<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_24_2210224</id>
	<title>Google Analytics May Be Illegal In Germany</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1259061540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>sopssa sends in a TechCrunch story that begins <i>"Several federal and regional government officials in Germany are trying to <a href="http://eu.techcrunch.com/2009/11/24/google-analytics-illegal-germany/">put a ban on Google Analytics</a>, the search giant's free software product that allows website owners and publishers to get detailed statistics about the number, whereabouts, and search behavior of their visitors (and much more)."</i> Here's Google's translation of the <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&amp;prev=\_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;u=http://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2009-11/google-analytics-datenschutz&amp;sl=de&amp;tl=en">article from Zeit Online</a> (<a href="http://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2009-11/google-analytics-datenschutz">original in German</a>). A German lawyer cited there says that penalties for websites that uses Google Analytics could amount to &euro;50,000 (about $75,000). Reader sopssa adds, "The amount of data Google collects from everywhere on the Internet is indeed huge, and website owners should be using a <a href="http://piwik.org/">local open source alternative</a> to keep visitor data private."</htmltext>
<tokenext>sopssa sends in a TechCrunch story that begins " Several federal and regional government officials in Germany are trying to put a ban on Google Analytics , the search giant 's free software product that allows website owners and publishers to get detailed statistics about the number , whereabouts , and search behavior of their visitors ( and much more ) .
" Here 's Google 's translation of the article from Zeit Online ( original in German ) .
A German lawyer cited there says that penalties for websites that uses Google Analytics could amount to    50,000 ( about $ 75,000 ) .
Reader sopssa adds , " The amount of data Google collects from everywhere on the Internet is indeed huge , and website owners should be using a local open source alternative to keep visitor data private .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sopssa sends in a TechCrunch story that begins "Several federal and regional government officials in Germany are trying to put a ban on Google Analytics, the search giant's free software product that allows website owners and publishers to get detailed statistics about the number, whereabouts, and search behavior of their visitors (and much more).
" Here's Google's translation of the article from Zeit Online (original in German).
A German lawyer cited there says that penalties for websites that uses Google Analytics could amount to €50,000 (about $75,000).
Reader sopssa adds, "The amount of data Google collects from everywhere on the Internet is indeed huge, and website owners should be using a local open source alternative to keep visitor data private.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220614</id>
	<title>What's one of the #1 blocked items in my browser?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259066100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Analytics</p><p>Just behind doubleclick.net</p><p>It never makes a noticeable difference to have both disabled so far.</p><p>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent (which it never will).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google AnalyticsJust behind doubleclick.netIt never makes a noticeable difference to have both disabled so far.Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent ( which it never will ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google AnalyticsJust behind doubleclick.netIt never makes a noticeable difference to have both disabled so far.Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent (which it never will).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223902</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>dunkelfalke</author>
	<datestamp>1257156300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankfurt airport really sucks. Try DUS sometimes, it is much more relaxed and friendly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankfurt airport really sucks .
Try DUS sometimes , it is much more relaxed and friendly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankfurt airport really sucks.
Try DUS sometimes, it is much more relaxed and friendly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</id>
	<title>Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259067000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't understand people saying that Google knows too much about each of us. Maybe I haven't been paying close enough attention as of late, but has Google ever done wrong by their users? And besides, as an entirely uninteresting person, I don't really care if Google knows my surfing habits. I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets, and the same response applies. I don't care if the supermarket "Man" knows that I buy excessive amounts of phallic vegetables and personal lubricant (unrelated).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand people saying that Google knows too much about each of us .
Maybe I have n't been paying close enough attention as of late , but has Google ever done wrong by their users ?
And besides , as an entirely uninteresting person , I do n't really care if Google knows my surfing habits .
I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets , and the same response applies .
I do n't care if the supermarket " Man " knows that I buy excessive amounts of phallic vegetables and personal lubricant ( unrelated ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand people saying that Google knows too much about each of us.
Maybe I haven't been paying close enough attention as of late, but has Google ever done wrong by their users?
And besides, as an entirely uninteresting person, I don't really care if Google knows my surfing habits.
I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets, and the same response applies.
I don't care if the supermarket "Man" knows that I buy excessive amounts of phallic vegetables and personal lubricant (unrelated).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220618</id>
	<title>Re:10 Years ago...</title>
	<author>misiu\_mp</author>
	<datestamp>1259066100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>FYI: In 2000 1 dollar was 1.083 euros (enl. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tables\_of\_historical\_exchange\_rates\_to\_the\_USD" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tables\_of\_historical\_exchange\_rates\_to\_the\_USD</a> [wikipedia.org]).
Why would it be 25000 eur more ten years ago? Anyway, 75000/1.083 is 69250.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FYI : In 2000 1 dollar was 1.083 euros ( enl .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tables \ _of \ _historical \ _exchange \ _rates \ _to \ _the \ _USD [ wikipedia.org ] ) .
Why would it be 25000 eur more ten years ago ?
Anyway , 75000/1.083 is 69250 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FYI: In 2000 1 dollar was 1.083 euros (enl.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tables\_of\_historical\_exchange\_rates\_to\_the\_USD [wikipedia.org]).
Why would it be 25000 eur more ten years ago?
Anyway, 75000/1.083 is 69250.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220524</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221948</id>
	<title>At least the EU is on your side.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259075640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Moves like this make it clear that there are very fundamental differences between the governments in Europe and the USA.</p><p>In the USA, the government exists to help corporations make money.</p><p>In Europe, governments exist to help people live enjoyable lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Moves like this make it clear that there are very fundamental differences between the governments in Europe and the USA.In the USA , the government exists to help corporations make money.In Europe , governments exist to help people live enjoyable lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Moves like this make it clear that there are very fundamental differences between the governments in Europe and the USA.In the USA, the government exists to help corporations make money.In Europe, governments exist to help people live enjoyable lives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222684</id>
	<title>Take a look at your cookies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259082720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before getting too paranoid about google analytics, take a look at the actual cookies it stores. E.G. in Firefox "Tools", "Options", "Show Cookies", search for "\_\_utmz". Whoa, there are a few hundred. Check out the one from Slashdot - in my case: "9273847.1252068577.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none)". "9273847" means "slashdot.org". "1252068577" means me, when I go to Slashdot. The rest of the stuff has to do with how I found the site. But now look at \_\_utmz for say, pennyarcade.com: "84531096.1252070740.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none)". It's a different web site ID, but it's also a different user ID.

There's no correlation between the person who goes to slashdot, and the person who goes to pennyarcade. Google can't tell that they're both me. My ID is different on every single web site that uses Google analytics. The only purpose of the ID is so that, for a single given website, they can tell the difference between one person visiting it a hundred times, or a hundred people each visiting it one time. There's no other personally identifiable information tied to that number. Your analytics cookies on all those sites are not correlated with each other; they're not tracking everything you do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Before getting too paranoid about google analytics , take a look at the actual cookies it stores .
E.G. in Firefox " Tools " , " Options " , " Show Cookies " , search for " \ _ \ _utmz " .
Whoa , there are a few hundred .
Check out the one from Slashdot - in my case : " 9273847.1252068577.1.1.utmcsr = ( direct ) | utmccn = ( direct ) | utmcmd = ( none ) " .
" 9273847 " means " slashdot.org " .
" 1252068577 " means me , when I go to Slashdot .
The rest of the stuff has to do with how I found the site .
But now look at \ _ \ _utmz for say , pennyarcade.com : " 84531096.1252070740.1.1.utmcsr = ( direct ) | utmccn = ( direct ) | utmcmd = ( none ) " .
It 's a different web site ID , but it 's also a different user ID .
There 's no correlation between the person who goes to slashdot , and the person who goes to pennyarcade .
Google ca n't tell that they 're both me .
My ID is different on every single web site that uses Google analytics .
The only purpose of the ID is so that , for a single given website , they can tell the difference between one person visiting it a hundred times , or a hundred people each visiting it one time .
There 's no other personally identifiable information tied to that number .
Your analytics cookies on all those sites are not correlated with each other ; they 're not tracking everything you do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before getting too paranoid about google analytics, take a look at the actual cookies it stores.
E.G. in Firefox "Tools", "Options", "Show Cookies", search for "\_\_utmz".
Whoa, there are a few hundred.
Check out the one from Slashdot - in my case: "9273847.1252068577.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none)".
"9273847" means "slashdot.org".
"1252068577" means me, when I go to Slashdot.
The rest of the stuff has to do with how I found the site.
But now look at \_\_utmz for say, pennyarcade.com: "84531096.1252070740.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)|utmccn=(direct)|utmcmd=(none)".
It's a different web site ID, but it's also a different user ID.
There's no correlation between the person who goes to slashdot, and the person who goes to pennyarcade.
Google can't tell that they're both me.
My ID is different on every single web site that uses Google analytics.
The only purpose of the ID is so that, for a single given website, they can tell the difference between one person visiting it a hundred times, or a hundred people each visiting it one time.
There's no other personally identifiable information tied to that number.
Your analytics cookies on all those sites are not correlated with each other; they're not tracking everything you do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223670</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>stirz</author>
	<datestamp>1257153180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fortunately, "The country that tried to take over the world" has ceased to exist in May 1945. So what are you talking about?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately , " The country that tried to take over the world " has ceased to exist in May 1945 .
So what are you talking about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately, "The country that tried to take over the world" has ceased to exist in May 1945.
So what are you talking about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221826</id>
	<title>Re:Blocked with NoScript</title>
	<author>non-registered</author>
	<datestamp>1259074560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks, al0ha! I installed RequestPolicy and Slashdot is readable again: fast, sleek, non-graphical. I love it!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks , al0ha !
I installed RequestPolicy and Slashdot is readable again : fast , sleek , non-graphical .
I love it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks, al0ha!
I installed RequestPolicy and Slashdot is readable again: fast, sleek, non-graphical.
I love it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224478</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, disregard my other posting, something went wrong.</p><blockquote><div><p>I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm german and i actually feel that i'm in a very free country, thank you very much. Yes, there are some laws which i disagree with, but overall it is fine.</p><blockquote><div><p>and then you can't say anything about Nazis or face jail time or some other severe penalty</p></div></blockquote><p>Complete bullshit. You can say a lot about nazis and the nazi era. You can discuss this, and you are even free to utter dumb sentences like "not everything was bad in nazi germany" (which is technically spoken true, but a dumb statement nethertheless as a german tv personality badly learned a while a ago).</p><p>You are only banned from showing symbols like the swastika, play/sing some songs like the "Horst Wessel Lied" (horst wessel song, hymn of the nazi party), deny the holocaust or praise the unlawful nazi regime. But even doing this will most of the time not lead you into jail. A fine will do in most cases.</p><p>Now you might argue that this is against freedom of speech, but as a german i feel that given our history there is very good reason to ban said things, especially denying the holocaust. Our ancestors have done enough harm to e.g. jews, there is no need to further harm them by allowing to state that the horror they (the few who were not killed) encountered actually never happened.</p><blockquote><div><p>I could go on on but in short I put Germany up there with China, not quiet as bad</p></div></blockquote><p>Yes, you could go on with bullshit claims, but this still puts germany nowhere near china. Not quite as bad? That is the understatement of the year.</p><blockquote><div><p>but still the fact that free speech is merely an illusion</p></div></blockquote><p>Still the fact is that free speech is actually provided in germany. But most of us germans (and europeans in general) have a different feeling of the meaning of free speech. Free speech is fine, but the right to it ends where others are harmed. I don't have a problem with that, and most people i know don't have either. This concept might be hard to grasp for a citizen of the United States, but i'm still fine with it and i don't feel that i'm missing some of the banned speech.</p><blockquote><div><p>there makes me feel that Germany has a ways to go in terms of personal liberties when compared to several other democratic countries in the western world.</p></div></blockquote><p>I take it that you are from the US. People like you also have a long way to go until you will finally understand that the us american believes are not the holy grail to which the whole world needs to subscribe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , disregard my other posting , something went wrong.I 've said it once and I 'll say it again : Germany is not a free country.I 'm german and i actually feel that i 'm in a very free country , thank you very much .
Yes , there are some laws which i disagree with , but overall it is fine.and then you ca n't say anything about Nazis or face jail time or some other severe penaltyComplete bullshit .
You can say a lot about nazis and the nazi era .
You can discuss this , and you are even free to utter dumb sentences like " not everything was bad in nazi germany " ( which is technically spoken true , but a dumb statement nethertheless as a german tv personality badly learned a while a ago ) .You are only banned from showing symbols like the swastika , play/sing some songs like the " Horst Wessel Lied " ( horst wessel song , hymn of the nazi party ) , deny the holocaust or praise the unlawful nazi regime .
But even doing this will most of the time not lead you into jail .
A fine will do in most cases.Now you might argue that this is against freedom of speech , but as a german i feel that given our history there is very good reason to ban said things , especially denying the holocaust .
Our ancestors have done enough harm to e.g .
jews , there is no need to further harm them by allowing to state that the horror they ( the few who were not killed ) encountered actually never happened.I could go on on but in short I put Germany up there with China , not quiet as badYes , you could go on with bullshit claims , but this still puts germany nowhere near china .
Not quite as bad ?
That is the understatement of the year.but still the fact that free speech is merely an illusionStill the fact is that free speech is actually provided in germany .
But most of us germans ( and europeans in general ) have a different feeling of the meaning of free speech .
Free speech is fine , but the right to it ends where others are harmed .
I do n't have a problem with that , and most people i know do n't have either .
This concept might be hard to grasp for a citizen of the United States , but i 'm still fine with it and i do n't feel that i 'm missing some of the banned speech.there makes me feel that Germany has a ways to go in terms of personal liberties when compared to several other democratic countries in the western world.I take it that you are from the US .
People like you also have a long way to go until you will finally understand that the us american believes are not the holy grail to which the whole world needs to subscribe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, disregard my other posting, something went wrong.I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.I'm german and i actually feel that i'm in a very free country, thank you very much.
Yes, there are some laws which i disagree with, but overall it is fine.and then you can't say anything about Nazis or face jail time or some other severe penaltyComplete bullshit.
You can say a lot about nazis and the nazi era.
You can discuss this, and you are even free to utter dumb sentences like "not everything was bad in nazi germany" (which is technically spoken true, but a dumb statement nethertheless as a german tv personality badly learned a while a ago).You are only banned from showing symbols like the swastika, play/sing some songs like the "Horst Wessel Lied" (horst wessel song, hymn of the nazi party), deny the holocaust or praise the unlawful nazi regime.
But even doing this will most of the time not lead you into jail.
A fine will do in most cases.Now you might argue that this is against freedom of speech, but as a german i feel that given our history there is very good reason to ban said things, especially denying the holocaust.
Our ancestors have done enough harm to e.g.
jews, there is no need to further harm them by allowing to state that the horror they (the few who were not killed) encountered actually never happened.I could go on on but in short I put Germany up there with China, not quiet as badYes, you could go on with bullshit claims, but this still puts germany nowhere near china.
Not quite as bad?
That is the understatement of the year.but still the fact that free speech is merely an illusionStill the fact is that free speech is actually provided in germany.
But most of us germans (and europeans in general) have a different feeling of the meaning of free speech.
Free speech is fine, but the right to it ends where others are harmed.
I don't have a problem with that, and most people i know don't have either.
This concept might be hard to grasp for a citizen of the United States, but i'm still fine with it and i don't feel that i'm missing some of the banned speech.there makes me feel that Germany has a ways to go in terms of personal liberties when compared to several other democratic countries in the western world.I take it that you are from the US.
People like you also have a long way to go until you will finally understand that the us american believes are not the holy grail to which the whole world needs to subscribe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220588</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>TooMuchToDo</author>
	<datestamp>1259065980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except German scheisse videos. Cartman taught me that much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except German scheisse videos .
Cartman taught me that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except German scheisse videos.
Cartman taught me that much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222238</id>
	<title>Re:What's one of the #1 blocked items in my browse</title>
	<author>Gadget\_Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1259078280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent (which it never will)</p></div><p>Way back in the IE4 days, I used a mixture of the zone system (Trusted Sites for those few where I wanted Javascript) and the hosts file. These days, if you use multiple browsers then <a href="http://www.privoxy.org/" title="privoxy.org">privoxy</a> [privoxy.org] is the better solution because the one configuration will work in all the browsers (yes, including Internet Explorer).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent ( which it never will ) Way back in the IE4 days , I used a mixture of the zone system ( Trusted Sites for those few where I wanted Javascript ) and the hosts file .
These days , if you use multiple browsers then privoxy [ privoxy.org ] is the better solution because the one configuration will work in all the browsers ( yes , including Internet Explorer ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent (which it never will)Way back in the IE4 days, I used a mixture of the zone system (Trusted Sites for those few where I wanted Javascript) and the hosts file.
These days, if you use multiple browsers then privoxy [privoxy.org] is the better solution because the one configuration will work in all the browsers (yes, including Internet Explorer).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222396</id>
	<title>So block it</title>
	<author>Exp315</author>
	<datestamp>1259079420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use Ghostery (the Firefox add-on) that shows you what trackers are loading with the page and lets you block them individually. There are plenty of other options if you want to block tracking cookies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Ghostery ( the Firefox add-on ) that shows you what trackers are loading with the page and lets you block them individually .
There are plenty of other options if you want to block tracking cookies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Ghostery (the Firefox add-on) that shows you what trackers are loading with the page and lets you block them individually.
There are plenty of other options if you want to block tracking cookies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221728</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>introspekt.i</author>
	<datestamp>1259073780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if we get rights from laws, who gives laws rights so the laws can give us rights?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if we get rights from laws , who gives laws rights so the laws can give us rights ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if we get rights from laws, who gives laws rights so the laws can give us rights?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223022</id>
	<title>Re:Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259086620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't care if the supermarket "Man" knows that I buy excessive amounts of phallic vegetables and personal lubricant (unrelated).</p></div></blockquote><p>
"We're sorry, SheepFister, but we're denying your claim on the grounds that those hemmoroids were a pre-existing condition.  And does your cardiologist know just how much fat there is in a whole lamb, bought live from even the most organic community-supported agriculture co-op?  You got any idea how much fat there is in lamb?"
</p><p>
Sure, they're making an incorrect assumption - that the lamb is for <em>eating</em>, and that the 'roids come from eating too much red meat and not enough fiber.
</p><p>
So you could count yourself lucky that they didn't take your name at face value.
</p><p>
But to get serious, would your insurance premiums be any lower if they knew that you (according to Google Analytics<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.js time-on-page stats) spend several hours a day sitting on a chair, while reading Slashdot?  Are you <em>sure</em> they wouldn't consider 'roids a self-inflicted injury?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care if the supermarket " Man " knows that I buy excessive amounts of phallic vegetables and personal lubricant ( unrelated ) .
" We 're sorry , SheepFister , but we 're denying your claim on the grounds that those hemmoroids were a pre-existing condition .
And does your cardiologist know just how much fat there is in a whole lamb , bought live from even the most organic community-supported agriculture co-op ?
You got any idea how much fat there is in lamb ?
" Sure , they 're making an incorrect assumption - that the lamb is for eating , and that the 'roids come from eating too much red meat and not enough fiber .
So you could count yourself lucky that they did n't take your name at face value .
But to get serious , would your insurance premiums be any lower if they knew that you ( according to Google Analytics .js time-on-page stats ) spend several hours a day sitting on a chair , while reading Slashdot ?
Are you sure they would n't consider 'roids a self-inflicted injury ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care if the supermarket "Man" knows that I buy excessive amounts of phallic vegetables and personal lubricant (unrelated).
"We're sorry, SheepFister, but we're denying your claim on the grounds that those hemmoroids were a pre-existing condition.
And does your cardiologist know just how much fat there is in a whole lamb, bought live from even the most organic community-supported agriculture co-op?
You got any idea how much fat there is in lamb?
"

Sure, they're making an incorrect assumption - that the lamb is for eating, and that the 'roids come from eating too much red meat and not enough fiber.
So you could count yourself lucky that they didn't take your name at face value.
But to get serious, would your insurance premiums be any lower if they knew that you (according to Google Analytics .js time-on-page stats) spend several hours a day sitting on a chair, while reading Slashdot?
Are you sure they wouldn't consider 'roids a self-inflicted injury?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220840</id>
	<title>Complete nonsense.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259067360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Sir or Madam,<br>this is acutally complete nonsense.<br>If you choose to publish, you have no right whatsoever to track who is reading your publication for what reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Sir or Madam,this is acutally complete nonsense.If you choose to publish , you have no right whatsoever to track who is reading your publication for what reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Sir or Madam,this is acutally complete nonsense.If you choose to publish, you have no right whatsoever to track who is reading your publication for what reason.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222372</id>
	<title>Re:What's one of the #1 blocked items in my browse</title>
	<author>Kalriath</author>
	<datestamp>1259079300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent (which it never will).</p></div><p> <a href="http://www.ie7pro.com/" title="ie7pro.com">http://www.ie7pro.com/</a> [ie7pro.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent ( which it never will ) .
http : //www.ie7pro.com/ [ ie7pro.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another reason to avoid Internet Explorer until it gets a no script equivalent (which it never will).
http://www.ie7pro.com/ [ie7pro.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220614</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220636</id>
	<title>good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259066160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google can fuck off. Why the hell doesn't AdBlock block Google Analytics by default?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google can fuck off .
Why the hell does n't AdBlock block Google Analytics by default ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google can fuck off.
Why the hell doesn't AdBlock block Google Analytics by default?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30234902</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>stirz</author>
	<datestamp>1259229240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.</p></div><p>Alright. Let's have a look at the German constitution (Grundgesetz, basic law, they call it).
I retrieved an official English translation for it via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic\_Law\_for\_the\_Federal\_Republic\_of\_Germany" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org], quote:</p><ol>
<li>(1) Human dignity shall be inviolable. To respect and protect it shall be
the duty of all state authority.</li><li> (2) The German people therefore acknowledge inviolable and inalienable
human rights as the basis of every community, of peace and of justice
in the world.</li><li> (3) The following basic rights shall bind the legislature, the executive and
the judiciary as directly applicable law.</li></ol><p>
As every governmental decision has to obey to this fundamental rule, why should Germany not be "a free country"?
What you say about Nazis is in fact not true. It's quite the opposite: If you spread Nazi ideology you may soon face some time in jail, but not if you protest against neo-Nazism. The censorship of videogames is mainly related to a certain law which forbids to show Nazi-symbols, like the swastika. So, if you want to sell a game there, leave them out, and it can be sold. How could law differentiate between videogames and propaganda posters and allow video games to show those symbols while keeping neo-Nazi propaganda from doing so?<br> <br>
I'd say you depict Germany in a really distorted way. Deducting non-freedom from special Nazi-related laws is a little far fetched, imho.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've said it once and I 'll say it again : Germany is not a free country.Alright .
Let 's have a look at the German constitution ( Grundgesetz , basic law , they call it ) .
I retrieved an official English translation for it via Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] , quote : ( 1 ) Human dignity shall be inviolable .
To respect and protect it shall be the duty of all state authority .
( 2 ) The German people therefore acknowledge inviolable and inalienable human rights as the basis of every community , of peace and of justice in the world .
( 3 ) The following basic rights shall bind the legislature , the executive and the judiciary as directly applicable law .
As every governmental decision has to obey to this fundamental rule , why should Germany not be " a free country " ?
What you say about Nazis is in fact not true .
It 's quite the opposite : If you spread Nazi ideology you may soon face some time in jail , but not if you protest against neo-Nazism .
The censorship of videogames is mainly related to a certain law which forbids to show Nazi-symbols , like the swastika .
So , if you want to sell a game there , leave them out , and it can be sold .
How could law differentiate between videogames and propaganda posters and allow video games to show those symbols while keeping neo-Nazi propaganda from doing so ?
I 'd say you depict Germany in a really distorted way .
Deducting non-freedom from special Nazi-related laws is a little far fetched , imho .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.Alright.
Let's have a look at the German constitution (Grundgesetz, basic law, they call it).
I retrieved an official English translation for it via Wikipedia [wikipedia.org], quote:
(1) Human dignity shall be inviolable.
To respect and protect it shall be
the duty of all state authority.
(2) The German people therefore acknowledge inviolable and inalienable
human rights as the basis of every community, of peace and of justice
in the world.
(3) The following basic rights shall bind the legislature, the executive and
the judiciary as directly applicable law.
As every governmental decision has to obey to this fundamental rule, why should Germany not be "a free country"?
What you say about Nazis is in fact not true.
It's quite the opposite: If you spread Nazi ideology you may soon face some time in jail, but not if you protest against neo-Nazism.
The censorship of videogames is mainly related to a certain law which forbids to show Nazi-symbols, like the swastika.
So, if you want to sell a game there, leave them out, and it can be sold.
How could law differentiate between videogames and propaganda posters and allow video games to show those symbols while keeping neo-Nazi propaganda from doing so?
I'd say you depict Germany in a really distorted way.
Deducting non-freedom from special Nazi-related laws is a little far fetched, imho.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222752</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>BrokenHalo</author>
	<datestamp>1259083380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Laws don't give you rights. They can only take them away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Laws do n't give you rights .
They can only take them away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Laws don't give you rights.
They can only take them away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225756</id>
	<title>Re:Take a look at your cookies</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257176340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you know?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you know?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225672</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257175740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>deny the holocaust or praise the unlawful nazi regime.</p></div><p>So you are basically saying that even though it is *illegal* for me to hold a purely personal opinion (denying the holocaust) because the state wants to control what I am thinking, I am free? In other words, you're free as long as you don't commit a thoughtcrime (which is what this essentially is). I guess for narrow enough definitions of freedom, sure...</p><p>See, I was under the impression that one of the most basic definitions of freedom was a freedom to hold one's own independent opinion, but I guess I was wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>deny the holocaust or praise the unlawful nazi regime.So you are basically saying that even though it is * illegal * for me to hold a purely personal opinion ( denying the holocaust ) because the state wants to control what I am thinking , I am free ?
In other words , you 're free as long as you do n't commit a thoughtcrime ( which is what this essentially is ) .
I guess for narrow enough definitions of freedom , sure...See , I was under the impression that one of the most basic definitions of freedom was a freedom to hold one 's own independent opinion , but I guess I was wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>deny the holocaust or praise the unlawful nazi regime.So you are basically saying that even though it is *illegal* for me to hold a purely personal opinion (denying the holocaust) because the state wants to control what I am thinking, I am free?
In other words, you're free as long as you don't commit a thoughtcrime (which is what this essentially is).
I guess for narrow enough definitions of freedom, sure...See, I was under the impression that one of the most basic definitions of freedom was a freedom to hold one's own independent opinion, but I guess I was wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</id>
	<title>Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1259065620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you come to my website then I, or my designated party, have the right to record the fact that you came to my website. If you don't like it then don't use the web. Is it also against the law to record what customers come in the door of your brick and mortar store in Germany?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you come to my website then I , or my designated party , have the right to record the fact that you came to my website .
If you do n't like it then do n't use the web .
Is it also against the law to record what customers come in the door of your brick and mortar store in Germany ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you come to my website then I, or my designated party, have the right to record the fact that you came to my website.
If you don't like it then don't use the web.
Is it also against the law to record what customers come in the door of your brick and mortar store in Germany?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221456</id>
	<title>who doesn't block that, anyway?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259071380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is there any person left using the internet who does NOT block the google, doubleclick, etc trackers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there any person left using the internet who does NOT block the google , doubleclick , etc trackers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there any person left using the internet who does NOT block the google, doubleclick, etc trackers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220810</id>
	<title>Re:10 Years ago...</title>
	<author>NoYob</author>
	<datestamp>1259067240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>7,8,9, 10<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...years ago gets to be all the same after a while. No, I can't remember what I had for breakfast this morning, either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>7,8,9 , 10 ...years ago gets to be all the same after a while .
No , I ca n't remember what I had for breakfast this morning , either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7,8,9, 10 ...years ago gets to be all the same after a while.
No, I can't remember what I had for breakfast this morning, either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222246</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>FleaPlus</author>
	<datestamp>1259078340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not really about you recording the fact that someone came to your website. The article says that there are worries that Google could further use the data, and eg connect it with the data they might have from Google Mail or other sites using Google Analytics, thus generating profiles about habits and preferences etc.</p></div><p>So collecting data is ok, but it's forbidden to run certain algorithms on the collected data? Something tells me this isn't a particularly sustainable arrangement.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not really about you recording the fact that someone came to your website .
The article says that there are worries that Google could further use the data , and eg connect it with the data they might have from Google Mail or other sites using Google Analytics , thus generating profiles about habits and preferences etc.So collecting data is ok , but it 's forbidden to run certain algorithms on the collected data ?
Something tells me this is n't a particularly sustainable arrangement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not really about you recording the fact that someone came to your website.
The article says that there are worries that Google could further use the data, and eg connect it with the data they might have from Google Mail or other sites using Google Analytics, thus generating profiles about habits and preferences etc.So collecting data is ok, but it's forbidden to run certain algorithms on the collected data?
Something tells me this isn't a particularly sustainable arrangement.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</id>
	<title>Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259065500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everything is illegal in Germany.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything is illegal in Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything is illegal in Germany.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220644</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1259066220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>No. What people end up accepting in the States is their business, but the EU has
a number of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data\_Protection\_Directive" title="wikipedia.org">data
protection principles</a> [wikipedia.org] (see section 2.2). Veiled third party
advertising bugs don't follow those principles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
What people end up accepting in the States is their business , but the EU has a number of data protection principles [ wikipedia.org ] ( see section 2.2 ) .
Veiled third party advertising bugs do n't follow those principles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
What people end up accepting in the States is their business, but the EU has
a number of data
protection principles [wikipedia.org] (see section 2.2).
Veiled third party
advertising bugs don't follow those principles.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224634</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>timbo234</author>
	<datestamp>1257165300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and drinking alcohol in public (including parks and public transport)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and drinking alcohol in public ( including parks and public transport )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and drinking alcohol in public (including parks and public transport)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30243798</id>
	<title>Open Source alternative</title>
	<author>ZerdZerd</author>
	<datestamp>1259316660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does anyone know about an open source alternative to Google analytics? Something that gives a more information than just webalizer/awstats etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does anyone know about an open source alternative to Google analytics ?
Something that gives a more information than just webalizer/awstats etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does anyone know about an open source alternative to Google analytics?
Something that gives a more information than just webalizer/awstats etc.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225614</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257175500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh stop it.</p><p>You act like the Germans would stoop to Gestapo tactics, or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh stop it.You act like the Germans would stoop to Gestapo tactics , or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh stop it.You act like the Germans would stoop to Gestapo tactics, or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1259067600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except saying bad words on TV or being naked in public<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except saying bad words on TV or being naked in public : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except saying bad words on TV or being naked in public :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30228412</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1257189300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I applaud your retort, and hope that somewhere some lines have been made more apparent to tohers about different cultures, and how someone can speak so freely about another culture without having truly experienced it.</p><p>I tend to think someone who has lived there for a few years would be entitled to speak about it, yet this other person had no such claim, therefor I think you were in the right to make his ignorance<br>come to light.</p><p>I do hope things are better in germany then they were let's say 20-25 years ago...then again I have yet to go back there since... I only wish that the earth as a whole had a one unified modus operandie<br>it would make things much easier on everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I applaud your retort , and hope that somewhere some lines have been made more apparent to tohers about different cultures , and how someone can speak so freely about another culture without having truly experienced it.I tend to think someone who has lived there for a few years would be entitled to speak about it , yet this other person had no such claim , therefor I think you were in the right to make his ignorancecome to light.I do hope things are better in germany then they were let 's say 20-25 years ago...then again I have yet to go back there since... I only wish that the earth as a whole had a one unified modus operandieit would make things much easier on everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I applaud your retort, and hope that somewhere some lines have been made more apparent to tohers about different cultures, and how someone can speak so freely about another culture without having truly experienced it.I tend to think someone who has lived there for a few years would be entitled to speak about it, yet this other person had no such claim, therefor I think you were in the right to make his ignorancecome to light.I do hope things are better in germany then they were let's say 20-25 years ago...then again I have yet to go back there since... I only wish that the earth as a whole had a one unified modus operandieit would make things much easier on everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221014</id>
	<title>Hell froze over.</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1259068560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Government wants to ban a proprietary tool serving obtaining vast amounts of data about the net users by a big corporation, without the users' content. The government suggests an open-source alternative.</p><p>Slashdot crowd violently opposes.</p><p>brb checking if RMS applied for a job at Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Government wants to ban a proprietary tool serving obtaining vast amounts of data about the net users by a big corporation , without the users ' content .
The government suggests an open-source alternative.Slashdot crowd violently opposes.brb checking if RMS applied for a job at Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Government wants to ban a proprietary tool serving obtaining vast amounts of data about the net users by a big corporation, without the users' content.
The government suggests an open-source alternative.Slashdot crowd violently opposes.brb checking if RMS applied for a job at Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974</id>
	<title>Re:Blocked with NoScript</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259068380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, NoScript only does part of the job, google-analytics.com, coremetrics.com, any many other ad/tracking entities sneak around NoScript on many sites, including<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.
<br>
<br>
Install the RequestPolicy add-on and browse<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. again, you will see what I mean.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , NoScript only does part of the job , google-analytics.com , coremetrics.com , any many other ad/tracking entities sneak around NoScript on many sites , including / .
Install the RequestPolicy add-on and browse / .
again , you will see what I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, NoScript only does part of the job, google-analytics.com, coremetrics.com, any many other ad/tracking entities sneak around NoScript on many sites, including /.
Install the RequestPolicy add-on and browse /.
again, you will see what I mean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222292</id>
	<title>Re:Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1259078640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>but has Google ever done wrong by their users?</p></div><p>And would you ever know? Are you sure that the prices you find on line are the same ones I see? Some manufacturers of luxury goods might not even want "your kind" seen in public with their product (replace "your kind" with whatever socio-economic group you want). Maybe you can't even see their web pages in a search.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> I don't really care if Google knows my surfing habits. I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets, and the same response applies.</p></div><p>In addition to the loyalty club discount, I also get an additional percentage knocked off at the cash register. Plus, I get rebates. Because they like me. I'm a desirable customer. You, not so much.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>but has Google ever done wrong by their users ? And would you ever know ?
Are you sure that the prices you find on line are the same ones I see ?
Some manufacturers of luxury goods might not even want " your kind " seen in public with their product ( replace " your kind " with whatever socio-economic group you want ) .
Maybe you ca n't even see their web pages in a search .
I do n't really care if Google knows my surfing habits .
I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets , and the same response applies.In addition to the loyalty club discount , I also get an additional percentage knocked off at the cash register .
Plus , I get rebates .
Because they like me .
I 'm a desirable customer .
You , not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but has Google ever done wrong by their users?And would you ever know?
Are you sure that the prices you find on line are the same ones I see?
Some manufacturers of luxury goods might not even want "your kind" seen in public with their product (replace "your kind" with whatever socio-economic group you want).
Maybe you can't even see their web pages in a search.
I don't really care if Google knows my surfing habits.
I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets, and the same response applies.In addition to the loyalty club discount, I also get an additional percentage knocked off at the cash register.
Plus, I get rebates.
Because they like me.
I'm a desirable customer.
You, not so much.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220988</id>
	<title>Re:Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259068380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't understand people saying that Google knows too much about each of us. [...] has Google ever done wrong by their users? And besides [...] I don't really care if Google knows my surfing habits. I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets, and the same response applies.</p></div><p>Thank you for not caring. This is not about google but the</p><p>Over here in the real world, there is quite a difference between an opt-in scheme and the default assumption that your visitors don't mind you keeping every bit of information you can. "Well, then they shouldn't visit me!" you say, ignoring the huge power differential between the average visitor (consumer) and website owner (vendor).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand people saying that Google knows too much about each of us .
[ ... ] has Google ever done wrong by their users ?
And besides [ ... ] I do n't really care if Google knows my surfing habits .
I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets , and the same response applies.Thank you for not caring .
This is not about google but theOver here in the real world , there is quite a difference between an opt-in scheme and the default assumption that your visitors do n't mind you keeping every bit of information you can .
" Well , then they should n't visit me !
" you say , ignoring the huge power differential between the average visitor ( consumer ) and website owner ( vendor ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand people saying that Google knows too much about each of us.
[...] has Google ever done wrong by their users?
And besides [...] I don't really care if Google knows my surfing habits.
I hear the same argument against the club cards at supermarkets, and the same response applies.Thank you for not caring.
This is not about google but theOver here in the real world, there is quite a difference between an opt-in scheme and the default assumption that your visitors don't mind you keeping every bit of information you can.
"Well, then they shouldn't visit me!
" you say, ignoring the huge power differential between the average visitor (consumer) and website owner (vendor).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222540</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>misexistentialist</author>
	<datestamp>1259080980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cops get to carry assault rifles, but you get to carry a beer around in the dreaded "open container." Seems fair considering that Americans cops take their fancy weapons out whenever they get the chance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cops get to carry assault rifles , but you get to carry a beer around in the dreaded " open container .
" Seems fair considering that Americans cops take their fancy weapons out whenever they get the chance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cops get to carry assault rifles, but you get to carry a beer around in the dreaded "open container.
" Seems fair considering that Americans cops take their fancy weapons out whenever they get the chance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259076780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm actually an American on vacation in Frankfurt at this very moment, and it is, indeed, a much more regulated environment. Seeing three guys walking through the aiport, one of them holding an automatic weapon at the ready, and getting the feeling that they're just waiting for a reason to jump you is very sobering. As far as everything being against the law, after talking candidly with some of my friends that live in Germany that is a far less humorous statement than it should be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually an American on vacation in Frankfurt at this very moment , and it is , indeed , a much more regulated environment .
Seeing three guys walking through the aiport , one of them holding an automatic weapon at the ready , and getting the feeling that they 're just waiting for a reason to jump you is very sobering .
As far as everything being against the law , after talking candidly with some of my friends that live in Germany that is a far less humorous statement than it should be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually an American on vacation in Frankfurt at this very moment, and it is, indeed, a much more regulated environment.
Seeing three guys walking through the aiport, one of them holding an automatic weapon at the ready, and getting the feeling that they're just waiting for a reason to jump you is very sobering.
As far as everything being against the law, after talking candidly with some of my friends that live in Germany that is a far less humorous statement than it should be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221162</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.Christmas gifts, see here.</title>
	<author>coolforsale124</author>
	<datestamp>1259069460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225300</id>
	<title>That is nothing</title>
	<author>aepervius</author>
	<datestamp>1257173460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least those guy are policemen and/or related to law enforcement/anti terrorism. Whereas for my short stint in the US everybody and their grandma had a weapon. Whether you find the first sobering , or me the second frightening is a question of the culture where youa re born. And FYI, in the french airport they also had french guys with automatic weapons. So it isn't a German things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least those guy are policemen and/or related to law enforcement/anti terrorism .
Whereas for my short stint in the US everybody and their grandma had a weapon .
Whether you find the first sobering , or me the second frightening is a question of the culture where youa re born .
And FYI , in the french airport they also had french guys with automatic weapons .
So it is n't a German things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least those guy are policemen and/or related to law enforcement/anti terrorism.
Whereas for my short stint in the US everybody and their grandma had a weapon.
Whether you find the first sobering , or me the second frightening is a question of the culture where youa re born.
And FYI, in the french airport they also had french guys with automatic weapons.
So it isn't a German things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220862</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259067600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about cookies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about cookies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about cookies?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223486</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, that will improve things</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257193440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The difference is, when I'm out to slaughter everyone with the ridiculous name of 'isomeme', it's unlikely I'll ever approach these 200 SMB's. Quite likely I'll turn to Google instead - it's just easier. Or maybe to the disgruntled Google employee.</p><p>Whether you approach this from a War point of view (central registry) or a Technical one (single point of failure), you can't deny Google being a potential risk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is , when I 'm out to slaughter everyone with the ridiculous name of 'isomeme ' , it 's unlikely I 'll ever approach these 200 SMB 's .
Quite likely I 'll turn to Google instead - it 's just easier .
Or maybe to the disgruntled Google employee.Whether you approach this from a War point of view ( central registry ) or a Technical one ( single point of failure ) , you ca n't deny Google being a potential risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is, when I'm out to slaughter everyone with the ridiculous name of 'isomeme', it's unlikely I'll ever approach these 200 SMB's.
Quite likely I'll turn to Google instead - it's just easier.
Or maybe to the disgruntled Google employee.Whether you approach this from a War point of view (central registry) or a Technical one (single point of failure), you can't deny Google being a potential risk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223388</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259092740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think good food is illegal there either. Seems to me they're not missing out on anything worthwhile.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think good food is illegal there either .
Seems to me they 're not missing out on anything worthwhile .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think good food is illegal there either.
Seems to me they're not missing out on anything worthwhile.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220944</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1259068140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it also against the law to record what customers come in the door of your brick and mortar store in Germany?</p></div><p>Depends. It <b>is</b> illegal to store their name, home address, passport number and blood type just because they wanted to shop at your place, yes.</p><p>And rightly so. You do business under the law of the land, so the law of the land tells you how you can do it. If you don't like it, you can shove off to some place in the middle of Africa where they don't have laws.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it also against the law to record what customers come in the door of your brick and mortar store in Germany ? Depends .
It is illegal to store their name , home address , passport number and blood type just because they wanted to shop at your place , yes.And rightly so .
You do business under the law of the land , so the law of the land tells you how you can do it .
If you do n't like it , you can shove off to some place in the middle of Africa where they do n't have laws .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it also against the law to record what customers come in the door of your brick and mortar store in Germany?Depends.
It is illegal to store their name, home address, passport number and blood type just because they wanted to shop at your place, yes.And rightly so.
You do business under the law of the land, so the law of the land tells you how you can do it.
If you don't like it, you can shove off to some place in the middle of Africa where they don't have laws.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221372</id>
	<title>Apply your stupid laws equally!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259070780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If google analytics is banned then most online advertising systems which essentially do the same thing should be banned too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If google analytics is banned then most online advertising systems which essentially do the same thing should be banned too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If google analytics is banned then most online advertising systems which essentially do the same thing should be banned too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220818</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1259067300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't have that right if the laws don't give it to you.  Don't like the laws, move elsewhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have that right if the laws do n't give it to you .
Do n't like the laws , move elsewhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have that right if the laws don't give it to you.
Don't like the laws, move elsewhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30243516</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>shnull</author>
	<datestamp>1259312700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>what are bad words ? are these words with free will ? or are these words a work of the devil ? who is the devil? have you seen it ? have you seen that god-guy lately perhaps ? are you one of those rightwing catholics we hear so much about ?

no<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... i know, hippie ? i presume ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>what are bad words ?
are these words with free will ?
or are these words a work of the devil ?
who is the devil ?
have you seen it ?
have you seen that god-guy lately perhaps ?
are you one of those rightwing catholics we hear so much about ?
no ... i know , hippie ?
i presume ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what are bad words ?
are these words with free will ?
or are these words a work of the devil ?
who is the devil?
have you seen it ?
have you seen that god-guy lately perhaps ?
are you one of those rightwing catholics we hear so much about ?
no ... i know, hippie ?
i presume ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220524</id>
	<title>10 Years ago...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259065620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>... &euro;50,000 (about $75,000)</i> <p>10 Years ago it would have read:</p><p>&euro;75,000 (about $50,000)</p><p>*sigh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...    50,000 ( about $ 75,000 ) 10 Years ago it would have read :    75,000 ( about $ 50,000 ) * sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... €50,000 (about $75,000) 10 Years ago it would have read:€75,000 (about $50,000)*sigh*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224720</id>
	<title>Re:Complete nonsense.</title>
	<author>mike2R</author>
	<datestamp>1257166500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't be a fool.<br> <br>
You are using my computer, not reading my book.  Of course I have the right to keep records of that usage.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be a fool .
You are using my computer , not reading my book .
Of course I have the right to keep records of that usage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be a fool.
You are using my computer, not reading my book.
Of course I have the right to keep records of that usage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222990</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1259086260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What does <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mongol\_Empire\_map.gif" title="wikipedia.org">Mongolia</a> [wikipedia.org] have to do with this story?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does Mongolia [ wikipedia.org ] have to do with this story ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does Mongolia [wikipedia.org] have to do with this story?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30238468</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1259262660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball</p> </div><p>See, you must live in a country with free speech, because you can claim completely untrue things about another country.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball See , you must live in a country with free speech , because you can claim completely untrue things about another country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball See, you must live in a country with free speech, because you can claim completely untrue things about another country.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221754</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.Christmas gift is here...</title>
	<author>fytuyoiulhretryiyter</author>
	<datestamp>1259073900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222780</id>
	<title>/etc/host and you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259083500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fyi, if you don't want to be counted by google analytics add a record to your<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/etc/host or C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts file that points the google analytics URL to local host or some other invalid address.</p><p>Peace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fyi , if you do n't want to be counted by google analytics add a record to your /etc/host or C : \ Windows \ System32 \ drivers \ etc \ hosts file that points the google analytics URL to local host or some other invalid address.Peace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fyi, if you don't want to be counted by google analytics add a record to your /etc/host or C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts file that points the google analytics URL to local host or some other invalid address.Peace.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222344</id>
	<title>Drupal has a Piwik module</title>
	<author>laddiebuck</author>
	<datestamp>1259079060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just checked and Drupal has a reasonably good Piwik module. Good news for me! I'll be switching a site I admin (120k users) to it in the next week. I already disallow google analytics because I've never enabled it via NoScript, but my visitors don't. When I got started, there wasn't really a good alternative to GA for what we were doing short of rolling our own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just checked and Drupal has a reasonably good Piwik module .
Good news for me !
I 'll be switching a site I admin ( 120k users ) to it in the next week .
I already disallow google analytics because I 've never enabled it via NoScript , but my visitors do n't .
When I got started , there was n't really a good alternative to GA for what we were doing short of rolling our own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just checked and Drupal has a reasonably good Piwik module.
Good news for me!
I'll be switching a site I admin (120k users) to it in the next week.
I already disallow google analytics because I've never enabled it via NoScript, but my visitors don't.
When I got started, there wasn't really a good alternative to GA for what we were doing short of rolling our own.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224338</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1257161100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>you might not be aware if you visit a site using Google Analytics</p></div></blockquote><p>Except that for me the GA servers are exceedingly slow (unlike about everything else Google hosts) so GA added ten to thirty seconds of loading time to every page using it until I stopped at at the DNS level.<br>
<br>
Reduced GA usage can only improve the web.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>you might not be aware if you visit a site using Google AnalyticsExcept that for me the GA servers are exceedingly slow ( unlike about everything else Google hosts ) so GA added ten to thirty seconds of loading time to every page using it until I stopped at at the DNS level .
Reduced GA usage can only improve the web .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you might not be aware if you visit a site using Google AnalyticsExcept that for me the GA servers are exceedingly slow (unlike about everything else Google hosts) so GA added ten to thirty seconds of loading time to every page using it until I stopped at at the DNS level.
Reduced GA usage can only improve the web.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221010</id>
	<title>Oh, that will improve things</title>
	<author>isomeme</author>
	<datestamp>1259068560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, I certainly want my personal data tracked and stored by 200 small-to-medium businesses that don't understand net security rather than one company with the knowledge and resources to do it well.  I feel safer already!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I certainly want my personal data tracked and stored by 200 small-to-medium businesses that do n't understand net security rather than one company with the knowledge and resources to do it well .
I feel safer already !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I certainly want my personal data tracked and stored by 200 small-to-medium businesses that don't understand net security rather than one company with the knowledge and resources to do it well.
I feel safer already!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223282</id>
	<title>google should comply</title>
	<author>leehwtsohg</author>
	<datestamp>1259090880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strange, but in this case I think that the german law is in the right and google should change (and many other sites, such as adsense should too)</p><p>Web sites today collect much too much data on users. This data could easily fall into the wrong hands, and you have no control over who collects what, and who stores what. And, for every trick you find for web sites not to track you, new tricks are invented to continue to do so. Once it was enough to turn off cookies. Today you also need noscript, and betterPrivacy. And you lose much of the functions of sites when you enable these addons. If it was the law that you can't collect potentially private data, sites would find ways to have full functionality without tracking the users.</p><p>Another point is opt out vs. opt in. It is true that users can "opt out" by doing the above mentioned steps, but it is quite hard to keep yourself informed about all the steps necessary, and the average grandmother will not take them. This tracking should be opt out so that you don't need to be an expert to not be tracked.</p><p>A last point is the collection of really private data - cross referencing your browsing habits with your e-mail, and other interactions. Google currently says that they are not doing it, but allow themselves to do it. I think again google should comply and say what type of cross-referencing they will never do.</p><p>What are examples where tracking could be harmful? Reading up on certain medical problems on the web, looking for a new job when you don't want your employer to know about it. Obtaining tools to break DRM, or just reading up on how to do that. Expressing your political views on a website (think of how that was misused in nazi germany, the gdr, or during the McCarthy era). How dangerous was it for iranians to browse the web recently? It could have been much worse.</p><p>come on Google, do no evil!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strange , but in this case I think that the german law is in the right and google should change ( and many other sites , such as adsense should too ) Web sites today collect much too much data on users .
This data could easily fall into the wrong hands , and you have no control over who collects what , and who stores what .
And , for every trick you find for web sites not to track you , new tricks are invented to continue to do so .
Once it was enough to turn off cookies .
Today you also need noscript , and betterPrivacy .
And you lose much of the functions of sites when you enable these addons .
If it was the law that you ca n't collect potentially private data , sites would find ways to have full functionality without tracking the users.Another point is opt out vs. opt in .
It is true that users can " opt out " by doing the above mentioned steps , but it is quite hard to keep yourself informed about all the steps necessary , and the average grandmother will not take them .
This tracking should be opt out so that you do n't need to be an expert to not be tracked.A last point is the collection of really private data - cross referencing your browsing habits with your e-mail , and other interactions .
Google currently says that they are not doing it , but allow themselves to do it .
I think again google should comply and say what type of cross-referencing they will never do.What are examples where tracking could be harmful ?
Reading up on certain medical problems on the web , looking for a new job when you do n't want your employer to know about it .
Obtaining tools to break DRM , or just reading up on how to do that .
Expressing your political views on a website ( think of how that was misused in nazi germany , the gdr , or during the McCarthy era ) .
How dangerous was it for iranians to browse the web recently ?
It could have been much worse.come on Google , do no evil !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strange, but in this case I think that the german law is in the right and google should change (and many other sites, such as adsense should too)Web sites today collect much too much data on users.
This data could easily fall into the wrong hands, and you have no control over who collects what, and who stores what.
And, for every trick you find for web sites not to track you, new tricks are invented to continue to do so.
Once it was enough to turn off cookies.
Today you also need noscript, and betterPrivacy.
And you lose much of the functions of sites when you enable these addons.
If it was the law that you can't collect potentially private data, sites would find ways to have full functionality without tracking the users.Another point is opt out vs. opt in.
It is true that users can "opt out" by doing the above mentioned steps, but it is quite hard to keep yourself informed about all the steps necessary, and the average grandmother will not take them.
This tracking should be opt out so that you don't need to be an expert to not be tracked.A last point is the collection of really private data - cross referencing your browsing habits with your e-mail, and other interactions.
Google currently says that they are not doing it, but allow themselves to do it.
I think again google should comply and say what type of cross-referencing they will never do.What are examples where tracking could be harmful?
Reading up on certain medical problems on the web, looking for a new job when you don't want your employer to know about it.
Obtaining tools to break DRM, or just reading up on how to do that.
Expressing your political views on a website (think of how that was misused in nazi germany, the gdr, or during the McCarthy era).
How dangerous was it for iranians to browse the web recently?
It could have been much worse.come on Google, do no evil!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224014</id>
	<title>Re:Complete nonsense.</title>
	<author>Richard\_at\_work</author>
	<datestamp>1257157740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If we were talking about a traditional book, then I would agree with you.  However, we are not - we are talking about the end user directly requesting the publication from you and presenting a wealth of data at the same time as the request.<br> <br>

If you don't like that data collected, then don't present it.  Its that simple.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If we were talking about a traditional book , then I would agree with you .
However , we are not - we are talking about the end user directly requesting the publication from you and presenting a wealth of data at the same time as the request .
If you do n't like that data collected , then do n't present it .
Its that simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If we were talking about a traditional book, then I would agree with you.
However, we are not - we are talking about the end user directly requesting the publication from you and presenting a wealth of data at the same time as the request.
If you don't like that data collected, then don't present it.
Its that simple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221474</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>darthwader</author>
	<datestamp>1259071560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not quite as cut-and-dry as you think.</p><p>It could very well be illegal to follow you around the store and record every product you looked at, and then follow you around the library and see every book you look at (and then examine the records to see what you have ever checked out), then followed you to the video store and measured exactly how much time you spent looking at each title (and also examine your rental history).</p><p>The Germans lived through both the Nazis and with the KGB.  They have a good reason to be sensitive about protecting people's privacy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not quite as cut-and-dry as you think.It could very well be illegal to follow you around the store and record every product you looked at , and then follow you around the library and see every book you look at ( and then examine the records to see what you have ever checked out ) , then followed you to the video store and measured exactly how much time you spent looking at each title ( and also examine your rental history ) .The Germans lived through both the Nazis and with the KGB .
They have a good reason to be sensitive about protecting people 's privacy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not quite as cut-and-dry as you think.It could very well be illegal to follow you around the store and record every product you looked at, and then follow you around the library and see every book you look at (and then examine the records to see what you have ever checked out), then followed you to the video store and measured exactly how much time you spent looking at each title (and also examine your rental history).The Germans lived through both the Nazis and with the KGB.
They have a good reason to be sensitive about protecting people's privacy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>ProzacPatient</author>
	<datestamp>1257161040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.<br>
I always hear about them banning something or other for some stupid reason because it isn't good for the public.<br>
The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball because they believe it will lead to less gun-related violence and therefore good for society, and then you can't say anything about Nazis or face jail time or some other severe penalty and video games have to be heavily censored.<br>
I could go on on but in short I put Germany up there with China, not quiet as bad but still the fact that free speech is merely an illusion there makes me feel that Germany has a ways to go in terms of personal liberties when compared to several other democratic countries in the western world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've said it once and I 'll say it again : Germany is not a free country .
I always hear about them banning something or other for some stupid reason because it is n't good for the public .
The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball because they believe it will lead to less gun-related violence and therefore good for society , and then you ca n't say anything about Nazis or face jail time or some other severe penalty and video games have to be heavily censored .
I could go on on but in short I put Germany up there with China , not quiet as bad but still the fact that free speech is merely an illusion there makes me feel that Germany has a ways to go in terms of personal liberties when compared to several other democratic countries in the western world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.
I always hear about them banning something or other for some stupid reason because it isn't good for the public.
The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball because they believe it will lead to less gun-related violence and therefore good for society, and then you can't say anything about Nazis or face jail time or some other severe penalty and video games have to be heavily censored.
I could go on on but in short I put Germany up there with China, not quiet as bad but still the fact that free speech is merely an illusion there makes me feel that Germany has a ways to go in terms of personal liberties when compared to several other democratic countries in the western world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223236</id>
	<title>Re:Blocked with NoScript</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1259090040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoa... very cool!  Thank you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoa... very cool !
Thank you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoa... very cool!
Thank you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224986</id>
	<title>Re:Hell froze over.</title>
	<author>Asic Eng</author>
	<datestamp>1257170460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The government is German, the company is American. That triggers the "my tribe vs your tribe" reflex, which so often overrides rational thought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The government is German , the company is American .
That triggers the " my tribe vs your tribe " reflex , which so often overrides rational thought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The government is German, the company is American.
That triggers the "my tribe vs your tribe" reflex, which so often overrides rational thought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221450</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>george14215</author>
	<datestamp>1259071320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No. What people end up accepting in the States is their business, but the EU has
a number of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data\_Protection\_Directive" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">data
protection principles</a> [wikipedia.org] (see section 2.2). Veiled third party
advertising bugs don't follow those principles.</p></div><p>Agreed. I would say that similar concerns exist for allowing third party companies in other countries do x-ray analysis or tax returns on behalf of one's citizens. There may be business ramifications for breach of privacy but very little civil/criminal ramifications.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
What people end up accepting in the States is their business , but the EU has a number of data protection principles [ wikipedia.org ] ( see section 2.2 ) .
Veiled third party advertising bugs do n't follow those principles.Agreed .
I would say that similar concerns exist for allowing third party companies in other countries do x-ray analysis or tax returns on behalf of one 's citizens .
There may be business ramifications for breach of privacy but very little civil/criminal ramifications .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
What people end up accepting in the States is their business, but the EU has
a number of data
protection principles [wikipedia.org] (see section 2.2).
Veiled third party
advertising bugs don't follow those principles.Agreed.
I would say that similar concerns exist for allowing third party companies in other countries do x-ray analysis or tax returns on behalf of one's citizens.
There may be business ramifications for breach of privacy but very little civil/criminal ramifications.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522</id>
	<title>Blocked with NoScript</title>
	<author>misiu\_mp</author>
	<datestamp>1259065620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found about google analytics when I started using the NoScript plugin. Its used almost everywhere!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found about google analytics when I started using the NoScript plugin .
Its used almost everywhere !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found about google analytics when I started using the NoScript plugin.
Its used almost everywhere!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221628</id>
	<title>Re:Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259073060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you're talking about publicly traded corporations, it's not enough that their top management seems to be a nice, community-oriented group of guys.  All it takes is a disappointing year or two and the shareholders start demanding changes... and that generally involves putting numbers-oriented SVP's in charge who are known for kicking butt and punching up the bottom line.  Cherished company traditions, such as decency to employees, business partners, and community, have a tendency to fall by the wayside.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you 're talking about publicly traded corporations , it 's not enough that their top management seems to be a nice , community-oriented group of guys .
All it takes is a disappointing year or two and the shareholders start demanding changes... and that generally involves putting numbers-oriented SVP 's in charge who are known for kicking butt and punching up the bottom line .
Cherished company traditions , such as decency to employees , business partners , and community , have a tendency to fall by the wayside .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you're talking about publicly traded corporations, it's not enough that their top management seems to be a nice, community-oriented group of guys.
All it takes is a disappointing year or two and the shareholders start demanding changes... and that generally involves putting numbers-oriented SVP's in charge who are known for kicking butt and punching up the bottom line.
Cherished company traditions, such as decency to employees, business partners, and community, have a tendency to fall by the wayside.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224458</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257162480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, fuck you. You have no rights to store my personal data whatsoever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , fuck you .
You have no rights to store my personal data whatsoever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, fuck you.
You have no rights to store my personal data whatsoever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221762</id>
	<title>Good.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259073960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate that google analytics thing.  For a lot of sites, the page won't display anything until it's done loading.  I guess it gets a lot of traffic, because it's frequently unresponsive.  So much so that I have to map it to 127.0.0.1 to get a lot of websites to load at reasonable speed (i.e. less than 2 minutes)</p><p>Way to go Germany.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate that google analytics thing .
For a lot of sites , the page wo n't display anything until it 's done loading .
I guess it gets a lot of traffic , because it 's frequently unresponsive .
So much so that I have to map it to 127.0.0.1 to get a lot of websites to load at reasonable speed ( i.e .
less than 2 minutes ) Way to go Germany .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate that google analytics thing.
For a lot of sites, the page won't display anything until it's done loading.
I guess it gets a lot of traffic, because it's frequently unresponsive.
So much so that I have to map it to 127.0.0.1 to get a lot of websites to load at reasonable speed (i.e.
less than 2 minutes)Way to go Germany.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220580</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>mrwolf007</author>
	<datestamp>1259065980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Everything is illegal in Germany.</p></div><p>Bullshit. Only if its usefull for anything.<br>
Otherwise the chances of it being illegal are merely high.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything is illegal in Germany.Bullshit .
Only if its usefull for anything .
Otherwise the chances of it being illegal are merely high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything is illegal in Germany.Bullshit.
Only if its usefull for anything.
Otherwise the chances of it being illegal are merely high.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220798</id>
	<title>25\% of all american home owners</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259067060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>25\% of all american home owners are on the virgue of going under.<br> <br>aren't you glad obama spent trillions on corporate welfare?</htmltext>
<tokenext>25 \ % of all american home owners are on the virgue of going under .
are n't you glad obama spent trillions on corporate welfare ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>25\% of all american home owners are on the virgue of going under.
aren't you glad obama spent trillions on corporate welfare?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222466</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>smd75</author>
	<datestamp>1259080440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The country that tried to take over the world is afraid of the company that is taking over the world?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The country that tried to take over the world is afraid of the company that is taking over the world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The country that tried to take over the world is afraid of the company that is taking over the world?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221420</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>MikeFM</author>
	<datestamp>1259071140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not personal information. It's anonymous stats.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not personal information .
It 's anonymous stats .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not personal information.
It's anonymous stats.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221566</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Brian Gordon</author>
	<datestamp>1259072640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it's their own fault. Why doesn't Germany, I don't know, stop electing these people?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it 's their own fault .
Why does n't Germany , I do n't know , stop electing these people ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it's their own fault.
Why doesn't Germany, I don't know, stop electing these people?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225212</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257172860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;the fact that free speech is merely an illusion there...</p><p>Forgot to take on your pills? You are just plain full of shit. No really, this typical American notion deserves no better words. How dare any of you stupid fucktards to say about the rest of the world they have 'just an illusion of free speech'? Let me repeat, you are full of shit. And an arrogant little twat. Have a nice day, asshole.</p><p>BTW, this: <a href="http://www.break.com/index/officer-slams-dude-through-window.html" title="break.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.break.com/index/officer-slams-dude-through-window.html</a> [break.com]</p><p>Germany's a police state, lalalala, I can't hear you, Germans are Nazis, Chinese are Commies, lalalala<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; the fact that free speech is merely an illusion there...Forgot to take on your pills ?
You are just plain full of shit .
No really , this typical American notion deserves no better words .
How dare any of you stupid fucktards to say about the rest of the world they have 'just an illusion of free speech ' ?
Let me repeat , you are full of shit .
And an arrogant little twat .
Have a nice day , asshole.BTW , this : http : //www.break.com/index/officer-slams-dude-through-window.html [ break.com ] Germany 's a police state , lalalala , I ca n't hear you , Germans are Nazis , Chinese are Commies , lalalala .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;the fact that free speech is merely an illusion there...Forgot to take on your pills?
You are just plain full of shit.
No really, this typical American notion deserves no better words.
How dare any of you stupid fucktards to say about the rest of the world they have 'just an illusion of free speech'?
Let me repeat, you are full of shit.
And an arrogant little twat.
Have a nice day, asshole.BTW, this: http://www.break.com/index/officer-slams-dude-through-window.html [break.com]Germany's a police state, lalalala, I can't hear you, Germans are Nazis, Chinese are Commies, lalalala ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225026</id>
	<title>Google translation</title>
	<author>Rogue Pat</author>
	<datestamp>1257170820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one who thinks it's funny that they point to a Google translation of a story how Google analytics may be illegal in Germany?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who thinks it 's funny that they point to a Google translation of a story how Google analytics may be illegal in Germany ?
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who thinks it's funny that they point to a Google translation of a story how Google analytics may be illegal in Germany?
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221810</id>
	<title>Connecting the dots -- Murdoch behind this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259074320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Open Source alternative" is Piwik<br>Piwik is sponsored by OpenX<br>OpenX is an ad serving company that competes with Adsense<br>Jon Miller is on the board of OpenX<br>Jon Miller is CEO of Digital Media at News Corp.</p><p>I didn't mean to create a conspiracy out of this, but it's amusing to see how any move against Google is now a move in favor of Rupert Murdoch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Open Source alternative " is PiwikPiwik is sponsored by OpenXOpenX is an ad serving company that competes with AdsenseJon Miller is on the board of OpenXJon Miller is CEO of Digital Media at News Corp.I did n't mean to create a conspiracy out of this , but it 's amusing to see how any move against Google is now a move in favor of Rupert Murdoch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Open Source alternative" is PiwikPiwik is sponsored by OpenXOpenX is an ad serving company that competes with AdsenseJon Miller is on the board of OpenXJon Miller is CEO of Digital Media at News Corp.I didn't mean to create a conspiracy out of this, but it's amusing to see how any move against Google is now a move in favor of Rupert Murdoch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220750</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259066880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not really about you recording the fact that someone came to your website. The article says that there are worries that Google could further use the data, and eg connect it with the data they might have from Google Mail or other sites using Google Analytics, thus generating profiles about habits and preferences etc. If you use Google Mail, it is your own decision, but you might not be aware if you visit a site using Google Analytics and that not only the site owner records the fact that you were there, but Google knows, too (including all other Google Analytics sites you were visiting).</p><p>According to the article, nothing is decided. There is also some dispute whether the above scenario is possible under Google's own usage terms. Currently, it's a discussion among the data protection officials from the various German states. So, currently, they are basically doing their job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not really about you recording the fact that someone came to your website .
The article says that there are worries that Google could further use the data , and eg connect it with the data they might have from Google Mail or other sites using Google Analytics , thus generating profiles about habits and preferences etc .
If you use Google Mail , it is your own decision , but you might not be aware if you visit a site using Google Analytics and that not only the site owner records the fact that you were there , but Google knows , too ( including all other Google Analytics sites you were visiting ) .According to the article , nothing is decided .
There is also some dispute whether the above scenario is possible under Google 's own usage terms .
Currently , it 's a discussion among the data protection officials from the various German states .
So , currently , they are basically doing their job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not really about you recording the fact that someone came to your website.
The article says that there are worries that Google could further use the data, and eg connect it with the data they might have from Google Mail or other sites using Google Analytics, thus generating profiles about habits and preferences etc.
If you use Google Mail, it is your own decision, but you might not be aware if you visit a site using Google Analytics and that not only the site owner records the fact that you were there, but Google knows, too (including all other Google Analytics sites you were visiting).According to the article, nothing is decided.
There is also some dispute whether the above scenario is possible under Google's own usage terms.
Currently, it's a discussion among the data protection officials from the various German states.
So, currently, they are basically doing their job.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30240484</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1259237340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's not personal information. It's anonymous stats.</p></div><p>Just like an image from a CCTV camera is anonymous data - but wait, that's the evil government, not a benevolent corporation that can pull together endless amounts of "anonymous" information and create a exact profile of <i>you</i>.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not personal information .
It 's anonymous stats.Just like an image from a CCTV camera is anonymous data - but wait , that 's the evil government , not a benevolent corporation that can pull together endless amounts of " anonymous " information and create a exact profile of you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not personal information.
It's anonymous stats.Just like an image from a CCTV camera is anonymous data - but wait, that's the evil government, not a benevolent corporation that can pull together endless amounts of "anonymous" information and create a exact profile of you.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224648</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257165480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball because they believe it will lead to less gun-related violence and therefore good for society,...</p></div><p>Some politicians proposed it, but it didn't go through, too much oposition...</p><p>Also your other arguments are not really founded on good knowledge of Germany. "Saying something about Nazis" is very common in Germany. Yes, there are certain restrictions, like the ban of the Nazi symbols. On the other hand, this ban is directed against using it for propaganda, so there are many exceptions (you see it in movies, theater, books, TV,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...).</p><p>Yes, I know, it's still a restriction. In Germany you get in trouble for advocating the holocaust, in other free countries it is a apparently a problem to drink a beer in a public place. I guess every society has its sensitive spots...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball because they believe it will lead to less gun-related violence and therefore good for society,...Some politicians proposed it , but it did n't go through , too much oposition...Also your other arguments are not really founded on good knowledge of Germany .
" Saying something about Nazis " is very common in Germany .
Yes , there are certain restrictions , like the ban of the Nazi symbols .
On the other hand , this ban is directed against using it for propaganda , so there are many exceptions ( you see it in movies , theater , books , TV , ... ) .Yes , I know , it 's still a restriction .
In Germany you get in trouble for advocating the holocaust , in other free countries it is a apparently a problem to drink a beer in a public place .
I guess every society has its sensitive spots.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most recent thing I heard about was that German politicians banned paintball because they believe it will lead to less gun-related violence and therefore good for society,...Some politicians proposed it, but it didn't go through, too much oposition...Also your other arguments are not really founded on good knowledge of Germany.
"Saying something about Nazis" is very common in Germany.
Yes, there are certain restrictions, like the ban of the Nazi symbols.
On the other hand, this ban is directed against using it for propaganda, so there are many exceptions (you see it in movies, theater, books, TV, ...).Yes, I know, it's still a restriction.
In Germany you get in trouble for advocating the holocaust, in other free countries it is a apparently a problem to drink a beer in a public place.
I guess every society has its sensitive spots...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223804</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>quadrox</author>
	<datestamp>1257155280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I agree that things are overregulated, how is this any different from the police patroling the Golden Gate bridge with autmatic weapons? An M4 as far as I remember - I was there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree that things are overregulated , how is this any different from the police patroling the Golden Gate bridge with autmatic weapons ?
An M4 as far as I remember - I was there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree that things are overregulated, how is this any different from the police patroling the Golden Gate bridge with autmatic weapons?
An M4 as far as I remember - I was there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222054</id>
	<title>if they do that to google they</title>
	<author>jobst</author>
	<datestamp>1259076360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>have to do this to a lot of other "keeping of data" if they want to "be fair", including advertising (e.g. tracking), logging (each webserver keeps logs of who has accessed what), cookies, preferences, facebook, linkedin, online games, google/yahoo/bing keeping websites<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... are they for real?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>have to do this to a lot of other " keeping of data " if they want to " be fair " , including advertising ( e.g .
tracking ) , logging ( each webserver keeps logs of who has accessed what ) , cookies , preferences , facebook , linkedin , online games , google/yahoo/bing keeping websites ... are they for real ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have to do this to a lot of other "keeping of data" if they want to "be fair", including advertising (e.g.
tracking), logging (each webserver keeps logs of who has accessed what), cookies, preferences, facebook, linkedin, online games, google/yahoo/bing keeping websites ... are they for real?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225350</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>bbx</author>
	<datestamp>1257173820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah , you're so true<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , you 're so true : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah , you're so true :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220894</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259067780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you run that website in Germany, it is illegal for you to save customers' personal data longer than X days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you run that website in Germany , it is illegal for you to save customers ' personal data longer than X days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you run that website in Germany, it is illegal for you to save customers' personal data longer than X days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221486</id>
	<title>Re:Ridiculous.</title>
	<author>LordLimecat</author>
	<datestamp>1259071680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What constitutes personal?<br> <br>

Also, does this apply to cookies?  The data isnt actually stored on your server, but on the client machines...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What constitutes personal ?
Also , does this apply to cookies ?
The data isnt actually stored on your server , but on the client machines.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What constitutes personal?
Also, does this apply to cookies?
The data isnt actually stored on your server, but on the client machines...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222398</id>
	<title>Re:Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>KlaasVaak</author>
	<datestamp>1259079480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google is already the most subpoenaed company in the US. It's the greatest christmas gift ever for the government and intelligence services, all the data centralized in one place you don't need to do some hard searching anymore just demand the data from google,</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is already the most subpoenaed company in the US .
It 's the greatest christmas gift ever for the government and intelligence services , all the data centralized in one place you do n't need to do some hard searching anymore just demand the data from google,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is already the most subpoenaed company in the US.
It's the greatest christmas gift ever for the government and intelligence services, all the data centralized in one place you don't need to do some hard searching anymore just demand the data from google,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222216</id>
	<title>Re:Blocked with NoScript</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1259077980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I now did so, but I got no google-analytics or similar. Only fsdn.com. I don't know if it's due to NoScript or Adblock Plus, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I now did so , but I got no google-analytics or similar .
Only fsdn.com .
I do n't know if it 's due to NoScript or Adblock Plus , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I now did so, but I got no google-analytics or similar.
Only fsdn.com.
I don't know if it's due to NoScript or Adblock Plus, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223406</id>
	<title>Re:Has Google ever betrayed our trust?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257192180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Europe we had a bunch of registries that never betrayed our trust and were in fact quite useful to have.</p><p>Then some dude called Hitler rolled in and started using these same registries for totally different purposes.</p><p>"I have nothing to hide" is a dumb statement because you have no idea who you're not-hiding it from somewhere down the line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Europe we had a bunch of registries that never betrayed our trust and were in fact quite useful to have.Then some dude called Hitler rolled in and started using these same registries for totally different purposes .
" I have nothing to hide " is a dumb statement because you have no idea who you 're not-hiding it from somewhere down the line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Europe we had a bunch of registries that never betrayed our trust and were in fact quite useful to have.Then some dude called Hitler rolled in and started using these same registries for totally different purposes.
"I have nothing to hide" is a dumb statement because you have no idea who you're not-hiding it from somewhere down the line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220674</id>
	<title>Re:Schadenfreude</title>
	<author>atheistmonk</author>
	<datestamp>1259066400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How else do you think Inspector Rex would stay on the job?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How else do you think Inspector Rex would stay on the job ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How else do you think Inspector Rex would stay on the job?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30233844</id>
	<title>Re:Blocked with NoScript</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257183540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Like Maxwell Demon's response above, NoScript appears to be sufficient for me.  However, I have disabled the "Accept third-party cookies" option, which might be in play.</p><p>- T</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like Maxwell Demon 's response above , NoScript appears to be sufficient for me .
However , I have disabled the " Accept third-party cookies " option , which might be in play.- T</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like Maxwell Demon's response above, NoScript appears to be sufficient for me.
However, I have disabled the "Accept third-party cookies" option, which might be in play.- T</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30240484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30234902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30243516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220614
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30233844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30238468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30228412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220524
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_24_2210224_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222054
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222238
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30243516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223804
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225300
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222540
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30238468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224478
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30228412
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225672
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30234902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30225212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223670
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222344
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30233844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221826
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222216
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30223236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_24_2210224.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220894
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221486
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221420
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30240484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220818
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221728
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220750
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224338
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30222246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30224720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30220644
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_24_2210224.30221450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
