<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_22_2019219</id>
	<title>Google Patents Displaying Patents</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1258878600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"<a href="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2528/4122971005\_b1b1ea0038\_o.jpg">Google has actually managed to patent displaying patents</a>. The USPTO issued US Patent No. D603,866 to six Google inventors for their '<a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=D603,866">graphical user interface for display screen of a communications terminal</a>.' Among the six inventors is the guy who <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2006/12/now-you-can-search-for-us-patents.html">introduced Google Patents</a>. Ironically, <a href="http://www.google.com/patents">Google Patents</a> can't seem to <a href="http://www.google.com/patents?q=D603866">find the new Google patent for Google Patents</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " Google has actually managed to patent displaying patents .
The USPTO issued US Patent No .
D603,866 to six Google inventors for their 'graphical user interface for display screen of a communications terminal .
' Among the six inventors is the guy who introduced Google Patents .
Ironically , Google Patents ca n't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "Google has actually managed to patent displaying patents.
The USPTO issued US Patent No.
D603,866 to six Google inventors for their 'graphical user interface for display screen of a communications terminal.
' Among the six inventors is the guy who introduced Google Patents.
Ironically, Google Patents can't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198202</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1258900080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The summary's misleading</i></p><p>Thanks for the information!  When I read the headline I of course thought, "I wonder what Google has patented.  It's too bad I don't know anything about it, having just read the headline and summary.  I can be pretty Google has filed a patent application, but I have no idea what it's on."</p><p>Wouldn't it be amazing if the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. editors actually posted actual information in summaries?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary 's misleadingThanks for the information !
When I read the headline I of course thought , " I wonder what Google has patented .
It 's too bad I do n't know anything about it , having just read the headline and summary .
I can be pretty Google has filed a patent application , but I have no idea what it 's on .
" Would n't it be amazing if the / .
editors actually posted actual information in summaries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary's misleadingThanks for the information!
When I read the headline I of course thought, "I wonder what Google has patented.
It's too bad I don't know anything about it, having just read the headline and summary.
I can be pretty Google has filed a patent application, but I have no idea what it's on.
"Wouldn't it be amazing if the /.
editors actually posted actual information in summaries?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196416</id>
	<title>Good God</title>
	<author>DaMattster</author>
	<datestamp>1258885380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Enough is enough!  A good corollary would be a tax on paying taxes.  No, Google, is not to blame but the system and the lobbyists that built it should be blamed.  Software patents are anti-competitive and end up hurting innovation.  Software patents are going to cause the computing industry to go the way of manufacturing - the US will no longer be a leader in development.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enough is enough !
A good corollary would be a tax on paying taxes .
No , Google , is not to blame but the system and the lobbyists that built it should be blamed .
Software patents are anti-competitive and end up hurting innovation .
Software patents are going to cause the computing industry to go the way of manufacturing - the US will no longer be a leader in development .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enough is enough!
A good corollary would be a tax on paying taxes.
No, Google, is not to blame but the system and the lobbyists that built it should be blamed.
Software patents are anti-competitive and end up hurting innovation.
Software patents are going to cause the computing industry to go the way of manufacturing - the US will no longer be a leader in development.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196250</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1258883760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No.  They figured out <i>a</i> way to do so.  Patents are on the solution, not the problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
They figured out a way to do so .
Patents are on the solution , not the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
They figured out a way to do so.
Patents are on the solution, not the problem.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199114</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>the eric conspiracy</author>
	<datestamp>1258908240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK, but I have the design patent that covers the design of the  anonymous display of anonymous comments discussing anonymous patents.</p><p>And yes it's anonymous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK , but I have the design patent that covers the design of the anonymous display of anonymous comments discussing anonymous patents.And yes it 's anonymous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK, but I have the design patent that covers the design of the  anonymous display of anonymous comments discussing anonymous patents.And yes it's anonymous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197936</id>
	<title>Re:No, they didn't</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1258897860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;They got a design patent.<br><br>Oh, so then it's more like this?<br><br>P a a a a a a a a a a tent<br>&nbsp; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br><br></tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>      They got a design patent.Oh , so then it 's more like this ? P a a a a a a a a a a tent   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</tokentext>
<sentencetext>     They got a design patent.Oh, so then it's more like this?P a a a a a a a a a a tent  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196240</id>
	<title>I thought it was Don't be evil</title>
	<author>MarcLeeT</author>
	<datestamp>1258883700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not be slightly evil.. I guess google needs some sort of balance..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not be slightly evil.. I guess google needs some sort of balance. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not be slightly evil.. I guess google needs some sort of balance..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198194</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...Christmas gifts,shoes,handbags,ugg...erc</title>
	<author>coolforsale1212</author>
	<datestamp>1258900020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival. Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs. Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products . Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing! Welcome to come next time ! Thank you! <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76</a> [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!! Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello , In order to meet Christmas , Site launched Christmas spree , welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises , look forward to your arrival .
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
http : //www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp ? id = s76 [ coolforsale.com ] ( Tracksuit w ) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping Thanks ! ! !
Advance wish you a merry Christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  Dear ladies and gentlemen Hello, In order to meet Christmas, Site launched Christmas spree, welcome new and old customers come to participate in the there are unexpected surprises, look forward to your arrival.
Only this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but don't miss it.Select your favorite clothing!
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you!
http://www.coolforsale.com/productlist.asp?id=s76 [coolforsale.com]   (Tracksuit w) ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket, Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35 Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16 free shipping Thanks!!!
Advance wish you a merry Christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199006</id>
	<title>It's a feature, not a bug</title>
	<author>DreadfulGrape</author>
	<datestamp>1258907340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>re:  "Google Patents can't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents."</p><p>If it did, the gates of hell would be flung open and chaos would reign.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>re : " Google Patents ca n't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents .
" If it did , the gates of hell would be flung open and chaos would reign .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>re:  "Google Patents can't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents.
"If it did, the gates of hell would be flung open and chaos would reign.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200024</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correct. This is a design patent -- which is similar to a very powerful registered trademark -- not a utility patent -- the "bad" kind of patent ( http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/types/#differ ).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct .
This is a design patent -- which is similar to a very powerful registered trademark -- not a utility patent -- the " bad " kind of patent ( http : //www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/types/ # differ ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct.
This is a design patent -- which is similar to a very powerful registered trademark -- not a utility patent -- the "bad" kind of patent ( http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/types/#differ ).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30218180</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259055060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, but now it's <i>on the internet</i>, so it's totally revolutionary, innovative, and patent-worthy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but now it 's on the internet , so it 's totally revolutionary , innovative , and patent-worthy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but now it's on the internet, so it's totally revolutionary, innovative, and patent-worthy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30206146</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>gamecrusader</author>
	<datestamp>1258971660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ultimate ending patent to every patent and copyright for the next 20 years.</p><p>The last and ultimate patent, the patent to end all copyrights, and patents and everything the human race can do besides movement. and working,</p><p>lets end this once and for all if no one does anythin about it just patent human languages this includes writing, and speach, that would be the ultimate patent end it all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ultimate ending patent to every patent and copyright for the next 20 years.The last and ultimate patent , the patent to end all copyrights , and patents and everything the human race can do besides movement .
and working,lets end this once and for all if no one does anythin about it just patent human languages this includes writing , and speach , that would be the ultimate patent end it all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ultimate ending patent to every patent and copyright for the next 20 years.The last and ultimate patent, the patent to end all copyrights, and patents and everything the human race can do besides movement.
and working,lets end this once and for all if no one does anythin about it just patent human languages this includes writing, and speach, that would be the ultimate patent end it all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200232</id>
	<title>Re:Design Patents - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?</title>
	<author>howlingmadhowie</author>
	<datestamp>1258971840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that sounds to me rather like the corn laws, but being passed by a company and not the government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that sounds to me rather like the corn laws , but being passed by a company and not the government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that sounds to me rather like the corn laws, but being passed by a company and not the government.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196824</id>
	<title>Why Is Everyone On Here Pro-Google?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258888380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously - Google is a bigger Monopoly now than Microsoft ever could be.  Be careful out there, no matter who you are backing, your enemys enemy will prove to be, more than often than not, just another enemy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously - Google is a bigger Monopoly now than Microsoft ever could be .
Be careful out there , no matter who you are backing , your enemys enemy will prove to be , more than often than not , just another enemy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously - Google is a bigger Monopoly now than Microsoft ever could be.
Be careful out there, no matter who you are backing, your enemys enemy will prove to be, more than often than not, just another enemy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196104</id>
	<title>Yo dawg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258882680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yo dawg, herd u liek patents, so I put a patent on displaying patents so now you can violate my patent while ur lookin at patents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yo dawg , herd u liek patents , so I put a patent on displaying patents so now you can violate my patent while ur lookin at patents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yo dawg, herd u liek patents, so I put a patent on displaying patents so now you can violate my patent while ur lookin at patents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196054</id>
	<title>O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258882380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, I just sent in an anonymous patent patenting posting anonymous comments!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , I just sent in an anonymous patent patenting posting anonymous comments !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, I just sent in an anonymous patent patenting posting anonymous comments!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197180</id>
	<title>modJ down</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258890900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>same w$orthless milestonEs, telling</htmltext>
<tokenext>same w $ orthless milestonEs , telling</tokentext>
<sentencetext>same w$orthless milestonEs, telling</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30206050</id>
	<title>OUTRAGOUS PATENTS</title>
	<author>gamecrusader</author>
	<datestamp>1258971180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has gone way to far, become way out of control, it&rsquo;s starting to decompose our rights, the world and our country. Shouldn&rsquo;t the government start investigating outrageous, abusing the use patents?<br>Isn&rsquo;t the patent office also regulating who gets a patent and what the patents are for?  Can't the government regulate what the patent office&rsquo;s do?<br>I thought the government should work for the people, protect our rights, and pursuit of happiness, and the right to succeed, which is starting to be forgotten<br>It should be against the law abuse patents, as people are doing, what Google has done, and another person patented podcasts.<br>I thought the government enforced it, same with the patent office which obviously they're not doing. This can hurt the people of the United States, and keep people from being able to succeed.<br>*****If anyone in the government who reads this has any influence or able to revoke patents could you please, please try to do anything, anything at all about people/corporations/organizations who abuse the use of a patent or copyright for that matter, this is going too far, can&rsquo;t someone try to stop these outrageous patents? Please, please try to do something,  Why let someone tarnish what  all people can do, try to succeed in life, not by taking the rights of others for their own personal, business gains.*****</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has gone way to far , become way out of control , it    s starting to decompose our rights , the world and our country .
Shouldn    t the government start investigating outrageous , abusing the use patents ? Isn    t the patent office also regulating who gets a patent and what the patents are for ?
Ca n't the government regulate what the patent office    s do ? I thought the government should work for the people , protect our rights , and pursuit of happiness , and the right to succeed , which is starting to be forgottenIt should be against the law abuse patents , as people are doing , what Google has done , and another person patented podcasts.I thought the government enforced it , same with the patent office which obviously they 're not doing .
This can hurt the people of the United States , and keep people from being able to succeed .
* * * * * If anyone in the government who reads this has any influence or able to revoke patents could you please , please try to do anything , anything at all about people/corporations/organizations who abuse the use of a patent or copyright for that matter , this is going too far , can    t someone try to stop these outrageous patents ?
Please , please try to do something , Why let someone tarnish what all people can do , try to succeed in life , not by taking the rights of others for their own personal , business gains .
* * * * *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has gone way to far, become way out of control, it’s starting to decompose our rights, the world and our country.
Shouldn’t the government start investigating outrageous, abusing the use patents?Isn’t the patent office also regulating who gets a patent and what the patents are for?
Can't the government regulate what the patent office’s do?I thought the government should work for the people, protect our rights, and pursuit of happiness, and the right to succeed, which is starting to be forgottenIt should be against the law abuse patents, as people are doing, what Google has done, and another person patented podcasts.I thought the government enforced it, same with the patent office which obviously they're not doing.
This can hurt the people of the United States, and keep people from being able to succeed.
*****If anyone in the government who reads this has any influence or able to revoke patents could you please, please try to do anything, anything at all about people/corporations/organizations who abuse the use of a patent or copyright for that matter, this is going too far, can’t someone try to stop these outrageous patents?
Please, please try to do something,  Why let someone tarnish what  all people can do, try to succeed in life, not by taking the rights of others for their own personal, business gains.
*****</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196342</id>
	<title>Google, google, google.</title>
	<author>HazMat 79</author>
	<datestamp>1258884540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That is a lot of googles in one paragraph. Read it out loud and it is a word twister.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That is a lot of googles in one paragraph .
Read it out loud and it is a word twister .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is a lot of googles in one paragraph.
Read it out loud and it is a word twister.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196296</id>
	<title>I get dibs...</title>
	<author>ksemlerK</author>
	<datestamp>1258884120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wish to patent the patenting process.  I also want to patent patenting the patent process.  Ad infinitum.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish to patent the patenting process .
I also want to patent patenting the patent process .
Ad infinitum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish to patent the patenting process.
I also want to patent patenting the patent process.
Ad infinitum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196412</id>
	<title>Re:O RLY?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258885380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My lawyers will be contacting you with a cease and desist letter, very soon...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My lawyers will be contacting you with a cease and desist letter , very soon.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My lawyers will be contacting you with a cease and desist letter, very soon...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30201850</id>
	<title>Re:Design Patents - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?</title>
	<author>xednieht</author>
	<datestamp>1258990920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"This is going to hit consumer pocketbooks."<br> <br>
No, it's going to hit Ford's pocket book.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" This is going to hit consumer pocketbooks .
" No , it 's going to hit Ford 's pocket book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This is going to hit consumer pocketbooks.
" 
No, it's going to hit Ford's pocket book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>morgan\_greywolf</author>
	<datestamp>1258882740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary's misleading.  It isn't the displaying of patents that Google patented, it is the particular Web GUI that they patented.  Which is, mind you, fairly unique in that it displays the original images quickly and uses particularly unique layout for the display of the very intuitive controls.</p><p>Not that I agree with software patents, I think they're stupid, but under current patent laws, what they patented seems to meet the standard for what is patentable.</p><p>(IANAL, TINLA, bleh.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary 's misleading .
It is n't the displaying of patents that Google patented , it is the particular Web GUI that they patented .
Which is , mind you , fairly unique in that it displays the original images quickly and uses particularly unique layout for the display of the very intuitive controls.Not that I agree with software patents , I think they 're stupid , but under current patent laws , what they patented seems to meet the standard for what is patentable .
( IANAL , TINLA , bleh .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary's misleading.
It isn't the displaying of patents that Google patented, it is the particular Web GUI that they patented.
Which is, mind you, fairly unique in that it displays the original images quickly and uses particularly unique layout for the display of the very intuitive controls.Not that I agree with software patents, I think they're stupid, but under current patent laws, what they patented seems to meet the standard for what is patentable.
(IANAL, TINLA, bleh.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197554</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258894500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never mind that... I sense a business opportunity...</p><p>"Google Patents can't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents."</p><p>I am going to patent the process by which Google Patents will be able to find the new Google patent for Google Patents.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never mind that... I sense a business opportunity... " Google Patents ca n't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents .
" I am going to patent the process by which Google Patents will be able to find the new Google patent for Google Patents .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never mind that... I sense a business opportunity..."Google Patents can't seem to find the new Google patent for Google Patents.
"I am going to patent the process by which Google Patents will be able to find the new Google patent for Google Patents.
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199802</id>
	<title>Re:Design Patent</title>
	<author>nacturation</author>
	<datestamp>1258919040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's just theodp's usual patent trolling:</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q="theodp+writes"+intitle:patent+site:slashdot.org</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just theodp 's usual patent trolling : http : //www.google.com/search ? q = " theodp + writes " + intitle : patent + site : slashdot.org [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just theodp's usual patent trolling:http://www.google.com/search?q="theodp+writes"+intitle:patent+site:slashdot.org [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042</id>
	<title>Uh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258882320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't the Patent Office figure out and implement the displaying of patents first?  Like... oh, maybe a century or two ago?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't the Patent Office figure out and implement the displaying of patents first ?
Like... oh , maybe a century or two ago ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't the Patent Office figure out and implement the displaying of patents first?
Like... oh, maybe a century or two ago?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30202590</id>
	<title>Re:Design Patent</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1258995000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Even worse, not the only time. Remember Google's design patent on it's home page?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Even worse , not the only time .
Remember Google 's design patent on it 's home page ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even worse, not the only time.
Remember Google's design patent on it's home page?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196890</id>
	<title>Design Patents - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?</title>
	<author>theodp</author>
	<datestamp>1258888740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=akme5MOT.kCA" title="bloomberg.com">Ford Seeks to Stop Imports of Replacement Car Parts</a> [bloomberg.com]: Ford Motor Co., the second-biggest U.S.-based automaker, filed a trade complaint to block imports of replacement parts for Mustang cars, saying they impermissibly copy its patented designs..."The car companies are intentionally looking to wipe out competition and using the ITC and the patent system," said Eileen Sottile, the coalition's executive director. "This is going to hit consumer pocketbooks."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ford Seeks to Stop Imports of Replacement Car Parts [ bloomberg.com ] : Ford Motor Co. , the second-biggest U.S.-based automaker , filed a trade complaint to block imports of replacement parts for Mustang cars , saying they impermissibly copy its patented designs... " The car companies are intentionally looking to wipe out competition and using the ITC and the patent system , " said Eileen Sottile , the coalition 's executive director .
" This is going to hit consumer pocketbooks .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ford Seeks to Stop Imports of Replacement Car Parts [bloomberg.com]: Ford Motor Co., the second-biggest U.S.-based automaker, filed a trade complaint to block imports of replacement parts for Mustang cars, saying they impermissibly copy its patented designs..."The car companies are intentionally looking to wipe out competition and using the ITC and the patent system," said Eileen Sottile, the coalition's executive director.
"This is going to hit consumer pocketbooks.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197974</id>
	<title>a batter patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258898280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>damn.. I'm going to patent the patents. Everyone patenting something should pay me with his first son.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>damn.. I 'm going to patent the patents .
Everyone patenting something should pay me with his first son .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>damn.. I'm going to patent the patents.
Everyone patenting something should pay me with his first son.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196634</id>
	<title>it's a design patent</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1258887240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google isn't "patenting displaying patents", they are getting a <i>design</i> patent on the look of Google Patents.  Design patents are harmless; they just mean that if you display patents, it should be visually different from Google.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is n't " patenting displaying patents " , they are getting a design patent on the look of Google Patents .
Design patents are harmless ; they just mean that if you display patents , it should be visually different from Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google isn't "patenting displaying patents", they are getting a design patent on the look of Google Patents.
Design patents are harmless; they just mean that if you display patents, it should be visually different from Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196110</id>
	<title>Yo dawg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258882680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought you'd like to patent viewing your patent, so we patented viewing your patent viewing your patent!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought you 'd like to patent viewing your patent , so we patented viewing your patent viewing your patent !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought you'd like to patent viewing your patent, so we patented viewing your patent viewing your patent!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30270814</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>twr57</author>
	<datestamp>1259601900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, it's a substandard post.  This is not a patent on GUIs as such, but a design patent (note the D prefix) to the particular form of GUI shown. And Google haven't got round to indexing design patents yet, so no wonder you can't find it on their system.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it 's a substandard post .
This is not a patent on GUIs as such , but a design patent ( note the D prefix ) to the particular form of GUI shown .
And Google have n't got round to indexing design patents yet , so no wonder you ca n't find it on their system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it's a substandard post.
This is not a patent on GUIs as such, but a design patent (note the D prefix) to the particular form of GUI shown.
And Google haven't got round to indexing design patents yet, so no wonder you can't find it on their system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196282</id>
	<title>Re:No, they didn't</title>
	<author>ChienAndalu</author>
	<datestamp>1258884060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>mod +10 threadover</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>mod + 10 threadover</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mod +10 threadover</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196624</id>
	<title>Re:Google's strange stance</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1258887180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While this isn't a software patent you bring up a good point in regards to Google's patent strategy. They are in favor of reform but as long as everyone else is making software patents and similar patents they need to do do defensively to stay competitive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While this is n't a software patent you bring up a good point in regards to Google 's patent strategy .
They are in favor of reform but as long as everyone else is making software patents and similar patents they need to do do defensively to stay competitive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this isn't a software patent you bring up a good point in regards to Google's patent strategy.
They are in favor of reform but as long as everyone else is making software patents and similar patents they need to do do defensively to stay competitive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196222</id>
	<title>Re:Google's strange stance</title>
	<author>canajin56</author>
	<datestamp>1258883640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This isn't a software patent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't a software patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't a software patent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199998</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259009160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Impossible! I already patented the action of patenting! And I patented (the result* of) x':</p><p><tt>x'(x) = something whose patenting would prevent patenting x</tt><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; where <tt>x in X</tt><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <tt>X = { x'(y) | y &lt;- Y }</tt><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <tt>Y = { p, X }</tt><br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <tt>p = "patenting the action of patenting"</tt>.</p><p>\_\_\_<br>* if you don't think in the functional programming / mathematical way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Impossible !
I already patented the action of patenting !
And I patented ( the result * of ) x ' : x ' ( x ) = something whose patenting would prevent patenting x             where x in X                       X = { x ' ( y ) | y                       Y = { p , X }                       p = " patenting the action of patenting " . \ _ \ _ \ _ * if you do n't think in the functional programming / mathematical way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impossible!
I already patented the action of patenting!
And I patented (the result* of) x':x'(x) = something whose patenting would prevent patenting x
            where x in X
                      X = { x'(y) | y 
                      Y = { p, X }
                      p = "patenting the action of patenting".\_\_\_* if you don't think in the functional programming / mathematical way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196226</id>
	<title>Google Lawyers Blasted Others' Frivolous Patents</title>
	<author>theodp</author>
	<datestamp>1258883640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2007/09/reforming-patents-promoting-innovation.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Reforming patents, promoting innovation:</a> [blogspot.com] "Google and other technology companies increasingly face mounting legal costs to defend against frivolous patent claims from parties gaming the system...Low-quality patents and escalating legal costs are currently hurting the ability of U.S. companies to compete globally, and that in turn hurts U.S. workers and consumers."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reforming patents , promoting innovation : [ blogspot.com ] " Google and other technology companies increasingly face mounting legal costs to defend against frivolous patent claims from parties gaming the system...Low-quality patents and escalating legal costs are currently hurting the ability of U.S. companies to compete globally , and that in turn hurts U.S. workers and consumers .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reforming patents, promoting innovation: [blogspot.com] "Google and other technology companies increasingly face mounting legal costs to defend against frivolous patent claims from parties gaming the system...Low-quality patents and escalating legal costs are currently hurting the ability of U.S. companies to compete globally, and that in turn hurts U.S. workers and consumers.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196446</id>
	<title>I think it's appropriate to point out...</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1258885860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>that things are getting to be ridiculous right about now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that things are getting to be ridiculous right about now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that things are getting to be ridiculous right about now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196072</id>
	<title>Design Patent</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258882500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a design patent.  Please learn how the patent system works before posting patent stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a design patent .
Please learn how the patent system works before posting patent stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a design patent.
Please learn how the patent system works before posting patent stories.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200568</id>
	<title>Brain = Fucked</title>
	<author>\_0rm\_</author>
	<datestamp>1258977960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Congrats there! You have just fucked my brain.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Congrats there !
You have just fucked my brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congrats there!
You have just fucked my brain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30201712</id>
	<title>Re:Google's strange stance</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258990260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://projects.beyondtext.ac.uk/deplacingfuturememory/uploads/boot\_on\_head.jpg" title="beyondtext.ac.uk">Here</a> [beyondtext.ac.uk] is every corporation's stance on patents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here [ beyondtext.ac.uk ] is every corporation 's stance on patents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here [beyondtext.ac.uk] is every corporation's stance on patents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198428</id>
	<title>Not irony</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258902120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not irony. It would be irony if it caused the Google Patents to not display unintentionally. This is technically called Alanis irony, where there is no irony, merely potentially humorous contrast.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not irony .
It would be irony if it caused the Google Patents to not display unintentionally .
This is technically called Alanis irony , where there is no irony , merely potentially humorous contrast .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not irony.
It would be irony if it caused the Google Patents to not display unintentionally.
This is technically called Alanis irony, where there is no irony, merely potentially humorous contrast.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30202746</id>
	<title>All right, line's been crossed</title>
	<author>paragon1</author>
	<datestamp>1258995660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What we need now is for someone to figure out a clever, original way to prove the entire patent system is broken and being abused.  And then patent that method.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What we need now is for someone to figure out a clever , original way to prove the entire patent system is broken and being abused .
And then patent that method .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What we need now is for someone to figure out a clever, original way to prove the entire patent system is broken and being abused.
And then patent that method.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30205572</id>
	<title>Re:Uh...</title>
	<author>Carnildo</author>
	<datestamp>1258968840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You see that "D" in the patent number?  This is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design\_patent" title="wikipedia.org">design patent</a> [wikipedia.org], on the appearance of their particular user interface for displaying patents.  For the next 14 years, nobody else can copy the "decorative ornamentation" of their page.  Since it's not a utility patent, anybody can copy the underlying idea of displaying patents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You see that " D " in the patent number ?
This is a design patent [ wikipedia.org ] , on the appearance of their particular user interface for displaying patents .
For the next 14 years , nobody else can copy the " decorative ornamentation " of their page .
Since it 's not a utility patent , anybody can copy the underlying idea of displaying patents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You see that "D" in the patent number?
This is a design patent [wikipedia.org], on the appearance of their particular user interface for displaying patents.
For the next 14 years, nobody else can copy the "decorative ornamentation" of their page.
Since it's not a utility patent, anybody can copy the underlying idea of displaying patents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30202992</id>
	<title>Google's coverage is not up-to-date</title>
	<author>KristinAtIntellogist</author>
	<datestamp>1258997160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The reason that Google Patents cannot find this document is that the database is not as up-to-date as it could be.  The latest patents they seem to have in the database were issued in October 2009.  They are about a month behind, and the USPTO publishes issued patents once a week.

Although the system is better than the USPTO's patent search in many ways, USPTO is better for patents issued in the last month or so.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The reason that Google Patents can not find this document is that the database is not as up-to-date as it could be .
The latest patents they seem to have in the database were issued in October 2009 .
They are about a month behind , and the USPTO publishes issued patents once a week .
Although the system is better than the USPTO 's patent search in many ways , USPTO is better for patents issued in the last month or so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reason that Google Patents cannot find this document is that the database is not as up-to-date as it could be.
The latest patents they seem to have in the database were issued in October 2009.
They are about a month behind, and the USPTO publishes issued patents once a week.
Although the system is better than the USPTO's patent search in many ways, USPTO is better for patents issued in the last month or so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108</id>
	<title>Google's strange stance</title>
	<author>H4x0r Jim Duggan</author>
	<datestamp>1258882680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've tried to figure out Google's stance on software patents, but it's never clear.</p><p>The brief they signed for the Supreme Court Bilski case does seem to argue against software patents, so that's the main thing.</p><p>On the other hand, they're stockpiling them.  But do they use them aggressively?  Have they ever argued *for* them being generally allowed by the USPTO?</p><p>(I know they support "patent reform", but that's only important for massive corporations, it's got little to do with anything of importance to software developers or users)</p><p>Here's what I have so far:</p><ul>

<li> <a href="http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Google" title="swpat.org">Google @ swpat.org</a> [swpat.org] </li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've tried to figure out Google 's stance on software patents , but it 's never clear.The brief they signed for the Supreme Court Bilski case does seem to argue against software patents , so that 's the main thing.On the other hand , they 're stockpiling them .
But do they use them aggressively ?
Have they ever argued * for * them being generally allowed by the USPTO ?
( I know they support " patent reform " , but that 's only important for massive corporations , it 's got little to do with anything of importance to software developers or users ) Here 's what I have so far : Google @ swpat.org [ swpat.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've tried to figure out Google's stance on software patents, but it's never clear.The brief they signed for the Supreme Court Bilski case does seem to argue against software patents, so that's the main thing.On the other hand, they're stockpiling them.
But do they use them aggressively?
Have they ever argued *for* them being generally allowed by the USPTO?
(I know they support "patent reform", but that's only important for massive corporations, it's got little to do with anything of importance to software developers or users)Here's what I have so far:

 Google @ swpat.org [swpat.org] </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196790</id>
	<title>So</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1258888200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this make google evil now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this make google evil now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this make google evil now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196058</id>
	<title>No, they didn't</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258882380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They got a <i>design</i> patent. That's something <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design\_patent" title="wikipedia.org">complete different</a> [wikipedia.org] from a regular patent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They got a design patent .
That 's something complete different [ wikipedia.org ] from a regular patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They got a design patent.
That's something complete different [wikipedia.org] from a regular patent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196242</id>
	<title>Prior Art</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258883700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jeff Bezos already has a patent on patenting patents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeff Bezos already has a patent on patenting patents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeff Bezos already has a patent on patenting patents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196396</id>
	<title>the pittsburgh steelers lost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258885200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they suck. their city sucks. if you like them you suck too.<br> <br>here we go stillers. here we go.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they suck .
their city sucks .
if you like them you suck too .
here we go stillers .
here we go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they suck.
their city sucks.
if you like them you suck too.
here we go stillers.
here we go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196058
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30201850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30205572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30201712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30206146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30218180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30202590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30270814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_22_2019219_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30202590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30218180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30270814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30198194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30199998
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30206146
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30205572
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30201712
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30197936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30200232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30201850
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_22_2019219.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_22_2019219.30196824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
