<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article09_11_09_2326215</id>
	<title>Esquire Launches First Augmented Reality Magazine</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1257770880000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"We've seen augmented reality applications for years (and seen the GE windmill replicated in PopSci), but now Esquire Magazine seems to be trying to show off the undying value of print by <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/augmented-reality">launching its 'AR issue'</a> &mdash; which, from <a href="http://www.esquire.com/video/#v49407280001">the demo video</a>, looks pretty cool. Applications include a 3D cover with Robert Downey Jr., a weather-changing fashion portfolio with The Hurt Locker's Jeremy Renner, a time-sensitive Funny Joke from a Beautiful Woman with Community's Gillian Jacobs, plus a song, a photo slideshow, and a face-recognition ad from Lexus.  From the <a href="http://www.esquire.com/the-side/feature/augmented-reality-technology-110909">behind-the-scenes geekery</a>: 'Advancements to further involve the user were happening even as we produced this issue, and while motion-sensor recognition already exists, so-called "natural-feature tracking" technology could soon put you inside AR without any googly-looking [note: not in the Google sense] boxes at all.'"</i> Enjoying Esquire's AR issue requires downloading software &mdash; Windows and Mac only.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " We 've seen augmented reality applications for years ( and seen the GE windmill replicated in PopSci ) , but now Esquire Magazine seems to be trying to show off the undying value of print by launching its 'AR issue '    which , from the demo video , looks pretty cool .
Applications include a 3D cover with Robert Downey Jr. , a weather-changing fashion portfolio with The Hurt Locker 's Jeremy Renner , a time-sensitive Funny Joke from a Beautiful Woman with Community 's Gillian Jacobs , plus a song , a photo slideshow , and a face-recognition ad from Lexus .
From the behind-the-scenes geekery : 'Advancements to further involve the user were happening even as we produced this issue , and while motion-sensor recognition already exists , so-called " natural-feature tracking " technology could soon put you inside AR without any googly-looking [ note : not in the Google sense ] boxes at all .
' " Enjoying Esquire 's AR issue requires downloading software    Windows and Mac only .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "We've seen augmented reality applications for years (and seen the GE windmill replicated in PopSci), but now Esquire Magazine seems to be trying to show off the undying value of print by launching its 'AR issue' — which, from the demo video, looks pretty cool.
Applications include a 3D cover with Robert Downey Jr., a weather-changing fashion portfolio with The Hurt Locker's Jeremy Renner, a time-sensitive Funny Joke from a Beautiful Woman with Community's Gillian Jacobs, plus a song, a photo slideshow, and a face-recognition ad from Lexus.
From the behind-the-scenes geekery: 'Advancements to further involve the user were happening even as we produced this issue, and while motion-sensor recognition already exists, so-called "natural-feature tracking" technology could soon put you inside AR without any googly-looking [note: not in the Google sense] boxes at all.
'" Enjoying Esquire's AR issue requires downloading software — Windows and Mac only.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041262</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257777480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, tell us how you really feel.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , tell us how you really feel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, tell us how you really feel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040896</id>
	<title>attention all faggots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257774600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>die of aids and begone. i'm sick of you sucking down the resources of society for your sick pleasure. faggots are shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>die of aids and begone .
i 'm sick of you sucking down the resources of society for your sick pleasure .
faggots are shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>die of aids and begone.
i'm sick of you sucking down the resources of society for your sick pleasure.
faggots are shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041654</id>
	<title>Re:That buzzing sound you hear....</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1257780960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is the sound of magazine pages fluttering in the breeze as Esquire jumps the shark.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is the sound of magazine pages fluttering in the breeze as Esquire jumps the shark .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is the sound of magazine pages fluttering in the breeze as Esquire jumps the shark.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984</id>
	<title>But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257775080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I fail to see what's so impressive about the magazine, they seem to have taken 'save PINs from bottle caps of Coke and enter them online to win!!' to a whole new silly level. Claiming that this is somehow augmented reality is ridiculous. Why would I want to buy a magazine and then hold it up to my PC? If I'm reading a magazine I don't have my PC handy, if I'm reading stuff on the web then I don't want to have my magazine handy. And I hear I have to download some spiffy software too? Why not just have the whole thing online? Ugh, this is almost as bad as when some tool decided to call Fear Factory's sound 'Terrorkore', almost, but not quite.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I fail to see what 's so impressive about the magazine , they seem to have taken 'save PINs from bottle caps of Coke and enter them online to win ! !
' to a whole new silly level .
Claiming that this is somehow augmented reality is ridiculous .
Why would I want to buy a magazine and then hold it up to my PC ?
If I 'm reading a magazine I do n't have my PC handy , if I 'm reading stuff on the web then I do n't want to have my magazine handy .
And I hear I have to download some spiffy software too ?
Why not just have the whole thing online ?
Ugh , this is almost as bad as when some tool decided to call Fear Factory 's sound 'Terrorkore ' , almost , but not quite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I fail to see what's so impressive about the magazine, they seem to have taken 'save PINs from bottle caps of Coke and enter them online to win!!
' to a whole new silly level.
Claiming that this is somehow augmented reality is ridiculous.
Why would I want to buy a magazine and then hold it up to my PC?
If I'm reading a magazine I don't have my PC handy, if I'm reading stuff on the web then I don't want to have my magazine handy.
And I hear I have to download some spiffy software too?
Why not just have the whole thing online?
Ugh, this is almost as bad as when some tool decided to call Fear Factory's sound 'Terrorkore', almost, but not quite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30057386</id>
	<title>An awful lot of wet blankets in here</title>
	<author>Absentminded-Artist</author>
	<datestamp>1257109080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a gimmick. Obviously. Meant to generate sales. And it will work for some people and not work for others. It's not meant to be new technology to people such as slashdotters who are generally on the cutting edge. Magazines using marketing gimmicks to boost sales isn't news. However, it is a use of technology that we haven't seen magazines do before. As e-ink becomes more affordable and viable, we'll see more magazines trying to stay in business with interactive gimmicks, perhaps even on the page itself. Where's the harm in it? I only hope they sell enough magazines to recoup their investment.</p><p>Esquire most likely paid RDJ and other actors to produce video content for a special edition magazine. They had software for both PCs and Macs produced. And they're advertising it on the web. It's all pretty slick, even if it IS limited. Has your favorite blog produced something like this lately? Personally, I'd like to see more ad campaigns using current technology in creative ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a gimmick .
Obviously. Meant to generate sales .
And it will work for some people and not work for others .
It 's not meant to be new technology to people such as slashdotters who are generally on the cutting edge .
Magazines using marketing gimmicks to boost sales is n't news .
However , it is a use of technology that we have n't seen magazines do before .
As e-ink becomes more affordable and viable , we 'll see more magazines trying to stay in business with interactive gimmicks , perhaps even on the page itself .
Where 's the harm in it ?
I only hope they sell enough magazines to recoup their investment.Esquire most likely paid RDJ and other actors to produce video content for a special edition magazine .
They had software for both PCs and Macs produced .
And they 're advertising it on the web .
It 's all pretty slick , even if it IS limited .
Has your favorite blog produced something like this lately ?
Personally , I 'd like to see more ad campaigns using current technology in creative ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a gimmick.
Obviously. Meant to generate sales.
And it will work for some people and not work for others.
It's not meant to be new technology to people such as slashdotters who are generally on the cutting edge.
Magazines using marketing gimmicks to boost sales isn't news.
However, it is a use of technology that we haven't seen magazines do before.
As e-ink becomes more affordable and viable, we'll see more magazines trying to stay in business with interactive gimmicks, perhaps even on the page itself.
Where's the harm in it?
I only hope they sell enough magazines to recoup their investment.Esquire most likely paid RDJ and other actors to produce video content for a special edition magazine.
They had software for both PCs and Macs produced.
And they're advertising it on the web.
It's all pretty slick, even if it IS limited.
Has your favorite blog produced something like this lately?
Personally, I'd like to see more ad campaigns using current technology in creative ways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30043682</id>
	<title>ARToolKitPlus</title>
	<author>guardia</author>
	<datestamp>1257851220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The markers they are using come from the open source ARToolKitPlus
<a href="http://studierstube.icg.tu-graz.ac.at/handheld\_ar/artoolkitplus.php" title="tu-graz.ac.at" rel="nofollow">http://studierstube.icg.tu-graz.ac.at/handheld\_ar/artoolkitplus.php</a> [tu-graz.ac.at]
for those interested...

The demo marker is actually the one with ID = 0<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The markers they are using come from the open source ARToolKitPlus http : //studierstube.icg.tu-graz.ac.at/handheld \ _ar/artoolkitplus.php [ tu-graz.ac.at ] for those interested.. . The demo marker is actually the one with ID = 0 .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The markers they are using come from the open source ARToolKitPlus
http://studierstube.icg.tu-graz.ac.at/handheld\_ar/artoolkitplus.php [tu-graz.ac.at]
for those interested...

The demo marker is actually the one with ID = 0 ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040974</id>
	<title>I can't believe it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257775080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sceond Psot?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sceond Psot ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sceond Psot?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041482</id>
	<title>sixth sense</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257779400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It becomes *surprisingly* relevant if you are informed of MIT media labs development of their 'sixth sense' technology.</p><p>http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/09/171204/MIT-Grad-To-Make-Digital-SixthSense-Open-Source?from=rss  Article from today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It becomes * surprisingly * relevant if you are informed of MIT media labs development of their 'sixth sense ' technology.http : //tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/09/171204/MIT-Grad-To-Make-Digital-SixthSense-Open-Source ? from = rss Article from today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It becomes *surprisingly* relevant if you are informed of MIT media labs development of their 'sixth sense' technology.http://tech.slashdot.org/story/09/11/09/171204/MIT-Grad-To-Make-Digital-SixthSense-Open-Source?from=rss  Article from today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041926</id>
	<title>No good for reading in the john...</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1257783900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If I want to go online to read my dead-tree edition magazine, I'ld just subscribe to the freaking digital edition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If I want to go online to read my dead-tree edition magazine , I'ld just subscribe to the freaking digital edition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I want to go online to read my dead-tree edition magazine, I'ld just subscribe to the freaking digital edition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30047306</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257875460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I appreciate the humor in your forceful rant, yet feel compelled to point out that augmented reality is an effective and engaging medium for advertisements which is likely to grow in scope and depth. Consumers like brands and enjoy being part of the community around a brand, as part of their self-identification (or projection, if you prefer). A large number of folks have found and will find it quite entertaining to play with an augmented reality advertisement. Fun is subjective, I'll grant you. Some people enjoy Antonio Carlos Jobim and family dinners, whereas you apparently enjoy vitrolic and hyperbolic attacks against most anything just to get a laugh in the race to the bottom. Just don't convince yourself that you're in the normal majority, because you'll be much happier smugly basking in lonely superiority.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I appreciate the humor in your forceful rant , yet feel compelled to point out that augmented reality is an effective and engaging medium for advertisements which is likely to grow in scope and depth .
Consumers like brands and enjoy being part of the community around a brand , as part of their self-identification ( or projection , if you prefer ) .
A large number of folks have found and will find it quite entertaining to play with an augmented reality advertisement .
Fun is subjective , I 'll grant you .
Some people enjoy Antonio Carlos Jobim and family dinners , whereas you apparently enjoy vitrolic and hyperbolic attacks against most anything just to get a laugh in the race to the bottom .
Just do n't convince yourself that you 're in the normal majority , because you 'll be much happier smugly basking in lonely superiority .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I appreciate the humor in your forceful rant, yet feel compelled to point out that augmented reality is an effective and engaging medium for advertisements which is likely to grow in scope and depth.
Consumers like brands and enjoy being part of the community around a brand, as part of their self-identification (or projection, if you prefer).
A large number of folks have found and will find it quite entertaining to play with an augmented reality advertisement.
Fun is subjective, I'll grant you.
Some people enjoy Antonio Carlos Jobim and family dinners, whereas you apparently enjoy vitrolic and hyperbolic attacks against most anything just to get a laugh in the race to the bottom.
Just don't convince yourself that you're in the normal majority, because you'll be much happier smugly basking in lonely superiority.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041774</id>
	<title>Re:System Requirements</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257782220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not really. As you can see the Linux rump roasters have been left out again. Oh well, they'll have to go comfort themselves by sucking off one faggot while getting ass rammed by another.<br> <br>LINUX IS FOR SMALL BRAINED FAGGOTS!!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not really .
As you can see the Linux rump roasters have been left out again .
Oh well , they 'll have to go comfort themselves by sucking off one faggot while getting ass rammed by another .
LINUX IS FOR SMALL BRAINED FAGGOTS ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not really.
As you can see the Linux rump roasters have been left out again.
Oh well, they'll have to go comfort themselves by sucking off one faggot while getting ass rammed by another.
LINUX IS FOR SMALL BRAINED FAGGOTS!!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041166</id>
	<title>Re:Bah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257776640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>you're a lump of dog shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>you 're a lump of dog shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you're a lump of dog shit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041224</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Shadow of Eternity</author>
	<datestamp>1257777120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Still, the more money they pour into it trying to spam us with ads the more money goes into developing the tech and assuming it doesn't die out entirely (which I doubt, too many people concurrently trying to do useful things with it, too well known as one of the SciFi dreams of the future) eventually someone will grab it and run with it in the right direction. Probably all the way to the bank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Still , the more money they pour into it trying to spam us with ads the more money goes into developing the tech and assuming it does n't die out entirely ( which I doubt , too many people concurrently trying to do useful things with it , too well known as one of the SciFi dreams of the future ) eventually someone will grab it and run with it in the right direction .
Probably all the way to the bank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still, the more money they pour into it trying to spam us with ads the more money goes into developing the tech and assuming it doesn't die out entirely (which I doubt, too many people concurrently trying to do useful things with it, too well known as one of the SciFi dreams of the future) eventually someone will grab it and run with it in the right direction.
Probably all the way to the bank.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920</id>
	<title>Bah</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257774840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Enjoying Esquire's AR issue requires downloading software &mdash; Windows and Mac only</i></p><p>I use Linux, you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoying Esquire 's AR issue requires downloading software    Windows and Mac onlyI use Linux , you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoying Esquire's AR issue requires downloading software — Windows and Mac onlyI use Linux, you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041238</id>
	<title>Re:Bah</title>
	<author>Interoperable</author>
	<datestamp>1257777300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I use Linux</p></div><p>You may not be in their target audience.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I use LinuxYou may not be in their target audience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use LinuxYou may not be in their target audience.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041960</id>
	<title>Re:sell:shoes,handbags,T-shirt,Jeans,sunglass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257784140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey asshole. You know that buttplug you sold me? It's shit! I mean, it falls right out! CoolForSale.com sucks ass!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey asshole .
You know that buttplug you sold me ?
It 's shit !
I mean , it falls right out !
CoolForSale.com sucks ass !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey asshole.
You know that buttplug you sold me?
It's shit!
I mean, it falls right out!
CoolForSale.com sucks ass!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041592</id>
	<title>This is not the Augmented Reality you're looking 4</title>
	<author>tomhudson</author>
	<datestamp>1257780480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>Enjoying Esquire's AR issue requires downloading software -- Windows and Mac only</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I use Linux, you insensitive clod!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

It's LAME.  Basically, it's some software that uses your webcam to recognize which page of the magazine you're holding up to the camera, and how the page is oriented - you're using the magazine as a mouse or pointer.
</p><p>
This is NOT "augmented reality" - it's print media going "OMFG I'M DYING HELP.Me.be.relevant.agggghhhhhh...." and FAILING!
</p><p>
This is about as "smart" an idea as the cue cat.  Or for us really old farts, remember those weird graphics strips in PC Mag that you were supposed to scan in?
</p><p>
Why should I use a magazine as a controller?  I'm going to look even stupider than the loon in the next cube with their light sabre.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoying Esquire 's AR issue requires downloading software -- Windows and Mac only I use Linux , you insensitive clod !
It 's LAME .
Basically , it 's some software that uses your webcam to recognize which page of the magazine you 're holding up to the camera , and how the page is oriented - you 're using the magazine as a mouse or pointer .
This is NOT " augmented reality " - it 's print media going " OMFG I 'M DYING HELP.Me.be.relevant.agggghhhhhh.... " and FAILING !
This is about as " smart " an idea as the cue cat .
Or for us really old farts , remember those weird graphics strips in PC Mag that you were supposed to scan in ?
Why should I use a magazine as a controller ?
I 'm going to look even stupider than the loon in the next cube with their light sabre .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoying Esquire's AR issue requires downloading software -- Windows and Mac only

I use Linux, you insensitive clod!
It's LAME.
Basically, it's some software that uses your webcam to recognize which page of the magazine you're holding up to the camera, and how the page is oriented - you're using the magazine as a mouse or pointer.
This is NOT "augmented reality" - it's print media going "OMFG I'M DYING HELP.Me.be.relevant.agggghhhhhh...." and FAILING!
This is about as "smart" an idea as the cue cat.
Or for us really old farts, remember those weird graphics strips in PC Mag that you were supposed to scan in?
Why should I use a magazine as a controller?
I'm going to look even stupider than the loon in the next cube with their light sabre.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042260</id>
	<title>Eh...</title>
	<author>FlyByPC</author>
	<datestamp>1257787440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll wait for the Arrrr edition. That, I could at least pirate and get some enjoyment from.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait for the Arrrr edition .
That , I could at least pirate and get some enjoyment from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait for the Arrrr edition.
That, I could at least pirate and get some enjoyment from.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30046042</id>
	<title>Bah.</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1257870780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Webcam and "magic" markers ? Have an eyepet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPENA1Bpm68</htmltext>
<tokenext>Webcam and " magic " markers ?
Have an eyepet : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = aPENA1Bpm68</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Webcam and "magic" markers ?
Have an eyepet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aPENA1Bpm68</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30056374</id>
	<title>Its an embarrassment, that's what it is.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257876060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its an embarrassment, that's what it is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its an embarrassment , that 's what it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its an embarrassment, that's what it is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041016</id>
	<title>WARNING IPHONE USERS: WORM OUTBREAK IN PROGRESS</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257775380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apologies for the OT, but this is important. Oh the humanity, the humanity:</p><p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8349905.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8349905.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apologies for the OT , but this is important .
Oh the humanity , the humanity : http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8349905.stm [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apologies for the OT, but this is important.
Oh the humanity, the humanity:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8349905.stm [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040970</id>
	<title>That buzzing sound you hear....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257775020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is Buzzword Compliance Magazine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is Buzzword Compliance Magazine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is Buzzword Compliance Magazine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041306</id>
	<title>sell:shoes,handbags,T-shirt,Jeans,sunglass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257778020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In order to meet the Thanksgiving holiday, this site hereby release Thanksgiving gift, that is, gift, our web site is <a href="http://www.coolforsale.com/" title="coolforsale.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.coolforsale.com/</a> [coolforsale.com] nike air max jordan shoes, coach,gucci,lv,dg,ed hardy handbags, Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,T-shirt welcome new and old customers come to order.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to meet the Thanksgiving holiday , this site hereby release Thanksgiving gift , that is , gift , our web site is http : //www.coolforsale.com/ [ coolforsale.com ] nike air max jordan shoes , coach,gucci,lv,dg,ed hardy handbags , Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F ,T-shirt welcome new and old customers come to order .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to meet the Thanksgiving holiday, this site hereby release Thanksgiving gift, that is, gift, our web site is http://www.coolforsale.com/ [coolforsale.com] nike air max jordan shoes, coach,gucci,lv,dg,ed hardy handbags, Polo/Ed Hardy/Lacoste/Ca/A&amp;F ,T-shirt welcome new and old customers come to order.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041542</id>
	<title>System Requirements</title>
	<author>Lord Byron II</author>
	<datestamp>1257779940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It says "XP or better". Surely, any recent distribution of Linux meets that, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It says " XP or better " .
Surely , any recent distribution of Linux meets that , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It says "XP or better".
Surely, any recent distribution of Linux meets that, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042882</id>
	<title>Oh, THOSE strips</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1257795960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Or for us really old farts, remember those weird graphics strips in PC Mag that you were supposed to scan in?</p></div></blockquote><p>Oh, you mean the ones with the babes sitting backwards chair so they weren't quite so naked?   Yeah, I remember those.  Scanning took forever...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or for us really old farts , remember those weird graphics strips in PC Mag that you were supposed to scan in ? Oh , you mean the ones with the babes sitting backwards chair so they were n't quite so naked ?
Yeah , I remember those .
Scanning took forever.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or for us really old farts, remember those weird graphics strips in PC Mag that you were supposed to scan in?Oh, you mean the ones with the babes sitting backwards chair so they weren't quite so naked?
Yeah, I remember those.
Scanning took forever...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042330</id>
	<title>This isn't augmented...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257788400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I read the title, I thought it was going to be a magazine with that nifty electronic paper that we hear so much about on this site. Then it could do something neat like allow you to pick which articles and ads would be in it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I read the title , I thought it was going to be a magazine with that nifty electronic paper that we hear so much about on this site .
Then it could do something neat like allow you to pick which articles and ads would be in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I read the title, I thought it was going to be a magazine with that nifty electronic paper that we hear so much about on this site.
Then it could do something neat like allow you to pick which articles and ads would be in it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041048</id>
	<title>Sounds like someone has never heard of . . .</title>
	<author>rev\_sanchez</author>
	<datestamp>1257775620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>a little periodical called High Times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a little periodical called High Times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a little periodical called High Times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041734</id>
	<title>What does this have to do with augmented reality?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1257781800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing. Period. Plain and simple.</p><p>As I work a bit in that field, I think I could define it like this:</p><p>If it's inside a computer, it's not reality. If it's happening in reality, it's not augmented.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>What I see there, is him holding up the magazine, against what appears to be a camera with special software that reads the fancy bar code, and shows a silly animation of what a 70 year old guy from the last century would think is "this fancy virtual reality".</p><p>I wonder how that software got on there. And who turned on the camera and all that stuff? Veery "all by itself", those things...*cough*.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>It's basically just a normal feature detection combined with one of those completely pointless supposed-to-be-artsy Flash websites. And an old man of a dying industry, who, in his desperation to gain some attention from the youth, got beautifully ripped off by some guys on drugs.</p><p>I wouldn't hire those guys as augmented reality experts. I'd hire them as sales men, or perhaps con men. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing .
Period. Plain and simple.As I work a bit in that field , I think I could define it like this : If it 's inside a computer , it 's not reality .
If it 's happening in reality , it 's not augmented .
: ) What I see there , is him holding up the magazine , against what appears to be a camera with special software that reads the fancy bar code , and shows a silly animation of what a 70 year old guy from the last century would think is " this fancy virtual reality " .I wonder how that software got on there .
And who turned on the camera and all that stuff ?
Veery " all by itself " , those things... * cough * .
; ) It 's basically just a normal feature detection combined with one of those completely pointless supposed-to-be-artsy Flash websites .
And an old man of a dying industry , who , in his desperation to gain some attention from the youth , got beautifully ripped off by some guys on drugs.I would n't hire those guys as augmented reality experts .
I 'd hire them as sales men , or perhaps con men .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing.
Period. Plain and simple.As I work a bit in that field, I think I could define it like this:If it's inside a computer, it's not reality.
If it's happening in reality, it's not augmented.
:)What I see there, is him holding up the magazine, against what appears to be a camera with special software that reads the fancy bar code, and shows a silly animation of what a 70 year old guy from the last century would think is "this fancy virtual reality".I wonder how that software got on there.
And who turned on the camera and all that stuff?
Veery "all by itself", those things...*cough*.
;)It's basically just a normal feature detection combined with one of those completely pointless supposed-to-be-artsy Flash websites.
And an old man of a dying industry, who, in his desperation to gain some attention from the youth, got beautifully ripped off by some guys on drugs.I wouldn't hire those guys as augmented reality experts.
I'd hire them as sales men, or perhaps con men.
^^</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041216</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1257777000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rather than showing off the "undying value of print" it would seem to do the opposite - it emphasizes that the print version of the magazine can be much enhanced with a computer.  The next thought is, why do I need the magazine?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than showing off the " undying value of print " it would seem to do the opposite - it emphasizes that the print version of the magazine can be much enhanced with a computer .
The next thought is , why do I need the magazine ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rather than showing off the "undying value of print" it would seem to do the opposite - it emphasizes that the print version of the magazine can be much enhanced with a computer.
The next thought is, why do I need the magazine?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257776160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's nothing impressive.</p><p>1:  It's not augmented reality - it's a shitty flash site that scans a 2D barcode using your webcam and gives you some shitty ads and "content" deemed to shitty to go in the magazine proper.</p><p>2:  Even if there WAS an aspect of augmented reality - augmented reality is shit.  The ONLY area where augmented reality can ever be not shit is applying an overlay over a recorded image (or sound, I guess).  Though this is only ever useful if it can be made completely dynamic.</p><p>Useful:  A pair of glasses that tags the people in the board room with names and titles, since you can't be assed to remember their fucking names.</p><p>Useful:  A car HUD that projects 2D tags on stuff as you drive by.  That highway sign could have tags that always face you head on, with a larger font, etc.  That gas station?  Nobody buys premium - replace the whole price sign with the fucking cheapo price, so you can actually see it from far enough away to get off in time.  Color code it based on prices further along your route, if one is planned.  Again, the tag would always be facing you head on.</p><p>Useful:  Headphones you lock onto your kids heads so you can swear all you want and have it get bleeped out.  (Though I guess this would be more of a demented reality.)</p><p>Fun:  Some games where characters dynamically react to real-world environs.</p><p>Shitty:  Some games where characters simply appear with standard scripted animations as an overlay of a video of real-world environs (see that shitty PS3 card game).</p><p>Super shitty:  Delivering fucking scripted ads based on real-world environs.</p><p>We're miles away from useful augmented reality, and we're going in the wrong direction.  We're using it as a gate to shitty ad content, when it should be used to generate useful contextual content, or at least fun shit for games/porn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's nothing impressive.1 : It 's not augmented reality - it 's a shitty flash site that scans a 2D barcode using your webcam and gives you some shitty ads and " content " deemed to shitty to go in the magazine proper.2 : Even if there WAS an aspect of augmented reality - augmented reality is shit .
The ONLY area where augmented reality can ever be not shit is applying an overlay over a recorded image ( or sound , I guess ) .
Though this is only ever useful if it can be made completely dynamic.Useful : A pair of glasses that tags the people in the board room with names and titles , since you ca n't be assed to remember their fucking names.Useful : A car HUD that projects 2D tags on stuff as you drive by .
That highway sign could have tags that always face you head on , with a larger font , etc .
That gas station ?
Nobody buys premium - replace the whole price sign with the fucking cheapo price , so you can actually see it from far enough away to get off in time .
Color code it based on prices further along your route , if one is planned .
Again , the tag would always be facing you head on.Useful : Headphones you lock onto your kids heads so you can swear all you want and have it get bleeped out .
( Though I guess this would be more of a demented reality .
) Fun : Some games where characters dynamically react to real-world environs.Shitty : Some games where characters simply appear with standard scripted animations as an overlay of a video of real-world environs ( see that shitty PS3 card game ) .Super shitty : Delivering fucking scripted ads based on real-world environs.We 're miles away from useful augmented reality , and we 're going in the wrong direction .
We 're using it as a gate to shitty ad content , when it should be used to generate useful contextual content , or at least fun shit for games/porn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's nothing impressive.1:  It's not augmented reality - it's a shitty flash site that scans a 2D barcode using your webcam and gives you some shitty ads and "content" deemed to shitty to go in the magazine proper.2:  Even if there WAS an aspect of augmented reality - augmented reality is shit.
The ONLY area where augmented reality can ever be not shit is applying an overlay over a recorded image (or sound, I guess).
Though this is only ever useful if it can be made completely dynamic.Useful:  A pair of glasses that tags the people in the board room with names and titles, since you can't be assed to remember their fucking names.Useful:  A car HUD that projects 2D tags on stuff as you drive by.
That highway sign could have tags that always face you head on, with a larger font, etc.
That gas station?
Nobody buys premium - replace the whole price sign with the fucking cheapo price, so you can actually see it from far enough away to get off in time.
Color code it based on prices further along your route, if one is planned.
Again, the tag would always be facing you head on.Useful:  Headphones you lock onto your kids heads so you can swear all you want and have it get bleeped out.
(Though I guess this would be more of a demented reality.
)Fun:  Some games where characters dynamically react to real-world environs.Shitty:  Some games where characters simply appear with standard scripted animations as an overlay of a video of real-world environs (see that shitty PS3 card game).Super shitty:  Delivering fucking scripted ads based on real-world environs.We're miles away from useful augmented reality, and we're going in the wrong direction.
We're using it as a gate to shitty ad content, when it should be used to generate useful contextual content, or at least fun shit for games/porn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30043678</id>
	<title>Wired also</title>
	<author>koogydelbbog</author>
	<datestamp>1257851220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the issue of Wired (american edition (17.10?) bought in the uk, the one that's already available via the web) that i picked up yesterday claimed in the editor's preamble to do the same thing.</p><p>personally i spend the first 5 minutes of reading any issue of wired ripping the adverts out. ads for cigarettes that they always print on stiffer card and which makes it impossible to leave the mag open on your desk are the first to go...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the issue of Wired ( american edition ( 17.10 ?
) bought in the uk , the one that 's already available via the web ) that i picked up yesterday claimed in the editor 's preamble to do the same thing.personally i spend the first 5 minutes of reading any issue of wired ripping the adverts out .
ads for cigarettes that they always print on stiffer card and which makes it impossible to leave the mag open on your desk are the first to go.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the issue of Wired (american edition (17.10?
) bought in the uk, the one that's already available via the web) that i picked up yesterday claimed in the editor's preamble to do the same thing.personally i spend the first 5 minutes of reading any issue of wired ripping the adverts out.
ads for cigarettes that they always print on stiffer card and which makes it impossible to leave the mag open on your desk are the first to go...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042026</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257784800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many people buy premium gasoline, many cars require it (or at least run better using it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many people buy premium gasoline , many cars require it ( or at least run better using it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many people buy premium gasoline, many cars require it (or at least run better using it)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042858</id>
	<title>Re:This is not the Augmented Reality you're lookin</title>
	<author>CarpetShark</author>
	<datestamp>1257795780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It's LAME. Basically, it's some software that uses your webcam to recognize which page of the magazine you're holding up to the camera, and how the page is oriented - you're using the magazine as a mouse or pointer.</p></div></blockquote><p>Precisely.  I don't see anything about this that would appeal to anyone but a child, much less Esquire's audience.</p><blockquote><div><p>This is about as "smart" an idea as the cue cat.</p></div></blockquote><p>Since I've never heard of "the cue cat", it's probably safe to agree<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's LAME .
Basically , it 's some software that uses your webcam to recognize which page of the magazine you 're holding up to the camera , and how the page is oriented - you 're using the magazine as a mouse or pointer.Precisely .
I do n't see anything about this that would appeal to anyone but a child , much less Esquire 's audience.This is about as " smart " an idea as the cue cat.Since I 've never heard of " the cue cat " , it 's probably safe to agree : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's LAME.
Basically, it's some software that uses your webcam to recognize which page of the magazine you're holding up to the camera, and how the page is oriented - you're using the magazine as a mouse or pointer.Precisely.
I don't see anything about this that would appeal to anyone but a child, much less Esquire's audience.This is about as "smart" an idea as the cue cat.Since I've never heard of "the cue cat", it's probably safe to agree :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041906</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>icepick72</author>
	<datestamp>1257783720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Equally as bad as the scent producing peripheral devices from 2007 <a href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/day-smelly-computer-has-arrived.html" title="buzzle.com">http://www.buzzle.com/articles/day-smelly-computer-has-arrived.html</a> [buzzle.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Equally as bad as the scent producing peripheral devices from 2007 http : //www.buzzle.com/articles/day-smelly-computer-has-arrived.html [ buzzle.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Equally as bad as the scent producing peripheral devices from 2007 http://www.buzzle.com/articles/day-smelly-computer-has-arrived.html [buzzle.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042136</id>
	<title>Re:sell:shoes,handbags,T-shirt,Jeans,sunglass</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257785880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In order to let you know how much your crap spam pisses us off, you will find yourself moderated to oblivion every time you post. Now fuck off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to let you know how much your crap spam pisses us off , you will find yourself moderated to oblivion every time you post .
Now fuck off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to let you know how much your crap spam pisses us off, you will find yourself moderated to oblivion every time you post.
Now fuck off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041536</id>
	<title>Cat's meow</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257779880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wired magazine and Radio Shack did something like this about ten years ago. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CueCat" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">CueCat</a> [wikipedia.org] anyone?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wired magazine and Radio Shack did something like this about ten years ago .
CueCat [ wikipedia.org ] anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wired magazine and Radio Shack did something like this about ten years ago.
CueCat [wikipedia.org] anyone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041952</id>
	<title>Didn't Wired do this ten+ years ago?</title>
	<author>elistan</author>
	<datestamp>1257784080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't remember the exact timeframe, but I recall Wired (and possibly other mags) doing the exact same thing during the dotcom bubble.  Hold up your print magazine to a webcam on a computer running the right software and it'd scan embedded codes and you'd get what you've always wanted - more advertising!  This Esquire thing has been done before, and failed before, and hopefully it'll fail again.  Next thing you know, they'll be shipping out little cat-shaped barcode readers to their circulation for those people who don't have webcames.  Now THAT'S innovation!  
<br> <br>
"AR" my ass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't remember the exact timeframe , but I recall Wired ( and possibly other mags ) doing the exact same thing during the dotcom bubble .
Hold up your print magazine to a webcam on a computer running the right software and it 'd scan embedded codes and you 'd get what you 've always wanted - more advertising !
This Esquire thing has been done before , and failed before , and hopefully it 'll fail again .
Next thing you know , they 'll be shipping out little cat-shaped barcode readers to their circulation for those people who do n't have webcames .
Now THAT 'S innovation !
" AR " my ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't remember the exact timeframe, but I recall Wired (and possibly other mags) doing the exact same thing during the dotcom bubble.
Hold up your print magazine to a webcam on a computer running the right software and it'd scan embedded codes and you'd get what you've always wanted - more advertising!
This Esquire thing has been done before, and failed before, and hopefully it'll fail again.
Next thing you know, they'll be shipping out little cat-shaped barcode readers to their circulation for those people who don't have webcames.
Now THAT'S innovation!
"AR" my ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041148</id>
	<title>Er..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257776520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WTF?  Where's the VMS version of the software?  Or hell at least OS2!?  Screw this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WTF ?
Where 's the VMS version of the software ?
Or hell at least OS2 ! ?
Screw this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WTF?
Where's the VMS version of the software?
Or hell at least OS2!?
Screw this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041302</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Thansal</author>
	<datestamp>1257778020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it is cute, and amusing, and to people who read esquire magazine it is an interesting introduction to a technology that is gaining in popularity.</p><p>Congratulations, you aren't the target audience.  However I suspect that the target audience will have fun messing around with it.</p><p>As for all of the "This isn't AR" comments.  No shit.  But it is what is currently being called AR, and in a sense it is AR.  IT isn't very good AR, or very usable AR, but it is AR.  Instead of the ideal overlay of images on reality, it is an overlay of images over a live video.  Not perfect, but close enough to entertain some people, and to give proof of concepts ideas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it is cute , and amusing , and to people who read esquire magazine it is an interesting introduction to a technology that is gaining in popularity.Congratulations , you are n't the target audience .
However I suspect that the target audience will have fun messing around with it.As for all of the " This is n't AR " comments .
No shit .
But it is what is currently being called AR , and in a sense it is AR .
IT is n't very good AR , or very usable AR , but it is AR .
Instead of the ideal overlay of images on reality , it is an overlay of images over a live video .
Not perfect , but close enough to entertain some people , and to give proof of concepts ideas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it is cute, and amusing, and to people who read esquire magazine it is an interesting introduction to a technology that is gaining in popularity.Congratulations, you aren't the target audience.
However I suspect that the target audience will have fun messing around with it.As for all of the "This isn't AR" comments.
No shit.
But it is what is currently being called AR, and in a sense it is AR.
IT isn't very good AR, or very usable AR, but it is AR.
Instead of the ideal overlay of images on reality, it is an overlay of images over a live video.
Not perfect, but close enough to entertain some people, and to give proof of concepts ideas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30044164</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1257858240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hello, I think you should go slower on the caffeine.</p><p>Other than that, you offer some interesting uses of augmented reality. I would like to offer another:</p><p>A month ago or so I went to Rome for vacation. During my visit I was lucky enough to enter the Roman Forum. While I was visiting, I had a book guide on hand, which provided me (and my wife) with really interesting information.</p><p>Although we did not get an audio guide (don't even remember if it was available to rent), I think this kind of places would *really* benefit from things such as augmented reality.</p><p>Imagine that you put your glasses before entering the forum (or coliseum). The technology is a combination of really-good GPS (knows your exact position, orientation, etc) and 3D modelling/animation.</p><p>With the glasses, you can stand in any place within the forum while looking at the ruins and at the press of a button you would turn on a graphics layer which showed you the complete buildings as they were originally.</p><p>If you were in the Colliseum, you would get a similar view, in addition, you may be able to get a nice video recreating a day in the colliseum.</p><p>That could be used for the majority of archeological places. Such as Mayan/Aztec, Roman and Greek ruins.</p><p>In addition, it could be used for places such as ex-concentration camps  (I've recently been to Buchenwald).</p><p>My take is that, more than a service to rent from the site administration, this may be delivered by a specialized company which sells to you the Augmented Reality glasses along with an ipod touch like program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hello , I think you should go slower on the caffeine.Other than that , you offer some interesting uses of augmented reality .
I would like to offer another : A month ago or so I went to Rome for vacation .
During my visit I was lucky enough to enter the Roman Forum .
While I was visiting , I had a book guide on hand , which provided me ( and my wife ) with really interesting information.Although we did not get an audio guide ( do n't even remember if it was available to rent ) , I think this kind of places would * really * benefit from things such as augmented reality.Imagine that you put your glasses before entering the forum ( or coliseum ) .
The technology is a combination of really-good GPS ( knows your exact position , orientation , etc ) and 3D modelling/animation.With the glasses , you can stand in any place within the forum while looking at the ruins and at the press of a button you would turn on a graphics layer which showed you the complete buildings as they were originally.If you were in the Colliseum , you would get a similar view , in addition , you may be able to get a nice video recreating a day in the colliseum.That could be used for the majority of archeological places .
Such as Mayan/Aztec , Roman and Greek ruins.In addition , it could be used for places such as ex-concentration camps ( I 've recently been to Buchenwald ) .My take is that , more than a service to rent from the site administration , this may be delivered by a specialized company which sells to you the Augmented Reality glasses along with an ipod touch like program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hello, I think you should go slower on the caffeine.Other than that, you offer some interesting uses of augmented reality.
I would like to offer another:A month ago or so I went to Rome for vacation.
During my visit I was lucky enough to enter the Roman Forum.
While I was visiting, I had a book guide on hand, which provided me (and my wife) with really interesting information.Although we did not get an audio guide (don't even remember if it was available to rent), I think this kind of places would *really* benefit from things such as augmented reality.Imagine that you put your glasses before entering the forum (or coliseum).
The technology is a combination of really-good GPS (knows your exact position, orientation, etc) and 3D modelling/animation.With the glasses, you can stand in any place within the forum while looking at the ruins and at the press of a button you would turn on a graphics layer which showed you the complete buildings as they were originally.If you were in the Colliseum, you would get a similar view, in addition, you may be able to get a nice video recreating a day in the colliseum.That could be used for the majority of archeological places.
Such as Mayan/Aztec, Roman and Greek ruins.In addition, it could be used for places such as ex-concentration camps  (I've recently been to Buchenwald).My take is that, more than a service to rent from the site administration, this may be delivered by a specialized company which sells to you the Augmented Reality glasses along with an ipod touch like program.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041744</id>
	<title>Re:System Requirements</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257781920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe if it said windows 98 or better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe if it said windows 98 or better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe if it said windows 98 or better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041192</id>
	<title>Re:But it's still clunky and silly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257776820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Exactly.  Nothing to see here.  It's the same stuff I saw done on CDs for music/artsy stuff back in the late 90's. It's just Web 2.0 now.  Plus, using bar codes to go to a web site?  Can you say CueCat?</p><p>The only good thing is that Esquire is at least trying new things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly .
Nothing to see here .
It 's the same stuff I saw done on CDs for music/artsy stuff back in the late 90 's .
It 's just Web 2.0 now .
Plus , using bar codes to go to a web site ?
Can you say CueCat ? The only good thing is that Esquire is at least trying new things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly.
Nothing to see here.
It's the same stuff I saw done on CDs for music/artsy stuff back in the late 90's.
It's just Web 2.0 now.
Plus, using bar codes to go to a web site?
Can you say CueCat?The only good thing is that Esquire is at least trying new things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041320</id>
	<title>What a world we live in</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1257778140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did I just watch a commercial, in order to see a advertisement ABOUT a stupid gimmicky magazine, that's basically just a giant advertisement?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did I just watch a commercial , in order to see a advertisement ABOUT a stupid gimmicky magazine , that 's basically just a giant advertisement ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did I just watch a commercial, in order to see a advertisement ABOUT a stupid gimmicky magazine, that's basically just a giant advertisement?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041484</id>
	<title>*sigh*</title>
	<author>noirsoldats</author>
	<datestamp>1257779460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Stupidest thing I've ever seen... Honestly they think this is advanced tech or anything even remotely impressive?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Stupidest thing I 've ever seen... Honestly they think this is advanced tech or anything even remotely impressive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stupidest thing I've ever seen... Honestly they think this is advanced tech or anything even remotely impressive?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30043246</id>
	<title>Just a moment...</title>
	<author>ctrl-alt-canc</author>
	<datestamp>1257844560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>First they announced a <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/11/09/0431232" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">3D TV</a> [slashdot.org], now they come out with an aumengted reality magazine. Is the media industry trying to physically invade our homes ?!?</htmltext>
<tokenext>First they announced a 3D TV [ slashdot.org ] , now they come out with an aumengted reality magazine .
Is the media industry trying to physically invade our homes ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they announced a 3D TV [slashdot.org], now they come out with an aumengted reality magazine.
Is the media industry trying to physically invade our homes ?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30047306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30044164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_09_11_09_2326215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041906
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041192
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042026
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30047306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30044164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30040896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30042136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30041960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation09_11_09_2326215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment09_11_09_2326215.30057386
</commentlist>
</conversation>
