<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_12_058216</id>
	<title>Hollywood Backs Swedish Movie Streaming Site</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258021440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>paulraps writes <i>"Forget Spotify and Skype: the latest strangely-named-but-hey-it's-free service from Sweden offers users <a href="http://www.thelocal.se/23206/20091111/">streamed on-demand movies free of charge</a>, has deals with two major Hollywood studios, and is called Voddler. Since its launch two weeks ago, the service has signed up a quarter of a million users and has almost the same number queuing for an invitation. After signing deals with Disney and Paramount, the company provides access to thousands of films, which are shown uninterrupted after a barrage of ads. The target is the file-sharing generation: 'Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal, secure, and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files,' says executive vice president Zoran Slavic."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>paulraps writes " Forget Spotify and Skype : the latest strangely-named-but-hey-it 's-free service from Sweden offers users streamed on-demand movies free of charge , has deals with two major Hollywood studios , and is called Voddler .
Since its launch two weeks ago , the service has signed up a quarter of a million users and has almost the same number queuing for an invitation .
After signing deals with Disney and Paramount , the company provides access to thousands of films , which are shown uninterrupted after a barrage of ads .
The target is the file-sharing generation : 'Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal , secure , and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files, ' says executive vice president Zoran Slavic .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>paulraps writes "Forget Spotify and Skype: the latest strangely-named-but-hey-it's-free service from Sweden offers users streamed on-demand movies free of charge, has deals with two major Hollywood studios, and is called Voddler.
Since its launch two weeks ago, the service has signed up a quarter of a million users and has almost the same number queuing for an invitation.
After signing deals with Disney and Paramount, the company provides access to thousands of films, which are shown uninterrupted after a barrage of ads.
The target is the file-sharing generation: 'Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal, secure, and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files,' says executive vice president Zoran Slavic.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071576</id>
	<title>Re:Videos that contain viruses?</title>
	<author>Misagon</author>
	<datestamp>1258036140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't it obvious? They tried to refer to the program that you download the file with.. but jumbled up the grammar. Duh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't it obvious ?
They tried to refer to the program that you download the file with.. but jumbled up the grammar .
Duh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't it obvious?
They tried to refer to the program that you download the file with.. but jumbled up the grammar.
Duh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071216</id>
	<title>Re: forced shutdown</title>
	<author>An anonymous Frank</author>
	<datestamp>1258032660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe that [Command-Option-Esc] will get you a "kill task" dialog most of the time, even when a program has taken the Mac hostage in full-screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that [ Command-Option-Esc ] will get you a " kill task " dialog most of the time , even when a program has taken the Mac hostage in full-screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that [Command-Option-Esc] will get you a "kill task" dialog most of the time, even when a program has taken the Mac hostage in full-screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071842</id>
	<title>How is this different from...</title>
	<author>xkcdFan1011011101111</author>
	<datestamp>1258037760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hulu or any of the other free online TV/movie streaming sites?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hulu or any of the other free online TV/movie streaming sites ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hulu or any of the other free online TV/movie streaming sites?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071178</id>
	<title>Re:No news here, RIAA peddles M$</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1258032060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"The nature of our business is both IT and media related and we are developing software solutions based on the Microsoft platform. "</p></div><p>"The nature of our business is to ignore all the users that use BSD, Linux, or Solaris, because we don't want their money.  We only care about Windows users (and maybe some day, Mac users)."</p><p>There, fixed it for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... them.  And yea, I took that "solutions" buzzword out to help them not look so much like a bunch of clueless pinheads.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The nature of our business is both IT and media related and we are developing software solutions based on the Microsoft platform .
" " The nature of our business is to ignore all the users that use BSD , Linux , or Solaris , because we do n't want their money .
We only care about Windows users ( and maybe some day , Mac users ) .
" There , fixed it for ... them. And yea , I took that " solutions " buzzword out to help them not look so much like a bunch of clueless pinheads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The nature of our business is both IT and media related and we are developing software solutions based on the Microsoft platform.
""The nature of our business is to ignore all the users that use BSD, Linux, or Solaris, because we don't want their money.
We only care about Windows users (and maybe some day, Mac users).
"There, fixed it for ... them.  And yea, I took that "solutions" buzzword out to help them not look so much like a bunch of clueless pinheads.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070908</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072818</id>
	<title>You need a client?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1258042140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well forget it then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well forget it then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well forget it then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073568</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone skim the summary and read</title>
	<author>badass fish</author>
	<datestamp>1258045140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>aXXo hasnt been doing his job lately and copycats are posting as him/her BEWARE FAKE TORRENTS</htmltext>
<tokenext>aXXo hasnt been doing his job lately and copycats are posting as him/her BEWARE FAKE TORRENTS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>aXXo hasnt been doing his job lately and copycats are posting as him/her BEWARE FAKE TORRENTS</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071332</id>
	<title>Re:barrage of ads; been to the theater lately?</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1258034220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that <b>after I paid to get in</b>, I was sitting through commercials</p></div> </blockquote><p>As far as I can tell, the only thing you're paying to use Voddler is the bandwith and the time to watch the adverts.</p><p>Why is it bad to have your movies paid by watching ads? Yes, on paid cable and theatres ads are fucking annoying as I've already paid for admission. Here, the ads ARE my payment of admission.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in , I was sitting through commercials As far as I can tell , the only thing you 're paying to use Voddler is the bandwith and the time to watch the adverts.Why is it bad to have your movies paid by watching ads ?
Yes , on paid cable and theatres ads are fucking annoying as I 've already paid for admission .
Here , the ads ARE my payment of admission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in, I was sitting through commercials As far as I can tell, the only thing you're paying to use Voddler is the bandwith and the time to watch the adverts.Why is it bad to have your movies paid by watching ads?
Yes, on paid cable and theatres ads are fucking annoying as I've already paid for admission.
Here, the ads ARE my payment of admission.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071378</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on definition of virus,</title>
	<author>dr\_d\_19</author>
	<datestamp>1258034640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's already fixed. Doesn't run as root and you now have the option of turning the P2P stuff off and on as you wish.</p><p><a href="http://blog.voddler.com/?p=268" title="voddler.com">Voddler on Mac</a> [voddler.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's already fixed .
Does n't run as root and you now have the option of turning the P2P stuff off and on as you wish.Voddler on Mac [ voddler.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's already fixed.
Doesn't run as root and you now have the option of turning the P2P stuff off and on as you wish.Voddler on Mac [voddler.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30075382</id>
	<title>Sweden? More like Estonia</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1258051380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly does Skype have to do with Sweden?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly does Skype have to do with Sweden ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly does Skype have to do with Sweden?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072066</id>
	<title>Re:You don't have to go to the theater, buy blu-ra</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258038840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever heard of the main menu button on your remote, works like a charm goes right to the movies menu and skips the adds</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever heard of the main menu button on your remote , works like a charm goes right to the movies menu and skips the adds</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever heard of the main menu button on your remote, works like a charm goes right to the movies menu and skips the adds</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071176</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070876</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258026840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is not phishing.</p><p>I got an invitation via my ISP Bredbandsbolaget.</p><p>Voddler works fine, but has currenly only budget movies to show. But that will change now with the Hollywood deals<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p><p>It also works as advertised; see a few commercials (time to pop the popcorn), and the movie is played without interruption... as long as your network connection is ok<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is not phishing.I got an invitation via my ISP Bredbandsbolaget.Voddler works fine , but has currenly only budget movies to show .
But that will change now with the Hollywood deals : ) .It also works as advertised ; see a few commercials ( time to pop the popcorn ) , and the movie is played without interruption... as long as your network connection is ok : - ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is not phishing.I got an invitation via my ISP Bredbandsbolaget.Voddler works fine, but has currenly only budget movies to show.
But that will change now with the Hollywood deals :).It also works as advertised; see a few commercials (time to pop the popcorn), and the movie is played without interruption... as long as your network connection is ok :-).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070812</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Rig0r</author>
	<datestamp>1258025880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, they do already need names for the companies that sponsor this concept...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they do already need names for the companies that sponsor this concept.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they do already need names for the companies that sponsor this concept...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070948</id>
	<title>How about downloading?</title>
	<author>ickleberry</author>
	<datestamp>1258027740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but without DRM and in common formats. streaming wastes bandwidth each time you want to watch the movie. there is probably a way to rip but with the MPAA involved you can be guaranteed 'the man' is putting in some sort of DRM to try and stop that</htmltext>
<tokenext>but without DRM and in common formats .
streaming wastes bandwidth each time you want to watch the movie .
there is probably a way to rip but with the MPAA involved you can be guaranteed 'the man ' is putting in some sort of DRM to try and stop that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but without DRM and in common formats.
streaming wastes bandwidth each time you want to watch the movie.
there is probably a way to rip but with the MPAA involved you can be guaranteed 'the man' is putting in some sort of DRM to try and stop that</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070852</id>
	<title>Anyone skim the summary and read</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1258026480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>uninterrupted barrage of ads</p></div><p>Why, oh why do they insist on this selling point of "no risks of computer viruses".<br>I'm always concerned that "legitimate" sources will contain a dodgy driver or a rootkit. No such concerns with the latest aXXo rip.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>uninterrupted barrage of adsWhy , oh why do they insist on this selling point of " no risks of computer viruses " .I 'm always concerned that " legitimate " sources will contain a dodgy driver or a rootkit .
No such concerns with the latest aXXo rip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uninterrupted barrage of adsWhy, oh why do they insist on this selling point of "no risks of computer viruses".I'm always concerned that "legitimate" sources will contain a dodgy driver or a rootkit.
No such concerns with the latest aXXo rip.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070924</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1258027320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is why god invented yahoo email.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is why god invented yahoo email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is why god invented yahoo email.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071918</id>
	<title>Need coffee...</title>
	<author>digitalhermit</author>
	<datestamp>1258038060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read that as "Bollywood Hacks Swedish Movie Streaming Site". Had this image of some programmer replacing documentaries about meatballs with clips of Aishwarya Rai dacing on a hilltop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that as " Bollywood Hacks Swedish Movie Streaming Site " .
Had this image of some programmer replacing documentaries about meatballs with clips of Aishwarya Rai dacing on a hilltop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that as "Bollywood Hacks Swedish Movie Streaming Site".
Had this image of some programmer replacing documentaries about meatballs with clips of Aishwarya Rai dacing on a hilltop.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073984</id>
	<title>Re:barrage of ads; been to the theater lately?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1258047180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having commercials before a movie is an annoyance, but the movie itself is uninterrupted, while non-premium cable's movies are not only interrupted by commercials, but "edited for content" as well.</p><p>I won't watch a movie that's rated higher than PG-13 on TV, because they butcher them. There was a movie a couple of weeks ago Tami wanted me to watch about a woman in rehab (made me think of Amy), saying it was hilarious. We watched it and she said "I remember it being funnier than that." I mentioned the inevitable censorship, and she said "well, there wasn't really anything to cut, just a little language."</p><p>I guess I'll either have to rent the DVD or check it out from the library.</p><p>She'd rented "Diary of a Mad Black Woman" and I watched that one with her, it was funny as hell after a slow start. A few months later I watched the TV version with Charlie on some cable network, and the things they cut were unbelievable. The scene where a joint was being passed around they actually blurred out the joint, and they cut the scene where the guy's crack whore wife shows up and he calls her a crack whore. That movie was funny on DVD, abysmally boring on cable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having commercials before a movie is an annoyance , but the movie itself is uninterrupted , while non-premium cable 's movies are not only interrupted by commercials , but " edited for content " as well.I wo n't watch a movie that 's rated higher than PG-13 on TV , because they butcher them .
There was a movie a couple of weeks ago Tami wanted me to watch about a woman in rehab ( made me think of Amy ) , saying it was hilarious .
We watched it and she said " I remember it being funnier than that .
" I mentioned the inevitable censorship , and she said " well , there was n't really anything to cut , just a little language .
" I guess I 'll either have to rent the DVD or check it out from the library.She 'd rented " Diary of a Mad Black Woman " and I watched that one with her , it was funny as hell after a slow start .
A few months later I watched the TV version with Charlie on some cable network , and the things they cut were unbelievable .
The scene where a joint was being passed around they actually blurred out the joint , and they cut the scene where the guy 's crack whore wife shows up and he calls her a crack whore .
That movie was funny on DVD , abysmally boring on cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having commercials before a movie is an annoyance, but the movie itself is uninterrupted, while non-premium cable's movies are not only interrupted by commercials, but "edited for content" as well.I won't watch a movie that's rated higher than PG-13 on TV, because they butcher them.
There was a movie a couple of weeks ago Tami wanted me to watch about a woman in rehab (made me think of Amy), saying it was hilarious.
We watched it and she said "I remember it being funnier than that.
" I mentioned the inevitable censorship, and she said "well, there wasn't really anything to cut, just a little language.
"I guess I'll either have to rent the DVD or check it out from the library.She'd rented "Diary of a Mad Black Woman" and I watched that one with her, it was funny as hell after a slow start.
A few months later I watched the TV version with Charlie on some cable network, and the things they cut were unbelievable.
The scene where a joint was being passed around they actually blurred out the joint, and they cut the scene where the guy's crack whore wife shows up and he calls her a crack whore.
That movie was funny on DVD, abysmally boring on cable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071026</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258029240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but your post was almost indecipherable gibberish.</p><p>First you say something about Americans being too insular, then you try to segue into commenting on the site's business model.  These things have nothing to do with each other.</p><p>&gt;We are quick to glom on to any sort of thing that we find even somewhat pleasing without fully understanding all the consequences. How will the movie companies make money from this type of site? Who is actually paying for the movies you see?</p><p>Why should I care?  There is no conceivable way that they can get money from me unless I give them a credit card number - and I really hope you're not stupid enough to give them a credit card number.  If their business plan works, it works.  If it fails, it fails.  I have no money invested in their stock, so why should I care who's paying?</p><p>&gt;Yes, the commercials are played before the movie now, but as that becomes unprofitable where are they going to start putting them?</p><p>The answer to this question, which you seem to think is so deep, is: "If they aren't profitable they will either attempt to make more money by putting commercials in the middle of the movie, which TV networks have done for decades, or they will go out of business."  Either of these options harms me not at all.</p><p>&gt;We all want free access to premium content. Is the price worth it?</p><p>You haven't made any argument for what the price is.  What *do* you imagine the cost is?  So far you've just rambled on in a vague way about how this business plan will be vaguely bad for us...somehow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but your post was almost indecipherable gibberish.First you say something about Americans being too insular , then you try to segue into commenting on the site 's business model .
These things have nothing to do with each other. &gt; We are quick to glom on to any sort of thing that we find even somewhat pleasing without fully understanding all the consequences .
How will the movie companies make money from this type of site ?
Who is actually paying for the movies you see ? Why should I care ?
There is no conceivable way that they can get money from me unless I give them a credit card number - and I really hope you 're not stupid enough to give them a credit card number .
If their business plan works , it works .
If it fails , it fails .
I have no money invested in their stock , so why should I care who 's paying ? &gt; Yes , the commercials are played before the movie now , but as that becomes unprofitable where are they going to start putting them ? The answer to this question , which you seem to think is so deep , is : " If they are n't profitable they will either attempt to make more money by putting commercials in the middle of the movie , which TV networks have done for decades , or they will go out of business .
" Either of these options harms me not at all. &gt; We all want free access to premium content .
Is the price worth it ? You have n't made any argument for what the price is .
What * do * you imagine the cost is ?
So far you 've just rambled on in a vague way about how this business plan will be vaguely bad for us...somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but your post was almost indecipherable gibberish.First you say something about Americans being too insular, then you try to segue into commenting on the site's business model.
These things have nothing to do with each other.&gt;We are quick to glom on to any sort of thing that we find even somewhat pleasing without fully understanding all the consequences.
How will the movie companies make money from this type of site?
Who is actually paying for the movies you see?Why should I care?
There is no conceivable way that they can get money from me unless I give them a credit card number - and I really hope you're not stupid enough to give them a credit card number.
If their business plan works, it works.
If it fails, it fails.
I have no money invested in their stock, so why should I care who's paying?&gt;Yes, the commercials are played before the movie now, but as that becomes unprofitable where are they going to start putting them?The answer to this question, which you seem to think is so deep, is: "If they aren't profitable they will either attempt to make more money by putting commercials in the middle of the movie, which TV networks have done for decades, or they will go out of business.
"  Either of these options harms me not at all.&gt;We all want free access to premium content.
Is the price worth it?You haven't made any argument for what the price is.
What *do* you imagine the cost is?
So far you've just rambled on in a vague way about how this business plan will be vaguely bad for us...somehow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071176</id>
	<title>You don't have to go to the theater, buy blu-ray</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1258032060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still think one of the reasons Blu Ray won in the end is because HD required the movie start when you loaded the DvD.  My Disney produced Blu Ray discs are loaded with nearly a dozen ads and such before the movie selection screen pops.</p><p>Its a constant pushing of "Next Chapter" after loading many Blu Ray titles.  If they going to stream them over the net for free after a barrage of ads the least they could do is reduce the price of Blu Ray discs.  Fortunately I haven't had a problem with skipping the ads, but I do have to press "Next Chapter" as each loads.  One day someone might wise up and figure a way to go directly to the movie again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still think one of the reasons Blu Ray won in the end is because HD required the movie start when you loaded the DvD .
My Disney produced Blu Ray discs are loaded with nearly a dozen ads and such before the movie selection screen pops.Its a constant pushing of " Next Chapter " after loading many Blu Ray titles .
If they going to stream them over the net for free after a barrage of ads the least they could do is reduce the price of Blu Ray discs .
Fortunately I have n't had a problem with skipping the ads , but I do have to press " Next Chapter " as each loads .
One day someone might wise up and figure a way to go directly to the movie again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still think one of the reasons Blu Ray won in the end is because HD required the movie start when you loaded the DvD.
My Disney produced Blu Ray discs are loaded with nearly a dozen ads and such before the movie selection screen pops.Its a constant pushing of "Next Chapter" after loading many Blu Ray titles.
If they going to stream them over the net for free after a barrage of ads the least they could do is reduce the price of Blu Ray discs.
Fortunately I haven't had a problem with skipping the ads, but I do have to press "Next Chapter" as each loads.
One day someone might wise up and figure a way to go directly to the movie again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070904</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258027140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>BAG, please go and live with fellow Jobs-worth jcr and never post to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. again, instead telling all you have to say to each other. You and he crossed the line between potentially chronic troll and just plain stupid many moons ago, and you reflect badly on the uniform you wear.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>BAG , please go and live with fellow Jobs-worth jcr and never post to / .
again , instead telling all you have to say to each other .
You and he crossed the line between potentially chronic troll and just plain stupid many moons ago , and you reflect badly on the uniform you wear .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BAG, please go and live with fellow Jobs-worth jcr and never post to /.
again, instead telling all you have to say to each other.
You and he crossed the line between potentially chronic troll and just plain stupid many moons ago, and you reflect badly on the uniform you wear.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072542</id>
	<title>Re:sell:nike air max jordan shoes,coach,gucci,hand</title>
	<author>lupinstel</author>
	<datestamp>1258041000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uggs and Ed Hardy clothing.  Somebody nuke it from orbit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uggs and Ed Hardy clothing .
Somebody nuke it from orbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uggs and Ed Hardy clothing.
Somebody nuke it from orbit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071368</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on definition of virus,</title>
	<author>siyavash</author>
	<datestamp>1258034520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Long time ago, I realized I can NOT trust ANY application that asks for root/admin access to my system. My solution was to virtualize the crap into its own virtual machine.</p><p>RAM is cheap these days, I have 12GB... Perhaps you could do the same. When you want to use that specific application, you just unpause the virtual machine.</p><p>I have actually done the same thing with "Internet". "ALL" my "Internet" is inside a virtual machine and my main PC has no Internet access at all.</p><p>Just a suggestion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Long time ago , I realized I can NOT trust ANY application that asks for root/admin access to my system .
My solution was to virtualize the crap into its own virtual machine.RAM is cheap these days , I have 12GB... Perhaps you could do the same .
When you want to use that specific application , you just unpause the virtual machine.I have actually done the same thing with " Internet " .
" ALL " my " Internet " is inside a virtual machine and my main PC has no Internet access at all.Just a suggestion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Long time ago, I realized I can NOT trust ANY application that asks for root/admin access to my system.
My solution was to virtualize the crap into its own virtual machine.RAM is cheap these days, I have 12GB... Perhaps you could do the same.
When you want to use that specific application, you just unpause the virtual machine.I have actually done the same thing with "Internet".
"ALL" my "Internet" is inside a virtual machine and my main PC has no Internet access at all.Just a suggestion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071142</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258031280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Hollywood Back Swedish Movie Streaming Site</p></div></blockquote><p>But how many Ingmar Bergman films can anyone watch?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood Back Swedish Movie Streaming SiteBut how many Ingmar Bergman films can anyone watch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hollywood Back Swedish Movie Streaming SiteBut how many Ingmar Bergman films can anyone watch?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30074098</id>
	<title>Yeah right...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258047600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that argument works, because your customers can't tell data formats (like MKV or AVI) from executable files.</p><p>Unfortunately, I say FUCK streaming! I'm not falling for that "you actually don't own shit" strategy!</p><p>Either I <em>own</em> the unencrypted file on my hard drive, of you can just right GTFO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that argument works , because your customers ca n't tell data formats ( like MKV or AVI ) from executable files.Unfortunately , I say FUCK streaming !
I 'm not falling for that " you actually do n't own shit " strategy ! Either I own the unencrypted file on my hard drive , of you can just right GTFO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that argument works, because your customers can't tell data formats (like MKV or AVI) from executable files.Unfortunately, I say FUCK streaming!
I'm not falling for that "you actually don't own shit" strategy!Either I own the unencrypted file on my hard drive, of you can just right GTFO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072868</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a beta tester of voddler</title>
	<author>kalirion</author>
	<datestamp>1258042320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>then the movie plays nicely on just 10-12Mbit adsl line.</i></p><p>I've been watching Hulu on 768kb...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>then the movie plays nicely on just 10-12Mbit adsl line.I 've been watching Hulu on 768kb.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then the movie plays nicely on just 10-12Mbit adsl line.I've been watching Hulu on 768kb...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070850</id>
	<title>Phishing? (and where is your analogy?)</title>
	<author>tpgp</author>
	<datestamp>1258026360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HTF is that phishing? Wikipedia sez:</p><blockquote><div><p>phishing is the criminally fraudulent process of attempting to acquire sensitive information such as usernames, passwords and credit card details by masquerading as a trustworthy entity</p></div></blockquote><p>And no analogy in your comment. Perhaps consider renaming yourself to inane first post guy?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>HTF is that phishing ?
Wikipedia sez : phishing is the criminally fraudulent process of attempting to acquire sensitive information such as usernames , passwords and credit card details by masquerading as a trustworthy entityAnd no analogy in your comment .
Perhaps consider renaming yourself to inane first post guy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HTF is that phishing?
Wikipedia sez:phishing is the criminally fraudulent process of attempting to acquire sensitive information such as usernames, passwords and credit card details by masquerading as a trustworthy entityAnd no analogy in your comment.
Perhaps consider renaming yourself to inane first post guy?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071432</id>
	<title>Re:Anyone skim the summary and read</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258035060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm always concerned that "legitimate" sources will contain a dodgy driver or a rootkit.</p></div><p>A poster later on in this thread says that Voddler (the mac client, at least) continuously uploads to other users, even when you're not actively downloading, and the only way to stop it is to uninstall it.  I'd consider a bittorrent client that acted this way as at least partly malicious.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm always concerned that " legitimate " sources will contain a dodgy driver or a rootkit.A poster later on in this thread says that Voddler ( the mac client , at least ) continuously uploads to other users , even when you 're not actively downloading , and the only way to stop it is to uninstall it .
I 'd consider a bittorrent client that acted this way as at least partly malicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm always concerned that "legitimate" sources will contain a dodgy driver or a rootkit.A poster later on in this thread says that Voddler (the mac client, at least) continuously uploads to other users, even when you're not actively downloading, and the only way to stop it is to uninstall it.
I'd consider a bittorrent client that acted this way as at least partly malicious.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071244</id>
	<title>sell:nike air max jordan shoes,coach,gucci,handbag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258033080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com] If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are &ldquo;must have &rdquo; nike air max jordan,shoes,caoch,gucci,lv,dg, ed hardy handbags,Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F T-shirtin, True Religion/Coogi/Evisu/Ed Hardy/Prada Jeansthe winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30\%-50\% off,free shipping, you may take a look, you may find the UGGS you want here.
<a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are    must have    nike air max jordan,shoes,caoch,gucci,lv,dg , ed hardy handbags,Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F T-shirtin , True Religion/Coogi/Evisu/Ed Hardy/Prada Jeansthe winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30 \ % -50 \ % off,free shipping , you may take a look , you may find the UGGS you want here .
http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com] If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are “must have ” nike air max jordan,shoes,caoch,gucci,lv,dg, ed hardy handbags,Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F T-shirtin, True Religion/Coogi/Evisu/Ed Hardy/Prada Jeansthe winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30\%-50\% off,free shipping, you may take a look, you may find the UGGS you want here.
http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070936</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Jugalator</author>
	<datestamp>1258027500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not phishing, you're added to the queue. But it's a pretty long queue.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not phishing , you 're added to the queue .
But it 's a pretty long queue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not phishing, you're added to the queue.
But it's a pretty long queue.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070840</id>
	<title>Free movies</title>
	<author>WarJolt</author>
	<datestamp>1258026240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "free" movies from Comcast on-demand suck and I would imagine those costs are somehow worked into your Comcast bill. I can't imagine free movies would be that great if they are only ad supported. Hollywood wouldn't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " free " movies from Comcast on-demand suck and I would imagine those costs are somehow worked into your Comcast bill .
I ca n't imagine free movies would be that great if they are only ad supported .
Hollywood would n't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "free" movies from Comcast on-demand suck and I would imagine those costs are somehow worked into your Comcast bill.
I can't imagine free movies would be that great if they are only ad supported.
Hollywood wouldn't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30075098</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>citab</author>
	<datestamp>1258050540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><blockquote><div><p>Hollywood Back Swedish Movie Streaming Site</p></div></blockquote><p>But how many Ingmar Bergman films can anyone watch?</p></div><p>I was hoping it's more like 'Swedish Erotica' streaming... hmmm, that takes on a whole new meaning somehow.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood Back Swedish Movie Streaming SiteBut how many Ingmar Bergman films can anyone watch ? I was hoping it 's more like 'Swedish Erotica ' streaming... hmmm , that takes on a whole new meaning somehow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hollywood Back Swedish Movie Streaming SiteBut how many Ingmar Bergman films can anyone watch?I was hoping it's more like 'Swedish Erotica' streaming... hmmm, that takes on a whole new meaning somehow.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071010</id>
	<title>Re:Videos that contain viruses?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258028820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>somethingmalicious.exe + movie.avi &gt; maliciousmovie.avi

Embedded files are a possibility but it depends on the player and Voddler might have a player that they trust for not falling for this. I also think that they use professional obtained movie files, nothing that went through an other network yet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>somethingmalicious.exe + movie.avi &gt; maliciousmovie.avi Embedded files are a possibility but it depends on the player and Voddler might have a player that they trust for not falling for this .
I also think that they use professional obtained movie files , nothing that went through an other network yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>somethingmalicious.exe + movie.avi &gt; maliciousmovie.avi

Embedded files are a possibility but it depends on the player and Voddler might have a player that they trust for not falling for this.
I also think that they use professional obtained movie files, nothing that went through an other network yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071188</id>
	<title>Re:barrage of ads; been to the theater lately?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258032300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you ever tried being late 15-20mins for a movie? Works every time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you ever tried being late 15-20mins for a movie ?
Works every time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you ever tried being late 15-20mins for a movie?
Works every time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848</id>
	<title>Interesting story</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1258026360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is a story further down the page: <a href="http://www.thelocal.se/23202/20091111/" title="thelocal.se" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelocal.se/23202/20091111/</a> [thelocal.se]</p><p>A Swede was caught and fined for <b>speeding on the autobahn</b>.</p><p>As Americans, we sometimes willfully ignore facts, as most Americans believe the Autobahn to be this magical road where speed limits don't exist and every can drive as fast as they want.</p><p>Our perspective is very narrow and insular, and that is one of our greatest weaknesses. Our willingness to quickly grab ahold of any negative story about China, Iran, or other "enemy" of ours is precisely the result of this lack of perspective.</p><p>So when we see a new site that is offering up movies for free, we are quick to cheer. We are quick to glom on to any sort of thing that we find even somewhat pleasing without fully understanding all the consequences. How will the movie companies make money from this type of site? Who is actually paying for the movies you see?</p><p>Yes, the commercials are played before the movie now, but as that becomes unprofitable where are they going to start putting them? What are we going to lose down the road?</p><p>We all want free access to premium content. Is the price worth it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a story further down the page : http : //www.thelocal.se/23202/20091111/ [ thelocal.se ] A Swede was caught and fined for speeding on the autobahn.As Americans , we sometimes willfully ignore facts , as most Americans believe the Autobahn to be this magical road where speed limits do n't exist and every can drive as fast as they want.Our perspective is very narrow and insular , and that is one of our greatest weaknesses .
Our willingness to quickly grab ahold of any negative story about China , Iran , or other " enemy " of ours is precisely the result of this lack of perspective.So when we see a new site that is offering up movies for free , we are quick to cheer .
We are quick to glom on to any sort of thing that we find even somewhat pleasing without fully understanding all the consequences .
How will the movie companies make money from this type of site ?
Who is actually paying for the movies you see ? Yes , the commercials are played before the movie now , but as that becomes unprofitable where are they going to start putting them ?
What are we going to lose down the road ? We all want free access to premium content .
Is the price worth it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is a story further down the page: http://www.thelocal.se/23202/20091111/ [thelocal.se]A Swede was caught and fined for speeding on the autobahn.As Americans, we sometimes willfully ignore facts, as most Americans believe the Autobahn to be this magical road where speed limits don't exist and every can drive as fast as they want.Our perspective is very narrow and insular, and that is one of our greatest weaknesses.
Our willingness to quickly grab ahold of any negative story about China, Iran, or other "enemy" of ours is precisely the result of this lack of perspective.So when we see a new site that is offering up movies for free, we are quick to cheer.
We are quick to glom on to any sort of thing that we find even somewhat pleasing without fully understanding all the consequences.
How will the movie companies make money from this type of site?
Who is actually paying for the movies you see?Yes, the commercials are played before the movie now, but as that becomes unprofitable where are they going to start putting them?
What are we going to lose down the road?We all want free access to premium content.
Is the price worth it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071164</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a beta tester of voddler</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258031640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cancel your internet subscription, put on your tinfoil-hat and from now on only use VHS-tapes. Safety first!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cancel your internet subscription , put on your tinfoil-hat and from now on only use VHS-tapes .
Safety first !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cancel your internet subscription, put on your tinfoil-hat and from now on only use VHS-tapes.
Safety first!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071140</id>
	<title>While waiting for the major studios to join in</title>
	<author>Provocateur</author>
	<datestamp>1258031280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They probably have the look alikes and the wannabee movies. Like a Swedish Steven Seagal that kicks arse and gets all the Swedish chicks...and he runs outta chicks...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They probably have the look alikes and the wannabee movies .
Like a Swedish Steven Seagal that kicks arse and gets all the Swedish chicks...and he runs outta chicks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They probably have the look alikes and the wannabee movies.
Like a Swedish Steven Seagal that kicks arse and gets all the Swedish chicks...and he runs outta chicks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070968</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258027920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol @ americans not having "first and/or only access" for once<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol @ americans not having " first and/or only access " for once : p</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol @ americans not having "first and/or only access" for once :p</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071220</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a beta tester of voddler</title>
	<author>TheKidWho</author>
	<datestamp>1258032780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ONLY on a SAFE computer?  My god MAN, get off the internet NOW!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ONLY on a SAFE computer ?
My god MAN , get off the internet NOW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ONLY on a SAFE computer?
My god MAN, get off the internet NOW!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071266</id>
	<title>Finally...</title>
	<author>bkr1\_2k</author>
	<datestamp>1258033440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, maybe Hollywood is finally starting to get it?  We'll see how badly they try to screw the customers in the long term, but this is at least a step in the right direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , maybe Hollywood is finally starting to get it ?
We 'll see how badly they try to screw the customers in the long term , but this is at least a step in the right direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, maybe Hollywood is finally starting to get it?
We'll see how badly they try to screw the customers in the long term, but this is at least a step in the right direction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</id>
	<title>barrage of ads; been to the theater lately?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258027740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in, I was sitting through commercials (not just trailers, but commercials).  I decided that I might as well stay home and wait for the movies on non-premium cable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in , I was sitting through commercials ( not just trailers , but commercials ) .
I decided that I might as well stay home and wait for the movies on non-premium cable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in, I was sitting through commercials (not just trailers, but commercials).
I decided that I might as well stay home and wait for the movies on non-premium cable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071042</id>
	<title>Re:barrage of ads; been to the theater lately?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258029480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Same here.  Even worse we'd already rung the cinema and specifically asked what time the actual feature started and had explained we weren't going to sit through adverts.  The arsehole manager we spoke to on the phone of course told us what time the advertising started so I very loudly got us a refund and, to the best of my knowledge, none of our party of 10 has been back to a cinema since.  That was in 1994.</p><p>These days the only way to watch a film in any decent way is to watch a decrapified rip at home on your own system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Same here .
Even worse we 'd already rung the cinema and specifically asked what time the actual feature started and had explained we were n't going to sit through adverts .
The arsehole manager we spoke to on the phone of course told us what time the advertising started so I very loudly got us a refund and , to the best of my knowledge , none of our party of 10 has been back to a cinema since .
That was in 1994.These days the only way to watch a film in any decent way is to watch a decrapified rip at home on your own system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Same here.
Even worse we'd already rung the cinema and specifically asked what time the actual feature started and had explained we weren't going to sit through adverts.
The arsehole manager we spoke to on the phone of course told us what time the advertising started so I very loudly got us a refund and, to the best of my knowledge, none of our party of 10 has been back to a cinema since.
That was in 1994.These days the only way to watch a film in any decent way is to watch a decrapified rip at home on your own system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071800</id>
	<title>Question about pr0n</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1258037580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it a Swedish site that streams movies, or a site that streams Swedish movies?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it a Swedish site that streams movies , or a site that streams Swedish movies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it a Swedish site that streams movies, or a site that streams Swedish movies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071648</id>
	<title>Re:Depends on definition of virus,</title>
	<author>Misagon</author>
	<datestamp>1258036740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember the Mac version is still in Alpha!</p><p>The root access-stuff was a bug in the installer. It wasn't supposed to run as root, and it didn't have to. That has been fixed in the latest alpha-release for Mac.</p><p>Yes, Voddler is based on file-sharing tech quite similiar to Bittorrent and Spotify. (except that Bittorrent doesnt' stream) Read the FAQ!<br>The developers have said that the uplink rate will be throttled in an upcoming release. I say it again: It is in Alpha!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember the Mac version is still in Alpha ! The root access-stuff was a bug in the installer .
It was n't supposed to run as root , and it did n't have to .
That has been fixed in the latest alpha-release for Mac.Yes , Voddler is based on file-sharing tech quite similiar to Bittorrent and Spotify .
( except that Bittorrent doesnt ' stream ) Read the FAQ ! The developers have said that the uplink rate will be throttled in an upcoming release .
I say it again : It is in Alpha !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember the Mac version is still in Alpha!The root access-stuff was a bug in the installer.
It wasn't supposed to run as root, and it didn't have to.
That has been fixed in the latest alpha-release for Mac.Yes, Voddler is based on file-sharing tech quite similiar to Bittorrent and Spotify.
(except that Bittorrent doesnt' stream) Read the FAQ!The developers have said that the uplink rate will be throttled in an upcoming release.
I say it again: It is in Alpha!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186</id>
	<title>Depends on definition of virus,</title>
	<author>antiaktiv</author>
	<datestamp>1258032300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was very excited about Voddler (I'm a Spotify premium subscriber, and a big movie buff, so it was just what I'd been waiting for), until I read about how the mac client works.<br>
When installed it takes root access (in beta? how can that be safe?), and the server part never shuts down. That's right, when you're not watching a movie, you're still uploading. When you're out and about with your laptop and on a 3G tether, just checking your email and paying for data transfer, you're still uploading. When you have some real uploading to do (for work or whatever), the only way to turn off the Voddler sharing is to uninstall the server part, and then the client and player stops working.<br>
<br>

No thanks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was very excited about Voddler ( I 'm a Spotify premium subscriber , and a big movie buff , so it was just what I 'd been waiting for ) , until I read about how the mac client works .
When installed it takes root access ( in beta ?
how can that be safe ?
) , and the server part never shuts down .
That 's right , when you 're not watching a movie , you 're still uploading .
When you 're out and about with your laptop and on a 3G tether , just checking your email and paying for data transfer , you 're still uploading .
When you have some real uploading to do ( for work or whatever ) , the only way to turn off the Voddler sharing is to uninstall the server part , and then the client and player stops working .
No thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was very excited about Voddler (I'm a Spotify premium subscriber, and a big movie buff, so it was just what I'd been waiting for), until I read about how the mac client works.
When installed it takes root access (in beta?
how can that be safe?
), and the server part never shuts down.
That's right, when you're not watching a movie, you're still uploading.
When you're out and about with your laptop and on a 3G tether, just checking your email and paying for data transfer, you're still uploading.
When you have some real uploading to do (for work or whatever), the only way to turn off the Voddler sharing is to uninstall the server part, and then the client and player stops working.
No thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071696</id>
	<title>Security?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258037040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Having a firewall with a default deny policy is a good way to promote safety.<br>If you use Voddler, you need to open each and every TCP and UDP port from 1025 and up. (Or have some D-Linkish "router" with UPnP.)</p><p>Okay, this may not be such a big deal for most home users. But it makes it impossible to use in a work or school setting.<br>This is a great service for documentaries and educational videos that can never be.</p><p>Why can't they do like Skype, Spotify or... well most anything else, like the web?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Having a firewall with a default deny policy is a good way to promote safety.If you use Voddler , you need to open each and every TCP and UDP port from 1025 and up .
( Or have some D-Linkish " router " with UPnP .
) Okay , this may not be such a big deal for most home users .
But it makes it impossible to use in a work or school setting.This is a great service for documentaries and educational videos that can never be.Why ca n't they do like Skype , Spotify or... well most anything else , like the web ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having a firewall with a default deny policy is a good way to promote safety.If you use Voddler, you need to open each and every TCP and UDP port from 1025 and up.
(Or have some D-Linkish "router" with UPnP.
)Okay, this may not be such a big deal for most home users.
But it makes it impossible to use in a work or school setting.This is a great service for documentaries and educational videos that can never be.Why can't they do like Skype, Spotify or... well most anything else, like the web?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30082610</id>
	<title>There is a reason why this came in Sweden</title>
	<author>smartdreamer</author>
	<datestamp>1258038960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
There is a reason why this came in Sweden and not elsewhere. Don't expect to see something like this here.
</p><p>
Sweden giving more power to their people than to foreign companies, those companies were faced with the choice of staying with their old way of doing business (making no virtually no money) or changing the model to do less. At least, less means more than nothing. The fact that this tactic of suing customers failed forced the big players to change. Sweden people along side with their government forced an industry to innovate. And this wouldn't have been possible without <b>piracy</b>. It was the mean through which people expressed their discontent with an industry's current way of doing things. Piracy was like a boycott and it worked.
</p><p>
Now let see how this goes. Could this open the way for other countries? Don't expect it in countries where governments are more concerned by profit making business than their people.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is a reason why this came in Sweden and not elsewhere .
Do n't expect to see something like this here .
Sweden giving more power to their people than to foreign companies , those companies were faced with the choice of staying with their old way of doing business ( making no virtually no money ) or changing the model to do less .
At least , less means more than nothing .
The fact that this tactic of suing customers failed forced the big players to change .
Sweden people along side with their government forced an industry to innovate .
And this would n't have been possible without piracy .
It was the mean through which people expressed their discontent with an industry 's current way of doing things .
Piracy was like a boycott and it worked .
Now let see how this goes .
Could this open the way for other countries ?
Do n't expect it in countries where governments are more concerned by profit making business than their people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
There is a reason why this came in Sweden and not elsewhere.
Don't expect to see something like this here.
Sweden giving more power to their people than to foreign companies, those companies were faced with the choice of staying with their old way of doing business (making no virtually no money) or changing the model to do less.
At least, less means more than nothing.
The fact that this tactic of suing customers failed forced the big players to change.
Sweden people along side with their government forced an industry to innovate.
And this wouldn't have been possible without piracy.
It was the mean through which people expressed their discontent with an industry's current way of doing things.
Piracy was like a boycott and it worked.
Now let see how this goes.
Could this open the way for other countries?
Don't expect it in countries where governments are more concerned by profit making business than their people.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846</id>
	<title>I'm a beta tester of voddler</title>
	<author>Xerfas</author>
	<datestamp>1258026360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been using voddler as a beta tester for a few weeks now and it works quite ok after the last client upgrade.
The first mac client was crap, nothing happened when I tried to login and it went fullscreen mode when started plus the program froze so I had to shut down the computer with forced shut down. After the latest client version I was logged in when I started the program, Voddler client is built on XBMC Media Center and you can only use the keyboard to navigate which can be quite annoying when navigating.<br>
Browsing the few movies they have at the moment is fairly easy (only about 500 movies or so). First I get a commercial and then the movie plays nicely on just 10-12Mbit adsl line. I have heard that there was commercial breaks in the movies, but I haven't seen any commercial in a movie so far, just the commercial just before the movie starts which can be 10 minutes long or so.<br>
For a beta I think it's a nice product which works quite well for me. Especially since the last update on the client which allows you to go into windowed mode which I forgot to mention further up in my text.<br>
I believe that Voddler can be great once the new movies pop in and the beta goes into full product. The client has only crashed on me once and when I started it up again and found my movie I was looking at I could start where it ended.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been using voddler as a beta tester for a few weeks now and it works quite ok after the last client upgrade .
The first mac client was crap , nothing happened when I tried to login and it went fullscreen mode when started plus the program froze so I had to shut down the computer with forced shut down .
After the latest client version I was logged in when I started the program , Voddler client is built on XBMC Media Center and you can only use the keyboard to navigate which can be quite annoying when navigating .
Browsing the few movies they have at the moment is fairly easy ( only about 500 movies or so ) .
First I get a commercial and then the movie plays nicely on just 10-12Mbit adsl line .
I have heard that there was commercial breaks in the movies , but I have n't seen any commercial in a movie so far , just the commercial just before the movie starts which can be 10 minutes long or so .
For a beta I think it 's a nice product which works quite well for me .
Especially since the last update on the client which allows you to go into windowed mode which I forgot to mention further up in my text .
I believe that Voddler can be great once the new movies pop in and the beta goes into full product .
The client has only crashed on me once and when I started it up again and found my movie I was looking at I could start where it ended .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been using voddler as a beta tester for a few weeks now and it works quite ok after the last client upgrade.
The first mac client was crap, nothing happened when I tried to login and it went fullscreen mode when started plus the program froze so I had to shut down the computer with forced shut down.
After the latest client version I was logged in when I started the program, Voddler client is built on XBMC Media Center and you can only use the keyboard to navigate which can be quite annoying when navigating.
Browsing the few movies they have at the moment is fairly easy (only about 500 movies or so).
First I get a commercial and then the movie plays nicely on just 10-12Mbit adsl line.
I have heard that there was commercial breaks in the movies, but I haven't seen any commercial in a movie so far, just the commercial just before the movie starts which can be 10 minutes long or so.
For a beta I think it's a nice product which works quite well for me.
Especially since the last update on the client which allows you to go into windowed mode which I forgot to mention further up in my text.
I believe that Voddler can be great once the new movies pop in and the beta goes into full product.
The client has only crashed on me once and when I started it up again and found my movie I was looking at I could start where it ended.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071116</id>
	<title>You turn up at the time they say the film starts?</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1258030800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I work on a 5 minute per released week system:<br> <br>First week: 20 minutes late<br>Second week: 15 minutes late<br>Third week: 10 minutes late<br> <br>If it's been out longer than 3 weeks, I can wait for the DVD ( which I can skip the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALZZx1xmAzg" title="youtube.com">You wouldn't steal a policeman's helmet!</a> [youtube.com] adverts and trailers through VLC )</htmltext>
<tokenext>I work on a 5 minute per released week system : First week : 20 minutes lateSecond week : 15 minutes lateThird week : 10 minutes late If it 's been out longer than 3 weeks , I can wait for the DVD ( which I can skip the You would n't steal a policeman 's helmet !
[ youtube.com ] adverts and trailers through VLC )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I work on a 5 minute per released week system: First week: 20 minutes lateSecond week: 15 minutes lateThird week: 10 minutes late If it's been out longer than 3 weeks, I can wait for the DVD ( which I can skip the You wouldn't steal a policeman's helmet!
[youtube.com] adverts and trailers through VLC )</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30082818</id>
	<title>Premium movie theaters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe a premium movie theater like the "VIP" cinemas we have in M&#233;xico would help bring people to the movie theaters.<br>Here's a picture. http://dealante.com/upload/nodos/2008/8/28/doc-151693.jpg<br>Admission costs the equivalent of 9.50 USD (twice what the regular theater costs) and there's waiters bringing you food and alcohol to your seat, huge reclining seats and you choose your seat while buying the admission. I've never seen anything like that in the US, maybe they'd have to cost over twice as much the regular admission since the staff would be so much more expensive but there's been great success with that business model over here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe a premium movie theater like the " VIP " cinemas we have in M   xico would help bring people to the movie theaters.Here 's a picture .
http : //dealante.com/upload/nodos/2008/8/28/doc-151693.jpgAdmission costs the equivalent of 9.50 USD ( twice what the regular theater costs ) and there 's waiters bringing you food and alcohol to your seat , huge reclining seats and you choose your seat while buying the admission .
I 've never seen anything like that in the US , maybe they 'd have to cost over twice as much the regular admission since the staff would be so much more expensive but there 's been great success with that business model over here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe a premium movie theater like the "VIP" cinemas we have in México would help bring people to the movie theaters.Here's a picture.
http://dealante.com/upload/nodos/2008/8/28/doc-151693.jpgAdmission costs the equivalent of 9.50 USD (twice what the regular theater costs) and there's waiters bringing you food and alcohol to your seat, huge reclining seats and you choose your seat while buying the admission.
I've never seen anything like that in the US, maybe they'd have to cost over twice as much the regular admission since the staff would be so much more expensive but there's been great success with that business model over here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070870</id>
	<title>Disappointing movie selection</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258026720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find the movie selection on Voddler quite disappointing.</p><p>
&nbsp; When the fine article said "Swedish movie site", I was expecting something entirely different.  As any movie buff knows, a true Swedish movie always ends with the single word "SLUT" and you all know there is a good reason for it.</p><p>At the very least I was expecting previosly unreleased footage of the Swedish Bikini team, and I was hoping for quite a few sluts.</p><p>xenu.net</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find the movie selection on Voddler quite disappointing .
  When the fine article said " Swedish movie site " , I was expecting something entirely different .
As any movie buff knows , a true Swedish movie always ends with the single word " SLUT " and you all know there is a good reason for it.At the very least I was expecting previosly unreleased footage of the Swedish Bikini team , and I was hoping for quite a few sluts.xenu.net</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find the movie selection on Voddler quite disappointing.
  When the fine article said "Swedish movie site", I was expecting something entirely different.
As any movie buff knows, a true Swedish movie always ends with the single word "SLUT" and you all know there is a good reason for it.At the very least I was expecting previosly unreleased footage of the Swedish Bikini team, and I was hoping for quite a few sluts.xenu.net</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a beta tester of voddler</title>
	<author>Skapare</author>
	<datestamp>1258030560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It requires their own client?  Wow, that was brave of you.  Does the Linux version come in both 32 bit and 64 bit versions?  If I would have to run THEIR client, I'd want to do so ONLY on a SAFE computer (that rules out all of Windows and I don't have a Mac).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It requires their own client ?
Wow , that was brave of you .
Does the Linux version come in both 32 bit and 64 bit versions ?
If I would have to run THEIR client , I 'd want to do so ONLY on a SAFE computer ( that rules out all of Windows and I do n't have a Mac ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It requires their own client?
Wow, that was brave of you.
Does the Linux version come in both 32 bit and 64 bit versions?
If I would have to run THEIR client, I'd want to do so ONLY on a SAFE computer (that rules out all of Windows and I don't have a Mac).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073372</id>
	<title>Re:I'm a beta tester of voddler</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258044300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here is a blog post looking for linux programmers. Says it was originally developed in a linux environment.</p><p>http://blog.voddler.com/?p=202</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is a blog post looking for linux programmers .
Says it was originally developed in a linux environment.http : //blog.voddler.com/ ? p = 202</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is a blog post looking for linux programmers.
Says it was originally developed in a linux environment.http://blog.voddler.com/?p=202</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070860</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting story</title>
	<author>Xerfas</author>
	<datestamp>1258026600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are plans once the service is for everyone which allows you to get rid of commercials.
From voddlers FAQ:<p><div class="quote"><p>Do I need to pay for Voddler? You will have the choice of advertised movies and pay per view. In the beta version only advertised movies are available.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are plans once the service is for everyone which allows you to get rid of commercials .
From voddlers FAQ : Do I need to pay for Voddler ?
You will have the choice of advertised movies and pay per view .
In the beta version only advertised movies are available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are plans once the service is for everyone which allows you to get rid of commercials.
From voddlers FAQ:Do I need to pay for Voddler?
You will have the choice of advertised movies and pay per view.
In the beta version only advertised movies are available.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071008</id>
	<title>Re:Videos that contain viruses?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258028820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because you have never seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exists.</p><p>There has been numerous viruses inside, for example, JPEG and GIF files. The viruses get executed via bugs in common decoder libraries. I don't see any reason why such a thing could not exist in video files as well. I guess someone more knowledgeable than me can post some examples.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because you have never seen it does n't mean it does n't exists.There has been numerous viruses inside , for example , JPEG and GIF files .
The viruses get executed via bugs in common decoder libraries .
I do n't see any reason why such a thing could not exist in video files as well .
I guess someone more knowledgeable than me can post some examples .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because you have never seen it doesn't mean it doesn't exists.There has been numerous viruses inside, for example, JPEG and GIF files.
The viruses get executed via bugs in common decoder libraries.
I don't see any reason why such a thing could not exist in video files as well.
I guess someone more knowledgeable than me can post some examples.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30077236</id>
	<title>Re:Free movies</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1258057380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>``I can't imagine free movies would be that great if they are only ad supported. Hollywood wouldn't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.''</p><p>Isn't that how<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... all movies get on TV?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>` ` I ca n't imagine free movies would be that great if they are only ad supported .
Hollywood would n't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties .
''Is n't that how ... all movies get on TV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>``I can't imagine free movies would be that great if they are only ad supported.
Hollywood wouldn't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.
''Isn't that how ... all movies get on TV?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071536</id>
	<title>Re:Videos that contain viruses?</title>
	<author>muntis</author>
	<datestamp>1258035840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My GF last week infected my computer indirectly but through video.
After downloading file from suspicios source and opening it with VLC it showed that it can only be seen through windows media player. When she opened with wmp it asked to download codec to play file. And wolla, what a surprise - codec contained worm or something. I spent whole evening cleaning up the mess. <br>
If I remember correctly it was <a href="https://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/Threat/Encyclopedia/Entry.aspx?Name=TrojanDownloader:ASX/Wimad.CN" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">TrojanDownloader:ASX/Wimad.CN</a> [microsoft.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>My GF last week infected my computer indirectly but through video .
After downloading file from suspicios source and opening it with VLC it showed that it can only be seen through windows media player .
When she opened with wmp it asked to download codec to play file .
And wolla , what a surprise - codec contained worm or something .
I spent whole evening cleaning up the mess .
If I remember correctly it was TrojanDownloader : ASX/Wimad.CN [ microsoft.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My GF last week infected my computer indirectly but through video.
After downloading file from suspicios source and opening it with VLC it showed that it can only be seen through windows media player.
When she opened with wmp it asked to download codec to play file.
And wolla, what a surprise - codec contained worm or something.
I spent whole evening cleaning up the mess.
If I remember correctly it was TrojanDownloader:ASX/Wimad.CN [microsoft.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</id>
	<title>Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1258025460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what happens when you access their site.</p><p>First you are presented with a very sparse page with a couple areas you can put your name and email address to "register".</p><p>Next, if you are so inclined, you enter your email address and name.</p><p>Then it says "Thanks for your interest in Voddler!"</p><p>Then you receive an email informing you that actually you didn't actually register since the site isn't actually open yet.</p><blockquote><div><p>Thank you for showing an interest in Voddler!<br>A beta version of Voddler is currently out and we will not add new members at this stage.</p><p>But have patience, the official Voddler will soon be released and your name and email will be saved until then. An invitation will find its way to your inbox when the time is right.</p></div></blockquote><p>I suppose it was a good idea to use a throwaway account for this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what happens when you access their site.First you are presented with a very sparse page with a couple areas you can put your name and email address to " register " .Next , if you are so inclined , you enter your email address and name.Then it says " Thanks for your interest in Voddler !
" Then you receive an email informing you that actually you did n't actually register since the site is n't actually open yet.Thank you for showing an interest in Voddler ! A beta version of Voddler is currently out and we will not add new members at this stage.But have patience , the official Voddler will soon be released and your name and email will be saved until then .
An invitation will find its way to your inbox when the time is right.I suppose it was a good idea to use a throwaway account for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what happens when you access their site.First you are presented with a very sparse page with a couple areas you can put your name and email address to "register".Next, if you are so inclined, you enter your email address and name.Then it says "Thanks for your interest in Voddler!
"Then you receive an email informing you that actually you didn't actually register since the site isn't actually open yet.Thank you for showing an interest in Voddler!A beta version of Voddler is currently out and we will not add new members at this stage.But have patience, the official Voddler will soon be released and your name and email will be saved until then.
An invitation will find its way to your inbox when the time is right.I suppose it was a good idea to use a throwaway account for this.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072970</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting story</title>
	<author>sponga</author>
	<datestamp>1258042680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What?</p><p>You just started ranting on and some gibberish on Americans.</p><p>What the hell does 'speeding on the autobahn' have to do with Hollywood and our perspective?<br>Not really a priority in life to learn about the Autobahn, not like all of us have a car that can go over 110KmH or for that matter drive our own car across the ocean. Anyways just look up 'Autobahn accident' on Youtube and you will see dozens of videos of foreigner people and lots of British kids crashing their cars on the Autobahn because of too much speed. So I don't know what kind of distinction you are trying to draw between the two.</p><p>How is it Americans(Hollywoods) fault that we are not giving you the movies/music/etc for free and your creativity level is non-existent..</p><p>I can't help it that the Swedish people cannot make a good movie or music; instead of trying to think of new ways to ride on the Americans coat tail or to suck on the tit of Hollywood for their material. They should be working on ways to improve the film industry and improve the quality of the shows/movies.</p><p>Down the road is a dead end if you want to keep pirating and sucking off the tit of Hollywood for the rest of your life, better to just get some bigger priorities in life unless they are holding a gun to your head forcing you to pirate this material.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What ? You just started ranting on and some gibberish on Americans.What the hell does 'speeding on the autobahn ' have to do with Hollywood and our perspective ? Not really a priority in life to learn about the Autobahn , not like all of us have a car that can go over 110KmH or for that matter drive our own car across the ocean .
Anyways just look up 'Autobahn accident ' on Youtube and you will see dozens of videos of foreigner people and lots of British kids crashing their cars on the Autobahn because of too much speed .
So I do n't know what kind of distinction you are trying to draw between the two.How is it Americans ( Hollywoods ) fault that we are not giving you the movies/music/etc for free and your creativity level is non-existent..I ca n't help it that the Swedish people can not make a good movie or music ; instead of trying to think of new ways to ride on the Americans coat tail or to suck on the tit of Hollywood for their material .
They should be working on ways to improve the film industry and improve the quality of the shows/movies.Down the road is a dead end if you want to keep pirating and sucking off the tit of Hollywood for the rest of your life , better to just get some bigger priorities in life unless they are holding a gun to your head forcing you to pirate this material .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?You just started ranting on and some gibberish on Americans.What the hell does 'speeding on the autobahn' have to do with Hollywood and our perspective?Not really a priority in life to learn about the Autobahn, not like all of us have a car that can go over 110KmH or for that matter drive our own car across the ocean.
Anyways just look up 'Autobahn accident' on Youtube and you will see dozens of videos of foreigner people and lots of British kids crashing their cars on the Autobahn because of too much speed.
So I don't know what kind of distinction you are trying to draw between the two.How is it Americans(Hollywoods) fault that we are not giving you the movies/music/etc for free and your creativity level is non-existent..I can't help it that the Swedish people cannot make a good movie or music; instead of trying to think of new ways to ride on the Americans coat tail or to suck on the tit of Hollywood for their material.
They should be working on ways to improve the film industry and improve the quality of the shows/movies.Down the road is a dead end if you want to keep pirating and sucking off the tit of Hollywood for the rest of your life, better to just get some bigger priorities in life unless they are holding a gun to your head forcing you to pirate this material.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071424</id>
	<title>Ads upfront</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1258034880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like the option to get all my ads up front and then watch a show uninterrupted. Hulu has this feature with some of its teevee offerings. I generally mute the stupid thing for the couple minutes that the ads are running, run to the kitchen grab something to eat, or switch windows and do work there, then when the time's over, I'll watch my show. Essentially the whole thing is ad free at that point. Of course advertisers probably hate me for suggesting we all ignore them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the option to get all my ads up front and then watch a show uninterrupted .
Hulu has this feature with some of its teevee offerings .
I generally mute the stupid thing for the couple minutes that the ads are running , run to the kitchen grab something to eat , or switch windows and do work there , then when the time 's over , I 'll watch my show .
Essentially the whole thing is ad free at that point .
Of course advertisers probably hate me for suggesting we all ignore them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the option to get all my ads up front and then watch a show uninterrupted.
Hulu has this feature with some of its teevee offerings.
I generally mute the stupid thing for the couple minutes that the ads are running, run to the kitchen grab something to eat, or switch windows and do work there, then when the time's over, I'll watch my show.
Essentially the whole thing is ad free at that point.
Of course advertisers probably hate me for suggesting we all ignore them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952</id>
	<title>Videos that contain viruses?</title>
	<author>anomnomnomymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258027800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i> "Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal, secure, and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files"</i> <br> <br>
Finally! The amount of times I've had viruses from video-files have been... Erm... Ohwait.<br>
What video files containing viruses -are- they talking about?,br&gt; <br>
With software they might at least have a point, but I've never seen a video file with a virus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal , secure , and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files " Finally !
The amount of times I 've had viruses from video-files have been... Erm... Ohwait .
What video files containing viruses -are- they talking about ? ,br &gt; With software they might at least have a point , but I 've never seen a video file with a virus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal, secure, and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files"  
Finally!
The amount of times I've had viruses from video-files have been... Erm... Ohwait.
What video files containing viruses -are- they talking about?,br&gt; 
With software they might at least have a point, but I've never seen a video file with a virus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30080920</id>
	<title>Re:blocked by isp's like p2p traffic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258027680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>does anyone know if this streaming service will be "throttled" like p2p traffic is?</p><p>sure would be one sided to block my p2p traffic while giving me a full 600kb/sec download for these movies.</p><p>www.disolvethecrtc.com<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>does anyone know if this streaming service will be " throttled " like p2p traffic is ? sure would be one sided to block my p2p traffic while giving me a full 600kb/sec download for these movies.www.disolvethecrtc.com : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does anyone know if this streaming service will be "throttled" like p2p traffic is?sure would be one sided to block my p2p traffic while giving me a full 600kb/sec download for these movies.www.disolvethecrtc.com :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070908</id>
	<title>No news here, RIAA peddles M$</title>
	<author>SgtChaireBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1258027140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The nature of our business is both IT and media related and we are developing software solutions based on the Microsoft platform. "

<p>
No news here.  It's just the RIAA / MPAA getting a free slashvertisement for their buddy, bill.
<br>

If you want video, go to the <a href="http://thevideobay.org/" title="thevideobay.org" rel="nofollow">video bay</a> [thevideobay.org].  If you want the net locked down in proprietary, DRM'd formats, go to viddler, vaudler, or whatever it was called.   If you want to send a big F-U to European and American business, then go to viddler, vaudler, or whatever it was called.  If you want to give a boost to European and American business, then go <a href="http://thevideobay.org/" title="thevideobay.org" rel="nofollow">video bay</a> [thevideobay.org] or any other site specializing in open technology.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The nature of our business is both IT and media related and we are developing software solutions based on the Microsoft platform .
" No news here .
It 's just the RIAA / MPAA getting a free slashvertisement for their buddy , bill .
If you want video , go to the video bay [ thevideobay.org ] .
If you want the net locked down in proprietary , DRM 'd formats , go to viddler , vaudler , or whatever it was called .
If you want to send a big F-U to European and American business , then go to viddler , vaudler , or whatever it was called .
If you want to give a boost to European and American business , then go video bay [ thevideobay.org ] or any other site specializing in open technology .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The nature of our business is both IT and media related and we are developing software solutions based on the Microsoft platform.
"


No news here.
It's just the RIAA / MPAA getting a free slashvertisement for their buddy, bill.
If you want video, go to the video bay [thevideobay.org].
If you want the net locked down in proprietary, DRM'd formats, go to viddler, vaudler, or whatever it was called.
If you want to send a big F-U to European and American business, then go to viddler, vaudler, or whatever it was called.
If you want to give a boost to European and American business, then go video bay [thevideobay.org] or any other site specializing in open technology.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071810</id>
	<title>Re:barrage of ads; been to the theater lately?</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1258037580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in, I was sitting through commercials (not just trailers, but commercials).</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm not going to excuse the ads, I hate them too, but you do realize that most (if not all) of the money that you paid to get into the movie went right back to the movie studios?  Why do you think that popcorn and a soda cost to much at the movies?  They need to pay their employees and run the entire facility on popcorn sales.  When those didn't cut it (probably due to them costing so much), they turned to ads in front of the movies to bring in money.</p><p>Of course, the bigger issue is the home video market slowly killing movie theaters.  Sure, movie theaters provide a bigger screen and possibly a better sound system (depending on your home system and the movie theater's sound system), but your home theater comes with cheaper snacks, more tailored to your tastes.  (Sushi during the movie?  Sure, why not?)  It lets you pause to go to the bathroom or rewind to watch a favorite scene again and again.  It comes without idiots talking to each other or on cell phones, revealing plot twists before they happen.  And it comes without sticky floors.  (Well, if the floors are sticky, at least it is your own fault for not cleaning them.)</p><p>Plus, it is cheaper.  Last I checked, it costs about $8 per ticket.  Renting a movie costs about $5 and unlimited people can watch.  Plus, you can get them cheaper from your library (free) or Netflix.  A couple seeing a movie will save at least $11 by renting versus going to the movie theater.  A family of four will save $27 at minimum.  That's hard to ignore.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in , I was sitting through commercials ( not just trailers , but commercials ) .I 'm not going to excuse the ads , I hate them too , but you do realize that most ( if not all ) of the money that you paid to get into the movie went right back to the movie studios ?
Why do you think that popcorn and a soda cost to much at the movies ?
They need to pay their employees and run the entire facility on popcorn sales .
When those did n't cut it ( probably due to them costing so much ) , they turned to ads in front of the movies to bring in money.Of course , the bigger issue is the home video market slowly killing movie theaters .
Sure , movie theaters provide a bigger screen and possibly a better sound system ( depending on your home system and the movie theater 's sound system ) , but your home theater comes with cheaper snacks , more tailored to your tastes .
( Sushi during the movie ?
Sure , why not ?
) It lets you pause to go to the bathroom or rewind to watch a favorite scene again and again .
It comes without idiots talking to each other or on cell phones , revealing plot twists before they happen .
And it comes without sticky floors .
( Well , if the floors are sticky , at least it is your own fault for not cleaning them .
) Plus , it is cheaper .
Last I checked , it costs about $ 8 per ticket .
Renting a movie costs about $ 5 and unlimited people can watch .
Plus , you can get them cheaper from your library ( free ) or Netflix .
A couple seeing a movie will save at least $ 11 by renting versus going to the movie theater .
A family of four will save $ 27 at minimum .
That 's hard to ignore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the reasons I stopped going to theaters to watch movies was that after I paid to get in, I was sitting through commercials (not just trailers, but commercials).I'm not going to excuse the ads, I hate them too, but you do realize that most (if not all) of the money that you paid to get into the movie went right back to the movie studios?
Why do you think that popcorn and a soda cost to much at the movies?
They need to pay their employees and run the entire facility on popcorn sales.
When those didn't cut it (probably due to them costing so much), they turned to ads in front of the movies to bring in money.Of course, the bigger issue is the home video market slowly killing movie theaters.
Sure, movie theaters provide a bigger screen and possibly a better sound system (depending on your home system and the movie theater's sound system), but your home theater comes with cheaper snacks, more tailored to your tastes.
(Sushi during the movie?
Sure, why not?
)  It lets you pause to go to the bathroom or rewind to watch a favorite scene again and again.
It comes without idiots talking to each other or on cell phones, revealing plot twists before they happen.
And it comes without sticky floors.
(Well, if the floors are sticky, at least it is your own fault for not cleaning them.
)Plus, it is cheaper.
Last I checked, it costs about $8 per ticket.
Renting a movie costs about $5 and unlimited people can watch.
Plus, you can get them cheaper from your library (free) or Netflix.
A couple seeing a movie will save at least $11 by renting versus going to the movie theater.
A family of four will save $27 at minimum.
That's hard to ignore.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070820</id>
	<title>Re:Um.. Can someone tag this "phishing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258026000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here's what happens when you access their site.</p><p>First you are presented with a very sparse page with a couple areas you can put your name and email address to "register".</p><p>Next, if you are so inclined, you enter your email address and name.</p><p>Then it says "Thanks for your interest in Voddler!"</p><p>Then you receive an email informing you that actually you didn't actually register since the site isn't actually open yet.</p><blockquote><div><p>Thank you for showing an interest in Voddler!<br>A beta version of Voddler is currently out and we will not add new members at this stage.</p><p>But have patience, the official Voddler will soon be released and your name and email will be saved until then. An invitation will find its way to your inbox when the time is right.</p></div></blockquote><p>I suppose it was a good idea to use a throwaway account for this.</p></div><p>You're an idiot. This is not a phising site, this is a completely legit site, and those who are with the ISP "Bredbandsbolaget" can already use the service. It's the same type of business model that spotify uses. And frankly, if you ever get your fat ass out of the US you'll see how many services aren't available for the rest of us. Not everything comes instantly, jackass.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what happens when you access their site.First you are presented with a very sparse page with a couple areas you can put your name and email address to " register " .Next , if you are so inclined , you enter your email address and name.Then it says " Thanks for your interest in Voddler !
" Then you receive an email informing you that actually you did n't actually register since the site is n't actually open yet.Thank you for showing an interest in Voddler ! A beta version of Voddler is currently out and we will not add new members at this stage.But have patience , the official Voddler will soon be released and your name and email will be saved until then .
An invitation will find its way to your inbox when the time is right.I suppose it was a good idea to use a throwaway account for this.You 're an idiot .
This is not a phising site , this is a completely legit site , and those who are with the ISP " Bredbandsbolaget " can already use the service .
It 's the same type of business model that spotify uses .
And frankly , if you ever get your fat ass out of the US you 'll see how many services are n't available for the rest of us .
Not everything comes instantly , jackass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what happens when you access their site.First you are presented with a very sparse page with a couple areas you can put your name and email address to "register".Next, if you are so inclined, you enter your email address and name.Then it says "Thanks for your interest in Voddler!
"Then you receive an email informing you that actually you didn't actually register since the site isn't actually open yet.Thank you for showing an interest in Voddler!A beta version of Voddler is currently out and we will not add new members at this stage.But have patience, the official Voddler will soon be released and your name and email will be saved until then.
An invitation will find its way to your inbox when the time is right.I suppose it was a good idea to use a throwaway account for this.You're an idiot.
This is not a phising site, this is a completely legit site, and those who are with the ISP "Bredbandsbolaget" can already use the service.
It's the same type of business model that spotify uses.
And frankly, if you ever get your fat ass out of the US you'll see how many services aren't available for the rest of us.
Not everything comes instantly, jackass.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30074966</id>
	<title>Viruses? Right...</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1258050240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The target is the file-sharing generation</p></div><p>Okay, I'm listening.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>'Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal, secure<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></div><p>Sounds good.</p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files,'</p></div><p>Say, what? If your target is "file-sharing generation", then don't spout bullshit that is obvious to the majority of it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The target is the file-sharing generationOkay , I 'm listening .
'Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal , secure ...Sounds good .
... and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files,'Say , what ?
If your target is " file-sharing generation " , then do n't spout bullshit that is obvious to the majority of it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The target is the file-sharing generationOkay, I'm listening.
'Our customers can be sure that Voddler is totally legal, secure ...Sounds good.
... and that there are no risks of computer viruses infecting their machines from downloaded files,'Say, what?
If your target is "file-sharing generation", then don't spout bullshit that is obvious to the majority of it!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30078326</id>
	<title>Re:Free movies</title>
	<author>TBoon</author>
	<datestamp>1258018140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Hollywood wouldn't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.</p></div><p>Hollywood owns rights for movies worth seeing??</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hollywood would n't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.Hollywood owns rights for movies worth seeing ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hollywood wouldn't give the rights to any movie actually worth seeing unless you pay the expensive royalties.Hollywood owns rights for movies worth seeing?
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073720</id>
	<title>500 movies? Seriously?</title>
	<author>gozu</author>
	<datestamp>1258045860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi there movie industry,</p><p>When launching a new movie streaming service, don't bother unless you start with..say..100,000 movies. 500 movies is laughable, risible, ridiculous.</p><p>Just saying, Technology has advanced, no reason why all movies in existence can't be hosted in HD in h.264 format on the cloud by the studios, and provided to partners such as vodswede.</p><p>That's assuming you actually want to compete with unauthorized copies. Maybe this is just to tell judges there are legal alternatives or something. It just seems too pathetic to mean anything else.</p><p>Good luck to you, MPAA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi there movie industry,When launching a new movie streaming service , do n't bother unless you start with..say..100,000 movies .
500 movies is laughable , risible , ridiculous.Just saying , Technology has advanced , no reason why all movies in existence ca n't be hosted in HD in h.264 format on the cloud by the studios , and provided to partners such as vodswede.That 's assuming you actually want to compete with unauthorized copies .
Maybe this is just to tell judges there are legal alternatives or something .
It just seems too pathetic to mean anything else.Good luck to you , MPAA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi there movie industry,When launching a new movie streaming service, don't bother unless you start with..say..100,000 movies.
500 movies is laughable, risible, ridiculous.Just saying, Technology has advanced, no reason why all movies in existence can't be hosted in HD in h.264 format on the cloud by the studios, and provided to partners such as vodswede.That's assuming you actually want to compete with unauthorized copies.
Maybe this is just to tell judges there are legal alternatives or something.
It just seems too pathetic to mean anything else.Good luck to you, MPAA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30083174</id>
	<title>Sorry, but..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These are still corporations that are members of organizations such as the RIAA, MPAA, etc. and have themselves participated in many large-scale abuses that have been documented over the years, correct? Should I suddenly support and fund them now that they've launched a heavily ad-supported streaming video website?</p><p>Don't get me wrong, ads bombarding you before a movie instead of every 15 minutes during is better, I guess (And I doubt will last long.) But you'd have to have a sort of battered wife syndrome to champion them for this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These are still corporations that are members of organizations such as the RIAA , MPAA , etc .
and have themselves participated in many large-scale abuses that have been documented over the years , correct ?
Should I suddenly support and fund them now that they 've launched a heavily ad-supported streaming video website ? Do n't get me wrong , ads bombarding you before a movie instead of every 15 minutes during is better , I guess ( And I doubt will last long .
) But you 'd have to have a sort of battered wife syndrome to champion them for this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These are still corporations that are members of organizations such as the RIAA, MPAA, etc.
and have themselves participated in many large-scale abuses that have been documented over the years, correct?
Should I suddenly support and fund them now that they've launched a heavily ad-supported streaming video website?Don't get me wrong, ads bombarding you before a movie instead of every 15 minutes during is better, I guess (And I doubt will last long.
) But you'd have to have a sort of battered wife syndrome to champion them for this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071202</id>
	<title>Re:Videos that contain viruses?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258032540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they're referring to the Voddler player software?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they 're referring to the Voddler player software ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they're referring to the Voddler player software?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072066
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30075098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30080920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072970
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30077236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30078326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_058216_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071332
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071176
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072066
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30080920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071142
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30075098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072818
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071092
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073372
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30073568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30072542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30078326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30077236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_058216.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30070952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_058216.30071536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
