<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_17_1619205</id>
	<title>Ask Sam Ramji About the CodePlex Foundation</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1258477200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>This week the <a href="//developers.slashdot.org/story/09/09/10/1712247/Microsoft-Launches-Its-Own-Open-Source-Foundation">Codeplex Foundation</a> announced <a href="http://codeplex.org/projects.aspx">its first project</a>, the ASP.NET Ajax Library Project, as part of its <a href="http://codeplex.org/galleries.aspx">first sponsored gallery</a>, the ASP.NET Gallery. The CodePlex Foundation is now two months old, and Foundation President Sam Ramji has agreed to answer questions about the Foundation, its first project, and overall progress to date. Usual Slashdot <a href="http://slashdot.org/faq/interviews.shtml">interview rules</a> apply.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This week the Codeplex Foundation announced its first project , the ASP.NET Ajax Library Project , as part of its first sponsored gallery , the ASP.NET Gallery .
The CodePlex Foundation is now two months old , and Foundation President Sam Ramji has agreed to answer questions about the Foundation , its first project , and overall progress to date .
Usual Slashdot interview rules apply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This week the Codeplex Foundation announced its first project, the ASP.NET Ajax Library Project, as part of its first sponsored gallery, the ASP.NET Gallery.
The CodePlex Foundation is now two months old, and Foundation President Sam Ramji has agreed to answer questions about the Foundation, its first project, and overall progress to date.
Usual Slashdot interview rules apply.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145840</id>
	<title>Non-Microsoft technologies?</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1257100080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will priority be given to those using Microsoft tools, or can anyone play?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will priority be given to those using Microsoft tools , or can anyone play ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will priority be given to those using Microsoft tools, or can anyone play?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145790</id>
	<title>Everyone wants to know</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How does it feel to be the next goatse man?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How does it feel to be the next goatse man ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How does it feel to be the next goatse man?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147820</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft Front</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1257109020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Half the Board of Directors, and half of the Advisory Board are from Microsoft. Why should we think that this anything but a Microsoft front?"</p><p>Because if it were a "front" you wouldn't have known that Microsoft was involved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Half the Board of Directors , and half of the Advisory Board are from Microsoft .
Why should we think that this anything but a Microsoft front ?
" Because if it were a " front " you would n't have known that Microsoft was involved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Half the Board of Directors, and half of the Advisory Board are from Microsoft.
Why should we think that this anything but a Microsoft front?
"Because if it were a "front" you wouldn't have known that Microsoft was involved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30149082</id>
	<title>Dear Sam,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257072060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why no Army of Darkness sequel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why no Army of Darkness sequel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why no Army of Darkness sequel?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147626</id>
	<title>Re:Development?</title>
	<author>KraftDinner</author>
	<datestamp>1257108000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you confusing Sam Ramji with Sam Raimi? And is it supposed to be a joke?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you confusing Sam Ramji with Sam Raimi ?
And is it supposed to be a joke ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you confusing Sam Ramji with Sam Raimi?
And is it supposed to be a joke?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30154032</id>
	<title>Why the same name as the MS code site?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258624680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why did you need to use the name Codeplex? Now the foundation will always be associated to the codeplex.com site, which is owned and operated by Microsoft, and where all code is in Visual Studio Team System/Server/Foundation/Whatever it's called, a thoroughly closed patform for source control.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did you need to use the name Codeplex ?
Now the foundation will always be associated to the codeplex.com site , which is owned and operated by Microsoft , and where all code is in Visual Studio Team System/Server/Foundation/Whatever it 's called , a thoroughly closed patform for source control .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why did you need to use the name Codeplex?
Now the foundation will always be associated to the codeplex.com site, which is owned and operated by Microsoft, and where all code is in Visual Studio Team System/Server/Foundation/Whatever it's called, a thoroughly closed patform for source control.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146700</id>
	<title>Microsoft Front</title>
	<author>mounthood</author>
	<datestamp>1257103620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Half the Board of Directors, and half of the Advisory Board are from Microsoft. Why should we think that this anything but a Microsoft front?
<br> <br>
The <a href="http://www.codeplex.org/about.aspx" title="codeplex.org">about page</a> [codeplex.org] says "Our Board of Directors is an interim board" and that they will pick the new board but that's no too encouraging given who's doing the picking. CodePlex seems like Microsoft trying to create a community.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the Board of Directors , and half of the Advisory Board are from Microsoft .
Why should we think that this anything but a Microsoft front ?
The about page [ codeplex.org ] says " Our Board of Directors is an interim board " and that they will pick the new board but that 's no too encouraging given who 's doing the picking .
CodePlex seems like Microsoft trying to create a community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the Board of Directors, and half of the Advisory Board are from Microsoft.
Why should we think that this anything but a Microsoft front?
The about page [codeplex.org] says "Our Board of Directors is an interim board" and that they will pick the new board but that's no too encouraging given who's doing the picking.
CodePlex seems like Microsoft trying to create a community.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30161564</id>
	<title>Re:Development?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258662540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spider-Man 3 was in theatres two years ago. It sucked. Don't see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spider-Man 3 was in theatres two years ago .
It sucked .
Do n't see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spider-Man 3 was in theatres two years ago.
It sucked.
Don't see it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145872</id>
	<title>"IP needs"?</title>
	<author>SanityInAnarchy</author>
	<datestamp>1257100200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From your FAQ:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>We wanted a foundation that addresses a full spectrum of software projects, and does so with the licensing and intellectual property needs of commercial software companies in mind.</p></div><p>This seems to imply that there are existing foundations that do so without those licensing and IP needs. Regardless, what do you see as the role of a foundation like yours in addressing the needs of commercial software companies?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From your FAQ : We wanted a foundation that addresses a full spectrum of software projects , and does so with the licensing and intellectual property needs of commercial software companies in mind.This seems to imply that there are existing foundations that do so without those licensing and IP needs .
Regardless , what do you see as the role of a foundation like yours in addressing the needs of commercial software companies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From your FAQ:We wanted a foundation that addresses a full spectrum of software projects, and does so with the licensing and intellectual property needs of commercial software companies in mind.This seems to imply that there are existing foundations that do so without those licensing and IP needs.
Regardless, what do you see as the role of a foundation like yours in addressing the needs of commercial software companies?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146332</id>
	<title>Engineering Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257102000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can he and his cohorts look at themselves in the mirror knowing that they've worked at and succeeded in make bad engineering acceptable?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can he and his cohorts look at themselves in the mirror knowing that they 've worked at and succeeded in make bad engineering acceptable ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can he and his cohorts look at themselves in the mirror knowing that they've worked at and succeeded in make bad engineering acceptable?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146966</id>
	<title>Re:SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because that's what <a href="http://code.google.com/" title="google.com">big companies do</a> [google.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because that 's what big companies do [ google.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because that's what big companies do [google.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145542</id>
	<title>And whats with the typo in your name?</title>
	<author>ReverendLoki</author>
	<datestamp>1257098700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Will the Codeplex Project, or perhaps just programming/coding in general, feature a more prominent role in the upcoming <i>Spiderman 4</i>?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Will the Codeplex Project , or perhaps just programming/coding in general , feature a more prominent role in the upcoming Spiderman 4 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will the Codeplex Project, or perhaps just programming/coding in general, feature a more prominent role in the upcoming Spiderman 4?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146588</id>
	<title>repo</title>
	<author>LordMyren</author>
	<datestamp>1257103140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>is your svn hosted on a 386?  is it in someone's closet, on a dsl line?  why is your source repository humiliatingly unbearably slow, and why does it take minutes for an svn update to even start?  is the abominable performance a hardware, or software issue?</htmltext>
<tokenext>is your svn hosted on a 386 ?
is it in someone 's closet , on a dsl line ?
why is your source repository humiliatingly unbearably slow , and why does it take minutes for an svn update to even start ?
is the abominable performance a hardware , or software issue ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is your svn hosted on a 386?
is it in someone's closet, on a dsl line?
why is your source repository humiliatingly unbearably slow, and why does it take minutes for an svn update to even start?
is the abominable performance a hardware, or software issue?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30169660</id>
	<title>Codeplex - MS or community?</title>
	<author>Edam</author>
	<datestamp>1258718820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hi Sam,<br>

Codeplex claims to be an "open source project community". So why no GPLv3? If fact, why was GPLv3 actually *removed*? And how is this in the interests of the "community" of which you claim to represent?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi Sam , Codeplex claims to be an " open source project community " .
So why no GPLv3 ?
If fact , why was GPLv3 actually * removed * ?
And how is this in the interests of the " community " of which you claim to represent ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi Sam,

Codeplex claims to be an "open source project community".
So why no GPLv3?
If fact, why was GPLv3 actually *removed*?
And how is this in the interests of the "community" of which you claim to represent?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30152792</id>
	<title>Next episode?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257094440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, Mr. Sam Gamgee, now that Frodo is gone, what do you plan to do?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , Mr. Sam Gamgee , now that Frodo is gone , what do you plan to do ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, Mr. Sam Gamgee, now that Frodo is gone, what do you plan to do?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147736</id>
	<title>Re:SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1257108600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you ever tried to use Sourceforge? It's slow, ugly, constantly gives vague errors, image uploads constantly fail, terrible UI, forgets which page you were on before logging in, awful bug tracking with insultingly-named fields (canned response!)...</p><p>A better question is, "why would any project actually interested in user feedback use Sourceforge?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever tried to use Sourceforge ?
It 's slow , ugly , constantly gives vague errors , image uploads constantly fail , terrible UI , forgets which page you were on before logging in , awful bug tracking with insultingly-named fields ( canned response !
) ...A better question is , " why would any project actually interested in user feedback use Sourceforge ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever tried to use Sourceforge?
It's slow, ugly, constantly gives vague errors, image uploads constantly fail, terrible UI, forgets which page you were on before logging in, awful bug tracking with insultingly-named fields (canned response!
)...A better question is, "why would any project actually interested in user feedback use Sourceforge?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145804</id>
	<title>Conspiracy theories and where are you guys headed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you say to the inevitable flood of "advocates" who claim Microsoft is doing this sort of thing to subvert FOSS?</p><p>Bonus points: Do you see Microsoft headed in the same general direction as Google and IBM where the core products and IP are held close to the chest while some of the more peripheral stuff (not key to revenue) is released under open licenses? Recent news like the open sourcing of one of the versions of the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET framework make it seem that way.</p><p>Double bonus points: Do you see Microsoft ever releasing the whole of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET itself under a non-restrictive license? Do you think there would be some benefit to Microsoft in pulling something akin to Sun GPL'ing Java and still retaining control over its direction? I ask this because it would end a lot of problems (imagined and real) with Mono, for example. But that would imply a lot of work with things like WinForms, ASP.NET and parts of the data client stack, without which any<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET implementation cannot help but be seen as a interesting experiment rather than as a valid enterprise-ready alternative.</p><p>To be clear, I would love to see Codeplex lead the way in facilitating a truly cross-platform alternative to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET on the Windows platform. If that's Mono, great. Perhaps within Microsoft something like this is seen as a threat, but you guys need to get past that mindset. How come I can robustly host PHP or Python apps on Server 2003 today but I can't do the same with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NET in BSD? The Mono team has already done most of the heavy lifting, all you guys need to do is clear up the air around it!</p><p>(sorry for the multiple questions, these are things I've been thinking about lately a lot)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you say to the inevitable flood of " advocates " who claim Microsoft is doing this sort of thing to subvert FOSS ? Bonus points : Do you see Microsoft headed in the same general direction as Google and IBM where the core products and IP are held close to the chest while some of the more peripheral stuff ( not key to revenue ) is released under open licenses ?
Recent news like the open sourcing of one of the versions of the .NET framework make it seem that way.Double bonus points : Do you see Microsoft ever releasing the whole of .NET itself under a non-restrictive license ?
Do you think there would be some benefit to Microsoft in pulling something akin to Sun GPL'ing Java and still retaining control over its direction ?
I ask this because it would end a lot of problems ( imagined and real ) with Mono , for example .
But that would imply a lot of work with things like WinForms , ASP.NET and parts of the data client stack , without which any .NET implementation can not help but be seen as a interesting experiment rather than as a valid enterprise-ready alternative.To be clear , I would love to see Codeplex lead the way in facilitating a truly cross-platform alternative to .NET on the Windows platform .
If that 's Mono , great .
Perhaps within Microsoft something like this is seen as a threat , but you guys need to get past that mindset .
How come I can robustly host PHP or Python apps on Server 2003 today but I ca n't do the same with .NET in BSD ?
The Mono team has already done most of the heavy lifting , all you guys need to do is clear up the air around it !
( sorry for the multiple questions , these are things I 've been thinking about lately a lot )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you say to the inevitable flood of "advocates" who claim Microsoft is doing this sort of thing to subvert FOSS?Bonus points: Do you see Microsoft headed in the same general direction as Google and IBM where the core products and IP are held close to the chest while some of the more peripheral stuff (not key to revenue) is released under open licenses?
Recent news like the open sourcing of one of the versions of the .NET framework make it seem that way.Double bonus points: Do you see Microsoft ever releasing the whole of .NET itself under a non-restrictive license?
Do you think there would be some benefit to Microsoft in pulling something akin to Sun GPL'ing Java and still retaining control over its direction?
I ask this because it would end a lot of problems (imagined and real) with Mono, for example.
But that would imply a lot of work with things like WinForms, ASP.NET and parts of the data client stack, without which any .NET implementation cannot help but be seen as a interesting experiment rather than as a valid enterprise-ready alternative.To be clear, I would love to see Codeplex lead the way in facilitating a truly cross-platform alternative to .NET on the Windows platform.
If that's Mono, great.
Perhaps within Microsoft something like this is seen as a threat, but you guys need to get past that mindset.
How come I can robustly host PHP or Python apps on Server 2003 today but I can't do the same with .NET in BSD?
The Mono team has already done most of the heavy lifting, all you guys need to do is clear up the air around it!
(sorry for the multiple questions, these are things I've been thinking about lately a lot)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145834</id>
	<title>not Raimi</title>
	<author>hammarlund</author>
	<datestamp>1257100080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Damn, I thought it said Sam Raimi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , I thought it said Sam Raimi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, I thought it said Sam Raimi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146642</id>
	<title>My Question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sam, do you think Barack Obama is a George W Bush level failure, a Jimmy Carter level failure, or has he set a new standard in failure?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sam , do you think Barack Obama is a George W Bush level failure , a Jimmy Carter level failure , or has he set a new standard in failure ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sam, do you think Barack Obama is a George W Bush level failure, a Jimmy Carter level failure, or has he set a new standard in failure?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30154404</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft Front</title>
	<author>gtall</author>
	<datestamp>1258630440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah, it is the usual MS bumbling propaganda ploy, recall how opaque the MSOOXML vote came about?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah , it is the usual MS bumbling propaganda ploy , recall how opaque the MSOOXML vote came about ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah, it is the usual MS bumbling propaganda ploy, recall how opaque the MSOOXML vote came about?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146988</id>
	<title>Re:Development?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously he meant Spider-Man 5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously he meant Spider-Man 5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously he meant Spider-Man 5.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30163182</id>
	<title>Re:SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>Gerald</author>
	<datestamp>1258624620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because each parent company answers to a different set of investors?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because each parent company answers to a different set of investors ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because each parent company answers to a different set of investors?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146096</id>
	<title>What readers want to know:</title>
	<author>UnknowingFool</author>
	<datestamp>1257101100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr, Ramji, what is your opinion of Glenn Beck's lack of denial that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990?  I'm not saying he did it, I just found it interesting that he has never denied it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr , Ramji , what is your opinion of Glenn Beck 's lack of denial that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990 ?
I 'm not saying he did it , I just found it interesting that he has never denied it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr, Ramji, what is your opinion of Glenn Beck's lack of denial that he raped and murdered a young girl in 1990?
I'm not saying he did it, I just found it interesting that he has never denied it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30148156</id>
	<title>Your take on bad engineerinrg?</title>
	<author>SgtChaireBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1257067680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can you and your cohorts look yourselves in the mirror knowing that you've worked at and succeeded in making bad engineering acceptable and a common occurrance?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can you and your cohorts look yourselves in the mirror knowing that you 've worked at and succeeded in making bad engineering acceptable and a common occurrance ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can you and your cohorts look yourselves in the mirror knowing that you've worked at and succeeded in making bad engineering acceptable and a common occurrance?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30148704</id>
	<title>Re:SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>CrashNBrn</author>
	<datestamp>1257070200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are there a gazillion different Linux distros...shouldn't they all just contribute to TheOneRealLinux.org <i>instead of unnecessarily duplicating it? </i> <br>
<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<br>
<br>
In fact, linux should just go away and help contribute to Unix. Then they can call it:<br>
<br>
Unix: The Real Linux.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are there a gazillion different Linux distros...should n't they all just contribute to TheOneRealLinux.org instead of unnecessarily duplicating it ?
.. . In fact , linux should just go away and help contribute to Unix .
Then they can call it : Unix : The Real Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are there a gazillion different Linux distros...shouldn't they all just contribute to TheOneRealLinux.org instead of unnecessarily duplicating it?
...

In fact, linux should just go away and help contribute to Unix.
Then they can call it:

Unix: The Real Linux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147402</id>
	<title>I have a good one...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257106920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How did you like it when I gave you the bone hard and fast last night? I was the one in the sombrero...</htmltext>
<tokenext>How did you like it when I gave you the bone hard and fast last night ?
I was the one in the sombrero.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did you like it when I gave you the bone hard and fast last night?
I was the one in the sombrero...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145714</id>
	<title>A gallery...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.... is somewhere pictures are displayed last time I looked. Are we trying to co-opt this word now to try and make a code repository sound sexy? Sorry , doesn't work pal.</p><p>Just leave the friggin language alone and use words appropriately, don't invent your own meanings to try and sound clever. Its bad enough with all the idiotic management speak around without geeks adding to the mess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.... is somewhere pictures are displayed last time I looked .
Are we trying to co-opt this word now to try and make a code repository sound sexy ?
Sorry , does n't work pal.Just leave the friggin language alone and use words appropriately , do n't invent your own meanings to try and sound clever .
Its bad enough with all the idiotic management speak around without geeks adding to the mess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... is somewhere pictures are displayed last time I looked.
Are we trying to co-opt this word now to try and make a code repository sound sexy?
Sorry , doesn't work pal.Just leave the friggin language alone and use words appropriately, don't invent your own meanings to try and sound clever.
Its bad enough with all the idiotic management speak around without geeks adding to the mess.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30151226</id>
	<title>Re:SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1257082200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming you're comparing CodePlex <em>the website</em> (which isn't the same thing as CodePlex the foundation) to SourceForge, then I'd imagine one reason is that CodePlex uses TFS for source control and related stuff. Aside from being a showcase, some people might actually prefer that to SourceForge offerings, especially when they code to MS stack already, and use non-Express Visual Studio edition (which has decent TFS integration).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming you 're comparing CodePlex the website ( which is n't the same thing as CodePlex the foundation ) to SourceForge , then I 'd imagine one reason is that CodePlex uses TFS for source control and related stuff .
Aside from being a showcase , some people might actually prefer that to SourceForge offerings , especially when they code to MS stack already , and use non-Express Visual Studio edition ( which has decent TFS integration ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming you're comparing CodePlex the website (which isn't the same thing as CodePlex the foundation) to SourceForge, then I'd imagine one reason is that CodePlex uses TFS for source control and related stuff.
Aside from being a showcase, some people might actually prefer that to SourceForge offerings, especially when they code to MS stack already, and use non-Express Visual Studio edition (which has decent TFS integration).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706</id>
	<title>Development?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can you give us an update on the development of Spider-Man 3?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you give us an update on the development of Spider-Man 3 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you give us an update on the development of Spider-Man 3?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147046</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>davester666</author>
	<datestamp>1257105000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you may be referring to their trademark-pending FaceTweet technology...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you may be referring to their trademark-pending FaceTweet technology.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you may be referring to their trademark-pending FaceTweet technology...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146678</id>
	<title>Question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does the issue of the extreme hostility to Microsoft across the FOSS community come up much when you're planning this sort of thing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does the issue of the extreme hostility to Microsoft across the FOSS community come up much when you 're planning this sort of thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does the issue of the extreme hostility to Microsoft across the FOSS community come up much when you're planning this sort of thing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30268762</id>
	<title>Sequel?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1259585460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will there be a fourth installment of the Evil Dead series?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will there be a fourth installment of the Evil Dead series ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will there be a fourth installment of the Evil Dead series?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146912</id>
	<title>Competitiveness of the US</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You and your cohorts are making huge progress in making bad engineering acceptable.  How will you live down the effect that has had on the competitiveness of the US as a nation?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You and your cohorts are making huge progress in making bad engineering acceptable .
How will you live down the effect that has had on the competitiveness of the US as a nation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You and your cohorts are making huge progress in making bad engineering acceptable.
How will you live down the effect that has had on the competitiveness of the US as a nation?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145464</id>
	<title>Who are you?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Googling him doesn't count.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Googling him does n't count .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Googling him doesn't count.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145966</id>
	<title>How will projects be organized.</title>
	<author>TravisHein</author>
	<datestamp>1257100500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>How will the Codeplex foundation organize and align its [future] projects ?

For example, in other foundation sites, over time there are typically several projects created by different groups, and while each is different, there is a good bit of overlap in the features and the main goals of the purpose of the project, and this can lead to confusion for people that would want to use the project, not sure which one is the better one to use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How will the Codeplex foundation organize and align its [ future ] projects ?
For example , in other foundation sites , over time there are typically several projects created by different groups , and while each is different , there is a good bit of overlap in the features and the main goals of the purpose of the project , and this can lead to confusion for people that would want to use the project , not sure which one is the better one to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How will the Codeplex foundation organize and align its [future] projects ?
For example, in other foundation sites, over time there are typically several projects created by different groups, and while each is different, there is a good bit of overlap in the features and the main goals of the purpose of the project, and this can lead to confusion for people that would want to use the project, not sure which one is the better one to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145580</id>
	<title>Question for ya...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just want to know what it's been like to work with Bruce Campbell on so many projects, and if there's a "Spiderman Vs. Hulk" movie in the works anytime soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just want to know what it 's been like to work with Bruce Campbell on so many projects , and if there 's a " Spiderman Vs. Hulk " movie in the works anytime soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just want to know what it's been like to work with Bruce Campbell on so many projects, and if there's a "Spiderman Vs. Hulk" movie in the works anytime soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146738</id>
	<title>Re:Non-Microsoft technologies?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is directed at Sam not the parent poster.
</p><p>
When are you going to dive off the balcony
of a 190 story skyscraper for being a piece
of freedom hating subversive M$ piece of shit.
Fuck you, fuck your Mickeysquish masters in
Redmond and fuck this sham "Foundation".
I hope your whole family gets West Nile virus
and dies in a pool of your own feces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is directed at Sam not the parent poster .
When are you going to dive off the balcony of a 190 story skyscraper for being a piece of freedom hating subversive M $ piece of shit .
Fuck you , fuck your Mickeysquish masters in Redmond and fuck this sham " Foundation " .
I hope your whole family gets West Nile virus and dies in a pool of your own feces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is directed at Sam not the parent poster.
When are you going to dive off the balcony
of a 190 story skyscraper for being a piece
of freedom hating subversive M$ piece of shit.
Fuck you, fuck your Mickeysquish masters in
Redmond and fuck this sham "Foundation".
I hope your whole family gets West Nile virus
and dies in a pool of your own feces.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147662</id>
	<title>ASP.NET AJAX library size</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257108180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why does the ASP.NET AJAX library need a <b>400k</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.js file?  Isn't that a bit excessive???</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does the ASP.NET AJAX library need a 400k .js file ?
Is n't that a bit excessive ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does the ASP.NET AJAX library need a 400k .js file?
Isn't that a bit excessive??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30150602</id>
	<title>Re:Microsoft Front</title>
	<author>ssyladin</author>
	<datestamp>1257078780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the heck?  You mean they're somehow pretending to NOT be a Microsoft front?</p><p>I've gone to CodePlex several times for various curiosities, such as a <a href="http://quickstartengine.codeplex.com/" title="codeplex.com" rel="nofollow">graphics engine</a> [codeplex.com] or neato <a href="http://singularity.codeplex.com/" title="codeplex.com" rel="nofollow">research oriented OS</a> [codeplex.com].  Every time I've gone to CodePlex I've only seen Microsoft Research spinouts or code built for Microsoft stacks.</p><p>I thought it was just Microsoft's "community" site from the get go - never knew they were trying to avoid that branding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What the heck ?
You mean they 're somehow pretending to NOT be a Microsoft front ? I 've gone to CodePlex several times for various curiosities , such as a graphics engine [ codeplex.com ] or neato research oriented OS [ codeplex.com ] .
Every time I 've gone to CodePlex I 've only seen Microsoft Research spinouts or code built for Microsoft stacks.I thought it was just Microsoft 's " community " site from the get go - never knew they were trying to avoid that branding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the heck?
You mean they're somehow pretending to NOT be a Microsoft front?I've gone to CodePlex several times for various curiosities, such as a graphics engine [codeplex.com] or neato research oriented OS [codeplex.com].
Every time I've gone to CodePlex I've only seen Microsoft Research spinouts or code built for Microsoft stacks.I thought it was just Microsoft's "community" site from the get go - never knew they were trying to avoid that branding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146210</id>
	<title>Re:SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ugh, 'cuz sourceforge sucks balls?  Shitty layout.  Slow as hell.  Seriously, I welcome a decent alternative to SourceForge (not that this is necessarily it).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ugh , 'cuz sourceforge sucks balls ?
Shitty layout .
Slow as hell .
Seriously , I welcome a decent alternative to SourceForge ( not that this is necessarily it ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ugh, 'cuz sourceforge sucks balls?
Shitty layout.
Slow as hell.
Seriously, I welcome a decent alternative to SourceForge (not that this is necessarily it).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147858</id>
	<title>Re:Development?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257066000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even more important, will there be an Army of Darkness sequel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even more important , will there be an Army of Darkness sequel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even more important, will there be an Army of Darkness sequel?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866</id>
	<title>SourceForge.net</title>
	<author>rs232</author>
	<datestamp>1257100200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not contribute to SourceForge.net instead of unnecessarly duplicating it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not contribute to SourceForge.net instead of unnecessarly duplicating it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not contribute to SourceForge.net instead of unnecessarly duplicating it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147384</id>
	<title>Not Sam Raimi?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257106740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I though it said Sam Raimi, now that ajax implementation would have some cool animation.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I though it said Sam Raimi , now that ajax implementation would have some cool animation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I though it said Sam Raimi, now that ajax implementation would have some cool animation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30155214</id>
	<title>Jumping through hoops to get things done</title>
	<author>Digana</author>
	<datestamp>1258641120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I recently had to deal with Codeplex in order to track down a bug on code hosted therein that we were using at my workplace. This is fine, I am quite happy to work with free projects in order to track down bugs. Unfortunately, I got the impression that Codeplex doesn't "get" what free collaboration is about.
</p><p>
For instance, it has a clickthrough for GPL and other free licenses. While harmless, it is annoying and shows that Microsoft doesn't "get" it. I also had issues doing an svn checkout of the code, since it looks like the svn repositories are hidden except for Codeplex developers. They did eventually gave me a URL to an svn checkout, but I had to ask, and it wasn't exposed in the site's web interface. I overall got the impression that unless there was some way to track me (e.g. with a username), I wasn't welcome to look at or contribute to their code. Regardless, I did eventually track down the bug and submitted a patch which got accepted.
</p><p>
My question, why these hoops? Is there still some restraint from Microsoft from allowing free collaboration? Do old habits die hard, is that why there are clickthroughs for free licenses, hidden svn repositories, mandatory registration? What can you tell me about the historical non-free culture in Microsoft and how it is adapting to free culture?
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I recently had to deal with Codeplex in order to track down a bug on code hosted therein that we were using at my workplace .
This is fine , I am quite happy to work with free projects in order to track down bugs .
Unfortunately , I got the impression that Codeplex does n't " get " what free collaboration is about .
For instance , it has a clickthrough for GPL and other free licenses .
While harmless , it is annoying and shows that Microsoft does n't " get " it .
I also had issues doing an svn checkout of the code , since it looks like the svn repositories are hidden except for Codeplex developers .
They did eventually gave me a URL to an svn checkout , but I had to ask , and it was n't exposed in the site 's web interface .
I overall got the impression that unless there was some way to track me ( e.g .
with a username ) , I was n't welcome to look at or contribute to their code .
Regardless , I did eventually track down the bug and submitted a patch which got accepted .
My question , why these hoops ?
Is there still some restraint from Microsoft from allowing free collaboration ?
Do old habits die hard , is that why there are clickthroughs for free licenses , hidden svn repositories , mandatory registration ?
What can you tell me about the historical non-free culture in Microsoft and how it is adapting to free culture ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I recently had to deal with Codeplex in order to track down a bug on code hosted therein that we were using at my workplace.
This is fine, I am quite happy to work with free projects in order to track down bugs.
Unfortunately, I got the impression that Codeplex doesn't "get" what free collaboration is about.
For instance, it has a clickthrough for GPL and other free licenses.
While harmless, it is annoying and shows that Microsoft doesn't "get" it.
I also had issues doing an svn checkout of the code, since it looks like the svn repositories are hidden except for Codeplex developers.
They did eventually gave me a URL to an svn checkout, but I had to ask, and it wasn't exposed in the site's web interface.
I overall got the impression that unless there was some way to track me (e.g.
with a username), I wasn't welcome to look at or contribute to their code.
Regardless, I did eventually track down the bug and submitted a patch which got accepted.
My question, why these hoops?
Is there still some restraint from Microsoft from allowing free collaboration?
Do old habits die hard, is that why there are clickthroughs for free licenses, hidden svn repositories, mandatory registration?
What can you tell me about the historical non-free culture in Microsoft and how it is adapting to free culture?
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146932</id>
	<title>Re:Question:</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1257104580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword\_bingo" title="wikipedia.org">Bingo!</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bingo !
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bingo!
[wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145864</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145864</id>
	<title>Question:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do you plan to integrate Ajax into the Web 2.0 Cloud to empower the Semantic Web using SaaS on top of a SOAP backend utilizing XML?  What is the signal-to-buzzword ratio in day-to-day communications at your foundation?  Isn't Ajax just soooo 2007, and shouldn't you rename your new project something more up-to-date, such as Tweetbook.blog?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you plan to integrate Ajax into the Web 2.0 Cloud to empower the Semantic Web using SaaS on top of a SOAP backend utilizing XML ?
What is the signal-to-buzzword ratio in day-to-day communications at your foundation ?
Is n't Ajax just soooo 2007 , and should n't you rename your new project something more up-to-date , such as Tweetbook.blog ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you plan to integrate Ajax into the Web 2.0 Cloud to empower the Semantic Web using SaaS on top of a SOAP backend utilizing XML?
What is the signal-to-buzzword ratio in day-to-day communications at your foundation?
Isn't Ajax just soooo 2007, and shouldn't you rename your new project something more up-to-date, such as Tweetbook.blog?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30150602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30148704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145864
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30148156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30151226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30161564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30163182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30154404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1619205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30148156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30151226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30148704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30163182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30161564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30146700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30147820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30154404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30150602
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1619205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1619205.30145580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
