<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_11_1950225</id>
	<title>China Lauds iPhone App That Spreads Gov't Views</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1257926820000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/" rel="nofollow">angry tapir</a> writes <i>"China's film and TV regulator has <a href="http://www.goodgearguide.com.au/article/325866">praised the growth of an iPhone application from state broadcaster CCTV</a> as the country looks for new ways to project its political views abroad. The free iPhone app, one of a growing number from Chinese state-owned news outlets, has gained 500,000 users in the month or so since it went online and is adding 2,000 new users each day, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television said in a statement on its Web site. The CCTV app has shown 'favorable performance' and proven especially popular during broadcasts of major events, such as a high-flown military parade held in Beijing last month, the statement said."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>angry tapir writes " China 's film and TV regulator has praised the growth of an iPhone application from state broadcaster CCTV as the country looks for new ways to project its political views abroad .
The free iPhone app , one of a growing number from Chinese state-owned news outlets , has gained 500,000 users in the month or so since it went online and is adding 2,000 new users each day , the State Administration of Radio , Film and Television said in a statement on its Web site .
The CCTV app has shown 'favorable performance ' and proven especially popular during broadcasts of major events , such as a high-flown military parade held in Beijing last month , the statement said .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>angry tapir writes "China's film and TV regulator has praised the growth of an iPhone application from state broadcaster CCTV as the country looks for new ways to project its political views abroad.
The free iPhone app, one of a growing number from Chinese state-owned news outlets, has gained 500,000 users in the month or so since it went online and is adding 2,000 new users each day, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television said in a statement on its Web site.
The CCTV app has shown 'favorable performance' and proven especially popular during broadcasts of major events, such as a high-flown military parade held in Beijing last month, the statement said.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065498</id>
	<title>What this article forgot to mention is</title>
	<author>gsgriffin</author>
	<datestamp>1257069240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that they are getting 2000 new subscribers a day...because they are forced to. <br> <br> I suppose they could also claim that millions are becoming communists too (birth rate, you know).</htmltext>
<tokenext>that they are getting 2000 new subscribers a day...because they are forced to .
I suppose they could also claim that millions are becoming communists too ( birth rate , you know ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that they are getting 2000 new subscribers a day...because they are forced to.
I suppose they could also claim that millions are becoming communists too (birth rate, you know).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065028</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it shows the cheesy WW2 movies that look like they were made in the '50s (Chinese '50s, not Hollywood's) for anti-Japanese propaganda purposes, then I'll download this app.</p><p>Pure MST3K material!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it shows the cheesy WW2 movies that look like they were made in the '50s ( Chinese '50s , not Hollywood 's ) for anti-Japanese propaganda purposes , then I 'll download this app.Pure MST3K material !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it shows the cheesy WW2 movies that look like they were made in the '50s (Chinese '50s, not Hollywood's) for anti-Japanese propaganda purposes, then I'll download this app.Pure MST3K material!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065886</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda</title>
	<author>mr\_death</author>
	<datestamp>1257071400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a pity that Apple's notorious approval process didn't kill this propaganda.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a pity that Apple 's notorious approval process did n't kill this propaganda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a pity that Apple's notorious approval process didn't kill this propaganda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065668</id>
	<title>In other words...</title>
	<author>nsayer</author>
	<datestamp>1257070140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives. We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology. Where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths. Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth. We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause. Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Today , we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives .
We have created , for the first time in all history , a garden of pure ideology .
Where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths .
Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth .
We are one people , with one will , one resolve , one cause .
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion .
We shall prevail !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.
We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology.
Where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of contradictory and confusing truths.
Our Unification of Thoughts is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth.
We are one people, with one will, one resolve, one cause.
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion.
We shall prevail!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065230</id>
	<title>ugh</title>
	<author>vvaduva</author>
	<datestamp>1257067980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The government statement also said promotion of the CCTV app on Apple's Web site in China was helpful for its user growth. The Apple site includes the CCTV and China Daily products on a list of recommended apps. "</p><p>A red Apple, a hammer and a sickle...why do they operate in groups of three? One can read, one can write and one to keep an eye on the two intellectuals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The government statement also said promotion of the CCTV app on Apple 's Web site in China was helpful for its user growth .
The Apple site includes the CCTV and China Daily products on a list of recommended apps .
" A red Apple , a hammer and a sickle...why do they operate in groups of three ?
One can read , one can write and one to keep an eye on the two intellectuals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The government statement also said promotion of the CCTV app on Apple's Web site in China was helpful for its user growth.
The Apple site includes the CCTV and China Daily products on a list of recommended apps.
"A red Apple, a hammer and a sickle...why do they operate in groups of three?
One can read, one can write and one to keep an eye on the two intellectuals.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065342</id>
	<title>Way to go Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257068460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now, you just have to report on the citizens to the feds, pay for the bullets to kill those that want their freedom, and then you can join the ranks of Yahoo and Microsoft in helping communism. And you can make a pretty penny in doing it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , you just have to report on the citizens to the feds , pay for the bullets to kill those that want their freedom , and then you can join the ranks of Yahoo and Microsoft in helping communism .
And you can make a pretty penny in doing it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, you just have to report on the citizens to the feds, pay for the bullets to kill those that want their freedom, and then you can join the ranks of Yahoo and Microsoft in helping communism.
And you can make a pretty penny in doing it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30067264</id>
	<title>Re:Double standard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257078000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Time for a free tibet iphone app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Time for a free tibet iphone app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Time for a free tibet iphone app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065086</id>
	<title>on slashdot microsoft is worse than dictatorship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if MS made an iphone app it would be shouted down as 'propaganda' and tagged all sorts of horrible things.</p><p>but the chinese red army puts out an iphone app... oh. who cares.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if MS made an iphone app it would be shouted down as 'propaganda ' and tagged all sorts of horrible things.but the chinese red army puts out an iphone app... oh. who cares .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if MS made an iphone app it would be shouted down as 'propaganda' and tagged all sorts of horrible things.but the chinese red army puts out an iphone app... oh. who cares.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30070502</id>
	<title>Has anyone here actually seen CCTV?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258021200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has anyone here actually seen CCTV? My cable was out once and CCTV was one of the channels I still had. After watching it for a while I found it low key and educational. If learning about other people's culture, lifestyle and views are propaganda, then it must be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has anyone here actually seen CCTV ?
My cable was out once and CCTV was one of the channels I still had .
After watching it for a while I found it low key and educational .
If learning about other people 's culture , lifestyle and views are propaganda , then it must be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has anyone here actually seen CCTV?
My cable was out once and CCTV was one of the channels I still had.
After watching it for a while I found it low key and educational.
If learning about other people's culture, lifestyle and views are propaganda, then it must be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</id>
	<title>Propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257066600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Want to keep your citizens in line, with false statements and a warped view of the world? There's an App for that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Want to keep your citizens in line , with false statements and a warped view of the world ?
There 's an App for that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want to keep your citizens in line, with false statements and a warped view of the world?
There's an App for that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065612</id>
	<title>Apple + China: Birds of a feather...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257069960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering how they run the app store, is it really any surprise to see it confirmed once again that Apple loves totalitarianism?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering how they run the app store , is it really any surprise to see it confirmed once again that Apple loves totalitarianism ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering how they run the app store, is it really any surprise to see it confirmed once again that Apple loves totalitarianism?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065642</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257070020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just had to post to tell you how funny that was.  I think I might have hurt myself laughing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just had to post to tell you how funny that was .
I think I might have hurt myself laughing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just had to post to tell you how funny that was.
I think I might have hurt myself laughing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064992</id>
	<title>Holy fagioli...</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1257066840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And this app was approved by Apple? I mean, sure, Apple can do whatever they want on their playground, I guess, even be douchebags.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this app was approved by Apple ?
I mean , sure , Apple can do whatever they want on their playground , I guess , even be douchebags .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And this app was approved by Apple?
I mean, sure, Apple can do whatever they want on their playground, I guess, even be douchebags.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30069024</id>
	<title>Pure Irony.....</title>
	<author>IHC Navistar</author>
	<datestamp>1257092400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FTFA:</p><p>"In 1984, the iconic American company ran a popular commercial for its new Macintosh computers that said the machines would show users "why 1984 won't be like '1984,' " a reference to the George Orwell book about a society ruled by a mind-controlling regime. "</p><p>Wow. Talk about shooting one's self in the foot..... But then again, what do you expect from a company that strives to maintain COMPLETE control of their products?</p><p>So where are the Apple Fanbois on this one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTFA : " In 1984 , the iconic American company ran a popular commercial for its new Macintosh computers that said the machines would show users " why 1984 wo n't be like '1984, ' " a reference to the George Orwell book about a society ruled by a mind-controlling regime .
" Wow. Talk about shooting one 's self in the foot..... But then again , what do you expect from a company that strives to maintain COMPLETE control of their products ? So where are the Apple Fanbois on this one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTFA:"In 1984, the iconic American company ran a popular commercial for its new Macintosh computers that said the machines would show users "why 1984 won't be like '1984,' " a reference to the George Orwell book about a society ruled by a mind-controlling regime.
"Wow. Talk about shooting one's self in the foot..... But then again, what do you expect from a company that strives to maintain COMPLETE control of their products?So where are the Apple Fanbois on this one?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024</id>
	<title>Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Want to keep your citizens in line, with false statements and a warped view of the world? There's an App for that.</i></p><p><a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/iphone" title="barackobama.com" rel="nofollow">Yes, we've seen that before.</a> [barackobama.com]  Important "news" from our Dear Leader!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Want to keep your citizens in line , with false statements and a warped view of the world ?
There 's an App for that.Yes , we 've seen that before .
[ barackobama.com ] Important " news " from our Dear Leader !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Want to keep your citizens in line, with false statements and a warped view of the world?
There's an App for that.Yes, we've seen that before.
[barackobama.com]  Important "news" from our Dear Leader!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30066274</id>
	<title>Oh cool</title>
	<author>gravis777</author>
	<datestamp>1257072960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will have to look this one up when I get home. I enjoy CCTV9, and its, um, interesting take on international events. Plus, I just get tickled watching any international commercials! And their learn chinese language shows are actually pretty good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will have to look this one up when I get home .
I enjoy CCTV9 , and its , um , interesting take on international events .
Plus , I just get tickled watching any international commercials !
And their learn chinese language shows are actually pretty good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will have to look this one up when I get home.
I enjoy CCTV9, and its, um, interesting take on international events.
Plus, I just get tickled watching any international commercials!
And their learn chinese language shows are actually pretty good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065250</id>
	<title>Double standard?</title>
	<author>Beelzebud</author>
	<datestamp>1257068040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Apple has rejected apps that are "political" (an app about the cost of health care, for one), but they're fine with a Chinese government propaganda app?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Apple has rejected apps that are " political " ( an app about the cost of health care , for one ) , but they 're fine with a Chinese government propaganda app ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Apple has rejected apps that are "political" (an app about the cost of health care, for one), but they're fine with a Chinese government propaganda app?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065326</id>
	<title>Oh, the irony...</title>
	<author>DieByWire</author>
	<datestamp>1257068340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>"Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives. We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology. Where each worker may bloom, secure from the pests purveying contradictory thoughts. Our Unification of Thought is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth. We are one people. With one will, one resolve, one cause. Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion. We shall prevail!"</i> </p><p>...now delivered to millions on an iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Today , we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives .
We have created , for the first time in all history , a garden of pure ideology .
Where each worker may bloom , secure from the pests purveying contradictory thoughts .
Our Unification of Thought is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth .
We are one people .
With one will , one resolve , one cause .
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion .
We shall prevail !
" ...now delivered to millions on an iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> "Today, we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.
We have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure ideology.
Where each worker may bloom, secure from the pests purveying contradictory thoughts.
Our Unification of Thought is more powerful a weapon than any fleet or army on earth.
We are one people.
With one will, one resolve, one cause.
Our enemies shall talk themselves to death and we will bury them with their own confusion.
We shall prevail!
" ...now delivered to millions on an iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065362</id>
	<title>This is what China does</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257068520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not sure why anyone would be shocked by this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not sure why anyone would be shocked by this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not sure why anyone would be shocked by this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065466</id>
	<title>Re:Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257068940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't Obama using apps for news is a big deal since there are plenty of other places to get news that have various points of view.</p><p>If China has an app like this but is letting other news get through... more power to them.  It becomes a problem when other POVs are not allowed to be heard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't Obama using apps for news is a big deal since there are plenty of other places to get news that have various points of view.If China has an app like this but is letting other news get through... more power to them .
It becomes a problem when other POVs are not allowed to be heard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't Obama using apps for news is a big deal since there are plenty of other places to get news that have various points of view.If China has an app like this but is letting other news get through... more power to them.
It becomes a problem when other POVs are not allowed to be heard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30076900</id>
	<title>iDon't Support Democracy</title>
	<author>Bushido Hacks</author>
	<datestamp>1258056300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny thing about China right now, is that in order to run a business in China, you must have a Chinse partner working with you.  To which, the Chinese have <a href="http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2009/04/28/china-all-your-source-code-are-belong-to-us/" title="sankakucomplex.com" rel="nofollow">big plans for foreigners looking for cheap labor</a> [sankakucomplex.com] (NSFW website! though story is very important!)<br>
<br>
The question now is, do we still want to manufacture in china, if the Chinese government wants to force foreign companies (i.e. Motorola, Nokia, Sony, etc.) to hand over their Intellectual Property to the Chinese government?<br>
<br>
Personally, I don't see why we should outsource goods to China when we can manufacture them here in the United States or at very least Mexico.<br>
<br>
The chinese could very well install these programs on goods exported from China or posted in the App Store and Android Market.<br>
<br>
Now would be a good time to bring manufacturing back to America especially with the 10.2\% unemployment rate and China's intentions.<br>
<br>
Of course, Apple won't do that. Apple would rather continue to manufacture a device that has be under lock and key so badly, people have died because someone lost the phone or some other moral implications. (Imagine if HTC or Motorola had this problem, their would be one hell of a controversy!)<br>
<br>
But as long as Apple continues to appease the Chinese with a steady revenue from a device that despite being so popular is really becoming a social control, the status quo will prevail...more so since they sell iPhones at places like <a href="http://www.peopleofwalmart.com/" title="peopleofwalmart.com" rel="nofollow">Walmart</a> [peopleofwalmart.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny thing about China right now , is that in order to run a business in China , you must have a Chinse partner working with you .
To which , the Chinese have big plans for foreigners looking for cheap labor [ sankakucomplex.com ] ( NSFW website !
though story is very important !
) The question now is , do we still want to manufacture in china , if the Chinese government wants to force foreign companies ( i.e .
Motorola , Nokia , Sony , etc .
) to hand over their Intellectual Property to the Chinese government ?
Personally , I do n't see why we should outsource goods to China when we can manufacture them here in the United States or at very least Mexico .
The chinese could very well install these programs on goods exported from China or posted in the App Store and Android Market .
Now would be a good time to bring manufacturing back to America especially with the 10.2 \ % unemployment rate and China 's intentions .
Of course , Apple wo n't do that .
Apple would rather continue to manufacture a device that has be under lock and key so badly , people have died because someone lost the phone or some other moral implications .
( Imagine if HTC or Motorola had this problem , their would be one hell of a controversy !
) But as long as Apple continues to appease the Chinese with a steady revenue from a device that despite being so popular is really becoming a social control , the status quo will prevail...more so since they sell iPhones at places like Walmart [ peopleofwalmart.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny thing about China right now, is that in order to run a business in China, you must have a Chinse partner working with you.
To which, the Chinese have big plans for foreigners looking for cheap labor [sankakucomplex.com] (NSFW website!
though story is very important!
)

The question now is, do we still want to manufacture in china, if the Chinese government wants to force foreign companies (i.e.
Motorola, Nokia, Sony, etc.
) to hand over their Intellectual Property to the Chinese government?
Personally, I don't see why we should outsource goods to China when we can manufacture them here in the United States or at very least Mexico.
The chinese could very well install these programs on goods exported from China or posted in the App Store and Android Market.
Now would be a good time to bring manufacturing back to America especially with the 10.2\% unemployment rate and China's intentions.
Of course, Apple won't do that.
Apple would rather continue to manufacture a device that has be under lock and key so badly, people have died because someone lost the phone or some other moral implications.
(Imagine if HTC or Motorola had this problem, their would be one hell of a controversy!
)

But as long as Apple continues to appease the Chinese with a steady revenue from a device that despite being so popular is really becoming a social control, the status quo will prevail...more so since they sell iPhones at places like Walmart [peopleofwalmart.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30066610</id>
	<title>Re:Needlessly alarmist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257074280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even though many of the comments posted after this have a point - respect for the phrasing. We all so often chose to see daemons on the other side of the fence...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even though many of the comments posted after this have a point - respect for the phrasing .
We all so often chose to see daemons on the other side of the fence.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even though many of the comments posted after this have a point - respect for the phrasing.
We all so often chose to see daemons on the other side of the fence...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30069112</id>
	<title>o sad sad day</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257093360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as some one who is living in china i find it a very sad day that the same company that did that 1984 is now promoting this horible goverment !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as some one who is living in china i find it a very sad day that the same company that did that 1984 is now promoting this horible goverment !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as some one who is living in china i find it a very sad day that the same company that did that 1984 is now promoting this horible goverment !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106</id>
	<title>Needlessly alarmist</title>
	<author>CoolGuySteve</author>
	<datestamp>1257067440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The UK's Heritage Minister has praised the growth of the iPlayer application from state broadcaster BBC as the Trust looks for new ways to project its political views. The free flash video streaming, one of a growing number from British state-owned news outlets, has gained 500,000 users in the month or so since it went online and is adding 2,000 new users each day, the BBC Trust said in a statement on its Web site. The iPlayer app has shown 'favorable performance' and proven especially popular during broadcasts of major events, such as a recent royal funeral, the statement said."</p><p>But I guess "Chinese government streams television network to iPhones" wouldn't be nearly as fetching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The UK 's Heritage Minister has praised the growth of the iPlayer application from state broadcaster BBC as the Trust looks for new ways to project its political views .
The free flash video streaming , one of a growing number from British state-owned news outlets , has gained 500,000 users in the month or so since it went online and is adding 2,000 new users each day , the BBC Trust said in a statement on its Web site .
The iPlayer app has shown 'favorable performance ' and proven especially popular during broadcasts of major events , such as a recent royal funeral , the statement said .
" But I guess " Chinese government streams television network to iPhones " would n't be nearly as fetching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The UK's Heritage Minister has praised the growth of the iPlayer application from state broadcaster BBC as the Trust looks for new ways to project its political views.
The free flash video streaming, one of a growing number from British state-owned news outlets, has gained 500,000 users in the month or so since it went online and is adding 2,000 new users each day, the BBC Trust said in a statement on its Web site.
The iPlayer app has shown 'favorable performance' and proven especially popular during broadcasts of major events, such as a recent royal funeral, the statement said.
"But I guess "Chinese government streams television network to iPhones" wouldn't be nearly as fetching.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065036</id>
	<title>Oppressed?</title>
	<author>rampant mac</author>
	<datestamp>1257067080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's an app for that!</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's an app for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's an app for that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065194</id>
	<title>Lauds? Really?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Has<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ gone sensational?<br><i>New Flash</i>:<br>Microsoft Decries EU Decision...<br>Judge Slams Anonymous Poster...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has ./ gone sensational ? New Flash : Microsoft Decries EU Decision...Judge Slams Anonymous Poster.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Has ./ gone sensational?New Flash:Microsoft Decries EU Decision...Judge Slams Anonymous Poster...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065370</id>
	<title>Apple won't approve of some apps domestically</title>
	<author>phorest</author>
	<datestamp>1257068520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Cartoonist Tom Richmond was very excited about his new iPhone application project: He was approached to contribute cartoon caricatures of members of Congress for an app that would allow users to locate and contact their representatives using zipcodes and/or the iPhone's GPS capabilities.

But then Apple rejected the app, after Richmond had done all 540 caricatures, claiming that "it contains content that ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement."</p></div> </blockquote><p>
From <a href="http://www.politico.com/click/stories/0911/congress\_iphone\_app\_denied.html" title="politico.com">Here</a> [politico.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cartoonist Tom Richmond was very excited about his new iPhone application project : He was approached to contribute cartoon caricatures of members of Congress for an app that would allow users to locate and contact their representatives using zipcodes and/or the iPhone 's GPS capabilities .
But then Apple rejected the app , after Richmond had done all 540 caricatures , claiming that " it contains content that ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement .
" From Here [ politico.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cartoonist Tom Richmond was very excited about his new iPhone application project: He was approached to contribute cartoon caricatures of members of Congress for an app that would allow users to locate and contact their representatives using zipcodes and/or the iPhone's GPS capabilities.
But then Apple rejected the app, after Richmond had done all 540 caricatures, claiming that "it contains content that ridicules public figures and is in violation of Section 3.3.14 from the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement.
" 
From Here [politico.com]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065148</id>
	<title>iPhone sales?</title>
	<author>Danimoth</author>
	<datestamp>1257067620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought people were in agreement that Chinese iPhone sales were dismal?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought people were in agreement that Chinese iPhone sales were dismal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought people were in agreement that Chinese iPhone sales were dismal?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065138</id>
	<title>Value</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...And nothing of value was gained?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...And nothing of value was gained ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...And nothing of value was gained?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065442</id>
	<title>Not a problem</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1257068880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>China has several iphones clones that appear to now run the same apps. So, shortly sales of iphone clones will overwhelm iphones sales with the gov. approval.</htmltext>
<tokenext>China has several iphones clones that appear to now run the same apps .
So , shortly sales of iphone clones will overwhelm iphones sales with the gov .
approval .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China has several iphones clones that appear to now run the same apps.
So, shortly sales of iphone clones will overwhelm iphones sales with the gov.
approval.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30071982</id>
	<title>CCTV</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1258038360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many points do I score for guessing that the majority of this howling chorus have never even watched as much as 1 second of CCTV's programs? This is just some idiots that - once again - want to whip up some anti-Chinese sentiment, to prevent bad things from happening in case people start thinking on their own. I mean, that is how the people of America have been conned for decades, and why your education system is constantly under threat from "religious" groups; that is why Americans automatically think that "free market" must be good - despite all the Enrons and the current recession, which were the direct results of deregulation.</p><p>Wake up and think your own thoughts, for God's sake; it won't turn you into a Communist overnight. Just don't be a sheep (or a cow - why do you think they called GWB a cowboy?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many points do I score for guessing that the majority of this howling chorus have never even watched as much as 1 second of CCTV 's programs ?
This is just some idiots that - once again - want to whip up some anti-Chinese sentiment , to prevent bad things from happening in case people start thinking on their own .
I mean , that is how the people of America have been conned for decades , and why your education system is constantly under threat from " religious " groups ; that is why Americans automatically think that " free market " must be good - despite all the Enrons and the current recession , which were the direct results of deregulation.Wake up and think your own thoughts , for God 's sake ; it wo n't turn you into a Communist overnight .
Just do n't be a sheep ( or a cow - why do you think they called GWB a cowboy ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many points do I score for guessing that the majority of this howling chorus have never even watched as much as 1 second of CCTV's programs?
This is just some idiots that - once again - want to whip up some anti-Chinese sentiment, to prevent bad things from happening in case people start thinking on their own.
I mean, that is how the people of America have been conned for decades, and why your education system is constantly under threat from "religious" groups; that is why Americans automatically think that "free market" must be good - despite all the Enrons and the current recession, which were the direct results of deregulation.Wake up and think your own thoughts, for God's sake; it won't turn you into a Communist overnight.
Just don't be a sheep (or a cow - why do you think they called GWB a cowboy?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065502</id>
	<title>Apple censorship?</title>
	<author>Ustice</author>
	<datestamp>1257069300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hasn't Apple blocked apps for political reasons? Shouldn't this app be blocked then?

Honestly, I'm surprised that it wasn't required to be included on the device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't Apple blocked apps for political reasons ?
Should n't this app be blocked then ?
Honestly , I 'm surprised that it was n't required to be included on the device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't Apple blocked apps for political reasons?
Shouldn't this app be blocked then?
Honestly, I'm surprised that it wasn't required to be included on the device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068150</id>
	<title>Re:Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257084420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, I met the team that wrote the app. It was originally a grass roots app, that when the Obama team found out about it, they officialized it. Furthermore, it was only for use during the campaign, so it's not an app sponsored by the federal government...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I met the team that wrote the app .
It was originally a grass roots app , that when the Obama team found out about it , they officialized it .
Furthermore , it was only for use during the campaign , so it 's not an app sponsored by the federal government.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I met the team that wrote the app.
It was originally a grass roots app, that when the Obama team found out about it, they officialized it.
Furthermore, it was only for use during the campaign, so it's not an app sponsored by the federal government...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30071104</id>
	<title>Very useful to anyone with a brain</title>
	<author>Froomb</author>
	<datestamp>1258030740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The underlying assumption here is that viewers of the world are so brainless that even the slightest exposure to CCTV will turn them into slack-jawed commie zombies.  I've downloaded the app and anticipate that it will prove quite useful for a number of reasons:</p><p>1. Local conflicts that don't make the international news. Often within China the national media are seen as "liberal" in the sense of less beholden to local, partisan interests.  As a result CCTV frequently has journalistic exposes of shocking illegality out in the provinces: workers unpaid for years at a time due to venality, shoddy construction practices, rank corruption, etc.  Not unlike the CNBC talking about exotic minor financial crimes unearthed by the SEC, while the kingpins of Wall Street crime are never mentioned, CCTC will only rarely expose problems in the major organs of power, but what they do talk about can make for riveting TV.</p><p>2. Coverage during crises such as the Tibet and Sinjiang rebellions as well as natural disasters.  By the imperative to fill the time available, the images, information, interviews etc. presented can be revealing as much for what isn't being seen as for what is.</p><p>3. Coverage of the outside world. How China perceives flaws in the U.S. financial system, their annual report on human rights abuses in the U.S., their extensive coverage of African affairs all adds balance to what isn't normally seen in the U.S.</p><p>In short, we're all adults, capable of parsing media on a number of levels.  This is an excellent addition to the iphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The underlying assumption here is that viewers of the world are so brainless that even the slightest exposure to CCTV will turn them into slack-jawed commie zombies .
I 've downloaded the app and anticipate that it will prove quite useful for a number of reasons : 1 .
Local conflicts that do n't make the international news .
Often within China the national media are seen as " liberal " in the sense of less beholden to local , partisan interests .
As a result CCTV frequently has journalistic exposes of shocking illegality out in the provinces : workers unpaid for years at a time due to venality , shoddy construction practices , rank corruption , etc .
Not unlike the CNBC talking about exotic minor financial crimes unearthed by the SEC , while the kingpins of Wall Street crime are never mentioned , CCTC will only rarely expose problems in the major organs of power , but what they do talk about can make for riveting TV.2 .
Coverage during crises such as the Tibet and Sinjiang rebellions as well as natural disasters .
By the imperative to fill the time available , the images , information , interviews etc .
presented can be revealing as much for what is n't being seen as for what is.3 .
Coverage of the outside world .
How China perceives flaws in the U.S. financial system , their annual report on human rights abuses in the U.S. , their extensive coverage of African affairs all adds balance to what is n't normally seen in the U.S.In short , we 're all adults , capable of parsing media on a number of levels .
This is an excellent addition to the iphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The underlying assumption here is that viewers of the world are so brainless that even the slightest exposure to CCTV will turn them into slack-jawed commie zombies.
I've downloaded the app and anticipate that it will prove quite useful for a number of reasons:1.
Local conflicts that don't make the international news.
Often within China the national media are seen as "liberal" in the sense of less beholden to local, partisan interests.
As a result CCTV frequently has journalistic exposes of shocking illegality out in the provinces: workers unpaid for years at a time due to venality, shoddy construction practices, rank corruption, etc.
Not unlike the CNBC talking about exotic minor financial crimes unearthed by the SEC, while the kingpins of Wall Street crime are never mentioned, CCTC will only rarely expose problems in the major organs of power, but what they do talk about can make for riveting TV.2.
Coverage during crises such as the Tibet and Sinjiang rebellions as well as natural disasters.
By the imperative to fill the time available, the images, information, interviews etc.
presented can be revealing as much for what isn't being seen as for what is.3.
Coverage of the outside world.
How China perceives flaws in the U.S. financial system, their annual report on human rights abuses in the U.S., their extensive coverage of African affairs all adds balance to what isn't normally seen in the U.S.In short, we're all adults, capable of parsing media on a number of levels.
This is an excellent addition to the iphone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30083332</id>
	<title>Laud what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258045080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole report is based on a small piece here: http://www.sarft.gov.cn/articles/2009/11/10/20091110153833740830.html, totally one paragraph, and it's under the section "News Abstract".</p><p>You guys can really make a lot out of it. Great imagination!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole report is based on a small piece here : http : //www.sarft.gov.cn/articles/2009/11/10/20091110153833740830.html , totally one paragraph , and it 's under the section " News Abstract " .You guys can really make a lot out of it .
Great imagination !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole report is based on a small piece here: http://www.sarft.gov.cn/articles/2009/11/10/20091110153833740830.html, totally one paragraph, and it's under the section "News Abstract".You guys can really make a lot out of it.
Great imagination!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065454</id>
	<title>Chinese Propaganda</title>
	<author>bkedersha</author>
	<datestamp>1257068940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Chinese Propaganda, yup, we got an app for that!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chinese Propaganda , yup , we got an app for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chinese Propaganda, yup, we got an app for that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068154</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257084420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mao's Little Red iBook</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mao 's Little Red iBook</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mao's Little Red iBook</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065544</id>
	<title>Re:Double standard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257069540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who said anything about propaganda?  It's just a video streaming service.  Hell, by your logic, an app which allowed you to view Fox News or BBC programming on the iPhone should be banned (the former being "political" and the latter being "state run").</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who said anything about propaganda ?
It 's just a video streaming service .
Hell , by your logic , an app which allowed you to view Fox News or BBC programming on the iPhone should be banned ( the former being " political " and the latter being " state run " ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who said anything about propaganda?
It's just a video streaming service.
Hell, by your logic, an app which allowed you to view Fox News or BBC programming on the iPhone should be banned (the former being "political" and the latter being "state run").</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065234</id>
	<title>Re:Needlessly alarmist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257067980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but the BBC isn't really looking for "new ways to project its political views". In fact, it's ridiculously neutral compared to literally anything I've seen state-side (even NPR and PBS, which come closest).</p><p>Reporting != indoctrinating.</p><p>Frankly I'm not too fussed about the Chinese, everyone knows they won't be able to keep this up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but the BBC is n't really looking for " new ways to project its political views " .
In fact , it 's ridiculously neutral compared to literally anything I 've seen state-side ( even NPR and PBS , which come closest ) .Reporting ! = indoctrinating.Frankly I 'm not too fussed about the Chinese , everyone knows they wo n't be able to keep this up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but the BBC isn't really looking for "new ways to project its political views".
In fact, it's ridiculously neutral compared to literally anything I've seen state-side (even NPR and PBS, which come closest).Reporting != indoctrinating.Frankly I'm not too fussed about the Chinese, everyone knows they won't be able to keep this up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30066792</id>
	<title>Stupid Americans, you cry four hour now!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257075360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You shut fuck up!</p><p>I for one am looking forward to loading this app on my iPhone and learning how to integrate with the Masters who will take over when this pitiful Empire finishes crumbling away. You fat American pigs go ahead and shoot your inbred heads off, I will be heading to China informed and culturally aware! BITCHES!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You shut fuck up ! I for one am looking forward to loading this app on my iPhone and learning how to integrate with the Masters who will take over when this pitiful Empire finishes crumbling away .
You fat American pigs go ahead and shoot your inbred heads off , I will be heading to China informed and culturally aware !
BITCHES !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You shut fuck up!I for one am looking forward to loading this app on my iPhone and learning how to integrate with the Masters who will take over when this pitiful Empire finishes crumbling away.
You fat American pigs go ahead and shoot your inbred heads off, I will be heading to China informed and culturally aware!
BITCHES!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068182</id>
	<title>Re:Old News</title>
	<author>KillShill</author>
	<datestamp>1257084540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If there were no App&pound;e, we'd have one less evil empire" A derivation of Voltaire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If there were no App   e , we 'd have one less evil empire " A derivation of Voltaire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If there were no App£e, we'd have one less evil empire" A derivation of Voltaire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30066522</id>
	<title>Did anyone else find it interesting...</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257073980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...that the name of the Chinese broadcaster is the same as that of the UK surveillance camera network?</p><p>That's a fitting new association, isn't it? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...that the name of the Chinese broadcaster is the same as that of the UK surveillance camera network ? That 's a fitting new association , is n't it ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...that the name of the Chinese broadcaster is the same as that of the UK surveillance camera network?That's a fitting new association, isn't it?
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065674</id>
	<title>Re:Old News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257070200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, I'm certain there will be a Hillary Clinton iPhone app developed which will alert iPhone users to "run with your head down" so as to dodge sniper fire!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , I 'm certain there will be a Hillary Clinton iPhone app developed which will alert iPhone users to " run with your head down " so as to dodge sniper fire !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, I'm certain there will be a Hillary Clinton iPhone app developed which will alert iPhone users to "run with your head down" so as to dodge sniper fire!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065846</id>
	<title>Re:Needlessly alarmist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257071100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nowm I'm not actually bothered by the Chinese app, I'm all for plurality of opinion. But your analogy is poor. The BBC is not directly funded or controlled by the government, there aren't a growing number (or any?) state-owned news outlets. Apart from that - spot on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nowm I 'm not actually bothered by the Chinese app , I 'm all for plurality of opinion .
But your analogy is poor .
The BBC is not directly funded or controlled by the government , there are n't a growing number ( or any ?
) state-owned news outlets .
Apart from that - spot on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nowm I'm not actually bothered by the Chinese app, I'm all for plurality of opinion.
But your analogy is poor.
The BBC is not directly funded or controlled by the government, there aren't a growing number (or any?
) state-owned news outlets.
Apart from that - spot on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065772</id>
	<title>OMG! Chinese TV.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257070740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not just put them in a shared location (like<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/local/share/go ?)</p><p>I don't see an issue with having the base libs in there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just put them in a shared location ( like /usr/local/share/go ?
) I do n't see an issue with having the base libs in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just put them in a shared location (like /usr/local/share/go ?
)I don't see an issue with having the base libs in there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065266</id>
	<title>Whoa...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257068100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple supports Communism.</p><p>Support America.</p><p>Get a PC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple supports Communism.Support America.Get a PC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple supports Communism.Support America.Get a PC.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068596</id>
	<title>Re:iPhone sales?</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1257088320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So as soon as somebody writes about something on their blog, how does that translate to people being in agreement? You realize there aren't just two people in the world, you and everyone else? Most people grow out of this phase at about 4 years old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So as soon as somebody writes about something on their blog , how does that translate to people being in agreement ?
You realize there are n't just two people in the world , you and everyone else ?
Most people grow out of this phase at about 4 years old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So as soon as somebody writes about something on their blog, how does that translate to people being in agreement?
You realize there aren't just two people in the world, you and everyone else?
Most people grow out of this phase at about 4 years old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30070140</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258058880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US has an equivalent media:<br>http://www1.voanews.com/</p><p>With news in lots of languages. Chinese for example http://www1.voanews.com/chinese/news/<br>Well of course the Chinese must be censoring that website<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>France has "Radio France International", UK has a BBC radio channel. Etc<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p><p>Of course, Voice Of America and Chinese radios, web-site and apps are much more propaganda!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US has an equivalent media : http : //www1.voanews.com/With news in lots of languages .
Chinese for example http : //www1.voanews.com/chinese/news/Well of course the Chinese must be censoring that website ...France has " Radio France International " , UK has a BBC radio channel .
Etc ...Of course , Voice Of America and Chinese radios , web-site and apps are much more propaganda !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US has an equivalent media:http://www1.voanews.com/With news in lots of languages.
Chinese for example http://www1.voanews.com/chinese/news/Well of course the Chinese must be censoring that website ...France has "Radio France International", UK has a BBC radio channel.
Etc ...Of course, Voice Of America and Chinese radios, web-site and apps are much more propaganda!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065042</id>
	<title>Kommie Abomination</title>
	<author>oldhack</author>
	<datestamp>1257067140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You'll burn in hell for this, Apple!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll burn in hell for this , Apple !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll burn in hell for this, Apple!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064960</id>
	<title>first post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257066660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really think they'd hate it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think they 'd hate it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think they'd hate it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30069766</id>
	<title>I hate to read Apple'S adv</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257101340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>To be honest, really really hate...........</htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest , really really hate.......... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest, really really hate...........</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30066610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30067264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30070140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1950225_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065326
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065138
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30067264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065544
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068182
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30070140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30068154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065886
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30066610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30064992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30065086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1950225.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1950225.30069024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
