<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_23_147258</id>
	<title>William Gibson's Neuromancer Staged With Porn Star</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1258986420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>destinyland writes <i>"Sunday night saw a <a href="http://www.newmuseum.org/events/384">reading of the William Gibson's classic cyberpunk novel</a> featuring porn star Sasha Grey at a New York art museum, along with sculpture-props simulating virtual reality.  Artist Brody Condon promised to combine 'Gibson's 1980s dystopian techno-fetishism with early twentieth-century abstraction,' but <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/editors-blog/neuromancer-porn-star-sasha-grey-molly">the editor of H+ magazine challenges that description</a>.  'In a 1993 interview, Gibson himself told me: "I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993... There are so many places in the world today that are so much crappier than anything I'm writing about."' And earlier this month William Gibson <a href="http://twitter.com/GreatDismal/status/5657480958">shared his response</a> to a blog post about the event. 'Gol' dang! It's news to me!'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>destinyland writes " Sunday night saw a reading of the William Gibson 's classic cyberpunk novel featuring porn star Sasha Grey at a New York art museum , along with sculpture-props simulating virtual reality .
Artist Brody Condon promised to combine 'Gibson 's 1980s dystopian techno-fetishism with early twentieth-century abstraction, ' but the editor of H + magazine challenges that description .
'In a 1993 interview , Gibson himself told me : " I think my world looks dystopian if you 're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993... There are so many places in the world today that are so much crappier than anything I 'm writing about .
" ' And earlier this month William Gibson shared his response to a blog post about the event .
'Gol ' dang !
It 's news to me !
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>destinyland writes "Sunday night saw a reading of the William Gibson's classic cyberpunk novel featuring porn star Sasha Grey at a New York art museum, along with sculpture-props simulating virtual reality.
Artist Brody Condon promised to combine 'Gibson's 1980s dystopian techno-fetishism with early twentieth-century abstraction,' but the editor of H+ magazine challenges that description.
'In a 1993 interview, Gibson himself told me: "I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993... There are so many places in the world today that are so much crappier than anything I'm writing about.
"' And earlier this month William Gibson shared his response to a blog post about the event.
'Gol' dang!
It's news to me!
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203756</id>
	<title>Guys... It's an NYC Performance Art Piece...!</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1259001240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...which puts it roughly on professional par with a Community Theater production of <i>Guys and Dolls</i> in Toledo, except you don't leave the theater humming any of the tunes.</p><p>And I'm not just being snarky... I remember my last such show in SoHo: the second act began with the performer crawling out of a giant garbage bag (featuring real garbage), singing a song about former UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick set to the tune of "Mr. Sandman" (that's Chordettes, not Metallica, as in "bung bung bung bung BUNG BUNG bung bung BUNG BUNG bung BUNG BUNG...!").</p><p>Anybody -- ANYBODY! -- ANNN-NEEE-BODY!!! -- and I've dated more than my share, yet have somehow avoided therapy -- can have a "One Woman Show" in NYC (which looks great on a resume, of course); all you need to do is rent a theater  (of which there are hundreds available -- it's a cottage industry) and, ummm, believe in yourself...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...which puts it roughly on professional par with a Community Theater production of Guys and Dolls in Toledo , except you do n't leave the theater humming any of the tunes.And I 'm not just being snarky... I remember my last such show in SoHo : the second act began with the performer crawling out of a giant garbage bag ( featuring real garbage ) , singing a song about former UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick set to the tune of " Mr. Sandman " ( that 's Chordettes , not Metallica , as in " bung bung bung bung BUNG BUNG bung bung BUNG BUNG bung BUNG BUNG... !
" ) .Anybody -- ANYBODY !
-- ANNN-NEEE-BODY ! ! !
-- and I 've dated more than my share , yet have somehow avoided therapy -- can have a " One Woman Show " in NYC ( which looks great on a resume , of course ) ; all you need to do is rent a theater ( of which there are hundreds available -- it 's a cottage industry ) and , ummm , believe in yourself.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...which puts it roughly on professional par with a Community Theater production of Guys and Dolls in Toledo, except you don't leave the theater humming any of the tunes.And I'm not just being snarky... I remember my last such show in SoHo: the second act began with the performer crawling out of a giant garbage bag (featuring real garbage), singing a song about former UN Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick set to the tune of "Mr. Sandman" (that's Chordettes, not Metallica, as in "bung bung bung bung BUNG BUNG bung bung BUNG BUNG bung BUNG BUNG...!
").Anybody -- ANYBODY!
-- ANNN-NEEE-BODY!!!
-- and I've dated more than my share, yet have somehow avoided therapy -- can have a "One Woman Show" in NYC (which looks great on a resume, of course); all you need to do is rent a theater  (of which there are hundreds available -- it's a cottage industry) and, ummm, believe in yourself...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202060</id>
	<title>Re:They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>King\_TJ</author>
	<datestamp>1258991940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed....  The fact that you can point to even worse situations or living conditions somewhere doesn't mean the fictional world being described in a book like 1984 or Brave New World is any less disturbing or "bad".</p><p>In fact, one can often infer that even in those fictional worlds, there are probably still places where people have things worse off than in the cities they're describing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed.... The fact that you can point to even worse situations or living conditions somewhere does n't mean the fictional world being described in a book like 1984 or Brave New World is any less disturbing or " bad " .In fact , one can often infer that even in those fictional worlds , there are probably still places where people have things worse off than in the cities they 're describing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed....  The fact that you can point to even worse situations or living conditions somewhere doesn't mean the fictional world being described in a book like 1984 or Brave New World is any less disturbing or "bad".In fact, one can often infer that even in those fictional worlds, there are probably still places where people have things worse off than in the cities they're describing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201874</id>
	<title>Re:Not a play, just</title>
	<author>Terminus32</author>
	<datestamp>1258990980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the film even in production yet?<br>I read the book for the first time recently, brilliant stuff!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the film even in production yet ? I read the book for the first time recently , brilliant stuff !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the film even in production yet?I read the book for the first time recently, brilliant stuff!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204924</id>
	<title>Re:I want to take der jerbs!</title>
	<author>Anonymusing</author>
	<datestamp>1259007900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Hey, I have some lovely post-post-post modern retro-reconstructionist works that would make a great display somewhere. They fractalize the repetitive nature of our increasingly vapid 21st century existences via surrealist digital sculpture and open mike poetry reads by fast fading reality TV pseduocelebrities.</i>
</p><p>I have no mod points, but this made me laugh.  Thanks.  (former art major here!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , I have some lovely post-post-post modern retro-reconstructionist works that would make a great display somewhere .
They fractalize the repetitive nature of our increasingly vapid 21st century existences via surrealist digital sculpture and open mike poetry reads by fast fading reality TV pseduocelebrities .
I have no mod points , but this made me laugh .
Thanks. ( former art major here !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Hey, I have some lovely post-post-post modern retro-reconstructionist works that would make a great display somewhere.
They fractalize the repetitive nature of our increasingly vapid 21st century existences via surrealist digital sculpture and open mike poetry reads by fast fading reality TV pseduocelebrities.
I have no mod points, but this made me laugh.
Thanks.  (former art major here!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202162</id>
	<title>Re:They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258992480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who wouldn't want to live in Brave New World?  It's a society based on instant gratification all the time.  Sounds like heaven on earth to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would n't want to live in Brave New World ?
It 's a society based on instant gratification all the time .
Sounds like heaven on earth to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who wouldn't want to live in Brave New World?
It's a society based on instant gratification all the time.
Sounds like heaven on earth to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201758</id>
	<title>Queen of 'Loser Porn' - Yawn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258990560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sasha Grey is the Queen of Loser Porn.</p><p>Amazing to see that in 2009 movie makers would still be trying something as stupid as hoping that casting some second tier porn skank is going to help hype and sell their film.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sasha Grey is the Queen of Loser Porn.Amazing to see that in 2009 movie makers would still be trying something as stupid as hoping that casting some second tier porn skank is going to help hype and sell their film .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sasha Grey is the Queen of Loser Porn.Amazing to see that in 2009 movie makers would still be trying something as stupid as hoping that casting some second tier porn skank is going to help hype and sell their film.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</id>
	<title>Middle class "white guy?"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258992780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That kind of uncritical asinine blather never ceases to tweak me. Middle class anyone, Gibson, you tool. It's amazing that people spout (and think) racist shit like this, and it is left bare, unchallenged, validated by silence thus tacit approval. Fuck that. The assumption is what? If you're middle class but not white that your perspective is different? GMAFB. If you're middle class and white, like me, you can't possibly know about destitution? (I came from it).</p><p>Idiocy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That kind of uncritical asinine blather never ceases to tweak me .
Middle class anyone , Gibson , you tool .
It 's amazing that people spout ( and think ) racist shit like this , and it is left bare , unchallenged , validated by silence thus tacit approval .
Fuck that .
The assumption is what ?
If you 're middle class but not white that your perspective is different ?
GMAFB. If you 're middle class and white , like me , you ca n't possibly know about destitution ?
( I came from it ) .Idiocy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That kind of uncritical asinine blather never ceases to tweak me.
Middle class anyone, Gibson, you tool.
It's amazing that people spout (and think) racist shit like this, and it is left bare, unchallenged, validated by silence thus tacit approval.
Fuck that.
The assumption is what?
If you're middle class but not white that your perspective is different?
GMAFB. If you're middle class and white, like me, you can't possibly know about destitution?
(I came from it).Idiocy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203104</id>
	<title>Re:Queen of 'Loser Porn' - Yawn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258997760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll bite, who's a top tier porn star?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bite , who 's a top tier porn star ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bite, who's a top tier porn star?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203044</id>
	<title>comment moderation needed ..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258997400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given the quality of the replies so far, slashdot is sorely in need of commment moderation<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the quality of the replies so far , slashdot is sorely in need of commment moderation . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the quality of the replies so far, slashdot is sorely in need of commment moderation ..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206592</id>
	<title>Re:Middle-class White Guy?</title>
	<author>mochan\_s</author>
	<datestamp>1258973400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; "I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993..."<br>&gt; How about if you are a middle class "black" guy doing reasonably well in 1993?</p><p>I think the white middle class joke comes from psychology. Most experiments that psychology professors did during the last few decades were done on undergraduate students who tended to be white middle class.</p><p>So, all the psychology papers would sort of say, results on white middle class only.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; " I think my world looks dystopian if you 're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993... " &gt; How about if you are a middle class " black " guy doing reasonably well in 1993 ? I think the white middle class joke comes from psychology .
Most experiments that psychology professors did during the last few decades were done on undergraduate students who tended to be white middle class.So , all the psychology papers would sort of say , results on white middle class only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; "I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993..."&gt; How about if you are a middle class "black" guy doing reasonably well in 1993?I think the white middle class joke comes from psychology.
Most experiments that psychology professors did during the last few decades were done on undergraduate students who tended to be white middle class.So, all the psychology papers would sort of say, results on white middle class only.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201836</id>
	<title>I think my world looks dystopian...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258990860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But the world looks utopian if you're a middle class white guy doing Sasha Grey.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But the world looks utopian if you 're a middle class white guy doing Sasha Grey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the world looks utopian if you're a middle class white guy doing Sasha Grey.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202566</id>
	<title>i give this troll an 8 out 10</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1258994880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the contrived outrage: well-played sir</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the contrived outrage : well-played sir</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the contrived outrage: well-played sir</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201952</id>
	<title>Re:Why..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258991400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sasha Grey plays a vitol role in some of the documentaries that we so love to watch in our cellars - that is why.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sasha Grey plays a vitol role in some of the documentaries that we so love to watch in our cellars - that is why .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sasha Grey plays a vitol role in some of the documentaries that we so love to watch in our cellars - that is why.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202380</id>
	<title>Re:Middle class "white guy?"</title>
	<author>Prune</author>
	<datestamp>1258993500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent up.  Best BS-call-out-despite-everyone-else's-blindfolds post I've seen on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. in a year.  Bravo!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up .
Best BS-call-out-despite-everyone-else 's-blindfolds post I 've seen on / .
in a year .
Bravo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up.
Best BS-call-out-despite-everyone-else's-blindfolds post I've seen on /.
in a year.
Bravo!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010</id>
	<title>Middle-class White Guy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258997220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993..."
<p>
How about if you are a middle class "black" guy doing reasonably well in 1993?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think my world looks dystopian if you 're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993... " How about if you are a middle class " black " guy doing reasonably well in 1993 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993..."

How about if you are a middle class "black" guy doing reasonably well in 1993?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203434</id>
	<title>Re:Middle class "white guy?"</title>
	<author>m.ducharme</author>
	<datestamp>1258999380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would say that the world does look different to middle class black people, and even middle class white women, at least in North America. To pretend otherwise to to assume that we've successfully removed all race and gender barriers from our society. But we haven't. You can pretend that everything is all sweetness and light if you like, and that all the injustices of the past have been righted and anyone who says otherwise is just a whiner, but the facts simply don't bear that out. Despite affirmative action, despite equal opportunities, life is still better for white guys in North America than it is for anyone else.</p><p>The fact that you came up from destitution isn't the point. The point is that it's easier for someone to pull themselves up from the gutter if they're white males than it is for anyone else. It's easier to stay out of the gutter if you're a white male, and it's easier to get from the middle class to the upper classes if you're a white male (which is not to say that it's easy, it's been getting harder for all of us to even maintain our financial positions over the last few decades).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say that the world does look different to middle class black people , and even middle class white women , at least in North America .
To pretend otherwise to to assume that we 've successfully removed all race and gender barriers from our society .
But we have n't .
You can pretend that everything is all sweetness and light if you like , and that all the injustices of the past have been righted and anyone who says otherwise is just a whiner , but the facts simply do n't bear that out .
Despite affirmative action , despite equal opportunities , life is still better for white guys in North America than it is for anyone else.The fact that you came up from destitution is n't the point .
The point is that it 's easier for someone to pull themselves up from the gutter if they 're white males than it is for anyone else .
It 's easier to stay out of the gutter if you 're a white male , and it 's easier to get from the middle class to the upper classes if you 're a white male ( which is not to say that it 's easy , it 's been getting harder for all of us to even maintain our financial positions over the last few decades ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say that the world does look different to middle class black people, and even middle class white women, at least in North America.
To pretend otherwise to to assume that we've successfully removed all race and gender barriers from our society.
But we haven't.
You can pretend that everything is all sweetness and light if you like, and that all the injustices of the past have been righted and anyone who says otherwise is just a whiner, but the facts simply don't bear that out.
Despite affirmative action, despite equal opportunities, life is still better for white guys in North America than it is for anyone else.The fact that you came up from destitution isn't the point.
The point is that it's easier for someone to pull themselves up from the gutter if they're white males than it is for anyone else.
It's easier to stay out of the gutter if you're a white male, and it's easier to get from the middle class to the upper classes if you're a white male (which is not to say that it's easy, it's been getting harder for all of us to even maintain our financial positions over the last few decades).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202208</id>
	<title>MMMM Sasha Grey</title>
	<author>Americium</author>
	<datestamp>1258992600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I respect pornstars - is that wrong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I respect pornstars - is that wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I respect pornstars - is that wrong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203392</id>
	<title>Re:They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258999140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Who wouldn't want to live in Brave New World? It's a society based on instant gratification all the time. Sounds like heaven on earth to me.</p></div></blockquote><p>
"Sure as I know anything, I know this: they will try again. Maybe on another world, maybe on this very ground swept clean. A year from now? ten? They'll swing back to the belief that they can <i>make people better.</i> And I do not hold to that."<br>
<br>"I'm going to grant you your greatest wish - I'm going to show you a world without sin."
&lt;/malreynolds&gt;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who would n't want to live in Brave New World ?
It 's a society based on instant gratification all the time .
Sounds like heaven on earth to me .
" Sure as I know anything , I know this : they will try again .
Maybe on another world , maybe on this very ground swept clean .
A year from now ?
ten ? They 'll swing back to the belief that they can make people better .
And I do not hold to that .
" " I 'm going to grant you your greatest wish - I 'm going to show you a world without sin .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who wouldn't want to live in Brave New World?
It's a society based on instant gratification all the time.
Sounds like heaven on earth to me.
"Sure as I know anything, I know this: they will try again.
Maybe on another world, maybe on this very ground swept clean.
A year from now?
ten? They'll swing back to the belief that they can make people better.
And I do not hold to that.
"
"I'm going to grant you your greatest wish - I'm going to show you a world without sin.
"

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204028</id>
	<title>Re:They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259002680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except in 1984 if you were in Somalia, you were pretty much part of a slave caste and your conditions wouldn't have changed regardless of who owned you. You were worth less even than the proles. [Rant] I wonder how many people that reference 1984 actually have read it, much less remember it. People talk about heading into a 1984 society where everyone is monitored and having no freedom but by and large the majority of the population did not experience this in the book. The proles like you and I were just disregarded and left to our devices unless we spoke up or showed some prowness towards helping Big Brother.[/Rant]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except in 1984 if you were in Somalia , you were pretty much part of a slave caste and your conditions would n't have changed regardless of who owned you .
You were worth less even than the proles .
[ Rant ] I wonder how many people that reference 1984 actually have read it , much less remember it .
People talk about heading into a 1984 society where everyone is monitored and having no freedom but by and large the majority of the population did not experience this in the book .
The proles like you and I were just disregarded and left to our devices unless we spoke up or showed some prowness towards helping Big Brother .
[ /Rant ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except in 1984 if you were in Somalia, you were pretty much part of a slave caste and your conditions wouldn't have changed regardless of who owned you.
You were worth less even than the proles.
[Rant] I wonder how many people that reference 1984 actually have read it, much less remember it.
People talk about heading into a 1984 society where everyone is monitored and having no freedom but by and large the majority of the population did not experience this in the book.
The proles like you and I were just disregarded and left to our devices unless we spoke up or showed some prowness towards helping Big Brother.
[/Rant]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206748</id>
	<title>Re:Middle class "white guy?"</title>
	<author>stagg</author>
	<datestamp>1258974060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe that Gibson was implying that middle class, white North Americans are relatively privileged. A member of the middle class who happened to be a woman or was of African or Middle Eastern descent might still suffer from racism and other things that the white man would not.

Furthermore, I do agree that it's fair to say that the middle class is privileged and as a rule doesn't experience extreme poverty. Some do climb out of extreme poverty, but most don't. The average North American also has a rather different idea of what extreme poverty does than someone in say India might.

I actually think that Gibson's comments were remarkably insightful, and already took into account your response.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that Gibson was implying that middle class , white North Americans are relatively privileged .
A member of the middle class who happened to be a woman or was of African or Middle Eastern descent might still suffer from racism and other things that the white man would not .
Furthermore , I do agree that it 's fair to say that the middle class is privileged and as a rule does n't experience extreme poverty .
Some do climb out of extreme poverty , but most do n't .
The average North American also has a rather different idea of what extreme poverty does than someone in say India might .
I actually think that Gibson 's comments were remarkably insightful , and already took into account your response .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that Gibson was implying that middle class, white North Americans are relatively privileged.
A member of the middle class who happened to be a woman or was of African or Middle Eastern descent might still suffer from racism and other things that the white man would not.
Furthermore, I do agree that it's fair to say that the middle class is privileged and as a rule doesn't experience extreme poverty.
Some do climb out of extreme poverty, but most don't.
The average North American also has a rather different idea of what extreme poverty does than someone in say India might.
I actually think that Gibson's comments were remarkably insightful, and already took into account your response.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203260</id>
	<title>Re:"sculpture-props simulating virtual reality"</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1258998420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>sculpture-props simulating virtual reality</i> </p><p>You get the sense that someone doesn't quite grasp the basic concepts.</p></div><p>No, actually, they got it right. Something real styled after something that doesn't exist must be simulated.</p><p>

Thinking about any one of their props hard enough leads me to this train of thought: It's a real object, therefore it is real reality. So it can't be real virtual reality, it has to be simulated virtual reality which is what any real real reality made with real virtual reality in mind has to be, though since it's based on a cyberpunk novel it's really a simulated virtual fictional object, or a non-real non-real non-real object and now my ears are bleeding and I wonder why that is and it's all really real ooooh....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>sculpture-props simulating virtual reality You get the sense that someone does n't quite grasp the basic concepts.No , actually , they got it right .
Something real styled after something that does n't exist must be simulated .
Thinking about any one of their props hard enough leads me to this train of thought : It 's a real object , therefore it is real reality .
So it ca n't be real virtual reality , it has to be simulated virtual reality which is what any real real reality made with real virtual reality in mind has to be , though since it 's based on a cyberpunk novel it 's really a simulated virtual fictional object , or a non-real non-real non-real object and now my ears are bleeding and I wonder why that is and it 's all really real ooooh... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> sculpture-props simulating virtual reality You get the sense that someone doesn't quite grasp the basic concepts.No, actually, they got it right.
Something real styled after something that doesn't exist must be simulated.
Thinking about any one of their props hard enough leads me to this train of thought: It's a real object, therefore it is real reality.
So it can't be real virtual reality, it has to be simulated virtual reality which is what any real real reality made with real virtual reality in mind has to be, though since it's based on a cyberpunk novel it's really a simulated virtual fictional object, or a non-real non-real non-real object and now my ears are bleeding and I wonder why that is and it's all really real ooooh....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202234</id>
	<title>I want to take der jerbs!</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1258992780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where do you get jobs like this? First there's the "MIT artist-in-residence" job where you can send messages into space that will never be received. Now this one where you can prattle on about dystopian piffle hoo-ha and people with higher educations will nod and shake their heads knowingly because they don't want to look unhip, or however you kids describe the squares these days.</p><p>Hey, I have some lovely post-post-post modern retro-reconstructionist works that would make a great display somewhere. They fractalize the repetitive nature of our increasingly vapid 21st century existences via surrealist digital sculpture and open mike poetry reads by fast fading reality TV pseduocelebrities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where do you get jobs like this ?
First there 's the " MIT artist-in-residence " job where you can send messages into space that will never be received .
Now this one where you can prattle on about dystopian piffle hoo-ha and people with higher educations will nod and shake their heads knowingly because they do n't want to look unhip , or however you kids describe the squares these days.Hey , I have some lovely post-post-post modern retro-reconstructionist works that would make a great display somewhere .
They fractalize the repetitive nature of our increasingly vapid 21st century existences via surrealist digital sculpture and open mike poetry reads by fast fading reality TV pseduocelebrities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where do you get jobs like this?
First there's the "MIT artist-in-residence" job where you can send messages into space that will never be received.
Now this one where you can prattle on about dystopian piffle hoo-ha and people with higher educations will nod and shake their heads knowingly because they don't want to look unhip, or however you kids describe the squares these days.Hey, I have some lovely post-post-post modern retro-reconstructionist works that would make a great display somewhere.
They fractalize the repetitive nature of our increasingly vapid 21st century existences via surrealist digital sculpture and open mike poetry reads by fast fading reality TV pseduocelebrities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30211418</id>
	<title>For a more elite cultural critic view, AVN.</title>
	<author>vaguestalker</author>
	<datestamp>1259062680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems that Adult Video Network have outdone themselves as contemporary culture critics... <a href="http://business.avn.com/articles/36788.html" title="avn.com" rel="nofollow">http://business.avn.com/articles/36788.html</a> [avn.com] reads like a Sunday Times supplement, who would have thought?</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that Adult Video Network have outdone themselves as contemporary culture critics... http : //business.avn.com/articles/36788.html [ avn.com ] reads like a Sunday Times supplement , who would have thought ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that Adult Video Network have outdone themselves as contemporary culture critics... http://business.avn.com/articles/36788.html [avn.com] reads like a Sunday Times supplement, who would have thought?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201856</id>
	<title>Article written by...</title>
	<author>\_PimpDaddy7\_</author>
	<datestamp>1258990920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>R.U. Sirius</p><p>This can't be real????</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>R.U .
SiriusThis ca n't be real ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>R.U.
SiriusThis can't be real???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202378</id>
	<title>The middle class</title>
	<author>manekineko2</author>
	<datestamp>1258993500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree the race dropping was uncalled for, but he also was giving this response in an interview, where we can't always pick the perfect words for what we're trying to say.  If he was just trying to draw a distinction between middle class in the privileged (and largely white) West versus the middle class in, say, India where by US standards you're still desperately poor, I don't think it's entirely illegitimate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree the race dropping was uncalled for , but he also was giving this response in an interview , where we ca n't always pick the perfect words for what we 're trying to say .
If he was just trying to draw a distinction between middle class in the privileged ( and largely white ) West versus the middle class in , say , India where by US standards you 're still desperately poor , I do n't think it 's entirely illegitimate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree the race dropping was uncalled for, but he also was giving this response in an interview, where we can't always pick the perfect words for what we're trying to say.
If he was just trying to draw a distinction between middle class in the privileged (and largely white) West versus the middle class in, say, India where by US standards you're still desperately poor, I don't think it's entirely illegitimate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962</id>
	<title>They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258991460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The world of \_1984\_ would look great to someone from Somalia or some of the other hellholes of the world.  \_Brave New World\_ even more so.  Yet they're still both considered dystopian. Same goes for Neuromancer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The world of \ _1984 \ _ would look great to someone from Somalia or some of the other hellholes of the world .
\ _Brave New World \ _ even more so .
Yet they 're still both considered dystopian .
Same goes for Neuromancer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The world of \_1984\_ would look great to someone from Somalia or some of the other hellholes of the world.
\_Brave New World\_ even more so.
Yet they're still both considered dystopian.
Same goes for Neuromancer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202158</id>
	<title>Re:Why..</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1258992480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is this on slashdot?/quote<br>Sasha Grey</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this on slashdot ? /quoteSasha Grey</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this on slashdot?/quoteSasha Grey
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202688</id>
	<title>our core culture</title>
	<author>Tom</author>
	<datestamp>1258995360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Glad to see some celebrities finally appreciating Gibson's work.</p><p>I mean - according to Wikipedia, roughly half of all famous people are porn stars, if you go by pagecount. There's something about that I haven't yet found words for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glad to see some celebrities finally appreciating Gibson 's work.I mean - according to Wikipedia , roughly half of all famous people are porn stars , if you go by pagecount .
There 's something about that I have n't yet found words for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glad to see some celebrities finally appreciating Gibson's work.I mean - according to Wikipedia, roughly half of all famous people are porn stars, if you go by pagecount.
There's something about that I haven't yet found words for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202210</id>
	<title>Better Dys topian then Dat topien</title>
	<author>Zorlon</author>
	<datestamp>1258992600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't the Declaration of Independents and Constitution imply that there is no Utopia hence we need checks and balances.</p><p>Is Dystopia the same as Non-Utopia?</p><p>Whenever someone (or some group) thinks they know what Utopia is, they try to force everybody down the same path.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't the Declaration of Independents and Constitution imply that there is no Utopia hence we need checks and balances.Is Dystopia the same as Non-Utopia ? Whenever someone ( or some group ) thinks they know what Utopia is , they try to force everybody down the same path .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't the Declaration of Independents and Constitution imply that there is no Utopia hence we need checks and balances.Is Dystopia the same as Non-Utopia?Whenever someone (or some group) thinks they know what Utopia is, they try to force everybody down the same path.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30213430</id>
	<title>Re:They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259076720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, aren't you just special.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , are n't you just special .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, aren't you just special.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201798</id>
	<title>"sculpture-props simulating virtual reality"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258990680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>sculpture-props simulating virtual reality</i></p><p>You get the sense that someone doesn't quite grasp the basic concepts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sculpture-props simulating virtual realityYou get the sense that someone does n't quite grasp the basic concepts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sculpture-props simulating virtual realityYou get the sense that someone doesn't quite grasp the basic concepts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202664</id>
	<title>Molly Millions</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258995240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you take into account the mindless sex-doll career of the character Molly, Sasha Grey is an apt choice for the part.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you take into account the mindless sex-doll career of the character Molly , Sasha Grey is an apt choice for the part .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you take into account the mindless sex-doll career of the character Molly, Sasha Grey is an apt choice for the part.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202430</id>
	<title>Dystopian is contextual</title>
	<author>manekineko2</author>
	<datestamp>1258993860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, they're all considered dystopian in the context of the West, but I think his point is astute, that whether something is a dystopia is contextual.  The people living in positions of privilege, i.e. the West, wring their hands over and work hard to prevent these various dystopias from occurring, even while they may be actually working against the interests of the majority of humanity.</p><p>What we have now, if it wasn't reality, could be easily portrayed as a dystopia in a novel.  Worse, the people with power to change things (the powered and moneyed people who are citizens in the first world) are unwilling to consider a lot of possibilities that may be on the table because they seem worse than their own privileged positions, without considering how badly off the majority of humanity is under their current system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , they 're all considered dystopian in the context of the West , but I think his point is astute , that whether something is a dystopia is contextual .
The people living in positions of privilege , i.e .
the West , wring their hands over and work hard to prevent these various dystopias from occurring , even while they may be actually working against the interests of the majority of humanity.What we have now , if it was n't reality , could be easily portrayed as a dystopia in a novel .
Worse , the people with power to change things ( the powered and moneyed people who are citizens in the first world ) are unwilling to consider a lot of possibilities that may be on the table because they seem worse than their own privileged positions , without considering how badly off the majority of humanity is under their current system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, they're all considered dystopian in the context of the West, but I think his point is astute, that whether something is a dystopia is contextual.
The people living in positions of privilege, i.e.
the West, wring their hands over and work hard to prevent these various dystopias from occurring, even while they may be actually working against the interests of the majority of humanity.What we have now, if it wasn't reality, could be easily portrayed as a dystopia in a novel.
Worse, the people with power to change things (the powered and moneyed people who are citizens in the first world) are unwilling to consider a lot of possibilities that may be on the table because they seem worse than their own privileged positions, without considering how badly off the majority of humanity is under their current system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201764</id>
	<title>Shiny Red Ball</title>
	<author>SeeSp0tRun</author>
	<datestamp>1258990560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I didn't RTFA, but from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. alone, I am unsure if this article is about porn or the film itself.  My attention span stopped at...<br>
<br>
I didn't RTFA, but from<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. (you get the idea).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't RTFA , but from / .
alone , I am unsure if this article is about porn or the film itself .
My attention span stopped at.. . I did n't RTFA , but from / .
( you get the idea ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't RTFA, but from /.
alone, I am unsure if this article is about porn or the film itself.
My attention span stopped at...

I didn't RTFA, but from /.
(you get the idea).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203594</id>
	<title>Re:Middle-class White Guy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259000340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993..."</p><p>How about if you are a middle class "black" guy doing reasonably well in 1993?</p></div><p>Realistically, how many middle class black guys were wasting their time reading that crap?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I think my world looks dystopian if you 're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993... " How about if you are a middle class " black " guy doing reasonably well in 1993 ? Realistically , how many middle class black guys were wasting their time reading that crap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I think my world looks dystopian if you're a middle class white guy doing reasonably well in 1993..."How about if you are a middle class "black" guy doing reasonably well in 1993?Realistically, how many middle class black guys were wasting their time reading that crap?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206140</id>
	<title>Re:Middle-class White Guy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258971540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the point was that Gibson *is* a middle-class white guy... he can't really speak about his experience as a black man, can he?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the point was that Gibson * is * a middle-class white guy... he ca n't really speak about his experience as a black man , can he ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the point was that Gibson *is* a middle-class white guy... he can't really speak about his experience as a black man, can he?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204164</id>
	<title>staging events..</title>
	<author>arikol</author>
	<datestamp>1259003460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I could stage a few events with Sasha Grey.. they would not be considered sci-fi (unless the props I were to use would be considered sci-fi... plasma powered "toys" anyone?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could stage a few events with Sasha Grey.. they would not be considered sci-fi ( unless the props I were to use would be considered sci-fi... plasma powered " toys " anyone ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could stage a few events with Sasha Grey.. they would not be considered sci-fi (unless the props I were to use would be considered sci-fi... plasma powered "toys" anyone?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201738</id>
	<title>BY GOLLY, FIRST POST!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258990440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BY GOLLY, FIRST POST!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BY GOLLY , FIRST POST !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BY GOLLY, FIRST POST!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202778</id>
	<title>Old</title>
	<author>Das Auge</author>
	<datestamp>1258996020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're only as old as the woman you feel. - W. C. Fields</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're only as old as the woman you feel .
- W. C. Fields</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're only as old as the woman you feel.
- W. C. Fields</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201740</id>
	<title>Not a play, just</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258990440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"The performance event... occurring at the new museum is a deadpan reading of Gibson's reading, not a theatre piece. "</p></div></blockquote><p>.</p><p>Rats</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The performance event... occurring at the new museum is a deadpan reading of Gibson 's reading , not a theatre piece .
" .Rats</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The performance event... occurring at the new museum is a deadpan reading of Gibson's reading, not a theatre piece.
".Rats
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202666</id>
	<title>Re:I think my world looks dystopian...</title>
	<author>Lord Kano</author>
	<datestamp>1258995240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>But the world looks utopian if you're a middle class white guy doing Sasha Grey.</i></p><p>Yes, because we all know how hard it is for middle class white men in western society.</p><p>LK</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But the world looks utopian if you 're a middle class white guy doing Sasha Grey.Yes , because we all know how hard it is for middle class white men in western society.LK</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But the world looks utopian if you're a middle class white guy doing Sasha Grey.Yes, because we all know how hard it is for middle class white men in western society.LK</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202062</id>
	<title>Re:Article written by...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258991940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too real, unfortunately.  And beyond stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too real , unfortunately .
And beyond stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too real, unfortunately.
And beyond stupid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201956</id>
	<title>I saw this...</title>
	<author>PortWineBoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258991460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was at the reading yesterday as part of my sojourns around Performa 09.

No one else recognized her (that I could tell) in the audience, but it was a durational piece and I was only there a half hour.

I was almost positive it was her, but she had these huge sunglasses on and I couldn't be sure...and it didn't seem like a good question to just ask a random chick at a performance piece while I was there with my gf...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was at the reading yesterday as part of my sojourns around Performa 09 .
No one else recognized her ( that I could tell ) in the audience , but it was a durational piece and I was only there a half hour .
I was almost positive it was her , but she had these huge sunglasses on and I could n't be sure...and it did n't seem like a good question to just ask a random chick at a performance piece while I was there with my gf.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was at the reading yesterday as part of my sojourns around Performa 09.
No one else recognized her (that I could tell) in the audience, but it was a durational piece and I was only there a half hour.
I was almost positive it was her, but she had these huge sunglasses on and I couldn't be sure...and it didn't seem like a good question to just ask a random chick at a performance piece while I was there with my gf...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202384</id>
	<title>Re:They're Still Dystopian</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258993500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>those of us that value liberty and individuality.
<br> <br>A dying breed, I know.</htmltext>
<tokenext>those of us that value liberty and individuality .
A dying breed , I know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>those of us that value liberty and individuality.
A dying breed, I know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204396</id>
	<title>Re:our core culture</title>
	<author>Pinback</author>
	<datestamp>1259004840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, and how long before Nintendo comes out with PornStar? You can imagine what the "instruments" will look like?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and how long before Nintendo comes out with PornStar ?
You can imagine what the " instruments " will look like ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and how long before Nintendo comes out with PornStar?
You can imagine what the "instruments" will look like?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202688</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30205102</id>
	<title>Re:Middle class "white guy?"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259008980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the most part, I would agree.</p><p>There is some resentment up here in Canada based on 'minority status', rather than race, but that's due to a law (which I can't remember the name of at the moment).</p><p>The general idea of the law in question is to fight racism, which is good, but the implementation of it is such that there is a requirement by law to hire a certain percentage of minorities into your workforce.</p><p>I think by far and large racism isn't an issue up here, but it frustrates people that if it comes down to a white man and a minority (be it a disabled person, or a coloured person, a woman...whatever) with the exact same qualifications and general likabilty... the minority wins out because of the law.</p><p>It's ironic that a law meant to combat racism seems to be promoting it, up here.</p><p>And I believe Gibson is Canadian, so that's likely what he is refering to.</p><p>Honestly, I can say i see it all the time. I'm considering applying for a new government job... I've already been told by most that I'm screwed because my lack of colour (red head), am a male, and have no disabilty.</p><p>Almost 100\% of the time something racist is said in my presence, it's been a total joke<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...mostly from minorities, come to think of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the most part , I would agree.There is some resentment up here in Canada based on 'minority status ' , rather than race , but that 's due to a law ( which I ca n't remember the name of at the moment ) .The general idea of the law in question is to fight racism , which is good , but the implementation of it is such that there is a requirement by law to hire a certain percentage of minorities into your workforce.I think by far and large racism is n't an issue up here , but it frustrates people that if it comes down to a white man and a minority ( be it a disabled person , or a coloured person , a woman...whatever ) with the exact same qualifications and general likabilty... the minority wins out because of the law.It 's ironic that a law meant to combat racism seems to be promoting it , up here.And I believe Gibson is Canadian , so that 's likely what he is refering to.Honestly , I can say i see it all the time .
I 'm considering applying for a new government job... I 've already been told by most that I 'm screwed because my lack of colour ( red head ) , am a male , and have no disabilty.Almost 100 \ % of the time something racist is said in my presence , it 's been a total joke ...mostly from minorities , come to think of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the most part, I would agree.There is some resentment up here in Canada based on 'minority status', rather than race, but that's due to a law (which I can't remember the name of at the moment).The general idea of the law in question is to fight racism, which is good, but the implementation of it is such that there is a requirement by law to hire a certain percentage of minorities into your workforce.I think by far and large racism isn't an issue up here, but it frustrates people that if it comes down to a white man and a minority (be it a disabled person, or a coloured person, a woman...whatever) with the exact same qualifications and general likabilty... the minority wins out because of the law.It's ironic that a law meant to combat racism seems to be promoting it, up here.And I believe Gibson is Canadian, so that's likely what he is refering to.Honestly, I can say i see it all the time.
I'm considering applying for a new government job... I've already been told by most that I'm screwed because my lack of colour (red head), am a male, and have no disabilty.Almost 100\% of the time something racist is said in my presence, it's been a total joke ...mostly from minorities, come to think of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30213796</id>
	<title>Re:Middle-class White Guy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259078580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then you probably didn't feel like you were losing your whitey birthright.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then you probably did n't feel like you were losing your whitey birthright .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then you probably didn't feel like you were losing your whitey birthright.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201808</id>
	<title>Why..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258990740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. is this on slashdot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. is this on slashdot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. is this on slashdot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202778
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30205102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30213430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201836
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30213796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_147258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202688
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203594
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30213796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202384
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30213430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202060
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202210
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201952
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30204924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30206748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30205102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30203104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_147258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30201856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_147258.30202062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
