<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_14_1831258</id>
	<title>Two Earth-Sized Bodies With Oxygen-Rich Atmospheres</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1258202400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>tugfoigel writes <i>"Astrophysicists at the University of Warwick and Kiel University have discovered <a href="http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pressreleases/2\_earth-sized\_bodies/">two bodies the size of earth with oxygen-rich atmospheres</a> &mdash; however, there is a disappointing snag for anyone looking for a potential home for alien life, or even a future home for ourselves. These are not planets, but are actually two unusual white dwarf stars."</i> The objects, 220 and 400 light-years distant, are believed to be remnants of stars between 7 and 10 solar masses. Such stars, the largest that evolve to white dwarves, have been sought for years. If the stars were a little more massive they would collapse to neutron stars, or so the theory goes. Here is <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2246">the paper</a> on the arXiv.</htmltext>
<tokenext>tugfoigel writes " Astrophysicists at the University of Warwick and Kiel University have discovered two bodies the size of earth with oxygen-rich atmospheres    however , there is a disappointing snag for anyone looking for a potential home for alien life , or even a future home for ourselves .
These are not planets , but are actually two unusual white dwarf stars .
" The objects , 220 and 400 light-years distant , are believed to be remnants of stars between 7 and 10 solar masses .
Such stars , the largest that evolve to white dwarves , have been sought for years .
If the stars were a little more massive they would collapse to neutron stars , or so the theory goes .
Here is the paper on the arXiv .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tugfoigel writes "Astrophysicists at the University of Warwick and Kiel University have discovered two bodies the size of earth with oxygen-rich atmospheres — however, there is a disappointing snag for anyone looking for a potential home for alien life, or even a future home for ourselves.
These are not planets, but are actually two unusual white dwarf stars.
" The objects, 220 and 400 light-years distant, are believed to be remnants of stars between 7 and 10 solar masses.
Such stars, the largest that evolve to white dwarves, have been sought for years.
If the stars were a little more massive they would collapse to neutron stars, or so the theory goes.
Here is the paper on the arXiv.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103698</id>
	<title>If we learn anything from past experiences..</title>
	<author>tangent3</author>
	<datestamp>1258219380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do not colonize the planet after a terrorist sets off a nuclear device nearby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do not colonize the planet after a terrorist sets off a nuclear device nearby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do not colonize the planet after a terrorist sets off a nuclear device nearby.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103604</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>mhall119</author>
	<datestamp>1258218540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All known arrangements of life either consume oxygen or produce it, either way we will find free oxygen anywhere we find such life.</p><p>All known arrangements of life depend on liquid water, even in those under-glacier lakes or deep ocean thermal vents, liquid water is necessary.  Therefore we will find liquid water anywhere we find such life.</p><p>Unless there is some arrangement for life than is fundamentally different from ours, on a molecular level, then oxygen and liquid water will be found anywhere life will be found.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All known arrangements of life either consume oxygen or produce it , either way we will find free oxygen anywhere we find such life.All known arrangements of life depend on liquid water , even in those under-glacier lakes or deep ocean thermal vents , liquid water is necessary .
Therefore we will find liquid water anywhere we find such life.Unless there is some arrangement for life than is fundamentally different from ours , on a molecular level , then oxygen and liquid water will be found anywhere life will be found .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All known arrangements of life either consume oxygen or produce it, either way we will find free oxygen anywhere we find such life.All known arrangements of life depend on liquid water, even in those under-glacier lakes or deep ocean thermal vents, liquid water is necessary.
Therefore we will find liquid water anywhere we find such life.Unless there is some arrangement for life than is fundamentally different from ours, on a molecular level, then oxygen and liquid water will be found anywhere life will be found.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103020</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1258212360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is a perfect example of how deceptive headlines get created.</i></p><p>Never underestimate the power of really stupid people who are profoundly ignorant of the subject they report on.</p><p>The "earth sized body" is a pure fiction, as near as I can tell.  The radius is not explicitly stated in the paper, and the estimated masses are around one solar mass, which means they are no where near earth-sized.  Some ignoramous just made that up, and the highly-paid<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/-tard editors passed it on, stripping the tiny bit of correct information from the original PR headline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a perfect example of how deceptive headlines get created.Never underestimate the power of really stupid people who are profoundly ignorant of the subject they report on.The " earth sized body " is a pure fiction , as near as I can tell .
The radius is not explicitly stated in the paper , and the estimated masses are around one solar mass , which means they are no where near earth-sized .
Some ignoramous just made that up , and the highly-paid /-tard editors passed it on , stripping the tiny bit of correct information from the original PR headline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a perfect example of how deceptive headlines get created.Never underestimate the power of really stupid people who are profoundly ignorant of the subject they report on.The "earth sized body" is a pure fiction, as near as I can tell.
The radius is not explicitly stated in the paper, and the estimated masses are around one solar mass, which means they are no where near earth-sized.
Some ignoramous just made that up, and the highly-paid /-tard editors passed it on, stripping the tiny bit of correct information from the original PR headline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103094</id>
	<title>White dwarfs' salvation lies in our hands</title>
	<author>cupantae</author>
	<datestamp>1258213320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is man's destiny to save these stars from eternal, er, hellfire?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is man 's destiny to save these stars from eternal , er , hellfire ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is man's destiny to save these stars from eternal, er, hellfire?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30106074</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>realityimpaired</author>
	<datestamp>1258304940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're wrong.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic\_respiration" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic\_respiration</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>We have discovered forms of life on this planet that do not require oxygen to live. For some of them, oxygen is actually a poison, and they can't survive in Earth's surface atmosphere. The life forms found around sulfur vents at the bottom of the ocean are an example of anaerobic life, as are some of the species of bacteria found deep within the Earth's crust.</p><p>Water is still an important part of the equation, but there are substitutes for Oxygen that life can use instead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're wrong.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic \ _respiration [ wikipedia.org ] We have discovered forms of life on this planet that do not require oxygen to live .
For some of them , oxygen is actually a poison , and they ca n't survive in Earth 's surface atmosphere .
The life forms found around sulfur vents at the bottom of the ocean are an example of anaerobic life , as are some of the species of bacteria found deep within the Earth 's crust.Water is still an important part of the equation , but there are substitutes for Oxygen that life can use instead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're wrong.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anaerobic\_respiration [wikipedia.org]We have discovered forms of life on this planet that do not require oxygen to live.
For some of them, oxygen is actually a poison, and they can't survive in Earth's surface atmosphere.
The life forms found around sulfur vents at the bottom of the ocean are an example of anaerobic life, as are some of the species of bacteria found deep within the Earth's crust.Water is still an important part of the equation, but there are substitutes for Oxygen that life can use instead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30116100</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258390500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.</p></div><p>You are aware that Tolkien was writing <em>fiction</em> when he wrote that, are you?</p></div><p>"You are aware that Tolkien was" a Rawlinson and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford from 1925 to 1945, and Merton Professor of English Language and Literature from 1945 to 1959?  I believe that makes him an expert.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.You are aware that Tolkien was writing fiction when he wrote that , are you ?
" You are aware that Tolkien was " a Rawlinson and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford from 1925 to 1945 , and Merton Professor of English Language and Literature from 1945 to 1959 ?
I believe that makes him an expert .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.You are aware that Tolkien was writing fiction when he wrote that, are you?
"You are aware that Tolkien was" a Rawlinson and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford from 1925 to 1945, and Merton Professor of English Language and Literature from 1945 to 1959?
I believe that makes him an expert.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650</id>
	<title>white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258207680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>"White dwarfs" is the proper plural form when talking about more than one white dwarf star.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" White dwarfs " is the proper plural form when talking about more than one white dwarf star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"White dwarfs" is the proper plural form when talking about more than one white dwarf star.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30107098</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258312620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>-1 No Sense of Humor</htmltext>
<tokenext>-1 No Sense of Humor</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-1 No Sense of Humor</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102768</id>
	<title>Re:nomenclature</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1258208880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Shouldn't we call them blue dwarfs</p></div></blockquote><p>That was the initial idea, but unfortunately there were already numerous related trademarks held by the porn industry.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't we call them blue dwarfsThat was the initial idea , but unfortunately there were already numerous related trademarks held by the porn industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't we call them blue dwarfsThat was the initial idea, but unfortunately there were already numerous related trademarks held by the porn industry.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103426</id>
	<title>Why does this preclude life?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258217280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why does this preclude alien life?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does this preclude alien life ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why does this preclude alien life?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30166624</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1258637820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us?</p></div><p>Because very specific circumstances are required in order for a life form to exist, and the only type of livable circumstances we've been able to compare to are our own.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us ? Because very specific circumstances are required in order for a life form to exist , and the only type of livable circumstances we 've been able to compare to are our own .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us?Because very specific circumstances are required in order for a life form to exist, and the only type of livable circumstances we've been able to compare to are our own.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102594</id>
	<title>If there is intelligent life...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258207200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>given the gravity they're likely to be really short and with really bad backs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>given the gravity they 're likely to be really short and with really bad backs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>given the gravity they're likely to be really short and with really bad backs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104060</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>ericbg05</author>
	<datestamp>1258223640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The radius is not explicitly stated in the paper, and the estimated masses are around one solar mass, which means they are no where near earth-sized.</p></div><p>Wrong.  WDs are *ridiculously* dense, with a rho of about 10^6 g/cm^3, so a 1M\_sun WD has a volume of like 2*10^31 cubic meters, which means the radius is around 8000 kilometers.  R\_earth is about 6400 kilometers, so Earth is actually really useful to get an intuitive picture of how these guys look.</p><p>

The cool thing about WDs is that they shrink in volume when you add mass.  Which means they get denser the more mass you add.  Even cooler is that lots of them are in a co-orbit with other stars in a binary system, and they steal mass from the other star, so it's not so strange to see WDs gaining mass and getting denser over time.</p><p>

It turns out there is one special mass at which the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron\_degeneracy\_pressure" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">electron degeneracy pressure</a> [wikipedia.org] holding the star up is not enough to fight the force of gravity pushing it inward.  (This mass is about 1.4 times the mass of the sun, depending on whether the star is rotating.)  At that point the thing collapses from the size of earth to about the size of a soccer ball in less than a second, generating one of the most spectacular explosions in nature.  I mean this thing is blown apart at around 3\% of the speed of light and is 5 billion times brighter than the sun.</p><p>

This is called a "type Ia supernova" -- a pretty boring name for what is, technically speaking, the awesomest thing in the universe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The radius is not explicitly stated in the paper , and the estimated masses are around one solar mass , which means they are no where near earth-sized.Wrong .
WDs are * ridiculously * dense , with a rho of about 10 ^ 6 g/cm ^ 3 , so a 1M \ _sun WD has a volume of like 2 * 10 ^ 31 cubic meters , which means the radius is around 8000 kilometers .
R \ _earth is about 6400 kilometers , so Earth is actually really useful to get an intuitive picture of how these guys look .
The cool thing about WDs is that they shrink in volume when you add mass .
Which means they get denser the more mass you add .
Even cooler is that lots of them are in a co-orbit with other stars in a binary system , and they steal mass from the other star , so it 's not so strange to see WDs gaining mass and getting denser over time .
It turns out there is one special mass at which the electron degeneracy pressure [ wikipedia.org ] holding the star up is not enough to fight the force of gravity pushing it inward .
( This mass is about 1.4 times the mass of the sun , depending on whether the star is rotating .
) At that point the thing collapses from the size of earth to about the size of a soccer ball in less than a second , generating one of the most spectacular explosions in nature .
I mean this thing is blown apart at around 3 \ % of the speed of light and is 5 billion times brighter than the sun .
This is called a " type Ia supernova " -- a pretty boring name for what is , technically speaking , the awesomest thing in the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The radius is not explicitly stated in the paper, and the estimated masses are around one solar mass, which means they are no where near earth-sized.Wrong.
WDs are *ridiculously* dense, with a rho of about 10^6 g/cm^3, so a 1M\_sun WD has a volume of like 2*10^31 cubic meters, which means the radius is around 8000 kilometers.
R\_earth is about 6400 kilometers, so Earth is actually really useful to get an intuitive picture of how these guys look.
The cool thing about WDs is that they shrink in volume when you add mass.
Which means they get denser the more mass you add.
Even cooler is that lots of them are in a co-orbit with other stars in a binary system, and they steal mass from the other star, so it's not so strange to see WDs gaining mass and getting denser over time.
It turns out there is one special mass at which the electron degeneracy pressure [wikipedia.org] holding the star up is not enough to fight the force of gravity pushing it inward.
(This mass is about 1.4 times the mass of the sun, depending on whether the star is rotating.
)  At that point the thing collapses from the size of earth to about the size of a soccer ball in less than a second, generating one of the most spectacular explosions in nature.
I mean this thing is blown apart at around 3\% of the speed of light and is 5 billion times brighter than the sun.
This is called a "type Ia supernova" -- a pretty boring name for what is, technically speaking, the awesomest thing in the universe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104498</id>
	<title>Pssh you guys don't take anything.</title>
	<author>tengeta</author>
	<datestamp>1258315560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give it a chance, let the shit cool off and were good to go. Get to work on the space ships, and we might need a ton of water bottles.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give it a chance , let the shit cool off and were good to go .
Get to work on the space ships , and we might need a ton of water bottles .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give it a chance, let the shit cool off and were good to go.
Get to work on the space ships, and we might need a ton of water bottles.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550</id>
	<title>Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258206840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is a perfect example of how deceptive headlines get created.<br> <br>
<b>Original paper title:</b> "Two white dwarfs with oxygen-rich atmospheres"<br>
<b>The newspaper headline:</b> "2 Earth-sized bodies with oxygen rich atmospheres found- but they're stars not planets"<br>
<b>Slashdot headline:</b> "Two Earth-Sized Bodies With Oxygen-Rich Atmospheres"<br> <br>
The submitter could have simply stated "Two white dwarf stars with oxygen-rich atmospheres" but then who would have clicked further.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a perfect example of how deceptive headlines get created .
Original paper title : " Two white dwarfs with oxygen-rich atmospheres " The newspaper headline : " 2 Earth-sized bodies with oxygen rich atmospheres found- but they 're stars not planets " Slashdot headline : " Two Earth-Sized Bodies With Oxygen-Rich Atmospheres " The submitter could have simply stated " Two white dwarf stars with oxygen-rich atmospheres " but then who would have clicked further .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a perfect example of how deceptive headlines get created.
Original paper title: "Two white dwarfs with oxygen-rich atmospheres"
The newspaper headline: "2 Earth-sized bodies with oxygen rich atmospheres found- but they're stars not planets"
Slashdot headline: "Two Earth-Sized Bodies With Oxygen-Rich Atmospheres" 
The submitter could have simply stated "Two white dwarf stars with oxygen-rich atmospheres" but then who would have clicked further.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102626</id>
	<title>The TOW-TURE truck:</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1258207440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Synopsis: The tow-ture truck is a vehicle operated by the fire department for the purpose of punishing those who work on

their cars in public parking lots. It is driven by stoic surfer-dudes. It has an inverted bed on the back which is full of

instruments of torture as well as a robot arm to pull people under for punishment.</i> <br> <br>

<i> <b>Tow-ture truck operator</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr></i>:<blockquote><div><p> This is the tow-ture truck.</p></div></blockquote><p>
<i>[ Two men are tending to a beat-up Chevy Nova in a public parking lot. One of them is under the rear, fixing it, and one

is standing to the side of the pickup. The tow-ture truck operator attaches the winch hook to the rear bumper. The man

standing to the side of the Nova graps the cable and begins to spin it. When the cable is spun quickly, it smears to the

various shapes of the <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e7/Hydrogen\_Density\_Plots.png/350px-Hydrogen\_Density\_Plots.png" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">hydrogen wave function</a> [wikimedia.org] when seen from above. ]<br> <br>

<i> <b>Tow-ture truck operator</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr></i>:</i></p><blockquote><div><p><i>First, don't spin my cable,<br>
which is a solution to<br>
the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr\%C3\%B6dinger\_equation#Expressing\_the\_wave\_function\_as\_a\_complex\_plane\_wave" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">partial

differential equations</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
schroedinger knew<br> <br>

the direction field follows<br>
a blurry twist<br>
which is why, if you can't see it,<br>
it <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr\%C3\%B6dinger's\_cat" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">dosen't exist.</a> [wikipedia.org]</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>

<i>[ The winch on the tow-ture truck begins to pull the Nova upwards as the man under it, previously oblivious to the

spectacle, says, "what the hell?" as a robot arm extends from under the tow-ture truck and grabs him by is ankle. He is being

pulled under the tow-ture truck, enclosed on all sides by metal walls and the ground below. he is trapped under the towture

truck when it begins to move slowly... ]</i> <br> <br>

<i> <b>Tow-ture truck operator</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr></i>:</p><blockquote><div><p>next, we back over you<br>
till you're under the bed<br>
if you cant keep up, the motorized tailgate<br>
will crush your head.<br> <br>

as long as you keep crawling,<br>
I'll go slow enough for you,<br>
but if we vent the coolant plugs<br>
we may turn you to stew.<br> <br>

One more thing -- <br>
there's no way...you can crawl out the sides,<br>
50 Kilovolt volt lightning rods<br>
will <b>fry your fuckin' hide!</b></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Synopsis : The tow-ture truck is a vehicle operated by the fire department for the purpose of punishing those who work on their cars in public parking lots .
It is driven by stoic surfer-dudes .
It has an inverted bed on the back which is full of instruments of torture as well as a robot arm to pull people under for punishment .
Tow-ture truck operator : This is the tow-ture truck .
[ Two men are tending to a beat-up Chevy Nova in a public parking lot .
One of them is under the rear , fixing it , and one is standing to the side of the pickup .
The tow-ture truck operator attaches the winch hook to the rear bumper .
The man standing to the side of the Nova graps the cable and begins to spin it .
When the cable is spun quickly , it smears to the various shapes of the hydrogen wave function [ wikimedia.org ] when seen from above .
] Tow-ture truck operator : First , do n't spin my cable , which is a solution to the partial differential equations [ wikipedia.org ] schroedinger knew the direction field follows a blurry twist which is why , if you ca n't see it , it dose n't exist .
[ wikipedia.org ] [ The winch on the tow-ture truck begins to pull the Nova upwards as the man under it , previously oblivious to the spectacle , says , " what the hell ?
" as a robot arm extends from under the tow-ture truck and grabs him by is ankle .
He is being pulled under the tow-ture truck , enclosed on all sides by metal walls and the ground below .
he is trapped under the towture truck when it begins to move slowly... ] Tow-ture truck operator : next , we back over you till you 're under the bed if you cant keep up , the motorized tailgate will crush your head .
as long as you keep crawling , I 'll go slow enough for you , but if we vent the coolant plugs we may turn you to stew .
One more thing -- there 's no way...you can crawl out the sides , 50 Kilovolt volt lightning rods will fry your fuckin ' hide !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Synopsis: The tow-ture truck is a vehicle operated by the fire department for the purpose of punishing those who work on

their cars in public parking lots.
It is driven by stoic surfer-dudes.
It has an inverted bed on the back which is full of

instruments of torture as well as a robot arm to pull people under for punishment.
Tow-ture truck operator : This is the tow-ture truck.
[ Two men are tending to a beat-up Chevy Nova in a public parking lot.
One of them is under the rear, fixing it, and one

is standing to the side of the pickup.
The tow-ture truck operator attaches the winch hook to the rear bumper.
The man

standing to the side of the Nova graps the cable and begins to spin it.
When the cable is spun quickly, it smears to the

various shapes of the hydrogen wave function [wikimedia.org] when seen from above.
] 

 Tow-ture truck operator :First, don't spin my cable,
which is a solution to
the partial

differential equations [wikipedia.org] 
schroedinger knew 

the direction field follows
a blurry twist
which is why, if you can't see it,
it dosen't exist.
[wikipedia.org] 

[ The winch on the tow-ture truck begins to pull the Nova upwards as the man under it, previously oblivious to the

spectacle, says, "what the hell?
" as a robot arm extends from under the tow-ture truck and grabs him by is ankle.
He is being

pulled under the tow-ture truck, enclosed on all sides by metal walls and the ground below.
he is trapped under the towture

truck when it begins to move slowly... ]  

 Tow-ture truck operator :next, we back over you
till you're under the bed
if you cant keep up, the motorized tailgate
will crush your head.
as long as you keep crawling,
I'll go slow enough for you,
but if we vent the coolant plugs
we may turn you to stew.
One more thing -- 
there's no way...you can crawl out the sides,
50 Kilovolt volt lightning rods
will fry your fuckin' hide! 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103110</id>
	<title>When We Finally Find Them</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1258213500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When we do find a planet fairly like Earth, will we then finally be able to stop having news stories that start off making noises about "Earth-like" but quickly devolve into "having one characteristic that can be compared to Earth, such as a particular element, but in all other respects are entirely unlike Earth"? This particular story was perfectly good without the bogus 'grabber'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When we do find a planet fairly like Earth , will we then finally be able to stop having news stories that start off making noises about " Earth-like " but quickly devolve into " having one characteristic that can be compared to Earth , such as a particular element , but in all other respects are entirely unlike Earth " ?
This particular story was perfectly good without the bogus 'grabber' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When we do find a planet fairly like Earth, will we then finally be able to stop having news stories that start off making noises about "Earth-like" but quickly devolve into "having one characteristic that can be compared to Earth, such as a particular element, but in all other respects are entirely unlike Earth"?
This particular story was perfectly good without the bogus 'grabber'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30111752</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258303560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.</p></div><p>You are aware that Tolkien was writing <em>fiction</em> when he wrote that, are you?</p></div><p>You are aware that Tolkien was a <b>language professor at Oxford</b> when he wrote that, are you not?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.You are aware that Tolkien was writing fiction when he wrote that , are you ? You are aware that Tolkien was a language professor at Oxford when he wrote that , are you not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.You are aware that Tolkien was writing fiction when he wrote that, are you?You are aware that Tolkien was a language professor at Oxford when he wrote that, are you not?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103324</id>
	<title>apartment on the sun</title>
	<author>Dyinobal</author>
	<datestamp>1258216260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"oh please do you know how much an apartment that size on the sun would cost?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" oh please do you know how much an apartment that size on the sun would cost ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"oh please do you know how much an apartment that size on the sun would cost?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30119394</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>juhaz</author>
	<datestamp>1258401720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All known arrangements of life either consume oxygen or produce it, either way we will find free oxygen anywhere we find such life.</p></div><p>Uhh. What? Life on Earth was already at least few hundred million years old when cyanobacteria figured out the trick to produce oxygen, and obviously nothing consumed it before that either, because there wasn't any oxygen to consume. And boy was it bad for the critters that weren't used to it when those buggers started releasing the stuff into the atmosphere en masse, they call it the friggin' oxygen catastrophe.</p><p>There are STILL <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obligate\_anaerobe" title="wikipedia.org">things that die</a> [wikipedia.org] when exposed to oxygen, many of them pathogens (not much free oxygen in your body, since it's all bound up in hemoglobin) for example Clostridium bacteria, the nice buggers responsible for botulism (that's why it's so commonly associated with contaminated canned foods - no pesky oxygen there) and tetanus (tends to happen with deep wounds where air won't reach). There are also organisms that can tolerate (and sometimes use oxygen), but don't NEED it - fermentation is a form of anaerobic metabolism, for example, so the next time you have a beer, be thankful not every living thing consumes oxygen.</p><p>You are right about water, but considering there's exactly one "known arrangement", you'd be hard pressed to draw any statistics from that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All known arrangements of life either consume oxygen or produce it , either way we will find free oxygen anywhere we find such life.Uhh .
What ? Life on Earth was already at least few hundred million years old when cyanobacteria figured out the trick to produce oxygen , and obviously nothing consumed it before that either , because there was n't any oxygen to consume .
And boy was it bad for the critters that were n't used to it when those buggers started releasing the stuff into the atmosphere en masse , they call it the friggin ' oxygen catastrophe.There are STILL things that die [ wikipedia.org ] when exposed to oxygen , many of them pathogens ( not much free oxygen in your body , since it 's all bound up in hemoglobin ) for example Clostridium bacteria , the nice buggers responsible for botulism ( that 's why it 's so commonly associated with contaminated canned foods - no pesky oxygen there ) and tetanus ( tends to happen with deep wounds where air wo n't reach ) .
There are also organisms that can tolerate ( and sometimes use oxygen ) , but do n't NEED it - fermentation is a form of anaerobic metabolism , for example , so the next time you have a beer , be thankful not every living thing consumes oxygen.You are right about water , but considering there 's exactly one " known arrangement " , you 'd be hard pressed to draw any statistics from that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All known arrangements of life either consume oxygen or produce it, either way we will find free oxygen anywhere we find such life.Uhh.
What? Life on Earth was already at least few hundred million years old when cyanobacteria figured out the trick to produce oxygen, and obviously nothing consumed it before that either, because there wasn't any oxygen to consume.
And boy was it bad for the critters that weren't used to it when those buggers started releasing the stuff into the atmosphere en masse, they call it the friggin' oxygen catastrophe.There are STILL things that die [wikipedia.org] when exposed to oxygen, many of them pathogens (not much free oxygen in your body, since it's all bound up in hemoglobin) for example Clostridium bacteria, the nice buggers responsible for botulism (that's why it's so commonly associated with contaminated canned foods - no pesky oxygen there) and tetanus (tends to happen with deep wounds where air won't reach).
There are also organisms that can tolerate (and sometimes use oxygen), but don't NEED it - fermentation is a form of anaerobic metabolism, for example, so the next time you have a beer, be thankful not every living thing consumes oxygen.You are right about water, but considering there's exactly one "known arrangement", you'd be hard pressed to draw any statistics from that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102832</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>Alsee</author>
	<datestamp>1258209660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In related news SETI Has Detected Intelligent Radio Signals From Space.</p><p>They are currently working on better methods to filter out the earth TV broadcasts being reflected back from the moon.</p><p>-</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In related news SETI Has Detected Intelligent Radio Signals From Space.They are currently working on better methods to filter out the earth TV broadcasts being reflected back from the moon.-</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In related news SETI Has Detected Intelligent Radio Signals From Space.They are currently working on better methods to filter out the earth TV broadcasts being reflected back from the moon.-</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102792</id>
	<title>I for one...</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1258209240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>hope there's adequate parking space!</htmltext>
<tokenext>hope there 's adequate parking space !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>hope there's adequate parking space!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103158</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>AniVisual</author>
	<datestamp>1258214160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Pish, putting a spin on things is old news. If you own a NIV Bible, congrats, you already own a book where theologians twist the source material to censor embarrassing verses. </p><p>Take Songs 5:4 for example: </p><dl>
<dt>Young's Literal Version</dt><dd>My beloved sent his hand from the net-work[probably something with threads], And my bowels were moved for him.</dd><dt>New International Version</dt><dd>My lover thrust his hand through the latch-opening; my heart began to pound for him.</dd><dt> The Interpretation</dt><dd>Read it yourself <a href="http://bible.cc/songs/5-4.htm" title="bible.cc" rel="nofollow">here</a> [bible.cc].</dd></dl><p> It's like taking "You idiot, you aren't wearing a condom!" and publishing it as "Dear, your pen is uncapped." on the virtue that "pen is" remotely looks like "penis" which, when substituted, gives a meaning similar to the original. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pish , putting a spin on things is old news .
If you own a NIV Bible , congrats , you already own a book where theologians twist the source material to censor embarrassing verses .
Take Songs 5 : 4 for example : Young 's Literal VersionMy beloved sent his hand from the net-work [ probably something with threads ] , And my bowels were moved for him.New International VersionMy lover thrust his hand through the latch-opening ; my heart began to pound for him .
The InterpretationRead it yourself here [ bible.cc ] .
It 's like taking " You idiot , you are n't wearing a condom !
" and publishing it as " Dear , your pen is uncapped .
" on the virtue that " pen is " remotely looks like " penis " which , when substituted , gives a meaning similar to the original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Pish, putting a spin on things is old news.
If you own a NIV Bible, congrats, you already own a book where theologians twist the source material to censor embarrassing verses.
Take Songs 5:4 for example: 
Young's Literal VersionMy beloved sent his hand from the net-work[probably something with threads], And my bowels were moved for him.New International VersionMy lover thrust his hand through the latch-opening; my heart began to pound for him.
The InterpretationRead it yourself here [bible.cc].
It's like taking "You idiot, you aren't wearing a condom!
" and publishing it as "Dear, your pen is uncapped.
" on the virtue that "pen is" remotely looks like "penis" which, when substituted, gives a meaning similar to the original. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103718</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>Abreu</author>
	<datestamp>1258219500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.</p></div><p>You are aware that Tolkien was writing <em>fiction</em> when he wrote that, are you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.You are aware that Tolkien was writing fiction when he wrote that , are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.You are aware that Tolkien was writing fiction when he wrote that, are you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458</id>
	<title>That's okay.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258206120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I bet life forms from these environments would be really <b>hot</b>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet life forms from these environments would be really hot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet life forms from these environments would be really hot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103194</id>
	<title>Suck it up Space Cowboy</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1258214640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least you got air to breathe and it's not a neutron star......</p><p>Never mind the bone pulverizing gravity and the extreme heat, 1 out of three earth like conditions is enough for anyone.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least you got air to breathe and it 's not a neutron star......Never mind the bone pulverizing gravity and the extreme heat , 1 out of three earth like conditions is enough for anyone.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least you got air to breathe and it's not a neutron star......Never mind the bone pulverizing gravity and the extreme heat, 1 out of three earth like conditions is enough for anyone.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30112078</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>ibsteve2u</author>
	<datestamp>1258307640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet two dwarfs can sail from two wharves...or two wharfs, for that matter.</p><p>English is Britain's revenge for the loss of their empire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet two dwarfs can sail from two wharves...or two wharfs , for that matter.English is Britain 's revenge for the loss of their empire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet two dwarfs can sail from two wharves...or two wharfs, for that matter.English is Britain's revenge for the loss of their empire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103708</id>
	<title>White Dwarfs are real.</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1258219380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEOBDSA3rqQ" title="youtube.com">Gnome saying?</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gnome saying ?
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gnome saying?
[youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30105578</id>
	<title>Schwarzschild radius</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258298340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>At that point the thing collapses from the size of earth to about the size of a soccer ball in less than a second</p></div></blockquote><p>Not quite so small, as the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzchild\_radius" title="wikipedia.org">Schwarzschild radius</a> [wikipedia.org] of the sun is about 3 km.</p><p>Actually, it's believed that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type\_1a\_supernova#Consensus\_model" title="wikipedia.org">type 1A supernovae do not reach gravitational collapse</a> [wikipedia.org], they explode in a runaway carbon fusion before reaching the Chandrasekar limit. It's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type\_II\_supernova" title="wikipedia.org">type II supernovae</a> [wikipedia.org] that explode the way you mention.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>At that point the thing collapses from the size of earth to about the size of a soccer ball in less than a secondNot quite so small , as the Schwarzschild radius [ wikipedia.org ] of the sun is about 3 km.Actually , it 's believed that type 1A supernovae do not reach gravitational collapse [ wikipedia.org ] , they explode in a runaway carbon fusion before reaching the Chandrasekar limit .
It 's type II supernovae [ wikipedia.org ] that explode the way you mention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At that point the thing collapses from the size of earth to about the size of a soccer ball in less than a secondNot quite so small, as the Schwarzschild radius [wikipedia.org] of the sun is about 3 km.Actually, it's believed that type 1A supernovae do not reach gravitational collapse [wikipedia.org], they explode in a runaway carbon fusion before reaching the Chandrasekar limit.
It's type II supernovae [wikipedia.org] that explode the way you mention.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102624</id>
	<title>Cough, Cough...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258207380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever heard of the Smoke Ring??</p><p>Cough, cough.</p><p>Man...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever heard of the Smoke Ring ?
? Cough , cough.Man.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever heard of the Smoke Ring?
?Cough, cough.Man...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103122</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258213620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they're talking about two Earth-sized bodies, so I guess the other one is <b>ur dad</b>. Take that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they 're talking about two Earth-sized bodies , so I guess the other one is ur dad .
Take that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they're talking about two Earth-sized bodies, so I guess the other one is ur dad.
Take that!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104460</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>FatherDale</author>
	<datestamp>1258228500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly. I thought it was gonna be about fat chicks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
I thought it was gon na be about fat chicks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
I thought it was gonna be about fat chicks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104116</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258224240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and I'm certain that the Tim Burtonesque animation character-for-a-head, one Heat Miser Al Gore is all ready to jump into this with "indisputable evidence" revealing an "increase of green house gases" on these bodies due to some comical human causation. ("An Inconvenient Distance" available now at book stores nationwide at $34.99 folks!")</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and I 'm certain that the Tim Burtonesque animation character-for-a-head , one Heat Miser Al Gore is all ready to jump into this with " indisputable evidence " revealing an " increase of green house gases " on these bodies due to some comical human causation .
( " An Inconvenient Distance " available now at book stores nationwide at $ 34.99 folks !
" )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and I'm certain that the Tim Burtonesque animation character-for-a-head, one Heat Miser Al Gore is all ready to jump into this with "indisputable evidence" revealing an "increase of green house gases" on these bodies due to some comical human causation.
("An Inconvenient Distance" available now at book stores nationwide at $34.99 folks!
")</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102820</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>bcat24</author>
	<datestamp>1258209480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh yeah? Well, <strong>your mom</strong> is an Earth-sized body with an oxygen-rich atmosphere. If you know what I mean.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah ?
Well , your mom is an Earth-sized body with an oxygen-rich atmosphere .
If you know what I mean .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah?
Well, your mom is an Earth-sized body with an oxygen-rich atmosphere.
If you know what I mean.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103102</id>
	<title>This...</title>
	<author>Braintrust</author>
	<datestamp>1258213440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...explains Kryptonian physiology.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...explains Kryptonian physiology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...explains Kryptonian physiology.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102562</id>
	<title>Re:bummer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258206900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's already one <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule\%2034" title="urbandictionary.com">rule 34</a> [urbandictionary.com] response to your comment; I anticipate more are on the way.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's already one rule 34 [ urbandictionary.com ] response to your comment ; I anticipate more are on the way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's already one rule 34 [urbandictionary.com] response to your comment; I anticipate more are on the way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102542</id>
	<title>nomenclature</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258206840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the image SDSS 1102+2054 looks blue. Shouldn't we call them blue dwarfs? Or should we call them smurfs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the image SDSS 1102 + 2054 looks blue .
Should n't we call them blue dwarfs ?
Or should we call them smurfs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the image SDSS 1102+2054 looks blue.
Shouldn't we call them blue dwarfs?
Or should we call them smurfs?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103212</id>
	<title>If you want to have a warm winter,</title>
	<author>coolforsale132</author>
	<datestamp>1258214760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]
Best quality, Best reputation , Best services
Our commitment, customer is God.
Quality is our Dignity; Service is our Lift.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products . Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!  Welcome  to come  next   time ! Thank you!
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Thanks</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] Best quality , Best reputation , Best services Our commitment , customer is God .
Quality is our Dignity ; Service is our Lift .
Ladies and Gentlemen weicome to my coolforsale.com.Here,there are the most fashion products .
Pass by but do n't miss it.Select your favorite clothing !
Welcome to come next time !
Thank you !
Air jordan ( 1-24 ) shoes $ 33 Nike shox ( R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3 ) $ 35 Handbags ( Coach lv fendi d&amp;g ) $ 35 Tshirts ( Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste ) $ 16 free shipping competitive price any size available accept the paypal Thanks</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]
Best quality, Best reputation , Best services
Our commitment, customer is God.
Quality is our Dignity; Service is our Lift.
Ladies and Gentlemen  weicome  to  my  coolforsale.com.Here,there  are   the   most   fashion   products .
Pass by but don't   miss  it.Select  your  favorite  clothing!
Welcome  to come  next   time !
Thank you!
Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33
Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35
Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&amp;g) $35
Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal
Thanks</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258208760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows. Dwarves is bad grammar, but is in common enough usage that it's pointless to argue. "Dwarfs" just makes you look illiterate, as if you spelled the plural of fish as "fishs."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows .
Dwarves is bad grammar , but is in common enough usage that it 's pointless to argue .
" Dwarfs " just makes you look illiterate , as if you spelled the plural of fish as " fishs .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.
Dwarves is bad grammar, but is in common enough usage that it's pointless to argue.
"Dwarfs" just makes you look illiterate, as if you spelled the plural of fish as "fishs.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30118140</id>
	<title>Re:Deceptive headlines</title>
	<author>Nyeerrmm</author>
	<datestamp>1258398000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget one of the most interesting things about Type 1a's: they're always the same size.  Because it happens from gradual accumuluation, the star is always at the same mass when it goes off, and is thus always the same brightness.</p><p>This, along with a few other standard candles (such as Cepheid Variables) allow us to know how far away things are -- brightness we see is related to both absolute brightness and distance, so when you know the absolute and relative brightness you can calculate the distance.  Combine this with measuring the speed of the objects, measured from a redshift, and these kind of stars are critical for understanding how the universe is expanding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget one of the most interesting things about Type 1a 's : they 're always the same size .
Because it happens from gradual accumuluation , the star is always at the same mass when it goes off , and is thus always the same brightness.This , along with a few other standard candles ( such as Cepheid Variables ) allow us to know how far away things are -- brightness we see is related to both absolute brightness and distance , so when you know the absolute and relative brightness you can calculate the distance .
Combine this with measuring the speed of the objects , measured from a redshift , and these kind of stars are critical for understanding how the universe is expanding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget one of the most interesting things about Type 1a's: they're always the same size.
Because it happens from gradual accumuluation, the star is always at the same mass when it goes off, and is thus always the same brightness.This, along with a few other standard candles (such as Cepheid Variables) allow us to know how far away things are -- brightness we see is related to both absolute brightness and distance, so when you know the absolute and relative brightness you can calculate the distance.
Combine this with measuring the speed of the objects, measured from a redshift, and these kind of stars are critical for understanding how the universe is expanding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103292</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258215840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, astromatt's understanding of the rules of grammar is correct. Because "White Dwarf" refers to an entity unrelated to a "dwarf", it's pluralised as a proper noun (which generally ignores suffix manipulation). If you knew two people named "Dwarf", you wouldn't say "the two dwarves" (which would only be valid if Dwarf and Dwarf were very short and you were intentionally pointing it out), you'd say "the two Dwarfs".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , astromatt 's understanding of the rules of grammar is correct .
Because " White Dwarf " refers to an entity unrelated to a " dwarf " , it 's pluralised as a proper noun ( which generally ignores suffix manipulation ) .
If you knew two people named " Dwarf " , you would n't say " the two dwarves " ( which would only be valid if Dwarf and Dwarf were very short and you were intentionally pointing it out ) , you 'd say " the two Dwarfs " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, astromatt's understanding of the rules of grammar is correct.
Because "White Dwarf" refers to an entity unrelated to a "dwarf", it's pluralised as a proper noun (which generally ignores suffix manipulation).
If you knew two people named "Dwarf", you wouldn't say "the two dwarves" (which would only be valid if Dwarf and Dwarf were very short and you were intentionally pointing it out), you'd say "the two Dwarfs".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102598</id>
	<title>Earth sized stars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258207260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that stars would have to be a lot heavier than that, even if a large part of them was blown away in a supernova.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that stars would have to be a lot heavier than that , even if a large part of them was blown away in a supernova .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that stars would have to be a lot heavier than that, even if a large part of them was blown away in a supernova.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082</id>
	<title>Re:That's okay.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258213020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us?  In the sense that it needs oxygen, similar temperatures, and rely on the same energy pathways.  For example extremophile, there are even examples that live near vents in the ocean at hundreds of degrees and rely on completely different metabolic pathways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us ?
In the sense that it needs oxygen , similar temperatures , and rely on the same energy pathways .
For example extremophile , there are even examples that live near vents in the ocean at hundreds of degrees and rely on completely different metabolic pathways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing that was never adequately explained to me is why can life only be very similar to us?
In the sense that it needs oxygen, similar temperatures, and rely on the same energy pathways.
For example extremophile, there are even examples that live near vents in the ocean at hundreds of degrees and rely on completely different metabolic pathways.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102696</id>
	<title>so can we gate to them?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258208220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so can we gate to them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so can we gate to them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so can we gate to them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103240</id>
	<title>Re:so can we gate to them?</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1258215060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The second you step through that stargate is the second you become "Chunky Salsa" on the gate ramp.  Try again....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The second you step through that stargate is the second you become " Chunky Salsa " on the gate ramp .
Try again... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The second you step through that stargate is the second you become "Chunky Salsa" on the gate ramp.
Try again....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102504</id>
	<title>bummer...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258206540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that my future family dream to live on a white dwarf star has been crushed... my only hope is that black midget stars are better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that my future family dream to live on a white dwarf star has been crushed... my only hope is that black midget stars are better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that my future family dream to live on a white dwarf star has been crushed... my only hope is that black midget stars are better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30166734</id>
	<title>Re:white dwarfs not white dwarves</title>
	<author>DaVince21</author>
	<datestamp>1258638480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows. Dwarves is bad grammar, but is in common enough usage that it's pointless to argue. "Dwarfs" just makes you look illiterate, as if you spelled the plural of fish as "fishs."</p></div><p>Or fishes, for that matter. The plural for fish is, after all, fish.</p><p>Unless you're mafia I guess.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows .
Dwarves is bad grammar , but is in common enough usage that it 's pointless to argue .
" Dwarfs " just makes you look illiterate , as if you spelled the plural of fish as " fishs .
" Or fishes , for that matter .
The plural for fish is , after all , fish.Unless you 're mafia I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The real historical plural of dwarf is dwarrows.
Dwarves is bad grammar, but is in common enough usage that it's pointless to argue.
"Dwarfs" just makes you look illiterate, as if you spelled the plural of fish as "fishs.
"Or fishes, for that matter.
The plural for fish is, after all, fish.Unless you're mafia I guess.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30116100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30111752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30118140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30107098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30166624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30166734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30119394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30105578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30112078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_14_1831258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30106074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103194
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102768
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103240
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102598
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103292
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103718
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30116100
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30111752
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30166734
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30112078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30107098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103020
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104060
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30118140
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30105578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103698
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_14_1831258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30166624
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103604
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30119394
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30106074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30102820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30103122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_14_1831258.30104116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
