<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_12_0020205</id>
	<title>Bing To Use Wolfram Alpha Results</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1258045320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"Microsoft is rolling out some enhancements to its Bing search engine, including some that rely on <a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/325937">computational information delivered by Wolfram Alpha</a>. That means that people will be able to search for some complicated information, and the search engine will be able to compute the answers. In a blog post, Tracey Yao, program manager, and Pedro Silva, product manager at Microsoft, <a href="http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/11/11/how-many-calories-in-a-burger-what-s-2-2-2-2-2-bing-and-wolfram-alpha-have-the-answers.aspx">give some examples</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " Microsoft is rolling out some enhancements to its Bing search engine , including some that rely on computational information delivered by Wolfram Alpha .
That means that people will be able to search for some complicated information , and the search engine will be able to compute the answers .
In a blog post , Tracey Yao , program manager , and Pedro Silva , product manager at Microsoft , give some examples .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "Microsoft is rolling out some enhancements to its Bing search engine, including some that rely on computational information delivered by Wolfram Alpha.
That means that people will be able to search for some complicated information, and the search engine will be able to compute the answers.
In a blog post, Tracey Yao, program manager, and Pedro Silva, product manager at Microsoft, give some examples.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30077304</id>
	<title>Re:Good move, but...</title>
	<author>josath</author>
	<datestamp>1258057620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe Google doesn't feel like burning huge piles of cash on the wolfram API? Have you seen <a href="http://products.wolframalpha.com/api/pricing.html" title="wolframalpha.com">how much they charge</a> [wolframalpha.com] for it?<br>
<br>
It starts at a minimum commitment of $2,000/mo at $0.10 per query. At the high end it's $220,000/mo at $0.023 per query. I wonder how much google makes off each search? Can't be much more than that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe Google does n't feel like burning huge piles of cash on the wolfram API ?
Have you seen how much they charge [ wolframalpha.com ] for it ?
It starts at a minimum commitment of $ 2,000/mo at $ 0.10 per query .
At the high end it 's $ 220,000/mo at $ 0.023 per query .
I wonder how much google makes off each search ?
Ca n't be much more than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe Google doesn't feel like burning huge piles of cash on the wolfram API?
Have you seen how much they charge [wolframalpha.com] for it?
It starts at a minimum commitment of $2,000/mo at $0.10 per query.
At the high end it's $220,000/mo at $0.023 per query.
I wonder how much google makes off each search?
Can't be much more than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071326</id>
	<title>sell:nike air max jordan shoes,coach,gucci,handbag</title>
	<author>coolforsale</author>
	<datestamp>1258034160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]  If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are &ldquo;must have &rdquo; nike air max jordan,shoes,caoch,gucci,lv,dg, ed hardy handbags,Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F T-shirtin, True Religion/Coogi/Evisu/Ed Hardy/Prada Jeansthe winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30\%-50\% off,free shipping, you may take a look, you may find the UGGS you want here. <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are    must have    nike air max jordan,shoes,caoch,gucci,lv,dg , ed hardy handbags,Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F T-shirtin , True Religion/Coogi/Evisu/Ed Hardy/Prada Jeansthe winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30 \ % -50 \ % off,free shipping , you may take a look , you may find the UGGS you want here .
http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]  If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are “must have ” nike air max jordan,shoes,caoch,gucci,lv,dg, ed hardy handbags,Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F T-shirtin, True Religion/Coogi/Evisu/Ed Hardy/Prada Jeansthe winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30\%-50\% off,free shipping, you may take a look, you may find the UGGS you want here.
http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071078</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258030260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>erm, the term is "even a broken clock is right twice a day</i></p><p>But "stopped" makes more sense, at least for an analog clock.</p><p>"Broken" could simply means that it loses a minute per day, in which case it's going to be right much less often.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>erm , the term is " even a broken clock is right twice a dayBut " stopped " makes more sense , at least for an analog clock .
" Broken " could simply means that it loses a minute per day , in which case it 's going to be right much less often .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>erm, the term is "even a broken clock is right twice a dayBut "stopped" makes more sense, at least for an analog clock.
"Broken" could simply means that it loses a minute per day, in which case it's going to be right much less often.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584</id>
	<title>Good move, but...</title>
	<author>tonycheese</author>
	<datestamp>1257099240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While this is interesting and possibly useful, it seems to me there's nothing stopping Google from turning around and doing the exact same thing. Wolfram is unaffiliated with either party as far as I know and certainly wouldn't mind getting exposure on the bigger of the two search engines as well.</p><p>And hey, I already do multiplication and find constants in my Google search box, it might be nice to do integrals and whatnot as well! In the meantime, if I have a specific enough question I'll just go directly to Wolfram's site to ask.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While this is interesting and possibly useful , it seems to me there 's nothing stopping Google from turning around and doing the exact same thing .
Wolfram is unaffiliated with either party as far as I know and certainly would n't mind getting exposure on the bigger of the two search engines as well.And hey , I already do multiplication and find constants in my Google search box , it might be nice to do integrals and whatnot as well !
In the meantime , if I have a specific enough question I 'll just go directly to Wolfram 's site to ask .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While this is interesting and possibly useful, it seems to me there's nothing stopping Google from turning around and doing the exact same thing.
Wolfram is unaffiliated with either party as far as I know and certainly wouldn't mind getting exposure on the bigger of the two search engines as well.And hey, I already do multiplication and find constants in my Google search box, it might be nice to do integrals and whatnot as well!
In the meantime, if I have a specific enough question I'll just go directly to Wolfram's site to ask.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</id>
	<title>It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>RudeIota</author>
	<datestamp>1257102780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why are you so hard on W|A? Wolfram Alpha answers LOTS of extremely important questions!<br> <br>

Query: What is the speed of an unladen swallow?<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www33.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=What's+the+speed+of+an+unladen+swallow\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">"there is unfortunately insufficient data to estimate the velocity of an African swallow (even if you specified which of the 47 species of swallow found in Africa you meant)"</a> [wolframalpha.com]
<br> <br>
Query: What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www33.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=What+is+the+answer+to+life\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">42</a> [wolframalpha.com]
<br> <br>
Query: Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=where+in+the+world+is+carmen+san+diego\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">Not sure, but wherever she is, it isn't here.</a> [wolframalpha.com]
<br> <br>
Query: When is judgement day?<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=when+is+judgement+day\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">"2:14 am EDT  |  Friday, August 29, 1997"</a> [wolframalpha.com]
<br> <br>
Query: If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound??<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=If+a+tree+falls+in+a+forest+and+no+one+is+around+to+hear+it\%2C+does+it+make+a+sound\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">"No.  Sound is vibration, transmitted to our senses through the mechanism of the ear, and recognized as sound only at our nerve centers.  The falling of the tree or any other disturbance will produce vibration of the air.  If there be no ears to hear, there will be no sound."</a> [wolframalpha.com]
<br> <br>
Query: Can entropy be reversed?<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www33.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Can+entropy+be+reversed\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">"THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER."</a> [wolframalpha.com]
<br> <br>
Query: who would win in a fight: pirates or ninjas?<br>
Answer: <a href="http://www33.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=who+would+win+in+a+fight\%3A+pirates+or+ninjas\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">"The answer remains an ongoing debate which Wolfram|Alpha is not in a position to arbitrate."</a> [wolframalpha.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are you so hard on W | A ?
Wolfram Alpha answers LOTS of extremely important questions !
Query : What is the speed of an unladen swallow ?
Answer : " there is unfortunately insufficient data to estimate the velocity of an African swallow ( even if you specified which of the 47 species of swallow found in Africa you meant ) " [ wolframalpha.com ] Query : What is the answer to life , the universe , and everything ?
Answer : 42 [ wolframalpha.com ] Query : Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego ?
Answer : Not sure , but wherever she is , it is n't here .
[ wolframalpha.com ] Query : When is judgement day ?
Answer : " 2 : 14 am EDT | Friday , August 29 , 1997 " [ wolframalpha.com ] Query : If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it , does it make a sound ? ?
Answer : " No .
Sound is vibration , transmitted to our senses through the mechanism of the ear , and recognized as sound only at our nerve centers .
The falling of the tree or any other disturbance will produce vibration of the air .
If there be no ears to hear , there will be no sound .
" [ wolframalpha.com ] Query : Can entropy be reversed ?
Answer : " THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER .
" [ wolframalpha.com ] Query : who would win in a fight : pirates or ninjas ?
Answer : " The answer remains an ongoing debate which Wolfram | Alpha is not in a position to arbitrate .
" [ wolframalpha.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are you so hard on W|A?
Wolfram Alpha answers LOTS of extremely important questions!
Query: What is the speed of an unladen swallow?
Answer: "there is unfortunately insufficient data to estimate the velocity of an African swallow (even if you specified which of the 47 species of swallow found in Africa you meant)" [wolframalpha.com]
 
Query: What is the answer to life, the universe, and everything?
Answer: 42 [wolframalpha.com]
 
Query: Where in the world is Carmen Sandiego?
Answer: Not sure, but wherever she is, it isn't here.
[wolframalpha.com]
 
Query: When is judgement day?
Answer: "2:14 am EDT  |  Friday, August 29, 1997" [wolframalpha.com]
 
Query: If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound??
Answer: "No.
Sound is vibration, transmitted to our senses through the mechanism of the ear, and recognized as sound only at our nerve centers.
The falling of the tree or any other disturbance will produce vibration of the air.
If there be no ears to hear, there will be no sound.
" [wolframalpha.com]
 
Query: Can entropy be reversed?
Answer: "THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
" [wolframalpha.com]
 
Query: who would win in a fight: pirates or ninjas?
Answer: "The answer remains an ongoing debate which Wolfram|Alpha is not in a position to arbitrate.
" [wolframalpha.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560</id>
	<title>is google the next netscape?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>i think it's a valid question. netscape went from total market domination to nothing in a few years. granted MS pulled from under handed moves to make it happen that would be a LOT harder to do this time around, the scene is set the same. google innovates and takes market by storm, MS puts out a few non starters, eventually refines it's product to take the lead.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i think it 's a valid question .
netscape went from total market domination to nothing in a few years .
granted MS pulled from under handed moves to make it happen that would be a LOT harder to do this time around , the scene is set the same .
google innovates and takes market by storm , MS puts out a few non starters , eventually refines it 's product to take the lead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think it's a valid question.
netscape went from total market domination to nothing in a few years.
granted MS pulled from under handed moves to make it happen that would be a LOT harder to do this time around, the scene is set the same.
google innovates and takes market by storm, MS puts out a few non starters, eventually refines it's product to take the lead.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075022</id>
	<title>I use W|A</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258050360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to check my calculus homework. It is much easier to get transforms there than in Matlab...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to check my calculus homework .
It is much easier to get transforms there than in Matlab.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to check my calculus homework.
It is much easier to get transforms there than in Matlab...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070056</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1258057200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try a few more searches. WA was the best for "uk time" and Bing the worst. Google UK was the best for "glaxo share price" (and the only one that gave me what I wanted), and again Bing was the worst. Wolfram gave the right answer in the wrong currency (the primary listing in London, so the price should be in GBP pence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try a few more searches .
WA was the best for " uk time " and Bing the worst .
Google UK was the best for " glaxo share price " ( and the only one that gave me what I wanted ) , and again Bing was the worst .
Wolfram gave the right answer in the wrong currency ( the primary listing in London , so the price should be in GBP pence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try a few more searches.
WA was the best for "uk time" and Bing the worst.
Google UK was the best for "glaxo share price" (and the only one that gave me what I wanted), and again Bing was the worst.
Wolfram gave the right answer in the wrong currency (the primary listing in London, so the price should be in GBP pence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070346</id>
	<title>Well, it got this one right</title>
	<author>Chrisq</author>
	<datestamp>1258018800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=How+many+roads+must+a+man+go+down+before+he+becomes+a+man\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com">How many roads must a man go down before he becomes a man?</a> [wolframalpha.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>How many roads must a man go down before he becomes a man ?
[ wolframalpha.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many roads must a man go down before he becomes a man?
[wolframalpha.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069836</id>
	<title>What if humans are the stopped clock?</title>
	<author>rolfwind</author>
	<datestamp>1257102240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In that the current google search is so good for the majority of users, that they are trying to grab at a few disatisfied straws.  I can't really think of a way google search fails me, but perhaps if the results were presented a different way, I could see the clear-cut differences and improvements.</p><p>I think text search is pretty much there.  The one thing I would appreciate is a better image search, and not relying on text of the image name, but being able to describe it, or sketch a rough outline, and for a search engine to recognize the content to some degree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In that the current google search is so good for the majority of users , that they are trying to grab at a few disatisfied straws .
I ca n't really think of a way google search fails me , but perhaps if the results were presented a different way , I could see the clear-cut differences and improvements.I think text search is pretty much there .
The one thing I would appreciate is a better image search , and not relying on text of the image name , but being able to describe it , or sketch a rough outline , and for a search engine to recognize the content to some degree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In that the current google search is so good for the majority of users, that they are trying to grab at a few disatisfied straws.
I can't really think of a way google search fails me, but perhaps if the results were presented a different way, I could see the clear-cut differences and improvements.I think text search is pretty much there.
The one thing I would appreciate is a better image search, and not relying on text of the image name, but being able to describe it, or sketch a rough outline, and for a search engine to recognize the content to some degree.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534</id>
	<title>brb</title>
	<author>russlar</author>
	<datestamp>1257098700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>brb, dividing by zero on bing</htmltext>
<tokenext>brb , dividing by zero on bing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brb, dividing by zero on bing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30084448</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258103580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>most importantly,<br>Query: Which is better, vim or emacs?<br>Answer: "<a href="http://www33.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=which+is+better\%2C+vim+or+emacs\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com" rel="nofollow">Vim</a> [wolframalpha.com]"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>most importantly,Query : Which is better , vim or emacs ? Answer : " Vim [ wolframalpha.com ] "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>most importantly,Query: Which is better, vim or emacs?Answer: "Vim [wolframalpha.com]"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071348</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>J3llym4n</author>
	<datestamp>1258034460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's also reassuring to know that I have another 640, 400 hours to live.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also reassuring to know that I have another 640 , 400 hours to live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also reassuring to know that I have another 640, 400 hours to live.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1257101820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I use Wolfram Alpha to help with homework (it doesn't just calculate things, it will walk you through how it did it), but I can't think of any reason I'd want Wolfram Alpha results to show up during a web search. When I have Wolfram Alpha open, I usually have it open for hours, so it's not like mixing this in with other search engine results is helpful.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Wolfram Alpha to help with homework ( it does n't just calculate things , it will walk you through how it did it ) , but I ca n't think of any reason I 'd want Wolfram Alpha results to show up during a web search .
When I have Wolfram Alpha open , I usually have it open for hours , so it 's not like mixing this in with other search engine results is helpful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Wolfram Alpha to help with homework (it doesn't just calculate things, it will walk you through how it did it), but I can't think of any reason I'd want Wolfram Alpha results to show up during a web search.
When I have Wolfram Alpha open, I usually have it open for hours, so it's not like mixing this in with other search engine results is helpful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070180</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Have Brain Will Rent</author>
	<datestamp>1258016640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Who is actually using Bing? </i> </p><p>

Well unfortunately here in Canada the Multiple Listing Service, which almost all Realtors use to advertise real estate for sale, has switched over to Bing from Google and Google maps. It is a large decrease in usability and functionality. But then MLS seems to feel a need to completely change it's public interface for the worse every year or two - I guess they have to or nobody would bother hiring a Realtor.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is actually using Bing ?
Well unfortunately here in Canada the Multiple Listing Service , which almost all Realtors use to advertise real estate for sale , has switched over to Bing from Google and Google maps .
It is a large decrease in usability and functionality .
But then MLS seems to feel a need to completely change it 's public interface for the worse every year or two - I guess they have to or nobody would bother hiring a Realtor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Who is actually using Bing?
Well unfortunately here in Canada the Multiple Listing Service, which almost all Realtors use to advertise real estate for sale, has switched over to Bing from Google and Google maps.
It is a large decrease in usability and functionality.
But then MLS seems to feel a need to completely change it's public interface for the worse every year or two - I guess they have to or nobody would bother hiring a Realtor.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070884</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258026900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless it's a 24 hour clock.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless it 's a 24 hour clock .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless it's a 24 hour clock.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072724</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds great but...</title>
	<author>gtall</author>
	<datestamp>1258041780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's more likely is that Wolfram will barely survive the knife MS is sure to stick in their back. I predict within 3 years, MS will announce its own version. Wolfram, acting like a blushing bride running back to Mommy crying, will file a lawsuit which will be mired in legal limbo until a settlement is reached.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's more likely is that Wolfram will barely survive the knife MS is sure to stick in their back .
I predict within 3 years , MS will announce its own version .
Wolfram , acting like a blushing bride running back to Mommy crying , will file a lawsuit which will be mired in legal limbo until a settlement is reached .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's more likely is that Wolfram will barely survive the knife MS is sure to stick in their back.
I predict within 3 years, MS will announce its own version.
Wolfram, acting like a blushing bride running back to Mommy crying, will file a lawsuit which will be mired in legal limbo until a settlement is reached.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069854</id>
	<title>Google goes Beta, Bing goes Alpha!</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1257102540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Beat that Google Muhahahahahaha</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Beat that Google Muhahahahahaha</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Beat that Google Muhahahahahaha</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069694</id>
	<title>What this means is...</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1257100440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Wolfie needs Mula.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Wolfie needs Mula .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Wolfie needs Mula.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070564</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>hvm2hvm</author>
	<datestamp>1258022280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah but it's not a term, it's an expression. You're welcome</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah but it 's not a term , it 's an expression .
You 're welcome</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah but it's not a term, it's an expression.
You're welcome</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070130</id>
	<title>Wolfram Alpha, or how i tried to hype Bing?</title>
	<author>miffo.swe</author>
	<datestamp>1258058760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wolfram Alpha is an interesting research concept but really not a product thats even remotely ready for daily use. There are some areas where online search could be improved and where Microsoft could be better than others. For example, why not create an error message / log message search function ? That alone would drive people to Bing in droves.</p><p>Microsoft should stop and think about what information they have themselves thats interesting and how they can index it for easy use. Right now their own support sites are a total nightmare because of their utter crap of a search function.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wolfram Alpha is an interesting research concept but really not a product thats even remotely ready for daily use .
There are some areas where online search could be improved and where Microsoft could be better than others .
For example , why not create an error message / log message search function ?
That alone would drive people to Bing in droves.Microsoft should stop and think about what information they have themselves thats interesting and how they can index it for easy use .
Right now their own support sites are a total nightmare because of their utter crap of a search function .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wolfram Alpha is an interesting research concept but really not a product thats even remotely ready for daily use.
There are some areas where online search could be improved and where Microsoft could be better than others.
For example, why not create an error message / log message search function ?
That alone would drive people to Bing in droves.Microsoft should stop and think about what information they have themselves thats interesting and how they can index it for easy use.
Right now their own support sites are a total nightmare because of their utter crap of a search function.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070054</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1258057200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=temperature+in+melbourne" title="google.com">temperature in melbourne</a> [google.com] works just fine. I guess I just never phrase search queries as complete sentences. You'd think Google would be smart enough to try the query without the "what is" though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>temperature in melbourne [ google.com ] works just fine .
I guess I just never phrase search queries as complete sentences .
You 'd think Google would be smart enough to try the query without the " what is " though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>temperature in melbourne [google.com] works just fine.
I guess I just never phrase search queries as complete sentences.
You'd think Google would be smart enough to try the query without the "what is" though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>timmarhy</author>
	<datestamp>1257099180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>erm, the term is "even a broken clock is right twice a day"</htmltext>
<tokenext>erm , the term is " even a broken clock is right twice a day "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>erm, the term is "even a broken clock is right twice a day"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069668</id>
	<title>"Dr Wolfram".</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That will be the number one Bing search result when asking the question "Who is the smartest man in the whole wide world?"...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That will be the number one Bing search result when asking the question " Who is the smartest man in the whole wide world ?
" .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That will be the number one Bing search result when asking the question "Who is the smartest man in the whole wide world?
"...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069960</id>
	<title>Re:Bleh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257105060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's like Alpha is having a stab at an answer, but isn't smart enough to know when it's answering the question wrong.</p></div><p>Sounds a lot like it's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen\_Wolfram" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">creator</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like Alpha is having a stab at an answer , but is n't smart enough to know when it 's answering the question wrong.Sounds a lot like it 's creator [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like Alpha is having a stab at an answer, but isn't smart enough to know when it's answering the question wrong.Sounds a lot like it's creator [wikipedia.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</id>
	<title>Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A clock has at least two hands depicting the hour and minute of the day. If stopped, it would appear that the clock is useless, but twice a day the clock tells the current time perfectly. What matters most is that you look at the clock at precisely those two moments to tell the time. Otherwise the tool just doesn't work as you'd expect it.</p><p>So when you take two tools that aren't very good, sometimes you end up with something that might be useful. But then again, just because you have two hands doesn't mean you're going to end up doing something useful. One hand could be occupied or paralyzed or otherwise out of commission. The other hand could be gimpy or not your favored hand or even cut off entirely if you lived in Saudi Arabia.</p><p>What I'm trying to say here is simply what you all are already thinking. Who is actually using Bing? Furthermore, who is actually using Alpha? These two useless hands working together just makes it easier to forget them both altogether.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A clock has at least two hands depicting the hour and minute of the day .
If stopped , it would appear that the clock is useless , but twice a day the clock tells the current time perfectly .
What matters most is that you look at the clock at precisely those two moments to tell the time .
Otherwise the tool just does n't work as you 'd expect it.So when you take two tools that are n't very good , sometimes you end up with something that might be useful .
But then again , just because you have two hands does n't mean you 're going to end up doing something useful .
One hand could be occupied or paralyzed or otherwise out of commission .
The other hand could be gimpy or not your favored hand or even cut off entirely if you lived in Saudi Arabia.What I 'm trying to say here is simply what you all are already thinking .
Who is actually using Bing ?
Furthermore , who is actually using Alpha ?
These two useless hands working together just makes it easier to forget them both altogether .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A clock has at least two hands depicting the hour and minute of the day.
If stopped, it would appear that the clock is useless, but twice a day the clock tells the current time perfectly.
What matters most is that you look at the clock at precisely those two moments to tell the time.
Otherwise the tool just doesn't work as you'd expect it.So when you take two tools that aren't very good, sometimes you end up with something that might be useful.
But then again, just because you have two hands doesn't mean you're going to end up doing something useful.
One hand could be occupied or paralyzed or otherwise out of commission.
The other hand could be gimpy or not your favored hand or even cut off entirely if you lived in Saudi Arabia.What I'm trying to say here is simply what you all are already thinking.
Who is actually using Bing?
Furthermore, who is actually using Alpha?
These two useless hands working together just makes it easier to forget them both altogether.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070298</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>gzipped\_tar</author>
	<datestamp>1258017960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still, <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=The+tortoise+lays+on+its+back\%2C+its+belly+baking+in+the+sun.+Beating+its+legs\%2C+trying+to+turn+itself+over\%2C+but+it+can't.+Not+without+your+help.+You're+not+helping.+Why+is+that\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com" rel="nofollow">it failed to pass the Voigt-Kampff test</a> [wolframalpha.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still , it failed to pass the Voigt-Kampff test [ wolframalpha.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still, it failed to pass the Voigt-Kampff test [wolframalpha.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073718</id>
	<title>Re:Hellllooo</title>
	<author>pitchpipe</author>
	<datestamp>1258045860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Been using Wolfram-enhanced search already - and without the <b>b***</b> crap.</p></div><p>Dude, you can say 'bull', we won't be offended.  Honest!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Been using Wolfram-enhanced search already - and without the b * * * crap.Dude , you can say 'bull ' , we wo n't be offended .
Honest ! : -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Been using Wolfram-enhanced search already - and without the b*** crap.Dude, you can say 'bull', we won't be offended.
Honest! :-D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070228</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>2Bits</author>
	<datestamp>1258017240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know what is more pathetic, that you actually bothered to go ask those questions on WA, or that I went to WA trying to confirm that everything you said is fiction?

Either case, we both have too much time on hands.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know what is more pathetic , that you actually bothered to go ask those questions on WA , or that I went to WA trying to confirm that everything you said is fiction ?
Either case , we both have too much time on hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know what is more pathetic, that you actually bothered to go ask those questions on WA, or that I went to WA trying to confirm that everything you said is fiction?
Either case, we both have too much time on hands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069658</id>
	<title>Re:is google the next netscape?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google moves too fast for MS to ever catch up, dirty tricks notwithstanding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google moves too fast for MS to ever catch up , dirty tricks notwithstanding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google moves too fast for MS to ever catch up, dirty tricks notwithstanding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069708</id>
	<title>Re:Good move, but...</title>
	<author>Barryke</author>
	<datestamp>1257100620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If they do, i sure hope Google introduces the feature on a worldwide scale. The bing.com results outside the US are useless, and there is no Wolfram-Alpha to be seen. Now why exactly should i use bing.com? It is not better at anything i use it for.</p><p>On one side, some competition for Google would be nice by now. But its not bing.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If they do , i sure hope Google introduces the feature on a worldwide scale .
The bing.com results outside the US are useless , and there is no Wolfram-Alpha to be seen .
Now why exactly should i use bing.com ?
It is not better at anything i use it for.On one side , some competition for Google would be nice by now .
But its not bing.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they do, i sure hope Google introduces the feature on a worldwide scale.
The bing.com results outside the US are useless, and there is no Wolfram-Alpha to be seen.
Now why exactly should i use bing.com?
It is not better at anything i use it for.On one side, some competition for Google would be nice by now.
But its not bing.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070004</id>
	<title>Re:wolfram alpha and hubristic user interfaces</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1258056180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It must actually read the user's mind. God can do this</p></div><p>Google is God?</p><p>Of course!... the motto finally makes sense!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It must actually read the user 's mind .
God can do thisGoogle is God ? Of course ! .. .
the motto finally makes sense !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It must actually read the user's mind.
God can do thisGoogle is God?Of course!...
the motto finally makes sense!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30085446</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1258118880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google is too <a href="http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/20/google-envisions-10-million-servers/" title="datacenterknowledge.com" rel="nofollow">big</a> [datacenterknowledge.com] to fail.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google is too big [ datacenterknowledge.com ] to fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google is too big [datacenterknowledge.com] to fail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257105480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lets try <b>what is the temperature in melbourne</b></p><ul><li> <a href="http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=what+is+the+temperature+in+melbourne&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;meta=&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=what+is+the+temperature+in+melbourne&amp;fp=805e51d68d593095" title="google.com.au">google</a> [google.com.au] </li><li> <a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=what+is+the+temperature+in+melbourne&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;qs=n" title="bing.com">bing</a> [bing.com] </li><li> <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=what+is+the+temperature+in+melbourne" title="wolframalpha.com">wolfram</a> [wolframalpha.com] </li></ul><p>Wolfram gives me the best result IMHO, and google the worst. Bing is close to wolfram but using a different source of data. For the average luser out there a nice chart or graphic is better than a link which you have to follow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lets try what is the temperature in melbourne google [ google.com.au ] bing [ bing.com ] wolfram [ wolframalpha.com ] Wolfram gives me the best result IMHO , and google the worst .
Bing is close to wolfram but using a different source of data .
For the average luser out there a nice chart or graphic is better than a link which you have to follow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lets try what is the temperature in melbourne google [google.com.au]  bing [bing.com]  wolfram [wolframalpha.com] Wolfram gives me the best result IMHO, and google the worst.
Bing is close to wolfram but using a different source of data.
For the average luser out there a nice chart or graphic is better than a link which you have to follow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30150704</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257079380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Query: When is judgement day?<br>Answer: "2:14 am EDT | Friday, August 29, 1997"</p></div><p>Well, that one is wrong.  Judgement Day was postponed when they took out Cyberdyne Systems in Terminator 2 and according to Terminator 3, it started at 6:18 PM on June 24th 2004.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Query : When is judgement day ? Answer : " 2 : 14 am EDT | Friday , August 29 , 1997 " Well , that one is wrong .
Judgement Day was postponed when they took out Cyberdyne Systems in Terminator 2 and according to Terminator 3 , it started at 6 : 18 PM on June 24th 2004 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Query: When is judgement day?Answer: "2:14 am EDT | Friday, August 29, 1997"Well, that one is wrong.
Judgement Day was postponed when they took out Cyberdyne Systems in Terminator 2 and according to Terminator 3, it started at 6:18 PM on June 24th 2004.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070062</id>
	<title>Re:Bleh</title>
	<author>s1lverl0rd</author>
	<datestamp>1258057380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't expect it to be completely right for every query you could possibly throw at it. I have actually been impressed with how 'intelligent' it manages to be (something like 'circumference of the earth in eiffel towers' gave me correct results).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't expect it to be completely right for every query you could possibly throw at it .
I have actually been impressed with how 'intelligent ' it manages to be ( something like 'circumference of the earth in eiffel towers ' gave me correct results ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't expect it to be completely right for every query you could possibly throw at it.
I have actually been impressed with how 'intelligent' it manages to be (something like 'circumference of the earth in eiffel towers' gave me correct results).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070166</id>
	<title>New site name</title>
	<author>raftpeople</author>
	<datestamp>1258059480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've combined Bing and Alpha and you get: Bleh!</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've combined Bing and Alpha and you get : Bleh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've combined Bing and Alpha and you get: Bleh!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075694</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258052280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another good one</p><p>Query: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?</p><p>Answer: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=How+can+the+net+amount+of+entropy+of+the+universe+be+massively+decreased\%3F</p><p>THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another good oneQuery : How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased ? Answer : http : //www.wolframalpha.com/input/ ? i = How + can + the + net + amount + of + entropy + of + the + universe + be + massively + decreased \ % 3FTHERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another good oneQuery: How can the net amount of entropy of the universe be massively decreased?Answer: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=How+can+the+net+amount+of+entropy+of+the+universe+be+massively+decreased\%3FTHERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069740</id>
	<title>Sounds great but...</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1257100920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wolfram Alpha is well known to badly guess what you are trying to do, and has plenty of graphs and charts. Now add a liberal amount of Microsoft flavoring to it, and you have a cross between Clippy and a really bad PowerPoint presentation... let's hope Microsoft never tries to help "improve" WA.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wolfram Alpha is well known to badly guess what you are trying to do , and has plenty of graphs and charts .
Now add a liberal amount of Microsoft flavoring to it , and you have a cross between Clippy and a really bad PowerPoint presentation... let 's hope Microsoft never tries to help " improve " WA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wolfram Alpha is well known to badly guess what you are trying to do, and has plenty of graphs and charts.
Now add a liberal amount of Microsoft flavoring to it, and you have a cross between Clippy and a really bad PowerPoint presentation... let's hope Microsoft never tries to help "improve" WA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072318</id>
	<title>Re:wolfram alpha and hubristic user interfaces</title>
	<author>buchner.johannes</author>
	<datestamp>1258039980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It could do things the average person might want (such as generating customized nutrition labels) as well as [...].</p><p>Generating customized nutrition labels! The average person! I just laughed so hard, I needed a complete change of clothing.</p></div><p>That guy has never seen a women on a diet. And I think you missed a level of &lt;quote&gt;-tags</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could do things the average person might want ( such as generating customized nutrition labels ) as well as [ ... ] .Generating customized nutrition labels !
The average person !
I just laughed so hard , I needed a complete change of clothing.That guy has never seen a women on a diet .
And I think you missed a level of -tags</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could do things the average person might want (such as generating customized nutrition labels) as well as [...].Generating customized nutrition labels!
The average person!
I just laughed so hard, I needed a complete change of clothing.That guy has never seen a women on a diet.
And I think you missed a level of -tags
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069574</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069544</id>
	<title>Hellllooo</title>
	<author>djupedal</author>
	<datestamp>1257098880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Been using Wolfram-enhanced search already - and without the b*** crap.
<br>
<br>
What else ya got...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Been using Wolfram-enhanced search already - and without the b * * * crap .
What else ya got.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Been using Wolfram-enhanced search already - and without the b*** crap.
What else ya got...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069912</id>
	<title>Re:Bleh</title>
	<author>IgnoramusMaximus</author>
	<datestamp>1257103860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>So far I haven't been terribly impressed with Wolfram Alpha.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Neither was I.
</p><p>I asked the thing a simple question, pertinent to the minds of many: "How to get rich quick?" and it went on about some nonsense about surnames of "Quick" and "Rich" and how many of these there are in the US...
</p><p>I mean, yes it was a joke but seriously, this "semantic" search engine is incapable of doing even most basic natural language parsing, something that AI research projects were capable of back in the 1960s, instead assuming that whatever you type is a list of individual terms. And then, instead of trying to clarify the context, the thing returns wild guesses which it tries to pass as "results", despite the fact that it is horribly wrong as to the <b>whole domain</b> of the query, never you mind specifics. This is of course far worse from the point of view of design of AI systems then simply returning an "insufficient data" or "scope too large" type of message, as it is indicative of a system incapable of knowing its own limitations.
</p><p>This of course applies to many other queries I tried, where the ratio of "wild shot in the dark" to "result of logical induction" in the "results" was about 100:1.
</p><p>Words "pathetic" and "next to useless" come to mind when looking at this Wolfram-Ego-Megalomania<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. err<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Alpha-and-Omega thing.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So far I have n't been terribly impressed with Wolfram Alpha .
Neither was I . I asked the thing a simple question , pertinent to the minds of many : " How to get rich quick ?
" and it went on about some nonsense about surnames of " Quick " and " Rich " and how many of these there are in the US.. . I mean , yes it was a joke but seriously , this " semantic " search engine is incapable of doing even most basic natural language parsing , something that AI research projects were capable of back in the 1960s , instead assuming that whatever you type is a list of individual terms .
And then , instead of trying to clarify the context , the thing returns wild guesses which it tries to pass as " results " , despite the fact that it is horribly wrong as to the whole domain of the query , never you mind specifics .
This is of course far worse from the point of view of design of AI systems then simply returning an " insufficient data " or " scope too large " type of message , as it is indicative of a system incapable of knowing its own limitations .
This of course applies to many other queries I tried , where the ratio of " wild shot in the dark " to " result of logical induction " in the " results " was about 100 : 1 .
Words " pathetic " and " next to useless " come to mind when looking at this Wolfram-Ego-Megalomania .. err ... Alpha-and-Omega thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So far I haven't been terribly impressed with Wolfram Alpha.
Neither was I.
I asked the thing a simple question, pertinent to the minds of many: "How to get rich quick?
" and it went on about some nonsense about surnames of "Quick" and "Rich" and how many of these there are in the US...
I mean, yes it was a joke but seriously, this "semantic" search engine is incapable of doing even most basic natural language parsing, something that AI research projects were capable of back in the 1960s, instead assuming that whatever you type is a list of individual terms.
And then, instead of trying to clarify the context, the thing returns wild guesses which it tries to pass as "results", despite the fact that it is horribly wrong as to the whole domain of the query, never you mind specifics.
This is of course far worse from the point of view of design of AI systems then simply returning an "insufficient data" or "scope too large" type of message, as it is indicative of a system incapable of knowing its own limitations.
This of course applies to many other queries I tried, where the ratio of "wild shot in the dark" to "result of logical induction" in the "results" was about 100:1.
Words "pathetic" and "next to useless" come to mind when looking at this Wolfram-Ego-Megalomania .. err ... Alpha-and-Omega thing.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070692</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>iron-kurton</author>
	<datestamp>1258023960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Clearly, the answer to the last question is Chuck Norris.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly , the answer to the last question is Chuck Norris .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly, the answer to the last question is Chuck Norris.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073098</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258043160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's a bizarre way of querying a search engine. It's not a human, so you don't communicate with it like you would a human. "current temperature" melbourne would have been much better (1st result gives you the answer). The other words don't add anything to your query and just get in the way. Once you learn how to use the tools properly, the results you get will be much better.<br> <br>We're dumbing down too much as it is, people don't care to get educated which eventually interferes with "experts" using the systems.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a bizarre way of querying a search engine .
It 's not a human , so you do n't communicate with it like you would a human .
" current temperature " melbourne would have been much better ( 1st result gives you the answer ) .
The other words do n't add anything to your query and just get in the way .
Once you learn how to use the tools properly , the results you get will be much better .
We 're dumbing down too much as it is , people do n't care to get educated which eventually interferes with " experts " using the systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a bizarre way of querying a search engine.
It's not a human, so you don't communicate with it like you would a human.
"current temperature" melbourne would have been much better (1st result gives you the answer).
The other words don't add anything to your query and just get in the way.
Once you learn how to use the tools properly, the results you get will be much better.
We're dumbing down too much as it is, people don't care to get educated which eventually interferes with "experts" using the systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069656</id>
	<title>Next up...</title>
	<author>BountyX</author>
	<datestamp>1257099960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Bing to use google results!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing to use google results !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing to use google results!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30077588</id>
	<title>Wolfram Alpha Google</title>
	<author>mighty7sd</author>
	<datestamp>1258058700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I already get Wolfram Alpha results in my Google searches with the "Wolfram Alpha Google" add-on.  Plus, no ads...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I already get Wolfram Alpha results in my Google searches with the " Wolfram Alpha Google " add-on .
Plus , no ads.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I already get Wolfram Alpha results in my Google searches with the "Wolfram Alpha Google" add-on.
Plus, no ads...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070084</id>
	<title>Computing What?</title>
	<author>kyc</author>
	<datestamp>1258057920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What can a search engine possibly compute anything other than the ridiculous 2^2^2^2...?</p><p>Who would type that question to a search engine anyway? No, no, Microsoft is confused, you use Mathematica 7.0 for that kind of computation.</p><p>The best today's idiotic search engines could possibly hope to do is to add/subtract some numbers, provide unit/currency conversions and that's all. Google is already doing all that.</p><p>Unless Bing servers are some clever cousins of HAL, adding some funky math skills to them won't do a bit of a difference. It's a loooong shot before the search engine actually gathers unrelated information and connects it to the actual query, doing some useful computation in between.</p><p>Sorry Microsoft, this doesn't fly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What can a search engine possibly compute anything other than the ridiculous 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2... ? Who would type that question to a search engine anyway ?
No , no , Microsoft is confused , you use Mathematica 7.0 for that kind of computation.The best today 's idiotic search engines could possibly hope to do is to add/subtract some numbers , provide unit/currency conversions and that 's all .
Google is already doing all that.Unless Bing servers are some clever cousins of HAL , adding some funky math skills to them wo n't do a bit of a difference .
It 's a loooong shot before the search engine actually gathers unrelated information and connects it to the actual query , doing some useful computation in between.Sorry Microsoft , this does n't fly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What can a search engine possibly compute anything other than the ridiculous 2^2^2^2...?Who would type that question to a search engine anyway?
No, no, Microsoft is confused, you use Mathematica 7.0 for that kind of computation.The best today's idiotic search engines could possibly hope to do is to add/subtract some numbers, provide unit/currency conversions and that's all.
Google is already doing all that.Unless Bing servers are some clever cousins of HAL, adding some funky math skills to them won't do a bit of a difference.
It's a loooong shot before the search engine actually gathers unrelated information and connects it to the actual query, doing some useful computation in between.Sorry Microsoft, this doesn't fly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075658</id>
	<title>Re:is google the next netscape?</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1258052160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>netscape went from total market domination to nothing in a few years. granted MS pulled from under handed moves to make it happen</i> </p><p>I remember buying Microsoft's Internet Starter Kit in 1996.</p><p>It came with a handsome paperback book and a useful bundle of software, and sold directly for about $10-20.</p><p> Bundling IE with AOL was another smart move. Integrating a look-alike - work-alike - e-mail client and a browser into the Windows consumer product was a logical progression that made perfect sense to the user.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>netscape went from total market domination to nothing in a few years .
granted MS pulled from under handed moves to make it happen I remember buying Microsoft 's Internet Starter Kit in 1996.It came with a handsome paperback book and a useful bundle of software , and sold directly for about $ 10-20 .
Bundling IE with AOL was another smart move .
Integrating a look-alike - work-alike - e-mail client and a browser into the Windows consumer product was a logical progression that made perfect sense to the user .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>netscape went from total market domination to nothing in a few years.
granted MS pulled from under handed moves to make it happen I remember buying Microsoft's Internet Starter Kit in 1996.It came with a handsome paperback book and a useful bundle of software, and sold directly for about $10-20.
Bundling IE with AOL was another smart move.
Integrating a look-alike - work-alike - e-mail client and a browser into the Windows consumer product was a logical progression that made perfect sense to the user.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070114</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1258058460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bing may incorporate some Wolfram Alpha functionality - but if you "search the web" from Wolfram Alpha's website, it sends you to Google.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bing may incorporate some Wolfram Alpha functionality - but if you " search the web " from Wolfram Alpha 's website , it sends you to Google .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bing may incorporate some Wolfram Alpha functionality - but if you "search the web" from Wolfram Alpha's website, it sends you to Google.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069786</id>
	<title>I just asked bing:</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1257101580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can the suckiness of Microsoft be reversed? It said:</p><p>THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER</p><p>This wolfram thing might be working out after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can the suckiness of Microsoft be reversed ?
It said : THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWERThis wolfram thing might be working out after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can the suckiness of Microsoft be reversed?
It said:THERE IS AS YET INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWERThis wolfram thing might be working out after all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073330</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1258044060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I would say that bing gave the best results to the question, in terms of presentation.  I would say that google answered the question exactly, and Wolfram gave TMI.
<p>
Bing is clearly trying to be the search engine for the masses, a one stop shop for anything.  In this it is being successful, and may be the future.  I don't currently see the value in a one stop shop as I know where to go if I want a different information.  For weather, I go to the NOAA or the weather channel.  For math inform I go to mathworld.  The list goes on.
</p><p>
I think this wolfram deal may be about getting some of the functionality google already has onto Bing.  It is going to be good for Wolfram and for MS, neither of which could compete alone.  In terms of unit converstion and simple maths I still prefer google.  Wolfram, does, however do calculus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would say that bing gave the best results to the question , in terms of presentation .
I would say that google answered the question exactly , and Wolfram gave TMI .
Bing is clearly trying to be the search engine for the masses , a one stop shop for anything .
In this it is being successful , and may be the future .
I do n't currently see the value in a one stop shop as I know where to go if I want a different information .
For weather , I go to the NOAA or the weather channel .
For math inform I go to mathworld .
The list goes on .
I think this wolfram deal may be about getting some of the functionality google already has onto Bing .
It is going to be good for Wolfram and for MS , neither of which could compete alone .
In terms of unit converstion and simple maths I still prefer google .
Wolfram , does , however do calculus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would say that bing gave the best results to the question, in terms of presentation.
I would say that google answered the question exactly, and Wolfram gave TMI.
Bing is clearly trying to be the search engine for the masses, a one stop shop for anything.
In this it is being successful, and may be the future.
I don't currently see the value in a one stop shop as I know where to go if I want a different information.
For weather, I go to the NOAA or the weather channel.
For math inform I go to mathworld.
The list goes on.
I think this wolfram deal may be about getting some of the functionality google already has onto Bing.
It is going to be good for Wolfram and for MS, neither of which could compete alone.
In terms of unit converstion and simple maths I still prefer google.
Wolfram, does, however do calculus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071806</id>
	<title>Re:is google the next netscape?</title>
	<author>Waffle Iron</author>
	<datestamp>1258037580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>MS puts out a few non starters, eventually refines it's product to take the lead.</p></div><p>Not if it keeps up its current marketing incompetence. I've been amazed at how stupid their approach has been with their obnoxious pop-up search windows.</p><p>They've turned a whole bunch of 3rd-party websites into minefields, where you don't dare move your mouse cursor. If you're unlucky enough to hover over one of their stupid "links" that's put on every 10th common English word, then they evade popup blockers and slap in a huge irrelevant window topped with <b>bing</b> that covers up exactly what you're trying to read.</p><p>The result is that the user is repeatedly infuriated. What's worse, at exactly each time he is angered, he is shown the "bing" trademark, which reinforces the association in his mind between bing and idiocy.</p><p>Microsoft <i>still</i> doesn't understand the Internet or what its users want. Google has nothing to worry about yet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>MS puts out a few non starters , eventually refines it 's product to take the lead.Not if it keeps up its current marketing incompetence .
I 've been amazed at how stupid their approach has been with their obnoxious pop-up search windows.They 've turned a whole bunch of 3rd-party websites into minefields , where you do n't dare move your mouse cursor .
If you 're unlucky enough to hover over one of their stupid " links " that 's put on every 10th common English word , then they evade popup blockers and slap in a huge irrelevant window topped with bing that covers up exactly what you 're trying to read.The result is that the user is repeatedly infuriated .
What 's worse , at exactly each time he is angered , he is shown the " bing " trademark , which reinforces the association in his mind between bing and idiocy.Microsoft still does n't understand the Internet or what its users want .
Google has nothing to worry about yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MS puts out a few non starters, eventually refines it's product to take the lead.Not if it keeps up its current marketing incompetence.
I've been amazed at how stupid their approach has been with their obnoxious pop-up search windows.They've turned a whole bunch of 3rd-party websites into minefields, where you don't dare move your mouse cursor.
If you're unlucky enough to hover over one of their stupid "links" that's put on every 10th common English word, then they evade popup blockers and slap in a huge irrelevant window topped with bing that covers up exactly what you're trying to read.The result is that the user is repeatedly infuriated.
What's worse, at exactly each time he is angered, he is shown the "bing" trademark, which reinforces the association in his mind between bing and idiocy.Microsoft still doesn't understand the Internet or what its users want.
Google has nothing to worry about yet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072290</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A clock has at least two hands depicting the hour and minute of the day. If stopped, it would appear that the clock is useless, but twice a day the clock tells the current time perfectly.</p></div><p>
&nbsp; I use a twenty-four hour watch, you insensitive clod!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A clock has at least two hands depicting the hour and minute of the day .
If stopped , it would appear that the clock is useless , but twice a day the clock tells the current time perfectly .
  I use a twenty-four hour watch , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A clock has at least two hands depicting the hour and minute of the day.
If stopped, it would appear that the clock is useless, but twice a day the clock tells the current time perfectly.
  I use a twenty-four hour watch, you insensitive clod!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070050</id>
	<title>Other Microsoft News Has Me Wondering</title>
	<author>The Wooden Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1258057140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long will it take Microsoft to try to patent complex computational searches?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long will it take Microsoft to try to patent complex computational searches ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long will it take Microsoft to try to patent complex computational searches?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070104</id>
	<title>Re:brb</title>
	<author>black3d</author>
	<datestamp>1258058340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hit up Wolfram a few minutes ago to test out the search with such queries as "what is the temperature in beijing?" and "how far is it between earth and mars?" which it handled nicely with lots of relative graphs and links.</p><p>However, I was very pleased to see this search turn up a result:</p><p><a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=is+there+an+easter+egg\%3F" title="wolframalpha.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=is+there+an+easter+egg\%3F</a> [wolframalpha.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hit up Wolfram a few minutes ago to test out the search with such queries as " what is the temperature in beijing ?
" and " how far is it between earth and mars ?
" which it handled nicely with lots of relative graphs and links.However , I was very pleased to see this search turn up a result : http : //www.wolframalpha.com/input/ ? i = is + there + an + easter + egg \ % 3F [ wolframalpha.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hit up Wolfram a few minutes ago to test out the search with such queries as "what is the temperature in beijing?
" and "how far is it between earth and mars?
" which it handled nicely with lots of relative graphs and links.However, I was very pleased to see this search turn up a result:http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=is+there+an+easter+egg\%3F [wolframalpha.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30082396</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258036800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately it does not answer <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=how+can+I+find+a+girlfriend" title="wolframalpha.com" rel="nofollow">another important question</a> [wolframalpha.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately it does not answer another important question [ wolframalpha.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately it does not answer another important question [wolframalpha.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30082648</id>
	<title>Re:brb</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258039380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Impossible, the Higgs boson will not allow you to find it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Impossible , the Higgs boson will not allow you to find it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impossible, the Higgs boson will not allow you to find it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071366</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>weeb0</author>
	<datestamp>1258034520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Who is actually using Bing?</p></div><p>simple, everybody that don't understand the difference between the address edit zone and the search edit zone.  The one that don't understand what is internet and using IE and like it! ( because it is an habit and never tried anything else ).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is actually using Bing ? simple , everybody that do n't understand the difference between the address edit zone and the search edit zone .
The one that do n't understand what is internet and using IE and like it !
( because it is an habit and never tried anything else ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is actually using Bing?simple, everybody that don't understand the difference between the address edit zone and the search edit zone.
The one that don't understand what is internet and using IE and like it!
( because it is an habit and never tried anything else ).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069574</id>
	<title>wolfram alpha and hubristic user interfaces</title>
	<author>dackroyd</author>
	<datestamp>1257099120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It will be interesting how Bing presents Wolfram Alpha and whether it removes the inherent design flaws in it. There is an insightful but long article about the problems here - <a href="http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2009/07/wolfram-alpha-and-hubristic-user.html" title="blogspot.com">wolfram alpha and hubristic user interfaces</a> [blogspot.com]. Two good quotes from which are:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Hype also generates funding because it generates exaggerated sales projections. For instance:</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; "What Wolfram Alpha will do," Wolfram says, "is let people make use of the achievements of science and engineering on an everyday basis, much as the Web and search engines have let billions of people become reference librarians, so to speak."<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; [...]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; It could do things the average person might want (such as generating customized nutrition labels) as well as things only geeks would care about (such as generating truth tables for Boolean algebraic equations).</p><p>Generating customized nutrition labels! The average person! I just laughed so hard, I needed a complete change of clothing.</p><p>Dr. Wolfram, may I mention a word to you? That word is MySpace. If there is any such person as this average person, she has a MySpace account. Does she generate customized nutrition labels? On a regular basis, or just occasionally? In what other similar activities does she engage - monitoring the population of Burma? Graphing the lifecycle of stars? Charting Korean copper consumption since the 1960s? Perhaps you should feed MySpace into your giant electronic brain, and see what comes out.</p></div><p>and</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Google is not a control interface; WA is. When you use WA, you know which of these tools you wish to select. You know that when you type "two cups of flour and two eggs" (which now works) you are looking for a Nutrition Facts label. It is only Stephen Wolfram's giant electronic brain which has to run ten million lines of code to figure this out. Inside your own brain, it is written on glowing letters across your forehead.</p><p>So the giant electronic brain is doing an enormous amount of work to discern information which the user knows and can enter easily: which tool she wants to use.</p><p>When the giant electronic brain succeeds in this task, it has saved the user from having to manually select and indicate her actual data-visualization application of choice. This has perhaps saved her some time. How much? Um, not very much.</p><p>When the giant electronic brain fails in this task, you type in Grandma's fried-chicken recipe and get a beautiful 3-D animation of a bird-flu epidemic. (Or, more likely, "Wolfram Alpha wasn't sure what to do with your input." Thanks, Wolfram Alpha!) How do you get from this to your Nutrition Facts? Rearrange some words, try again, bang your head on the desk, give up. What we're looking at here is a classic, old-school, big steaming lump of UI catastrophe.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p><p>The task of "guess the application I want to use" is actually not even in the domain of artificial intelligence. AI is normally defined by the human standard. To work properly as a control interface, Wolfram's guessing algorithm actually requires divine intelligence. It is not sufficient for it to just think. It must actually read the user's mind. God can do this, but software can't.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will be interesting how Bing presents Wolfram Alpha and whether it removes the inherent design flaws in it .
There is an insightful but long article about the problems here - wolfram alpha and hubristic user interfaces [ blogspot.com ] .
Two good quotes from which are : Hype also generates funding because it generates exaggerated sales projections .
For instance :         " What Wolfram Alpha will do , " Wolfram says , " is let people make use of the achievements of science and engineering on an everyday basis , much as the Web and search engines have let billions of people become reference librarians , so to speak .
"         [ ... ]         It could do things the average person might want ( such as generating customized nutrition labels ) as well as things only geeks would care about ( such as generating truth tables for Boolean algebraic equations ) .Generating customized nutrition labels !
The average person !
I just laughed so hard , I needed a complete change of clothing.Dr .
Wolfram , may I mention a word to you ?
That word is MySpace .
If there is any such person as this average person , she has a MySpace account .
Does she generate customized nutrition labels ?
On a regular basis , or just occasionally ?
In what other similar activities does she engage - monitoring the population of Burma ?
Graphing the lifecycle of stars ?
Charting Korean copper consumption since the 1960s ?
Perhaps you should feed MySpace into your giant electronic brain , and see what comes out.andGoogle is not a control interface ; WA is .
When you use WA , you know which of these tools you wish to select .
You know that when you type " two cups of flour and two eggs " ( which now works ) you are looking for a Nutrition Facts label .
It is only Stephen Wolfram 's giant electronic brain which has to run ten million lines of code to figure this out .
Inside your own brain , it is written on glowing letters across your forehead.So the giant electronic brain is doing an enormous amount of work to discern information which the user knows and can enter easily : which tool she wants to use.When the giant electronic brain succeeds in this task , it has saved the user from having to manually select and indicate her actual data-visualization application of choice .
This has perhaps saved her some time .
How much ?
Um , not very much.When the giant electronic brain fails in this task , you type in Grandma 's fried-chicken recipe and get a beautiful 3-D animation of a bird-flu epidemic .
( Or , more likely , " Wolfram Alpha was n't sure what to do with your input .
" Thanks , Wolfram Alpha !
) How do you get from this to your Nutrition Facts ?
Rearrange some words , try again , bang your head on the desk , give up .
What we 're looking at here is a classic , old-school , big steaming lump of UI catastrophe .
....The task of " guess the application I want to use " is actually not even in the domain of artificial intelligence .
AI is normally defined by the human standard .
To work properly as a control interface , Wolfram 's guessing algorithm actually requires divine intelligence .
It is not sufficient for it to just think .
It must actually read the user 's mind .
God can do this , but software ca n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will be interesting how Bing presents Wolfram Alpha and whether it removes the inherent design flaws in it.
There is an insightful but long article about the problems here - wolfram alpha and hubristic user interfaces [blogspot.com].
Two good quotes from which are:Hype also generates funding because it generates exaggerated sales projections.
For instance:
        "What Wolfram Alpha will do," Wolfram says, "is let people make use of the achievements of science and engineering on an everyday basis, much as the Web and search engines have let billions of people become reference librarians, so to speak.
"
        [...]
        It could do things the average person might want (such as generating customized nutrition labels) as well as things only geeks would care about (such as generating truth tables for Boolean algebraic equations).Generating customized nutrition labels!
The average person!
I just laughed so hard, I needed a complete change of clothing.Dr.
Wolfram, may I mention a word to you?
That word is MySpace.
If there is any such person as this average person, she has a MySpace account.
Does she generate customized nutrition labels?
On a regular basis, or just occasionally?
In what other similar activities does she engage - monitoring the population of Burma?
Graphing the lifecycle of stars?
Charting Korean copper consumption since the 1960s?
Perhaps you should feed MySpace into your giant electronic brain, and see what comes out.andGoogle is not a control interface; WA is.
When you use WA, you know which of these tools you wish to select.
You know that when you type "two cups of flour and two eggs" (which now works) you are looking for a Nutrition Facts label.
It is only Stephen Wolfram's giant electronic brain which has to run ten million lines of code to figure this out.
Inside your own brain, it is written on glowing letters across your forehead.So the giant electronic brain is doing an enormous amount of work to discern information which the user knows and can enter easily: which tool she wants to use.When the giant electronic brain succeeds in this task, it has saved the user from having to manually select and indicate her actual data-visualization application of choice.
This has perhaps saved her some time.
How much?
Um, not very much.When the giant electronic brain fails in this task, you type in Grandma's fried-chicken recipe and get a beautiful 3-D animation of a bird-flu epidemic.
(Or, more likely, "Wolfram Alpha wasn't sure what to do with your input.
" Thanks, Wolfram Alpha!
) How do you get from this to your Nutrition Facts?
Rearrange some words, try again, bang your head on the desk, give up.
What we're looking at here is a classic, old-school, big steaming lump of UI catastrophe.
....The task of "guess the application I want to use" is actually not even in the domain of artificial intelligence.
AI is normally defined by the human standard.
To work properly as a control interface, Wolfram's guessing algorithm actually requires divine intelligence.
It is not sufficient for it to just think.
It must actually read the user's mind.
God can do this, but software can't.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072398</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258040340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Query: When is judgement day?</p><p>Answer: "2:14 am EDT  |  Friday, August 29, 1997"</p></div><p>Damn, and I was in bed and the good god didn't wake me up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Query : When is judgement day ? Answer : " 2 : 14 am EDT | Friday , August 29 , 1997 " Damn , and I was in bed and the good god did n't wake me up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Query: When is judgement day?Answer: "2:14 am EDT  |  Friday, August 29, 1997"Damn, and I was in bed and the good god didn't wake me up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069714</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think there's some variation; I've always preferred "stopped watch" myself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think there 's some variation ; I 've always preferred " stopped watch " myself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think there's some variation; I've always preferred "stopped watch" myself.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30077016</id>
	<title>Yeah right...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1258056660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As if Bing users had the brains to even spell "math" correctly. Because if they had the brains, they wouldn't use Bing in the first place. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As if Bing users had the brains to even spell " math " correctly .
Because if they had the brains , they would n't use Bing in the first place .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As if Bing users had the brains to even spell "math" correctly.
Because if they had the brains, they wouldn't use Bing in the first place.
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071356</id>
	<title>The point is innovation, not who's on first.</title>
	<author>beatsme</author>
	<datestamp>1258034520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's kind of the whole point. This isn't a show-stopper, it's a show-starter. It's going to force similar innovation from Google, which means that everyone wins.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's kind of the whole point .
This is n't a show-stopper , it 's a show-starter .
It 's going to force similar innovation from Google , which means that everyone wins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's kind of the whole point.
This isn't a show-stopper, it's a show-starter.
It's going to force similar innovation from Google, which means that everyone wins.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070024</id>
	<title>Re:Good move, but...</title>
	<author>BikeHelmet</author>
	<datestamp>1258056480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>there's nothing stopping Google from turning around and doing the exact same thing.</p></div><p>But really, why would they? Google's results often contain links to exactly the same places. And arguably more useful places, too.</p><p>Google <a href="http://www.google.ca/#hl=en&amp;source=hp&amp;q=dodecahedron&amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;meta=&amp;aq=0&amp;oq=dodecah&amp;fp=8a2e5f2ec75fca07" title="google.ca">Dodecahedron</a> [google.ca] and you get #1 wikipedia.com - #2 wolfram.com</p><p>I tried using Wolfram Alpha, but every time I do it tells me "Wolfram Alpha wasn't sure what to do with your input."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>there 's nothing stopping Google from turning around and doing the exact same thing.But really , why would they ?
Google 's results often contain links to exactly the same places .
And arguably more useful places , too.Google Dodecahedron [ google.ca ] and you get # 1 wikipedia.com - # 2 wolfram.comI tried using Wolfram Alpha , but every time I do it tells me " Wolfram Alpha was n't sure what to do with your input .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>there's nothing stopping Google from turning around and doing the exact same thing.But really, why would they?
Google's results often contain links to exactly the same places.
And arguably more useful places, too.Google Dodecahedron [google.ca] and you get #1 wikipedia.com - #2 wolfram.comI tried using Wolfram Alpha, but every time I do it tells me "Wolfram Alpha wasn't sure what to do with your input.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069630</id>
	<title>Are You Delusional Or Just Stupid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft's latest rebranding of their failed search engine has lower marketshare now than when it was released.</p><p>It has lower marketshare than last year before it was rebranded with the new stupid 'bing' name.</p><p>Microsoft is so desperate they are resorting to paying the distant second place search engine Yahoo to use Microsoft's own last place search engine.</p><p>"eventually refines it's product to take the lead."</p><p>Yeah, that's the story you want to believe. Too bad Reality is fucking it up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft 's latest rebranding of their failed search engine has lower marketshare now than when it was released.It has lower marketshare than last year before it was rebranded with the new stupid 'bing ' name.Microsoft is so desperate they are resorting to paying the distant second place search engine Yahoo to use Microsoft 's own last place search engine .
" eventually refines it 's product to take the lead .
" Yeah , that 's the story you want to believe .
Too bad Reality is fucking it up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft's latest rebranding of their failed search engine has lower marketshare now than when it was released.It has lower marketshare than last year before it was rebranded with the new stupid 'bing' name.Microsoft is so desperate they are resorting to paying the distant second place search engine Yahoo to use Microsoft's own last place search engine.
"eventually refines it's product to take the lead.
"Yeah, that's the story you want to believe.
Too bad Reality is fucking it up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070392</id>
	<title>How is babby formed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258019580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=How+is+babby+formed</p><p>They need to do way instain search</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.wolframalpha.com/input/ ? i = How + is + babby + formedThey need to do way instain search</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=How+is+babby+formedThey need to do way instain search</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070818</id>
	<title>a non-solution to a non-problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258025940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The raison d'etre of the natural-language interface, stated baldly, is to create a usable tool for stupid people who might be confused or intimidated by a tree of menus. The market of stupid people is indeed enormous. The market of stupid people who like to use data-visualization tools is, well, not. (And since the interface is not in fact easy but actually quite difficult, it achieves the coveted status of a non-solution to a non-problem.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The raison d'etre of the natural-language interface , stated baldly , is to create a usable tool for stupid people who might be confused or intimidated by a tree of menus .
The market of stupid people is indeed enormous .
The market of stupid people who like to use data-visualization tools is , well , not .
( And since the interface is not in fact easy but actually quite difficult , it achieves the coveted status of a non-solution to a non-problem .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The raison d'etre of the natural-language interface, stated baldly, is to create a usable tool for stupid people who might be confused or intimidated by a tree of menus.
The market of stupid people is indeed enormous.
The market of stupid people who like to use data-visualization tools is, well, not.
(And since the interface is not in fact easy but actually quite difficult, it achieves the coveted status of a non-solution to a non-problem.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069738</id>
	<title>Re:Bleh</title>
	<author>Shadow Wrought</author>
	<datestamp>1257100920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah <a href="http://slashdot.org/~Shadow+Wrought/journal/230253" title="slashdot.org">I tried Wolfram|Alpha out</a> [slashdot.org] when it was first released with pretty crappy results.  Just not sure how a meh site is going to improved by a crappy one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah I tried Wolfram | Alpha out [ slashdot.org ] when it was first released with pretty crappy results .
Just not sure how a meh site is going to improved by a crappy one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah I tried Wolfram|Alpha out [slashdot.org] when it was first released with pretty crappy results.
Just not sure how a meh site is going to improved by a crappy one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070218</id>
	<title>Re:Hellllooo</title>
	<author>pHus10n</author>
	<datestamp>1258017180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here on Slashdot, anything Microsoft is now filtered with asterisks.  Much like curse words.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here on Slashdot , anything Microsoft is now filtered with asterisks .
Much like curse words .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here on Slashdot, anything Microsoft is now filtered with asterisks.
Much like curse words.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069816</id>
	<title>Re:Good move, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Closer to home, most of the simple math I do on my computer, I do in in MacOS X's Spotlight.<p>If I have a specific enough question, I ask google<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Closer to home , most of the simple math I do on my computer , I do in in MacOS X 's Spotlight.If I have a specific enough question , I ask google : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Closer to home, most of the simple math I do on my computer, I do in in MacOS X's Spotlight.If I have a specific enough question, I ask google :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070316</id>
	<title>Wolfram Alpha's got Memes!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258018260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fairly suprised at how good that Wolfram database is. Typed in "what are all your base?" and it correctly replied "Belong to us".</p><p>Memetastic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fairly suprised at how good that Wolfram database is .
Typed in " what are all your base ?
" and it correctly replied " Belong to us " .Memetastic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fairly suprised at how good that Wolfram database is.
Typed in "what are all your base?
" and it correctly replied "Belong to us".Memetastic.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30081952</id>
	<title>Like someone interrupting u b4 your done saying it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258033500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This type of searching is going to be as annoying as that dancing paperclip.  The problem with Microsoft is that it's run by people who don't really want to do any heavy lifting.  So while you are feeding pablumized information to a general public I will search on another engine that won't give information culled by higher order search methods.  It's just stupid and probably dangerous if someone is dumbly relying on the verity of the information.  Knowing this I won't touch Bing</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This type of searching is going to be as annoying as that dancing paperclip .
The problem with Microsoft is that it 's run by people who do n't really want to do any heavy lifting .
So while you are feeding pablumized information to a general public I will search on another engine that wo n't give information culled by higher order search methods .
It 's just stupid and probably dangerous if someone is dumbly relying on the verity of the information .
Knowing this I wo n't touch Bing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This type of searching is going to be as annoying as that dancing paperclip.
The problem with Microsoft is that it's run by people who don't really want to do any heavy lifting.
So while you are feeding pablumized information to a general public I will search on another engine that won't give information culled by higher order search methods.
It's just stupid and probably dangerous if someone is dumbly relying on the verity of the information.
Knowing this I won't touch Bing</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30080498</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258025820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Alpha quite a bit. It is very good for what it can do and saves me a lot of time on things that I would otherwise have to calculate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Alpha quite a bit .
It is very good for what it can do and saves me a lot of time on things that I would otherwise have to calculate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Alpha quite a bit.
It is very good for what it can do and saves me a lot of time on things that I would otherwise have to calculate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662</id>
	<title>what about how Wulfram Alpha is not useful?</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1257100140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For very narrow queries, <i>where you already know ahead of time Wulfram Alpha supports it</i>, you can get useful structured information out of it. For example, if you look up a first name or surname, you can get information on popularity and geographic distribution and such. But the only time I've <i>ever</i> gotten useful information like that is when I already knew that it supported a particular kind of query. That's less like a search engine, and more like just querying a database. There have always been special-purpose databases on the internet where you can look up specific information, once you know that such a database exists for a particular kind of fact. What Alpha utterly fails to do is answer any useful proportion of queries without already knowing in advance exactly what you need to query and what syntax to use when doing so.</p><p>And yes, I've seen Wulfram's talks on it, and they're crap. He presented via videoconference at IJCAI <a href="http://ijcai-09.org/" title="ijcai-09.org">IJCAI 2009</a> [ijcai-09.org], which he only got into because of the hype (sure, it's blind review, but it's hard to have blind review of a Wulfram Alpha paper that identifies itself as such in the paper), and there was no technical information at all, nor AI advances that weren't already done by like the 1960s (the AI advance in question is "querying a database").</p><p>Maybe Bing has something up their sleeve, but I'd bet on it being more hype.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For very narrow queries , where you already know ahead of time Wulfram Alpha supports it , you can get useful structured information out of it .
For example , if you look up a first name or surname , you can get information on popularity and geographic distribution and such .
But the only time I 've ever gotten useful information like that is when I already knew that it supported a particular kind of query .
That 's less like a search engine , and more like just querying a database .
There have always been special-purpose databases on the internet where you can look up specific information , once you know that such a database exists for a particular kind of fact .
What Alpha utterly fails to do is answer any useful proportion of queries without already knowing in advance exactly what you need to query and what syntax to use when doing so.And yes , I 've seen Wulfram 's talks on it , and they 're crap .
He presented via videoconference at IJCAI IJCAI 2009 [ ijcai-09.org ] , which he only got into because of the hype ( sure , it 's blind review , but it 's hard to have blind review of a Wulfram Alpha paper that identifies itself as such in the paper ) , and there was no technical information at all , nor AI advances that were n't already done by like the 1960s ( the AI advance in question is " querying a database " ) .Maybe Bing has something up their sleeve , but I 'd bet on it being more hype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For very narrow queries, where you already know ahead of time Wulfram Alpha supports it, you can get useful structured information out of it.
For example, if you look up a first name or surname, you can get information on popularity and geographic distribution and such.
But the only time I've ever gotten useful information like that is when I already knew that it supported a particular kind of query.
That's less like a search engine, and more like just querying a database.
There have always been special-purpose databases on the internet where you can look up specific information, once you know that such a database exists for a particular kind of fact.
What Alpha utterly fails to do is answer any useful proportion of queries without already knowing in advance exactly what you need to query and what syntax to use when doing so.And yes, I've seen Wulfram's talks on it, and they're crap.
He presented via videoconference at IJCAI IJCAI 2009 [ijcai-09.org], which he only got into because of the hype (sure, it's blind review, but it's hard to have blind review of a Wulfram Alpha paper that identifies itself as such in the paper), and there was no technical information at all, nor AI advances that weren't already done by like the 1960s (the AI advance in question is "querying a database").Maybe Bing has something up their sleeve, but I'd bet on it being more hype.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071250</id>
	<title>That's bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258033200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's bad because it's Microsoft. LINUX ROCKS!!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's bad because it 's Microsoft .
LINUX ROCKS ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's bad because it's Microsoft.
LINUX ROCKS!!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069872</id>
	<title>Re:brb</title>
	<author>girlintraining</author>
	<datestamp>1257102780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>brb, dividing by zero on bing</p></div><p>Found 1 result:</p><p>LHC\_Homepage<br>LHC - THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... LHC Safety. LHC Cooldown Status. LHC@ interactions.org<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Revised: 2009-09-30 LHC Webmaster.<br>LHC NEWS - Cooldown\_status - CERN Document Server<br>www.cern.ch/lhc</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>brb , dividing by zero on bingFound 1 result : LHC \ _HomepageLHC - THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER ... LHC Safety .
LHC Cooldown Status .
LHC @ interactions.org ... Revised : 2009-09-30 LHC Webmaster.LHC NEWS - Cooldown \ _status - CERN Document Serverwww.cern.ch/lhc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>brb, dividing by zero on bingFound 1 result:LHC\_HomepageLHC - THE LARGE HADRON COLLIDER ... LHC Safety.
LHC Cooldown Status.
LHC@ interactions.org ... Revised: 2009-09-30 LHC Webmaster.LHC NEWS - Cooldown\_status - CERN Document Serverwww.cern.ch/lhc
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069684</id>
	<title>one power more than Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Microsoft wants to compute 2^2^2^2^2 because Google can only do <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=2\%5E2\%5E2\%5E2+\%3D" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">2^2^2^2</a> [google.com]? Yeah right, that will help them get more users.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Microsoft wants to compute 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 because Google can only do 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 [ google.com ] ?
Yeah right , that will help them get more users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Microsoft wants to compute 2^2^2^2^2 because Google can only do 2^2^2^2 [google.com]?
Yeah right, that will help them get more users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</id>
	<title>Bleh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So far I haven't been terribly impressed with Wolfram Alpha.</p><p>For example, searching for the price of oil in non-US dollars results in a US dollar timeline multiplied by the CURRENT exchange rate of that foreign currency, not in the historical timeline. It's like Alpha is having a stab at an answer, but isn't smart enough to know when it's answering the question wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So far I have n't been terribly impressed with Wolfram Alpha.For example , searching for the price of oil in non-US dollars results in a US dollar timeline multiplied by the CURRENT exchange rate of that foreign currency , not in the historical timeline .
It 's like Alpha is having a stab at an answer , but is n't smart enough to know when it 's answering the question wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So far I haven't been terribly impressed with Wolfram Alpha.For example, searching for the price of oil in non-US dollars results in a US dollar timeline multiplied by the CURRENT exchange rate of that foreign currency, not in the historical timeline.
It's like Alpha is having a stab at an answer, but isn't smart enough to know when it's answering the question wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070432</id>
	<title>Lots of people using Alpha...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258020240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I glance around the vast undergrad computer labs at my university, it's fair to say the majority of people use Wolfram Alpha in some form.  It's a very powerful tool to augment our normal calculators, especially if you need to do conversion between SI and other units, or if you need some value that doesn't come to hand quickly (e.g. atmospheric pressure at 1254 metres, density of some fluid, etc.).  It's also very helpful for checking your equations as Alpha reformats in an intuitive manner so that something like ((43+(58/8)*84)^2)/(78848)^(1/2) looks much nicer and is easier to check if something is wrong.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I glance around the vast undergrad computer labs at my university , it 's fair to say the majority of people use Wolfram Alpha in some form .
It 's a very powerful tool to augment our normal calculators , especially if you need to do conversion between SI and other units , or if you need some value that does n't come to hand quickly ( e.g .
atmospheric pressure at 1254 metres , density of some fluid , etc. ) .
It 's also very helpful for checking your equations as Alpha reformats in an intuitive manner so that something like ( ( 43 + ( 58/8 ) * 84 ) ^ 2 ) / ( 78848 ) ^ ( 1/2 ) looks much nicer and is easier to check if something is wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I glance around the vast undergrad computer labs at my university, it's fair to say the majority of people use Wolfram Alpha in some form.
It's a very powerful tool to augment our normal calculators, especially if you need to do conversion between SI and other units, or if you need some value that doesn't come to hand quickly (e.g.
atmospheric pressure at 1254 metres, density of some fluid, etc.).
It's also very helpful for checking your equations as Alpha reformats in an intuitive manner so that something like ((43+(58/8)*84)^2)/(78848)^(1/2) looks much nicer and is easier to check if something is wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070080</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>graffitirock</author>
	<datestamp>1258057860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It passed the `favourite color' question, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It passed the ` favourite color ' question , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It passed the `favourite color' question, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072088</id>
	<title>Re:It answers the most important questions though.</title>
	<author>Alioth</author>
	<datestamp>1258038960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It still doesn't know what the question to life, the universe and everything is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It still does n't know what the question to life , the universe and everything is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It still doesn't know what the question to life, the universe and everything is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30089858</id>
	<title>Ha! Don't need Wolfie or Bing Bong for those Qs!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258141380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>How Many Calories in a Burger? What's 2^2^2^2^2? Bing and Wolfram|Alpha Have the Answers</p></div></blockquote><p>What dumbasses, don't they realize the second question is the answer to the first question? OMG self-referential searching!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>How Many Calories in a Burger ?
What 's 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ^ 2 ?
Bing and Wolfram | Alpha Have the AnswersWhat dumbasses , do n't they realize the second question is the answer to the first question ?
OMG self-referential searching !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How Many Calories in a Burger?
What's 2^2^2^2^2?
Bing and Wolfram|Alpha Have the AnswersWhat dumbasses, don't they realize the second question is the answer to the first question?
OMG self-referential searching!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070148</id>
	<title>Come on people</title>
	<author>tengeta</author>
	<datestamp>1258059060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its interesting, I'll give it that much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its interesting , I 'll give it that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its interesting, I'll give it that much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069746</id>
	<title>Yes But,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can it tell us the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can it tell us the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can it tell us the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070436</id>
	<title>Re:Bleh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258020240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's great for maths homework, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's great for maths homework , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's great for maths homework, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069800</id>
	<title>So smart, it guesses wrong for you</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the results will be presented by<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Clippy.</p><p>When will Micro$oft realize that most users don't WANT Microsoft to do their thinking for them? Just get out of my way and do what I say. Like, I dunno, maybe Google?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the results will be presented by ...Clippy.When will Micro $ oft realize that most users do n't WANT Microsoft to do their thinking for them ?
Just get out of my way and do what I say .
Like , I dunno , maybe Google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the results will be presented by ...Clippy.When will Micro$oft realize that most users don't WANT Microsoft to do their thinking for them?
Just get out of my way and do what I say.
Like, I dunno, maybe Google?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070124</id>
	<title>Winston Churchill's Father - Google vs Bing</title>
	<author>BayaWeaver</author>
	<datestamp>1258058640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Simple query of a well-known statesman. Google gets it right with its very first response. Bing doesn't seem to know what I want. Alpha doesn't have a clue.
<br> <br>
Google 1 - Bing 0
<br> <br>
Bing and Alpha have a lot of catching up to do. And Google doesn't blink even when I get the spelling wrong as in "Winston Chrchill's Father"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Simple query of a well-known statesman .
Google gets it right with its very first response .
Bing does n't seem to know what I want .
Alpha does n't have a clue .
Google 1 - Bing 0 Bing and Alpha have a lot of catching up to do .
And Google does n't blink even when I get the spelling wrong as in " Winston Chrchill 's Father "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Simple query of a well-known statesman.
Google gets it right with its very first response.
Bing doesn't seem to know what I want.
Alpha doesn't have a clue.
Google 1 - Bing 0
 
Bing and Alpha have a lot of catching up to do.
And Google doesn't blink even when I get the spelling wrong as in "Winston Chrchill's Father"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070160</id>
	<title>Re:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day</title>
	<author>someone1234</author>
	<datestamp>1258059360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, the Alpha's concept is good. It just needs more data and computing capacity.<br>I'm surprised Google didn't find it before M$.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , the Alpha 's concept is good .
It just needs more data and computing capacity.I 'm surprised Google did n't find it before M $ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, the Alpha's concept is good.
It just needs more data and computing capacity.I'm surprised Google didn't find it before M$.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30150704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30085446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30082396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30084448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069740
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30080498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30077304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069574
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30082648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_12_0020205_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075658
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30082648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069870
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070298
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072398
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30075694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070080
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30084448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30150704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30082396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069836
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071366
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30080498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069578
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070564
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069714
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071078
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069812
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069994
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30085446
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070054
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073098
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073330
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30077304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30071356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069816
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30072318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30073718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30070218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_12_0020205.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_12_0020205.30069684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
