<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_25_1320215</id>
	<title>Wikileaks Publishes 500,000 9/11 Pager Messages</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1259159940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Wikileaks is preparing to <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2009-11/25/wikileaks-says-it-has-half-a-million-911-pager-messages.aspx">release 500,000 intercepted pager messages</a> from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks. The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse. Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Wikileaks is preparing to release 500,000 intercepted pager messages from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks .
The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse .
Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Wikileaks is preparing to release 500,000 intercepted pager messages from a 24-hour period encompassing the September 11 terrorist attacks.
The messages show emergency services springing into action and computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse.
Wikileaks implies this data came from an organised collection effort.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226656</id>
	<title>Global warming a conspiracy, maybe 911 is too</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257180900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until we got the email evidence proving global warming was a hoax, I was ready to almost start believing it.  Given that it IS apparently possible for the UN and thousands of scientists across the world to fake something as wide ranging as global warming, I am going to have to re-examine my skepticism of the 911 "truther" conspiracy theory as well.  Like the email that brought down global warming, this pager evidence is pretty damned convincing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until we got the email evidence proving global warming was a hoax , I was ready to almost start believing it .
Given that it IS apparently possible for the UN and thousands of scientists across the world to fake something as wide ranging as global warming , I am going to have to re-examine my skepticism of the 911 " truther " conspiracy theory as well .
Like the email that brought down global warming , this pager evidence is pretty damned convincing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until we got the email evidence proving global warming was a hoax, I was ready to almost start believing it.
Given that it IS apparently possible for the UN and thousands of scientists across the world to fake something as wide ranging as global warming, I am going to have to re-examine my skepticism of the 911 "truther" conspiracy theory as well.
Like the email that brought down global warming, this pager evidence is pretty damned convincing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229216</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Data to phones can be delivered when the network is very congested, since the speed that packages reach the phone isn't all that important, unlike voice where if you miss a couple dozen packets in a row your call is gone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Data to phones can be delivered when the network is very congested , since the speed that packages reach the phone is n't all that important , unlike voice where if you miss a couple dozen packets in a row your call is gone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Data to phones can be delivered when the network is very congested, since the speed that packages reach the phone isn't all that important, unlike voice where if you miss a couple dozen packets in a row your call is gone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231084</id>
	<title>Re:that's nice</title>
	<author>erroneus</author>
	<datestamp>1257159840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just love that "conspiracy theory" automatically makes anyone who thinks there is something wrong with the official story some sort of fruitcake or worse.  Once upon a time, the official story was that the universe was created in a week or something like that.  Once upon a time, the official story was "spontaneous generation."  Once upon a time, the official story was a geocentric universe.  Once upon a time, the official story was that the tooth-fairy took the tooth from under your pillow and replaced it with money.  Once upon a time, the official story was that Santa Claus delivered those presents while you were sleeping.</p><p>There have been, throughout time and experience, when official positions and stories have been wrong and some of them were shown to be intentionally deceptive.  We have seen times where, at various levels, governments have lied to their own people about various things as well.  None of these things should be surprising to anyone.</p><p>There are definitely some weird things about the official story that just don't seem to work well with reality as we know it.  I think it is okay to question those oddities without being labeled as a "conspiracy theorist."  Jumping to unfounded conclusions, on the other hand, is a trait that could and probably should lead to the label of conspiracy theorist, but therein lies the problem.  Evidence of truth is so often denied and dismissed because of faith already committed in favor of an original story or belief.</p><p>I think we need a counter-term for conspiracy theory... one that suggests an equal level of folly for believing everything that people in positions of authority tells us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just love that " conspiracy theory " automatically makes anyone who thinks there is something wrong with the official story some sort of fruitcake or worse .
Once upon a time , the official story was that the universe was created in a week or something like that .
Once upon a time , the official story was " spontaneous generation .
" Once upon a time , the official story was a geocentric universe .
Once upon a time , the official story was that the tooth-fairy took the tooth from under your pillow and replaced it with money .
Once upon a time , the official story was that Santa Claus delivered those presents while you were sleeping.There have been , throughout time and experience , when official positions and stories have been wrong and some of them were shown to be intentionally deceptive .
We have seen times where , at various levels , governments have lied to their own people about various things as well .
None of these things should be surprising to anyone.There are definitely some weird things about the official story that just do n't seem to work well with reality as we know it .
I think it is okay to question those oddities without being labeled as a " conspiracy theorist .
" Jumping to unfounded conclusions , on the other hand , is a trait that could and probably should lead to the label of conspiracy theorist , but therein lies the problem .
Evidence of truth is so often denied and dismissed because of faith already committed in favor of an original story or belief.I think we need a counter-term for conspiracy theory... one that suggests an equal level of folly for believing everything that people in positions of authority tells us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just love that "conspiracy theory" automatically makes anyone who thinks there is something wrong with the official story some sort of fruitcake or worse.
Once upon a time, the official story was that the universe was created in a week or something like that.
Once upon a time, the official story was "spontaneous generation.
"  Once upon a time, the official story was a geocentric universe.
Once upon a time, the official story was that the tooth-fairy took the tooth from under your pillow and replaced it with money.
Once upon a time, the official story was that Santa Claus delivered those presents while you were sleeping.There have been, throughout time and experience, when official positions and stories have been wrong and some of them were shown to be intentionally deceptive.
We have seen times where, at various levels, governments have lied to their own people about various things as well.
None of these things should be surprising to anyone.There are definitely some weird things about the official story that just don't seem to work well with reality as we know it.
I think it is okay to question those oddities without being labeled as a "conspiracy theorist.
"  Jumping to unfounded conclusions, on the other hand, is a trait that could and probably should lead to the label of conspiracy theorist, but therein lies the problem.
Evidence of truth is so often denied and dismissed because of faith already committed in favor of an original story or belief.I think we need a counter-term for conspiracy theory... one that suggests an equal level of folly for believing everything that people in positions of authority tells us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228188</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Thumper\_SVX</author>
	<datestamp>1257188220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously didn't work in IT in the early '90s. I did, and pagers were de-facto office-wear.</p><p>Of course, once cellphones started to become popular (I remember my first Motorola StarTac... that was an awesome phone), a bunch of drunk IT guys at a local pub could entertain themselves for hours by lining their pagers up at one end of a table with a slight lean and constantly calling them. Vibrating pager races were always a great way to decide who bought the next round.</p><p>Yes, this was in East London<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously did n't work in IT in the early '90s .
I did , and pagers were de-facto office-wear.Of course , once cellphones started to become popular ( I remember my first Motorola StarTac... that was an awesome phone ) , a bunch of drunk IT guys at a local pub could entertain themselves for hours by lining their pagers up at one end of a table with a slight lean and constantly calling them .
Vibrating pager races were always a great way to decide who bought the next round.Yes , this was in East London : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously didn't work in IT in the early '90s.
I did, and pagers were de-facto office-wear.Of course, once cellphones started to become popular (I remember my first Motorola StarTac... that was an awesome phone), a bunch of drunk IT guys at a local pub could entertain themselves for hours by lining their pagers up at one end of a table with a slight lean and constantly calling them.
Vibrating pager races were always a great way to decide who bought the next round.Yes, this was in East London :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227110</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>AmiMoJo</author>
	<datestamp>1257183060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just put it on vibrate and leave it resting on your crotch. I guarantee you will wake up happy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just put it on vibrate and leave it resting on your crotch .
I guarantee you will wake up happy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just put it on vibrate and leave it resting on your crotch.
I guarantee you will wake up happy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232224</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>slimjim8094</author>
	<datestamp>1257168540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For what it's worth, most emergency services aren't standard pagers. Standard pagers broadcast via satellite or terrestrial towers. Emergency pagers receive broadcasts from the agency itself; there's no third party involved.</p><p>I'm in EMS. This is how it works for us, and every EMS/fire person I've ever spoken to - but it may not be universal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For what it 's worth , most emergency services are n't standard pagers .
Standard pagers broadcast via satellite or terrestrial towers .
Emergency pagers receive broadcasts from the agency itself ; there 's no third party involved.I 'm in EMS .
This is how it works for us , and every EMS/fire person I 've ever spoken to - but it may not be universal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For what it's worth, most emergency services aren't standard pagers.
Standard pagers broadcast via satellite or terrestrial towers.
Emergency pagers receive broadcasts from the agency itself; there's no third party involved.I'm in EMS.
This is how it works for us, and every EMS/fire person I've ever spoken to - but it may not be universal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30237666</id>
	<title>for your grepping pleasure</title>
	<author>goodtrick</author>
	<datestamp>1259256420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>juicy stuff

003951473
002461139
005385065</htmltext>
<tokenext>juicy stuff 003951473 002461139 005385065</tokentext>
<sentencetext>juicy stuff

003951473
002461139
005385065</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226938</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mod you troll and laugh, because I know you'll just think I'm part of the conspiracy too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mod you troll and laugh , because I know you 'll just think I 'm part of the conspiracy too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mod you troll and laugh, because I know you'll just think I'm part of the conspiracy too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226170</id>
	<title>Twitter next</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257178620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>After the next major event it will be the twitter stream which will be subject to such analysis</htmltext>
<tokenext>After the next major event it will be the twitter stream which will be subject to such analysis</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the next major event it will be the twitter stream which will be subject to such analysis</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232700</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>tuxicle</author>
	<datestamp>1257172140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pagers operate at a lower frequency than cell phones, the likelihood of a dead zone is lower.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pagers operate at a lower frequency than cell phones , the likelihood of a dead zone is lower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pagers operate at a lower frequency than cell phones, the likelihood of a dead zone is lower.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228334</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>lothos</author>
	<datestamp>1257188940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most pagers back then used satellites for coverage.</p><p>Anyone remember the satellite outage in 1998 when pagers stopped working for 2 days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most pagers back then used satellites for coverage.Anyone remember the satellite outage in 1998 when pagers stopped working for 2 days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most pagers back then used satellites for coverage.Anyone remember the satellite outage in 1998 when pagers stopped working for 2 days?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228758</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257190800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They will be popular again soon.  Technology is cyclical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They will be popular again soon .
Technology is cyclical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They will be popular again soon.
Technology is cyclical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30239484</id>
	<title>sed /fuck/!d</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259228340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2001-09-11 15:56:37 metrocall [1543818] c  alpha  i want to suck you and fuck you. i want you to lick me, too! i'm wearing a see-thru outfit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2001-09-11 15 : 56 : 37 metrocall [ 1543818 ] c alpha i want to suck you and fuck you .
i want you to lick me , too !
i 'm wearing a see-thru outfit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2001-09-11 15:56:37 metrocall [1543818] c  alpha  i want to suck you and fuck you.
i want you to lick me, too!
i'm wearing a see-thru outfit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226950</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Mashiki</author>
	<datestamp>1257182280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just to add to this, a lot of EMS services here in North America use this because newer pagers can include the EMS TONE system for responses. Including in vibrate mode(using pulses and buzzes) if you're at a conference inside a building and you have to have the pager on, but tone off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just to add to this , a lot of EMS services here in North America use this because newer pagers can include the EMS TONE system for responses .
Including in vibrate mode ( using pulses and buzzes ) if you 're at a conference inside a building and you have to have the pager on , but tone off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just to add to this, a lot of EMS services here in North America use this because newer pagers can include the EMS TONE system for responses.
Including in vibrate mode(using pulses and buzzes) if you're at a conference inside a building and you have to have the pager on, but tone off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225896</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Tteddo</author>
	<datestamp>1257177240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have one!! I don't have a phone either. And I am in IT. And yes, the young-ins make fun of me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have one ! !
I do n't have a phone either .
And I am in IT .
And yes , the young-ins make fun of me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have one!!
I don't have a phone either.
And I am in IT.
And yes, the young-ins make fun of me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226000</id>
	<title>Who needs to make backups anymore?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257177840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who needs to make backups anymore? The NSA has all your data and communications stored for you.  Maybe they should sell backup services to fix the budget deficit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who needs to make backups anymore ?
The NSA has all your data and communications stored for you .
Maybe they should sell backup services to fix the budget deficit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who needs to make backups anymore?
The NSA has all your data and communications stored for you.
Maybe they should sell backup services to fix the budget deficit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227052</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you think we know everything about what happened at 9/11 you're just gullable, maybe those people you so easily call nutters just want some good answers. What about those hijackers that turned up alive afterwards, the investigation that was closed from higher up, the third building that crashed in (seemingly unrelated accident? structural faults exposed by the other buildings crashing? yeah right), the so-called plane debris at the pentagon, the almost immediate insistence to attack Afghanistan before any investigation even had occurred, and so on. There's a big stink around the whole thing which will never be cleared up, just like the JFK assassination, and it probably just is the government covering up again. (But don't tell them I told you this!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think we know everything about what happened at 9/11 you 're just gullable , maybe those people you so easily call nutters just want some good answers .
What about those hijackers that turned up alive afterwards , the investigation that was closed from higher up , the third building that crashed in ( seemingly unrelated accident ?
structural faults exposed by the other buildings crashing ?
yeah right ) , the so-called plane debris at the pentagon , the almost immediate insistence to attack Afghanistan before any investigation even had occurred , and so on .
There 's a big stink around the whole thing which will never be cleared up , just like the JFK assassination , and it probably just is the government covering up again .
( But do n't tell them I told you this !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think we know everything about what happened at 9/11 you're just gullable, maybe those people you so easily call nutters just want some good answers.
What about those hijackers that turned up alive afterwards, the investigation that was closed from higher up, the third building that crashed in (seemingly unrelated accident?
structural faults exposed by the other buildings crashing?
yeah right), the so-called plane debris at the pentagon, the almost immediate insistence to attack Afghanistan before any investigation even had occurred, and so on.
There's a big stink around the whole thing which will never be cleared up, just like the JFK assassination, and it probably just is the government covering up again.
(But don't tell them I told you this!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30242576</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1259256720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How in the fuck does a comment which links to "patriotsquestion911" get modded +5 informative?</p><p>You're lying about what the commissioners said.  You need to pull your head out of your ass and look at some <i>credible</i> sources, instead of getting all of your misinformation from the paranoid circle-jerk which the 9/11 goof movement has become.  You also need to stop pretending that you want another investigation.  You don't.  What you want is a witch-hunt.  Any investigation which disagrees with you will simply be dismissed as another coverup.  If you expect to be taken seriously, you need to stop lying, and you need to stop misrepresenting your intentions.  Until then, rational people will continue to dismiss you as a dishonest crank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How in the fuck does a comment which links to " patriotsquestion911 " get modded + 5 informative ? You 're lying about what the commissioners said .
You need to pull your head out of your ass and look at some credible sources , instead of getting all of your misinformation from the paranoid circle-jerk which the 9/11 goof movement has become .
You also need to stop pretending that you want another investigation .
You do n't .
What you want is a witch-hunt .
Any investigation which disagrees with you will simply be dismissed as another coverup .
If you expect to be taken seriously , you need to stop lying , and you need to stop misrepresenting your intentions .
Until then , rational people will continue to dismiss you as a dishonest crank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How in the fuck does a comment which links to "patriotsquestion911" get modded +5 informative?You're lying about what the commissioners said.
You need to pull your head out of your ass and look at some credible sources, instead of getting all of your misinformation from the paranoid circle-jerk which the 9/11 goof movement has become.
You also need to stop pretending that you want another investigation.
You don't.
What you want is a witch-hunt.
Any investigation which disagrees with you will simply be dismissed as another coverup.
If you expect to be taken seriously, you need to stop lying, and you need to stop misrepresenting your intentions.
Until then, rational people will continue to dismiss you as a dishonest crank.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227626</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Stupid McStupidson</author>
	<datestamp>1257185640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>    It's mostly because you have a gross misunderstanding of how the military works. When something gets fucked up, somebody is responsible for the fuck up. While that statement at first makes you say, "Well, duh!" you need to understand how it functions in the military. That statement is an absolute truth. There are no "whoops, nobody's fault" moments in the military.  If something fucked up, SOMEBODY fucked up, and therefore, SOMEBODY will pay. Usually an officer is in charge, a relatively minor fuck up might be a slap on the wrist. A moderate fuck up, or a string of minor ones will result in a bad evaluation report which will prevent your promotion, and essentially make you a dead man walking. Major fuck ups are the end of your career. There isn't a chart somewhere delineating all the fuck-up degrees, but I'm sure as they watched iconic building collapsing in flames, they assumed it was pretty major. This results in many waves of ass-covering, as really major fuck ups tend to take out swaths of officers and NCO's. To a third party observer, the ass covering to save yourself from the "SOMEBODY will pay" maxim probably seems sinister..as if they were hiding something. But in reality, they are just trying to hide what they assume to be their vulnerable behinds.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's mostly because you have a gross misunderstanding of how the military works .
When something gets fucked up , somebody is responsible for the fuck up .
While that statement at first makes you say , " Well , duh !
" you need to understand how it functions in the military .
That statement is an absolute truth .
There are no " whoops , nobody 's fault " moments in the military .
If something fucked up , SOMEBODY fucked up , and therefore , SOMEBODY will pay .
Usually an officer is in charge , a relatively minor fuck up might be a slap on the wrist .
A moderate fuck up , or a string of minor ones will result in a bad evaluation report which will prevent your promotion , and essentially make you a dead man walking .
Major fuck ups are the end of your career .
There is n't a chart somewhere delineating all the fuck-up degrees , but I 'm sure as they watched iconic building collapsing in flames , they assumed it was pretty major .
This results in many waves of ass-covering , as really major fuck ups tend to take out swaths of officers and NCO 's .
To a third party observer , the ass covering to save yourself from the " SOMEBODY will pay " maxim probably seems sinister..as if they were hiding something .
But in reality , they are just trying to hide what they assume to be their vulnerable behinds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>    It's mostly because you have a gross misunderstanding of how the military works.
When something gets fucked up, somebody is responsible for the fuck up.
While that statement at first makes you say, "Well, duh!
" you need to understand how it functions in the military.
That statement is an absolute truth.
There are no "whoops, nobody's fault" moments in the military.
If something fucked up, SOMEBODY fucked up, and therefore, SOMEBODY will pay.
Usually an officer is in charge, a relatively minor fuck up might be a slap on the wrist.
A moderate fuck up, or a string of minor ones will result in a bad evaluation report which will prevent your promotion, and essentially make you a dead man walking.
Major fuck ups are the end of your career.
There isn't a chart somewhere delineating all the fuck-up degrees, but I'm sure as they watched iconic building collapsing in flames, they assumed it was pretty major.
This results in many waves of ass-covering, as really major fuck ups tend to take out swaths of officers and NCO's.
To a third party observer, the ass covering to save yourself from the "SOMEBODY will pay" maxim probably seems sinister..as if they were hiding something.
But in reality, they are just trying to hide what they assume to be their vulnerable behinds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227738</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257186120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used a pager when I worked at a nuclear plant three years ago.  It was too noisy to talk on a cell phone in the turbine hall (and the company was probably too cheap to buy us cell phones anyways, preferring to give those to managers and senior engineers), so they gave us pagers which we set to vibrate when a page came through.  If it went off then I'd just walk to a quiet area of the plant and return the call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used a pager when I worked at a nuclear plant three years ago .
It was too noisy to talk on a cell phone in the turbine hall ( and the company was probably too cheap to buy us cell phones anyways , preferring to give those to managers and senior engineers ) , so they gave us pagers which we set to vibrate when a page came through .
If it went off then I 'd just walk to a quiet area of the plant and return the call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used a pager when I worked at a nuclear plant three years ago.
It was too noisy to talk on a cell phone in the turbine hall (and the company was probably too cheap to buy us cell phones anyways, preferring to give those to managers and senior engineers), so they gave us pagers which we set to vibrate when a page came through.
If it went off then I'd just walk to a quiet area of the plant and return the call.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227208</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Spudds</author>
	<datestamp>1257183600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's partially true.<br>I also lived and worked in Manhattan during 9/11.</p><p>There was a cellphone tower on top of one of the two towers which killed cellphones for the lower region of the island, but cellphones were working just fine as low as 35th st. I called my parents back home from my apartment on 91st street and spoke with a co-worker who was already at work and watching the events unfold from the corner of 35th and 7th.</p><p>You are definitely correct about cellphones not working down in the financial district however.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's partially true.I also lived and worked in Manhattan during 9/11.There was a cellphone tower on top of one of the two towers which killed cellphones for the lower region of the island , but cellphones were working just fine as low as 35th st. I called my parents back home from my apartment on 91st street and spoke with a co-worker who was already at work and watching the events unfold from the corner of 35th and 7th.You are definitely correct about cellphones not working down in the financial district however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's partially true.I also lived and worked in Manhattan during 9/11.There was a cellphone tower on top of one of the two towers which killed cellphones for the lower region of the island, but cellphones were working just fine as low as 35th st. I called my parents back home from my apartment on 91st street and spoke with a co-worker who was already at work and watching the events unfold from the corner of 35th and 7th.You are definitely correct about cellphones not working down in the financial district however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226380</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter next</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257179700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you crazy? it takes down vell networks and what not and you think the failwhale won't appear?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you crazy ?
it takes down vell networks and what not and you think the failwhale wo n't appear ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you crazy?
it takes down vell networks and what not and you think the failwhale won't appear?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226412</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>jayhawk88</author>
	<datestamp>1257179820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>im not dealing with this shit today.i will call johnston in earlyford shut down there plants and im not answering why we are still working.fuck this. FROM: RYDER LITTLEJOHN (x18914) (3</i></p><p>I bet someone felt like a real asshole after sending that. So sorry that one of the greatest tragedies in the countries history screwed up your day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>im not dealing with this shit today.i will call johnston in earlyford shut down there plants and im not answering why we are still working.fuck this .
FROM : RYDER LITTLEJOHN ( x18914 ) ( 3I bet someone felt like a real asshole after sending that .
So sorry that one of the greatest tragedies in the countries history screwed up your day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>im not dealing with this shit today.i will call johnston in earlyford shut down there plants and im not answering why we are still working.fuck this.
FROM: RYDER LITTLEJOHN (x18914) (3I bet someone felt like a real asshole after sending that.
So sorry that one of the greatest tragedies in the countries history screwed up your day.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225984</id>
	<title>Good Move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257177720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks. Its one of those things, where in the digital age, that information lasts for a long time, but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks. What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things, including emergency response methods and efficiency, the way people react to catastrophic events, and information that may have previously been unknown, and things like that. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing. Yes, there will be both ends of the extremist section, both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts, who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories, but its still a good thing. Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt, I found one very interesting message.."WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB." This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that aren't there, but regardless, it will be interesting to see where this leads. Data by itself sometimes can be useless, but in context can have implications you don't expect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks .
Its one of those things , where in the digital age , that information lasts for a long time , but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks .
What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things , including emergency response methods and efficiency , the way people react to catastrophic events , and information that may have previously been unknown , and things like that .
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing .
Yes , there will be both ends of the extremist section , both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts , who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories , but its still a good thing .
Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt , I found one very interesting message.. " WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB .
" This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that are n't there , but regardless , it will be interesting to see where this leads .
Data by itself sometimes can be useless , but in context can have implications you do n't expect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks.
Its one of those things, where in the digital age, that information lasts for a long time, but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks.
What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things, including emergency response methods and efficiency, the way people react to catastrophic events, and information that may have previously been unknown, and things like that.
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing.
Yes, there will be both ends of the extremist section, both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts, who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories, but its still a good thing.
Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt, I found one very interesting message.."WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB.
" This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that aren't there, but regardless, it will be interesting to see where this leads.
Data by itself sometimes can be useless, but in context can have implications you don't expect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226654</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257180900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's a shame though, because pagers don't have transmitter hardware. Unlike a cellphone, a pager can not be located by the network. A cellphone can be located to within a few hundred yards at worst, but typically much more closely. (Even in rural areas with few towers. Look up "timing advance" in the GSM specification.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a shame though , because pagers do n't have transmitter hardware .
Unlike a cellphone , a pager can not be located by the network .
A cellphone can be located to within a few hundred yards at worst , but typically much more closely .
( Even in rural areas with few towers .
Look up " timing advance " in the GSM specification .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a shame though, because pagers don't have transmitter hardware.
Unlike a cellphone, a pager can not be located by the network.
A cellphone can be located to within a few hundred yards at worst, but typically much more closely.
(Even in rural areas with few towers.
Look up "timing advance" in the GSM specification.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226066</id>
	<title>It's not just 9/11 related pager messages</title>
	<author>rbb</author>
	<datestamp>1257178140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>In <a href="http://911.wikileaks.org/files/messages\_2001\_09\_11-07\_40\_2001\_09\_11-07\_44.txt" title="wikileaks.org">this file</a> [wikileaks.org] I noticed a message that, in hindsight, is especially morbid:<blockquote><div><p>Good morning. I haven't heard from you in a while. I'll try one more time and I suppose I will take the hint if you don't page me back. Have a good day. Todd</p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In this file [ wikileaks.org ] I noticed a message that , in hindsight , is especially morbid : Good morning .
I have n't heard from you in a while .
I 'll try one more time and I suppose I will take the hint if you do n't page me back .
Have a good day .
Todd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In this file [wikileaks.org] I noticed a message that, in hindsight, is especially morbid:Good morning.
I haven't heard from you in a while.
I'll try one more time and I suppose I will take the hint if you don't page me back.
Have a good day.
Todd

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226766</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257181380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No matter how many times you cut and paste that into message boards, no one cares. No one will ever care. And deep in your narcissistic heart, you know that bothers you way more than any nonsensical "conspiracy."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No matter how many times you cut and paste that into message boards , no one cares .
No one will ever care .
And deep in your narcissistic heart , you know that bothers you way more than any nonsensical " conspiracy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No matter how many times you cut and paste that into message boards, no one cares.
No one will ever care.
And deep in your narcissistic heart, you know that bothers you way more than any nonsensical "conspiracy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226314</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1257179280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.</i></p><p>Let me save someone else the trouble:</p><p>blah blah blah kids today blah blah blah get off my lawn blah blah blah I remember when this was all fields.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pager" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pager</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages ; indeed , I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.Let me save someone else the trouble : blah blah blah kids today blah blah blah get off my lawn blah blah blah I remember when this was all fields.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pager [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.Let me save someone else the trouble:blah blah blah kids today blah blah blah get off my lawn blah blah blah I remember when this was all fields.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pager [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229858</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>binary paladin</author>
	<datestamp>1257152640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if I had the same phone, but I had an old LG with that kind of ringer. It was crazy loud!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if I had the same phone , but I had an old LG with that kind of ringer .
It was crazy loud !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if I had the same phone, but I had an old LG with that kind of ringer.
It was crazy loud!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226688</id>
	<title>Re:that's nice</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257181020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The conspiracy theories are already full of thousands of snippets of stuff, this new data isn't going to change anyone's mind. People who want to believe in a conspiracy will find "proof" in whatever information they get, so it doesn't really matter what's available.</p><p>Basically, there's already so many barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories out there that it doesn't really matter if this new data spawns a few more. I think most people have already chosen a side on the whole government conspiracy angle, and a bunch of snippets of pager text isn't going to sway anyone either way. The conspiracy nuts will have lots of fun endlessly debating all this new stuff for a few months, and everyone else will shrug their shoulders and go on with their lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The conspiracy theories are already full of thousands of snippets of stuff , this new data is n't going to change anyone 's mind .
People who want to believe in a conspiracy will find " proof " in whatever information they get , so it does n't really matter what 's available.Basically , there 's already so many barely contextualized , ill-thought out , and poorly worded conspiracy theories out there that it does n't really matter if this new data spawns a few more .
I think most people have already chosen a side on the whole government conspiracy angle , and a bunch of snippets of pager text is n't going to sway anyone either way .
The conspiracy nuts will have lots of fun endlessly debating all this new stuff for a few months , and everyone else will shrug their shoulders and go on with their lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The conspiracy theories are already full of thousands of snippets of stuff, this new data isn't going to change anyone's mind.
People who want to believe in a conspiracy will find "proof" in whatever information they get, so it doesn't really matter what's available.Basically, there's already so many barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories out there that it doesn't really matter if this new data spawns a few more.
I think most people have already chosen a side on the whole government conspiracy angle, and a bunch of snippets of pager text isn't going to sway anyone either way.
The conspiracy nuts will have lots of fun endlessly debating all this new stuff for a few months, and everyone else will shrug their shoulders and go on with their lives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232362</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>BlueWaterBaboonFarm</author>
	<datestamp>1257169500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Where I live (BC, Canada) a lot of drug dealers use them for privacy reasons.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Where I live ( BC , Canada ) a lot of drug dealers use them for privacy reasons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where I live (BC, Canada) a lot of drug dealers use them for privacy reasons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30287002</id>
	<title>Collected how?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259698140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wait a sec. Just how did they *acquire* these messages? Especially the ones from *official* sources! Moral: There IS no such thing as privacy any more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait a sec .
Just how did they * acquire * these messages ?
Especially the ones from * official * sources !
Moral : There IS no such thing as privacy any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait a sec.
Just how did they *acquire* these messages?
Especially the ones from *official* sources!
Moral: There IS no such thing as privacy any more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232034</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>SpaceCadets</author>
	<datestamp>1257167220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In Australia, the SES (State Emergency Service) still uses them &ndash; at least they did three years ago.  This might be Victoria only, but when I was a member we were issued with them.  FYI, the SES do things like search / rescue, vehicle extractions in accidents, and storm damage &lsquo;clean up&rsquo;.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In Australia , the SES ( State Emergency Service ) still uses them    at least they did three years ago .
This might be Victoria only , but when I was a member we were issued with them .
FYI , the SES do things like search / rescue , vehicle extractions in accidents , and storm damage    clean up    .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Australia, the SES (State Emergency Service) still uses them – at least they did three years ago.
This might be Victoria only, but when I was a member we were issued with them.
FYI, the SES do things like search / rescue, vehicle extractions in accidents, and storm damage ‘clean up’.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227138</id>
	<title>08:58:33</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>2001-09-11 08:58:33 Skytel [002399634] A  ALPHA  Initial reports indictate that AAL11, B767, after initial hijacking on flight from BOS-LAX, has crashed into the side of the World Trade Center in NY.  ATCSCC/bl</p></div><p>That was an insane amount of detail at a point when everyone else was going: "It's possible something may have happened somewhere."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>2001-09-11 08 : 58 : 33 Skytel [ 002399634 ] A ALPHA Initial reports indictate that AAL11 , B767 , after initial hijacking on flight from BOS-LAX , has crashed into the side of the World Trade Center in NY .
ATCSCC/blThat was an insane amount of detail at a point when everyone else was going : " It 's possible something may have happened somewhere .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2001-09-11 08:58:33 Skytel [002399634] A  ALPHA  Initial reports indictate that AAL11, B767, after initial hijacking on flight from BOS-LAX, has crashed into the side of the World Trade Center in NY.
ATCSCC/blThat was an insane amount of detail at a point when everyone else was going: "It's possible something may have happened somewhere.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30234796</id>
	<title>grep them for "password"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259227500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wonder if any of these are still valid.</p><p>Teehee...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if any of these are still valid.Teehee.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if any of these are still valid.Teehee...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226902</id>
	<title>Back when pagers were still popular</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought a product for about $50 from and ad in a magazine called "Monitoring Times". It was a little device that plugged into the speaker jack of a scanner that could pick up the pager frequencies. The other end plugged into my sound-card input, and software decoded it.  I would read other people's pages all day long.</p><p>Certainly anyone who had one of these and lived in NYC during 9/11 would have monitored pager traffic.  It's not that surprising that WikiLeaks was able to get this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought a product for about $ 50 from and ad in a magazine called " Monitoring Times " .
It was a little device that plugged into the speaker jack of a scanner that could pick up the pager frequencies .
The other end plugged into my sound-card input , and software decoded it .
I would read other people 's pages all day long.Certainly anyone who had one of these and lived in NYC during 9/11 would have monitored pager traffic .
It 's not that surprising that WikiLeaks was able to get this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought a product for about $50 from and ad in a magazine called "Monitoring Times".
It was a little device that plugged into the speaker jack of a scanner that could pick up the pager frequencies.
The other end plugged into my sound-card input, and software decoded it.
I would read other people's pages all day long.Certainly anyone who had one of these and lived in NYC during 9/11 would have monitored pager traffic.
It's not that surprising that WikiLeaks was able to get this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233802</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Leave cookie monster alone.. I happen to know he was chillin' with Colbert eating cookies!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Leave cookie monster alone.. I happen to know he was chillin ' with Colbert eating cookies !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Leave cookie monster alone.. I happen to know he was chillin' with Colbert eating cookies!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225884</id>
	<title>It is revealed</title>
	<author>For a Free Internet</author>
	<datestamp>1257177180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now watch Obama try to censor the TRUTH of Italian conspiracy against AMERICA that is PROVEN BEYOND DOUBT by these NEW REVELATIONS!!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now watch Obama try to censor the TRUTH of Italian conspiracy against AMERICA that is PROVEN BEYOND DOUBT by these NEW REVELATIONS ! ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now watch Obama try to censor the TRUTH of Italian conspiracy against AMERICA that is PROVEN BEYOND DOUBT by these NEW REVELATIONS!!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226546</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257180360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unnngghh my dick is so fucking hard right now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unnngghh my dick is so fucking hard right now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unnngghh my dick is so fucking hard right now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225996</id>
	<title>Good Move</title>
	<author>carp3\_noct3m</author>
	<datestamp>1257177840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks. Its one of those things, where in the digital age, that information lasts for a long time, but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks. What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things, including emergency response methods and efficiency, the way people react to catastrophic events, and information that may have previously been unknown, and things like that. There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing. Yes, there will be both ends of the extremist section, both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts, who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories, but its still a good thing. Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt, I found one very interesting message.."WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB." This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that aren't there, but regardless, it will be interesting to see where this leads. Data by itself sometimes can be useless, but in context can have implications you don't expect. My personal opinions are far to complex to list here, but people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks .
Its one of those things , where in the digital age , that information lasts for a long time , but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks .
What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things , including emergency response methods and efficiency , the way people react to catastrophic events , and information that may have previously been unknown , and things like that .
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing .
Yes , there will be both ends of the extremist section , both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts , who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories , but its still a good thing .
Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt , I found one very interesting message.. " WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB .
" This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that are n't there , but regardless , it will be interesting to see where this leads .
Data by itself sometimes can be useless , but in context can have implications you do n't expect .
My personal opinions are far to complex to list here , but people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems to be a really good move on the part of Wikileaks.
Its one of those things, where in the digital age, that information lasts for a long time, but I think the significance here is that this data was collected within a day of the attacks.
What this does is give us a clearer picture of lots of things, including emergency response methods and efficiency, the way people react to catastrophic events, and information that may have previously been unknown, and things like that.
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding Sep 11. and simple data being released to the public is always a good thing.
Yes, there will be both ends of the extremist section, both conspiracy theorists and their counterparts, who may try to find specific data to backup their preconceived theories, but its still a good thing.
Just browsing over to the TFA and their shortened excerpt, I found one very interesting message.."WTC HAS BEEN HIT BY AN AIRPLANE AND A BOMB.
" This does nothing as far as credibility and in situations like that people are known to panic and see and hear things that aren't there, but regardless, it will be interesting to see where this leads.
Data by itself sometimes can be useless, but in context can have implications you don't expect.
My personal opinions are far to complex to list here, but people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226750</id>
	<title>Re:I Can't Wait...</title>
	<author>MickyTheIdiot</author>
	<datestamp>1257181320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You deaded me, you swine, you! - Bluebottle"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You deaded me , you swine , you !
- Bluebottle "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You deaded me, you swine, you!
- Bluebottle"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233344</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just 9/11 related pager messages</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1257177540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would assume these messages were all being broadcast form/to the general NYC area, not just the twin towers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would assume these messages were all being broadcast form/to the general NYC area , not just the twin towers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would assume these messages were all being broadcast form/to the general NYC area, not just the twin towers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226508</id>
	<title>What about Iridium?</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1257180120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be interesting to see Satellite phone traffic from that day. Iridium also runs a pager service that still works<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be interesting to see Satellite phone traffic from that day .
Iridium also runs a pager service that still works : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be interesting to see Satellite phone traffic from that day.
Iridium also runs a pager service that still works :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226958</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1257182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There *are* dead zones, but far less, ime.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There * are * dead zones , but far less , ime .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There *are* dead zones, but far less, ime.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30242774</id>
	<title>Re:that's nice</title>
	<author>c6gunner</author>
	<datestamp>1259258940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I just love that "conspiracy theory" automatically makes anyone who thinks there is something wrong with the official story some sort of fruitcake or worse.</p></div><p>I'm glad you agree!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Once upon a time, the official story was that the universe was created in a week or something like that.</p></div><p>Right.  And then one day, a bunch of college dropouts made a crappy video which claimed that the universe was actually a giant conspiracy by the Illuminati, the NWO, and the Jooos.  In reality, we're all living in an online world - a Matrix, if you will - while our eeeevil Zionist Space Lizard overlords harvest our true bodies for organs and nutrients.  Ever since that day, we've known the TRUTH!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There are definitely some weird things about the official story that just don't seem to work well with reality as we know it.</p> </div><p>It's not WHAT you question, but HOW you question it that matters.  For instance, I have no problem with people questioning the theory of evolution - but when you start telling me that the Perfect Shape of the Banana proves that evolution never happened, I'm going to write you off as a complete moron.  Likewise, 9/11 conspiracy theorists have shown by their actions that they are mostly either crazy, stupid, ignorant, delusional, or some combination of the four.  There may be a few rational, informed, and intelligent ones out there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... but I've yet to meet any.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I think we need a counter-term for conspiracy theory... one that suggests an equal level of folly for believing everything that people in positions of authority tells us.</p></div><p>Anyone who dismisses conspiracy theorists on those grounds is every bit as stupid as the conspiracy theorists themselves<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... although probably not as crazy.  They're the flip side of the same coin, really:  the conspiracy theorists will accept any claim, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it runs counter to conventional wisdom, while the people you're referring to will accept any claim as long as it comes from a mainstream authority figure.  They have a lot in common.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just love that " conspiracy theory " automatically makes anyone who thinks there is something wrong with the official story some sort of fruitcake or worse.I 'm glad you agree ! Once upon a time , the official story was that the universe was created in a week or something like that.Right .
And then one day , a bunch of college dropouts made a crappy video which claimed that the universe was actually a giant conspiracy by the Illuminati , the NWO , and the Jooos .
In reality , we 're all living in an online world - a Matrix , if you will - while our eeeevil Zionist Space Lizard overlords harvest our true bodies for organs and nutrients .
Ever since that day , we 've known the TRUTH ! There are definitely some weird things about the official story that just do n't seem to work well with reality as we know it .
It 's not WHAT you question , but HOW you question it that matters .
For instance , I have no problem with people questioning the theory of evolution - but when you start telling me that the Perfect Shape of the Banana proves that evolution never happened , I 'm going to write you off as a complete moron .
Likewise , 9/11 conspiracy theorists have shown by their actions that they are mostly either crazy , stupid , ignorant , delusional , or some combination of the four .
There may be a few rational , informed , and intelligent ones out there .... but I 've yet to meet any.I think we need a counter-term for conspiracy theory... one that suggests an equal level of folly for believing everything that people in positions of authority tells us.Anyone who dismisses conspiracy theorists on those grounds is every bit as stupid as the conspiracy theorists themselves ... although probably not as crazy .
They 're the flip side of the same coin , really : the conspiracy theorists will accept any claim , no matter how ridiculous , as long as it runs counter to conventional wisdom , while the people you 're referring to will accept any claim as long as it comes from a mainstream authority figure .
They have a lot in common .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just love that "conspiracy theory" automatically makes anyone who thinks there is something wrong with the official story some sort of fruitcake or worse.I'm glad you agree!Once upon a time, the official story was that the universe was created in a week or something like that.Right.
And then one day, a bunch of college dropouts made a crappy video which claimed that the universe was actually a giant conspiracy by the Illuminati, the NWO, and the Jooos.
In reality, we're all living in an online world - a Matrix, if you will - while our eeeevil Zionist Space Lizard overlords harvest our true bodies for organs and nutrients.
Ever since that day, we've known the TRUTH!There are definitely some weird things about the official story that just don't seem to work well with reality as we know it.
It's not WHAT you question, but HOW you question it that matters.
For instance, I have no problem with people questioning the theory of evolution - but when you start telling me that the Perfect Shape of the Banana proves that evolution never happened, I'm going to write you off as a complete moron.
Likewise, 9/11 conspiracy theorists have shown by their actions that they are mostly either crazy, stupid, ignorant, delusional, or some combination of the four.
There may be a few rational, informed, and intelligent ones out there .... but I've yet to meet any.I think we need a counter-term for conspiracy theory... one that suggests an equal level of folly for believing everything that people in positions of authority tells us.Anyone who dismisses conspiracy theorists on those grounds is every bit as stupid as the conspiracy theorists themselves ... although probably not as crazy.
They're the flip side of the same coin, really:  the conspiracy theorists will accept any claim, no matter how ridiculous, as long as it runs counter to conventional wisdom, while the people you're referring to will accept any claim as long as it comes from a mainstream authority figure.
They have a lot in common.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227234</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>stumblingblock</author>
	<datestamp>1257183780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once upon a time, I had a landline telephone answering machine that would send a message to my pager letting me know what phone numbers had called. Pretty useful in a pre-cellphone world. But pagers were mostly used by pimps and dealers to assist trade I guess. Obsolete. I tried to get a replacement when I lost mine, and the company couldn't supply one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time , I had a landline telephone answering machine that would send a message to my pager letting me know what phone numbers had called .
Pretty useful in a pre-cellphone world .
But pagers were mostly used by pimps and dealers to assist trade I guess .
Obsolete. I tried to get a replacement when I lost mine , and the company could n't supply one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time, I had a landline telephone answering machine that would send a message to my pager letting me know what phone numbers had called.
Pretty useful in a pre-cellphone world.
But pagers were mostly used by pimps and dealers to assist trade I guess.
Obsolete. I tried to get a replacement when I lost mine, and the company couldn't supply one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226054</id>
	<title>Self aware computer systems?</title>
	<author>feedayeen</author>
	<datestamp>1257178080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse"


8:46 a.m. - "Ow, something hit me!"

8:47 a.m. - "Anyone else smell smoke?"

8:47 a.m. - "Admin has logged off"

10:28 a.m. - "System failure"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse " 8 : 46 a.m. - " Ow , something hit me !
" 8 : 47 a.m. - " Anyone else smell smoke ?
" 8 : 47 a.m. - " Admin has logged off " 10 : 28 a.m. - " System failure "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"computer systems sending automated messages as buildings collapse"


8:46 a.m. - "Ow, something hit me!
"

8:47 a.m. - "Anyone else smell smoke?
"

8:47 a.m. - "Admin has logged off"

10:28 a.m. - "System failure"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227024</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>spookymonster</author>
	<datestamp>1257182640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In what context were these quotes made? What was the nature of the lies? Were they covering up their own incompetent response (like, say, the FAA taking too long to contact NORAD)? Or were they of a much larger scope (like trying to hide a missile attack on the pentagon)? Quite a bit of difference between those two...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In what context were these quotes made ?
What was the nature of the lies ?
Were they covering up their own incompetent response ( like , say , the FAA taking too long to contact NORAD ) ?
Or were they of a much larger scope ( like trying to hide a missile attack on the pentagon ) ?
Quite a bit of difference between those two.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In what context were these quotes made?
What was the nature of the lies?
Were they covering up their own incompetent response (like, say, the FAA taking too long to contact NORAD)?
Or were they of a much larger scope (like trying to hide a missile attack on the pentagon)?
Quite a bit of difference between those two...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226044</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257178020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be young. Pagers were very widely used in the UK when mobile phones where the size of car batteries, and emergency staff still use them because they are far more reliable than mobile networks. It's only office lackies that moved to mobile comms, because just about everyone working in an office has one, and companies don't have to pay for pager services, and it's pretty rare for a business communication to truly be an emergency.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be young .
Pagers were very widely used in the UK when mobile phones where the size of car batteries , and emergency staff still use them because they are far more reliable than mobile networks .
It 's only office lackies that moved to mobile comms , because just about everyone working in an office has one , and companies do n't have to pay for pager services , and it 's pretty rare for a business communication to truly be an emergency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be young.
Pagers were very widely used in the UK when mobile phones where the size of car batteries, and emergency staff still use them because they are far more reliable than mobile networks.
It's only office lackies that moved to mobile comms, because just about everyone working in an office has one, and companies don't have to pay for pager services, and it's pretty rare for a business communication to truly be an emergency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808</id>
	<title>So much raw data</title>
	<author>Shrike82</author>
	<datestamp>1257176700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed .
All those messages to pick through ; I 'm sure they 'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed.
All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226858</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter next</title>
	<author>barbazoo</author>
	<datestamp>1257181860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>[2012-01-01 06:12:32] OMG The Jebus statue has fallen #riodude<br>[2012-01-01 06:12:33] Too many tweets! We'll try to lighten the load and have things back to normal soon.<br><br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ 2012-01-01 06 : 12 : 32 ] OMG The Jebus statue has fallen # riodude [ 2012-01-01 06 : 12 : 33 ] Too many tweets !
We 'll try to lighten the load and have things back to normal soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[2012-01-01 06:12:32] OMG The Jebus statue has fallen #riodude[2012-01-01 06:12:33] Too many tweets!
We'll try to lighten the load and have things back to normal soon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226924</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>WGFCrafty</author>
	<datestamp>1257182100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also in a medical context there can be one "emergency pager."
<br> <br>
On certain days, my father would always have a pager with him because different psychologists took the same pager home on different days.
<br> <br>
This made one contact number which would always wake someone qualified to help in an emergency.
<br> <br>
I have no idea how many times I saw my dad stop dinner to go to the nearest payphone (mainly before the widespread use of cell phones, mind you, although this system is still used) to check to make sure the latest and most psychotic patients weren't endangering themselves or others. Always seemed like a good system, and it always got a PhD on the line within a few minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also in a medical context there can be one " emergency pager .
" On certain days , my father would always have a pager with him because different psychologists took the same pager home on different days .
This made one contact number which would always wake someone qualified to help in an emergency .
I have no idea how many times I saw my dad stop dinner to go to the nearest payphone ( mainly before the widespread use of cell phones , mind you , although this system is still used ) to check to make sure the latest and most psychotic patients were n't endangering themselves or others .
Always seemed like a good system , and it always got a PhD on the line within a few minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also in a medical context there can be one "emergency pager.
"
 
On certain days, my father would always have a pager with him because different psychologists took the same pager home on different days.
This made one contact number which would always wake someone qualified to help in an emergency.
I have no idea how many times I saw my dad stop dinner to go to the nearest payphone (mainly before the widespread use of cell phones, mind you, although this system is still used) to check to make sure the latest and most psychotic patients weren't endangering themselves or others.
Always seemed like a good system, and it always got a PhD on the line within a few minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231008</id>
	<title>Re:It's not just 9/11 related pager messages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257159240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Found this one in the midst of all the confusion...</p><p>2001-09-11 10:01:10 Arch [1006335] D  ALPHA<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...all of a sudden, work doesn't seem so important today....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Found this one in the midst of all the confusion...2001-09-11 10 : 01 : 10 Arch [ 1006335 ] D ALPHA ...all of a sudden , work does n't seem so important today... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Found this one in the midst of all the confusion...2001-09-11 10:01:10 Arch [1006335] D  ALPHA ...all of a sudden, work doesn't seem so important today....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226066</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</id>
	<title>Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>wandazulu</author>
	<datestamp>1257178260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.</p><p>I was in NYC on Sept 11 and the only thing that *was* working that day was the Internet...phones, both land line and cell were unavailable. We were trying to contact my brother-in-law who lived in Manhattan (we were in Brooklyn) and every phone we tried, including the pay phone down the street (still had 'em back then...) gave us the "fast busy signal", indicating "We didn't even try to make your call..."</p><p>So we spent the rest of the day IM'ing people as that was the only way to verify who was where. Bad times...bad times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages ; indeed , I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.I was in NYC on Sept 11 and the only thing that * was * working that day was the Internet...phones , both land line and cell were unavailable .
We were trying to contact my brother-in-law who lived in Manhattan ( we were in Brooklyn ) and every phone we tried , including the pay phone down the street ( still had 'em back then... ) gave us the " fast busy signal " , indicating " We did n't even try to make your call... " So we spent the rest of the day IM'ing people as that was the only way to verify who was where .
Bad times...bad times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought pagers used the cell networks a la text messages; indeed, I thought a pager was essentially a dedicated text message device.I was in NYC on Sept 11 and the only thing that *was* working that day was the Internet...phones, both land line and cell were unavailable.
We were trying to contact my brother-in-law who lived in Manhattan (we were in Brooklyn) and every phone we tried, including the pay phone down the street (still had 'em back then...) gave us the "fast busy signal", indicating "We didn't even try to make your call..."So we spent the rest of the day IM'ing people as that was the only way to verify who was where.
Bad times...bad times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226432</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1257179880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway.</i></p><p>Some are. Mine is. I used to have an old LG phone that sounded exactly like an old fashioned landline phone, the kind with a real bell in it. It was loud enough to wake you up, too.</p><p>I use my phone for an alarm clock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ringing cell phones often are n't loud enough to wake you up anyway.Some are .
Mine is .
I used to have an old LG phone that sounded exactly like an old fashioned landline phone , the kind with a real bell in it .
It was loud enough to wake you up , too.I use my phone for an alarm clock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway.Some are.
Mine is.
I used to have an old LG phone that sounded exactly like an old fashioned landline phone, the kind with a real bell in it.
It was loud enough to wake you up, too.I use my phone for an alarm clock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225812</id>
	<title>Conspiracy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257176760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First the global warming emails, and now this? What next 7 foot lizards are real now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First the global warming emails , and now this ?
What next 7 foot lizards are real now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First the global warming emails, and now this?
What next 7 foot lizards are real now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228100</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257187800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zomg, there's a message saying "2001-09-11 12:35:03 Arch [0895403] C  ALPHA  THIS IS A TEST PERIODIC PAGE SEQUENTIAL NUMBER  7284". 2 8 and 4!! Those are all powers of 2! But the 7 isn't That is proof that a secret governement orginazation is behind it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zomg , there 's a message saying " 2001-09-11 12 : 35 : 03 Arch [ 0895403 ] C ALPHA THIS IS A TEST PERIODIC PAGE SEQUENTIAL NUMBER 7284 " .
2 8 and 4 ! !
Those are all powers of 2 !
But the 7 is n't That is proof that a secret governement orginazation is behind it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zomg, there's a message saying "2001-09-11 12:35:03 Arch [0895403] C  ALPHA  THIS IS A TEST PERIODIC PAGE SEQUENTIAL NUMBER  7284".
2 8 and 4!!
Those are all powers of 2!
But the 7 isn't That is proof that a secret governement orginazation is behind it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228300</id>
	<title>Re:Good Move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257188820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.</p></div><p>And we can expect this from the next generation? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQdhMSEqhfg</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.And we can expect this from the next generation ?
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = qQdhMSEqhfg</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... people should learn how to use logic and think for themselves.And we can expect this from the next generation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQdhMSEqhfg
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225900</id>
	<title>that's nice</title>
	<author>Darth\_brooks</author>
	<datestamp>1257177240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure this will lead to rational debate, as well as this information being added to our view of those tragic events as a whole and will finally lay to bed some of the misconceptions that have surrounded the events of 9/11, rather than becoming the source for thousands of snippets of information that will get used in barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories.</p><p>Also, when you bring me my pony, make sure it's pink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure this will lead to rational debate , as well as this information being added to our view of those tragic events as a whole and will finally lay to bed some of the misconceptions that have surrounded the events of 9/11 , rather than becoming the source for thousands of snippets of information that will get used in barely contextualized , ill-thought out , and poorly worded conspiracy theories.Also , when you bring me my pony , make sure it 's pink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure this will lead to rational debate, as well as this information being added to our view of those tragic events as a whole and will finally lay to bed some of the misconceptions that have surrounded the events of 9/11, rather than becoming the source for thousands of snippets of information that will get used in barely contextualized, ill-thought out, and poorly worded conspiracy theories.Also, when you bring me my pony, make sure it's pink.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231346</id>
	<title>Re:Self aware computer systems?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257161820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printer\_on\_fire" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">lp0 on fire</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lp0 on fire [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lp0 on fire [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30239212</id>
	<title>Going Back to Bed....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259268840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; 08:51:11 Metrocall [0623896] C ALPHA goodmorning I love you hope you slept good Have a greatday!!me Ps I m going back to bed (your side) naked think about it XXXOOO</p><p>BTW Pagers are still CRITICAL for Oncall support!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    08 : 51 : 11 Metrocall [ 0623896 ] C ALPHA goodmorning I love you hope you slept good Have a greatday !
! me Ps I m going back to bed ( your side ) naked think about it XXXOOOBTW Pagers are still CRITICAL for Oncall support !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    08:51:11 Metrocall [0623896] C ALPHA goodmorning I love you hope you slept good Have a greatday!
!me Ps I m going back to bed (your side) naked think about it XXXOOOBTW Pagers are still CRITICAL for Oncall support!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228542</id>
	<title>Cantor Fitzgerald offline message</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1257189960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The most chilling automated early warning before the human chatter really gets going:</p><p>2001-09-11 08:48:46 Arch [0162912] A ALPHA PAGE FROM lifeline: alert 8933585 ETS appl nbetpsd27.fi.gs.com ETS RTCE: - Market data inconsistent...Cantor API problem Trading system offline on nbetpsd27.fi.gs.com, run by etsuser on nbetpsd27, pid = 24</p><p>Human chatter:<br>2001-09-11 08:50:25 Arch [0901509] B  ALPHA  A plane crashed thru the twin towers.  Real bad..BR</p><p>Repeated automated chatter:<br>2001-09-11 08:50:31 Skytel [003260422] B  ALPHA  An Aloha call is starting . This is for a fire at 2WT.  Please call into TeleMeeting conference center at -877-913-7943 .  If Morgan Stanley has not initiated the call you will hear music until they initiate the call.  Dallas Data</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The most chilling automated early warning before the human chatter really gets going : 2001-09-11 08 : 48 : 46 Arch [ 0162912 ] A ALPHA PAGE FROM lifeline : alert 8933585 ETS appl nbetpsd27.fi.gs.com ETS RTCE : - Market data inconsistent...Cantor API problem Trading system offline on nbetpsd27.fi.gs.com , run by etsuser on nbetpsd27 , pid = 24Human chatter : 2001-09-11 08 : 50 : 25 Arch [ 0901509 ] B ALPHA A plane crashed thru the twin towers .
Real bad..BRRepeated automated chatter : 2001-09-11 08 : 50 : 31 Skytel [ 003260422 ] B ALPHA An Aloha call is starting .
This is for a fire at 2WT .
Please call into TeleMeeting conference center at -877-913-7943 .
If Morgan Stanley has not initiated the call you will hear music until they initiate the call .
Dallas Data</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most chilling automated early warning before the human chatter really gets going:2001-09-11 08:48:46 Arch [0162912] A ALPHA PAGE FROM lifeline: alert 8933585 ETS appl nbetpsd27.fi.gs.com ETS RTCE: - Market data inconsistent...Cantor API problem Trading system offline on nbetpsd27.fi.gs.com, run by etsuser on nbetpsd27, pid = 24Human chatter:2001-09-11 08:50:25 Arch [0901509] B  ALPHA  A plane crashed thru the twin towers.
Real bad..BRRepeated automated chatter:2001-09-11 08:50:31 Skytel [003260422] B  ALPHA  An Aloha call is starting .
This is for a fire at 2WT.
Please call into TeleMeeting conference center at -877-913-7943 .
If Morgan Stanley has not initiated the call you will hear music until they initiate the call.
Dallas Data</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>v1</author>
	<datestamp>1257177180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pagers can be more reliable than TM.  And a lot of people turn off their cell phone when they are sleeping.  Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway.  Not everyone has a cell phone. (I don't)  A lot of automated systems are still only able to do a broadcast-style alert to multiple pagers, not text messaging. (volunteer fire departments are good examples)  Pagers can run a month or more on a single AA battery which increases their reliability.  Lots of reasons to stick with pagers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pagers can be more reliable than TM .
And a lot of people turn off their cell phone when they are sleeping .
Ringing cell phones often are n't loud enough to wake you up anyway .
Not everyone has a cell phone .
( I do n't ) A lot of automated systems are still only able to do a broadcast-style alert to multiple pagers , not text messaging .
( volunteer fire departments are good examples ) Pagers can run a month or more on a single AA battery which increases their reliability .
Lots of reasons to stick with pagers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pagers can be more reliable than TM.
And a lot of people turn off their cell phone when they are sleeping.
Ringing cell phones often aren't loud enough to wake you up anyway.
Not everyone has a cell phone.
(I don't)  A lot of automated systems are still only able to do a broadcast-style alert to multiple pagers, not text messaging.
(volunteer fire departments are good examples)  Pagers can run a month or more on a single AA battery which increases their reliability.
Lots of reasons to stick with pagers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226418</id>
	<title>Surely this is proof if ever it were needed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257179820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>that a number of Muslim fundamentalist fanatics conspired to hijack four aircraft and flew one of them into the Pentagon, and two others into the twin trade towers in New York.</p><p>Now that's what I call a real conspiracy theory.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>that a number of Muslim fundamentalist fanatics conspired to hijack four aircraft and flew one of them into the Pentagon , and two others into the twin trade towers in New York.Now that 's what I call a real conspiracy theory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that a number of Muslim fundamentalist fanatics conspired to hijack four aircraft and flew one of them into the Pentagon, and two others into the twin trade towers in New York.Now that's what I call a real conspiracy theory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30285502</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259692980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Text pagers are run on paging towers operated by a third-party, and on frequencies and signal modulations different from cellular. (POCSAG, MDT4800, FLEX, etc.)  At that time, at least, they were not just a dedicated cellular SMS device.</p><p>http://www.nettwerked.net/pager\_decoding.txt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Text pagers are run on paging towers operated by a third-party , and on frequencies and signal modulations different from cellular .
( POCSAG , MDT4800 , FLEX , etc .
) At that time , at least , they were not just a dedicated cellular SMS device.http : //www.nettwerked.net/pager \ _decoding.txt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Text pagers are run on paging towers operated by a third-party, and on frequencies and signal modulations different from cellular.
(POCSAG, MDT4800, FLEX, etc.
)  At that time, at least, they were not just a dedicated cellular SMS device.http://www.nettwerked.net/pager\_decoding.txt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226398</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Coren22</author>
	<datestamp>1257179760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no, pagers are MUCH older then cell phones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no , pagers are MUCH older then cell phones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, pagers are MUCH older then cell phones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233306</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1257177300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pager broadcasts are completely separate from cell networks and don't really have anything in common in them, to my knowledge. Pager networks are incredibly robust. I believe they'll scale to thousands of messages per minute at least and if you look at the logs posted by wikileaks, there are rarely more than a few dozen every second. Although I guess the downside is that you normally have to place a phone call or have Internet connectivity to send a page.</p><p>On a related note, it's possible to use a second-hand pager and a few dollars' worth of components to make your very own pager scanner. Ladyada posted a nice <a href="http://www.adafruit.com/blog/2009/05/12/how-to-make-a-cheap-pager-scanner/" title="adafruit.com">HOWTO</a> [adafruit.com] on how to do this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pager broadcasts are completely separate from cell networks and do n't really have anything in common in them , to my knowledge .
Pager networks are incredibly robust .
I believe they 'll scale to thousands of messages per minute at least and if you look at the logs posted by wikileaks , there are rarely more than a few dozen every second .
Although I guess the downside is that you normally have to place a phone call or have Internet connectivity to send a page.On a related note , it 's possible to use a second-hand pager and a few dollars ' worth of components to make your very own pager scanner .
Ladyada posted a nice HOWTO [ adafruit.com ] on how to do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pager broadcasts are completely separate from cell networks and don't really have anything in common in them, to my knowledge.
Pager networks are incredibly robust.
I believe they'll scale to thousands of messages per minute at least and if you look at the logs posted by wikileaks, there are rarely more than a few dozen every second.
Although I guess the downside is that you normally have to place a phone call or have Internet connectivity to send a page.On a related note, it's possible to use a second-hand pager and a few dollars' worth of components to make your very own pager scanner.
Ladyada posted a nice HOWTO [adafruit.com] on how to do this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233768</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257182340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mobile phones do not interfere with ANY medical equipment. If a mobile phone interferes with a piece of equipment in a hospital, it doesn't pass audit to begin with so it's not even a real piece of medical equipment.</p><p>Obviously you wouldn't take a mobile phone with you into an active mri or xray but for most part, "OMG TURN OFF THAT PHONE IT WILL BLOW UP THE HOSPITAL" is a bs fed to people who dont know better, by people who don't know better.</p><p>- techie in a hospital.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mobile phones do not interfere with ANY medical equipment .
If a mobile phone interferes with a piece of equipment in a hospital , it does n't pass audit to begin with so it 's not even a real piece of medical equipment.Obviously you would n't take a mobile phone with you into an active mri or xray but for most part , " OMG TURN OFF THAT PHONE IT WILL BLOW UP THE HOSPITAL " is a bs fed to people who dont know better , by people who do n't know better.- techie in a hospital .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mobile phones do not interfere with ANY medical equipment.
If a mobile phone interferes with a piece of equipment in a hospital, it doesn't pass audit to begin with so it's not even a real piece of medical equipment.Obviously you wouldn't take a mobile phone with you into an active mri or xray but for most part, "OMG TURN OFF THAT PHONE IT WILL BLOW UP THE HOSPITAL" is a bs fed to people who dont know better, by people who don't know better.- techie in a hospital.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229736</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Antique Geekmeister</author>
	<datestamp>1257195180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They did in 2001: they were critical to both technical leaders of complex systems as a more reliable tool than a cell phone, and were a supported feature of many cell phones of the time. Many of those messages were probably to the fancy cell phones popular to sales types of the time. Also, crashing systems and their entire networks going offline probably generated many thousands of text messages to particular managers for the single event "our network was just cut at one of our core connections".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did in 2001 : they were critical to both technical leaders of complex systems as a more reliable tool than a cell phone , and were a supported feature of many cell phones of the time .
Many of those messages were probably to the fancy cell phones popular to sales types of the time .
Also , crashing systems and their entire networks going offline probably generated many thousands of text messages to particular managers for the single event " our network was just cut at one of our core connections " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did in 2001: they were critical to both technical leaders of complex systems as a more reliable tool than a cell phone, and were a supported feature of many cell phones of the time.
Many of those messages were probably to the fancy cell phones popular to sales types of the time.
Also, crashing systems and their entire networks going offline probably generated many thousands of text messages to particular managers for the single event "our network was just cut at one of our core connections".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226832</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257181740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> There are no dead zones</p></div><p>Not true.  They're RF devices and suffer the same limitations as any other radio receiver. With most pagers, they are not bidirectional and so if you are in a dead zone the person sending the message does not get any notification that the delivery failed or was delayed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are no dead zonesNot true .
They 're RF devices and suffer the same limitations as any other radio receiver .
With most pagers , they are not bidirectional and so if you are in a dead zone the person sending the message does not get any notification that the delivery failed or was delayed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> There are no dead zonesNot true.
They're RF devices and suffer the same limitations as any other radio receiver.
With most pagers, they are not bidirectional and so if you are in a dead zone the person sending the message does not get any notification that the delivery failed or was delayed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226062</id>
	<title>Some really touching messages, like</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257178080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2001-09-11 09:05:13 Metrocall [0902425] C  ALPHA  HQFPSCORP2:Backup Exec Job Failed</p><p>That one brings a tear to my eye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2001-09-11 09 : 05 : 13 Metrocall [ 0902425 ] C ALPHA HQFPSCORP2 : Backup Exec Job FailedThat one brings a tear to my eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2001-09-11 09:05:13 Metrocall [0902425] C  ALPHA  HQFPSCORP2:Backup Exec Job FailedThat one brings a tear to my eye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</id>
	<title>News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257176640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pagers still exist? Granted they never caught on in the UK, but I've never, not even once, seen an actual functioning pager in use. I guess text messaging took over any utility pagers would have over here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pagers still exist ?
Granted they never caught on in the UK , but I 've never , not even once , seen an actual functioning pager in use .
I guess text messaging took over any utility pagers would have over here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pagers still exist?
Granted they never caught on in the UK, but I've never, not even once, seen an actual functioning pager in use.
I guess text messaging took over any utility pagers would have over here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226890</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>kriston</author>
	<datestamp>1257181980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In those days most pager networks were separate and distinct from the mobile phone networks (and were on different frequencies, too).  My two-way Motorola Skytel pager worked everywhere.  Even today I cannot find a comparable mobile phone service with the coverage and reliability of the pagers that I cannot carry anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In those days most pager networks were separate and distinct from the mobile phone networks ( and were on different frequencies , too ) .
My two-way Motorola Skytel pager worked everywhere .
Even today I can not find a comparable mobile phone service with the coverage and reliability of the pagers that I can not carry anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In those days most pager networks were separate and distinct from the mobile phone networks (and were on different frequencies, too).
My two-way Motorola Skytel pager worked everywhere.
Even today I cannot find a comparable mobile phone service with the coverage and reliability of the pagers that I cannot carry anymore.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233808</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>passion</author>
	<datestamp>1257183060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A) this is 2001 you're talking about (8 years ago)
<br> <br>
B) I know that lots of IT personnel wear pagers since they need to receive one-way messages sent by a machine to report downtime, and you don't really need to respond with "OK, hang on - I'm on my way!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>A ) this is 2001 you 're talking about ( 8 years ago ) B ) I know that lots of IT personnel wear pagers since they need to receive one-way messages sent by a machine to report downtime , and you do n't really need to respond with " OK , hang on - I 'm on my way !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A) this is 2001 you're talking about (8 years ago)
 
B) I know that lots of IT personnel wear pagers since they need to receive one-way messages sent by a machine to report downtime, and you don't really need to respond with "OK, hang on - I'm on my way!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30246752</id>
	<title>Word counts</title>
	<author>ScaledLizard</author>
	<datestamp>1259345880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to my count, the following words appear more than 2000 times:</p><p>alpha: 299534, skytel: 237233, arch: 122616, metroca: 73973, num: 72115, tone: 63352, com: 43040, call: 36191, from: 33065, this: 18987, has: 17926, all: 15899, sep: 15773, down: 15761, weblink: 14934, will: 14215, new: 13903, frm: 13723, test: 13269, txt: 13082, page: 13077, sub: 11974, have: 11060, been: 10876, center: 10687, number: 10512, your: 10444, update: 10292, york: 9740, home: 9562, alert: 9338, critica: 9334, server: 8994, trade: 8846, connect: 8807, informi: 8465, error: 8330, machine: 8208, cnn: 8013, world: 7967, message: 7947, news: 7901, that: 7894, time: 7815, edt: 7743, reboot: 7515, due: 7484, cabinet: 7339, cmp: 7339, status: 7332, mail: 7320, gblnetn: 7307, periodi: 7256, sequent: 7199, tkt: 7176, can: 6971, sev: 6833, service: 6514, ibm: 6409, now: 6206, today: 6054, evacuat: 5838, site: 5670, problem: 5289, network: 5111, system: 5102, ncc: 5101, www: 5057, everyon: 5031, sent: 5018, office: 4914, need: 4815, abs: 4745, socket: 4719, terrori: 4701, check: 4605, breakin: 4573, element: 4549, mpfetch: 4503, tue: 4412, line: 4409, get: 4394, asap: 4387, greater: 4325, contact: 4284, outage: 4224, any: 4218, phone: 4196, pls: 4183, custome: 4180, http: 4159, msg: 4139, unable: 4081, meeting: 4076, unch: 4027, subject: 4015, sendq: 3995, monitor: 3967, process: 3946, know: 3773, city: 3681, code: 3650, fyi: 3641, calls: 3616, plane: 3602, availab: 3553, yahoo: 3553, just: 3538, current: 3492, report: 3485, back: 3467, open: 3411, closed: 3407, team: 3406, being: 3399, bridge: 3375, timed: 3362, when: 3356, data: 3343, per: 3339, att: 3324, work: 3308, support: 3268, inc: 3266, updates: 3213, complet: 3205, job: 3198, reports: 3079, info: 3052, minutes: 3049, until: 3034, net: 3019, file: 2989, root: 2953, noc: 2952, issue: 2944, msn: 2933, failed: 2910, they: 2889, working: 2852, email: 2804, tomorro: 2795, case: 2723, access: 2678, operati: 2654, switch: 2652, ticket: 2630, sybase: 2611, still: 2599, alerts: 2503, emmc: 2484, our: 2484, informa: 2477, cdt: 2472, see: 2458, day: 2435, follow: 2406, script: 2405, their: 2397, investi: 2391, buildin: 2365, cell: 2338, pentago: 2318, fire: 2316, room: 2284, emergen: 2282, confirm: 2280, about: 2275, tuesday: 2272, name: 2266, event: 2260, opencon: 2258, sock: 2255, creditd: 2251, come: 2250, crdtdrv: 2250, alarm: 2245, chunk: 2245, possibl: 2240, web: 2229, sales: 2221, loock: 2217, attack: 2216, hudson: 2212, high: 2198, prob: 2187, says: 2173, only: 2136, west: 2134, request: 2133, followi: 2107, user: 2099, applica: 2076, let: 2076, account: 2061, nationa: 2050, going: 2046, device: 2014, morning: 2011, immedia: 2002</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to my count , the following words appear more than 2000 times : alpha : 299534 , skytel : 237233 , arch : 122616 , metroca : 73973 , num : 72115 , tone : 63352 , com : 43040 , call : 36191 , from : 33065 , this : 18987 , has : 17926 , all : 15899 , sep : 15773 , down : 15761 , weblink : 14934 , will : 14215 , new : 13903 , frm : 13723 , test : 13269 , txt : 13082 , page : 13077 , sub : 11974 , have : 11060 , been : 10876 , center : 10687 , number : 10512 , your : 10444 , update : 10292 , york : 9740 , home : 9562 , alert : 9338 , critica : 9334 , server : 8994 , trade : 8846 , connect : 8807 , informi : 8465 , error : 8330 , machine : 8208 , cnn : 8013 , world : 7967 , message : 7947 , news : 7901 , that : 7894 , time : 7815 , edt : 7743 , reboot : 7515 , due : 7484 , cabinet : 7339 , cmp : 7339 , status : 7332 , mail : 7320 , gblnetn : 7307 , periodi : 7256 , sequent : 7199 , tkt : 7176 , can : 6971 , sev : 6833 , service : 6514 , ibm : 6409 , now : 6206 , today : 6054 , evacuat : 5838 , site : 5670 , problem : 5289 , network : 5111 , system : 5102 , ncc : 5101 , www : 5057 , everyon : 5031 , sent : 5018 , office : 4914 , need : 4815 , abs : 4745 , socket : 4719 , terrori : 4701 , check : 4605 , breakin : 4573 , element : 4549 , mpfetch : 4503 , tue : 4412 , line : 4409 , get : 4394 , asap : 4387 , greater : 4325 , contact : 4284 , outage : 4224 , any : 4218 , phone : 4196 , pls : 4183 , custome : 4180 , http : 4159 , msg : 4139 , unable : 4081 , meeting : 4076 , unch : 4027 , subject : 4015 , sendq : 3995 , monitor : 3967 , process : 3946 , know : 3773 , city : 3681 , code : 3650 , fyi : 3641 , calls : 3616 , plane : 3602 , availab : 3553 , yahoo : 3553 , just : 3538 , current : 3492 , report : 3485 , back : 3467 , open : 3411 , closed : 3407 , team : 3406 , being : 3399 , bridge : 3375 , timed : 3362 , when : 3356 , data : 3343 , per : 3339 , att : 3324 , work : 3308 , support : 3268 , inc : 3266 , updates : 3213 , complet : 3205 , job : 3198 , reports : 3079 , info : 3052 , minutes : 3049 , until : 3034 , net : 3019 , file : 2989 , root : 2953 , noc : 2952 , issue : 2944 , msn : 2933 , failed : 2910 , they : 2889 , working : 2852 , email : 2804 , tomorro : 2795 , case : 2723 , access : 2678 , operati : 2654 , switch : 2652 , ticket : 2630 , sybase : 2611 , still : 2599 , alerts : 2503 , emmc : 2484 , our : 2484 , informa : 2477 , cdt : 2472 , see : 2458 , day : 2435 , follow : 2406 , script : 2405 , their : 2397 , investi : 2391 , buildin : 2365 , cell : 2338 , pentago : 2318 , fire : 2316 , room : 2284 , emergen : 2282 , confirm : 2280 , about : 2275 , tuesday : 2272 , name : 2266 , event : 2260 , opencon : 2258 , sock : 2255 , creditd : 2251 , come : 2250 , crdtdrv : 2250 , alarm : 2245 , chunk : 2245 , possibl : 2240 , web : 2229 , sales : 2221 , loock : 2217 , attack : 2216 , hudson : 2212 , high : 2198 , prob : 2187 , says : 2173 , only : 2136 , west : 2134 , request : 2133 , followi : 2107 , user : 2099 , applica : 2076 , let : 2076 , account : 2061 , nationa : 2050 , going : 2046 , device : 2014 , morning : 2011 , immedia : 2002</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to my count, the following words appear more than 2000 times:alpha: 299534, skytel: 237233, arch: 122616, metroca: 73973, num: 72115, tone: 63352, com: 43040, call: 36191, from: 33065, this: 18987, has: 17926, all: 15899, sep: 15773, down: 15761, weblink: 14934, will: 14215, new: 13903, frm: 13723, test: 13269, txt: 13082, page: 13077, sub: 11974, have: 11060, been: 10876, center: 10687, number: 10512, your: 10444, update: 10292, york: 9740, home: 9562, alert: 9338, critica: 9334, server: 8994, trade: 8846, connect: 8807, informi: 8465, error: 8330, machine: 8208, cnn: 8013, world: 7967, message: 7947, news: 7901, that: 7894, time: 7815, edt: 7743, reboot: 7515, due: 7484, cabinet: 7339, cmp: 7339, status: 7332, mail: 7320, gblnetn: 7307, periodi: 7256, sequent: 7199, tkt: 7176, can: 6971, sev: 6833, service: 6514, ibm: 6409, now: 6206, today: 6054, evacuat: 5838, site: 5670, problem: 5289, network: 5111, system: 5102, ncc: 5101, www: 5057, everyon: 5031, sent: 5018, office: 4914, need: 4815, abs: 4745, socket: 4719, terrori: 4701, check: 4605, breakin: 4573, element: 4549, mpfetch: 4503, tue: 4412, line: 4409, get: 4394, asap: 4387, greater: 4325, contact: 4284, outage: 4224, any: 4218, phone: 4196, pls: 4183, custome: 4180, http: 4159, msg: 4139, unable: 4081, meeting: 4076, unch: 4027, subject: 4015, sendq: 3995, monitor: 3967, process: 3946, know: 3773, city: 3681, code: 3650, fyi: 3641, calls: 3616, plane: 3602, availab: 3553, yahoo: 3553, just: 3538, current: 3492, report: 3485, back: 3467, open: 3411, closed: 3407, team: 3406, being: 3399, bridge: 3375, timed: 3362, when: 3356, data: 3343, per: 3339, att: 3324, work: 3308, support: 3268, inc: 3266, updates: 3213, complet: 3205, job: 3198, reports: 3079, info: 3052, minutes: 3049, until: 3034, net: 3019, file: 2989, root: 2953, noc: 2952, issue: 2944, msn: 2933, failed: 2910, they: 2889, working: 2852, email: 2804, tomorro: 2795, case: 2723, access: 2678, operati: 2654, switch: 2652, ticket: 2630, sybase: 2611, still: 2599, alerts: 2503, emmc: 2484, our: 2484, informa: 2477, cdt: 2472, see: 2458, day: 2435, follow: 2406, script: 2405, their: 2397, investi: 2391, buildin: 2365, cell: 2338, pentago: 2318, fire: 2316, room: 2284, emergen: 2282, confirm: 2280, about: 2275, tuesday: 2272, name: 2266, event: 2260, opencon: 2258, sock: 2255, creditd: 2251, come: 2250, crdtdrv: 2250, alarm: 2245, chunk: 2245, possibl: 2240, web: 2229, sales: 2221, loock: 2217, attack: 2216, hudson: 2212, high: 2198, prob: 2187, says: 2173, only: 2136, west: 2134, request: 2133, followi: 2107, user: 2099, applica: 2076, let: 2076, account: 2061, nationa: 2050, going: 2046, device: 2014, morning: 2011, immedia: 2002</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227156</id>
	<title>Classless post</title>
	<author>darkpixel2k</author>
	<datestamp>1257183300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn it--it looks like the terrorists stopped a Microsoft Exchange event...<p><div class="quote"><p>7 Skytel [002380116] B  ALPHA  Frank.Heisler@ubsw.com|FW: Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED|  -----Original Message----- From:   Bucher, Gisela Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:54 PM To:   DL-Perot-STAM-Permanent Cc:    Subject:   Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED</p></div><p>
This confuses me greatly.  On one hand I utterly despise the terrorists for what they did...but I really hate Exchange too...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn it--it looks like the terrorists stopped a Microsoft Exchange event...7 Skytel [ 002380116 ] B ALPHA Frank.Heisler @ ubsw.com | FW : Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED | -----Original Message----- From : Bucher , Gisela Sent : Tuesday , September 11 , 2001 2 : 54 PM To : DL-Perot-STAM-Permanent Cc : Subject : Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED This confuses me greatly .
On one hand I utterly despise the terrorists for what they did...but I really hate Exchange too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn it--it looks like the terrorists stopped a Microsoft Exchange event...7 Skytel [002380116] B  ALPHA  Frank.Heisler@ubsw.com|FW: Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED|  -----Original Message----- From:   Bucher, Gisela Sent:   Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:54 PM To:   DL-Perot-STAM-Permanent Cc:    Subject:   Exchange IT Event - CANCELLED
This confuses me greatly.
On one hand I utterly despise the terrorists for what they did...but I really hate Exchange too...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257177060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most hospital physicians still use them for a few reasons.
<ul>
<li>
There are no dead zones
</li><li>
They are easier to page than a cell phone (any nurse can pick up the nearest land line, no need to text)
</li><li>
They don't interfere with medical equipment (which is becoming less of a concern lately)
</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most hospital physicians still use them for a few reasons .
There are no dead zones They are easier to page than a cell phone ( any nurse can pick up the nearest land line , no need to text ) They do n't interfere with medical equipment ( which is becoming less of a concern lately )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most hospital physicians still use them for a few reasons.
There are no dead zones

They are easier to page than a cell phone (any nurse can pick up the nearest land line, no need to text)

They don't interfere with medical equipment (which is becoming less of a concern lately)
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229780</id>
	<title>Proof</title>
	<author>cdrguru</author>
	<datestamp>1257195360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is proof that anything in digital form will find it way into the most undeserving, obnoxious hands possible.</p><p>Sure, probably 90\% of these messages are pointless and of no value to anyone.  The remaining 10\% are probably either personal information or are going to cause some people untold grief.  Imagine walking into a conversation about a security video that got posted to YouTube only to discover it is the video of your husband or wife being murdered.  This isn't much different for some people today.</p><p>Bad taste to publish this stuff?  Na, this is the Internet.  Bad taste is what it is all about.  Lowest common denominator sells.  If you haven't checked out rotten.com in a while, you are certainly missing something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is proof that anything in digital form will find it way into the most undeserving , obnoxious hands possible.Sure , probably 90 \ % of these messages are pointless and of no value to anyone .
The remaining 10 \ % are probably either personal information or are going to cause some people untold grief .
Imagine walking into a conversation about a security video that got posted to YouTube only to discover it is the video of your husband or wife being murdered .
This is n't much different for some people today.Bad taste to publish this stuff ?
Na , this is the Internet .
Bad taste is what it is all about .
Lowest common denominator sells .
If you have n't checked out rotten.com in a while , you are certainly missing something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is proof that anything in digital form will find it way into the most undeserving, obnoxious hands possible.Sure, probably 90\% of these messages are pointless and of no value to anyone.
The remaining 10\% are probably either personal information or are going to cause some people untold grief.
Imagine walking into a conversation about a security video that got posted to YouTube only to discover it is the video of your husband or wife being murdered.
This isn't much different for some people today.Bad taste to publish this stuff?
Na, this is the Internet.
Bad taste is what it is all about.
Lowest common denominator sells.
If you haven't checked out rotten.com in a while, you are certainly missing something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226550</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>lawpoop</author>
	<datestamp>1257180420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pagers still exist?</p> </div><p>These are texts and pages from 9/11/<b>2001</b>, which is some 8 years ago.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pagers still exist ?
These are texts and pages from 9/11/2001 , which is some 8 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pagers still exist?
These are texts and pages from 9/11/2001, which is some 8 years ago.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228790</id>
	<title>Does this REALLY need to be public?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1257190860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand the need to know what happened.  I understand the amount of knowledge that can be gleaned from analyzing this event.</p><p>But do we really need to make public the messages of thousands of people full of fear and worry for their lives and loved ones?</p><p>This seems to be in rather poor taste to me.</p><p>Its one thing for a group of researchers to go over the data, its another entirely to splatter across the Internet where the age of maturity runs about half of the physical age of the person in talking.  Already in response to this story their are jokes here that while funny, as a prime example of bad taste.</p><p>I'd have to say that this is an example taking the whole Wikileaks thing too far.  Its one thing to post emails from money grabbing scum bag CEOs, its entirely different to post a text message from a man to his wife begging her to contact him so he knows if she's alive of dead.  Some things really should be left private.  And no, just because you can't tie the message to the actual person who sent it doesn't make it private.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand the need to know what happened .
I understand the amount of knowledge that can be gleaned from analyzing this event.But do we really need to make public the messages of thousands of people full of fear and worry for their lives and loved ones ? This seems to be in rather poor taste to me.Its one thing for a group of researchers to go over the data , its another entirely to splatter across the Internet where the age of maturity runs about half of the physical age of the person in talking .
Already in response to this story their are jokes here that while funny , as a prime example of bad taste.I 'd have to say that this is an example taking the whole Wikileaks thing too far .
Its one thing to post emails from money grabbing scum bag CEOs , its entirely different to post a text message from a man to his wife begging her to contact him so he knows if she 's alive of dead .
Some things really should be left private .
And no , just because you ca n't tie the message to the actual person who sent it does n't make it private .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand the need to know what happened.
I understand the amount of knowledge that can be gleaned from analyzing this event.But do we really need to make public the messages of thousands of people full of fear and worry for their lives and loved ones?This seems to be in rather poor taste to me.Its one thing for a group of researchers to go over the data, its another entirely to splatter across the Internet where the age of maturity runs about half of the physical age of the person in talking.
Already in response to this story their are jokes here that while funny, as a prime example of bad taste.I'd have to say that this is an example taking the whole Wikileaks thing too far.
Its one thing to post emails from money grabbing scum bag CEOs, its entirely different to post a text message from a man to his wife begging her to contact him so he knows if she's alive of dead.
Some things really should be left private.
And no, just because you can't tie the message to the actual person who sent it doesn't make it private.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226142</id>
	<title>I Can't Wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257178500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For that text pager message: "Finished arming the detonating device, Herr Cheney".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For that text pager message : " Finished arming the detonating device , Herr Cheney " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For that text pager message: "Finished arming the detonating device, Herr Cheney".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225978</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257177720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In 1998, when I started college, I got a pager, since it was a $5/mo alternative to a cell phone. I said that I did not want to get a cell phone until it could be my only phone.</p><p>I held through on that. In 2005, I used the relatively new number portability law to get my home phone number transferred to a cell phone, and ditched my pager service.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In 1998 , when I started college , I got a pager , since it was a $ 5/mo alternative to a cell phone .
I said that I did not want to get a cell phone until it could be my only phone.I held through on that .
In 2005 , I used the relatively new number portability law to get my home phone number transferred to a cell phone , and ditched my pager service .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In 1998, when I started college, I got a pager, since it was a $5/mo alternative to a cell phone.
I said that I did not want to get a cell phone until it could be my only phone.I held through on that.
In 2005, I used the relatively new number portability law to get my home phone number transferred to a cell phone, and ditched my pager service.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229734</id>
	<title>I don't think it's complete</title>
	<author>Tweezer</author>
	<datestamp>1257195180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I searched a whole bunch of these for the word "fuck" and couldn't find a single instance.  I find it hard to believe that nobody got a page from their girl/boy friend saying why don't you come over and fuck me or a message saying holy fuck a plane just hit the WTC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I searched a whole bunch of these for the word " fuck " and could n't find a single instance .
I find it hard to believe that nobody got a page from their girl/boy friend saying why do n't you come over and fuck me or a message saying holy fuck a plane just hit the WTC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I searched a whole bunch of these for the word "fuck" and couldn't find a single instance.
I find it hard to believe that nobody got a page from their girl/boy friend saying why don't you come over and fuck me or a message saying holy fuck a plane just hit the WTC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225954</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1257177600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You do realize that 9/11 occurred over eight years ago. Even if pagers didn't exist now, they did exist then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realize that 9/11 occurred over eight years ago .
Even if pagers did n't exist now , they did exist then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realize that 9/11 occurred over eight years ago.
Even if pagers didn't exist now, they did exist then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225944</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257177480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are also places where two-way devices (i.e. mobile phones) aren't allowed for security reasons. We maintain a bunch of pagers for just that reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are also places where two-way devices ( i.e .
mobile phones ) are n't allowed for security reasons .
We maintain a bunch of pagers for just that reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are also places where two-way devices (i.e.
mobile phones) aren't allowed for security reasons.
We maintain a bunch of pagers for just that reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30230420</id>
	<title>Funny thing is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257155580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that nowadays we have only two options:</p><p>1. The government (bush) planned and executed the whole attack from a to z without any terrorists being part of it.</p><p>2. Terrorists planned and executed the whole attack from a to z without any government being part of it.</p><p>No middle ground is offered. You are either with 1 of 2. If I were a government with plans to allow/plan an attack, this is what I would do. Along with the official statement, I would create buzz that there's a crazy conspiracy behind it.</p><p>Instead of giving people's minds room for free thinking and investigation, I now narrowed it down to 2 choices: are you with us? Or with the nuts?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that nowadays we have only two options : 1 .
The government ( bush ) planned and executed the whole attack from a to z without any terrorists being part of it.2 .
Terrorists planned and executed the whole attack from a to z without any government being part of it.No middle ground is offered .
You are either with 1 of 2 .
If I were a government with plans to allow/plan an attack , this is what I would do .
Along with the official statement , I would create buzz that there 's a crazy conspiracy behind it.Instead of giving people 's minds room for free thinking and investigation , I now narrowed it down to 2 choices : are you with us ?
Or with the nuts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that nowadays we have only two options:1.
The government (bush) planned and executed the whole attack from a to z without any terrorists being part of it.2.
Terrorists planned and executed the whole attack from a to z without any government being part of it.No middle ground is offered.
You are either with 1 of 2.
If I were a government with plans to allow/plan an attack, this is what I would do.
Along with the official statement, I would create buzz that there's a crazy conspiracy behind it.Instead of giving people's minds room for free thinking and investigation, I now narrowed it down to 2 choices: are you with us?
Or with the nuts?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226916</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>neoform</author>
	<datestamp>1257182100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Pagers still exist?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Uhh, this is data from 8 years ago.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pagers still exist ?
Uhh , this is data from 8 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pagers still exist?
Uhh, this is data from 8 years ago.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257177960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed. All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.</p></div><p>The NORAD tapes, which were released long ago proved that there was a conspiracy by The Pentagon to lie to the 9/11 Commission and the American people. The 9/11 Commission had a closed meeting deciding whether or not to charge Air Force officials with perjury but chose not to because "it wouldn't be good for the country."</p><p>John Farmer, senior counsel on the 9/11 Commission said, "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened [during 9/11]"</p><p>6 of the 10 Commissioners have come out saying that they were lied to and that the report is not accurate.<br><a href="http://patriotsquestion911.com/" title="patriotsquestion911.com" rel="nofollow">http://patriotsquestion911.com/</a> [patriotsquestion911.com]</p><p>&ldquo;More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques,&rdquo; writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-13/cheneys-role-deepens/full/" title="thedailybeast.com" rel="nofollow">The Daily Beast.</a> [thedailybeast.com] &ldquo;In fact, information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report&rsquo;s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks.&rdquo;</p><p>We've been lied to about 9/11 from day one. It needs to be investigated further. If 6 out of the 10 Commissioners are distancing themselves from the report by saying they were lied to something isn't right. Burying your head deeper into the sand won't help.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed .
All those messages to pick through ; I 'm sure they 'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.The NORAD tapes , which were released long ago proved that there was a conspiracy by The Pentagon to lie to the 9/11 Commission and the American people .
The 9/11 Commission had a closed meeting deciding whether or not to charge Air Force officials with perjury but chose not to because " it would n't be good for the country .
" John Farmer , senior counsel on the 9/11 Commission said , " at some level of the government , at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened [ during 9/11 ] " 6 of the 10 Commissioners have come out saying that they were lied to and that the report is not accurate.http : //patriotsquestion911.com/ [ patriotsquestion911.com ]    More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques ,    writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in The Daily Beast .
[ thedailybeast.com ]    In fact , information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report    s most critical chapters , those on the planning and execution of the attacks.    We 've been lied to about 9/11 from day one .
It needs to be investigated further .
If 6 out of the 10 Commissioners are distancing themselves from the report by saying they were lied to something is n't right .
Burying your head deeper into the sand wo n't help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every conspircay theorist in the world just simultaneously orgasmed.
All those messages to pick through; I'm sure they'll be able to prove it was the US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.The NORAD tapes, which were released long ago proved that there was a conspiracy by The Pentagon to lie to the 9/11 Commission and the American people.
The 9/11 Commission had a closed meeting deciding whether or not to charge Air Force officials with perjury but chose not to because "it wouldn't be good for the country.
"John Farmer, senior counsel on the 9/11 Commission said, "at some level of the government, at some point in time...there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened [during 9/11]"6 of the 10 Commissioners have come out saying that they were lied to and that the report is not accurate.http://patriotsquestion911.com/ [patriotsquestion911.com]“More than one-quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al Qaeda operatives subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques,” writes former NBC producer Robert Windrem in The Daily Beast.
[thedailybeast.com] “In fact, information derived from the interrogations was central to the 9/11 Report’s most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks.”We've been lied to about 9/11 from day one.
It needs to be investigated further.
If 6 out of the 10 Commissioners are distancing themselves from the report by saying they were lied to something isn't right.
Burying your head deeper into the sand won't help.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232892</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Rebelgecko</author>
	<datestamp>1257173520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you think we know everything about what happened at 9/11 you're just gullable...</p></div><p>You think I'm gullable?!!?!?<br>I'd bet you're so  gullible , you think gullable <i> is </i> in the dictionary!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you think we know everything about what happened at 9/11 you 're just gullable...You think I 'm gullable ? ! ! ? !
? I 'd bet you 're so gullible , you think gullable is in the dictionary !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you think we know everything about what happened at 9/11 you're just gullable...You think I'm gullable?!!?!
?I'd bet you're so  gullible , you think gullable  is  in the dictionary!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231134</id>
	<title>Re:08:58:33</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257160380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The FAA knew something was up the moment AAL11's transponder was switched off. Here's a segment of the timeline of ATC's activities that morning:<br>
<br>
0825: controllers at Boston Center notified New England Regional Ops, ATC System Command Center, the Boston Center facility manager, and New York Center that they suspected AAL11 had been hijacked<br>
0834: Boston Center contacted Cape Terminal Radar Approach and requested that they notify the military<br>
0835: New England ROC notified Washington Operations Center of the suspected hijacking of AAL11<br>
0836: Washington Ops notified the FAA's Civil Aviation Security Intelligence and initiated a teleconference with New England ROC and ATCSCC<br>
0838: Boston Center notified NORAD of the hijacking<br>
~0842: NORAD is notified of the hijacking of UAL175<br>
0844: New York Center notified New York TRACON<br>
0850: Newark Tower, who had a direct line of sight to the WTC, notified New York TRACON of a possible aircraft crash into the WTC<br>
0855: controller-in-charge at New York Center advised the Ops Manager that UAL175 was also hijacked; CIC began to coordinate with controllers, who stated UAL175 was heading "right for the city;" CIC returned to Ops Manager and overheard a request for military aircraft to scramble<br>
<br>
So you see, there was as you put it an insane amount of detail that the FAA had already collected at that point.<br>
<br>
Source: <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/14353715/FAA-Draft-Report-The-Air-Traffic-Organizations-Response-to-the-September-11th-Terrorist-Attack" title="scribd.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.scribd.com/doc/14353715/FAA-Draft-Report-The-Air-Traffic-Organizations-Response-to-the-September-11th-Terrorist-Attack</a> [scribd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The FAA knew something was up the moment AAL11 's transponder was switched off .
Here 's a segment of the timeline of ATC 's activities that morning : 0825 : controllers at Boston Center notified New England Regional Ops , ATC System Command Center , the Boston Center facility manager , and New York Center that they suspected AAL11 had been hijacked 0834 : Boston Center contacted Cape Terminal Radar Approach and requested that they notify the military 0835 : New England ROC notified Washington Operations Center of the suspected hijacking of AAL11 0836 : Washington Ops notified the FAA 's Civil Aviation Security Intelligence and initiated a teleconference with New England ROC and ATCSCC 0838 : Boston Center notified NORAD of the hijacking ~ 0842 : NORAD is notified of the hijacking of UAL175 0844 : New York Center notified New York TRACON 0850 : Newark Tower , who had a direct line of sight to the WTC , notified New York TRACON of a possible aircraft crash into the WTC 0855 : controller-in-charge at New York Center advised the Ops Manager that UAL175 was also hijacked ; CIC began to coordinate with controllers , who stated UAL175 was heading " right for the city ; " CIC returned to Ops Manager and overheard a request for military aircraft to scramble So you see , there was as you put it an insane amount of detail that the FAA had already collected at that point .
Source : http : //www.scribd.com/doc/14353715/FAA-Draft-Report-The-Air-Traffic-Organizations-Response-to-the-September-11th-Terrorist-Attack [ scribd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The FAA knew something was up the moment AAL11's transponder was switched off.
Here's a segment of the timeline of ATC's activities that morning:

0825: controllers at Boston Center notified New England Regional Ops, ATC System Command Center, the Boston Center facility manager, and New York Center that they suspected AAL11 had been hijacked
0834: Boston Center contacted Cape Terminal Radar Approach and requested that they notify the military
0835: New England ROC notified Washington Operations Center of the suspected hijacking of AAL11
0836: Washington Ops notified the FAA's Civil Aviation Security Intelligence and initiated a teleconference with New England ROC and ATCSCC
0838: Boston Center notified NORAD of the hijacking
~0842: NORAD is notified of the hijacking of UAL175
0844: New York Center notified New York TRACON
0850: Newark Tower, who had a direct line of sight to the WTC, notified New York TRACON of a possible aircraft crash into the WTC
0855: controller-in-charge at New York Center advised the Ops Manager that UAL175 was also hijacked; CIC began to coordinate with controllers, who stated UAL175 was heading "right for the city;" CIC returned to Ops Manager and overheard a request for military aircraft to scramble

So you see, there was as you put it an insane amount of detail that the FAA had already collected at that point.
Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/14353715/FAA-Draft-Report-The-Air-Traffic-Organizations-Response-to-the-September-11th-Terrorist-Attack [scribd.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227614</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>bigredradio</author>
	<datestamp>1257185580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>LOL!</htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30230748</id>
	<title>definitely 4. maybe more.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257157380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2001-09-11 08:46:31 Arch [1426125] D  ALPHA  FIRE IS/WAS 3 OR 4 ALARMS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2001-09-11 08 : 46 : 31 Arch [ 1426125 ] D ALPHA FIRE IS/WAS 3 OR 4 ALARMS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2001-09-11 08:46:31 Arch [1426125] D  ALPHA  FIRE IS/WAS 3 OR 4 ALARMS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227364</id>
	<title>Re:So much raw data</title>
	<author>Foobar of Borg</author>
	<datestamp>1257184440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.</p></div></blockquote><p>That's ridiculous!  Everyone knows it Elmo all along!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.That 's ridiculous !
Everyone knows it Elmo all along !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>US Government/Al-Qaeda/Joseph Fritzel/The Cookie Monster/Scientologists all along.That's ridiculous!
Everyone knows it Elmo all along!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227786</id>
	<title>Re:News to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257186360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pagers can be more reliable than TM.  </p></div><p>There's something more reliable than Transcendental Meditation?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pagers can be more reliable than TM .
There 's something more reliable than Transcendental Meditation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pagers can be more reliable than TM.
There's something more reliable than Transcendental Meditation?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226906</id>
	<title>Take your meds!</title>
	<author>operagost</author>
	<datestamp>1257182040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are an amusing number of messages to "take your meds".  That's NYC for ya.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are an amusing number of messages to " take your meds " .
That 's NYC for ya .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are an amusing number of messages to "take your meds".
That's NYC for ya.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30230738</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>bjb</author>
	<datestamp>1257157380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can concur that the only thing working was the internet. In fact, since I couldn't make any phone calls (except, by miracle, one call to my family to tell them I was alive!) the only way I could communicate to the world was through the dial-up connection in my apartment. The overload of people asking me on AIM what happened and was I OK drove me to write an email which ultimately became widespread (and noted on <a href="http://slashdot.org/story/01/09/13/1325202/More-WTC-News" title="slashdot.org">Slashdot</a> [slashdot.org]). Wasn't a good day, but it was invaluable to have an internet connection when all other means of communicating were out of commission.
<p>
Forget getting a cell phone signal. Forget calling outside of your local PBX. Local call to your neighbor or ISP? sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can concur that the only thing working was the internet .
In fact , since I could n't make any phone calls ( except , by miracle , one call to my family to tell them I was alive !
) the only way I could communicate to the world was through the dial-up connection in my apartment .
The overload of people asking me on AIM what happened and was I OK drove me to write an email which ultimately became widespread ( and noted on Slashdot [ slashdot.org ] ) .
Was n't a good day , but it was invaluable to have an internet connection when all other means of communicating were out of commission .
Forget getting a cell phone signal .
Forget calling outside of your local PBX .
Local call to your neighbor or ISP ?
sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can concur that the only thing working was the internet.
In fact, since I couldn't make any phone calls (except, by miracle, one call to my family to tell them I was alive!
) the only way I could communicate to the world was through the dial-up connection in my apartment.
The overload of people asking me on AIM what happened and was I OK drove me to write an email which ultimately became widespread (and noted on Slashdot [slashdot.org]).
Wasn't a good day, but it was invaluable to have an internet connection when all other means of communicating were out of commission.
Forget getting a cell phone signal.
Forget calling outside of your local PBX.
Local call to your neighbor or ISP?
sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228284</id>
	<title>Wow, I wonder if my texts are in there...</title>
	<author>Fritz T. Coyote</author>
	<datestamp>1257188760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I am a New Yorker.

Yes, I was in the city that day.

My Cellphone was useless, probably due to a combination of losing a major relay point, and everybody in town trying to use their phones at the same time.  Landlines were flakey (probably due to losing a major chunk of the infrastructure).

My Obsolete and Archaic text pager kept working.

(I wonder if the pager "I'm OK, R U OK?"messages I exchanged with my sister are in this archive?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I am a New Yorker .
Yes , I was in the city that day .
My Cellphone was useless , probably due to a combination of losing a major relay point , and everybody in town trying to use their phones at the same time .
Landlines were flakey ( probably due to losing a major chunk of the infrastructure ) .
My Obsolete and Archaic text pager kept working .
( I wonder if the pager " I 'm OK , R U OK ?
" messages I exchanged with my sister are in this archive ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I am a New Yorker.
Yes, I was in the city that day.
My Cellphone was useless, probably due to a combination of losing a major relay point, and everybody in town trying to use their phones at the same time.
Landlines were flakey (probably due to losing a major chunk of the infrastructure).
My Obsolete and Archaic text pager kept working.
(I wonder if the pager "I'm OK, R U OK?
"messages I exchanged with my sister are in this archive?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226988</id>
	<title>Obviously</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1257182460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad it isn't phone calls. They might be more intresting than meeting reminders:</p><p>Him: Guess where I'm calling from.<br>Her: Huh?<br>Him: I'm calling from ythe plane. I'm on the plane, and calling you. It's a phone, on the plane.<br>Her: How stupid.<br>Him: Hold on, we're about to fly through a buil.....<br>Her: Hello? Hello?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad it is n't phone calls .
They might be more intresting than meeting reminders : Him : Guess where I 'm calling from.Her : Huh ? Him : I 'm calling from ythe plane .
I 'm on the plane , and calling you .
It 's a phone , on the plane.Her : How stupid.Him : Hold on , we 're about to fly through a buil.....Her : Hello ?
Hello ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad it isn't phone calls.
They might be more intresting than meeting reminders:Him: Guess where I'm calling from.Her: Huh?Him: I'm calling from ythe plane.
I'm on the plane, and calling you.
It's a phone, on the plane.Her: How stupid.Him: Hold on, we're about to fly through a buil.....Her: Hello?
Hello?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227640</id>
	<title>Re:Pagers were working?</title>
	<author>Jafafa Hots</author>
	<datestamp>1257185640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The pagers I know of used transmissions over FM radio stations' towers, using sideband frequencies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The pagers I know of used transmissions over FM radio stations ' towers , using sideband frequencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pagers I know of used transmissions over FM radio stations' towers, using sideband frequencies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30230738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30242576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226066
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30242774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30285502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226142
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30239212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_25_1320215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30239212
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225890
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226432
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227110
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225866
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226832
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232700
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226958
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226546
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231084
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30242774
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30229216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30285502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30230738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226938
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30242576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227364
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30227052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30232892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30246752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226066
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30231008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30233344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30225812
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30226000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_25_1320215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_25_1320215.30228790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
