<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_23_1940206</id>
	<title>Opera 10.10 Released, Includes New "Unite" Tech</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1258964160000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Opera 10.10 has been released, and with it their <a href="http://www.opera.com/press/releases/2009/11/23/">new "Unite" technology</a>, which allows users to share content directly between all of their own devices.  Unite wraps both web browser and web server into a single package in an attempt to change the way users think about their browser.  <i>"'We promised Opera Unite would reinvent the Web,' said Jon von Tetzchner, CEO, Opera. 'What we are really doing is reinventing how we as consumers interact with the Web. By giving our devices the ability to serve content, we become equal citizens on the Web. In an age where we have ceded control of our personal data to third-parties, Opera Unite gives us the freedom to choose how we will share the data that belongs to us.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera 10.10 has been released , and with it their new " Unite " technology , which allows users to share content directly between all of their own devices .
Unite wraps both web browser and web server into a single package in an attempt to change the way users think about their browser .
" 'We promised Opera Unite would reinvent the Web, ' said Jon von Tetzchner , CEO , Opera .
'What we are really doing is reinventing how we as consumers interact with the Web .
By giving our devices the ability to serve content , we become equal citizens on the Web .
In an age where we have ceded control of our personal data to third-parties , Opera Unite gives us the freedom to choose how we will share the data that belongs to us .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera 10.10 has been released, and with it their new "Unite" technology, which allows users to share content directly between all of their own devices.
Unite wraps both web browser and web server into a single package in an attempt to change the way users think about their browser.
"'We promised Opera Unite would reinvent the Web,' said Jon von Tetzchner, CEO, Opera.
'What we are really doing is reinventing how we as consumers interact with the Web.
By giving our devices the ability to serve content, we become equal citizens on the Web.
In an age where we have ceded control of our personal data to third-parties, Opera Unite gives us the freedom to choose how we will share the data that belongs to us.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208004</id>
	<title>Re:For me, Opera is like Usenet</title>
	<author>sweatyboatman</author>
	<datestamp>1258979220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Only possible downside is needing to setup a opera account to use the DNS</p></div><p>really? that's the only downside you can envision to setting up a web server on your parent's PC?</p><p>it says it runs in a sandbox, but sandboxes can have holes.  especially when they let independent developers write plugins.</p><p>and, even if everything is 100\% secure, what's to keep your dad from accidentally sharing that text file where he keeps his bank account passwords with the whole world?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only possible downside is needing to setup a opera account to use the DNSreally ?
that 's the only downside you can envision to setting up a web server on your parent 's PC ? it says it runs in a sandbox , but sandboxes can have holes .
especially when they let independent developers write plugins.and , even if everything is 100 \ % secure , what 's to keep your dad from accidentally sharing that text file where he keeps his bank account passwords with the whole world ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only possible downside is needing to setup a opera account to use the DNSreally?
that's the only downside you can envision to setting up a web server on your parent's PC?it says it runs in a sandbox, but sandboxes can have holes.
especially when they let independent developers write plugins.and, even if everything is 100\% secure, what's to keep your dad from accidentally sharing that text file where he keeps his bank account passwords with the whole world?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207234</id>
	<title>Makes sense to me</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258975980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unite makes a lot of sense to me:</p><p>- I keep ownership of my data. No more finding my personal photo used in an add, like happened to that woman a while back.<br>- I keep control of my data. No more entrusting it to some advertiser, their trainees, their subcontractors...<br>- I can easily backup all of my data. See the Sidekick debacle.<br>- Everything is in ONE location<br>- I have relatively fine control over who can see what, and can change content and rights at any time.</p><p>It currently is not very polished, though It IS very easy to use, much easier that setting up the same services with the usual software.<br>- not very good looking<br>- nor very feature rich</p><p>Hopefuly the design will get smoother, and addons will make it better... the idea by itself sounds very good, and the implementation is kinda OK, for a 1.0 version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unite makes a lot of sense to me : - I keep ownership of my data .
No more finding my personal photo used in an add , like happened to that woman a while back.- I keep control of my data .
No more entrusting it to some advertiser , their trainees , their subcontractors...- I can easily backup all of my data .
See the Sidekick debacle.- Everything is in ONE location- I have relatively fine control over who can see what , and can change content and rights at any time.It currently is not very polished , though It IS very easy to use , much easier that setting up the same services with the usual software.- not very good looking- nor very feature richHopefuly the design will get smoother , and addons will make it better... the idea by itself sounds very good , and the implementation is kinda OK , for a 1.0 version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unite makes a lot of sense to me:- I keep ownership of my data.
No more finding my personal photo used in an add, like happened to that woman a while back.- I keep control of my data.
No more entrusting it to some advertiser, their trainees, their subcontractors...- I can easily backup all of my data.
See the Sidekick debacle.- Everything is in ONE location- I have relatively fine control over who can see what, and can change content and rights at any time.It currently is not very polished, though It IS very easy to use, much easier that setting up the same services with the usual software.- not very good looking- nor very feature richHopefuly the design will get smoother, and addons will make it better... the idea by itself sounds very good, and the implementation is kinda OK, for a 1.0 version.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30212386</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259070420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except they'll drop their 3-4Mb files straight off the camera and serve them through a (mostly) max 1Mbit upload... No thanks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except they 'll drop their 3-4Mb files straight off the camera and serve them through a ( mostly ) max 1Mbit upload... No thanks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except they'll drop their 3-4Mb files straight off the camera and serve them through a (mostly) max 1Mbit upload... No thanks...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205916</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1258970580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congrats on birthing one of the worst analogies ever posted to slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats on birthing one of the worst analogies ever posted to slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats on birthing one of the worst analogies ever posted to slashdot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30212586</id>
	<title>Real deal will be the mobile version</title>
	<author>Ilgaz</author>
	<datestamp>1259071920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess their real plan is put that technology to Mobile version of Opera. Opera 10 Mobile beta is already out and it is absolutely amazing. Why amazing? Well, it works with same engine as Opera 10 on my poor Nokia E65 which is absolutely unsupported<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>I am sure this "plugin" was written in highly (amazingly) portable way and it will end up in mobile devices/game consoles.</p><p>Nokia already has a Webserver for Symbian devices. Believe or not, it doesn't use that much battery and RAM. Less than a very high end multi purpose messenger. If you haven't heard about it, blame nobody else than Nokia.</p><p><a href="http://mymobilesite.net/" title="mymobilesite.net">http://mymobilesite.net/</a> [mymobilesite.net]</p><p>It worked fine under 24MB RAM/200Mhz ARM powered E65.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess their real plan is put that technology to Mobile version of Opera .
Opera 10 Mobile beta is already out and it is absolutely amazing .
Why amazing ?
Well , it works with same engine as Opera 10 on my poor Nokia E65 which is absolutely unsupported : ) I am sure this " plugin " was written in highly ( amazingly ) portable way and it will end up in mobile devices/game consoles.Nokia already has a Webserver for Symbian devices .
Believe or not , it does n't use that much battery and RAM .
Less than a very high end multi purpose messenger .
If you have n't heard about it , blame nobody else than Nokia.http : //mymobilesite.net/ [ mymobilesite.net ] It worked fine under 24MB RAM/200Mhz ARM powered E65 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess their real plan is put that technology to Mobile version of Opera.
Opera 10 Mobile beta is already out and it is absolutely amazing.
Why amazing?
Well, it works with same engine as Opera 10 on my poor Nokia E65 which is absolutely unsupported :)I am sure this "plugin" was written in highly (amazingly) portable way and it will end up in mobile devices/game consoles.Nokia already has a Webserver for Symbian devices.
Believe or not, it doesn't use that much battery and RAM.
Less than a very high end multi purpose messenger.
If you haven't heard about it, blame nobody else than Nokia.http://mymobilesite.net/ [mymobilesite.net]It worked fine under 24MB RAM/200Mhz ARM powered E65.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208088</id>
	<title>Re:Except in China?</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258979580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What should they have done ?<br>- rebelled and gotten their employess imprisoned ?<br>- pulled out and deprived people in China from an alternative to whatever the government prefers ?</p><p>How is any of the above better than comromising ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What should they have done ? - rebelled and gotten their employess imprisoned ? - pulled out and deprived people in China from an alternative to whatever the government prefers ? How is any of the above better than comromising ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What should they have done ?- rebelled and gotten their employess imprisoned ?- pulled out and deprived people in China from an alternative to whatever the government prefers ?How is any of the above better than comromising ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208052</id>
	<title>Re:Breaks broadband service contract?</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258979340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not really relevant, IMHO:<br>- at worst, you can switch Unite off, and just keep Opera<br>- you can finagle that it's not a server, but a browser<br>- the data volume is going to be so low that your ISP won't care anyway<br>- it's clearly capable at best of serving some kind of personal page, not a high-volume, commercial web site, which is what your ISP doesn't want you to setup on a home line.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really relevant , IMHO : - at worst , you can switch Unite off , and just keep Opera- you can finagle that it 's not a server , but a browser- the data volume is going to be so low that your ISP wo n't care anyway- it 's clearly capable at best of serving some kind of personal page , not a high-volume , commercial web site , which is what your ISP does n't want you to setup on a home line .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really relevant, IMHO:- at worst, you can switch Unite off, and just keep Opera- you can finagle that it's not a server, but a browser- the data volume is going to be so low that your ISP won't care anyway- it's clearly capable at best of serving some kind of personal page, not a high-volume, commercial web site, which is what your ISP doesn't want you to setup on a home line.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210874</id>
	<title>Re:Forget "Unite"... how's Opera doing on CSS 3?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259095140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>?? You can already use border-radius, outline-radius and shadows for text and elements in Firefox.<br>https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/text-shadow<br>https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-box-shadow<br>https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-outline-radius<br>https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-border-radius</p><p>Not only that, there's also a more than three years old extension available that allows you to setup a web server with support for Server Side Javascript, PHP, Perl, Python and Ruby!<br>https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3002</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>? ?
You can already use border-radius , outline-radius and shadows for text and elements in Firefox.https : //developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/text-shadowhttps : //developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-box-shadowhttps : //developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-outline-radiushttps : //developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-border-radiusNot only that , there 's also a more than three years old extension available that allows you to setup a web server with support for Server Side Javascript , PHP , Perl , Python and Ruby ! https : //addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3002</tokentext>
<sentencetext>??
You can already use border-radius, outline-radius and shadows for text and elements in Firefox.https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/text-shadowhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-box-shadowhttps://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-outline-radiushttps://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-border-radiusNot only that, there's also a more than three years old extension available that allows you to setup a web server with support for Server Side Javascript, PHP, Perl, Python and Ruby!https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3002</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211244</id>
	<title>Copy?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259058900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>which allows users to share content directly between all of their own devices</p></div><p>What, Opera users couldn&rsquo;t copy a file (or copy/paste content) before??</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>which allows users to share content directly between all of their own devicesWhat , Opera users couldn    t copy a file ( or copy/paste content ) before ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>which allows users to share content directly between all of their own devicesWhat, Opera users couldn’t copy a file (or copy/paste content) before?
?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210896</id>
	<title>'Sup Dawg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259095620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo, we heard you like web pages in your browser, so we put a server in your browser so you can serve while you browse!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo , we heard you like web pages in your browser , so we put a server in your browser so you can serve while you browse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo, we heard you like web pages in your browser, so we put a server in your browser so you can serve while you browse!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205714</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Y'know when I first saw this I thought "hey cool, if only it was on some other browser"...</p><p>What is it about Opera exactly that has the stink of death on it? I mean it went through phases where it wasn't free and had embedded ads in it, as far as I know those days are long gone. So if that's the case what gives?</p><p>My current running theory is that it just has an unfortunate name. When I think of "Opera" I think of a long, boring musical experience in Italian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Y'know when I first saw this I thought " hey cool , if only it was on some other browser " ...What is it about Opera exactly that has the stink of death on it ?
I mean it went through phases where it was n't free and had embedded ads in it , as far as I know those days are long gone .
So if that 's the case what gives ? My current running theory is that it just has an unfortunate name .
When I think of " Opera " I think of a long , boring musical experience in Italian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Y'know when I first saw this I thought "hey cool, if only it was on some other browser"...What is it about Opera exactly that has the stink of death on it?
I mean it went through phases where it wasn't free and had embedded ads in it, as far as I know those days are long gone.
So if that's the case what gives?My current running theory is that it just has an unfortunate name.
When I think of "Opera" I think of a long, boring musical experience in Italian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750</id>
	<title>Breaks broadband service contract?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not sure if this was mentioned anywhere, but this technology is sure to break many user's broadband service contracts. You are affectively running a web server, which isn't allowed under most plans.

I wonder how this will be addressed?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure if this was mentioned anywhere , but this technology is sure to break many user 's broadband service contracts .
You are affectively running a web server , which is n't allowed under most plans .
I wonder how this will be addressed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure if this was mentioned anywhere, but this technology is sure to break many user's broadband service contracts.
You are affectively running a web server, which isn't allowed under most plans.
I wonder how this will be addressed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206444</id>
	<title>ISP ToS Violation?</title>
	<author>InfinityWpi</author>
	<datestamp>1258972860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And for those of us who's ISP's Terms of Service inclue a line that boils down to "Thou shalt not run a web server on your home PC unless you pay for a buisness-class connection"... well, what then? Just... don't use Opera?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And for those of us who 's ISP 's Terms of Service inclue a line that boils down to " Thou shalt not run a web server on your home PC unless you pay for a buisness-class connection " ... well , what then ?
Just... do n't use Opera ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And for those of us who's ISP's Terms of Service inclue a line that boils down to "Thou shalt not run a web server on your home PC unless you pay for a buisness-class connection"... well, what then?
Just... don't use Opera?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205680</id>
	<title>For me, Opera is like Usenet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Best kept secret.</p><p>Nice features with a target size small enough that malware that might go after IE or firefox won't touch.</p><p>I browse in a VM with Opera. Never lets me down.</p><p>Still a small size. Damn thing fits in less than 10 MB of disk space.</p><p>Stuff like this unite threatens this. I wish they would stop making it better so suckers will stay with IE and firefox.</p><p>The unite stuff rocks. Your parents could never setup p2p or ftp, but they can use unite. Better than some file sharing site when all your family has got FIOS pipes.  Only possible downside is needing to setup a opera account to use the DNS to get the "myopera" addresses, but I believe it is just another port 80 server that you could point to directly via IP. And any filehosting site is going to require a login/email, but will probably only give you crappy throughput and make it hard to share large binaries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Best kept secret.Nice features with a target size small enough that malware that might go after IE or firefox wo n't touch.I browse in a VM with Opera .
Never lets me down.Still a small size .
Damn thing fits in less than 10 MB of disk space.Stuff like this unite threatens this .
I wish they would stop making it better so suckers will stay with IE and firefox.The unite stuff rocks .
Your parents could never setup p2p or ftp , but they can use unite .
Better than some file sharing site when all your family has got FIOS pipes .
Only possible downside is needing to setup a opera account to use the DNS to get the " myopera " addresses , but I believe it is just another port 80 server that you could point to directly via IP .
And any filehosting site is going to require a login/email , but will probably only give you crappy throughput and make it hard to share large binaries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Best kept secret.Nice features with a target size small enough that malware that might go after IE or firefox won't touch.I browse in a VM with Opera.
Never lets me down.Still a small size.
Damn thing fits in less than 10 MB of disk space.Stuff like this unite threatens this.
I wish they would stop making it better so suckers will stay with IE and firefox.The unite stuff rocks.
Your parents could never setup p2p or ftp, but they can use unite.
Better than some file sharing site when all your family has got FIOS pipes.
Only possible downside is needing to setup a opera account to use the DNS to get the "myopera" addresses, but I believe it is just another port 80 server that you could point to directly via IP.
And any filehosting site is going to require a login/email, but will probably only give you crappy throughput and make it hard to share large binaries.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208390</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258981260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is probably the worst analogy ever, and the worst way to make the point that Opera gives you back ownership, control, and security, that "the cloud" took away.</p><p>Welcome back, backups, freely defined access rights, copyright @myself, not some photosharing site, on my own stuff !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is probably the worst analogy ever , and the worst way to make the point that Opera gives you back ownership , control , and security , that " the cloud " took away.Welcome back , backups , freely defined access rights , copyright @ myself , not some photosharing site , on my own stuff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is probably the worst analogy ever, and the worst way to make the point that Opera gives you back ownership, control, and security, that "the cloud" took away.Welcome back, backups, freely defined access rights, copyright @myself, not some photosharing site, on my own stuff !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208172</id>
	<title>Re:ISPs won't like this</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258980000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can I give you my Mom's phone number so you can explain her how to do that ?</p><p>With Unite, she was up and running in 20 minutes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I give you my Mom 's phone number so you can explain her how to do that ? With Unite , she was up and running in 20 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I give you my Mom's phone number so you can explain her how to do that ?With Unite, she was up and running in 20 minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205446</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205746</id>
	<title>Forget "Unite"... how's Opera doing on CSS 3?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1258969740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It may sound silly and pointless to a lot of devs, but supporting things like border-radius and drop-shadow (even with the temporary vendor prefixes) would be nice.</p><p>That's one area where Safari is way, WAY ahead of both Opera and Firefox.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It may sound silly and pointless to a lot of devs , but supporting things like border-radius and drop-shadow ( even with the temporary vendor prefixes ) would be nice.That 's one area where Safari is way , WAY ahead of both Opera and Firefox .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It may sound silly and pointless to a lot of devs, but supporting things like border-radius and drop-shadow (even with the temporary vendor prefixes) would be nice.That's one area where Safari is way, WAY ahead of both Opera and Firefox.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30214948</id>
	<title>where is ipv6?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259083260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am hidden behind a NAT out of my control.  I use 6in4 tunnel so my computers can be used as a server.  I see no dancing turtle with Opera 10.10 but my other browsers can see him getting his groove on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am hidden behind a NAT out of my control .
I use 6in4 tunnel so my computers can be used as a server .
I see no dancing turtle with Opera 10.10 but my other browsers can see him getting his groove on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am hidden behind a NAT out of my control.
I use 6in4 tunnel so my computers can be used as a server.
I see no dancing turtle with Opera 10.10 but my other browsers can see him getting his groove on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209970</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Rick the Red</author>
	<datestamp>1258995060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what I'm basically saying is that *I* should be the one controlling my content, not some other site or cloud service. Unite makes that easy for people.</p></div><p>Yeah, but it's Opera, so the <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/11/23/1328228/Opera-Closes-China-Loophole-Reinstates-Censorship?art\_pos=17" title="slashdot.org">Chinese Government</a> [slashdot.org] is the one controlling your content.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what I 'm basically saying is that * I * should be the one controlling my content , not some other site or cloud service .
Unite makes that easy for people.Yeah , but it 's Opera , so the Chinese Government [ slashdot.org ] is the one controlling your content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what I'm basically saying is that *I* should be the one controlling my content, not some other site or cloud service.
Unite makes that easy for people.Yeah, but it's Opera, so the Chinese Government [slashdot.org] is the one controlling your content.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205858</id>
	<title>No Privacy Concerns Here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258970280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Move Along.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Move Along.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Move Along.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211924</id>
	<title>Re:ISP ToS Violation?</title>
	<author>Slashcrap</author>
	<datestamp>1259066580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>well, what then? Just... don't use Opera?</p></div><p>Well, that's something that about 99\% of web users can already manage quite easily without even trying. Doesn't seem like much of a problem to me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>well , what then ?
Just... do n't use Opera ? Well , that 's something that about 99 \ % of web users can already manage quite easily without even trying .
Does n't seem like much of a problem to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well, what then?
Just... don't use Opera?Well, that's something that about 99\% of web users can already manage quite easily without even trying.
Doesn't seem like much of a problem to me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206860</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258974600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah but what about security?</p><p>I'm playing around with it right now and there appears to be no real security whatsoever.  No SSL connections and the authentication page is wide open for anyone on the line to snag your password.</p><p>Also, it appears to transfer all your content through an intermediate Opera server.  So I'm not sure how that's you controlling your data.  You're handing it all off to Opera and they give it to the final destination.  So basically Opera gets to snoop on everything you're doing (plus your ISP and anyone else in-between since none of the connections are encrypted).</p><p>Now I could be wrong since I have only started to look at it, but it seems that security or privacy weren't big concerns even though they're touting "personal control."  Ha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah but what about security ? I 'm playing around with it right now and there appears to be no real security whatsoever .
No SSL connections and the authentication page is wide open for anyone on the line to snag your password.Also , it appears to transfer all your content through an intermediate Opera server .
So I 'm not sure how that 's you controlling your data .
You 're handing it all off to Opera and they give it to the final destination .
So basically Opera gets to snoop on everything you 're doing ( plus your ISP and anyone else in-between since none of the connections are encrypted ) .Now I could be wrong since I have only started to look at it , but it seems that security or privacy were n't big concerns even though they 're touting " personal control .
" Ha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah but what about security?I'm playing around with it right now and there appears to be no real security whatsoever.
No SSL connections and the authentication page is wide open for anyone on the line to snag your password.Also, it appears to transfer all your content through an intermediate Opera server.
So I'm not sure how that's you controlling your data.
You're handing it all off to Opera and they give it to the final destination.
So basically Opera gets to snoop on everything you're doing (plus your ISP and anyone else in-between since none of the connections are encrypted).Now I could be wrong since I have only started to look at it, but it seems that security or privacy weren't big concerns even though they're touting "personal control.
"  Ha</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206308</id>
	<title>Re:Except in China?</title>
	<author>Threni</author>
	<datestamp>1258972260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They get to help the Chinese dictators "Unite" pro-democracy campaigners in huge open prisons where they can serve their 20 years making cheap plastic shit to be sold in shops which are currently occupying the failed businesses which went bust trying to selling higher quality and longer lasting but slightly more expensive products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They get to help the Chinese dictators " Unite " pro-democracy campaigners in huge open prisons where they can serve their 20 years making cheap plastic shit to be sold in shops which are currently occupying the failed businesses which went bust trying to selling higher quality and longer lasting but slightly more expensive products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They get to help the Chinese dictators "Unite" pro-democracy campaigners in huge open prisons where they can serve their 20 years making cheap plastic shit to be sold in shops which are currently occupying the failed businesses which went bust trying to selling higher quality and longer lasting but slightly more expensive products.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205802</id>
	<title>I don't need your steenking content</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bite me. I'll fill my life on my own.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bite me .
I 'll fill my life on my own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bite me.
I'll fill my life on my own.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207900</id>
	<title>Re:Fine if you have lax security</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258978680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No it doen't depend on UPnP. It's good to read the post made by other users and then post yours.
Is basically a proxy service.

As mentioned above by  tomhudson

"Check the documentation - your web browser is not really becoming a "web server" - your requests go through their proxy server at yourdevicename.yourusername.operaunite.com

They've just wrapped xhmhttprequests (XHR) in their own custom javascript class, and provided a default proxy for it.

<a href="http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-unite-developer-primer-revisited/#conceptsproxy" title="opera.com" rel="nofollow">http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-unite-developer-primer-revisited/#conceptsproxy</a> [opera.com] [opera.com]"</htmltext>
<tokenext>No it doe n't depend on UPnP .
It 's good to read the post made by other users and then post yours .
Is basically a proxy service .
As mentioned above by tomhudson " Check the documentation - your web browser is not really becoming a " web server " - your requests go through their proxy server at yourdevicename.yourusername.operaunite.com They 've just wrapped xhmhttprequests ( XHR ) in their own custom javascript class , and provided a default proxy for it .
http : //dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-unite-developer-primer-revisited/ # conceptsproxy [ opera.com ] [ opera.com ] "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it doen't depend on UPnP.
It's good to read the post made by other users and then post yours.
Is basically a proxy service.
As mentioned above by  tomhudson

"Check the documentation - your web browser is not really becoming a "web server" - your requests go through their proxy server at yourdevicename.yourusername.operaunite.com

They've just wrapped xhmhttprequests (XHR) in their own custom javascript class, and provided a default proxy for it.
http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/opera-unite-developer-primer-revisited/#conceptsproxy [opera.com] [opera.com]"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205848</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>hkmwbz</author>
	<datestamp>1258970280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Problem is, we already have web servers, p2p, ftp etc. and they are stable, mature and bug-free. Why your entirely new, potentially untrustworthy integrated solution? It's hi-fi seperates vs. computer speakers again...</p></div></blockquote><p>
Exactly. Hi-Fi = sites you have to sign up for, upload, invite your friends to, get them to sign up, log in, etc. All you do with Unite is send them an URL to whatever they need, and it's done. Also, Unite is much, much easier to use than standard web servers, P2P, FTP, etc. And it can be added to with new application which can be installed with a single click.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Problem is , we already have web servers , p2p , ftp etc .
and they are stable , mature and bug-free .
Why your entirely new , potentially untrustworthy integrated solution ?
It 's hi-fi seperates vs. computer speakers again.. . Exactly. Hi-Fi = sites you have to sign up for , upload , invite your friends to , get them to sign up , log in , etc .
All you do with Unite is send them an URL to whatever they need , and it 's done .
Also , Unite is much , much easier to use than standard web servers , P2P , FTP , etc .
And it can be added to with new application which can be installed with a single click .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Problem is, we already have web servers, p2p, ftp etc.
and they are stable, mature and bug-free.
Why your entirely new, potentially untrustworthy integrated solution?
It's hi-fi seperates vs. computer speakers again...
Exactly. Hi-Fi = sites you have to sign up for, upload, invite your friends to, get them to sign up, log in, etc.
All you do with Unite is send them an URL to whatever they need, and it's done.
Also, Unite is much, much easier to use than standard web servers, P2P, FTP, etc.
And it can be added to with new application which can be installed with a single click.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205446</id>
	<title>ISPs won't like this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of TOS cite that you cannot use your connection as a server. Other ISPs simply block all P2P traffic.</p><p>The best way, as of right now, is to sign up at a Web Hosting provider where you host your own website instead of relying on something like Facebook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of TOS cite that you can not use your connection as a server .
Other ISPs simply block all P2P traffic.The best way , as of right now , is to sign up at a Web Hosting provider where you host your own website instead of relying on something like Facebook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of TOS cite that you cannot use your connection as a server.
Other ISPs simply block all P2P traffic.The best way, as of right now, is to sign up at a Web Hosting provider where you host your own website instead of relying on something like Facebook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</id>
	<title>just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>PizzaAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1258967760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's great that Opera Software understands the power of P2P like sharing between people. I dont want to have everything on sites like Facebook just so people can see them.<br>
<br>
Let me give you an example.<br>
<br>
If you're cooking your own pizza, you have the choice on what to put in it. Make it a normal pizza or a pan pizza? Make it square or round? What toppings to put on it? Unite allows you bake your own pizza in the heart of your pc, and <i>you</i> can choose what to put on it. Want ham? Fine! Want pineapples? Fine! Want tuna? Fine! Want pepperoni? Fine! What would you have as a sauce? Barbeque sauce! The widgets you install and enable are <i>your</i> toppings and you choose what you want to have.<br>
<br>
What comes to the <i>"from the but-does-it-live-in-the-cloud dept."</i>, I personally dont want it to be in the cloud. Then I lose control over it. That would be like having a happening in your town square where everyone is ordered to bake their pizza. They bring it there, put it out and lose control over who eats it. Direct friend-to-friend model lets you control who eats your delicious pizza, or who even knows about it. And if that said pizza happens to be a bad one and it comes hunting you later, you can pull it off. Good luck trying to do that in the town square after people have ate your pizza already.<br>
<br>
So what I'm basically saying is that *I* should be the one controlling my content, not some other site or cloud service. Unite makes that easy for people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's great that Opera Software understands the power of P2P like sharing between people .
I dont want to have everything on sites like Facebook just so people can see them .
Let me give you an example .
If you 're cooking your own pizza , you have the choice on what to put in it .
Make it a normal pizza or a pan pizza ?
Make it square or round ?
What toppings to put on it ?
Unite allows you bake your own pizza in the heart of your pc , and you can choose what to put on it .
Want ham ?
Fine ! Want pineapples ?
Fine ! Want tuna ?
Fine ! Want pepperoni ?
Fine ! What would you have as a sauce ?
Barbeque sauce !
The widgets you install and enable are your toppings and you choose what you want to have .
What comes to the " from the but-does-it-live-in-the-cloud dept .
" , I personally dont want it to be in the cloud .
Then I lose control over it .
That would be like having a happening in your town square where everyone is ordered to bake their pizza .
They bring it there , put it out and lose control over who eats it .
Direct friend-to-friend model lets you control who eats your delicious pizza , or who even knows about it .
And if that said pizza happens to be a bad one and it comes hunting you later , you can pull it off .
Good luck trying to do that in the town square after people have ate your pizza already .
So what I 'm basically saying is that * I * should be the one controlling my content , not some other site or cloud service .
Unite makes that easy for people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's great that Opera Software understands the power of P2P like sharing between people.
I dont want to have everything on sites like Facebook just so people can see them.
Let me give you an example.
If you're cooking your own pizza, you have the choice on what to put in it.
Make it a normal pizza or a pan pizza?
Make it square or round?
What toppings to put on it?
Unite allows you bake your own pizza in the heart of your pc, and you can choose what to put on it.
Want ham?
Fine! Want pineapples?
Fine! Want tuna?
Fine! Want pepperoni?
Fine! What would you have as a sauce?
Barbeque sauce!
The widgets you install and enable are your toppings and you choose what you want to have.
What comes to the "from the but-does-it-live-in-the-cloud dept.
", I personally dont want it to be in the cloud.
Then I lose control over it.
That would be like having a happening in your town square where everyone is ordered to bake their pizza.
They bring it there, put it out and lose control over who eats it.
Direct friend-to-friend model lets you control who eats your delicious pizza, or who even knows about it.
And if that said pizza happens to be a bad one and it comes hunting you later, you can pull it off.
Good luck trying to do that in the town square after people have ate your pizza already.
So what I'm basically saying is that *I* should be the one controlling my content, not some other site or cloud service.
Unite makes that easy for people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205468</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Despite being a shill account created by Opera Software, you are, nonetheless correct about hosting our own content. Problem is, we already have web servers, p2p, ftp etc. and they are stable, mature and bug-free. Why your entirely new, potentially untrustworthy integrated solution? It's hi-fi seperates vs. computer speakers again... see my other posts today...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite being a shill account created by Opera Software , you are , nonetheless correct about hosting our own content .
Problem is , we already have web servers , p2p , ftp etc .
and they are stable , mature and bug-free .
Why your entirely new , potentially untrustworthy integrated solution ?
It 's hi-fi seperates vs. computer speakers again... see my other posts today... : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite being a shill account created by Opera Software, you are, nonetheless correct about hosting our own content.
Problem is, we already have web servers, p2p, ftp etc.
and they are stable, mature and bug-free.
Why your entirely new, potentially untrustworthy integrated solution?
It's hi-fi seperates vs. computer speakers again... see my other posts today... :-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208160</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258979880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, stick with IE, get yesteryear's features with very high "usage numbers" (sic). You won't be missed. Don't forget to eat all your meals at McDonald's, wear whatever is the fashion, watch Fox, and use Windows+Office on a Dell.</p><p>You won't be missed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , stick with IE , get yesteryear 's features with very high " usage numbers " ( sic ) .
You wo n't be missed .
Do n't forget to eat all your meals at McDonald 's , wear whatever is the fashion , watch Fox , and use Windows + Office on a Dell.You wo n't be missed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, stick with IE, get yesteryear's features with very high "usage numbers" (sic).
You won't be missed.
Don't forget to eat all your meals at McDonald's, wear whatever is the fashion, watch Fox, and use Windows+Office on a Dell.You won't be missed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206596</id>
	<title>Re:Except in China?</title>
	<author>the linux geek</author>
	<datestamp>1258973400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The PRC "government" aren't dictators, they're criminals. The legitimate government of China does not behave that way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The PRC " government " are n't dictators , they 're criminals .
The legitimate government of China does not behave that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The PRC "government" aren't dictators, they're criminals.
The legitimate government of China does not behave that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30213884</id>
	<title>Love it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259079000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Opera is a fantastic browser.  It's got the perfect balance between speed, relability, features, memory usage, usability.</p><p>Opera-Link is essential, Turbo works well on the move, 100\% ACID3, Bittorrent, Mail/News/IRC/RSS/ContentBlocker/UserJS it's all in there, and manages it all in a 4MB binary. (Opera.dll)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Opera is a fantastic browser .
It 's got the perfect balance between speed , relability , features , memory usage , usability.Opera-Link is essential , Turbo works well on the move , 100 \ % ACID3 , Bittorrent , Mail/News/IRC/RSS/ContentBlocker/UserJS it 's all in there , and manages it all in a 4MB binary .
( Opera.dll )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Opera is a fantastic browser.
It's got the perfect balance between speed, relability, features, memory usage, usability.Opera-Link is essential, Turbo works well on the move, 100\% ACID3, Bittorrent, Mail/News/IRC/RSS/ContentBlocker/UserJS it's all in there, and manages it all in a 4MB binary.
(Opera.dll)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205832</id>
	<title>Breaking News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Third Post ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Third Post ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Third Post ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205688</id>
	<title>like the old slogan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dyslexics of the world, untie!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dyslexics of the world , untie !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dyslexics of the world, untie!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205664</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Lamborghini factories continue to spew out features. Good for them but I still won't touch their product.</p><p>Nuff said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Lamborghini factories continue to spew out features .
Good for them but I still wo n't touch their product.Nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Lamborghini factories continue to spew out features.
Good for them but I still won't touch their product.Nuff said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205612</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting perspective.  I used to use Opera all the time, until early betas of Firefox came out.  I can see value in providing p2p in a browser for some circumstances, however, look at the given example of sharing lots of pictures.  Direct is fine, if you've got good upload speeds and the 2nd person has a good path between you.  But uploading them to Google, or some other host, has the advantage of probably faster download speeds from them to the 2nd person, as they most likely have a fatter pipe.  Add in a 2nd person, and you've only had to upload once.  And you don't have to worry about what security holes you've opened up on your machine, or what other subfolders you happened to share by mistake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting perspective .
I used to use Opera all the time , until early betas of Firefox came out .
I can see value in providing p2p in a browser for some circumstances , however , look at the given example of sharing lots of pictures .
Direct is fine , if you 've got good upload speeds and the 2nd person has a good path between you .
But uploading them to Google , or some other host , has the advantage of probably faster download speeds from them to the 2nd person , as they most likely have a fatter pipe .
Add in a 2nd person , and you 've only had to upload once .
And you do n't have to worry about what security holes you 've opened up on your machine , or what other subfolders you happened to share by mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting perspective.
I used to use Opera all the time, until early betas of Firefox came out.
I can see value in providing p2p in a browser for some circumstances, however, look at the given example of sharing lots of pictures.
Direct is fine, if you've got good upload speeds and the 2nd person has a good path between you.
But uploading them to Google, or some other host, has the advantage of probably faster download speeds from them to the 2nd person, as they most likely have a fatter pipe.
Add in a 2nd person, and you've only had to upload once.
And you don't have to worry about what security holes you've opened up on your machine, or what other subfolders you happened to share by mistake.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30213090</id>
	<title>bb tos unconstitutional</title>
	<author>airdrummer</author>
	<datestamp>1259074680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>they abrogate the 1st &amp; 2nd amendments: freedom of speech &amp; the right to keep &amp; bear servers... 'bout time the b-o-r is given a 21st century interpretation!-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>they abrogate the 1st &amp; 2nd amendments : freedom of speech &amp; the right to keep &amp; bear servers... 'bout time the b-o-r is given a 21st century interpretation ! - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they abrogate the 1st &amp; 2nd amendments: freedom of speech &amp; the right to keep &amp; bear servers... 'bout time the b-o-r is given a 21st century interpretation!-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207822</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>assert(0)</author>
	<datestamp>1258978260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I just came.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I just came .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I just came.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205574</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>TeXMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1258968840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Opera folks continue to spew out features. Good for them but I still won't touch their product.</p></div><p>I wonder why. It's not open source but it's still gratis and technically superior to anything else I've tried.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Opera folks continue to spew out features .
Good for them but I still wo n't touch their product.I wonder why .
It 's not open source but it 's still gratis and technically superior to anything else I 've tried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Opera folks continue to spew out features.
Good for them but I still won't touch their product.I wonder why.
It's not open source but it's still gratis and technically superior to anything else I've tried.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211262</id>
	<title>Re:Forget "Unite"... how's Opera doing on CSS 3?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1259059200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you're saying that Apple realized, that their clients care more for looks than even for their friends?</p><p>Who woulda thunk of that? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you 're saying that Apple realized , that their clients care more for looks than even for their friends ? Who woulda thunk of that ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you're saying that Apple realized, that their clients care more for looks than even for their friends?Who woulda thunk of that?
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208230</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1258980360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Definate killer application: Cloud-like sharing services but you <b> retain total control of your data </b>. It's also stunningly easy. It is by far the fastest set up of a webserver I've seen. You fire up opera, log in with a opera account, choose folders for sharing, start the server or other services. You then send your friends <a href="http://username.computername.operaunite.com/" title="operaunite.com">http://username.computername.operaunite.com/</a> [operaunite.com]
<br> <br>
It even seems to be a pretty good performing web server, opera are also know for their good attitude towards security. I think it's killer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Definate killer application : Cloud-like sharing services but you retain total control of your data .
It 's also stunningly easy .
It is by far the fastest set up of a webserver I 've seen .
You fire up opera , log in with a opera account , choose folders for sharing , start the server or other services .
You then send your friends http : //username.computername.operaunite.com/ [ operaunite.com ] It even seems to be a pretty good performing web server , opera are also know for their good attitude towards security .
I think it 's killer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Definate killer application: Cloud-like sharing services but you  retain total control of your data .
It's also stunningly easy.
It is by far the fastest set up of a webserver I've seen.
You fire up opera, log in with a opera account, choose folders for sharing, start the server or other services.
You then send your friends http://username.computername.operaunite.com/ [operaunite.com]
 
It even seems to be a pretty good performing web server, opera are also know for their good attitude towards security.
I think it's killer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30220388</id>
	<title>Still No QT4</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1259064960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not interested in QT3 and not gtk.  QT4 is where they should be now.  This is silly of them to implement a depricating library.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not interested in QT3 and not gtk .
QT4 is where they should be now .
This is silly of them to implement a depricating library .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not interested in QT3 and not gtk.
QT4 is where they should be now.
This is silly of them to implement a depricating library.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</id>
	<title>Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>bogaboga</author>
	<datestamp>1258968120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Opera folks continue to spew out features. Good for them but I still won't touch their product.</p><p>Nuff said.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Opera folks continue to spew out features .
Good for them but I still wo n't touch their product.Nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Despite low usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Opera folks continue to spew out features.
Good for them but I still won't touch their product.Nuff said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624</id>
	<title>Fine if you have lax security</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258973580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously, this thing seems to depend on you running UPnP.  Anyone using that is a moron because it makes it super easy for an attacker to poke holes in your firewall.</p><p>Basically you browse to malicious site which then does a network request inside your internal network to your UPnP server (router) asking it to open a port which later can be used to connect to your internal machine.</p><p>UPnP is a dangerous thing, I always have it disabled.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously , this thing seems to depend on you running UPnP .
Anyone using that is a moron because it makes it super easy for an attacker to poke holes in your firewall.Basically you browse to malicious site which then does a network request inside your internal network to your UPnP server ( router ) asking it to open a port which later can be used to connect to your internal machine.UPnP is a dangerous thing , I always have it disabled .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously, this thing seems to depend on you running UPnP.
Anyone using that is a moron because it makes it super easy for an attacker to poke holes in your firewall.Basically you browse to malicious site which then does a network request inside your internal network to your UPnP server (router) asking it to open a port which later can be used to connect to your internal machine.UPnP is a dangerous thing, I always have it disabled.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205880</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Stratoukos</author>
	<datestamp>1258970400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I thought unite was mostly for sharing stuff between your devices, not with other people or as a social networking... thing...</p></div><p>It's neither or both, depending on how you use it. Basically it's what it advertises it is. A server. You get a URL for your pc (pc-name.username.operaunite.com) and you open services like file sharing. Anyone can go to that URL and see what services you are running, So, if you want you can advertise that URL making it something like a social network, where everyone can go there and leave messages, stream music from your pc or whatever else you are running. Or you can keep that URL for yourself and password protect everything, if you just want to share stuff between your devices.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought unite was mostly for sharing stuff between your devices , not with other people or as a social networking... thing...It 's neither or both , depending on how you use it .
Basically it 's what it advertises it is .
A server .
You get a URL for your pc ( pc-name.username.operaunite.com ) and you open services like file sharing .
Anyone can go to that URL and see what services you are running , So , if you want you can advertise that URL making it something like a social network , where everyone can go there and leave messages , stream music from your pc or whatever else you are running .
Or you can keep that URL for yourself and password protect everything , if you just want to share stuff between your devices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought unite was mostly for sharing stuff between your devices, not with other people or as a social networking... thing...It's neither or both, depending on how you use it.
Basically it's what it advertises it is.
A server.
You get a URL for your pc (pc-name.username.operaunite.com) and you open services like file sharing.
Anyone can go to that URL and see what services you are running, So, if you want you can advertise that URL making it something like a social network, where everyone can go there and leave messages, stream music from your pc or whatever else you are running.
Or you can keep that URL for yourself and password protect everything, if you just want to share stuff between your devices.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209104</id>
	<title>Re:Fine if you have lax security</title>
	<author>HBoar</author>
	<datestamp>1258986240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It gives you the option of using UPnP, it does not require it.  All you need to do is untick the "Use UPnP port forwarding from my router" box.  Not too diffcult.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It gives you the option of using UPnP , it does not require it .
All you need to do is untick the " Use UPnP port forwarding from my router " box .
Not too diffcult .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It gives you the option of using UPnP, it does not require it.
All you need to do is untick the "Use UPnP port forwarding from my router" box.
Not too diffcult.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205488</id>
	<title>Flock?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is this different from the firefox based flock browser?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is this different from the firefox based flock browser ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is this different from the firefox based flock browser?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624</id>
	<title>Except in China?</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1258969140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I love how all the computer companies have these new-age wonderful human mottos for their products, like "Unite", and then cut deals with dictators to try and make a couple of extra bucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I love how all the computer companies have these new-age wonderful human mottos for their products , like " Unite " , and then cut deals with dictators to try and make a couple of extra bucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I love how all the computer companies have these new-age wonderful human mottos for their products, like "Unite", and then cut deals with dictators to try and make a couple of extra bucks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207016</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>easyTree</author>
	<datestamp>1258975260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not Opera, it's people - they like the clunkiness of IE and Firefox - the massive amounts of wasted screen space - the lack of responsiveness. Try opening 75+ tabs in firefox without the universe grinding to a halt..!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not Opera , it 's people - they like the clunkiness of IE and Firefox - the massive amounts of wasted screen space - the lack of responsiveness .
Try opening 75 + tabs in firefox without the universe grinding to a halt.. !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not Opera, it's people - they like the clunkiness of IE and Firefox - the massive amounts of wasted screen space - the lack of responsiveness.
Try opening 75+ tabs in firefox without the universe grinding to a halt..!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205714</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210772</id>
	<title>Unite is not enabled by default</title>
	<author>grandmofftarkin</author>
	<datestamp>1259093580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hence you could change that to, "Just... don't enable the Unite feature."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hence you could change that to , " Just... do n't enable the Unite feature .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hence you could change that to, "Just... don't enable the Unite feature.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209906</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258994400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what I'm basically saying is that *I* should be the one controlling my content, not some other site or cloud service. Unite makes that easy for people.</p></div><p>Ooooh!  I thought you were basically saying that we could have some of your pizza.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what I 'm basically saying is that * I * should be the one controlling my content , not some other site or cloud service .
Unite makes that easy for people.Ooooh !
I thought you were basically saying that we could have some of your pizza .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what I'm basically saying is that *I* should be the one controlling my content, not some other site or cloud service.
Unite makes that easy for people.Ooooh!
I thought you were basically saying that we could have some of your pizza.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207980</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1258979100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can someone please explain a pizza analogy in a car analogy??</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can someone please explain a pizza analogy in a car analogy ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can someone please explain a pizza analogy in a car analogy?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205522</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1258968480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm confused, even though you made a pizza analogy (maybe there's a reason we stick with car metaphors).  I from the summary and press release, I thought unite was mostly for sharing stuff between your devices, not with other people or as a social networking... thing...  I was under the impression that there were plenty of, er, cloud services where you could put your files on the cloud and then share them with one person instead of everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused , even though you made a pizza analogy ( maybe there 's a reason we stick with car metaphors ) .
I from the summary and press release , I thought unite was mostly for sharing stuff between your devices , not with other people or as a social networking... thing... I was under the impression that there were plenty of , er , cloud services where you could put your files on the cloud and then share them with one person instead of everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm confused, even though you made a pizza analogy (maybe there's a reason we stick with car metaphors).
I from the summary and press release, I thought unite was mostly for sharing stuff between your devices, not with other people or as a social networking... thing...  I was under the impression that there were plenty of, er, cloud services where you could put your files on the cloud and then share them with one person instead of everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205508</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>colourmyeyes</author>
	<datestamp>1258968420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>By this line of reasoning, would you agree with the following?<br>
<br>
Despite low desktop usage numbers after more than a decade in existence <b>Linux</b> folks continue to spew out features. Good for them but I still won't touch their product.<br>
<br>
Nuff said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>By this line of reasoning , would you agree with the following ?
Despite low desktop usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Linux folks continue to spew out features .
Good for them but I still wo n't touch their product .
Nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By this line of reasoning, would you agree with the following?
Despite low desktop usage numbers after more than a decade in existence Linux folks continue to spew out features.
Good for them but I still won't touch their product.
Nuff said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207730</id>
	<title>Holy retro Batman! (Win 98)</title>
	<author>shking</author>
	<datestamp>1258977900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just tried it on a vm running Windows 98 and it works! Holy retro Batman! We don' need no steenkin IE 6</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just tried it on a vm running Windows 98 and it works !
Holy retro Batman !
We don ' need no steenkin IE 6</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just tried it on a vm running Windows 98 and it works!
Holy retro Batman!
We don' need no steenkin IE 6</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205658</id>
	<title>Where is VIDEO and AUDIO tag support?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can't believe Opera doesn't support these tags even in v10.10 when they pioneered the introduction of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe Opera does n't support these tags even in v10.10 when they pioneered the introduction of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe Opera doesn't support these tags even in v10.10 when they pioneered the introduction of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205754</id>
	<title>Re:Wow, Opera has what I call ambition...</title>
	<author>gmuslera</author>
	<datestamp>1258969800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been ever fan of Opera innovations, because i know i will probably see them in my future, no matter in which browser. But the new additions looks dangerous. Are open the field tie browser/user content to the maker of the browser (the 10gb of shared photos and opera turbo mean opera servers and services behind, and not so sure about the "embedded" server) and if well they could do that right or wrong, are practically forcing the other players in the browser arena to do the same, and not all are so well behaved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been ever fan of Opera innovations , because i know i will probably see them in my future , no matter in which browser .
But the new additions looks dangerous .
Are open the field tie browser/user content to the maker of the browser ( the 10gb of shared photos and opera turbo mean opera servers and services behind , and not so sure about the " embedded " server ) and if well they could do that right or wrong , are practically forcing the other players in the browser arena to do the same , and not all are so well behaved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been ever fan of Opera innovations, because i know i will probably see them in my future, no matter in which browser.
But the new additions looks dangerous.
Are open the field tie browser/user content to the maker of the browser (the 10gb of shared photos and opera turbo mean opera servers and services behind, and not so sure about the "embedded" server) and if well they could do that right or wrong, are practically forcing the other players in the browser arena to do the same, and not all are so well behaved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210966</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259053920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or just use a service like OnlinePizza where you can specify which ingredients should be on your pizza and use the time you gained on something worthwhile.<br>http://onlinepizza.se/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or just use a service like OnlinePizza where you can specify which ingredients should be on your pizza and use the time you gained on something worthwhile.http : //onlinepizza.se/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or just use a service like OnlinePizza where you can specify which ingredients should be on your pizza and use the time you gained on something worthwhile.http://onlinepizza.se/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>ErkDemon</author>
	<datestamp>1258970880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Potential Killer Application: sharing family photos with family. Almost everyone has a digital camera these days, but almost nobody (apart from SlashDot readers) has their own home server. A lot of people still try to share photos by email.
<p>
It'd be interesting to see how they're handling security, though. Damn, now I'm going to have to download it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Potential Killer Application : sharing family photos with family .
Almost everyone has a digital camera these days , but almost nobody ( apart from SlashDot readers ) has their own home server .
A lot of people still try to share photos by email .
It 'd be interesting to see how they 're handling security , though .
Damn , now I 'm going to have to download it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Potential Killer Application: sharing family photos with family.
Almost everyone has a digital camera these days, but almost nobody (apart from SlashDot readers) has their own home server.
A lot of people still try to share photos by email.
It'd be interesting to see how they're handling security, though.
Damn, now I'm going to have to download it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206004</id>
	<title>Re:Breaks broadband service contract?</title>
	<author>VinylPusher</author>
	<datestamp>1258971000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh come on, farting at the table is probably against the TOS of some ISP's contracts. For the unclever, that's an exaggeration to illustrate that ISP's bung quite a lot of "Don't do this" clauses in contracts in order to cover their collective arses if they have to take the fairly ultimate step of asking a customer to politely piss-off somewhere else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh come on , farting at the table is probably against the TOS of some ISP 's contracts .
For the unclever , that 's an exaggeration to illustrate that ISP 's bung quite a lot of " Do n't do this " clauses in contracts in order to cover their collective arses if they have to take the fairly ultimate step of asking a customer to politely piss-off somewhere else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh come on, farting at the table is probably against the TOS of some ISP's contracts.
For the unclever, that's an exaggeration to illustrate that ISP's bung quite a lot of "Don't do this" clauses in contracts in order to cover their collective arses if they have to take the fairly ultimate step of asking a customer to politely piss-off somewhere else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210780</id>
	<title>If uPnP is not enabled it can use Opera's proxy</title>
	<author>grandmofftarkin</author>
	<datestamp>1259093760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't need uPnP but services can use it if it is there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't need uPnP but services can use it if it is there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't need uPnP but services can use it if it is there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208976</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>tftp</author>
	<datestamp>1258985100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>A lot of people still try to share photos by email.</i>
</p><p>
Are they somehow failing at that, or what? Where is the problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of people still try to share photos by email .
Are they somehow failing at that , or what ?
Where is the problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> A lot of people still try to share photos by email.
Are they somehow failing at that, or what?
Where is the problem?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208200</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1258980120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not so much Hi-Fi separates vs Computers, rather Hi-FI Separates vs cheap all-in-one stereos.</p><p>Guess what sold more ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not so much Hi-Fi separates vs Computers , rather Hi-FI Separates vs cheap all-in-one stereos.Guess what sold more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not so much Hi-Fi separates vs Computers, rather Hi-FI Separates vs cheap all-in-one stereos.Guess what sold more ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207140</id>
	<title>Re:just friends, no facebook, no cloud</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1258975620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you're cooking your own pizza, you have the choice on what to put in it. Make it a normal pizza or a pan pizza? Make it square or round? What toppings to put on it? Unite allows you bake your own pizza in the heart of your pc, and you can choose what to put on it. Want ham? Fine! Want pineapples? Fine!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....you choose what you want to have.</p></div><p>  Brilliant.</p><p>Now why don't people apply the same thought-pattern to government?<br>Why do they insist upon a "one size fits all" centralized program?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're cooking your own pizza , you have the choice on what to put in it .
Make it a normal pizza or a pan pizza ?
Make it square or round ?
What toppings to put on it ?
Unite allows you bake your own pizza in the heart of your pc , and you can choose what to put on it .
Want ham ?
Fine ! Want pineapples ?
Fine ! .....you choose what you want to have .
Brilliant.Now why do n't people apply the same thought-pattern to government ? Why do they insist upon a " one size fits all " centralized program ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're cooking your own pizza, you have the choice on what to put in it.
Make it a normal pizza or a pan pizza?
Make it square or round?
What toppings to put on it?
Unite allows you bake your own pizza in the heart of your pc, and you can choose what to put on it.
Want ham?
Fine! Want pineapples?
Fine! .....you choose what you want to have.
Brilliant.Now why don't people apply the same thought-pattern to government?Why do they insist upon a "one size fits all" centralized program?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30213090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205446
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30212386
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208976
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1940206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210772
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30211262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30213090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208976
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30212386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30206860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30209906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30210966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205688
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1940206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30207016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30205680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1940206.30208004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
