<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_13_205210</id>
	<title>FreeCreditReport.com Wins 1,017 Domains By UDRP</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1258110660000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>typosquatting writes to mention that the <a href="http://aliasencore.com/p502/freecreditreportcom-wins-1017-domains-in-largest-ever-udrp.html">largest domain dispute case</a> since the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) was enacted ten years ago has been decided. The decision saw 1,017 cyber-squatting domains turned over to ConsumerInfo.com, owner of FreeCreditReport.com.  The <a href="http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/decisions/1283469.htm">full decision</a> can be read via the National Arbitration Forum website. <i>"It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to, not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark, potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>typosquatting writes to mention that the largest domain dispute case since the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy ( UDRP ) was enacted ten years ago has been decided .
The decision saw 1,017 cyber-squatting domains turned over to ConsumerInfo.com , owner of FreeCreditReport.com .
The full decision can be read via the National Arbitration Forum website .
" It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to , not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark , but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark , potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>typosquatting writes to mention that the largest domain dispute case since the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) was enacted ten years ago has been decided.
The decision saw 1,017 cyber-squatting domains turned over to ConsumerInfo.com, owner of FreeCreditReport.com.
The full decision can be read via the National Arbitration Forum website.
"It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to, not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark, potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30098786</id>
	<title>Lookout SPARCfun ;-)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258223100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Sparkfun,</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; In light of recent events, we're going to totally screw you over now...</p><p>--SPARC International</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Sparkfun ,         In light of recent events , we 're going to totally screw you over now...--SPARC International</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Sparkfun,
        In light of recent events, we're going to totally screw you over now...--SPARC International</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30097230</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1258212000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand that freecreditreport.com is claiming that "google.com" is actually a very bad misspelling of their domain name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand that freecreditreport.com is claiming that " google.com " is actually a very bad misspelling of their domain name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand that freecreditreport.com is claiming that "google.com" is actually a very bad misspelling of their domain name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238</id>
	<title>Freecreditreport.com is a criminal scam</title>
	<author>Michael G. Kaplan</author>
	<datestamp>1258115580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The New York Times recently did <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/your-money/credit-scores/03scores.html?scp=2&amp;sq=freecreditreport&amp;st=cse" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">an extensive article on this scam</a> [nytimes.com].</p><p>The entire basis of their operation is to fool people into paying for something advertised as free.  They claim that their site discloses its fees, but the disclosure is still  discrete enough to fool massive numbers of people.</p><p>Any site where you make a purchase should disclose the fact that you are making a purchase with at least the level of clarity that you encounter on a reputable site such as Amazon.com.  Also a service that advertises itself as "free" should never be allowed to charge -- even if they gratuitously disclosed their fee (which they don't) it would still be a bait an switch scam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The New York Times recently did an extensive article on this scam [ nytimes.com ] .The entire basis of their operation is to fool people into paying for something advertised as free .
They claim that their site discloses its fees , but the disclosure is still discrete enough to fool massive numbers of people.Any site where you make a purchase should disclose the fact that you are making a purchase with at least the level of clarity that you encounter on a reputable site such as Amazon.com .
Also a service that advertises itself as " free " should never be allowed to charge -- even if they gratuitously disclosed their fee ( which they do n't ) it would still be a bait an switch scam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The New York Times recently did an extensive article on this scam [nytimes.com].The entire basis of their operation is to fool people into paying for something advertised as free.
They claim that their site discloses its fees, but the disclosure is still  discrete enough to fool massive numbers of people.Any site where you make a purchase should disclose the fact that you are making a purchase with at least the level of clarity that you encounter on a reputable site such as Amazon.com.
Also a service that advertises itself as "free" should never be allowed to charge -- even if they gratuitously disclosed their fee (which they don't) it would still be a bait an switch scam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093864</id>
	<title>Credit is fascism</title>
	<author>AthleteMusicianNerd</author>
	<datestamp>1258120560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any company or government institution can put whatever they want on your credit report and you have no right to defend yourself.  Serial killers even get a trial.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any company or government institution can put whatever they want on your credit report and you have no right to defend yourself .
Serial killers even get a trial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any company or government institution can put whatever they want on your credit report and you have no right to defend yourself.
Serial killers even get a trial.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100172</id>
	<title>Maybe</title>
	<author>ThurstonMoore</author>
	<datestamp>1258231980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe they should take away freecreditreport.com's domain away and give it to annualcreditreport.com since it is the place to go to really get your free credit report.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they should take away freecreditreport.com 's domain away and give it to annualcreditreport.com since it is the place to go to really get your free credit report .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they should take away freecreditreport.com's domain away and give it to annualcreditreport.com since it is the place to go to really get your free credit report.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093174</id>
	<title>Another win for the legal community</title>
	<author>Trip6</author>
	<datestamp>1258115100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Get ready for many more such lawsuits, thus providing job security for lawyers and judges.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Get ready for many more such lawsuits , thus providing job security for lawyers and judges .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get ready for many more such lawsuits, thus providing job security for lawyers and judges.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093094</id>
	<title>freecreditreport.com sucks ass.</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1258114620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't do it. You give them your info and get a free credit report, but you have to opt out like AOL or else they'll charge you. When you call them to opt out they haggle and harass you like AOL did ("Are you <i>sure</i> you want to cancel? Here are our other plans...") and you have to tell them no multiple times until either of you gives up. Then they continue to spam the living fuck out of your inbox. <br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/rant</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't do it .
You give them your info and get a free credit report , but you have to opt out like AOL or else they 'll charge you .
When you call them to opt out they haggle and harass you like AOL did ( " Are you sure you want to cancel ?
Here are our other plans... " ) and you have to tell them no multiple times until either of you gives up .
Then they continue to spam the living fuck out of your inbox .
/rant</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't do it.
You give them your info and get a free credit report, but you have to opt out like AOL or else they'll charge you.
When you call them to opt out they haggle and harass you like AOL did ("Are you sure you want to cancel?
Here are our other plans...") and you have to tell them no multiple times until either of you gives up.
Then they continue to spam the living fuck out of your inbox.
/rant</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093228</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>arth1</author>
	<datestamp>1258115520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am surprised that they themselves aren't considered domain squatters on "creditreport.com" -- if they argue that howtogetafreecreditreport.com is infringing on freecreditreport.com, I can't think of why they aren't infringing on creditreport.com<br>Even more so considering that they have paid Google for a sponsored link when someone searches for "creditreport.com".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am surprised that they themselves are n't considered domain squatters on " creditreport.com " -- if they argue that howtogetafreecreditreport.com is infringing on freecreditreport.com , I ca n't think of why they are n't infringing on creditreport.comEven more so considering that they have paid Google for a sponsored link when someone searches for " creditreport.com " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am surprised that they themselves aren't considered domain squatters on "creditreport.com" -- if they argue that howtogetafreecreditreport.com is infringing on freecreditreport.com, I can't think of why they aren't infringing on creditreport.comEven more so considering that they have paid Google for a sponsored link when someone searches for "creditreport.com".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30097374</id>
	<title>Re:Freecreditreport.com is a criminal scam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258213080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's free as in freedom, not free as in free beer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's free as in freedom , not free as in free beer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's free as in freedom, not free as in free beer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095516</id>
	<title>Generic Trademark</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258141500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>example of some of the names given to freecreditreport.com:<br>newyorkfreecreditreport.com<br>getfreecreditreportonline.com<br>statewithfreecreditreport.com</p><p>I see that freecreditreport.com owns freecreditscore.com. There are hundreds of businesses that use the term "free credit report" or "free credit score". Why did the uspto grant freecreditreport.com trademark rights to such a generic term?  The term is too ordinary and by definition has a natural association with something in a consumers mind.</p><p>
&nbsp; I guess if you spend enough millions and have a superbowl commercial or two you can trademark almost anything?</p><p>I don't agree with the typosquatting, but this decision goes way beyond it, and sets a bad precedent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>example of some of the names given to freecreditreport.com : newyorkfreecreditreport.comgetfreecreditreportonline.comstatewithfreecreditreport.comI see that freecreditreport.com owns freecreditscore.com .
There are hundreds of businesses that use the term " free credit report " or " free credit score " .
Why did the uspto grant freecreditreport.com trademark rights to such a generic term ?
The term is too ordinary and by definition has a natural association with something in a consumers mind .
  I guess if you spend enough millions and have a superbowl commercial or two you can trademark almost anything ? I do n't agree with the typosquatting , but this decision goes way beyond it , and sets a bad precedent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>example of some of the names given to freecreditreport.com:newyorkfreecreditreport.comgetfreecreditreportonline.comstatewithfreecreditreport.comI see that freecreditreport.com owns freecreditscore.com.
There are hundreds of businesses that use the term "free credit report" or "free credit score".
Why did the uspto grant freecreditreport.com trademark rights to such a generic term?
The term is too ordinary and by definition has a natural association with something in a consumers mind.
  I guess if you spend enough millions and have a superbowl commercial or two you can trademark almost anything?I don't agree with the typosquatting, but this decision goes way beyond it, and sets a bad precedent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074</id>
	<title>This is gthe only real answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258114440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to solve the important dilemma of people not wanting to be responsible for typing correctly.</p><p>Jeez this is so stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to solve the important dilemma of people not wanting to be responsible for typing correctly.Jeez this is so stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to solve the important dilemma of people not wanting to be responsible for typing correctly.Jeez this is so stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093176</id>
	<title>Reasons FTA..</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1258115100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In one or more of the following ways<br>(1) adding "ing," changing the tense of the mark to a present participle;<br>(2) adding the letter "s," changing the mark from singular to plural;<br>(3) adding a generic or descriptive word to the mark;<br>(4) adding a generic or descriptive word to the mark that has an obvious association with Complainant's business;<br>(5) adding an abbreviation of a geographic word to the mark; (6) adding a geographic word to the mark;<br>(7) misspelling the mark by changing a letter in the mark to a different letter;<br>(8) misspelling the mark by changing a letter in the mark to a number;<br>(9) misspelling the mark by adding a letter within the mark;<br>(10) adding a letter to the beginning or end of the mark;<br>(11) misspelling the mark by adding a number within the mark;<br>(12) adding a number to the beginning or end of the mark;<br>(13) omitting the period between the first-level domain, "www," and the mark;<br>(14) changing the generic top-level domain (gTLD) included in the mark from ".com" to ".org;" and/or<br>(15) adding hyphens to the mark.  Any individual disputed domain name typically contains Complainant's mark and one of these changes.</p></div><p>I'm glad they won.  The showed plenty of examples of other companies that also won b/c of squatters like Bank Of America vs wwwbankofamerica.com  (squatter removed the ".").</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In one or more of the following ways ( 1 ) adding " ing , " changing the tense of the mark to a present participle ; ( 2 ) adding the letter " s , " changing the mark from singular to plural ; ( 3 ) adding a generic or descriptive word to the mark ; ( 4 ) adding a generic or descriptive word to the mark that has an obvious association with Complainant 's business ; ( 5 ) adding an abbreviation of a geographic word to the mark ; ( 6 ) adding a geographic word to the mark ; ( 7 ) misspelling the mark by changing a letter in the mark to a different letter ; ( 8 ) misspelling the mark by changing a letter in the mark to a number ; ( 9 ) misspelling the mark by adding a letter within the mark ; ( 10 ) adding a letter to the beginning or end of the mark ; ( 11 ) misspelling the mark by adding a number within the mark ; ( 12 ) adding a number to the beginning or end of the mark ; ( 13 ) omitting the period between the first-level domain , " www , " and the mark ; ( 14 ) changing the generic top-level domain ( gTLD ) included in the mark from " .com " to " .org ; " and/or ( 15 ) adding hyphens to the mark .
Any individual disputed domain name typically contains Complainant 's mark and one of these changes.I 'm glad they won .
The showed plenty of examples of other companies that also won b/c of squatters like Bank Of America vs wwwbankofamerica.com ( squatter removed the " .
" ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In one or more of the following ways(1) adding "ing," changing the tense of the mark to a present participle;(2) adding the letter "s," changing the mark from singular to plural;(3) adding a generic or descriptive word to the mark;(4) adding a generic or descriptive word to the mark that has an obvious association with Complainant's business;(5) adding an abbreviation of a geographic word to the mark; (6) adding a geographic word to the mark;(7) misspelling the mark by changing a letter in the mark to a different letter;(8) misspelling the mark by changing a letter in the mark to a number;(9) misspelling the mark by adding a letter within the mark;(10) adding a letter to the beginning or end of the mark;(11) misspelling the mark by adding a number within the mark;(12) adding a number to the beginning or end of the mark;(13) omitting the period between the first-level domain, "www," and the mark;(14) changing the generic top-level domain (gTLD) included in the mark from ".com" to ".org;" and/or(15) adding hyphens to the mark.
Any individual disputed domain name typically contains Complainant's mark and one of these changes.I'm glad they won.
The showed plenty of examples of other companies that also won b/c of squatters like Bank Of America vs wwwbankofamerica.com  (squatter removed the ".
").
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094792</id>
	<title>DO NOT USE FREECREDITREPORT.COM</title>
	<author>JimboFBX</author>
	<datestamp>1258130340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>freecreditreport.com will automatically sign you up for a service which you can cancel at any time. They will never ask how they will bill you because they will steal it out of one of your bank accounts as 3TVC. yeah, if you call to cancel they won't actually cancel. I've talked with like 3 or 4 people who have used the service and all of them said that freecreditreport.com didn't cancel even though they claimed that they did so on the phone. You have to get their payments disputed through your bank once you figure out which bank account they are pick-pocketing you from. I dont understand why they aren't all arrested and thrown in jail. My wife used this service, found out 6 months later that 3TVC was actually freecreditreport.com, tried to get refunds on them, and found that the bank wouldn't refund that far even though they had records of her account much farther back. She only got 3 months back. When she talked with someone from the bank, they said they get this all the time from freecreditreport.com. WHY ISN'T THIS ILLEGAL!?! THIS IS MINOR THEFT ON A LARGE SCALE AND EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT IT!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>freecreditreport.com will automatically sign you up for a service which you can cancel at any time .
They will never ask how they will bill you because they will steal it out of one of your bank accounts as 3TVC .
yeah , if you call to cancel they wo n't actually cancel .
I 've talked with like 3 or 4 people who have used the service and all of them said that freecreditreport.com did n't cancel even though they claimed that they did so on the phone .
You have to get their payments disputed through your bank once you figure out which bank account they are pick-pocketing you from .
I dont understand why they are n't all arrested and thrown in jail .
My wife used this service , found out 6 months later that 3TVC was actually freecreditreport.com , tried to get refunds on them , and found that the bank would n't refund that far even though they had records of her account much farther back .
She only got 3 months back .
When she talked with someone from the bank , they said they get this all the time from freecreditreport.com .
WHY IS N'T THIS ILLEGAL ! ? !
THIS IS MINOR THEFT ON A LARGE SCALE AND EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT IT ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>freecreditreport.com will automatically sign you up for a service which you can cancel at any time.
They will never ask how they will bill you because they will steal it out of one of your bank accounts as 3TVC.
yeah, if you call to cancel they won't actually cancel.
I've talked with like 3 or 4 people who have used the service and all of them said that freecreditreport.com didn't cancel even though they claimed that they did so on the phone.
You have to get their payments disputed through your bank once you figure out which bank account they are pick-pocketing you from.
I dont understand why they aren't all arrested and thrown in jail.
My wife used this service, found out 6 months later that 3TVC was actually freecreditreport.com, tried to get refunds on them, and found that the bank wouldn't refund that far even though they had records of her account much farther back.
She only got 3 months back.
When she talked with someone from the bank, they said they get this all the time from freecreditreport.com.
WHY ISN'T THIS ILLEGAL!?!
THIS IS MINOR THEFT ON A LARGE SCALE AND EVERYONE KNOWS ABOUT IT!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093424</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1258117200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their front page is (and always has been) right up front that they are selling you a service.
<br>
<br>
They even give you the link to the "real" free credit report.
<br>
<br>
Name aside, they don't seem too shady. There are plenty of opportunities to buy something you don't need, this is just another one. It's like buying clothes that say "dry clean only" right on the tag. You know what you are getting up front.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their front page is ( and always has been ) right up front that they are selling you a service .
They even give you the link to the " real " free credit report .
Name aside , they do n't seem too shady .
There are plenty of opportunities to buy something you do n't need , this is just another one .
It 's like buying clothes that say " dry clean only " right on the tag .
You know what you are getting up front .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their front page is (and always has been) right up front that they are selling you a service.
They even give you the link to the "real" free credit report.
Name aside, they don't seem too shady.
There are plenty of opportunities to buy something you don't need, this is just another one.
It's like buying clothes that say "dry clean only" right on the tag.
You know what you are getting up front.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094864</id>
	<title>Free</title>
	<author>daveime</author>
	<datestamp>1258131000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's laughable that the domain freecreditreport.com says this on it's homepage.</p><p><i>When you order your free report here, you will begin your free trial membership in Triple AdvantageSM Credit Monitoring. If you don't cancel your membership within the 7-day trial period**, you will be billed $14.95 for each month that you continue your membership.</i></p><p>So it's NOT free at all. Seems like they just handed over care of the lambs from one wolf to another.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's laughable that the domain freecreditreport.com says this on it 's homepage.When you order your free report here , you will begin your free trial membership in Triple AdvantageSM Credit Monitoring .
If you do n't cancel your membership within the 7-day trial period * * , you will be billed $ 14.95 for each month that you continue your membership.So it 's NOT free at all .
Seems like they just handed over care of the lambs from one wolf to another .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's laughable that the domain freecreditreport.com says this on it's homepage.When you order your free report here, you will begin your free trial membership in Triple AdvantageSM Credit Monitoring.
If you don't cancel your membership within the 7-day trial period**, you will be billed $14.95 for each month that you continue your membership.So it's NOT free at all.
Seems like they just handed over care of the lambs from one wolf to another.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095680</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>Entropy98</author>
	<datestamp>1258230780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually freecreditreport.com is owned by Experian, one of the big 3 credit reporting agencies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually freecreditreport.com is owned by Experian , one of the big 3 credit reporting agencies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually freecreditreport.com is owned by Experian, one of the big 3 credit reporting agencies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093816</id>
	<title>Erm</title>
	<author>ShooterNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1258120140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has to be said : what exactly do you get "for free" from freecreditreport.com?  You can't get any information without paying and signing up for a service that you have to beg the phone reps to get canceled.  Scarier still, the company that runs the site has the power to truly screw you over if you contest the charges on your credit card, since they ARE one of the credit reporting companies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has to be said : what exactly do you get " for free " from freecreditreport.com ?
You ca n't get any information without paying and signing up for a service that you have to beg the phone reps to get canceled .
Scarier still , the company that runs the site has the power to truly screw you over if you contest the charges on your credit card , since they ARE one of the credit reporting companies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has to be said : what exactly do you get "for free" from freecreditreport.com?
You can't get any information without paying and signing up for a service that you have to beg the phone reps to get canceled.
Scarier still, the company that runs the site has the power to truly screw you over if you contest the charges on your credit card, since they ARE one of the credit reporting companies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095338</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>DragonIV</author>
	<datestamp>1258138200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's funny that "free"creditreport.com is upset that someone else is profiting off their name, when their name is designed to profit off someone else's.  I don't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year (via annualcreditreport.com).  "free"creditreport.com doesn't actually give you a credit report for free; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.</p></div><p>Wrong. FreeCreditReport.com (and many other competitors) existed long before the government even enacted the legislation to create annualcreditreport.com.  By long, I mean several years.

That said, their business model is definitely sleazy.  However,  you can get your report for free, so long as you remember to cancel that automatic subscription they enroll you for...and which they make it a pain in the posterior to cancel.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny that " free " creditreport.com is upset that someone else is profiting off their name , when their name is designed to profit off someone else 's .
I do n't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year ( via annualcreditreport.com ) .
" free " creditreport.com does n't actually give you a credit report for free ; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.Wrong .
FreeCreditReport.com ( and many other competitors ) existed long before the government even enacted the legislation to create annualcreditreport.com .
By long , I mean several years .
That said , their business model is definitely sleazy .
However , you can get your report for free , so long as you remember to cancel that automatic subscription they enroll you for...and which they make it a pain in the posterior to cancel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny that "free"creditreport.com is upset that someone else is profiting off their name, when their name is designed to profit off someone else's.
I don't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year (via annualcreditreport.com).
"free"creditreport.com doesn't actually give you a credit report for free; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.Wrong.
FreeCreditReport.com (and many other competitors) existed long before the government even enacted the legislation to create annualcreditreport.com.
By long, I mean several years.
That said, their business model is definitely sleazy.
However,  you can get your report for free, so long as you remember to cancel that automatic subscription they enroll you for...and which they make it a pain in the posterior to cancel.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093896</id>
	<title>FCR.c Is a Total Scam</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1258120740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FreeCreditReport.com is a total scam. It's not free - you have to pay to get the report. But everyone's entitled to a free credit report once a year anyway, direct from the reporting corps, under US credit laws.</p><p>And now that scam has funded this evil precedent.</p><p>Goddamn the lawyers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FreeCreditReport.com is a total scam .
It 's not free - you have to pay to get the report .
But everyone 's entitled to a free credit report once a year anyway , direct from the reporting corps , under US credit laws.And now that scam has funded this evil precedent.Goddamn the lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FreeCreditReport.com is a total scam.
It's not free - you have to pay to get the report.
But everyone's entitled to a free credit report once a year anyway, direct from the reporting corps, under US credit laws.And now that scam has funded this evil precedent.Goddamn the lawyers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094422</id>
	<title>Only a concern for the American Empire wage slave</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258125720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That worthless bullshit garbage means <b>NOTHING</b> outside the borders of the Empire.</p><p>Seriously, you can rack up tens of thousands in debt and just bounce to another country and get citizenship there leaving your silly social number and all that Imperial rabid consumerism as you get a new ID/identity for your new citizenship. All your three Master's can do then is cry into their platinum cups while sitting on their gold thrones on top of their titanium floors with embedded diamonds and pearls.</p><p>The only check you need is a reality check with this set of  debt chains you Imperials so proudly wear for some asinine reason.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That worthless bullshit garbage means NOTHING outside the borders of the Empire.Seriously , you can rack up tens of thousands in debt and just bounce to another country and get citizenship there leaving your silly social number and all that Imperial rabid consumerism as you get a new ID/identity for your new citizenship .
All your three Master 's can do then is cry into their platinum cups while sitting on their gold thrones on top of their titanium floors with embedded diamonds and pearls.The only check you need is a reality check with this set of debt chains you Imperials so proudly wear for some asinine reason .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That worthless bullshit garbage means NOTHING outside the borders of the Empire.Seriously, you can rack up tens of thousands in debt and just bounce to another country and get citizenship there leaving your silly social number and all that Imperial rabid consumerism as you get a new ID/identity for your new citizenship.
All your three Master's can do then is cry into their platinum cups while sitting on their gold thrones on top of their titanium floors with embedded diamonds and pearls.The only check you need is a reality check with this set of  debt chains you Imperials so proudly wear for some asinine reason.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093104</id>
	<title>Doesn't seem unfair to me...</title>
	<author>moz25</author>
	<datestamp>1258114680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do not really agree that domains that only bear similarity to a mark should be transferred, but in this case, they are part of a large collection of domains that appear to be very obviously registered in bad faith, with the sole intention of typosquatting.</p><p>I wonder if the registrant paid for those domains... this should have set him back at least $5k.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not really agree that domains that only bear similarity to a mark should be transferred , but in this case , they are part of a large collection of domains that appear to be very obviously registered in bad faith , with the sole intention of typosquatting.I wonder if the registrant paid for those domains... this should have set him back at least $ 5k .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not really agree that domains that only bear similarity to a mark should be transferred, but in this case, they are part of a large collection of domains that appear to be very obviously registered in bad faith, with the sole intention of typosquatting.I wonder if the registrant paid for those domains... this should have set him back at least $5k.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095514</id>
	<title>A special place in hell...</title>
	<author>BlueF</author>
	<datestamp>1258141440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd like to think this is a fair more positive step in the right direction to curtailing cybersquatters -- those for whom there is a special place in hell... along the lines of sub-prime mortgage profiteers (and anyone else making money off the misfortuate/suffering of others) -- rather than a dangerous precedent against fair use.
<br> <br>
Seriously, unless you run a legit business which happens to have a name similar to another, where you own ONE similar domain (maybe a few that ALL rediect to your legitimate web business), otherwise you have 0\% right to own multiple domains.  This is not to mention 1017 variations of a legit domain, where the squatter domains are dead-pages or fake web portals (search/news/whatever).  There is no fair-use going on there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd like to think this is a fair more positive step in the right direction to curtailing cybersquatters -- those for whom there is a special place in hell... along the lines of sub-prime mortgage profiteers ( and anyone else making money off the misfortuate/suffering of others ) -- rather than a dangerous precedent against fair use .
Seriously , unless you run a legit business which happens to have a name similar to another , where you own ONE similar domain ( maybe a few that ALL rediect to your legitimate web business ) , otherwise you have 0 \ % right to own multiple domains .
This is not to mention 1017 variations of a legit domain , where the squatter domains are dead-pages or fake web portals ( search/news/whatever ) .
There is no fair-use going on there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd like to think this is a fair more positive step in the right direction to curtailing cybersquatters -- those for whom there is a special place in hell... along the lines of sub-prime mortgage profiteers (and anyone else making money off the misfortuate/suffering of others) -- rather than a dangerous precedent against fair use.
Seriously, unless you run a legit business which happens to have a name similar to another, where you own ONE similar domain (maybe a few that ALL rediect to your legitimate web business), otherwise you have 0\% right to own multiple domains.
This is not to mention 1017 variations of a legit domain, where the squatter domains are dead-pages or fake web portals (search/news/whatever).
There is no fair-use going on there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30186752</id>
	<title>Re:use annualcreditreport.com instead</title>
	<author>WindShadow</author>
	<datestamp>1258834260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suggest getting a credit report from each of the three reporting companies, and staggering your requests by four months. I do that and get a picture of the report on a regular basis. I wish the law required them to provide a convenient way to lock your report, I see 50-60 requests a year from people I never heard of or dealt with, they're in a "just looking" report, and I'm sure they're people trying to pick identities worth stealing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest getting a credit report from each of the three reporting companies , and staggering your requests by four months .
I do that and get a picture of the report on a regular basis .
I wish the law required them to provide a convenient way to lock your report , I see 50-60 requests a year from people I never heard of or dealt with , they 're in a " just looking " report , and I 'm sure they 're people trying to pick identities worth stealing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest getting a credit report from each of the three reporting companies, and staggering your requests by four months.
I do that and get a picture of the report on a regular basis.
I wish the law required them to provide a convenient way to lock your report, I see 50-60 requests a year from people I never heard of or dealt with, they're in a "just looking" report, and I'm sure they're people trying to pick identities worth stealing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093690</id>
	<title>Its's a ripoff of "annualcreditreport.com".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258118940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
FreeCreditReport is a ripoff of
<a href="http://www.annualcreditreport.com/" title="annualcreditreport.com">AnnualCreditReport.com</a> [annualcreditreport.com], the real free site which the U.S. Federal Trade Commission requires the three major credit bureaus to maintain at their expense.
</p><p>
<i>
"ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. and Freecreditreport.com are not affiliated with the annual free credit report program. Under a new Federal law, you have the right to receive a free copy of your credit report once every 12 months from each of the three nationwide consumer reporting companies. To request your free annual report under that law, you must go to www.annualcreditreport.com."</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FreeCreditReport is a ripoff of AnnualCreditReport.com [ annualcreditreport.com ] , the real free site which the U.S. Federal Trade Commission requires the three major credit bureaus to maintain at their expense .
" ConsumerInfo.com , Inc. and Freecreditreport.com are not affiliated with the annual free credit report program .
Under a new Federal law , you have the right to receive a free copy of your credit report once every 12 months from each of the three nationwide consumer reporting companies .
To request your free annual report under that law , you must go to www.annualcreditreport.com .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
FreeCreditReport is a ripoff of
AnnualCreditReport.com [annualcreditreport.com], the real free site which the U.S. Federal Trade Commission requires the three major credit bureaus to maintain at their expense.
"ConsumerInfo.com, Inc. and Freecreditreport.com are not affiliated with the annual free credit report program.
Under a new Federal law, you have the right to receive a free copy of your credit report once every 12 months from each of the three nationwide consumer reporting companies.
To request your free annual report under that law, you must go to www.annualcreditreport.com.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093278</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258115760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not only do you have to enroll, but every month they charge you a fee of approximately $10/month. Which might seem okay if you could actually see your credit report every month.... I couldn't figure out how. I had to call them and cancel. The kind of cancellation where you have to convince them that you don't want to be a customer. As far as I am concerned freecreditreport.com is scum of the internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not only do you have to enroll , but every month they charge you a fee of approximately $ 10/month .
Which might seem okay if you could actually see your credit report every month.... I could n't figure out how .
I had to call them and cancel .
The kind of cancellation where you have to convince them that you do n't want to be a customer .
As far as I am concerned freecreditreport.com is scum of the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not only do you have to enroll, but every month they charge you a fee of approximately $10/month.
Which might seem okay if you could actually see your credit report every month.... I couldn't figure out how.
I had to call them and cancel.
The kind of cancellation where you have to convince them that you don't want to be a customer.
As far as I am concerned freecreditreport.com is scum of the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093430</id>
	<title>Re:Freecreditreport.com is a criminal scam</title>
	<author>Zanix</author>
	<datestamp>1258117260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's actually even worse than this.   There is no cancel option on their website which means to stop service, you have to call them and deal with their trashy customer service.   That doesn't even mention the fact that they will refuse to delete your account if you ask.   They claim they have to keep the credit card for record purposes.   Somehow I doubt it.   The only way to get your credit card number out of their hands is to cancel it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's actually even worse than this .
There is no cancel option on their website which means to stop service , you have to call them and deal with their trashy customer service .
That does n't even mention the fact that they will refuse to delete your account if you ask .
They claim they have to keep the credit card for record purposes .
Somehow I doubt it .
The only way to get your credit card number out of their hands is to cancel it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's actually even worse than this.
There is no cancel option on their website which means to stop service, you have to call them and deal with their trashy customer service.
That doesn't even mention the fact that they will refuse to delete your account if you ask.
They claim they have to keep the credit card for record purposes.
Somehow I doubt it.
The only way to get your credit card number out of their hands is to cancel it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093838</id>
	<title>slashdot has been trolled.</title>
	<author>Jeremy Erwin</author>
	<datestamp>1258120320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The submitter's name is "typosquatting." The linked article was written by Alias Encore's PR flack , and exists for the sole purpose of selling Alias-Encore's software and services-- namely "helping companies increase highly qualified traffic to their websites through the strategic acquisition of misspelled domain names."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The submitter 's name is " typosquatting .
" The linked article was written by Alias Encore 's PR flack , and exists for the sole purpose of selling Alias-Encore 's software and services-- namely " helping companies increase highly qualified traffic to their websites through the strategic acquisition of misspelled domain names .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The submitter's name is "typosquatting.
" The linked article was written by Alias Encore's PR flack , and exists for the sole purpose of selling Alias-Encore's software and services-- namely "helping companies increase highly qualified traffic to their websites through the strategic acquisition of misspelled domain names.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094104</id>
	<title>FreeCreditReport.com</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258122300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>* Ruling applies with enrollment to Triple Advantage(tm).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* Ruling applies with enrollment to Triple Advantage ( tm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* Ruling applies with enrollment to Triple Advantage(tm).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093926</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1258120920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very true.  In fact, the FTC has already won one civil complaint against them (Experian) and is gearing up for another.</p><p>What I really don't understand is why the FTC didn't use a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gov domain name when they set up their website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very true .
In fact , the FTC has already won one civil complaint against them ( Experian ) and is gearing up for another.What I really do n't understand is why the FTC did n't use a .gov domain name when they set up their website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very true.
In fact, the FTC has already won one civil complaint against them (Experian) and is gearing up for another.What I really don't understand is why the FTC didn't use a .gov domain name when they set up their website.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093122</id>
	<title>Sets a precedant</title>
	<author>DeadDecoy</author>
	<datestamp>1258114800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to, not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark, potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words.</p> </div><p>Does it? It strikes me that FreeCreditReport variants have more potential to defraud regular people than your regular news site. If slashdot tried to do the same thing, and pick up all of the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.coms,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.nets, etc on its variants, it would probably be shot down. It would be a bit nice if this precendent was viewed in context as an exception where the public would benefit from not having ambiguous urls over the corporate entity actually owning the urls.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to , not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark , but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark , potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words .
Does it ?
It strikes me that FreeCreditReport variants have more potential to defraud regular people than your regular news site .
If slashdot tried to do the same thing , and pick up all of the .coms , .nets , etc on its variants , it would probably be shot down .
It would be a bit nice if this precendent was viewed in context as an exception where the public would benefit from not having ambiguous urls over the corporate entity actually owning the urls .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It would seem that this decision sets or reinforces a fairly strong precedent that trademark holders may be entitled to, not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also to a wide swath of other domain names including nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark, potentially even if the trademark is comprised of generic words.
Does it?
It strikes me that FreeCreditReport variants have more potential to defraud regular people than your regular news site.
If slashdot tried to do the same thing, and pick up all of the .coms, .nets, etc on its variants, it would probably be shot down.
It would be a bit nice if this precendent was viewed in context as an exception where the public would benefit from not having ambiguous urls over the corporate entity actually owning the urls.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093136</id>
	<title>Precedent against Google?</title>
	<author>CuteSteveJobs</author>
	<datestamp>1258114860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark<br>
<br>
Right now Larry Page and Sergey Brin are yelling at each other over their diamond-encrusted platinum iPhones. On the bright side this guy claims that Google earns $32M-50M on typosquatting. That's the sort of cash they could easily walk away:<br>
<a href="http://www.itworld.com/internet/56426/professor-google-earns-32-50m-typosquatting-sites" title="itworld.com">http://www.itworld.com/internet/56426/professor-google-earns-32-50m-typosquatting-sites</a> [itworld.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark , but also ... nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark Right now Larry Page and Sergey Brin are yelling at each other over their diamond-encrusted platinum iPhones .
On the bright side this guy claims that Google earns $ 32M-50M on typosquatting .
That 's the sort of cash they could easily walk away : http : //www.itworld.com/internet/56426/professor-google-earns-32-50m-typosquatting-sites [ itworld.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; not only to the domain name that exactly matches their trademark, but also ... nearly every possible misspelling or other variation of that trademark

Right now Larry Page and Sergey Brin are yelling at each other over their diamond-encrusted platinum iPhones.
On the bright side this guy claims that Google earns $32M-50M on typosquatting.
That's the sort of cash they could easily walk away:
http://www.itworld.com/internet/56426/professor-google-earns-32-50m-typosquatting-sites [itworld.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093102</id>
	<title>Really horrible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258114680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are millions of people in the world with the same name.  If I want a web site in my name, and someone else has it, I have to wait for them to die before I can have a site with my name on it.  Unlike license plates where I can put up -01 or -02 or whatever, I can't do that now (oh noes, its too close).  This is really really dumb.  If you've ever tried to find someone on Facebook and has to go through ten pages of people with the same name, you know what I mean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are millions of people in the world with the same name .
If I want a web site in my name , and someone else has it , I have to wait for them to die before I can have a site with my name on it .
Unlike license plates where I can put up -01 or -02 or whatever , I ca n't do that now ( oh noes , its too close ) .
This is really really dumb .
If you 've ever tried to find someone on Facebook and has to go through ten pages of people with the same name , you know what I mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are millions of people in the world with the same name.
If I want a web site in my name, and someone else has it, I have to wait for them to die before I can have a site with my name on it.
Unlike license plates where I can put up -01 or -02 or whatever, I can't do that now (oh noes, its too close).
This is really really dumb.
If you've ever tried to find someone on Facebook and has to go through ten pages of people with the same name, you know what I mean.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093116</id>
	<title>Woohoo!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258114740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>freecriditreeport.com isn't on the list.</htmltext>
<tokenext>freecriditreeport.com is n't on the list .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>freecriditreeport.com isn't on the list.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093276</id>
	<title>Re:A battle between two evil companies</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1258115760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean you're not happy to see that a credit report scammer has protected itself against credit report scammer typo scammers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean you 're not happy to see that a credit report scammer has protected itself against credit report scammer typo scammers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean you're not happy to see that a credit report scammer has protected itself against credit report scammer typo scammers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</id>
	<title>Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258114500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's funny that "free"creditreport.com is upset that someone else is profiting off their name, when their name is designed to profit off someone else's.  I don't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year (via annualcreditreport.com).  "free"creditreport.com doesn't actually give you a credit report for free; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's funny that " free " creditreport.com is upset that someone else is profiting off their name , when their name is designed to profit off someone else 's .
I do n't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year ( via annualcreditreport.com ) .
" free " creditreport.com does n't actually give you a credit report for free ; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's funny that "free"creditreport.com is upset that someone else is profiting off their name, when their name is designed to profit off someone else's.
I don't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year (via annualcreditreport.com).
"free"creditreport.com doesn't actually give you a credit report for free; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30098458</id>
	<title>Re:Only a concern for the American Empire wage sla</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258221240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...because as we all well know, the American economy has absolutely no impact on the world economy at all [coughs].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...because as we all well know , the American economy has absolutely no impact on the world economy at all [ coughs ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...because as we all well know, the American economy has absolutely no impact on the world economy at all [coughs].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30099030</id>
	<title>Horrible Commercials - like fingernails on board</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258224420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or does anyone else want to take that singing idiot in their commercials and beat the living snot out of him?  Worst-Commercial-Evar</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or does anyone else want to take that singing idiot in their commercials and beat the living snot out of him ?
Worst-Commercial-Evar</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or does anyone else want to take that singing idiot in their commercials and beat the living snot out of him?
Worst-Commercial-Evar</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095138</id>
	<title>Costs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258135080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am wondering how much it cost them to contest 1017 domains</p><p>Source: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/fees/index.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am wondering how much it cost them to contest 1017 domainsSource : http : //www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/fees/index.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am wondering how much it cost them to contest 1017 domainsSource: http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/fees/index.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100982</id>
	<title>Re:This is gthe only real answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258194960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nah I own dictionary.com.  All your domains belong to us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nah I own dictionary.com .
All your domains belong to us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nah I own dictionary.com.
All your domains belong to us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093442</id>
	<title>Re:A battle between two evil companies</title>
	<author>clarkkent09</author>
	<datestamp>1258117380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So guys from freecreditreport.com, cybersquatters, AND their lawyers were all in one courtroom at one time? Damn,there's never a suicide bomber around when you need one</htmltext>
<tokenext>So guys from freecreditreport.com , cybersquatters , AND their lawyers were all in one courtroom at one time ?
Damn,there 's never a suicide bomber around when you need one</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So guys from freecreditreport.com, cybersquatters, AND their lawyers were all in one courtroom at one time?
Damn,there's never a suicide bomber around when you need one</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093168</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258115100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But their commercials are so catchy!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But their commercials are so catchy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But their commercials are so catchy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094462</id>
	<title>scam site makes my blood boil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258126380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here in the UK I was recommended to join the UK version of this site BY MY BANK. The credit report was worthless and I couldn't cancel my account.</p><p>Months later when I saw the sneaky submarine charges on my card bills I rung up several times but never got my money back. The site is a low life scam- pure and simple. It has multiple complaints all over the net yet when I asked customer service each time if they feel good working for a scam website they would reply that it's perfectly clear and in the TOS.</p><p>Come on, who reads the TOS ever? It says on the website FREE credit report (in caps)... Therefore I assume it's free.</p><p>Stay away. They should be shut down. They stole money off me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here in the UK I was recommended to join the UK version of this site BY MY BANK .
The credit report was worthless and I could n't cancel my account.Months later when I saw the sneaky submarine charges on my card bills I rung up several times but never got my money back .
The site is a low life scam- pure and simple .
It has multiple complaints all over the net yet when I asked customer service each time if they feel good working for a scam website they would reply that it 's perfectly clear and in the TOS.Come on , who reads the TOS ever ?
It says on the website FREE credit report ( in caps ) ... Therefore I assume it 's free.Stay away .
They should be shut down .
They stole money off me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here in the UK I was recommended to join the UK version of this site BY MY BANK.
The credit report was worthless and I couldn't cancel my account.Months later when I saw the sneaky submarine charges on my card bills I rung up several times but never got my money back.
The site is a low life scam- pure and simple.
It has multiple complaints all over the net yet when I asked customer service each time if they feel good working for a scam website they would reply that it's perfectly clear and in the TOS.Come on, who reads the TOS ever?
It says on the website FREE credit report (in caps)... Therefore I assume it's free.Stay away.
They should be shut down.
They stole money off me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30096920</id>
	<title>Bad decision.</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1258209360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This has bad decision written all over it, and will only serve to stifle people in the future.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This has bad decision written all over it , and will only serve to stifle people in the future .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This has bad decision written all over it, and will only serve to stifle people in the future.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093498</id>
	<title>Re:Sets a precedant</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258117800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was with you right up till the "public benefit" part; the FreeCreditReport people are only about one step above the typosquatting scum in this case. They're still trying to scam a $20/month service off on people who come to their site for something "free". Maybe they can team up with the Video Professor people and find even BETTER ways to rip people off...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was with you right up till the " public benefit " part ; the FreeCreditReport people are only about one step above the typosquatting scum in this case .
They 're still trying to scam a $ 20/month service off on people who come to their site for something " free " .
Maybe they can team up with the Video Professor people and find even BETTER ways to rip people off.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was with you right up till the "public benefit" part; the FreeCreditReport people are only about one step above the typosquatting scum in this case.
They're still trying to scam a $20/month service off on people who come to their site for something "free".
Maybe they can team up with the Video Professor people and find even BETTER ways to rip people off...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094508</id>
	<title>Ren Faire</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258126860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fuck your friends, fuck your dad, fuck your mom!<br>Never mind, they've been droning our songs<br>Since we first showed up with our fag hats on!<br>If you're not into pork sword fights<br>Pointy slippers and green wool tights<br>Take a trip from a jerk who knows<br>Notso Free Credit Report dot com, let's go!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fuck your friends , fuck your dad , fuck your mom ! Never mind , they 've been droning our songsSince we first showed up with our fag hats on ! If you 're not into pork sword fightsPointy slippers and green wool tightsTake a trip from a jerk who knowsNotso Free Credit Report dot com , let 's go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fuck your friends, fuck your dad, fuck your mom!Never mind, they've been droning our songsSince we first showed up with our fag hats on!If you're not into pork sword fightsPointy slippers and green wool tightsTake a trip from a jerk who knowsNotso Free Credit Report dot com, let's go!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093140</id>
	<title>A battle between two evil companies</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1258114920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... means squat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... means squat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... means squat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093554</id>
	<title>Re:This is gthe only real answer</title>
	<author>Romancer</author>
	<datestamp>1258117980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one who thought that this was funny because of the typo in the subject of his post?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>This is <b>g</b>the only real answer</p></div><p>People are currently modding it insightful...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one who thought that this was funny because of the typo in the subject of his post ? This is gthe only real answerPeople are currently modding it insightful.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one who thought that this was funny because of the typo in the subject of his post?This is gthe only real answerPeople are currently modding it insightful...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093142</id>
	<title>Reading the article...</title>
	<author>Itninja</author>
	<datestamp>1258114920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>....requires enrollment in Triple Advantage (tm).</htmltext>
<tokenext>....requires enrollment in Triple Advantage ( tm ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....requires enrollment in Triple Advantage (tm).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100328</id>
	<title>Re:Only a concern for the American Empire wage sla</title>
	<author>ponraul</author>
	<datestamp>1258189740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which country do you suggest for the American debt slave emegrant?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which country do you suggest for the American debt slave emegrant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which country do you suggest for the American debt slave emegrant?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094422</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095548</id>
	<title>Re:Liar beats other liars?</title>
	<author>Helen O'Boyle</author>
	<datestamp>1258141920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I had the same problem.  With new addresses every few months while I was on partial sabbatical years ago, I amassed quite a stack of previous locations.  Their 3rd degree authn process required me to know all of them.  I didn't.
<p>
Never could access what I was paying for, and you'd think the company would be required to cease billing if not providing the service, right?  I I called them up, pointed this out, tried to get cancelled, tried to get charges refunded.  Well, guess what?  As far as they were concerned I couldn't even prove to them sufficiently that I was who I was, for them to allow me to initiate the cancel operation!
</p><p>
You'd also think that you could appeal to your bank when you couldn't cancel it and you weren't getting the service paid for, right?  Well, according to Bank of America, I had to completely disable the card number.  They couldn't refuse to honor that one recurring debit against it..  That was my main card on hmany dozens of online sites and autopays.  I paid a couple hundred to freecreditreport over a couple years for the convenience of maintaining my card before it was finally eaten by an ATM machine and the bank disabled that card's number as per their policy.  The only good thing about the card getting eaten was that I was then free of freecreditreport.com.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had the same problem .
With new addresses every few months while I was on partial sabbatical years ago , I amassed quite a stack of previous locations .
Their 3rd degree authn process required me to know all of them .
I did n't .
Never could access what I was paying for , and you 'd think the company would be required to cease billing if not providing the service , right ?
I I called them up , pointed this out , tried to get cancelled , tried to get charges refunded .
Well , guess what ?
As far as they were concerned I could n't even prove to them sufficiently that I was who I was , for them to allow me to initiate the cancel operation !
You 'd also think that you could appeal to your bank when you could n't cancel it and you were n't getting the service paid for , right ?
Well , according to Bank of America , I had to completely disable the card number .
They could n't refuse to honor that one recurring debit against it.. That was my main card on hmany dozens of online sites and autopays .
I paid a couple hundred to freecreditreport over a couple years for the convenience of maintaining my card before it was finally eaten by an ATM machine and the bank disabled that card 's number as per their policy .
The only good thing about the card getting eaten was that I was then free of freecreditreport.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had the same problem.
With new addresses every few months while I was on partial sabbatical years ago, I amassed quite a stack of previous locations.
Their 3rd degree authn process required me to know all of them.
I didn't.
Never could access what I was paying for, and you'd think the company would be required to cease billing if not providing the service, right?
I I called them up, pointed this out, tried to get cancelled, tried to get charges refunded.
Well, guess what?
As far as they were concerned I couldn't even prove to them sufficiently that I was who I was, for them to allow me to initiate the cancel operation!
You'd also think that you could appeal to your bank when you couldn't cancel it and you weren't getting the service paid for, right?
Well, according to Bank of America, I had to completely disable the card number.
They couldn't refuse to honor that one recurring debit against it..  That was my main card on hmany dozens of online sites and autopays.
I paid a couple hundred to freecreditreport over a couple years for the convenience of maintaining my card before it was finally eaten by an ATM machine and the bank disabled that card's number as per their policy.
The only good thing about the card getting eaten was that I was then free of freecreditreport.com.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093278</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094340</id>
	<title>Re:Sets a precedant</title>
	<author>nextekcarl</author>
	<datestamp>1258124940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was wondering since this sounds like it went through arbitration rather than an actual court, does it set a precedent? I mean a legal precedent? IANAL, so I don't know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was wondering since this sounds like it went through arbitration rather than an actual court , does it set a precedent ?
I mean a legal precedent ?
IANAL , so I do n't know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was wondering since this sounds like it went through arbitration rather than an actual court, does it set a precedent?
I mean a legal precedent?
IANAL, so I don't know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093122</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093216</id>
	<title>Re:Really horrible</title>
	<author>mccrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258115340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I call BS.</p><p>The whole issue with trademarks is whether a name is confusingly similar.  Seems pretty clear to me that certain parties are trying to leech off a valid trademark holders name by registering common misspellings which would certainly meet the "confusingly similar" test.</p><p>There is no equivalence between your example of common name domains JohnDoe.com and a real trademark CocaCola.com, or freecreditreport.com in this case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I call BS.The whole issue with trademarks is whether a name is confusingly similar .
Seems pretty clear to me that certain parties are trying to leech off a valid trademark holders name by registering common misspellings which would certainly meet the " confusingly similar " test.There is no equivalence between your example of common name domains JohnDoe.com and a real trademark CocaCola.com , or freecreditreport.com in this case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I call BS.The whole issue with trademarks is whether a name is confusingly similar.
Seems pretty clear to me that certain parties are trying to leech off a valid trademark holders name by registering common misspellings which would certainly meet the "confusingly similar" test.There is no equivalence between your example of common name domains JohnDoe.com and a real trademark CocaCola.com, or freecreditreport.com in this case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093782</id>
	<title>Re:This is gthe only real answer</title>
	<author>fucket</author>
	<datestamp>1258119720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh man, does this mean slashdot is going to come after my <a href="http://questionmarkdot.org/" title="questionmarkdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://questionmarkdot.org/</a> [questionmarkdot.org] and <a href="http://perioddot.org/" title="perioddot.org" rel="nofollow">http://perioddot.org/</a> [perioddot.org] domains?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh man , does this mean slashdot is going to come after my http : //questionmarkdot.org/ [ questionmarkdot.org ] and http : //perioddot.org/ [ perioddot.org ] domains ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh man, does this mean slashdot is going to come after my http://questionmarkdot.org/ [questionmarkdot.org] and http://perioddot.org/ [perioddot.org] domains?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093506</id>
	<title>Re:This is gthe only real answer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258117800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a better solution. Instead of redirecting all of the common misspellings of big sites back to the correct spelling (the typist learns nothing). You could have every typo redirect to goatze and tubgirl. Spelling errors will plummet in weeks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a better solution .
Instead of redirecting all of the common misspellings of big sites back to the correct spelling ( the typist learns nothing ) .
You could have every typo redirect to goatze and tubgirl .
Spelling errors will plummet in weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a better solution.
Instead of redirecting all of the common misspellings of big sites back to the correct spelling (the typist learns nothing).
You could have every typo redirect to goatze and tubgirl.
Spelling errors will plummet in weeks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093128</id>
	<title>use annualcreditreport.com instead</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258114860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can get a really-and-truly free annual credit report from <a href="http://annualcreditreport.com/" title="annualcreditreport.com" rel="nofollow">this website</a> [annualcreditreport.com]
<p>
FreeCreditReport.com charges $15 and is run by
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;ie=ISO-8859-1&amp;q=freecreditreport+experian+\%22not+free\%22" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">
lying, typo-squatting douches at Experian</a> [google.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get a really-and-truly free annual credit report from this website [ annualcreditreport.com ] FreeCreditReport.com charges $ 15 and is run by lying , typo-squatting douches at Experian [ google.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get a really-and-truly free annual credit report from this website [annualcreditreport.com]

FreeCreditReport.com charges $15 and is run by

lying, typo-squatting douches at Experian [google.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30096332</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't seem unfair to me...</title>
	<author>517714</author>
	<datestamp>1258200540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is inwyoming a typo?  as in freecreditreoportinwyoming.com?</p><p>I think I will register freecreditreportinchicago.com, and I encourage everyone to register a similar domain with the name of their favorite city,county, town, or region.  My website will have a link to annualcreditreport.com stating that the consumer may obtain one report each year free of charge or obligation and won't receive spam by using the link and a simple statement that freecreditreport.com will charge the consumer unless he/she opts out or avoids them altogether, after which there will be a link to freecreditreportinwyoming.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is inwyoming a typo ?
as in freecreditreoportinwyoming.com ? I think I will register freecreditreportinchicago.com , and I encourage everyone to register a similar domain with the name of their favorite city,county , town , or region .
My website will have a link to annualcreditreport.com stating that the consumer may obtain one report each year free of charge or obligation and wo n't receive spam by using the link and a simple statement that freecreditreport.com will charge the consumer unless he/she opts out or avoids them altogether , after which there will be a link to freecreditreportinwyoming.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is inwyoming a typo?
as in freecreditreoportinwyoming.com?I think I will register freecreditreportinchicago.com, and I encourage everyone to register a similar domain with the name of their favorite city,county, town, or region.
My website will have a link to annualcreditreport.com stating that the consumer may obtain one report each year free of charge or obligation and won't receive spam by using the link and a simple statement that freecreditreport.com will charge the consumer unless he/she opts out or avoids them altogether, after which there will be a link to freecreditreportinwyoming.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095610</id>
	<title>This stuff deserves better explanation.</title>
	<author>Estanislao Martínez</author>
	<datestamp>1258229580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year (via annualcreditreport.com). "free"creditreport.com doesn't actually give you a credit report for free; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.</p></div></blockquote><p>This is worth emphasizing more carefully so that people can't possibly miss it.  <b>You are entitled to one free yearly credit report from the consumer credit reporting agencies.  The official website for this is <a href="https://www.annualcreditreport.com/cra/index.jsp" title="annualcreditreport.com" rel="nofollow">AnnualCreditReport.com</a> [annualcreditreport.com].</b>

</p><p>Some important details to be aware of:
</p><ul>
<li>A credit <b>report</b> is not the same as a credit <b>score</b>.  A credit report states what names and addresses are known for you, what credit accounts you have had, and your history of making payments on these accounts.  A credit score is a number generated by a computerized analysis of your credit report, used for a quick judgement of how good your credit is.</li>
<li>You're entitled to one free credit <b>report</b> each year, not a free credit score.  The free reports website will forward you to the websites for the credit reporting agencies to get your reports.  Read the pages in those websites very carefully, because the reporting agencies are sleazebags that will try to trick you into buying a credit score in addition to your free credit report, and sell you credit monitoring subscription services.</li>
<li>The credit scores that the websites will try sell you are normally calculated with a different formula than the ones that lenders use to process your credit application.  So don't buy the agencies' credit scores because you'd like to see the same score that a lender would pull up for you; the number will likely not be the same.  (The credit agencies don't want you to know this either; when pressed upon this point, they say something along the lines that they sell you a special credit score designed to help consumers improve their credit.)</li>
<li>The point of looking at your credit report is to make sure there are no errors.  Read the information carefully, and if you see anything you think is an error, then bring it up with the agency.</li>
<li>You don't have to get the credit reports from all three agencies all at once.   You can get a report from one of them now, one from another four months from now, one from the third eight months from now, and start the cycle all over again next year.</li>
</ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year ( via annualcreditreport.com ) .
" free " creditreport.com does n't actually give you a credit report for free ; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.This is worth emphasizing more carefully so that people ca n't possibly miss it .
You are entitled to one free yearly credit report from the consumer credit reporting agencies .
The official website for this is AnnualCreditReport.com [ annualcreditreport.com ] .
Some important details to be aware of : A credit report is not the same as a credit score .
A credit report states what names and addresses are known for you , what credit accounts you have had , and your history of making payments on these accounts .
A credit score is a number generated by a computerized analysis of your credit report , used for a quick judgement of how good your credit is .
You 're entitled to one free credit report each year , not a free credit score .
The free reports website will forward you to the websites for the credit reporting agencies to get your reports .
Read the pages in those websites very carefully , because the reporting agencies are sleazebags that will try to trick you into buying a credit score in addition to your free credit report , and sell you credit monitoring subscription services .
The credit scores that the websites will try sell you are normally calculated with a different formula than the ones that lenders use to process your credit application .
So do n't buy the agencies ' credit scores because you 'd like to see the same score that a lender would pull up for you ; the number will likely not be the same .
( The credit agencies do n't want you to know this either ; when pressed upon this point , they say something along the lines that they sell you a special credit score designed to help consumers improve their credit .
) The point of looking at your credit report is to make sure there are no errors .
Read the information carefully , and if you see anything you think is an error , then bring it up with the agency .
You do n't have to get the credit reports from all three agencies all at once .
You can get a report from one of them now , one from another four months from now , one from the third eight months from now , and start the cycle all over again next year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think they existed before the US government mandated the credit agencies give you a free copy of your credit report every year (via annualcreditreport.com).
"free"creditreport.com doesn't actually give you a credit report for free; you have to enroll in a reporting service to get it.This is worth emphasizing more carefully so that people can't possibly miss it.
You are entitled to one free yearly credit report from the consumer credit reporting agencies.
The official website for this is AnnualCreditReport.com [annualcreditreport.com].
Some important details to be aware of:

A credit report is not the same as a credit score.
A credit report states what names and addresses are known for you, what credit accounts you have had, and your history of making payments on these accounts.
A credit score is a number generated by a computerized analysis of your credit report, used for a quick judgement of how good your credit is.
You're entitled to one free credit report each year, not a free credit score.
The free reports website will forward you to the websites for the credit reporting agencies to get your reports.
Read the pages in those websites very carefully, because the reporting agencies are sleazebags that will try to trick you into buying a credit score in addition to your free credit report, and sell you credit monitoring subscription services.
The credit scores that the websites will try sell you are normally calculated with a different formula than the ones that lenders use to process your credit application.
So don't buy the agencies' credit scores because you'd like to see the same score that a lender would pull up for you; the number will likely not be the same.
(The credit agencies don't want you to know this either; when pressed upon this point, they say something along the lines that they sell you a special credit score designed to help consumers improve their credit.
)
The point of looking at your credit report is to make sure there are no errors.
Read the information carefully, and if you see anything you think is an error, then bring it up with the agency.
You don't have to get the credit reports from all three agencies all at once.
You can get a report from one of them now, one from another four months from now, one from the third eight months from now, and start the cycle all over again next year.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30186752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093128
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093122
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30097374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30096332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30098458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093140
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30097230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094422
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_13_205210_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093278
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30097230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30095338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30186752
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30096332
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30098458
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30094864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093838
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093442
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093506
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30100982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30097374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_13_205210.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_13_205210.30093864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
