<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_14_1857200</id>
	<title>Caffeinated Alcoholic Drinks May Be Illegal</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1258212960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Anonymusing writes <i>"The FDA has announced an investigation into the <a href="http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm190427.htm">safety and legality of alcoholic beverages containing caffeine</a>. As a Wall Street Journal blog reports, two major beer companies, MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch, <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2009/11/13/caffeinated-alcoholic-drinks-are-dead-long-live/">stopped producing caffeinated alcoholic drinks</a> last year after <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2007/11/04/get-wired-get-wasted-get-hurt/">reports surfaced of increased negative effects</a> compared to caffeine-free alcohol. CNN notes that, according to FDA rules, '<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/11/13/caffeinated.alcohol.illegal/index.html">food additives require premarket approval</a> based on data demonstrating safety submitted to the agency' &mdash; and caffeine is a food additive. The <a href="http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodIngredientsPackaging/ucm190448.htm">26 targeted beverage makers</a> have 30 days to respond."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anonymusing writes " The FDA has announced an investigation into the safety and legality of alcoholic beverages containing caffeine .
As a Wall Street Journal blog reports , two major beer companies , MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch , stopped producing caffeinated alcoholic drinks last year after reports surfaced of increased negative effects compared to caffeine-free alcohol .
CNN notes that , according to FDA rules , 'food additives require premarket approval based on data demonstrating safety submitted to the agency '    and caffeine is a food additive .
The 26 targeted beverage makers have 30 days to respond .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anonymusing writes "The FDA has announced an investigation into the safety and legality of alcoholic beverages containing caffeine.
As a Wall Street Journal blog reports, two major beer companies, MillerCoors and Anheuser-Busch, stopped producing caffeinated alcoholic drinks last year after reports surfaced of increased negative effects compared to caffeine-free alcohol.
CNN notes that, according to FDA rules, 'food additives require premarket approval based on data demonstrating safety submitted to the agency' — and caffeine is a food additive.
The 26 targeted beverage makers have 30 days to respond.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104014</id>
	<title>Misrepresentation of data!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258222980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First, this is not a scientific study, it's simply a survey that shows a slight correlation between some increased risk behaviors and mixing alcohol with caffeine...

All this study shows is that people who make increased risk choices are more likely to make increased risk choices in other unrelated issues...because they are risk takers.

Correlation is not causation!  Wake up!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>First , this is not a scientific study , it 's simply a survey that shows a slight correlation between some increased risk behaviors and mixing alcohol with caffeine.. . All this study shows is that people who make increased risk choices are more likely to make increased risk choices in other unrelated issues...because they are risk takers .
Correlation is not causation !
Wake up !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, this is not a scientific study, it's simply a survey that shows a slight correlation between some increased risk behaviors and mixing alcohol with caffeine...

All this study shows is that people who make increased risk choices are more likely to make increased risk choices in other unrelated issues...because they are risk takers.
Correlation is not causation!
Wake up!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30108342</id>
	<title>Oh darn...</title>
	<author>Jager Dave</author>
	<datestamp>1258276320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There goes my Rum and Coke, with my Jager &amp; Red Bull chaser.....  (Kidding!  I'd never corrupt Jager by mixing it with Red Bull... Drink it straight, like a man!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:&gt;  )</htmltext>
<tokenext>There goes my Rum and Coke , with my Jager &amp; Red Bull chaser..... ( Kidding ! I 'd never corrupt Jager by mixing it with Red Bull... Drink it straight , like a man !
: &gt; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There goes my Rum and Coke, with my Jager &amp; Red Bull chaser.....  (Kidding!  I'd never corrupt Jager by mixing it with Red Bull... Drink it straight, like a man!
:&gt;  )</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382</id>
	<title>Jack and Coke?</title>
	<author>Just Some Guy</author>
	<datestamp>1258216860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since Coke is probably the single most common dark mixer, a lot of bartenders are going to be peeved over this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since Coke is probably the single most common dark mixer , a lot of bartenders are going to be peeved over this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since Coke is probably the single most common dark mixer, a lot of bartenders are going to be peeved over this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104704</id>
	<title>Re:Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1258276140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Yeah, it's pretty weird to read that the combination of caffeine and alcohol is not "generally recognized as safe".  For how many centuries do you suppose people have been drinking Irish coffee?</p></div><p>(Using the same logic...) It's pretty weird to read that cars require safety testing before being allowed on the road.  For how many centuries do you suppose people have been using wheeled vehicles?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's pretty weird to read that the combination of caffeine and alcohol is not " generally recognized as safe " .
For how many centuries do you suppose people have been drinking Irish coffee ?
( Using the same logic... ) It 's pretty weird to read that cars require safety testing before being allowed on the road .
For how many centuries do you suppose people have been using wheeled vehicles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's pretty weird to read that the combination of caffeine and alcohol is not "generally recognized as safe".
For how many centuries do you suppose people have been drinking Irish coffee?
(Using the same logic...) It's pretty weird to read that cars require safety testing before being allowed on the road.
For how many centuries do you suppose people have been using wheeled vehicles?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104378</id>
	<title>Re:The War on Drugs just got dumberer</title>
	<author>value\_added</author>
	<datestamp>1258227480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-12767-US-Headlines-Examiner~y2009m11d14-Portland-Oregon-opens-first-marijuana-cafe-in-US" title="examiner.com">this development</a> [examiner.com] is any indication, then we'll be there soon enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If this development [ examiner.com ] is any indication , then we 'll be there soon enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If this development [examiner.com] is any indication, then we'll be there soon enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30108532</id>
	<title>this is sad news for my invention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258277340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aspirbeer, with 100 mg of ibuprofen per bottle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aspirbeer , with 100 mg of ibuprofen per bottle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aspirbeer, with 100 mg of ibuprofen per bottle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30114698</id>
	<title>Re:Alcohol is "food" now?</title>
	<author>Alex Belits</author>
	<datestamp>1258383900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean, drug stamps?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean , drug stamps ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean, drug stamps?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107776</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258316640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the point is to get people aware of the risks involved with mixing caffeine. No it's not going to stop people from making a Jager bomb, or a rum and coke, but get rid of premixed drinks that have caffeine. I knew a girl who was quite against drinking caffeine (except a bit of tea) she always condemned me for drinking energy drinks refusing to ever drink one. Then one day I saw her drinking a cooler that had a decent amount of caffeine, she had no clue that it did. Now thats her own fault for not reading the label (and drinking a cooler ), but to be fair most people don't expect alcohol to have caffeine unless it's a well known brand (like rockstar drinks that have alcohol).</p><p>In general I don't get why people drink caffeine with alcohol, it only dehydrates you more so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the point is to get people aware of the risks involved with mixing caffeine .
No it 's not going to stop people from making a Jager bomb , or a rum and coke , but get rid of premixed drinks that have caffeine .
I knew a girl who was quite against drinking caffeine ( except a bit of tea ) she always condemned me for drinking energy drinks refusing to ever drink one .
Then one day I saw her drinking a cooler that had a decent amount of caffeine , she had no clue that it did .
Now thats her own fault for not reading the label ( and drinking a cooler ) , but to be fair most people do n't expect alcohol to have caffeine unless it 's a well known brand ( like rockstar drinks that have alcohol ) .In general I do n't get why people drink caffeine with alcohol , it only dehydrates you more so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the point is to get people aware of the risks involved with mixing caffeine.
No it's not going to stop people from making a Jager bomb, or a rum and coke, but get rid of premixed drinks that have caffeine.
I knew a girl who was quite against drinking caffeine (except a bit of tea) she always condemned me for drinking energy drinks refusing to ever drink one.
Then one day I saw her drinking a cooler that had a decent amount of caffeine, she had no clue that it did.
Now thats her own fault for not reading the label (and drinking a cooler ), but to be fair most people don't expect alcohol to have caffeine unless it's a well known brand (like rockstar drinks that have alcohol).In general I don't get why people drink caffeine with alcohol, it only dehydrates you more so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104580</id>
	<title>Re:The names alone should be enough for a ban</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1258316880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pan-galactic Gargle Blaster, that's a good one.  Make sure they cut it with Good Ol' Janx Spirit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pan-galactic Gargle Blaster , that 's a good one .
Make sure they cut it with Good Ol ' Janx Spirit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pan-galactic Gargle Blaster, that's a good one.
Make sure they cut it with Good Ol' Janx Spirit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30105370</id>
	<title>Re:Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok</title>
	<author>MrMr</author>
	<datestamp>1258296780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>not many, it was invented at Shannon airport about 70 years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>not many , it was invented at Shannon airport about 70 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>not many, it was invented at Shannon airport about 70 years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</id>
	<title>The War on Drugs just got dumberer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258217400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Soon, we'll be smoking weed in a bar wondering how we can score some Jack &amp; Coke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Soon , we 'll be smoking weed in a bar wondering how we can score some Jack &amp; Coke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Soon, we'll be smoking weed in a bar wondering how we can score some Jack &amp; Coke.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103724</id>
	<title>Missing the Obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258219500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they really going to mess withe Coca-Cola like that?</p><p>Most popular caffeinated alcoholic beverage? Jack/Jim and Coke</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they really going to mess withe Coca-Cola like that ? Most popular caffeinated alcoholic beverage ?
Jack/Jim and Coke</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they really going to mess withe Coca-Cola like that?Most popular caffeinated alcoholic beverage?
Jack/Jim and Coke</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109002</id>
	<title>Re:This is ridiculous</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258280400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not legislating, it's regulating. The FDA is exercising regulatory authority already granted to them by Congress.</p><p>I would like to see government be more hands-off, though. Then I can lock those eight year olds into my sweat shops during their twenty-three hour shifts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not legislating , it 's regulating .
The FDA is exercising regulatory authority already granted to them by Congress.I would like to see government be more hands-off , though .
Then I can lock those eight year olds into my sweat shops during their twenty-three hour shifts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not legislating, it's regulating.
The FDA is exercising regulatory authority already granted to them by Congress.I would like to see government be more hands-off, though.
Then I can lock those eight year olds into my sweat shops during their twenty-three hour shifts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107268</id>
	<title>Not a ban on whiskey and Coke</title>
	<author>bigsexyjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1258313700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't support the FDA's actions here.  But in reply to about half the comments thus far written.  This isn't a ban on mixing an alcoholic beverage with a caffeinated one.

The FDA, in light of studies that suggest mixing caffeine and alcohol causes more injuries than alcohol alone, has asked makers of alcoholic beverages to supply evidence that it has already allowed caffeine to be added to alcoholic beverages.  Their is that caffeine is legally a food additive and you must get the FDA's permission to add a given additive to a given product.

So whether you like this development or not, it does not ban whiskey and Coke or Red Bull and Vodka, as the FDA does not have the authority to ban the mixing of drinks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't support the FDA 's actions here .
But in reply to about half the comments thus far written .
This is n't a ban on mixing an alcoholic beverage with a caffeinated one .
The FDA , in light of studies that suggest mixing caffeine and alcohol causes more injuries than alcohol alone , has asked makers of alcoholic beverages to supply evidence that it has already allowed caffeine to be added to alcoholic beverages .
Their is that caffeine is legally a food additive and you must get the FDA 's permission to add a given additive to a given product .
So whether you like this development or not , it does not ban whiskey and Coke or Red Bull and Vodka , as the FDA does not have the authority to ban the mixing of drinks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't support the FDA's actions here.
But in reply to about half the comments thus far written.
This isn't a ban on mixing an alcoholic beverage with a caffeinated one.
The FDA, in light of studies that suggest mixing caffeine and alcohol causes more injuries than alcohol alone, has asked makers of alcoholic beverages to supply evidence that it has already allowed caffeine to be added to alcoholic beverages.
Their is that caffeine is legally a food additive and you must get the FDA's permission to add a given additive to a given product.
So whether you like this development or not, it does not ban whiskey and Coke or Red Bull and Vodka, as the FDA does not have the authority to ban the mixing of drinks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104740</id>
	<title>Alcohol is a drug</title>
	<author>justinlee37</author>
	<datestamp>1258276560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Case closed</htmltext>
<tokenext>Case closed</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Case closed</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103750</id>
	<title>They'll take my...</title>
	<author>mirix</author>
	<datestamp>1258219800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They'll take my Black Russian from my cold dead hands.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 'll take my Black Russian from my cold dead hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They'll take my Black Russian from my cold dead hands.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109104</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>nEoN nOoDlE</author>
	<datestamp>1258281300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It wasn't too long ago when the dangers of smoking or fast food weren't made aware to everybody. Some smoking ads advertised the health benefits of smoking. It's because of government intervention and regulation that you have the information you currently have, and are fully aware you're destroying your lungs and will most likely die of cancer far earlier than you would have otherwise by smoking. What makes the FDA looking into the dangers of smoking any different than the FDA looking into the dangers of caffeine mixed with alcohol? Do you trust your friendly, neighborhood, multinational alcohol corporation that much as to have them advise you of the health risks of the drinks they're trying to sell you? Making your own mistakes are one thing... having information about my health being deliberately hidden so that some corporation can make a few million dollars off of killing me is another thing altogether.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was n't too long ago when the dangers of smoking or fast food were n't made aware to everybody .
Some smoking ads advertised the health benefits of smoking .
It 's because of government intervention and regulation that you have the information you currently have , and are fully aware you 're destroying your lungs and will most likely die of cancer far earlier than you would have otherwise by smoking .
What makes the FDA looking into the dangers of smoking any different than the FDA looking into the dangers of caffeine mixed with alcohol ?
Do you trust your friendly , neighborhood , multinational alcohol corporation that much as to have them advise you of the health risks of the drinks they 're trying to sell you ?
Making your own mistakes are one thing... having information about my health being deliberately hidden so that some corporation can make a few million dollars off of killing me is another thing altogether .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It wasn't too long ago when the dangers of smoking or fast food weren't made aware to everybody.
Some smoking ads advertised the health benefits of smoking.
It's because of government intervention and regulation that you have the information you currently have, and are fully aware you're destroying your lungs and will most likely die of cancer far earlier than you would have otherwise by smoking.
What makes the FDA looking into the dangers of smoking any different than the FDA looking into the dangers of caffeine mixed with alcohol?
Do you trust your friendly, neighborhood, multinational alcohol corporation that much as to have them advise you of the health risks of the drinks they're trying to sell you?
Making your own mistakes are one thing... having information about my health being deliberately hidden so that some corporation can make a few million dollars off of killing me is another thing altogether.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104240</id>
	<title>Car analogy!</title>
	<author>w0mprat</author>
	<datestamp>1258225560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA: &ldquo;The analogy I like to use is that it&rsquo;s like stepping on the gas pedal and the brake pedal of a car at the same time," <br> <br>
Crap. I was going to post a car analogy, but I am now redundant.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA :    The analogy I like to use is that it    s like stepping on the gas pedal and the brake pedal of a car at the same time , " Crap .
I was going to post a car analogy , but I am now redundant .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA: “The analogy I like to use is that it’s like stepping on the gas pedal and the brake pedal of a car at the same time,"  
Crap.
I was going to post a car analogy, but I am now redundant.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106170</id>
	<title>Slippery slope</title>
	<author>d\_54321</author>
	<datestamp>1258305840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First they came for the heroin shooters, and I said nothing.<br>Then they came for the crack smokers, and I said nothing.<br>Then they came for me with my rum and Coke, and there was no one left to defend me.<br>Plus I was really wasted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First they came for the heroin shooters , and I said nothing.Then they came for the crack smokers , and I said nothing.Then they came for me with my rum and Coke , and there was no one left to defend me.Plus I was really wasted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they came for the heroin shooters, and I said nothing.Then they came for the crack smokers, and I said nothing.Then they came for me with my rum and Coke, and there was no one left to defend me.Plus I was really wasted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30115718</id>
	<title>Where is Pepsi and Coke</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1258388640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They did not mention any of the products that we know has way too much caffeine in it, Pepsi and Coke, would they not<br>be subject to this law as well, or are they greasing the pockets of those pushing the enforcement of such laws?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They did not mention any of the products that we know has way too much caffeine in it , Pepsi and Coke , would they notbe subject to this law as well , or are they greasing the pockets of those pushing the enforcement of such laws ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They did not mention any of the products that we know has way too much caffeine in it, Pepsi and Coke, would they notbe subject to this law as well, or are they greasing the pockets of those pushing the enforcement of such laws?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30129168</id>
	<title>Re:The War on Drugs just got dumberer</title>
	<author>chimericdream</author>
	<datestamp>1258474920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except with all of the anti-smoking laws being passed, you will be smoking your week *outside* the bar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except with all of the anti-smoking laws being passed , you will be smoking your week * outside * the bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except with all of the anti-smoking laws being passed, you will be smoking your week *outside* the bar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103880</id>
	<title>Aren't they 10-15 years late?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258221180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Caffeinated alcohol drinks really caught on in the mid to late 90's (when "rave" culture became mainstream and made lamer than it already was). So why now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Caffeinated alcohol drinks really caught on in the mid to late 90 's ( when " rave " culture became mainstream and made lamer than it already was ) .
So why now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Caffeinated alcohol drinks really caught on in the mid to late 90's (when "rave" culture became mainstream and made lamer than it already was).
So why now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107046</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258312320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck it, J&#228;germeister and Red Bull is the best thing you can find if you go out partying.<br>What's so bad about it really?</p><p>If you can't handle booze then don't drink it. Or don't drink it so much.</p><p>And if you don't do coffee then you shouldn't do energy drinks either. But if your blood serum level of caffeine is moderate to high, you can safely gulp it. Enjoy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck it , J   germeister and Red Bull is the best thing you can find if you go out partying.What 's so bad about it really ? If you ca n't handle booze then do n't drink it .
Or do n't drink it so much.And if you do n't do coffee then you should n't do energy drinks either .
But if your blood serum level of caffeine is moderate to high , you can safely gulp it .
Enjoy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck it, Jägermeister and Red Bull is the best thing you can find if you go out partying.What's so bad about it really?If you can't handle booze then don't drink it.
Or don't drink it so much.And if you don't do coffee then you shouldn't do energy drinks either.
But if your blood serum level of caffeine is moderate to high, you can safely gulp it.
Enjoy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103588</id>
	<title>Re:Buzz Beer!</title>
	<author>macshit</author>
	<datestamp>1258218420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Does this remind anyone of the Drew Carey show, with their concoction of coffee and beer?  Buzz Beer!</p></div><p>The concept is intriguing, but... it sounds like it'd taste pretty vile...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this remind anyone of the Drew Carey show , with their concoction of coffee and beer ?
Buzz Beer ! The concept is intriguing , but... it sounds like it 'd taste pretty vile.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this remind anyone of the Drew Carey show, with their concoction of coffee and beer?
Buzz Beer!The concept is intriguing, but... it sounds like it'd taste pretty vile...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103488</id>
	<title>Drug criminalization never works.</title>
	<author>reporter</author>
	<datestamp>1258217700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fact of the matter is that drug criminalization never works.  If people want to pop, snort, or inject drugs, then they will do so.  If the FDA bans the caffeine-spiked beer, then it will just be available in the black market.
<p>
So, the FDA should allow anything to be consumed by anyone under 1 caveat:  feeding, selling, or offering FDA-determined unhealthy substances (e. g., heroin, tobacco, alcohol, and the like) to anyone under the age of 21 should be treated as a felony -- with a mandatory minimum penalty of 10 years in prison.  Once you reach the age of 21, you are an adult in the eyes of the law, and you are free to destroy your body in any way that you want.  What you do with yourself is none of society's business.  Since health care is not guaranteed in the USA, medical treatment for your sickness (due to your deliberate consumption of unhealthy substances) will  not be paid by the other taxpayers.
</p><p>
The "Just say no." campaign never worked.  The "You are free to inject until you die at your own expense." campaign will work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact of the matter is that drug criminalization never works .
If people want to pop , snort , or inject drugs , then they will do so .
If the FDA bans the caffeine-spiked beer , then it will just be available in the black market .
So , the FDA should allow anything to be consumed by anyone under 1 caveat : feeding , selling , or offering FDA-determined unhealthy substances ( e. g. , heroin , tobacco , alcohol , and the like ) to anyone under the age of 21 should be treated as a felony -- with a mandatory minimum penalty of 10 years in prison .
Once you reach the age of 21 , you are an adult in the eyes of the law , and you are free to destroy your body in any way that you want .
What you do with yourself is none of society 's business .
Since health care is not guaranteed in the USA , medical treatment for your sickness ( due to your deliberate consumption of unhealthy substances ) will not be paid by the other taxpayers .
The " Just say no .
" campaign never worked .
The " You are free to inject until you die at your own expense .
" campaign will work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact of the matter is that drug criminalization never works.
If people want to pop, snort, or inject drugs, then they will do so.
If the FDA bans the caffeine-spiked beer, then it will just be available in the black market.
So, the FDA should allow anything to be consumed by anyone under 1 caveat:  feeding, selling, or offering FDA-determined unhealthy substances (e. g., heroin, tobacco, alcohol, and the like) to anyone under the age of 21 should be treated as a felony -- with a mandatory minimum penalty of 10 years in prison.
Once you reach the age of 21, you are an adult in the eyes of the law, and you are free to destroy your body in any way that you want.
What you do with yourself is none of society's business.
Since health care is not guaranteed in the USA, medical treatment for your sickness (due to your deliberate consumption of unhealthy substances) will  not be paid by the other taxpayers.
The "Just say no.
" campaign never worked.
The "You are free to inject until you die at your own expense.
" campaign will work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109048</id>
	<title>Re:The War on Drugs just got dumberer</title>
	<author>nEoN nOoDlE</author>
	<datestamp>1258280700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's probably a better version of the future than what we have in the present, seeing as how the number of alcohol related deaths is significantly higher than the number of marijuana related deaths.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's probably a better version of the future than what we have in the present , seeing as how the number of alcohol related deaths is significantly higher than the number of marijuana related deaths .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's probably a better version of the future than what we have in the present, seeing as how the number of alcohol related deaths is significantly higher than the number of marijuana related deaths.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103802</id>
	<title>Binge and Surge</title>
	<author>jer2eydevil88</author>
	<datestamp>1258220340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How can I binge and surge if they outlaw it?  I guess I'll be an Outlaw.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How can I binge and surge if they outlaw it ?
I guess I 'll be an Outlaw .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can I binge and surge if they outlaw it?
I guess I'll be an Outlaw.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104282</id>
	<title>This is ridiculous</title>
	<author>SheeEttin</author>
	<datestamp>1258226220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm starting to get a little scared about all the legislating going on... I mean, seriously, it's <i>alcohol</i>. People don't drink it for the health benefits!<br>
I'm really hoping that in the near future, the US government becomes much more hands-off. We can handle life on our own, really. (Well, most of us can. As for people like <a href="http://bash.org/?420855" title="bash.org">this</a> [bash.org], well... Tough luck to them.)<br> <br>
Failing that, though, can anyone recommend a nice country with good Internet access and a hands-off government?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm starting to get a little scared about all the legislating going on... I mean , seriously , it 's alcohol .
People do n't drink it for the health benefits !
I 'm really hoping that in the near future , the US government becomes much more hands-off .
We can handle life on our own , really .
( Well , most of us can .
As for people like this [ bash.org ] , well... Tough luck to them .
) Failing that , though , can anyone recommend a nice country with good Internet access and a hands-off government ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm starting to get a little scared about all the legislating going on... I mean, seriously, it's alcohol.
People don't drink it for the health benefits!
I'm really hoping that in the near future, the US government becomes much more hands-off.
We can handle life on our own, really.
(Well, most of us can.
As for people like this [bash.org], well... Tough luck to them.
) 
Failing that, though, can anyone recommend a nice country with good Internet access and a hands-off government?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30105022</id>
	<title>Tia Maria</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258292940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tia Maria or Kahlua anyone?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tia Maria or Kahlua anyone ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tia Maria or Kahlua anyone?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106694</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1258309560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>well if the mistake only harmed the person doing it, sure.</p><p>but then there are all kinds of issues beyond that, like lawsuits, insurance agencies and maybe more i fail to recall right now.</p><p>take your smoking example, said activity is just as harmful, if not more so, to people in the same room or general area, as the person smoking.</p><p>or maybe boil it down to this: your rights end, where mine begins, and vice versa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>well if the mistake only harmed the person doing it , sure.but then there are all kinds of issues beyond that , like lawsuits , insurance agencies and maybe more i fail to recall right now.take your smoking example , said activity is just as harmful , if not more so , to people in the same room or general area , as the person smoking.or maybe boil it down to this : your rights end , where mine begins , and vice versa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>well if the mistake only harmed the person doing it, sure.but then there are all kinds of issues beyond that, like lawsuits, insurance agencies and maybe more i fail to recall right now.take your smoking example, said activity is just as harmful, if not more so, to people in the same room or general area, as the person smoking.or maybe boil it down to this: your rights end, where mine begins, and vice versa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110206</id>
	<title>Re:Misrepresentation of data!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258289340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know...<br>Like in your remark, correlation is quite often found in the same sentence as causation.<br>That just reinforces in my mind that correlation IS causation after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know...Like in your remark , correlation is quite often found in the same sentence as causation.That just reinforces in my mind that correlation IS causation after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know...Like in your remark, correlation is quite often found in the same sentence as causation.That just reinforces in my mind that correlation IS causation after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104122</id>
	<title>Re:Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok</title>
	<author>amRadioHed</author>
	<datestamp>1258224300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've never heard of someone getting trashed off of Irish coffee. Maybe it happens sometimes, but I think that redbull and vodka's are much more likely to be abused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've never heard of someone getting trashed off of Irish coffee .
Maybe it happens sometimes , but I think that redbull and vodka 's are much more likely to be abused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've never heard of someone getting trashed off of Irish coffee.
Maybe it happens sometimes, but I think that redbull and vodka's are much more likely to be abused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104398</id>
	<title>Re:Just try and take my Espresso Stout away!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258227720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Those "coffee" stouts you are so worried about usually do not have any coffee in them at all (some may use it for flavoring, but I'm pretty sure they are a very small minority).  The dark roasted malts impart a coffee-like flavor to the beer.  I love me some dark beers, but get very jittery when I have caffeine (I pretty much won't drink any caffeinated beverages), and I never have any reactions when I drink "coffee" stouts.  Even if all stouts used coffee in them, they would use it for the flavor, not the caffeine, and could use decaffeinated coffee.  Trust this anonymous coward, your beer is safe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Those " coffee " stouts you are so worried about usually do not have any coffee in them at all ( some may use it for flavoring , but I 'm pretty sure they are a very small minority ) .
The dark roasted malts impart a coffee-like flavor to the beer .
I love me some dark beers , but get very jittery when I have caffeine ( I pretty much wo n't drink any caffeinated beverages ) , and I never have any reactions when I drink " coffee " stouts .
Even if all stouts used coffee in them , they would use it for the flavor , not the caffeine , and could use decaffeinated coffee .
Trust this anonymous coward , your beer is safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those "coffee" stouts you are so worried about usually do not have any coffee in them at all (some may use it for flavoring, but I'm pretty sure they are a very small minority).
The dark roasted malts impart a coffee-like flavor to the beer.
I love me some dark beers, but get very jittery when I have caffeine (I pretty much won't drink any caffeinated beverages), and I never have any reactions when I drink "coffee" stouts.
Even if all stouts used coffee in them, they would use it for the flavor, not the caffeine, and could use decaffeinated coffee.
Trust this anonymous coward, your beer is safe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103956</id>
	<title>Re:Just try and take my Espresso Stout away!!!</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1258222200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those that can't be bothered to read TFA: They are looking into banning the addition of caffeine to alcoholic drinks.  They have said nothing about banning the use of coffee as an ingredient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those that ca n't be bothered to read TFA : They are looking into banning the addition of caffeine to alcoholic drinks .
They have said nothing about banning the use of coffee as an ingredient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those that can't be bothered to read TFA: They are looking into banning the addition of caffeine to alcoholic drinks.
They have said nothing about banning the use of coffee as an ingredient.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104588</id>
	<title>But what about...?</title>
	<author>NightHwk1</author>
	<datestamp>1258316880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would this affect legality of "normal" drinks like coffee porters/stouts? How about Irish coffee?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would this affect legality of " normal " drinks like coffee porters/stouts ?
How about Irish coffee ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would this affect legality of "normal" drinks like coffee porters/stouts?
How about Irish coffee?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107428</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1258314420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hear, hear!! Enough with the nannying already!</p><p>It's better to have some people fuck up, and maybe even hurt other people along the way, than it is to restrict everyone to the lowest common denominator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hear , hear ! !
Enough with the nannying already ! It 's better to have some people fuck up , and maybe even hurt other people along the way , than it is to restrict everyone to the lowest common denominator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hear, hear!!
Enough with the nannying already!It's better to have some people fuck up, and maybe even hurt other people along the way, than it is to restrict everyone to the lowest common denominator.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758</id>
	<title>Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok?</title>
	<author>Glasswire</author>
	<datestamp>1258229160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And would my bartender get arrested?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And would my bartender get arrested ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And would my bartender get arrested?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107952</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>dontmakemethink</author>
	<datestamp>1258317420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If adding caffeine in mass quantities to a commercial beverage is not the business of the FDA, neither is adding salt St. Peter or any other over-the-counter drug.</p><p>However, you, like dozens of others here, did not read TFA, which only deals with high ratios of caffeine *packaged* in alcoholic beverages.  The FDA cannot prevent anyone from ordering a Jagermeister and a Red Bull, and mixing them together themselves.  That is up to the liquor control boards of the relevant jurisdiction.  For example in Ontario Canada, bartenders cannot pour the Jager into the Red Bull, nor can they even put the shot glass into the Red Bull glass, but patrons are free to do it themselves.</p><p>I've also heard of some municipalities banning the sale of Red Bull at licensed establishments, though patrons can bring in their own.  This is intended to reduce the promotional effect of bars putting Red Bull on sale to sell more liquor.  It's otherwise very common for bars to have Jager bombs on sale for the same price as just a shot of Jager, which gets people trying it who otherwise wouldn't, and shouldn't.  Now that's a restriction I can live with.  Remember that caffeine is no less addictive than alcohol.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If adding caffeine in mass quantities to a commercial beverage is not the business of the FDA , neither is adding salt St. Peter or any other over-the-counter drug.However , you , like dozens of others here , did not read TFA , which only deals with high ratios of caffeine * packaged * in alcoholic beverages .
The FDA can not prevent anyone from ordering a Jagermeister and a Red Bull , and mixing them together themselves .
That is up to the liquor control boards of the relevant jurisdiction .
For example in Ontario Canada , bartenders can not pour the Jager into the Red Bull , nor can they even put the shot glass into the Red Bull glass , but patrons are free to do it themselves.I 've also heard of some municipalities banning the sale of Red Bull at licensed establishments , though patrons can bring in their own .
This is intended to reduce the promotional effect of bars putting Red Bull on sale to sell more liquor .
It 's otherwise very common for bars to have Jager bombs on sale for the same price as just a shot of Jager , which gets people trying it who otherwise would n't , and should n't .
Now that 's a restriction I can live with .
Remember that caffeine is no less addictive than alcohol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If adding caffeine in mass quantities to a commercial beverage is not the business of the FDA, neither is adding salt St. Peter or any other over-the-counter drug.However, you, like dozens of others here, did not read TFA, which only deals with high ratios of caffeine *packaged* in alcoholic beverages.
The FDA cannot prevent anyone from ordering a Jagermeister and a Red Bull, and mixing them together themselves.
That is up to the liquor control boards of the relevant jurisdiction.
For example in Ontario Canada, bartenders cannot pour the Jager into the Red Bull, nor can they even put the shot glass into the Red Bull glass, but patrons are free to do it themselves.I've also heard of some municipalities banning the sale of Red Bull at licensed establishments, though patrons can bring in their own.
This is intended to reduce the promotional effect of bars putting Red Bull on sale to sell more liquor.
It's otherwise very common for bars to have Jager bombs on sale for the same price as just a shot of Jager, which gets people trying it who otherwise wouldn't, and shouldn't.
Now that's a restriction I can live with.
Remember that caffeine is no less addictive than alcohol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103782</id>
	<title>change the packaging</title>
	<author>Wireless Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1258220160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they can just alter the packaging to have two sides, like dual-action drain cleaner or epoxy.  Open the top and it mixes when you pour.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they can just alter the packaging to have two sides , like dual-action drain cleaner or epoxy .
Open the top and it mixes when you pour .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they can just alter the packaging to have two sides, like dual-action drain cleaner or epoxy.
Open the top and it mixes when you pour.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103796</id>
	<title>The War on Drugs just got smarterer</title>
	<author>AlpineR</author>
	<datestamp>1258220280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I think this is the right way to determine legality of drugs. (And alcohol and caffeine are certainly drugs.) Determine whether a reasonable person can use the drug with a high confidence of safety. If yes, the drug is legal. If no, the drug is illegal for reasons of public health and safety.</p><p>Jack and Coke are two consumables that are reasonably safe in their separate forms. If you mix them together then indeed you have alcohol and caffeine, but each active ingredient is more dilute than before. That's different than adding all the caffeine of Coke (or much more) to a drink with all the alcohol of Jack Daniels.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I think this is the right way to determine legality of drugs .
( And alcohol and caffeine are certainly drugs .
) Determine whether a reasonable person can use the drug with a high confidence of safety .
If yes , the drug is legal .
If no , the drug is illegal for reasons of public health and safety.Jack and Coke are two consumables that are reasonably safe in their separate forms .
If you mix them together then indeed you have alcohol and caffeine , but each active ingredient is more dilute than before .
That 's different than adding all the caffeine of Coke ( or much more ) to a drink with all the alcohol of Jack Daniels .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I think this is the right way to determine legality of drugs.
(And alcohol and caffeine are certainly drugs.
) Determine whether a reasonable person can use the drug with a high confidence of safety.
If yes, the drug is legal.
If no, the drug is illegal for reasons of public health and safety.Jack and Coke are two consumables that are reasonably safe in their separate forms.
If you mix them together then indeed you have alcohol and caffeine, but each active ingredient is more dilute than before.
That's different than adding all the caffeine of Coke (or much more) to a drink with all the alcohol of Jack Daniels.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103526</id>
	<title>Just try and take my Espresso Stout away!!!</title>
	<author>Cordath</author>
	<datestamp>1258217940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a pretty huge problem with banning alcoholic beverages containing caffeine.  The worst offenders are not drinks that come in a can from Coors, but mixed drinks, like Vodka Red-Bull's.  You can make laws telling people not to mix their Vodka and Red Bulls together, but good luck enforcing them!  (Honestly, you'd think common sense and a sense of taste would be enough...)
<br> <br>
The truly awful thing is that, if this kind of law was enacted, the drinks it would actually kill would be wonderful, rich microbrew espresso stouts and imperial coffee stouts.  Outlaw Coors Light if you must, but DO NOT FUCK WITH GOOD BEER.
<br> <br>
Finally, the most damning argument against this sort of law of all is that stupid frat boys and girls will still wind up doing stupid things no matter what they're drinking.  So what's the point eh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a pretty huge problem with banning alcoholic beverages containing caffeine .
The worst offenders are not drinks that come in a can from Coors , but mixed drinks , like Vodka Red-Bull 's .
You can make laws telling people not to mix their Vodka and Red Bulls together , but good luck enforcing them !
( Honestly , you 'd think common sense and a sense of taste would be enough... ) The truly awful thing is that , if this kind of law was enacted , the drinks it would actually kill would be wonderful , rich microbrew espresso stouts and imperial coffee stouts .
Outlaw Coors Light if you must , but DO NOT FUCK WITH GOOD BEER .
Finally , the most damning argument against this sort of law of all is that stupid frat boys and girls will still wind up doing stupid things no matter what they 're drinking .
So what 's the point eh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a pretty huge problem with banning alcoholic beverages containing caffeine.
The worst offenders are not drinks that come in a can from Coors, but mixed drinks, like Vodka Red-Bull's.
You can make laws telling people not to mix their Vodka and Red Bulls together, but good luck enforcing them!
(Honestly, you'd think common sense and a sense of taste would be enough...)
 
The truly awful thing is that, if this kind of law was enacted, the drinks it would actually kill would be wonderful, rich microbrew espresso stouts and imperial coffee stouts.
Outlaw Coors Light if you must, but DO NOT FUCK WITH GOOD BEER.
Finally, the most damning argument against this sort of law of all is that stupid frat boys and girls will still wind up doing stupid things no matter what they're drinking.
So what's the point eh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103576</id>
	<title>Re:Buzz Beer!</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1258218300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's actually quite a few porters and stouts brewed with coffee, e.g. <a href="http://ratebeer.com/beer/terrapin-wake-n-bake-coffee-oatmeal-imperial-stout/42303/" title="ratebeer.com">example A</a> [ratebeer.com], <a href="http://ratebeer.com/beer/kona-pipeline-porter/65278/" title="ratebeer.com">example B</a> [ratebeer.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's actually quite a few porters and stouts brewed with coffee , e.g .
example A [ ratebeer.com ] , example B [ ratebeer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's actually quite a few porters and stouts brewed with coffee, e.g.
example A [ratebeer.com], example B [ratebeer.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104248</id>
	<title>They can have my Twisted Tea...</title>
	<author>Crock23A</author>
	<datestamp>1258225560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...when they pry it from my cold , dead fingers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...when they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099720</id>
	<title>Mines a vodka and red bull...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258228980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or is that not going to be available either?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or is that not going to be available either ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or is that not going to be available either?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099766</id>
	<title>The names alone should be enough for a ban</title>
	<author>Daniel Dvorkin</author>
	<datestamp>1258229220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Liquid Charge, Max Fury, Hard Wired, Vicious Vodka<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...  Anyone who sells stuff with names like that deserves to be shut down.  Of course, anyone who buys the stuff deserves whatever happens to them, so maybe they should stay on the market.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Liquid Charge , Max Fury , Hard Wired , Vicious Vodka ... Anyone who sells stuff with names like that deserves to be shut down .
Of course , anyone who buys the stuff deserves whatever happens to them , so maybe they should stay on the market .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Liquid Charge, Max Fury, Hard Wired, Vicious Vodka ...  Anyone who sells stuff with names like that deserves to be shut down.
Of course, anyone who buys the stuff deserves whatever happens to them, so maybe they should stay on the market.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104854</id>
	<title>What's the point....</title>
	<author>thephydes</author>
	<datestamp>1258279440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I drink coffee in the morning to get rid of the last effects of alcohol the evening before, and drink alcohol in the evening to get rid of the last effects of the coffee in the morning....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I drink coffee in the morning to get rid of the last effects of alcohol the evening before , and drink alcohol in the evening to get rid of the last effects of the coffee in the morning... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drink coffee in the morning to get rid of the last effects of alcohol the evening before, and drink alcohol in the evening to get rid of the last effects of the coffee in the morning....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103990</id>
	<title>Re:The War on Drugs just got dumberer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258222680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is effing hilarious!!!  Score 5 Funny!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is effing hilarious ! ! !
Score 5 Funny !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is effing hilarious!!!
Score 5 Funny!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103618</id>
	<title>Pan-galactic Gargle Blaster</title>
	<author>Datamonstar</author>
	<datestamp>1258218600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's see...<blockquote><div><p>        "Take the juice from one bottle of that Ol' Janx Spirit.<br> 
        Pour into it one measure of water from the seas of Santraginus V<br> 
        Allow three cubes of Arcturan Mega-gin to melt into the mixture (it must be properly iced or the benzene is lost).<br> 
        Allow four litres of Fallian marsh gas to bubble through it (in memory of all those happy Hikers who have died of pleasure in the Marshes of Fallia).<br> 
        Over the back of a silver spoon float a measure of Qualactin Hypermint extract, redolent of all the heady odours of the dark Qualactin Zones.<br> 
        Drop in the tooth of an Algolian Suntiger. Watch it dissolve, spreading the fires of the Algolian suns deep into the heart of the drink.<br> 
        Sprinkle Zamphour.<br> 
        Add an olive.<br> 
        Drink...but very carefully."</p></div>  </blockquote><p>

No caffeine, so it's safe (kinda).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see... " Take the juice from one bottle of that Ol ' Janx Spirit .
Pour into it one measure of water from the seas of Santraginus V Allow three cubes of Arcturan Mega-gin to melt into the mixture ( it must be properly iced or the benzene is lost ) .
Allow four litres of Fallian marsh gas to bubble through it ( in memory of all those happy Hikers who have died of pleasure in the Marshes of Fallia ) .
Over the back of a silver spoon float a measure of Qualactin Hypermint extract , redolent of all the heady odours of the dark Qualactin Zones .
Drop in the tooth of an Algolian Suntiger .
Watch it dissolve , spreading the fires of the Algolian suns deep into the heart of the drink .
Sprinkle Zamphour .
Add an olive .
Drink...but very carefully .
" No caffeine , so it 's safe ( kinda ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see...        "Take the juice from one bottle of that Ol' Janx Spirit.
Pour into it one measure of water from the seas of Santraginus V 
        Allow three cubes of Arcturan Mega-gin to melt into the mixture (it must be properly iced or the benzene is lost).
Allow four litres of Fallian marsh gas to bubble through it (in memory of all those happy Hikers who have died of pleasure in the Marshes of Fallia).
Over the back of a silver spoon float a measure of Qualactin Hypermint extract, redolent of all the heady odours of the dark Qualactin Zones.
Drop in the tooth of an Algolian Suntiger.
Watch it dissolve, spreading the fires of the Algolian suns deep into the heart of the drink.
Sprinkle Zamphour.
Add an olive.
Drink...but very carefully.
"  

No caffeine, so it's safe (kinda).
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494</id>
	<title>Re:Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok</title>
	<author>5pp000</author>
	<datestamp>1258217700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, it's pretty weird to read that the combination of caffeine and alcohol is not "generally recognized as safe".  For how many centuries do you suppose people have been drinking Irish coffee?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's pretty weird to read that the combination of caffeine and alcohol is not " generally recognized as safe " .
For how many centuries do you suppose people have been drinking Irish coffee ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's pretty weird to read that the combination of caffeine and alcohol is not "generally recognized as safe".
For how many centuries do you suppose people have been drinking Irish coffee?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110508</id>
	<title>Yes, but are you informed enough?</title>
	<author>gillbates</author>
	<datestamp>1258291500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>
Have you as a public been fooled into thinking I'm unaware of the dangers of smoking, carousing, and general debauchery?
</i>
</p><p>
It's not these the FDA is concerned about, but the possibly as-yet-unknown interactions between caffeine and alcohol that could exacerbate the long term ill effects of the other.
</p><p>
As I understand it, to fully understand the risks, you must be a microbiologist who specializes in human metabolism.  Me, I'm a CS major, and while I could spend a decade of my life studying biology and chemistry, and human metabolism so that I could know for certain the risks, I choose not to.
</p><p>
Instead, a portion of my tax dollars pays someone at the FDA to do that for me.  That way, I can get on with having a good time without having to conduct a formal risk analysis every time I go the bar.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you as a public been fooled into thinking I 'm unaware of the dangers of smoking , carousing , and general debauchery ?
It 's not these the FDA is concerned about , but the possibly as-yet-unknown interactions between caffeine and alcohol that could exacerbate the long term ill effects of the other .
As I understand it , to fully understand the risks , you must be a microbiologist who specializes in human metabolism .
Me , I 'm a CS major , and while I could spend a decade of my life studying biology and chemistry , and human metabolism so that I could know for certain the risks , I choose not to .
Instead , a portion of my tax dollars pays someone at the FDA to do that for me .
That way , I can get on with having a good time without having to conduct a formal risk analysis every time I go the bar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> 
Have you as a public been fooled into thinking I'm unaware of the dangers of smoking, carousing, and general debauchery?
It's not these the FDA is concerned about, but the possibly as-yet-unknown interactions between caffeine and alcohol that could exacerbate the long term ill effects of the other.
As I understand it, to fully understand the risks, you must be a microbiologist who specializes in human metabolism.
Me, I'm a CS major, and while I could spend a decade of my life studying biology and chemistry, and human metabolism so that I could know for certain the risks, I choose not to.
Instead, a portion of my tax dollars pays someone at the FDA to do that for me.
That way, I can get on with having a good time without having to conduct a formal risk analysis every time I go the bar.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110780</id>
	<title>Re:Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok</title>
	<author>aXis100</author>
	<datestamp>1258294140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but do people have half a dozen plus irish coffees in a single night, then dance around like hooligans?  No - and I'd bet most people usually only have one after a substantial restaurant meal and beer/wine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but do people have half a dozen plus irish coffees in a single night , then dance around like hooligans ?
No - and I 'd bet most people usually only have one after a substantial restaurant meal and beer/wine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but do people have half a dozen plus irish coffees in a single night, then dance around like hooligans?
No - and I'd bet most people usually only have one after a substantial restaurant meal and beer/wine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106514</id>
	<title>Re:Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1258308240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I assure you, Jager and Redbull can come to no good end.</p><p>Though I don't think it's any business of the FDA.</p></div></blockquote><p>I assure you, Jager and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rohypnol" title="wikipedia.org">Rohypnol</a> [wikipedia.org] can come to no good end.</p><p>Though I don't think it's any business of the FDA.</p><p>Here's a minor hint as to why it's their busness. They are called the <b>Food</b> and <b>Drug</b> Administration. J&#228;germeister is an alcohol and thus counts as a drug. And caffeine is a food additive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assure you , Jager and Redbull can come to no good end.Though I do n't think it 's any business of the FDA.I assure you , Jager and Rohypnol [ wikipedia.org ] can come to no good end.Though I do n't think it 's any business of the FDA.Here 's a minor hint as to why it 's their busness .
They are called the Food and Drug Administration .
J   germeister is an alcohol and thus counts as a drug .
And caffeine is a food additive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assure you, Jager and Redbull can come to no good end.Though I don't think it's any business of the FDA.I assure you, Jager and Rohypnol [wikipedia.org] can come to no good end.Though I don't think it's any business of the FDA.Here's a minor hint as to why it's their busness.
They are called the Food and Drug Administration.
Jägermeister is an alcohol and thus counts as a drug.
And caffeine is a food additive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103548</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>rapturizer</author>
	<datestamp>1258218120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>if the drinks with caffeine caused the behavior they are concerned about or the personality of the person. The people a the bar I occasionally visit who order these drinks (particularly the ones with energy drinks) seem to have a certain type of personality that would lend itself to the actions observed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>if the drinks with caffeine caused the behavior they are concerned about or the personality of the person .
The people a the bar I occasionally visit who order these drinks ( particularly the ones with energy drinks ) seem to have a certain type of personality that would lend itself to the actions observed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if the drinks with caffeine caused the behavior they are concerned about or the personality of the person.
The people a the bar I occasionally visit who order these drinks (particularly the ones with energy drinks) seem to have a certain type of personality that would lend itself to the actions observed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104610</id>
	<title>Oh the irony...</title>
	<author>CoolCalmChris</author>
	<datestamp>1258317360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that they took Sparks off the market (well, the caffeinated version that was worth a damn, I certainly never drank it because it tasted good) and replaced it with 4Loko, which at 12\% is twice as strong as original Sparks in a can twice the size (24 oz).</p><p>I'm no lightweight when it comes to drinking, but one of these packs a punch and two is pushing your luck. Three 4Lokos is the equivalent of drinking a 12 pack of 6\% beer and a few Red Bulls, so it's real easy to get lulled into thinking "I only had three of these things, I can't be that fucked up."</p><p>Still, I don't see why they should be illegal. Clearly labeled, yes...but banned? Definitely not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that they took Sparks off the market ( well , the caffeinated version that was worth a damn , I certainly never drank it because it tasted good ) and replaced it with 4Loko , which at 12 \ % is twice as strong as original Sparks in a can twice the size ( 24 oz ) .I 'm no lightweight when it comes to drinking , but one of these packs a punch and two is pushing your luck .
Three 4Lokos is the equivalent of drinking a 12 pack of 6 \ % beer and a few Red Bulls , so it 's real easy to get lulled into thinking " I only had three of these things , I ca n't be that fucked up .
" Still , I do n't see why they should be illegal .
Clearly labeled , yes...but banned ?
Definitely not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that they took Sparks off the market (well, the caffeinated version that was worth a damn, I certainly never drank it because it tasted good) and replaced it with 4Loko, which at 12\% is twice as strong as original Sparks in a can twice the size (24 oz).I'm no lightweight when it comes to drinking, but one of these packs a punch and two is pushing your luck.
Three 4Lokos is the equivalent of drinking a 12 pack of 6\% beer and a few Red Bulls, so it's real easy to get lulled into thinking "I only had three of these things, I can't be that fucked up.
"Still, I don't see why they should be illegal.
Clearly labeled, yes...but banned?
Definitely not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103484</id>
	<title>Re:Shoot, there goes my Irish Coffee. Is Decafe ok</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258217640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ignoring the legalities of this, and focusing on the identified risk, decaf would be OK.</p><p>The problem as identified in the article, if I read it correctly, is that drinking megacaf beverages with large amounts of alcohol basically puts you in an "inebriated and energized" state.  In other words, when you get completely falling-down drunk, the caffeine only mitigates the "falling down" part.  It prevents you from passing out when passing out is a damned fine defense mechanism that keeps you from doing something incredibly and amazingly stupid.</p><p>The same effect can be seen by a drunk who's had WAY too many and tries to down a bunch of coffee to compensate.  Their responses aren't any more accurate - they are still a danger to themselves and others, but it gives them the energy to FEEL like they are functioning somewhere near normal.  At least someone on four sixpacks of Bud is pretty much incapacitated, and generally understands that.  Add two pots of coffee and they start FEELING energized and alert, when in fact they are only energized.</p><p>So you can safely mix anything you want with your alcohol and avoid this effect, as long as you don't want a stimulant.  And while decaf coffee does have a certain amount of caffeine, for the purposes of this discussion it's not enough to compensate for the alcohol and is therefore irrelevant.</p><p>As to "would the law follow this logical train of thought", well, look at the state of the average knee-jerk law and think about it.  Though, as others have stated, if the bartender mixes it it's OK.  It's really only packaged liquor they appear to be going after.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ignoring the legalities of this , and focusing on the identified risk , decaf would be OK.The problem as identified in the article , if I read it correctly , is that drinking megacaf beverages with large amounts of alcohol basically puts you in an " inebriated and energized " state .
In other words , when you get completely falling-down drunk , the caffeine only mitigates the " falling down " part .
It prevents you from passing out when passing out is a damned fine defense mechanism that keeps you from doing something incredibly and amazingly stupid.The same effect can be seen by a drunk who 's had WAY too many and tries to down a bunch of coffee to compensate .
Their responses are n't any more accurate - they are still a danger to themselves and others , but it gives them the energy to FEEL like they are functioning somewhere near normal .
At least someone on four sixpacks of Bud is pretty much incapacitated , and generally understands that .
Add two pots of coffee and they start FEELING energized and alert , when in fact they are only energized.So you can safely mix anything you want with your alcohol and avoid this effect , as long as you do n't want a stimulant .
And while decaf coffee does have a certain amount of caffeine , for the purposes of this discussion it 's not enough to compensate for the alcohol and is therefore irrelevant.As to " would the law follow this logical train of thought " , well , look at the state of the average knee-jerk law and think about it .
Though , as others have stated , if the bartender mixes it it 's OK. It 's really only packaged liquor they appear to be going after .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ignoring the legalities of this, and focusing on the identified risk, decaf would be OK.The problem as identified in the article, if I read it correctly, is that drinking megacaf beverages with large amounts of alcohol basically puts you in an "inebriated and energized" state.
In other words, when you get completely falling-down drunk, the caffeine only mitigates the "falling down" part.
It prevents you from passing out when passing out is a damned fine defense mechanism that keeps you from doing something incredibly and amazingly stupid.The same effect can be seen by a drunk who's had WAY too many and tries to down a bunch of coffee to compensate.
Their responses aren't any more accurate - they are still a danger to themselves and others, but it gives them the energy to FEEL like they are functioning somewhere near normal.
At least someone on four sixpacks of Bud is pretty much incapacitated, and generally understands that.
Add two pots of coffee and they start FEELING energized and alert, when in fact they are only energized.So you can safely mix anything you want with your alcohol and avoid this effect, as long as you don't want a stimulant.
And while decaf coffee does have a certain amount of caffeine, for the purposes of this discussion it's not enough to compensate for the alcohol and is therefore irrelevant.As to "would the law follow this logical train of thought", well, look at the state of the average knee-jerk law and think about it.
Though, as others have stated, if the bartender mixes it it's OK.  It's really only packaged liquor they appear to be going after.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104306</id>
	<title>Re:Pan-galactic Gargle Blaster</title>
	<author>fractoid</author>
	<datestamp>1258226460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Like having my brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped around a large gold brick."</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Like having my brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped around a large gold brick .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Like having my brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped around a large gold brick.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30112304</id>
	<title>Re:What's the point....</title>
	<author>Anci3nt of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1258310460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I drink coffee in the morning to get rid of the last effects of alcohol the evening before, and drink alcohol in the evening to get rid of the last effects of the coffee in the morning....</p></div><p>So when you drink coffee all night cramming for an exam - of course the only logical solution is to drink copious amounts of alcohol in the morning. <br>See Mum... I isnt' just a dum colledge student.</p><p>-----<br>Never let your schooling interfere with your education.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I drink coffee in the morning to get rid of the last effects of alcohol the evening before , and drink alcohol in the evening to get rid of the last effects of the coffee in the morning....So when you drink coffee all night cramming for an exam - of course the only logical solution is to drink copious amounts of alcohol in the morning .
See Mum... I isnt ' just a dum colledge student.-----Never let your schooling interfere with your education .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I drink coffee in the morning to get rid of the last effects of alcohol the evening before, and drink alcohol in the evening to get rid of the last effects of the coffee in the morning....So when you drink coffee all night cramming for an exam - of course the only logical solution is to drink copious amounts of alcohol in the morning.
See Mum... I isnt' just a dum colledge student.-----Never let your schooling interfere with your education.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103458</id>
	<title>correlation, causation... same difference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258217520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Of 2,900 students in the study who had had a drink in the past month, 39\% of those who had mixed an energy drink with alcohol had ridden with a drunk driver, compared with 23\% of those who had a plain alcoholic drink. More than 12\% of students who had consumed an energy drink with alcohol had been hurt or injured, compared with 6\% who had consumed a plain alcoholic drink.</p></div></blockquote><p>causality is overrated anyway</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of 2,900 students in the study who had had a drink in the past month , 39 \ % of those who had mixed an energy drink with alcohol had ridden with a drunk driver , compared with 23 \ % of those who had a plain alcoholic drink .
More than 12 \ % of students who had consumed an energy drink with alcohol had been hurt or injured , compared with 6 \ % who had consumed a plain alcoholic drink.causality is overrated anyway</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of 2,900 students in the study who had had a drink in the past month, 39\% of those who had mixed an energy drink with alcohol had ridden with a drunk driver, compared with 23\% of those who had a plain alcoholic drink.
More than 12\% of students who had consumed an energy drink with alcohol had been hurt or injured, compared with 6\% who had consumed a plain alcoholic drink.causality is overrated anyway
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103886</id>
	<title>Not just Caffine</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258221300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is not just caffeine, which has been included in drinks for quite some time; rum and coke was mentioned earlier. It is the ingredients that are mixed in with energy drinks that have strong side effects that are not fully understood, such as  guarana and taurine.</p><p>Now it may seem a little ambiguous at first, but there are several classifications of these drinks:<br>1. Crazy bar mixers, such as jager bombs and red bull vodkas (strong but expensive)<br>2. Malt liquor/energy drink mixers, such as Sparks (weak but cheap)<br>3. High alcohol/strong energy drinks (strong and cheap), such as Four, which seem to have been pulled off the market in my area.</p><p>Drinks such as Four have an alcohol content of 9-11\% in a 24 once serving, which justifies its name as 4 times the normal alcoholic drink content. It's hard to draw the line in this debate, but being able to ingest 4x the alcoholic content of a beer plus a red bull or two from a single can is a bit much. Why not throw some absinthe in while we can?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is not just caffeine , which has been included in drinks for quite some time ; rum and coke was mentioned earlier .
It is the ingredients that are mixed in with energy drinks that have strong side effects that are not fully understood , such as guarana and taurine.Now it may seem a little ambiguous at first , but there are several classifications of these drinks : 1 .
Crazy bar mixers , such as jager bombs and red bull vodkas ( strong but expensive ) 2 .
Malt liquor/energy drink mixers , such as Sparks ( weak but cheap ) 3 .
High alcohol/strong energy drinks ( strong and cheap ) , such as Four , which seem to have been pulled off the market in my area.Drinks such as Four have an alcohol content of 9-11 \ % in a 24 once serving , which justifies its name as 4 times the normal alcoholic drink content .
It 's hard to draw the line in this debate , but being able to ingest 4x the alcoholic content of a beer plus a red bull or two from a single can is a bit much .
Why not throw some absinthe in while we can ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is not just caffeine, which has been included in drinks for quite some time; rum and coke was mentioned earlier.
It is the ingredients that are mixed in with energy drinks that have strong side effects that are not fully understood, such as  guarana and taurine.Now it may seem a little ambiguous at first, but there are several classifications of these drinks:1.
Crazy bar mixers, such as jager bombs and red bull vodkas (strong but expensive)2.
Malt liquor/energy drink mixers, such as Sparks (weak but cheap)3.
High alcohol/strong energy drinks (strong and cheap), such as Four, which seem to have been pulled off the market in my area.Drinks such as Four have an alcohol content of 9-11\% in a 24 once serving, which justifies its name as 4 times the normal alcoholic drink content.
It's hard to draw the line in this debate, but being able to ingest 4x the alcoholic content of a beer plus a red bull or two from a single can is a bit much.
Why not throw some absinthe in while we can?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103668</id>
	<title>This is why jagerbombs are horrible....</title>
	<author>asdfx</author>
	<datestamp>1258219020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>when you mix alcohol and caffeine people don't pass out.</p><p>instead they run around black-out drunk until someone bumps into them and a fight breaks out right at closing time.</p><p>save yourself and don't mix the two, especially in high doses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when you mix alcohol and caffeine people do n't pass out.instead they run around black-out drunk until someone bumps into them and a fight breaks out right at closing time.save yourself and do n't mix the two , especially in high doses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when you mix alcohol and caffeine people don't pass out.instead they run around black-out drunk until someone bumps into them and a fight breaks out right at closing time.save yourself and don't mix the two, especially in high doses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30115982</id>
	<title>Somewhere...</title>
	<author>Hettinga</author>
	<datestamp>1258390020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... a dude named Lebowski laughs...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... a dude named Lebowski laughs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... a dude named Lebowski laughs...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099778</id>
	<title>Jeebus, this is a first for me.</title>
	<author>palegray.net</author>
	<datestamp>1258229220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This story has been on the front page for almost 24 hours, and I'm the second poster? Wow, somebody please tag this one "nobodygivesashit".</htmltext>
<tokenext>This story has been on the front page for almost 24 hours , and I 'm the second poster ?
Wow , somebody please tag this one " nobodygivesashit " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This story has been on the front page for almost 24 hours, and I'm the second poster?
Wow, somebody please tag this one "nobodygivesashit".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103410</id>
	<title>Buzz Beer!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258217100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this remind anyone of the Drew Carey show, with their concoction of coffee and beer?  Buzz Beer!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this remind anyone of the Drew Carey show , with their concoction of coffee and beer ?
Buzz Beer !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this remind anyone of the Drew Carey show, with their concoction of coffee and beer?
Buzz Beer!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103910</id>
	<title>Re:Jack and Coke?</title>
	<author>eggman9713</author>
	<datestamp>1258221540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fuck Jack! Jameson all the way!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck Jack !
Jameson all the way !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck Jack!
Jameson all the way!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30113928</id>
	<title>Re:Jack and Coke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258376340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Two things... I've been warning people about the dangers of whiskey and coke for years and I can't believe the FDA actually banned something.  Red Bull and Coca-Cola must have pretty crappy lobbyists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two things... I 've been warning people about the dangers of whiskey and coke for years and I ca n't believe the FDA actually banned something .
Red Bull and Coca-Cola must have pretty crappy lobbyists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two things... I've been warning people about the dangers of whiskey and coke for years and I can't believe the FDA actually banned something.
Red Bull and Coca-Cola must have pretty crappy lobbyists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104314</id>
	<title>Alcohol is "food" now?</title>
	<author>bobv-pillars-net</author>
	<datestamp>1258226580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So alcoholic beverages are "food" according to the FDA.  At least that's the logic they appear to be pursuing.  I guess the next step is to subsidize beer with food stamps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So alcoholic beverages are " food " according to the FDA .
At least that 's the logic they appear to be pursuing .
I guess the next step is to subsidize beer with food stamps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So alcoholic beverages are "food" according to the FDA.
At least that's the logic they appear to be pursuing.
I guess the next step is to subsidize beer with food stamps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30125736</id>
	<title>Re:Jack and Coke?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258392360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are referring to Red Bull type drinks NOT Coca Cola or any other typical mixer. When I bartended I had a Doctor that would ask me to refuse to make those drinks because they are so dangerous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are referring to Red Bull type drinks NOT Coca Cola or any other typical mixer .
When I bartended I had a Doctor that would ask me to refuse to make those drinks because they are so dangerous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are referring to Red Bull type drinks NOT Coca Cola or any other typical mixer.
When I bartended I had a Doctor that would ask me to refuse to make those drinks because they are so dangerous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30174262</id>
	<title>imo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258744740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IMO this was bound to happen.  Have you ever drank two Sparks in a row?</p><p>My heart started to feel uncomfortable.</p><p>I think these companies could be in a lot of trouble if the shit were to hit the fan.  Drugs don't produce this uncomfortable feeling until near-overdose territory.</p><p>Read: Meth is comfortable where as higher doses of caffeine make my heart feel like it's under strain (*cough* a friend told me lol).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IMO this was bound to happen .
Have you ever drank two Sparks in a row ? My heart started to feel uncomfortable.I think these companies could be in a lot of trouble if the shit were to hit the fan .
Drugs do n't produce this uncomfortable feeling until near-overdose territory.Read : Meth is comfortable where as higher doses of caffeine make my heart feel like it 's under strain ( * cough * a friend told me lol ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMO this was bound to happen.
Have you ever drank two Sparks in a row?My heart started to feel uncomfortable.I think these companies could be in a lot of trouble if the shit were to hit the fan.
Drugs don't produce this uncomfortable feeling until near-overdose territory.Read: Meth is comfortable where as higher doses of caffeine make my heart feel like it's under strain (*cough* a friend told me lol).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103918</id>
	<title>Re:correlation, causation... same difference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258221660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod parent up. Do you think this result might just have something to do with the target demographic for energy drink marketing? EXTREME!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod parent up .
Do you think this result might just have something to do with the target demographic for energy drink marketing ?
EXTREME ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod parent up.
Do you think this result might just have something to do with the target demographic for energy drink marketing?
EXTREME!!!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103754</id>
	<title>Re:Drug criminalization never works.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258219860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While I agree with the premise of your argument, i must point out that the age should reasonably be no more that 18 years. 18 is the point were you are emancipated and therefore responsible for all your own actions, and this can even be lower in some instances ie enlist at 17 your parents sign a release and you don't have to go through them for anything again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While I agree with the premise of your argument , i must point out that the age should reasonably be no more that 18 years .
18 is the point were you are emancipated and therefore responsible for all your own actions , and this can even be lower in some instances ie enlist at 17 your parents sign a release and you do n't have to go through them for anything again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I agree with the premise of your argument, i must point out that the age should reasonably be no more that 18 years.
18 is the point were you are emancipated and therefore responsible for all your own actions, and this can even be lower in some instances ie enlist at 17 your parents sign a release and you don't have to go through them for anything again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104408</id>
	<title>How many more laws ....</title>
	<author>xgadflyx</author>
	<datestamp>1258227780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>At most this should wind up an FDA advisory notice/warning. We DO NOT need anymore legislation dictating how we are to live. Period.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At most this should wind up an FDA advisory notice/warning .
We DO NOT need anymore legislation dictating how we are to live .
Period .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At most this should wind up an FDA advisory notice/warning.
We DO NOT need anymore legislation dictating how we are to live.
Period.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104884</id>
	<title>Re:Rum and coke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258279740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard a (possibly apocryphal) story that rum and coke has its roots in the Spanish-American war, around 1898.  American troops fighting in Cuba and Puerto Rico mixed caribbean culture (rum) with American (coke).</p><p>But...  Coke has a lot less caffeine than an energy drink..  And rum and coke isn't sold prepacked, i.e. you don't get rum in your can at the super market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard a ( possibly apocryphal ) story that rum and coke has its roots in the Spanish-American war , around 1898 .
American troops fighting in Cuba and Puerto Rico mixed caribbean culture ( rum ) with American ( coke ) .But... Coke has a lot less caffeine than an energy drink.. And rum and coke is n't sold prepacked , i.e .
you do n't get rum in your can at the super market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard a (possibly apocryphal) story that rum and coke has its roots in the Spanish-American war, around 1898.
American troops fighting in Cuba and Puerto Rico mixed caribbean culture (rum) with American (coke).But...  Coke has a lot less caffeine than an energy drink..  And rum and coke isn't sold prepacked, i.e.
you don't get rum in your can at the super market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103374</id>
	<title>Rum and coke</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1258216800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How long has this been around? Probably as long as coke. So now they think it should be made illegal. Idiots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How long has this been around ?
Probably as long as coke .
So now they think it should be made illegal .
Idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long has this been around?
Probably as long as coke.
So now they think it should be made illegal.
Idiots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950</id>
	<title>Absolute Truth</title>
	<author>Groggnrath</author>
	<datestamp>1258222080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I assure you, Jager and Redbull can come to no good end. <br> <br>Though I don't think it's any business of the FDA. <br> <br>Is it too much to ask for a society that lets people make their own mistakes? Must we be hemmed in by the moral and ethical mistakes of the stupidest amongst us? How long must the law protect us from ourselves? Have you as a public been fooled into thinking I'm unaware of the dangers of smoking, carousing, and general debauchery? I assure I'm well aware, and I don't care. Please stop making thing illegal for my own good. I'm old enough to choose to make my own mistakes. As should you be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I assure you , Jager and Redbull can come to no good end .
Though I do n't think it 's any business of the FDA .
Is it too much to ask for a society that lets people make their own mistakes ?
Must we be hemmed in by the moral and ethical mistakes of the stupidest amongst us ?
How long must the law protect us from ourselves ?
Have you as a public been fooled into thinking I 'm unaware of the dangers of smoking , carousing , and general debauchery ?
I assure I 'm well aware , and I do n't care .
Please stop making thing illegal for my own good .
I 'm old enough to choose to make my own mistakes .
As should you be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I assure you, Jager and Redbull can come to no good end.
Though I don't think it's any business of the FDA.
Is it too much to ask for a society that lets people make their own mistakes?
Must we be hemmed in by the moral and ethical mistakes of the stupidest amongst us?
How long must the law protect us from ourselves?
Have you as a public been fooled into thinking I'm unaware of the dangers of smoking, carousing, and general debauchery?
I assure I'm well aware, and I don't care.
Please stop making thing illegal for my own good.
I'm old enough to choose to make my own mistakes.
As should you be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30105282</id>
	<title>Correlation does not impy causation</title>
	<author>bongk</author>
	<datestamp>1258295940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I read the article about the reports of negative effects.  They surveyed college students, and a result (for example) was that students who mixed energy drinks and alcohol were more likely to ride with a drunk driver.  Or put another way, students who rode with a drunk driver were more likely to mix energy drinks and alcohol.  Maybe riding with a drunk driver gives a person cravings for energy drinks mixed with alcohol.  Or maybe <b>People who are stupid or have poor regard for their own health and safety are likely to make multiple bad decisions,</b> like riding with a drunk driver and mixing energy drinks and alcohol.</p><p>I'm not saying mixing energy drinks and alcohol is not bad, I'm sure it is, I'm just saying the study may be flawed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I read the article about the reports of negative effects .
They surveyed college students , and a result ( for example ) was that students who mixed energy drinks and alcohol were more likely to ride with a drunk driver .
Or put another way , students who rode with a drunk driver were more likely to mix energy drinks and alcohol .
Maybe riding with a drunk driver gives a person cravings for energy drinks mixed with alcohol .
Or maybe People who are stupid or have poor regard for their own health and safety are likely to make multiple bad decisions , like riding with a drunk driver and mixing energy drinks and alcohol.I 'm not saying mixing energy drinks and alcohol is not bad , I 'm sure it is , I 'm just saying the study may be flawed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I read the article about the reports of negative effects.
They surveyed college students, and a result (for example) was that students who mixed energy drinks and alcohol were more likely to ride with a drunk driver.
Or put another way, students who rode with a drunk driver were more likely to mix energy drinks and alcohol.
Maybe riding with a drunk driver gives a person cravings for energy drinks mixed with alcohol.
Or maybe People who are stupid or have poor regard for their own health and safety are likely to make multiple bad decisions, like riding with a drunk driver and mixing energy drinks and alcohol.I'm not saying mixing energy drinks and alcohol is not bad, I'm sure it is, I'm just saying the study may be flawed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110074</id>
	<title>Re:The War on Drugs just got dumberer</title>
	<author>mrmeval</author>
	<datestamp>1258288380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can sell the booze and the store can sell them nodoze. FDA is grandstanding for a budget increase again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can sell the booze and the store can sell them nodoze .
FDA is grandstanding for a budget increase again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can sell the booze and the store can sell them nodoze.
FDA is grandstanding for a budget increase again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30113928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103754
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30112304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103410
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30129168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30105370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30114698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103618
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1857200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30125736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103548
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30106694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30107776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104122
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30105370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103484
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099778
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104398
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30099720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30112304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30114698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30129168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30109048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30110074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30104884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1857200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30113928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30125736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1857200.30103910
</commentlist>
</conversation>
