<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_17_2220243</id>
	<title>Chinese Court Rules Microsoft Violated IP Rights</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1258455420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"A Beijing court has ruled that Microsoft <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/17/microsoft\_china\_font\_ip\_infringement/">violated a Chinese company's intellectual property rights</a> in a case over fonts used in past Windows operating systems. The Beijing Number One Intermediate People's Court ordered Microsoft to stop selling versions of Windows that use the Chinese fonts, including Windows XP. Microsoft plans to appeal the case. Microsoft originally licensed Zhongyi's intellectual property more than a decade ago for use in the Chinese version of Windows 95, according to Zhongyi. Zhongyi argues that agreement applied only to Windows 95, but that Microsoft continued to use the intellectual property in eight versions of Windows from Windows 98 to Windows XP. Vista and Windows 7 are not involved."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " A Beijing court has ruled that Microsoft violated a Chinese company 's intellectual property rights in a case over fonts used in past Windows operating systems .
The Beijing Number One Intermediate People 's Court ordered Microsoft to stop selling versions of Windows that use the Chinese fonts , including Windows XP .
Microsoft plans to appeal the case .
Microsoft originally licensed Zhongyi 's intellectual property more than a decade ago for use in the Chinese version of Windows 95 , according to Zhongyi .
Zhongyi argues that agreement applied only to Windows 95 , but that Microsoft continued to use the intellectual property in eight versions of Windows from Windows 98 to Windows XP .
Vista and Windows 7 are not involved .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "A Beijing court has ruled that Microsoft violated a Chinese company's intellectual property rights in a case over fonts used in past Windows operating systems.
The Beijing Number One Intermediate People's Court ordered Microsoft to stop selling versions of Windows that use the Chinese fonts, including Windows XP.
Microsoft plans to appeal the case.
Microsoft originally licensed Zhongyi's intellectual property more than a decade ago for use in the Chinese version of Windows 95, according to Zhongyi.
Zhongyi argues that agreement applied only to Windows 95, but that Microsoft continued to use the intellectual property in eight versions of Windows from Windows 98 to Windows XP.
Vista and Windows 7 are not involved.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137600</id>
	<title>China, Microsoft, China Microsoft</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1258463520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Who to hate? Talk about Sophie's choice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who to hate ?
Talk about Sophie 's choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who to hate?
Talk about Sophie's choice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141384</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257073080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fascinating is that nobody has invoked the WTO to invalidate the rights of the chinese firm to open up quality chinese fonts for everyone. Isn't that the job of the WTO? Help us and screw everyone else who has patents, IP rights or else?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fascinating is that nobody has invoked the WTO to invalidate the rights of the chinese firm to open up quality chinese fonts for everyone .
Is n't that the job of the WTO ?
Help us and screw everyone else who has patents , IP rights or else ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fascinating is that nobody has invoked the WTO to invalidate the rights of the chinese firm to open up quality chinese fonts for everyone.
Isn't that the job of the WTO?
Help us and screw everyone else who has patents, IP rights or else?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137736</id>
	<title>Did I miss a russian reversal joke somewhere?</title>
	<author>Gruturo</author>
	<datestamp>1258464420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did I miss a russian reversal joke somewhere? Chinese government suing over IP infringement?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did I miss a russian reversal joke somewhere ?
Chinese government suing over IP infringement ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did I miss a russian reversal joke somewhere?
Chinese government suing over IP infringement?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137580</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1258463460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree with the other guy saying this post shouldn't be modded up. Regardless of the point he's trying to make, he's completely incoherent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with the other guy saying this post should n't be modded up .
Regardless of the point he 's trying to make , he 's completely incoherent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with the other guy saying this post shouldn't be modded up.
Regardless of the point he's trying to make, he's completely incoherent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137178</id>
	<title>Re:Sothe guy who AGREES get insightful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258461480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No mod, making a point about the ridiculousness of reading MY post,and modding it down, then reading a post that AGREES, and modding it up, is NOT flamebait.</p><p>And honestly, it does make you an idiot if you do so, as someone did here.</p><p>Please try to avoid being wrong when you use your points in the future, thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No mod , making a point about the ridiculousness of reading MY post,and modding it down , then reading a post that AGREES , and modding it up , is NOT flamebait.And honestly , it does make you an idiot if you do so , as someone did here.Please try to avoid being wrong when you use your points in the future , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No mod, making a point about the ridiculousness of reading MY post,and modding it down, then reading a post that AGREES, and modding it up, is NOT flamebait.And honestly, it does make you an idiot if you do so, as someone did here.Please try to avoid being wrong when you use your points in the future, thanks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141964</id>
	<title>Enforce IP rights or not?</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1257080460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hmm, not so long ago it was "Those evil communists don't respect IP rights...", but now it is bad that they do? Is this not simply because to some people, China simply can't do anything right, no matter what? It works both ways, you know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , not so long ago it was " Those evil communists do n't respect IP rights... " , but now it is bad that they do ?
Is this not simply because to some people , China simply ca n't do anything right , no matter what ?
It works both ways , you know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, not so long ago it was "Those evil communists don't respect IP rights...", but now it is bad that they do?
Is this not simply because to some people, China simply can't do anything right, no matter what?
It works both ways, you know.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137852</id>
	<title>HA.</title>
	<author>DuoDreamer</author>
	<datestamp>1258465080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think someone in China would actually have to BUY a copy of Windows first...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think someone in China would actually have to BUY a copy of Windows first.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think someone in China would actually have to BUY a copy of Windows first...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136764</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>mike260</author>
	<datestamp>1258459500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty easy to make the same argument but with the opposite emphasis, no?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty easy to make the same argument but with the opposite emphasis , no ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty easy to make the same argument but with the opposite emphasis, no?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137940</id>
	<title>Send Balmer!!!</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1258465500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear that this sort of thing is a capital offense over there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear that this sort of thing is a capital offense over there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear that this sort of thing is a capital offense over there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137028</id>
	<title>Wow, what a ridiculous statement</title>
	<author>ifwm</author>
	<datestamp>1258460700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand.</p></div></blockquote><p>I think pointing out the arbitrary nature of law enforcement is ALWAYS relevant to any issue regarding the law.</p><p>There's really no way to argue otherwise.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand.I think pointing out the arbitrary nature of law enforcement is ALWAYS relevant to any issue regarding the law.There 's really no way to argue otherwise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand.I think pointing out the arbitrary nature of law enforcement is ALWAYS relevant to any issue regarding the law.There's really no way to argue otherwise.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144184</id>
	<title>Pointless</title>
	<author>wye43</author>
	<datestamp>1257093480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Beijing Number One Intermediate People's Court ordered Microsoft to stop selling versions of Windows that use the Chinese fonts, including Windows XP</p></div><p>
So now Microsoft cannot sell Windows 95-XP in China. But wait, Microsoft stopped selling those operating system some time ago. Anywhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Beijing Number One Intermediate People 's Court ordered Microsoft to stop selling versions of Windows that use the Chinese fonts , including Windows XP So now Microsoft can not sell Windows 95-XP in China .
But wait , Microsoft stopped selling those operating system some time ago .
Anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Beijing Number One Intermediate People's Court ordered Microsoft to stop selling versions of Windows that use the Chinese fonts, including Windows XP
So now Microsoft cannot sell Windows 95-XP in China.
But wait, Microsoft stopped selling those operating system some time ago.
Anywhere.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144482</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>LifesABeach</author>
	<datestamp>1257094560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I stand here amazed that a government that I personally consider an Apex Predator has the same views that I do about m$.  I can count on my hand the number of times that I am in agreement with the Middle Kingdom, and still hold a cup of Coffee. Maybe the Smiling Show Offs that lead the Middle Kingdom are starting to understand the concept of "Community", na, there's no money in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I stand here amazed that a government that I personally consider an Apex Predator has the same views that I do about m $ .
I can count on my hand the number of times that I am in agreement with the Middle Kingdom , and still hold a cup of Coffee .
Maybe the Smiling Show Offs that lead the Middle Kingdom are starting to understand the concept of " Community " , na , there 's no money in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stand here amazed that a government that I personally consider an Apex Predator has the same views that I do about m$.
I can count on my hand the number of times that I am in agreement with the Middle Kingdom, and still hold a cup of Coffee.
Maybe the Smiling Show Offs that lead the Middle Kingdom are starting to understand the concept of "Community", na, there's no money in it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137032</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258460700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unlike national laws, international laws and treaties are more like guidelines.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlike national laws , international laws and treaties are more like guidelines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlike national laws, international laws and treaties are more like guidelines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136674</id>
	<title>convenient</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258459140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How convenient to stop selling older version of Windows. Does it also stop support for those version in China?</p><p>So who buys software in China???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How convenient to stop selling older version of Windows .
Does it also stop support for those version in China ? So who buys software in China ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How convenient to stop selling older version of Windows.
Does it also stop support for those version in China?So who buys software in China??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144234</id>
	<title>Re:Pointless</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1257093660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, and correction: they would have to stop producing &amp; selling Windows 98-XP. They had a perfectly legitimate license to use the fonts with Windows 95, by any account.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , and correction : they would have to stop producing &amp; selling Windows 98-XP .
They had a perfectly legitimate license to use the fonts with Windows 95 , by any account .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, and correction: they would have to stop producing &amp; selling Windows 98-XP.
They had a perfectly legitimate license to use the fonts with Windows 95, by any account.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138698</id>
	<title>Microsoft still wins</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258471440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because atleast now they have a legal reason to stop selling windows XP<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because atleast now they have a legal reason to stop selling windows XP : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because atleast now they have a legal reason to stop selling windows XP :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137778</id>
	<title>April Fools?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258464600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems a little early/late for April Fools, did someone pick this story up from the Onion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems a little early/late for April Fools , did someone pick this story up from the Onion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems a little early/late for April Fools, did someone pick this story up from the Onion?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137508</id>
	<title>China &amp; IP?!</title>
	<author>AmonTheMetalhead</author>
	<datestamp>1258463100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All i can say is "LOL"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>All i can say is " LOL " : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All i can say is "LOL" :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986</id>
	<title>10+ years?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258460520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Zhongyi argues that agreement applied only to Windows 95</p><p>It took them over 10 years to notice their fonts were also being used in 98, 2000, xp, vista, and 7???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Zhongyi argues that agreement applied only to Windows 95It took them over 10 years to notice their fonts were also being used in 98 , 2000 , xp , vista , and 7 ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Zhongyi argues that agreement applied only to Windows 95It took them over 10 years to notice their fonts were also being used in 98, 2000, xp, vista, and 7??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137358</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258462320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>said in chinese: " your honor, do you have a laptop in your chambers or in front of you? yes? could i see your license key for a moment?"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>said in chinese : " your honor , do you have a laptop in your chambers or in front of you ?
yes ? could i see your license key for a moment ?
" ; p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>said in chinese: " your honor, do you have a laptop in your chambers or in front of you?
yes? could i see your license key for a moment?
" ;p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30149280</id>
	<title>More info about the case</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257073080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Zhongyi started the law suit in 2007. MS used some legal stalling techniques until the verdict was finally out today.<br>2. Zhongyi didn't sue for monetary gain. They asked for $0 but immediate halt of selling those OSes. In the end although it sounds like they win, they actually lose.<br>3. To learn more about Chinese legal system, please refer to chinalawblog.com, a blog written by a partner of a Seattle based law firm who deal with Chinese law suit extensively.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Zhongyi started the law suit in 2007 .
MS used some legal stalling techniques until the verdict was finally out today.2 .
Zhongyi did n't sue for monetary gain .
They asked for $ 0 but immediate halt of selling those OSes .
In the end although it sounds like they win , they actually lose.3 .
To learn more about Chinese legal system , please refer to chinalawblog.com , a blog written by a partner of a Seattle based law firm who deal with Chinese law suit extensively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Zhongyi started the law suit in 2007.
MS used some legal stalling techniques until the verdict was finally out today.2.
Zhongyi didn't sue for monetary gain.
They asked for $0 but immediate halt of selling those OSes.
In the end although it sounds like they win, they actually lose.3.
To learn more about Chinese legal system, please refer to chinalawblog.com, a blog written by a partner of a Seattle based law firm who deal with Chinese law suit extensively.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136672</id>
	<title>Seems like it's a little late....</title>
	<author>postbigbang</author>
	<datestamp>1258459140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If one was really interested in revenue, the very next version ought to have been challenged.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If one was really interested in revenue , the very next version ought to have been challenged .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If one was really interested in revenue, the very next version ought to have been challenged.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30140082</id>
	<title>lol</title>
	<author>shentino</author>
	<datestamp>1258482660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Irony at its finest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Irony at its finest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irony at its finest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>shaitand</author>
	<datestamp>1258459560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the case is legit and the rest of the world has IP agreements with them (pretty sure they do) then this should be upheld.</p><p>The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the case is legit and the rest of the world has IP agreements with them ( pretty sure they do ) then this should be upheld.The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the case is legit and the rest of the world has IP agreements with them (pretty sure they do) then this should be upheld.The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137010</id>
	<title>Pot----"black!"----&gt;Kettle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258460580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, now if this isn't a prime example of the Pot calling th Kettle black, I don't know what is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , now if this is n't a prime example of the Pot calling th Kettle black , I do n't know what is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, now if this isn't a prime example of the Pot calling th Kettle black, I don't know what is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138130</id>
	<title>Re:10+ years?</title>
	<author>xigxag</author>
	<datestamp>1258467000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nitpicking aside, font IP law can be a little tricky.  In the US, anyway, <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2004/12/26/can-you-copyright-a-.html" title="boingboing.net">you can't copyright typefaces</a> [boingboing.net], that is, the actual representation of the font on the page.  You can't even copyright bitmapped fonts, which are nothing but representations of typefaces.  You can however, copyright scalable fonts such as TrueType fonts which are basically instructions (programs) on how to draw a font.  In other countries the law tends to be more in favor of the creator, but even so, it's not unreasonable that MS could've reverse engineered a font clone without violating IP laws.  So Zhongyi might've needed time to gather compelling evidence before pressing its case.  There's also the fact that this lawsuit was commenced back in <a href="http://www.interfax.com/4/530261/news.aspx" title="interfax.com">April 2007</a> [interfax.com], and possibly there was an attempt to negotiate before the case started.  And possibly Zhongyi was deterred by the knowledge that heretofore, as ifwm says, China didn't "give a shit about IP" rights.  So I think the delay in prosecution was likely reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nitpicking aside , font IP law can be a little tricky .
In the US , anyway , you ca n't copyright typefaces [ boingboing.net ] , that is , the actual representation of the font on the page .
You ca n't even copyright bitmapped fonts , which are nothing but representations of typefaces .
You can however , copyright scalable fonts such as TrueType fonts which are basically instructions ( programs ) on how to draw a font .
In other countries the law tends to be more in favor of the creator , but even so , it 's not unreasonable that MS could 've reverse engineered a font clone without violating IP laws .
So Zhongyi might 've needed time to gather compelling evidence before pressing its case .
There 's also the fact that this lawsuit was commenced back in April 2007 [ interfax.com ] , and possibly there was an attempt to negotiate before the case started .
And possibly Zhongyi was deterred by the knowledge that heretofore , as ifwm says , China did n't " give a shit about IP " rights .
So I think the delay in prosecution was likely reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nitpicking aside, font IP law can be a little tricky.
In the US, anyway, you can't copyright typefaces [boingboing.net], that is, the actual representation of the font on the page.
You can't even copyright bitmapped fonts, which are nothing but representations of typefaces.
You can however, copyright scalable fonts such as TrueType fonts which are basically instructions (programs) on how to draw a font.
In other countries the law tends to be more in favor of the creator, but even so, it's not unreasonable that MS could've reverse engineered a font clone without violating IP laws.
So Zhongyi might've needed time to gather compelling evidence before pressing its case.
There's also the fact that this lawsuit was commenced back in April 2007 [interfax.com], and possibly there was an attempt to negotiate before the case started.
And possibly Zhongyi was deterred by the knowledge that heretofore, as ifwm says, China didn't "give a shit about IP" rights.
So I think the delay in prosecution was likely reasonable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137250</id>
	<title>I'm sure it's not irrelevant and that you're wrong</title>
	<author>ifwm</author>
	<datestamp>1258461840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand."</p><p>No sir, the law is based on treaties, and I strongly suspect the reciprocal application of the treaty is in fact, a requirement of the law, as it is in most such treaties.</p><p>So, if China is NOT applying the law adequately in everyday practice, then MS may very well be ableto use that as evidence that China isn't upholding their end of the treaty.</p><p>So, you see, it IS relevant, despite your pontification that it isn't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand .
" No sir , the law is based on treaties , and I strongly suspect the reciprocal application of the treaty is in fact , a requirement of the law , as it is in most such treaties.So , if China is NOT applying the law adequately in everyday practice , then MS may very well be ableto use that as evidence that China is n't upholding their end of the treaty.So , you see , it IS relevant , despite your pontification that it is n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The hypocrisy of China is irrelevant to the issue at hand.
"No sir, the law is based on treaties, and I strongly suspect the reciprocal application of the treaty is in fact, a requirement of the law, as it is in most such treaties.So, if China is NOT applying the law adequately in everyday practice, then MS may very well be ableto use that as evidence that China isn't upholding their end of the treaty.So, you see, it IS relevant, despite your pontification that it isn't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136668</id>
	<title>A bit late?</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1258459140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't Zhongyi have reacted a bit sooner?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't Zhongyi have reacted a bit sooner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't Zhongyi have reacted a bit sooner?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136994</id>
	<title>Go to sleep with itchy bum...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258460580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... wake up with smelly finger.</p><p>You'd think a people who came up with such wisdom would have known better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... wake up with smelly finger.You 'd think a people who came up with such wisdom would have known better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... wake up with smelly finger.You'd think a people who came up with such wisdom would have known better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137926</id>
	<title>XP is irrelevant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258465440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XP is no longer relevant at all. Microsoft does not sell it. It's all about royalties</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XP is no longer relevant at all .
Microsoft does not sell it .
It 's all about royalties</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XP is no longer relevant at all.
Microsoft does not sell it.
It's all about royalties</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136984</id>
	<title>Sothe guy who AGREES get insightful...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258460520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And I get troll.</p><p>For something that clearly isn't a troll.</p><p>You mods are fucking idiots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I get troll.For something that clearly is n't a troll.You mods are fucking idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I get troll.For something that clearly isn't a troll.You mods are fucking idiots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136960</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>RazorSharp</author>
	<datestamp>1258460400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think the Chinese have a problem with being hypocrites as long as it suits their needs. Look at what they do with exchange rates. Doublethink.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the Chinese have a problem with being hypocrites as long as it suits their needs .
Look at what they do with exchange rates .
Doublethink .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the Chinese have a problem with being hypocrites as long as it suits their needs.
Look at what they do with exchange rates.
Doublethink.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30143720</id>
	<title>Re:Enforce IP rights or not?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1257091740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even if you do believe in IP rights, the guy licensed his font to Microsoft and he hasn't produced any new editions to go with the new editions of Windows. As far as Microsoft was concerned, they were using the same font that they'd legitimately licensed from him. Now all of a sudden it's "no, I only licensed it to you for use in THAT version of your operating system". Well, I'm not sure how well that flies. It probably depends on the language of the original contract.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even if you do believe in IP rights , the guy licensed his font to Microsoft and he has n't produced any new editions to go with the new editions of Windows .
As far as Microsoft was concerned , they were using the same font that they 'd legitimately licensed from him .
Now all of a sudden it 's " no , I only licensed it to you for use in THAT version of your operating system " .
Well , I 'm not sure how well that flies .
It probably depends on the language of the original contract .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even if you do believe in IP rights, the guy licensed his font to Microsoft and he hasn't produced any new editions to go with the new editions of Windows.
As far as Microsoft was concerned, they were using the same font that they'd legitimately licensed from him.
Now all of a sudden it's "no, I only licensed it to you for use in THAT version of your operating system".
Well, I'm not sure how well that flies.
It probably depends on the language of the original contract.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30140970</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>rastos1</author>
	<datestamp>1257067140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'd really like to see a bar graph with two values on it, one for the amount of IP theft perpetrated by US-based companies, and one for IP theft perpetrated by Chinese firms</p></div></blockquote><p>

Ask and you <a href="http://googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en\_GB&amp;word1=theft+perpetrated+by+US-based+companies&amp;word2=heft+perpetrated+by+Chinese-based+companies" title="googlefight.com">shall receive</a> [googlefight.com].<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd really like to see a bar graph with two values on it , one for the amount of IP theft perpetrated by US-based companies , and one for IP theft perpetrated by Chinese firms Ask and you shall receive [ googlefight.com ] .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd really like to see a bar graph with two values on it, one for the amount of IP theft perpetrated by US-based companies, and one for IP theft perpetrated by Chinese firms

Ask and you shall receive [googlefight.com].
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137716</id>
	<title>Only one thing to do</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258464300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly, Microsoft MUST withdraw WIndows 98, ME, 2000, and XP from the Chinese market, and refund the purchase money paid for said products. This should not cost Microsoft very much; after all, there can't have been more than one legitimate copy of each OS sold in-country. Microsoft would then be well-placed to declare all other copies of the affected products in the PRC illegal, and use the automatic-update feature to download a deactivating code. Microsoft should also apologize profusely to the font-sourcing company for the fact that their fonts would then be completely unused, then sell lots of Windows 7 upgrades. Oh wait, they can't actually sell Windows 7 in China, since they can't afford to pay for it due to the manipulated exchange rate for the Yuan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , Microsoft MUST withdraw WIndows 98 , ME , 2000 , and XP from the Chinese market , and refund the purchase money paid for said products .
This should not cost Microsoft very much ; after all , there ca n't have been more than one legitimate copy of each OS sold in-country .
Microsoft would then be well-placed to declare all other copies of the affected products in the PRC illegal , and use the automatic-update feature to download a deactivating code .
Microsoft should also apologize profusely to the font-sourcing company for the fact that their fonts would then be completely unused , then sell lots of Windows 7 upgrades .
Oh wait , they ca n't actually sell Windows 7 in China , since they ca n't afford to pay for it due to the manipulated exchange rate for the Yuan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, Microsoft MUST withdraw WIndows 98, ME, 2000, and XP from the Chinese market, and refund the purchase money paid for said products.
This should not cost Microsoft very much; after all, there can't have been more than one legitimate copy of each OS sold in-country.
Microsoft would then be well-placed to declare all other copies of the affected products in the PRC illegal, and use the automatic-update feature to download a deactivating code.
Microsoft should also apologize profusely to the font-sourcing company for the fact that their fonts would then be completely unused, then sell lots of Windows 7 upgrades.
Oh wait, they can't actually sell Windows 7 in China, since they can't afford to pay for it due to the manipulated exchange rate for the Yuan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139322</id>
	<title>Re:10+ years?</title>
	<author>khchung</author>
	<datestamp>1258476480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it took them 10 years to find a Chinese court that will accept the case?  That they are not optimistic nor rich enough to hope to win the case in US courts?</p><p>Or maybe it is just a pawn in the latest volley between the US-China trade disputes?</p><p>It could just be a small warning to US, that if they push too hard at China's IP law enforcement, they might find a few of their own companies being hit?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it took them 10 years to find a Chinese court that will accept the case ?
That they are not optimistic nor rich enough to hope to win the case in US courts ? Or maybe it is just a pawn in the latest volley between the US-China trade disputes ? It could just be a small warning to US , that if they push too hard at China 's IP law enforcement , they might find a few of their own companies being hit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it took them 10 years to find a Chinese court that will accept the case?
That they are not optimistic nor rich enough to hope to win the case in US courts?Or maybe it is just a pawn in the latest volley between the US-China trade disputes?It could just be a small warning to US, that if they push too hard at China's IP law enforcement, they might find a few of their own companies being hit?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138088</id>
	<title>A Chinese company suing over IP?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258466640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Awesome.</p><p>I'll be sure to put on my Nykes and Leyvis and jump into my new Ferd Focus to drive over to the court house to support their case. And as I drive I'll probably watch my "screener" of the new "Twilight" movie on my iPhoon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Awesome.I 'll be sure to put on my Nykes and Leyvis and jump into my new Ferd Focus to drive over to the court house to support their case .
And as I drive I 'll probably watch my " screener " of the new " Twilight " movie on my iPhoon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Awesome.I'll be sure to put on my Nykes and Leyvis and jump into my new Ferd Focus to drive over to the court house to support their case.
And as I drive I'll probably watch my "screener" of the new "Twilight" movie on my iPhoon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30142834</id>
	<title>Microsoft is acrually SELLING Windiows in China?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257088080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hah! How about asking Chinese to crack down a little on IP piracy themselves. "Herro... is this esteemed kettre? This is pot. Your appearance is dark!"<br>I don't doubt that MS swiped something from this company or over extended the contract, but come on! China. Stop living in glass house before starting to throw stones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hah !
How about asking Chinese to crack down a little on IP piracy themselves .
" Herro... is this esteemed kettre ?
This is pot .
Your appearance is dark !
" I do n't doubt that MS swiped something from this company or over extended the contract , but come on !
China. Stop living in glass house before starting to throw stones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hah!
How about asking Chinese to crack down a little on IP piracy themselves.
"Herro... is this esteemed kettre?
This is pot.
Your appearance is dark!
"I don't doubt that MS swiped something from this company or over extended the contract, but come on!
China. Stop living in glass house before starting to throw stones.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141944</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>jabuzz</author>
	<datestamp>1257080160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why just China? This is the United Kingdom calling and we have trillions of dollars of stolen IP damages we want, for all the IP you stole in the 19th century.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why just China ?
This is the United Kingdom calling and we have trillions of dollars of stolen IP damages we want , for all the IP you stole in the 19th century .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why just China?
This is the United Kingdom calling and we have trillions of dollars of stolen IP damages we want, for all the IP you stole in the 19th century.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139112</id>
	<title>Re:10+ years?</title>
	<author>lanner</author>
	<datestamp>1258475040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>poster didn't RTFA, mod down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>poster did n't RTFA , mod down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>poster didn't RTFA, mod down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064</id>
	<title>Re:It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258460820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't disagree with the premise of your argument. Companies should be held accountable for their actions.<br> <br>

That said, I'd <b>really</b> like to see a bar graph with two values on it, one for the amount of IP theft perpetrated by US-based companies, and one for IP theft perpetrated by Chinese firms. I imagine in might look <a href="http://img29.imageshack.us/i/chartb.png/" title="imageshack.us">something like this</a> [imageshack.us].</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't disagree with the premise of your argument .
Companies should be held accountable for their actions .
That said , I 'd really like to see a bar graph with two values on it , one for the amount of IP theft perpetrated by US-based companies , and one for IP theft perpetrated by Chinese firms .
I imagine in might look something like this [ imageshack.us ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't disagree with the premise of your argument.
Companies should be held accountable for their actions.
That said, I'd really like to see a bar graph with two values on it, one for the amount of IP theft perpetrated by US-based companies, and one for IP theft perpetrated by Chinese firms.
I imagine in might look something like this [imageshack.us].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138260</id>
	<title>Re:10+ years?</title>
	<author>prockcore</author>
	<datestamp>1258468020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It took them over 10 years to acquire enough legit Windows licenses for their company to not be countersued.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It took them over 10 years to acquire enough legit Windows licenses for their company to not be countersued .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It took them over 10 years to acquire enough legit Windows licenses for their company to not be countersued.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30143070</id>
	<title>Re:A bit late?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257089340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, most of the coverage I've read in the financial press has focused on concerns that this is yet another case of Chinese protectionism, where a bogus IP claim of a Chinese firm is being upheld solely because it's a Chinese firm, and the complaint is against a foreign firm. This sort of thing makes it difficult for foreign firms to do business in China. Western governments really ought to stop kowtowing to this grotesque regime and demand fair treatment of foreign firms within China's legal system.</p><p>Western governments should also demand a revaluation of the renminbi, or take China to the WTO for currency manipulation. This would be an unfortunate path to take, but the alternative of doing nothing is even worse, particularly in terms of convincing the Chinese that they can get all the benefits of trade with the West without having to live up to the agreements they've signed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , most of the coverage I 've read in the financial press has focused on concerns that this is yet another case of Chinese protectionism , where a bogus IP claim of a Chinese firm is being upheld solely because it 's a Chinese firm , and the complaint is against a foreign firm .
This sort of thing makes it difficult for foreign firms to do business in China .
Western governments really ought to stop kowtowing to this grotesque regime and demand fair treatment of foreign firms within China 's legal system.Western governments should also demand a revaluation of the renminbi , or take China to the WTO for currency manipulation .
This would be an unfortunate path to take , but the alternative of doing nothing is even worse , particularly in terms of convincing the Chinese that they can get all the benefits of trade with the West without having to live up to the agreements they 've signed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, most of the coverage I've read in the financial press has focused on concerns that this is yet another case of Chinese protectionism, where a bogus IP claim of a Chinese firm is being upheld solely because it's a Chinese firm, and the complaint is against a foreign firm.
This sort of thing makes it difficult for foreign firms to do business in China.
Western governments really ought to stop kowtowing to this grotesque regime and demand fair treatment of foreign firms within China's legal system.Western governments should also demand a revaluation of the renminbi, or take China to the WTO for currency manipulation.
This would be an unfortunate path to take, but the alternative of doing nothing is even worse, particularly in terms of convincing the Chinese that they can get all the benefits of trade with the West without having to live up to the agreements they've signed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678</id>
	<title>It fascinates me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258459200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It fascinates me that China thinks they can simultaneously not give a shit about IP in every day practice, yet still think a ruling like this will have credibility.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It fascinates me that China thinks they can simultaneously not give a shit about IP in every day practice , yet still think a ruling like this will have credibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It fascinates me that China thinks they can simultaneously not give a shit about IP in every day practice, yet still think a ruling like this will have credibility.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138198</id>
	<title>This is what happens, Mr. Obama...</title>
	<author>TheModelEskimo</author>
	<datestamp>1258467600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...when you shoot your mouth off on our TV show.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...when you shoot your mouth off on our TV show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...when you shoot your mouth off on our TV show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137376</id>
	<title>so</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258462440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is there any proof of any of these operating systems actually legally bought in china?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is there any proof of any of these operating systems actually legally bought in china ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is there any proof of any of these operating systems actually legally bought in china?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139518</id>
	<title>Go China!</title>
	<author>herojig</author>
	<datestamp>1258477920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boy are they smart...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boy are they smart.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boy are they smart...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30143720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30140970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30143070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_2220243_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30138130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30139112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30149280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30143720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30143070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136984
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136784
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137358
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30144482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137032
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137250
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137064
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141384
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30141944
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30140970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136764
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30136960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_2220243.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_2220243.30137716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
