<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_25_151219</id>
	<title>STEREO Satellites Spot Solar Flare Tsunami</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1259165280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>westtxfun writes <i>"The  <a href="http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/">STEREO satellites</a> recently confirmed the existence of <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/24nov\_solartsunami.htm?list185042">solar mega-tsunamis</a> when they captured height data after a sunspot recently erupted.  The scale of this tsunami literally dwarfs the Earth's diameter &mdash; it was 62,000 miles high and raced across the surface at 560,000 mph!  <a href="http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/where.shtml">STEREO A and B orbit 90 degrees apart</a> and luckily, one was overhead while the other saw the eruption on the limb.  This gave NASA scientists enough data to confirm the tsunami wasn't a shadow, solving a modern solar mystery.  The images are simply stunning, to boot."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>westtxfun writes " The STEREO satellites recently confirmed the existence of solar mega-tsunamis when they captured height data after a sunspot recently erupted .
The scale of this tsunami literally dwarfs the Earth 's diameter    it was 62,000 miles high and raced across the surface at 560,000 mph !
STEREO A and B orbit 90 degrees apart and luckily , one was overhead while the other saw the eruption on the limb .
This gave NASA scientists enough data to confirm the tsunami was n't a shadow , solving a modern solar mystery .
The images are simply stunning , to boot .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>westtxfun writes "The  STEREO satellites recently confirmed the existence of solar mega-tsunamis when they captured height data after a sunspot recently erupted.
The scale of this tsunami literally dwarfs the Earth's diameter — it was 62,000 miles high and raced across the surface at 560,000 mph!
STEREO A and B orbit 90 degrees apart and luckily, one was overhead while the other saw the eruption on the limb.
This gave NASA scientists enough data to confirm the tsunami wasn't a shadow, solving a modern solar mystery.
The images are simply stunning, to boot.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230398</id>
	<title>Re:Large CME?</title>
	<author>Trogre</author>
	<datestamp>1257155340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Haven't you been keeping up?  These days it's all about mutating neutrinos and microwaving the earths core.</p><p>Popcorn, anyone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have n't you been keeping up ?
These days it 's all about mutating neutrinos and microwaving the earths core.Popcorn , anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Haven't you been keeping up?
These days it's all about mutating neutrinos and microwaving the earths core.Popcorn, anyone?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30229262</id>
	<title>Shades of Praxis?</title>
	<author>IonOtter</author>
	<datestamp>1257192960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Stardate 2322.1, Captain's log, Stereo A, Linux commanding. After three years, I have completed my first assignment as master of this vessel, cataloging gaseous planetary anomalies in Alpha Quadrant. We're continuing our mission under full gravitational power. I'm pleased to report that ship and programming have functioned well."</p><p>*starts a cronjob*</p><p>*rumble...rattle-rattle-RATTLE-<b>RATTLE</b>..*</p><p>ALERT!  ALERT!</p><p>"Sir, we're getting a massive energy reading, dead ahead!"</p><p>"On screen!"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>"My...<i>God</i>!  Shields!  <b> <i>SHIELDS!</i></b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Stardate 2322.1 , Captain 's log , Stereo A , Linux commanding .
After three years , I have completed my first assignment as master of this vessel , cataloging gaseous planetary anomalies in Alpha Quadrant .
We 're continuing our mission under full gravitational power .
I 'm pleased to report that ship and programming have functioned well .
" * starts a cronjob * * rumble...rattle-rattle-RATTLE-RATTLE.. * ALERT !
ALERT ! " Sir , we 're getting a massive energy reading , dead ahead !
" " On screen !
" ... " My...God !
Shields ! SHIELDS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Stardate 2322.1, Captain's log, Stereo A, Linux commanding.
After three years, I have completed my first assignment as master of this vessel, cataloging gaseous planetary anomalies in Alpha Quadrant.
We're continuing our mission under full gravitational power.
I'm pleased to report that ship and programming have functioned well.
"*starts a cronjob**rumble...rattle-rattle-RATTLE-RATTLE..*ALERT!
ALERT!"Sir, we're getting a massive energy reading, dead ahead!
""On screen!
" ..."My...God!
Shields!   SHIELDS!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230064</id>
	<title>Cosmic Fun and Games</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK -- I get it. The sun is lighting its "hot gases" with nuclear fire, emitting what is probably the biggest flaming fart in this end of the galaxy. Bad diet of black holes on top of frozen comets no doubt...<br>Very funny, Sol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK -- I get it .
The sun is lighting its " hot gases " with nuclear fire , emitting what is probably the biggest flaming fart in this end of the galaxy .
Bad diet of black holes on top of frozen comets no doubt...Very funny , Sol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK -- I get it.
The sun is lighting its "hot gases" with nuclear fire, emitting what is probably the biggest flaming fart in this end of the galaxy.
Bad diet of black holes on top of frozen comets no doubt...Very funny, Sol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30229054</id>
	<title>looks like a mammogram to me</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257192000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i guess i need more RPG instead of so much TNA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i guess i need more RPG instead of so much TNA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i guess i need more RPG instead of so much TNA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227246</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227596</id>
	<title>Large CME?</title>
	<author>IGnatius T Foobar</author>
	<datestamp>1257185520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait a minute.  Wasn't a CME this big supposed to <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/03/27/1256231&amp;tid=160" title="slashdot.org">completely destroy the power grid?</a> [slashdot.org]  Wasn't this supposed to <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/04/26/1743255" title="slashdot.org">plunge us back into the stone age?</a> [slashdot.org] <br> <br>So what happened?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a minute .
Was n't a CME this big supposed to completely destroy the power grid ?
[ slashdot.org ] Was n't this supposed to plunge us back into the stone age ?
[ slashdot.org ] So what happened ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a minute.
Wasn't a CME this big supposed to completely destroy the power grid?
[slashdot.org]  Wasn't this supposed to plunge us back into the stone age?
[slashdot.org]  So what happened?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942</id>
	<title>It is probably 62 miles</title>
	<author>Eukariote</author>
	<datestamp>1257182220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article speaks about a 100,000 km high (62,000 mile high) tsunami. Assuming that they are referring to the initial height of the surface wave, that is no doubt a typo since the sun's diameter is only 14 times that. Likely, they meant something rather less such as 100,000 m or 100 km. That's still a <em>big</em> wave though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article speaks about a 100,000 km high ( 62,000 mile high ) tsunami .
Assuming that they are referring to the initial height of the surface wave , that is no doubt a typo since the sun 's diameter is only 14 times that .
Likely , they meant something rather less such as 100,000 m or 100 km .
That 's still a big wave though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article speaks about a 100,000 km high (62,000 mile high) tsunami.
Assuming that they are referring to the initial height of the surface wave, that is no doubt a typo since the sun's diameter is only 14 times that.
Likely, they meant something rather less such as 100,000 m or 100 km.
That's still a big wave though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30229314</id>
	<title>Global Warming?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe now people will start to take into account that the Sun may indeed have something to do with the Global Warming, instead of blaming "passive-wind" and CO2. I can't believe when these fancy politicians account for everything that may be contributing to global warming but conveniently forget to mention the Sun, but then again how would you TAX the Sun</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe now people will start to take into account that the Sun may indeed have something to do with the Global Warming , instead of blaming " passive-wind " and CO2 .
I ca n't believe when these fancy politicians account for everything that may be contributing to global warming but conveniently forget to mention the Sun , but then again how would you TAX the Sun</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe now people will start to take into account that the Sun may indeed have something to do with the Global Warming, instead of blaming "passive-wind" and CO2.
I can't believe when these fancy politicians account for everything that may be contributing to global warming but conveniently forget to mention the Sun, but then again how would you TAX the Sun</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30231418</id>
	<title>Re:It is probably 62 miles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and it looks like the sun is burping...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and it looks like the sun is burping.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and it looks like the sun is burping...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227220</id>
	<title>120, not 90</title>
	<author>necro81</author>
	<datestamp>1257183660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>A correction from the summary: the two spacecraft are nearly 128 degrees apart, not 90.  They were launched into <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=STEREO&amp;oldid=326568741#Mission\_profile" title="wikipedia.org">slightly different heliocentric orbits</a> [wikipedia.org] that cause the angle between them to increase by about 21 degrees per year.  They've already passed through the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lagrangian\_point&amp;oldid=327784729#L4\_and\_L5" title="wikipedia.org">L4 and L5 Lagrangian points</a> [wikipedia.org] of the Sun-Earth system.  In Feb 2011, they'll be on opposite sides of the Sun, then start to converge once again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A correction from the summary : the two spacecraft are nearly 128 degrees apart , not 90 .
They were launched into slightly different heliocentric orbits [ wikipedia.org ] that cause the angle between them to increase by about 21 degrees per year .
They 've already passed through the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points [ wikipedia.org ] of the Sun-Earth system .
In Feb 2011 , they 'll be on opposite sides of the Sun , then start to converge once again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A correction from the summary: the two spacecraft are nearly 128 degrees apart, not 90.
They were launched into slightly different heliocentric orbits [wikipedia.org] that cause the angle between them to increase by about 21 degrees per year.
They've already passed through the L4 and L5 Lagrangian points [wikipedia.org] of the Sun-Earth system.
In Feb 2011, they'll be on opposite sides of the Sun, then start to converge once again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227266</id>
	<title>Shadows?</title>
	<author>Java Pimp</author>
	<datestamp>1257183900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave&mdash;or just a shadow of the CME overhead?"</p></div></blockquote><p>Shadows on the surface of the sun?</p><p>Must have been light from Venus reflecting off some swamp gas...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" We wondered , " recalls Gurman , " is that a wave    or just a shadow of the CME overhead ?
" Shadows on the surface of the sun ? Must have been light from Venus reflecting off some swamp gas.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave—or just a shadow of the CME overhead?
"Shadows on the surface of the sun?Must have been light from Venus reflecting off some swamp gas...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230492</id>
	<title>Re:They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257155880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A shadow in our direction, like an eclipse? Sounds ok to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A shadow in our direction , like an eclipse ?
Sounds ok to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A shadow in our direction, like an eclipse?
Sounds ok to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227652</id>
	<title>Re:They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1257185700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems counter-intuitive but the sun's corona is brighter than it's actual surface. It's possible that some cooler ejecta from a solar flare could cast a shadow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems counter-intuitive but the sun 's corona is brighter than it 's actual surface .
It 's possible that some cooler ejecta from a solar flare could cast a shadow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems counter-intuitive but the sun's corona is brighter than it's actual surface.
It's possible that some cooler ejecta from a solar flare could cast a shadow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230528</id>
	<title>Re:They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1257156060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Darker things between the sun and the observer cast a shadow outwards, ie. a solar eclipse.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Darker things between the sun and the observer cast a shadow outwards , ie .
a solar eclipse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darker things between the sun and the observer cast a shadow outwards, ie.
a solar eclipse.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226822</id>
	<title>A way to solve tsunamis problems on Earth ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257181680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if we harness solar tsunamis, we could use them to cancel out the wave of sea water tsunamis on Earth or at least cause them to evaporate !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if we harness solar tsunamis , we could use them to cancel out the wave of sea water tsunamis on Earth or at least cause them to evaporate !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if we harness solar tsunamis, we could use them to cancel out the wave of sea water tsunamis on Earth or at least cause them to evaporate !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</id>
	<title>They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA: </p><p><div class="quote"><p>"We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave&mdash;or just a shadow of the CME overhead?"</p> </div><p>Really? They thought it was a shadow? And what pray-tell would be shining brightly enough from above the CME material, to cast a shadow onto the <b>surface of the Sun</b>?</p><p>They didn't really think that through, did they?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " We wondered , " recalls Gurman , " is that a wave    or just a shadow of the CME overhead ?
" Really ?
They thought it was a shadow ?
And what pray-tell would be shining brightly enough from above the CME material , to cast a shadow onto the surface of the Sun ? They did n't really think that through , did they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: "We wondered," recalls Gurman, "is that a wave—or just a shadow of the CME overhead?
" Really?
They thought it was a shadow?
And what pray-tell would be shining brightly enough from above the CME material, to cast a shadow onto the surface of the Sun?They didn't really think that through, did they?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227650</id>
	<title>Anihilation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257185700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone else look at that movie and think that the whole thing could go "boom", like, anytime? OMG, that would NOT be pleasant.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone else look at that movie and think that the whole thing could go " boom " , like , anytime ?
OMG , that would NOT be pleasant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone else look at that movie and think that the whole thing could go "boom", like, anytime?
OMG, that would NOT be pleasant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226864</id>
	<title>is it sending a stream of neutrinos?</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1257181920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that will hit the earth's core and cause the plates to shift like in 2012?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that will hit the earth 's core and cause the plates to shift like in 2012 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that will hit the earth's core and cause the plates to shift like in 2012?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228238</id>
	<title>(plUs one Informative)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257188460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">futur3. Even</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>futur3 .
Even [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>futur3.
Even [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227914</id>
	<title>Re:Recent? Try February.</title>
	<author>theelectron</author>
	<datestamp>1257186900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Geologic time?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geologic time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geologic time?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227460</id>
	<title>Improved Long Distance Radio Propagation?</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1257184920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the sake of us amateur radio operators, I sure hope so. HF DX has sucked for the last few years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the sake of us amateur radio operators , I sure hope so .
HF DX has sucked for the last few years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the sake of us amateur radio operators, I sure hope so.
HF DX has sucked for the last few years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228514</id>
	<title>Re:It is probably 62 miles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257189900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some fade away, some explode - just like human zits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some fade away , some explode - just like human zits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some fade away, some explode - just like human zits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227086</id>
	<title>Re:It is probably 62 miles</title>
	<author>MadKeithV</author>
	<datestamp>1257182940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looking at the movies in TFA, I think one hundred thousand kilometers at 1/14th of the sun's diameter could actually be correct.  The wave is gigantic if I interpret the movie correctly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looking at the movies in TFA , I think one hundred thousand kilometers at 1/14th of the sun 's diameter could actually be correct .
The wave is gigantic if I interpret the movie correctly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looking at the movies in TFA, I think one hundred thousand kilometers at 1/14th of the sun's diameter could actually be correct.
The wave is gigantic if I interpret the movie correctly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227250</id>
	<title>Recent?  Try February.</title>
	<author>oneiros27</author>
	<datestamp>1257183840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the article<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:</p><blockquote><div><p>The twin STEREO spacecraft confirmed their reality in February 2009 when sunspot 11012 unexpectedly erupted</p></div></blockquote><p>Since when does 9 months ago count as 'recent' ?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : The twin STEREO spacecraft confirmed their reality in February 2009 when sunspot 11012 unexpectedly eruptedSince when does 9 months ago count as 'recent ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article :The twin STEREO spacecraft confirmed their reality in February 2009 when sunspot 11012 unexpectedly eruptedSince when does 9 months ago count as 'recent' ?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227164</id>
	<title>Solar wave?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You imbeciles, clearly they are a series of solar particles!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You imbeciles , clearly they are a series of solar particles !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You imbeciles, clearly they are a series of solar particles!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227940</id>
	<title>Re:Large CME?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257187020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The earth made its reflex save, duh. <br>
<br>
Did it occur to you the Coronal Mass Ejection might not be pointed at us?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The earth made its reflex save , duh .
Did it occur to you the Coronal Mass Ejection might not be pointed at us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The earth made its reflex save, duh.
Did it occur to you the Coronal Mass Ejection might not be pointed at us?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227596</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227636</id>
	<title>Re:Recent? Try February.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257185640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Sun is over 4.5 billion years old. Slightly less than how old you feel when you see your kids have grown up.</p><p>9 months is but a blink of an eye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sun is over 4.5 billion years old .
Slightly less than how old you feel when you see your kids have grown up.9 months is but a blink of an eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Sun is over 4.5 billion years old.
Slightly less than how old you feel when you see your kids have grown up.9 months is but a blink of an eye.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30232200</id>
	<title>Stereo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257168480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sure, they have a stereo image, but when will 5.1 channel version be available?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure , they have a stereo image , but when will 5.1 channel version be available ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure, they have a stereo image, but when will 5.1 channel version be available?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227042</id>
	<title>Exclamation points</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exclamation points have no place in article summaries!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exclamation points have no place in article summaries !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exclamation points have no place in article summaries!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30237774</id>
	<title>Only 2400 MT?</title>
	<author>Wolfkin</author>
	<datestamp>1259257260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"packing as much energy as 2400 megatons of TNT"</p><p>That seems a bit low, doesn't it?  Only two orders of magnitude more than what we've produced in a single nuke explosion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" packing as much energy as 2400 megatons of TNT " That seems a bit low , does n't it ?
Only two orders of magnitude more than what we 've produced in a single nuke explosion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"packing as much energy as 2400 megatons of TNT"That seems a bit low, doesn't it?
Only two orders of magnitude more than what we've produced in a single nuke explosion?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228124</id>
	<title>Hey Poindexter!</title>
	<author>paiute</author>
	<datestamp>1257187860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's tsunamis, not tsunami's.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's tsunamis , not tsunami 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's tsunamis, not tsunami's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227082</id>
	<title>Re:It is probably 62 miles</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did you see the animation?  That wave looks to be easily 1/14th of the solar diameter, especially near the origin.</p><p>What I learned from this article is that sunspots explode.  Never knew that; I thought they faded away...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did you see the animation ?
That wave looks to be easily 1/14th of the solar diameter , especially near the origin.What I learned from this article is that sunspots explode .
Never knew that ; I thought they faded away.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did you see the animation?
That wave looks to be easily 1/14th of the solar diameter, especially near the origin.What I learned from this article is that sunspots explode.
Never knew that; I thought they faded away...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226966</id>
	<title>Ahead, not OVERhead...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just correcting the summary, one spacecraft is *ahead* of the other (and of Earth) -- not "overhead".  Also, they don't orbit 90-deg apart.  They were ~90-deg apart for the even in question but are currently 127-deg apart.  This value will increase as they continue in their orbits around the Sun.  (By Feb 6, 2011 they will be 180-degrees apart, and will both be "behind" the Sun in ~mid-2015.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just correcting the summary , one spacecraft is * ahead * of the other ( and of Earth ) -- not " overhead " .
Also , they do n't orbit 90-deg apart .
They were ~ 90-deg apart for the even in question but are currently 127-deg apart .
This value will increase as they continue in their orbits around the Sun .
( By Feb 6 , 2011 they will be 180-degrees apart , and will both be " behind " the Sun in ~ mid-2015 .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just correcting the summary, one spacecraft is *ahead* of the other (and of Earth) -- not "overhead".
Also, they don't orbit 90-deg apart.
They were ~90-deg apart for the even in question but are currently 127-deg apart.
This value will increase as they continue in their orbits around the Sun.
(By Feb 6, 2011 they will be 180-degrees apart, and will both be "behind" the Sun in ~mid-2015.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30283748</id>
	<title>Too Much DBZ</title>
	<author>kenp2002</author>
	<datestamp>1259685300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one who, upon reading "Solar Flare Tsunami", said it in the delivery of some overpowered fighter yelling his attack out:</p><p>SOLAR FLARE TSUNAMI!<br>RAGING DEATH BLAST!<br>LINEAR TAX RATE!<br>SPINNING SIDE KICK!<br>HADOUKEN!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who , upon reading " Solar Flare Tsunami " , said it in the delivery of some overpowered fighter yelling his attack out : SOLAR FLARE TSUNAMI ! RAGING DEATH BLAST ! LINEAR TAX RATE ! SPINNING SIDE KICK ! HADOUKEN !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who, upon reading "Solar Flare Tsunami", said it in the delivery of some overpowered fighter yelling his attack out:SOLAR FLARE TSUNAMI!RAGING DEATH BLAST!LINEAR TAX RATE!SPINNING SIDE KICK!HADOUKEN!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227338</id>
	<title>Re:They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>necro81</author>
	<datestamp>1257184260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It could be that a chunk of the CME was cold and not very luminous, but another chunk farther out was (the corona is very bright and hot, after all).  Stereo images in multiple spectra, and it is well known that portions of the corona are much hotter than the surface of the sun, so it could be that in particular wavelengths the corona can cast shadows onto the sun's surface.<br> <br>

In any event, this was a comment made by a project scientist - a <i>solar physicist</i> - someone who probably knows more about the subject than you or I.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could be that a chunk of the CME was cold and not very luminous , but another chunk farther out was ( the corona is very bright and hot , after all ) .
Stereo images in multiple spectra , and it is well known that portions of the corona are much hotter than the surface of the sun , so it could be that in particular wavelengths the corona can cast shadows onto the sun 's surface .
In any event , this was a comment made by a project scientist - a solar physicist - someone who probably knows more about the subject than you or I .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could be that a chunk of the CME was cold and not very luminous, but another chunk farther out was (the corona is very bright and hot, after all).
Stereo images in multiple spectra, and it is well known that portions of the corona are much hotter than the surface of the sun, so it could be that in particular wavelengths the corona can cast shadows onto the sun's surface.
In any event, this was a comment made by a project scientist - a solar physicist - someone who probably knows more about the subject than you or I.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226922</id>
	<title>Surf's up</title>
	<author>Darth Sdlavrot</author>
	<datestamp>1257182100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>kawabunga.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>kawabunga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kawabunga.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228760</id>
	<title>Re:They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>nefertitian</author>
	<datestamp>1257190800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>UFO</htmltext>
<tokenext>UFO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UFO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227274</id>
	<title>2012</title>
	<author>binaryartist</author>
	<datestamp>1257183960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am going to investigate of if China is building Arc ships</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am going to investigate of if China is building Arc ships</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am going to investigate of if China is building Arc ships</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227106</id>
	<title>Re:It is probably 62 miles</title>
	<author>drerwk</author>
	<datestamp>1257183060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know, if you look at the side view, the initial eruption of the wave looks like it could be 5\% or 10\% the diameter of the sun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , if you look at the side view , the initial eruption of the wave looks like it could be 5 \ % or 10 \ % the diameter of the sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, if you look at the side view, the initial eruption of the wave looks like it could be 5\% or 10\% the diameter of the sun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227356</id>
	<title>Re:They really thought it might be a shadow?</title>
	<author>AlecC</author>
	<datestamp>1257184380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sloppy wording - absorbtion by the CME i.e. you are looking through the CME.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sloppy wording - absorbtion by the CME i.e .
you are looking through the CME .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sloppy wording - absorbtion by the CME i.e.
you are looking through the CME.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227840</id>
	<title>A watched Sun never boils</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257186600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, at least STEREO proved that phrase wrong.</p><p>We now know the Sun boils and splashes like a pot of hot chili on a stove. Now, who's going to clean up the cosmic stove top of all the solar splatters?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , at least STEREO proved that phrase wrong.We now know the Sun boils and splashes like a pot of hot chili on a stove .
Now , who 's going to clean up the cosmic stove top of all the solar splatters ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, at least STEREO proved that phrase wrong.We now know the Sun boils and splashes like a pot of hot chili on a stove.
Now, who's going to clean up the cosmic stove top of all the solar splatters?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30229240</id>
	<title>lmod 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One Here dbut now</htmltext>
<tokenext>One Here dbut now</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One Here dbut now</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228234</id>
	<title>Re:Surf's up</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1257188400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Finally <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver\_Surfer" title="wikipedia.org">Norrin Radd</a> [wikipedia.org] has a chance to prove he's not just a poseur. I mean, seriously, has anyone actually seen him surf <i>anything?!</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally Norrin Radd [ wikipedia.org ] has a chance to prove he 's not just a poseur .
I mean , seriously , has anyone actually seen him surf anything ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally Norrin Radd [wikipedia.org] has a chance to prove he's not just a poseur.
I mean, seriously, has anyone actually seen him surf anything?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226922</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227192</id>
	<title>Impossible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's 2 years early!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's 2 years early !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's 2 years early!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227246</id>
	<title>Too much gaming...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else see the gifs and think "BOOM! HEADSHOT!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else see the gifs and think " BOOM !
HEADSHOT ! "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else see the gifs and think "BOOM!
HEADSHOT!"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227392</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257184620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The slow response to this Tsunami is clearly George Bush's fault.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The slow response to this Tsunami is clearly George Bush 's fault .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The slow response to this Tsunami is clearly George Bush's fault.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226922
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30229054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227246
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230528
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227596
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_151219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30231418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227914
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228514
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30231418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30229054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30228760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230528
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227652
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30230398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30227840
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_151219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_151219.30226822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
