<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_21_1524213</id>
	<title>NIMF To Close Its Doors</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1258823880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>eldavojohn writes <i>"One of the driving forces behind the ESRB toughening its ratings is <a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2009/11/20/nimf-close-year-end">closing its doors on December 31st, 2009</a>. The National Institute on Media and the Family was funded by Fairview Health Services, and simply could <a href="http://www.mediafamily.org/press/2009-11-20.shtml">no longer justify the yearly $750,000 price tag</a> given today's economic climate.  NIMF's reign of nagging has been pretty consistent since 1996, and was often <a href="https://games.slashdot.org/story/05/11/30/1742213/The-ESRB-Gets-An-F">indirectly featured</a> <a href="//games.slashdot.org/story/08/11/27/0538209/Annual-Video-Game-Report-Card-Is-Positive-For-Once">on Slashdot</a>.  Don't worry, president and founder Dr. David Walsh promises to keep writing and giving speeches ... and imploring us all to think of the children."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>eldavojohn writes " One of the driving forces behind the ESRB toughening its ratings is closing its doors on December 31st , 2009 .
The National Institute on Media and the Family was funded by Fairview Health Services , and simply could no longer justify the yearly $ 750,000 price tag given today 's economic climate .
NIMF 's reign of nagging has been pretty consistent since 1996 , and was often indirectly featured on Slashdot .
Do n't worry , president and founder Dr. David Walsh promises to keep writing and giving speeches ... and imploring us all to think of the children .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>eldavojohn writes "One of the driving forces behind the ESRB toughening its ratings is closing its doors on December 31st, 2009.
The National Institute on Media and the Family was funded by Fairview Health Services, and simply could no longer justify the yearly $750,000 price tag given today's economic climate.
NIMF's reign of nagging has been pretty consistent since 1996, and was often indirectly featured on Slashdot.
Don't worry, president and founder Dr. David Walsh promises to keep writing and giving speeches ... and imploring us all to think of the children.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192912</id>
	<title>Isn't it NIMH?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258901160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are they going to do with all those super smart rats?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are they going to do with all those super smart rats ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are they going to do with all those super smart rats?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185686</id>
	<title>Sad news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258827600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>A lot of us NIMFomaniacs will miss this organization. It always worked to satisfy us in creative ways.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:*(</htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of us NIMFomaniacs will miss this organization .
It always worked to satisfy us in creative ways .
: * (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of us NIMFomaniacs will miss this organization.
It always worked to satisfy us in creative ways.
:*(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185840</id>
	<title>That is terrible!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258828620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>These people protected our MORALS and our VALUES and our CHILDREN.
<p>
*sniffle*
</p><p>
You are thinking of the children, aren't you?  Michael Jackson did.
</p><p>
E</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These people protected our MORALS and our VALUES and our CHILDREN .
* sniffle * You are thinking of the children , are n't you ?
Michael Jackson did .
E</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These people protected our MORALS and our VALUES and our CHILDREN.
*sniffle*

You are thinking of the children, aren't you?
Michael Jackson did.
E</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186080</id>
	<title>NIMF closes...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258830120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... and nothing of value was lost.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and nothing of value was lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and nothing of value was lost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</id>
	<title>Fortunately</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258828020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>   This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship. Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues, like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; We need many more years of economic hardship to get rid of all the free-loaders who make a living from telling other people how guilty they should be feeling, or making nonsensical claims with no evidence to back them up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship .
Idiotic , wasteful , inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues , like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children .
      We need many more years of economic hardship to get rid of all the free-loaders who make a living from telling other people how guilty they should be feeling , or making nonsensical claims with no evidence to back them up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>   This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship.
Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues, like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.
      We need many more years of economic hardship to get rid of all the free-loaders who make a living from telling other people how guilty they should be feeling, or making nonsensical claims with no evidence to back them up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188082</id>
	<title>Re:Already said, but true...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258799760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"What, are you a pedophile?".</p></div><p>What in heck have foot-fetishists got to do with this?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" What , are you a pedophile ?
" .What in heck have foot-fetishists got to do with this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"What, are you a pedophile?
".What in heck have foot-fetishists got to do with this?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30187340</id>
	<title>And so we say farewell...</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1258795080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to the Rats of NIMF.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to the Rats of NIMF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to the Rats of NIMF.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056</id>
	<title>Already said, but true...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258830000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Whenever someone brought up "think of the children" to me, I always asked them "What, are you a pedophile?".
</p><p>
Has resulted in the occasional fist-fight and me having to bail before the cops arrived, but I think it's worth it just for laughs (and knocking some sense into an idiot - you can't <i>teach</i> a moron, but repeated beatings at least discourage them). If you need proof, look at the protesters at Marilyn Manson concerts. When they started out, there were hundreds of fundamentalists. The last time I saw him play, it was one teenage girl who looked so pathetic and discouraged that I offered to buy her a ticket.
</p><p>
Now if that guy who writes all those fundamentalist pamphlets suggesting that rock'n'roll or whatever leads to demonic possession or what-have-you dies, and the MPAA/RIAA goes away, they legalize drugs, and the government gets to deport illegal immigrants (like it was for a while and should be - I never minded waiting the extra 8 hours or so when getting released from jail while ICE came in and hauled off every one of those fucks away, before the PC crowd managed to tamp that down as "civil rights violations"; this is one of the few times I've seen a government agency <i>actually doing it's job <b>effectively</b> </i> and properly) my native country will be a better place (and before you start in with bits about American Indians, I'm part Cherokee as well as a White, so shut it).
</p><p>
Ah, if wishes were fishes...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever someone brought up " think of the children " to me , I always asked them " What , are you a pedophile ? " .
Has resulted in the occasional fist-fight and me having to bail before the cops arrived , but I think it 's worth it just for laughs ( and knocking some sense into an idiot - you ca n't teach a moron , but repeated beatings at least discourage them ) .
If you need proof , look at the protesters at Marilyn Manson concerts .
When they started out , there were hundreds of fundamentalists .
The last time I saw him play , it was one teenage girl who looked so pathetic and discouraged that I offered to buy her a ticket .
Now if that guy who writes all those fundamentalist pamphlets suggesting that rock'n'roll or whatever leads to demonic possession or what-have-you dies , and the MPAA/RIAA goes away , they legalize drugs , and the government gets to deport illegal immigrants ( like it was for a while and should be - I never minded waiting the extra 8 hours or so when getting released from jail while ICE came in and hauled off every one of those fucks away , before the PC crowd managed to tamp that down as " civil rights violations " ; this is one of the few times I 've seen a government agency actually doing it 's job effectively and properly ) my native country will be a better place ( and before you start in with bits about American Indians , I 'm part Cherokee as well as a White , so shut it ) .
Ah , if wishes were fishes.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Whenever someone brought up "think of the children" to me, I always asked them "What, are you a pedophile?".
Has resulted in the occasional fist-fight and me having to bail before the cops arrived, but I think it's worth it just for laughs (and knocking some sense into an idiot - you can't teach a moron, but repeated beatings at least discourage them).
If you need proof, look at the protesters at Marilyn Manson concerts.
When they started out, there were hundreds of fundamentalists.
The last time I saw him play, it was one teenage girl who looked so pathetic and discouraged that I offered to buy her a ticket.
Now if that guy who writes all those fundamentalist pamphlets suggesting that rock'n'roll or whatever leads to demonic possession or what-have-you dies, and the MPAA/RIAA goes away, they legalize drugs, and the government gets to deport illegal immigrants (like it was for a while and should be - I never minded waiting the extra 8 hours or so when getting released from jail while ICE came in and hauled off every one of those fucks away, before the PC crowd managed to tamp that down as "civil rights violations"; this is one of the few times I've seen a government agency actually doing it's job effectively  and properly) my native country will be a better place (and before you start in with bits about American Indians, I'm part Cherokee as well as a White, so shut it).
Ah, if wishes were fishes...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188638</id>
	<title>Nimfy.</title>
	<author>Snufu</author>
	<datestamp>1258803600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not In My FRONT Yard?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not In My FRONT Yard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not In My FRONT Yard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185818</id>
	<title>violence is go</title>
	<author>czarangelus</author>
	<datestamp>1258828440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>We lost the war on exploding craniums, explicit torture, and visible viscera - but as long as penises, vaginas, and boobs are still kept off limits in a game by adults for adults, we can consider this a victory.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We lost the war on exploding craniums , explicit torture , and visible viscera - but as long as penises , vaginas , and boobs are still kept off limits in a game by adults for adults , we can consider this a victory .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We lost the war on exploding craniums, explicit torture, and visible viscera - but as long as penises, vaginas, and boobs are still kept off limits in a game by adults for adults, we can consider this a victory.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30187406</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1258795620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship. Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues, like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.</i> <br> <br>Pity other extremist political groups appear to have rather deeper pockets. No doubt some even thrive in times of economic hardship<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship .
Idiotic , wasteful , inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues , like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children .
Pity other extremist political groups appear to have rather deeper pockets .
No doubt some even thrive in times of economic hardship : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship.
Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues, like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.
Pity other extremist political groups appear to have rather deeper pockets.
No doubt some even thrive in times of economic hardship :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186500</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>Machtyn</author>
	<datestamp>1258832880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I disagree that this is an idiotic and wasteful idea, I will agree that it is inefficient.  It is not idiotic, because it gives us a baseline of what content to expect.  It's not wasteful, because some of us use these ratings.  It is inefficient because it makes the more hardcore games seem more appealing and some parents just don't care and will let their kids play anything.  And when they find out their little precious boy is severely depressed, grades have dropped, and has no social life they are *shocked*!
<br> <br>Be it known, I am not saying that playing violent games will lead to this, but it can be a side effect of playing violent games too much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I disagree that this is an idiotic and wasteful idea , I will agree that it is inefficient .
It is not idiotic , because it gives us a baseline of what content to expect .
It 's not wasteful , because some of us use these ratings .
It is inefficient because it makes the more hardcore games seem more appealing and some parents just do n't care and will let their kids play anything .
And when they find out their little precious boy is severely depressed , grades have dropped , and has no social life they are * shocked * !
Be it known , I am not saying that playing violent games will lead to this , but it can be a side effect of playing violent games too much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I disagree that this is an idiotic and wasteful idea, I will agree that it is inefficient.
It is not idiotic, because it gives us a baseline of what content to expect.
It's not wasteful, because some of us use these ratings.
It is inefficient because it makes the more hardcore games seem more appealing and some parents just don't care and will let their kids play anything.
And when they find out their little precious boy is severely depressed, grades have dropped, and has no social life they are *shocked*!
Be it known, I am not saying that playing violent games will lead to this, but it can be a side effect of playing violent games too much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186418</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>morethanapapercert</author>
	<datestamp>1258832400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so what you're saying is that we can look forward to a huge wave of ignosticism to sweep the world? I think that would be wonderful, but I do see a small problem with that prediction. When times are tough, when the common person feels helpless in the face of forces and circumstances larger than they are, they tend to seek out explanations that are larger than they are. Religion *thrives* when things are toughest. "There are no athesists in a foxhole" is one common way of phrasing that. As I see it, every generation looks at it's kids, looks at the way society is evolving and finds that they don't really understand either one. They also tend to fear the worst. It is all too easy to take heed of those who prophesy a doom that we already suspect ourselves and at the same time promise that doom can be averted if we all just make a few changes in what we are doing. <p>
To my mind; the fundamental problem with groups like NIMF isn't that they View With Alarm, that is a enshrined tradition of priests, politicians and the power-hungry since the dawn of human history. The real problem is human arrogance and an inability to keep from meddling. If can't we can't accurately imagine the future, how can we hope to shape it as we desire? The law of unintended consequences still reigns supreme</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so what you 're saying is that we can look forward to a huge wave of ignosticism to sweep the world ?
I think that would be wonderful , but I do see a small problem with that prediction .
When times are tough , when the common person feels helpless in the face of forces and circumstances larger than they are , they tend to seek out explanations that are larger than they are .
Religion * thrives * when things are toughest .
" There are no athesists in a foxhole " is one common way of phrasing that .
As I see it , every generation looks at it 's kids , looks at the way society is evolving and finds that they do n't really understand either one .
They also tend to fear the worst .
It is all too easy to take heed of those who prophesy a doom that we already suspect ourselves and at the same time promise that doom can be averted if we all just make a few changes in what we are doing .
To my mind ; the fundamental problem with groups like NIMF is n't that they View With Alarm , that is a enshrined tradition of priests , politicians and the power-hungry since the dawn of human history .
The real problem is human arrogance and an inability to keep from meddling .
If ca n't we ca n't accurately imagine the future , how can we hope to shape it as we desire ?
The law of unintended consequences still reigns supreme</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so what you're saying is that we can look forward to a huge wave of ignosticism to sweep the world?
I think that would be wonderful, but I do see a small problem with that prediction.
When times are tough, when the common person feels helpless in the face of forces and circumstances larger than they are, they tend to seek out explanations that are larger than they are.
Religion *thrives* when things are toughest.
"There are no athesists in a foxhole" is one common way of phrasing that.
As I see it, every generation looks at it's kids, looks at the way society is evolving and finds that they don't really understand either one.
They also tend to fear the worst.
It is all too easy to take heed of those who prophesy a doom that we already suspect ourselves and at the same time promise that doom can be averted if we all just make a few changes in what we are doing.
To my mind; the fundamental problem with groups like NIMF isn't that they View With Alarm, that is a enshrined tradition of priests, politicians and the power-hungry since the dawn of human history.
The real problem is human arrogance and an inability to keep from meddling.
If can't we can't accurately imagine the future, how can we hope to shape it as we desire?
The law of unintended consequences still reigns supreme</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186618</id>
	<title>Re:Already said, but true...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258833480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>my native country will be a better place (and before you start in with bits about American Indians, I'm part Cherokee as well as a White, so shut it)</i></p><p>Irrelevant. If you were born there, you're a native. Doesn't matter if your parents invaded the country and stole the land your house is built on, you'd still be a native.</p><p>Without the Cherokee blood (and perhaps even with it) you can't claim to be a Native American, but that is not the same thing as claiming to be a native American (= native of America).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my native country will be a better place ( and before you start in with bits about American Indians , I 'm part Cherokee as well as a White , so shut it ) Irrelevant .
If you were born there , you 're a native .
Does n't matter if your parents invaded the country and stole the land your house is built on , you 'd still be a native.Without the Cherokee blood ( and perhaps even with it ) you ca n't claim to be a Native American , but that is not the same thing as claiming to be a native American ( = native of America ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my native country will be a better place (and before you start in with bits about American Indians, I'm part Cherokee as well as a White, so shut it)Irrelevant.
If you were born there, you're a native.
Doesn't matter if your parents invaded the country and stole the land your house is built on, you'd still be a native.Without the Cherokee blood (and perhaps even with it) you can't claim to be a Native American, but that is not the same thing as claiming to be a native American (= native of America).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192166</id>
	<title>Re:Already said, but true...</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1258887900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you need proof, look at the protesters at Marilyn Manson concerts. When they started out, there were hundreds of fundamentalists. The last time I saw him play, it was one teenage girl who looked so pathetic and discouraged that I offered to buy her a ticket.</p></div><p>People <em>pay</em> to see Marilyn Manson? Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper just to wait for him to come to your house as he goes door-to-door?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you need proof , look at the protesters at Marilyn Manson concerts .
When they started out , there were hundreds of fundamentalists .
The last time I saw him play , it was one teenage girl who looked so pathetic and discouraged that I offered to buy her a ticket.People pay to see Marilyn Manson ?
Would n't it be easier and cheaper just to wait for him to come to your house as he goes door-to-door ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you need proof, look at the protesters at Marilyn Manson concerts.
When they started out, there were hundreds of fundamentalists.
The last time I saw him play, it was one teenage girl who looked so pathetic and discouraged that I offered to buy her a ticket.People pay to see Marilyn Manson?
Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper just to wait for him to come to your house as he goes door-to-door?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185956</id>
	<title>well....</title>
	<author>Kierthos</author>
	<datestamp>1258829340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't let the door hit your ass on the way out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188444</id>
	<title>Re:Economic climate... or lack of concern?</title>
	<author>jonwil</author>
	<datestamp>1258802160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering the number of attempts to pass video game regulation legislation in various states (all of which have so far been struck down as unconstitutional AFAIK) I dont think the "war on video games" is dead by a long shot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the number of attempts to pass video game regulation legislation in various states ( all of which have so far been struck down as unconstitutional AFAIK ) I dont think the " war on video games " is dead by a long shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the number of attempts to pass video game regulation legislation in various states (all of which have so far been struck down as unconstitutional AFAIK) I dont think the "war on video games" is dead by a long shot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192104</id>
	<title>Re:That is terrible!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258886820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hmmm, the kid who accused him of that commited suicide not too long ago, telling the world that MJ did not sexually abuse him.<br>Restored a bit of faith in humanity for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hmmm , the kid who accused him of that commited suicide not too long ago , telling the world that MJ did not sexually abuse him.Restored a bit of faith in humanity for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hmmm, the kid who accused him of that commited suicide not too long ago, telling the world that MJ did not sexually abuse him.Restored a bit of faith in humanity for me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890</id>
	<title>Economic climate... or lack of concern?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258828920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is NIMF's inability to procure funding just a sign of the harsh economic climate or is it an indication that people are becoming less concerned with the issues it promoted. 15 years ago, computer and video games were making the transition from "toys for children" (Sonic, Mario) to more graphic and mature titles (Doom, Duke Nukem). Parents and (older) adults saw these gore-soaked, stripper-filled games and wondered what effect this would have on the younger generation. Worriedly, they funded -through contributions or taxes- groups like NIMF.</p><p>More than a decade later, a generation has come of age having played these games for most of their lives and -surprise, surprise!- they are not any more messed up than any previous generation. Video games, it seems, are not the corrupting influence people thought they might be. Not only are the supporters of yesteryear lest likely to fund these groups,  but the same generation NIMF etal were meant to protect -now grown up themselves- are equally unlikely to open their pocketbooks to them.</p><p>Claiming it is merely the "economic climate" that is shutting down these groups is buying into their argument that there is a necessity for the services they provide but that harsher realities requires our finances to be redirected to more essential things. People generally consider "protecting the children" to be a priority. That NIMF is closing is just as likely an indication that we recognize they are not necessary to keep the kids safe because there never was any real danger to them in the first place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is NIMF 's inability to procure funding just a sign of the harsh economic climate or is it an indication that people are becoming less concerned with the issues it promoted .
15 years ago , computer and video games were making the transition from " toys for children " ( Sonic , Mario ) to more graphic and mature titles ( Doom , Duke Nukem ) .
Parents and ( older ) adults saw these gore-soaked , stripper-filled games and wondered what effect this would have on the younger generation .
Worriedly , they funded -through contributions or taxes- groups like NIMF.More than a decade later , a generation has come of age having played these games for most of their lives and -surprise , surprise ! - they are not any more messed up than any previous generation .
Video games , it seems , are not the corrupting influence people thought they might be .
Not only are the supporters of yesteryear lest likely to fund these groups , but the same generation NIMF etal were meant to protect -now grown up themselves- are equally unlikely to open their pocketbooks to them.Claiming it is merely the " economic climate " that is shutting down these groups is buying into their argument that there is a necessity for the services they provide but that harsher realities requires our finances to be redirected to more essential things .
People generally consider " protecting the children " to be a priority .
That NIMF is closing is just as likely an indication that we recognize they are not necessary to keep the kids safe because there never was any real danger to them in the first place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is NIMF's inability to procure funding just a sign of the harsh economic climate or is it an indication that people are becoming less concerned with the issues it promoted.
15 years ago, computer and video games were making the transition from "toys for children" (Sonic, Mario) to more graphic and mature titles (Doom, Duke Nukem).
Parents and (older) adults saw these gore-soaked, stripper-filled games and wondered what effect this would have on the younger generation.
Worriedly, they funded -through contributions or taxes- groups like NIMF.More than a decade later, a generation has come of age having played these games for most of their lives and -surprise, surprise!- they are not any more messed up than any previous generation.
Video games, it seems, are not the corrupting influence people thought they might be.
Not only are the supporters of yesteryear lest likely to fund these groups,  but the same generation NIMF etal were meant to protect -now grown up themselves- are equally unlikely to open their pocketbooks to them.Claiming it is merely the "economic climate" that is shutting down these groups is buying into their argument that there is a necessity for the services they provide but that harsher realities requires our finances to be redirected to more essential things.
People generally consider "protecting the children" to be a priority.
That NIMF is closing is just as likely an indication that we recognize they are not necessary to keep the kids safe because there never was any real danger to them in the first place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186076</id>
	<title>Now, now. Be nice</title>
	<author>Telecommando</author>
	<datestamp>1258830120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure there will be quite a few disparaging remarks about the NIMF in this thread. And while some comments may be deserved, we should all just step back and take the time to say something good.</p><p>I'll start.</p><p>
&nbsp; They're gone.</p><p>Good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure there will be quite a few disparaging remarks about the NIMF in this thread .
And while some comments may be deserved , we should all just step back and take the time to say something good.I 'll start .
  They 're gone.Good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure there will be quite a few disparaging remarks about the NIMF in this thread.
And while some comments may be deserved, we should all just step back and take the time to say something good.I'll start.
  They're gone.Good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186234</id>
	<title>Let's face facts</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258831260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Groups like these have little to no pull anywhere. The fact is, and we've all seen it first hand, that if the US government wants to tighten the screws on something or someone they're going to do it regardless of cost, common sense or public support. Until there is some serious political reform in this nation neither we nor the NIMF will have any serious voice in these decisions.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Groups like these have little to no pull anywhere .
The fact is , and we 've all seen it first hand , that if the US government wants to tighten the screws on something or someone they 're going to do it regardless of cost , common sense or public support .
Until there is some serious political reform in this nation neither we nor the NIMF will have any serious voice in these decisions .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Groups like these have little to no pull anywhere.
The fact is, and we've all seen it first hand, that if the US government wants to tighten the screws on something or someone they're going to do it regardless of cost, common sense or public support.
Until there is some serious political reform in this nation neither we nor the NIMF will have any serious voice in these decisions.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186642</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1258833600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's nothing inherently wasteful about game age ratings.  <br> <br>
There's nothing wrong with parents wanting to prevent their children playing certain types of games.  If you think they're harmless, that's fine.  Let your own kids play them.  A lot of parents do care, and do like some sort of age rating.  The NIMF encouraged this in a generally fairly reasonable manner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing inherently wasteful about game age ratings .
There 's nothing wrong with parents wanting to prevent their children playing certain types of games .
If you think they 're harmless , that 's fine .
Let your own kids play them .
A lot of parents do care , and do like some sort of age rating .
The NIMF encouraged this in a generally fairly reasonable manner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing inherently wasteful about game age ratings.
There's nothing wrong with parents wanting to prevent their children playing certain types of games.
If you think they're harmless, that's fine.
Let your own kids play them.
A lot of parents do care, and do like some sort of age rating.
The NIMF encouraged this in a generally fairly reasonable manner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186098</id>
	<title>The secret of NIMF</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258830300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But who is going to create super-intelligent rats now?*</p><p><i>* yes, I know. NIMH = NIMF. But that's the first thing that crossed my mind when I saw this story.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But who is going to create super-intelligent rats now ?
* * yes , I know .
NIMH = NIMF .
But that 's the first thing that crossed my mind when I saw this story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But who is going to create super-intelligent rats now?
** yes, I know.
NIMH = NIMF.
But that's the first thing that crossed my mind when I saw this story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185726</id>
	<title>Maybe the NIMF junk scientists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258827780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...can go from working for Tipper Gore to working for Al Gore in the AGW bullshit dept.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...can go from working for Tipper Gore to working for Al Gore in the AGW bullshit dept .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...can go from working for Tipper Gore to working for Al Gore in the AGW bullshit dept.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186568</id>
	<title>Re:Economic climate... or lack of concern?</title>
	<author>Tim C</author>
	<datestamp>1258833180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Either that, or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman, and people are simply concentrating on that instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Either that , or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman , and people are simply concentrating on that instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either that, or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman, and people are simply concentrating on that instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186004</id>
	<title>Crying Wolf3D</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258829640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wolf3D was "too violent" for these guys.</p><p>Now when I play Mario Kart or the new COD, I get the same violence warning (to skip).</p><p>To their credit, I was warned about the slaughtering of all those Green Shell, Red Shell, and the rare Blue Shelled turtles.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wolf3D was " too violent " for these guys.Now when I play Mario Kart or the new COD , I get the same violence warning ( to skip ) .To their credit , I was warned about the slaughtering of all those Green Shell , Red Shell , and the rare Blue Shelled turtles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wolf3D was "too violent" for these guys.Now when I play Mario Kart or the new COD, I get the same violence warning (to skip).To their credit, I was warned about the slaughtering of all those Green Shell, Red Shell, and the rare Blue Shelled turtles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188370</id>
	<title>tubgirL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258801560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>these challenges do and doing 3ha7 *BSD has lost more All major marketing what provides the and easy - only</htmltext>
<tokenext>these challenges do and doing 3ha7 * BSD has lost more All major marketing what provides the and easy - only</tokentext>
<sentencetext>these challenges do and doing 3ha7 *BSD has lost more All major marketing what provides the and easy - only</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30190120</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1258815000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>A lot of parents do care, and do like some sort of age rating.</i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; You obviously don't care enough to fund it, hence the insolvency.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of parents do care , and do like some sort of age rating .
      You obviously do n't care enough to fund it , hence the insolvency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of parents do care, and do like some sort of age rating.
      You obviously don't care enough to fund it, hence the insolvency.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186642</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186038</id>
	<title>Re:Sad news</title>
	<author>LrdDimwit</author>
	<datestamp>1258829820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rule 34?  Of NIMF?  Are you insane?  Didn't anyone tell you to never cross the, uh, streams!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rule 34 ?
Of NIMF ?
Are you insane ?
Did n't anyone tell you to never cross the , uh , streams !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rule 34?
Of NIMF?
Are you insane?
Didn't anyone tell you to never cross the, uh, streams!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188516</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1258802760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship. Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Except when the bad ones get bailed out, and thus make the good ones suffer more than the bad ones.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship .
Idiotic , wasteful , inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues Except when the bad ones get bailed out , and thus make the good ones suffer more than the bad ones .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship.
Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues
Except when the bad ones get bailed out, and thus make the good ones suffer more than the bad ones.
:(
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188068</id>
	<title>Re:Economic climate... or lack of concern?</title>
	<author>frosty\_tsm</author>
	<datestamp>1258799700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Either that, or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman, and people are simply concentrating on that instead.</p></div><p>Sad but true.<br> <br>

This touches on another trend.  If you want power over a man, don't make him feel secure.  Instead, instill a fear of a great evil and position yourself as his protector.  Then he will willingly give you his wealth, servitude, and even family.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Either that , or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman , and people are simply concentrating on that instead.Sad but true .
This touches on another trend .
If you want power over a man , do n't make him feel secure .
Instead , instill a fear of a great evil and position yourself as his protector .
Then he will willingly give you his wealth , servitude , and even family .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Either that, or the Video Game Bogeyman has been replaced by the Terrorism Bogeyman, and people are simply concentrating on that instead.Sad but true.
This touches on another trend.
If you want power over a man, don't make him feel secure.
Instead, instill a fear of a great evil and position yourself as his protector.
Then he will willingly give you his wealth, servitude, and even family.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188852</id>
	<title>Re:Fortunately</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258804920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship. Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues, like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.</p></div></blockquote><p>Which is why Democrats always get elected to clean up the economic problems of the previous Republican administrations.  But don't worry, though, times will get good again and the Republicans will get re-elected once the country is ready to focus on sex education, intelligent design, flag burnings and other trivial shit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship .
Idiotic , wasteful , inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues , like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.Which is why Democrats always get elected to clean up the economic problems of the previous Republican administrations .
But do n't worry , though , times will get good again and the Republicans will get re-elected once the country is ready to focus on sex education , intelligent design , flag burnings and other trivial shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is one good thing that comes with economic hardship.
Idiotic, wasteful, inefficient ideas like this get swept away in the tide while people start focusing on more important issues, like keeping a roof over their heads or feeding and clothing themselves and their children.Which is why Democrats always get elected to clean up the economic problems of the previous Republican administrations.
But don't worry, though, times will get good again and the Republicans will get re-elected once the country is ready to focus on sex education, intelligent design, flag burnings and other trivial shit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186904</id>
	<title>Re:Economic climate... or lack of concern?</title>
	<author>WCguru42</author>
	<datestamp>1258835220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"toys for children" (Sonic, Mario)</p> </div><p>Sonic has, is and always will be a mans (or womans) game.  Despite the fact that it's nearly 20 years old it's still one of the most fun games I've ever played.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" toys for children " ( Sonic , Mario ) Sonic has , is and always will be a mans ( or womans ) game .
Despite the fact that it 's nearly 20 years old it 's still one of the most fun games I 've ever played .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"toys for children" (Sonic, Mario) Sonic has, is and always will be a mans (or womans) game.
Despite the fact that it's nearly 20 years old it's still one of the most fun games I've ever played.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30191210</id>
	<title>Re:Economic climate... or lack of concern?</title>
	<author>cavebison</author>
	<datestamp>1258828440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>More than a decade later, a generation has come of age having played these games for most of their lives and -surprise, surprise!- they are not any more messed up than any previous generation.</p></div><p>Two words: [citation needed]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More than a decade later , a generation has come of age having played these games for most of their lives and -surprise , surprise ! - they are not any more messed up than any previous generation.Two words : [ citation needed ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More than a decade later, a generation has come of age having played these games for most of their lives and -surprise, surprise!- they are not any more messed up than any previous generation.Two words: [citation needed]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186062</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>JockTroll</author>
	<datestamp>1258830000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take them fuckers out and execute them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take them fuckers out and execute them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take them fuckers out and execute them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30191210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30187406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30190120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_21_1524213_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30191210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186642
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30190120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30187406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188852
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30192166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30188082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186618
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_21_1524213.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30185686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_21_1524213.30186038
</commentlist>
</conversation>
