<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_11_1544201</id>
	<title>Project Natal Release Details Emerge</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1257955920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>scruffybr writes <i>"Today the first information about the <a href="http://www.criticalgamer.co.uk/2009/11/11/project-natal-release-details-emerge/">pricing and launch of Microsoft&rsquo;s Project Natal</a> has emerged. The pricing for the hardware will be much much lower than many had anticipated, coming in at around &pound;50 when sold separately from the console. The idea being that it&rsquo;s low enough that people will purchase on impulse."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>scruffybr writes " Today the first information about the pricing and launch of Microsoft    s Project Natal has emerged .
The pricing for the hardware will be much much lower than many had anticipated , coming in at around   50 when sold separately from the console .
The idea being that it    s low enough that people will purchase on impulse .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>scruffybr writes "Today the first information about the pricing and launch of Microsoft’s Project Natal has emerged.
The pricing for the hardware will be much much lower than many had anticipated, coming in at around £50 when sold separately from the console.
The idea being that it’s low enough that people will purchase on impulse.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064110</id>
	<title>Re:I still don't get it...</title>
	<author>chrysrobyn</author>
	<datestamp>1257106440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When I first saw this "Natal" thing, I was confused, and I still am. Unlike the Playstation 3 controller announced around the same time which was a bulb on a stick that controls things on screen when you move it, I remain clueless about what Natal actually does.</p></div></blockquote><p>Natal is a peripheral for your XBox 360 with gives it 3-D sight, particularly with respect to people.  The concept is that a skeleton can be built in software to understand what motions you're making.  Either through an API or through game code, the programmer can watch this skeleton and react differently based on how the user moves.  There was a video on launch about playing breakout using your hands.  It's conceivable that it could watch you do yoga, like Wii Fit, except actually correct your poses or represent you with an avatar in the pretty room.  I don't know if it could see fingers or hands very well, but things like driving simulators and frisbee golf (I love my Wii Sports Resort) seem easy to envision.  Of course, for most things, I'd rather have the resolution and tactile certainty of a controller I can hold.</p><p>I fell in love with my Wii when I realized I could lay down on my sofa, with my arms comfortable crossed over my chest while playing Lego Star Wars.  The Wii controller is revolutionary, but not only because of the motion control.  For me, it takes ergonomics to a new level.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I first saw this " Natal " thing , I was confused , and I still am .
Unlike the Playstation 3 controller announced around the same time which was a bulb on a stick that controls things on screen when you move it , I remain clueless about what Natal actually does.Natal is a peripheral for your XBox 360 with gives it 3-D sight , particularly with respect to people .
The concept is that a skeleton can be built in software to understand what motions you 're making .
Either through an API or through game code , the programmer can watch this skeleton and react differently based on how the user moves .
There was a video on launch about playing breakout using your hands .
It 's conceivable that it could watch you do yoga , like Wii Fit , except actually correct your poses or represent you with an avatar in the pretty room .
I do n't know if it could see fingers or hands very well , but things like driving simulators and frisbee golf ( I love my Wii Sports Resort ) seem easy to envision .
Of course , for most things , I 'd rather have the resolution and tactile certainty of a controller I can hold.I fell in love with my Wii when I realized I could lay down on my sofa , with my arms comfortable crossed over my chest while playing Lego Star Wars .
The Wii controller is revolutionary , but not only because of the motion control .
For me , it takes ergonomics to a new level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I first saw this "Natal" thing, I was confused, and I still am.
Unlike the Playstation 3 controller announced around the same time which was a bulb on a stick that controls things on screen when you move it, I remain clueless about what Natal actually does.Natal is a peripheral for your XBox 360 with gives it 3-D sight, particularly with respect to people.
The concept is that a skeleton can be built in software to understand what motions you're making.
Either through an API or through game code, the programmer can watch this skeleton and react differently based on how the user moves.
There was a video on launch about playing breakout using your hands.
It's conceivable that it could watch you do yoga, like Wii Fit, except actually correct your poses or represent you with an avatar in the pretty room.
I don't know if it could see fingers or hands very well, but things like driving simulators and frisbee golf (I love my Wii Sports Resort) seem easy to envision.
Of course, for most things, I'd rather have the resolution and tactile certainty of a controller I can hold.I fell in love with my Wii when I realized I could lay down on my sofa, with my arms comfortable crossed over my chest while playing Lego Star Wars.
The Wii controller is revolutionary, but not only because of the motion control.
For me, it takes ergonomics to a new level.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061938</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061918</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257097920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext> You can't convert &pound;50 into dollars using the exchange rate for something like this.  If it follows the standard trend then it will be $50 in the US and &pound;50 in the UK.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't convert   50 into dollars using the exchange rate for something like this .
If it follows the standard trend then it will be $ 50 in the US and   50 in the UK .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> You can't convert £50 into dollars using the exchange rate for something like this.
If it follows the standard trend then it will be $50 in the US and £50 in the UK.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986</id>
	<title>Link dead.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Account has been suspended"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Account has been suspended "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Account has been suspended"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062460</id>
	<title>Re:Link dead.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070654</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1258023480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think price has much relation to impulse buying to be honest. I've turned away from impulse buys of Wii games at &pound;20 after resisting the impulse and deciding I wouldn't play them, but my &pound;250 netbook was really an impulse buy because I wanted something smaller than my laptop to take on holiday for 2 weeks but have really never used since.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think price has much relation to impulse buying to be honest .
I 've turned away from impulse buys of Wii games at   20 after resisting the impulse and deciding I would n't play them , but my   250 netbook was really an impulse buy because I wanted something smaller than my laptop to take on holiday for 2 weeks but have really never used since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think price has much relation to impulse buying to be honest.
I've turned away from impulse buys of Wii games at £20 after resisting the impulse and deciding I wouldn't play them, but my £250 netbook was really an impulse buy because I wanted something smaller than my laptop to take on holiday for 2 weeks but have really never used since.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062042</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>Etherized</author>
	<datestamp>1257098460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I tend to agree that this shoots the product out of true impulse buy range, but I do think it's a reasonable price point compared to other game peripherals. Unlike (for example) plastic guitars or traditional controllers, you only need <i>one</i> of these things for up to 4 people, and it works out to be cheaper than buying up 4 controllers/wiimotes/whathaveyou.</p><p>Of course, unlike adding additional controllers, you don't have an incremental purchasing option with this thing, and there's a good chance that you don't have a game yet that will actually *work* with it.</p><p>I think the smart thing is to do what Nintendo did with the Wii motion plus: bundle it with a tech demo 'game.' If it's 80 USD for *just the hardware*, you're suddenly talking about 140 USD in order to actually *use* it, and that starts to look pretty sketchy. But 80 USD for the device *and* a game looks like a pretty decent value proposition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I tend to agree that this shoots the product out of true impulse buy range , but I do think it 's a reasonable price point compared to other game peripherals .
Unlike ( for example ) plastic guitars or traditional controllers , you only need one of these things for up to 4 people , and it works out to be cheaper than buying up 4 controllers/wiimotes/whathaveyou.Of course , unlike adding additional controllers , you do n't have an incremental purchasing option with this thing , and there 's a good chance that you do n't have a game yet that will actually * work * with it.I think the smart thing is to do what Nintendo did with the Wii motion plus : bundle it with a tech demo 'game .
' If it 's 80 USD for * just the hardware * , you 're suddenly talking about 140 USD in order to actually * use * it , and that starts to look pretty sketchy .
But 80 USD for the device * and * a game looks like a pretty decent value proposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I tend to agree that this shoots the product out of true impulse buy range, but I do think it's a reasonable price point compared to other game peripherals.
Unlike (for example) plastic guitars or traditional controllers, you only need one of these things for up to 4 people, and it works out to be cheaper than buying up 4 controllers/wiimotes/whathaveyou.Of course, unlike adding additional controllers, you don't have an incremental purchasing option with this thing, and there's a good chance that you don't have a game yet that will actually *work* with it.I think the smart thing is to do what Nintendo did with the Wii motion plus: bundle it with a tech demo 'game.
' If it's 80 USD for *just the hardware*, you're suddenly talking about 140 USD in order to actually *use* it, and that starts to look pretty sketchy.
But 80 USD for the device *and* a game looks like a pretty decent value proposition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666</id>
	<title>$83</title>
	<author>bobbomo</author>
	<datestamp>1257096900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>Who spends $83 dollars on impulse buys?</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who spends $ 83 dollars on impulse buys ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who spends $83 dollars on impulse buys?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068652</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>Arch3r 87</author>
	<datestamp>1257088920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Both of which traditionally transfer into $100AU.

Despite the fact that currently AUD is approaching parity with the USD. $1 AU was buying 93 US cents yesterday.

This is far beyond my impulse purchase limit.

I don't see what the point of having international exchange rates is if the price of goods doesn't change according to it. I know that many prices do change, just nothing I actually care about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Both of which traditionally transfer into $ 100AU .
Despite the fact that currently AUD is approaching parity with the USD .
$ 1 AU was buying 93 US cents yesterday .
This is far beyond my impulse purchase limit .
I do n't see what the point of having international exchange rates is if the price of goods does n't change according to it .
I know that many prices do change , just nothing I actually care about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both of which traditionally transfer into $100AU.
Despite the fact that currently AUD is approaching parity with the USD.
$1 AU was buying 93 US cents yesterday.
This is far beyond my impulse purchase limit.
I don't see what the point of having international exchange rates is if the price of goods doesn't change according to it.
I know that many prices do change, just nothing I actually care about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062286</id>
	<title>Natal time!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much extra is it to get that freakishly realistic british kid from the demo to start bitching at me in british-ese? lol.  It's just not Natal without AI characters talking to you and throwing CG balls at your head<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P  Oh and how much extra would it be to make him stop talking like the girl from Resident Evil and actually speak American english so we can understand him and also not feel like there's zombies behind us.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much extra is it to get that freakishly realistic british kid from the demo to start bitching at me in british-ese ?
lol. It 's just not Natal without AI characters talking to you and throwing CG balls at your head : P Oh and how much extra would it be to make him stop talking like the girl from Resident Evil and actually speak American english so we can understand him and also not feel like there 's zombies behind us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much extra is it to get that freakishly realistic british kid from the demo to start bitching at me in british-ese?
lol.  It's just not Natal without AI characters talking to you and throwing CG balls at your head :P  Oh and how much extra would it be to make him stop talking like the girl from Resident Evil and actually speak American english so we can understand him and also not feel like there's zombies behind us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068278</id>
	<title>forgive my asking.</title>
	<author>Hybrid-brain</author>
	<datestamp>1257085680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not sure if this question was brought up already, if it has been, then mod me down...however, I've been thinking.

why not just create a new x-box system, like they did when they created the 360.  Keep all the same elements and everything.  essentially it'd be the 360, but it would have the inboard system for the Natal.  I see nothing wrong with going out and buying the Natal as an add on, but yet at the same time, I find it extremely interesting that they want to do an add on for (when all is said and done mind you) $100.

If they were just to create a new system, call it the X-box 360+ and have everything built in, wouldn't that be more cheaper in the long run? Because when you think about it, do you really want to go out and buy something that may not work, when if they build it in system, they can test it to make sure it works.   That I think was something along the same lines when they first did in comp web cams, because people weren't sure if the product was going to work.

I dunno.  just my thoughts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure if this question was brought up already , if it has been , then mod me down...however , I 've been thinking .
why not just create a new x-box system , like they did when they created the 360 .
Keep all the same elements and everything .
essentially it 'd be the 360 , but it would have the inboard system for the Natal .
I see nothing wrong with going out and buying the Natal as an add on , but yet at the same time , I find it extremely interesting that they want to do an add on for ( when all is said and done mind you ) $ 100 .
If they were just to create a new system , call it the X-box 360 + and have everything built in , would n't that be more cheaper in the long run ?
Because when you think about it , do you really want to go out and buy something that may not work , when if they build it in system , they can test it to make sure it works .
That I think was something along the same lines when they first did in comp web cams , because people were n't sure if the product was going to work .
I dunno .
just my thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure if this question was brought up already, if it has been, then mod me down...however, I've been thinking.
why not just create a new x-box system, like they did when they created the 360.
Keep all the same elements and everything.
essentially it'd be the 360, but it would have the inboard system for the Natal.
I see nothing wrong with going out and buying the Natal as an add on, but yet at the same time, I find it extremely interesting that they want to do an add on for (when all is said and done mind you) $100.
If they were just to create a new system, call it the X-box 360+ and have everything built in, wouldn't that be more cheaper in the long run?
Because when you think about it, do you really want to go out and buy something that may not work, when if they build it in system, they can test it to make sure it works.
That I think was something along the same lines when they first did in comp web cams, because people weren't sure if the product was going to work.
I dunno.
just my thoughts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061872</id>
	<title>I just can't wait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257097680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just can't wait to try to play naked !</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just ca n't wait to try to play naked !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just can't wait to try to play naked !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062076</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>frito\_x</author>
	<datestamp>1257098580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of the Wii that supposedly had plenty of developers on board to make new and exciting games for the then-revolutionary wiimote... we all know how that turned out.</p><p>one of the funny things in the natal tech demos i've seen on youtube is how one of the presenters takes cheap shots at the wii's "waggling" of the remote and how stupid and silly blah blah blah... and then watching them arm-waving and making awkward poses to "draw" an elephant (pretty silly IMO) i wonder how much different natal is going to be.</p><p>Not that much, judging by the demos i've seen so far. Hope i'm wrong, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of the Wii that supposedly had plenty of developers on board to make new and exciting games for the then-revolutionary wiimote... we all know how that turned out.one of the funny things in the natal tech demos i 've seen on youtube is how one of the presenters takes cheap shots at the wii 's " waggling " of the remote and how stupid and silly blah blah blah... and then watching them arm-waving and making awkward poses to " draw " an elephant ( pretty silly IMO ) i wonder how much different natal is going to be.Not that much , judging by the demos i 've seen so far .
Hope i 'm wrong , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of the Wii that supposedly had plenty of developers on board to make new and exciting games for the then-revolutionary wiimote... we all know how that turned out.one of the funny things in the natal tech demos i've seen on youtube is how one of the presenters takes cheap shots at the wii's "waggling" of the remote and how stupid and silly blah blah blah... and then watching them arm-waving and making awkward poses to "draw" an elephant (pretty silly IMO) i wonder how much different natal is going to be.Not that much, judging by the demos i've seen so far.
Hope i'm wrong, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070090</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1258058100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Impulse products in marketing don't depend specifically on price: a set of alloy wheels for your new car is often an impulse product, despite the crazy mark-up.  It becomes an impulse buy when you buy a console, a couple of games, and ooh, what's this?  A shiny that is lots of fun?  And I've already spent $300 on this...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Impulse products in marketing do n't depend specifically on price : a set of alloy wheels for your new car is often an impulse product , despite the crazy mark-up .
It becomes an impulse buy when you buy a console , a couple of games , and ooh , what 's this ?
A shiny that is lots of fun ?
And I 've already spent $ 300 on this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Impulse products in marketing don't depend specifically on price: a set of alloy wheels for your new car is often an impulse product, despite the crazy mark-up.
It becomes an impulse buy when you buy a console, a couple of games, and ooh, what's this?
A shiny that is lots of fun?
And I've already spent $300 on this...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062402</id>
	<title>Re:Link dead.</title>
	<author>Mercution</author>
	<datestamp>1257099900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can find more details from <a href="http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour" title="mcvuk.com" rel="nofollow">here</a> [mcvuk.com]. Plenty of other places are commenting on them but most sight mcvuk.com as their source.

<a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?um=1&amp;cf=all&amp;ned=us&amp;cf=all&amp;ncl=dGRHbU0kOxNZPGMk75Z6Up5Hj2ekM" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Google News Articles on Natal Details</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can find more details from here [ mcvuk.com ] .
Plenty of other places are commenting on them but most sight mcvuk.com as their source .
Google News Articles on Natal Details [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can find more details from here [mcvuk.com].
Plenty of other places are commenting on them but most sight mcvuk.com as their source.
Google News Articles on Natal Details [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062416</id>
	<title>Gaming addicts and rich kids with daddies card</title>
	<author>Viol8</author>
	<datestamp>1257099960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most normal people would consider that sort of money a fairly large purchase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most normal people would consider that sort of money a fairly large purchase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most normal people would consider that sort of money a fairly large purchase.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070628</id>
	<title>Re:"Product Vision"</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1258023060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie02k3eAvxY" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie02k3eAvxY</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuJivFFa-c" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuJivFFa-c</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-443dE5-gk" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-443dE5-gk</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AscJO0uUQ\_Q&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AscJO0uUQ\_Q&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqooMGua3Yk&amp;feature=related" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqooMGua3Yk&amp;feature=related</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ie02k3eAvxY [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = DYuJivFFa-c [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = i-443dE5-gk [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = AscJO0uUQ \ _Q&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = dqooMGua3Yk&amp;feature = related [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie02k3eAvxY [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DYuJivFFa-c [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-443dE5-gk [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AscJO0uUQ\_Q&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqooMGua3Yk&amp;feature=related [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063678</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>MMInterface</author>
	<datestamp>1257105000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you say your buying habits are probably not the norm and that you might be cheap, and the product is only "a little" high to be deemed and impulse buy type item, then the item is probably an impulse buy type item based on your own suggestions. In addition, you generally wouldn't convert  the price of something in &pound;s to US dollars to see how much it would cost in the US. It doesn't work that way. The cost is actually differs a lot by region. You would be looking at closer to $50 ot $60, the price of a game.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you say your buying habits are probably not the norm and that you might be cheap , and the product is only " a little " high to be deemed and impulse buy type item , then the item is probably an impulse buy type item based on your own suggestions .
In addition , you generally would n't convert the price of something in   s to US dollars to see how much it would cost in the US .
It does n't work that way .
The cost is actually differs a lot by region .
You would be looking at closer to $ 50 ot $ 60 , the price of a game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you say your buying habits are probably not the norm and that you might be cheap, and the product is only "a little" high to be deemed and impulse buy type item, then the item is probably an impulse buy type item based on your own suggestions.
In addition, you generally wouldn't convert  the price of something in £s to US dollars to see how much it would cost in the US.
It doesn't work that way.
The cost is actually differs a lot by region.
You would be looking at closer to $50 ot $60, the price of a game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062702</id>
	<title>And you thought Wii remotes were bad?</title>
	<author>Stephen Samuel</author>
	<datestamp>1257101400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I figure 2 weeks of general release before we're getting stories about people throwing themselves out of windows with Natal.
<p>
Not so bad if you're in a house, but God help the guy on a penthouse balcony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I figure 2 weeks of general release before we 're getting stories about people throwing themselves out of windows with Natal .
Not so bad if you 're in a house , but God help the guy on a penthouse balcony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I figure 2 weeks of general release before we're getting stories about people throwing themselves out of windows with Natal.
Not so bad if you're in a house, but God help the guy on a penthouse balcony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061534</id>
	<title>Story was...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...originally broken by MCV: http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...originally broken by MCV : http : //www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...originally broken by MCV: http://www.mcvuk.com/news/36466/Natal-launch-details-leak-from-secret-Microsoft-tour</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062178</id>
	<title>Re:long way</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was, the gameplay has went downhill since then.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was , the gameplay has went downhill since then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was, the gameplay has went downhill since then.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063736</id>
	<title>WTF</title>
	<author>jridley</author>
	<datestamp>1257105300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'd be nice if ANY of the duplicate-posted slashdot stories about Natal linked to a page that wasn't crushed or suspended, so I could find out WTF Natal is.</p><p>Ah, wait.  I see a link up the page.  AAAAND, it's something to do with gaming.  OK, not interested.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'd be nice if ANY of the duplicate-posted slashdot stories about Natal linked to a page that was n't crushed or suspended , so I could find out WTF Natal is.Ah , wait .
I see a link up the page .
AAAAND , it 's something to do with gaming .
OK , not interested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'd be nice if ANY of the duplicate-posted slashdot stories about Natal linked to a page that wasn't crushed or suspended, so I could find out WTF Natal is.Ah, wait.
I see a link up the page.
AAAAND, it's something to do with gaming.
OK, not interested.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062154</id>
	<title>in7ormative goatgoat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">FreeBSD had long [gay-sex-access.com]? which allows are atTending a private sex party This exploitation, Departures of</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>FreeBSD had long [ gay-sex-access.com ] ?
which allows are atTending a private sex party This exploitation , Departures of [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FreeBSD had long [gay-sex-access.com]?
which allows are atTending a private sex party This exploitation, Departures of [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30073850</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258046580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But... The PS3, already has Natal like capabilities now... and all it needs is the Playstation Eeye (or indeed, possibly ANY USB webcam)</p><p>I know this, as I am already trying out some augmented reality stuff on my PS3, and it works quite nicely..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But... The PS3 , already has Natal like capabilities now... and all it needs is the Playstation Eeye ( or indeed , possibly ANY USB webcam ) I know this , as I am already trying out some augmented reality stuff on my PS3 , and it works quite nicely. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But... The PS3, already has Natal like capabilities now... and all it needs is the Playstation Eeye (or indeed, possibly ANY USB webcam)I know this, as I am already trying out some augmented reality stuff on my PS3, and it works quite nicely..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068460</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1257087000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>how is it misleading? it clearly says its &pound; . If other story is USD, I dont come bitching its not in euro for me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>how is it misleading ?
it clearly says its   .
If other story is USD , I dont come bitching its not in euro for me : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how is it misleading?
it clearly says its £ .
If other story is USD, I dont come bitching its not in euro for me :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063512</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062064</id>
	<title>Re:As to what PN is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What a stupid name. It makes me think of "prenatal", which makes me think of fetuses.</p><p>Good job, Microsoft. You've managed to associate a video game console add-on with fetuses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What a stupid name .
It makes me think of " prenatal " , which makes me think of fetuses.Good job , Microsoft .
You 've managed to associate a video game console add-on with fetuses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What a stupid name.
It makes me think of "prenatal", which makes me think of fetuses.Good job, Microsoft.
You've managed to associate a video game console add-on with fetuses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061688</id>
	<title>Last laugh</title>
	<author>Jeppe Utzon</author>
	<datestamp>1257096960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Overtaking Apple (and their yesterday's news [badly suppressed yawn] no-button Magic Mouse) in the inner lane is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Microsoft with their no-mouse-mouse!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Overtaking Apple ( and their yesterday 's news [ badly suppressed yawn ] no-button Magic Mouse ) in the inner lane is ... Microsoft with their no-mouse-mouse !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Overtaking Apple (and their yesterday's news [badly suppressed yawn] no-button Magic Mouse) in the inner lane is ... Microsoft with their no-mouse-mouse!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062130</id>
	<title>Sorry, my server can't handle Slashdot!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As a regular Slashdot reader I'm sorry to be on the receiving end of a Slashdot effect and have had to suspend the site - I run the hosting company it's with and the 8-core server has just been nicely roasted<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As a regular Slashdot reader I 'm sorry to be on the receiving end of a Slashdot effect and have had to suspend the site - I run the hosting company it 's with and the 8-core server has just been nicely roasted : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As a regular Slashdot reader I'm sorry to be on the receiving end of a Slashdot effect and have had to suspend the site - I run the hosting company it's with and the 8-core server has just been nicely roasted :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064672</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257108660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>From what I can gather, Lionhead's Milo shown at E3 is actually a tech demo for the AI and Natal support for Fable 3, which if true would again be Lionhead getting me to buy Microsoft hardware for one of their games, as the only reason I originally got a 360 was for Fable 2.  This is not a complaint, as I feel the purchase has been more than worth it, and I have since found a number of other games that I thoroughly enjoyed.  I can't help but imagine the possibilities this opens up for fighting games, maybe a DBZ fighting game where you can pose for 30 minutes before fighting?</htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I can gather , Lionhead 's Milo shown at E3 is actually a tech demo for the AI and Natal support for Fable 3 , which if true would again be Lionhead getting me to buy Microsoft hardware for one of their games , as the only reason I originally got a 360 was for Fable 2 .
This is not a complaint , as I feel the purchase has been more than worth it , and I have since found a number of other games that I thoroughly enjoyed .
I ca n't help but imagine the possibilities this opens up for fighting games , maybe a DBZ fighting game where you can pose for 30 minutes before fighting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I can gather, Lionhead's Milo shown at E3 is actually a tech demo for the AI and Natal support for Fable 3, which if true would again be Lionhead getting me to buy Microsoft hardware for one of their games, as the only reason I originally got a 360 was for Fable 2.
This is not a complaint, as I feel the purchase has been more than worth it, and I have since found a number of other games that I thoroughly enjoyed.
I can't help but imagine the possibilities this opens up for fighting games, maybe a DBZ fighting game where you can pose for 30 minutes before fighting?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061368</id>
	<title>Not bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257095880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow... hope that's all true because then I'd consider getting one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow... hope that 's all true because then I 'd consider getting one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow... hope that's all true because then I'd consider getting one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062644</id>
	<title>Will be a delay</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1257101160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There will be a short delay while Microsoft works toward establishing the same quality in this periphial as the base. They should reach the necessary &gt;50\% failure rate soon by replacing major components with with bamboo waste products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There will be a short delay while Microsoft works toward establishing the same quality in this periphial as the base .
They should reach the necessary &gt; 50 \ % failure rate soon by replacing major components with with bamboo waste products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There will be a short delay while Microsoft works toward establishing the same quality in this periphial as the base.
They should reach the necessary &gt;50\% failure rate soon by replacing major components with with bamboo waste products.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063006</id>
	<title>Re:Well...</title>
	<author>raddan</author>
	<datestamp>1257102660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess I'm living in the dark ages because I don't have a console (well, actually, I have an SNES), but how did the wiimote turn out?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess I 'm living in the dark ages because I do n't have a console ( well , actually , I have an SNES ) , but how did the wiimote turn out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess I'm living in the dark ages because I don't have a console (well, actually, I have an SNES), but how did the wiimote turn out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063160</id>
	<title>Re:As to what PN is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257103200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So will Sony's new control system that competes with Natal will be called Project Bortion?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So will Sony 's new control system that competes with Natal will be called Project Bortion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So will Sony's new control system that competes with Natal will be called Project Bortion?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062064</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061440</id>
	<title>long way</title>
	<author>jDeepbeep</author>
	<datestamp>1257096180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>*sigh*
And I still recall when I thought having a plastic gun for Duck Hunt was cutting edge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>* sigh * And I still recall when I thought having a plastic gun for Duck Hunt was cutting edge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*sigh*
And I still recall when I thought having a plastic gun for Duck Hunt was cutting edge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30071134</id>
	<title>DIY stuff? Robots?</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1258030980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like it has a potential to be mighty useful for some pet projects, like robotics or general motion capture (for whatever reason...), and with a pleasently low price.</p><p>Of course the "custom processor running proprietary software" is a bit unfortunate, even if totally expected and undestandable. Who knows though what perversions we'll see in the protocol...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like it has a potential to be mighty useful for some pet projects , like robotics or general motion capture ( for whatever reason... ) , and with a pleasently low price.Of course the " custom processor running proprietary software " is a bit unfortunate , even if totally expected and undestandable .
Who knows though what perversions we 'll see in the protocol.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like it has a potential to be mighty useful for some pet projects, like robotics or general motion capture (for whatever reason...), and with a pleasently low price.Of course the "custom processor running proprietary software" is a bit unfortunate, even if totally expected and undestandable.
Who knows though what perversions we'll see in the protocol...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063580</id>
	<title>*sigh*</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why are you reporting a rumour as news?</p><p>Don't you actually research the tip before posting it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are you reporting a rumour as news ? Do n't you actually research the tip before posting it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are you reporting a rumour as news?Don't you actually research the tip before posting it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061556</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>$1uck</author>
	<datestamp>1257096540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you will see more of this,  the console makers want to extend this "generation" out longer than previous ones.  Instead of creating next gen consoles Sony and MS seem to be working on enhancing the current crop with things like this.   I just hope that when the next generation does come around that they will be backwards compatible with all the games and addon hardware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you will see more of this , the console makers want to extend this " generation " out longer than previous ones .
Instead of creating next gen consoles Sony and MS seem to be working on enhancing the current crop with things like this .
I just hope that when the next generation does come around that they will be backwards compatible with all the games and addon hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you will see more of this,  the console makers want to extend this "generation" out longer than previous ones.
Instead of creating next gen consoles Sony and MS seem to be working on enhancing the current crop with things like this.
I just hope that when the next generation does come around that they will be backwards compatible with all the games and addon hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061938</id>
	<title>I still don't get it...</title>
	<author>RobDollar</author>
	<datestamp>1257097980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I first saw this "Natal" thing, I was confused, and I still am. Unlike the Playstation 3 controller announced around the same time which was a bulb on a stick that controls things on screen when you move it, I remain clueless about what Natal actually does.</p><p>The marketing video when it was announced was a human having a scripted embarrasing conversation with a computer animation <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8077369.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8077369.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk] (second video on the article)</p><p>Are there any videos of Natal doing something obviously interesting?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I first saw this " Natal " thing , I was confused , and I still am .
Unlike the Playstation 3 controller announced around the same time which was a bulb on a stick that controls things on screen when you move it , I remain clueless about what Natal actually does.The marketing video when it was announced was a human having a scripted embarrasing conversation with a computer animation http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8077369.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] ( second video on the article ) Are there any videos of Natal doing something obviously interesting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I first saw this "Natal" thing, I was confused, and I still am.
Unlike the Playstation 3 controller announced around the same time which was a bulb on a stick that controls things on screen when you move it, I remain clueless about what Natal actually does.The marketing video when it was announced was a human having a scripted embarrasing conversation with a computer animation http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8077369.stm [bbc.co.uk] (second video on the article)Are there any videos of Natal doing something obviously interesting?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420</id>
	<title>As to what PN is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
For the confused: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project\_Natal" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Project Natal</a> [wikipedia.org] (per Wikipedia).
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the confused : Project Natal [ wikipedia.org ] ( per Wikipedia ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
For the confused: Project Natal [wikipedia.org] (per Wikipedia).
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356</id>
	<title>Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257095820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First post, and I think the news is just fantastic, a low price on a hot item for the holidays. Can you say doorbuster? Pick up a xbox 360 with some older games now, and next year get the kids Natal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First post , and I think the news is just fantastic , a low price on a hot item for the holidays .
Can you say doorbuster ?
Pick up a xbox 360 with some older games now , and next year get the kids Natal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First post, and I think the news is just fantastic, a low price on a hot item for the holidays.
Can you say doorbuster?
Pick up a xbox 360 with some older games now, and next year get the kids Natal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062536</id>
	<title>Cheaper than $83</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1257100560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More than likley it will be cheaper here in the US.  Based on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft\_Points#Pricing\_differences\_between\_regions" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">pricing differences between regions</a> [wikipedia.org]  for Microsoft Points, it's looking like about $55-$60.  Those poor Europeans get hosed on conversion all the time.  Blizzard and Valve <a href="http://tobolds.blogspot.com/2009/05/1-euro-is-not-equal-to-1-dollar.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">are doing it</a> [blogspot.com]  with thier game stores treating dollars and euros as the same or closer in value than they really are.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More than likley it will be cheaper here in the US .
Based on pricing differences between regions [ wikipedia.org ] for Microsoft Points , it 's looking like about $ 55- $ 60 .
Those poor Europeans get hosed on conversion all the time .
Blizzard and Valve are doing it [ blogspot.com ] with thier game stores treating dollars and euros as the same or closer in value than they really are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More than likley it will be cheaper here in the US.
Based on pricing differences between regions [wikipedia.org]  for Microsoft Points, it's looking like about $55-$60.
Those poor Europeans get hosed on conversion all the time.
Blizzard and Valve are doing it [blogspot.com]  with thier game stores treating dollars and euros as the same or closer in value than they really are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061786</id>
	<title>Tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257097320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdotted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdotted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdotted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062152</id>
	<title>Re:long way</title>
	<author>Nerdfest</author>
	<datestamp>1257098880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Conversely, I was playing skeet shooting on Wii Olympics at a party last night and was thinking that things really hadn't changed that much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Conversely , I was playing skeet shooting on Wii Olympics at a party last night and was thinking that things really had n't changed that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Conversely, I was playing skeet shooting on Wii Olympics at a party last night and was thinking that things really hadn't changed that much.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070560</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>ookaze</author>
	<datestamp>1258022220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If its that low, Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.</p></div><p>In which user base? In MS user base?<br>This has no chance on Wii user base: they have a Wii, not a XB360, and I doubt the XB360 + Natal will be &pound;50. Get real people.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There are already 14 development studios confirmed to be working on natal titles, including Lionhead, Rare, Activision Blizzard, Bethesda Softworks,  Capcom,  Disney Interactive, Electronic Arts, Konami, MTV Games, Namco Bandai, Sega, Square Enix, THQ and Ubisoft.  Not a bad lineup for a peripheral, sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.</p></div><p>It sounds like a very bad launch if the goal is to attract the Wii user base. Absolutely none of these studios have any good track record making games for the Wii audience, that could attract a user base. Those are the studios making the shovelware on Wii!<br>Only Sega managed to make a system seller on Wii, but that was with help from Nintendo.<br>Keep in mind that Nintendo is basically the sole developer attracting the new audience to the Wii.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If its that low , Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.In which user base ?
In MS user base ? This has no chance on Wii user base : they have a Wii , not a XB360 , and I doubt the XB360 + Natal will be   50 .
Get real people.There are already 14 development studios confirmed to be working on natal titles , including Lionhead , Rare , Activision Blizzard , Bethesda Softworks , Capcom , Disney Interactive , Electronic Arts , Konami , MTV Games , Namco Bandai , Sega , Square Enix , THQ and Ubisoft .
Not a bad lineup for a peripheral , sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.It sounds like a very bad launch if the goal is to attract the Wii user base .
Absolutely none of these studios have any good track record making games for the Wii audience , that could attract a user base .
Those are the studios making the shovelware on Wii ! Only Sega managed to make a system seller on Wii , but that was with help from Nintendo.Keep in mind that Nintendo is basically the sole developer attracting the new audience to the Wii .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If its that low, Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.In which user base?
In MS user base?This has no chance on Wii user base: they have a Wii, not a XB360, and I doubt the XB360 + Natal will be £50.
Get real people.There are already 14 development studios confirmed to be working on natal titles, including Lionhead, Rare, Activision Blizzard, Bethesda Softworks,  Capcom,  Disney Interactive, Electronic Arts, Konami, MTV Games, Namco Bandai, Sega, Square Enix, THQ and Ubisoft.
Not a bad lineup for a peripheral, sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.It sounds like a very bad launch if the goal is to attract the Wii user base.
Absolutely none of these studios have any good track record making games for the Wii audience, that could attract a user base.
Those are the studios making the shovelware on Wii!Only Sega managed to make a system seller on Wii, but that was with help from Nintendo.Keep in mind that Nintendo is basically the sole developer attracting the new audience to the Wii.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062026</id>
	<title>/.'d!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And another site bites the slashdot "Connection has timed out" error!<br>Yay for us.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And another site bites the slashdot " Connection has timed out " error ! Yay for us.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And another site bites the slashdot "Connection has timed out" error!Yay for us.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061686</id>
	<title>Colbert said it best</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://kotaku.com/5297023/colbert-mocks-project-natal-debuts-new-xbox" title="kotaku.com" rel="nofollow">Colbert said it best.</a> [kotaku.com]</p><p>"Now a child who owns a skateboard and has the skills to ride a skateboard, will no longer have to ever ride a skateboard again."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Colbert said it best .
[ kotaku.com ] " Now a child who owns a skateboard and has the skills to ride a skateboard , will no longer have to ever ride a skateboard again .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Colbert said it best.
[kotaku.com]"Now a child who owns a skateboard and has the skills to ride a skateboard, will no longer have to ever ride a skateboard again.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30077854</id>
	<title>Re:$83</title>
	<author>Just Justin</author>
	<datestamp>1258059540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ahh, you forgot to remember that the UK gets screwed over with game pricing.  All they do now is just change the dollar sign to a pound sign.  So that means here in the states we should probably see it for $50.  The problem I see is that you gotta buy a $60 game and the $50 natal add-on, and that really comes out to something closer to a $110 impulse buy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh , you forgot to remember that the UK gets screwed over with game pricing .
All they do now is just change the dollar sign to a pound sign .
So that means here in the states we should probably see it for $ 50 .
The problem I see is that you got ta buy a $ 60 game and the $ 50 natal add-on , and that really comes out to something closer to a $ 110 impulse buy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ahh, you forgot to remember that the UK gets screwed over with game pricing.
All they do now is just change the dollar sign to a pound sign.
So that means here in the states we should probably see it for $50.
The problem I see is that you gotta buy a $60 game and the $50 natal add-on, and that really comes out to something closer to a $110 impulse buy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</id>
	<title>Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If its that low, Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.  Addon peripherals are always risky and usually end in less than stellar support but this sounds cheap enough to be bundled not only with the console but with hot titles much like Sony has done with Singstar and the Mics or Eyepets with the camera.</p><p>There are already 14 development studios confirmed to be working on natal titles, including Lionhead, Rare, Activision Blizzard, Bethesda Softworks,  Capcom,  Disney Interactive, Electronic Arts, Konami, MTV Games, Namco Bandai, Sega, Square Enix, THQ and Ubisoft.  Not a bad lineup for a peripheral, sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If its that low , Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base .
Addon peripherals are always risky and usually end in less than stellar support but this sounds cheap enough to be bundled not only with the console but with hot titles much like Sony has done with Singstar and the Mics or Eyepets with the camera.There are already 14 development studios confirmed to be working on natal titles , including Lionhead , Rare , Activision Blizzard , Bethesda Softworks , Capcom , Disney Interactive , Electronic Arts , Konami , MTV Games , Namco Bandai , Sega , Square Enix , THQ and Ubisoft .
Not a bad lineup for a peripheral , sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If its that low, Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.
Addon peripherals are always risky and usually end in less than stellar support but this sounds cheap enough to be bundled not only with the console but with hot titles much like Sony has done with Singstar and the Mics or Eyepets with the camera.There are already 14 development studios confirmed to be working on natal titles, including Lionhead, Rare, Activision Blizzard, Bethesda Softworks,  Capcom,  Disney Interactive, Electronic Arts, Konami, MTV Games, Namco Bandai, Sega, Square Enix, THQ and Ubisoft.
Not a bad lineup for a peripheral, sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062438</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257100020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holidays<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... in November 2010.</p><p>Gives the Wii a year to release more than three games that support MotionPlus. Or even to release the WiiHD (it had better support the Wii controllers).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holidays ... in November 2010.Gives the Wii a year to release more than three games that support MotionPlus .
Or even to release the WiiHD ( it had better support the Wii controllers ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holidays ... in November 2010.Gives the Wii a year to release more than three games that support MotionPlus.
Or even to release the WiiHD (it had better support the Wii controllers).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063372</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>grumbel</author>
	<datestamp>1257104100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If its that low, Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.</p></div><p>I doubt that price really matters that much. The important part is the software. In terms of price the Wii for example was horrible, but it had software (Wii Sports) that people actually wanted to have, so they didn't care to pay $250 for what was not much more then a Gamecube which you could get for half as much. Same with Wii Fit or GuitarHero/RockBand, neither of which is cheap, but as long as it does something that people really want it doesn't really matter.</p><p>What worries me with Natal is that they so far have shown nothing interesting. All they have shown so far was primitive tech demos where its hard to imagine if such stuff would even translate to an actual game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If its that low , Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.I doubt that price really matters that much .
The important part is the software .
In terms of price the Wii for example was horrible , but it had software ( Wii Sports ) that people actually wanted to have , so they did n't care to pay $ 250 for what was not much more then a Gamecube which you could get for half as much .
Same with Wii Fit or GuitarHero/RockBand , neither of which is cheap , but as long as it does something that people really want it does n't really matter.What worries me with Natal is that they so far have shown nothing interesting .
All they have shown so far was primitive tech demos where its hard to imagine if such stuff would even translate to an actual game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If its that low, Natal actually has a real chance of making a dent in their user base.I doubt that price really matters that much.
The important part is the software.
In terms of price the Wii for example was horrible, but it had software (Wii Sports) that people actually wanted to have, so they didn't care to pay $250 for what was not much more then a Gamecube which you could get for half as much.
Same with Wii Fit or GuitarHero/RockBand, neither of which is cheap, but as long as it does something that people really want it doesn't really matter.What worries me with Natal is that they so far have shown nothing interesting.
All they have shown so far was primitive tech demos where its hard to imagine if such stuff would even translate to an actual game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30076056</id>
	<title>In reality. . .</title>
	<author>intheshelter</author>
	<datestamp>1258053480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft sells the hardware at a loss to try and steal another market.  Unfortunately those days are over and it's just one more unprofitable venture for the bloated has-been.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft sells the hardware at a loss to try and steal another market .
Unfortunately those days are over and it 's just one more unprofitable venture for the bloated has-been .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft sells the hardware at a loss to try and steal another market.
Unfortunately those days are over and it's just one more unprofitable venture for the bloated has-been.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061578</id>
	<title>Speculation...</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1257096600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, 7 comments and nobody has mentioned that this is just speculation from some "tip" heard by mcvuk web page (which is down right now) and that pretty much all game news sites have been running?.</p><p>I'll believe it when I see it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , 7 comments and nobody has mentioned that this is just speculation from some " tip " heard by mcvuk web page ( which is down right now ) and that pretty much all game news sites have been running ? .I 'll believe it when I see it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, 7 comments and nobody has mentioned that this is just speculation from some "tip" heard by mcvuk web page (which is down right now) and that pretty much all game news sites have been running?.I'll believe it when I see it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30069288</id>
	<title>Costs more than a wiimote + nunchuk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257095820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Costs more than a Wiimote + nunchuk, and you still have to find games that work with it.  We'll see how well it does, it probably could do with a killer app.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Costs more than a Wiimote + nunchuk , and you still have to find games that work with it .
We 'll see how well it does , it probably could do with a killer app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Costs more than a Wiimote + nunchuk, and you still have to find games that work with it.
We'll see how well it does, it probably could do with a killer app.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061612</id>
	<title>realpeopleusedollars?</title>
	<author>FTWinston</author>
	<datestamp>1257096720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pfft. Real people use beans.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pfft .
Real people use beans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pfft.
Real people use beans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061354</id>
	<title>what does microsoft want</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257095820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>my belly button for?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>my belly button for ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my belly button for?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068502</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>sincewhen</author>
	<datestamp>1257087360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, I suspect this reveals that MSFT &amp; SONY are devoid of fresh ideas for video gaming. <p>
While they have, with this generation, pushed the hardware so that it can produce quite realistic graphics, improvements from here on will only be incremental. Better hardware will yield diminishing returns in graphics quality.</p><p>
Sadly, they don't seem to have anything else to bring to the party.</p><p>
Seems to me that Natal is a response to the Wii, but I suspect it will be a novelty and won't be used for any "serious" games. </p><p>
The other factor which disheartens me is that 80\% of games are FPS. So, all the games are now looking/playing like each other. </p><p>
Where is the originality, the fun, the entertainment in gaming?</p><p>
I think this is where Nintendo better understands the video game marketplace. They are trying to provide their customers with a different gaming experience, and a different style of game. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , I suspect this reveals that MSFT &amp; SONY are devoid of fresh ideas for video gaming .
While they have , with this generation , pushed the hardware so that it can produce quite realistic graphics , improvements from here on will only be incremental .
Better hardware will yield diminishing returns in graphics quality .
Sadly , they do n't seem to have anything else to bring to the party .
Seems to me that Natal is a response to the Wii , but I suspect it will be a novelty and wo n't be used for any " serious " games .
The other factor which disheartens me is that 80 \ % of games are FPS .
So , all the games are now looking/playing like each other .
Where is the originality , the fun , the entertainment in gaming ?
I think this is where Nintendo better understands the video game marketplace .
They are trying to provide their customers with a different gaming experience , and a different style of game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, I suspect this reveals that MSFT &amp; SONY are devoid of fresh ideas for video gaming.
While they have, with this generation, pushed the hardware so that it can produce quite realistic graphics, improvements from here on will only be incremental.
Better hardware will yield diminishing returns in graphics quality.
Sadly, they don't seem to have anything else to bring to the party.
Seems to me that Natal is a response to the Wii, but I suspect it will be a novelty and won't be used for any "serious" games.
The other factor which disheartens me is that 80\% of games are FPS.
So, all the games are now looking/playing like each other.
Where is the originality, the fun, the entertainment in gaming?
I think this is where Nintendo better understands the video game marketplace.
They are trying to provide their customers with a different gaming experience, and a different style of game. </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064692</id>
	<title>Re:And you thought Wii remotes were bad?</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1257108720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just need to tie the ankle strap to their ankle and the couch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just need to tie the ankle strap to their ankle and the couch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just need to tie the ankle strap to their ankle and the couch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062674</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>nomorecwrd</author>
	<datestamp>1257101280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well... the Wii is not much more than a "refurbished" Nintendo Cube<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
<br>so one can argue that it was in reality just a peripheral introduction.<br>
<br>
My 2 cents.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well... the Wii is not much more than a " refurbished " Nintendo Cube .. . so one can argue that it was in reality just a peripheral introduction .
My 2 cents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well... the Wii is not much more than a "refurbished" Nintendo Cube ...
so one can argue that it was in reality just a peripheral introduction.
My 2 cents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061950</id>
	<title>well what about us poor Americans?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257098100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>at that price it could be 3000 USD by the time it comes out...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>at that price it could be 3000 USD by the time it comes out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>at that price it could be 3000 USD by the time it comes out...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30067964</id>
	<title>Compatible with Esquire magazine?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257082860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will it make Rodney jump up off the page?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will it make Rodney jump up off the page ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will it make Rodney jump up off the page?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062370</id>
	<title>Too bad many more people</title>
	<author>Shivetya</author>
	<datestamp>1257099720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would not look at phone, cable/sat, etc, contracts the same way.</p><p>I know people paying more per month for cell or tv service than this device costs!  It is all about context.  To some of us $100 is impulse, to others its "do I eat" or can I put it on lay away, and to some its a "tip".</p><p>This is a great price in the realm of video controllers, let alone the possibilities it opens up.  Think of it as the razor, they will get you on the blades (games)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would not look at phone , cable/sat , etc , contracts the same way.I know people paying more per month for cell or tv service than this device costs !
It is all about context .
To some of us $ 100 is impulse , to others its " do I eat " or can I put it on lay away , and to some its a " tip " .This is a great price in the realm of video controllers , let alone the possibilities it opens up .
Think of it as the razor , they will get you on the blades ( games )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would not look at phone, cable/sat, etc, contracts the same way.I know people paying more per month for cell or tv service than this device costs!
It is all about context.
To some of us $100 is impulse, to others its "do I eat" or can I put it on lay away, and to some its a "tip".This is a great price in the realm of video controllers, let alone the possibilities it opens up.
Think of it as the razor, they will get you on the blades (games)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062776</id>
	<title>Re:Link dead.</title>
	<author>DangerousDriver</author>
	<datestamp>1257101700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Modded aready<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... ?</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8354166.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8354166.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Modded aready ... ? http : //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8354166.stm [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Modded aready ... ?http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8354166.stm [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062324</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>Vyse of Arcadia</author>
	<datestamp>1257099540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>$50 or &pound;50 is still quite high for an impulse buy.<br>
<br>
The only reason it could possibly be considered anything related to an impulse buy is that with a price so unexpectedly low, people who previously dismissed it are now considering it. But I suggest the article author and perhaps Microsoft look up the definition of "impulse."</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 50 or   50 is still quite high for an impulse buy .
The only reason it could possibly be considered anything related to an impulse buy is that with a price so unexpectedly low , people who previously dismissed it are now considering it .
But I suggest the article author and perhaps Microsoft look up the definition of " impulse .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$50 or £50 is still quite high for an impulse buy.
The only reason it could possibly be considered anything related to an impulse buy is that with a price so unexpectedly low, people who previously dismissed it are now considering it.
But I suggest the article author and perhaps Microsoft look up the definition of "impulse.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061958</id>
	<title>Re:As to what PN is...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257098160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Certainly does add some new air guitar possibilities...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Certainly does add some new air guitar possibilities.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Certainly does add some new air guitar possibilities...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064642</id>
	<title>Re:well what about us poor Americans?</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1257108480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't worry. While it is true that the USD has been tanking, the pound has been dropping even faster.  Their economy was more reliant on finance than ours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't worry .
While it is true that the USD has been tanking , the pound has been dropping even faster .
Their economy was more reliant on finance than ours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't worry.
While it is true that the USD has been tanking, the pound has been dropping even faster.
Their economy was more reliant on finance than ours.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061950</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062714</id>
	<title>Now maybe...</title>
	<author>Jinjuku</author>
	<datestamp>1257101400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If M$ would stop selling a $30 wireless adapter for $100...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If M $ would stop selling a $ 30 wireless adapter for $ 100.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If M$ would stop selling a $30 wireless adapter for $100...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064444</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe</title>
	<author>huckamania</author>
	<datestamp>1257107640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the Natal video looked very interesting.   The mapping from the people moving to the screen was smooth.</p><p>I actually felt sorry for Sony when the guy in their video couldn't hit the ball.  I thought it was fitting he finally got it (and really just barely) with a Stop sign.   Now that was ironical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the Natal video looked very interesting .
The mapping from the people moving to the screen was smooth.I actually felt sorry for Sony when the guy in their video could n't hit the ball .
I thought it was fitting he finally got it ( and really just barely ) with a Stop sign .
Now that was ironical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the Natal video looked very interesting.
The mapping from the people moving to the screen was smooth.I actually felt sorry for Sony when the guy in their video couldn't hit the ball.
I thought it was fitting he finally got it (and really just barely) with a Stop sign.
Now that was ironical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062454</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>foo fighter</author>
	<datestamp>1257100080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't tried it.</p><p>But the demo videos at <a href="http://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/projectnatal/" title="xbox.com">http://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/projectnatal/</a> [xbox.com] strike me as extremely weird and creepy.</p><p>I play games on my Wii almost every day, and didn't have the same problem with it. Maybe it's just having used a physical controller for 30 years seeing people play without one at all strikes me as wrong.</p><p>Maybe it's that, while I'm comfortable with manipulating controllers I'm not comfortable with manipulating my body. Insert the standard nerd jokes here, but it's true: I'm not good at sports or exercise and tend to injure myself rather than getting better or more physically fit.</p><p>Setting my personal problems, who is going to get this that doesn't have a Wii already? If someone has neither a 360 nor a Wii, would this really make them pick the 360? I honestly can't picture someone who doesn't have a 360 or a Wii but will get a 360 now because of this thing at this stage of the game. I'm also having a hard time imagining a large number of people who have a 360 who will want this thing.</p><p>I just don't get it, at all, except as a yet another lame "me too" from Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't tried it.But the demo videos at http : //www.xbox.com/en-US/live/projectnatal/ [ xbox.com ] strike me as extremely weird and creepy.I play games on my Wii almost every day , and did n't have the same problem with it .
Maybe it 's just having used a physical controller for 30 years seeing people play without one at all strikes me as wrong.Maybe it 's that , while I 'm comfortable with manipulating controllers I 'm not comfortable with manipulating my body .
Insert the standard nerd jokes here , but it 's true : I 'm not good at sports or exercise and tend to injure myself rather than getting better or more physically fit.Setting my personal problems , who is going to get this that does n't have a Wii already ?
If someone has neither a 360 nor a Wii , would this really make them pick the 360 ?
I honestly ca n't picture someone who does n't have a 360 or a Wii but will get a 360 now because of this thing at this stage of the game .
I 'm also having a hard time imagining a large number of people who have a 360 who will want this thing.I just do n't get it , at all , except as a yet another lame " me too " from Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't tried it.But the demo videos at http://www.xbox.com/en-US/live/projectnatal/ [xbox.com] strike me as extremely weird and creepy.I play games on my Wii almost every day, and didn't have the same problem with it.
Maybe it's just having used a physical controller for 30 years seeing people play without one at all strikes me as wrong.Maybe it's that, while I'm comfortable with manipulating controllers I'm not comfortable with manipulating my body.
Insert the standard nerd jokes here, but it's true: I'm not good at sports or exercise and tend to injure myself rather than getting better or more physically fit.Setting my personal problems, who is going to get this that doesn't have a Wii already?
If someone has neither a 360 nor a Wii, would this really make them pick the 360?
I honestly can't picture someone who doesn't have a 360 or a Wii but will get a 360 now because of this thing at this stage of the game.
I'm also having a hard time imagining a large number of people who have a 360 who will want this thing.I just don't get it, at all, except as a yet another lame "me too" from Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063512</id>
	<title>Re:Awesome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257104460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the summary is misleading in USD thats about $100 and while not eye-gouging, its certainly not a bargain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the summary is misleading in USD thats about $ 100 and while not eye-gouging , its certainly not a bargain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the summary is misleading in USD thats about $100 and while not eye-gouging, its certainly not a bargain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062244</id>
	<title>I could only think of one thing when I saw that</title>
	<author>NotSoHeavyD3</author>
	<datestamp>1257099240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>demo with kid on the dock. I hope it lets me shove him off the docks and into the pond.</htmltext>
<tokenext>demo with kid on the dock .
I hope it lets me shove him off the docks and into the pond .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>demo with kid on the dock.
I hope it lets me shove him off the docks and into the pond.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30083318</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe Natal has a chance after all?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258044960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not a bad lineup for a peripheral, sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.</p></div><p>Microsoft wants to launch Natal like it would launch a new console. They plan to have launch games ready to go when Natal comes out. This is how they plan to extend the 360's shelf life. No new console in the next few years, only a new way to play new games using the current console. I'm happy enough with that.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not a bad lineup for a peripheral , sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.Microsoft wants to launch Natal like it would launch a new console .
They plan to have launch games ready to go when Natal comes out .
This is how they plan to extend the 360 's shelf life .
No new console in the next few years , only a new way to play new games using the current console .
I 'm happy enough with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not a bad lineup for a peripheral, sounds more like a console lauch than a peripheral introduction.Microsoft wants to launch Natal like it would launch a new console.
They plan to have launch games ready to go when Natal comes out.
This is how they plan to extend the 360's shelf life.
No new console in the next few years, only a new way to play new games using the current console.
I'm happy enough with that.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061482</id>
	<title>"Product Vision"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257096300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The video disclaimer says that this is the "product vision". Are there videos of the actual product itself in use?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The video disclaimer says that this is the " product vision " .
Are there videos of the actual product itself in use ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video disclaimer says that this is the "product vision".
Are there videos of the actual product itself in use?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30065578</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1257069780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're not low UID until you hit five digits. In any case, all I would say is that if I can get it with a game for a hundred bucks, I'll buy it. And by that I mean, if I can get it with <em>the</em> game to have. Any worse deal than that, I would have to chew on carefully.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not low UID until you hit five digits .
In any case , all I would say is that if I can get it with a game for a hundred bucks , I 'll buy it .
And by that I mean , if I can get it with the game to have .
Any worse deal than that , I would have to chew on carefully .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not low UID until you hit five digits.
In any case, all I would say is that if I can get it with a game for a hundred bucks, I'll buy it.
And by that I mean, if I can get it with the game to have.
Any worse deal than that, I would have to chew on carefully.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064200</id>
	<title>Re:$83</title>
	<author>pwfffff</author>
	<datestamp>1257106800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Combine the fact that anyone with a smartphone has in their pocket the ability to purchase almost anything worldwide with the fact that taking a crap is really boring and you get a hell of a lot of impulse buys via bathroom stall. E.g.: me and my new nVidia monitor/shutterglasses 3d bundle.</p><p>That and the current generation is full of impulsive idiots (see above).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Combine the fact that anyone with a smartphone has in their pocket the ability to purchase almost anything worldwide with the fact that taking a crap is really boring and you get a hell of a lot of impulse buys via bathroom stall .
E.g. : me and my new nVidia monitor/shutterglasses 3d bundle.That and the current generation is full of impulsive idiots ( see above ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combine the fact that anyone with a smartphone has in their pocket the ability to purchase almost anything worldwide with the fact that taking a crap is really boring and you get a hell of a lot of impulse buys via bathroom stall.
E.g.: me and my new nVidia monitor/shutterglasses 3d bundle.That and the current generation is full of impulsive idiots (see above).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</id>
	<title>Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1257097380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... coming in at around &pound;50 when sold separately from the console. The idea being that it&rsquo;s low enough that people will purchase on impulse.</p></div><p>
Maybe I am just a cheapskate...but isn't 50 pounds a little above the 'impulse buy' margin? Usually impulse buys for me run in the arena of $20.00 or less. 50 pounds converts to, according to google, $83.27. That's approaching that dreaded $100.00 limit. When I am walking through wal-mart stocking up on whatever I need, I rarely, if ever, see an $80.00 item and say, "Ooooh I need that!" and throw it in the cart. That's a week and a half's worth of groceries... I don't know, maybe I am the exception to the rule, but I think 50 pounds is a little on the high side to term it an 'impulse buy.'
<br> <br>
And yes, people can fill in all the snarky responses about, "Oh, well, since YOU wouldn't spend the money I guess NOONE would...its not like anyone else has DIFFERENT buying habits..." and so on. I am not trying to say that nobody will fork over eighty bucks for the Natal, but it just seems a little high to be deemed an impulse buy type item...I mean hell, I won't even impulse buy new release games that I am excited about and they retail for $60.00.
<br> <br>
But like I said, maybe I am just a cheapskate.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... coming in at around   50 when sold separately from the console .
The idea being that it    s low enough that people will purchase on impulse .
Maybe I am just a cheapskate...but is n't 50 pounds a little above the 'impulse buy ' margin ?
Usually impulse buys for me run in the arena of $ 20.00 or less .
50 pounds converts to , according to google , $ 83.27 .
That 's approaching that dreaded $ 100.00 limit .
When I am walking through wal-mart stocking up on whatever I need , I rarely , if ever , see an $ 80.00 item and say , " Ooooh I need that !
" and throw it in the cart .
That 's a week and a half 's worth of groceries... I do n't know , maybe I am the exception to the rule , but I think 50 pounds is a little on the high side to term it an 'impulse buy .
' And yes , people can fill in all the snarky responses about , " Oh , well , since YOU would n't spend the money I guess NOONE would...its not like anyone else has DIFFERENT buying habits... " and so on .
I am not trying to say that nobody will fork over eighty bucks for the Natal , but it just seems a little high to be deemed an impulse buy type item...I mean hell , I wo n't even impulse buy new release games that I am excited about and they retail for $ 60.00 .
But like I said , maybe I am just a cheapskate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... coming in at around £50 when sold separately from the console.
The idea being that it’s low enough that people will purchase on impulse.
Maybe I am just a cheapskate...but isn't 50 pounds a little above the 'impulse buy' margin?
Usually impulse buys for me run in the arena of $20.00 or less.
50 pounds converts to, according to google, $83.27.
That's approaching that dreaded $100.00 limit.
When I am walking through wal-mart stocking up on whatever I need, I rarely, if ever, see an $80.00 item and say, "Ooooh I need that!
" and throw it in the cart.
That's a week and a half's worth of groceries... I don't know, maybe I am the exception to the rule, but I think 50 pounds is a little on the high side to term it an 'impulse buy.
'
 
And yes, people can fill in all the snarky responses about, "Oh, well, since YOU wouldn't spend the money I guess NOONE would...its not like anyone else has DIFFERENT buying habits..." and so on.
I am not trying to say that nobody will fork over eighty bucks for the Natal, but it just seems a little high to be deemed an impulse buy type item...I mean hell, I won't even impulse buy new release games that I am excited about and they retail for $60.00.
But like I said, maybe I am just a cheapskate.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062292</id>
	<title>Where the f*** is the slashdotted tag</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257099420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where the f*** is the slashdotted tag</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where the f * * * is the slashdotted tag</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where the f*** is the slashdotted tag</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062346</id>
	<title>It's 1984</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1257099600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your TV with a camera. They should build one into an LCD TV next, and give it a catchy name like Telescreen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your TV with a camera .
They should build one into an LCD TV next , and give it a catchy name like Telescreen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your TV with a camera.
They should build one into an LCD TV next, and give it a catchy name like Telescreen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30071670</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1258036920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think 50 pounds is a little on the high side to term it an 'impulse buy.'</p></div><p>I'm 155 pound and still quite impulsive buyer, so i guess it \_does\_ vary from person to person.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think 50 pounds is a little on the high side to term it an 'impulse buy .
'I 'm 155 pound and still quite impulsive buyer , so i guess it \ _does \ _ vary from person to person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think 50 pounds is a little on the high side to term it an 'impulse buy.
'I'm 155 pound and still quite impulsive buyer, so i guess it \_does\_ vary from person to person.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061744</id>
	<title>Maybe</title>
	<author>Alaren</author>
	<datestamp>1257097200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm intrigued by how much your post reads like a press release (or astroturfing), but you've got good karma and a low UID so...

</p><p>The biggest thing Natal has going for it is the continued success of Wii peripherals (as distinguished from plastic non-peripherals like steering wheels and tennis rackets).  But Wii Fit and the Motion+ add-on have seen pretty significant success despite a relative dearth of games for those peripherals (so far).  This is par for the course with the Wii--first-party titles continue to drive its success--but it suggests to me that users are more willing to pay the price of peripherals if they are attached to a particularly high-quality game experience.

</p><p>Natal <i>sounds</i> very interesting--certainly it <i>sounds</i> like it has more potential than the Wiimote, the Motion+, and the Balance Board combined.  But anyone with any familiarity with the game industry can tell you that listed "confirmed working titles" is a step up from vaporware.  The hype around Natal is unreal, and I'm skeptical, and listing committed studios does little to ease my skepticism.  Even the demo videos leave me scratching my head, wondering if Microsoft can deliver on half the hype.

</p><p>I'm happy to be proven wrong.  But for now I will continue to echo <a href="http://www.penny-arcade.com/2009/6/5/" title="penny-arcade.com">Tycho's ambivalence</a> [penny-arcade.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm intrigued by how much your post reads like a press release ( or astroturfing ) , but you 've got good karma and a low UID so.. . The biggest thing Natal has going for it is the continued success of Wii peripherals ( as distinguished from plastic non-peripherals like steering wheels and tennis rackets ) .
But Wii Fit and the Motion + add-on have seen pretty significant success despite a relative dearth of games for those peripherals ( so far ) .
This is par for the course with the Wii--first-party titles continue to drive its success--but it suggests to me that users are more willing to pay the price of peripherals if they are attached to a particularly high-quality game experience .
Natal sounds very interesting--certainly it sounds like it has more potential than the Wiimote , the Motion + , and the Balance Board combined .
But anyone with any familiarity with the game industry can tell you that listed " confirmed working titles " is a step up from vaporware .
The hype around Natal is unreal , and I 'm skeptical , and listing committed studios does little to ease my skepticism .
Even the demo videos leave me scratching my head , wondering if Microsoft can deliver on half the hype .
I 'm happy to be proven wrong .
But for now I will continue to echo Tycho 's ambivalence [ penny-arcade.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm intrigued by how much your post reads like a press release (or astroturfing), but you've got good karma and a low UID so...

The biggest thing Natal has going for it is the continued success of Wii peripherals (as distinguished from plastic non-peripherals like steering wheels and tennis rackets).
But Wii Fit and the Motion+ add-on have seen pretty significant success despite a relative dearth of games for those peripherals (so far).
This is par for the course with the Wii--first-party titles continue to drive its success--but it suggests to me that users are more willing to pay the price of peripherals if they are attached to a particularly high-quality game experience.
Natal sounds very interesting--certainly it sounds like it has more potential than the Wiimote, the Motion+, and the Balance Board combined.
But anyone with any familiarity with the game industry can tell you that listed "confirmed working titles" is a step up from vaporware.
The hype around Natal is unreal, and I'm skeptical, and listing committed studios does little to ease my skepticism.
Even the demo videos leave me scratching my head, wondering if Microsoft can deliver on half the hype.
I'm happy to be proven wrong.
But for now I will continue to echo Tycho's ambivalence [penny-arcade.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062148</id>
	<title>Re:$83</title>
	<author>IndieKid</author>
	<datestamp>1257098820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it's &pound;50 in the UK it will probably be closer to $50 in the US. We always get screwed on the exchange rate (and quoted prices in the UK include tax).</p><p>An xbox game at launch is typically &pound;35-40 over here (the RRP of Modern Warfare 2 was even higher, but I don't think that's a phenomenon unique to the UK).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's   50 in the UK it will probably be closer to $ 50 in the US .
We always get screwed on the exchange rate ( and quoted prices in the UK include tax ) .An xbox game at launch is typically   35-40 over here ( the RRP of Modern Warfare 2 was even higher , but I do n't think that 's a phenomenon unique to the UK ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's £50 in the UK it will probably be closer to $50 in the US.
We always get screwed on the exchange rate (and quoted prices in the UK include tax).An xbox game at launch is typically £35-40 over here (the RRP of Modern Warfare 2 was even higher, but I don't think that's a phenomenon unique to the UK).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063188</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>steviepunk</author>
	<datestamp>1257103320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At &pound;50, it costs more than most games cost, and given that games themselves aren't impulse buys (at least, not for me anyway), then I wouldn't call this an impulse buy either.</p><p>However, what you don't consider is that if the games supporting Natal are as numerous as is being suggested, then the potential market should be quite large - think about how many people have spent &pound;70 on plastic guitars that can only be used for a handful of games (not to mention drum kits).  It looks like there will be more Natal games at launch than there are guitar games in total (even though Activision aim to have that number doubled by the end of the year..), so the chances of someone buying this would be significantly greater.. and that would just be for existing Xbox gamers.</p><p>I'm sure there are also more people like myself that want to involve other people in games (ie. getting my gf to play, but equally others may be aiming to get parents involved, etc) but do not want to buy a Wii to do it. Again Natal opens that possibility if the right games are there, even if Natal controls in games is not something that I want to use myself.</p><p>Of course, same will apply the PS3 wand system assuming that falls into a similar pricing level.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At   50 , it costs more than most games cost , and given that games themselves are n't impulse buys ( at least , not for me anyway ) , then I would n't call this an impulse buy either.However , what you do n't consider is that if the games supporting Natal are as numerous as is being suggested , then the potential market should be quite large - think about how many people have spent   70 on plastic guitars that can only be used for a handful of games ( not to mention drum kits ) .
It looks like there will be more Natal games at launch than there are guitar games in total ( even though Activision aim to have that number doubled by the end of the year.. ) , so the chances of someone buying this would be significantly greater.. and that would just be for existing Xbox gamers.I 'm sure there are also more people like myself that want to involve other people in games ( ie .
getting my gf to play , but equally others may be aiming to get parents involved , etc ) but do not want to buy a Wii to do it .
Again Natal opens that possibility if the right games are there , even if Natal controls in games is not something that I want to use myself.Of course , same will apply the PS3 wand system assuming that falls into a similar pricing level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At £50, it costs more than most games cost, and given that games themselves aren't impulse buys (at least, not for me anyway), then I wouldn't call this an impulse buy either.However, what you don't consider is that if the games supporting Natal are as numerous as is being suggested, then the potential market should be quite large - think about how many people have spent £70 on plastic guitars that can only be used for a handful of games (not to mention drum kits).
It looks like there will be more Natal games at launch than there are guitar games in total (even though Activision aim to have that number doubled by the end of the year..), so the chances of someone buying this would be significantly greater.. and that would just be for existing Xbox gamers.I'm sure there are also more people like myself that want to involve other people in games (ie.
getting my gf to play, but equally others may be aiming to get parents involved, etc) but do not want to buy a Wii to do it.
Again Natal opens that possibility if the right games are there, even if Natal controls in games is not something that I want to use myself.Of course, same will apply the PS3 wand system assuming that falls into a similar pricing level.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062160</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1257098940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it depends on what you are shopping for.  If I'm in the market for a handful of new games at $60 each, adding in an ~$80 controller doesn't sound all that bad, and could be an impulse buy pretty easily.</p><p>When and where it will be marketed, it's cheap and attractive enough for an impulse buy for the type of person they are marketing to in the context of what they are likely intending to buy.  It's the equivalent of putting bags of $1 candy at the checkout line or a $10 DVD bin near the DVD players.  Or a $250 branded polo shirt on the wall in a Mercedes salesperson's office.  Or a display of an $8000 glass cockpit at your local Cessna dealer.</p><p>In context, each of those items can be easily sold as an impulse buy - "it's not that much money in context to what I am currently looking at spending, so I can buy it without a second thought."</p><p>Put the $8000 glass cockpit in the candy aisle and you'll get a lot fewer takers.  Heck, put the $1 candy in the Cessna dealer and you probably won't sell any there, either.</p><p>Your "impulses" are a lot more controlled and managed by savvy retailers than you might be comfortable with.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it depends on what you are shopping for .
If I 'm in the market for a handful of new games at $ 60 each , adding in an ~ $ 80 controller does n't sound all that bad , and could be an impulse buy pretty easily.When and where it will be marketed , it 's cheap and attractive enough for an impulse buy for the type of person they are marketing to in the context of what they are likely intending to buy .
It 's the equivalent of putting bags of $ 1 candy at the checkout line or a $ 10 DVD bin near the DVD players .
Or a $ 250 branded polo shirt on the wall in a Mercedes salesperson 's office .
Or a display of an $ 8000 glass cockpit at your local Cessna dealer.In context , each of those items can be easily sold as an impulse buy - " it 's not that much money in context to what I am currently looking at spending , so I can buy it without a second thought .
" Put the $ 8000 glass cockpit in the candy aisle and you 'll get a lot fewer takers .
Heck , put the $ 1 candy in the Cessna dealer and you probably wo n't sell any there , either.Your " impulses " are a lot more controlled and managed by savvy retailers than you might be comfortable with .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it depends on what you are shopping for.
If I'm in the market for a handful of new games at $60 each, adding in an ~$80 controller doesn't sound all that bad, and could be an impulse buy pretty easily.When and where it will be marketed, it's cheap and attractive enough for an impulse buy for the type of person they are marketing to in the context of what they are likely intending to buy.
It's the equivalent of putting bags of $1 candy at the checkout line or a $10 DVD bin near the DVD players.
Or a $250 branded polo shirt on the wall in a Mercedes salesperson's office.
Or a display of an $8000 glass cockpit at your local Cessna dealer.In context, each of those items can be easily sold as an impulse buy - "it's not that much money in context to what I am currently looking at spending, so I can buy it without a second thought.
"Put the $8000 glass cockpit in the candy aisle and you'll get a lot fewer takers.
Heck, put the $1 candy in the Cessna dealer and you probably won't sell any there, either.Your "impulses" are a lot more controlled and managed by savvy retailers than you might be comfortable with.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30067698</id>
	<title>Re:Purchase On Impulse?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1257080820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Impulse buy" is a relative term. It's not an impulse buy in the same way a candy bar is, certainly. But it's barely more expensive than a game, and that puts it in the range of impulse buys for any console owner.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Impulse buy " is a relative term .
It 's not an impulse buy in the same way a candy bar is , certainly .
But it 's barely more expensive than a game , and that puts it in the range of impulse buys for any console owner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Impulse buy" is a relative term.
It's not an impulse buy in the same way a candy bar is, certainly.
But it's barely more expensive than a game, and that puts it in the range of impulse buys for any console owner.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061770</id>
	<title>Re:"Product Vision"</title>
	<author>The Moof</author>
	<datestamp>1257097260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's a ton if it from E3 this year.  I'm not sure how much of it was staged during Microsoft's presentation.  However, people have said the floor demo of Burnout Paradise using Natal was pretty smooth.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a ton if it from E3 this year .
I 'm not sure how much of it was staged during Microsoft 's presentation .
However , people have said the floor demo of Burnout Paradise using Natal was pretty smooth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a ton if it from E3 this year.
I'm not sure how much of it was staged during Microsoft's presentation.
However, people have said the floor demo of Burnout Paradise using Natal was pretty smooth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061482</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30083318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30071670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30077854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061950
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30073850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061938
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30067698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30069288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062702
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30071134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_11_1544201_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30065578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061556
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30065578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30083318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063736
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064692
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062454
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30064200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30077854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061354
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070090
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068652
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062370
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30071670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30069288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30067698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30073850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063512
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30068460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30071134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30063160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061686
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30070628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30061770
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_11_1544201.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_11_1544201.30062286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
