<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_18_2336214</id>
	<title>Two Arrested For Zbot Trojan</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258557780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Officers from the Metropolitan Police's Central e-Crime Unit have made Europe's first <a href="http://www.net-security.org/malware\_news.php?id=1143">arrests in the battle against the ZeuS or Zbot Trojan</a> which threatened to compromise thousands of computers. Officers arrested a man and woman, both aged 20 years, in Manchester for offenses under the 1990 Computer Misuse Act and the 2006 Fraud Act. Both suspects were interviewed by PCeU detectives and have been bailed for further in-depth inquiries to be completed. The arrests in connection with the malware represent some of the first in the world, and the first in Europe to combat the distribution and control of ZeuS."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Officers from the Metropolitan Police 's Central e-Crime Unit have made Europe 's first arrests in the battle against the ZeuS or Zbot Trojan which threatened to compromise thousands of computers .
Officers arrested a man and woman , both aged 20 years , in Manchester for offenses under the 1990 Computer Misuse Act and the 2006 Fraud Act .
Both suspects were interviewed by PCeU detectives and have been bailed for further in-depth inquiries to be completed .
The arrests in connection with the malware represent some of the first in the world , and the first in Europe to combat the distribution and control of ZeuS .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Officers from the Metropolitan Police's Central e-Crime Unit have made Europe's first arrests in the battle against the ZeuS or Zbot Trojan which threatened to compromise thousands of computers.
Officers arrested a man and woman, both aged 20 years, in Manchester for offenses under the 1990 Computer Misuse Act and the 2006 Fraud Act.
Both suspects were interviewed by PCeU detectives and have been bailed for further in-depth inquiries to be completed.
The arrests in connection with the malware represent some of the first in the world, and the first in Europe to combat the distribution and control of ZeuS.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30157756</id>
	<title>Re:Not mentioned in the article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258650600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's like saying you will never die in a car crash because you drive a Sunbeam Venezia (only 7 still exist) and no one has ever died while driving one...</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's like saying you will never die in a car crash because you drive a Sunbeam Venezia ( only 7 still exist ) and no one has ever died while driving one.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's like saying you will never die in a car crash because you drive a Sunbeam Venezia (only 7 still exist) and no one has ever died while driving one...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152926</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152818</id>
	<title>PMITA Prison</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257094620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hope they now feel the same level of invasion and infection as their victims except it will be physical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hope they now feel the same level of invasion and infection as their victims except it will be physical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hope they now feel the same level of invasion and infection as their victims except it will be physical.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30167322</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>psithurism</author>
	<datestamp>1258643100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, screw people stupid enough to use windows. They deserve to have their information stolen. That's why I only use Linux, so no one can get my personal information from my computer. You know, the information that I use to do my online banking where my bank uses...Oh shit.<br> <br>Really, your personal information is everywhere passed around through many companies (and governments), and many of them use windows to access it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , screw people stupid enough to use windows .
They deserve to have their information stolen .
That 's why I only use Linux , so no one can get my personal information from my computer .
You know , the information that I use to do my online banking where my bank uses...Oh shit .
Really , your personal information is everywhere passed around through many companies ( and governments ) , and many of them use windows to access it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, screw people stupid enough to use windows.
They deserve to have their information stolen.
That's why I only use Linux, so no one can get my personal information from my computer.
You know, the information that I use to do my online banking where my bank uses...Oh shit.
Really, your personal information is everywhere passed around through many companies (and governments), and many of them use windows to access it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152830</id>
	<title>mod 0p</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257094740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>and coders the next round of profits without every chance I got disaapearing up its</htmltext>
<tokenext>and coders the next round of profits without every chance I got disaapearing up its</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and coders the next round of profits without every chance I got disaapearing up its</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30157564</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1258650120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't worry. The world will get along just fine without your help.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry .
The world will get along just fine without your help .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry.
The world will get along just fine without your help.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154240</id>
	<title>I'm just wondering...</title>
	<author>madenglishbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1258627920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>why the Met had to get involved.
surely, every time the Police in London want to arrest someone in Manchester (usually terror related!) they should be the ones doing the support.
Or is it another case of our Southern masters not trusting anyone north of the Watford Gap?</htmltext>
<tokenext>why the Met had to get involved .
surely , every time the Police in London want to arrest someone in Manchester ( usually terror related !
) they should be the ones doing the support .
Or is it another case of our Southern masters not trusting anyone north of the Watford Gap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why the Met had to get involved.
surely, every time the Police in London want to arrest someone in Manchester (usually terror related!
) they should be the ones doing the support.
Or is it another case of our Southern masters not trusting anyone north of the Watford Gap?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820</id>
	<title>Not mentioned in the article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257094680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zbot.  This is a Windows, thing, right?  So if you don't use Windows, it's not a problem.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zbot .
This is a Windows , thing , right ?
So if you do n't use Windows , it 's not a problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zbot.
This is a Windows, thing, right?
So if you don't use Windows, it's not a problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154142</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>auric\_dude</author>
	<datestamp>1258626240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Guardian would suggest that the met Police e-crime unit were involved in the take down <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/18/zeus-zbot-trojan-virus" title="guardian.co.uk">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/18/zeus-zbot-trojan-virus</a> [guardian.co.uk] and the e-crime unit <a href="http://www.kable.co.uk/government-ecrime-review-home-office-14jul09" title="kable.co.uk">http://www.kable.co.uk/government-ecrime-review-home-office-14jul09</a> [kable.co.uk] is part of GCHQ <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/25/cyberspace-war-computer-hacking-fraud" title="guardian.co.uk">http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/25/cyberspace-war-computer-hacking-fraud</a> [guardian.co.uk]. So may well be more to this than meets the eye.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Guardian would suggest that the met Police e-crime unit were involved in the take down http : //www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/18/zeus-zbot-trojan-virus [ guardian.co.uk ] and the e-crime unit http : //www.kable.co.uk/government-ecrime-review-home-office-14jul09 [ kable.co.uk ] is part of GCHQ http : //www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/25/cyberspace-war-computer-hacking-fraud [ guardian.co.uk ] .
So may well be more to this than meets the eye .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Guardian would suggest that the met Police e-crime unit were involved in the take down http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/18/zeus-zbot-trojan-virus [guardian.co.uk] and the e-crime unit http://www.kable.co.uk/government-ecrime-review-home-office-14jul09 [kable.co.uk] is part of GCHQ http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/25/cyberspace-war-computer-hacking-fraud [guardian.co.uk].
So may well be more to this than meets the eye.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30155444</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1258642320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>2 down, a billion to go.<i> <br> <br>Probably thousands or millions to go.<br> <br> <i>Sorry, I just can't get excited about 2 people caught.</i> <br> <br>Especially when these two are the first to be arrested for this kind of crime in the whole of Europe.</i></i></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 down , a billion to go .
Probably thousands or millions to go .
Sorry , I just ca n't get excited about 2 people caught .
Especially when these two are the first to be arrested for this kind of crime in the whole of Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 down, a billion to go.
Probably thousands or millions to go.
Sorry, I just can't get excited about 2 people caught.
Especially when these two are the first to be arrested for this kind of crime in the whole of Europe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153392</id>
	<title>Bullshit</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck the Man!  These two are proud an heroes and should be lauded for their efforts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck the Man !
These two are proud an heroes and should be lauded for their efforts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck the Man!
These two are proud an heroes and should be lauded for their efforts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154302</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1258628760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If your bank has any Windows PCs or servers, you probably should care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If your bank has any Windows PCs or servers , you probably should care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If your bank has any Windows PCs or servers, you probably should care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153346</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, I do get a similar feeling. And although default settings are better on an OS like Linux, I can't help but think that those same users would manage to get infected on Linux too - if everyone started to switch.
<br> <br>
The only thing I know for certain is that I have more control over a Linux machine and as such have found them easier to diagnose and fix. Oh, and <b>tonnes</b> easier to reliably lock down.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , I do get a similar feeling .
And although default settings are better on an OS like Linux , I ca n't help but think that those same users would manage to get infected on Linux too - if everyone started to switch .
The only thing I know for certain is that I have more control over a Linux machine and as such have found them easier to diagnose and fix .
Oh , and tonnes easier to reliably lock down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, I do get a similar feeling.
And although default settings are better on an OS like Linux, I can't help but think that those same users would manage to get infected on Linux too - if everyone started to switch.
The only thing I know for certain is that I have more control over a Linux machine and as such have found them easier to diagnose and fix.
Oh, and tonnes easier to reliably lock down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153112</id>
	<title>f'n Bastards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we take turns bludgeoning them with a pitchfork?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we take turns bludgeoning them with a pitchfork ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we take turns bludgeoning them with a pitchfork?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would be excited to know how they got caught. There might be an enjoyable story there.
<br> <br>
I would have imagined that if these two were smart then they would have completely covered/obfuscated their tracks every step of the way. From propagating the first copy of the trojan to making sure any profits/information was sent through an elaborate network of communication-encrypted proxies before arriving on a remote server from which they could connect to using a similar but different network of communication-encrypted proxies and download/view the information.
<br> <br>
I'd really love to know if they were just stupid, or if someone else was just way smarter. For the stories sake, I hope its the latter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I would be excited to know how they got caught .
There might be an enjoyable story there .
I would have imagined that if these two were smart then they would have completely covered/obfuscated their tracks every step of the way .
From propagating the first copy of the trojan to making sure any profits/information was sent through an elaborate network of communication-encrypted proxies before arriving on a remote server from which they could connect to using a similar but different network of communication-encrypted proxies and download/view the information .
I 'd really love to know if they were just stupid , or if someone else was just way smarter .
For the stories sake , I hope its the latter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would be excited to know how they got caught.
There might be an enjoyable story there.
I would have imagined that if these two were smart then they would have completely covered/obfuscated their tracks every step of the way.
From propagating the first copy of the trojan to making sure any profits/information was sent through an elaborate network of communication-encrypted proxies before arriving on a remote server from which they could connect to using a similar but different network of communication-encrypted proxies and download/view the information.
I'd really love to know if they were just stupid, or if someone else was just way smarter.
For the stories sake, I hope its the latter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154042</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258624800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i bet they have sold trojan to officer</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i bet they have sold trojan to officer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i bet they have sold trojan to officer</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632</id>
	<title>2 Down...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257092880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>2 down, a billion to go.  Sorry, I just can't get excited about 2 people caught.</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 down , a billion to go .
Sorry , I just ca n't get excited about 2 people caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 down, a billion to go.
Sorry, I just can't get excited about 2 people caught.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153344</id>
	<title>Anybody else feeling frisky</title>
	<author>sleeponthemic</author>
	<datestamp>1257101100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>.. and thinking  "20 year old woman" is tantamount to slashrotica?</htmltext>
<tokenext>.. and thinking " 20 year old woman " is tantamount to slashrotica ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. and thinking  "20 year old woman" is tantamount to slashrotica?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154260</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>hab136</author>
	<datestamp>1258628100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'd really love to know if they were just stupid, or if someone else was just way smarter</p></div></blockquote><p>The vast, vast majority of criminals are caught either because of stupidity on their part or someone squealing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd really love to know if they were just stupid , or if someone else was just way smarterThe vast , vast majority of criminals are caught either because of stupidity on their part or someone squealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd really love to know if they were just stupid, or if someone else was just way smarterThe vast, vast majority of criminals are caught either because of stupidity on their part or someone squealing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153334</id>
	<title>Aiming</title>
	<author>Merc248</author>
	<datestamp>1257100980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this is the program that allows me to auto aim in Quake 2, yet is still pleasurable and safe to use.</p><p>I guess this sounds alright.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this is the program that allows me to auto aim in Quake 2 , yet is still pleasurable and safe to use.I guess this sounds alright .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this is the program that allows me to auto aim in Quake 2, yet is still pleasurable and safe to use.I guess this sounds alright.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153134</id>
	<title>i hope there's a follow up story</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257098580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it would be interesting to find out if they are merely patsies for a larger effort, or are genuinely isolated and inspired script kiddies</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it would be interesting to find out if they are merely patsies for a larger effort , or are genuinely isolated and inspired script kiddies</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it would be interesting to find out if they are merely patsies for a larger effort, or are genuinely isolated and inspired script kiddies</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154500</id>
	<title>infected computers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"<i>The Zbot Trojan is believed to have infected and subsequently accessed personal information from tens of thousands of computers around the world</i>"<br> <br>

What Operating System did this <a href="http://www.viruslist.com/en/viruses/encyclopedia?virusid=21782783" title="viruslist.com" rel="nofollow">Zbot trojan</a> [viruslist.com] run on ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Zbot Trojan is believed to have infected and subsequently accessed personal information from tens of thousands of computers around the world " What Operating System did this Zbot trojan [ viruslist.com ] run on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Zbot Trojan is believed to have infected and subsequently accessed personal information from tens of thousands of computers around the world" 

What Operating System did this Zbot trojan [viruslist.com] run on ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153914</id>
	<title>Re:Oh please</title>
	<author>daedlanth</author>
	<datestamp>1258622700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you cannot see the abject honesty here you are not a hacker.

daed</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can not see the abject honesty here you are not a hacker .
daed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you cannot see the abject honesty here you are not a hacker.
daed</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153228</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1257099540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The "who cares about windows users" keeps getting stronger.</i></p><p>What else do the evil voices tell you to do?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " who cares about windows users " keeps getting stronger.What else do the evil voices tell you to do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "who cares about windows users" keeps getting stronger.What else do the evil voices tell you to do?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153872</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258621800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cliff Stoll noticed a $0.75 accounting error...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cliff Stoll noticed a $ 0.75 accounting error.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cliff Stoll noticed a $0.75 accounting error...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</id>
	<title>Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>baomike</author>
	<datestamp>1257096660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I try to be sympathetic to windows users, and even try to help on occasion<br>but I am slowly losing any semblance of a positive attitude.<br>The "who cares about windows users" keeps getting stronger.<br>I can't protect everybody from themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I try to be sympathetic to windows users , and even try to help on occasionbut I am slowly losing any semblance of a positive attitude.The " who cares about windows users " keeps getting stronger.I ca n't protect everybody from themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I try to be sympathetic to windows users, and even try to help on occasionbut I am slowly losing any semblance of a positive attitude.The "who cares about windows users" keeps getting stronger.I can't protect everybody from themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152926</id>
	<title>Re:Not mentioned in the article...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257095700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes. The theft of tons of personal information worth a ton of money is something that only affects Windows users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
The theft of tons of personal information worth a ton of money is something that only affects Windows users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
The theft of tons of personal information worth a ton of money is something that only affects Windows users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152786</id>
	<title>She got a pussy in her panties</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257094260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>She got a pussy in her panties<br>She wore a pussy thong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>She got a pussy in her pantiesShe wore a pussy thong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30158940</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1258654260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If only the crappy virus infested Windows junk would quit blasting my mail server with projectile vomit.</p><p>It's <i>almost</i> enough that I wish someone would just once and for all inject a secure wipe all your HDs and flash your BIOS with junk command into the botnets and be done with it.</p><p>Given that that *IS* a possibility and the number of businesses dependent on their virus ridden junk, I would think killing the botnets would be considered top priority for the cyber-security do-nothings in Washington.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If only the crappy virus infested Windows junk would quit blasting my mail server with projectile vomit.It 's almost enough that I wish someone would just once and for all inject a secure wipe all your HDs and flash your BIOS with junk command into the botnets and be done with it.Given that that * IS * a possibility and the number of businesses dependent on their virus ridden junk , I would think killing the botnets would be considered top priority for the cyber-security do-nothings in Washington .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If only the crappy virus infested Windows junk would quit blasting my mail server with projectile vomit.It's almost enough that I wish someone would just once and for all inject a secure wipe all your HDs and flash your BIOS with junk command into the botnets and be done with it.Given that that *IS* a possibility and the number of businesses dependent on their virus ridden junk, I would think killing the botnets would be considered top priority for the cyber-security do-nothings in Washington.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152664</id>
	<title>http://www.inuggshop.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257093180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Christmas is coming. It is time to shop <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">Classic UGG Boots</a> [inuggshop.com] as big <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">Christmas gifts</a> [inuggshop.com] for your beloved and families. Show off your love with these must-have <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">sheepskin footwear</a> [inuggshop.com]. Cozy <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/ugg-classic-short-boots-c-1.html" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">UGG Classic Short Boots</a> [inuggshop.com] &amp; <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/ugg-classic-tall-boots-c-3.html" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">UGG Classic Tall Boots</a> [inuggshop.com] keep your feet warm and comfortable. What is more, <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/ugg-bailey-button-boots-c-22.html" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">UGG Bailey Button Boots</a> [inuggshop.com] and <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/ugg-classic-cardy-boots-c-2.html" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">UGG Classic Cardy Boots</a> [inuggshop.com] are stunning design for UGG faddist. Come on, InUGGShop is <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">No.1 UGG Shop</a> [inuggshop.com] for provides the perfect collection of <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">UGG Boots UK</a> [inuggshop.com] &amp; <a href="http://www.inuggshop.com/" title="inuggshop.com" rel="nofollow">UGG Boots Ireland</a> [inuggshop.com] for you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Christmas is coming .
It is time to shop Classic UGG Boots [ inuggshop.com ] as big Christmas gifts [ inuggshop.com ] for your beloved and families .
Show off your love with these must-have sheepskin footwear [ inuggshop.com ] .
Cozy UGG Classic Short Boots [ inuggshop.com ] &amp; UGG Classic Tall Boots [ inuggshop.com ] keep your feet warm and comfortable .
What is more , UGG Bailey Button Boots [ inuggshop.com ] and UGG Classic Cardy Boots [ inuggshop.com ] are stunning design for UGG faddist .
Come on , InUGGShop is No.1 UGG Shop [ inuggshop.com ] for provides the perfect collection of UGG Boots UK [ inuggshop.com ] &amp; UGG Boots Ireland [ inuggshop.com ] for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Christmas is coming.
It is time to shop Classic UGG Boots [inuggshop.com] as big Christmas gifts [inuggshop.com] for your beloved and families.
Show off your love with these must-have sheepskin footwear [inuggshop.com].
Cozy UGG Classic Short Boots [inuggshop.com] &amp; UGG Classic Tall Boots [inuggshop.com] keep your feet warm and comfortable.
What is more, UGG Bailey Button Boots [inuggshop.com] and UGG Classic Cardy Boots [inuggshop.com] are stunning design for UGG faddist.
Come on, InUGGShop is No.1 UGG Shop [inuggshop.com] for provides the perfect collection of UGG Boots UK [inuggshop.com] &amp; UGG Boots Ireland [inuggshop.com] for you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153376</id>
	<title>Actually...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobody in the real world gives a rip about "Linux" and uses primarily Windows and then Apple!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody in the real world gives a rip about " Linux " and uses primarily Windows and then Apple !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody in the real world gives a rip about "Linux" and uses primarily Windows and then Apple!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254</id>
	<title>Oh please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Idiots are everywhere. You think people won't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share? People write the shit for windows because its what everyone uses. Why would I bother with 1.2\% of the linux users when theres 92\% of windows users available? Nothing is idiot proof, not even linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Idiots are everywhere .
You think people wo n't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share ?
People write the shit for windows because its what everyone uses .
Why would I bother with 1.2 \ % of the linux users when theres 92 \ % of windows users available ?
Nothing is idiot proof , not even linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idiots are everywhere.
You think people won't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share?
People write the shit for windows because its what everyone uses.
Why would I bother with 1.2\% of the linux users when theres 92\% of windows users available?
Nothing is idiot proof, not even linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30155964</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>LordSnooty</author>
	<datestamp>1258644900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>In the neither of the last two articles there does it say that the Met Police's e-crime unit is part of GCHQ. The Met Police is the police force of London.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the neither of the last two articles there does it say that the Met Police 's e-crime unit is part of GCHQ .
The Met Police is the police force of London .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the neither of the last two articles there does it say that the Met Police's e-crime unit is part of GCHQ.
The Met Police is the police force of London.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154896</id>
	<title>Re:Oh please</title>
	<author>value\_added</author>
	<datestamp>1258638660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>You think people won't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share?</i></p><p>"Oh, please" back at you.</p><p>It's fine to comment on hypothetical scenarios, but the reality is that malware is a problem for Windows users only.  The only conclusion that's valid (and demonstrably so) is that everyone else is immune.  The rest is speculation and serves no real or useful purpose.</p><p>I'd suggest letting go of hypotheticals.  They have as much value as asserting that the *next* version of Windows will the best and most secure version yet.  The next version is already here, and gasp, there are still problems.</p><p>Maybe next time things will be better?  Maybe next time Linux users will be affected?  Maybe those smug Mac users will get their due.  Maybe, maybe, maybe.  Maybe I'll get a pony.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You think people wo n't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share ?
" Oh , please " back at you.It 's fine to comment on hypothetical scenarios , but the reality is that malware is a problem for Windows users only .
The only conclusion that 's valid ( and demonstrably so ) is that everyone else is immune .
The rest is speculation and serves no real or useful purpose.I 'd suggest letting go of hypotheticals .
They have as much value as asserting that the * next * version of Windows will the best and most secure version yet .
The next version is already here , and gasp , there are still problems.Maybe next time things will be better ?
Maybe next time Linux users will be affected ?
Maybe those smug Mac users will get their due .
Maybe , maybe , maybe .
Maybe I 'll get a pony .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>You think people won't write malware or trojans if macos or linux suddenly jumped to a majority market share?
"Oh, please" back at you.It's fine to comment on hypothetical scenarios, but the reality is that malware is a problem for Windows users only.
The only conclusion that's valid (and demonstrably so) is that everyone else is immune.
The rest is speculation and serves no real or useful purpose.I'd suggest letting go of hypotheticals.
They have as much value as asserting that the *next* version of Windows will the best and most secure version yet.
The next version is already here, and gasp, there are still problems.Maybe next time things will be better?
Maybe next time Linux users will be affected?
Maybe those smug Mac users will get their due.
Maybe, maybe, maybe.
Maybe I'll get a pony.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154512</id>
	<title>Re:Oh please</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258632240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah like all those Apache/Linux worms and trojans out there infecting web servers. <b>OH, WAIT!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah like all those Apache/Linux worms and trojans out there infecting web servers .
OH , WAIT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah like all those Apache/Linux worms and trojans out there infecting web servers.
OH, WAIT!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154124</id>
	<title>Re:Oh please</title>
	<author>Tellarin</author>
	<datestamp>1258626120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot."<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" You try to create an idiot proof system , mother nature just creates a 'better ' idiot .
" : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot.
" :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153252</id>
	<title>Re:Windows only / not windows only</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, not all Windows users are total mouth breathing idiots. How many people here are Windows admins FFS? I've been using it since 3.1 and have never had a virus etc. own one of my machines. Linux in all it's incarnations is fun to use, but it doesn't cover everything I need a computer for...yet.<br>Who the fuck modded this +4 Insightful? Somebody with an account copy and paste this for this dweeb! This is why I don't bother to get an account!</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , not all Windows users are total mouth breathing idiots .
How many people here are Windows admins FFS ?
I 've been using it since 3.1 and have never had a virus etc .
own one of my machines .
Linux in all it 's incarnations is fun to use , but it does n't cover everything I need a computer for...yet.Who the fuck modded this + 4 Insightful ?
Somebody with an account copy and paste this for this dweeb !
This is why I do n't bother to get an account !
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, not all Windows users are total mouth breathing idiots.
How many people here are Windows admins FFS?
I've been using it since 3.1 and have never had a virus etc.
own one of my machines.
Linux in all it's incarnations is fun to use, but it doesn't cover everything I need a computer for...yet.Who the fuck modded this +4 Insightful?
Somebody with an account copy and paste this for this dweeb!
This is why I don't bother to get an account!
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153130</id>
	<title>sudo -i</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[sudo]password for anonymous:<br>root@ubuntu~#:</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ sudo ] password for anonymous : root @ ubuntu ~ # :</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[sudo]password for anonymous:root@ubuntu~#:</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154534</id>
	<title>Re:I'm just wondering...</title>
	<author>XSpud</author>
	<datestamp>1258632660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's because the UK's e-crime unit is part of the Metropolitan Police. I guess it doesn't make sense for each police authority to have it's own e-crime unit.</p><p>
<a href="http://www.met.police.uk/pceu/index.htm" title="police.uk" rel="nofollow">PCeU - Police Central e-crime Unit</a> [police.uk]
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's because the UK 's e-crime unit is part of the Metropolitan Police .
I guess it does n't make sense for each police authority to have it 's own e-crime unit .
PCeU - Police Central e-crime Unit [ police.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's because the UK's e-crime unit is part of the Metropolitan Police.
I guess it doesn't make sense for each police authority to have it's own e-crime unit.
PCeU - Police Central e-crime Unit [police.uk]
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154024</id>
	<title>Metropolitan police</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258624500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they've been arrested and questioned by the Metropolitan Police, then they'll have had a good kicking by now. Jolly good too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they 've been arrested and questioned by the Metropolitan Police , then they 'll have had a good kicking by now .
Jolly good too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they've been arrested and questioned by the Metropolitan Police, then they'll have had a good kicking by now.
Jolly good too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153248</id>
	<title>Arrested, then bailed</title>
	<author>BlackMesaLabs</author>
	<datestamp>1257099780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They've both been bailed, so presumably they're now furiously DBAN'ing everything they own.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've both been bailed , so presumably they 're now furiously DBAN'ing everything they own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've both been bailed, so presumably they're now furiously DBAN'ing everything they own.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154000</id>
	<title>Re:2 Down...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258623840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who really cares about the real story, certainly not Hollywhooowhood, it will end up making Swordfish 2, with flying skateboards "interfaces" in "cyberspace"... with mysterious "Hydra" servers, uncrackeable government codes cracked with "keyloggers" (sic, seriously, wtf?!) while getting a blowjob.<br> As long as there is a blowjob I don't really care about the story, it is good to go. (Now thinking of it, maybe the Blowjob was a reference to Blowfish?... nah, I am probably thinking too hard.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who really cares about the real story , certainly not Hollywhooowhood , it will end up making Swordfish 2 , with flying skateboards " interfaces " in " cyberspace " ... with mysterious " Hydra " servers , uncrackeable government codes cracked with " keyloggers " ( sic , seriously , wtf ? !
) while getting a blowjob .
As long as there is a blowjob I do n't really care about the story , it is good to go .
( Now thinking of it , maybe the Blowjob was a reference to Blowfish ? .. .
nah , I am probably thinking too hard .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who really cares about the real story, certainly not Hollywhooowhood, it will end up making Swordfish 2, with flying skateboards "interfaces" in "cyberspace"... with mysterious "Hydra" servers, uncrackeable government codes cracked with "keyloggers" (sic, seriously, wtf?!
) while getting a blowjob.
As long as there is a blowjob I don't really care about the story, it is good to go.
(Now thinking of it, maybe the Blowjob was a reference to Blowfish?...
nah, I am probably thinking too hard.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154252</id>
	<title>Re:Oh please</title>
	<author>Monolith1</author>
	<datestamp>1258628040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Idiots are everywhere. </p></div><p>My Mac fanboy brother in law told me he only needs WEP on his access point because he has a Mac and they are safer. I suggested he might want to increase his wireless security if he is going to keep running his web business behind it. Unconvinced he said he would look into it.

You can lead a horse to water...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Idiots are everywhere .
My Mac fanboy brother in law told me he only needs WEP on his access point because he has a Mac and they are safer .
I suggested he might want to increase his wireless security if he is going to keep running his web business behind it .
Unconvinced he said he would look into it .
You can lead a horse to water.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Idiots are everywhere.
My Mac fanboy brother in law told me he only needs WEP on his access point because he has a Mac and they are safer.
I suggested he might want to increase his wireless security if he is going to keep running his web business behind it.
Unconvinced he said he would look into it.
You can lead a horse to water...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154608</id>
	<title>Re:I'm just wondering...</title>
	<author>minasoko</author>
	<datestamp>1258633920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm guessing, but it could be because the Greater Manchester Police Authority does not have a sufficiently-resourced e-crime unit to take on this case.<p>
Perhaps in these cases the arresting officers, or at least a support team, must have appropriate training in technology-related crimes, or risk the charges not sticking once the case gets to the courts.</p><p>Think how important it might be to make sure all relevant devices are confiscated at the point of arrest. An untrained eye could miss something vital.</p><p>Or, it could just be bureaucracy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing , but it could be because the Greater Manchester Police Authority does not have a sufficiently-resourced e-crime unit to take on this case .
Perhaps in these cases the arresting officers , or at least a support team , must have appropriate training in technology-related crimes , or risk the charges not sticking once the case gets to the courts.Think how important it might be to make sure all relevant devices are confiscated at the point of arrest .
An untrained eye could miss something vital.Or , it could just be bureaucracy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing, but it could be because the Greater Manchester Police Authority does not have a sufficiently-resourced e-crime unit to take on this case.
Perhaps in these cases the arresting officers, or at least a support team, must have appropriate training in technology-related crimes, or risk the charges not sticking once the case gets to the courts.Think how important it might be to make sure all relevant devices are confiscated at the point of arrest.
An untrained eye could miss something vital.Or, it could just be bureaucracy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152994</id>
	<title>Wasn't...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lisbeth Salander or she would have never been caught.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lisbeth Salander or she would have never been caught .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lisbeth Salander or she would have never been caught.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152700</id>
	<title>Great news</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1257093480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the cops on the hunt, it sounds like people writing malicious code will have to be spending a lot more time indoors. <br> <br>Oh, wait...</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the cops on the hunt , it sounds like people writing malicious code will have to be spending a lot more time indoors .
Oh , wait.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the cops on the hunt, it sounds like people writing malicious code will have to be spending a lot more time indoors.
Oh, wait...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30157756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30167322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30155444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30157564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30158940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30155964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_18_2336214_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153376
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152632
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30155444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153312
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154000
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154142
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30155964
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153134
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_18_2336214.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30157756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30152980
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30158940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154302
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153254
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154512
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153914
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154252
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154896
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30154124
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30167322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30157564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_18_2336214.30153228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
