<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_20_2123234</id>
	<title>Proton Beams Sent Around the LHC</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1258710000000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>feldhaus writes <i>"The BBC reports that the first beams for over one year have been successfully <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8368417.stm">sent around the complete circumference of the Large Hadron Collider</a>. Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to by 0600 GMT on Saturday."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>feldhaus writes " The BBC reports that the first beams for over one year have been successfully sent around the complete circumference of the Large Hadron Collider .
Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to by 0600 GMT on Saturday .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>feldhaus writes "The BBC reports that the first beams for over one year have been successfully sent around the complete circumference of the Large Hadron Collider.
Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to by 0600 GMT on Saturday.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178306</id>
	<title>Crap, I was going to go see a movie on Monday</title>
	<author>JeffSpudrinski</author>
	<datestamp>1258715160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I *was* going to go see a movie on Monday, but since we're all going to be sucked into a black hole of oblivion, that plan is out the window.</p><p>On a positive note, I don't have to worry about those credit card bills now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I * was * going to go see a movie on Monday , but since we 're all going to be sucked into a black hole of oblivion , that plan is out the window.On a positive note , I do n't have to worry about those credit card bills now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I *was* going to go see a movie on Monday, but since we're all going to be sucked into a black hole of oblivion, that plan is out the window.On a positive note, I don't have to worry about those credit card bills now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178342</id>
	<title>Damn!</title>
	<author>hippie-joel</author>
	<datestamp>1258715280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the end of the world people!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the end of the world people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the end of the world people!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177934</id>
	<title>'Pew Pew' noises uttered by people with PHDs</title>
	<author>Kenja</author>
	<datestamp>1258713960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on, you know someone did it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , you know someone did it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, you know someone did it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179328</id>
	<title>Re:wow, we are still here!</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1258719480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go ahead, <a href="http://hasthelhcdestroyedtheearth.com/" title="hasthelhcd...eearth.com">ask the question</a> [hasthelhcd...eearth.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go ahead , ask the question [ hasthelhcd...eearth.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go ahead, ask the question [hasthelhcd...eearth.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179288</id>
	<title>Can they set it up in 2 years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Say, at about January, 2012?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Say , at about January , 2012 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Say, at about January, 2012?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178016</id>
	<title>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258714200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to byNO UNIVERSE</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to byNO UNIVERSE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to byNO UNIVERSE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178240</id>
	<title>Good news everyone!</title>
	<author>spammeister</author>
	<datestamp>1258714920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's just an ordinary particle beam. But watch out, because that's no ordinary particle beam!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just an ordinary particle beam .
But watch out , because that 's no ordinary particle beam !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just an ordinary particle beam.
But watch out, because that's no ordinary particle beam!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30201008</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1258985340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection. I know it is completely unscientific, and probably complete rubbish.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I thought it was scientists from the future travelling back in time to stop the machine that obliterated the entire universe, including those future scientists...oh, wait.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection .
I know it is completely unscientific , and probably complete rubbish .
I thought it was scientists from the future travelling back in time to stop the machine that obliterated the entire universe , including those future scientists...oh , wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection.
I know it is completely unscientific, and probably complete rubbish.
I thought it was scientists from the future travelling back in time to stop the machine that obliterated the entire universe, including those future scientists...oh, wait.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179318</id>
	<title>A picture from LHC</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258719420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they were successful, here's a picture:</p><p><a href="http://fox.nncdn.com/nn/0/142/729/324435.jpg" title="nncdn.com" rel="nofollow">http://fox.nncdn.com/nn/0/142/729/324435.jpg</a> [nncdn.com]</p><p>No problems whatsoever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they were successful , here 's a picture : http : //fox.nncdn.com/nn/0/142/729/324435.jpg [ nncdn.com ] No problems whatsoever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they were successful, here's a picture:http://fox.nncdn.com/nn/0/142/729/324435.jpg [nncdn.com]No problems whatsoever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179598</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1258720680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everybody hates Protons.  Neutrons are the cool bits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everybody hates Protons .
Neutrons are the cool bits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everybody hates Protons.
Neutrons are the cool bits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180808</id>
	<title>Re:Just in case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258727820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A Ferrari won't work -- the stainless steel skin of the DeLorean was necessary to distribute the electrical charge correctly.</p><p>That said, they sell for about $50k on eBay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A Ferrari wo n't work -- the stainless steel skin of the DeLorean was necessary to distribute the electrical charge correctly.That said , they sell for about $ 50k on eBay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Ferrari won't work -- the stainless steel skin of the DeLorean was necessary to distribute the electrical charge correctly.That said, they sell for about $50k on eBay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</id>
	<title>PROTON CANNON!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258713780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well... at least no killer blackholes were sent across the circumference, that's a good thing right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well... at least no killer blackholes were sent across the circumference , that 's a good thing right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well... at least no killer blackholes were sent across the circumference, that's a good thing right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178902</id>
	<title>Just in case</title>
	<author>failedlogic</author>
	<datestamp>1258717500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where can I buy a Delorean they are hard to find nowadays? I'm working on the flux gapacitor. I'm adding Nitro to the car so I can go 88 mph in no time and the source of the 1.21 gigawatts is easy for me to get. Its just that darn Delorean. I don't think my Honda Civic will work. Screw it, I'm going to steal a Ferrari.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where can I buy a Delorean they are hard to find nowadays ?
I 'm working on the flux gapacitor .
I 'm adding Nitro to the car so I can go 88 mph in no time and the source of the 1.21 gigawatts is easy for me to get .
Its just that darn Delorean .
I do n't think my Honda Civic will work .
Screw it , I 'm going to steal a Ferrari .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where can I buy a Delorean they are hard to find nowadays?
I'm working on the flux gapacitor.
I'm adding Nitro to the car so I can go 88 mph in no time and the source of the 1.21 gigawatts is easy for me to get.
Its just that darn Delorean.
I don't think my Honda Civic will work.
Screw it, I'm going to steal a Ferrari.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178048</id>
	<title>Real-time Updates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258714260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://twitter.com/CERN" title="twitter.com" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/CERN</a> [twitter.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //twitter.com/CERN [ twitter.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://twitter.com/CERN [twitter.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179184</id>
	<title>Awesome!</title>
	<author>RepelHistory</author>
	<datestamp>1258718820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't wait to see what causes it to malfunction this time!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't wait to see what causes it to malfunction this time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't wait to see what causes it to malfunction this time!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182582</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>mako1138</author>
	<datestamp>1258834740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean one is charged, right? They both have a magnetic moment.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean one is charged , right ?
They both have a magnetic moment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean one is charged, right?
They both have a magnetic moment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178434</id>
	<title>end of the world special</title>
	<author>czarangelus</author>
	<datestamp>1258715640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Won't you all have egg on your faces when the LHC opens the Abyss from Revelations and the Beast and false prophet are able to materialize on the Earth for the first time in ages? The Nephilim from the Old Testament have been psychically manipulating the power elites of Earth in order to secure funding for this demonic Stargate. Source: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt1Yo610lG0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">Satan's Star Gate</a> [youtube.com] <br> <br>
I love all these romantic theories about alien or demonic invasion. Sadly, I think that neither that will happen nor will any new particles be discovered. RE: The Tao of Physics - we find what we're looking for in the act of looking for it. Or to paraphrase Eris - the more attention I pay to the number five the more places I see it!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wo n't you all have egg on your faces when the LHC opens the Abyss from Revelations and the Beast and false prophet are able to materialize on the Earth for the first time in ages ?
The Nephilim from the Old Testament have been psychically manipulating the power elites of Earth in order to secure funding for this demonic Stargate .
Source : Satan 's Star Gate [ youtube.com ] I love all these romantic theories about alien or demonic invasion .
Sadly , I think that neither that will happen nor will any new particles be discovered .
RE : The Tao of Physics - we find what we 're looking for in the act of looking for it .
Or to paraphrase Eris - the more attention I pay to the number five the more places I see it !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Won't you all have egg on your faces when the LHC opens the Abyss from Revelations and the Beast and false prophet are able to materialize on the Earth for the first time in ages?
The Nephilim from the Old Testament have been psychically manipulating the power elites of Earth in order to secure funding for this demonic Stargate.
Source: Satan's Star Gate [youtube.com]  
I love all these romantic theories about alien or demonic invasion.
Sadly, I think that neither that will happen nor will any new particles be discovered.
RE: The Tao of Physics - we find what we're looking for in the act of looking for it.
Or to paraphrase Eris - the more attention I pay to the number five the more places I see it!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181114</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258730100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably you can still hit static neutrons with the proton beam?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably you can still hit static neutrons with the proton beam ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably you can still hit static neutrons with the proton beam?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182470</id>
	<title>Re:Just in case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258746360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just stick a coffee can exhaust and a giant spoiler on your Civic. At least then it'll look like it's going 88MPH</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just stick a coffee can exhaust and a giant spoiler on your Civic .
At least then it 'll look like it 's going 88MPH</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just stick a coffee can exhaust and a giant spoiler on your Civic.
At least then it'll look like it's going 88MPH</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180690</id>
	<title>Re:'Pew Pew' noises uttered by people with PHDs</title>
	<author>brianc</author>
	<datestamp>1258726860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suspect it was more along the lines of a NASCAR/Indy/Forumula 1 doppler effect...</p><p>That, or a light saber hum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect it was more along the lines of a NASCAR/Indy/Forumula 1 doppler effect...That , or a light saber hum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect it was more along the lines of a NASCAR/Indy/Forumula 1 doppler effect...That, or a light saber hum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178546</id>
	<title>Re:Beam me up Scotty!</title>
	<author>click2005</author>
	<datestamp>1258716060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>quark smashing across the LHC<br>on the LEP collider looking for the higgs<br>quark smashing across the LHC<br>only smashing protons cos we cant find bosons</p><p>theres ATLAS and the CMS, ALICE and LHCb<br>looking for dark matter and super symmetry</p><p>quark smashing across the LHC<br>on the LEP collider looking for the higgs<br>quark smashing across the LHC<br>only smashing protons cos we cant find bosons</p><p>theres gluons on the starboard bow but no signs of dark energy<br>fundamental forces and its link to weak gravity</p><p>quark smashing across the LHC<br>on the LEP collider looking for the higgs<br>quark smashing across the LHC<br>only smashing protons cos we cant find bosons</p><p>(sung to Star Trekkin')</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>quark smashing across the LHCon the LEP collider looking for the higgsquark smashing across the LHConly smashing protons cos we cant find bosonstheres ATLAS and the CMS , ALICE and LHCblooking for dark matter and super symmetryquark smashing across the LHCon the LEP collider looking for the higgsquark smashing across the LHConly smashing protons cos we cant find bosonstheres gluons on the starboard bow but no signs of dark energyfundamental forces and its link to weak gravityquark smashing across the LHCon the LEP collider looking for the higgsquark smashing across the LHConly smashing protons cos we cant find bosons ( sung to Star Trekkin ' )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>quark smashing across the LHCon the LEP collider looking for the higgsquark smashing across the LHConly smashing protons cos we cant find bosonstheres ATLAS and the CMS, ALICE and LHCblooking for dark matter and super symmetryquark smashing across the LHCon the LEP collider looking for the higgsquark smashing across the LHConly smashing protons cos we cant find bosonstheres gluons on the starboard bow but no signs of dark energyfundamental forces and its link to weak gravityquark smashing across the LHCon the LEP collider looking for the higgsquark smashing across the LHConly smashing protons cos we cant find bosons(sung to Star Trekkin')</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179558</id>
	<title>Well that's a relief!</title>
	<author>HiggsBison</author>
	<datestamp>1258720500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>They still have many engineering challenges to complete before the LHC can start looking for the Higgs Boson.</i> </p><p>Well, that's a big relief! Wait... Boson? Oh. Never mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They still have many engineering challenges to complete before the LHC can start looking for the Higgs Boson .
Well , that 's a big relief !
Wait... Boson ?
Oh. Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> They still have many engineering challenges to complete before the LHC can start looking for the Higgs Boson.
Well, that's a big relief!
Wait... Boson?
Oh. Never mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</id>
	<title>Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258713840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They still have many engineering challenges to complete before the LHC can start looking for the Higgs Boson.<p>
<i>Assuming</i> it exists.  After all, this <i>is</i> an experiment designed to determine the accurace of a theory, <i>not</i> to confirm it.</p><p>
Of course, I believe they'll find it.  My wife goes to 'mass' every weekend; I'm assuming that's where Higgs particles come from?  I wouldn't know, as I haven't gone.  You could describe me as 'massless'.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They still have many engineering challenges to complete before the LHC can start looking for the Higgs Boson .
Assuming it exists .
After all , this is an experiment designed to determine the accurace of a theory , not to confirm it .
Of course , I believe they 'll find it .
My wife goes to 'mass ' every weekend ; I 'm assuming that 's where Higgs particles come from ?
I would n't know , as I have n't gone .
You could describe me as 'massless' .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They still have many engineering challenges to complete before the LHC can start looking for the Higgs Boson.
Assuming it exists.
After all, this is an experiment designed to determine the accurace of a theory, not to confirm it.
Of course, I believe they'll find it.
My wife goes to 'mass' every weekend; I'm assuming that's where Higgs particles come from?
I wouldn't know, as I haven't gone.
You could describe me as 'massless'.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178466</id>
	<title>Re:Real-time Updates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258715760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. missed<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... it... too... fast... to... tweet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just .. missed ... it... too... fast... to... tweet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just .. missed ... it... too... fast... to... tweet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178048</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178608</id>
	<title>Re:wow, we are still here!</title>
	<author>ACS Solver</author>
	<datestamp>1258716300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't worry, the power levels required for planet-consuming black holes will be reached right on schedule, on December 22nd.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry , the power levels required for planet-consuming black holes will be reached right on schedule , on December 22nd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry, the power levels required for planet-consuming black holes will be reached right on schedule, on December 22nd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30183182</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they're more careful</title>
	<author>perturbed1</author>
	<datestamp>1258803420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First thing is that they did not need to test "everything" to get it started. When you have 450 GeV protons in the ring, you dont need 7-8 Tesla magnetic field... So they got it started because they could and decided that they can test the high magnetic field setting later. <br>
Second: The incident happened as they *were* testing it in a break from the low energy collisions schedule.  <br>
Third: It was more like 6 tons of helium...  <br>
<br>
But OK, you've got most of the story right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>First thing is that they did not need to test " everything " to get it started .
When you have 450 GeV protons in the ring , you dont need 7-8 Tesla magnetic field... So they got it started because they could and decided that they can test the high magnetic field setting later .
Second : The incident happened as they * were * testing it in a break from the low energy collisions schedule .
Third : It was more like 6 tons of helium.. . But OK , you 've got most of the story right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First thing is that they did not need to test "everything" to get it started.
When you have 450 GeV protons in the ring, you dont need 7-8 Tesla magnetic field... So they got it started because they could and decided that they can test the high magnetic field setting later.
Second: The incident happened as they *were* testing it in a break from the low energy collisions schedule.
Third: It was more like 6 tons of helium...  

But OK, you've got most of the story right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179080</id>
	<title>But...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258718220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/ ???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/ ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/ ??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180460</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>abarrieris5eV</author>
	<datestamp>1258725360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes that is where it comes from, that's why they call it the god particle.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes that is where it comes from , that 's why they call it the god particle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes that is where it comes from, that's why they call it the god particle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178966</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>anarchyboy</author>
	<datestamp>1258717740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Umm well kind of, its an experiment to confirm the existence of the higgs if it does exist and to probe the physics of electroweak symmetry breaking (i.e find whatever else is causing the higgs mechanism) if it doesn't. I mean determining that the existence of a higgs particle is an accurate theory is the same as determining its existence give or take some philisophical arguments about existance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm well kind of , its an experiment to confirm the existence of the higgs if it does exist and to probe the physics of electroweak symmetry breaking ( i.e find whatever else is causing the higgs mechanism ) if it does n't .
I mean determining that the existence of a higgs particle is an accurate theory is the same as determining its existence give or take some philisophical arguments about existance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm well kind of, its an experiment to confirm the existence of the higgs if it does exist and to probe the physics of electroweak symmetry breaking (i.e find whatever else is causing the higgs mechanism) if it doesn't.
I mean determining that the existence of a higgs particle is an accurate theory is the same as determining its existence give or take some philisophical arguments about existance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178238</id>
	<title>Circulating beam captured</title>
	<author>flamingnight</author>
	<datestamp>1258714920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>CERN reported that <a href="https://twitter.com/CERN/status/5900287205" title="twitter.com">"We have captured it! First circulating beam of 2009!"</a> [twitter.com] at 21:02 today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>CERN reported that " We have captured it !
First circulating beam of 2009 !
" [ twitter.com ] at 21 : 02 today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>CERN reported that "We have captured it!
First circulating beam of 2009!
" [twitter.com] at 21:02 today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179640</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1258720860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>For a guy with planck in his name you really need to read up on particle physics A neutron is udd, a proton is uud. Nothing special there, one is magnetic though.<br> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle\_physics" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle\_physics</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>For a guy with planck in his name you really need to read up on particle physics A neutron is udd , a proton is uud .
Nothing special there , one is magnetic though .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle \ _physics [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a guy with planck in his name you really need to read up on particle physics A neutron is udd, a proton is uud.
Nothing special there, one is magnetic though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle\_physics [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178896</id>
	<title>Lets root out more expencive bugs.</title>
	<author>SueAnnSueAnn</author>
	<datestamp>1258717440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I expect there to be more failures and more faulty engineering uncovered. This project would have been better off had it been built by high school students.</p><p>The Ultimate ManToy can't function due to impotence.<br>You guys know there is a cure for that............</p><p>Right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I expect there to be more failures and more faulty engineering uncovered .
This project would have been better off had it been built by high school students.The Ultimate ManToy ca n't function due to impotence.You guys know there is a cure for that............Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I expect there to be more failures and more faulty engineering uncovered.
This project would have been better off had it been built by high school students.The Ultimate ManToy can't function due to impotence.You guys know there is a cure for that............Right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30183468</id>
	<title>The catastrophic effect is already apparent..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258809060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they fired up the LHC and what happens? Once in a thousand years rainfall and flash floods across the UK and Ireland.. and on the opposite side of the world in Australia, catastrophic record heat and lightening storms sparking hundreds of fires..</p><p>Coincidence? I think not - sounds like the end of the world!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>But seriously.. looking forward to them getting the LHC fully active and doing cool science.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they fired up the LHC and what happens ?
Once in a thousand years rainfall and flash floods across the UK and Ireland.. and on the opposite side of the world in Australia , catastrophic record heat and lightening storms sparking hundreds of fires..Coincidence ?
I think not - sounds like the end of the world !
; ) But seriously.. looking forward to them getting the LHC fully active and doing cool science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they fired up the LHC and what happens?
Once in a thousand years rainfall and flash floods across the UK and Ireland.. and on the opposite side of the world in Australia, catastrophic record heat and lightening storms sparking hundreds of fires..Coincidence?
I think not - sounds like the end of the world!
;)But seriously.. looking forward to them getting the LHC fully active and doing cool science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182692</id>
	<title>anonymous coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258837020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>wow! cool! they proton-beam-scanned a calorimeter!<br>(wondering what all those yellow X's are in atlas flash movie?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>wow !
cool ! they proton-beam-scanned a calorimeter !
( wondering what all those yellow X 's are in atlas flash movie ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>wow!
cool! they proton-beam-scanned a calorimeter!
(wondering what all those yellow X's are in atlas flash movie?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176</id>
	<title>wow, we are still here!</title>
	<author>idji</author>
	<datestamp>1258714680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is there anybody else out there, or am I alone in my own micro black hole?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is there anybody else out there , or am I alone in my own micro black hole ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is there anybody else out there, or am I alone in my own micro black hole?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178662</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1258716480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Science confirms stuff all the time.  Any theory claiming that claims the existance of X can be confirmed by finding X.  When a scientist duplicates an experiment and obtains the same results, they are confirming the experiment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Science confirms stuff all the time .
Any theory claiming that claims the existance of X can be confirmed by finding X. When a scientist duplicates an experiment and obtains the same results , they are confirming the experiment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Science confirms stuff all the time.
Any theory claiming that claims the existance of X can be confirmed by finding X.  When a scientist duplicates an experiment and obtains the same results, they are confirming the experiment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30188558</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>stevelinton</author>
	<datestamp>1258803000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are plans to accelerate (and collide) lead and possibly uranium nuclei. These would include neutrons as well as protons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are plans to accelerate ( and collide ) lead and possibly uranium nuclei .
These would include neutrons as well as protons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are plans to accelerate (and collide) lead and possibly uranium nuclei.
These would include neutrons as well as protons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178718</id>
	<title>Re:PROTON CANNON!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258716660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And they were sure to kill any ghosts that were haunting the doomsday device.
<br> <br>Let's just hope they never try to cross the beams...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And they were sure to kill any ghosts that were haunting the doomsday device .
Let 's just hope they never try to cross the beams.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And they were sure to kill any ghosts that were haunting the doomsday device.
Let's just hope they never try to cross the beams...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182918</id>
	<title>Zombies</title>
	<author>Msdose</author>
	<datestamp>1258798440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ten thousand years of religions breeding their adherents into zombie armies have resulted in a population that is entirely caught up in a death wish which prevents it from seeing that the LHC is creating the field that is responsible for giving them their wish. This is why half the movies today are about zombies; people unconsciously recognize themselves but are unable to resist their fate.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ten thousand years of religions breeding their adherents into zombie armies have resulted in a population that is entirely caught up in a death wish which prevents it from seeing that the LHC is creating the field that is responsible for giving them their wish .
This is why half the movies today are about zombies ; people unconsciously recognize themselves but are unable to resist their fate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ten thousand years of religions breeding their adherents into zombie armies have resulted in a population that is entirely caught up in a death wish which prevents it from seeing that the LHC is creating the field that is responsible for giving them their wish.
This is why half the movies today are about zombies; people unconsciously recognize themselves but are unable to resist their fate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178356</id>
	<title>What next...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258715340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to by 0600 GMT on Saturday.</p></div><p>By 0324 GMT Sat. the protonbeam will inadvertedly collide with a piece o' bread.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to by 0600 GMT on Saturday.By 0324 GMT Sat .
the protonbeam will inadvertedly collide with a piece o ' bread .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Engineers do not yet have a stable circulating beam but they hope to by 0600 GMT on Saturday.By 0324 GMT Sat.
the protonbeam will inadvertedly collide with a piece o' bread.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180356</id>
	<title>Re:Beam me up Scotty!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258724580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe "Beam Me Around, Willy"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe " Beam Me Around , Willy " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe "Beam Me Around, Willy"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181456</id>
	<title>They've started it again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258733520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I knew they started that damned thing up again, my hemroids are killing me again...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I knew they started that damned thing up again , my hemroids are killing me again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I knew they started that damned thing up again, my hemroids are killing me again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178332</id>
	<title>first</title>
	<author>pitu</author>
	<datestamp>1258715280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext> proton beam!</htmltext>
<tokenext>proton beam !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> proton beam!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177900</id>
	<title>Beam me up Scotty!</title>
	<author>volxdragon</author>
	<datestamp>1258713840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, wait, wrong show (or was that a LHC around the disc of the Enterprise??!?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , wait , wrong show ( or was that a LHC around the disc of the Enterprise ? ? ! ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, wait, wrong show (or was that a LHC around the disc of the Enterprise??!?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181870</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258737840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My understanding is that neutrons, like any other subatomic particle, do not rest unless at 0 Kelvin.  Otherwise, they will wiggle about, making poor targets in the absence of an sort of capture/containment field.  Also, cooling to 0K is asymptotically hard to achieve, effectively impossible.</p><p>At present, it looks like the LHC will operate at just above 0K, but not at it.<br>http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/</p><p>Charged particles, on the other hand, may be held at a known location and/or known path with the application of a containment field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that neutrons , like any other subatomic particle , do not rest unless at 0 Kelvin .
Otherwise , they will wiggle about , making poor targets in the absence of an sort of capture/containment field .
Also , cooling to 0K is asymptotically hard to achieve , effectively impossible.At present , it looks like the LHC will operate at just above 0K , but not at it.http : //lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/Charged particles , on the other hand , may be held at a known location and/or known path with the application of a containment field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that neutrons, like any other subatomic particle, do not rest unless at 0 Kelvin.
Otherwise, they will wiggle about, making poor targets in the absence of an sort of capture/containment field.
Also, cooling to 0K is asymptotically hard to achieve, effectively impossible.At present, it looks like the LHC will operate at just above 0K, but not at it.http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/Charged particles, on the other hand, may be held at a known location and/or known path with the application of a containment field.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182936</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>bar-agent</author>
	<datestamp>1258798740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection. I know it is completely unscientific, and probably complete rubbish.</i></p><p>The "greater being" part, yes. That that collider is sabotaged for our protection is more-or-less plausible. It's more like, we happen to be in a universe that is consistently winning games of Russian Roulette. In other universes, they didn't have any issues starting the LHC, it accidentally the entire universe, and they got wiped from creation. Hasn't happened here...yet. Quantum suicide, they call it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection .
I know it is completely unscientific , and probably complete rubbish.The " greater being " part , yes .
That that collider is sabotaged for our protection is more-or-less plausible .
It 's more like , we happen to be in a universe that is consistently winning games of Russian Roulette .
In other universes , they did n't have any issues starting the LHC , it accidentally the entire universe , and they got wiped from creation .
Has n't happened here...yet .
Quantum suicide , they call it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection.
I know it is completely unscientific, and probably complete rubbish.The "greater being" part, yes.
That that collider is sabotaged for our protection is more-or-less plausible.
It's more like, we happen to be in a universe that is consistently winning games of Russian Roulette.
In other universes, they didn't have any issues starting the LHC, it accidentally the entire universe, and they got wiped from creation.
Hasn't happened here...yet.
Quantum suicide, they call it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178786</id>
	<title>Hopefully they're more careful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258717020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this time around. I have a physics prof who's part of the project. Part of our lecture on superconductivity was dedicated to the catastrophic malfunction. There's nothing that conveys the epic nature of the failure like technical language.</p><p>According to my professor, they were in too much of a rush to get the thing started they didn't fully test the whole thing. One of the superconducting junctions quenched (transitioned from superconductive to non-superconductive states due to the 7-8 Tesla magnetic field), necessitating the dispersal of IIRC 1500 A of current. This turned insulating copper into plasma which breached the chamber wall and caused the explosive vaporization of 2 tons of liquid helium into the accelerating chamber.</p><p>Long story short, it's a very large, complicated, and expensive machine. They'd better sure everything works this time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this time around .
I have a physics prof who 's part of the project .
Part of our lecture on superconductivity was dedicated to the catastrophic malfunction .
There 's nothing that conveys the epic nature of the failure like technical language.According to my professor , they were in too much of a rush to get the thing started they did n't fully test the whole thing .
One of the superconducting junctions quenched ( transitioned from superconductive to non-superconductive states due to the 7-8 Tesla magnetic field ) , necessitating the dispersal of IIRC 1500 A of current .
This turned insulating copper into plasma which breached the chamber wall and caused the explosive vaporization of 2 tons of liquid helium into the accelerating chamber.Long story short , it 's a very large , complicated , and expensive machine .
They 'd better sure everything works this time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this time around.
I have a physics prof who's part of the project.
Part of our lecture on superconductivity was dedicated to the catastrophic malfunction.
There's nothing that conveys the epic nature of the failure like technical language.According to my professor, they were in too much of a rush to get the thing started they didn't fully test the whole thing.
One of the superconducting junctions quenched (transitioned from superconductive to non-superconductive states due to the 7-8 Tesla magnetic field), necessitating the dispersal of IIRC 1500 A of current.
This turned insulating copper into plasma which breached the chamber wall and caused the explosive vaporization of 2 tons of liquid helium into the accelerating chamber.Long story short, it's a very large, complicated, and expensive machine.
They'd better sure everything works this time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178672</id>
	<title>Re:PROTON CANNON!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258716540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And no bird droppings</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And no bird droppings</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And no bird droppings</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178078</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258714380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard that LHC is being sabotaged from the future by parallel universes. Cool, neat. Let's all marvel at this idea and give 5, Interesting to this comment for no good fucking reason</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard that LHC is being sabotaged from the future by parallel universes .
Cool , neat .
Let 's all marvel at this idea and give 5 , Interesting to this comment for no good fucking reason</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard that LHC is being sabotaged from the future by parallel universes.
Cool, neat.
Let's all marvel at this idea and give 5, Interesting to this comment for no good fucking reason</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178416</id>
	<title>Re:wow, we are still here!</title>
	<author>owlstead</author>
	<datestamp>1258715580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know you well enough to answer that question, I'm afraid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know you well enough to answer that question , I 'm afraid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know you well enough to answer that question, I'm afraid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180900</id>
	<title>The REAL picture from the LHC and ATLAS</title>
	<author>Roger W Moore</author>
	<datestamp>1258728360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Splash events from the ATLAS experiment, from beam hitting an upstream collimator, can be seen <a href="http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/public/EVTDISPLAY/events.html" title="web.cern.ch">here</a> [web.cern.ch] (updated regularly). The plan is to have low energy collisions within a week to help test the detectors. Accelerating the beams, in preparation for high energy collisions, will happen next year (so no black holes until then!). More details are available from the <a href="http://lhc-commissioning.web.cern.ch/lhc-commissioning/news/LHC-latest-news.htm" title="web.cern.ch">LHC commissioning</a> [web.cern.ch] and <a href="http://op-webtools.web.cern.ch/op-webtools/vistar/vistars.php?usr=LHC1" title="web.cern.ch">status pages</a> [web.cern.ch]. There is even a <a href="http://twitter.com/cern" title="twitter.com">CERN tweet</a> [twitter.com] available for all you twits.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Splash events from the ATLAS experiment , from beam hitting an upstream collimator , can be seen here [ web.cern.ch ] ( updated regularly ) .
The plan is to have low energy collisions within a week to help test the detectors .
Accelerating the beams , in preparation for high energy collisions , will happen next year ( so no black holes until then ! ) .
More details are available from the LHC commissioning [ web.cern.ch ] and status pages [ web.cern.ch ] .
There is even a CERN tweet [ twitter.com ] available for all you twits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Splash events from the ATLAS experiment, from beam hitting an upstream collimator, can be seen here [web.cern.ch] (updated regularly).
The plan is to have low energy collisions within a week to help test the detectors.
Accelerating the beams, in preparation for high energy collisions, will happen next year (so no black holes until then!).
More details are available from the LHC commissioning [web.cern.ch] and status pages [web.cern.ch].
There is even a CERN tweet [twitter.com] available for all you twits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179318</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30186650</id>
	<title>Re:Hopefully they're more careful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258833660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the catastrophic malfunction of last year was during a test. they only need the 8 tesla field when they get to 7TeV, lower beam energy needs lower magnets. they had tested all the magnets up as high as they needed them before they injected beam. after they had been sending beams around for a few days they did some more testing, taking the magnets up to higher currents (while there was no beam in the machine). this is when the quench and failure happened.</p><p>if they had done more testing before they put beam in, then they would have had the problem, before they had the chance to gather data from a few days of beam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the catastrophic malfunction of last year was during a test .
they only need the 8 tesla field when they get to 7TeV , lower beam energy needs lower magnets .
they had tested all the magnets up as high as they needed them before they injected beam .
after they had been sending beams around for a few days they did some more testing , taking the magnets up to higher currents ( while there was no beam in the machine ) .
this is when the quench and failure happened.if they had done more testing before they put beam in , then they would have had the problem , before they had the chance to gather data from a few days of beam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the catastrophic malfunction of last year was during a test.
they only need the 8 tesla field when they get to 7TeV, lower beam energy needs lower magnets.
they had tested all the magnets up as high as they needed them before they injected beam.
after they had been sending beams around for a few days they did some more testing, taking the magnets up to higher currents (while there was no beam in the machine).
this is when the quench and failure happened.if they had done more testing before they put beam in, then they would have had the problem, before they had the chance to gather data from a few days of beam.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180546</id>
	<title>Has the Large Hadron Collider?</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1258725780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/" title="hasthelarg...rldyet.com">Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the world yet?</a> [hasthelarg...rldyet.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the world yet ?
[ hasthelarg...rldyet.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has the Large Hadron Collider destroyed the world yet?
[hasthelarg...rldyet.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30185946</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258829280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Higgs is not held inside the proton, it's created during quark-quark, quark-gluon or gluon-gluon collisions (quarks and gluons constitute protons and neutrons).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Higgs is not held inside the proton , it 's created during quark-quark , quark-gluon or gluon-gluon collisions ( quarks and gluons constitute protons and neutrons ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Higgs is not held inside the proton, it's created during quark-quark, quark-gluon or gluon-gluon collisions (quarks and gluons constitute protons and neutrons).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30186584</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>3-State Bit</author>
	<datestamp>1258833300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;For a guy with planck in his name you really need to read up on particle physics</p><p>ironically, that's the exact opposite of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max\_Planck" title="wikipedia.org">the advice given to Planck</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><blockquote><div><p>The Munich physics professor Philipp von Jolly advised Planck against going into physics.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; For a guy with planck in his name you really need to read up on particle physicsironically , that 's the exact opposite of the advice given to Planck [ wikipedia.org ] : The Munich physics professor Philipp von Jolly advised Planck against going into physics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;For a guy with planck in his name you really need to read up on particle physicsironically, that's the exact opposite of the advice given to Planck [wikipedia.org]:The Munich physics professor Philipp von Jolly advised Planck against going into physics.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179640</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182080</id>
	<title>Re:PROTON CANNON!</title>
	<author>rockNme2349</author>
	<datestamp>1258740180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This proton cannon has no power. You must construct a pylon near it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This proton cannon has no power .
You must construct a pylon near it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This proton cannon has no power.
You must construct a pylon near it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178474</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>jonbryce</author>
	<datestamp>1258715820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection.  I know it is completely unscientific, and probably complete rubbish.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection .
I know it is completely unscientific , and probably complete rubbish .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer the hypothesis that some greater being is actively trying to sabotage the collider for our own protection.
I know it is completely unscientific, and probably complete rubbish.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178256</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258714980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since when could science confirm anything?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when could science confirm anything ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when could science confirm anything?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182862</id>
	<title>Sounds like CERN rolled a 20</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1258797180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>On the luck check needed to beat the universe.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>On the luck check needed to beat the universe .
: P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>On the luck check needed to beat the universe.
:P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182506</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not neutrons?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258747140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Just curious, but why do they only smash protons and not neutrons? Is it because the proton has a charge and thus can be flung around by the magnets? I mean if they are looking for elusive particles like the Higgs, I would think it would more likely be held inside a neutron rather than a proton.</p></div><p>because magnetic fields cause rotational motion which can be used to redirect the protons in such a manner that accelrates them through electric fields, a process only works with charged particles... ie protons, an electron would work, but you'd have to run it backwards, and munipulate the intensity of the b-field.   However, protons provide a more impressive show than electrons, so we stuck with that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just curious , but why do they only smash protons and not neutrons ?
Is it because the proton has a charge and thus can be flung around by the magnets ?
I mean if they are looking for elusive particles like the Higgs , I would think it would more likely be held inside a neutron rather than a proton.because magnetic fields cause rotational motion which can be used to redirect the protons in such a manner that accelrates them through electric fields , a process only works with charged particles... ie protons , an electron would work , but you 'd have to run it backwards , and munipulate the intensity of the b-field .
However , protons provide a more impressive show than electrons , so we stuck with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just curious, but why do they only smash protons and not neutrons?
Is it because the proton has a charge and thus can be flung around by the magnets?
I mean if they are looking for elusive particles like the Higgs, I would think it would more likely be held inside a neutron rather than a proton.because magnetic fields cause rotational motion which can be used to redirect the protons in such a manner that accelrates them through electric fields, a process only works with charged particles... ie protons, an electron would work, but you'd have to run it backwards, and munipulate the intensity of the b-field.
However, protons provide a more impressive show than electrons, so we stuck with that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436</id>
	<title>Re:why protons and not  neutrons?</title>
	<author>planckscale</author>
	<datestamp>1258719900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just curious, but why do they only smash protons and not neutrons? Is it because the proton has a charge and thus can be flung around by the magnets? I mean if they are looking for elusive particles like the Higgs, I would think it would more likely be held inside a neutron rather than a proton.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just curious , but why do they only smash protons and not neutrons ?
Is it because the proton has a charge and thus can be flung around by the magnets ?
I mean if they are looking for elusive particles like the Higgs , I would think it would more likely be held inside a neutron rather than a proton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just curious, but why do they only smash protons and not neutrons?
Is it because the proton has a charge and thus can be flung around by the magnets?
I mean if they are looking for elusive particles like the Higgs, I would think it would more likely be held inside a neutron rather than a proton.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179094</id>
	<title>Re:Remember, this is only ONE hurdle to clear...</title>
	<author>SueAnnSueAnn</author>
	<datestamp>1258718280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like fusion all over again.<br>More pie in the sky.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like fusion all over again.More pie in the sky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like fusion all over again.More pie in the sky.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177962</id>
	<title>bad timing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258714020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what with everything else going whack, a planet/universe eating black hole will not help much? like the sci-fi channel in real time/space/circumstance?</p><p>not to mention, the lights are coming up all over now. ta da?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what with everything else going whack , a planet/universe eating black hole will not help much ?
like the sci-fi channel in real time/space/circumstance ? not to mention , the lights are coming up all over now .
ta da ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what with everything else going whack, a planet/universe eating black hole will not help much?
like the sci-fi channel in real time/space/circumstance?not to mention, the lights are coming up all over now.
ta da?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177944</id>
	<title>Thanks for the warning</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258713960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was planning on getting really drunk on December 20th 2012, but maybe I'll get drunk tonight because obviously the earth will disappear tomorrow at 0600GMT</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was planning on getting really drunk on December 20th 2012 , but maybe I 'll get drunk tonight because obviously the earth will disappear tomorrow at 0600GMT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was planning on getting really drunk on December 20th 2012, but maybe I'll get drunk tonight because obviously the earth will disappear tomorrow at 0600GMT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179318
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30188558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30183182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30186650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178786
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30185946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30186584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178048
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30201008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177900
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179640
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_20_2123234_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178902
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178466
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178474
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182936
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30201008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30186650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30183182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179436
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179598
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30185946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30188558
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30179640
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30186584
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30182582
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181114
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30181870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_20_2123234.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30177900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30178546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_20_2123234.30180356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
