<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_23_0557227</id>
	<title>Modded UX490 UMPC Shows Off Years of Community Development</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1259000820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"The community at www.MicroPCTalk.com have spent the last few years devising all sorts of mods and tweaks for the Sony VAIO UX-series UMPC. Now they've <a href="http://www.umpcportal.com/2009/11/modded-sony-vaio-ux-does-everything-and-then-some-voice-3g-quad-boot-core-2-duo-is-this-the-fastest-most-versatile-umpc-in-the-world/">thrown nearly all of their major breakthroughs into one machine</a>. Using the latest UX model (UX490) as the base, the original SSD has been swapped for a speedy 128GB SSD, the CPU has been unsoldered from the mobo and replaced with a Core 2 Duo U7700 (making this probably the smallest computer to use said CPU). The original EDGE module has been removed, and carefully put in its place is an E169 Huawei terminal which provides up to 7.2mbps 3G (HSDPA), voice and texting. On top of this, the unit quad-boots Mac OS X, Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows XP (and the Huawei terminal works under Mac OS X as well)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " The community at www.MicroPCTalk.com have spent the last few years devising all sorts of mods and tweaks for the Sony VAIO UX-series UMPC .
Now they 've thrown nearly all of their major breakthroughs into one machine .
Using the latest UX model ( UX490 ) as the base , the original SSD has been swapped for a speedy 128GB SSD , the CPU has been unsoldered from the mobo and replaced with a Core 2 Duo U7700 ( making this probably the smallest computer to use said CPU ) .
The original EDGE module has been removed , and carefully put in its place is an E169 Huawei terminal which provides up to 7.2mbps 3G ( HSDPA ) , voice and texting .
On top of this , the unit quad-boots Mac OS X , Windows 7 , Windows Vista , and Windows XP ( and the Huawei terminal works under Mac OS X as well ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "The community at www.MicroPCTalk.com have spent the last few years devising all sorts of mods and tweaks for the Sony VAIO UX-series UMPC.
Now they've thrown nearly all of their major breakthroughs into one machine.
Using the latest UX model (UX490) as the base, the original SSD has been swapped for a speedy 128GB SSD, the CPU has been unsoldered from the mobo and replaced with a Core 2 Duo U7700 (making this probably the smallest computer to use said CPU).
The original EDGE module has been removed, and carefully put in its place is an E169 Huawei terminal which provides up to 7.2mbps 3G (HSDPA), voice and texting.
On top of this, the unit quad-boots Mac OS X, Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows XP (and the Huawei terminal works under Mac OS X as well).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201110</id>
	<title>The really sad part...</title>
	<author>Civil\_Disobedient</author>
	<datestamp>1258986120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, the really sad part about all of this is that Sony could have <i>easily</i> done this themselves.  They've got all the fab plants and production facilities at their disposal.  All it would have required was a simple <i>"YES"</i> from above and they could have been making money hand/fist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , the really sad part about all of this is that Sony could have easily done this themselves .
They 've got all the fab plants and production facilities at their disposal .
All it would have required was a simple " YES " from above and they could have been making money hand/fist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, the really sad part about all of this is that Sony could have easily done this themselves.
They've got all the fab plants and production facilities at their disposal.
All it would have required was a simple "YES" from above and they could have been making money hand/fist.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258972620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I only see two version of Windows installed.<br> <br>Incidently, there are only three Star Wars movies, two Terminator movies, and what the hell does "Back to the Future" mean?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I only see two version of Windows installed .
Incidently , there are only three Star Wars movies , two Terminator movies , and what the hell does " Back to the Future " mean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only see two version of Windows installed.
Incidently, there are only three Star Wars movies, two Terminator movies, and what the hell does "Back to the Future" mean?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30203112</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258997820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the article says that they replaced the core solo cpu with a 1.4GHz core2 duo. MACOSx should run fine on there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the article says that they replaced the core solo cpu with a 1.4GHz core2 duo .
MACOSx should run fine on there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the article says that they replaced the core solo cpu with a 1.4GHz core2 duo.
MACOSx should run fine on there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30208590</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but....</title>
	<author>socceroos</author>
	<datestamp>1258982460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot, there is only one Matrix movie too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot , there is only one Matrix movie too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot, there is only one Matrix movie too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200458</id>
	<title>Re:Modding Old Hardware</title>
	<author>Ozlanthos</author>
	<datestamp>1258975740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I could swear I've seen that exact scenario in a Star Trek movie.....
<p>
-Oz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I could swear I 've seen that exact scenario in a Star Trek movie.... . -Oz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I could swear I've seen that exact scenario in a Star Trek movie.....

-Oz</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201582</id>
	<title>Re:Quad-boots, huh?</title>
	<author>Stenchwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1258989360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They probably figured you could shell out in OSX and that would be good enough. Plus, how hard would it be to add another boot option?</htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably figured you could shell out in OSX and that would be good enough .
Plus , how hard would it be to add another boot option ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably figured you could shell out in OSX and that would be good enough.
Plus, how hard would it be to add another boot option?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199912</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Starlon</author>
	<datestamp>1259007540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What, and add 5+ more boot options?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Fedora, Ubuntu, SUSE, Mandriva, Gentoo... <a href="http://www.linux.com/directory/Distributions/Desktop" title="linux.com">I could go on...</a> [linux.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>What , and add 5 + more boot options ?
: ) Fedora , Ubuntu , SUSE , Mandriva , Gentoo... I could go on... [ linux.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, and add 5+ more boot options?
:) Fedora, Ubuntu, SUSE, Mandriva, Gentoo... I could go on... [linux.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199830</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30202108</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but....</title>
	<author>NightFears</author>
	<datestamp>1258992180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I only see two version of Windows installed.</p></div></blockquote><p>Hmm, then how come I see <b>four</b> Windows versions on that list?<br>The newest one goes first. Not that I see much difference between it and the second, to be honest. And the third. Each time I think that Microsoft is as glamorous as it gets, but NO - here goes the next shiny surprise! It even reminds me that company - err... you know, the dorks who sold mice with a single mouse button.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I only see two version of Windows installed.Hmm , then how come I see four Windows versions on that list ? The newest one goes first .
Not that I see much difference between it and the second , to be honest .
And the third .
Each time I think that Microsoft is as glamorous as it gets , but NO - here goes the next shiny surprise !
It even reminds me that company - err... you know , the dorks who sold mice with a single mouse button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only see two version of Windows installed.Hmm, then how come I see four Windows versions on that list?The newest one goes first.
Not that I see much difference between it and the second, to be honest.
And the third.
Each time I think that Microsoft is as glamorous as it gets, but NO - here goes the next shiny surprise!
It even reminds me that company - err... you know, the dorks who sold mice with a single mouse button.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30222866</id>
	<title>Got the point?</title>
	<author>Darkerx</author>
	<datestamp>1259084640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read mostly out of topic posts on these forums... I should precise the point of creating this device:
1- It's the most powerful computer you can have at your belt (57k at crystalmark...)
2- It's the only 'mac' of this size with wifi N working+3.5g+voice+touchscreen
3- It hasn't been made by Sony/Apple... but by a single man... what are their 'engineers' doing?
4- It weighs 524gr/1.1lbs!
5- If only it should 'tickle' those 'innovative' corps to release 'innovative products'..... we wouldn't have to do it ourselves...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read mostly out of topic posts on these forums... I should precise the point of creating this device : 1- It 's the most powerful computer you can have at your belt ( 57k at crystalmark... ) 2- It 's the only 'mac ' of this size with wifi N working + 3.5g + voice + touchscreen 3- It has n't been made by Sony/Apple... but by a single man... what are their 'engineers ' doing ?
4- It weighs 524gr/1.1lbs !
5- If only it should 'tickle ' those 'innovative ' corps to release 'innovative products'..... we would n't have to do it ourselves.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read mostly out of topic posts on these forums... I should precise the point of creating this device:
1- It's the most powerful computer you can have at your belt (57k at crystalmark...)
2- It's the only 'mac' of this size with wifi N working+3.5g+voice+touchscreen
3- It hasn't been made by Sony/Apple... but by a single man... what are their 'engineers' doing?
4- It weighs 524gr/1.1lbs!
5- If only it should 'tickle' those 'innovative' corps to release 'innovative products'..... we wouldn't have to do it ourselves...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200604</id>
	<title>huh, bug deal?</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1258979280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>maybe there is something awesome about this i'm not getting? it's commodity hardware thats been tweaked a bit, nothing that should take "years"</htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe there is something awesome about this i 'm not getting ?
it 's commodity hardware thats been tweaked a bit , nothing that should take " years "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe there is something awesome about this i'm not getting?
it's commodity hardware thats been tweaked a bit, nothing that should take "years"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199856</id>
	<title>link dead?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259006760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As of Nov 23rd, 18:05 AEST, the link you have provided is dead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As of Nov 23rd , 18 : 05 AEST , the link you have provided is dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As of Nov 23rd, 18:05 AEST, the link you have provided is dead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30204084</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259003040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your comment reminds me of Picard: "there are FOUR LIGHTS!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your comment reminds me of Picard : " there are FOUR LIGHTS !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your comment reminds me of Picard: "there are FOUR LIGHTS!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200090</id>
	<title>Re:link dead?</title>
	<author>cfriedt</author>
	<datestamp>1258967700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their server is definitely under some heavy load. I've been loading the page slowly for the last 10 minutes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their server is definitely under some heavy load .
I 've been loading the page slowly for the last 10 minutes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their server is definitely under some heavy load.
I've been loading the page slowly for the last 10 minutes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199812</id>
	<title>Re:Hooray for standardized hardware</title>
	<author>gerryn</author>
	<datestamp>1258919160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm looking forward to your own modified VAIO! =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm looking forward to your own modified VAIO !
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm looking forward to your own modified VAIO!
=)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199774</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199766</id>
	<title>I'm not familiar with it...</title>
	<author>Yuioup</author>
	<datestamp>1258918320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sony VAIO UX-series UMPC"</p><p>A Sony VAIO whatnow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sony VAIO UX-series UMPC " A Sony VAIO whatnow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sony VAIO UX-series UMPC"A Sony VAIO whatnow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30222930</id>
	<title>Re:Just because you can</title>
	<author>Darkerx</author>
	<datestamp>1259085420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OsX works perfectly on it, as it's only a fraction slower than the Mac Air...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)   (It has a 1438mhz CORE2DUO)

Oh... it boots windows 7 in 15 seconds, and aero works without a glitch...</htmltext>
<tokenext>OsX works perfectly on it , as it 's only a fraction slower than the Mac Air... : ) ( It has a 1438mhz CORE2DUO ) Oh... it boots windows 7 in 15 seconds , and aero works without a glitch.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OsX works perfectly on it, as it's only a fraction slower than the Mac Air... :)   (It has a 1438mhz CORE2DUO)

Oh... it boots windows 7 in 15 seconds, and aero works without a glitch...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200708</id>
	<title>Re:Quad-boots, huh?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258980780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I mean, surely you could boot both Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 on there, right? (Rolleyes)</i> <br>
<br>
Actually, that's not necessarily a given. There are some machines out there that can run 10.5 with no problems but that can't run 10.6. This is even before the whole Atom-disabling thing. It's mostly due to certain incompatible ATI video cards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , surely you could boot both Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 on there , right ?
( Rolleyes ) Actually , that 's not necessarily a given .
There are some machines out there that can run 10.5 with no problems but that ca n't run 10.6 .
This is even before the whole Atom-disabling thing .
It 's mostly due to certain incompatible ATI video cards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, surely you could boot both Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 on there, right?
(Rolleyes) 

Actually, that's not necessarily a given.
There are some machines out there that can run 10.5 with no problems but that can't run 10.6.
This is even before the whole Atom-disabling thing.
It's mostly due to certain incompatible ATI video cards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30207414</id>
	<title>Re:Not impressed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258976640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>57k at crystalmark, 15s to boot W7... the world fastest netbook.... not made by asus/sony/apple/etc.<br>524gr/1.1lbs.... the world most little core2duo...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>57k at crystalmark , 15s to boot W7... the world fastest netbook.... not made by asus/sony/apple/etc.524gr/1.1lbs.... the world most little core2duo.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>57k at crystalmark, 15s to boot W7... the world fastest netbook.... not made by asus/sony/apple/etc.524gr/1.1lbs.... the world most little core2duo...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798</id>
	<title>Yes, but....</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1258918920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...does it run 3 versions of windows for no reason?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...does it run 3 versions of windows for no reason ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...does it run 3 versions of windows for no reason?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199760</id>
	<title>Quad-boots, huh?</title>
	<author>immaterial</author>
	<datestamp>1258918260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't you mean Quint-boots? I mean, surely you could boot both Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 on there, right?

(Rolleyes)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you mean Quint-boots ?
I mean , surely you could boot both Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 on there , right ?
( Rolleyes )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you mean Quint-boots?
I mean, surely you could boot both Mac OS X 10.5 and Mac OS X 10.6 on there, right?
(Rolleyes)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30223016</id>
	<title>Re:How much?</title>
	<author>Darkerx</author>
	<datestamp>1259086500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You don't have to use a 490, any UX with 1gb ram will do=500$ on ebay+ 400$128gbssd+ 130$cpu+ 120$ wifi and vodafone k3520 (to get the modem components within). Then do it yourself, or pay Anh at www.micropctalk.com to do it for you (much easier)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't have to use a 490 , any UX with 1gb ram will do = 500 $ on ebay + 400 $ 128gbssd + 130 $ cpu + 120 $ wifi and vodafone k3520 ( to get the modem components within ) .
Then do it yourself , or pay Anh at www.micropctalk.com to do it for you ( much easier )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't have to use a 490, any UX with 1gb ram will do=500$ on ebay+ 400$128gbssd+ 130$cpu+ 120$ wifi and vodafone k3520 (to get the modem components within).
Then do it yourself, or pay Anh at www.micropctalk.com to do it for you (much easier)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199774</id>
	<title>Hooray for standardized hardware</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258918320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's no magic here. It's all the same old standardized PC hardware.</p><p>What would be surprising is if they couldn't replace the CPU and peripherals. Or if they did so on a non-Intel platform.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no magic here .
It 's all the same old standardized PC hardware.What would be surprising is if they could n't replace the CPU and peripherals .
Or if they did so on a non-Intel platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no magic here.
It's all the same old standardized PC hardware.What would be surprising is if they couldn't replace the CPU and peripherals.
Or if they did so on a non-Intel platform.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199930</id>
	<title>Or you could...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...just buy a computer, that has the features that you want in the first place! ^^</p><p>I mean it&rsquo;s all nice, and &ldquo;because I can&rdquo;y, but I stopped getting the point at a certain level of modding.</p><p>It&rsquo;s like: Hey, let&rsquo;s not buy a Ferrari, but a Tata Nano, and then replace all the Tata parts one by one by Ferrari parts, until it&rsquo;s basically a Ferrari with Tata looks, that can&rsquo;t beat a real Ferrari but costed more. ^^<br>I mean, the reason why you wanted to do this aside (as I understand the &ldquo;the journey is the reward&rdquo; and &ldquo;because I can&rdquo; well), but wouldn&rsquo;t it be smarter and cheaper to buy a Ferrari and then wrap it in a Tata body and interior?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...just buy a computer , that has the features that you want in the first place !
^ ^ I mean it    s all nice , and    because I can    y , but I stopped getting the point at a certain level of modding.It    s like : Hey , let    s not buy a Ferrari , but a Tata Nano , and then replace all the Tata parts one by one by Ferrari parts , until it    s basically a Ferrari with Tata looks , that can    t beat a real Ferrari but costed more .
^ ^ I mean , the reason why you wanted to do this aside ( as I understand the    the journey is the reward    and    because I can    well ) , but wouldn    t it be smarter and cheaper to buy a Ferrari and then wrap it in a Tata body and interior ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...just buy a computer, that has the features that you want in the first place!
^^I mean it’s all nice, and “because I can”y, but I stopped getting the point at a certain level of modding.It’s like: Hey, let’s not buy a Ferrari, but a Tata Nano, and then replace all the Tata parts one by one by Ferrari parts, until it’s basically a Ferrari with Tata looks, that can’t beat a real Ferrari but costed more.
^^I mean, the reason why you wanted to do this aside (as I understand the “the journey is the reward” and “because I can” well), but wouldn’t it be smarter and cheaper to buy a Ferrari and then wrap it in a Tata body and interior?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200150</id>
	<title>it begs the question :-)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but...</p><p>does it run linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but...does it run linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but...does it run linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201264</id>
	<title>How much?</title>
	<author>$1uck</author>
	<datestamp>1258987320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So... after all the modding is said and done,  how much does this cost? (not to someone buying the finished product, but just how much do all the parts here cost).</htmltext>
<tokenext>So... after all the modding is said and done , how much does this cost ?
( not to someone buying the finished product , but just how much do all the parts here cost ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... after all the modding is said and done,  how much does this cost?
(not to someone buying the finished product, but just how much do all the parts here cost).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199832</id>
	<title>Gave one of these to my Mom</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1258919580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...for her birthday. She needed a space heater and also had some problems with needing to use the internet anywhere in the house.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...for her birthday .
She needed a space heater and also had some problems with needing to use the internet anywhere in the house .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...for her birthday.
She needed a space heater and also had some problems with needing to use the internet anywhere in the house.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200108</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258968180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" On top of this, the unit quad-boots Mac OS X, Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows XP (and the Huawei terminal works under Mac OS X as well)."</p><p>the bigger question is: yeah, but does it run linux. XD</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" On top of this , the unit quad-boots Mac OS X , Windows 7 , Windows Vista , and Windows XP ( and the Huawei terminal works under Mac OS X as well ) .
" the bigger question is : yeah , but does it run linux .
XD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" On top of this, the unit quad-boots Mac OS X, Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows XP (and the Huawei terminal works under Mac OS X as well).
"the bigger question is: yeah, but does it run linux.
XD</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199772</id>
	<title>Just because you can</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258918320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>doesn't necessarily mean you should.  This might just be a case of that.  What's the usability of OSX on this?  For that matter what about the resource hungry Vista and 7?  XP was probably as far as it needed to go.  That and perhaps Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't necessarily mean you should .
This might just be a case of that .
What 's the usability of OSX on this ?
For that matter what about the resource hungry Vista and 7 ?
XP was probably as far as it needed to go .
That and perhaps Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't necessarily mean you should.
This might just be a case of that.
What's the usability of OSX on this?
For that matter what about the resource hungry Vista and 7?
XP was probably as far as it needed to go.
That and perhaps Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30205162</id>
	<title>Some words from the owner...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi, I'm the owner of this device...</p><p>We made this world fastest netbook, or world most little laptop, to show it was possible. Sony discontinued this product line, so it was a fun challenge to go beyond their design and improve it by ourselves. Then it's now the smallest core2duo in the world, it boots W7 in 15 seconds, does 57k at cmark2004, it now has 3.5g/7,2mbps instead of edge (with also cellphone/voice feature), and is also the smallest mac with touchscreen and 3g and voice-call features.</p><p>Sony and Apple didn't do it...we did... if it can only tickle their pride a little and make them think about doing this kind of stuff themselves...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi , I 'm the owner of this device...We made this world fastest netbook , or world most little laptop , to show it was possible .
Sony discontinued this product line , so it was a fun challenge to go beyond their design and improve it by ourselves .
Then it 's now the smallest core2duo in the world , it boots W7 in 15 seconds , does 57k at cmark2004 , it now has 3.5g/7,2mbps instead of edge ( with also cellphone/voice feature ) , and is also the smallest mac with touchscreen and 3g and voice-call features.Sony and Apple did n't do it...we did... if it can only tickle their pride a little and make them think about doing this kind of stuff themselves.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi, I'm the owner of this device...We made this world fastest netbook, or world most little laptop, to show it was possible.
Sony discontinued this product line, so it was a fun challenge to go beyond their design and improve it by ourselves.
Then it's now the smallest core2duo in the world, it boots W7 in 15 seconds, does 57k at cmark2004, it now has 3.5g/7,2mbps instead of edge (with also cellphone/voice feature), and is also the smallest mac with touchscreen and 3g and voice-call features.Sony and Apple didn't do it...we did... if it can only tickle their pride a little and make them think about doing this kind of stuff themselves...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30207152</id>
	<title>Re:Yes, but....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258975680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only reason is to be able to compare/review this hardware with the different windozes easily...and I had many useless licenses to waste...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only reason is to be able to compare/review this hardware with the different windozes easily...and I had many useless licenses to waste.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only reason is to be able to compare/review this hardware with the different windozes easily...and I had many useless licenses to waste...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199888</id>
	<title>Not impressed.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259007120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So lets see, they spent $2500 for the base computer, and probably another $500 for extra parts. All this for basically a netbook. Good job umpc portal, and why would you bother hosting your website on a umpc? (slashdotted already)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So lets see , they spent $ 2500 for the base computer , and probably another $ 500 for extra parts .
All this for basically a netbook .
Good job umpc portal , and why would you bother hosting your website on a umpc ?
( slashdotted already ) : /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So lets see, they spent $2500 for the base computer, and probably another $500 for extra parts.
All this for basically a netbook.
Good job umpc portal, and why would you bother hosting your website on a umpc?
(slashdotted already) :/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199830</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>mapinguari</author>
	<datestamp>1258919400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200666</id>
	<title>Re:Modding Old Hardware</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1258980300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when they come we can immediately arrest them under the DMCA?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when they come we can immediately arrest them under the DMCA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when they come we can immediately arrest them under the DMCA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200358</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199924</id>
	<title>Re:link dead?</title>
	<author>greensoap</author>
	<datestamp>1259007720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently they were using a Modded UX49 for the web server...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently they were using a Modded UX49 for the web server.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently they were using a Modded UX49 for the web server...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199856</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200164</id>
	<title>Re:Quad-boots, huh?</title>
	<author>mad\_minstrel</author>
	<datestamp>1258969860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And no Linux? For shame!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And no Linux ?
For shame !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And no Linux?
For shame!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200358</id>
	<title>Modding Old Hardware</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258974000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In a parallel universe, there's a bunch of space aliens laughing about the mods they made to an old satellite they found drifting in deep space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In a parallel universe , there 's a bunch of space aliens laughing about the mods they made to an old satellite they found drifting in deep space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a parallel universe, there's a bunch of space aliens laughing about the mods they made to an old satellite they found drifting in deep space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30204084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30203112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199830
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30222930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30223016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30202108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200358
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199774
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199856
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30207414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30207152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_23_0557227_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30208590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30207152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30208590
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30204084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30202108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200108
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30207414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30223016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30200164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30201582
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30203112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30222930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199812
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_23_0557227.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199830
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_23_0557227.30199912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
