<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_23_1754241</id>
	<title>Chrome OS Benchmarked Against Moblin, Ubuntu Netbook, More</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1259004780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Using the latest build of Google's Chromium OS source code, Phoronix built it out to run on a Samsung netbook and <a href="http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=14393">ran sixteen benchmarks</a>, putting it up against Moblin 2.1, Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10, openSUSE 11.2, and Fedora 12. They ran some of their usual desktop benchmarks (encoding, video, etc..), but more interestingly they ran a number of battery, CPU usage, and memory consumption tests under different settings that show some of the advantages and disadvantages for each of the Linux distributions, and spotted a few bugs along the way."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Using the latest build of Google 's Chromium OS source code , Phoronix built it out to run on a Samsung netbook and ran sixteen benchmarks , putting it up against Moblin 2.1 , Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 , openSUSE 11.2 , and Fedora 12 .
They ran some of their usual desktop benchmarks ( encoding , video , etc.. ) , but more interestingly they ran a number of battery , CPU usage , and memory consumption tests under different settings that show some of the advantages and disadvantages for each of the Linux distributions , and spotted a few bugs along the way .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Using the latest build of Google's Chromium OS source code, Phoronix built it out to run on a Samsung netbook and ran sixteen benchmarks, putting it up against Moblin 2.1, Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10, openSUSE 11.2, and Fedora 12.
They ran some of their usual desktop benchmarks (encoding, video, etc..), but more interestingly they ran a number of battery, CPU usage, and memory consumption tests under different settings that show some of the advantages and disadvantages for each of the Linux distributions, and spotted a few bugs along the way.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205454</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>kFiddle</author>
	<datestamp>1258968120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I understand it, Chrome OS packages a full linux kernel and device drivers to be able to interact with your hardware. It would probably be more accurate to call it a new linux distribution. But, why argue about terminology when "linux" itself isn't even an operating system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it , Chrome OS packages a full linux kernel and device drivers to be able to interact with your hardware .
It would probably be more accurate to call it a new linux distribution .
But , why argue about terminology when " linux " itself is n't even an operating system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it, Chrome OS packages a full linux kernel and device drivers to be able to interact with your hardware.
It would probably be more accurate to call it a new linux distribution.
But, why argue about terminology when "linux" itself isn't even an operating system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205866</id>
	<title>musings</title>
	<author>Sterculius</author>
	<datestamp>1258970340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At first, Google impressed me quite a bit, but their latest forays into programming languages (Go!) and the OS market<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... yawn.  Honestly, Chrome in no way compares to FireFox either.  It is just a light, quick browser that is light and quick because it doesn't do the truly great things that FireFox can do.  The Google "genius club" isn't going to take over the world, no matter how arrogantly they try.  However, if they upset the drone army at Microsoft, I applaud their efforts anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At first , Google impressed me quite a bit , but their latest forays into programming languages ( Go !
) and the OS market ... yawn. Honestly , Chrome in no way compares to FireFox either .
It is just a light , quick browser that is light and quick because it does n't do the truly great things that FireFox can do .
The Google " genius club " is n't going to take over the world , no matter how arrogantly they try .
However , if they upset the drone army at Microsoft , I applaud their efforts anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At first, Google impressed me quite a bit, but their latest forays into programming languages (Go!
) and the OS market ... yawn.  Honestly, Chrome in no way compares to FireFox either.
It is just a light, quick browser that is light and quick because it doesn't do the truly great things that FireFox can do.
The Google "genius club" isn't going to take over the world, no matter how arrogantly they try.
However, if they upset the drone army at Microsoft, I applaud their efforts anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30216512</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259090040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"3) There's Google Gears, which is pretty cool, but doesn't work with Chromium O/S, or Chrome the browser."</p><p>Google gears is built into the Browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 3 ) There 's Google Gears , which is pretty cool , but does n't work with Chromium O/S , or Chrome the browser .
" Google gears is built into the Browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"3) There's Google Gears, which is pretty cool, but doesn't work with Chromium O/S, or Chrome the browser.
"Google gears is built into the Browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205144</id>
	<title>Feh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seven pages to tell us that they're pretty much the same?  And Chrome's power management sucks?  I'm wondering why they didn't do a Windows test, too.  I thought that would be a requirement in these types of tests.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seven pages to tell us that they 're pretty much the same ?
And Chrome 's power management sucks ?
I 'm wondering why they did n't do a Windows test , too .
I thought that would be a requirement in these types of tests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seven pages to tell us that they're pretty much the same?
And Chrome's power management sucks?
I'm wondering why they didn't do a Windows test, too.
I thought that would be a requirement in these types of tests.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207146</id>
	<title>Nice colors</title>
	<author>formfeed</author>
	<datestamp>1258975680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I switchd to ubuntu becaue all my friends had it *lol* and thanthey hadthat real nice brown swirl in the bagground,but now it look like they R switching to grey, and which I don like that much. but Fedora looks like pretty impressive. me like blue!
<p> i really really  like comparizons between diffrent linux distrobutions because they alwayz show U pictores of the desktops</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I switchd to ubuntu becaue all my friends had it * lol * and thanthey hadthat real nice brown swirl in the bagground,but now it look like they R switching to grey , and which I don like that much .
but Fedora looks like pretty impressive .
me like blue !
i really really like comparizons between diffrent linux distrobutions because they alwayz show U pictores of the desktops</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I switchd to ubuntu becaue all my friends had it *lol* and thanthey hadthat real nice brown swirl in the bagground,but now it look like they R switching to grey, and which I don like that much.
but Fedora looks like pretty impressive.
me like blue!
i really really  like comparizons between diffrent linux distrobutions because they alwayz show U pictores of the desktops</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205134</id>
	<title>snake oil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Benchmarking operating system distributions in such a way is only useful for regression testing. Benchmarking operating systems that are designed only to run only on specific hardware against operating systems designed to run on as much hardware as possible won't provide any meaningful results.<br>They didn't even use the same file system for each install.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Benchmarking operating system distributions in such a way is only useful for regression testing .
Benchmarking operating systems that are designed only to run only on specific hardware against operating systems designed to run on as much hardware as possible wo n't provide any meaningful results.They did n't even use the same file system for each install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Benchmarking operating system distributions in such a way is only useful for regression testing.
Benchmarking operating systems that are designed only to run only on specific hardware against operating systems designed to run on as much hardware as possible won't provide any meaningful results.They didn't even use the same file system for each install.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209052</id>
	<title>Re:Program loader, not a true OS</title>
	<author>int69h</author>
	<datestamp>1258985700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't mind my asking, what's scheduling Chromium's processes or the other processes like the X server then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't mind my asking , what 's scheduling Chromium 's processes or the other processes like the X server then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't mind my asking, what's scheduling Chromium's processes or the other processes like the X server then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>mcrbids</author>
	<datestamp>1258981740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A more appropriate name for it is "Chrome Fullscreen".</i></p><p>An even more appropriate name for it is "Chrome's Google-Confusion-Fest". Because Google is starting to bewilder me with parallel, seemingly conflicting options!</p><p>1) There's Chromium O/S, which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser.</p><p>2) There's Android O/S, which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser, that's incompatible with Chromium.</p><p>3) There's Google Gears, which is pretty cool, but doesn't work with Chromium O/S, or Chrome the browser.</p><p>4) There's Chrome itself, whicch is just a browser, without a distro of any kind, and paradoxically, doesn't work on Linux.</p><p>In short, while Google has been lobbing all this juicy-looking stuff out onto the marketplace, it's been set up in such a way as the boxes are likely to fall on anxious developers.</p><p> <b>This looks to me more like a minefield than a fruited plain! </b></p><p>Come on, Google! If you want me, a developer, to "jump on board" with your stuff, you'd better get it all talking to each other, because <b>your deeply fragmented product lines are causing me to shun your products.</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A more appropriate name for it is " Chrome Fullscreen " .An even more appropriate name for it is " Chrome 's Google-Confusion-Fest " .
Because Google is starting to bewilder me with parallel , seemingly conflicting options ! 1 ) There 's Chromium O/S , which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser.2 ) There 's Android O/S , which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser , that 's incompatible with Chromium.3 ) There 's Google Gears , which is pretty cool , but does n't work with Chromium O/S , or Chrome the browser.4 ) There 's Chrome itself , whicch is just a browser , without a distro of any kind , and paradoxically , does n't work on Linux.In short , while Google has been lobbing all this juicy-looking stuff out onto the marketplace , it 's been set up in such a way as the boxes are likely to fall on anxious developers .
This looks to me more like a minefield than a fruited plain !
Come on , Google !
If you want me , a developer , to " jump on board " with your stuff , you 'd better get it all talking to each other , because your deeply fragmented product lines are causing me to shun your products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A more appropriate name for it is "Chrome Fullscreen".An even more appropriate name for it is "Chrome's Google-Confusion-Fest".
Because Google is starting to bewilder me with parallel, seemingly conflicting options!1) There's Chromium O/S, which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser.2) There's Android O/S, which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser, that's incompatible with Chromium.3) There's Google Gears, which is pretty cool, but doesn't work with Chromium O/S, or Chrome the browser.4) There's Chrome itself, whicch is just a browser, without a distro of any kind, and paradoxically, doesn't work on Linux.In short, while Google has been lobbing all this juicy-looking stuff out onto the marketplace, it's been set up in such a way as the boxes are likely to fall on anxious developers.
This looks to me more like a minefield than a fruited plain!
Come on, Google!
If you want me, a developer, to "jump on board" with your stuff, you'd better get it all talking to each other, because your deeply fragmented product lines are causing me to shun your products.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211062</id>
	<title>I'm going to give it a chance</title>
	<author>DeBaas</author>
	<datestamp>1259055720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Years ago I worked on something that has some similarities to Chrome OS (http://www.simpc.nl). And of course the same things were being said about it as now on Chrome OS;-) (http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/05/01/13/0033206/simPC---Your-Grandparents-New-Computer?art\_pos=1)</p><p>It had a lot of the same features: runs on flash, read-only file system, 'firmware approach' mostly online and webbased apps, low requirements on hardware (VIA C3). Resulting in much easier to use, more secure and tamperproof system then a full desktop. Although I believe that Google will do a lot better job.</p><p>What most people failed to see then as they do now is that a lot of people don't care about the PC. They care about being online.</p><p>I'm glad to see Google building something similar and open source. There are much more uses for a webbased desktop. And other service suppliers could build something with Chromium OS. At the time we thought about Xul applications for companies (we were working with Firefox). But these days I would go for HTML5.</p><p>It is not necessarily so that the netbook with such a system is unusable without the internet available. We had a very simple system that checked for the availability of the internet at startup. Without internet it would simply load a local desktop (which can be an html file). And doesn't Google docs have offline capabilities as well?</p><p>Personally I'm gonna give Chromium OS a change on my netbook if it allows me to play videofiles, (so if mplayer or VLC can be run, I'm good). I use a netbook daily while commuting in the train. And aside from internet stuff, playing episodes of TV-shows is the only thing I do on that thing in the train.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Years ago I worked on something that has some similarities to Chrome OS ( http : //www.simpc.nl ) .
And of course the same things were being said about it as now on Chrome OS ; - ) ( http : //hardware.slashdot.org/story/05/01/13/0033206/simPC---Your-Grandparents-New-Computer ? art \ _pos = 1 ) It had a lot of the same features : runs on flash , read-only file system , 'firmware approach ' mostly online and webbased apps , low requirements on hardware ( VIA C3 ) .
Resulting in much easier to use , more secure and tamperproof system then a full desktop .
Although I believe that Google will do a lot better job.What most people failed to see then as they do now is that a lot of people do n't care about the PC .
They care about being online.I 'm glad to see Google building something similar and open source .
There are much more uses for a webbased desktop .
And other service suppliers could build something with Chromium OS .
At the time we thought about Xul applications for companies ( we were working with Firefox ) .
But these days I would go for HTML5.It is not necessarily so that the netbook with such a system is unusable without the internet available .
We had a very simple system that checked for the availability of the internet at startup .
Without internet it would simply load a local desktop ( which can be an html file ) .
And does n't Google docs have offline capabilities as well ? Personally I 'm gon na give Chromium OS a change on my netbook if it allows me to play videofiles , ( so if mplayer or VLC can be run , I 'm good ) .
I use a netbook daily while commuting in the train .
And aside from internet stuff , playing episodes of TV-shows is the only thing I do on that thing in the train .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Years ago I worked on something that has some similarities to Chrome OS (http://www.simpc.nl).
And of course the same things were being said about it as now on Chrome OS;-) (http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/05/01/13/0033206/simPC---Your-Grandparents-New-Computer?art\_pos=1)It had a lot of the same features: runs on flash, read-only file system, 'firmware approach' mostly online and webbased apps, low requirements on hardware (VIA C3).
Resulting in much easier to use, more secure and tamperproof system then a full desktop.
Although I believe that Google will do a lot better job.What most people failed to see then as they do now is that a lot of people don't care about the PC.
They care about being online.I'm glad to see Google building something similar and open source.
There are much more uses for a webbased desktop.
And other service suppliers could build something with Chromium OS.
At the time we thought about Xul applications for companies (we were working with Firefox).
But these days I would go for HTML5.It is not necessarily so that the netbook with such a system is unusable without the internet available.
We had a very simple system that checked for the availability of the internet at startup.
Without internet it would simply load a local desktop (which can be an html file).
And doesn't Google docs have offline capabilities as well?Personally I'm gonna give Chromium OS a change on my netbook if it allows me to play videofiles, (so if mplayer or VLC can be run, I'm good).
I use a netbook daily while commuting in the train.
And aside from internet stuff, playing episodes of TV-shows is the only thing I do on that thing in the train.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211352</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>DMiax</author>
	<datestamp>1259061840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since they want your data to be online, they are scrapping the hard disk. So a FS like Ext4, that shines on TB storages is not really useful. There are performance issues with all that metadata to be kept in synch, which may be relevant on the netbook scale (Google's target).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since they want your data to be online , they are scrapping the hard disk .
So a FS like Ext4 , that shines on TB storages is not really useful .
There are performance issues with all that metadata to be kept in synch , which may be relevant on the netbook scale ( Google 's target ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since they want your data to be online, they are scrapping the hard disk.
So a FS like Ext4, that shines on TB storages is not really useful.
There are performance issues with all that metadata to be kept in synch, which may be relevant on the netbook scale (Google's target).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205354</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258967520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Each distro includes distro-specific kernel patches. They configure the kernel differently. They ship different releases of the kernel. And they compile with slightly different versions of the toolchain.</p><p>So you will see benchmark differences with the "same" kernel on different distros.</p><p>I'm shocked to read the Chromium is eschewing Ext4. What FS are they using, and it it because it is optimized for SSDs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Each distro includes distro-specific kernel patches .
They configure the kernel differently .
They ship different releases of the kernel .
And they compile with slightly different versions of the toolchain.So you will see benchmark differences with the " same " kernel on different distros.I 'm shocked to read the Chromium is eschewing Ext4 .
What FS are they using , and it it because it is optimized for SSDs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Each distro includes distro-specific kernel patches.
They configure the kernel differently.
They ship different releases of the kernel.
And they compile with slightly different versions of the toolchain.So you will see benchmark differences with the "same" kernel on different distros.I'm shocked to read the Chromium is eschewing Ext4.
What FS are they using, and it it because it is optimized for SSDs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206006</id>
	<title>Absurd</title>
	<author>MonsterTrimble</author>
	<datestamp>1258971000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The testing concept was pretty absurd - (relatively) stable netbook releases vs a new distro that can barely be considered in 'Alpha' and really doesn't have a platform yet. If Ubuntu, Fedora or Suse had one of their Alpha distros benchmarked vs something stable they would be screaming bloody murder. Wake me when Chromium (much better name for the OS than Chrome by the way) is about to get released.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The testing concept was pretty absurd - ( relatively ) stable netbook releases vs a new distro that can barely be considered in 'Alpha ' and really does n't have a platform yet .
If Ubuntu , Fedora or Suse had one of their Alpha distros benchmarked vs something stable they would be screaming bloody murder .
Wake me when Chromium ( much better name for the OS than Chrome by the way ) is about to get released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The testing concept was pretty absurd - (relatively) stable netbook releases vs a new distro that can barely be considered in 'Alpha' and really doesn't have a platform yet.
If Ubuntu, Fedora or Suse had one of their Alpha distros benchmarked vs something stable they would be screaming bloody murder.
Wake me when Chromium (much better name for the OS than Chrome by the way) is about to get released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206332</id>
	<title>Stop it please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258972380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF, could someone stop these endless Chrome OS advertisement posts on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p><p>WE HAVE HEARD YOU and know what Chrome OS is, okay? (And no, thanks, I don't need it.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF , could someone stop these endless Chrome OS advertisement posts on /.WE HAVE HEARD YOU and know what Chrome OS is , okay ?
( And no , thanks , I do n't need it .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF, could someone stop these endless Chrome OS advertisement posts on /.WE HAVE HEARD YOU and know what Chrome OS is, okay?
(And no, thanks, I don't need it.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211342</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>DMiax</author>
	<datestamp>1259061600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think they really care about any of those. Any user of one product will be a faithful user of their online services, which they *do* care about. It a form of advertisement, if you will.</p><p>A 1-3\% marketshare is good for them: they do not want to dominate. Of course if they start to dominate, you will see the real developer power of Google when it gets serious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think they really care about any of those .
Any user of one product will be a faithful user of their online services , which they * do * care about .
It a form of advertisement , if you will.A 1-3 \ % marketshare is good for them : they do not want to dominate .
Of course if they start to dominate , you will see the real developer power of Google when it gets serious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think they really care about any of those.
Any user of one product will be a faithful user of their online services, which they *do* care about.
It a form of advertisement, if you will.A 1-3\% marketshare is good for them: they do not want to dominate.
Of course if they start to dominate, you will see the real developer power of Google when it gets serious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208090</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1258979580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the phrase you're looking for is GNU/Chrome.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the phrase you 're looking for is GNU/Chrome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the phrase you're looking for is GNU/Chrome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205142</id>
	<title>The result</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows 7 Ultimate wins again. Kicking penguin butt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows 7 Ultimate wins again .
Kicking penguin butt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows 7 Ultimate wins again.
Kicking penguin butt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207154</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258975680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, Chrome is nothing more than a web browser.</p><p>Chrome Fullscreen (known as "Chrome OS" to retards) is nothing more than the Chrome web browser running on Linux, with the ability to exit it disabled.</p><p>It is not an operating system in any way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , Chrome is nothing more than a web browser.Chrome Fullscreen ( known as " Chrome OS " to retards ) is nothing more than the Chrome web browser running on Linux , with the ability to exit it disabled.It is not an operating system in any way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, Chrome is nothing more than a web browser.Chrome Fullscreen (known as "Chrome OS" to retards) is nothing more than the Chrome web browser running on Linux, with the ability to exit it disabled.It is not an operating system in any way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206458</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1258972920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Google's rebranding of Linux. Perhaps in a few years Linus will be demanding that it be called "Linux/Chrome".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Google 's rebranding of Linux .
Perhaps in a few years Linus will be demanding that it be called " Linux/Chrome " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Google's rebranding of Linux.
Perhaps in a few years Linus will be demanding that it be called "Linux/Chrome".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205232</id>
	<title>"benched"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In sports "benched" usually means taken off the field.  I like this tech usage (benchmarked) -- which is new to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In sports " benched " usually means taken off the field .
I like this tech usage ( benchmarked ) -- which is new to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In sports "benched" usually means taken off the field.
I like this tech usage (benchmarked) -- which is new to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209096</id>
	<title>Re:Program loader, not a true OS</title>
	<author>oxfletch</author>
	<datestamp>1258986180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What on earth makes you think that an OS running a multiprocess browser has no scheduler?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What on earth makes you think that an OS running a multiprocess browser has no scheduler ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What on earth makes you think that an OS running a multiprocess browser has no scheduler?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205700</id>
	<title>Re:If you really care about Linux performance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those "enormous improvements" in the scheduler need to be seen in the context of previous enormous performance regressions.  A lot of the "improvement" is simply returning to earlier standards of performance.  The really positive aspect is that there is now a good test case which will prevent similar regressions passing unnoticed by the kernel developers as happened before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those " enormous improvements " in the scheduler need to be seen in the context of previous enormous performance regressions .
A lot of the " improvement " is simply returning to earlier standards of performance .
The really positive aspect is that there is now a good test case which will prevent similar regressions passing unnoticed by the kernel developers as happened before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those "enormous improvements" in the scheduler need to be seen in the context of previous enormous performance regressions.
A lot of the "improvement" is simply returning to earlier standards of performance.
The really positive aspect is that there is now a good test case which will prevent similar regressions passing unnoticed by the kernel developers as happened before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207432</id>
	<title>Re:How?</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1258976700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But they are the same os. Except one has a web browser and one has a web browser and other actual applications installed. It seems fair to compare them. When is the limitation of choice a design feature?</p><p>Hah! Imagine if M$ only let you install and run internet explorer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But they are the same os .
Except one has a web browser and one has a web browser and other actual applications installed .
It seems fair to compare them .
When is the limitation of choice a design feature ? Hah !
Imagine if M $ only let you install and run internet explorer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But they are the same os.
Except one has a web browser and one has a web browser and other actual applications installed.
It seems fair to compare them.
When is the limitation of choice a design feature?Hah!
Imagine if M$ only let you install and run internet explorer!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564</id>
	<title>Program loader, not a true OS</title>
	<author>zorro-z</author>
	<datestamp>1258968780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I watched the Google Chrome OS rollout, it occurred to me that, when it comes down to it, Chrome isn't so much a full OS as it is a program loader, a la DOS. As the presenter explained, most of what an OS does Chrome *won't* do- no scheduler, no other apps, barely a file system, etc. What it will do is load a Web browser, and then get out of the way. That strikes me as rather similar to the experience I had back in the day using SLIPNot to simulate a graphical browser over a SLIP connection.</p><p>This isn't a criticism; far from it. It may just be that precisely what netbooks need is a program loader to start a Web browser + then get out of the way, rather than a full-fledged OS to tax their limited- by design- resources.</p><p>Now, if I could just find a way to load SLIPNot on my Eee...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I watched the Google Chrome OS rollout , it occurred to me that , when it comes down to it , Chrome is n't so much a full OS as it is a program loader , a la DOS .
As the presenter explained , most of what an OS does Chrome * wo n't * do- no scheduler , no other apps , barely a file system , etc .
What it will do is load a Web browser , and then get out of the way .
That strikes me as rather similar to the experience I had back in the day using SLIPNot to simulate a graphical browser over a SLIP connection.This is n't a criticism ; far from it .
It may just be that precisely what netbooks need is a program loader to start a Web browser + then get out of the way , rather than a full-fledged OS to tax their limited- by design- resources.Now , if I could just find a way to load SLIPNot on my Eee.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I watched the Google Chrome OS rollout, it occurred to me that, when it comes down to it, Chrome isn't so much a full OS as it is a program loader, a la DOS.
As the presenter explained, most of what an OS does Chrome *won't* do- no scheduler, no other apps, barely a file system, etc.
What it will do is load a Web browser, and then get out of the way.
That strikes me as rather similar to the experience I had back in the day using SLIPNot to simulate a graphical browser over a SLIP connection.This isn't a criticism; far from it.
It may just be that precisely what netbooks need is a program loader to start a Web browser + then get out of the way, rather than a full-fledged OS to tax their limited- by design- resources.Now, if I could just find a way to load SLIPNot on my Eee...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205384</id>
	<title>Re:Feh</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258967760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news\_item&amp;px=NzY1MA" title="phoronix.com">http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news\_item&amp;px=NzY1MA</a> [phoronix.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.phoronix.com/scan.php ? page = news \ _item&amp;px = NzY1MA [ phoronix.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news\_item&amp;px=NzY1MA [phoronix.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209644</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258991280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There's Android O/S, which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser, that's incompatible with Chromium.</p></div><p>Do you even understand the words of ignorance coming out of your mouth?   Learn about Android before stating it is a Linux destro with a browser, FFS.  http://developer.android.com</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's Android O/S , which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser , that 's incompatible with Chromium.Do you even understand the words of ignorance coming out of your mouth ?
Learn about Android before stating it is a Linux destro with a browser , FFS .
http : //developer.android.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's Android O/S, which is pretty much just a Linux distro with a browser, that's incompatible with Chromium.Do you even understand the words of ignorance coming out of your mouth?
Learn about Android before stating it is a Linux destro with a browser, FFS.
http://developer.android.com
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205096</id>
	<title>How?</title>
	<author>Spety</author>
	<datestamp>1259008920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are CPU and memory usage statistics even available in the current build of Chrome OS? I don't remember seeing them when I ran the version that was posted as a VMWare image.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are CPU and memory usage statistics even available in the current build of Chrome OS ?
I do n't remember seeing them when I ran the version that was posted as a VMWare image .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are CPU and memory usage statistics even available in the current build of Chrome OS?
I don't remember seeing them when I ran the version that was posted as a VMWare image.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205188</id>
	<title>More FUD paid for by M$</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4 comments and no M$ hate? What kind of slashdot article is this!?!?</p><p>Next you're gonna expect me to read the article!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4 comments and no M $ hate ?
What kind of slashdot article is this ! ? !
? Next you 're gon na expect me to read the article !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4 comments and no M$ hate?
What kind of slashdot article is this!?!
?Next you're gonna expect me to read the article!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205412</id>
	<title>Re:How?</title>
	<author>wizardforce</author>
	<datestamp>1258967880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if it was, Chrome isn't in the same game that Fedora, Ubuntu and Opensuse are.  Chrome is designed to rely heavily on net applications, the others are designed to rely much more on the desktop.  Comparing them to Chrome is nothing less than comparing Apples to Oranges.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if it was , Chrome is n't in the same game that Fedora , Ubuntu and Opensuse are .
Chrome is designed to rely heavily on net applications , the others are designed to rely much more on the desktop .
Comparing them to Chrome is nothing less than comparing Apples to Oranges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if it was, Chrome isn't in the same game that Fedora, Ubuntu and Opensuse are.
Chrome is designed to rely heavily on net applications, the others are designed to rely much more on the desktop.
Comparing them to Chrome is nothing less than comparing Apples to Oranges.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178</id>
	<title>If you really care about Linux performance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's been an <a href="http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/?p=185" title="multimedia.cx">enormous improvement in the Linux scheduler in recent months</a> [multimedia.cx]--in some cases the performance improvements are as high as 60-80\% with simple multithreaded apps like video encoders.  The instant 2.6.32 comes out officially, expect to start seeing some completely absurd results in stupid "comparisons between Linux distros" like these, where the distros that happened to update to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.32 trash the ones that haven't yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's been an enormous improvement in the Linux scheduler in recent months [ multimedia.cx ] --in some cases the performance improvements are as high as 60-80 \ % with simple multithreaded apps like video encoders .
The instant 2.6.32 comes out officially , expect to start seeing some completely absurd results in stupid " comparisons between Linux distros " like these , where the distros that happened to update to .32 trash the ones that have n't yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's been an enormous improvement in the Linux scheduler in recent months [multimedia.cx]--in some cases the performance improvements are as high as 60-80\% with simple multithreaded apps like video encoders.
The instant 2.6.32 comes out officially, expect to start seeing some completely absurd results in stupid "comparisons between Linux distros" like these, where the distros that happened to update to .32 trash the ones that haven't yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205252</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But that leaves chromeOS as a system that perform like other distros while having less functionality. It sure may be easier to use - less functionality means less things that can break or confuse users, but frustrating when its limits are reached. Good for locked down corporate terminals, but not very exciting for me.</p><p>MS carefully avoids to use the king argument for windows&gt; we got the games. It is another factor that doesnt help Chrome. Linux manages to have a handful of good games and can run some win ones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But that leaves chromeOS as a system that perform like other distros while having less functionality .
It sure may be easier to use - less functionality means less things that can break or confuse users , but frustrating when its limits are reached .
Good for locked down corporate terminals , but not very exciting for me.MS carefully avoids to use the king argument for windows &gt; we got the games .
It is another factor that doesnt help Chrome .
Linux manages to have a handful of good games and can run some win ones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But that leaves chromeOS as a system that perform like other distros while having less functionality.
It sure may be easier to use - less functionality means less things that can break or confuse users, but frustrating when its limits are reached.
Good for locked down corporate terminals, but not very exciting for me.MS carefully avoids to use the king argument for windows&gt; we got the games.
It is another factor that doesnt help Chrome.
Linux manages to have a handful of good games and can run some win ones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205496</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux is an operating system.  Chrome is a customized linux distrbution and therefore an operating system.  Even if you don't like it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is an operating system .
Chrome is a customized linux distrbution and therefore an operating system .
Even if you do n't like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is an operating system.
Chrome is a customized linux distrbution and therefore an operating system.
Even if you don't like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208658</id>
	<title>Why is Chrome called an OS and not a Linux dist?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258982880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Serious question, I browsed the source tree and immediately came across the same network card drivers from Linux. (the tulip driver)</p><p>So isn't Chrome just a Linux distribution, or is it actually significantly different?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious question , I browsed the source tree and immediately came across the same network card drivers from Linux .
( the tulip driver ) So is n't Chrome just a Linux distribution , or is it actually significantly different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious question, I browsed the source tree and immediately came across the same network card drivers from Linux.
(the tulip driver)So isn't Chrome just a Linux distribution, or is it actually significantly different?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205350</id>
	<title>Re:"benched"</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1258967460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except when "benched" is short for "bench-pressed", as in "He benched 200 pounds."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except when " benched " is short for " bench-pressed " , as in " He benched 200 pounds .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except when "benched" is short for "bench-pressed", as in "He benched 200 pounds.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206834</id>
	<title>general thought</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258974480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chrome OS is long from beta, why bother benchmarking it now? Anyway it's OS who don't do much apart from using mobile phones for exploring the net</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome OS is long from beta , why bother benchmarking it now ?
Anyway it 's OS who do n't do much apart from using mobile phones for exploring the net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome OS is long from beta, why bother benchmarking it now?
Anyway it's OS who don't do much apart from using mobile phones for exploring the net</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30230014</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257153360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>4) There's Chrome itself, whicch is just a browser, without a distro of any kind, and paradoxically, doesn't work on Linux.</p></div><p>It's really ironic that I'm typing this from Chromium running on Ubuntu 9.10<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>4 ) There 's Chrome itself , whicch is just a browser , without a distro of any kind , and paradoxically , does n't work on Linux.It 's really ironic that I 'm typing this from Chromium running on Ubuntu 9.10 : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4) There's Chrome itself, whicch is just a browser, without a distro of any kind, and paradoxically, doesn't work on Linux.It's really ironic that I'm typing this from Chromium running on Ubuntu 9.10 :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208176</id>
	<title>The hidden conclusion from this test</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258980000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>After reading the article, and thinking about the numbers: after all the hype has passed, if you're looking for a good all around featured and decent performing system that has rock-solid stability, large community, and is cater for both users and developers?
<br>
<br>
<br>
OpenSuse 11.2 <i>(and yes, their latest KDE integration is very, very good).</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>After reading the article , and thinking about the numbers : after all the hype has passed , if you 're looking for a good all around featured and decent performing system that has rock-solid stability , large community , and is cater for both users and developers ?
OpenSuse 11.2 ( and yes , their latest KDE integration is very , very good ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After reading the article, and thinking about the numbers: after all the hype has passed, if you're looking for a good all around featured and decent performing system that has rock-solid stability, large community, and is cater for both users and developers?
OpenSuse 11.2 (and yes, their latest KDE integration is very, very good).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206814</id>
	<title>Re:How?</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1258974420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linux and Windows would be oranges and apples.  I think Linux and Chrome might be comparing oranges to tangerines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux and Windows would be oranges and apples .
I think Linux and Chrome might be comparing oranges to tangerines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux and Windows would be oranges and apples.
I think Linux and Chrome might be comparing oranges to tangerines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205412</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206754</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>Runaway1956</author>
	<datestamp>1258974120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But, don't forget - it's open source.  I browsed through the file system.  It's Linux.  No matter what Google finally releases as the "official" ChromeOS release, all of us abnormal geeky types can go in and tweak to our heart's content.  Look for unofficial ChromeOS releases soon after - or maybe even BEFORE - Google releases version 1.0</p><p>Isn't that kinda similar to the war Slackware got it's start?  Some dude wanted Linux to do something that the official releases weren't doing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But , do n't forget - it 's open source .
I browsed through the file system .
It 's Linux .
No matter what Google finally releases as the " official " ChromeOS release , all of us abnormal geeky types can go in and tweak to our heart 's content .
Look for unofficial ChromeOS releases soon after - or maybe even BEFORE - Google releases version 1.0Is n't that kinda similar to the war Slackware got it 's start ?
Some dude wanted Linux to do something that the official releases were n't doing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, don't forget - it's open source.
I browsed through the file system.
It's Linux.
No matter what Google finally releases as the "official" ChromeOS release, all of us abnormal geeky types can go in and tweak to our heart's content.
Look for unofficial ChromeOS releases soon after - or maybe even BEFORE - Google releases version 1.0Isn't that kinda similar to the war Slackware got it's start?
Some dude wanted Linux to do something that the official releases weren't doing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209516</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>collinstocks</author>
	<datestamp>1258990020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Chrome (the browser) actually does run on Linux. It even has flash and java support now.</p><p>I added the chromium-daily repository, and everything is stable and works fine.</p><p><a href="https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa" title="launchpad.net">https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa</a> [launchpad.net]</p><p>By the way, I still use firefox for the most part. Adblock plus is nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Chrome ( the browser ) actually does run on Linux .
It even has flash and java support now.I added the chromium-daily repository , and everything is stable and works fine.https : //launchpad.net/ ~ chromium-daily/ + archive/ppa [ launchpad.net ] By the way , I still use firefox for the most part .
Adblock plus is nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Chrome (the browser) actually does run on Linux.
It even has flash and java support now.I added the chromium-daily repository, and everything is stable and works fine.https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa [launchpad.net]By the way, I still use firefox for the most part.
Adblock plus is nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207276</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1258976160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why reinvent the wheel? Linux has had millions of dollars invested in its development over the years and is stable, reasonably efficient, and well documented. To start out from scratch would take years of development time. Why do you think that linux is becoming so prolific on so many different devices? It runs on any remotely modern processor under the sun. Actually, that is why I am so disappointed in all of this in a way. This is simply a rebadging that does little to credit all of the people that got linux and GNU to where they are today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why reinvent the wheel ?
Linux has had millions of dollars invested in its development over the years and is stable , reasonably efficient , and well documented .
To start out from scratch would take years of development time .
Why do you think that linux is becoming so prolific on so many different devices ?
It runs on any remotely modern processor under the sun .
Actually , that is why I am so disappointed in all of this in a way .
This is simply a rebadging that does little to credit all of the people that got linux and GNU to where they are today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why reinvent the wheel?
Linux has had millions of dollars invested in its development over the years and is stable, reasonably efficient, and well documented.
To start out from scratch would take years of development time.
Why do you think that linux is becoming so prolific on so many different devices?
It runs on any remotely modern processor under the sun.
Actually, that is why I am so disappointed in all of this in a way.
This is simply a rebadging that does little to credit all of the people that got linux and GNU to where they are today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206500</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250</id>
	<title>Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Face it, "Chrome OS" isn't an operating system in any way. It's a web browser running on a Linux distribution. Nothing more, nothing less.</p><p>A more appropriate name for it is "Chrome Fullscreen".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Face it , " Chrome OS " is n't an operating system in any way .
It 's a web browser running on a Linux distribution .
Nothing more , nothing less.A more appropriate name for it is " Chrome Fullscreen " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Face it, "Chrome OS" isn't an operating system in any way.
It's a web browser running on a Linux distribution.
Nothing more, nothing less.A more appropriate name for it is "Chrome Fullscreen".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206698</id>
	<title>Re:Let's stop calling it "Chrome OS".</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1258973880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Face it, "Chrome OS" isn't an operating system in any way. It's a web browser running on a Linux distribution.</p><p>Chrome OS is an operating system. Specifically, it is specialized a Linux distribution where the in place of a traditional desktop environment, a variation of the Chrome browser is sued. Since a specialized Linux distribution <i>is</i> an operating system, so is Chrome OS.</p><p>It may not do what you want out an operating system to do, and that may make it a <i>bad</i> operating system for your use. That doesn't make it <i>not</i> an operating system, however.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Face it , " Chrome OS " is n't an operating system in any way .
It 's a web browser running on a Linux distribution.Chrome OS is an operating system .
Specifically , it is specialized a Linux distribution where the in place of a traditional desktop environment , a variation of the Chrome browser is sued .
Since a specialized Linux distribution is an operating system , so is Chrome OS.It may not do what you want out an operating system to do , and that may make it a bad operating system for your use .
That does n't make it not an operating system , however .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Face it, "Chrome OS" isn't an operating system in any way.
It's a web browser running on a Linux distribution.Chrome OS is an operating system.
Specifically, it is specialized a Linux distribution where the in place of a traditional desktop environment, a variation of the Chrome browser is sued.
Since a specialized Linux distribution is an operating system, so is Chrome OS.It may not do what you want out an operating system to do, and that may make it a bad operating system for your use.
That doesn't make it not an operating system, however.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205470</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1258968180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given the number of times that Ext4 is mentioned in Chrome's publicly released design docs, I'd be inclined to suspect that they just haven't bothered to configure it with Ext4 yet, at least not in the publicly released build.<br> <br>

Either that, or the left hand and the right hand need to have a little sit down and chat in the immediate future...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the number of times that Ext4 is mentioned in Chrome 's publicly released design docs , I 'd be inclined to suspect that they just have n't bothered to configure it with Ext4 yet , at least not in the publicly released build .
Either that , or the left hand and the right hand need to have a little sit down and chat in the immediate future.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the number of times that Ext4 is mentioned in Chrome's publicly released design docs, I'd be inclined to suspect that they just haven't bothered to configure it with Ext4 yet, at least not in the publicly released build.
Either that, or the left hand and the right hand need to have a little sit down and chat in the immediate future...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205148</id>
	<title>The most boring benchmarking ever.</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1259009220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the distros were very close in performance with the exception of one or two benchmarks. 10\% is not a perceptable difference. Wake me up when Chrome fever is over and something interesting is posted about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the distros were very close in performance with the exception of one or two benchmarks .
10 \ % is not a perceptable difference .
Wake me up when Chrome fever is over and something interesting is posted about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the distros were very close in performance with the exception of one or two benchmarks.
10\% is not a perceptable difference.
Wake me up when Chrome fever is over and something interesting is posted about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209408</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.Christmas gifts,shoes, handbags,ugg</title>
	<author>coolforsale122</author>
	<datestamp>1258988880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com] (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206462</id>
	<title>Re:Program loader, not a true OS</title>
	<author>pavon</author>
	<datestamp>1258972920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well since Chromium is basically the Chrome Browser running on Linux/X11, I see it as more like GEM or Windows 3.11, except it lacks tiled windows and has a fairly primitive API.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well since Chromium is basically the Chrome Browser running on Linux/X11 , I see it as more like GEM or Windows 3.11 , except it lacks tiled windows and has a fairly primitive API .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well since Chromium is basically the Chrome Browser running on Linux/X11, I see it as more like GEM or Windows 3.11, except it lacks tiled windows and has a fairly primitive API.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206130</id>
	<title>Too many pages</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258971540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>7 pages? k thx bye.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>7 pages ?
k thx bye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7 pages?
k thx bye.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</id>
	<title>Shocking.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259008680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Similar linux kernels perform mostly similarly on identical hardware, except for the pre-production one that they probably haven't bothered to polish for any particular real-world hardware yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Similar linux kernels perform mostly similarly on identical hardware , except for the pre-production one that they probably have n't bothered to polish for any particular real-world hardware yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Similar linux kernels perform mostly similarly on identical hardware, except for the pre-production one that they probably haven't bothered to polish for any particular real-world hardware yet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206032</id>
	<title>Dualboot.</title>
	<author>nomorecwrd</author>
	<datestamp>1258971120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think ChromeOS will be very useful as a second boot choice, when you are in a hurry (airport, hotspot, whatever)  and need some info on the internet quick. Just turn on your netbook and get your info in a few seconds. To do the real job you have the OS of your choice as the primary boot (Linux or Windows)<br>
<br>
I know, I know, you can always use hibernation and be also ready in a few more seconds, but note every note(net)book likes the hibernation. <br>
<br>
Just my 2 pesos.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think ChromeOS will be very useful as a second boot choice , when you are in a hurry ( airport , hotspot , whatever ) and need some info on the internet quick .
Just turn on your netbook and get your info in a few seconds .
To do the real job you have the OS of your choice as the primary boot ( Linux or Windows ) I know , I know , you can always use hibernation and be also ready in a few more seconds , but note every note ( net ) book likes the hibernation .
Just my 2 pesos .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think ChromeOS will be very useful as a second boot choice, when you are in a hurry (airport, hotspot, whatever)  and need some info on the internet quick.
Just turn on your netbook and get your info in a few seconds.
To do the real job you have the OS of your choice as the primary boot (Linux or Windows)

I know, I know, you can always use hibernation and be also ready in a few more seconds, but note every note(net)book likes the hibernation.
Just my 2 pesos.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209090</id>
	<title>.CX RICKROLL LINK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258986120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NICE TRY!</p><p>Get a real TLD next time<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NICE TRY ! Get a real TLD next time : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NICE TRY!Get a real TLD next time :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206500</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258973100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Speaking of which, I wonder why they went with the linux kernel and didn't try doing something new?  I mean, you'd think with the ridiculous resources they have and all the top-flight programmers they hire, they could have come up with something new and improved.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Speaking of which , I wonder why they went with the linux kernel and did n't try doing something new ?
I mean , you 'd think with the ridiculous resources they have and all the top-flight programmers they hire , they could have come up with something new and improved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Speaking of which, I wonder why they went with the linux kernel and didn't try doing something new?
I mean, you'd think with the ridiculous resources they have and all the top-flight programmers they hire, they could have come up with something new and improved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205408</id>
	<title>Phoronix, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258967880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can give you the results from any Phoronix benchmark article: Ubuntu won.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can give you the results from any Phoronix benchmark article : Ubuntu won .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can give you the results from any Phoronix benchmark article: Ubuntu won.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205294</id>
	<title>Re:Feh</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1258967040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phoronix is a Unix, Linux, Solaris site, they never bother with testing windows. The results would be of little interest to their target audience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phoronix is a Unix , Linux , Solaris site , they never bother with testing windows .
The results would be of little interest to their target audience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phoronix is a Unix, Linux, Solaris site, they never bother with testing windows.
The results would be of little interest to their target audience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205632</id>
	<title>Not the banchmarks I care for.</title>
	<author>Requiem18th</author>
	<datestamp>1258969200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While Ubuntu Netbook Remix (soon to be "Edition") owns Moblin in most graphs the reason I switched to moblin was because of its fast start up, about about 20 seconds.</p><p>Another distro xPUD boots in about 10 seconds, but flash doesn't work out of the box.</p><p>However, while youtube runs beautifully in moblin (including fullscreen!) other flash games are too slow and there is still no shockwave, so what I want is a linux that boots fast, runs flash ok and runs shockwave somehow (maybe with wine?) and the more of these features that run out of the box the better, for anything else I can use the terminal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While Ubuntu Netbook Remix ( soon to be " Edition " ) owns Moblin in most graphs the reason I switched to moblin was because of its fast start up , about about 20 seconds.Another distro xPUD boots in about 10 seconds , but flash does n't work out of the box.However , while youtube runs beautifully in moblin ( including fullscreen !
) other flash games are too slow and there is still no shockwave , so what I want is a linux that boots fast , runs flash ok and runs shockwave somehow ( maybe with wine ?
) and the more of these features that run out of the box the better , for anything else I can use the terminal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While Ubuntu Netbook Remix (soon to be "Edition") owns Moblin in most graphs the reason I switched to moblin was because of its fast start up, about about 20 seconds.Another distro xPUD boots in about 10 seconds, but flash doesn't work out of the box.However, while youtube runs beautifully in moblin (including fullscreen!
) other flash games are too slow and there is still no shockwave, so what I want is a linux that boots fast, runs flash ok and runs shockwave somehow (maybe with wine?
) and the more of these features that run out of the box the better, for anything else I can use the terminal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30217446</id>
	<title>Re:Program loader, not a true OS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259094840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Chrome isn't so much a full OS as it is a program loader, a la DOS</p></div><p>Disk Operating System isn't an operating system?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chrome is n't so much a full OS as it is a program loader , a la DOSDisk Operating System is n't an operating system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chrome isn't so much a full OS as it is a program loader, a la DOSDisk Operating System isn't an operating system?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205960</id>
	<title>Re:If you really care about Linux performance...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258970760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cool.  I just installed the 2.6.32 kernel from Ubuntu Lucid (I'm running Karmic, BTW) and the performance is better when using Handbrake/x264.  Previously my machine was 30-40\% idle when encoding where now it's 10-15\% idle.  I'm seeing about a 30-40\% decrease in overall encoding time.</p><p>I have been doing a lot of x264 encoding lately so a boost in performance is great.  I know one thing that helps is disabling the "ondemand" CPU frequency scaling.  I hate that damn thing.  The problem is that the OS will move processes around to different CPU cores so the ondemand thing keeps flipping the cores between different speeds.  Since that speed switching isn't instantaneous you see a dip in performance as each processor changes its clock (run the openssl benchmarks with ondemand enabled and disabled and you will see the difference in speed).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cool .
I just installed the 2.6.32 kernel from Ubuntu Lucid ( I 'm running Karmic , BTW ) and the performance is better when using Handbrake/x264 .
Previously my machine was 30-40 \ % idle when encoding where now it 's 10-15 \ % idle .
I 'm seeing about a 30-40 \ % decrease in overall encoding time.I have been doing a lot of x264 encoding lately so a boost in performance is great .
I know one thing that helps is disabling the " ondemand " CPU frequency scaling .
I hate that damn thing .
The problem is that the OS will move processes around to different CPU cores so the ondemand thing keeps flipping the cores between different speeds .
Since that speed switching is n't instantaneous you see a dip in performance as each processor changes its clock ( run the openssl benchmarks with ondemand enabled and disabled and you will see the difference in speed ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cool.
I just installed the 2.6.32 kernel from Ubuntu Lucid (I'm running Karmic, BTW) and the performance is better when using Handbrake/x264.
Previously my machine was 30-40\% idle when encoding where now it's 10-15\% idle.
I'm seeing about a 30-40\% decrease in overall encoding time.I have been doing a lot of x264 encoding lately so a boost in performance is great.
I know one thing that helps is disabling the "ondemand" CPU frequency scaling.
I hate that damn thing.
The problem is that the OS will move processes around to different CPU cores so the ondemand thing keeps flipping the cores between different speeds.
Since that speed switching isn't instantaneous you see a dip in performance as each processor changes its clock (run the openssl benchmarks with ondemand enabled and disabled and you will see the difference in speed).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209068</id>
	<title>Re:Shocking.</title>
	<author>supremebob</author>
	<datestamp>1258985820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah... they benchmarked 2 regular Linux distributions, versus 2 netbook Linux distributions, verses a beta netbook Linux distribution. Not surprisingly, they all performed within 5\% of each other.</p><p>This article would have been a lot more interesting to read if they included Mac OS X, Windows 7, and Windows XP in the mix for some of the application testing. A lot of the applications that they tested with (like 7 zip) are available on all of the platforms, making some of these tests a fair comparison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah... they benchmarked 2 regular Linux distributions , versus 2 netbook Linux distributions , verses a beta netbook Linux distribution .
Not surprisingly , they all performed within 5 \ % of each other.This article would have been a lot more interesting to read if they included Mac OS X , Windows 7 , and Windows XP in the mix for some of the application testing .
A lot of the applications that they tested with ( like 7 zip ) are available on all of the platforms , making some of these tests a fair comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah... they benchmarked 2 regular Linux distributions, versus 2 netbook Linux distributions, verses a beta netbook Linux distribution.
Not surprisingly, they all performed within 5\% of each other.This article would have been a lot more interesting to read if they included Mac OS X, Windows 7, and Windows XP in the mix for some of the application testing.
A lot of the applications that they tested with (like 7 zip) are available on all of the platforms, making some of these tests a fair comparison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30216512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30217446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205144
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30230014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_1754241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205412
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211352
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206500
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206458
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208090
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205496
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30207154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30208494
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30216512
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30211342
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209644
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30230014
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206698
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206754
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_1754241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30205564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30217446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30206462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_1754241.30209096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
