<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_19_152243</id>
	<title>FAA Computer Glitch Causes Widespread Airline Delays</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1258645320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>seven of five writes with this excerpt from an Associated Press report: <i>"A problem with the FAA system that collects airlines' flight plans <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jXrjvmqVYNm4O\_i4ak6IuZMRAhegD9C2L4TG0">caused widespread flight cancellations and delays nationwide</a> Thursday. It was the second time in 15 months that a glitch in the flight plan system caused delays. The FAA said in a statement that it is having a problem processing flight plan information. 'We are investigating the cause of the problem,' the agency said. 'We are processing flight plans manually and expect some delays. We have radar coverage and communications with planes.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>seven of five writes with this excerpt from an Associated Press report : " A problem with the FAA system that collects airlines ' flight plans caused widespread flight cancellations and delays nationwide Thursday .
It was the second time in 15 months that a glitch in the flight plan system caused delays .
The FAA said in a statement that it is having a problem processing flight plan information .
'We are investigating the cause of the problem, ' the agency said .
'We are processing flight plans manually and expect some delays .
We have radar coverage and communications with planes .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>seven of five writes with this excerpt from an Associated Press report: "A problem with the FAA system that collects airlines' flight plans caused widespread flight cancellations and delays nationwide Thursday.
It was the second time in 15 months that a glitch in the flight plan system caused delays.
The FAA said in a statement that it is having a problem processing flight plan information.
'We are investigating the cause of the problem,' the agency said.
'We are processing flight plans manually and expect some delays.
We have radar coverage and communications with planes.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157332</id>
	<title>Honest!</title>
	<author>sycodon</author>
	<datestamp>1258649400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I only changed one little line of code! It wasn't even important enough to test!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I only changed one little line of code !
It was n't even important enough to test !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I only changed one little line of code!
It wasn't even important enough to test!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162060</id>
	<title>the best layover</title>
	<author>nimbius</author>
	<datestamp>1258664100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ive had was a 7 hour standby at a connecting airport that was 45 minutes away from my house, only to be flown back to my original airport and directly flown to houston.  downsides: i ate so much au bon pain at the airport i had these weird pastry farts the entire flight, and so much coffee i thought i was going to barf before we took off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>ive had was a 7 hour standby at a connecting airport that was 45 minutes away from my house , only to be flown back to my original airport and directly flown to houston .
downsides : i ate so much au bon pain at the airport i had these weird pastry farts the entire flight , and so much coffee i thought i was going to barf before we took off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ive had was a 7 hour standby at a connecting airport that was 45 minutes away from my house, only to be flown back to my original airport and directly flown to houston.
downsides: i ate so much au bon pain at the airport i had these weird pastry farts the entire flight, and so much coffee i thought i was going to barf before we took off.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30164156</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258627320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually you have the question backwards is there any private organization that I trust or that works as well even the worst government run organiztions</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually you have the question backwards is there any private organization that I trust or that works as well even the worst government run organiztions</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually you have the question backwards is there any private organization that I trust or that works as well even the worst government run organiztions</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157898</id>
	<title>To quote some technology middle manager</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1258651080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"That's it, you're all grounded!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" That 's it , you 're all grounded !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"That's it, you're all grounded!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157216</id>
	<title>Yep...</title>
	<author>TrisexualPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1258649040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm here in a terminal at ATL waiting for a second flight. Been sitting here for four hours now and no hope is in sight according to the people at the counter and overhead announcements. Will keep "y'all" updated.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm here in a terminal at ATL waiting for a second flight .
Been sitting here for four hours now and no hope is in sight according to the people at the counter and overhead announcements .
Will keep " y'all " updated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm here in a terminal at ATL waiting for a second flight.
Been sitting here for four hours now and no hope is in sight according to the people at the counter and overhead announcements.
Will keep "y'all" updated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</id>
	<title>Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258657440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yea, these are the guys (the feds) I want building cars, taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes. I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.  Any idea?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , these are the guys ( the feds ) I want building cars , taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes .
I 'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one .
Any idea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, these are the guys (the feds) I want building cars, taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes.
I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.
Any idea?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30168106</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258652220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This was a private contractor (Harris Corp.) fucking up the network:</p><p><a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story\_channel.jsp?channel=comm&amp;id=news/ATCOUT111909.xml" title="aviationweek.com" rel="nofollow">From aviationweek.com:</a> [aviationweek.com]:</p><blockquote><div><p>Initially, some lawmakers and media outlets blamed the "antiquated" ATC system, but this changed when it became clear the problem lay with the FAA Telecommunications Infrastructure (FTI), a new system installed and operated over the past few years by Harris Corp. under contract to the FAA. Now, scrutiny has shifted to the outsourcing issue.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This was a private contractor ( Harris Corp. ) fucking up the network : From aviationweek.com : [ aviationweek.com ] : Initially , some lawmakers and media outlets blamed the " antiquated " ATC system , but this changed when it became clear the problem lay with the FAA Telecommunications Infrastructure ( FTI ) , a new system installed and operated over the past few years by Harris Corp. under contract to the FAA .
Now , scrutiny has shifted to the outsourcing issue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This was a private contractor (Harris Corp.) fucking up the network:From aviationweek.com: [aviationweek.com]:Initially, some lawmakers and media outlets blamed the "antiquated" ATC system, but this changed when it became clear the problem lay with the FAA Telecommunications Infrastructure (FTI), a new system installed and operated over the past few years by Harris Corp. under contract to the FAA.
Now, scrutiny has shifted to the outsourcing issue.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258650120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not if it causes 2 plains to crash together in mid flight and kill 487 people, it's not.<br>Unless you want to be 1 amongst the 487!<br>Software for this industry or the car or even medical has no room for glitches....<br>when your heart monitor glitches out and sends a shock to your heart triggering a heart attack, I would like to hear you say, it was acceptable seeing as it didn't have AS many bugs as let's say windows.</p><p>Thanks to M$ and the like, we have grown accustomed to accepting certain levels of errors in software,<br>while I would like to be able to say I accept no bugs in my software, what about you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if it causes 2 plains to crash together in mid flight and kill 487 people , it 's not.Unless you want to be 1 amongst the 487 ! Software for this industry or the car or even medical has no room for glitches....when your heart monitor glitches out and sends a shock to your heart triggering a heart attack , I would like to hear you say , it was acceptable seeing as it did n't have AS many bugs as let 's say windows.Thanks to M $ and the like , we have grown accustomed to accepting certain levels of errors in software,while I would like to be able to say I accept no bugs in my software , what about you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if it causes 2 plains to crash together in mid flight and kill 487 people, it's not.Unless you want to be 1 amongst the 487!Software for this industry or the car or even medical has no room for glitches....when your heart monitor glitches out and sends a shock to your heart triggering a heart attack, I would like to hear you say, it was acceptable seeing as it didn't have AS many bugs as let's say windows.Thanks to M$ and the like, we have grown accustomed to accepting certain levels of errors in software,while I would like to be able to say I accept no bugs in my software, what about you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30161210</id>
	<title>mod do3N</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258661340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">happiness Another of BSD/OS. A SURPRISE TO THE</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>happiness Another of BSD/OS .
A SURPRISE TO THE [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>happiness Another of BSD/OS.
A SURPRISE TO THE [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157934</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258651200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, if they are great plains it could be lots more people.  I'm sure that there are a few million people in the great plains.</p><p>But if you meant the flying tubes in the sky planes, it's not as if atc is down, just filing the flight plans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if they are great plains it could be lots more people .
I 'm sure that there are a few million people in the great plains.But if you meant the flying tubes in the sky planes , it 's not as if atc is down , just filing the flight plans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if they are great plains it could be lots more people.
I'm sure that there are a few million people in the great plains.But if you meant the flying tubes in the sky planes, it's not as if atc is down, just filing the flight plans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157722</id>
	<title>Re:Honest!</title>
	<author>kb1ikn</author>
	<datestamp>1258650540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>
It works fine on my computer.<p><div class="quote"><p>I only changed one little line of code! It wasn't even important enough to test!</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It works fine on my computer.I only changed one little line of code !
It was n't even important enough to test !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
It works fine on my computer.I only changed one little line of code!
It wasn't even important enough to test!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157872</id>
	<title>Maybe it's like the internet...</title>
	<author>ShatteredArm</author>
	<datestamp>1258651020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...and Iran was publishing bad flight plans.  You know, to block undesirable traffic.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...and Iran was publishing bad flight plans .
You know , to block undesirable traffic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and Iran was publishing bad flight plans.
You know, to block undesirable traffic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30161560</id>
	<title>mod do3n</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258662540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">the 'comm0nIty'</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>the 'comm0nIty ' [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the 'comm0nIty' [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30165346</id>
	<title>Re:what do you expect from 70's technology ??</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1258631760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Carrying things on my back and walking places is much more dependable than driving a vehicle which can break down. I'm still not gonna start hauling everything in a backpack.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Carrying things on my back and walking places is much more dependable than driving a vehicle which can break down .
I 'm still not gon na start hauling everything in a backpack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Carrying things on my back and walking places is much more dependable than driving a vehicle which can break down.
I'm still not gonna start hauling everything in a backpack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158386</id>
	<title>Uh-oh!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258652580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems they rebooted using that recycled AOL floppy diskette again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems they rebooted using that recycled AOL floppy diskette again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems they rebooted using that recycled AOL floppy diskette again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157236</id>
	<title>re problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds funny to me. Packet switch due to a database mismatch?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds funny to me .
Packet switch due to a database mismatch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds funny to me.
Packet switch due to a database mismatch?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158050</id>
	<title>Re:Here I sit...</title>
	<author>gEvil (beta)</author>
	<datestamp>1258651560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...stuck in Atlanta...
</i> <br>
<br>
It could be worse. You could be stuck in Lodi (again).</htmltext>
<tokenext>...stuck in Atlanta.. . It could be worse .
You could be stuck in Lodi ( again ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...stuck in Atlanta...
 

It could be worse.
You could be stuck in Lodi (again).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30164288</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>dkleinsc</author>
	<datestamp>1258627740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A government-run organization that works as well as a private one: US Postal Service.</p><p>Seriously. Those guys move tons of stuff around the US every day, and significant portions of daily business would grind to a halt if they stopped. Think about it: for around 50 cents, you can send something from Maine to California and expect it to arrive within a few days. They make extensive use of OCR, have an extremely sophisticated sorting and routing system, and are in many ways more efficient than FedEx or UPS (for instance, FedEx will route packages through Memphis while USPS will send them more directly).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A government-run organization that works as well as a private one : US Postal Service.Seriously .
Those guys move tons of stuff around the US every day , and significant portions of daily business would grind to a halt if they stopped .
Think about it : for around 50 cents , you can send something from Maine to California and expect it to arrive within a few days .
They make extensive use of OCR , have an extremely sophisticated sorting and routing system , and are in many ways more efficient than FedEx or UPS ( for instance , FedEx will route packages through Memphis while USPS will send them more directly ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A government-run organization that works as well as a private one: US Postal Service.Seriously.
Those guys move tons of stuff around the US every day, and significant portions of daily business would grind to a halt if they stopped.
Think about it: for around 50 cents, you can send something from Maine to California and expect it to arrive within a few days.
They make extensive use of OCR, have an extremely sophisticated sorting and routing system, and are in many ways more efficient than FedEx or UPS (for instance, FedEx will route packages through Memphis while USPS will send them more directly).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226</id>
	<title>Here I sit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...stuck in Atlanta...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...stuck in Atlanta.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...stuck in Atlanta...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162864</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258623660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yea, these are the guys (the feds) I want building cars, taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes. I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.  Any idea?</p></div><p>This morning I was woken by my alarm clock powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the US Dept of Energy. I then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility. After that, I turned on the TV to one of the FCC regulated channels to see what the national weather service of the national oceanographic and atmospheric administration determined the weather was going to be like using satellites designed, built and launched by the national aeronautics and space administration. I watched this while eating my breakfast of US Dept. of Agriculture inspected food and taking the drugs which have been determined as safe by the food and drug administration.</p><p>At the appropriate time as regulated by the US congress and kept accurate by the national institute of standards and technology and the US naval observatory, I get into my national highway traffic safety administration approved automobile and set out to work on roads built by the local, state and federal departments of transportation, possibly stopping to purchase additional fuel of a quality determined by the environmental protection agency, using legal tender issued by the federal reserve bank. On the way out the door, I deposit any mail I have to be sent out via the US postal service and drop the kids off at the public school.</p><p>After work, I drive my NHTSA car back home on the DOT roads, to a house which has not burned down in my absence because of the state and local building codes and the fire marshal's inspection, and which has not been plundered of all it's valuables thanks to the local police department.</p><p>I then log onto the internet which was developed by the defense advanced research projects administration and post on freerepublic.com and fox news forums about how SOCIALISM in medicine is BAD because the government can't do anything right.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , these are the guys ( the feds ) I want building cars , taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes .
I 'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one .
Any idea ? This morning I was woken by my alarm clock powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the US Dept of Energy .
I then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility .
After that , I turned on the TV to one of the FCC regulated channels to see what the national weather service of the national oceanographic and atmospheric administration determined the weather was going to be like using satellites designed , built and launched by the national aeronautics and space administration .
I watched this while eating my breakfast of US Dept .
of Agriculture inspected food and taking the drugs which have been determined as safe by the food and drug administration.At the appropriate time as regulated by the US congress and kept accurate by the national institute of standards and technology and the US naval observatory , I get into my national highway traffic safety administration approved automobile and set out to work on roads built by the local , state and federal departments of transportation , possibly stopping to purchase additional fuel of a quality determined by the environmental protection agency , using legal tender issued by the federal reserve bank .
On the way out the door , I deposit any mail I have to be sent out via the US postal service and drop the kids off at the public school.After work , I drive my NHTSA car back home on the DOT roads , to a house which has not burned down in my absence because of the state and local building codes and the fire marshal 's inspection , and which has not been plundered of all it 's valuables thanks to the local police department.I then log onto the internet which was developed by the defense advanced research projects administration and post on freerepublic.com and fox news forums about how SOCIALISM in medicine is BAD because the government ca n't do anything right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, these are the guys (the feds) I want building cars, taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes.
I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.
Any idea?This morning I was woken by my alarm clock powered by electricity generated by the public power monopoly regulated by the US Dept of Energy.
I then took a shower in the clean water provided by the municipal water utility.
After that, I turned on the TV to one of the FCC regulated channels to see what the national weather service of the national oceanographic and atmospheric administration determined the weather was going to be like using satellites designed, built and launched by the national aeronautics and space administration.
I watched this while eating my breakfast of US Dept.
of Agriculture inspected food and taking the drugs which have been determined as safe by the food and drug administration.At the appropriate time as regulated by the US congress and kept accurate by the national institute of standards and technology and the US naval observatory, I get into my national highway traffic safety administration approved automobile and set out to work on roads built by the local, state and federal departments of transportation, possibly stopping to purchase additional fuel of a quality determined by the environmental protection agency, using legal tender issued by the federal reserve bank.
On the way out the door, I deposit any mail I have to be sent out via the US postal service and drop the kids off at the public school.After work, I drive my NHTSA car back home on the DOT roads, to a house which has not burned down in my absence because of the state and local building codes and the fire marshal's inspection, and which has not been plundered of all it's valuables thanks to the local police department.I then log onto the internet which was developed by the defense advanced research projects administration and post on freerepublic.com and fox news forums about how SOCIALISM in medicine is BAD because the government can't do anything right.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162682</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258622940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.  Any idea?</p></div><p>Hmm I dunno, healthcare maybe?  Compare member satisfaction with Medicare to any coverage-denying, drop-you-as-soon-as-you're-ill private insurer...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one .
Any idea ? Hmm I dunno , healthcare maybe ?
Compare member satisfaction with Medicare to any coverage-denying , drop-you-as-soon-as-you 're-ill private insurer.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.
Any idea?Hmm I dunno, healthcare maybe?
Compare member satisfaction with Medicare to any coverage-denying, drop-you-as-soon-as-you're-ill private insurer...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158802</id>
	<title>Re:what do you expect from 70's technology ??</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1258653780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They are comfortable running systems on ancient mainframes running ULTRA.</p></div><p>I would be comfortable doing the same thing.<br>Why do people shit on mainframes?  They may cost a lot of money and time, but they're orders of magnitude more dependable than any other server solution that exists.</p><p>Yes, that includes the "cloud".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are comfortable running systems on ancient mainframes running ULTRA.I would be comfortable doing the same thing.Why do people shit on mainframes ?
They may cost a lot of money and time , but they 're orders of magnitude more dependable than any other server solution that exists.Yes , that includes the " cloud " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are comfortable running systems on ancient mainframes running ULTRA.I would be comfortable doing the same thing.Why do people shit on mainframes?
They may cost a lot of money and time, but they're orders of magnitude more dependable than any other server solution that exists.Yes, that includes the "cloud".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157202</id>
	<title>First Trout</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am a fish</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am a fish</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am a fish</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30176288</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258708380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mod parent flamebait</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent flamebait</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent flamebait</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30160640</id>
	<title>bitcH</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258659360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">followed. Obviously a fact: FreeBSD another cunting the >wind appeared</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>followed .
Obviously a fact : FreeBSD another cunting the &gt; wind appeared [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>followed.
Obviously a fact: FreeBSD another cunting the &gt;wind appeared [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157986</id>
	<title>Glitch is now fixed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258651320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/faa-says-air-traffic-scheduling-problems-solved-2009-11-19" title="marketwatch.com">this article</a> [marketwatch.com], the glitch is no longer.

<br> <br>

Apparently they fixed the glitch so the problem worked itself out naturally.</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to this article [ marketwatch.com ] , the glitch is no longer .
Apparently they fixed the glitch so the problem worked itself out naturally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to this article [marketwatch.com], the glitch is no longer.
Apparently they fixed the glitch so the problem worked itself out naturally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158868</id>
	<title>Re:Yep...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258653960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You and dtmos (see post further down in this thread) should get together for a beer.  You're both stuck in Atlanta, and it's after noon.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>Slashdotters meeting in person?  Whoda thunk it.  LOL.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You and dtmos ( see post further down in this thread ) should get together for a beer .
You 're both stuck in Atlanta , and it 's after noon .
: ) Slashdotters meeting in person ?
Whoda thunk it .
LOL .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You and dtmos (see post further down in this thread) should get together for a beer.
You're both stuck in Atlanta, and it's after noon.
:)Slashdotters meeting in person?
Whoda thunk it.
LOL.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162496</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1258622400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yea, these are the guys (the feds) I want building cars, taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes. I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one. Any idea?</p></div></blockquote><p>Under their control, 87,000 flights a day cross the skies of the US.  Despite incredible crowding at and in the airspace surrounding a large number of airports, collisions are one-in-billions events.  The vast majority depart and arrive without undue delay.  (And anyone expecting no delay in such a dynamic system with so many variable is smoking some good stuff.)<br>
&nbsp; <br>In this incident, a problem was detected, backup procedures implemented, the problem was fixed, and full functionality was restored - all in a matter of hours <i>without halting the system</i>.<br>
&nbsp; <br>I'd be the first to admit that there are a lot of badly broken government programs - but in this case, you're just blowing smoke.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea , these are the guys ( the feds ) I want building cars , taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes .
I 'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one .
Any idea ? Under their control , 87,000 flights a day cross the skies of the US .
Despite incredible crowding at and in the airspace surrounding a large number of airports , collisions are one-in-billions events .
The vast majority depart and arrive without undue delay .
( And anyone expecting no delay in such a dynamic system with so many variable is smoking some good stuff .
)   In this incident , a problem was detected , backup procedures implemented , the problem was fixed , and full functionality was restored - all in a matter of hours without halting the system .
  I 'd be the first to admit that there are a lot of badly broken government programs - but in this case , you 're just blowing smoke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea, these are the guys (the feds) I want building cars, taking over health care...thanks god they are not building the planes.
I'm just trying to think one government run organization that works as well as any private one.
Any idea?Under their control, 87,000 flights a day cross the skies of the US.
Despite incredible crowding at and in the airspace surrounding a large number of airports, collisions are one-in-billions events.
The vast majority depart and arrive without undue delay.
(And anyone expecting no delay in such a dynamic system with so many variable is smoking some good stuff.
)
  In this incident, a problem was detected, backup procedures implemented, the problem was fixed, and full functionality was restored - all in a matter of hours without halting the system.
  I'd be the first to admit that there are a lot of badly broken government programs - but in this case, you're just blowing smoke.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158844</id>
	<title>Re:And ./ just noticed?</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1258653900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet their landlines were still working.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet their landlines were still working .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet their landlines were still working.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30173020</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258740240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>PS:  You are confusing "Air Traffic Control" and "Flight Services" with "Flight Planning".  They are three separate entities.</p><p>An "Air Traffic Controller" is a person (or multiple people) sitting in a tower or other control area.  They have one primary job - to make sure planes don't smack into each other while in their domain.  They sequence takeoffs and landings, taxiing, etc.</p><p>ATC has absolute and utter control within their domain.  If a Controller tells you to jump, you start jumping then ask "how high?" on the way up.  Any aircraft wishing to enter their little fiefdom has to ask permissions.</p><p>"Flight Services" controls flights that are at altitude and flying outside an ATC area.  They are basically a Controller, but without landing and takeoff responsibilities.</p><p>A Controller is not told by Flight Services to allocate a runway to a flight.  If a Flight Services agent called from 1000 miles away and tried to tell a Controller what runway to use, that Controller would undoubtedly (and rightfully) hang up on the Flight Services agent, probably after offering a few choice expletives.  There is nothing Flight Services can say to a Controller that could affect operations at that Control Tower in any way.</p><p>In the same way, Flight Services is not told exactly where a plane should fly by Flight Planning.  They are advised which way the plane WANTS to go, but they decide where the plane ACTUALLY goes, and they can tell a pilot to deviate from a flight plan any time they please to maintain separation and safety.</p><p>The reason I can't imagine a failure in Flight Services affecting the safety in Control or Services is simple - there isn't any way it could.   Flight Planning does not include any traffic separation services.  That's the responsibility of the people with the RADAR screens and radios in front of them, in Control and Services.</p><p>Planning is only there as a "gatekeeper" to help prevent the skies from getting too crowded, and if they get delayed planes don't take off until they can coordinate the flights properly.</p><p>A failure in Planning doesn't mean all planes will suddenly get clearance, a failure means planes stay safely on the ground.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>PS : You are confusing " Air Traffic Control " and " Flight Services " with " Flight Planning " .
They are three separate entities.An " Air Traffic Controller " is a person ( or multiple people ) sitting in a tower or other control area .
They have one primary job - to make sure planes do n't smack into each other while in their domain .
They sequence takeoffs and landings , taxiing , etc.ATC has absolute and utter control within their domain .
If a Controller tells you to jump , you start jumping then ask " how high ?
" on the way up .
Any aircraft wishing to enter their little fiefdom has to ask permissions .
" Flight Services " controls flights that are at altitude and flying outside an ATC area .
They are basically a Controller , but without landing and takeoff responsibilities.A Controller is not told by Flight Services to allocate a runway to a flight .
If a Flight Services agent called from 1000 miles away and tried to tell a Controller what runway to use , that Controller would undoubtedly ( and rightfully ) hang up on the Flight Services agent , probably after offering a few choice expletives .
There is nothing Flight Services can say to a Controller that could affect operations at that Control Tower in any way.In the same way , Flight Services is not told exactly where a plane should fly by Flight Planning .
They are advised which way the plane WANTS to go , but they decide where the plane ACTUALLY goes , and they can tell a pilot to deviate from a flight plan any time they please to maintain separation and safety.The reason I ca n't imagine a failure in Flight Services affecting the safety in Control or Services is simple - there is n't any way it could .
Flight Planning does not include any traffic separation services .
That 's the responsibility of the people with the RADAR screens and radios in front of them , in Control and Services.Planning is only there as a " gatekeeper " to help prevent the skies from getting too crowded , and if they get delayed planes do n't take off until they can coordinate the flights properly.A failure in Planning does n't mean all planes will suddenly get clearance , a failure means planes stay safely on the ground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PS:  You are confusing "Air Traffic Control" and "Flight Services" with "Flight Planning".
They are three separate entities.An "Air Traffic Controller" is a person (or multiple people) sitting in a tower or other control area.
They have one primary job - to make sure planes don't smack into each other while in their domain.
They sequence takeoffs and landings, taxiing, etc.ATC has absolute and utter control within their domain.
If a Controller tells you to jump, you start jumping then ask "how high?
" on the way up.
Any aircraft wishing to enter their little fiefdom has to ask permissions.
"Flight Services" controls flights that are at altitude and flying outside an ATC area.
They are basically a Controller, but without landing and takeoff responsibilities.A Controller is not told by Flight Services to allocate a runway to a flight.
If a Flight Services agent called from 1000 miles away and tried to tell a Controller what runway to use, that Controller would undoubtedly (and rightfully) hang up on the Flight Services agent, probably after offering a few choice expletives.
There is nothing Flight Services can say to a Controller that could affect operations at that Control Tower in any way.In the same way, Flight Services is not told exactly where a plane should fly by Flight Planning.
They are advised which way the plane WANTS to go, but they decide where the plane ACTUALLY goes, and they can tell a pilot to deviate from a flight plan any time they please to maintain separation and safety.The reason I can't imagine a failure in Flight Services affecting the safety in Control or Services is simple - there isn't any way it could.
Flight Planning does not include any traffic separation services.
That's the responsibility of the people with the RADAR screens and radios in front of them, in Control and Services.Planning is only there as a "gatekeeper" to help prevent the skies from getting too crowded, and if they get delayed planes don't take off until they can coordinate the flights properly.A failure in Planning doesn't mean all planes will suddenly get clearance, a failure means planes stay safely on the ground.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30170416</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157308</id>
	<title>Hmm could it be a windows problem?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I remember correctly they built this thing on a windows platform with MSSQL as the back end database. I wonder how long it will take for them to dump it and put in a real OS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I remember correctly they built this thing on a windows platform with MSSQL as the back end database .
I wonder how long it will take for them to dump it and put in a real OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I remember correctly they built this thing on a windows platform with MSSQL as the back end database.
I wonder how long it will take for them to dump it and put in a real OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157892</id>
	<title>Already fixed before it even got posted on /.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258651080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125863837097855555.html?mod=WSJ\_hpp\_LEFTTopStories" title="wsj.com">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125863837097855555.html?mod=WSJ\_hpp\_LEFTTopStories</a> [wsj.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //online.wsj.com/article/SB125863837097855555.html ? mod = WSJ \ _hpp \ _LEFTTopStories [ wsj.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125863837097855555.html?mod=WSJ\_hpp\_LEFTTopStories [wsj.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159304</id>
	<title>Re:Here I sit...</title>
	<author>fprintf</author>
	<datestamp>1258655340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No it is supposed to go:</p><p>"Here I sit, broken hearted, came to s**t and only farted."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No it is supposed to go : " Here I sit , broken hearted , came to s * * t and only farted .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No it is supposed to go:"Here I sit, broken hearted, came to s**t and only farted.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30161290</id>
	<title>Re:what do you expect from 70's technology ??</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1258661580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The wallstreet journal article mentions the issue was with a new system, specifically noting that it was not related to their antiquated hardware that has historically been the cause of failures in the past. I think it's naive to suggest that old hardware or coding in C++ (over C, as if C's a completely dead language... they both have their places in complex engineering tasks) will eliminate failures in the system, because in this case it was newer hardware, which had a cascading effect, implying involvement of networked databases, etc...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The wallstreet journal article mentions the issue was with a new system , specifically noting that it was not related to their antiquated hardware that has historically been the cause of failures in the past .
I think it 's naive to suggest that old hardware or coding in C + + ( over C , as if C 's a completely dead language... they both have their places in complex engineering tasks ) will eliminate failures in the system , because in this case it was newer hardware , which had a cascading effect , implying involvement of networked databases , etc.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The wallstreet journal article mentions the issue was with a new system, specifically noting that it was not related to their antiquated hardware that has historically been the cause of failures in the past.
I think it's naive to suggest that old hardware or coding in C++ (over C, as if C's a completely dead language... they both have their places in complex engineering tasks) will eliminate failures in the system, because in this case it was newer hardware, which had a cascading effect, implying involvement of networked databases, etc...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157282</id>
	<title>What OS?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I thought of that."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I thought of that .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I thought of that.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30171486</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258734540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are so wrong.</p><p>Flight planning specifies routes and times so ATC can keep track of aircraft.  For airlines, these are IFR flightplans, specifying altitudes, waypoints, and ETAs.  That is the route the pilot must fly.  The benefit of flight planning is that ATC can handle collision avoidance for aircraft not equipped with traffic receivers.  Mode S transponders with ADS-B capability are expensive, and there aren't a lot of GA aircraft that have them.  Another benefit is that you verify your safe arrival with ATC.  If you do not close your flightplan with an FSS, FSS staff calls you, search and rescue gets deployed, FAA reps come to your house, etc.  Flight planning whether VFR or IFR helps ensure safe separation between aircraft, reducing the risk of an accident.</p><p>I was flying through southeast Kansas and lost comms with Kansas City Center just before they were going to warn me that I was nearing some weather that was worse than forecasted.  I had XM weather in my airplane and saw this, diverting and notifying the Columbia FSS.  When I landed later that evening, I had a voicemail from Center telling me they tried to reach me and that they would be checking to make sure I arrived safely.</p><p>So, to look at your points specifically:</p><p>Radar: Its helpful for ATC to know where the blips on their radar are actually going.  With a flight plan, you will be assigned a unique transponder code so ATC can see you specifically on radar and can track you more easily.</p><p>ATC: See above.  Flight planning helps keep aircraft from running into each other because ATC knows where you're going.</p><p>Landings: At a major airport, if they don't expect your arrival, be prepared to wait a while before you get a chance to land.</p><p>Passenger safety:  If you don't think any of the above increases risk at all, I don't trust you as a pilot.  A good pilot understands what adds to his risk.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are so wrong.Flight planning specifies routes and times so ATC can keep track of aircraft .
For airlines , these are IFR flightplans , specifying altitudes , waypoints , and ETAs .
That is the route the pilot must fly .
The benefit of flight planning is that ATC can handle collision avoidance for aircraft not equipped with traffic receivers .
Mode S transponders with ADS-B capability are expensive , and there are n't a lot of GA aircraft that have them .
Another benefit is that you verify your safe arrival with ATC .
If you do not close your flightplan with an FSS , FSS staff calls you , search and rescue gets deployed , FAA reps come to your house , etc .
Flight planning whether VFR or IFR helps ensure safe separation between aircraft , reducing the risk of an accident.I was flying through southeast Kansas and lost comms with Kansas City Center just before they were going to warn me that I was nearing some weather that was worse than forecasted .
I had XM weather in my airplane and saw this , diverting and notifying the Columbia FSS .
When I landed later that evening , I had a voicemail from Center telling me they tried to reach me and that they would be checking to make sure I arrived safely.So , to look at your points specifically : Radar : Its helpful for ATC to know where the blips on their radar are actually going .
With a flight plan , you will be assigned a unique transponder code so ATC can see you specifically on radar and can track you more easily.ATC : See above .
Flight planning helps keep aircraft from running into each other because ATC knows where you 're going.Landings : At a major airport , if they do n't expect your arrival , be prepared to wait a while before you get a chance to land.Passenger safety : If you do n't think any of the above increases risk at all , I do n't trust you as a pilot .
A good pilot understands what adds to his risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are so wrong.Flight planning specifies routes and times so ATC can keep track of aircraft.
For airlines, these are IFR flightplans, specifying altitudes, waypoints, and ETAs.
That is the route the pilot must fly.
The benefit of flight planning is that ATC can handle collision avoidance for aircraft not equipped with traffic receivers.
Mode S transponders with ADS-B capability are expensive, and there aren't a lot of GA aircraft that have them.
Another benefit is that you verify your safe arrival with ATC.
If you do not close your flightplan with an FSS, FSS staff calls you, search and rescue gets deployed, FAA reps come to your house, etc.
Flight planning whether VFR or IFR helps ensure safe separation between aircraft, reducing the risk of an accident.I was flying through southeast Kansas and lost comms with Kansas City Center just before they were going to warn me that I was nearing some weather that was worse than forecasted.
I had XM weather in my airplane and saw this, diverting and notifying the Columbia FSS.
When I landed later that evening, I had a voicemail from Center telling me they tried to reach me and that they would be checking to make sure I arrived safely.So, to look at your points specifically:Radar: Its helpful for ATC to know where the blips on their radar are actually going.
With a flight plan, you will be assigned a unique transponder code so ATC can see you specifically on radar and can track you more easily.ATC: See above.
Flight planning helps keep aircraft from running into each other because ATC knows where you're going.Landings: At a major airport, if they don't expect your arrival, be prepared to wait a while before you get a chance to land.Passenger safety:  If you don't think any of the above increases risk at all, I don't trust you as a pilot.
A good pilot understands what adds to his risk.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157686</id>
	<title>Re:Honest!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1258650420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No you see the problem was that someone tried to comment out a comment. However, their skewed vision on how comments work, and by some MIRACLE of programming and compilation, All the code ended up commented and the comment was compiled instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No you see the problem was that someone tried to comment out a comment .
However , their skewed vision on how comments work , and by some MIRACLE of programming and compilation , All the code ended up commented and the comment was compiled instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No you see the problem was that someone tried to comment out a comment.
However, their skewed vision on how comments work, and by some MIRACLE of programming and compilation, All the code ended up commented and the comment was compiled instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258653240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, this is flight planning/scheduling software.  This is the system by which airliners are told what route they are to take when they finally get their flight clearance.</p><p>The primary reason this has not received "oh my god the sky is falling" priority is because, well, it isn't.  Nor are shiny metal tubes blasting through the sky at 500 miles an hour going to smash into each other because of this.  People will be inconvenienced and that's regrettable and needs to be fixed, but this is not a safety issue.</p><p>
&nbsp; - Radar control systems:  Unaffected.<br>
&nbsp; - Air Traffic control:  Unaffected.<br>
&nbsp; - Communications:  Unaffected.<br>
&nbsp; - Landings:  Unaffected.<br>
&nbsp; - Any flights already in progress:  Unaffected.<br>
&nbsp; - Ground control: Unaffected.<br>
&nbsp; - Passenger Safety:  Unaffected.</p><p>This only delays the granting of flight clearance.  The planes that are inconvenienced by this are safely on the ground, and the effect is that they stay on the ground longer than they should.   Again, this is regrettable, but not fatal.  There is no plausible scenario that would lead from this to a failure of traffic control.  In fact, with fewer planes in the sky, you could argue that flying is actually safer (for those people who are lucky enough to have gotten clearance, of course!).</p><p>In the medical field, this would be a failure of the system that the receptionist uses to schedule your next appointment.  In the automotive analogy, this would be a failure of your garage door opener.  In the heart monitor analogy, there isn't even an analogy because heart monitors don't have (as far as I know) any non-critical systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , this is flight planning/scheduling software .
This is the system by which airliners are told what route they are to take when they finally get their flight clearance.The primary reason this has not received " oh my god the sky is falling " priority is because , well , it is n't .
Nor are shiny metal tubes blasting through the sky at 500 miles an hour going to smash into each other because of this .
People will be inconvenienced and that 's regrettable and needs to be fixed , but this is not a safety issue .
  - Radar control systems : Unaffected .
  - Air Traffic control : Unaffected .
  - Communications : Unaffected .
  - Landings : Unaffected .
  - Any flights already in progress : Unaffected .
  - Ground control : Unaffected .
  - Passenger Safety : Unaffected.This only delays the granting of flight clearance .
The planes that are inconvenienced by this are safely on the ground , and the effect is that they stay on the ground longer than they should .
Again , this is regrettable , but not fatal .
There is no plausible scenario that would lead from this to a failure of traffic control .
In fact , with fewer planes in the sky , you could argue that flying is actually safer ( for those people who are lucky enough to have gotten clearance , of course !
) .In the medical field , this would be a failure of the system that the receptionist uses to schedule your next appointment .
In the automotive analogy , this would be a failure of your garage door opener .
In the heart monitor analogy , there is n't even an analogy because heart monitors do n't have ( as far as I know ) any non-critical systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, this is flight planning/scheduling software.
This is the system by which airliners are told what route they are to take when they finally get their flight clearance.The primary reason this has not received "oh my god the sky is falling" priority is because, well, it isn't.
Nor are shiny metal tubes blasting through the sky at 500 miles an hour going to smash into each other because of this.
People will be inconvenienced and that's regrettable and needs to be fixed, but this is not a safety issue.
  - Radar control systems:  Unaffected.
  - Air Traffic control:  Unaffected.
  - Communications:  Unaffected.
  - Landings:  Unaffected.
  - Any flights already in progress:  Unaffected.
  - Ground control: Unaffected.
  - Passenger Safety:  Unaffected.This only delays the granting of flight clearance.
The planes that are inconvenienced by this are safely on the ground, and the effect is that they stay on the ground longer than they should.
Again, this is regrettable, but not fatal.
There is no plausible scenario that would lead from this to a failure of traffic control.
In fact, with fewer planes in the sky, you could argue that flying is actually safer (for those people who are lucky enough to have gotten clearance, of course!
).In the medical field, this would be a failure of the system that the receptionist uses to schedule your next appointment.
In the automotive analogy, this would be a failure of your garage door opener.
In the heart monitor analogy, there isn't even an analogy because heart monitors don't have (as far as I know) any non-critical systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159410</id>
	<title>bullshit detector on red alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258655700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>from TFA:</p><p>&gt; The FAA said at that time the source of the computer software malfunction was a "packet switch" that "failed due to a database mismatch."</p><p>hate it when that happens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>from TFA : &gt; The FAA said at that time the source of the computer software malfunction was a " packet switch " that " failed due to a database mismatch .
" hate it when that happens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>from TFA:&gt; The FAA said at that time the source of the computer software malfunction was a "packet switch" that "failed due to a database mismatch.
"hate it when that happens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312</id>
	<title>problems?</title>
	<author>archangel9</author>
	<datestamp>1258649340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>only the second glitch in fifteen months? One would assume that's far better than most commercially written software.</htmltext>
<tokenext>only the second glitch in fifteen months ?
One would assume that 's far better than most commercially written software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>only the second glitch in fifteen months?
One would assume that's far better than most commercially written software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30170416</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258728900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;This is the system by which airliners are told what route they are to take when they finally get &gt;their flight clearance.<br>&gt;The primary reason this has not received "oh my god the sky is falling" priority is because, well, &gt;it isn't</p><p>You lack of imagination leaves to me to think you would be a bad programmer.<br>See I could tell you to take off runway 7, which in itself would be harmless, however , the glitch comes from the same software that told the other air traffic controller that it was ok to use runway 7 to land, now when a moving object meets a moving object, which neither are either indestructible or unmovable, I wold say there tends to be a lot of carnage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; This is the system by which airliners are told what route they are to take when they finally get &gt; their flight clearance. &gt; The primary reason this has not received " oh my god the sky is falling " priority is because , well , &gt; it isn'tYou lack of imagination leaves to me to think you would be a bad programmer.See I could tell you to take off runway 7 , which in itself would be harmless , however , the glitch comes from the same software that told the other air traffic controller that it was ok to use runway 7 to land , now when a moving object meets a moving object , which neither are either indestructible or unmovable , I wold say there tends to be a lot of carnage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;This is the system by which airliners are told what route they are to take when they finally get &gt;their flight clearance.&gt;The primary reason this has not received "oh my god the sky is falling" priority is because, well, &gt;it isn'tYou lack of imagination leaves to me to think you would be a bad programmer.See I could tell you to take off runway 7, which in itself would be harmless, however , the glitch comes from the same software that told the other air traffic controller that it was ok to use runway 7 to land, now when a moving object meets a moving object, which neither are either indestructible or unmovable, I wold say there tends to be a lot of carnage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158258</id>
	<title>Honest...</title>
	<author>flogger</author>
	<datestamp>1258652160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That bug just flew in under the radar...<br> <br>

**ducks**</htmltext>
<tokenext>That bug just flew in under the radar.. . * * ducks * *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That bug just flew in under the radar... 

**ducks**</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158322</id>
	<title>glitch in Obama's healthcare con</title>
	<author>czarangelus</author>
	<datestamp>1258652340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Glitch in Central led to Tuttle^w Buttle being injected with Toradol, which resulted in severe gastrointestinal hemorage ultimately leading to death due to his warfarin medication.<br> <br>
Hooray for more Imperial competence!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Glitch in Central led to Tuttle ^ w Buttle being injected with Toradol , which resulted in severe gastrointestinal hemorage ultimately leading to death due to his warfarin medication .
Hooray for more Imperial competence !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glitch in Central led to Tuttle^w Buttle being injected with Toradol, which resulted in severe gastrointestinal hemorage ultimately leading to death due to his warfarin medication.
Hooray for more Imperial competence!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162162</id>
	<title>Re:Here I sit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258621320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>...stuck in Atlanta...</p></div><p>You betcha!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...stuck in Atlanta...You betcha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...stuck in Atlanta...You betcha!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157414</id>
	<title>Resolved...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125863837097855555.html?mod=WSJ\_hpp\_LEFTTopStories" title="wsj.com">...according to the Wall Street Journal.</a> [wsj.com]  Wonder if they'll give me a lift home?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...according to the Wall Street Journal .
[ wsj.com ] Wonder if they 'll give me a lift home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...according to the Wall Street Journal.
[wsj.com]  Wonder if they'll give me a lift home?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344</id>
	<title>what do you expect from 70's technology ??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258649400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The FAA and their omnipotent employees hate anything new/improved. I worked for a very large FAA contractor developing a modern system. We tried to use Solaris/C++ but they sandbagged it because we could not test each and every line of code in the OS and that even C++ stripped to essentially C may have hidden problems. They are comfortable running systems on ancient mainframes running ULTRA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The FAA and their omnipotent employees hate anything new/improved .
I worked for a very large FAA contractor developing a modern system .
We tried to use Solaris/C + + but they sandbagged it because we could not test each and every line of code in the OS and that even C + + stripped to essentially C may have hidden problems .
They are comfortable running systems on ancient mainframes running ULTRA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The FAA and their omnipotent employees hate anything new/improved.
I worked for a very large FAA contractor developing a modern system.
We tried to use Solaris/C++ but they sandbagged it because we could not test each and every line of code in the OS and that even C++ stripped to essentially C may have hidden problems.
They are comfortable running systems on ancient mainframes running ULTRA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157320</id>
	<title>Damn Excel</title>
	<author>headhot</author>
	<datestamp>1258649340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some one messed up their $2,000,000 excel macro that list morning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some one messed up their $ 2,000,000 excel macro that list morning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some one messed up their $2,000,000 excel macro that list morning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30160856</id>
	<title>Yeah, right.  A cynic's view.</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1258660140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its true the flights are delayed.  That's as much of the truth we get from this complex system of terribly overworked government and airline employees, national security, information systems, politics, FAA, corporate scum, secret clearance computer firms with bizarre contracts, and the 24/7 news spew with commercial airline as clients.

They start by overbooking flights, while trying to account for each seat for security, and the bean counters, vips, and bad weather.  To top it off information systems have to share some data, but not other data, while the people working have to comply with all sorts of rigid protocols and odd project management that controls everything except their overtime.

I dunno, I have no reason to believe that any news we get about this type of event is necessarily true.  It doesn't need to be.  Its just the spin that reporters have to make in the absence of any real statement for the record.  If they told you the truth you'd stop giving them your money.  God forbid airlines make customers a top priority. Ha!

Even if they were telling the truth, it would be a fluke, but just as vague and pointless.

OK.  We know the truth. Its aliens from Orion preparing for 2012.  And they work for Delta.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its true the flights are delayed .
That 's as much of the truth we get from this complex system of terribly overworked government and airline employees , national security , information systems , politics , FAA , corporate scum , secret clearance computer firms with bizarre contracts , and the 24/7 news spew with commercial airline as clients .
They start by overbooking flights , while trying to account for each seat for security , and the bean counters , vips , and bad weather .
To top it off information systems have to share some data , but not other data , while the people working have to comply with all sorts of rigid protocols and odd project management that controls everything except their overtime .
I dunno , I have no reason to believe that any news we get about this type of event is necessarily true .
It does n't need to be .
Its just the spin that reporters have to make in the absence of any real statement for the record .
If they told you the truth you 'd stop giving them your money .
God forbid airlines make customers a top priority .
Ha ! Even if they were telling the truth , it would be a fluke , but just as vague and pointless .
OK. We know the truth .
Its aliens from Orion preparing for 2012 .
And they work for Delta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its true the flights are delayed.
That's as much of the truth we get from this complex system of terribly overworked government and airline employees, national security, information systems, politics, FAA, corporate scum, secret clearance computer firms with bizarre contracts, and the 24/7 news spew with commercial airline as clients.
They start by overbooking flights, while trying to account for each seat for security, and the bean counters, vips, and bad weather.
To top it off information systems have to share some data, but not other data, while the people working have to comply with all sorts of rigid protocols and odd project management that controls everything except their overtime.
I dunno, I have no reason to believe that any news we get about this type of event is necessarily true.
It doesn't need to be.
Its just the spin that reporters have to make in the absence of any real statement for the record.
If they told you the truth you'd stop giving them your money.
God forbid airlines make customers a top priority.
Ha!

Even if they were telling the truth, it would be a fluke, but just as vague and pointless.
OK.  We know the truth.
Its aliens from Orion preparing for 2012.
And they work for Delta.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158318</id>
	<title>Re:what do you expect from 70's technology ??</title>
	<author>fbjon</author>
	<datestamp>1258652340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>C++ stripped to essentially C may have hidden problems</p></div><p>That sounds about right, yeah.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>C + + stripped to essentially C may have hidden problemsThat sounds about right , yeah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C++ stripped to essentially C may have hidden problemsThat sounds about right, yeah.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162180</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258621380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering how many companies have failed in the past 200 years, how the financial industry was central to our current economic crisis, and how we're still living under the same government we had 200 years ago, I'd say your faith in the private sector is severely misplaced.</p><p>But don't let that stop you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering how many companies have failed in the past 200 years , how the financial industry was central to our current economic crisis , and how we 're still living under the same government we had 200 years ago , I 'd say your faith in the private sector is severely misplaced.But do n't let that stop you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering how many companies have failed in the past 200 years, how the financial industry was central to our current economic crisis, and how we're still living under the same government we had 200 years ago, I'd say your faith in the private sector is severely misplaced.But don't let that stop you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158256</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm could it be a windows problem?</title>
	<author>Jumpin' Jon</author>
	<datestamp>1258652160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think MSSQL runs on any other OS??</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think MSSQL runs on any other OS ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think MSSQL runs on any other OS?
?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30166174</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>AceyMan</author>
	<datestamp>1258635420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I ran an airline for a time, and I see where you left off a few critical sub-systems.</p><p>- Dispatch Planning (what cooks up the flight plans in question for submission, specifying the fuel burn, max takeoff weight, planned landing weight, operating mach speed, altitude, etc.)</p><p>- Operations Control (where every plane and crew is, in real time.).  Think of a Gantt chart that would make your jaw drop, it's kind of like that.</p><p>These are the things that make an airline run.  The FAA only has one responsibility -- keep airplanes apart.  The rest (largely) is up to the carrier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I ran an airline for a time , and I see where you left off a few critical sub-systems.- Dispatch Planning ( what cooks up the flight plans in question for submission , specifying the fuel burn , max takeoff weight , planned landing weight , operating mach speed , altitude , etc .
) - Operations Control ( where every plane and crew is , in real time. ) .
Think of a Gantt chart that would make your jaw drop , it 's kind of like that.These are the things that make an airline run .
The FAA only has one responsibility -- keep airplanes apart .
The rest ( largely ) is up to the carrier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I ran an airline for a time, and I see where you left off a few critical sub-systems.- Dispatch Planning (what cooks up the flight plans in question for submission, specifying the fuel burn, max takeoff weight, planned landing weight, operating mach speed, altitude, etc.
)- Operations Control (where every plane and crew is, in real time.).
Think of a Gantt chart that would make your jaw drop, it's kind of like that.These are the things that make an airline run.
The FAA only has one responsibility -- keep airplanes apart.
The rest (largely) is up to the carrier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158840</id>
	<title>Re:Here I sit...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258653900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry to hear that.  But, as the old saying goes, "it's better to be DOWN HERE desperately wishing you were UP THERE, than UP THERE desperately wishing you were DOWN HERE."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to hear that .
But , as the old saying goes , " it 's better to be DOWN HERE desperately wishing you were UP THERE , than UP THERE desperately wishing you were DOWN HERE .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to hear that.
But, as the old saying goes, "it's better to be DOWN HERE desperately wishing you were UP THERE, than UP THERE desperately wishing you were DOWN HERE.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30165320</id>
	<title>Re:problems?</title>
	<author>PitaBred</author>
	<datestamp>1258631640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not a safety issue? Have you ever been in an airport with significantly delayed passengers? It's a bit of a powder keg when you get enough people trying to find seats in the terminal to wait for their "slightly delayed" planes, fight for power outlets, talk on cell phones...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a safety issue ?
Have you ever been in an airport with significantly delayed passengers ?
It 's a bit of a powder keg when you get enough people trying to find seats in the terminal to wait for their " slightly delayed " planes , fight for power outlets , talk on cell phones.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a safety issue?
Have you ever been in an airport with significantly delayed passengers?
It's a bit of a powder keg when you get enough people trying to find seats in the terminal to wait for their "slightly delayed" planes, fight for power outlets, talk on cell phones...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159706</id>
	<title>(plUs one Informative)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258656720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>compRehensive here, but what is</htmltext>
<tokenext>compRehensive here , but what is</tokentext>
<sentencetext>compRehensive here, but what is</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158168</id>
	<title>Foot TCP</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1258651920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA: <i> "The FAA said at that time the source of the computer software malfunction was a "packet switch" that "failed due to a database mismatch."</i> <br> <br>

We all know how large out of touch behemoths sometimes structure their IT. By 'packet switch' they mean 'guy who couriers hardcopy flight plans' and by 'database mistmatch' they mean their dewey-decimal-system was mixed-up by some jokesters.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " The FAA said at that time the source of the computer software malfunction was a " packet switch " that " failed due to a database mismatch .
" We all know how large out of touch behemoths sometimes structure their IT .
By 'packet switch ' they mean 'guy who couriers hardcopy flight plans ' and by 'database mistmatch ' they mean their dewey-decimal-system was mixed-up by some jokesters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:  "The FAA said at that time the source of the computer software malfunction was a "packet switch" that "failed due to a database mismatch.
"  

We all know how large out of touch behemoths sometimes structure their IT.
By 'packet switch' they mean 'guy who couriers hardcopy flight plans' and by 'database mistmatch' they mean their dewey-decimal-system was mixed-up by some jokesters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159534</id>
	<title>Re:Here I sit...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258656180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>... with you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... with you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... with you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30163284</id>
	<title>Re:Just another great goverment run program...</title>
	<author>MaWeiTao</author>
	<datestamp>1258624920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a lot of problems with government and many departments within that bureaucracy, but the FAA is not one of them. It's pretty amazing what they do and there probably aren't many other entities out there that could do what they do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a lot of problems with government and many departments within that bureaucracy , but the FAA is not one of them .
It 's pretty amazing what they do and there probably are n't many other entities out there that could do what they do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a lot of problems with government and many departments within that bureaucracy, but the FAA is not one of them.
It's pretty amazing what they do and there probably aren't many other entities out there that could do what they do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157612</id>
	<title>And ./ just noticed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258650180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*YAWN* they are almost out of the problem. Glad that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ finally noticed..</p><p>Did it also pass unobserved that the mobile phone network of one operator (Vodafone) of an entire land (the Netherlands) went totally K.O. for about 16 hours due to a single gateway failure, leaving several millions users and businesses and even some public transport stuck in the cold?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* YAWN * they are almost out of the problem .
Glad that ./ finally noticed..Did it also pass unobserved that the mobile phone network of one operator ( Vodafone ) of an entire land ( the Netherlands ) went totally K.O .
for about 16 hours due to a single gateway failure , leaving several millions users and businesses and even some public transport stuck in the cold ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*YAWN* they are almost out of the problem.
Glad that ./ finally noticed..Did it also pass unobserved that the mobile phone network of one operator (Vodafone) of an entire land (the Netherlands) went totally K.O.
for about 16 hours due to a single gateway failure, leaving several millions users and businesses and even some public transport stuck in the cold?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30160522</id>
	<title>I'm this many.</title>
	<author>StikyPad</author>
	<datestamp>1258659060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It was the second time in 15 months that a glitch in the flight plan system caused delays.</i></p><p>Thanks for the arbitrary use of months.  Is it a baby, or were you working from fortnights and thought you might as well round to the nearest lunar cycle and then convert to Gregorian?  Do you also append "and a half" to your age, as appropriate?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was the second time in 15 months that a glitch in the flight plan system caused delays.Thanks for the arbitrary use of months .
Is it a baby , or were you working from fortnights and thought you might as well round to the nearest lunar cycle and then convert to Gregorian ?
Do you also append " and a half " to your age , as appropriate ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was the second time in 15 months that a glitch in the flight plan system caused delays.Thanks for the arbitrary use of months.
Is it a baby, or were you working from fortnights and thought you might as well round to the nearest lunar cycle and then convert to Gregorian?
Do you also append "and a half" to your age, as appropriate?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157638</id>
	<title>obviously</title>
	<author>stillpixel</author>
	<datestamp>1258650240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they must have been transitioning over to Windows 7 this morning.. you know that can take days depending on what your current system is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they must have been transitioning over to Windows 7 this morning.. you know that can take days depending on what your current system is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they must have been transitioning over to Windows 7 this morning.. you know that can take days depending on what your current system is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30165320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30176288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30166174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30163284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157934
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30164156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30165346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30173020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30170416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30171486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30168106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30161290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30164288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_19_152243_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157574
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157934
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158624
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30166174
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30171486
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30170416
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30173020
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30165320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30159996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30176288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30164288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30164156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30168106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30163284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30162864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158802
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30165346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30158318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30161290
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_19_152243.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_19_152243.30157986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
