<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_17_1538245</id>
	<title>Former Microsoft CTO Builds Kitchen Laboratory</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258486740000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://circletimessquaregmailcom/" rel="nofollow">circletimessquare</a> writes <i>"Nathan Myhrvold, former CTO of Microsoft, is self-publishing a cook book with scientific underpinnings. The man who presided over the original iterations of Windows has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/science/17prof.html">built a laboratory kitchen</a>, hired 5 chefs, and plays with misplaced lab equipment: using an autoclave as a pressure cooker, using a 100-ton hydraulic press to make beef jerky, and using an ultrasonic welder for... he's not sure yet. The article includes a video on how to cryosear and cryorender duck. 'It's basically like a software project,' Dr. Myhrvold said. 'It's very much like a review we would do at Microsoft.' Is it possible to BSoD food?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>circletimessquare writes " Nathan Myhrvold , former CTO of Microsoft , is self-publishing a cook book with scientific underpinnings .
The man who presided over the original iterations of Windows has built a laboratory kitchen , hired 5 chefs , and plays with misplaced lab equipment : using an autoclave as a pressure cooker , using a 100-ton hydraulic press to make beef jerky , and using an ultrasonic welder for... he 's not sure yet .
The article includes a video on how to cryosear and cryorender duck .
'It 's basically like a software project, ' Dr. Myhrvold said .
'It 's very much like a review we would do at Microsoft .
' Is it possible to BSoD food ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>circletimessquare writes "Nathan Myhrvold, former CTO of Microsoft, is self-publishing a cook book with scientific underpinnings.
The man who presided over the original iterations of Windows has built a laboratory kitchen, hired 5 chefs, and plays with misplaced lab equipment: using an autoclave as a pressure cooker, using a 100-ton hydraulic press to make beef jerky, and using an ultrasonic welder for... he's not sure yet.
The article includes a video on how to cryosear and cryorender duck.
'It's basically like a software project,' Dr. Myhrvold said.
'It's very much like a review we would do at Microsoft.
' Is it possible to BSoD food?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892</id>
	<title>MS food</title>
	<author>AHuxley</author>
	<datestamp>1257109080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>After you consume it, 2 ports will open spontaneously and you will be ejecting data for days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>After you consume it , 2 ports will open spontaneously and you will be ejecting data for days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After you consume it, 2 ports will open spontaneously and you will be ejecting data for days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140990</id>
	<title>just don't</title>
	<author>stillpixel</author>
	<datestamp>1257067380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>try to get his ingredients.. or he'll sue your under the DMCA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>try to get his ingredients.. or he 'll sue your under the DMCA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>try to get his ingredients.. or he'll sue your under the DMCA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142576</id>
	<title>read the article: nathan HIRED the fat duck guy</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1257086460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"He hired 15 people, including 5 professional chefs, a photographer, an art director and writers and editors, to create it. They included Christopher Young, a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London, one of the most innovative restaurants in the world."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" He hired 15 people , including 5 professional chefs , a photographer , an art director and writers and editors , to create it .
They included Christopher Young , a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London , one of the most innovative restaurants in the world .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"He hired 15 people, including 5 professional chefs, a photographer, an art director and writers and editors, to create it.
They included Christopher Young, a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London, one of the most innovative restaurants in the world.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140902</id>
	<title>Think of the starving people in the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257066000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This guy is treating food like he treats money -- something to play with instead of use for the benefit of Man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy is treating food like he treats money -- something to play with instead of use for the benefit of Man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy is treating food like he treats money -- something to play with instead of use for the benefit of Man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141606</id>
	<title>How cute.</title>
	<author>rr00</author>
	<datestamp>1257076140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, lookie here.
<p>
Dr. Myrrvold - doing weird shit to poultry.   That's worthy of thousands of minutes of REAL human life.   To read something that one person thought was special, even though it's stupid and completely inapplicable to our living condition.
</p><p>
To the douche who made this is a headline: "Hello world, look at me!   I am capable of using above-average vocabulary and grammatical syntax, by some genetic gift or process that I will never be aware of!"
</p><p>
Dude (dudette) -&gt; circletimessquare, or whatever your real name is.
</p><p>
Does anyone REALLY give a shit?
</p><p>
I mean, really.
</p><p>
You need to stop projecting your insecurities onto us, and instead, realize that you're a worthy human being .  Yes, even without trying to seem clever, distinct, and included to like-minded people.
</p><p>
Instead, why not spend your time at a bar and try to impregnate the hottest woman (or man) you see?    Spread your genes along with beauty, and improve the human condition.    If you're too fearful to do so, then realize that your perceptions are an illusion, and even the stupid jock fucks realized this a decade+ before I mentioned it here.
</p><p>
You are not alone.  Be yourself.  We are like you, and love you as you are.
</p><p>
As long as you let Dr. Myhvold do whatever the fuck he does to  his ducks in private.    What he does behind closed doors is his business, even if some large PR firm or corporation wants to promote something to sell.
</p><p>
(I hate geek culture.  Fuck you all, in a sincere and appreciative way.  You are not empowered by your intellect.  Accept that and play the game, and know that the stupid fuck jock will win sometimes.)
</p><p>
r-r-0-0
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , lookie here .
Dr. Myrrvold - doing weird shit to poultry .
That 's worthy of thousands of minutes of REAL human life .
To read something that one person thought was special , even though it 's stupid and completely inapplicable to our living condition .
To the douche who made this is a headline : " Hello world , look at me !
I am capable of using above-average vocabulary and grammatical syntax , by some genetic gift or process that I will never be aware of !
" Dude ( dudette ) - &gt; circletimessquare , or whatever your real name is .
Does anyone REALLY give a shit ?
I mean , really .
You need to stop projecting your insecurities onto us , and instead , realize that you 're a worthy human being .
Yes , even without trying to seem clever , distinct , and included to like-minded people .
Instead , why not spend your time at a bar and try to impregnate the hottest woman ( or man ) you see ?
Spread your genes along with beauty , and improve the human condition .
If you 're too fearful to do so , then realize that your perceptions are an illusion , and even the stupid jock fucks realized this a decade + before I mentioned it here .
You are not alone .
Be yourself .
We are like you , and love you as you are .
As long as you let Dr. Myhvold do whatever the fuck he does to his ducks in private .
What he does behind closed doors is his business , even if some large PR firm or corporation wants to promote something to sell .
( I hate geek culture .
Fuck you all , in a sincere and appreciative way .
You are not empowered by your intellect .
Accept that and play the game , and know that the stupid fuck jock will win sometimes .
) r-r-0-0</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, lookie here.
Dr. Myrrvold - doing weird shit to poultry.
That's worthy of thousands of minutes of REAL human life.
To read something that one person thought was special, even though it's stupid and completely inapplicable to our living condition.
To the douche who made this is a headline: "Hello world, look at me!
I am capable of using above-average vocabulary and grammatical syntax, by some genetic gift or process that I will never be aware of!
"

Dude (dudette) -&gt; circletimessquare, or whatever your real name is.
Does anyone REALLY give a shit?
I mean, really.
You need to stop projecting your insecurities onto us, and instead, realize that you're a worthy human being .
Yes, even without trying to seem clever, distinct, and included to like-minded people.
Instead, why not spend your time at a bar and try to impregnate the hottest woman (or man) you see?
Spread your genes along with beauty, and improve the human condition.
If you're too fearful to do so, then realize that your perceptions are an illusion, and even the stupid jock fucks realized this a decade+ before I mentioned it here.
You are not alone.
Be yourself.
We are like you, and love you as you are.
As long as you let Dr. Myhvold do whatever the fuck he does to  his ducks in private.
What he does behind closed doors is his business, even if some large PR firm or corporation wants to promote something to sell.
(I hate geek culture.
Fuck you all, in a sincere and appreciative way.
You are not empowered by your intellect.
Accept that and play the game, and know that the stupid fuck jock will win sometimes.
)

r-r-0-0
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141124</id>
	<title>Molecular gastronomy</title>
	<author>martin-boundary</author>
	<datestamp>1257069060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not a new idea. See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular\_gastronomy" title="wikipedia.org">wikipedia on molecular gastronomy</a> [wikipedia.org]. Mhyrvold will probably try to <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/09/08/1731257/Intellectual-Ventures-Patent-Protection-Racket" title="slashdot.org">patent</a> [slashdot.org] it though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not a new idea .
See wikipedia on molecular gastronomy [ wikipedia.org ] .
Mhyrvold will probably try to patent [ slashdot.org ] it though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not a new idea.
See wikipedia on molecular gastronomy [wikipedia.org].
Mhyrvold will probably try to patent [slashdot.org] it though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141100</id>
	<title>Cooking?</title>
	<author>DavMz</author>
	<datestamp>1257068760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope that this laboratory kitchen is not to cooking what windows is to software.<br>But I can't help thinking it is...</p><p>That's such a waste of resources (food, talent, machine, time)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope that this laboratory kitchen is not to cooking what windows is to software.But I ca n't help thinking it is...That 's such a waste of resources ( food , talent , machine , time )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope that this laboratory kitchen is not to cooking what windows is to software.But I can't help thinking it is...That's such a waste of resources (food, talent, machine, time)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036</id>
	<title>Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1257067920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>For those who don't know, this is nothing new. Heston Blumenthal, who runs <a href="http://www.fatduck.co.uk/" title="fatduck.co.uk">The Fat Duck</a> [fatduck.co.uk] at Bray, Berkshire, for those of you with a few hundred euros to spend on dinner, has been doing this for years. Blumenthal uses laboratory equipment because it gives better, more consistent results than standard cooking equipment and is designed to stand up to the workloads of a commercial kitchen, but he has extended this a long way to develop new ideas. I'm assuming that this guy knows about him and his work and decided to try to go one better (possibly because of his connection to a company famous for doing precisely that?)</htmltext>
<tokenext>For those who do n't know , this is nothing new .
Heston Blumenthal , who runs The Fat Duck [ fatduck.co.uk ] at Bray , Berkshire , for those of you with a few hundred euros to spend on dinner , has been doing this for years .
Blumenthal uses laboratory equipment because it gives better , more consistent results than standard cooking equipment and is designed to stand up to the workloads of a commercial kitchen , but he has extended this a long way to develop new ideas .
I 'm assuming that this guy knows about him and his work and decided to try to go one better ( possibly because of his connection to a company famous for doing precisely that ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those who don't know, this is nothing new.
Heston Blumenthal, who runs The Fat Duck [fatduck.co.uk] at Bray, Berkshire, for those of you with a few hundred euros to spend on dinner, has been doing this for years.
Blumenthal uses laboratory equipment because it gives better, more consistent results than standard cooking equipment and is designed to stand up to the workloads of a commercial kitchen, but he has extended this a long way to develop new ideas.
I'm assuming that this guy knows about him and his work and decided to try to go one better (possibly because of his connection to a company famous for doing precisely that?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142208</id>
	<title>Re:How cute.</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1257083580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you in a manic phase?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you in a manic phase ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you in a manic phase?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142014</id>
	<title>Re:Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>asliarun</author>
	<datestamp>1257081060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Flamebait, but I'll bite.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh yes let's do crap dishes and make people pay oodles of money for it.</p></div><p>So what? You pay money for crappy food, don't you? Or do you eat Kobe steaks all the time? In any case, crappiness is purely a subjective thing. Lots of people don't seem to find it crappy at all.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I have seen and heard about the Fat Duck and while the elite cuisine establishment can be quite anal, we don't need to go to molecular chemistry. For if we go to molecular chemistry why are we even using real food in the first place? Why not just synthesize everything in the first place? Would make life a lot easier for the Fat Duck....</p></div><p>Sure, it could. However, why is the field of culinary fine dining suddenly beholden to your fancies? Fat Duck is doing what it wants to, and this is obviously working for them.</p><p>In any case, this so-called molecular gastronomy has been going on for a long long time. What do you think makes your cola sweet? Where do you think the colorings, preservatives, emulsifiers, stabilizers etc. come from? Real food?? Molecular gastronomy is only an effort to understand the nature of food, how cooking transforms food, and how ingredients affect food.</p><p>What's wrong if these ingredients are artificial instead of being natural. Just because something is "natural" doesn't make it any less toxic or more safe than an artificial ingredient. We've evolved way beyond the days when we would see an animal eat a fruit and hence know that it is safe to eat (the fruit, not the animal).</p><p><div class="quote"><p>What bothers me with people like Nathan and in fact the entire freaken generation like him is that they feel did something really big in one thing then they are God's gift to the world and can do everything else. I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions. For if this nut job had real skills he would invent a way to grow an artificial piece of steak! Imagine how much better our planet would be if we could grow artificial steaks? We could eat meat and not have the side effects of screwing up our planet. But hey that would require real work and I doubt his generation wants to do that...</p></div><p>Nobody has claimed that molecular gastronomy (or this guy for that matter) has the solution to world hunger. Your comment is no different from all the comments that routinely put down people doing something innovative just because "it has already been done before", "it is not perfect enough", "it really won't solve the problem", "it may create a blackhole and destroy us all", "the money could have been better used to feed the poor in Africa", or some such reason.</p><p>This guy is just a geek who has the money to play with expensive lab toys for heaven's sake. Wouldn't you like to have your own 100 ton press to play around with??</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flamebait , but I 'll bite.Oh yes let 's do crap dishes and make people pay oodles of money for it.So what ?
You pay money for crappy food , do n't you ?
Or do you eat Kobe steaks all the time ?
In any case , crappiness is purely a subjective thing .
Lots of people do n't seem to find it crappy at all.I have seen and heard about the Fat Duck and while the elite cuisine establishment can be quite anal , we do n't need to go to molecular chemistry .
For if we go to molecular chemistry why are we even using real food in the first place ?
Why not just synthesize everything in the first place ?
Would make life a lot easier for the Fat Duck....Sure , it could .
However , why is the field of culinary fine dining suddenly beholden to your fancies ?
Fat Duck is doing what it wants to , and this is obviously working for them.In any case , this so-called molecular gastronomy has been going on for a long long time .
What do you think makes your cola sweet ?
Where do you think the colorings , preservatives , emulsifiers , stabilizers etc .
come from ?
Real food ? ?
Molecular gastronomy is only an effort to understand the nature of food , how cooking transforms food , and how ingredients affect food.What 's wrong if these ingredients are artificial instead of being natural .
Just because something is " natural " does n't make it any less toxic or more safe than an artificial ingredient .
We 've evolved way beyond the days when we would see an animal eat a fruit and hence know that it is safe to eat ( the fruit , not the animal ) .What bothers me with people like Nathan and in fact the entire freaken generation like him is that they feel did something really big in one thing then they are God 's gift to the world and can do everything else .
I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions .
For if this nut job had real skills he would invent a way to grow an artificial piece of steak !
Imagine how much better our planet would be if we could grow artificial steaks ?
We could eat meat and not have the side effects of screwing up our planet .
But hey that would require real work and I doubt his generation wants to do that...Nobody has claimed that molecular gastronomy ( or this guy for that matter ) has the solution to world hunger .
Your comment is no different from all the comments that routinely put down people doing something innovative just because " it has already been done before " , " it is not perfect enough " , " it really wo n't solve the problem " , " it may create a blackhole and destroy us all " , " the money could have been better used to feed the poor in Africa " , or some such reason.This guy is just a geek who has the money to play with expensive lab toys for heaven 's sake .
Would n't you like to have your own 100 ton press to play around with ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flamebait, but I'll bite.Oh yes let's do crap dishes and make people pay oodles of money for it.So what?
You pay money for crappy food, don't you?
Or do you eat Kobe steaks all the time?
In any case, crappiness is purely a subjective thing.
Lots of people don't seem to find it crappy at all.I have seen and heard about the Fat Duck and while the elite cuisine establishment can be quite anal, we don't need to go to molecular chemistry.
For if we go to molecular chemistry why are we even using real food in the first place?
Why not just synthesize everything in the first place?
Would make life a lot easier for the Fat Duck....Sure, it could.
However, why is the field of culinary fine dining suddenly beholden to your fancies?
Fat Duck is doing what it wants to, and this is obviously working for them.In any case, this so-called molecular gastronomy has been going on for a long long time.
What do you think makes your cola sweet?
Where do you think the colorings, preservatives, emulsifiers, stabilizers etc.
come from?
Real food??
Molecular gastronomy is only an effort to understand the nature of food, how cooking transforms food, and how ingredients affect food.What's wrong if these ingredients are artificial instead of being natural.
Just because something is "natural" doesn't make it any less toxic or more safe than an artificial ingredient.
We've evolved way beyond the days when we would see an animal eat a fruit and hence know that it is safe to eat (the fruit, not the animal).What bothers me with people like Nathan and in fact the entire freaken generation like him is that they feel did something really big in one thing then they are God's gift to the world and can do everything else.
I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions.
For if this nut job had real skills he would invent a way to grow an artificial piece of steak!
Imagine how much better our planet would be if we could grow artificial steaks?
We could eat meat and not have the side effects of screwing up our planet.
But hey that would require real work and I doubt his generation wants to do that...Nobody has claimed that molecular gastronomy (or this guy for that matter) has the solution to world hunger.
Your comment is no different from all the comments that routinely put down people doing something innovative just because "it has already been done before", "it is not perfect enough", "it really won't solve the problem", "it may create a blackhole and destroy us all", "the money could have been better used to feed the poor in Africa", or some such reason.This guy is just a geek who has the money to play with expensive lab toys for heaven's sake.
Wouldn't you like to have your own 100 ton press to play around with?
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30146788</id>
	<title>Well that said</title>
	<author>stonecypher</author>
	<datestamp>1257103980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's already a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684800012/haugelandbook-20" title="amazon.com">very good book</a> [amazon.com] along those lines (affiliate link to "On Food And Cooking").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already a very good book [ amazon.com ] along those lines ( affiliate link to " On Food And Cooking " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already a very good book [amazon.com] along those lines (affiliate link to "On Food And Cooking").</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141218</id>
	<title>Autoclaved Turkey</title>
	<author>Rollgunner</author>
	<datestamp>1257070740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We did this once for a lab Christmas party. Frozen solid to cooked in about 25 minutes. <br> <br>

Problem is, with normal oven cooking, a lot of the liquids boil out and evaporate. Not so with the autoclave. <br> <br>

It was so juicy you could almost *drink* it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We did this once for a lab Christmas party .
Frozen solid to cooked in about 25 minutes .
Problem is , with normal oven cooking , a lot of the liquids boil out and evaporate .
Not so with the autoclave .
It was so juicy you could almost * drink * it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We did this once for a lab Christmas party.
Frozen solid to cooked in about 25 minutes.
Problem is, with normal oven cooking, a lot of the liquids boil out and evaporate.
Not so with the autoclave.
It was so juicy you could almost *drink* it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142156</id>
	<title>ugg boot,nike jordan shoes,coach,gucci,handbags,</title>
	<author>coolforsale110</author>
	<datestamp>1257082920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]
Christmas is around the corner:  And old customers can also enjoy the gifts sent by my company in a can also request to our company.  Gifts lot,Buy more get the moreOnly this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services". Your satisfaction is our main pursue. You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products . Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!  Welcome  to come  next   time ! Thank you!
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Thanks</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Christmas is around the corner : And old customers can also enjoy the gifts sent by my company in a can also request to our company .
Gifts lot,Buy more get the moreOnly this site have this treatmentOur goal is " Best quality , Best reputation , Best services " .
Your satisfaction is our main pursue .
You can find the best products from us , meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket , Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping competitive price any size available accept the paypal Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]
Christmas is around the corner:  And old customers can also enjoy the gifts sent by my company in a can also request to our company.
Gifts lot,Buy more get the moreOnly this site have this treatmentOur goal is "Best quality, Best reputation , Best services".
Your satisfaction is our main pursue.
You can find the best products from us, meeting your different needs.Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products .
Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!
Welcome  to come  next   time !
Thank you!
ugg boot,POLO hoody,Jacket,
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Thanks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141180</id>
	<title>What?no one managed to have a5 star rated comment?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257070020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know you hate him, c'mon he is long time microsoft. you gotta be able to hang some shit on him.</p><p>there were some pretty solid attempts, yeah! so he cooks/destroys food while the children in Africa are starving. So he has no moral highground or something? u serious?</p><p>guys, please!!</p><p>anyway, I only wish he would have chanelled more of his creativity and resourcefullness into making windows a bit more tasty, or at least digestable dish.</p><p>But after reading 'an autoclave as a pressure cooker, using a 100-ton hydraulic press to make beef jerky, and using an ultrasonic welder'<br>and his quote 'It's very much like a review we would do at Microsoft."</p><p>everything makes suddenly so much sense now!</p><p>In any case, I wish Dr. Myhrvold a lot of fun and success with his technical cooking and hope that he will fight against world famine by giving the Africans his ultrasonic welder rather than his food.<br>After all, if you consider that they are building wind generators from scrap parts without a guide, it might be just the thing they need in order to built their ultrasonic heat propulsed canon to fry all the excess freons in the atmosphere and turn them into gummy bears.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you hate him , c'mon he is long time microsoft .
you got ta be able to hang some shit on him.there were some pretty solid attempts , yeah !
so he cooks/destroys food while the children in Africa are starving .
So he has no moral highground or something ?
u serious ? guys , please !
! anyway , I only wish he would have chanelled more of his creativity and resourcefullness into making windows a bit more tasty , or at least digestable dish.But after reading 'an autoclave as a pressure cooker , using a 100-ton hydraulic press to make beef jerky , and using an ultrasonic welder'and his quote 'It 's very much like a review we would do at Microsoft .
" everything makes suddenly so much sense now ! In any case , I wish Dr. Myhrvold a lot of fun and success with his technical cooking and hope that he will fight against world famine by giving the Africans his ultrasonic welder rather than his food.After all , if you consider that they are building wind generators from scrap parts without a guide , it might be just the thing they need in order to built their ultrasonic heat propulsed canon to fry all the excess freons in the atmosphere and turn them into gummy bears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you hate him, c'mon he is long time microsoft.
you gotta be able to hang some shit on him.there were some pretty solid attempts, yeah!
so he cooks/destroys food while the children in Africa are starving.
So he has no moral highground or something?
u serious?guys, please!
!anyway, I only wish he would have chanelled more of his creativity and resourcefullness into making windows a bit more tasty, or at least digestable dish.But after reading 'an autoclave as a pressure cooker, using a 100-ton hydraulic press to make beef jerky, and using an ultrasonic welder'and his quote 'It's very much like a review we would do at Microsoft.
"everything makes suddenly so much sense now!In any case, I wish Dr. Myhrvold a lot of fun and success with his technical cooking and hope that he will fight against world famine by giving the Africans his ultrasonic welder rather than his food.After all, if you consider that they are building wind generators from scrap parts without a guide, it might be just the thing they need in order to built their ultrasonic heat propulsed canon to fry all the excess freons in the atmosphere and turn them into gummy bears.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142220</id>
	<title>binspam from the patent troll myhrvold</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257083700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Myhrvold is one of Microsoft's biggest and most <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/17/nathan-myhrvolds-patent-extortion-fund-is-reaping-hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars/" title="techcrunch.com" rel="nofollow">active patent trolls</a> [techcrunch.com].    Technically, blogging for pay is a legal business model.  If slashdot is getting paid to market him, then fine, but at least <a href="http://www.spinwatch.org/-news-by-category-mainmenu-9/157-us-politics/2969-assembly-passes-wolk-astroturf-lobbying-reform-bill" title="spinwatch.org" rel="nofollow">disclose </a> [spinwatch.org]it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Myhrvold is one of Microsoft 's biggest and most active patent trolls [ techcrunch.com ] .
Technically , blogging for pay is a legal business model .
If slashdot is getting paid to market him , then fine , but at least disclose [ spinwatch.org ] it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Myhrvold is one of Microsoft's biggest and most active patent trolls [techcrunch.com].
Technically, blogging for pay is a legal business model.
If slashdot is getting paid to market him, then fine, but at least disclose  [spinwatch.org]it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144524</id>
	<title>Windows Food</title>
	<author>Stenchwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1257094740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm...all his food has a slight hint of apples.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm...all his food has a slight hint of apples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm...all his food has a slight hint of apples.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140890</id>
	<title>Dear Microsoft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257109080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thou shalt not brute-force cooking.</p><p>REAL chefs will have no interest in your stupid book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thou shalt not brute-force cooking.REAL chefs will have no interest in your stupid book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thou shalt not brute-force cooking.REAL chefs will have no interest in your stupid book.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142866</id>
	<title>BSoD Yes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257088260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blue food it typically toxic, so yes in the kitchen, blue screen (sieve) is death.<br>But non-toxic blue food makes you immortal.  Eat some every day and you will live forever.<br>Bleu cheese?  Closer to grey neurotoxin.<br>Blueberries?  Blue on the bush; but purple on the plate.<br>Blue Meat? Run away, run away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blue food it typically toxic , so yes in the kitchen , blue screen ( sieve ) is death.But non-toxic blue food makes you immortal .
Eat some every day and you will live forever.Bleu cheese ?
Closer to grey neurotoxin.Blueberries ?
Blue on the bush ; but purple on the plate.Blue Meat ?
Run away , run away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blue food it typically toxic, so yes in the kitchen, blue screen (sieve) is death.But non-toxic blue food makes you immortal.
Eat some every day and you will live forever.Bleu cheese?
Closer to grey neurotoxin.Blueberries?
Blue on the bush; but purple on the plate.Blue Meat?
Run away, run away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141244</id>
	<title>Re:MS food</title>
	<author>Hogwash McFly</author>
	<datestamp>1257071220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The phrase 'core dump' springs to mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The phrase 'core dump ' springs to mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phrase 'core dump' springs to mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142318</id>
	<title>Re:"Is it possible to BSoD food?"</title>
	<author>Cassini2</author>
	<datestamp>1257084420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Microsoft we are talking about.  They gave us the Blue Screen of Death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Microsoft we are talking about .
They gave us the Blue Screen of Death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Microsoft we are talking about.
They gave us the Blue Screen of Death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141996</id>
	<title>Heston Blumethal may have some prior art.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257080820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.fatduck.co.uk/</p><p>"We embrace innovation&mdash;new ingredients, techniques, appliances, information, and ideas&mdash;whenever it can make a real contribution to our cooking.</p><p>We do not pursue novelty for its own sake. We may use modern thickeners, sugar substitutes, enzymes, liquid nitrogen, sous-vide, dehydration, and other nontraditional means, but these do not define our cooking. They are a few of the many tools that we are fortunate to have available as we strive to make delicious and stimulating dishes.</p><p>Similarly, the disciplines of food chemistry and food technology are valuable sources of information and ideas for all cooks. Even the most straightforward traditional preparation can be strengthened by an understanding of its ingredients and methods, and chemists have been helping cooks for hundreds of years. The fashionable term &ldquo;molecular gastronomy&rdquo; was introduced relatively recently, in 1992, to name a particular academic workshop for scientists and chefs on the basic food chemistry of traditional dishes. That workshop did not influence our approach, and the term &ldquo;molecular gastronomy&rdquo; does not describe our cooking, or indeed any style of cooking." - Heston Blumethal</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.fatduck.co.uk/ " We embrace innovation    new ingredients , techniques , appliances , information , and ideas    whenever it can make a real contribution to our cooking.We do not pursue novelty for its own sake .
We may use modern thickeners , sugar substitutes , enzymes , liquid nitrogen , sous-vide , dehydration , and other nontraditional means , but these do not define our cooking .
They are a few of the many tools that we are fortunate to have available as we strive to make delicious and stimulating dishes.Similarly , the disciplines of food chemistry and food technology are valuable sources of information and ideas for all cooks .
Even the most straightforward traditional preparation can be strengthened by an understanding of its ingredients and methods , and chemists have been helping cooks for hundreds of years .
The fashionable term    molecular gastronomy    was introduced relatively recently , in 1992 , to name a particular academic workshop for scientists and chefs on the basic food chemistry of traditional dishes .
That workshop did not influence our approach , and the term    molecular gastronomy    does not describe our cooking , or indeed any style of cooking .
" - Heston Blumethal</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.fatduck.co.uk/"We embrace innovation—new ingredients, techniques, appliances, information, and ideas—whenever it can make a real contribution to our cooking.We do not pursue novelty for its own sake.
We may use modern thickeners, sugar substitutes, enzymes, liquid nitrogen, sous-vide, dehydration, and other nontraditional means, but these do not define our cooking.
They are a few of the many tools that we are fortunate to have available as we strive to make delicious and stimulating dishes.Similarly, the disciplines of food chemistry and food technology are valuable sources of information and ideas for all cooks.
Even the most straightforward traditional preparation can be strengthened by an understanding of its ingredients and methods, and chemists have been helping cooks for hundreds of years.
The fashionable term “molecular gastronomy” was introduced relatively recently, in 1992, to name a particular academic workshop for scientists and chefs on the basic food chemistry of traditional dishes.
That workshop did not influence our approach, and the term “molecular gastronomy” does not describe our cooking, or indeed any style of cooking.
" - Heston Blumethal</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142564</id>
	<title>Re:Molecular gastronomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257086340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is old stuff. People at CERN are going to get into the business of subnuclear gastronomy, as soon as the supercollider is back into activity again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is old stuff .
People at CERN are going to get into the business of subnuclear gastronomy , as soon as the supercollider is back into activity again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is old stuff.
People at CERN are going to get into the business of subnuclear gastronomy, as soon as the supercollider is back into activity again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142486</id>
	<title>Re:"Is it possible to BSoD food?"</title>
	<author>MiniMike</author>
	<datestamp>1257085800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beware the blue cheese, used for...</p><p>Blue Sauce of Death!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beware the blue cheese , used for...Blue Sauce of Death !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beware the blue cheese, used for...Blue Sauce of Death!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141138</id>
	<title>Bloat...</title>
	<author>mehrotra.akash</author>
	<datestamp>1257069360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The project has grown in size and scope. <b>Originally planned as a 300-page discussion</b> of sous vide, an increasingly popular restaurant technique of cooking food in vacuum-sealed bags in warm water baths, <b>the book has swelled to 1,500 pages</b> that will also cover microbiology, food safety, the physics of heat transfer on the stove and in the oven, formulas for turning fruit and vegetable juices into gels, and more."</p><p>Has gone from win 2000 to vista, how long before it cuts the bloat and comes to Win 7??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The project has grown in size and scope .
Originally planned as a 300-page discussion of sous vide , an increasingly popular restaurant technique of cooking food in vacuum-sealed bags in warm water baths , the book has swelled to 1,500 pages that will also cover microbiology , food safety , the physics of heat transfer on the stove and in the oven , formulas for turning fruit and vegetable juices into gels , and more .
" Has gone from win 2000 to vista , how long before it cuts the bloat and comes to Win 7 ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The project has grown in size and scope.
Originally planned as a 300-page discussion of sous vide, an increasingly popular restaurant technique of cooking food in vacuum-sealed bags in warm water baths, the book has swelled to 1,500 pages that will also cover microbiology, food safety, the physics of heat transfer on the stove and in the oven, formulas for turning fruit and vegetable juices into gels, and more.
"Has gone from win 2000 to vista, how long before it cuts the bloat and comes to Win 7?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30147850</id>
	<title>Molecular Gastronomy</title>
	<author>Steve Hamlin</author>
	<datestamp>1257066000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular\_gastronomy" title="wikipedia.org">Molecular gastronomy</a> [wikipedia.org] - it's been around for years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Molecular gastronomy [ wikipedia.org ] - it 's been around for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Molecular gastronomy [wikipedia.org] - it's been around for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144752</id>
	<title>Re:MS food</title>
	<author>greed</author>
	<datestamp>1257095580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dr. Watson, I need you....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Watson , I need you... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Watson, I need you....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886</id>
	<title>Patent troll or genuis  (or both ?)</title>
	<author>iMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1257109020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The was an article on him a few years ago which seemed to suggest that  he was being a patent troll and his 'inventions' just a cover (though to be fair he is a real super genius... worked with Stephen Hawking, publications in Nature and Science and even a paper on paleontology !!! ):</p><p><a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune\_archive/2006/07/10/8380798/" title="cnn.com">http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune\_archive/2006/07/10/8380798/</a> [cnn.com]</p><p>(Who's afraid of Nathan Myhrvold?<br>The giants of tech, that's who. And they have a nasty name for the former Microsoft honcho: "patent troll."<br>FORTUNE Magazine<br>By Nicholas Varchaver, FORTUNE senior writer<br>June 26 2006: 1:20 PM EDT)</p><p>Patent troll or not, I have to admit that kitchen would have any tech savy cook drooling<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The was an article on him a few years ago which seemed to suggest that he was being a patent troll and his 'inventions ' just a cover ( though to be fair he is a real super genius... worked with Stephen Hawking , publications in Nature and Science and even a paper on paleontology ! ! !
) : http : //money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune \ _archive/2006/07/10/8380798/ [ cnn.com ] ( Who 's afraid of Nathan Myhrvold ? The giants of tech , that 's who .
And they have a nasty name for the former Microsoft honcho : " patent troll .
" FORTUNE MagazineBy Nicholas Varchaver , FORTUNE senior writerJune 26 2006 : 1 : 20 PM EDT ) Patent troll or not , I have to admit that kitchen would have any tech savy cook drooling : ) : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The was an article on him a few years ago which seemed to suggest that  he was being a patent troll and his 'inventions' just a cover (though to be fair he is a real super genius... worked with Stephen Hawking, publications in Nature and Science and even a paper on paleontology !!!
):http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune\_archive/2006/07/10/8380798/ [cnn.com](Who's afraid of Nathan Myhrvold?The giants of tech, that's who.
And they have a nasty name for the former Microsoft honcho: "patent troll.
"FORTUNE MagazineBy Nicholas Varchaver, FORTUNE senior writerJune 26 2006: 1:20 PM EDT)Patent troll or not, I have to admit that kitchen would have any tech savy cook drooling :) :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141030</id>
	<title>In software and the kitchen</title>
	<author>fotoguzzi</author>
	<datestamp>1257067740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>he's forcing ram to do preposterous things.</htmltext>
<tokenext>he 's forcing ram to do preposterous things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he's forcing ram to do preposterous things.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141428</id>
	<title>Programming Language Suggestion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257073740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is he going to write it in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chef\_(programming\_language)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Chef</a> [wikipedia.org]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is he going to write it in Chef [ wikipedia.org ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is he going to write it in Chef [wikipedia.org]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143510</id>
	<title>The power of suggestion.</title>
	<author>trudyscousin</author>
	<datestamp>1257090900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it possible to BSOD food?</p></div><p>The article includes a video on how to cyanosear and cyanorender duck, doesn't it?</p><p>(blink)</p><p>Never mind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it possible to BSOD food ? The article includes a video on how to cyanosear and cyanorender duck , does n't it ?
( blink ) Never mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it possible to BSOD food?The article includes a video on how to cyanosear and cyanorender duck, doesn't it?
(blink)Never mind.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145160</id>
	<title>Re:Patent troll or genuis (or both ?)</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1257097260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The troll will try to patent every god damn "dish" he and his chefs would cook up, both literally and figuratively.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The troll will try to patent every god damn " dish " he and his chefs would cook up , both literally and figuratively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The troll will try to patent every god damn "dish" he and his chefs would cook up, both literally and figuratively.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142448</id>
	<title>About time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257085500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Growing up with a mom working as a chef or cook in various kitchens the whole way, I'd often be baffled by how awkward and backwards the tech involved was. Tons of stuff was clearly considered way obsolete by standards in non-food engineering. Like many fields (like cells having features you'd never see on a cordless or a car having features a house rarely has) cooking sticks to tradition for no particular reason. It's of course ok to treat it as an art, but while painting in oil has it's place it's also useful to have photoshop and an inkjet printer for when you need speed, flexibility and consistent results.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Growing up with a mom working as a chef or cook in various kitchens the whole way , I 'd often be baffled by how awkward and backwards the tech involved was .
Tons of stuff was clearly considered way obsolete by standards in non-food engineering .
Like many fields ( like cells having features you 'd never see on a cordless or a car having features a house rarely has ) cooking sticks to tradition for no particular reason .
It 's of course ok to treat it as an art , but while painting in oil has it 's place it 's also useful to have photoshop and an inkjet printer for when you need speed , flexibility and consistent results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Growing up with a mom working as a chef or cook in various kitchens the whole way, I'd often be baffled by how awkward and backwards the tech involved was.
Tons of stuff was clearly considered way obsolete by standards in non-food engineering.
Like many fields (like cells having features you'd never see on a cordless or a car having features a house rarely has) cooking sticks to tradition for no particular reason.
It's of course ok to treat it as an art, but while painting in oil has it's place it's also useful to have photoshop and an inkjet printer for when you need speed, flexibility and consistent results.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142030</id>
	<title>Re:How cute.</title>
	<author>Lehk228</author>
	<datestamp>1257081240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Accept that and play <b>the game</b> </i>

I just lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Accept that and play the game I just lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accept that and play the game 

I just lost.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142948</id>
	<title>Re:Been done before... and better</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1257088620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This guy is just throwing random shit into random industrial equipment. Yeah, i guess it is a lot like MS code. Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it will stick. This isn't cooking, this is brute force mutilation of food.</p><p>There is a board of health after all.</p><p>--</p><p>Bubble sorted mousse, may contain moose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This guy is just throwing random shit into random industrial equipment .
Yeah , i guess it is a lot like MS code .
Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it will stick .
This is n't cooking , this is brute force mutilation of food.There is a board of health after all.--Bubble sorted mousse , may contain moose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This guy is just throwing random shit into random industrial equipment.
Yeah, i guess it is a lot like MS code.
Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it will stick.
This isn't cooking, this is brute force mutilation of food.There is a board of health after all.--Bubble sorted mousse, may contain moose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140908</id>
	<title>And so now they can claim...</title>
	<author>ctrl-alt-canc</author>
	<datestamp>1257066120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All your roast-beefs are belong to us ?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All your roast-beefs are belong to us ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All your roast-beefs are belong to us ?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144090</id>
	<title>Re:"Is it possible to BSoD food?"</title>
	<author>demachina</author>
	<datestamp>1257093060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Botulism Salmonella or Diarrhea?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Botulism Salmonella or Diarrhea ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Botulism Salmonella or Diarrhea?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141768</id>
	<title>Man, if you have to throw money around like that,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257077880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how about throwing some of it my way?</p><p>Woops. I forget myself. I don't want money stained by Microsoft. Can't imagine how to cut loose all the strings that it comes attached with. Carry on, I guess. This is one way to pump money back into the economy, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how about throwing some of it my way ? Woops .
I forget myself .
I do n't want money stained by Microsoft .
Ca n't imagine how to cut loose all the strings that it comes attached with .
Carry on , I guess .
This is one way to pump money back into the economy , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how about throwing some of it my way?Woops.
I forget myself.
I don't want money stained by Microsoft.
Can't imagine how to cut loose all the strings that it comes attached with.
Carry on, I guess.
This is one way to pump money back into the economy, anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141000</id>
	<title>Method</title>
	<author>supernova\_hq</author>
	<datestamp>1257067440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they program like they cook, it explains ME and Vista.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they program like they cook , it explains ME and Vista .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they program like they cook, it explains ME and Vista.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142512</id>
	<title>Re:Molecular gastronomy</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1257085980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who said it was? The article explains that he lured away one of Blumenthal's own research chefs for the book project, and even the summary is pretty clear on the matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said it was ?
The article explains that he lured away one of Blumenthal 's own research chefs for the book project , and even the summary is pretty clear on the matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said it was?
The article explains that he lured away one of Blumenthal's own research chefs for the book project, and even the summary is pretty clear on the matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141124</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141994</id>
	<title>Re:MS food</title>
	<author>Lehk228</author>
	<datestamp>1257080820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>no that is what happens when you eat ham salad from dollar tree.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no that is what happens when you eat ham salad from dollar tree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no that is what happens when you eat ham salad from dollar tree.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141052</id>
	<title>So he's been spending too much time reading...</title>
	<author>julesh</author>
	<datestamp>1257068160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Heston Blumenthal's output.  Who hasn't?  The only reason the rest of us don't have kitchens filled with expensive gadgets (and experienced help) is lack of finance.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Heston Blumenthal 's output .
Who has n't ?
The only reason the rest of us do n't have kitchens filled with expensive gadgets ( and experienced help ) is lack of finance .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Heston Blumenthal's output.
Who hasn't?
The only reason the rest of us don't have kitchens filled with expensive gadgets (and experienced help) is lack of finance.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141524</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Microsoft</title>
	<author>JohnBailey</author>
	<datestamp>1257075060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Thou shalt not brute-force cooking.

REAL chefs will have no interest in your stupid book.</p></div><p>Never heard of Heston Blumenthal then...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thou shalt not brute-force cooking .
REAL chefs will have no interest in your stupid book.Never heard of Heston Blumenthal then.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thou shalt not brute-force cooking.
REAL chefs will have no interest in your stupid book.Never heard of Heston Blumenthal then...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141276</id>
	<title>Sure looks like Microsoft...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257071520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. using the wrong tools for the job.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. using the wrong tools for the job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. using the wrong tools for the job.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120</id>
	<title>Re:Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>SerpentMage</author>
	<datestamp>1257069000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yes let's do crap dishes and make people pay oodles of money for it.</p><p>I have seen and heard about the Fat Duck and while the elite cuisine establishment can be quite anal, we don't need to go to molecular chemistry. For if we go to molecular chemistry why are we even using real food in the first place? Why not just synthesize everything in the first place? Would make life a lot easier for the Fat Duck....</p><p>What bothers me with people like Nathan and in fact the entire freaken generation like him is that they feel did something really big in one thing then they are God's gift to the world and can do everything else. I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions. For if this nut job had real skills he would invent a way to grow an artificial piece of steak! Imagine how much better our planet would be if we could grow artificial steaks? We could eat meat and not have the side effects of screwing up our planet. But hey that would require real work and I doubt his generation wants to do that...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes let 's do crap dishes and make people pay oodles of money for it.I have seen and heard about the Fat Duck and while the elite cuisine establishment can be quite anal , we do n't need to go to molecular chemistry .
For if we go to molecular chemistry why are we even using real food in the first place ?
Why not just synthesize everything in the first place ?
Would make life a lot easier for the Fat Duck....What bothers me with people like Nathan and in fact the entire freaken generation like him is that they feel did something really big in one thing then they are God 's gift to the world and can do everything else .
I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions .
For if this nut job had real skills he would invent a way to grow an artificial piece of steak !
Imagine how much better our planet would be if we could grow artificial steaks ?
We could eat meat and not have the side effects of screwing up our planet .
But hey that would require real work and I doubt his generation wants to do that.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes let's do crap dishes and make people pay oodles of money for it.I have seen and heard about the Fat Duck and while the elite cuisine establishment can be quite anal, we don't need to go to molecular chemistry.
For if we go to molecular chemistry why are we even using real food in the first place?
Why not just synthesize everything in the first place?
Would make life a lot easier for the Fat Duck....What bothers me with people like Nathan and in fact the entire freaken generation like him is that they feel did something really big in one thing then they are God's gift to the world and can do everything else.
I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions.
For if this nut job had real skills he would invent a way to grow an artificial piece of steak!
Imagine how much better our planet would be if we could grow artificial steaks?
We could eat meat and not have the side effects of screwing up our planet.
But hey that would require real work and I doubt his generation wants to do that...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142634</id>
	<title>Molecular chemistry?</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1257086940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's molecular chemistry? More to the point, what's nonmolecular chemistry?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's molecular chemistry ?
More to the point , what 's nonmolecular chemistry ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's molecular chemistry?
More to the point, what's nonmolecular chemistry?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30149454</id>
	<title>Clippy</title>
	<author>mujadaddy</author>
	<datestamp>1257073920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It looks like you're trying to bring meaning to your empty life by filling the hole in your stomach!</i></p><p>Would you like to...</p><ul> <li>Deep-Fry a Twinkie?</li><li>Raise your pate to room temperature?</li><li>Stir your chili con queso while simulaneously microwaving it?</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like you 're trying to bring meaning to your empty life by filling the hole in your stomach ! Would you like to... Deep-Fry a Twinkie ? Raise your pate to room temperature ? Stir your chili con queso while simulaneously microwaving it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like you're trying to bring meaning to your empty life by filling the hole in your stomach!Would you like to... Deep-Fry a Twinkie?Raise your pate to room temperature?Stir your chili con queso while simulaneously microwaving it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143702</id>
	<title>Now I see ...</title>
	<author>fkx</author>
	<datestamp>1257091620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we may be getting an insight into the reason for the underlying problems windows has had since the beginning<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... are there discarded code modules from 1980? Altair code?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we may be getting an insight into the reason for the underlying problems windows has had since the beginning ... are there discarded code modules from 1980 ?
Altair code ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we may be getting an insight into the reason for the underlying problems windows has had since the beginning ... are there discarded code modules from 1980?
Altair code?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141382</id>
	<title>Bill Gates comment:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257073080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>640 calories a day is enough for anyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>640 calories a day is enough for anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>640 calories a day is enough for anyone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141214</id>
	<title>Sounds like he needs to team up with Ferran Adria</title>
	<author>Lord\_Dweomer</author>
	<datestamp>1257070680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For any who are new to this approach to cooking, it is called molecular gastronomy.  See <a href="http://khymos.org/" title="khymos.org">here</a> [khymos.org] for a good primer.<p>This stuff is seriously cool and eating at a restaurant specializing in this style, while expensive, is definitely an experience worth having.</p><p>I live in Chicago and we are proud to have several famous chefs from this school of cooking with great restaurants including Alinea, Graham Elliot and Moto (along with its sister restaurant Otom).  I only wish some of the ingredients and techniques were less expensive and more accessible although you can buy some of the things online easily enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For any who are new to this approach to cooking , it is called molecular gastronomy .
See here [ khymos.org ] for a good primer.This stuff is seriously cool and eating at a restaurant specializing in this style , while expensive , is definitely an experience worth having.I live in Chicago and we are proud to have several famous chefs from this school of cooking with great restaurants including Alinea , Graham Elliot and Moto ( along with its sister restaurant Otom ) .
I only wish some of the ingredients and techniques were less expensive and more accessible although you can buy some of the things online easily enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For any who are new to this approach to cooking, it is called molecular gastronomy.
See here [khymos.org] for a good primer.This stuff is seriously cool and eating at a restaurant specializing in this style, while expensive, is definitely an experience worth having.I live in Chicago and we are proud to have several famous chefs from this school of cooking with great restaurants including Alinea, Graham Elliot and Moto (along with its sister restaurant Otom).
I only wish some of the ingredients and techniques were less expensive and more accessible although you can buy some of the things online easily enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143158</id>
	<title>Re:Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>Eevee</author>
	<datestamp>1257089760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the fine article you didn't read:</p><blockquote><div><p>He hired 15 people, including 5 professional chefs, a photographer, an art director and writers and editors, to create it. They included Christopher Young, a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London, one of the most innovative restaurants in the world.</p></div></blockquote><p>So yes, it isn't new. But the article didn't claim it was and even explicitly named the Fat Duck as one of the inspirations for the work.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the fine article you did n't read : He hired 15 people , including 5 professional chefs , a photographer , an art director and writers and editors , to create it .
They included Christopher Young , a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London , one of the most innovative restaurants in the world.So yes , it is n't new .
But the article did n't claim it was and even explicitly named the Fat Duck as one of the inspirations for the work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the fine article you didn't read:He hired 15 people, including 5 professional chefs, a photographer, an art director and writers and editors, to create it.
They included Christopher Young, a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London, one of the most innovative restaurants in the world.So yes, it isn't new.
But the article didn't claim it was and even explicitly named the Fat Duck as one of the inspirations for the work.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141046</id>
	<title>Thanks....</title>
	<author>matty619</author>
	<datestamp>1257068040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For using your riches to advance society.  This is a remarkable use of resources....you're of course free to do as you wish with your money, but why must I read of it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For using your riches to advance society .
This is a remarkable use of resources....you 're of course free to do as you wish with your money , but why must I read of it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For using your riches to advance society.
This is a remarkable use of resources....you're of course free to do as you wish with your money, but why must I read of it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144894</id>
	<title>Head Chef Maxime Bilet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He's not highlighted in the article, but the crazy-haired guy in the little picture on the first page of the article is "Head Chef" there. He's the former executive chef at Jack's Luxury Oyster Bar in NYC and has worked/studied at crazy places like the Fat Duck. He's also my brother-in-law, so I'm kind of biased, but MAN can this guy cook! He started out as "self-tought" during college, after which he went to CIA (I think) - dinner at the in-laws' has gotten better and better as he's learned/developed new skills. Sadly for me, this book has taken longer than originally planned to put together as he's on the West coast instead of the East - I CAN'T WAIT for Thanksgiving and Christmas, though!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He 's not highlighted in the article , but the crazy-haired guy in the little picture on the first page of the article is " Head Chef " there .
He 's the former executive chef at Jack 's Luxury Oyster Bar in NYC and has worked/studied at crazy places like the Fat Duck .
He 's also my brother-in-law , so I 'm kind of biased , but MAN can this guy cook !
He started out as " self-tought " during college , after which he went to CIA ( I think ) - dinner at the in-laws ' has gotten better and better as he 's learned/developed new skills .
Sadly for me , this book has taken longer than originally planned to put together as he 's on the West coast instead of the East - I CA N'T WAIT for Thanksgiving and Christmas , though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He's not highlighted in the article, but the crazy-haired guy in the little picture on the first page of the article is "Head Chef" there.
He's the former executive chef at Jack's Luxury Oyster Bar in NYC and has worked/studied at crazy places like the Fat Duck.
He's also my brother-in-law, so I'm kind of biased, but MAN can this guy cook!
He started out as "self-tought" during college, after which he went to CIA (I think) - dinner at the in-laws' has gotten better and better as he's learned/developed new skills.
Sadly for me, this book has taken longer than originally planned to put together as he's on the West coast instead of the East - I CAN'T WAIT for Thanksgiving and Christmas, though!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145496</id>
	<title>Our local ethical farmer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is Ruth Kimber, as documented on Channel 4 with Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall. Ruth produces (among other things) beef, veal and milk. Her calves get an outdoor life (no crating). She argues, and I tend to support this, that in the wild most ruminants cannot grow to maturity (otherwise you get population surges and mass starvation.) By producing calves and only allowing a certain number to survive to be adults, we actually mimic the natural environment with us as the top level predator. <p>I personally do not have a problem with vegans. I understand (but don't totally agree with) you because I am a fan of biodiversity, and because I love our Somerset and Wiltshire (UK) landscape which has been formed by dairy and sheep farming. But I completely agree that anyone who calls themselves a vegetarian and drinks milk or eats cheese is either self-deluding or is turning a dietary preference into an ethic. (I am also very much against mass consumption of beef from intensive farms - we are careful to eat a "sustainable" level of meat from local sources, which is once every couple of weeks for beef/veal.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is Ruth Kimber , as documented on Channel 4 with Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall .
Ruth produces ( among other things ) beef , veal and milk .
Her calves get an outdoor life ( no crating ) .
She argues , and I tend to support this , that in the wild most ruminants can not grow to maturity ( otherwise you get population surges and mass starvation .
) By producing calves and only allowing a certain number to survive to be adults , we actually mimic the natural environment with us as the top level predator .
I personally do not have a problem with vegans .
I understand ( but do n't totally agree with ) you because I am a fan of biodiversity , and because I love our Somerset and Wiltshire ( UK ) landscape which has been formed by dairy and sheep farming .
But I completely agree that anyone who calls themselves a vegetarian and drinks milk or eats cheese is either self-deluding or is turning a dietary preference into an ethic .
( I am also very much against mass consumption of beef from intensive farms - we are careful to eat a " sustainable " level of meat from local sources , which is once every couple of weeks for beef/veal .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is Ruth Kimber, as documented on Channel 4 with Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall.
Ruth produces (among other things) beef, veal and milk.
Her calves get an outdoor life (no crating).
She argues, and I tend to support this, that in the wild most ruminants cannot grow to maturity (otherwise you get population surges and mass starvation.
) By producing calves and only allowing a certain number to survive to be adults, we actually mimic the natural environment with us as the top level predator.
I personally do not have a problem with vegans.
I understand (but don't totally agree with) you because I am a fan of biodiversity, and because I love our Somerset and Wiltshire (UK) landscape which has been formed by dairy and sheep farming.
But I completely agree that anyone who calls themselves a vegetarian and drinks milk or eats cheese is either self-deluding or is turning a dietary preference into an ethic.
(I am also very much against mass consumption of beef from intensive farms - we are careful to eat a "sustainable" level of meat from local sources, which is once every couple of weeks for beef/veal.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30149044</id>
	<title>Re:Been done before... and better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257071820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Typical anti-MS Nonsense from a Linux/FOSS fanboi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Typical anti-MS Nonsense from a Linux/FOSS fanboi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typical anti-MS Nonsense from a Linux/FOSS fanboi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158</id>
	<title>What the world needs...is vegan cheese.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257069600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Given that he's experimenting with beef jerky and cryoseared duck, I doubt he'd go in such a direction but what I'd like to see is a good vegan cheese.</p><p>Those of you you have never tried the existing vegan cheese products will no doubt be puzzled - but those of you who have will either see the need or are hard-core masochists (the ethical problem with cheese is that to keep the cows producing milk the cows have to keep having calves  and the calves get turned into veal which is quite unpleasant for the calves).</p><p>Anyway, it turns out that vegan cheese is a surprisingly difficult problem. Vegan milk isn't that hard (e.g. soy-milk) but vegan cheese is a tough problem. One school of thought is that milk is has evolved for young animals whose digestive systems are ultimately most suited to solid food but who lack the coordination to eat solid food without choking: milk forms a solid "clot" in the stomach in response to the acids and enzymes that exist in the stomach.</p><p>So, anyway, milk is capable of forming a complex gel/clot structure of protein and fat in response to cleavage by certain enzymes ("rennet") and acid. This gel has some fairly specific properties - such as melting at relatively low temperature (in general, protein precipitates don't melt) - that are very difficult to replicate with plant proteins.</p><p>The problem is probably solvable but finding the right combination of plant proteins to replicate the gelling properties of milk proteins will require a substantial amount of research into protein structure and bioinformatics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given that he 's experimenting with beef jerky and cryoseared duck , I doubt he 'd go in such a direction but what I 'd like to see is a good vegan cheese.Those of you you have never tried the existing vegan cheese products will no doubt be puzzled - but those of you who have will either see the need or are hard-core masochists ( the ethical problem with cheese is that to keep the cows producing milk the cows have to keep having calves and the calves get turned into veal which is quite unpleasant for the calves ) .Anyway , it turns out that vegan cheese is a surprisingly difficult problem .
Vegan milk is n't that hard ( e.g .
soy-milk ) but vegan cheese is a tough problem .
One school of thought is that milk is has evolved for young animals whose digestive systems are ultimately most suited to solid food but who lack the coordination to eat solid food without choking : milk forms a solid " clot " in the stomach in response to the acids and enzymes that exist in the stomach.So , anyway , milk is capable of forming a complex gel/clot structure of protein and fat in response to cleavage by certain enzymes ( " rennet " ) and acid .
This gel has some fairly specific properties - such as melting at relatively low temperature ( in general , protein precipitates do n't melt ) - that are very difficult to replicate with plant proteins.The problem is probably solvable but finding the right combination of plant proteins to replicate the gelling properties of milk proteins will require a substantial amount of research into protein structure and bioinformatics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given that he's experimenting with beef jerky and cryoseared duck, I doubt he'd go in such a direction but what I'd like to see is a good vegan cheese.Those of you you have never tried the existing vegan cheese products will no doubt be puzzled - but those of you who have will either see the need or are hard-core masochists (the ethical problem with cheese is that to keep the cows producing milk the cows have to keep having calves  and the calves get turned into veal which is quite unpleasant for the calves).Anyway, it turns out that vegan cheese is a surprisingly difficult problem.
Vegan milk isn't that hard (e.g.
soy-milk) but vegan cheese is a tough problem.
One school of thought is that milk is has evolved for young animals whose digestive systems are ultimately most suited to solid food but who lack the coordination to eat solid food without choking: milk forms a solid "clot" in the stomach in response to the acids and enzymes that exist in the stomach.So, anyway, milk is capable of forming a complex gel/clot structure of protein and fat in response to cleavage by certain enzymes ("rennet") and acid.
This gel has some fairly specific properties - such as melting at relatively low temperature (in general, protein precipitates don't melt) - that are very difficult to replicate with plant proteins.The problem is probably solvable but finding the right combination of plant proteins to replicate the gelling properties of milk proteins will require a substantial amount of research into protein structure and bioinformatics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141074</id>
	<title>Heston Blumenthal</title>
	<author>epo001</author>
	<datestamp>1257068340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has been doing this for years. I am unsurprised that the NYT doesn't even bother to acknowledge this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has been doing this for years .
I am unsurprised that the NYT does n't even bother to acknowledge this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has been doing this for years.
I am unsurprised that the NYT doesn't even bother to acknowledge this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141106</id>
	<title>Frankenstein</title>
	<author>valentyn</author>
	<datestamp>1257068820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... inventing a new battery, taming hurricanes, defeating disease... attracting lightning, tunneling it into the autoclave... Frankenstein! Just like he did when he managed the Windows codebase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... inventing a new battery , taming hurricanes , defeating disease... attracting lightning , tunneling it into the autoclave... Frankenstein ! Just like he did when he managed the Windows codebase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... inventing a new battery, taming hurricanes, defeating disease... attracting lightning, tunneling it into the autoclave... Frankenstein! Just like he did when he managed the Windows codebase.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141096</id>
	<title>DLev</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257068700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dr. Myhrvold gave a great talk about his book at the University of Washington<br>http://norfolk.cs.washington.edu/htbin-post/unrestricted/colloq/details.cgi?id=842</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Myhrvold gave a great talk about his book at the University of Washingtonhttp : //norfolk.cs.washington.edu/htbin-post/unrestricted/colloq/details.cgi ? id = 842</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Myhrvold gave a great talk about his book at the University of Washingtonhttp://norfolk.cs.washington.edu/htbin-post/unrestricted/colloq/details.cgi?id=842</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140882</id>
	<title>If it is as ...</title>
	<author>Unclenefeesa</author>
	<datestamp>1257109020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... slow as Vista, we will starve to death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... slow as Vista , we will starve to death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... slow as Vista, we will starve to death.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30148614</id>
	<title>Re:What the world needs...is vegan cheese.</title>
	<author>Ironica</author>
	<datestamp>1257069720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Daiya is fairly good, as is Follow Your Heart.  But it is very difficult to replicate the stretchiness that casein imparts to cheese with other proteins.</p><p>I don't even want a cheese that's vegan, necessarily... I have no ethical problems with animal products*.  I just want a cheese sub that doesn't contain any trace of dairy, soy, canola, eggs, or for that matter, gluten or corn.</p><p>* I have ethical problems with the way most food animals are raised, and do my best to choose meat that's been pastured and grass- (or otherwise naturally-) fed, because it's better for my family as well as more humane towards the animals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Daiya is fairly good , as is Follow Your Heart .
But it is very difficult to replicate the stretchiness that casein imparts to cheese with other proteins.I do n't even want a cheese that 's vegan , necessarily... I have no ethical problems with animal products * .
I just want a cheese sub that does n't contain any trace of dairy , soy , canola , eggs , or for that matter , gluten or corn .
* I have ethical problems with the way most food animals are raised , and do my best to choose meat that 's been pastured and grass- ( or otherwise naturally- ) fed , because it 's better for my family as well as more humane towards the animals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Daiya is fairly good, as is Follow Your Heart.
But it is very difficult to replicate the stretchiness that casein imparts to cheese with other proteins.I don't even want a cheese that's vegan, necessarily... I have no ethical problems with animal products*.
I just want a cheese sub that doesn't contain any trace of dairy, soy, canola, eggs, or for that matter, gluten or corn.
* I have ethical problems with the way most food animals are raised, and do my best to choose meat that's been pastured and grass- (or otherwise naturally-) fed, because it's better for my family as well as more humane towards the animals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30153728</id>
	<title>Re:MS food</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1258662240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The phrase 'core dump' springs to mind.</i></p><p>In my uni days we use to say "Excuse me, gotta dump core" when we wanted to go to the bathroom.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The phrase 'core dump ' springs to mind.In my uni days we use to say " Excuse me , got ta dump core " when we wanted to go to the bathroom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The phrase 'core dump' springs to mind.In my uni days we use to say "Excuse me, gotta dump core" when we wanted to go to the bathroom.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140972</id>
	<title>Microsoft!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasting giant gobs of money in useless and stupid ways!</p><p>It's not something you can teach.  You're just born to be that stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wasting giant gobs of money in useless and stupid ways ! It 's not something you can teach .
You 're just born to be that stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasting giant gobs of money in useless and stupid ways!It's not something you can teach.
You're just born to be that stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145564</id>
	<title>Read the article: he didn't</title>
	<author>Kupfernigk</author>
	<datestamp>1257098880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article is wrong. Mhyrvold just hired one of Blumenthal's staff, not the man himself. It doesn't properly credit Blumenthal or explain the extent to which Mhyrvold is just copying someone else's work, by, in effect, hiring one of his developers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article is wrong .
Mhyrvold just hired one of Blumenthal 's staff , not the man himself .
It does n't properly credit Blumenthal or explain the extent to which Mhyrvold is just copying someone else 's work , by , in effect , hiring one of his developers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article is wrong.
Mhyrvold just hired one of Blumenthal's staff, not the man himself.
It doesn't properly credit Blumenthal or explain the extent to which Mhyrvold is just copying someone else's work, by, in effect, hiring one of his developers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141186</id>
	<title>Chef Blows Off His Own Hands in Cooking Accident</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1257070140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Chef-In-Germany-Blows-Of-Hands-In-Liquid-Nitrogen-Explosion-In-Heston-Blumenthal-Style-Experiment/Article/200907215337490" title="sky.com">This</a> [sky.com] is why kitchen laboratories should not be taken so lightly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This [ sky.com ] is why kitchen laboratories should not be taken so lightly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This [sky.com] is why kitchen laboratories should not be taken so lightly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141264</id>
	<title>Re:Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>gbjbaanb</author>
	<datestamp>1257071400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutions</p></div><p>Perhaps you should ignore the media hype about the Fat duck and its so-called 'molecular cooking' (which is just a term used to describe thinking what happens when you cook - like protein chains tightening under heat, etc).</p><p>For real solutions, take a look at what he did with the restaurant chain Little Chef. This was an iconic British brand from years back that was in decline, so he came in to make menus for it that would fit its price range and quick cook requirements. He did very well at it too. There were <a href="http://www.channel4.com/food/on-tv/heston-blumenthal/big-chef-takes-on-little-chef/did-heston-change-little-chef\_p\_1.html" title="channel4.com">2 programmes on Channel 4</a> [channel4.com] about it, take a look.</p><p>The other programmes he did were to reinvent ancient recipes, and to show the 'ultimate' way of cooking favourite dishes. His steak one was impressive if impractical for your average home cook.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutionsPerhaps you should ignore the media hype about the Fat duck and its so-called 'molecular cooking ' ( which is just a term used to describe thinking what happens when you cook - like protein chains tightening under heat , etc ) .For real solutions , take a look at what he did with the restaurant chain Little Chef .
This was an iconic British brand from years back that was in decline , so he came in to make menus for it that would fit its price range and quick cook requirements .
He did very well at it too .
There were 2 programmes on Channel 4 [ channel4.com ] about it , take a look.The other programmes he did were to reinvent ancient recipes , and to show the 'ultimate ' way of cooking favourite dishes .
His steak one was impressive if impractical for your average home cook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wish these folks would just sit on the sidelines and let people come up with real solutionsPerhaps you should ignore the media hype about the Fat duck and its so-called 'molecular cooking' (which is just a term used to describe thinking what happens when you cook - like protein chains tightening under heat, etc).For real solutions, take a look at what he did with the restaurant chain Little Chef.
This was an iconic British brand from years back that was in decline, so he came in to make menus for it that would fit its price range and quick cook requirements.
He did very well at it too.
There were 2 programmes on Channel 4 [channel4.com] about it, take a look.The other programmes he did were to reinvent ancient recipes, and to show the 'ultimate' way of cooking favourite dishes.
His steak one was impressive if impractical for your average home cook.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143334</id>
	<title>publicity whoring as a hobby</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257090300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just waiting (actually not, I know how Myhrvold looks like) for the sex tape to hit Youtube.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just waiting ( actually not , I know how Myhrvold looks like ) for the sex tape to hit Youtube .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just waiting (actually not, I know how Myhrvold looks like) for the sex tape to hit Youtube.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143564</id>
	<title>Re:"Is it possible to BSoD food?"</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1257091140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the duck is blue,<br>
it's not for you.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the duck is blue , it 's not for you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the duck is blue,
it's not for you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145092</id>
	<title>Microsoft Cuisine !!!</title>
	<author>DrYak</author>
	<datestamp>1257096900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me this old joke parodying Microsoft business practice and FUD strategies :<br><a href="http://www.davar.net/HUMOR/STORIES/MS-CUISN.HTM" title="davar.net">Microsoft Cuisine</a> [davar.net].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me this old joke parodying Microsoft business practice and FUD strategies : Microsoft Cuisine [ davar.net ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me this old joke parodying Microsoft business practice and FUD strategies :Microsoft Cuisine [davar.net].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145288</id>
	<title>HCN will do it.</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1257097800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sprinkle a bit of a cyanide compound on it - and avoid acidic ingredients so it doesn't convert to Hydrogen Cyanide until it hits the stomach.</p><p>Death and turning a nice solid blue is two out of three.  I suppose you could use a "screen" (the draining and sprinkling tool) to evenly distribute the "seasoning" in powdered form.</p><p>Gives the dish a nice Almond smell.  It's tempting to use it on an almond pie for desert but that's not authentic:  It should be something that's eaten at some point mid-meal so the timing is unexpected.</p><p>Call it "almond blue surprise".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sprinkle a bit of a cyanide compound on it - and avoid acidic ingredients so it does n't convert to Hydrogen Cyanide until it hits the stomach.Death and turning a nice solid blue is two out of three .
I suppose you could use a " screen " ( the draining and sprinkling tool ) to evenly distribute the " seasoning " in powdered form.Gives the dish a nice Almond smell .
It 's tempting to use it on an almond pie for desert but that 's not authentic : It should be something that 's eaten at some point mid-meal so the timing is unexpected.Call it " almond blue surprise " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sprinkle a bit of a cyanide compound on it - and avoid acidic ingredients so it doesn't convert to Hydrogen Cyanide until it hits the stomach.Death and turning a nice solid blue is two out of three.
I suppose you could use a "screen" (the draining and sprinkling tool) to evenly distribute the "seasoning" in powdered form.Gives the dish a nice Almond smell.
It's tempting to use it on an almond pie for desert but that's not authentic:  It should be something that's eaten at some point mid-meal so the timing is unexpected.Call it "almond blue surprise".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30158648</id>
	<title>Re:What the world needs...is vegan cheese.</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1258653300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the ethical problem with cheese is that to keep the cows producing milk the cows have to keep having calves and the calves get turned into veal which is quite unpleasant for the calves</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Couldn't someone just start a farm where the calves weren't sold for veal and charge a premium price to vegans to cover the loss in earnings, or something?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the ethical problem with cheese is that to keep the cows producing milk the cows have to keep having calves and the calves get turned into veal which is quite unpleasant for the calves Could n't someone just start a farm where the calves were n't sold for veal and charge a premium price to vegans to cover the loss in earnings , or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the ethical problem with cheese is that to keep the cows producing milk the cows have to keep having calves and the calves get turned into veal which is quite unpleasant for the calves

Couldn't someone just start a farm where the calves weren't sold for veal and charge a premium price to vegans to cover the loss in earnings, or something?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30147068</id>
	<title>The upgrade cycle expands to cooking..</title>
	<author>spasm</author>
	<datestamp>1257105120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Typical microsoft approach.  Take an everyday activity (cooking, writing a letter) and add bells and whistles to the point where you need a serious hardware upgrade to even get started any more..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Typical microsoft approach .
Take an everyday activity ( cooking , writing a letter ) and add bells and whistles to the point where you need a serious hardware upgrade to even get started any more. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Typical microsoft approach.
Take an everyday activity (cooking, writing a letter) and add bells and whistles to the point where you need a serious hardware upgrade to even get started any more..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141152</id>
	<title>I want a copy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257069540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I very much want a copy of that cook book!  Oh, and the kitchen to go with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I very much want a copy of that cook book !
Oh , and the kitchen to go with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I very much want a copy of that cook book!
Oh, and the kitchen to go with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141842</id>
	<title>More like Toad</title>
	<author>NoYob</author>
	<datestamp>1257078960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Dr. Myhrvold has long pursued a Renaissance man portfolio of interests.</p> </div><p>Renaissance man? More like Toad from the "Wind and the Willows".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr. Myhrvold has long pursued a Renaissance man portfolio of interests .
Renaissance man ?
More like Toad from the " Wind and the Willows " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr. Myhrvold has long pursued a Renaissance man portfolio of interests.
Renaissance man?
More like Toad from the "Wind and the Willows".
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145054</id>
	<title>Autoclaving food = Steril food?</title>
	<author>Schickeneder</author>
	<datestamp>1257096780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So if you cooked food in the autoclave you'd never really have to worry about it going bad. You'd be eating sterile food! Although if food already went bad before, would toxins still be present? I think I remember reading something about E. Coli and similar bacterias getting people sick because of the immune response to LPS--a component of their cell walls. Maybe some of the biologists in the room can correct me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So if you cooked food in the autoclave you 'd never really have to worry about it going bad .
You 'd be eating sterile food !
Although if food already went bad before , would toxins still be present ?
I think I remember reading something about E. Coli and similar bacterias getting people sick because of the immune response to LPS--a component of their cell walls .
Maybe some of the biologists in the room can correct me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So if you cooked food in the autoclave you'd never really have to worry about it going bad.
You'd be eating sterile food!
Although if food already went bad before, would toxins still be present?
I think I remember reading something about E. Coli and similar bacterias getting people sick because of the immune response to LPS--a component of their cell walls.
Maybe some of the biologists in the room can correct me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145616</id>
	<title>DEA will be raiding "kitchen laboratories" soon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because they might have equipment which could possibly be used to make drugs. Whether or not the equipment would actually be used for that purpose is irrelevant, only that there exists a remote possible ability for such equipment to be used that way.  Even better when a rich person owns the home &amp; kitchen lab since there's more money and property that can be seized for "civil forfeiture".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because they might have equipment which could possibly be used to make drugs .
Whether or not the equipment would actually be used for that purpose is irrelevant , only that there exists a remote possible ability for such equipment to be used that way .
Even better when a rich person owns the home &amp; kitchen lab since there 's more money and property that can be seized for " civil forfeiture " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because they might have equipment which could possibly be used to make drugs.
Whether or not the equipment would actually be used for that purpose is irrelevant, only that there exists a remote possible ability for such equipment to be used that way.
Even better when a rich person owns the home &amp; kitchen lab since there's more money and property that can be seized for "civil forfeiture".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142140</id>
	<title>Nathan on 'free' software</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257082680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"<i>If nobody can beat <a href="http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/6000/PX06394.pdf" title="slated.org" rel="nofollow">Linux and Apache</a> [slated.org] with commercial products, then shame on all of us in the industry!</i> <br> <br>

"<i>Even if Linux is on a path that ultimately bumps against economic realities, it might take years, or even a decade for that to occur. In the meantime it could be an important competitor, wreaking havoc with established OS providers. There are several ways to look at Linux as a competitor</i>"<br> <br>

"<i>As a desktop phenomenon, I don't think that Linux is very important. The application set is too limited, and they are too far behind. The place where <strong>Unix is very important</strong> (<a href="http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/6000/PX06482.pdf" title="slated.org" rel="nofollow">i.e. dangerous</a> [slated.org]) is <strong>on the server</strong> </i>"<br> <br>

"<i>This happens at an interesting time, because server based computing is exploding. The Internet creates a vast need for new servers at every level</i>"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" If nobody can beat Linux and Apache [ slated.org ] with commercial products , then shame on all of us in the industry !
" Even if Linux is on a path that ultimately bumps against economic realities , it might take years , or even a decade for that to occur .
In the meantime it could be an important competitor , wreaking havoc with established OS providers .
There are several ways to look at Linux as a competitor " " As a desktop phenomenon , I do n't think that Linux is very important .
The application set is too limited , and they are too far behind .
The place where Unix is very important ( i.e .
dangerous [ slated.org ] ) is on the server " " This happens at an interesting time , because server based computing is exploding .
The Internet creates a vast need for new servers at every level "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If nobody can beat Linux and Apache [slated.org] with commercial products, then shame on all of us in the industry!
"Even if Linux is on a path that ultimately bumps against economic realities, it might take years, or even a decade for that to occur.
In the meantime it could be an important competitor, wreaking havoc with established OS providers.
There are several ways to look at Linux as a competitor" 

"As a desktop phenomenon, I don't think that Linux is very important.
The application set is too limited, and they are too far behind.
The place where Unix is very important (i.e.
dangerous [slated.org]) is on the server " 

"This happens at an interesting time, because server based computing is exploding.
The Internet creates a vast need for new servers at every level"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142096</id>
	<title>Alton Brown... look out for charlatans bearing $$$</title>
	<author>gavron</author>
	<datestamp>1257082080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Food Science should be left to food scientists.
<p>
"Having money should never be confused for a license to be a fuckwit." - eg
</p><p>
Nathan Myhrvold should stick to what he does best.<br>
Retirement.
</p><p>
Ehud</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Food Science should be left to food scientists .
" Having money should never be confused for a license to be a fuckwit .
" - eg Nathan Myhrvold should stick to what he does best .
Retirement . Ehud</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Food Science should be left to food scientists.
"Having money should never be confused for a license to be a fuckwit.
" - eg

Nathan Myhrvold should stick to what he does best.
Retirement.

Ehud</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141104</id>
	<title>FUD &mdash; Fucking Unusable Diet ...</title>
	<author>foobsr</author>
	<datestamp>1257068820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... is to be the outcome.
<br> <br>
Shades a new light on the idiom mischief is brewing.
<br> <br>
CC.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... is to be the outcome .
Shades a new light on the idiom mischief is brewing .
CC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is to be the outcome.
Shades a new light on the idiom mischief is brewing.
CC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143198</id>
	<title>100 ton press</title>
	<author>MonsterTrimble</author>
	<datestamp>1257089880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's it? At my previous job those were the SMALL ones. If you <b>really</b> wanted to have fun the 500 Ton was sitting around idle a lot. Not sure how well it would make beef jerky though - kinda oily &amp; not a lot of heat. <br>
<br>
Of course, I'm a mechanical engineer - what do I know?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's it ?
At my previous job those were the SMALL ones .
If you really wanted to have fun the 500 Ton was sitting around idle a lot .
Not sure how well it would make beef jerky though - kinda oily &amp; not a lot of heat .
Of course , I 'm a mechanical engineer - what do I know ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's it?
At my previous job those were the SMALL ones.
If you really wanted to have fun the 500 Ton was sitting around idle a lot.
Not sure how well it would make beef jerky though - kinda oily &amp; not a lot of heat.
Of course, I'm a mechanical engineer - what do I know?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143042</id>
	<title>Very relieved!</title>
	<author>mattr</author>
	<datestamp>1257089160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about you, but I feel WAY SAFER now that Nathan Myhrvold is staying away from Microsoft and spending his time having fun with his molecular gastronomy investigation venture. I mean, this is the guy who was going to take over the world with a micropayments scheme. He could mess up your world if he really was a black hat. But if you want to you just don't have to eat his cooking... well unless it's THAT good.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>Of course, if you consider how much El Bulli's cookbook cost, if he could release it on the net for free he would really make friends.</p><p>I'd also like to know how he is organizing the whole project. What software does he use to handle the data? Don't tell me it's SourceSafe!</p><p>It sounds like he's having fun and if he discovers new things that's great. In case people don't know it, real chefs do know a bit of molecular gastronomy though not as equations maybe. Probably most chefs don't think of the intentional molecular gastronomists as so relevant to everyday customers but I'd like to try it some time. Of course the cheapest result of this field I expect could be found at McDonalds. He sounds like he is having fun but a dedicated chef goes about fun by working in the kitchen, a billionaire chef creates a whole documentary with cooking staff he supervises, I guess! I'd like to see one of his recipes without the gastronomy. Slow food style. Maybe Nathan's next project?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about you , but I feel WAY SAFER now that Nathan Myhrvold is staying away from Microsoft and spending his time having fun with his molecular gastronomy investigation venture .
I mean , this is the guy who was going to take over the world with a micropayments scheme .
He could mess up your world if he really was a black hat .
But if you want to you just do n't have to eat his cooking... well unless it 's THAT good .
; ) Of course , if you consider how much El Bulli 's cookbook cost , if he could release it on the net for free he would really make friends.I 'd also like to know how he is organizing the whole project .
What software does he use to handle the data ?
Do n't tell me it 's SourceSafe ! It sounds like he 's having fun and if he discovers new things that 's great .
In case people do n't know it , real chefs do know a bit of molecular gastronomy though not as equations maybe .
Probably most chefs do n't think of the intentional molecular gastronomists as so relevant to everyday customers but I 'd like to try it some time .
Of course the cheapest result of this field I expect could be found at McDonalds .
He sounds like he is having fun but a dedicated chef goes about fun by working in the kitchen , a billionaire chef creates a whole documentary with cooking staff he supervises , I guess !
I 'd like to see one of his recipes without the gastronomy .
Slow food style .
Maybe Nathan 's next project ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about you, but I feel WAY SAFER now that Nathan Myhrvold is staying away from Microsoft and spending his time having fun with his molecular gastronomy investigation venture.
I mean, this is the guy who was going to take over the world with a micropayments scheme.
He could mess up your world if he really was a black hat.
But if you want to you just don't have to eat his cooking... well unless it's THAT good.
;)Of course, if you consider how much El Bulli's cookbook cost, if he could release it on the net for free he would really make friends.I'd also like to know how he is organizing the whole project.
What software does he use to handle the data?
Don't tell me it's SourceSafe!It sounds like he's having fun and if he discovers new things that's great.
In case people don't know it, real chefs do know a bit of molecular gastronomy though not as equations maybe.
Probably most chefs don't think of the intentional molecular gastronomists as so relevant to everyday customers but I'd like to try it some time.
Of course the cheapest result of this field I expect could be found at McDonalds.
He sounds like he is having fun but a dedicated chef goes about fun by working in the kitchen, a billionaire chef creates a whole documentary with cooking staff he supervises, I guess!
I'd like to see one of his recipes without the gastronomy.
Slow food style.
Maybe Nathan's next project?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141198</id>
	<title>Re:Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>kjart</author>
	<datestamp>1257070320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTA:

</p><blockquote><div><p>He hired 15 people, including 5 professional chefs, a photographer, an art director and writers and editors, to create it. They included Christopher Young, a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near London</p></div></blockquote><p>So, he's hired the guy that probably actually came up with that idea and is also apparently a 'master french chef' himself (according to Wikipedia at least). They also have a quote from Wylie Dufresne who sounded somewhat impressed, so I tend to think these guys are legit - definitely keeping an eye out for this book.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : He hired 15 people , including 5 professional chefs , a photographer , an art director and writers and editors , to create it .
They included Christopher Young , a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near LondonSo , he 's hired the guy that probably actually came up with that idea and is also apparently a 'master french chef ' himself ( according to Wikipedia at least ) .
They also have a quote from Wylie Dufresne who sounded somewhat impressed , so I tend to think these guys are legit - definitely keeping an eye out for this book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:

He hired 15 people, including 5 professional chefs, a photographer, an art director and writers and editors, to create it.
They included Christopher Young, a biochemistry-graduate-student-turned-chef who headed the research kitchen at the Fat Duck near LondonSo, he's hired the guy that probably actually came up with that idea and is also apparently a 'master french chef' himself (according to Wikipedia at least).
They also have a quote from Wylie Dufresne who sounded somewhat impressed, so I tend to think these guys are legit - definitely keeping an eye out for this book.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143990</id>
	<title>A Kitchen huh?</title>
	<author>dontPanik</author>
	<datestamp>1257092760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we have a Windows 7 release party in his kitchen?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we have a Windows 7 release party in his kitchen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we have a Windows 7 release party in his kitchen?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141864</id>
	<title>No wonder</title>
	<author>pizza\_milkshake</author>
	<datestamp>1257079200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft : overkill.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft : overkill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft : overkill.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30153418</id>
	<title>sink</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257102120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have they finally included a kitchen sink to windows?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have they finally included a kitchen sink to windows ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have they finally included a kitchen sink to windows?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818</id>
	<title>"Is it possible to BSoD food?"</title>
	<author>yttrstein</author>
	<datestamp>1257108180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142648</id>
	<title>Re:Heston Blumenthal got there first</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1257087060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cooking is applied chemistry. Ergo, understanding the chemistry of food can be useful for a chef, especially an experimental one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cooking is applied chemistry .
Ergo , understanding the chemistry of food can be useful for a chef , especially an experimental one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cooking is applied chemistry.
Ergo, understanding the chemistry of food can be useful for a chef, especially an experimental one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141532</id>
	<title>Been done before... and better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257075240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This has already been done before, and been done much better.  This guy is just throwing random shit into random industrial equipment.  Yeah, i guess it is a lot like MS code.  Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it will stick.  This isn't cooking, this is brute force mutilation of food.<br><br>You don't just take a random piece of equipment and say "hey, let's throw all sorts of food into this and see if it makes it taste good".  You think about what you can use the equipment for, then what you need done to food.  You look for how these two things coincide.  Yeah, there's a bit of experimentation involved, but it's not random shit.  You don't take a damn ultrasonic welder and say "LOLOL LET'S USE THIS ON FOODSTUFFS AND CALL IT COOKING!!!"<br><br>Typical MS nonsense.<br><br>REAL chefs use rotovaps for distilling marinades and such.  Things that the equiptment is good for.  They use temperature controlled baths to control the temperature of things that need to be temperature controlled.  They don't use 10 ton presses at all.  Ten tons is good for just about nothing except obliterating your food.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This has already been done before , and been done much better .
This guy is just throwing random shit into random industrial equipment .
Yeah , i guess it is a lot like MS code .
Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it will stick .
This is n't cooking , this is brute force mutilation of food.You do n't just take a random piece of equipment and say " hey , let 's throw all sorts of food into this and see if it makes it taste good " .
You think about what you can use the equipment for , then what you need done to food .
You look for how these two things coincide .
Yeah , there 's a bit of experimentation involved , but it 's not random shit .
You do n't take a damn ultrasonic welder and say " LOLOL LET 'S USE THIS ON FOODSTUFFS AND CALL IT COOKING ! ! !
" Typical MS nonsense.REAL chefs use rotovaps for distilling marinades and such .
Things that the equiptment is good for .
They use temperature controlled baths to control the temperature of things that need to be temperature controlled .
They do n't use 10 ton presses at all .
Ten tons is good for just about nothing except obliterating your food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has already been done before, and been done much better.
This guy is just throwing random shit into random industrial equipment.
Yeah, i guess it is a lot like MS code.
Throw enough shit at the wall and some of it will stick.
This isn't cooking, this is brute force mutilation of food.You don't just take a random piece of equipment and say "hey, let's throw all sorts of food into this and see if it makes it taste good".
You think about what you can use the equipment for, then what you need done to food.
You look for how these two things coincide.
Yeah, there's a bit of experimentation involved, but it's not random shit.
You don't take a damn ultrasonic welder and say "LOLOL LET'S USE THIS ON FOODSTUFFS AND CALL IT COOKING!!!
"Typical MS nonsense.REAL chefs use rotovaps for distilling marinades and such.
Things that the equiptment is good for.
They use temperature controlled baths to control the temperature of things that need to be temperature controlled.
They don't use 10 ton presses at all.
Ten tons is good for just about nothing except obliterating your food.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30158648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30153728
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30149044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141532
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30148614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141606
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141124
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_17_1538245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142512
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141382
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142576
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30143564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140892
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30144752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30153728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141606
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145616
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30140972
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30148614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30145496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30158648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_17_1538245.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30141532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30142948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_17_1538245.30149044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
