrelevant .
As long as they operate in the Italian territory they 'll respond to Italian Laws , no extradition or other fancy bs is required .
Ever wondered why Guantanamo IS in Cuba , dude ?
Do you have any idea of what International Right is ? I 'm glad someone starts paying for copyright infringement on youtube or any other vehicle to distribute stuff that might be illegal .
Of course I 'd be really glad to see the authors of these videos behind the bars but this does n't mean these businesses that often operate in murky waters should n't be tried and found guilty as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You evidently don't know much of Law not to mention Italian law but as many people love to give your 2cents for the sake of that...A. If you allow a criminal act being done or render it possible somehow, you might likely be part of the crime itself as "involved" part.
Of course who commits the act is -often- "more" responsible and when tried -accordingly- gets a more severe sentence, but by letting the crime being done you are guilty as well with various degrees of responsibility.
It's not difficult to demonstrate that if you let ppl post videos on your website but you don't watch the content and someone posts copyrighted films, pedophile stuff or anything else infringing the law you're OBVIOUSLY responsible for that too.B.
This populist assertion of "get the real culprit" is funny every time I hear it.
Get ALL of them should be the right statement in a right system.
Maybe even a less-than-brilliant individual understands it's going to be more difficult to get a single individual that might have uploaded his vid from an internet cafe than high-rank employees of the ITALIAN business that didn't watch the stuff being posted while making a profit with it.C.
Google Italia IS and ITALIAN company, the ITALIAN branch of a wider business but this is irrelevant.
As long as they operate in the Italian territory they'll respond to Italian Laws, no extradition or other fancy bs is required.
Ever wondered why Guantanamo IS in Cuba, dude?
Do you have any idea of what International Right is?I'm glad someone starts paying for copyright infringement on youtube or any other vehicle to distribute stuff that might be illegal.
Of course I'd be really glad to see the authors of these videos behind the bars but this doesn't mean these businesses that often operate in murky waters shouldn't be tried and found guilty as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938</id>
	<title>A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259250720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope this serves as a lesson to companies who seem to want the best of all worlds.  I'm kind of glad that google is getting hit with this because it brings to light the problem with trying to cater to the demands of local governments.   When Google began working with governments in foreign jurisdictions it opened the door to this type of activity.</p><p>Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company, we will follow US laws.' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.</p><p>Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws.   That doesn't mean that the local governments can't block your service, but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope this serves as a lesson to companies who seem to want the best of all worlds .
I 'm kind of glad that google is getting hit with this because it brings to light the problem with trying to cater to the demands of local governments .
When Google began working with governments in foreign jurisdictions it opened the door to this type of activity.Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company , we will follow US laws .
' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs , if you 'fly the flag ' of a specific country on the Internet , you are bound by that country 's laws .
That does n't mean that the local governments ca n't block your service , but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope this serves as a lesson to companies who seem to want the best of all worlds.
I'm kind of glad that google is getting hit with this because it brings to light the problem with trying to cater to the demands of local governments.
When Google began working with governments in foreign jurisdictions it opened the door to this type of activity.Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company, we will follow US laws.
' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws.
That doesn't mean that the local governments can't block your service, but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237290</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259253300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Article 14 refers to Hosting and aims to protect ISP's, which is not the case: YouTube is not an ISP.But I agree that in this case Google cannot be found guilty.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Article 14 refers to Hosting and aims to protect ISP 's , which is not the case : YouTube is not an ISP.But I agree that in this case Google can not be found guilty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Article 14 refers to Hosting and aims to protect ISP's, which is not the case: YouTube is not an ISP.But I agree that in this case Google cannot be found guilty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240176</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Scrameustache</author>
	<datestamp>1259234820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They killed babies for being <i>genetically</i> inferior?</p><p>Well, if they discovered gene theory, in the centuries before Christ, I say more power to 'em!</p></div><p>Etymology: Latin genus (&ldquo;&lsquo;birth, origin, a race, sort, kind&rsquo;&rdquo;)  root gen in Latin gignere, Old Latin gegnere (&ldquo;&lsquo;to beget, produce&rsquo;&rdquo;)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They killed babies for being genetically inferior ? Well , if they discovered gene theory , in the centuries before Christ , I say more power to 'em ! Etymology : Latin genus (       birth , origin , a race , sort , kind       ) root gen in Latin gignere , Old Latin gegnere (       to beget , produce       )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They killed babies for being genetically inferior?Well, if they discovered gene theory, in the centuries before Christ, I say more power to 'em!Etymology: Latin genus (“‘birth, origin, a race, sort, kind’”)  root gen in Latin gignere, Old Latin gegnere (“‘to beget, produce’”)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046</id>
	<title>e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>lordholm</author>
	<datestamp>1259251500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since Italy is in the EU, they are bound by the directive of e-commerse, especially articles 14 (hosting) and 15 (no obligation to monitor) are important:
<p>
<i>
<b>Article 14 Hosting</b> <br>
1. Where an information society service is provided that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service, on condition that:
(a) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent; or
(b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information.<br>
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply when the recipient of the service is acting under the authority or the control of the provider.<br>
3. This Article shall not affect the possibility for a court or administrative authority, in accordance with Member States' legal systems, of requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement, nor does it affect the possibility for Member States of establishing procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to information.<br>
</i>
</p><p>
<i>
<b>Article 15 No general obligation to monitor</b> <br>
1. Member States shall not impose a general obligation on providers, when providing the services covered by Articles 12, 13 and 14, to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.<br>
2. Member States may establish obligations for information society service providers promptly to inform the competent public authorities of alleged illegal activities undertaken or information provided by recipients of their service or obligations to communicate to the competent authorities, at their request, information enabling the identification of recipients of their service with whom they have storage agreements.<br>
</i>
</p><p>
There is no discussion about it, they cannot be found guilty under EU legislation, and if Italy still sentences them, the Italian government can be dragged into the European court of justice, where they will most likely be found to be in violation of the e-commerce directive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Italy is in the EU , they are bound by the directive of e-commerse , especially articles 14 ( hosting ) and 15 ( no obligation to monitor ) are important : Article 14 Hosting 1 .
Where an information society service is provided that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service , Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service , on condition that : ( a ) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and , as regards claims for damages , is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent ; or ( b ) the provider , upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness , acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information .
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply when the recipient of the service is acting under the authority or the control of the provider .
3. This Article shall not affect the possibility for a court or administrative authority , in accordance with Member States ' legal systems , of requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement , nor does it affect the possibility for Member States of establishing procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to information .
Article 15 No general obligation to monitor 1 .
Member States shall not impose a general obligation on providers , when providing the services covered by Articles 12 , 13 and 14 , to monitor the information which they transmit or store , nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity .
2. Member States may establish obligations for information society service providers promptly to inform the competent public authorities of alleged illegal activities undertaken or information provided by recipients of their service or obligations to communicate to the competent authorities , at their request , information enabling the identification of recipients of their service with whom they have storage agreements .
There is no discussion about it , they can not be found guilty under EU legislation , and if Italy still sentences them , the Italian government can be dragged into the European court of justice , where they will most likely be found to be in violation of the e-commerce directive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Italy is in the EU, they are bound by the directive of e-commerse, especially articles 14 (hosting) and 15 (no obligation to monitor) are important:


Article 14 Hosting 
1.
Where an information society service is provided that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service, Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service, on condition that:
(a) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent; or
(b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information.
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply when the recipient of the service is acting under the authority or the control of the provider.
3. This Article shall not affect the possibility for a court or administrative authority, in accordance with Member States' legal systems, of requiring the service provider to terminate or prevent an infringement, nor does it affect the possibility for Member States of establishing procedures governing the removal or disabling of access to information.
Article 15 No general obligation to monitor 
1.
Member States shall not impose a general obligation on providers, when providing the services covered by Articles 12, 13 and 14, to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.
2. Member States may establish obligations for information society service providers promptly to inform the competent public authorities of alleged illegal activities undertaken or information provided by recipients of their service or obligations to communicate to the competent authorities, at their request, information enabling the identification of recipients of their service with whom they have storage agreements.
There is no discussion about it, they cannot be found guilty under EU legislation, and if Italy still sentences them, the Italian government can be dragged into the European court of justice, where they will most likely be found to be in violation of the e-commerce directive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237232</id>
	<title>Re:A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>markus\_baertschi</author>
	<datestamp>1259252880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it shows how Google lives the 'don't do evil' slogan. They try to be a good citizen everywhere. Unfortunately this is not easy, in Chine a good citizen does not talk about certain things, in the US you are not supposed to hide the same things. Sou you can not be a good citizen in both places at the same time. Google could choose not to be in China, but this would not help matters (it would be blocked by the great firewall).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it shows how Google lives the 'do n't do evil ' slogan .
They try to be a good citizen everywhere .
Unfortunately this is not easy , in Chine a good citizen does not talk about certain things , in the US you are not supposed to hide the same things .
Sou you can not be a good citizen in both places at the same time .
Google could choose not to be in China , but this would not help matters ( it would be blocked by the great firewall ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it shows how Google lives the 'don't do evil' slogan.
They try to be a good citizen everywhere.
Unfortunately this is not easy, in Chine a good citizen does not talk about certain things, in the US you are not supposed to hide the same things.
Sou you can not be a good citizen in both places at the same time.
Google could choose not to be in China, but this would not help matters (it would be blocked by the great firewall).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238114</id>
	<title>Re:A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1259259540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company, we will follow US laws.' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Google is not a US company, it is an international company with physical assets - datacenters, mostly - all around the world.</p><blockquote><div><p>Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws. That doesn't mean that the local governments can't block your service, but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company.</p></div> </blockquote><p>If you have assets or business where a particular country can get to them, you either avoid pissing that country or risk losing them.</p><p>It's not the flag you're flying that matters, but the flags of the warships within cannon range.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company , we will follow US laws .
' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands .
Google is not a US company , it is an international company with physical assets - datacenters , mostly - all around the world.Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs , if you 'fly the flag ' of a specific country on the Internet , you are bound by that country 's laws .
That does n't mean that the local governments ca n't block your service , but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company .
If you have assets or business where a particular country can get to them , you either avoid pissing that country or risk losing them.It 's not the flag you 're flying that matters , but the flags of the warships within cannon range .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google would have a much more stable leg to stand on if they simply said 'We are a US company, we will follow US laws.
' when China asked them to tailor GoogleChina to meet the party demands.
Google is not a US company, it is an international company with physical assets - datacenters, mostly - all around the world.Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws.
That doesn't mean that the local governments can't block your service, but it should serve as protection when local governments attempt to apply their laws to a foreign company.
If you have assets or business where a particular country can get to them, you either avoid pissing that country or risk losing them.It's not the flag you're flying that matters, but the flags of the warships within cannon range.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538</id>
	<title>I am Italian - It's not about bullies.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259255280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications. A few months ago they even made a law proposal for taking restrictive measures (no anonimity), officially to protect children, but the freely downloadable document metadata of the law proposal contained the address of the president of the Italian union of audiovisual publishers. So much for protecting children! That would have been laughable if it wasn't real, sadly it is.<br>Feel free to search for the Carlucci Law proposal, from the name of Gabriella Carlucci, another -just guess- ex showgirl turned into a politician by that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications .
A few months ago they even made a law proposal for taking restrictive measures ( no anonimity ) , officially to protect children , but the freely downloadable document metadata of the law proposal contained the address of the president of the Italian union of audiovisual publishers .
So much for protecting children !
That would have been laughable if it was n't real , sadly it is.Feel free to search for the Carlucci Law proposal , from the name of Gabriella Carlucci , another -just guess- ex showgirl turned into a politician by that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications.
A few months ago they even made a law proposal for taking restrictive measures (no anonimity), officially to protect children, but the freely downloadable document metadata of the law proposal contained the address of the president of the Italian union of audiovisual publishers.
So much for protecting children!
That would have been laughable if it wasn't real, sadly it is.Feel free to search for the Carlucci Law proposal, from the name of Gabriella Carlucci, another -just guess- ex showgirl turned into a politician by that criminal bastard named Silvio Berlusconi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239084</id>
	<title>Re:I hope that the primary focus of the prosecutio</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259267640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You will only spend time in jail for three-year sentences or more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You will only spend time in jail for three-year sentences or more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You will only spend time in jail for three-year sentences or more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238054</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259259180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.</p></div><p>Misguided tykes cannot afford a half million dollar lawsuit.... You cannot expect a large multinational lawsuit to go against a few kids who have poor parenting over some lunch money can you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little , misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.Misguided tykes can not afford a half million dollar lawsuit.... You can not expect a large multinational lawsuit to go against a few kids who have poor parenting over some lunch money can you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.Misguided tykes cannot afford a half million dollar lawsuit.... You cannot expect a large multinational lawsuit to go against a few kids who have poor parenting over some lunch money can you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238730</id>
	<title>Re:I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>pmontra</author>
	<datestamp>1259264520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those guys had a trial in 2007 but I don't remember the outcome. A non profit organization filed a suit against Google for allowing the video on youtube. They are two different issues and two different trials.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those guys had a trial in 2007 but I do n't remember the outcome .
A non profit organization filed a suit against Google for allowing the video on youtube .
They are two different issues and two different trials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those guys had a trial in 2007 but I don't remember the outcome.
A non profit organization filed a suit against Google for allowing the video on youtube.
They are two different issues and two different trials.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30241058</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259241540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>from my admittedly limited understanding of the case they appear to be guilty of failing on Article 14.1.b "(b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information."
<br> <br>
they took 2 months to remove the material, if it can be shown they were notified then quite honestly google doesn't have a leg to stand on as 2 months can't possibly be considered acting expeditiously.</htmltext>
<tokenext>from my admittedly limited understanding of the case they appear to be guilty of failing on Article 14.1.b " ( b ) the provider , upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness , acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information .
" they took 2 months to remove the material , if it can be shown they were notified then quite honestly google does n't have a leg to stand on as 2 months ca n't possibly be considered acting expeditiously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from my admittedly limited understanding of the case they appear to be guilty of failing on Article 14.1.b "(b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information.
"
 
they took 2 months to remove the material, if it can be shown they were notified then quite honestly google doesn't have a leg to stand on as 2 months can't possibly be considered acting expeditiously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237036</id>
	<title>The case is known as...</title>
	<author>gavron</author>
	<datestamp>1259251440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Retarded Italian Prosecutors v Google airing retarded Italians"

Happy TG

E</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Retarded Italian Prosecutors v Google airing retarded Italians " Happy TG E</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Retarded Italian Prosecutors v Google airing retarded Italians"

Happy TG

E</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237304</id>
	<title>Google should black list them</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1259253360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should just blacklist blocks of IPs used by Italian law enforcement and legislature for a few weeks from all of Google's services. The Italian government might be able to arrest them if they visit Italy, but Google can deal with them if they go on the Internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should just blacklist blocks of IPs used by Italian law enforcement and legislature for a few weeks from all of Google 's services .
The Italian government might be able to arrest them if they visit Italy , but Google can deal with them if they go on the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should just blacklist blocks of IPs used by Italian law enforcement and legislature for a few weeks from all of Google's services.
The Italian government might be able to arrest them if they visit Italy, but Google can deal with them if they go on the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238666</id>
	<title>Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies.</title>
	<author>orzetto</author>
	<datestamp>1259264160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet, those very corrupt politicians are pushing the "fast trial" reform, which will cancel this trial, since the facts date back to 2006.</p><p>Under the proposed (and likely going to be approved, unless they figure out something worse) fast-trial law, any trial lasting more than 2 years (counting from end of investigations) in any of the three degrees of appeal of the Italian justice system will be considered a mistrial. The average duration of a trial is currently 7 and a half years, you do the math.</p><p>The reason is to avoid Berlusconi from being found guilty in an open-and-shut witness-corruption case he has been dragging for months.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet , those very corrupt politicians are pushing the " fast trial " reform , which will cancel this trial , since the facts date back to 2006.Under the proposed ( and likely going to be approved , unless they figure out something worse ) fast-trial law , any trial lasting more than 2 years ( counting from end of investigations ) in any of the three degrees of appeal of the Italian justice system will be considered a mistrial .
The average duration of a trial is currently 7 and a half years , you do the math.The reason is to avoid Berlusconi from being found guilty in an open-and-shut witness-corruption case he has been dragging for months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet, those very corrupt politicians are pushing the "fast trial" reform, which will cancel this trial, since the facts date back to 2006.Under the proposed (and likely going to be approved, unless they figure out something worse) fast-trial law, any trial lasting more than 2 years (counting from end of investigations) in any of the three degrees of appeal of the Italian justice system will be considered a mistrial.
The average duration of a trial is currently 7 and a half years, you do the math.The reason is to avoid Berlusconi from being found guilty in an open-and-shut witness-corruption case he has been dragging for months.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237080</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you're way off, man<br>the name Torino comes from the ancient roman name Augusta Taurinorum and the latin root for Taurinorum means nothing like "cliff" or "crag" but is tied to the population (Taurini) that lived there before Julius Caesar conquered their city.<br>Also "taurus" is the latin word for "bull".<br>And, as far as i know, there were no mass infanticide in that city either.</p><p>THIS IS TUUUUUUUUUUURIN!!! (not Sparta<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:))</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're way off , manthe name Torino comes from the ancient roman name Augusta Taurinorum and the latin root for Taurinorum means nothing like " cliff " or " crag " but is tied to the population ( Taurini ) that lived there before Julius Caesar conquered their city.Also " taurus " is the latin word for " bull " .And , as far as i know , there were no mass infanticide in that city either.THIS IS TUUUUUUUUUUURIN ! ! !
( not Sparta : ) )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're way off, manthe name Torino comes from the ancient roman name Augusta Taurinorum and the latin root for Taurinorum means nothing like "cliff" or "crag" but is tied to the population (Taurini) that lived there before Julius Caesar conquered their city.Also "taurus" is the latin word for "bull".And, as far as i know, there were no mass infanticide in that city either.THIS IS TUUUUUUUUUUURIN!!!
(not Sparta :))</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237508</id>
	<title>Yep, again google's fault</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1259254980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like the image of Obama's wife as a money on images.google.com, and everyone seeing an image of a money when they type in her name....it was all their fault for creating such a great search engine that someone could post an image of a money to the web and call it what ever name.</p><p>Same thing here , the video is clearly google's fault for letting the video happen, I mean they should have had a multi billion software that is in place and is smart enough to watch the video, and know what is happening and be able to deny it from being posted once someone posts it on youtube or whatever. Come on, where has common sense gone.....I guess these *ssholes really know nothing about computers!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like the image of Obama 's wife as a money on images.google.com , and everyone seeing an image of a money when they type in her name....it was all their fault for creating such a great search engine that someone could post an image of a money to the web and call it what ever name.Same thing here , the video is clearly google 's fault for letting the video happen , I mean they should have had a multi billion software that is in place and is smart enough to watch the video , and know what is happening and be able to deny it from being posted once someone posts it on youtube or whatever .
Come on , where has common sense gone.....I guess these * ssholes really know nothing about computers !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like the image of Obama's wife as a money on images.google.com, and everyone seeing an image of a money when they type in her name....it was all their fault for creating such a great search engine that someone could post an image of a money to the web and call it what ever name.Same thing here , the video is clearly google's fault for letting the video happen, I mean they should have had a multi billion software that is in place and is smart enough to watch the video, and know what is happening and be able to deny it from being posted once someone posts it on youtube or whatever.
Come on, where has common sense gone.....I guess these *ssholes really know nothing about computers!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237070</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except sometimes a parent wouldn't have the heart to do this and would raise the deformed child to be a powerful warrior, promising that he will one day be able to be a spartan.
<br> <br>
Sadly this was not to be as his deformities would make him unsuitable to join their ranks. In a fit of self loathing he would then lead the Spartan's enemies down a hidden route so the Spartans would be flanked and killed.
<br> <br>
At least that is what I was led to believe by a highly accurate documentary I watched.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except sometimes a parent would n't have the heart to do this and would raise the deformed child to be a powerful warrior , promising that he will one day be able to be a spartan .
Sadly this was not to be as his deformities would make him unsuitable to join their ranks .
In a fit of self loathing he would then lead the Spartan 's enemies down a hidden route so the Spartans would be flanked and killed .
At least that is what I was led to believe by a highly accurate documentary I watched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except sometimes a parent wouldn't have the heart to do this and would raise the deformed child to be a powerful warrior, promising that he will one day be able to be a spartan.
Sadly this was not to be as his deformities would make him unsuitable to join their ranks.
In a fit of self loathing he would then lead the Spartan's enemies down a hidden route so the Spartans would be flanked and killed.
At least that is what I was led to believe by a highly accurate documentary I watched.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30245188</id>
	<title>Re:I am Italian - It's not about bullies.</title>
	<author>SigmundFloyd</author>
	<datestamp>1259335380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An anonymous coward wrote:</p><blockquote><div><p>This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications.</p></div></blockquote><p>You may be Italian, but you don't seem to know a lot about our system.</p><p>Prosecutors are completely independent of the government. This case has nothing to do with politicians, and everything to do with the fact that there was a privacy infringement and Google was - willingly or otherwise - instrumental in perpetrating it. Worse, they were turning a profit while doing it.</p><p>This means that - at the very least - there <i>must</i> be a trial.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous coward wrote : This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications.You may be Italian , but you do n't seem to know a lot about our system.Prosecutors are completely independent of the government .
This case has nothing to do with politicians , and everything to do with the fact that there was a privacy infringement and Google was - willingly or otherwise - instrumental in perpetrating it .
Worse , they were turning a profit while doing it.This means that - at the very least - there must be a trial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous coward wrote:This has nothing to do with the bullies or who uploaded the video but rather our corrupt politicians and their never ending fear of the Internet as a mean for free expression and communications.You may be Italian, but you don't seem to know a lot about our system.Prosecutors are completely independent of the government.
This case has nothing to do with politicians, and everything to do with the fact that there was a privacy infringement and Google was - willingly or otherwise - instrumental in perpetrating it.
Worse, they were turning a profit while doing it.This means that - at the very least - there must be a trial.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237096</id>
	<title>Re:Ironic</title>
	<author>sagematt</author>
	<datestamp>1259251800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Similar to Greek Sparta</p></div><p>Ironic?

This... is... TORINOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar to Greek SpartaIronic ?
This... is.. .
TORINOOOOOO ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar to Greek SpartaIronic?
This... is...
TORINOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239846</id>
	<title>Re:e-commerce directive say they go free</title>
	<author>aceofspades1217</author>
	<datestamp>1259231760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Youtube is most certainly an ISP. An ISP is any company that hosts content without having any sort of publishing arm or creating content themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Youtube is most certainly an ISP .
An ISP is any company that hosts content without having any sort of publishing arm or creating content themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Youtube is most certainly an ISP.
An ISP is any company that hosts content without having any sort of publishing arm or creating content themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</id>
	<title>I'm sure glad</title>
	<author>mandark1967</author>
	<datestamp>1259250420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little , misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237020</id>
	<title>I call for the UN</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call for the UN to seek long prison sentences for those italian judges, accusing them of bullying Google.</p><p>Furthermore, if I ever go to Italy, I'll print frames of that video, post them on the Piazza San Petro and sue the hell out of the Pope for allowing that to happen. That will fix <b>everything</b>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call for the UN to seek long prison sentences for those italian judges , accusing them of bullying Google.Furthermore , if I ever go to Italy , I 'll print frames of that video , post them on the Piazza San Petro and sue the hell out of the Pope for allowing that to happen .
That will fix everything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call for the UN to seek long prison sentences for those italian judges, accusing them of bullying Google.Furthermore, if I ever go to Italy, I'll print frames of that video, post them on the Piazza San Petro and sue the hell out of the Pope for allowing that to happen.
That will fix everything.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236996</id>
	<title>tpb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259251140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could this be similar to the pirate bay case?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this be similar to the pirate bay case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this be similar to the pirate bay case?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237712</id>
	<title>The law can multi-task</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259256720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.</i> </p><p>What makes you think that the prosecutors aren't going after everyone involved?</p><p> I will admit that what worries me more is that to far too many Slashdot posters the "really guilty party" <b>can't</b> be the geek, no matter what the charge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little , misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident .
What makes you think that the prosecutors are n't going after everyone involved ?
I will admit that what worries me more is that to far too many Slashdot posters the " really guilty party " ca n't be the geek , no matter what the charge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that those Italian prosecutors are going after the really guilty parties instead of the little, misguided tykes who perpetrated the incident.
What makes you think that the prosecutors aren't going after everyone involved?
I will admit that what worries me more is that to far too many Slashdot posters the "really guilty party" can't be the geek, no matter what the charge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237424</id>
	<title>Torino has never been a citystate in ancient time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259254140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This story is a complete fabrication. And I should know. I used to drive a Gran Torino. Also, I saw the movie of the same name. Man that was a good movie. I really liked the part where Clint was mad and didn't get along with his neighbors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This story is a complete fabrication .
And I should know .
I used to drive a Gran Torino .
Also , I saw the movie of the same name .
Man that was a good movie .
I really liked the part where Clint was mad and did n't get along with his neighbors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story is a complete fabrication.
And I should know.
I used to drive a Gran Torino.
Also, I saw the movie of the same name.
Man that was a good movie.
I really liked the part where Clint was mad and didn't get along with his neighbors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237870</id>
	<title>Re:A lesson to Google</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1259257860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws.</i> </p><p>You are also bound by the laws of the country in which you do business.</p><p> The Italian client expects to see an Italian presence in sales and development when he speaks to Google or he will take his money elsewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs , if you 'fly the flag ' of a specific country on the Internet , you are bound by that country 's laws .
You are also bound by the laws of the country in which you do business .
The Italian client expects to see an Italian presence in sales and development when he speaks to Google or he will take his money elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar to safe harbor protections when it comes to ISPs, if you 'fly the flag' of a specific country on the Internet, you are bound by that country's laws.
You are also bound by the laws of the country in which you do business.
The Italian client expects to see an Italian presence in sales and development when he speaks to Google or he will take his money elsewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30241058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30244562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30242800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30244050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30245188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_26_1326216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30245188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30244562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30242800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238204
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239846
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30241058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237642
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30244050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237348
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237070
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30236916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30240230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30238374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30239084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_26_1326216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_26_1326216.30237036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
