<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_10_1941209</id>
	<title>Intel's New E-Reader For the Visually Impaired</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1257848760000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>serverguy writes <i>"Intel will be releasing a win for all visually impaired members of society, a new device called the Intel Reader. It allows visually impaired people to take a snapshot of a newspaper, book, or magazine and <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/11/10/intel-offers-an-e-reader-with-a-difference/">have it read back to them</a>. It's estimated that in the US alone there are as many as 55 million people who could make use of such a device. It comes at hefty price though: the paperback-sized device costs $1,499. The device contains a 5-megapixel camera and is powered by a Linux OCR system that converts text into spoken words. The device can hold up to 2GB of data, which would equate to around 600 snapshots. In addition to reading text, the device can also play back audio books in a number of supported formats such as MP3 and WAV. The Intel Reader is expected to be released next Tuesday."</i> The device won't be speedy: "Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text... It took... about 30 minutes to scan in the pages of a 250-page book and then one hour to process them."</htmltext>
<tokenext>serverguy writes " Intel will be releasing a win for all visually impaired members of society , a new device called the Intel Reader .
It allows visually impaired people to take a snapshot of a newspaper , book , or magazine and have it read back to them .
It 's estimated that in the US alone there are as many as 55 million people who could make use of such a device .
It comes at hefty price though : the paperback-sized device costs $ 1,499 .
The device contains a 5-megapixel camera and is powered by a Linux OCR system that converts text into spoken words .
The device can hold up to 2GB of data , which would equate to around 600 snapshots .
In addition to reading text , the device can also play back audio books in a number of supported formats such as MP3 and WAV .
The Intel Reader is expected to be released next Tuesday .
" The device wo n't be speedy : " Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text... It took... about 30 minutes to scan in the pages of a 250-page book and then one hour to process them .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>serverguy writes "Intel will be releasing a win for all visually impaired members of society, a new device called the Intel Reader.
It allows visually impaired people to take a snapshot of a newspaper, book, or magazine and have it read back to them.
It's estimated that in the US alone there are as many as 55 million people who could make use of such a device.
It comes at hefty price though: the paperback-sized device costs $1,499.
The device contains a 5-megapixel camera and is powered by a Linux OCR system that converts text into spoken words.
The device can hold up to 2GB of data, which would equate to around 600 snapshots.
In addition to reading text, the device can also play back audio books in a number of supported formats such as MP3 and WAV.
The Intel Reader is expected to be released next Tuesday.
" The device won't be speedy: "Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text... It took... about 30 minutes to scan in the pages of a 250-page book and then one hour to process them.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054350</id>
	<title>A patent for this ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257862380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>According to this article on EETimes :<br>http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221600886</p><p>"I filed the first patents on this technology and have been the leader of the design team," said Foss, the "inventor" of this device.</p><p>A patent for putting together in such bleeding obvious way two existing technologies like OCR and text to speech ?<br>It is as laughable as the absurd price. This is more like an iPhone app, hardly an "invention".</p><p>What a joke!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>According to this article on EETimes : http : //www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml ? articleID = 221600886 " I filed the first patents on this technology and have been the leader of the design team , " said Foss , the " inventor " of this device.A patent for putting together in such bleeding obvious way two existing technologies like OCR and text to speech ? It is as laughable as the absurd price .
This is more like an iPhone app , hardly an " invention " .What a joke !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to this article on EETimes :http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=221600886"I filed the first patents on this technology and have been the leader of the design team," said Foss, the "inventor" of this device.A patent for putting together in such bleeding obvious way two existing technologies like OCR and text to speech ?It is as laughable as the absurd price.
This is more like an iPhone app, hardly an "invention".What a joke!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053414</id>
	<title>Re:This should be interesting...</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1257856500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Kinda like Braille on the ATM in the drive through lane at the bank, WTF?</p></div><p>Judging by the way people drive on the Southern California freeways, it makes some sense. In fact, auto manufactures might consider doing the instrument panels on cars destined for this area in Braille.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kinda like Braille on the ATM in the drive through lane at the bank , WTF ? Judging by the way people drive on the Southern California freeways , it makes some sense .
In fact , auto manufactures might consider doing the instrument panels on cars destined for this area in Braille .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kinda like Braille on the ATM in the drive through lane at the bank, WTF?Judging by the way people drive on the Southern California freeways, it makes some sense.
In fact, auto manufactures might consider doing the instrument panels on cars destined for this area in Braille.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053342</id>
	<title>Re:is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>bmgoau</author>
	<datestamp>1257856140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The NYtimes did an interesting article on something similar to this, it was about the exorbitant cost of text to speech devices for the speaking impaired compared to simple consumer solutions like the iphone.</p><p>Heres the article, its quite interesting:</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/technology/15speech.html" title="nytimes.com">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/technology/15speech.html</a> [nytimes.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The NYtimes did an interesting article on something similar to this , it was about the exorbitant cost of text to speech devices for the speaking impaired compared to simple consumer solutions like the iphone.Heres the article , its quite interesting : http : //www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/technology/15speech.html [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NYtimes did an interesting article on something similar to this, it was about the exorbitant cost of text to speech devices for the speaking impaired compared to simple consumer solutions like the iphone.Heres the article, its quite interesting:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/technology/15speech.html [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052798</id>
	<title>Can't pronounce "reading" !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257853260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you watch the video demonstration in the article, I believe that the device pronounces "reading" as something closer to "ri-add-ing."</p><p>It's hard to tell because the demonstrator starts to speak just before the word is read by the device, but I listened to it twice and heard "ri-add-ing" both times.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you watch the video demonstration in the article , I believe that the device pronounces " reading " as something closer to " ri-add-ing .
" It 's hard to tell because the demonstrator starts to speak just before the word is read by the device , but I listened to it twice and heard " ri-add-ing " both times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you watch the video demonstration in the article, I believe that the device pronounces "reading" as something closer to "ri-add-ing.
"It's hard to tell because the demonstrator starts to speak just before the word is read by the device, but I listened to it twice and heard "ri-add-ing" both times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053450</id>
	<title>Disabled tax</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1257856740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The admittedly unwieldy equivalent built out of commodity parts is basically a 5-megapixel camera that transfers its data over USB (can be had for under $100 these days), and a netbook (~$300), for a total of ~$400 of hardware. What's the extra $1100 for?</p></div></blockquote><p>Unfortunately rip-off pricing is pretty much guaranteed in accessibility devices.  Just go compare <a href="http://www.sightandsound.co.uk/prices/kurzweil1000.php" title="sightandsound.co.uk">Kurzweil 1000</a> [sightandsound.co.uk] with similar commodity scanning apps.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The admittedly unwieldy equivalent built out of commodity parts is basically a 5-megapixel camera that transfers its data over USB ( can be had for under $ 100 these days ) , and a netbook ( ~ $ 300 ) , for a total of ~ $ 400 of hardware .
What 's the extra $ 1100 for ? Unfortunately rip-off pricing is pretty much guaranteed in accessibility devices .
Just go compare Kurzweil 1000 [ sightandsound.co.uk ] with similar commodity scanning apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The admittedly unwieldy equivalent built out of commodity parts is basically a 5-megapixel camera that transfers its data over USB (can be had for under $100 these days), and a netbook (~$300), for a total of ~$400 of hardware.
What's the extra $1100 for?Unfortunately rip-off pricing is pretty much guaranteed in accessibility devices.
Just go compare Kurzweil 1000 [sightandsound.co.uk] with similar commodity scanning apps.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30059682</id>
	<title>The cost is to gouge medical issurance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257088680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just like those "power chair" commercials you see on TV that say they will get your medicare to pay for it. This device is no different. Massively overpriced and underpowered; trying to cash in on the visually impaired and their insurance.</p><p>An Android phone with a scanning attachment (or just a good camera) would have both the processing capability and the memory to extract text from images and run it through a text-to-speech engine.</p><p>I'm not anti-Intel, but this is just embarrassing.</p><p>- a legally blind software engineer -</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just like those " power chair " commercials you see on TV that say they will get your medicare to pay for it .
This device is no different .
Massively overpriced and underpowered ; trying to cash in on the visually impaired and their insurance.An Android phone with a scanning attachment ( or just a good camera ) would have both the processing capability and the memory to extract text from images and run it through a text-to-speech engine.I 'm not anti-Intel , but this is just embarrassing.- a legally blind software engineer -</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just like those "power chair" commercials you see on TV that say they will get your medicare to pay for it.
This device is no different.
Massively overpriced and underpowered; trying to cash in on the visually impaired and their insurance.An Android phone with a scanning attachment (or just a good camera) would have both the processing capability and the memory to extract text from images and run it through a text-to-speech engine.I'm not anti-Intel, but this is just embarrassing.- a legally blind software engineer -</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30058464</id>
	<title>Re:30 seconds</title>
	<author>WaywardGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1257079080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A larger group than "blind" will be visually-impaired... people who can probably see the book, but not the words.  I'm facing such a fate myself soon.  I came up with a similar idea, but as usual <a href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1756618/alchemy\_clip\_is\_an\_excellent\_ocr\_application.html" title="associatedcontent.com">someone beat me to it</a> [associatedcontent.com].  Just use your camera phone, and port some decent open-source OCR software to it.</p><p>In general, I'm not a fan of dedicated e-book readers.  I think next year we'll see some killer multi-touch arm-based net-tablets with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oawX3wenxNc" title="youtube.com">e-paper-like displays</a> [youtube.com] and battery life.  I think the killer app will be the e-book reader.  Twenty years from now, I'll be able to tell kids about the days when we had special devices for reading books, and that's what an e-book reader was, rather than a program.  Remember when a "word processor" meant a dedicated and very expensive machine for editing text documents?  Yes, I'm that old.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A larger group than " blind " will be visually-impaired... people who can probably see the book , but not the words .
I 'm facing such a fate myself soon .
I came up with a similar idea , but as usual someone beat me to it [ associatedcontent.com ] .
Just use your camera phone , and port some decent open-source OCR software to it.In general , I 'm not a fan of dedicated e-book readers .
I think next year we 'll see some killer multi-touch arm-based net-tablets with e-paper-like displays [ youtube.com ] and battery life .
I think the killer app will be the e-book reader .
Twenty years from now , I 'll be able to tell kids about the days when we had special devices for reading books , and that 's what an e-book reader was , rather than a program .
Remember when a " word processor " meant a dedicated and very expensive machine for editing text documents ?
Yes , I 'm that old .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A larger group than "blind" will be visually-impaired... people who can probably see the book, but not the words.
I'm facing such a fate myself soon.
I came up with a similar idea, but as usual someone beat me to it [associatedcontent.com].
Just use your camera phone, and port some decent open-source OCR software to it.In general, I'm not a fan of dedicated e-book readers.
I think next year we'll see some killer multi-touch arm-based net-tablets with e-paper-like displays [youtube.com] and battery life.
I think the killer app will be the e-book reader.
Twenty years from now, I'll be able to tell kids about the days when we had special devices for reading books, and that's what an e-book reader was, rather than a program.
Remember when a "word processor" meant a dedicated and very expensive machine for editing text documents?
Yes, I'm that old.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055428</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a future iPhone, N900, etc. app</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257868380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, there is already software to turn selected phones into exactly what this product does. At the moment, all good solutions I've seen cost at least $1500 for the software alone - plus the cost of a quite powerful phone to go with it. I saw a recent model in action just the other day, it starts reading a few seconds after the snapshot and continues deciphering the text on the fly as it reads - it was able to get an entire magazine article perfectly.</p><p>As to the iphone, apple is currently very good at support for the vision impaired. The screenreading software included with OSX is better than all the windows screenreaders I've had any real experience with (mostly just JAWS and windoweyes), and I've heard that the iphone is actually quite highly regarded despite the lack of any tactile feedback or input...I just haven't looked into that part myself, since we're unable to get grants from the government for iphones.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , there is already software to turn selected phones into exactly what this product does .
At the moment , all good solutions I 've seen cost at least $ 1500 for the software alone - plus the cost of a quite powerful phone to go with it .
I saw a recent model in action just the other day , it starts reading a few seconds after the snapshot and continues deciphering the text on the fly as it reads - it was able to get an entire magazine article perfectly.As to the iphone , apple is currently very good at support for the vision impaired .
The screenreading software included with OSX is better than all the windows screenreaders I 've had any real experience with ( mostly just JAWS and windoweyes ) , and I 've heard that the iphone is actually quite highly regarded despite the lack of any tactile feedback or input...I just have n't looked into that part myself , since we 're unable to get grants from the government for iphones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, there is already software to turn selected phones into exactly what this product does.
At the moment, all good solutions I've seen cost at least $1500 for the software alone - plus the cost of a quite powerful phone to go with it.
I saw a recent model in action just the other day, it starts reading a few seconds after the snapshot and continues deciphering the text on the fly as it reads - it was able to get an entire magazine article perfectly.As to the iphone, apple is currently very good at support for the vision impaired.
The screenreading software included with OSX is better than all the windows screenreaders I've had any real experience with (mostly just JAWS and windoweyes), and I've heard that the iphone is actually quite highly regarded despite the lack of any tactile feedback or input...I just haven't looked into that part myself, since we're unable to get grants from the government for iphones.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30060076</id>
	<title>Re:This should be interesting...</title>
	<author>Stooshie</author>
	<datestamp>1257090420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"... how can they read the instructions that are on the screen?"

The instructions are read out too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ... how can they read the instructions that are on the screen ?
" The instructions are read out too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"... how can they read the instructions that are on the screen?
"

The instructions are read out too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056228</id>
	<title>Re:Software for Everyone</title>
	<author>emergent chaos</author>
	<datestamp>1257874560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm looking forward to someone unlocking the reader SW from its Linux-driven dedicated HW. I'd like my webcam to read my books and magazines to me at home.</p></div><p>hg clone <a href="https://ocropus.googlecode.com/hg/" title="googlecode.com" rel="nofollow">https://ocropus.googlecode.com/hg/</a> [googlecode.com] ocropus</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm looking forward to someone unlocking the reader SW from its Linux-driven dedicated HW .
I 'd like my webcam to read my books and magazines to me at home.hg clone https : //ocropus.googlecode.com/hg/ [ googlecode.com ] ocropus</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm looking forward to someone unlocking the reader SW from its Linux-driven dedicated HW.
I'd like my webcam to read my books and magazines to me at home.hg clone https://ocropus.googlecode.com/hg/ [googlecode.com] ocropus
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053446</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a future iPhone, N900, etc. app</title>
	<author>dingen</author>
	<datestamp>1257856680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually, this isn't even a thing of the future. I know a blind person who already has an application which does exactly this on his Nokia phone. He can use it to read signs on the street, letters in his mailbox and basically any text he captures with the camera on his phone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , this is n't even a thing of the future .
I know a blind person who already has an application which does exactly this on his Nokia phone .
He can use it to read signs on the street , letters in his mailbox and basically any text he captures with the camera on his phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, this isn't even a thing of the future.
I know a blind person who already has an application which does exactly this on his Nokia phone.
He can use it to read signs on the street, letters in his mailbox and basically any text he captures with the camera on his phone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052670</id>
	<title>30 seconds</title>
	<author>Carnivore24</author>
	<datestamp>1257852600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>30 seconds ought to be enough for anybody.</htmltext>
<tokenext>30 seconds ought to be enough for anybody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>30 seconds ought to be enough for anybody.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054194</id>
	<title>Re:is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>westlake</author>
	<datestamp>1257860940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The raw features somehow make the $1500 seem odd.</i> </p><p>The geek can hack out a gadget and call it an aid for the disabled.</p><p>That doesn't mean that any public or private agency will be able to buy one for their clients.</p><p>Without proof that the thing actually works as described and has real and substantial benefits.</p><p>The first question that needs to be answered is how easy will it be for a visually - and perhaps physically - impaired reader to use the camera.</p><p>I have my own doubts about this one.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The raw features somehow make the $ 1500 seem odd .
The geek can hack out a gadget and call it an aid for the disabled.That does n't mean that any public or private agency will be able to buy one for their clients.Without proof that the thing actually works as described and has real and substantial benefits.The first question that needs to be answered is how easy will it be for a visually - and perhaps physically - impaired reader to use the camera.I have my own doubts about this one .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>The raw features somehow make the $1500 seem odd.
The geek can hack out a gadget and call it an aid for the disabled.That doesn't mean that any public or private agency will be able to buy one for their clients.Without proof that the thing actually works as described and has real and substantial benefits.The first question that needs to be answered is how easy will it be for a visually - and perhaps physically - impaired reader to use the camera.I have my own doubts about this one.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30064152</id>
	<title>Re:This should be interesting...</title>
	<author>fastfinge</author>
	<datestamp>1257106620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The purpose of the braille is so blind folks in cabs can withdraw cash.  The cabby just needs to pull forward a little more, so you can reach it from the back seat instead of the front.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The purpose of the braille is so blind folks in cabs can withdraw cash .
The cabby just needs to pull forward a little more , so you can reach it from the back seat instead of the front .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The purpose of the braille is so blind folks in cabs can withdraw cash.
The cabby just needs to pull forward a little more, so you can reach it from the back seat instead of the front.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053044</id>
	<title>55 million people in the US alone?</title>
	<author>tyrrell</author>
	<datestamp>1257854400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I did not RTFA, but doesn't 55 million seem like an inflated figure? (Supposedly the number of people in the U.S. who are visually impaired enough to make use of this device)

The U.S. has approximately 300 million people. This means more than 1 in 6 people are visually impaired enough to "make use" of the device. Or they're just lazy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did not RTFA , but does n't 55 million seem like an inflated figure ?
( Supposedly the number of people in the U.S. who are visually impaired enough to make use of this device ) The U.S. has approximately 300 million people .
This means more than 1 in 6 people are visually impaired enough to " make use " of the device .
Or they 're just lazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I did not RTFA, but doesn't 55 million seem like an inflated figure?
(Supposedly the number of people in the U.S. who are visually impaired enough to make use of this device)

The U.S. has approximately 300 million people.
This means more than 1 in 6 people are visually impaired enough to "make use" of the device.
Or they're just lazy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054032</id>
	<title>Re:Lawsuit over "performance royalties"?</title>
	<author>aedil</author>
	<datestamp>1257860160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem with the kindle was largely that the text-to-speech functionality was a mainstream feature they were advertising (albeit in somewhat beta-fashion).  In terms of accessibility to enable blind and visually impaired users to read the (otherwise) print materials on the kindle, no copyright violation etc would take place because that is covered under specific exceptions.  Of course, the overall inaccessibility of the kindle makes that argument a bit hard to make.</p><p>But with the Intel Reader being marketed as a specific assistive technology device, it's functionality as described would not be in violation with any copyright laws or DMCA because it is an assistive technology device that enables printed materials to be read by blind and visually impaired users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with the kindle was largely that the text-to-speech functionality was a mainstream feature they were advertising ( albeit in somewhat beta-fashion ) .
In terms of accessibility to enable blind and visually impaired users to read the ( otherwise ) print materials on the kindle , no copyright violation etc would take place because that is covered under specific exceptions .
Of course , the overall inaccessibility of the kindle makes that argument a bit hard to make.But with the Intel Reader being marketed as a specific assistive technology device , it 's functionality as described would not be in violation with any copyright laws or DMCA because it is an assistive technology device that enables printed materials to be read by blind and visually impaired users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with the kindle was largely that the text-to-speech functionality was a mainstream feature they were advertising (albeit in somewhat beta-fashion).
In terms of accessibility to enable blind and visually impaired users to read the (otherwise) print materials on the kindle, no copyright violation etc would take place because that is covered under specific exceptions.
Of course, the overall inaccessibility of the kindle makes that argument a bit hard to make.But with the Intel Reader being marketed as a specific assistive technology device, it's functionality as described would not be in violation with any copyright laws or DMCA because it is an assistive technology device that enables printed materials to be read by blind and visually impaired users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054078</id>
	<title>OCR viability.</title>
	<author>stimpleton</author>
	<datestamp>1257860280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have just got a proprietry scanner/ocr solution at work. I am limited in time but did investigate an open source solution for linux. But all i seemed to come accross was that "no OCR touches the commercial stuff". Indeed, some said, it can still be cheaper on a word/accuracy perspective to outsource to a typing service. <br> <br>
What I have done is use the Searchable PDF output and used linux to 1. Produce a gif thumb of the PDF, and 2.) Use pdf2text to put in a db.
<br> <br>The slowness frustrates me, I have much work to do on this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have just got a proprietry scanner/ocr solution at work .
I am limited in time but did investigate an open source solution for linux .
But all i seemed to come accross was that " no OCR touches the commercial stuff " .
Indeed , some said , it can still be cheaper on a word/accuracy perspective to outsource to a typing service .
What I have done is use the Searchable PDF output and used linux to 1 .
Produce a gif thumb of the PDF , and 2 .
) Use pdf2text to put in a db .
The slowness frustrates me , I have much work to do on this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have just got a proprietry scanner/ocr solution at work.
I am limited in time but did investigate an open source solution for linux.
But all i seemed to come accross was that "no OCR touches the commercial stuff".
Indeed, some said, it can still be cheaper on a word/accuracy perspective to outsource to a typing service.
What I have done is use the Searchable PDF output and used linux to 1.
Produce a gif thumb of the PDF, and 2.
) Use pdf2text to put in a db.
The slowness frustrates me, I have much work to do on this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053048</id>
	<title>Re:is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>theaveng</author>
	<datestamp>1257854460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The extra $1100 is for Intel to pay their legal defense fund when the Authors' Guild sues them for violating their authors' "performance rights".</p><p>I'm serious.  The Guild has already sued Amazon for creating a Kindle that reads books out loud.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The extra $ 1100 is for Intel to pay their legal defense fund when the Authors ' Guild sues them for violating their authors ' " performance rights " .I 'm serious .
The Guild has already sued Amazon for creating a Kindle that reads books out loud .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The extra $1100 is for Intel to pay their legal defense fund when the Authors' Guild sues them for violating their authors' "performance rights".I'm serious.
The Guild has already sued Amazon for creating a Kindle that reads books out loud.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053392</id>
	<title>Re:Illiteracy isn't a visual impairment.</title>
	<author>John Whitley</author>
	<datestamp>1257856380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Aside from the fact that you're a troll, there's a deeper meme here worth debunking: that accessibility features are just for the "impaired".</p><p>Gregg Vanderheiden gave the closing plenary talk at the <a href="http://www.sigchi.org/" title="sigchi.org">SIGCHI</a> [sigchi.org] 2001 conference.  The subject was how creative integration of accessibility features can greatly improve functionality for all users, including examples of products originally designed for people with impairments which went on to wider commercial success.  As an example of this kind of thinking, with portable devices (mobile phones, music players, PDAs) we're all "blind" at some time or another -- we cannot or do not want to redirect our visual attention to the device.  So what happens when the normal function of the device includes cues to operation that don't require vision (via audio, haptics, etc.)?  The device becomes <em>more useful</em> to everyone, including those with visual impairment.  Likewise, by including design elements that work when users can't hear a device that device is more useful to both the hearing impaired and to users in loud environments.</p><p>There's a summary of this presentation with more details here: <a href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/chi/" title="ariadne.ac.uk">http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/chi/</a> [ariadne.ac.uk]  Scroll down past the stuff about Bill Gates' opening keynote (which was utterly lame in comparison to Vanderheiden's talk, IMO).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aside from the fact that you 're a troll , there 's a deeper meme here worth debunking : that accessibility features are just for the " impaired " .Gregg Vanderheiden gave the closing plenary talk at the SIGCHI [ sigchi.org ] 2001 conference .
The subject was how creative integration of accessibility features can greatly improve functionality for all users , including examples of products originally designed for people with impairments which went on to wider commercial success .
As an example of this kind of thinking , with portable devices ( mobile phones , music players , PDAs ) we 're all " blind " at some time or another -- we can not or do not want to redirect our visual attention to the device .
So what happens when the normal function of the device includes cues to operation that do n't require vision ( via audio , haptics , etc. ) ?
The device becomes more useful to everyone , including those with visual impairment .
Likewise , by including design elements that work when users ca n't hear a device that device is more useful to both the hearing impaired and to users in loud environments.There 's a summary of this presentation with more details here : http : //www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/chi/ [ ariadne.ac.uk ] Scroll down past the stuff about Bill Gates ' opening keynote ( which was utterly lame in comparison to Vanderheiden 's talk , IMO ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aside from the fact that you're a troll, there's a deeper meme here worth debunking: that accessibility features are just for the "impaired".Gregg Vanderheiden gave the closing plenary talk at the SIGCHI [sigchi.org] 2001 conference.
The subject was how creative integration of accessibility features can greatly improve functionality for all users, including examples of products originally designed for people with impairments which went on to wider commercial success.
As an example of this kind of thinking, with portable devices (mobile phones, music players, PDAs) we're all "blind" at some time or another -- we cannot or do not want to redirect our visual attention to the device.
So what happens when the normal function of the device includes cues to operation that don't require vision (via audio, haptics, etc.)?
The device becomes more useful to everyone, including those with visual impairment.
Likewise, by including design elements that work when users can't hear a device that device is more useful to both the hearing impaired and to users in loud environments.There's a summary of this presentation with more details here: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue28/chi/ [ariadne.ac.uk]  Scroll down past the stuff about Bill Gates' opening keynote (which was utterly lame in comparison to Vanderheiden's talk, IMO).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053270</id>
	<title>Re:55 million people in the US alone?</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1257855780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=15&amp;DocumentID=4398#numbers" title="afb.org">http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=15&amp;DocumentID=4398#numbers</a> [afb.org] says that 20 million people have significant vision loss. Plus, add in the number of people who are close to blind without contacts or glasses on and the elderly and you can easily see 55 million people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.afb.org/Section.asp ? SectionID = 15&amp;DocumentID = 4398 # numbers [ afb.org ] says that 20 million people have significant vision loss .
Plus , add in the number of people who are close to blind without contacts or glasses on and the elderly and you can easily see 55 million people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.afb.org/Section.asp?SectionID=15&amp;DocumentID=4398#numbers [afb.org] says that 20 million people have significant vision loss.
Plus, add in the number of people who are close to blind without contacts or glasses on and the elderly and you can easily see 55 million people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053468</id>
	<title>Re:is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>NervousWreck</author>
	<datestamp>1257856800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the extra $1100 for?</p></div><p>Because they can, of course.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the extra $ 1100 for ? Because they can , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the extra $1100 for?Because they can, of course.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053328</id>
	<title>this FP f or GNAA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257856080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you loved that for the state of NIGGER community but I'd rather hear and some of the As fitti\%ngly elected, we ttok against vigorous is the worst off AMERICA) might be</htmltext>
<tokenext>you loved that for the state of NIGGER community but I 'd rather hear and some of the As fitti \ % ngly elected , we ttok against vigorous is the worst off AMERICA ) might be</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you loved that for the state of NIGGER community but I'd rather hear and some of the As fitti\%ngly elected, we ttok against vigorous is the worst off AMERICA) might be</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052872</id>
	<title>Lawsuit over "performance royalties"?</title>
	<author>tacarat</author>
	<datestamp>1257853620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't some group sue Amazon over the Kindle's ability to read text out loud?  Is Intel next on the hit list due to this?  I mean, for $1,500 you could hire some poor, out of work, minstrel to walk around with you and read articles in real time.<br> <br>

Granted, they are a bit clunkier than what most airlines allow for as carry on luggage items, but still.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't some group sue Amazon over the Kindle 's ability to read text out loud ?
Is Intel next on the hit list due to this ?
I mean , for $ 1,500 you could hire some poor , out of work , minstrel to walk around with you and read articles in real time .
Granted , they are a bit clunkier than what most airlines allow for as carry on luggage items , but still .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't some group sue Amazon over the Kindle's ability to read text out loud?
Is Intel next on the hit list due to this?
I mean, for $1,500 you could hire some poor, out of work, minstrel to walk around with you and read articles in real time.
Granted, they are a bit clunkier than what most airlines allow for as carry on luggage items, but still.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053444</id>
	<title>Re:Lawsuit over "performance royalties"?</title>
	<author>Nethemas the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1257856680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know, this has the potential to get rather interesting...</p><p>
<a href="http://www.community.eu.playstation.com/playstationeu/board/message?board.id=62&amp;thread.id=1647334" title="playstation.com">Sony</a> [playstation.com] is being sued by a blind fellow for <b>not</b> making their PS3 ADA compliant.  Amazon was <a href="http://news.cnet.com/amazon-retreats-on-kindles-text-to-speech-issue/" title="cnet.com">threatened</a> [cnet.com] with a lawsuit by the Authors Guild <b>for</b> making their Kindle ADA compliant.  Now Intel is taunting the Authors Guild by making a device with the express purpose of giving blind and otherwise visually impaired access to written works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know , this has the potential to get rather interesting.. . Sony [ playstation.com ] is being sued by a blind fellow for not making their PS3 ADA compliant .
Amazon was threatened [ cnet.com ] with a lawsuit by the Authors Guild for making their Kindle ADA compliant .
Now Intel is taunting the Authors Guild by making a device with the express purpose of giving blind and otherwise visually impaired access to written works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know, this has the potential to get rather interesting...
Sony [playstation.com] is being sued by a blind fellow for not making their PS3 ADA compliant.
Amazon was threatened [cnet.com] with a lawsuit by the Authors Guild for making their Kindle ADA compliant.
Now Intel is taunting the Authors Guild by making a device with the express purpose of giving blind and otherwise visually impaired access to written works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053592</id>
	<title>Missing the obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257857520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get the big push in text-to-speech technology. Is there a problem with making the fonts bigger?</p><p>My Android G1 is killing me and there's absolutely no accessibility feature to enlarge the fonts. The 1.6 update brought an accessibility option in the settings menu -- but the only option available is T2S. ARRRRGH!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get the big push in text-to-speech technology .
Is there a problem with making the fonts bigger ? My Android G1 is killing me and there 's absolutely no accessibility feature to enlarge the fonts .
The 1.6 update brought an accessibility option in the settings menu -- but the only option available is T2S .
ARRRRGH ! ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get the big push in text-to-speech technology.
Is there a problem with making the fonts bigger?My Android G1 is killing me and there's absolutely no accessibility feature to enlarge the fonts.
The 1.6 update brought an accessibility option in the settings menu -- but the only option available is T2S.
ARRRRGH!!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055304</id>
	<title>Sad state of our country</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1257867660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just wait until the book publishers get wind of this.</p><p>I predict pointless IP lawsuits up the ass<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p><p>Book publishers already claim using a screen reader for the blind is a copyright violation, text-to-voice on ebooks being illegal (I hope Amazon squashes that lawsuit instead of settles), and bypass some form of access control that doesn't exist and thus is a DMCA violation too.</p><p>And this is why we can't have nice things</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait until the book publishers get wind of this.I predict pointless IP lawsuits up the ass : ( Book publishers already claim using a screen reader for the blind is a copyright violation , text-to-voice on ebooks being illegal ( I hope Amazon squashes that lawsuit instead of settles ) , and bypass some form of access control that does n't exist and thus is a DMCA violation too.And this is why we ca n't have nice things</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait until the book publishers get wind of this.I predict pointless IP lawsuits up the ass :(Book publishers already claim using a screen reader for the blind is a copyright violation, text-to-voice on ebooks being illegal (I hope Amazon squashes that lawsuit instead of settles), and bypass some form of access control that doesn't exist and thus is a DMCA violation too.And this is why we can't have nice things</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052770</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a future iPhone, N900, etc. app</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1257853140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm curious if there's audio feedback to tell you if you're correctly framing the page.</p></div><p>I sure hope so...with these figures</p><p><div class="quote"><p> The device won't be speedy: "Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text</p></div><p>I'd sure be pissed to wait 30 seconds only to hear "Page 3 of 7"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm curious if there 's audio feedback to tell you if you 're correctly framing the page.I sure hope so...with these figures The device wo n't be speedy : " Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of textI 'd sure be pissed to wait 30 seconds only to hear " Page 3 of 7 "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm curious if there's audio feedback to tell you if you're correctly framing the page.I sure hope so...with these figures The device won't be speedy: "Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of textI'd sure be pissed to wait 30 seconds only to hear "Page 3 of 7"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</id>
	<title>is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257852600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The raw features somehow make the $1500 seem odd. The admittedly unwieldy equivalent built out of commodity parts is basically a 5-megapixel camera that transfers its data over USB (can be had for under $100 these days), and a netbook (~$300), for a total of ~$400 of hardware. What's the extra $1100 for? The integration into a nice portable package? Development costs of a proprietary OCR/voicesynth pipeline?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The raw features somehow make the $ 1500 seem odd .
The admittedly unwieldy equivalent built out of commodity parts is basically a 5-megapixel camera that transfers its data over USB ( can be had for under $ 100 these days ) , and a netbook ( ~ $ 300 ) , for a total of ~ $ 400 of hardware .
What 's the extra $ 1100 for ?
The integration into a nice portable package ?
Development costs of a proprietary OCR/voicesynth pipeline ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The raw features somehow make the $1500 seem odd.
The admittedly unwieldy equivalent built out of commodity parts is basically a 5-megapixel camera that transfers its data over USB (can be had for under $100 these days), and a netbook (~$300), for a total of ~$400 of hardware.
What's the extra $1100 for?
The integration into a nice portable package?
Development costs of a proprietary OCR/voicesynth pipeline?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30069408</id>
	<title>Re:ASCAP will put a stop to this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257097380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this translation came from http://www.microsofttranslator.com/Default.aspx cutting and pasting the above reply.<br>where is the author's consent/authorization for machine translation into the Polish language? We don't need no stinkin' translation machines, and our language is only for sharing with any people willing to share their language too. Long live Free Speech Accessibility!</p><p>Urzdzenie to stanowi to naruszenie, a uytkownicy bd musiay zapaci nalenoci licencyjne dla publicznych wydajnoci of copyrighted work.</p><p># 1)  Kopiujesz"(alias pirating), kiedy wykona migawki.<br>2) # Urzdzenie generuje nastpnie audio publicznych funkcjonowania pirackich pracy.</p><p>Nie jest dozwolone zgodnie z prawem autorskim i dostawca dostaje informacj.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this translation came from http : //www.microsofttranslator.com/Default.aspx cutting and pasting the above reply.where is the author 's consent/authorization for machine translation into the Polish language ?
We do n't need no stinkin ' translation machines , and our language is only for sharing with any people willing to share their language too .
Long live Free Speech Accessibility ! Urzdzenie to stanowi to naruszenie , a uytkownicy bd musiay zapaci nalenoci licencyjne dla publicznych wydajnoci of copyrighted work. # 1 ) Kopiujesz " ( alias pirating ) , kiedy wykona migawki.2 ) # Urzdzenie generuje nastpnie audio publicznych funkcjonowania pirackich pracy.Nie jest dozwolone zgodnie z prawem autorskim i dostawca dostaje informacj .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this translation came from http://www.microsofttranslator.com/Default.aspx cutting and pasting the above reply.where is the author's consent/authorization for machine translation into the Polish language?
We don't need no stinkin' translation machines, and our language is only for sharing with any people willing to share their language too.
Long live Free Speech Accessibility!Urzdzenie to stanowi to naruszenie, a uytkownicy bd musiay zapaci nalenoci licencyjne dla publicznych wydajnoci of copyrighted work.# 1)  Kopiujesz"(alias pirating), kiedy wykona migawki.2) # Urzdzenie generuje nastpnie audio publicznych funkcjonowania pirackich pracy.Nie jest dozwolone zgodnie z prawem autorskim i dostawca dostaje informacj.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056534</id>
	<title>Re:This should be interesting...</title>
	<author>bendie</author>
	<datestamp>1257877740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't have to read the instructions on the screen.  Everything on the screen (menu, directions, status, etc) is also spoken out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't have to read the instructions on the screen .
Everything on the screen ( menu , directions , status , etc ) is also spoken out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't have to read the instructions on the screen.
Everything on the screen (menu, directions, status, etc) is also spoken out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052870</id>
	<title>ASCAP will put a stop to this</title>
	<author>tekrat</author>
	<datestamp>1257853620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This device is a violation, and users will have to pay royalties for a public performance of a copyrighted work.</p><p>#1) You are "copying" (aka pirating), when you take the snapshot.<br>#2) The device then produces an audio public performance of the pirated work.</p><p>It's illegal under copyright laws and the DMCA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This device is a violation , and users will have to pay royalties for a public performance of a copyrighted work. # 1 ) You are " copying " ( aka pirating ) , when you take the snapshot. # 2 ) The device then produces an audio public performance of the pirated work.It 's illegal under copyright laws and the DMCA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This device is a violation, and users will have to pay royalties for a public performance of a copyrighted work.#1) You are "copying" (aka pirating), when you take the snapshot.#2) The device then produces an audio public performance of the pirated work.It's illegal under copyright laws and the DMCA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052720</id>
	<title>Illiteracy isn't a visual impairment.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257852780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It allows visually impaired people to take a snapshot of a newspaper, book, or magazine and have it read back to them. It's estimated that in the US alone there are as many as 55 million people who could make use of such a device.</i></p><p>Illiteracy is NOT a "visual impairment". Most of these Americans can see just fine. They're just too fucking lazy to turn off the TV, put down their bag of chips, grab even just a newspaper, and read it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It allows visually impaired people to take a snapshot of a newspaper , book , or magazine and have it read back to them .
It 's estimated that in the US alone there are as many as 55 million people who could make use of such a device.Illiteracy is NOT a " visual impairment " .
Most of these Americans can see just fine .
They 're just too fucking lazy to turn off the TV , put down their bag of chips , grab even just a newspaper , and read it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It allows visually impaired people to take a snapshot of a newspaper, book, or magazine and have it read back to them.
It's estimated that in the US alone there are as many as 55 million people who could make use of such a device.Illiteracy is NOT a "visual impairment".
Most of these Americans can see just fine.
They're just too fucking lazy to turn off the TV, put down their bag of chips, grab even just a newspaper, and read it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052824</id>
	<title>Potential abuse</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257853440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see this device somehow being turned into something that pirates audio books, or spies on people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see this device somehow being turned into something that pirates audio books , or spies on people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see this device somehow being turned into something that pirates audio books, or spies on people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30063942</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a future iPhone, N900, etc. app</title>
	<author>fastfinge</author>
	<datestamp>1257105900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The N82 is already doing this, with software called the KNFB reader.  The big issue with porting the KNFB Reader over to other phones is that, while some of them have a 5MP camera, none of them have a good enough flash.  I'm not totally clear on why that's an issue, but apparently it is.  I keep the phone close enough to the source (book/paper/whatever) that I don't really know why it wants the flash all the time, but it decides to use it in nearly every shot.  The only time I didn't hear the flash activate was once when I was sitting outside in direct sunlight.  I have an N82 with this software and use it daily.  I now can't upgrade to any other phone, because the software won't run on anything else, and I use it all the time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The N82 is already doing this , with software called the KNFB reader .
The big issue with porting the KNFB Reader over to other phones is that , while some of them have a 5MP camera , none of them have a good enough flash .
I 'm not totally clear on why that 's an issue , but apparently it is .
I keep the phone close enough to the source ( book/paper/whatever ) that I do n't really know why it wants the flash all the time , but it decides to use it in nearly every shot .
The only time I did n't hear the flash activate was once when I was sitting outside in direct sunlight .
I have an N82 with this software and use it daily .
I now ca n't upgrade to any other phone , because the software wo n't run on anything else , and I use it all the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The N82 is already doing this, with software called the KNFB reader.
The big issue with porting the KNFB Reader over to other phones is that, while some of them have a 5MP camera, none of them have a good enough flash.
I'm not totally clear on why that's an issue, but apparently it is.
I keep the phone close enough to the source (book/paper/whatever) that I don't really know why it wants the flash all the time, but it decides to use it in nearly every shot.
The only time I didn't hear the flash activate was once when I was sitting outside in direct sunlight.
I have an N82 with this software and use it daily.
I now can't upgrade to any other phone, because the software won't run on anything else, and I use it all the time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052996</id>
	<title>Kindle</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1257854160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe someone could build a device that lets you download the text of many national newspapers and can do a test-to-speach from that, instead of trying to use a crappy OCR application. Maybe if the sold it for a lot less, say $300, then it would be more affordable for blind people. They may not get many local newspapers, but for the price difference it might be a better fit for their income. It might be good if they could download the text of many books too. Could we interest a large bookseller, like Amazon, into selling them?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe someone could build a device that lets you download the text of many national newspapers and can do a test-to-speach from that , instead of trying to use a crappy OCR application .
Maybe if the sold it for a lot less , say $ 300 , then it would be more affordable for blind people .
They may not get many local newspapers , but for the price difference it might be a better fit for their income .
It might be good if they could download the text of many books too .
Could we interest a large bookseller , like Amazon , into selling them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe someone could build a device that lets you download the text of many national newspapers and can do a test-to-speach from that, instead of trying to use a crappy OCR application.
Maybe if the sold it for a lot less, say $300, then it would be more affordable for blind people.
They may not get many local newspapers, but for the price difference it might be a better fit for their income.
It might be good if they could download the text of many books too.
Could we interest a large bookseller, like Amazon, into selling them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052828</id>
	<title>oh, bother.</title>
	<author>adolf</author>
	<datestamp>1257853440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now we have yet another device waiting to be demonized by the copyright nazis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now we have yet another device waiting to be demonized by the copyright nazis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now we have yet another device waiting to be demonized by the copyright nazis.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710</id>
	<title>Seems like a future iPhone, N900, etc. app</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1257852780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The N900 seems like it ought to have enough horsepower to do this job, perhaps slightly slower but I don't see why the device can't be reading and scanning at the same time. N900 has a 5MP, I'm sure a future iPhone will have an acceptable camera... et cetera. I'm curious if there's audio feedback to tell you if you're correctly framing the page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The N900 seems like it ought to have enough horsepower to do this job , perhaps slightly slower but I do n't see why the device ca n't be reading and scanning at the same time .
N900 has a 5MP , I 'm sure a future iPhone will have an acceptable camera... et cetera .
I 'm curious if there 's audio feedback to tell you if you 're correctly framing the page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The N900 seems like it ought to have enough horsepower to do this job, perhaps slightly slower but I don't see why the device can't be reading and scanning at the same time.
N900 has a 5MP, I'm sure a future iPhone will have an acceptable camera... et cetera.
I'm curious if there's audio feedback to tell you if you're correctly framing the page.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054312</id>
	<title>Re:ASCAP will put a stop to this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257862080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot all the copying it does within RAM, and to the storage device. Havent courts ruled that copying as covered by copyright to?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot all the copying it does within RAM , and to the storage device .
Havent courts ruled that copying as covered by copyright to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot all the copying it does within RAM, and to the storage device.
Havent courts ruled that copying as covered by copyright to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052870</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056280</id>
	<title>Bravo</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1257875160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> Surely umpires and referees everywhere will weep tears of gratitude. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surely umpires and referees everywhere will weep tears of gratitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Surely umpires and referees everywhere will weep tears of gratitude. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053040</id>
	<title>Software for Everyone</title>
	<author>Doc Ruby</author>
	<datestamp>1257854340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm looking forward to someone unlocking the reader SW from its Linux-driven dedicated HW. I'd like my webcam to read my books and magazines to me at home.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm looking forward to someone unlocking the reader SW from its Linux-driven dedicated HW .
I 'd like my webcam to read my books and magazines to me at home .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm looking forward to someone unlocking the reader SW from its Linux-driven dedicated HW.
I'd like my webcam to read my books and magazines to me at home.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053290</id>
	<title>Overkill</title>
	<author>Unequivocal</author>
	<datestamp>1257855900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This seems like crazy overkill. Benetech's program BookShare already provides the content in a format that traditional disabled accessible devices can handle. Plus it's all free for the content. This is probably the single most socially beneficial exception to the copyright law operating on the books right now. Any disabled person can have access to any copyrighted content at no charge through this program. Totally amazing:</p><p><a href="http://www.benetech.org/literacy/bookshare.shtml" title="benetech.org">http://www.benetech.org/literacy/bookshare.shtml</a> [benetech.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This seems like crazy overkill .
Benetech 's program BookShare already provides the content in a format that traditional disabled accessible devices can handle .
Plus it 's all free for the content .
This is probably the single most socially beneficial exception to the copyright law operating on the books right now .
Any disabled person can have access to any copyrighted content at no charge through this program .
Totally amazing : http : //www.benetech.org/literacy/bookshare.shtml [ benetech.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This seems like crazy overkill.
Benetech's program BookShare already provides the content in a format that traditional disabled accessible devices can handle.
Plus it's all free for the content.
This is probably the single most socially beneficial exception to the copyright law operating on the books right now.
Any disabled person can have access to any copyrighted content at no charge through this program.
Totally amazing:http://www.benetech.org/literacy/bookshare.shtml [benetech.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054714</id>
	<title>Kurzweil makes Nokia N82 Based reader aleady</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257864480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kurzweil already makes the KNFB reader which runs on a Nokia N82 based phone.  The package is about $1500.</p><p>http://www.knfbreader.com/products-mobile.php</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kurzweil already makes the KNFB reader which runs on a Nokia N82 based phone .
The package is about $ 1500.http : //www.knfbreader.com/products-mobile.php</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kurzweil already makes the KNFB reader which runs on a Nokia N82 based phone.
The package is about $1500.http://www.knfbreader.com/products-mobile.php</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053622</id>
	<title>$1500!?</title>
	<author>Fear the Clam</author>
	<datestamp>1257857760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Screw that, they'll be an iPhone app that does this in about two months that also makes fart noises.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw that , they 'll be an iPhone app that does this in about two months that also makes fart noises .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw that, they'll be an iPhone app that does this in about two months that also makes fart noises.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052882</id>
	<title>Re:is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257853620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you talking about this e-reader or an Apple computer?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you talking about this e-reader or an Apple computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you talking about this e-reader or an Apple computer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30060478</id>
	<title>Speed issues and distributed (cloud) computing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257092220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The device won't be speedy: "Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text... It took... about 30 minutes to scan in the pages of a 250-page book and then one hour to process them."</p></div></blockquote><p>The New York Times <a href="http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/self-service-prorated-super-computing-fun/" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">used Amazon's Cloud computing</a> [nytimes.com] to create PDF's for a lot of their public domain files. And there's the <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/09/11/03/0053230/Cracking-PGP-In-the-Cloud" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">PGP cracking efforts</a> [slashdot.org] slashdot mentioned before.</p><p>Maybe Intel should tie this into a cloud computing based system that could distribute each scanned page to a new VM for processing. That way the pages could be prepared in parallel and loaded back to the system.</p><p>Ideally the result of the scanning process would be uploaded to Project Gutenberg, the Internet Archive, Google Books, and digital library efforts around the world, but first things first.</p><p>Another option would be to put the pages that are scanned into the ReCaptcha database.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The device wo n't be speedy : " Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text... It took... about 30 minutes to scan in the pages of a 250-page book and then one hour to process them .
" The New York Times used Amazon 's Cloud computing [ nytimes.com ] to create PDF 's for a lot of their public domain files .
And there 's the PGP cracking efforts [ slashdot.org ] slashdot mentioned before.Maybe Intel should tie this into a cloud computing based system that could distribute each scanned page to a new VM for processing .
That way the pages could be prepared in parallel and loaded back to the system.Ideally the result of the scanning process would be uploaded to Project Gutenberg , the Internet Archive , Google Books , and digital library efforts around the world , but first things first.Another option would be to put the pages that are scanned into the ReCaptcha database .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The device won't be speedy: "Intel says it takes about 30 seconds to process each page of text... It took... about 30 minutes to scan in the pages of a 250-page book and then one hour to process them.
"The New York Times used Amazon's Cloud computing [nytimes.com] to create PDF's for a lot of their public domain files.
And there's the PGP cracking efforts [slashdot.org] slashdot mentioned before.Maybe Intel should tie this into a cloud computing based system that could distribute each scanned page to a new VM for processing.
That way the pages could be prepared in parallel and loaded back to the system.Ideally the result of the scanning process would be uploaded to Project Gutenberg, the Internet Archive, Google Books, and digital library efforts around the world, but first things first.Another option would be to put the pages that are scanned into the ReCaptcha database.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30059718</id>
	<title>Re:Seems like a future iPhone, N900, etc. app</title>
	<author>jeffthejiff</author>
	<datestamp>1257088800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is actually already possible on S60 phones, with an app called KNFB Reader. Although it isn't cheap, its a fair bit cheaper than this Intel one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is actually already possible on S60 phones , with an app called KNFB Reader .
Although it is n't cheap , its a fair bit cheaper than this Intel one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is actually already possible on S60 phones, with an app called KNFB Reader.
Although it isn't cheap, its a fair bit cheaper than this Intel one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30058116</id>
	<title>You published my story - Happy but pissed off</title>
	<author>serverguy</author>
	<datestamp>1257074880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am happy you published my story, but pissed off that you removed the back link to the original <a href="http://bblogic.com/showthread.php?t=733" title="bblogic.com" rel="nofollow">http://bblogic.com/showthread.php?t=733</a> [bblogic.com], instead you back linked to some other persons blog WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am happy you published my story , but pissed off that you removed the back link to the original http : //bblogic.com/showthread.php ? t = 733 [ bblogic.com ] , instead you back linked to some other persons blog WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am happy you published my story, but pissed off that you removed the back link to the original http://bblogic.com/showthread.php?t=733 [bblogic.com], instead you back linked to some other persons blog WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052938</id>
	<title>Re:is the cost from portability/integration?</title>
	<author>poetmatt</author>
	<datestamp>1257853860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still laugh at the for the blind part. Are the blind expected to know what page they're on with which to have read?</p><p>"I really wonder what page 47 says".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still laugh at the for the blind part .
Are the blind expected to know what page they 're on with which to have read ?
" I really wonder what page 47 says " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still laugh at the for the blind part.
Are the blind expected to know what page they're on with which to have read?
"I really wonder what page 47 says".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055178</id>
	<title>Re:30 seconds</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1257866940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do the blind people know where to point the camera?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do the blind people know where to point the camera ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do the blind people know where to point the camera?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053672</id>
	<title>Intel is successful with CPUs, almost only that.</title>
	<author>Futurepower(R)</author>
	<datestamp>1257858000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe the big picture is that Intel has not been successful, generally, at
making products other than processors and chipsets and motherboards.

<br> <br>Intel had a consumer division which was closed. I don't know the
reason for closing the division, but all the Intel consumer products I
reviewed had major flaws.

<br> <br>Right now I'm trying to find a graphics driver for an Intel chipset
motherboard. The Intel web site is amazingly complicated to use.

<br> <br>Generally, Intel employees say they are unhappy with CEO Otellini.
Stories are told of extreme inefficiency in every area besides the main
business.

<br> <br>Once I called for Intel technical support, and told the technical
support representative about a major problem with the Intel web site. He said,
"We are updating it, that will be fixed soon." A year later, I called again
about something else. I accidentally got the same Intel representative. When I
asked him about the fault on the web site that was still exactly the same, he
made exactly the same statement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the big picture is that Intel has not been successful , generally , at making products other than processors and chipsets and motherboards .
Intel had a consumer division which was closed .
I do n't know the reason for closing the division , but all the Intel consumer products I reviewed had major flaws .
Right now I 'm trying to find a graphics driver for an Intel chipset motherboard .
The Intel web site is amazingly complicated to use .
Generally , Intel employees say they are unhappy with CEO Otellini .
Stories are told of extreme inefficiency in every area besides the main business .
Once I called for Intel technical support , and told the technical support representative about a major problem with the Intel web site .
He said , " We are updating it , that will be fixed soon .
" A year later , I called again about something else .
I accidentally got the same Intel representative .
When I asked him about the fault on the web site that was still exactly the same , he made exactly the same statement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the big picture is that Intel has not been successful, generally, at
making products other than processors and chipsets and motherboards.
Intel had a consumer division which was closed.
I don't know the
reason for closing the division, but all the Intel consumer products I
reviewed had major flaws.
Right now I'm trying to find a graphics driver for an Intel chipset
motherboard.
The Intel web site is amazingly complicated to use.
Generally, Intel employees say they are unhappy with CEO Otellini.
Stories are told of extreme inefficiency in every area besides the main
business.
Once I called for Intel technical support, and told the technical
support representative about a major problem with the Intel web site.
He said,
"We are updating it, that will be fixed soon.
" A year later, I called again
about something else.
I accidentally got the same Intel representative.
When I
asked him about the fault on the web site that was still exactly the same, he
made exactly the same statement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30059324</id>
	<title>What??</title>
	<author>jim.shilliday</author>
	<datestamp>1257086940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's no iPhone app for this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no iPhone app for this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no iPhone app for this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30064192</id>
	<title>Re:Overkill</title>
	<author>fastfinge</author>
	<datestamp>1257106800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Incorrect.  Bookshare only offers service to United States citizens, who are currently living inside the United States.  Americans outside the country, or those of us who aren't Americans, are out of luck.  One would assume this device will be sold internationally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Incorrect .
Bookshare only offers service to United States citizens , who are currently living inside the United States .
Americans outside the country , or those of us who are n't Americans , are out of luck .
One would assume this device will be sold internationally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Incorrect.
Bookshare only offers service to United States citizens, who are currently living inside the United States.
Americans outside the country, or those of us who aren't Americans, are out of luck.
One would assume this device will be sold internationally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053528</id>
	<title>Visually impaired people taking snapshots?</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1257857160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm not too sure about the various degrees of visual impairment that would reduce visual acuity to the point where reading is no longer feasible, but...
<br>
<br>
On the face of the matter, it seems someone ludicrous, or at the least ironic, that the device relies on a visually impaired individuals using a visual interface to interpret documents they cannot read. If they're impaired such that they cannot read, then will they easily be able to tell that the document is in focus? That the document is even entirely in the frame?
<br>
<br>
The screen looks awfully small, too...
<br>
<br>
It seems more like this device would help people who can see, but perhaps are unable to read for various reasons. If the cost were cut down, it may help in countries where there are many illiterate people. It may also be a solution for people with severe dyslexia.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not too sure about the various degrees of visual impairment that would reduce visual acuity to the point where reading is no longer feasible , but.. . On the face of the matter , it seems someone ludicrous , or at the least ironic , that the device relies on a visually impaired individuals using a visual interface to interpret documents they can not read .
If they 're impaired such that they can not read , then will they easily be able to tell that the document is in focus ?
That the document is even entirely in the frame ?
The screen looks awfully small , too.. . It seems more like this device would help people who can see , but perhaps are unable to read for various reasons .
If the cost were cut down , it may help in countries where there are many illiterate people .
It may also be a solution for people with severe dyslexia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not too sure about the various degrees of visual impairment that would reduce visual acuity to the point where reading is no longer feasible, but...


On the face of the matter, it seems someone ludicrous, or at the least ironic, that the device relies on a visually impaired individuals using a visual interface to interpret documents they cannot read.
If they're impaired such that they cannot read, then will they easily be able to tell that the document is in focus?
That the document is even entirely in the frame?
The screen looks awfully small, too...


It seems more like this device would help people who can see, but perhaps are unable to read for various reasons.
If the cost were cut down, it may help in countries where there are many illiterate people.
It may also be a solution for people with severe dyslexia.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054036</id>
	<title>Let see this in action now...</title>
	<author>gsgriffin</author>
	<datestamp>1257860160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Blind Person: "Where's that dang little camera thing?"<br>
(feels around until they find it)<br>
Blind Person: "Where's that paper?"<br>
(find the paper and unfolds some pages)<br>
(Takes a picture of the paper upside down)<br>
Reader: "Blah duh mup plump fluget..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Blind Person : " Where 's that dang little camera thing ?
" ( feels around until they find it ) Blind Person : " Where 's that paper ?
" ( find the paper and unfolds some pages ) ( Takes a picture of the paper upside down ) Reader : " Blah duh mup plump fluget... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blind Person: "Where's that dang little camera thing?
"
(feels around until they find it)
Blind Person: "Where's that paper?
"
(find the paper and unfolds some pages)
(Takes a picture of the paper upside down)
Reader: "Blah duh mup plump fluget..."</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055322</id>
	<title>sale:jordan 1-25,coach,ed hardy handbags,ugg</title>
	<author>coolforsale2010</author>
	<datestamp>1257867780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are &ldquo;must have &rdquo; nike air max jordan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,shoes, caoch,gucci,lv,dg, ed hardy handbagsin the winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30\%-50\% off,free shipping, you may take a look, you may find the UGGS you want here. <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com] [coolforsale.com] thanks...</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are    must have    nike air max jordan ,shoes , caoch,gucci,lv,dg , ed hardy handbagsin the winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30 \ % -50 \ % off,free shipping , you may take a look , you may find the UGGS you want here .
http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] [ coolforsale.com ] thanks.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you want to have a warm winter,you have to know Ugg boots.Ugg boots are “must have ” nike air max jordan ,shoes, caoch,gucci,lv,dg, ed hardy handbagsin the winter.Now here is an onlinestore , discount 30\%-50\% off,free shipping, you may take a look, you may find the UGGS you want here.
http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com] [coolforsale.com] thanks...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100</id>
	<title>This should be interesting...</title>
	<author>sjs132</author>
	<datestamp>1257854820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was too small to see in the article, but I didn't see Braille on the buttons to tell a (True) visually impared person where to touch...   Also, If they can't see to read, etc, how can they read the instructions that are on the screen?</p><p>The thought is nice, but I don't think well thought out... Kinda like Braille on the ATM in the drive through lane at the bank, WTF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was too small to see in the article , but I did n't see Braille on the buttons to tell a ( True ) visually impared person where to touch... Also , If they ca n't see to read , etc , how can they read the instructions that are on the screen ? The thought is nice , but I do n't think well thought out... Kinda like Braille on the ATM in the drive through lane at the bank , WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was too small to see in the article, but I didn't see Braille on the buttons to tell a (True) visually impared person where to touch...   Also, If they can't see to read, etc, how can they read the instructions that are on the screen?The thought is nice, but I don't think well thought out... Kinda like Braille on the ATM in the drive through lane at the bank, WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053808</id>
	<title>Worthless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257858840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At $1500 most people that they supposedly are targeting will not be able to afford it.  So other than 'goodwill' this is worthless.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At $ 1500 most people that they supposedly are targeting will not be able to afford it .
So other than 'goodwill ' this is worthless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At $1500 most people that they supposedly are targeting will not be able to afford it.
So other than 'goodwill' this is worthless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30057038</id>
	<title>"releasing a win"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257882480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Really?  They're releasing "a win"?  That wording is "a fail".  Get lost.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Really ?
They 're releasing " a win " ?
That wording is " a fail " .
Get lost .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really?
They're releasing "a win"?
That wording is "a fail".
Get lost.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052916</id>
	<title>Amazon Kindle text to speech</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257853740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought that the Kindle wasn't able to do text to speech because of copyright concerns. How is this any different?</p><p>http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/27/amazon-backs-off-text-to-speech-feature-in-kindle/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that the Kindle was n't able to do text to speech because of copyright concerns .
How is this any different ? http : //bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/27/amazon-backs-off-text-to-speech-feature-in-kindle/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that the Kindle wasn't able to do text to speech because of copyright concerns.
How is this any different?http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/27/amazon-backs-off-text-to-speech-feature-in-kindle/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053230</id>
	<title>Re:This should be interesting...</title>
	<author>kidblast</author>
	<datestamp>1257855540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The braille on the drive through bank ATMs is because it would be more expensive to create two types of buttons (braille and without) and know ahead of time where the ATM would be installed.</p><p>This was discussed in Freakonomics IIRC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The braille on the drive through bank ATMs is because it would be more expensive to create two types of buttons ( braille and without ) and know ahead of time where the ATM would be installed.This was discussed in Freakonomics IIRC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The braille on the drive through bank ATMs is because it would be more expensive to create two types of buttons (braille and without) and know ahead of time where the ATM would be installed.This was discussed in Freakonomics IIRC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30063942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30060076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30058464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053044
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30069408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052870
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30064152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30059718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_10_1941209_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30064192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055178
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30058464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053328
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30059718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30055428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30063942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052870
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30069408
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054194
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30064192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30060076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30064152
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30056228
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30053444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30054032
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_10_1941209.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_10_1941209.30052996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
