<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_14_209253</id>
	<title>Alternate Star Trek TOS Pilot Found</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1258193040000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Raver32 sends news that the <a href="http://www.thrfeed.com/neverbeforeseen-star-trek-pilot-found.html">lost second pilot for Star Trek has been found</a>, and will be released next month on Blu-ray. <i>"Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series. The first, 'The Cage,' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' (ah, some things never change). The second, 'Where No Man Has Gone Before,' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven. That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired. Apparently, a film collector in Germany acquired the print and 'recently brought it to the attention' of CBS/Paramount. CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec. 15."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Raver32 sends news that the lost second pilot for Star Trek has been found , and will be released next month on Blu-ray .
" Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series .
The first , 'The Cage, ' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral ' ( ah , some things never change ) .
The second , 'Where No Man Has Gone Before, ' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven .
That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired .
Apparently , a film collector in Germany acquired the print and 'recently brought it to the attention ' of CBS/Paramount .
CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec .
15. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raver32 sends news that the lost second pilot for Star Trek has been found, and will be released next month on Blu-ray.
"Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series.
The first, 'The Cage,' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' (ah, some things never change).
The second, 'Where No Man Has Gone Before,' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven.
That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired.
Apparently, a film collector in Germany acquired the print and 'recently brought it to the attention' of CBS/Paramount.
CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec.
15."</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107204</id>
	<title>Re:alternate universe</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258313340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No. But goatses!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
But goatses !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
But goatses!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105138</id>
	<title>Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatner??</title>
	<author>Provocateur</author>
	<datestamp>1258294440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are you going to do? Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him? I got news for you<br>pal, baldness will be cured in the 23rd century!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you going to do ?
Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him ?
I got news for youpal , baldness will be cured in the 23rd century !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you going to do?
Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him?
I got news for youpal, baldness will be cured in the 23rd century!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105014</id>
	<title>Mad rush on Blu-ray predicted</title>
	<author>ThreeGigs</author>
	<datestamp>1258292820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From TFA: "CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec. 15"</p><p>Only Blu-ray? I predict a spike in Blu-ray sales that's higher than expected for Christmas.</p><p>Either that or new records will be set for the most downloaded pirated TV show.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : " CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec. 15 " Only Blu-ray ?
I predict a spike in Blu-ray sales that 's higher than expected for Christmas.Either that or new records will be set for the most downloaded pirated TV show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: "CBS is now releasing this version on Blu-ray Dec. 15"Only Blu-ray?
I predict a spike in Blu-ray sales that's higher than expected for Christmas.Either that or new records will be set for the most downloaded pirated TV show.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106458</id>
	<title>Re:They leave the galaxy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258307820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only they did leave the "galazy" in that episode where the Enterprise is hijacked.  Despite that you get mooded Informative?  God I love this place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only they did leave the " galazy " in that episode where the Enterprise is hijacked .
Despite that you get mooded Informative ?
God I love this place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only they did leave the "galazy" in that episode where the Enterprise is hijacked.
Despite that you get mooded Informative?
God I love this place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105168</id>
	<title>Re:Nice marketing</title>
	<author>Eravnrekaree</author>
	<datestamp>1258294740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cage has been out for many years now. Is this the cage or is it something completely different. or a different cut of the cage?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cage has been out for many years now .
Is this the cage or is it something completely different .
or a different cut of the cage ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cage has been out for many years now.
Is this the cage or is it something completely different.
or a different cut of the cage?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106748</id>
	<title>Blu-Ray you say?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258310100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about DVD? Oh those of us who don't own or wanna waste money on the next "best" in spinning disk technology gonna have to wait? I guess I'll just have to download it the day it comes out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about DVD ?
Oh those of us who do n't own or wan na waste money on the next " best " in spinning disk technology gon na have to wait ?
I guess I 'll just have to download it the day it comes out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about DVD?
Oh those of us who don't own or wanna waste money on the next "best" in spinning disk technology gonna have to wait?
I guess I'll just have to download it the day it comes out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106560</id>
	<title>Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1258308600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the spend the extra bits on reducing fringing and/or increased color depth?  BluRay is still a little weak in those areas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the spend the extra bits on reducing fringing and/or increased color depth ?
BluRay is still a little weak in those areas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the spend the extra bits on reducing fringing and/or increased color depth?
BluRay is still a little weak in those areas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105334</id>
	<title>Re:alternate universe</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1258296360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>do they have goatees?</p></div></blockquote><p>See, now <i>that's</i> funny.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>do they have goatees ? See , now that 's funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do they have goatees?See, now that's funny.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105628</id>
	<title>In an alternative time line</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1258298880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was the one aired..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was the one aired. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was the one aired..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108948</id>
	<title>The 3rd pilot</title>
	<author>Antiocheian</author>
	<datestamp>1258280040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is an excerpt from the discussion on the article:</p><p>"Mind you there are differences such as Spock is not the 1st officer he's the second officer while Majel Barret played the 1st officer. In the remake of this 2nd pilot she was moved to the position of nurse Chapel. As other have said the music is different and the show is separated into sections land labelled as acts."</p><p>Capiche?</p><p>But there is in fact a 3rd pilot. Here it is: <a href="http://www.shatnerology.com/video.html" title="shatnerology.com">http://www.shatnerology.com/video.html</a> [shatnerology.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is an excerpt from the discussion on the article : " Mind you there are differences such as Spock is not the 1st officer he 's the second officer while Majel Barret played the 1st officer .
In the remake of this 2nd pilot she was moved to the position of nurse Chapel .
As other have said the music is different and the show is separated into sections land labelled as acts .
" Capiche ? But there is in fact a 3rd pilot .
Here it is : http : //www.shatnerology.com/video.html [ shatnerology.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is an excerpt from the discussion on the article:"Mind you there are differences such as Spock is not the 1st officer he's the second officer while Majel Barret played the 1st officer.
In the remake of this 2nd pilot she was moved to the position of nurse Chapel.
As other have said the music is different and the show is separated into sections land labelled as acts.
"Capiche?But there is in fact a 3rd pilot.
Here it is: http://www.shatnerology.com/video.html [shatnerology.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104990</id>
	<title>Typical..</title>
	<author>Bentov</author>
	<datestamp>1258292580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>'too cerebral' the phrase of death for way too many shows....Come on now, we can't let the sheeple start thinking about more than sports, reality tv and porn...ok, the porn is ok, but please more than sport and reality tv.</htmltext>
<tokenext>'too cerebral ' the phrase of death for way too many shows....Come on now , we ca n't let the sheeple start thinking about more than sports , reality tv and porn...ok , the porn is ok , but please more than sport and reality tv .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'too cerebral' the phrase of death for way too many shows....Come on now, we can't let the sheeple start thinking about more than sports, reality tv and porn...ok, the porn is ok, but please more than sport and reality tv.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106270</id>
	<title>Re:Typical..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258306560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I am surprised that "Bones", the television series not the doctor on the original Star Trek, made it to air. The show has a lot of scientifically valid material. Come to think of it so did "Numb3rs" until near the end of the series.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I am surprised that " Bones " , the television series not the doctor on the original Star Trek , made it to air .
The show has a lot of scientifically valid material .
Come to think of it so did " Numb3rs " until near the end of the series .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I am surprised that "Bones", the television series not the doctor on the original Star Trek, made it to air.
The show has a lot of scientifically valid material.
Come to think of it so did "Numb3rs" until near the end of the series.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110818</id>
	<title>Re:zomg it's trek</title>
	<author>youngone</author>
	<datestamp>1258294560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, and here are a few of them:

Thou shalt not brandish an Uzi while driving behind an old person.

Thou shalt not compose limericks at a funeral.

Thou shalt not teleport within sight of technologically-inferior species.

Thou shalt not use the "X word."

Thou shalt not say "groady".

Thou shalt not fast-forward through the commercials.

It's not a great idea to teach 'em to bark, either...

Thou shalt not teach a ferret to yodel.

Thou shalt not have misplaced priorities.

Thou shalt not align yourself with the dark side of the force.

Thou shalt not freeze-frame to look up Jessica Rabbitt's dress.

Thou shalt not buy stuff made in sweat shops unless it's really trendy and just to die for.

I can't claim them, they're from here: <a href="http://www.mindworkshop.com/alchemy/command.html" title="mindworkshop.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindworkshop.com/alchemy/command.html</a> [mindworkshop.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , and here are a few of them : Thou shalt not brandish an Uzi while driving behind an old person .
Thou shalt not compose limericks at a funeral .
Thou shalt not teleport within sight of technologically-inferior species .
Thou shalt not use the " X word .
" Thou shalt not say " groady " .
Thou shalt not fast-forward through the commercials .
It 's not a great idea to teach 'em to bark , either.. . Thou shalt not teach a ferret to yodel .
Thou shalt not have misplaced priorities .
Thou shalt not align yourself with the dark side of the force .
Thou shalt not freeze-frame to look up Jessica Rabbitt 's dress .
Thou shalt not buy stuff made in sweat shops unless it 's really trendy and just to die for .
I ca n't claim them , they 're from here : http : //www.mindworkshop.com/alchemy/command.html [ mindworkshop.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, and here are a few of them:

Thou shalt not brandish an Uzi while driving behind an old person.
Thou shalt not compose limericks at a funeral.
Thou shalt not teleport within sight of technologically-inferior species.
Thou shalt not use the "X word.
"

Thou shalt not say "groady".
Thou shalt not fast-forward through the commercials.
It's not a great idea to teach 'em to bark, either...

Thou shalt not teach a ferret to yodel.
Thou shalt not have misplaced priorities.
Thou shalt not align yourself with the dark side of the force.
Thou shalt not freeze-frame to look up Jessica Rabbitt's dress.
Thou shalt not buy stuff made in sweat shops unless it's really trendy and just to die for.
I can't claim them, they're from here: http://www.mindworkshop.com/alchemy/command.html [mindworkshop.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107292</id>
	<title>Re:They leave the galaxy?</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1258313820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, at least Kirk doesn't get magical powers and befriends Lucifer like in TAS.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , at least Kirk does n't get magical powers and befriends Lucifer like in TAS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, at least Kirk doesn't get magical powers and befriends Lucifer like in TAS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106356</id>
	<title>Sounds like true Star Trek alright</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258307100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The USS Enterprise, under the command of Captain Christopher Pike, receives a radio distress call from the fourth planet in the Talos star group. A landing party is assembled and beamed down to investigate. Tracking the distress signal to its source, the landing party discovers a camp of survivors from a scientific expedition that has been missing for 18 years. Among the survivors is a beautiful young woman named Vina.</p><p>Captivated by her beauty, Pike is caught off guard and is captured by the Talosians, a race of humanoids with bulbous heads who live beneath the planet's surface. It is revealed that the distress call, and the crash survivors, except for Vina, are just illusions created by the Talosians to lure the Enterprise to the planet. While imprisoned, Pike uncovers the Talosian's plans to repopulate their ravaged planet using himself and Vina as breeding stock for a race of slaves."</p><p>Yep, quality TOS here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The USS Enterprise , under the command of Captain Christopher Pike , receives a radio distress call from the fourth planet in the Talos star group .
A landing party is assembled and beamed down to investigate .
Tracking the distress signal to its source , the landing party discovers a camp of survivors from a scientific expedition that has been missing for 18 years .
Among the survivors is a beautiful young woman named Vina.Captivated by her beauty , Pike is caught off guard and is captured by the Talosians , a race of humanoids with bulbous heads who live beneath the planet 's surface .
It is revealed that the distress call , and the crash survivors , except for Vina , are just illusions created by the Talosians to lure the Enterprise to the planet .
While imprisoned , Pike uncovers the Talosian 's plans to repopulate their ravaged planet using himself and Vina as breeding stock for a race of slaves .
" Yep , quality TOS here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The USS Enterprise, under the command of Captain Christopher Pike, receives a radio distress call from the fourth planet in the Talos star group.
A landing party is assembled and beamed down to investigate.
Tracking the distress signal to its source, the landing party discovers a camp of survivors from a scientific expedition that has been missing for 18 years.
Among the survivors is a beautiful young woman named Vina.Captivated by her beauty, Pike is caught off guard and is captured by the Talosians, a race of humanoids with bulbous heads who live beneath the planet's surface.
It is revealed that the distress call, and the crash survivors, except for Vina, are just illusions created by the Talosians to lure the Enterprise to the planet.
While imprisoned, Pike uncovers the Talosian's plans to repopulate their ravaged planet using himself and Vina as breeding stock for a race of slaves.
"Yep, quality TOS here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105012</id>
	<title>Another alternate universe?</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1258292820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All this messing with the time lines gives me a headache.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All this messing with the time lines gives me a headache .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All this messing with the time lines gives me a headache.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30116524</id>
	<title>Blu-ray is the next CD format</title>
	<author>electrosoccertux</author>
	<datestamp>1258392480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By this I do not mean you need a rewinder with DVDs, I mean that there will be no reason to move to another format for movies-- because BluRay has as good as quality as anybody needs. Yes it's had a rough start and there are some issues, but I can positively say there is no reason we'd ever need to go on from BluRay-- 1080P, as many audio channels at lossless quality as you want, etc. The studios won't risk it, just like they won't risk supplanting the CD-audio format now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By this I do not mean you need a rewinder with DVDs , I mean that there will be no reason to move to another format for movies-- because BluRay has as good as quality as anybody needs .
Yes it 's had a rough start and there are some issues , but I can positively say there is no reason we 'd ever need to go on from BluRay-- 1080P , as many audio channels at lossless quality as you want , etc .
The studios wo n't risk it , just like they wo n't risk supplanting the CD-audio format now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By this I do not mean you need a rewinder with DVDs, I mean that there will be no reason to move to another format for movies-- because BluRay has as good as quality as anybody needs.
Yes it's had a rough start and there are some issues, but I can positively say there is no reason we'd ever need to go on from BluRay-- 1080P, as many audio channels at lossless quality as you want, etc.
The studios won't risk it, just like they won't risk supplanting the CD-audio format now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105356</id>
	<title>Far from new or unseen</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1258296600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're a fan of the ST TOS, go look at the embedded clip in the TFA - you've seen this episode.</p><p>As one commenter at the TFA stated: "Different music, graphics, some additional dialogue."</p><p>It was a great episode - Sally Kellerman (babe alert) and Gary Lockwood - where the eyes turn silver and mental powers abound.</p><p><a href="http://www.slashcontrol.com/free-tv-shows/star-trek-the-original-series/3461344488-star-trek-where-no-man-has-gone-before" title="slashcontrol.com">http://www.slashcontrol.com/free-tv-shows/star-trek-the-original-series/3461344488-star-trek-where-no-man-has-gone-before</a> [slashcontrol.com]</p><p>Season 1, episode 3.</p><p>See also - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where\_No\_Man\_Has\_Gone\_Before" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where\_No\_Man\_Has\_Gone\_Before</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>So - that was the alternate pilot.  I did not know that.  Very cool.</p><p>I mention all this for those us not on the Blu-ray bandwagon who will have to wait for this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're a fan of the ST TOS , go look at the embedded clip in the TFA - you 've seen this episode.As one commenter at the TFA stated : " Different music , graphics , some additional dialogue .
" It was a great episode - Sally Kellerman ( babe alert ) and Gary Lockwood - where the eyes turn silver and mental powers abound.http : //www.slashcontrol.com/free-tv-shows/star-trek-the-original-series/3461344488-star-trek-where-no-man-has-gone-before [ slashcontrol.com ] Season 1 , episode 3.See also - http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where \ _No \ _Man \ _Has \ _Gone \ _Before [ wikipedia.org ] So - that was the alternate pilot .
I did not know that .
Very cool.I mention all this for those us not on the Blu-ray bandwagon who will have to wait for this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're a fan of the ST TOS, go look at the embedded clip in the TFA - you've seen this episode.As one commenter at the TFA stated: "Different music, graphics, some additional dialogue.
"It was a great episode - Sally Kellerman (babe alert) and Gary Lockwood - where the eyes turn silver and mental powers abound.http://www.slashcontrol.com/free-tv-shows/star-trek-the-original-series/3461344488-star-trek-where-no-man-has-gone-before [slashcontrol.com]Season 1, episode 3.See also - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where\_No\_Man\_Has\_Gone\_Before [wikipedia.org]So - that was the alternate pilot.
I did not know that.
Very cool.I mention all this for those us not on the Blu-ray bandwagon who will have to wait for this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30111608</id>
	<title>Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray</title>
	<author>buckhead\_buddy</author>
	<datestamp>1258302000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scotty, what's going on with the viewscreen?</p><p>It's breaking up Cap'n.</p><p>Do what you can to hold it together, Mr. Scott!  Bones, give him a hand.</p><p>Damn it Jim, I'm a Doctor, not an avid media composer!</p><p>Spock, what can we do?</p><p>We can try routing transporters through the ship's phasers while accelerating to warp speed. Thereby causing a blue shift and broadcasting our image over the heads of our audience.</p><p>Can we skip the phasers and just use the transporter?</p><p>That wouldn't be logical Captain.</p><p>Scotty, I want every available man working on Spock's "blu ray" plan in time for release of the third season.</p><p>Aye Aye captain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scotty , what 's going on with the viewscreen ? It 's breaking up Cap'n.Do what you can to hold it together , Mr. Scott ! Bones , give him a hand.Damn it Jim , I 'm a Doctor , not an avid media composer ! Spock , what can we do ? We can try routing transporters through the ship 's phasers while accelerating to warp speed .
Thereby causing a blue shift and broadcasting our image over the heads of our audience.Can we skip the phasers and just use the transporter ? That would n't be logical Captain.Scotty , I want every available man working on Spock 's " blu ray " plan in time for release of the third season.Aye Aye captain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scotty, what's going on with the viewscreen?It's breaking up Cap'n.Do what you can to hold it together, Mr. Scott!  Bones, give him a hand.Damn it Jim, I'm a Doctor, not an avid media composer!Spock, what can we do?We can try routing transporters through the ship's phasers while accelerating to warp speed.
Thereby causing a blue shift and broadcasting our image over the heads of our audience.Can we skip the phasers and just use the transporter?That wouldn't be logical Captain.Scotty, I want every available man working on Spock's "blu ray" plan in time for release of the third season.Aye Aye captain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105058</id>
	<title>Re:Nice marketing</title>
	<author>vlad30</author>
	<datestamp>1258293360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was aired as episode 3<p>

<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061027/" title="imdb.com">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061027/</a> [imdb.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was aired as episode 3 http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0061027/ [ imdb.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was aired as episode 3

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0061027/ [imdb.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30109138</id>
	<title>Re:They leave the galaxy?</title>
	<author>EvanED</author>
	<datestamp>1258281540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In addition to what other people have said, it also happens in TNG's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where\_No\_One\_Has\_Gone\_Before" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">"Where No One Has Gone Before"</a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>(That being said, that was one of the worst episodes in a pretty terrible season (I say that as a big fan of TNG too), so forgetting it is entirely understandable.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In addition to what other people have said , it also happens in TNG 's " Where No One Has Gone Before " [ wikipedia.org ] .
( That being said , that was one of the worst episodes in a pretty terrible season ( I say that as a big fan of TNG too ) , so forgetting it is entirely understandable .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In addition to what other people have said, it also happens in TNG's "Where No One Has Gone Before" [wikipedia.org].
(That being said, that was one of the worst episodes in a pretty terrible season (I say that as a big fan of TNG too), so forgetting it is entirely understandable.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978</id>
	<title>zomg it's trek</title>
	<author>florin</author>
	<datestamp>1258292220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other less important news, a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments was excavated in the Iraqi desert today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other less important news , a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments was excavated in the Iraqi desert today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other less important news, a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments was excavated in the Iraqi desert today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105160</id>
	<title>It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1258294620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stardate 5191.5.</p><p>While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women, have come across a place called "the pirate bay". Apparently this is an exchange post for all kinds of illicit material, but based on an analysis of the comments, quite inexplicably, it is only frequented by pre-pubescent teenage boys and social misfits who lack a fundamental part of the anatomy: a sense of humour.</p><p>Recommend we study these life forms to learn what we can from them. They seem to have formed a lawless society loosely based on an earlier society that advocated rape and pilleage on the high seas . Furthermore they have technology that allows them to store an infinite number of files on a loose connection of inter-0networked machines, but strangely none of these files are complete, which often results in cursing and requests to perform a strange ritual invoked with the words "please seed".</p><p>To guard against their natural enemies -  a group who have become rich and successful by making entertainment audio and video recordings for a completely different group of pre-pubescent teenagers - they use a new kind of anti-mater which they call "peer guardian".</p><p>Mr Spock believes they are "fascinating" and I am hopeful we will soon encounter green alien dancing girls with 3 breasts. I have therefore committed all resources of the Enterprise to cataloging and studing this group.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stardate 5191.5.While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women , have come across a place called " the pirate bay " .
Apparently this is an exchange post for all kinds of illicit material , but based on an analysis of the comments , quite inexplicably , it is only frequented by pre-pubescent teenage boys and social misfits who lack a fundamental part of the anatomy : a sense of humour.Recommend we study these life forms to learn what we can from them .
They seem to have formed a lawless society loosely based on an earlier society that advocated rape and pilleage on the high seas .
Furthermore they have technology that allows them to store an infinite number of files on a loose connection of inter-0networked machines , but strangely none of these files are complete , which often results in cursing and requests to perform a strange ritual invoked with the words " please seed " .To guard against their natural enemies - a group who have become rich and successful by making entertainment audio and video recordings for a completely different group of pre-pubescent teenagers - they use a new kind of anti-mater which they call " peer guardian " .Mr Spock believes they are " fascinating " and I am hopeful we will soon encounter green alien dancing girls with 3 breasts .
I have therefore committed all resources of the Enterprise to cataloging and studing this group .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stardate 5191.5.While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women, have come across a place called "the pirate bay".
Apparently this is an exchange post for all kinds of illicit material, but based on an analysis of the comments, quite inexplicably, it is only frequented by pre-pubescent teenage boys and social misfits who lack a fundamental part of the anatomy: a sense of humour.Recommend we study these life forms to learn what we can from them.
They seem to have formed a lawless society loosely based on an earlier society that advocated rape and pilleage on the high seas .
Furthermore they have technology that allows them to store an infinite number of files on a loose connection of inter-0networked machines, but strangely none of these files are complete, which often results in cursing and requests to perform a strange ritual invoked with the words "please seed".To guard against their natural enemies -  a group who have become rich and successful by making entertainment audio and video recordings for a completely different group of pre-pubescent teenagers - they use a new kind of anti-mater which they call "peer guardian".Mr Spock believes they are "fascinating" and I am hopeful we will soon encounter green alien dancing girls with 3 breasts.
I have therefore committed all resources of the Enterprise to cataloging and studing this group.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108284</id>
	<title>Re:Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatne</title>
	<author>hodma727</author>
	<datestamp>1258275900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What are you going to do? Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him? I got news for you
pal, baldness will be cured in the 23rd century!</p></div><p>Cured? Sorry hairy one, but in the future your children (should you procreate through some devious means) will all be bald in order to ensure their massive genetically engineered brains can dissipate the extra heat. Politicians will still do so by keeping their mouths open - just like dogs.

Us "baldies" are just preparing in advance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are you going to do ?
Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him ?
I got news for you pal , baldness will be cured in the 23rd century ! Cured ?
Sorry hairy one , but in the future your children ( should you procreate through some devious means ) will all be bald in order to ensure their massive genetically engineered brains can dissipate the extra heat .
Politicians will still do so by keeping their mouths open - just like dogs .
Us " baldies " are just preparing in advance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are you going to do?
Get a bald headed guy with a British accent to play him?
I got news for you
pal, baldness will be cured in the 23rd century!Cured?
Sorry hairy one, but in the future your children (should you procreate through some devious means) will all be bald in order to ensure their massive genetically engineered brains can dissipate the extra heat.
Politicians will still do so by keeping their mouths open - just like dogs.
Us "baldies" are just preparing in advance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107998</id>
	<title>Re:zomg it's trek</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1258317660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thou shalt not examine this tablet too closely.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thou shalt not examine this tablet too closely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thou shalt not examine this tablet too closely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106824</id>
	<title>Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1258310640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Judge the <a href="http://www.highdefdiscnews.com/?p=26162" title="highdefdiscnews.com">1080p</a> [highdefdiscnews.com] screenshots for yourself.</p><p>Personally, I think bluray, as a technology, is a little hyperactive.</p><p>Here's a portion of bluray box copy for <i>No country for Old Men</i>.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...Featuring an acclaimed cast led by Tommy Lee Jones, this stunning game of cat and mouse is even grittier in flawless 1080p. Each heart stopping frame delivers maximum punch as 24 bit uncompressed audio and the unbridled strength of Blu ray High Definition take you to edge of your seat and beyond</p></div><p>Stunning? I wonder if that's a reference to Javier Bardem's weapon of choice.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Judge the 1080p [ highdefdiscnews.com ] screenshots for yourself.Personally , I think bluray , as a technology , is a little hyperactive.Here 's a portion of bluray box copy for No country for Old Men .
...Featuring an acclaimed cast led by Tommy Lee Jones , this stunning game of cat and mouse is even grittier in flawless 1080p .
Each heart stopping frame delivers maximum punch as 24 bit uncompressed audio and the unbridled strength of Blu ray High Definition take you to edge of your seat and beyondStunning ?
I wonder if that 's a reference to Javier Bardem 's weapon of choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Judge the 1080p [highdefdiscnews.com] screenshots for yourself.Personally, I think bluray, as a technology, is a little hyperactive.Here's a portion of bluray box copy for No country for Old Men.
...Featuring an acclaimed cast led by Tommy Lee Jones, this stunning game of cat and mouse is even grittier in flawless 1080p.
Each heart stopping frame delivers maximum punch as 24 bit uncompressed audio and the unbridled strength of Blu ray High Definition take you to edge of your seat and beyondStunning?
I wonder if that's a reference to Javier Bardem's weapon of choice.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106936</id>
	<title>Re:They leave the galaxy?</title>
	<author>caseih</author>
	<datestamp>1258311660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Umm, no.  In the original airing of this episode they did in fact leave the galaxy.  And that's not the only time either.  Also in "By any other Name" the Kelvins take the enterprise at "warp 11" through the barrier and into the void.</p><p>So yes, in the "canon" they have absolutely left the galaxy on two occasions.  What kind of trekkie are you!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Umm , no .
In the original airing of this episode they did in fact leave the galaxy .
And that 's not the only time either .
Also in " By any other Name " the Kelvins take the enterprise at " warp 11 " through the barrier and into the void.So yes , in the " canon " they have absolutely left the galaxy on two occasions .
What kind of trekkie are you !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Umm, no.
In the original airing of this episode they did in fact leave the galaxy.
And that's not the only time either.
Also in "By any other Name" the Kelvins take the enterprise at "warp 11" through the barrier and into the void.So yes, in the "canon" they have absolutely left the galaxy on two occasions.
What kind of trekkie are you!
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105008</id>
	<title>Its Life Jim</title>
	<author>ijakings</author>
	<datestamp>1258292820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its Life Jim, but not as you know it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its Life Jim , but not as you know it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its Life Jim, but not as you know it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105466</id>
	<title>Summary makes it seem like there is 3 pilots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258297560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nice, confusing summary.<br>
&nbsp; </p><blockquote><div><p>Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series. The first, 'The Cage,' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' (ah, some things never change). The second, 'Where No Man Has Gone Before,' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven. That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired.</p></div></blockquote><p>So is this the first, rejected pilot ("The Cage") or an alternate version of the second, accepted pilot?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nice , confusing summary .
  Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series .
The first , 'The Cage, ' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral ' ( ah , some things never change ) .
The second , 'Where No Man Has Gone Before, ' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven .
That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired.So is this the first , rejected pilot ( " The Cage " ) or an alternate version of the second , accepted pilot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nice, confusing summary.
  Star Trek fans know there were two pilots for the original series.
The first, 'The Cage,' was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' (ah, some things never change).
The second, 'Where No Man Has Gone Before,' replaced the actor who played the captain with William Shatner and was more action driven.
That pilot had an alternate version which was largely lost and has never aired.So is this the first, rejected pilot ("The Cage") or an alternate version of the second, accepted pilot?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104968</id>
	<title>WOW</title>
	<author>Higaran</author>
	<datestamp>1258292220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought I knew almost all of the major things about TOS, but I never heard about this.  It sounds interisting and I wonder what it looks like, will the update the graphics or leave it just like it was?  I can't wait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought I knew almost all of the major things about TOS , but I never heard about this .
It sounds interisting and I wonder what it looks like , will the update the graphics or leave it just like it was ?
I ca n't wait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought I knew almost all of the major things about TOS, but I never heard about this.
It sounds interisting and I wonder what it looks like, will the update the graphics or leave it just like it was?
I can't wait.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930</id>
	<title>Nice marketing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258291440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This episode has been available at conventions for years.  The only thing they "found" was access to the master copies, giving them better quality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This episode has been available at conventions for years .
The only thing they " found " was access to the master copies , giving them better quality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This episode has been available at conventions for years.
The only thing they "found" was access to the master copies, giving them better quality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104976</id>
	<title>Good God!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258292220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is the equivalent of ringing a bell at Pavlov's dogs!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the equivalent of ringing a bell at Pavlov 's dogs !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the equivalent of ringing a bell at Pavlov's dogs!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110566</id>
	<title>Re:It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it</title>
	<author>HBoar</author>
	<datestamp>1258291860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, must be pre TOS.  In TOS, you'd give the computer any vague, ambiguous vocal command, so long as it was preceded by "Computer:" and followed by "Compute".</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , must be pre TOS .
In TOS , you 'd give the computer any vague , ambiguous vocal command , so long as it was preceded by " Computer : " and followed by " Compute " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, must be pre TOS.
In TOS, you'd give the computer any vague, ambiguous vocal command, so long as it was preceded by "Computer:" and followed by "Compute".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108688</id>
	<title>Goody gumdrops!</title>
	<author>Cur8or</author>
	<datestamp>1258278300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A Star Trek story on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. Great way to start the week!</htmltext>
<tokenext>A Star Trek story on / .
Great way to start the week !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A Star Trek story on /.
Great way to start the week!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110678</id>
	<title>"Hornblower Meets Robby"?</title>
	<author>wrencherd</author>
	<datestamp>1258293120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought "Forbidden Planet" (after leavening with Horatio Hornblower) was the pilot for ST:TOS?</p><p>Though Spock beats Robby like a drum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought " Forbidden Planet " ( after leavening with Horatio Hornblower ) was the pilot for ST : TOS ? Though Spock beats Robby like a drum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought "Forbidden Planet" (after leavening with Horatio Hornblower) was the pilot for ST:TOS?Though Spock beats Robby like a drum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105288</id>
	<title>I hereby tag this:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258295940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>swine, profiteering.</p><p>Because you can bet your butts that this single episode will first be sold for the price of a full movie. Then it will be sold in an "exclusive collector's edition" package for twice the price of a full movie. Then it will be sold again in an "exclusive collector's edition" package bundled with a lame, arbitrary Star Trek-related 2-cent gadget made in China, and/or a 10 minute interview with someone from the cast, for thrice the price of a full movie.</p><p>I'll just wait until it lands on . F**k you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>swine , profiteering.Because you can bet your butts that this single episode will first be sold for the price of a full movie .
Then it will be sold in an " exclusive collector 's edition " package for twice the price of a full movie .
Then it will be sold again in an " exclusive collector 's edition " package bundled with a lame , arbitrary Star Trek-related 2-cent gadget made in China , and/or a 10 minute interview with someone from the cast , for thrice the price of a full movie.I 'll just wait until it lands on .
F * * k you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>swine, profiteering.Because you can bet your butts that this single episode will first be sold for the price of a full movie.
Then it will be sold in an "exclusive collector's edition" package for twice the price of a full movie.
Then it will be sold again in an "exclusive collector's edition" package bundled with a lame, arbitrary Star Trek-related 2-cent gadget made in China, and/or a 10 minute interview with someone from the cast, for thrice the price of a full movie.I'll just wait until it lands on .
F**k you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105808</id>
	<title>This is the first time...</title>
	<author>Cloud K</author>
	<datestamp>1258302600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... That my facial expression has matched that of the fake alien thingy whenever it's been used as an article icon. 8-o</p><p>Should be interesting to see!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... That my facial expression has matched that of the fake alien thingy whenever it 's been used as an article icon .
8-oShould be interesting to see !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... That my facial expression has matched that of the fake alien thingy whenever it's been used as an article icon.
8-oShould be interesting to see!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30123418</id>
	<title>Re:zomg it's trek</title>
	<author>DrCode</author>
	<datestamp>1258373520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>#12:  Thou shalt not use goto's in they code.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext># 12 : Thou shalt not use goto 's in they code .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#12:  Thou shalt not use goto's in they code.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106602</id>
	<title>Re:What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258308840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the film that they used is higher resolution than HD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the film that they used is higher resolution than HD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the film that they used is higher resolution than HD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107690</id>
	<title>Sigh</title>
	<author>Foobar of Borg</author>
	<datestamp>1258316160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you're going to do a first post on an article like this, you could at least do it right and say something like<p>
I'm Captain Kirk!  I'M CAPTAIN KIIIRRK!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're going to do a first post on an article like this , you could at least do it right and say something like I 'm Captain Kirk !
I 'M CAPTAIN KIIIRRK !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're going to do a first post on an article like this, you could at least do it right and say something like
I'm Captain Kirk!
I'M CAPTAIN KIIIRRK!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106624</id>
	<title>Re:Nice marketing</title>
	<author>commodore64\_love</author>
	<datestamp>1258309080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;&gt;It was aired as episode 3</p><p>Yippy.  That just means stupid NBC aired the show out of order.  I typically watch "Where No Man" as episode 1, and all the other season one episodes in production order.  Not only are the set &amp; unform designs more consistent that way, but also the story flows better from episode to episode.     (I don't typically watch The Cage because it's not all that great of story, plus it's already covered in The Menagerie Parts 1 and 2, so why watch it twice?)</p><p>Season 1 of Star Trek is also a good bargrain to buy on DVD.  You get 29(?) episodes each 51 minutes long, or almost   <b>  1500 minutes</b>, whereas today's shows like Stargate Universe barely offer up 840 minutes per season</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; &gt; It was aired as episode 3Yippy .
That just means stupid NBC aired the show out of order .
I typically watch " Where No Man " as episode 1 , and all the other season one episodes in production order .
Not only are the set &amp; unform designs more consistent that way , but also the story flows better from episode to episode .
( I do n't typically watch The Cage because it 's not all that great of story , plus it 's already covered in The Menagerie Parts 1 and 2 , so why watch it twice ?
) Season 1 of Star Trek is also a good bargrain to buy on DVD .
You get 29 ( ?
) episodes each 51 minutes long , or almost 1500 minutes , whereas today 's shows like Stargate Universe barely offer up 840 minutes per season</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;&gt;It was aired as episode 3Yippy.
That just means stupid NBC aired the show out of order.
I typically watch "Where No Man" as episode 1, and all the other season one episodes in production order.
Not only are the set &amp; unform designs more consistent that way, but also the story flows better from episode to episode.
(I don't typically watch The Cage because it's not all that great of story, plus it's already covered in The Menagerie Parts 1 and 2, so why watch it twice?
)Season 1 of Star Trek is also a good bargrain to buy on DVD.
You get 29(?
) episodes each 51 minutes long, or almost     1500 minutes, whereas today's shows like Stargate Universe barely offer up 840 minutes per season</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30109282</id>
	<title>Re:zomg it's trek</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258282680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Making #11 moot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Making # 11 moot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making #11 moot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105322</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108518</id>
	<title>karma's a bitch, eh NBC?</title>
	<author>Blue Shifted</author>
	<datestamp>1258277280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt; </p><blockquote><div class="quote"><p><i>  was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral'</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>and now NBC in in fourth place, being bought by a cable company....</p><p>that's what they get for messing with star trek</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral ' and now NBC in in fourth place , being bought by a cable company....that 's what they get for messing with star trek</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;   was rejected by NBC for being 'too cerebral' and now NBC in in fourth place, being bought by a cable company....that's what they get for messing with star trek
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108508</id>
	<title>Oblig. Red Dwarf</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1258277280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newscaster: "Archeologists near Mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible. The page is currently being carbon dated on Bonn. If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read: 'To my darling Candy. All characters portrayed within this book are fictitious and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.'"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newscaster : " Archeologists near Mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible .
The page is currently being carbon dated on Bonn .
If genuine , it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read : 'To my darling Candy .
All characters portrayed within this book are fictitious and any resemblance to actual persons , living or dead , is purely coincidental .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newscaster: "Archeologists near Mount Sinai have discovered what is believed to be a missing page from the Bible.
The page is currently being carbon dated on Bonn.
If genuine, it belongs at the beginning of the Bible and is believed to read: 'To my darling Candy.
All characters portrayed within this book are fictitious and any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
'"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107184</id>
	<title>Re:Replace William Shatner? REPLACE William Shatne</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258313160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, scientifically, we rather move in the hairless direction. The idea is, that there is no need for it anymore, anyway.</p><p>No Picard really is a rather advanced specimen. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , scientifically , we rather move in the hairless direction .
The idea is , that there is no need for it anymore , anyway.No Picard really is a rather advanced specimen .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, scientifically, we rather move in the hairless direction.
The idea is, that there is no need for it anymore, anyway.No Picard really is a rather advanced specimen.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302</id>
	<title>They leave the galaxy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258296060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the clips on youtube linked in the article, it says they leave the milky way - that would be a huge departure from the current canon, in which they have never left he galazy under their own power, in any series or movie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the clips on youtube linked in the article , it says they leave the milky way - that would be a huge departure from the current canon , in which they have never left he galazy under their own power , in any series or movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the clips on youtube linked in the article, it says they leave the milky way - that would be a huge departure from the current canon, in which they have never left he galazy under their own power, in any series or movie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105116</id>
	<title>Star Trek Act I...Warp II...</title>
	<author>rirugrat</author>
	<datestamp>1258294020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Star Trek...In Color!
<p>
Starring Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Star Trek...In Color !
Starring Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Star Trek...In Color!
Starring Rex Hamilton as Abraham Lincoln.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105718</id>
	<title>Re:It's a plot Jim, but not as we know it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258299660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Stardate 5191.5. While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women</p></div><p>Clearly this is TOS, in TNG you'd just say "Computer, list all pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women." Not surprising that it's Google delivering that amazingly context-sensitive half mind-reading search assistant though, the way they're going it's either that or Skynet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stardate 5191.5 .
While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien womenClearly this is TOS , in TNG you 'd just say " Computer , list all pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women .
" Not surprising that it 's Google delivering that amazingly context-sensitive half mind-reading search assistant though , the way they 're going it 's either that or Skynet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stardate 5191.5.
While googling frantically for pornographic footage of green three breasted alien womenClearly this is TOS, in TNG you'd just say "Computer, list all pornographic footage of green three breasted alien women.
" Not surprising that it's Google delivering that amazingly context-sensitive half mind-reading search assistant though, the way they're going it's either that or Skynet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105690</id>
	<title>Re:Nice marketing</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1258299480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can't Read The Fine Article, could you at least Read The Fine Summary?  This is an *uncut* version of that pilot, containing a great deal of footage that wasn't aired.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you ca n't Read The Fine Article , could you at least Read The Fine Summary ?
This is an * uncut * version of that pilot , containing a great deal of footage that was n't aired .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can't Read The Fine Article, could you at least Read The Fine Summary?
This is an *uncut* version of that pilot, containing a great deal of footage that wasn't aired.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104918</id>
	<title>First</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258286820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wooo first post</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wooo first post</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wooo first post</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986</id>
	<title>alternate universe</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258292460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do they have goatees?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do they have goatees ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do they have goatees?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105322</id>
	<title>Re:zomg it's trek</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1258296240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandments</p></div></blockquote><p>And #11 was "Thous shalt not listen to so-called "religious leaders""</p><p>Number 1 was supposed to be "Thou shalt read all instructions before beginning" and #15 was "Thous shalt ignore #2-14"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandmentsAnd # 11 was " Thous shalt not listen to so-called " religious leaders " " Number 1 was supposed to be " Thou shalt read all instructions before beginning " and # 15 was " Thous shalt ignore # 2-14 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a stone tablet containing 5 alternate commandmentsAnd #11 was "Thous shalt not listen to so-called "religious leaders""Number 1 was supposed to be "Thou shalt read all instructions before beginning" and #15 was "Thous shalt ignore #2-14"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105788</id>
	<title>My favorite part of the clip:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258302360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"George Takei as Chief Physicist"</p><p>Helmsman, swordsman, physicist... the guy can do everything!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" George Takei as Chief Physicist " Helmsman , swordsman , physicist... the guy can do everything !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"George Takei as Chief Physicist"Helmsman, swordsman, physicist... the guy can do everything!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474</id>
	<title>What's the point of releasing old TV on Blu Ray?</title>
	<author>cLive ;-)</author>
	<datestamp>1258307940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The resolution is what? 1/6 of Blu Ray HD. What point could there possibly be to releasing any legacy TV on Blu Ray?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The resolution is what ?
1/6 of Blu Ray HD .
What point could there possibly be to releasing any legacy TV on Blu Ray ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The resolution is what?
1/6 of Blu Ray HD.
What point could there possibly be to releasing any legacy TV on Blu Ray?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30112128</id>
	<title>"Replaced the actor who played the captain..."</title>
	<author>Dadoo</author>
	<datestamp>1258308360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably too late to post this, but seriously? This is Slashdot. Half the people here are trekkers, and you couldn't name <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001374/" title="imdb.com">Jeffrey Hunter</a> [imdb.com]? While I'll admit he wasn't at the same level as, say, Jack Nicholson or Al Pacino, he was certainly on par with people like James Garner or Clint Eastwood - or at least he would have been, had he not died young.</p><p>Honestly, I'd bet almost all of you can name the actress who played the green chick, in "Whom Gods Destroy". At least Hunter could act, which is more than you can say for William Shatner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably too late to post this , but seriously ?
This is Slashdot .
Half the people here are trekkers , and you could n't name Jeffrey Hunter [ imdb.com ] ?
While I 'll admit he was n't at the same level as , say , Jack Nicholson or Al Pacino , he was certainly on par with people like James Garner or Clint Eastwood - or at least he would have been , had he not died young.Honestly , I 'd bet almost all of you can name the actress who played the green chick , in " Whom Gods Destroy " .
At least Hunter could act , which is more than you can say for William Shatner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably too late to post this, but seriously?
This is Slashdot.
Half the people here are trekkers, and you couldn't name Jeffrey Hunter [imdb.com]?
While I'll admit he wasn't at the same level as, say, Jack Nicholson or Al Pacino, he was certainly on par with people like James Garner or Clint Eastwood - or at least he would have been, had he not died young.Honestly, I'd bet almost all of you can name the actress who played the green chick, in "Whom Gods Destroy".
At least Hunter could act, which is more than you can say for William Shatner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105092</id>
	<title>Re:Typical..</title>
	<author>VoidCrow</author>
	<datestamp>1258293780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course.</p><p>With sufficient education (and bananas onna stick), any monkey can be George Orwell...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course.With sufficient education ( and bananas onna stick ) , any monkey can be George Orwell.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course.With sufficient education (and bananas onna stick), any monkey can be George Orwell...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104990</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30109282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30116524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106748
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30109138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30111608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_209253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30123418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30111608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30116524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104976
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105322
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30109282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30123418
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105014
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30109138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105168
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30110566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30104990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30106270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30107184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30108284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_209253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_209253.30105012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
